Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence Group, LLC, Doing Business As LPBI Group, Newton, MA

Archive for the ‘International Global Work in Pharmaceutical’ Category

USPTO Guidance On Patentable Subject Matter

Posted in Academic Publishing, Advanced Drug Manufacturing Technology, Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research, Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics, Biomedical Measurement Science, Cancer Screening, Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment, Clinical Diagnostics, Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics, Curation, Diagnostic Immunology, Drug Delivery Platform Technology, Ecosystems & Industrial Concentration in the Medical Device Sector, Experimental validation, FDA Regulatory Affairs, FDA, CE Mark & Global Regulatory Affairs: process management and strategic planning - GCP, GLP, ISO 14155, Health Law & Patient Safety, HealthCare IT, Imaging-based Cancer Patient Management, Immunodiagnostics, Infectious Disease Immunodiagnostics, Innovation in Immunology Diagnostics, Innovations in Neurophysiology & Neuropsychology, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, ISO 10993 for Product Registration: FDA & CE Mark for Development of Medical Devices and Diagnostics, Mass automation of plasma proteins, Mechanical Assist Devices: LVAD, RVAD, BiVAD, Artificial Heart, Medical Devices R&D and Inventions, Medical Devices R&D Investment, Medical Imaging Technology, Image Processing/Computing, MRI, CT, Nuclear Medicine, Ultra Sound, Mitral Valve: Repair and Replacement, Monoclonal Immunotherapy, Nanotechnology for Drug Delivery, Open Access Journals, Patents, PCI, Pharmaceutical Discovery, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease, Prescription Drugs Costs, Rapid automation of plasma protein pools, Regulated Clinical Trials: Design, Methods, Components and IRB related issues, Statistical Methods for Research Evaluation, Stents & Tools, Technology Advance Assessment of, Technology Capital Expenses, Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical, Valves & Tools, tagged Clinical trial, FDA, FDA innovation route, gene, gene expression, gene patents, genomics, Innovation, Innovation Act, innovative applications, mutation, nanotechnology, research, science, tachnology protection, Therapeutic innovations, US Supreme Court, USPTO on July 3, 2014| Leave a Comment »

USPTO Guidance On Patentable Subject Matter

Curator and Reporter: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

LH Bernstein

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised 4 July, 2014

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/07/03/uspto-guidance-on-patentable-subject-matter

 

I came across a few recent articles on the subject of US Patent Office guidance on patentability as well as on Supreme Court ruling on claims. I filed several patents on clinical laboratory methods early in my career upon the recommendation of my brother-in-law, now deceased.  Years later, after both brother-in-law and patent attorney are no longer alive, I look back and ask what I have learned over $100,000 later, with many trips to the USPTO, opportunities not taken, and a one year provisional patent behind me.

My conclusion is

(1) that patents are for the protection of the innovator, who might realize legal protection, but the cost and the time investment can well exceed the cost of startup and building a small startup enterprize, that would be the next step.

(2) The other thing to consider is the capability of the lawyer or firm that represents you.  A patent that is well done can be expected to take 5-7 years to go through with due diligence.   I would not expect it to be done well by a university with many other competing demands. I might be wrong in this respect, as the climate has changed, and research universities have sprouted engines for change.  Experienced and productive faculty are encouraged or allowed to form their own such entities.

(3) The emergence of Big Data, computational biology, and very large data warehouses for data use and integration has changed the landscape. The resources required for an individual to pursue research along these lines is quite beyond an individuals sole capacity to successfully pursue without outside funding.  In addition, the changed designated requirement of first to publish has muddied the water.

Of course, one can propose without anything published in the public domain. That makes it possible for corporate entities to file thousands of patents, whether there is actual validation or not at the time of filing.  It would be a quite trying experience for anyone to pursue in the USPTO without some litigation over ownership of patent rights. At this stage of of technology development, I have come to realize that the organization of research, peer review, and archiving of data is still at a stage where some of the best systems avalailable for storing and accessing data still comes considerably short of what is needed for the most complex tasks, even though improvements have come at an exponential pace.

I shall not comment on the contested views held by physicists, chemists, biologists, and economists over the completeness of guiding theories strongly held.  Only history will tell.  Beliefs can hold a strong sway, and have many times held us back.

I am not an expert on legal matters, but it is incomprehensible to me that issues concerning technology innovation can be adjudicated in the Supreme Court, as has occurred in recent years. I have postgraduate degrees in  Medicine, Developmental Anatomy, and post-medical training in pathology and laboratory medicine, as well as experience in analytical and research biochemistry.  It is beyond the competencies expected for these type of cases to come before the Supreme Court, or even to the Federal District Courts, as we see with increasing frequency,  as this has occurred with respect to the development and application of the human genome.

I’m not sure that the developments can be resolved for the public good without a more full development of an open-access system of publishing. Now I present some recent publication about, or published by the USPTO.

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO

Dr. Melvin Castro – Organic Chemistry and New Drug Development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU ARE FOLLOWING THIS BLOG You are following this blog, along with 1,014 other amazing people (manage).

• patentimages.storage.goog…
• organic-chemistry.org/abs…
• google.co.in/patents/US75…

patentimages.storage.goog…

USPTO Guidance On Patentable Subject Matter: Impediment to Biotech Innovation

Joanna T. Brougher, David A. Fazzolare J Commercial Biotechnology 2014 20(3):Brougher

jcbiotech-patents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision upending more than three decades worth of established patent practice when it ruled that isolated gene sequences are no longer patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. Section 101.While many practitioners in the field believed that the USPTO would interpret the decision narrowly, the USPTO actually expanded the scope of the decision when it issued its guidelines for determining whether an invention satisfies Section 101.

The guidelines were met with intense backlash with many arguing that they unnecessarily expanded the scope of the Supreme Court cases in a way that could unduly restrict the scope of patentable subject matter, weaken the U.S. patent system, and create a disincentive to innovation. By undermining patentable subject matter in this way, the guidelines may end up harming not only the companies that patent medical innovations, but also the patients who need medical care.  This article examines the guidelines and their impact on various technologies.

Keywords:   patent, patentable subject matter, Myriad, Mayo, USPTO guidelines

Full Text: PDF

References

35 U.S.C. Section 101 states “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

” Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services, 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Association for Molecular Pathology et al., v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. ___ (2013).

Parke-Davis & Co. v. H.K. Mulford Co., 189 F. 95, 103 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1911)

USPTO. Guidance For Determining Subject Matter Eligibility Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products.

http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/myriad-mayo_guidance.pdf

Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127, 131 (1948)

USPTO. Guidance For Determining Subject Matter Eligibility Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products.

http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/myriad-mayo_guidance.pdf

Courtney C. Brinckerhoff, “The New USPTO Patent Eligibility Rejections Under Section 101.” PharmaPatentsBlog, published May 6, 2014, accessed http://www.pharmapatentsblog.com/2014/05/06/the-new-patent-eligibility-rejections-section-101/

Courtney C. Brinckerhoff, “The New USPTO Patent Eligibility Rejections Under Section 101.” PharmaPatentsBlog, published May 6, 2014, accessed http://www.pharmapatentsblog.com/2014/05/06/the-new-patent-eligibility-rejections-section-101/

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5912/jcb664

 

Science 4 July 2014; 345 (6192): pp. 14-15  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.345.6192.14

• IN DEPTH

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Biotech feels a chill from changing U.S. patent rules

1. Kelly Servick*

View larger version:

• In this page
• In a new window

• Download PowerPoint Slide for Teaching

A 2013 Supreme Court decision that barred human gene patents is scrambling patenting policies.

PHOTO: MLADEN ANTONOV/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

A year after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling that human genes cannot be patented, the biotech industry is struggling to adapt to a landscape in which inventions derived from nature are increasingly hard to patent. It is also pushing back against follow-on policies proposed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to guide examiners deciding whether an invention is too close to a natural product to deserve patent protection. Those policies reach far beyond what the high court intended, biotech representatives say.

“Everything we took for granted a few years ago is now changing, and it’s generating a bit of a scramble,” says patent attorney Damian Kotsis of Harness Dickey in Troy, Michigan, one of more than 15,000 people who gathered here last week for the Biotechnology Industry Organization’s (BIO’s) International Convention.

At the meeting, attorneys and executives fretted over the fate of patent applications for inventions involving naturally occurring products—including chemical compounds, antibodies, seeds, and vaccines—and traded stories of recent, unexpected rejections by USPTO. Industry leaders warned that the uncertainty could chill efforts to commercialize scientific discoveries made at universities and companies. Some plan to appeal the rejections in federal court.

USPTO officials, meanwhile, implored attendees to send them suggestions on how to clarify and improve its new policies on patenting natural products, and even announced that they were extending the deadline for public comment by a month. “Each and every one of you in this room has a moral duty … to provide written comments to the PTO,” patent lawyer and former USPTO Deputy Director Teresa Stanek Rea told one audience.

At the heart of the shake-up are two Supreme Court decisions: the ruling last year in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc. that human genes cannot be patented because they occur naturally (Science, 21 June 2013, p. 1387); and the 2012 Mayo v. Prometheus decision, which invalidated a patent on a method of measuring blood metabolites to determine drug doses because it relied on a “law of nature” (Science, 12 July 2013, p. 137).

Myriad and Mayo are already having a noticeable impact on patent decisions, according to a study released here. It examined about 1000 patent applications that included claims linked to natural products or laws of nature that USPTO reviewed between April 2011 and March 2014. Overall, examiners rejected about 40%; Myriad was the basis for rejecting about 23% of the applications, and Mayo about 35%, with some overlap, the authors concluded. That rejection rate would have been in the single digits just 5 years ago, asserted Hans Sauer, BIO’s intellectual property counsel, at a press conference. (There are no historical numbers for comparison.) The study was conducted by the news service Bloomberg BNA and the law firm Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciseri in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

USPTO is extending the decisions far beyond diagnostics and DNA?

The numbers suggest USPTO is extending the decisions far beyond diagnostics and DNA, attorneys say. Harness Dickey’s Kotsis, for example, says a client recently tried to patent a plant extract with therapeutic properties; it was different from anything in nature, Kotsis argued, because the inventor had altered the relative concentrations of key compounds to enhance its effect. Nope, decided USPTO, too close to nature.

In March, USPTO released draft guidance designed to help its examiners decide such questions, setting out 12 factors for them to weigh. For example, if an examiner deems a product “markedly different in structure” from anything in nature, that counts in its favor. But if it has a “high level of generality,” it gets dinged.

The draft has drawn extensive criticism. “I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything as complicated as this,” says Kevin Bastian, a patent attorney at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton in San Francisco, California. “I just can’t believe that this will be the standard.”

USPTO officials appear eager to fine-tune the draft guidance, but patent experts fear the Supreme Court decisions have made it hard to draw clear lines. “The Myriad decision is hopelessly contradictory and completely incoherent,” says Dan Burk, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. “We know you can’t patent genetic sequences,” he adds, but “we don’t really know why.”

Get creative in using Draft Guidelines!

For now, Kostis says, applicants will have to get creative to reduce the chance of rejection. Rather than claim protection for a plant extract itself, for instance, an inventor could instead patent the steps for using it to treat patients. Other biotech attorneys may try to narrow their patent claims. But there’s a downside to that strategy, they note: Narrower patents can be harder to protect from infringement, making them less attractive to investors. Others plan to wait out the storm, predicting USPTO will ultimately rethink its guidance and ease the way for new patents.

 

Public comment period extended

USPTO has extended the deadline for public comment to 31 July, with no schedule for issuing final language. Regardless of the outcome, however, Stanek Rea warned a crowd of riled-up attorneys that, in the world of biopatents, “the easy days are gone.”

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Today we published and made electronically available a new edition of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). Manual of Patent Examining Procedure uspto.gov http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.html Summary of Changes

PDF Title Page
PDF Foreword
PDF Introduction
PDF Table of Contents
PDF Chapter 600 –
PDF   Parts, Form, and Content of Application Chapter 700 –
PDF    Examination of Applications Chapter 800 –
PDF   Restriction in Applications Filed Under 35 U.S.C. 111; Double Patenting Chapter 900 –
PDF   Prior Art, Classification, and Search Chapter 1000 –
PDF  Matters Decided by Various U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Officials Chapter 1100 –
PDF   Statutory Invention Registration (SIR); Pre-Grant Publication (PGPub) and Preissuance Submissions Chapter 1200 –
PDF    Appeal Chapter 1300 –
PDF   Allowance and Issue Appendix L –
PDF   Patent Laws Appendix R –
PDF   Patent Rules Appendix P –
PDF   Paris Convention Subject Matter Index 
PDF Zipped version of the MPEP current revision in the PDF format.

Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP)Ninth Edition, March 2014

The USPTO continues to offer an online discussion tool for commenting on selected chapters of the Manual. To participate in the discussion and to contribute your ideas go to:
http://uspto-mpep.ideascale.com.

Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Ninth Edition, March 2014
The USPTO continues to offer an online discussion tool for commenting on selected chapters of the Manual. To participate in the discussion and to contribute your ideas go to: http://uspto-mpep.ideascale.com.

Note: For current fees, refer to the Current USPTO Fee Schedule.
Consolidated Laws – The patent laws in effect as of May 15, 2014. Consolidated Rules – The patent rules in effect as of May 15, 2014.  MPEP Archives (1948 – 2012)
Current MPEP: Searchable MPEP

• See the user manual or quick reference guide for help with search features (e.g., default operators, proximity searches, and wild cards) and navigation.

The documents updated in the Ninth Edition of the MPEP, dated March 2014, include changes that became effective in November 2013 or earlier.
All of the documents have been updated for the Ninth Edition except Chapters 800, 900, 1000, 1300, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2300, 2400, 2500, and Appendix P.
More information about the changes and updates is available from the “Blue Page – Introduction” of the Searchable MPEP or from the “Summary of Changes” link to the HTML and PDF versions provided below. Discuss the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Welcome to the MPEP discussion tool!

We have received many thoughtful ideas on Chapters 100-600 and 1800 of the MPEP as well as on how to improve the discussion site. Each and every idea submitted by you, the participants in this conversation, has been carefully reviewed by the Office, and many of these ideas have been implemented in the August 2012 revision of the MPEP and many will be implemented in future revisions of the MPEP. The August 2012 revision is the first version provided to the public in a web based searchable format. The new search tool is available at http://mpep.uspto.gov. We would like to thank everyone for participating in the discussion of the MPEP.

We have some great news! Chapters 1300, 1500, 1600 and 2400 of the MPEP are now available for discussion. Please submit any ideas and comments you may have on these chapters. Also, don’t forget to vote on ideas and comments submitted by other users. As before, our editorial staff will periodically be posting proposed new material for you to respond to, and in some cases will post responses to some of the submitted ideas and comments.Recently, we have received several comments concerning the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). Please note that comments regarding the implementation of the AIA should be submitted to the USPTO via email t aia_implementation@uspto.gov or via postal mail, as indicated at the America Invents Act Web site. Additional information regarding the AIA is available at www.uspto.gov/americainventsact  We have also received several comments suggesting policy changes which have been routed to the appropriate offices for consideration. We really appreciate your thinking and recommendations!

• 800 Restriction in Applications Filed Under 35 U.S.C. 111; Double Patenting
• 900 Prior Art, Classification, and Search
• 1000 Matters Decided by Various U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Officials
• 1100 Statutory Invention Registration (SIR); Pre-Grant Publication (PGPub) and Preissuance Submissions
• 1200 Appeal
• 1300 Allowance and Issue

FDA Guidance for Industry:Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations

Electronic Source Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The FDA published its new Guidance for Industry (GfI) – “Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations” in September 2013.
The Guidance defines the expectations of the FDA concerning electronic source data generated in the context of clinical trials. Find out more about this Guidance.
http://www.gmp-compliance.org/enews_4288_FDA%20Guidance%20for%20Industry%3A%20Electronic%20Source%20Data%20in%20Clinical%20Investigations
_8534,8457,8366,8308,Z-COVM_n.html

After more than 5 years and two draft versions, the final version of the Guidance for Industry (GfI) – “Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations” was published in September 2013. This new FDA Guidance defines the FDA’s expectations for sponsors, CROs, investigators and other persons involved in the capture, review and retention of electronic source data generated in the context of FDA-regulated clinical trials.In an effort to encourage the modernization and increased efficiency of processes in clinical trials, the FDA clearly supports the capture of electronic source data and emphasizes the agency’s intention to support activities aimed at ensuring the reliability, quality, integrity and traceability of this source data, from its electronic source to the electronic submission of the data in the context of an authorization procedure. The Guidance addresses aspects as data capture, data review and record retention. When the computerized systems used in clinical trials are described, the FDA recommends that the description not only focus on the intended use of the system, but also on data protection measures and the flow of data across system components and interfaces. In practice, the pharmaceutical industry needs to meet significant requirements regarding organisation, planning, specification and verification of computerized systems in the field of clinical trials. The FDA also mentions in the Guidance that it does not intend to apply 21 CFR Part 11 to electronic health records (EHR). Author: Oliver Herrmann Q-Infiity Source: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM328691.pdf Webinar: https://collaboration.fda.gov/p89r92dh8wc

 

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

Tang Prize for 2014: Immunity and Cancer

Posted in CANCER BIOLOGY & Innovations in Cancer Therapy, Discovery process, Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs, Drug Toxicity, Evolutionary cognition, Experimental validation, Human Immune System in Health and in Disease, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Monoclonal Immunotherapy, Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmacologic toxicities, Proteomics, Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical, Translational Effectiveness, Translational Research, Translational Science, tagged Cancer - General, Cancer immunology, chemical structure, chemo regimens, chemoresistance, immunosupression, research, T-cell biology, therapeutic toxicity reduction, Translational Research on June 20, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Tang Prize for 2014: Immunity and Cancer

Curator: Larry Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

 

2014 Tang Prize in Biopharmaceutical Sciences awards to James P. Allison and Tasuku Honjo For the discoveries of CTLA-4 and PD-1 as immune inhibitory molecules that led to their applications in cancer immunotherapy 2014/06/19.

Founded by Dr. Samuel Yin in December 2012, the Tang Prize recognizes scholars conducting revolutionary research in the four major fields of Sustainable Development, Biopharmaceutical Science, Sinology, and the Rule of Law. The Prize is awarded with each category a cash reward of over US$1 million (NT$50 million). The Tang Prize Foundation hopes that recipients of the Prize will continue to innovate while cultivating and nurturing new talent in their respective fields.
Academia Sinica was commissioned by the Tang-Prize Foundation to administer the selection of Tang-Prize Laureates for the category of Biopharmaceutical Science, recognizing original biopharmaceutical or biomedical research that has led to significant advances towards preventing, diagnosing and/or treating major human diseases to improve human health.
James P. Allison and Tasuku Honjo were chosen among nearly a hundred nominees for their discoveries of CTLA-4 and PD-1 as immune inhibitory molecules, revealing ways to harness our incredibly powerful immune system to fight cancer and marking the beginning of the immunotherapy revolution.
A critical process in the immune response involves presentation of antigens to T cells by antigen-presenting cells, two key cell types in our immune system. This process is highly regulated by molecules that stimulate the response to ensure our mounting a sufficient immune response, especially in the event of invasion by pathogens, but also by molecules that inhibit the process to ensure the response is not excessive. Indeed, there is now a family of proteins on T cells involved in this regulatory process, which is designated the “CD28 receptor family” co-receptors, as CD28 is the first protein identified to have such function. They are divided into co-receptors transmitting stimulatory signals and co-receptors transmitting inhibitory signals. Each of these has its counterpart (ligand) on antigen-presenting cells belonging to the “B7 family”. Two most prominent inhibitory receptors on T cells are called CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, as it is first identified on cytotoxic T lymphocytes) and PD-1 (program death-1, as it is first identified to be associated with a type of cell death process called programmed cell death). Their ligands are designated as B7-1/B7-2 and PD-L1/PD-L2, respectively. These are also referred to as immune checkpoint receptors and ligands.
Our immune system is not perfect and at times, the regulatory mechanisms might be faulty, which in fact may be the basis of a variety of diseases. For example, autoimmune diseases may be related to the suppressive mechanism becoming weak and the individuals can mount excessive immune responses even to their own cells and tissues. Also, our immune system is capable of recognizing cancer cells and attacking them, in a process called immune surveillance. However, cancer cells are also equipped with machineries to evade the host anti-tumor activity, which is described as immune escape. For example, cancer cells can also express B7 family ligands on their surfaces and, by engaging the co-receptors transmitting inhibitory signals on T cells, they can inhibit the host anti-tumor T cell activity. By recognizing how cancer cells escape the immune surveillance, scientists have developed novel approaches to interfere with the ability of cancer cells to suppress the immune response, thus enhancing the ability of the host immune system to inhibit cancer cell growth.
Dr. James Allison, Chairman, Department of Immunology and Executive Director, Immunotherapy Platform at the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, is one of two scientist to identify CTLA-4 as an inhibitory receptor on T-cells in 1995 and was the first to recognize it as a potential target for cancer therapy.  His team then developed an antibody that blocks CTLA-4 activity and showed in 1996 that this antibody is able to help reject several different types of tumors in mouse models. This subsequently led to development of a monoclonal antibody drug, which has undergone clinical trials against stage 4 melanoma and been approved for treatment of melanoma by the U.S. FDA in 2011.
Dr. Tasuku Honjo, Professor, Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, Kyoto University, discovered PD-1 in 1992. His group subsequently established that PD-1 is an inhibitor regulator of the T cell response. Additional studies from his and other laboratories established that this protein plays a critical role in the regulation of tumor immunity and stimulated many groups to generate its blocker for the treatment of cancer. Antibodies against PD-1 have been approved by the U.S. FDA as an investigational new drug and developed for the treatment of cancer. One such antibody produced complete or partial responses in non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal-cell cancer in clinical trials, and is predicted to be launched in 2015 for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer; this has been stated by some as having the potential to “change the landscape” of the treatment for lung cancer. Another antibody, shown to achieve a substantial response rate also in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, is currently in clinical trial for many types of cancers. In addition, combination therapy (anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1) has been shown to dramatically improve the long-term survival rates in cancer patients.
This is an exciting time in our fight against cancer. The discoveries by Dr. Allison and Dr. Honjo have spurred additional development of therapeutic approaches along the line of immunotherapy and brought new hope that many types of cancers can be cured.
In addition, dysregulation in immune checkpoint pathways may be intimately involved in other illnesses, such as allergy, infectious diseases, and autoimmune diseases. Thus, the approach of targeting immune stimulatory and inhibitory molecules also promises to lead to the development of new therapies for these diseases.
Dr. Allison’s and Dr. Honjo’s discoveries have opened a new therapeutic era in medicine.

 

Supplementary figure:

unleashes immune system to attack cancer cells

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Samuel Yin, founder of the Tang Prize, is currently chairman of the Ruentex Group and chief development officer, chief technology officer, and chief engineer of Ruentex Construction & Development. He is also an adjunct professor in the department of civil engineering at National Taiwan University and a professor at Peking University, where he advises PhD students.

Dr. Yin read history at Chinese Culture University. He received a master’s degree in business administration at National Taiwan University and a doctorate in business administration at National Chengchi University.

In addition to his academic background in the humanities and business administration, Dr. Yin’s great interest in and devotion to interdisciplinary studies have made him an award-winning civil engineer and educator.

In 2004, Dr. Yin was named fellow of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering. In 2008, he was invited to join Russia’s International Academy of Engineering and also awarded the Engineering Prowess Medal, the academy’s highest honour. In 2010, Dr. Yin received the Henry L. Michel Award for Industry Advancement of Research by the prestigious American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) for his contribution in the area of construction technology research. He was the first person without an academic background in engineering to receive the award.

Driven by a firm belief that he should give back to the society that has enabled him to achieve so much, Dr. Yin has been investing in philanthropy and education for a long time, in the hope of creating a positive force in society and making a better world.

Dr. Yin’s biggest dream was to set up an international award. He has long had great respect and admiration for the Nobel Prize, so he established an award modeled on the Nobel. The Tang Prize rewards excellent research in the areas of Sustainable Development, Biopharmaceutical Science, Sinology (excluding literary works), and Rule of Law. Dr. Yin hopes to encourage experts to dedicate themselves to innovative research in these fields and to spur human development with first-class research.

Dr. Yin’s relentless enthusiasm for philanthropy was instilled through his upbringing, particularly the example set by his late father Yin Shu-Tien. Dr. Yin established a foundation in memory of his grandfather, Yin Xun-Ruo, to provide scholarships to students of families originating in Shandong Province to study Chinese literature and history. When Yin senior passed away, Dr. Yin also set up the Kwang-Hua Education Foundation to help with China’s higher education programs.

In the past few years, Dr. Yin has set up a number of foundations to serve people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and to foster more talented people for the nation (the Yin Xun-Ruo Educational Foundation, the Yin Shu-Tien Medical Foundation, the Kwang-Hua Education Foundation, and the Guanghua School of Management of Peking University). In 2012, Dr. Yin set up a global award, the Tang Prize, to spread his philanthropy across the world.

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

The Discovery and Properties of Avemar – Fermented Wheat Germ Extract: Carcinogenesis Suppressor

Posted in Anaerobic Glycolysis, Biomedical Measurement Science, Ca2+ triggered activation, CANCER BIOLOGY & Innovations in Cancer Therapy, Discovery process, Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs, Drug Toxicity, Experimental validation, FDA, CE Mark & Global Regulatory Affairs: process management and strategic planning - GCP, GLP, ISO 14155, Historical relevance, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Interviews with Scientific Leaders, ISO 10993 for Product Registration: FDA & CE Mark for Development of Medical Devices and Diagnostics, Metabolomics, Nutrition, Oxidative phosphorylation, Phosphorylation, Population Health Management, Nutrition and Phytochemistry, Proteomics, Scientific & Biotech Conferences: Press Coverage, Signaling, Translational Science, Ubiquitinylation, tagged alternative medicine, Avemar, Chemotherapy, complementary medicine, Dietary supplement, experimental cancer research, fermented wheat germ extract, functional foods, gene expression, glucose consumption, pancreatic carcinoma, regulation of metabolism, RNA, tyrosine phosphorylation on June 7, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Contributor

Article ID #143: The Discovery and Properties of Avemar – Fermented Wheat Germ Extract: Carcinogenesis Suppressor. Published on 6/7/2014

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/5-6-2014/larryhbern/ The Discovery_and_Properties_of_Avemar – Fermented_ Wheat_Germ_Extract:_Carcinogenesis_Suppressor

The following discussion will be a review of the current interest in Avemar, a nontoxic, fermentation product of wheat germ extract, garnering interest with respect to alternative and complementary medicinal use.

Extracts from an interview by Sandra Cascio with Mate Hidvegi

Mate’s Transylvania Professor Lajos David was the organizer of the Department of Pharmacy of the University of Szeged in the 1920’s. He was elected as the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, the first and only pharmacist who reached this high position at the University since. Dr. Hidvegy’s grandfather was a devout Roman catholic, who publicly opposed Nazi persecution of Jews during the Holocaust. One of his colleagues and, perhaps his best friend, was Albert Szent­Gyorgyi, the Nobel laureate who discovered vitaminC. Szent­Gyorgyi moved to the United States after World War II, where he turned to studies of muscle biochemistry. In his later years he turned to cancer research. He  theorized that a revolutionary anticancer drug could be based upon vitamin C combined with methoxy­substituted benzoquinones, the precursors of which can be found in wheat germ. After completion of the PhD, Dr. Hidvegi spent two years with the Wheat Grain Trust in Winnipeg, Canada, before returning to Hungary in 1990.  He decided to followthepathwaythat Szent­Gyorgyi was now engaged intocompletehisgoals.He contacted anoldfriend,GaborFodor, a brilliantchemist, also a collaborator withSzent­Gyorgyiincancerresearch.

He wasinvited by Hermann Esterbauer, the head of the Institute of Biochemistry at the University of Graz, to work in his laboratory. Thanks to the generosity of Professor Esterbauer,  he accomplished much at Graz  together with his student, Dr. Rita Farkas.  It was soon after Szent­-Gyorgyi’s death when, with the help of Dr. Fodor, they prepared the chemicals to make the drug Szent­-Gyorgyi had intended to make, with encouragement from the great quantum­ biochemist, Janos Ladik.  They made wheat germ extracts with the highest free benzoquinone content.This required a  fermentation process to liberate the benzoquinone moieties from the chemical bonds which keep them in natural forms: in glycosides. He recalls the purple colored active molecules in the fermentation liquid. Living cells with their exo­ and endo­enzymes are used to split bonds and make new molecules. This is also true for the manufacturing process of Avemar. This extract contains new molecules which cannot be found elsewhere.

“WhenAvemar was voted by the majority of the more than 50,000 professionals for NutrAward, it became obvious that this product is of biological efficacy  plus safety, and it is based on good science.” It received the financial support needed. From this, he was able to complete the experiments and get the approval for the registration. The time arrived when he really had to give a name to the product which had only had a code name. One late night it just came: Avemar, from the Latin prayer: Ave Maria.

Avemar with widely used chemotherapeutic drugs completely inhibited the development of metastases. Exploring its whole activity profile might even take a lifetime of research. So far he has supervised Avemar research done in Hungary, Israel, the United States, Austria, Italy, Spain, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Germany,the United Kingdom, Russia, Australia, Korea, Vietnam. It has been a good experience to see the scientific interest it has generated worldwide. In 2009, Dr. Hidvegy received an invitation from the Nobel laureate, James Watson, co­discoverer of DNA’s double helix. It was a great honor. Avemar, he hopes,will be a significant cancer drug.

Mate Hidvegi was born in Budapest, Hungary, in 1955. He studied, then  taught at what is now Budapest University of Technology  and Economics.  After finishing university, he worked in the cereal industry and was co­developer of patented feed advisory system based on near infrared ingredient      data. In Hungary, Hidvegi was one of the pioneers in the development of           technologies for large ­scale production of instantized extracts for  therapeutic use.

 

Carcinogenesis vol.22 no.10 pp.1649–1652, 2001

Wheat germ extract inhibits experimental colon carcino-genesis in F-344 rats

Attila Zalatnai, Karoly Lapis, Bela Szende, Erzsebet Raso, Andros Telekes, Akos Resetar, and Mate Hidvegi

 

It has been demonstrated for the first time that a wheat germ extract prevents colonic cancer in laboratory animals. Four-week-old inbred male F-344 rats were used in the study. Colon carcinogenesis was induced by azoxy-methane (AOM). Ten rats served as untreated controls (group 1). For the treatment of the animals in group 2, AOM was dissolved in physiologic saline and the animals were given three weekly subcutaneous injections at 15 mg/kg body weight (b/w). In two additional groups Avemar (MSC), a fermented wheat germ extract standardized to 2,6-dimethoxy-p-benzoquinone was administered as a tentative chemo-preventive agent. MSC was dissolved in water and was given by gavage at a dose of 3 g/kg b/w once a day. In group 3, animals started to receive MSC 2 weeks prior to the first injection of AOM daily and continuously thereafter until they were killed 32 weeks later. In group 4 only the basal diet and MSC were administered. At the end of the experiment all the rats were exsanguinated under a light ether anesthesia and necropsied. Percentage of animals developing colon tumors and number of tumors per animals: group 1 – 0 and 0; group 2– 83.0 and 2.3; group 3 – 44.8 (P ≤ 0.001) and 1.3 (P ≤ 0.004); group 4 – 0 and 0. All the tumors were histologically neoplastic. The numbers of the aberrant crypt foci (ACF) per area (cm2) in group 2 were 4.85 while in group 3 the ACF numbers were 2.03 only (P ≤ 0.0001).

Table I. Macroscopic findings in the large intestines of F-344 rats treated with MSC or MSC +  AOM No. of animals     w/tumorw   Average # tumors Average diameter N 1 Untreated controls (10) 0/10 0/10 2.  AOM (47) 39/47 (83.0%) 2.3 ­+ 0.21 (range 1–8) 2.35 + 0.25 3.   MSC + AOM (29) 13/29 (44.8%) 1.3 + 0.17 (range 1–3) 2.21 + 0.12 4.  MSC (9) 0/9 0/9

Fig. 1. Experimental schedule. Colon carcinogenesis was induced by three consecutive s.c. doses of AOM 1 week apart in F-344 rats. Oral administration of MSC was started 2 weeks before the carcinogen treatments. All the animals were killed at the end of the experiment, e.g. on the 32nd week.  (not shown)

 

Summing up, although the chemoprevention of colon cancers (and their pre-neoplastic lesions) has well and long been established and could be achieved by totally different compounds, the mechanisms have still remained to be clarified. This is also true for MSC.

The exact mechanism by which the fermented wheat germ concentration can prevent colon cancer is still partly unknown. MSC did inhibit the AOM-induced ACF and colon neoplasm formation, the multiplicity of the tumors, apparently acting in the initiation phase. Regarding this, we can hypothesize that MSC acts as an immunomodulator.

 

Wheat Germ Extract Decreases Glucose Uptake and RNARibose Formation but Increases Fatty Acid Synthesis in MIAPancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cell

LG Boros, K Lapis, B Szende, R Tömösközi-Farkas, Ádám Balogh, …., and M Hidvégi

UCLA School of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, Torrance, Ca.; First Institute of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis  Medical University, Budapest, Hungary; Central Food Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Surgery, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Center, School of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; andDepartment of Biochemistryand Food Technology, Technical University of Budapest and Biromedicina Company, Budapest, Hungary

Pancreas 2001; 23 (2), pp. 141–147

Summary: The fermented wheat germ extract with standardized composition has potent tumor inhibitory properties. The fermented wheat germ extract controls tumor propagation. The authors show that this extract induces profound metabolic changes in cultured MIA pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells when the [1,2- ¹³C₂] glucose isotope is used as the single tracer with biologic gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.

MIA cells treated with 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/mL wheat  germ extract showed a dose-dependent decrease in cell glucose consumption, consumption, uptake of isotope into ribosomal RNA (2.4%, 9.4%, and 8.0%), and release of ¹³CO₂ . Conversely, direct glucose oxidation and ribose recycling in the pentose cycle showed a dose-dependent increase of 1.2%, 20.7%, and 93.4%. The newly synthesized fraction of cell palmitate and the ¹³C enrichment of acetyl units were also increased with all doses of wheat germ extract.

The fermented wheat germ extract controls tumor propagation primarily by regulating glucose carbon redistribution between cell proliferation–related and cell differentiation–related macromolecules. Wheat germ extract treatment is likely associated with the phosphor-ylation and transcriptional regulation of metabolic enzymes that are involved in glucose carbon redistribution between cell the direct oxidative degradation of glucose,proliferation–related structural and functional macromolecules(RNA, DNA) and the direct oxidative degradation and survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in culture.

Key Words: Pentose cycle—Ribose synthesis—Fermented wheat germ extract—Nonoxidative glucose metabolism—Cell proliferation—Avemar.

 

Fig 1 glu consumption of MIA pancreatic carcinoma cells in response to WGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1. Glucose consumption of MIA pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in response to increasing doses of fermented wheat germ extract (Avemar) treatment after 72 hours of culture. Glucose consumption (measured in milligrams) was estimated by the difference in media glucose content between Avemar-treated and control cultures. MIA cell glucose consumption was significantly inhibited in the presence of either 1 mg/mL (*p < 0.05) or 10 mg/mL (**p < 0.01) Avemar (x + SD;  n = 6).

 

fig-3-rna-syn-of-mia-pancreatic-carcinoma-cells-in-response-to-wge.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Ribosomal RNA synthesis of MIA pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in response to increasing doses of fermented wheat germ extract (Avemar) treatment after 72 hours of culture. Glucose carbon incorporation into ribose isolated from ribosomal RNA is expressed as molar enrichment. The dose-dependent decrease in of rRNA after Avemar treatment indicates that ribosomal RNA synthesis is the primary site significantly affected by all doses of Avemar treatment with a maximum decrease of 29% after 10 mg/mL treatment (x + SD; n = 9; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

changes in metabolic activity indicate that Avemar treatment affects cell metabolism primarily by decreasing glucose uptake and nucleic acid ribose synthesis while increasing glucose oxidation through the oxidative reactions of the pentose cycle and fatty acid  synthesis from glucose carbon. The effect of Avemar treatment on lactate production and TCA cycle anapleurotic flux compared with glucose oxidation is less prominent

 

Fermented wheat germ extract induces apoptosis and downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I proteins in tumor T and B cell lines

R FAJKA-BOJA, M HIDVÉGI, Y SHOENFELD, G  ION, D DEMYDENKO, R TÖMÖSKÖZI-FARKAS, et al.

INTL J ONCOLOGY 2002; 20: 563-570.

Lymphocyte Signal Transduction Laboratory, Institute of Genetics, and Cytokine Group, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged; Department of Biochemistry and Food Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Medicine ‘B’, Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Central Food Research Institute; National Institute of Oncology; Biromedicina Co., Budapest, Hungary
Abstract. The fermented wheat germ extract (code name:  on cyto-fluorimeter using a monoclonal antibody to the  MSC, trade name: Avemar), with standardized benzoquinone non-polymorphic region of the human MHC class I. MSC  content has been shown to inhibit tumor propagation and stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of intracellular proteins metastases formation in vivo. The aim of this study was to  understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the anti-tumor effect of MSC. Therefore, we have designed in vitro model experiments using T and B tumor lymphocytic cell lines. As a result of the MSC treatment, cell surface MHC class I proteins was downregulated by 70-85% compared to the non-stimulated control.

Prominent apoptosis of and the influx of extracellular Ca²⁺ resulted in elevation of the amount of the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration. 20-40% was detected upon 24 h of MSC treatment of the cell lines. Apoptosis was measured with cytofluorimetry by staining the DNA with propidium iodide and detecting the ‘sub-G ’ cell population.

Tyrosine phosphorylation of intra-cellular proteins and elevation of the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration were examined using immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and cytofluorimetry by means of Ca²⁺ sensitive fluorescence dyes, Fluo-3AM and FuraRed-AM, respectively. MSC did not induce a similar degree of apoptosis in healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Inhibition of the cellular tyrosine phosphatase activity or Ca²⁺ influx resulted in the opposite effect – increasing or diminishing the Avemar induced apoptosis as well as the MHC class I downregulation. The level of the cell surface MHC class I molecules was analysed with indirect immunofluorescence. The benzoquinone component (2,6-dimethoxi-p-benzoquinone) in MSC induced similar apoptosis and downregulation of the MHC class I molecules in the tumor T and B cell lines to that of MSC. These results suggest that MSC acts on lymphoid tumor cells by reducing MHC class I expression and selectively promoting apoptosis of tumor cells on a tyrosine phosphorylation and Ca²⁺ influx dependent way.  One of the components in MSC, 2,6-dimethoxi-p-benzoquinone was shown to be an important factor in MSC mediated cell response.

 

Abbreviations:MHC, major histocompatibility complex;NK, natural killer;DMBQ, 2,6-dimethoxi-p-benzoquinone; FCS, fetal calf serum;PBMC, peripheral bloodmononuclear cells; TCR, T cell receptor;BCR, B cell receptor; mAb, monoclonal antibody;PMSF,phenylmethyl-sulfonylfluoride;pNPP, para-nitrophenyl-phosphate; PHA,phytohemagglutinineKey words: fermented wheat germ extract, Avemar, MSC, 2+ benzoquinone, tyrosine phosphorylation, intracellular Ca , CD45, tyrosine phosphatase, MHC class I downregulation, apoptosis

 

fig-4-apoptosis-of-t-cell-lines-induced-by-avamer.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Apoptosis of tumor T cell lines and healthy lymphocytes upon MSC treatment. Jurkat cells were treated with 1 mg/ml MSC or .3 µg/ml DMBQ and PBMC were treated with 1 mg/ml
MSC for 24 h (A) or Jurkat cells were treated for 12 h (thick line in panel B). Control cells were left unstimulated (black bars in panel A or thin line on panel B). Apoptotic cells were enumerated
with the DNA analysis of the ‘sub-G ’ population (A) or with staining the cells with FITC1 labeled Annexin V
(B). Representative experiments are shown. The difference between the % of apoptosis in the case of treated and non-treated Jurkat cells was significant (MSC, p<0.001, n=14; DMBQ, p<0.05, n=3,
using  paired, two-tailed t-test). No difference was found for PBMC (n=2).

MSC treatment causes prominent apoptosis in lymphoid tumor cells but it does not induce apoptosis of healthy resting mononuclear cells. Moreover, although MSC blocks the proliferation of PBM cells stimulated with PHA, it does not induce apoptosis in PHA stimulated cells (data not shown).

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

The Bioscience Crowdfunding Environment: The Bigger Better VC?

Posted in Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research, Conference Coverage with Social Media, Curation, FDA Regulatory Affairs, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Health Law & Patient Safety, HealthCare IT, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Interviews with Scientific Leaders, Medical Devices R&D and Inventions, Medical Devices R&D Investment, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Scientific & Biotech Conferences: Press Coverage, Technology Capital Expenses, tagged @Biotech News, bioangel, bioinvestment, biotech startup, Biotechnology Industry Organization, crowd-funding, Entrepreneur, Food and Drug Administration, health, Medical Devices R&D Investment, research funding, science funding, Venture capital on May 14, 2014| Leave a Comment »

The Bioscience Crowdfunding Environment: Will Crowdfunding be the Bigger, New VC

Reporter: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.

Article ID #136: The Bioscience Crowdfunding Environment: The Bigger Better VC?. Published on 5/14/2014

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

Pharmaceutical Consulting Consortium International Inc. (PCCI) recently presented their 7^th annual Roundtable “CROWDFUNDING FOR LIFE SCIENCES: A BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS?”, a panel discussion on how this new funding mechanism applies to early stage life science companies and changes the funding landscape.

A major provision in the recently passed JOBS Act resulted in Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) rule changes revolutionizing the way companies can raise capital, with some figures in the range of $11 trillion dollars. Companies, startups, and entrepreneurs can, in a manner, now go directly to the individual investor and raise capital. This method is generally referred to as CROWDFUNDING.

As explained by Mark Roderick, moderator for the meeting, there are two main types of approved crowdfunding:

• Donation-based Crowdfunding – Popularized by the crowdfunding platform Kickstarter, this method of raising capital can accept small donations from anyone for an idea/project to be completed. The donor may either get a free token of appreciation or access to enjoy the fruits of the project, for example, a watching a movie funded by the donor. Some scientific researchers have used Kickstarter as a method to fund their research.
• Investor-based Crowdfunding– This type of crowdfunding involves the actual transfer of securities, and investors must qualify according to rules set by the SEC and go thru brokers, or portals, like the bioscience and healthcare internet portal Poliwogg.

Investor-based crowdfundingwas discussed at the meeting.  There are five different mechanisms with this type of funding: Title II (Rule 506c), Title II, Title IV, Existing Regulation A, and Rule 504. The main focus of the meeting was on Title II as, according to Mr. Roderick, involves the mechanism most suited for biotech startups, while rules for Title III still need to be finalized.

Title II crowdfunding requires that “accredited” or “qualified” investors (those who make at least $200,000/year or net worth $1 million US) go through licensed dealer internet nodes (or Portals) like Poliwog. The Portal will have lists of startups they deem legitimate which investors can choose from. For instance the Epilepsy Foundation uses Poliwog to fund certain projects.

The panelists discussed matters including:

• How crowdfunding is different than other mechanisms like venture capital
• What are the regulations and financial responsibilities for both biotech and crowdfunder
• Liabilities
• Due-diligence issues

The panelists included:

1. Mark Roderick, moderator. Mark is an attorney at Flaster/Greenberg PC (@CrowdfundAttny on Twitter) and has developed great experience and expertise in the details of crowdfunding. He maintains a Crowdfunding blog www.crowdfundattny.com, which contains information and links about the JOBS Act and crowdfunding.
2. Barbara Schiberg, Managing Director at BioAdvance, a Mid-Atlantic bioangel investment community.
3. Samuel Wertheimer, PhD, CIO Poliwogg, a crowdfunding internet portal.
4. Darrick Mix, Partner, Duane Morris LLP, corporate lawyer with experience in the JOBS act
5. Donlon Skerret, PCCI President and CEO of NanoScan Imaging and serial entrepreneur

The Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent estimates place Title II Crowdfunding capacity to $1 Trillion.

Venture Capital (VC) had estimated only $5 Billion bio-investment in 2013.

Where does the rest go?

 

Mr. Skerret noted that bioangels can only take you so far but thinks that crowdfunding may fill this “valley of death”.

Liabilities

 

Crowdfunding is SELLING SECURITIESso there is liability, disclosure and nondisclosure issues.

Title II contains 580 pages of regulations and SEC needs a licensed intermediary.

 

Due-Diligence

 

Barbara Schiberg also noted that with VCs or bioangels groups you also get s support network, basically their rolodex of contacts and KOL’s and experts. With Crowdfunding like Poliwog they just handle linking investors with entrepreneur. Any contact is done through social media and the crowd.

 

BioAdvance hires experts – may take months to years to get expert opinion

 

Poliwog only has responsibility to investor to make sure company is legitimate. They don’t do extensive due diligence like bioangels. Most crowdfunding do not have extensive networks of professionals.

 

 

To obtain a video recording of this meeting and get more information please go to PCCI’s web site at http://www.rxpcci.com/meetings.htm.

 

Other posts on this site related to FUNDING and Bio Investing include:

 

PCCI’s 7th Annual Roundtable “Crowdfunding for Life Sciences: A Bridge Over Troubled Waters?” May 12 2014 Embassy Suites Hotel, Chesterbrook PA 6:00-9:30 PM

10 heart-focused apps & devices are crowdfunding for American Heart Association’s open innovation challenge

Importance of Funding Replication Studies: NIH on Credibility of Basic Biomedical Studies

Partnerships & Funding

Updated: Investing and Inventing: Is the Tango of Mars and Venus Still on

Transforming Biotech & Pharma: LinkedIn is the Quiet Force by Timmerman

Technion-Cornell Innovation Institute in NYC: Postdocs keep exclusive license to their IP and take a fixed dollar amount of Equity if the researchers create a Spinoff company

 

 

 

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

Summary of Translational Medicine – e-Series A: Cardiovascular Diseases, Volume Four – Part 1

Posted in Academic Publishing, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Advanced Drug Manufacturing Technology, Alzheimer's Disease, Atherogenic Processes & Pathology, Autologous Cell Therapy, Automated Cell Processing, Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research, Biological Networks, Gene Regulation and Evolution, Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics, Biomedical Measurement Science, Bone Disease and Musculoskeletal Disease, Bone marrow derived cells, Ca2+ triggered activation, Ca2+ triggered activation, Cachexia, Calcium Signaling, Calmodulin, Calmodulin Kinase and Contraction, Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment, Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures, Cardiac muscle regeneration, Cardiomyopathy, Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics, Cell Biology, Signaling & Cell Circuits, Chemical Biology and its relations to Metabolic Disease, Chemical Genetics, Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Circulating Progenitor Cells, Coagulation Therapy and Internal Bleeding, Competition in regenerative stem cell science, Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics, Curation, Cytoskeleton, Diabetes Mellitus, Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs, Drug Delivery Platform Technology, Drug Toxicity, Electrophysiology, Endothelial cells, Epigenetics and Cardiovascular Risks, Etiology, Evolutionary cognition, Frontiers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disorders, Genome Biology, Genomic Expression, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Human Immune System in Health and in Disease, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Interviews with Scientific Leaders, Medical and Population Genetics, Medical Device Therapies for Altzheimer’s Disease, Medical Devices R&D Investment, Medical Imaging Technology, Image Processing/Computing, MRI, CT, Nuclear Medicine, Ultra Sound, Metabolomics, Molecular Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Myocardial metabolism, Myocardial ischemia, myocardial perfusion, Myocardial adenine nucleotide metabolism, Na-K transport, Na-K-ATPase, Neurohumoral Transmission, Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease, Nutrition, Nutritional Supplements: Atherogenesis, lipid metabolism, Origins of Cardiovascular Disease, Oxidative phosphorylation, Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research, Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmacologic toxicities, Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease, Phosphorylation, PKC, Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Population Health Management, Nutrition and Phytochemistry, Proteomics, Regenerative Biology and Medicine, S-nitrosylation, Signaling, Skeletal muscle regeneration, Statistical Methods for Research Evaluation, Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine, Stents & Tools, Synaptic vesicle, Systemic Inflammatory Response Related Disorders, Technology Advance Assessment of, Translational Effectiveness, Translational Science, Ubiquitinylation, Water Transporters, tagged bioengineering, Cardiovascular Disorders, computational biology, Coronary artery disease, DNA Sequencing, functional proteomics, gene expression, gene silencing, genetic engineering, Heart Failure, Human Genome Project, Hypertension, MicroRNA, mtRNA, myocardial infarction, nitric oxide, Nitric oxide synthase, Personalized medicine, protein modifications, Proteomics, reverse engineering, RNA, signaling pathways, Stem cell, synbiology on April 28, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Summary of Translational Medicine – e-Series A: Cardiovascular Diseases, Volume Four – Part 1

Author and Curator: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

and

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #135: Summary of Translational Medicine – e-Series A: Cardiovascular Diseases, Volume Four – Part 1. Published on 4/28/2014

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

Part 1 of Volume 4 in the e-series A: Cardiovascular Diseases and Translational Medicine, provides a foundation for grasping a rapidly developing surging scientific endeavor that is transcending laboratory hypothesis testing and providing guidelines to:

• Target genomes and multiple nucleotide sequences involved in either coding or in regulation that might have an impact on complex diseases, not necessarily genetic in nature.
• Target signaling pathways that are demonstrably maladjusted, activated or suppressed in many common and complex diseases, or in their progression.
• Enable a reduction in failure due to toxicities in the later stages of clinical drug trials as a result of this science-based understanding.
• Enable a reduction in complications from the improvement of machanical devices that have already had an impact on the practice of interventional procedures in cardiology, cardiac surgery, and radiological imaging, as well as improving laboratory diagnostics at the molecular level.
• Enable the discovery of new drugs in the continuing emergence of drug resistance.
• Enable the construction of critical pathways and better guidelines for patient management based on population outcomes data, that will be critically dependent on computational methods and large data-bases.

What has been presented can be essentially viewed in the following Table:

 

Summary Table for TM – Part 1

 

 

 

There are some developments that deserve additional development:

1. The importance of mitochondrial function in the activity state of the mitochondria in cellular work (combustion) is understood, and impairments of function are identified in diseases of muscle, cardiac contraction, nerve conduction, ion transport, water balance, and the cytoskeleton – beyond the disordered metabolism in cancer.  A more detailed explanation of the energetics that was elucidated based on the electron transport chain might also be in order.

2. The processes that are enabling a more full application of technology to a host of problems in the environment we live in and in disease modification is growing rapidly, and will change the face of medicine and its allied health sciences.

 

Electron Transport and Bioenergetics

Deferred for metabolomics topic

Synthetic Biology

Introduction to Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering

Kristala L. J. Prather: Part-1    <iBiology > iBioSeminars > Biophysics & Chemical Biology >

http://www.ibiology.org Lecturers generously donate their time to prepare these lectures. The project is funded by NSF and NIGMS, and is supported by the ASCB and HHMI.
Dr. Prather explains that synthetic biology involves applying engineering principles to biological systems to build “biological machines”.

http://synthetic_biology/Introduction_to_Synthetic_Biology_and_Metabolic_Engineering/Kristala_ L.J._Prather/E2/iBiology.htm#/sthash.71kZ0ofr.dpuf

Dr. Prather has received numerous awards both for her innovative research and for excellence in teaching.  Learn more about how Kris became a scientist at

http://science360.gov/obj/video/753bb4fa-aafb-4315-848e-51066ed9799a/finding-way-kristala-l-jones-prather-phd 

Prather 1: Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering  2/6/14IntroductionLecture Overview In the first part of her lecture, Dr. Prather explains that synthetic biology involves applying engineering principles to biological systems to build “biological machines”. The key material in building these machines is synthetic DNA. Synthetic DNA can be added in different combinations to biological hosts, such as bacteria, turning them into chemical factories that can produce small molecules of choice. In Part 2, Prather describes how her lab used design principles to engineer E. coli that produce glucaric acid from glucose. Glucaric acid is not naturally produced in bacteria, so Prather and her colleagues “bioprospected” enzymes from other organisms and expressed them in E. coli to build the needed enzymatic pathway. Prather walks us through the many steps of optimizing the timing, localization and levels of enzyme expression to produce the greatest yield. Speaker Bio: Kristala Jones Prather received her S.B. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her PhD at the University of California, Berkeley both in chemical engineering. Upon graduation, Prather joined the Merck Research Labs for 4 years before returning to academia. Prather is now an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at MIT and an investigator with the multi-university Synthetic Biology Engineering Reseach Center (SynBERC). Her lab designs and constructs novel synthetic pathways in microorganisms converting them into tiny factories for the production of small molecules. Dr. Prather has received numerous awards both for her innovative research and for excellence in teaching.

VIEW VIDEOS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ndThuqVumAk#t=0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ndThuqVumAk#t=12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ndThuqVumAk#t=74

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ndThuqVumAk#t=129

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ndThuqVumAk#t=168

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ndThuqVumAk

 

David Bartel: micro-RNAs

 

I. Introduction to microRNAs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dupzE66J8u4#t=0

– See more at: http://www.ibiology.org/ibioseminars/genetics-gene-regulation/david-bartel-part-1.html#sthash.nGGr1tIt.dpuf

II. Regulatory Effects of Mammalian microRNAs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TcZK_A_wcWQ#t=0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TcZK_A_wcWQ

Calcium Cycling in Synthetic and Contractile Phasic or Tonic Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

in INTECH
Current Basic and Pathological Approaches to
the Function of Muscle Cells and Tissues – From Molecules to HumansLarissa Lipskaia, Isabelle Limon, Regis Bobe and Roger Hajjar
Additional information is available at the end of the chapter
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/48240

1. Introduction
Calcium ions (Ca ) are present in low concentrations in the cytosol (~100 nM) and in high concentrations (in mM range) in both the extracellular medium and intracellular stores (mainly sarco/endo/plasmic reticulum, SR). This differential allows the calcium ion messenger that carries information
as diverse as contraction, metabolism, apoptosis, proliferation and/or hypertrophic growth. The mechanisms responsible for generating a Ca signal greatly differ from one cell type to another.

In the different types of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), enormous variations do exist with regard to the mechanisms responsible for generating Ca signal. In each VSMC phenotype (synthetic/proliferating and contractile [1], tonic or phasic), the Ca signaling system is adapted to its particular function and is due to the specific patterns of expression and regulation of Ca.
For instance, in contractile VSMCs, the initiation of contractile events is driven by mem- brane depolarization; and the principal entry-point for extracellular Ca is the voltage-operated L-type calcium channel (LTCC). In contrast, in synthetic/proliferating VSMCs, the principal way-in for extracellular Ca is the store-operated calcium (SOC) channel.
Whatever the cell type, the calcium signal consists of  limited elevations of cytosolic free calcium ions in time and space. The calcium pump, sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca ATPase (SERCA), has a critical role in determining the frequency of SR Ca release by upload into the sarcoplasmic
sensitivity of  SR calcium channels, Ryanodin Receptor, RyR and Inositol tri-Phosphate Receptor, IP3R.
Synthetic VSMCs have a fibroblast appearance, proliferate readily, and synthesize increased levels of various extracellular matrix components, particularly fibronectin, collagen types I and III, and tropoelastin [1].
Contractile VSMCs have a muscle-like or spindle-shaped appearance and well-developed contractile apparatus resulting from the expression and intracellular accumulation of thick and thin muscle filaments [1].

Schematic representation of Calcium Cycling in Contractile and Proliferating VSMCs

 

Figure 1. Schematic representation of Calcium Cycling in Contractile and Proliferating VSMCs.

Left panel: schematic representation of calcium cycling in quiescent /contractile VSMCs. Contractile re-sponse is initiated by extracellular Ca influx due to activation of Receptor Operated Ca (through phosphoinositol-coupled receptor) or to activation of L-Type Calcium channels (through an increase in luminal pressure). Small increase of cytosolic due IP3 binding to IP3R (puff) or RyR activation by LTCC or ROC-dependent Ca influx leads to large SR Ca IP3R or RyR clusters (“Ca -induced Ca SR calcium pumps (both SERCA2a and SERCA2b are expressed in quiescent VSMCs), maintaining high concentration of cytosolic Ca and setting the sensitivity of RyR or IP3R for the next spike.
Contraction of VSMCs occurs during oscillatory Ca transient.
Middle panel: schematic representa tion of atherosclerotic vessel wall. Contractile VSMC are located in the media layer, synthetic VSMC are located in sub-endothelial intima.
Right panel: schematic representation of calcium cycling in quiescent /contractile VSMCs. Agonist binding to phosphoinositol-coupled receptor leads to the activation of IP3R resulting in large increase in cytosolic Ca calcium pumps (only SERCA2b, having low turnover and low affinity to Ca depletion leads to translocation of SR Ca sensor STIM1 towards PM, resulting in extracellular Ca influx though opening of Store Operated Channel (CRAC). Resulted steady state Ca transient is critical for activation of proliferation-related transcription factors ‘NFAT).
Abbreviations: PLC – phospholipase C; PM – plasma membrane; PP2B – Ca /calmodulin-activated protein phosphatase 2B (calcineurin); ROC- receptor activated channel; IP3 – inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate, IP3R – inositol-1,4,5- trisphosphate receptor; RyR – ryanodine receptor; NFAT – nuclear factor of activated T-lymphocytes; VSMC – vascular smooth muscle cells; SERCA – sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca sarcoplasmic reticulum.

 

Time for New DNA Synthesis and Sequencing Cost Curves

By Rob Carlson

I’ll start with the productivity plot, as this one isn’t new. For a discussion of the substantial performance increase in sequencing compared to Moore’s Law, as well as the difficulty of finding this data, please see this post. If nothing else, keep two features of the plot in mind: 1) the consistency of the pace of Moore’s Law and 2) the inconsistency and pace of sequencing productivity. Illumina appears to be the primary driver, and beneficiary, of improvements in productivity at the moment, especially if you are looking at share prices. It looks like the recently announced NextSeq and Hiseq instruments will provide substantially higher productivities (hand waving, I would say the next datum will come in another order of magnitude higher), but I think I need a bit more data before officially putting another point on the plot.

 

cost-of-oligo-and-gene-synthesis

Illumina’s instruments are now responsible for such a high percentage of sequencing output that the company is effectively setting prices for the entire industry. Illumina is being pushed by competition to increase performance, but this does not necessarily translate into lower prices. It doesn’t behoove Illumina to drop prices at this point, and we won’t see any substantial decrease until a serious competitor shows up and starts threatening Illumina’s market share. The absence of real competition is the primary reason sequencing prices have flattened out over the last couple of data points.

Note that the oligo prices above are for column-based synthesis, and that oligos synthesized on arrays are much less expensive. However, array synthesis comes with the usual caveat that the quality is generally lower, unless you are getting your DNA from Agilent, which probably means you are getting your dsDNA from Gen9.

Note also that the distinction between the price of oligos and the price of double-stranded sDNA is becoming less useful. Whether you are ordering from Life/Thermo or from your local academic facility, the cost of producing oligos is now, in most cases, independent of their length. That’s because the cost of capital (including rent, insurance, labor, etc) is now more significant than the cost of goods. Consequently, the price reflects the cost of capital rather than the cost of goods. Moreover, the cost of the columns, reagents, and shipping tubes is certainly more than the cost of the atoms in the sDNA you are ostensibly paying for. Once you get into longer oligos (substantially larger than 50-mers) this relationship breaks down and the sDNA is more expensive. But, at this point in time, most people aren’t going to use longer oligos to assemble genes unless they have a tricky job that doesn’t work using short oligos.

Looking forward, I suspect oligos aren’t going to get much cheaper unless someone sorts out how to either 1) replace the requisite human labor and thereby reduce the cost of capital, or 2) finally replace the phosphoramidite chemistry that the industry relies upon.

IDT’s gBlocks come at prices that are constant across quite substantial ranges in length. Moreover, part of the decrease in price for these products is embedded in the fact that you are buying smaller chunks of DNA that you then must assemble and integrate into your organism of choice.

Someone who has purchased and assembled an absolutely enormous amount of sDNA over the last decade, suggested that if prices fell by another order of magnitude, he could switch completely to outsourced assembly. This is a potentially interesting “tipping point”. However, what this person really needs is sDNA integrated in a particular way into a particular genome operating in a particular host. The integration and testing of the new genome in the host organism is where most of the cost is. Given the wide variety of emerging applications, and the growing array of hosts/chassis, it isn’t clear that any given technology or firm will be able to provide arbitrary synthetic sequences incorporated into arbitrary hosts.

 TrackBack URL: http://www.synthesis.cc/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/397

 

Startup to Strengthen Synthetic Biology and Regenerative Medicine Industries with Cutting Edge Cell Products

28 Nov 2013 | PR Web

Dr. Jon Rowley and Dr. Uplaksh Kumar, Co-Founders of RoosterBio, Inc., a newly formed biotech startup located in Frederick, are paving the way for even more innovation in the rapidly growing fields of Synthetic Biology and Regenerative Medicine. Synthetic Biology combines engineering principles with basic science to build biological products, including regenerative medicines and cellular therapies. Regenerative medicine is a broad definition for innovative medical therapies that will enable the body to repair, replace, restore and regenerate damaged or diseased cells, tissues and organs. Regenerative therapies that are in clinical trials today may enable repair of damaged heart muscle following heart attack, replacement of skin for burn victims, restoration of movement after spinal cord injury, regeneration of pancreatic tissue for insulin production in diabetics and provide new treatments for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases, to name just a few applications.

While the potential of the field is promising, the pace of development has been slow. One main reason for this is that the living cells required for these therapies are cost-prohibitive and not supplied at volumes that support many research and product development efforts. RoosterBio will manufacture large quantities of standardized primary cells at high quality and low cost, which will quicken the pace of scientific discovery and translation to the clinic. “Our goal is to accelerate the development of products that incorporate living cells by providing abundant, affordable and high quality materials to researchers that are developing and commercializing these regenerative technologies” says Dr. Rowley

 

Life at the Speed of Light

http://kcpw.org/?powerpress_pinw=92027-podcast

NHMU Lecture featuring – J. Craig Venter, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman, and CEO – J. Craig Venter Institute; Co-Founder and CEO, Synthetic Genomics Inc.

J. Craig Venter, Ph.D., is Founder, Chairman, and CEO of the J. Craig Venter Institute (JVCI), a not-for-profit, research organization dedicated to human, microbial, plant, synthetic and environmental research. He is also Co-Founder and CEO of Synthetic Genomics Inc. (SGI), a privately-held company dedicated to commercializing genomic-driven solutions to address global needs.

In 1998, Dr. Venter founded Celera Genomics to sequence the human genome using new tools and techniques he and his team developed.  This research culminated with the February 2001 publication of the human genome in the journal, Science. Dr. Venter and his team at JVCI continue to blaze new trails in genomics.  They have sequenced and a created a bacterial cell constructed with synthetic DNA,  putting humankind at the threshold of a new phase of biological research.  Whereas, we could  previously read the genetic code (sequencing genomes), we can now write the genetic code for designing new species.

The science of synthetic genomics will have a profound impact on society, including new methods for chemical and energy production, human health and medical advances, clean water, and new food and nutritional products. One of the most prolific scientists of the 21st century for his numerous pioneering advances in genomics,  he  guides us through this emerging field, detailing its origins, current challenges, and the potential positive advances.

His work on synthetic biology truly embodies the theme of “pushing the boundaries of life.”  Essentially, Venter is seeking to “write the software of life” to create microbes designed by humans rather than only through evolution. The potential benefits and risks of this new technology are enormous. It also requires us to examine, both scientifically and philosophically, the question of “What is life?”

J Craig Venter wants to digitize DNA and transmit the signal to teleport organisms

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/11/01/j-craig-venter-wants-to-digitize-dna-and-transmit-the-signal-to-teleport-organisms/

2013 Genomics: The Era Beyond the Sequencing of the Human Genome: Francis Collins, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, et al.

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/02/11/2013-genomics-the-era-beyond-the-sequencing-human-genome-francis-collins-craig-venter-eric-lander-et-al/

Human Longevity Inc (HLI) – $70M in Financing of Venter’s New Integrative Omics and Clinical Bioinformatics

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/03/05/human-longevity-inc-hli-70m-in-financing-of-venters-new-integrative-omics-and-clinical-bioinformatics/

 

 

Where Will the Century of Biology Lead Us?

By Randall Mayes

A technology trend analyst offers an overview of synthetic biology, its potential applications, obstacles to its development, and prospects for public approval.

• In addition to boosting the economy, synthetic biology projects currently in development could have profound implications for the future of manufacturing, sustainability, and medicine.
• Before society can fully reap the benefits of synthetic biology, however, the field requires development and faces a series of hurdles in the process. Do researchers have the scientific know-how and technical capabilities to develop the field?

Biology + Engineering = Synthetic Biology

Bioengineers aim to build synthetic biological systems using compatible standardized parts that behave predictably. Bioengineers synthesize DNA parts—oligonucleotides composed of 50–100 base pairs—which make specialized components that ultimately make a biological system. As biology becomes a true engineering discipline, bioengineers will create genomes using mass-produced modular units similar to the microelectronics and computer industries.

Currently, bioengineering projects cost millions of dollars and take years to develop products. For synthetic biology to become a Schumpeterian revolution, smaller companies will need to be able to afford to use bioengineering concepts for industrial applications. This will require standardized and automated processes.

A major challenge to developing synthetic biology is the complexity of biological systems. When bioengineers assemble synthetic parts, they must prevent cross talk between signals in other biological pathways. Until researchers better understand these undesired interactions that nature has already worked out, applications such as gene therapy will have unwanted side effects. Scientists do not fully understand the effects of environmental and developmental interaction on gene expression. Currently, bioengineers must repeatedly use trial and error to create predictable systems.

Similar to physics, synthetic biology requires the ability to model systems and quantify relationships between variables in biological systems at the molecular level.

The second major challenge to ensuring the success of synthetic biology is the development of enabling technologies. With genomes having billions of nucleotides, this requires fast, powerful, and cost-efficient computers. Moore’s law, named for Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, posits that computing power progresses at a predictable rate and that the number of components in integrated circuits doubles each year until its limits are reached. Since Moore’s prediction, computer power has increased at an exponential rate while pricing has declined.

DNA sequencers and synthesizers are necessary to identify genes and make synthetic DNA sequences. Bioengineer Robert Carlson calculated that the capabilities of DNA sequencers and synthesizers have followed a pattern similar to computing. This pattern, referred to as the Carlson Curve, projects that scientists are approaching the ability to sequence a human genome for $1,000, perhaps in 2020. Carlson calculated that the costs of reading and writing new genes and genomes are falling by a factor of two every 18–24 months. (see recent Carlson comment on requirement to read and write for a variety of limiting  conditions).

Startup to Strengthen Synthetic Biology and Regenerative Medicine Industries with Cutting Edge Cell Products

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/11/28/startup-to-strengthen-synthetic-biology-and-regenerative-medicine-industries-with-cutting-edge-cell-products/

Synthetic Biology: On Advanced Genome Interpretation for Gene Variants and Pathways: What is the Genetic Base of Atherosclerosis and Loss of Arterial Elasticity with Aging

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/05/17/synthetic-biology-on-advanced-genome-interpretation-for-gene-variants-and-pathways-what-is-the-genetic-base-of-atherosclerosis-and-loss-of-arterial-elasticity-with-aging/

Synthesizing Synthetic Biology: PLOS Collections

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/17/synthesizing-synthetic-biology-plos-collections/

Capturing ten-color ultrasharp images of synthetic DNA structures resembling numerals 0 to 9

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/02/05/capturing-ten-color-ultrasharp-images-of-synthetic-dna-structures-resembling-numerals-0-to-9/

Silencing Cancers with Synthetic siRNAs

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/12/09/silencing-cancers-with-synthetic-sirnas/

Genomics Now—and Beyond the Bubble

Futurists have touted the twenty-first century as the century of biology based primarily on the promise of genomics. Medical researchers aim to use variations within genes as biomarkers for diseases, personalized treatments, and drug responses. Currently, we are experiencing a genomics bubble, but with advances in understanding biological complexity and the development of enabling technologies, synthetic biology is reviving optimism in many fields, particularly medicine.

BY MICHAEL BROOKS    17 APR, 2014     http://www.newstatesman.com/

Michael Brooks holds a PhD in quantum physics. He writes a weekly science column for the New Statesman, and his most recent book is The Secret Anarchy of Science.

The basic idea is that we take an organism – a bacterium, say – and re-engineer its genome so that it does something different. You might, for instance, make it ingest carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, process it and excrete crude oil.

That project is still under construction, but others, such as using synthesised DNA for data storage, have already been achieved. As evolution has proved, DNA is an extraordinarily stable medium that can preserve information for millions of years. In 2012, the Harvard geneticist George Church proved its potential by taking a book he had written, encoding it in a synthesised strand of DNA, and then making DNA sequencing machines read it back to him.

When we first started achieving such things it was costly and time-consuming and demanded extraordinary resources, such as those available to the millionaire biologist Craig Venter. Venter’s team spent most of the past two decades and tens of millions of dollars creating the first artificial organism, nicknamed “Synthia”. Using computer programs and robots that process the necessary chemicals, the team rebuilt the genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma mycoides from scratch. They also inserted a few watermarks and puzzles into the DNA sequence, partly as an identifying measure for safety’s sake, but mostly as a publicity stunt.

What they didn’t do was redesign the genome to do anything interesting. When the synthetic genome was inserted into an eviscerated bacterial cell, the new organism behaved exactly the same as its natural counterpart. Nevertheless, that Synthia, as Venter put it at the press conference to announce the research in 2010, was “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer” made it a standout achievement.

Today, however, we have entered another era in synthetic biology and Venter faces stiff competition. The Steve Jobs to Venter’s Bill Gates is Jef Boeke, who researches yeast genetics at New York University.

Boeke wanted to redesign the yeast genome so that he could strip out various parts to see what they did. Because it took a private company a year to complete just a small part of the task, at a cost of $50,000, he realised he should go open-source. By teaching an undergraduate course on how to build a genome and teaming up with institutions all over the world, he has assembled a skilled workforce that, tinkering together, has made a synthetic chromosome for baker’s yeast.

 

Stepping into DIYbio and Synthetic Biology at ScienceHack

Posted April 22, 2014 by Heather McGaw and Kyrie Vala-Webb

We got a crash course on genetics and protein pathways, and then set out to design and build our own pathways using both the “Genomikon: Violacein Factory” kit and Synbiota platform. With Synbiota’s software, we dragged and dropped the enzymes to create the sequence that we were then going to build out. After a process of sketching ideas, mocking up pathways, and writing hypotheses, we were ready to start building!

The night stretched long, and at midnight we were forced to vacate the school. Not quite finished, we loaded our delicate bacteria, incubator, and boxes of gloves onto the bus and headed back to complete our bacterial transformation in one of our hotel rooms. Jammed in between the beds and the mini-fridge, we heat-shocked our bacteria in the hotel ice bucket. It was a surreal moment.

While waiting for our bacteria, we held an “unconference” where we explored bioethics, security and risk related to synthetic biology, 3D printing on Mars, patterns in juggling (with live demonstration!), and even did a Google Hangout with Rob Carlson. Every few hours, we would excitedly check in on our bacteria, looking for bacterial colonies and the purple hue characteristic of violacein.

Most impressive was the wildly successful and seamless integration of a diverse set of people: in a matter of hours, we were transformed from individual experts and practitioners in assorted fields into cohesive and passionate teams of DIY biologists and science hackers. The ability of everyone to connect and learn was a powerful experience, and over the course of just one weekend we were able to challenge each other and grow.

Returning to work on Monday, we were hungry for more. We wanted to find a way to bring the excitement and energy from the weekend into the studio and into the projects we’re working on. It struck us that there are strong parallels between design and DIYbio, and we knew there was an opportunity to bring some of the scientific approaches and curiosity into our studio.

 

 

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

Methodology for Conference Coverage using Social Media: 2014 MassBio Annual Meeting 4/3 – 4/4 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research, Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics, Biomedical Measurement Science, Cell Biology, Signaling & Cell Circuits, Cerebrovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Chemical Biology and its relations to Metabolic Disease, Circulating Progenitor Cells, Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics, Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs, Drug Delivery Platform Technology, FDA Regulatory Affairs, Genome Biology, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Interviews with Scientific Leaders, Medical and Population Genetics, Medical Devices R&D Investment, Medical Imaging Technology, Image Processing/Computing, MRI, CT, Nuclear Medicine, Ultra Sound, Molecular Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research, Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Pharmacogenomics, Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Regulated Clinical Trials: Design, Methods, Components and IRB related issues, Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine, Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical, Translational Science on April 7, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Methodology for Conference Coverage using Social Media:

2014 MassBio Annual Meeting 4/3 – 4/4 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

e-mail: avivalev-ari@alum.berkeley.edu

Article ID #126: Methodology for Conference Coverage using Social Media: 2014 MassBio Annual Meeting 4/3 – 4/4 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA. Published on 4/7/2014

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

This article has three Parts:

 

Part One: Conference Agenda: Intellectual Property of MassBio

https://twitter.com/search?q=%40massbio&src=rela

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Impact2020&src=hash

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23AM2014&src=hash

http://www.massbio.org/events/calendar/2534-around_the_world_in_120_days_europe_101-/event_detail

Part Two: Conference Content Acquisition in REALTIME 

• Content: Spoken Words – IP of the Speakers
• Electronic Recording of the Curation of the Spoken Words – IP of Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence

Part Three: Social Media in Use of Information Dissemination

3.1 Our Tweets @ pharma_BI on www.twitter.com

3.2 REALTIME Posting to 53 LinkedIn BioTech Groups

3.3 FaceBook Coverage of the Event

https://www.facebook.com/LeadersInPharmaceuticalBusinessIntelligence

3.4 Our Open Access Online Scientific JOURNAL @ http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

3.5  GENOMICS related articles in the JOURNAL  @ http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

3.6  e-Books on Genomics  our BioMed e-Series

 

Part One

CONFERENCE AGENDA

MassBio Annual Meeting 2014
Thursday, April 3 – Friday, April 4 2014

Royal Sonesta Hotel, 40 Edwin Land Blvd, Cambridge, MA

FEATURING REMARKS FROM

• Senator Elizabeth Warren
• Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner, Food & Drug Administration
• Dr. Flemming Ornskov, President & CEO, Shire
• Dr. George Scangos, CEO, Biogen Idec
• Brad Margus, CEO, Genome Bridge

Thursday, April 3

8:00 am – 9:00 am Breakfast and Poster Presentation

9:00 am – 9:30 am Welcome Remarks, Overview of Meeting, and MassBio Board Elections

9:30 am – 10:15 am Opening Keynote: Brad Margus, CEO of Genome Bridge

10:15 am – 10:30 am Coffee Break

10:30 am – 11:30 am Breakout Sessions

Business Track: The Image Problem of the BioPharma Industry

Panelists:

Lisa Adler, Vice President, Corporate Communications, Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company
Maria Cantor, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Human Resources, ARIAD
Karen Carolonza, Principal, Strategy, Green Room Communications
Lori Gorski, Director, Corporate Communications, Genzyme

Moderator:

Luke Timmerman, Biotechnology Journalist

Science Track: Clinical Trial Trends

Panelists:

Neil Bodick, Chief Medical Officer & Co-Founder, Flexion Therapeutics
Marc Foster, Co-Founder & COO, Transparency Life Sciences
Amy O’Donnell, Executive Medical Director, Medical and Scientific Affairs, inVentiv Health Clinical
Richard Peters, Vice President & Division Medical Officer, Sanofi Oncology

Moderator:

Mark de Rosch, Vice President of Regulatory Drugs/Biologics and Head of US Operations, Voisin Consulting Life Sciences
11:45 am – 1:30 pm Awards Luncheon

11:45 am – 12:00 pm Awards Luncheon: Lunch is served

12:00 pm – 12:20 pm Leading Impact Award

12:20 pm – 12:45pm 2013 Joshua Boger Innovative School of the Year Award

12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Henri A. Termeer Innovative Leadership Award

1:30 pm – 2:15 pm Conference Wide Panel: Impact 2020 Overview

Panelists:

Glenn Batchelder, Founder & Board Member, Civitas Therapeutics
Katrine Bosley, Entrepreneur-in-residence, Broad Institute
Skip Irving, Partner and Managing Director, Health Advances
Terry McGuire, Co-Founder & General Partner, Polaris Partners

Moderator:

Rob Weisman, Healthcare Business Writer, The Boston Globe

2:15 pm – 3:15 pm Breakout Sessions

Business Track: Beg, Borrow & Crowdsource? Innovative Ways to Fund Your Early Stage Company

Panelists:

Alex Fair, Co-Founder and CEO, MedStartR
Barbara Fox, CEO & Founder, Avaxia Biologlics, Inc.
Dan Lilly, Government Sales Advisor, Massachusetts Small Business Development Center
Andrew Lo, Professor and Director, MIT Laboratory for Financial Engineering
Brock Reeve, Portfolio Manager, Poliwogg

Moderator:

Margaret Anderson, Executive Director, FasterCures

Science Track: Challenges to Managing Big Data

Panelists:

Bill Crown, Chief Scientific Officer, Optum Labs
Anil Jain, Chief Medical Information Officer, Explorys, Inc.
Iya Khalil, Executive Vice President and Co-Founder, GNS Healthcare
Peter Neumann, Director, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts Medical Center

Moderator:

Jeff Elton, Managing Director of Life Sciences, Accenture

3:15 pm – 3:30 pm Afternoon Break

3:30 pm – 4:30 pm Breakout Sessions

Business Track: Winning Strategies in Business and Corporate Development:

What are They and How Can We Learn From Them?

Panelists:

Tariq Kassum, Vice President, Business Development and Strategy, Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company
Tomas Landh, Director, Strategy and Innovation Sourcing, Diabetes, Novo Nordisk
Jason Rhodes, President & CFO, Epizyme

Moderator:

Jay Mohr, Managing Director and Co-Founder, Locust Walk Partners

Science Track: The Second Coming of Molecular Therapies

Panelists:

Philip Astley-Sparke, President US, uniQure
Stéphane Bancel, President and Founding Chief Executive Officer, Moderna
Kevin Bitterman, Interim CEO, Editas Medicine and Principal, Polaris Partners
Nick Leschly, chief bluebird, bluebird bio

Moderator:

Fred Ledley, Professor and Director at Center for Integration of Science and Industry, Bentley University

4:30 – 6:30 pm Reception

 

Friday, April 4

8:00am – 8:30 am Breakfast

8:30 – 9:30 am Breakout Sessions

Business Track: Addressing Opportunity Cost When We Focus on Rare Disease

Panelists:

Cristina Csimma, CEO, Cydan Development
Laurence Reid, Senior Vice President and Chief Business Officer, Alnylam
Rajeev Shah, Partner, RA Capital Management
Andre Turenne, Vice President & Head of Strategy and Business Development, Genzyme

Moderator:

Barry Werth, Author

Science Track: Mobile Technology and 3D Printing: Technologies Gaining Traction in Biotech and Pharma

Panelists:

Scott DeFelice, President, Oxford Performance Materials
David Kolesky, PhD Candidate, Lewis Research Group, Harvard University
Jacques Kpodonu, Cardiac Surgeon, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ravi Kuppuraj, CTO & Co-Founder, InfoBionic

Moderator:

Navjot Singh, Director, McKinsey & Company
9:45 am – 10:45 am Breakout Sessions

Business Track: Converging Relationships Among Biotech, Pharma, Investors, and Academia

Panelists:

Jane Amara, Director (interim),Technology & Innovation Development Office, Boston Children’s Hospital
Kathy Bowdish, Vice President Global R&D and Head of Sunrise
Judith Dunn, Global Head of pRED Clinical Development, Hoffmann-La Roche
Ben Thorner, Associate Vice President, Head of Business Development and Licensing, Boston Innovation Hub, Merck Research Laboratories
James Tobin, Vice President, Cardiovascular and Scientific Innovation, Johnson & Johnson

Moderator:

Jonathan Gertler, Managing Partner and CEO, Back Bay Life Sciences Advisors

Science Track: New Approaches to Treatments for Neurological Disease

Panelists:

Zaven Kaprielian, Director of Neuroscience Research, Amgen
Jeffrey Nye, Vice President Neuroscience Innovation and Scientific Partnership Strategy, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Johnson and Johnson Innovation
Mark Perrin, CEO, InVivo Therapeutics

Moderator:

Dennis Selkoe, Co-Director, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital at the Harvard Institutes of Medicine

10:45 am – 11:00 am Coffee Break

11:00 am – 12:00 pm Conference Wide Panel: Value Cost Effectiveness: Implications of the Changing Landscape in Reimbursement and Regulations

Panelists:

Chris Coburn, Vice President, Innovation, Partners HealthCare
Geoff MacKay,President & CEO, Organogenesis
Christina Severin, President & CEO, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization

12:00 pm – 12:30pm Remarks by FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg

Introduction by Senator Elizabeth Warren

12:30 pm – 12:45 pm Lunch is Served

12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Closing Keynote: Flemming Ornskov, CEO of Shire

1:30 pm – 2:00 pm Dessert Buffet in the Ballroom Foyer

 SOURCE

http://www.massbio.org/events/calendar/2302-massbio_annual_meeting_2014/event_detail/544

Part Two:

Conference Content Acquisition in REALTIME

• Content: Spoken Words – IP of the Speakers

• Electronic Recording of the Curation of the Spoken Words – IP of Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence

TODAY – 9:30 am – 10:15 am Opening Keynote: Brad Margus, CEO of Genome Bridge – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/03/today-930-am-1015-am-opening-keynote-brad-margus-ceo-of-genome-bridge-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

TODAY – 10:30 am – 11:30 am Business Track: The Image Problem of the BioPharma Industry – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/03/today-1030-am-1130-am-business-track-the-image-problem-of-the-biopharma-industry-bridge-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

TODAY – 11:45 am – 1:30 pm Awards Luncheon – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/03/today-1145-am-130-pm-awards-luncheon-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

TODAY –1:30 pm –2:15 pm Conference Wide Panel: Impact 2020 Overview – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/03/today-130-pm-215-pm-conference-wide-panel-impact-2020-overview-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

TODAY – 2:15 pm –3:15 pm Science Track: Challenges to Managing Big Data – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/03/today-215-pm-315-pm-science-track-challenges-to-managing-big-data-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

TODAY – 3:30 pm –4:30 pm Business Track: Winning Strategies in Business and Corporate Development: What are They and How Can We Learn From Them? – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/03/today-330-pm-430-pm-business-track-winning-strategies-in-business-and-corporate-development-what-are-they-and-how-can-we-learn-from-them-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-so/

 

Friday, April 4 8:30 am – 9:30 am Science Track: Mobile Technology and 3D Printing: Technologies Gaining Traction in Biotech and Pharma – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/04/friday-april-4-830-am-930-am-science-track-mobile-technology-and-3d-printing-technologies-gaining-traction-in-biotech-and-pharma-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

Friday, April 4 9:45 am – 10:45 am Business Track: Converging Relationships Among Biotech, Pharma, Investors, and Academia- MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/04/friday-april-4-945-am-1045-am-business-track-converging-relationships-among-biotech-pharma-investors-and-academia-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

Friday, 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Conference Wide Panel: Value Cost Effectiveness: Implications of the Changing Landscape in Reimbursement and Regulations – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/04/friday-1100-am-1200-pm-conference-wide-panel-value-cost-effectiveness-implications-of-the-changing-landscape-in-reimbursement-and-regulations-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta/

 

Friday, April 4, 12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Closing Keynote: Flemming Ornskov, CEO of Shire – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/04/04/friday-april-4-1245-pm-130-pm-closing-keynote-flemming-ornskov-ceo-of-shire-massbio-annual-meeting-2014-royal-sonesta-hotel-cambridge-ma/

 

 

Part Three:

Social Media in Use of Information Dissemination

3.1 Our Tweets

• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

• Friday, April 4, 12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Closing Keynote: Flemming Ornskov, CEO of Shire – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, R…http://lnkd.in/dkEpNJm 

 

• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4, 12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Closing Keynote: Flemming Ornskov, CEO of Shire – MassBio… http://fb.me/2NahP8tfv 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4, 12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Closing Keynote: Flemming Ornskov, CEO of Shire – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014,… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5FK 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Conference Wide Panel: Value Cost Effectiveness: Implications of the Changing Landscape i…http://lnkd.in/dbR2Q23 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Conference Wide Panel: Value Cost Effectiveness: Implications of the… http://fb.me/6Iut9RIr7 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Conference Wide Panel: Value Cost Effectiveness: Implications of the Changing Landscape… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5FC 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4 9:45 am – 10:45 am Business Track: Converging Relationships Among Biotech, Pharma, Investors, and Ac…http://lnkd.in/dWm8Vd7 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4 9:45 am – 10:45 am Business Track: Converging Relationships Among Biotech,… http://fb.me/2A24u7vds 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4 9:45 am – 10:45 am Business Track: Converging Relationships Among Biotech, Pharma, Investors, and… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5Ft 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4 8:30 am- 9:30 am Science Track: Mobile Technology and 3D Printing: Technologies Gaining Traction in …http://lnkd.in/d87iquJ 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4 8:30 am- 9:30 am Science Track: Mobile Technology and 3D Printing: Technologies… http://fb.me/1iupazGjg 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  Friday, April 4 8:30 am- 9:30 am Science Track: Mobile Technology and 3D Printing: Technologies Gaining Traction in… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5Fp 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  7 Ways To Boost Your Creativity http://fb.me/3h4PiHQVH 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 4

  US patent office stops Google trademarking ‘Glass’ http://lnkd.in/d_FUTTk 

   
•  Retweeted by @pharma_BI

  Genentech ‏@genentech  Apr 3

  Our scientists dev clinically-relevant mouse model to test spontaneous metastatic lesions in CRC | @NatureComms http://ow.ly/vmJm1 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 3:30 pm –4:30 pm Business Track: Winning Strategies in Business and Corporate Development: What are They and…http://lnkd.in/dwYTdn6 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 3:30 pm –4:30 pm Business Track: Winning Strategies in Business and Corporate… http://fb.me/3lyo10zgN 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 3:30 pm –4:30 pm Business Track: Winning Strategies in Business and Corporate Development: What are They… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5Fh 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 2:15 pm –3:15 pm Science Track: Challenges to Managing Big Data – MassBio Annual Meeting 20… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5Ff  via @Pharma_BI

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 2:15 pm –3:15 pm Science Track: Challenges to Managing Big Data – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta…http://lnkd.in/dVVVs8g 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 2:15 pm –3:15 pm Science Track: Challenges to Managing Big Data – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5Ff 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY –1:30 pm –2:15 pm Conference Wide Panel: Impact 2020 Overview – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hot…http://lnkd.in/dCeTerz 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY –1:30 pm –2:15 pm Conference Wide Panel: Impact 2020 Overview – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, … http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5F9  via @Pharma_BI

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY –1:30 pm –2:15 pm Conference Wide Panel: Impact 2020 Overview – MassBio Annual Meeting… http://fb.me/D1sZ0ABP 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY –1:30 pm –2:15 pm Conference Wide Panel: Impact 2020 Overview – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5F9 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 11:45 am – 1:30 pm Awards Luncheon – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA

• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 11:45 am – 1:30 pm Awards Luncheon – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel,…

• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 11:45 am – 1:30 pm Awards Luncheon – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5F7 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 10:30 am – 11:30 am Business Track: The Image Problem of the BioPharma Industry – Bridge – MassBio Annual Me…http://lnkd.in/dp4w2yT 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 10:30 am – 11:30 am Business Track: The Image Problem of the BioPharma Industry – Bridge… http://fb.me/6w43w6q3T 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 10:30 am – 11:30 am Business Track: The Image Problem of the BioPharma Industry – Bridge – MassBio Annual… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5F0 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 9:30 am – 10:15 am Opening Keynote: Brad Margus, CEO of Genome Bridge – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal S…http://lnkd.in/d-wKpbS 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 9:30 am – 10:15 am Opening Keynote: Brad Margus, CEO of Genome Bridge – MassBio Annual… http://fb.me/2zBbAscQc 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  TODAY – 9:30 am – 10:15 am Opening Keynote: Brad Margus, CEO of Genome Bridge – MassBio Annual Meeting 2014, Royal… http://wp.me/p2kEDv-5EY 

   
• @pharma_BI ‏@Pharma_BI  Apr 3

  2014 MassBio Annual Meeting 4/3 – 4/4 2014, Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA http://fb.me/6qpvQBHER 

   

3.2 REALTIME Posting to 53 LinkedIn BioTech Groups

• 

  Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence

  • 3 Discussions
• 

  Boston Healthcare Professionals

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  Cal Alumni Association | UC Berkeley

  • 2 Discussions
• 

  Cardiovascular Biotech & Pharma UK & US Networking Group

  • 105 Items to moderate
  • 40 Requests to join

• 

  Advanced Scientific Communities (TM)

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  American Society of Human Genetics – ASHG

  • 4 Discussions
• 

  Biotech Investment Group

  • 5 Discussions
• 

  California Biotech

  • 3 Discussions
• 

  Cancer Research

• 

  Cancer Sequencing

  • Top Contributor
• 

  Cardiology

  SUBGROUP

• 

  Cardiovascular Medical Devices Group

  • 6 Discussions
• 

  Cardiovascular Surgery

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  Cell & Gene Therapy Investment – Regenerative Medicine

  SUBGROUP

• 

  Clinical Metabonomics

• 

  Comparative Genomics

• 

  Connect: Professional Women’s Network, Powered by Citi

  OFFICIAL

  • 4 Discussions
  • 17 Jobs
• 

  Cornell University Alumni Network

  • 4 Discussions
• 

  East Coast Medical Science Liaisons and Medical Affairs

• 

  Endovascular Interventions

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  European Cardiovascular Medical Devices Group

  SUBGROUP

• 

  Genes Chromosomes and Cancer

• 

  Genomics: Next Generation DNA Sequencing (NGS) and Microarray

  • 1 Job
• 

  Golden Triangle Biotech – Oxford London Cambridge

  • 4 Discussions
• 

  Healthcare & Life Sciences

  • 4 Discussions
  • 1 Job
• 

  Innovation in Israel

• 

  Innovations in Cardiology

  SUBGROUP

  • 2 Discussions
• 

  Innovations In Health

  • 5 Discussions
  • 2 Jobs
• 

  Innovations in Pharmacogenetics

• 

  Israel Bio Professionals

• 

  Israel Medical Device Group

  • 2 Discussions
  • 6 Jobs
• 

  Jewish Pharma & Biotech Professionals

• 

  Life Science Professionals

  • 2 Discussions
  • 1 Job
• 

  LIFE SCIENCES at FRANCE ISRAEL Chamber of Commerce

• 

  Life Sciences Israel TM 2015 Conference – Partnering Event of the Year

• 

  LifeSciences▫Pharma▫Healthcare▫ Innovation & Integration: Professional Network

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  MassBio

  • 3 Discussions
• 

  Medical Device Opportunity

  • 14 Discussions
  • 7 Jobs
• 

  Medical Devices and FDA

  • 1 Job
• 

  Medical Devices Startups

  • 1 Job
• 

  MedicExchange

• 

  MIT Enterprise Forum of Cambridge

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  myBIO Community – Biotechnology connections

  • 2 Discussions
• 

  Pharma BD Professionals

• 

  Pharmaceutical / Biotech / Medical Devices: News, Career Management & Jobs

  • 2 Discussions
  • 1 Job
• 

  Pharmacogenomics

• 

  Pharmacology and Physiology

• 

  Pharmacology Professionals

  • 2 Discussions
• 

  Professionals in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industry

  • 17 Discussions
  • 1 Job
• 

  Romanian American Biomedical Association

• 

  TechAviv

  • 9 Discussions
  • 4 Jobs
• 

  The Life Science Executive Exchange, sponsored by BioInformatics LLC

  • 1 Discussion
• 

  יזמות ויזמים בישראל – Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurs in Israel

3.3 FaceBook Coverage of the Event

https://www.facebook.com/LeadersInPharmaceuticalBusinessIntelligence

3.4 Our Open Access Online Scientific Journal

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

Scientific Journal Site Statistics
Date |Views to Date |# of articles |NIH Clicks |Nature Clicks0

7/29/2013   217,356 1,138 1,389 705

12/01/2013   287,645 1,428 1,676 828

02/09/2014   325,039 1,665 1,793 892

03/05/2014   338,958 1,717 1,830 965

03/21/2014   347,667 1,750 1,838 974

03/31/2014  352,683 1,768 1,869 991

04/07/2014  356,059 1,784 1,869 1,014

 

3.5  GENOMICS related articles in the JOURNAL

• Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics – 134 articles
• Genomic Endocrinology, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Genomics – 55 articles
• Nutrigenomics – 43 articles
• Pharmacogenomics – 88 articles
• Genomic Testing: Methodology for Diagnosis – 241 articles
• Personalized Medicine & Genomic Research – 390 articles
• Genome Biology – 421 articles

 

 

3.6 e-Books on Genomics

Series B: Frontiers in Genomics Research

Content Consultant: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

Genomics Orientations for Individualized Medicine

Volume One

Image Collage by SJ WIlliams, PhD, Google Images in Assembly

Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Senior Editor

Triplex Medical Science, Trumbull, CT

Larry.bernstein@gmail.com

and
Stephen J. Williams, PhD, Editor

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence, Philadelphia

sjwilliamspa@comcast.net

and

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN, Editor

Editor-in-Chief BioMed E-Book Series

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence, Boston

avivalev-ari@alum.berkeley.edu

Volume Two:
Genomics Methodologies: NGS, BioInformatics & Simulations and the Genome Ontology

2015

Volume Three:
Five Leading Genomics Research Centers in the US

2015

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

Human Longevity Inc (HLI) – $70M in Financing of Venter’s New Integrative Omics and Clinical Bioinformatics

Posted in Biological Networks, Gene Regulation and Evolution, Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics, Biomedical Measurement Science, Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics, Chemical Genetics, Competition in regenerative stem cell science, Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics, Curation, Genome Biology, Genomic Testing: Methodology for Diagnosis, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Interviews with Scientific Leaders, Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research, Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Pharmacogenomics, Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Proteomics, Regenerative Biology and Medicine, Reproductive Andrology, Embryology, Genomic Endocrinology, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Genomics, Scientist: Career considerations, Statistical Methods for Research Evaluation, Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine, Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical, Translational Effectiveness, Translational Research, Translational Science on March 5, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Human Longevity Inc (HLI) – $70M in Financing of Venter’s New Integrative Omics and Clinical Bioinformatics

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #121: Human Longevity Inc (HLI) – $70M in Financing of Venter’s New Integrative Omics and Clinical Bioinformatics. Published on 3/5/14

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

Venter’s New Integrative Omics and Clinical Data Analysis Firm Lands $70M in Financing

March 04, 2014

By a GenomeWeb staff reporter

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – J. Craig Venter today unveiled a new company called Human Longevity Inc. that will combine human genome, microbiome, and metabolome data coupled with clinical information to fuel development of new diagnostics, therapeutics, and stem cell treatments for diseases related to aging.

In a media briefing today, Venter said the company will “change the way medicine is practiced,” and will spearhead “a shift to a more preventive, genomic-based medicine model” that can lead to longer, healthier lives and lower healthcare costs.

Using $70 million in Series A financing, HLI initially plans to conduct genome, microbiome, and tumor sequencing on patients from the University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center and use their clinical phenotype and metabolomics data to create a massive database, Venter explained in a media briefing. HLI said the financing came from a small group of private investors. Though it didn’t disclose the names of those investors, The New York Times reported today that Illumina was among the backers.

Venter said the initial financing should keep the company going for about 18 months. HLI is building a long-term facility in San Diego that will be completed in about a year, Venter said, and it is currently in temporary facilities.

The firm plans to license data and knowledge to pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms and universities for their own research programs, while developing new therapeutics and diagnostics and providing sequencing services.

The company has already bought two Illumina HiSeq X Ten Sequencing Systems, and has inked an option to buy three more. It plans to sequence up to 40,000 human genomes per year initially and ramp up to 100,000 per year. HLI said it will conduct the first clinical project to include germ line, human genome, and tumor genome sequencing, along with a range of other types of information from each patient.

As part of its efforts, HLI has struck an agreement with Metabolon, under which the NC-based firm will provide biochemical profiling of the genomic samples that HLI collects.

Venter is co-founder, executive chairman and CEO of HLI, which also has agreed to a research services collaboration with the J. Craig Venter Institute, of which he is founder and CEO. That alliance will cover proteomics, infectious disease diagnostics, and the human microbiome.

The company said that it will tackle cancer first. Every patient at the UCSD Moores Cancer Center will have the opportunity to have their genome, microbiome, and tumors sequenced and analyzed as part of their treatment, said Venter. Other diseases of interest include diabetes, obesity, heart and liver diseases, and dementia.

Venter noted that 13 years ago it cost around $100 million and took nine months to sequence his genome, but now that cost has dropped to around $1,000 per genome.

“We are scaling up to do tens of thousands of genomes in the same time frame that it took to do one,” he said.

Through its agreement with HLI, Metabolon will characterize 2,400 chemicals in the bloodstream of 10,000 of the initial patients.

Venter said HLI plans to try to layer “the chemical data with the microbiome data, the human genome data, and most importantly the human phenotype data. We will be importing clinical records of every individual we are sequencing, so this will be one of the largest data studies in the history of science and medicine.”

“Hopefully,” Venter said, within 10 years HLI will “have data from half a million to a million human genomes, and the phenotype data, clinical data, and outcome data associated with that.”

“I view this as just the beginning, a starting point of this new field that some of us have been waiting for for a very long time, following on the first human genome 13 years ago,” he said.

Among Venter’s ventures is Synthetic Genomics, a genomics and synthetic biology firm of which he is a co-founder, chairman, CEO, and co-CSO. Though HLI didn’t say specifically that it would collaborate with Synthetic Genomics, according to a FAQ sheet on its website, it plans to use “synthetic biology advances to repair and repopulate a patient’s depleted and degraded stem cell population, returning those cells to a more healthy and youthful state.”

In addition to Venter, HLI’s two other co-founders are Peter Diamandis, chairman and CEO of the X Prize Foundation and co-founder and executive chairman of Singularity University, and stem cell biology researcher and entrepreneur Robert Hariri, who also will serve as company vice chairman.

SOURCE

http://www.genomeweb.com//node/1357581?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Venter’s%20New%20Firm;%20White%20House’s%20NIH%20Budget%20Proposal;%20CDx%20Licensing%20Deal;%20$3M%20Gift%20for%20Autism;%20More%20-%2003/04/2014%2004:15:00%20PM

Other articles published on this Open Access Online Scientific Journal include the following:

J Craig Venter wants to digitize DNA and transmit the signal to teleport organisms

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/11/01/j-craig-venter-wants-to-digitize-dna-and-transmit-the-signal-to-teleport-organisms/

Life Sciences Circle Event: Next omics – Personalized Medicine beyond Genomics, December 11, 2013 5:30-8:30PM, The Broad Institute, Cambridge

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/11/18/life-sciences-circle-event-next-omics-personalized-medicine-beyond-genomics-december-11-2013-530-830pm-the-broad-institute-cambridge/

2013 Genomics: The Era Beyond the Sequencing of the Human Genome: Francis Collins, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, et al.

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/02/11/2013-genomics-the-era-beyond-the-sequencing-human-genome-francis-collins-craig-venter-eric-lander-et-al/

Synthetic Biology: On Advanced Genome Interpretation for Gene Variants and Pathways: What is the Genetic Base of Atherosclerosis and Loss of Arterial Elasticity with Aging

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/05/17/synthetic-biology-on-advanced-genome-interpretation-for-gene-variants-and-pathways-what-is-the-genetic-base-of-atherosclerosis-and-loss-of-arterial-elasticity-with-aging/

Scientific Innovation: as Influenced by Academia, Publishing Requirements and the Academic Publishing Industry

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/03/05/scientific-innovation-as-influenced-by-academia-publishing-requirements-and-the-academic-publishing-industry/

Fourth Annual QPrize Competition to Fund the World’s Next Groundbreaking Startups by Qualcomm Ventures

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/02/09/fourth-annual-qprize-competition-to-fund-the-worlds-next-groundbreaking-startups-by-qualcomm-ventures/

Cancer Genomics – Leading the Way by Cancer Genomics Program at UC Santa Cruz

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/29/cancer-genomics-leading-the-way-by-cancer-genomics-program-at-uc-santa-cruz/

Research Paradigm Shift in Human Genomics – Predictive Biomarkers and Personalized Medicine

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/01/13/paradigm-shift-in-human-genomics-predictive-biomarkers-and-personalized-medicine-part-1/

LEADERS in the Competitive Space of Genome Sequencing of Genetic Mutations for Therapeutic Drug Selection in Cancer Personalized Treatment

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/01/13/leaders-in-genome-sequencing-of-genetic-mutations-for-therapeutic-drug-selection-in-cancer-personalized-treatment-part-2/

Personalized Medicine: An Institute Profile – Coriell Institute for Medical Research

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/01/13/personalized-medicine-an-institute-profile-coriell-institute-for-medical-research-part-3/

The Consumer Market for Personal DNA Sequencing

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/01/13/consumer-market-for-personal-dna-sequencing-part-4/

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

The 10 Most Innovative Companies In America: This story appeared in the September 2, 2013 issue of Forbes.

Posted in Drug Delivery Platform Technology, Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Interviews with Scientific Leaders on February 26, 2014| Leave a Comment »

The 10 Most Innovative Companies In America: This story appeared in the September 2, 2013 issue of Forbes.

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #117: The 10 Most Innovative Companies In America: This story appeared in the September 2, 2013 issue of Forbes. Published on 2/26/2014

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

Matthew Herper, Forbes Staff

FORBES

8/14/2013 @ 9:00AM |98,902 views

On page three of the following article

How Two Guys From Queens Are Changing Drug Discovery

1.  Salesforce.com

2.  Alexion Pharmaceuticals (US)

3.  VMware (U.S.)

4.  Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (US)

5.  Amazon.com (US)

6.  Intuitive Surgical (US)

7.  Natura Cosmeticos (Brazil)

8.  Cerner (US)

9.  Estee Lauder Cos (US)

10. FMC Technologies (US)

SOURCE

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mkg45llkk/10-fmc-technologies-u-s/

Matthew Herper, Forbes Staff

FORBES

Regeneron Chief Leonard Schleifer Becomes A Billionaire After 25 Year Search For New Drugs

See Comments by Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN in above LINK, scroll down to COMMENTS

click on “Expand All Comments” please consider to add a REPLY

SOURCE

http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2014/02/25/regeneron-chief-leonard-schleifer-becomes-a-billionaire-after-25-year-search-for-new-drugs/2/

Share this:

• X
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Print
• Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

• Follow Blog via Email

  Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  Email Address

  Follow

  Join 2,041 other subscribers

• Recent Posts

  • FDA Moves Forward With Its Guidance Framework for Rare Disease Trials: 2026 August 3, 2026
  • Artificial Intelligence TRANSFORMS Medicine, Biotech and Healthcare, How? August 3, 2026
  • In Memoriam: Nobel Laureate J. Michael Bishop for discovery of Retroviral Oncogenes July 31, 2026
  • Companies Actively Engaging Artificial Intellegence for Drug Design: 2026 July 31, 2026
  • AI-Native Drug Discovery Landscape 2026 – How LPBI Group Differentiates in the New Era of Foundation Models July 19, 2026
  • In Memoriam: In Remembrance of Cancer Researchers who passed in 2026 July 13, 2026
  • Urgent Request for Action on Proposed Rule Affecting Federal Funding Grant Review July 7, 2026
  • 2026 Tang Prize in Biopharmaceutical Science Awarded to Three Pioneers of Cellular Immunotherapy Revolutionizing Treatments for Blood Cancers and Solid Tumors July 5, 2026
  • Protected: KOL on Competitive Dynamics: LPBI Group’s Founder’s Radar Screens on AI-in-Health, Life Sciences & BioPharma June 15, 2026
  • Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) as a first of kind FDA approved immunotherapy for cancer June 12, 2026

• Archives

  Archives Select Month August 2026  (2) July 2026  (6) June 2026  (4) May 2026  (1) January 2026  (10) December 2025  (8) November 2025  (8) October 2025  (12) September 2025  (2) July 2025  (4) June 2025  (8) May 2025  (4) April 2025  (2) March 2025  (1) February 2025  (2) January 2025  (3) December 2024  (1) November 2024  (5) October 2024  (7) September 2024  (7) August 2024  (1) June 2024  (1) May 2024  (2) April 2024  (2) January 2024  (1) November 2023  (1) October 2023  (3) September 2023  (3) August 2023  (2) July 2023  (2) June 2023  (7) May 2023  (4) April 2023  (2) March 2023  (5) February 2023  (2) January 2023  (3) December 2022  (2) October 2022  (6) September 2022  (2) August 2022  (1) July 2022  (3) June 2022  (3) May 2022  (8) April 2022  (10) March 2022  (7) February 2022  (7) January 2022  (3) December 2021  (3) November 2021  (4) October 2021  (11) September 2021  (5) August 2021  (8) July 2021  (21) June 2021  (8) May 2021  (10) April 2021  (8) March 2021  (15) February 2021  (17) January 2021  (20) December 2020  (10) November 2020  (12) October 2020  (26) September 2020  (17) August 2020  (22) July 2020  (27) June 2020  (33) May 2020  (26) April 2020  (42) March 2020  (22) February 2020  (11) January 2020  (7) December 2019  (20) November 2019  (13) October 2019  (11) September 2019  (3) August 2019  (8) July 2019  (25) June 2019  (47) May 2019  (40) April 2019  (27) March 2019  (29) February 2019  (17) January 2019  (50) December 2018  (14) November 2018  (17) October 2018  (18) September 2018  (17) August 2018  (8) July 2018  (20) June 2018  (22) May 2018  (17) April 2018  (12) March 2018  (20) February 2018  (26) January 2018  (16) December 2017  (6) November 2017  (20) October 2017  (13) September 2017  (16) August 2017  (16) July 2017  (19) June 2017  (20) May 2017  (32) April 2017  (21) March 2017  (10) February 2017  (24) January 2017  (21) December 2016  (43) November 2016  (8) October 2016  (40) September 2016  (67) August 2016  (59) July 2016  (75) June 2016  (37) May 2016  (95) April 2016  (152) March 2016  (175) February 2016  (196) January 2016  (139) December 2015  (90) November 2015  (287) October 2015  (237) September 2015  (115) August 2015  (96) July 2015  (63) June 2015  (44) May 2015  (53) April 2015  (76) March 2015  (95) February 2015  (83) January 2015  (75) December 2014  (75) November 2014  (88) October 2014  (135) September 2014  (117) August 2014  (88) July 2014  (88) June 2014  (109) May 2014  (60) April 2014  (85) March 2014  (58) February 2014  (72) January 2014  (107) December 2013  (104) November 2013  (136) October 2013  (62) September 2013  (32) August 2013  (46) July 2013  (74) June 2013  (110) May 2013  (112) April 2013  (86) March 2013  (92) February 2013  (63) January 2013  (63) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (71) October 2012  (84) September 2012  (82) August 2012  (122) July 2012  (59) June 2012  (34) May 2012  (46) April 2012  (2)

• Categories

  Categories Select Category 3D Printing for Medical Application  (239)    3D Plotting Scaffolds  (44)    BioInks  (34)       Biopolymer Blend Open Porous  (18)       Dental Applications  (10)    BioPrinting in Regenerative Medicine  (77)       Cell Level  (16)       MicroEngineering Cell-Tissue & Systems  (31)       Tissue Engineering  (37)    Cardiovascular and Vascular Systems  (30)       Artificial Vascular Structures  (9)       Cardiovascular Tissue  (8)    Drug Development using MultiOrgan Chip  (11)    Drug Development/Formulation using 3D Printing  (10)    MEMS  (16)       Bio-MEMS  (12)    Organ-on-a-Chip  (11)    Programmable Sensors (Carbon Nano Tubes)  (5) 3rd Party IP: Drug DIscovery  (1) 4D Printing and Meta Materials  (10) Academic Publishing  (223)    Key Opinion Leaders in eScientific Publishing – Interviews with  (8) Advanced Drug Manufacturing Technology  (96)    Antimalarial Preparation  (8)    Autologous Cell Therapy  (14)    Automated Cell Processing  (13) Allergy and Infectious Diseases  (12) Alzheimer’s Disease  (163)    Etiology  (77)    Medical Device Therapies for Altzheimer’s Disease  (15)    Pharmacotherapy and Cell Activity  (51) Anticancer Resistance  (31) Art Exhibits on the Human Condition  (1) Art Inspires Science  (4) Article Type  (2)    Authored  (1)    Curated  (2)    Scientific report  (1) Artificial Heart  (2) Artificial Intelligence – General  (239)    An executive’s guide to AI  (11)    Artificial Intelligence – Breakthroughs in Theories and Technologies  (119)    Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care  (130)       Artificial Intelligence in CANCER  (42)       Artificial Intelligence in Health Care – Tools & Innovations  (77)    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine – Application for Diagnosis  (72)       Artificial intelligence applications for cardiology  (33)          AI-assisted Cardiac MRI  (10)       Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry  (7)       Deep Learning in Pathology  (19)    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine – Applications in Therapeutics  (71)    ChatGPT, GPT-4  (7)       ChatGPT at LPBI Group  (3)       ChatGPT in Academic Education  (3)    Machine Learning  (73)       Deep Learning  (26)       Natural Language Processing (NLP)  (45)    Machine learning in predicting type 2 diabetes  (6) Auditory and vision  (13) Autism Spectrum Disorders  (10) Autoimmune Inflammatory DIseases  (24)    Crohn’s disease  (5)    Tolerance-inducing Autoimmune Disease Therapeutics  (6)    Ulcerative Colitis  (3) Autophagosome  (4) Bacterial Resistance  (25) Behavior  (26) Behavioral Genetics  (21) Big Data  (88)    Intelligent Information Systems  (51) Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research  (368)    Analytical Instruments Industry  (5)    Microfuidics  (8) Bio-Ethics  (16) BioBanking  (36) Biodegradable Drug-eluting Material  (8) Bioengineering & reverse engineering design  (43) BioIT: BioInformatics  (147) BioIT: BioInformatics, NGS, Clinical & Translational, Pharmaceutical R&D Informatics, Clinical Genomics, Cancer Informatics  (135)    Advanced Computing Platform  (32)       Blockchain Transactions System  (6)          Platform for Content Monetization embedded Content Promotion  (1)    Pancreatic adenocarcinoma classifier  (4)    Simulation Modeling in NGS  (5) Biological Engineering  (43) Biological Networks  (193) Biological Networks, Gene Regulation and Evolution  (479)    Virology  (10) Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics  (571)    VOC – Volatile Organic Compounds as BioMarkers  (2) Biomedical Measurement Science  (173) BioSimilars  (112) BioTechnology – Venture Creation  (133)    Foundations for supporting Science and Education  (14)    Philanthropy to Academic Institution  (3) BioTechnology – Venture Creation, Venture Capital  (110)    Seeking Talent  (3) BiVAD  (1) Blindness  (6) Bone Disease and Musculoskeletal Disease  (82) Brain Basis of Emotion  (5) Business Career Consideration  (1) Ca2+ triggered activation  (61) Calcium  (21) Calcium Signaling  (71) Calmodulin Kinase and Contraction  (36) Cancer – General  (186) Cancer and Current Therapeutics  (412)    interventional oncology  (49)       Breast Cancer – impalpable breast lesions  (20)       Prostate Cancer: Monitoring vs Treatment  (9) CANCER BIOLOGY & Innovations in Cancer Therapy  (1,127)    Anaerobic Glycolysis  (51)    Cachexia  (18)    Cancer Genomics  (85)       Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)  (27)          Liquid Biopsy Chip detects an array of metastatic cancer cell markers in blood  (17)             mRNA  (6)          MagSifter chip  (1)       KRAS Mutation  (9)       Li-fraumeni syndrome.  (4)       TP53 – Germline mutations  (9)    cancer metabolism  (28)    Funding Opportunities for Cancer Research  (13)    Genomic Expression  (150)    Glioblastoma  (7)    Hexokinase  (14)    Loss of function gene  (18)    Metabolic Immuno-Oncology  (21)    Metastasis Process  (15)    Methylation  (33)    Microbiome and Responses to Cancer Therapy  (10)    Monoclonal Immunotherapy  (29)    mtDNA  (13)    Oxidative phosphorylation  (56)    Pancreatic cancer  (10)    Pyruvate Kinase  (27)    The NCI Formulary  (1)    tumor microenvironment  (16)    Warburg effect  (50) Cancer Informatics  (104) Cancer Prevention: Research & Programs  (132) Cancer Screening  (108) Cancer Vaccines: Targeting Cancer Genes for Immunotherapy  (30)    Engineering Enhanced Cancer Vaccines  (3) cancer-general  (7) Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures  (328)    Aortic Valve: TAVR, TAVI vs Open Heart Surgery  (91)       Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch (PPM) in TAVI vs SAVR  (2)       TAVI vs Open Heart Surgery  (6)       Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement via the Transcarotid Access  (3)       Transcaval TAVR Procedure  (3)       Valve-in-Valve Procedure  (5)    Atrial Fibrilation (a-Fib), Cardiac Pacing and Arrhythmias  (18)    BackBeat’s Cardiac Neuromodulation Therapy (CNT) bioelectronic therapy  (1)    CABG  (47)    Cancer Surgery of the Heart  (10)    Cardiovascular Fluid Management: algorithms  (1)    Heart Transplant  (16)    Heart-Lung Transplant  (11)    Implantation  (3)    Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (LMCAD)  (3)    Mechanical Assist Devices: LVAD, RVAD, BiVAD, Artificial Heart  (22)    Mitral Valve: Repair and Replacement  (64)       TMVR – Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair  (5)    PCI  (108)       Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS)  (4)       Invasive FFR for PCI  (2)       Multivessel PCI FFR Guidance  (1)       Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention  (2)       Stent Retriever in endovascular thrombectomy  (3)    Peripheral Arterial Disease & Peripheral Vascular Surgery  (65)       Abdominal Aorta  (20)       Carotid Artery  (15)       Limb ischemia  (4)       Thoracic Aorta  (16)    Pulmonary Valve Replacement and Repair  (3)    Renal Denervation  (20)    Replacement  (1)    Robotically assisted Cardiothoracic Surgery  (2)    Tricuspid Valve Repair  (7)    Vena Caval Filters: Device for Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis  (2) Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics  (171) Cargo  (3) Cell Biology  (323) Cell Biology, Signaling & Cell Circuits  (672)    Apoptosis  (17)    Autophagy-Modulating Proteins  (6)    “Antibody–enzyme conjugates”  (6)    Cell Processing System in Cell Therapy Process Development  (27)    Endoplasmic reticulum  (3)    Enzymatic mechanism underlying the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)  (3)    Ubiquitin  (11) Cerebrovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases  (123)    Stroke  (9) Chemical Biology and its relations to Metabolic Disease  (464)    #BIGAxisSummit  (1)    Gut Microbiome and Obesity  (8) Chemical Genetics  (350) Child and Adolescent Psychiatry  (13) Childhood cancer  (17) Childhood malnutrition  (3) children  (4) Circulating Progenitor Cells  (27)    Bone marrow derived cells  (17)    Endothelial cells  (7)    Umbilical cord cells  (6) Clinical & Translational  (239) Clinical Diagnostics  (220)    Mass automation of plasma proteins  (13) Clinical Genomics  (144) Coagulation Therapy and Internal Bleeding  (83) Cognition  (47) Commercialization  (20) Components and IRB related issues  (4) Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics  (470)    Computational Histopathology  (3)    Meta-analysis of transcriptome data  (10) Conference Coverage with Social Media  (494)    MassBio  (3) coronavirus  (18) COVID-19  (20) CRISPR/Cas9 & Gene Editing  (192)    CRISPR alternative for editing genes without cutting  (14)       CAST – Alternative to CRISPR/Cas9  (3)       Transposon-encoded CRISPR–Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration  (4)    CRISPR applied to Human Germ Line  (13)       Gene Editing Impact on Longevity  (6) CT  (20) Cytokines  (21) Cytoskeleton  (85) Developmental biology  (107) Diabetes Mellitus  (146)    Artificial Pancreas for Type 2 Diabetes  (4)    Artificial Pancreas for Type1 Diabetes  (8)    Gestational diabetes  (5) Diagnostic Immunology  (61) Diagnostics and Lab Tests  (128)    Liquid Biopsy: Circulating Tumor Cells in Urine and Blood  (9) Digital HealthCare – biotech & internet joint ventures  (47) Disease Biology  (334) Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs  (488) DNA repair  (73)    Apoptosis  (13)    Autophagy  (13)    Cell death pathways  (19)    Proteolysis  (8)    Proteosome  (8) Drug Delivery Platform Technology  (159)    Drug Carrier Design  (21)       Medication Remote Compliance Monitoring  (3)    Exosomes: Natural Carriers for siRNA Delivery  (9) Drug Toxicity  (74) Ecosystems & Industrial Concentration in the Medical Device Sector  (172)    Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment  (128)    Exec Compensation in the Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment  (14)    Massachusetts Niche Suppliers and National Leaders  (20) Electronic Health Record  (10) Embryology  (24) Empathy  (6) Endocrine Diseases  (60) Enzyme Induction  (46)    ion-transporting enzyme  (2)    K + -ATPase.  (1)    Na +  (2) Epigenetics and Environmental Factors  (35) Ethics and Leadership  (10) Executive Compensation – Big Pharma  (3) Fat soluble vitamins  (4) FDA  (72) FDA Regulatory Affairs  (359)    FDA, CE Mark & Global Regulatory Affairs: process management and strategic planning – GCP, GLP, ISO 14155  (52)    ISO 10993 for Product Registration: FDA & CE Mark for Development of Medical Devices and Diagnostics  (30) Fetal Ultrasound  (2) Fiction and medicine  (5) Frontiers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disorders  (929)    Acute Myocardial Infarction  (63)       Cardiogenic Shock  (5)    Anemia in CVD Patients  (6)    Cardio-Oncology  (4)    Cardiomyopathy  (57)    Cardiovascular Research  (187)       Myocardial metabolism, Myocardial ischemia, myocardial perfusion, Myocardial adenine nucleotide metabolism  (64)       Pre-Clinical Animal Model Development  (23)    Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)  (20)    Cost of Inpatient Stay for Cardiovascular Diagnosis for Admission  (1)    Electrophysiology  (111)       Ablation Procedure vs Drug Therapy  (2)       Arrhythmia Detection with Machine Learning Algorithms  (7)       Cardiotoxic Risks of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors  (1)       Genomic Analysis of EKG Electrophysiology Genomics  (3)       implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and External Defibrillation  (1)       implantable pacemaker  (2)       Rare heart rhythm disorders and Long QT syndrome (LQTS)  (7)    Epigenetics and Cardiovascular Risks  (57)    Heart Failure (HF)  (51)       Acute coronary syndrome  (7)       congestive heart failure  (19)       Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy  (1)    Medical Devices R&D and Inventions  (212)       Assist Devices: LV  (3)       RV  (1)       Stents & Tools  (90)       Valves & Tools  (67)    Origins of Cardiovascular Disease  (422)       Atherogenic Processes & Pathology  (180)       Congenital Heart Disease  (34)          Genetic Mutations in Congenital Heart Disease  (4)       inflammation independent of lipid levels  (13)       Systemic Inflammatory Diseases as CVD Risk  (12)    Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease  (356)       HTN  (176)       HTN in Youth  (8)       Resident-cell-based  (43)       Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)  (1)       Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)  (1)    Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD)  (6)    Stroke  (15)       endovascular thrombectomy  (6)    Vascular Diseases  (21)       mesenteric ischemia  (3) Future Pandemics Inform-graphics  (1) Gastroenterology  (38) Gene Regulation  (233) Gene Regulation and Evolution  (137) Genetics & Innovations in Treatment  (176) Genetics & Pharmaceutical  (204) Genome Biology  (967)    Exosomes  (25)    Gene Therapy & Gene Editing Development  (42)    mRNA Therapeutics  (20)    Mutagenesis  (27)    Single Cell Genomics  (25)    Single-cell sequencing  (20)    Variation in human protein-coding regions  (35) Genomic Endocrinology  (42) Genomic Testing: Methodology for Diagnosis  (416) Genomics Pharmacy  (40) Global Market of Medical Devices Technology  (3) Global Medical Publishers by Country  (3) Global Partnering & Biotech Investment  (48) GLP  (4) Glycobiology: Biopharmaceutical Production  (16) Glycobiology: Biopharmaceutical Production, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics  (28) Health Care System by Country  (58)    AI Models in Healthcare  (12)    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services  (8)    Health in Israel  (2)    India  (1)    United States  (27)       Hospital-based Medical Innovations  (10)       Medical Recertification and Maintenance of Certification (MOC)  (1) Health Economics and Outcomes Research  (384)    Women Health  (18)       Heart and Brain Disease in Women  (3) Health Law & Patient Safety  (165)    and Bioethics  (14)    Biotechnology  (12)    Health Law Policy  (13) HealthCare IT  (139) Healthcare Reform  (118)    Accountable Care Organizations  (26)    Affordable Care Act  (29)       Repair  (1)       Repeal ACA  (1)       Replace  (1)    Federal Budget Appropriations  (27)    Healthcare costs and reimbursement  (59)    Indigent Nutrition  (14)    Medicare and Medicaid  (20)    Prescription Drugs Costs  (21)    Skilled Nursing Facilities  (6)    Technology Capital Expenses  (15)    Uninsured and Underinsured  (20) Hematology  (100)    Acute lymphocytic leukemia  (18)    Acute myelocytic leukemia  (21)    Hematopoiesis  (48)    Lymphoma  (21) History and physical exam  (6) Human aging  (27) Human Immune System in Health and in Disease  (246) Human Sensation and Cellular Transduction: Physiology and Therapeutics  (21) Image Processing/Computing  (41) Imaging-based Cancer Patient Management  (116) Immuno-Oncology & Genomics  (133)    mRNA platform in Drug DIscovery  (6) Immunodiagnostics  (141)    Cancer-Immune Interactions  (31)    CNS-Immune Interface  (5)    Neuronal Circuits  (4) Immunology  (123)    Adaptive Immune Response to Biomaterials and Tissue Repair  (13)    Antibody Responses Predict Antigen Exposure  (17)    Cytokine Receptor Structure  (8)    Human Antibody Response  (18)    Human Circulating Antibody Repertoire  (11)    Human Naive B Cell Repertoire  (8)    MHC Repertoires for Antigen Prediction  (8)    Protection Against Autoimmune Disease  (11)    Synthetic Immunology: Hacking Immune Cells  (15) Immunotherapy  (136)    CAR-T  (16)    combination immunotherapies.  (15)    Efficacy of Anti-Tumor T Cells  (15)    Engineering Better T Cells  (10)    Immune Engineering  (18)    Immune Modulatory  (16)    Integrin-targeted Combination Immunotherapy  (6)    Modulating Macrophages in Cancer Immunotherapy  (17)    NK Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy  (20)    Synergistic Innate and Adaptive Immunotherapy  (14) Income Disparity  (2) Infectious Disease & New Antibiotic Targets  (162)    Antibiotic resistance  (7)    Viral diseases  (37)       Myocarditis  (1) Infectious Disease Immunodiagnostics  (58)    Virology – Vector-borne DIsease  (17) Inflammasome  (29)    Anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (TNF inhibitors)  (3) Innovation in Immunology Diagnostics  (111)    Universal Immune Cell Therapies (uICT)  (11) Innovations  (186)    R&D Expenditure  (8) Innovations in Neurophysiology & Neuropsychology  (145)    Age and Life Expectancy  (3)    autism spectrum disorder  (1)    Circadian Rhythm and Sleep  (6)    hNPCs  (1)    Nervous System Function  (2)    Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis  (1) Intellectual Property  (85)    Disputes and Settlements  (9)    IP Valuation Models – Pricing Intangible Assets  (7)    Patent Law in Biotech  (12) Intellectual Property, Innovations, Commercialization, Investment in technological breakthrough  (121) International Global Work in Pharmaceutical  (191) Interventional Oncology: Radiofrequency Ablation, Transarterial Chemoembolization, Microwave Ablation and Irreversible Electroporation (IRE)  (12) Interviews with Scientific Leaders  (319)    Albany Medical Center Prize in Medicine and Biomedical Research  (3)    Annual Breakthrough Prize  (4)    Annual Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award  (2)    Awards in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine  (6)    CEOs of Biotech Companies  (3)    Gerald D Aurbach Award for Outstanding Translational Research  (2)    Interviews with Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs)  (11)    James Prize in Science and Technology Integration  (2)    Jessie Stevenson Kovalenko Medal – Medical Sciences  (2)    Lemelson-MIT Prize  (2)    Life Sciences Breakthrough Prize  (6)    Mosteller Statistician of the Year Award  (2)    Mourning the Loss of a Scientific Leader  (6)    National Academy of Sciences AWARDS  (4)    Nobel Prize Winners  (30)    Noble Prize (Not Nobel Prize)  (2)    Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research  (2)    Russ Prize recognizes bioengineering achievements worldwide  (2)    The Dan David Prize  (6)    Warren Alpert Foundation Prize Recipients  (4)    Wolf Prize  (2)    Wolf Prize in Medicine  (2)    women in science  (5) Investment in Technological Breakthrough  (60) Ionic Transporters Na+  (25) IP Development by LPBI Group Team  (14) IP Development by LPBI Group Team & Other Organizations  (8) ISO 14155  (3) Joint Venture – SBH & M3DP: SOP and Arrangements  (1) Justice & Law  (1) K  (15) Lab-on-a-chip  (2) Landscape  (1) Lasers and photonics  (18)    Midrange IR spectroscopy  (1) Law and Medicine Conflicts  (15) Leadership, Power, Social Interlocking Connections  (13) Lipid metabolism  (109)    Fatty acids  (38)    Lipids  (38)    PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy  (19) Lipidomics  (11) Liposome  (4) Liver & Digestive Diseases Research  (122) LPBI Group, e-Scientific Media, DFP, R&D-M3DP, R&D-Drug Discovery, US Patents: SOPs and Team Management  (143)    Award Nominations  (5)    BioMed e-Books e-Series by LPBI Group  (9)    Feedback from Investors: LPBI Portfolio of Five Businesses  (2)    LPBI Group Founder – Aviva Lev-Ari  (27)    PhD  (1)    RN  (1) LPBI Management  (23) Massachusetts Academy of Sciences (MAS)    (2) Materials Science & Engineering  (37)    Organic BioElectronics  (2) Math  (13)    Great Discoveries  (7) Mechanical Assist Devices: LVAD  (4) Medical and Population Genetics  (193) Medical Devices R&D Investment  (242)    21st Century Cures Act  (2)    CE Mark & Global Regulatory Affairs: process management and strategic planning – GCP  (14)    Rhythm management device hardware: dual-chamber pacemakers  (1)       Systolic HTN  (1) Medical Imaging Technology  (59) Medical Imaging Technology, Image Processing/Computing, MRI, CT, Nuclear Medicine, Ultra Sound  (164)    Circumferential-Intravascular-Radioluminescence-Photoacoustic-Imaging (CIRPI)  (3)    Echocardiography  (3)    MRI  (18)    Noninvasive Diagnostic Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) CT  (6)    Ultra Sound  (10) Melatonin & Circadian Regulation  (9) memory loss  (1) Metabolism  (239)    Biochemical pathways  (144)       Enzymes and isoenzymes  (73)          Dehydrogenase  (16)          Kinase  (28)          Phosphatase  (9)          Phosphorylase  (22)          tyrosine decarboxylases  (3)    Inosine nucleotides  (9)    Leloir pathway  (6)    microbiome  (7)    Pentose monophosphate shunt  (14)    Pyridine nucleotides  (28)       Pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase  (7) Metabolomics  (321) Methods  (37) Mg++  (10) Microbiologial genetics  (36) Microbiology  (68)    Virology  (14) Micronutrients  (16) Microvesicle  (7) Microwave Ablation and Irreversible Electroporation (IRE)  (1) Mobile Healthcare  (5) Molecular Genetics & Pharmaceutical  (377)    Organoids  (3) Monoclonal antibody therapy  (14) Mutant Gene Expression  (42) Myocardial adenine nucleotide metabolism  (6) Myocardial Ischemia  (26) Myocardial Metabolism  (36) Na-K transport  (40) Na-K-ATPase  (27) Nanotechnology for Drug Delivery  (99) Nephrology  (46) Nephrology & Regenerative medicine  (9) Neurodegenerative Diseases  (89)    hNPCs  (3)    MS  (5) Neurohumoral Transmission  (68)    Ca2+ triggered activation  (21)    Calmodulin  (13)    Parkinson’s disease dyskinesia levodopa  (3)    PKC  (13)    Synaptic vesicle  (20) Neurological Diseases  (121) Neuroscience  (126) Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)  (27)    Nanopore sequencing  (1) NIH Common Fund  (1) Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease  (136) Nuclear Medicine  (11) Nutrigenomics  (68) Nutrition  (195)    Nutritional Supplements: Atherogenesis, lipid metabolism  (50) Nutrition and Phytochemistry  (62)    Minerals in Medicine  (4)    Plant extract  (22) Nutrition Disorders  (31) Nutritional Supplements: Atherogenesis  (31) Obesity  (19) Oligonucleotide Therapeutics & Delivery  (7) Oncolytic virus & OncoViro-Therapy  (23)    Synthetic Virology  (1) Organ-on-a-Chip & 3D Printing in Life Sciences  (7) Pain: Etiology, Genetics & Innovations in Treatment  (24) Parasitology  (5)    Malaria  (4)    Tropical diseases  (1) Patents  (35) Patient Experience  (66)    Art therapy  (1)    Hospital reputation  (7)    Humor  (1)    Music therapy  (2)    Pain Alleviation  (7)    Patient Outlook  (28)    Reputation of Interventionist  (4)    Support Staff  (13)    Supportive therapies  (6)       laughfter  (1)    Surgical Procedure  (9) Patient Experience: Personal Memories of Invasive Medical Intervantion  (30) Patient’s Voice: Personal Experience with Invasive Medical Procedures  (18) Perioperative Statins at Noncardiac Surgery  (2) Personal Health Applications: Tech Innovations serves HealhCare  (43) Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research  (739)    Longevity  (3)    New Drug Approval  (6)    Patient-centered Medicine  (39)       cell-based therapy  (9)       stem cell biology and patient-specific  (7)    Personalized Medicine Coalition  (10)    Precision Cancer Medicine  (33) Phagophore  (2) Pharmaceutical Analytics  (261)    Pharmacologic toxicities  (62) Pharmaceutical Discovery  (111)    Rapid automation of plasma protein pools  (18) Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery  (206)    Drug Development Process  (61)       Drug Discovery Chemistry  (33)    drug repurposing  (11) Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence  (346)    Pharmacovigilance  (7)    Value-based Drug Pricing  (8) Pharmaceutical R&D Informatics  (45) Pharmaceutical R&D Investment  (301) Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics  (24) Pharmacogenomics  (161) Photography Collection  (1) Physics  (12) Placenta  (7) Population genetics  (27) Population Health Management  (205)    Evolution of Biology Through Culture  (14)    U.S. Employment-to-Population Ratio  (8) Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical  (643)    COVID-19  (157)       Biomarkers: Inflammation  (37)       Cancer Researchers Fighting COVID-19  (14)       COVID-19 effects on Human Heart  (15)       COVID-19: Pandemic Surgery Guidance  (19)       Economic Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic  (41)       number of asymptomatic infections  (27)       Treatment Protocols for COVID-19  (62)    SARS-CoV-2  (141)       Coronavirus Gene Expression  (66)          SARS-CoV-2 circulating variants   (14)          SARS-CoV-2 Viral Variants  (19)       Glycosylation and its Role in SARS-CoV-2 Viral Pathogenesis  (2)       Immune-Mediation (independent immunopathology: lung and reticuloendothelial system)  (30)       Mechanisms of infection by SARS-CoV-2  (21)       SAR-Cov-2 a vasculotropic (blood vessels) RNA Virus  (35)          SARS-COV2 Hijacking the Complement and Coagulation Systems  (19)       Seasonality & Environmental Factors in Resurgence  (26)       Serology tests for coronavirus antibodies  (44)       T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection  (14)       Vaccinology  (51)          Mechanism of Thrombosis with AZ & J&J COVID-19 Vaccines  (5)       Virtual Drug Molecule Screening targeting SAR-CoV-2 proteins  (8)    Virus Infective Acute Respiratory Syndrome: SARS-CoV  (92) Population Health Management, Nutrition and Phytochemistry  (162) Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Genomics  (13) Protein-energy malnutrition  (12) Proteomics  (367)    Amino acids  (54)    Proteins  (138) Pulmonary diseases  (16)    Lung and pulmonology  (15) Pulmonary pathology  (8) Radio Frequency (RF)-based Surgical Solutions  (2) REAL TIME Conference Coverage Twitter’s Hashtags and Handles per Presentation/session  (50) Regenerative Biology and Medicine  (92) Regulated Clinical Trials: Design, Methods, Components and IRB related issues  (265) Reproductive Andrology, Embryology, Genomic Endocrinology, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Genomics  (113) Reproductive Biology & Bio Instrumentation  (78) RNA Biology  (81)    RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic  (4) RNA Biology, Cancer and Therapeutics  (64) RVAD  (1) SBIR, SBA, NIH, NSF  (3) Schizophrenia  (16) Scientific & Biotech Conferences: Press Coverage  (182) Scientific Publishing  (609)    Curation  (585)       Curation methodology  (40)       De novo synthesis  (16)       Dialectic  (17)       Discovery process  (72)       Evolutionary cognition  (52)       Experimental validation  (91)       Explanatory  (91)       Historical relevance  (71)       Technology Advance Assessment of  (69)       Theoretic convergence  (27)    Open Access Journals  (37) Scientist: Career considerations  (198)    Big Data & Analytics  (17)    Data Science  (13)    Women in Life Sciences  (12) Scoop.it  (19) Sensors & Analytics  (18) Sepsis  (2) Severe Autism  (3) Signaling  (102)    Phosphorylation  (43)    S-nitrosylation  (13)    Ubiquitinylation  (34) Signaling & Cell Circuits  (130) single cell sequencing  (3) Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs  (71) Social Development  (15) Specialized 3D BioPrinters (Cornea  (1) Statistical Methods for Research Evaluation  (137) Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine  (177)    Cardiac muscle regeneration  (19)    Competition in regenerative stem cell science  (18)    Human neural progenitor cells  (8)    Skeletal muscle regeneration  (9) STORM  (2) Stress Disorders  (19) Substance Abuse  (4) Systemic Inflammatory Response Related Disorders  (161)    Inflammatory Pathophysiology  (9) Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical  (354) therapeutics  (3) Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine  (22) Tissue Microenvironment  (5) Transarterial Chemoembolization  (2) Transcriptomics  (47) Transformative Technologies in Healthcare  (23) Translational Science  (230)    Best evidence  (52)    Bias measurement tools  (2)    Evidence-based decision-making  (29)    Inferential analysis  (25)    Intra-rater error  (1)    Quality Assurance  (8)    Random Error  (2)    Systematic Error (Bias)  (6)    Total error  (2)    Translational Effectiveness  (49)    Translational Research  (92) Trends in Global Economy  (6) Uncategorized  (1,019) Unfolded Protein Response (UPR)  (6) US and Global Economy: Trends and Findings  (9) Venture Capital  (47)    Income Geographic Distribution  (3)    Institutional Capital Raised by Female Founders  (6) virology  (10) Vision  (7) Voices of Patients and Healthcare Providers  (22) Water Transporters  (8) Wearable Tech + Digital Health  (5) Anemia  (22) Neutropenia  (8) Neutrophilia  (9) Platelet count disorder  (9) Folate and B12  (7) Iron deficiency  (5) Myelodysplasia  (13) Myelofibrosis  (10)

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

• • 2012pharmaceutical
  • sjwilliamspa