Funding, Deals & Partnerships: BIOLOGICS & MEDICAL DEVICES; BioMed e-Series; Medicine and Life Sciences Scientific Journal – http://PharmaceuticalIntelligence.com
Biochemical Insights of Dr. Jose Eduardo de Salles Roselino
How is it that developments late in the 20th century diverted the attention of
biological processes from a dynamic construct involving interacting chemical
reactions under rapidly changing external conditions effecting tissues and cell
function to a rigid construct that is determined unilaterally by the genome
construct, diverting attention from mechanisms essential for seeing the complete
cellular construct?
Larry, I assume that in case you read the article titled Neo – Darwinism, The
Modern Synthesis and Selfish Genes that bares no relationship with Physiology
with Molecular Biology J. Physiol 2011; 589(5): 1007-11 by Denis Noble, you might
find that it was the key factor required in order to understand the dislodgment
of physiology as a foundation of medical reasoning. In the near unilateral emphasis
of genomic activity as a determinant of cellular activity all of the required general
support for the understanding of my reasoning. The DNA to protein link goes
from triplet sequence to amino acid sequence. That is the realm of genetics.
Further, protein conformation, activity and function requires that environmental
and micro-environmental factors should be considered (Biochemistry). If that
were not the case, we have no way to bridge the gap between the genetic
code and the evolution of cells, tissues, organs, and organisms.
Consider this example of hormonal function. I would like to stress in
the cAMP dependent hormonal response, the transfer of information
that occurs through conformation changes after protein interactions.
This mechanism therefore, requires that proteins must not have their
conformation determined by sequence alone.
Regulatory protein conformation is determined by its sequence plus
the interaction it has in its micro-environment. For instance, if your
scheme takes into account what happens inside the membrane and
that occurs before cAMP, then production is increased by hormone
action. A dynamic scheme will show an effect initially, over hormone
receptor (hormone binding causing change in its conformation) followed
by GTPase change in conformation caused by receptor interaction and
finally, Adenylate cyclase change in conformation and in activity after
GTPase protein binding in a complex system that is dependent on self-
assembly and also, on changes in their conformation in response to
hormonal signals (see R. A Kahn and A. G Gilman 1984 J. Biol. Chem.
v. 259,n 10 pp6235-6240. In this case, trimeric or dimeric G does not
matter). Furthermore, after the step of cAMP increased production we
also can see changes in protein conformation. The effect of increased
cAMP levels over (inhibitor protein and protein kinase protein complex)
also is an effect upon protein conformation. Increased cAMP levels led
to the separation of inhibitor protein (R ) from cAMP dependent protein
kinase (C ) causing removal of the inhibitor R and the increase in C activity.
R stands for regulatory subunit and C for catalytic subunit of the protein
complex.
This cAMP effect over the quaternary structure of the enzyme complex
(C protein kinase + R the inhibitor) may be better understood as an
environmental information producing an effect in opposition to
what may be considered as a tendency towards a conformation
“determined” by the genetic code. This “ideal” conformation
“determined” by the genome would be only seen in crystalline
protein. In carbohydrate metabolism in the liver the hormonal signal
causes a biochemical regulatory response that preserves homeostatic
levels of glucose (one function) and in the muscle, it is a biochemical
regulatory response that preserves intracellular levels of ATP (another
function).
Therefore, sequence alone does not explain conformation, activity
and function of regulatory proteins. If this important regulatory
mechanism was not ignored, the work of S. Prusiner (Prion diseases
and the BSE crisis Stanley B. Prusiner 1997 Science; 278: 245 – 251,
10 October) would be easily understood. We would be accustomed
to reason about changes in protein conformation caused by protein
interaction with other proteins, lipids, small molecules and even ions.
In case this wrong biochemical reasoning is used in microorganisms.
Still it is wrong but, it will cause a minor error most of the time, since
we may reduce almost all activity of microorganism´s proteins to a
single function – The production of another microorganism. However,
even microorganisms respond differently to their micro-environment
despite a single genome (See M. Rouxii dimorphic fungus works,
later). The reason for the reasoning error is, proteins are proteins
and DNA are DNA quite different in chemical terms. Proteins must
change their conformation to allow for fast regulatory responses and
DNA must preserve its sequence to allow for genetic inheritance.
In the imtroduction to this series of discussions I pointed out JEDS Rosalino’s observation about the construction of a complex molecule of acetyl coenzyme A, and the amount of genetic coding that had to go into it. Furthermore, he observes – Millions of years later, or as soon as, the information of interaction leading to activity and regulation could be found in RNA, proteins like reverse transcriptase move this information to a more stable form (DNA). In this way it is easier to understand the use of CoA to make two carbon molecules more reactive.
acetylCoA
In the tutorial that follows we find support for the view that mechanisms and examples from the current literature, which give insight into the developments in cell metabolism, are achieving a separation from inconsistent views introduced by the classical model of molecular biology and genomics, toward a more functional cellular dynamics that is not dependent on the classic view. The classical view fits a rigid framework that is to genomics and metabolomics as Mendelian genetics if to multidimentional, multifactorial genetics. The inherent difficulty lies in two places:
Interactions between differently weighted determinants
A large part of the genome is concerned with regulatory function, not expression of the code
The goal of the tutorial was to achieve an understanding of how cell signaling occurs in a cell. Completion of the tutorial would provide
a basic understanding signal transduction and
the role of phosphorylation in signal transduction.
Regulation of the integrity of endothelial cell–cell contacts by phosphorylation of VE-cadherin
In addition – detailed knowledge of –
the role of Tyrosine kinases and
G protein-coupled receptors in cell signaling.
serine
threonine
protein kinase
We are constantly receiving and interpreting signals from our environment, which can come
in the form of light, heat, odors, touch or sound.
The cells of our bodies are also
constantly receiving signals from other cells.
These signals are important to
keep cells alive and functioning as well as
to stimulate important events such as
cell division and differentiation.
Signals are most often chemicals that can be found
in the extracellular fluid around cells.
These chemicals can come
from distant locations in the body (endocrine signaling by hormones), from
nearby cells (paracrine signaling) or can even
be secreted by the same cell (autocrine signaling).
Signaling molecules may trigger any number of cellular responses, including
changing the metabolism of the cell receiving the signal or
result in a change in gene expression (transcription) within the nucleus of the cell or both.
controlling the output of ribosomes.
To which I would now add..
result in either an inhibitory or a stimulatory effect
The three stages of cell signaling are:
Cell signaling can be divided into 3 stages:
Reception: A cell detects a signaling molecule from the outside of the cell.
Transduction: When the signaling molecule binds the receptor it changes the receptor protein in some way. This change initiates the process of transduction. Signal transduction is usually a pathway of several steps. Each relay molecule in the signal transduction pathway changes the next molecule in the pathway.
Response: Finally, the signal triggers a specific cellular response.
Signal Transduction – ligand binds to surface receptor
Membrane receptors function by binding the signal molecule (ligand) and causing the production of a second signal (also known as a second messenger) that then causes a cellular response. These types of receptors transmit information from the extracellular environment to the inside of the cell.
by changing shape or
by joining with another protein
once a specific ligand binds to it.
Examples of membrane receptors include
G Protein-Coupled Receptors and
Understanding these receptors and identifying their ligands and the resulting signal transduction pathways represent a major conceptual advance.
Intracellular receptors are found inside the cell, either in the cytopolasm or in the nucleus of the target cell (the cell receiving the signal).
Note that though change in gene expression is stated, the change in gene expression does not here imply a change in the genetic information – such as – mutation. That does not have to be the case in the normal homeostatic case.
This point is the differentiating case between what JEDS Roselino has referred as
a fast, adaptive reaction, that is the feature of protein molecules, and distinguishes this interaction from
a one-to-one transcription of the genetic code.
The rate of transcription can be controlled, or it can be blocked. This is in large part in response to the metabolites in the immediate interstitium.
This might only be
a change in the rate of a transcription or a suppression of expression through RNA.
Or through a conformational change in an enzyme
Swinging domains in HECT E3 enzymes
Since signaling systems need to be
responsive to small concentrations of chemical signals and act quickly,
cells often use a multi-step pathway that transmits the signal quickly,
while amplifying the signal to numerous molecules at each step.
Signal transduction pathways are shown (simplified):
Signal Transduction
Signal transduction occurs when an
extracellular signaling molecule activates a specific receptor located on the cell surface or inside the cell.
In turn, this receptor triggers a biochemical chain of events inside the cell, creating a response.
Depending on the cell, the response alters the cell’s metabolism, shape, gene expression, or ability to divide.
The signal can be amplified at any step. Thus, one signaling molecule can cause many responses.
In 1970, Martin Rodbell examined the effects of glucagon on a rat’s liver cell membrane receptor. He noted that guanosine triphosphate disassociated glucagon from this receptor and stimulated the G-protein, which strongly influenced the cell’s metabolism. Thus, he deduced that the G-protein is a transducer that accepts glucagon molecules and affects the cell. For this, he shared the 1994 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Alfred G. Gilman.
Guanosine monophosphate structure
In 2007, a total of 48,377 scientific papers—including 11,211 e-review papers—were published on the subject. The term first appeared in a paper’s title in 1979. Widespread use of the term has been traced to a 1980 review article by Rodbell: Research papers focusing on signal transduction first appeared in large numbers in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
Signal transduction involves the binding of extracellular signaling molecules and ligands to cell-surface receptors that trigger events inside the cell. The combination of messenger with receptor causes a change in the conformation of the receptor, known as receptor activation.
This activation is always the initial step (the cause) leading to the cell’s ultimate responses (effect) to the messenger. Despite the myriad of these ultimate responses, they are all directly due to changes in particular cell proteins. Intracellular signaling cascades can be started through cell-substratum interactions; examples are the integrin that binds ligands in the extracellular matrix and steroids.
Integrin
Most steroid hormones have receptors within the cytoplasm and act by stimulating the binding of their receptors to the promoter region of steroid-responsive genes.
steroid hormone receptor
Various environmental stimuli exist that initiate signal transmission processes in multicellular organisms; examples include photons hitting cells in the retina of the eye, and odorants binding to odorant receptors in the nasal epithelium. Certain microbial molecules, such as viral nucleotides and protein antigens, can elicit an immune system response against invading pathogens mediated by signal transduction processes. This may occur independent of signal transduction stimulation by other molecules, as is the case for the toll-like receptor. It may occur with help from stimulatory molecules located at the cell surface of other cells, as with T-cell receptor signaling. Receptors can be roughly divided into two major classes: intracellular receptors and extracellular receptors.
Signal transduction cascades amplify the signal output
Signal transduction cascades amplify the signal output
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a family of integral transmembrane proteins that possess seven transmembrane domains and are linked to a heterotrimeric G protein. Many receptors are in this family, including adrenergic receptors and chemokine receptors.
Arrestin binding to active GPCR kinase (GRK)-phosphorylated GPCRs blocks G protein coupling
signal transduction pathways
Arrestin binding to active GPCR kinase (GRK)-phosphorylated GPCRs blocks G protein coupling
Signal transduction by a GPCR begins with an inactive G protein coupled to the receptor; it exists as a heterotrimer consisting of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ. Once the GPCR recognizes a ligand, the conformation of the receptor changes to activate the G protein, causing Gα to bind a molecule of GTP and dissociate from the other two G-protein subunits.
The dissociation exposes sites on the subunits that can interact with other molecules. The activated G protein subunits detach from the receptor and initiate signaling from many downstream effector proteins such as phospholipases and ion channels, the latter permitting the release of second messenger molecules.
Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are transmembrane proteins with an intracellular kinase domain and an extracellular domain that binds ligands; examples include growth factor receptors such as the insulin receptor.
insulin receptor and and insulin receptor signaling pathway (IRS)
To perform signal transduction, RTKs need to form dimers in the plasma membrane; the dimer is stabilized by ligands binding to the receptor.
RTKs
The interaction between the cytoplasmic domains stimulates the autophosphorylation of tyrosines within the domains of the RTKs, causing conformational changes.
Subsequent to this, the receptors’ kinase domains are activated, initiating phosphorylation signaling cascades of downstream cytoplasmic molecules that facilitate various cellular processes such as cell differentiation and metabolism.
Signal-Transduction-Pathway
As is the case with GPCRs, proteins that bind GTP play a major role in signal transduction from the activated RTK into the cell. In this case, the G proteins are
members of the Ras, Rho, and Raf families, referred to collectively as small G proteins.
They act as molecular switches usually
tethered to membranes by isoprenyl groups linked to their carboxyl ends.
Upon activation, they assign proteins to specific membrane subdomains where they participate in signaling. Activated RTKs in turn activate
small G proteins that activate guanine nucleotide exchange factors such as SOS1.
Once activated, these exchange factors can activate more small G proteins, thus
amplifying the receptor’s initial signal.
The mutation of certain RTK genes, as with that of GPCRs, can result in the expression of receptors that exist in a constitutively activate state; such mutated genes may act as oncogenes.
Integrin
Integrin
Integrin-mediated signal transduction
An overview of integrin-mediated signal transduction, adapted from Hehlgens et al. (2007).
Integrins are produced by a wide variety of cells; they play a role in
cell attachment to other cells and the extracellular matrix and
in the transduction of signals from extracellular matrix components such as fibronectin and collagen.
Ligand binding to the extracellular domain of integrins
changes the protein’s conformation,
clustering it at the cell membrane to
initiate signal transduction.
Integrins lack kinase activity; hence, integrin-mediated signal transduction is achieved through a variety of intracellular protein kinases and adaptor molecules, the main coordinator being integrin-linked kinase.
As shown in the picture, cooperative integrin-RTK signaling determines the
timing of cellular survival,
apoptosis,
proliferation, and
differentiation.
integrin-mediated signal transduction
Integrin signaling
ion channel
A ligand-gated ion channel, upon binding with a ligand, changes conformation
to open a channel in the cell membrane
through which ions relaying signals can pass.
An example of this mechanism is found in the receiving cell of a neural synapse. The influx of ions that occurs in response to the opening of these channels
induces action potentials, such as those that travel along nerves,
by depolarizing the membrane of post-synaptic cells,
resulting in the opening of voltage-gated ion channels.
RyR and Ca+ release from SR
An example of an ion allowed into the cell during a ligand-gated ion channel opening is Ca2+;
it acts as a second messenger
initiating signal transduction cascades and
altering the physiology of the responding cell.
This results in amplification of the synapse response between synaptic cells
by remodelling the dendritic spines involved in the synapse.
In eukaryotic cells, most intracellular proteins activated by a ligand/receptor interaction possess an enzymatic activity; examples include tyrosine kinase and phosphatases. Some of them create second messengers such as cyclic AMP and IP3,
cAMP
Inositol_1,4,5-trisphosphate.svg
the latter controlling the release of intracellular calcium stores into the cytoplasm.
Many adaptor proteins and enzymes activated as part of signal transduction possess specialized protein domains that bind to specific secondary messenger molecules. For example,
calcium ions bind to the EF hand domains of calmodulin,
allowing it to bind and activate calmodulin-dependent kinase.
calcium movement and RyR2 receptor
PIP3 and other phosphoinositides do the same thing to the Pleckstrin homology domains of proteins such as the kinase protein AKT.
Signals can be generated within organelles, such as chloroplasts and mitochondria, modulating the nuclear
gene expression in a process called retrograde signaling.
Recently, integrative genomics approaches, in which correlation analysis has been applied on transcript and metabolite profiling data of Arabidopsis thaliana, revealed the identification of metabolites which are putatively acting as mediators of nuclear gene expression.
Omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acids are one of the two main families of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The main omega-3 fatty acids in the mammalian body are
α-linolenic acid (ALA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).
Central nervous tissues of vertebrates are characterized by a high concentration of omega-3 fatty acids. Moreover, in the human brain,
DHA is considered as the main structural omega-3 fatty acid, which comprises about 40% of the PUFAs in total.
DHA deficiency may be the cause of many disorders such as depression, inability to concentrate, excessive mood swings, anxiety, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, dry skin and so on.
On the other hand,
zinc is the most abundant trace metal in the human brain.
There are many scientific studies linking zinc, especially
excess amounts of free zinc, to cellular death.
Neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, are characterized by altered zinc metabolism. Both animal model studies and human cell culture studies have shown a possible link between
omega-3 fatty acids, zinc transporter levels and
free zinc availability at cellular levels.
Many other studies have also suggested a possible
omega-3 and zinc effect on neurodegeneration and cellular death.
Therefore, in this review, we will examine
the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on zinc transporters and
the importance of free zinc for human neuronal cells.
Moreover, we will evaluate the collective understanding of
mechanism(s) for the interaction of these elements in neuronal research and their
significance for the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegeneration.
Epidemiological studies have linked high intake of fish and shellfish as part of the daily diet to
reduction of the incidence and/or severity of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and senile mental decline in
Omega-3 fatty acids are one of the two main families of a broader group of fatty acids referred to as polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). The other main family of PUFAs encompasses the omega-6 fatty acids. In general, PUFAs are essential in many biochemical events, especially in early post-natal development processes such as
cellular differentiation,
photoreceptor membrane biogenesis and
active synaptogenesis.
Despite the significance of these
two families, mammals cannot synthesize PUFA de novo, so they must be ingested from dietary sources. Though belonging to the same family, both
omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids are metabolically and functionally distinct and have
opposing physiological effects. In the human body,
high concentrations of omega-6 fatty acids are known to increase the formation of prostaglandins and
thereby increase inflammatory processes [10].
the reverse process can be seen with increased omega-3 fatty acids in the body.
Many other factors, such as
thromboxane A2 (TXA2),
leukotriene
B4 (LTB4),
IL-1,
IL-6,
tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and
C-reactive protein,
which are implicated in various health conditions, have been shown to be increased with high omega-6 fatty acids but decreased with omega-3 fatty acids in the human body.
Dietary fatty acids have been identified as protective factors in coronary heart disease, and PUFA levels are known to play a critical role in
immune responses,
gene expression and
intercellular communications.
omega-3 fatty acids are known to be vital in
the prevention of fatal ventricular arrhythmias, and
are also known to reduce thrombus formation propensity by decreasing platelet aggregation, blood viscosity and fibrinogen levels
.Since omega-3 fatty acids are prevalent in the nervous system, it seems logical that a deficiency may result in neuronal problems, and this is indeed what has been identified and reported.
The main
In another study conducted with individuals of 65 years of age or older (n = 6158), it was found that
only high fish consumption, but
not dietary omega-3 acid intake,
had a protective effect on cognitive decline
In 2005, based on a meta-analysis of the available epidemiology and preclinical studies, clinical trials were conducted to assess the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cognitive protection. Four of the trials completed have shown
a protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids only among those with mild cognitive impairment conditions.
A trial of subjects with mild memory complaints demonstrated
an improvement with 900 mg of DHA.
We review key findings on
the effect of the omega-3 fatty acid DHA on zinc transporters and the
importance of free zinc to human neuronal cells.
DHA is the most abundant fatty acid in neural membranes, imparting appropriate
fluidity and other properties,
and is thus considered as the most important fatty acid in neuronal studies. DHA is well conserved throughout the mammalian species despite their dietary differences. It is mainly concentrated
in membrane phospholipids at synapses and
in retinal photoreceptors and
also in the testis and sperm.
In adult rats’ brain, DHA comprises approximately
17% of the total fatty acid weight, and
in the retina it is as high as 33%.
DHA is believed to have played a major role in the evolution of the modern human –
in particular the well-developed brain.
Premature babies fed on DHA-rich formula show improvements in vocabulary and motor performance.
Analysis of human cadaver brains have shown that
people with AD have less DHA in their frontal lobe
and hippocampus compared with unaffected individuals
Furthermore, studies in mice have increased support for the
protective role of omega-3 fatty acids.
Mice administrated with a dietary intake of DHA showed
an increase in DHA levels in the hippocampus.
Errors in memory were decreased in these mice and they demonstrated
reduced peroxide and free radical levels,
suggesting a role in antioxidant defense.
Another study conducted with a Tg2576 mouse model of AD demonstrated that dietary
DHA supplementation had a protective effect against reduction in
drebrin (actin associated protein), elevated oxidation, and to some extent, apoptosis via
decreased caspase activity.
Zinc
Zinc is a trace element, which is indispensable for life, and it is the second most abundant trace element in the body. It is known to be related to
growth,
development,
differentiation,
immune response,
receptor activity,
DNA synthesis,
gene expression,
neuro-transmission,
enzymatic catalysis,
hormonal storage and release,
tissue repair,
memory,
the visual process
and many other cellular functions. Moreover, the indispensability of zinc to the body can be discussed in many other aspects, as
a component of over 300 different enzymes
an integral component of a metallothioneins
a gene regulatory protein.
Approximately 3% of all proteins contain
zinc binding motifs .
The broad biological functionality of zinc is thought to be due to its stable chemical and physical properties. Zinc is considered to have three different functions in enzymes;
catalytic,
coactive and
Indeed, it is the only metal found in all six different subclasses
of enzymes. The essential nature of zinc to the human body can be clearly displayed by studying the wide range of pathological effects of zinc deficiency. Anorexia, embryonic and post-natal growth retardation, alopecia, skin lesions, difficulties in wound healing, increased hemorrhage tendency and severe reproductive abnormalities, emotional instability, irritability and depression are just some of the detrimental effects of zinc deficiency.
Proper development and function of the central nervous system (CNS) is highly dependent on zinc levels. In the mammalian organs, zinc is mainly concentrated in the brain at around 150 μm. However, free zinc in the mammalian brain is calculated to be around 10 to 20 nm and the rest exists in either protein-, enzyme- or nucleotide bound form. The brain and zinc relationship is thought to be mediated
through glutamate receptors, and
it inhibits excitatory and inhibitory receptors.
Vesicular localization of zinc in pre-synaptic terminals is a characteristic feature of brain-localized zinc, and
its release is dependent on neural activity.
Retardation of the growth and development of CNS tissues have been linked to low zinc levels. Peripheral neuropathy, spina bifida, hydrocephalus, anencephalus, epilepsy and Pick’s disease have been linked to zinc deficiency. However, the body cannot tolerate excessive amounts of zinc.
The relationship between zinc and neurodegeneration, specifically AD, has been interpreted in several ways. One study has proposed that β-amyloid has a greater propensity to
form insoluble amyloid in the presence of
high physiological levels of zinc.
Insoluble amyloid is thought to
aggregate to form plaques,
which is a main pathological feature of AD. Further studies have shown that
chelation of zinc ions can deform and disaggregate plaques.
In AD, the most prominent injuries are found in
hippocampal pyramidal neurons, acetylcholine-containing neurons in the basal forebrain, and in
somatostatin-containing neurons in the forebrain.
All of these neurons are known to favor
rapid and direct entry of zinc in high concentration
leaving neurons frequently exposed to high dosages of zinc.
This is thought to promote neuronal cell damage through oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Excessive levels of zinc are also capable of
inhibiting Ca2+ and Na+ voltage gated channels
and up-regulating the cellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
High levels of zinc are found in Alzheimer’s brains indicating a possible zinc related neurodegeneration. A study conducted with mouse neuronal cells has shown that even a 24-h exposure to high levels of zinc (40 μm) is sufficient to degenerate cells.
If the human diet is deficient in zinc, the body
efficiently conserves zinc at the tissue level by compensating other cellular mechanisms
to delay the dietary deficiency effects of zinc. These include reduction of cellular growth rate and zinc excretion levels, and
redistribution of available zinc to more zinc dependent cells or organs.
A novel method of measuring metallothionein (MT) levels was introduced as a biomarker for the
assessment of the zinc status of individuals and populations.
In humans, erythrocyte metallothionein (E-MT) levels may be considered as an indicator of zinc depletion and repletion, as E-MT levels are sensitive to dietary zinc intake. It should be noted here that MT plays an important role in zinc homeostasis by acting
as a target for zinc ion binding and thus
assisting in the trafficking of zinc ions through the cell,
which may be similar to that of zinc transporters
Zinc Transporters
Deficient or excess amounts of zinc in the body can be catastrophic to the integrity of cellular biochemical and biological systems. The gastrointestinal system controls the absorption, excretion and the distribution of zinc, although the hydrophilic and high-charge molecular characteristics of zinc are not favorable for passive diffusion across the cell membranes. Zinc movement is known to occur
via intermembrane proteins and zinc transporter (ZnT) proteins
These transporters are mainly categorized under two metal transporter families; Zip (ZRT, IRT like proteins) and CDF/ZnT (Cation Diffusion Facilitator), also known as SLC (Solute Linked Carrier) gene families: Zip (SLC-39) and ZnT (SLC-30). More than 20 zinc transporters have been identified and characterized over the last two decades (14 Zips and 8 ZnTs).
Members of the SLC39 family have been identified as the putative facilitators of zinc influx into the cytosol, either from the extracellular environment or from intracellular compartments (Figure 1).
The identification of this transporter family was a result of gene sequencing of known Zip1 protein transporters in plants, yeast and human cells. In contrast to the SLC39 family, the SLC30 family facilitates the opposite process, namely zinc efflux from the cytosol to the extracellular environment or into luminal compartments such as secretory granules, endosomes and synaptic vesicles; thus decreasing intracellular zinc availability (Figure 1). ZnT3 is the most important in the brain where
it is responsible for the transport of zinc into the synaptic vesicles of
glutamatergic neurons in the hippocampus and neocortex,
Figure 1: Subcellular localization and direction of transport of the zinc transporter families, ZnT and ZIP. Arrows show the direction of zinc mobilization for the ZnT (green) and ZIP (red) proteins. A net gain in cytosolic zinc is achieved by the transportation of zinc from the extracellular region and organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus by the ZIP transporters. Cytosolic zinc is mobilized into early secretory compartments such as the ER and Golgi apparatus by the ZnT transporters. Figures were produced using Servier Medical Art, http://www.servier.com/. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jnme/2012/173712.fig.001.jpg
Figure 2: Early zinc signaling (EZS) and late zinc signaling (LZS). EZS involves transcription-independent mechanisms where an extracellular stimulus directly induces an increase in zinc levels within several minutes by releasing zinc from intracellular stores (e.g., endoplasmic reticulum). LSZ is induced several hours after an external stimulus and is dependent on transcriptional changes in zinc transporter expression. Components of this figure were produced using Servier Medical Art, http://www.servier.com/ and adapted from Fukada et al. [30].
omega-3 fatty acids in the mammalian body are
α-linolenic acid (ALA),
docosahexenoic acid (DHA) and
eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).
In general, seafood is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, more specifically DHA and EPA (Table 1). Thus far, there are nine separate epidemiological studies that suggest a possible link between
increased fish consumption and reduced risk of AD
and eight out of ten studies have reported a link between higher blood omega-3 levels
DHA and Zinc Homeostasis
Many studies have identified possible associations between DHA levels, zinc homeostasis, neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. Dietary DHA deficiency resulted in
increased zinc levels in the hippocampus and
elevated expression of the putative zinc transporter, ZnT3, in the rat brain.
Altered zinc metabolism in neuronal cells has been linked to neurodegenerative conditions such as AD. A study conducted with transgenic mice has shown a significant link between ZnT3 transporter levels and cerebral amyloid plaque pathology. When the ZnT3 transporter was silenced in transgenic mice expressing cerebral amyloid plaque pathology,
a significant reduction in plaque load
and the presence of insoluble amyloid were observed.
In addition to the decrease in plaque load, ZnT3 silenced mice also exhibited a significant
reduction in free zinc availability in the hippocampus
and cerebral cortex.
Collectively, the findings from this study are very interesting and indicate a clear connection between
zinc availability and amyloid plaque formation,
thus indicating a possible link to AD.
DHA supplementation has also been reported to limit the following:
amyloid presence,
synaptic marker loss,
hyper-phosphorylation of Tau,
oxidative damage and
cognitive deficits in transgenic mouse model of AD.
In addition, studies by Stoltenberg, Flinn and colleagues report on the modulation of zinc and the effect in transgenic mouse models of AD. Given that all of these are classic pathological features of AD, and considering the limiting nature of DHA in these processes, it can be argued that DHA is a key candidate in preventing or even curing this debilitating disease.
In order to better understand the possible links and pathways of zinc and DHA with neurodegeneration, we designed a study that incorporates all three of these aspects, to study their effects at the cellular level. In this study, we were able to demonstrate a possible link between omega-3 fatty acid (DHA) concentration, zinc availability and zinc transporter expression levels in cultured human neuronal cells.
When treated with DHA over 48 h, ZnT3 levels were markedly reduced in the human neuroblastoma M17 cell line. Moreover, in the same study, we were able to propose a possible
neuroprotective mechanism of DHA,
which we believe is exerted through
a reduction in cellular zinc levels (through altering zinc transporter expression levels)
that in turn inhibits apoptosis.
DHA supplemented M17 cells also showed a marked depletion of zinc uptake (up to 30%), and
free zinc levels in the cytosol were significantly low compared to the control
This reduction in free zinc availability was specific to DHA; cells treated with EPA had no significant change in free zinc levels (unpublished data). Moreover, DHA-repleted cells had
low levels of active caspase-3 and
high Bcl-2 levels compared to the control treatment.
These findings are consistent with previous published data and further strengthen the possible
correlation between zinc, DHA and neurodegeneration.
On the other hand, recent studies using ZnT3 knockout (ZnT3KO) mice have shown the importance of
ZnT3 in memory and AD pathology.
For example, Sindreu and colleagues have used ZnT3KO mice to establish the important role of
ZnT3 in zinc homeostasis that modulates presynaptic MAPK signaling
required for hippocampus-dependent memory
Results from these studies indicate a possible zinc-transporter-expression-level-dependent mechanism for DHA neuroprotection.
Complex Models of Signaling: Therapeutic Implications
Curator: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP
Updated 6/24/2019
Fishy Business: Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Zinc Transporters and Free Zinc Availability in Human Neuronal Cells
Damitha De Mel and Cenk Suphioglu *
NeuroAllergy Research Laboratory (NARL), School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.
Omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acids are one of the two main families of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The main omega-3 fatty acids in the mammalian body are
α-linolenic acid (ALA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).
Central nervous tissues of vertebrates are characterized by a high concentration of omega-3 fatty acids. Moreover, in the human brain,
DHA is considered as the main structural omega-3 fatty acid, which comprises about 40% of the PUFAs in total.
DHA deficiency may be the cause of many disorders such as depression, inability to concentrate, excessive mood swings, anxiety, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, dry skin and so on.
On the other hand,
zinc is the most abundant trace metal in the human brain.
There are many scientific studies linking zinc, especially
excess amounts of free zinc, to cellular death.
Neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, are characterized by altered zinc metabolism. Both animal model studies and human cell culture studies have shown a possible link between
omega-3 fatty acids, zinc transporter levels and
free zinc availability at cellular levels.
Many other studies have also suggested a possible
omega-3 and zinc effect on neurodegeneration and cellular death.
Therefore, in this review, we will examine
the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on zinc transporters and
the importance of free zinc for human neuronal cells.
Moreover, we will evaluate the collective understanding of
mechanism(s) for the interaction of these elements in neuronal research and their
significance for the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegeneration.
Epidemiological studies have linked high intake of fish and shellfish as part of the daily diet to
reduction of the incidence and/or severity of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and senile mental decline in
Omega-3 fatty acids are one of the two main families of a broader group of fatty acids referred to as polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). The other main family of PUFAs encompasses the omega-6 fatty acids. In general, PUFAs are essential in many biochemical events, especially in early post-natal development processes such as
cellular differentiation,
photoreceptor membrane biogenesis and
active synaptogenesis.
Despite the significance of these
two families, mammals cannot synthesize PUFA de novo, so they must be ingested from dietary sources. Though belonging to the same family, both
omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids are metabolically and functionally distinct and have
opposing physiological effects. In the human body,
high concentrations of omega-6 fatty acids are known to increase the formation of prostaglandins and
thereby increase inflammatory processes [10].
the reverse process can be seen with increased omega-3 fatty acids in the body.
Many other factors, such as
thromboxane A2 (TXA2),
leukotriene
B4 (LTB4),
IL-1,
IL-6,
tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and
C-reactive protein,
which are implicated in various health conditions, have been shown to be increased with high omega-6 fatty acids but decreased with omega-3 fatty acids in the human body.
Dietary fatty acids have been identified as protective factors in coronary heart disease, and PUFA levels are known to play a critical role in
immune responses,
gene expression and
intercellular communications.
omega-3 fatty acids are known to be vital in
the prevention of fatal ventricular arrhythmias, and
are also known to reduce thrombus formation propensity by decreasing platelet aggregation, blood viscosity and fibrinogen levels
.Since omega-3 fatty acids are prevalent in the nervous system, it seems logical that a deficiency may result in neuronal problems, and this is indeed what has been identified and reported.
The main omega-3 fatty acids in the mammalian body are
α-linolenic acid (ALA),
docosahexenoic acid (DHA) and
eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).
In general, seafood is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, more specifically DHA and EPA (Table 1). Thus far, there are nine separate epidemiological studies that suggest a possible link between
increased fish consumption and reduced risk of AD
and eight out of ten studies have reported a link between higher blood omega-3 levels
Table 1. Total percentage of omega-3 fatty acids in common foods and supplements.
Food/Supplement
EPA
DHA
ALA
Total %
Fish
SalmonSardine
Anchovy
Halibut
Herring
Mackerel
Tuna
Fresh Bluefin
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
>50%>50%
>50%
>50%
>50%
>50%
>50%
>50%
Oils/Supplements
Fish oil capsulesCod liver oils
Salmon oil
Sardine oil
XX
X
X
XX
X
X
>50%>50%
>50%
>50%
Black currant oilCanola oil Mustard seed oils
Soybean oil
Walnut oil
Wheat germ oil
XX
X
X
X
X
10%–50%10%–50%
10%–50%
10%–50%
10%–50%
10%–50%
Seeds and other foods
Flaxseeds/LinseedsSpinach
Wheat germ Human milk
Peanut butter
Soybeans
Olive oil
Walnuts
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
>50%>50%
10%–50%
10%–50%
<10%
<10%
<10%
<10%
Table adopted from Maclean C.H. et al. [18].
In another study conducted with individuals of 65 years of age or older (n = 6158), it was found that
only high fish consumption, but
not dietary omega-3 acid intake,
had a protective effect on cognitive decline
In 2005, based on a meta-analysis of the available epidemiology and preclinical studies, clinical trials were conducted to assess the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cognitive protection. Four of the trials completed have shown
a protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids only among those with mild cognitive impairment conditions.
A trial of subjects with mild memory complaints demonstrated
an improvement with 900 mg of DHA.
We review key findings on
the effect of the omega-3 fatty acid DHA on zinc transporters and the
importance of free zinc to human neuronal cells.
DHA is the most abundant fatty acid in neural membranes, imparting appropriate
fluidity and other properties,
and is thus considered as the most important fatty acid in neuronal studies. DHA is well conserved throughout the mammalian species despite their dietary differences. It is mainly concentrated
in membrane phospholipids at synapses and
in retinal photoreceptors and
also in the testis and sperm.
In adult rats’ brain, DHA comprises approximately
17% of the total fatty acid weight, and
in the retina it is as high as 33%.
DHA is believed to have played a major role in the evolution of the modern human –
in particular the well-developed brain.
Premature babies fed on DHA-rich formula show improvements in vocabulary and motor performance.
Analysis of human cadaver brains have shown that
people with AD have less DHA in their frontal lobe
and hippocampus compared with unaffected individuals
Furthermore, studies in mice have increased support for the
protective role of omega-3 fatty acids.
Mice administrated with a dietary intake of DHA showed
an increase in DHA levels in the hippocampus.
Errors in memory were decreased in these mice and they demonstrated
reduced peroxide and free radical levels,
suggesting a role in antioxidant defense.
Another study conducted with a Tg2576 mouse model of AD demonstrated that dietary
DHA supplementation had a protective effect against reduction in
drebrin (actin associated protein), elevated oxidation, and to some extent, apoptosis via
decreased caspase activity.
Zinc
Zinc is a trace element, which is indispensable for life, and it is the second most abundant trace element in the body. It is known to be related to
growth,
development,
differentiation,
immune response,
receptor activity,
DNA synthesis,
gene expression,
neuro-transmission,
enzymatic catalysis,
hormonal storage and release,
tissue repair,
memory,
the visual process
and many other cellular functions. Moreover, the indispensability of zinc to the body can be discussed in many other aspects, as
a component of over 300 different enzymes
an integral component of a metallothioneins
a gene regulatory protein.
Approximately 3% of all proteins contain
zinc binding motifs .
The broad biological functionality of zinc is thought to be due to its stable chemical and physical properties. Zinc is considered to have three different functions in enzymes;
catalytic,
coactive and
Indeed, it is the only metal found in all six different subclasses
of enzymes. The essential nature of zinc to the human body can be clearly displayed by studying the wide range of pathological effects of zinc deficiency. Anorexia, embryonic and post-natal growth retardation, alopecia, skin lesions, difficulties in wound healing, increased hemorrhage tendency and severe reproductive abnormalities, emotional instability, irritability and depression are just some of the detrimental effects of zinc deficiency.
Proper development and function of the central nervous system (CNS) is highly dependent on zinc levels. In the mammalian organs, zinc is mainly concentrated in the brain at around 150 μm. However, free zinc in the mammalian brain is calculated to be around 10 to 20 nm and the rest exists in either protein-, enzyme- or nucleotide bound form. The brain and zinc relationship is thought to be mediated
through glutamate receptors, and
it inhibits excitatory and inhibitory receptors.
Vesicular localization of zinc in pre-synaptic terminals is a characteristic feature of brain-localized zinc, and
its release is dependent on neural activity.
Retardation of the growth and development of CNS tissues have been linked to low zinc levels. Peripheral neuropathy, spina bifida, hydrocephalus, anencephalus, epilepsy and Pick’s disease have been linked to zinc deficiency. However, the body cannot tolerate excessive amounts of zinc.
The relationship between zinc and neurodegeneration, specifically AD, has been interpreted in several ways. One study has proposed that β-amyloid has a greater propensity to
form insoluble amyloid in the presence of
high physiological levels of zinc.
Insoluble amyloid is thought to
aggregate to form plaques,
which is a main pathological feature of AD. Further studies have shown that
chelation of zinc ions can deform and disaggregate plaques.
In AD, the most prominent injuries are found in
hippocampal pyramidal neurons, acetylcholine-containing neurons in the basal forebrain, and in
somatostatin-containing neurons in the forebrain.
All of these neurons are known to favor
rapid and direct entry of zinc in high concentration
leaving neurons frequently exposed to high dosages of zinc.
This is thought to promote neuronal cell damage through oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Excessive levels of zinc are also capable of
inhibiting Ca2+ and Na+ voltage gated channels
and up-regulating the cellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
High levels of zinc are found in Alzheimer’s brains indicating a possible zinc related neurodegeneration. A study conducted with mouse neuronal cells has shown that even a 24-h exposure to high levels of zinc (40 μm) is sufficient to degenerate cells.
If the human diet is deficient in zinc, the body
efficiently conserves zinc at the tissue level by compensating other cellular mechanisms
to delay the dietary deficiency effects of zinc. These include reduction of cellular growth rate and zinc excretion levels, and
redistribution of available zinc to more zinc dependent cells or organs.
A novel method of measuring metallothionein (MT) levels was introduced as a biomarker for the
assessment of the zinc status of individuals and populations.
In humans, erythrocyte metallothionein (E-MT) levels may be considered as an indicator of zinc depletion and repletion, as E-MT levels are sensitive to dietary zinc intake. It should be noted here that MT plays an important role in zinc homeostasis by acting
as a target for zinc ion binding and thus
assisting in the trafficking of zinc ions through the cell,
which may be similar to that of zinc transporters
Zinc Transporters
Deficient or excess amounts of zinc in the body can be catastrophic to the integrity of cellular biochemical and biological systems. The gastrointestinal system controls the absorption, excretion and the distribution of zinc, although the hydrophilic and high-charge molecular characteristics of zinc are not favorable for passive diffusion across the cell membranes. Zinc movement is known to occur
via intermembrane proteins and zinc transporter (ZnT) proteins
These transporters are mainly categorized under two metal transporter families; Zip (ZRT, IRT like proteins) and CDF/ZnT (Cation Diffusion Facilitator), also known as SLC (Solute Linked Carrier) gene families: Zip (SLC-39) and ZnT (SLC-30). More than 20 zinc transporters have been identified and characterized over the last two decades (14 Zips and 8 ZnTs).
Members of the SLC39 family have been identified as the putative facilitators of zinc influx into the cytosol, either from the extracellular environment or from intracellular compartments (Figure 1).
The identification of this transporter family was a result of gene sequencing of known Zip1 protein transporters in plants, yeast and human cells. In contrast to the SLC39 family, the SLC30 family facilitates the opposite process, namely zinc efflux from the cytosol to the extracellular environment or into luminal compartments such as secretory granules, endosomes and synaptic vesicles; thus decreasing intracellular zinc availability (Figure 1). ZnT3 is the most important in the brain where
it is responsible for the transport of zinc into the synaptic vesicles of
glutamatergic neurons in the hippocampus and neocortex,
Figure 1. Putative cellular localization of some of the different human zinc transporters (i.e., Zip1- Zip4 and ZnT1- ZnT7). Arrows indicate the direction of zinc passage by the appropriate putative zinc transporters in a generalized human cell. Although there are fourteen Zips and eight ZnTs known so far, only the main zinc transporters are illustrated in this figure for clarity and brevity.
Figure 1: Subcellular localization and direction of transport of the zinc transporter families, ZnT and ZIP. Arrows show the direction of zinc mobilization for the ZnT (green) and ZIP (red) proteins. A net gain in cytosolic zinc is achieved by the transportation of zinc from the extracellular region and organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus by the ZIP transporters. Cytosolic zinc is mobilized into early secretory compartments such as the ER and Golgi apparatus by the ZnT transporters. Figures were produced using Servier Medical Art, http://www.servier.com/. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jnme/2012/173712.fig.001.jpg
zinc transporters
Early zinc signaling (EZS) and late zinc signaling (LZS)
Figure 2: Early zinc signaling (EZS) and late zinc signaling (LZS). EZS involves transcription-independent mechanisms where an extracellular stimulus directly induces an increase in zinc levels within several minutes by releasing zinc from intracellular stores (e.g., endoplasmic reticulum). LSZ is induced several hours after an external stimulus and is dependent on transcriptional changes in zinc transporter expression. Components of this figure were produced using Servier Medical Art, http://www.servier.com/ and adapted from Fukada et al. [30].
DHA and Zinc Homeostasis
Many studies have identified possible associations between DHA levels, zinc homeostasis, neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. Dietary DHA deficiency resulted in
increased zinc levels in the hippocampus and
elevated expression of the putative zinc transporter, ZnT3, in the rat brain.
Altered zinc metabolism in neuronal cells has been linked to neurodegenerative conditions such as AD. A study conducted with transgenic mice has shown a significant link between ZnT3 transporter levels and cerebral amyloid plaque pathology. When the ZnT3 transporter was silenced in transgenic mice expressing cerebral amyloid plaque pathology,
a significant reduction in plaque load
and the presence of insoluble amyloid were observed.
In addition to the decrease in plaque load, ZnT3 silenced mice also exhibited a significant
reduction in free zinc availability in the hippocampus
and cerebral cortex.
Collectively, the findings from this study are very interesting and indicate a clear connection between
zinc availability and amyloid plaque formation,
thus indicating a possible link to AD.
DHA supplementation has also been reported to limit the following:
amyloid presence,
synaptic marker loss,
hyper-phosphorylation of Tau,
oxidative damage and
cognitive deficits in transgenic mouse model of AD.
In addition, studies by Stoltenberg, Flinn and colleagues report on the modulation of zinc and the effect in transgenic mouse models of AD. Given that all of these are classic pathological features of AD, and considering the limiting nature of DHA in these processes, it can be argued that DHA is a key candidate in preventing or even curing this debilitating disease.
In order to better understand the possible links and pathways of zinc and DHA with neurodegeneration, we designed a study that incorporates all three of these aspects, to study their effects at the cellular level. In this study, we were able to demonstrate a possible link between omega-3 fatty acid (DHA) concentration, zinc availability and zinc transporter expression levels in cultured human neuronal cells.
When treated with DHA over 48 h, ZnT3 levels were markedly reduced in the human neuroblastoma M17 cell line. Moreover, in the same study, we were able to propose a possible
neuroprotective mechanism of DHA,
which we believe is exerted through
a reduction in cellular zinc levels (through altering zinc transporter expression levels)
that in turn inhibits apoptosis.
DHA supplemented M17 cells also showed a marked depletion of zinc uptake (up to 30%), and
free zinc levels in the cytosol were significantly low compared to the control
This reduction in free zinc availability was specific to DHA; cells treated with EPA had no significant change in free zinc levels (unpublished data). Moreover, DHA-repleted cells had
low levels of active caspase-3 and
high Bcl-2 levels compared to the control treatment.
These findings are consistent with previous published data and further strengthen the possible
correlation between zinc, DHA and neurodegeneration.
On the other hand, recent studies using ZnT3 knockout (ZnT3KO) mice have shown the importance of
ZnT3 in memory and AD pathology.
For example, Sindreu and colleagues have used ZnT3KO mice to establish the important role of
ZnT3 in zinc homeostasis that modulates presynaptic MAPK signaling
required for hippocampus-dependent memory
Results from these studies indicate a possible zinc-transporter-expression-level-dependent mechanism for DHA neuroprotection.
Collectively from these studies, the following possible mechanism can be proposed (Figure 2).
possible benefits of DHA in neuroprotection through reduction of ZnT3 transporter
Figure 2. Proposed neuroprotection mechanism of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in reference to synaptic zinc. Schematic diagram showing possible benefits of DHA in neuroprotection through reduction of ZnT3 transporter expression levels in human neuronal cells, which results in a reduction of zinc flux and thus lowering zinc concentrations in neuronal synaptic vesicles, and therefore contributing to a lower incidence of neurodegenerative diseases (ND), such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
More recent data from our research group have also shown a link between the expression levels of histone H3 and H4 proteins in human neuronal cells in relation to DHA and zinc. Following DHA treatment, both H3 and H4 levels were up-regulated. In contrast, zinc treatment resulted in a down-regulation of histone levels. Both zinc and DHA have shown opposing effects on histone post-translational modifications, indicating a possible distinctive epigenetic pattern. Upon treatment with zinc, M17 cells displayed an increase in histone deacetylase (HDACs) and a reduction in histone acetylation. Conversely, with DHA treatment, HDAC levels were significantly reduced and the acetylation of histones was up-regulated. These findings also support a possible interaction between DHA and zinc availability.
Conclusions
It is possible to safely claim that there is more than one potential pathway by which DHA and zinc interact at a cellular level, at least in cultured human neuronal cells. Significance and importance of both DHA and zinc in neuronal survival is attested by the presence of these multiple mechanisms.
Most of these reported studies were conducted using human neuroblastoma cells, or similar cell types, due to the lack of live mature human neuronal cells. Thus, the results may differ from results achieved under actual human physiological conditions due to the structural and functional differences between these cells and mature human neurons. Therefore, an alternative approach that can mimic the human neuronal cells more effectively would be advantageous.
Sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling as a therapeutic target
E Giannoudaki, DJ Swan, JA Kirby, S Ali
Applied Immunobiology and Transplantation Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Cell Health and Cytoskeleton 2012; 4: 63–72
S1P is a 379Da member of the lysophospholipid family. It is the direct metabolite of sphingosine through the action of two sphingosine kinases, SphK1 and SphK2. The main metabolic pathway starts with the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin, a membrane sphingolipid, into ceramide by the enzyme sphingomyelinase and the subsequent production of sphingosine by ceramidase (Figure 1). Ceramide can also be produced de novo in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) from serine and palmitoyl coenzyme A through multiple intermediates. S1P production is regulated by various S1P-specific and general lipid phosphatases, as well as S1P lyase, which irreversibly degrades S1P into phosphoethanolamine and hexadecanal. The balance between intracellular S1P and its metabolite ceramide can determine cellular fate. Ceramide promotes apoptosis, while S1P suppresses cell death and promotes cell survival. This creates an S1P ceramide “rheostat” inside the cells. S1P lyase expression in tissue is higher than it is in erythrocytes and platelets, the main “suppliers” of S1P in blood. This causes a tissue–blood gradient of S1P, which is important in many S1P-mediated responses, like the lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs.
S1P signaling overview
S1P is produced inside cells; however, it can also be found extracellularly, in a variety of different tissues. It is abundant in the blood, at concentrations of 0.4–1.5 μM, where it is mainly secreted by erythrocytes and platelets. Blood S1P can be found separately, but mainly it exists in complexes with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (∼60%). Many of the cardioprotective effects of HDL are hypothesized to involve S1P. Before 1996, S1P was thought to act mainly intracellularly as a second messenger. However, the identification of several GPCRs that bind S1P led to the initiation of many studies on
extracellular S1P signaling through those receptors.
There are five receptors that have been identified currently. These can be coupled with different G-proteins. Assuming that each receptor coupling with a G protein has a slightly different function, one can recognize the complexity of S1P receptor signaling.
S1P as a second messenger
S1P is involved in many cellular processes through its GPCR signaling; studies demonstrate that S1P also acts at an intracellular level. Intracellular S1P plays a role in maintaining the balance of cell survival signal toward apoptotic signals, creating a
cell “rheostat” between S1P and its precursor ceramide.
Important evidence that S1P can act intracellularly as a second messenger came from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and plant (Arabidopsis thaliana) cells. Yeast cells do not express any S1P receptors, although they can be affected by S1P during heat-shock responses. Similarly, Arabidopsis has only one GPCR-like protein, termed “GCR1,” which does not bind S1P, although S1P regulates stomata closure during drought.
Sphingosine-1-phosphate
In mammals, the sphingosine kinases have been found to localize in different cell compartments, being responsible for the accumulation of S1P in those compartments to give intracellular signals. In mitochondria, for instance,
S1P was recently found to interact with prohibitin 2,
a conserved protein that maintains mitochondria assembly and function. According to the same study,
SphK2 is the major producer of S1P in mitochondria and the knockout of its gene can cause
disruption of mitochondrial respiration and cytochrome c oxidase function.
SphK2 is also present in the nucleus of many cells and has been implicated to cause cell cycle arrest, and it causes S1P accumulation in the nucleus. It seems that nuclear S1P is affiliated with the histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2,
inhibiting their activity, thus having an indirect effect in epigenetic regulation of gene expression.
In the ER, SphK2 has been identified to translocate during stress, and promote apoptosis. It seems that S1P has specific targets in the ER that cause apoptosis, probably through calcium mobilization signals.
Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a small bioactive lipid molecule that is involved in several processes both intracellularly and extracellularly. It acts intracellularly
to promote the survival and growth of the cell,
through its interaction with molecules in different compartments of the cell.
It can also exist at high concentrations extracellularly, in the blood plasma and lymph. This causes an S1P gradient important for cell migration. S1P signals through five G protein-coupled receptors, S1PR1–S1PR5, whose expression varies in different types of cells and tissue. S1P signaling can be involved in physiological and pathophysiological conditions of the cardiovascular, nervous, and immune systems and diseases such as ischemia/reperfusion injury, autoimmunity, and cancer. In this review, we discuss how it can be used to discover novel therapeutic targets.
The involvement of S1P signaling in disease
In a mouse model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), S1P and its carrier, HDL, can help protect myocardial tissue and decrease the infarct size. It seems they reduce cardiomyocyte apoptosis and neutrophil recruitment to the ischemic tissue and may decrease leukocyte adhesion to the endothelium. This effect appears to be S1PR3 mediated, since in S1PR3 knockout mice it is alleviated.
Ischemia activates SphK1, which is then translocated to the plasma membrane. This leads to an increase of intracellular S1P, helping to promote cardiomyocyte survival against apoptosis, induced by ceramide. SphK1 knockout mice cannot be preconditioned against IRI, whereas SphK1 gene induction in the heart protects it from IRI. Interestingly, a recent study shows SphK2 may also play a role, since its knockout reduces the cardioprotective effects of preconditioning. Further, administration of S1P or sphingosine during reperfusion results in better recovery and attenuation of damage to cardiomyocytes. As with preconditioning, SphK1 deficiency also affects post-conditioning of mouse hearts after ischemia reperfusion (IR).
S1P does not only protect the heart from IRI. During intestinal IR, multiple organs can be damaged, including the lungs. S1P treatment of mice during intestinal IR seems to have a protective effect on lung injury, probably due to suppression of iNOS-induced nitric oxide generation. In renal IRI, SphK1 seems to be important, since its deficiency increased the damage in kidney tissue, whereas the lentiviral overexpression of the SphK1 gene protected from injury. Another study suggests that, after IRI, apoptotic renal cells release S1P, which recruits macrophages through S1PR3 activation and might contribute to kidney regeneration and restoration of renal epithelium. However, SphK2 is negatively implicated in hepatic IRI, its inhibition helping protect hepatocytes and restoring mitochondrial function.
Further studies are implicating S1P signaling or sphingosine kinases in several kinds of cancer as well as autoimmune diseases.
Figure 2 FTY720-P causes retention of T cells in the lymph nodes.
Notes: C57BL/6 mice were injected with BALB/c splenocytes in the footpad to create an allogenic response then treated with FTY720-P or vehicle every day on days 2 to 5. On day 6, the popliteal lymph nodes were removed. Popliteal node-derived cells were mixed with BALB/c splenocytes in interferon gamma (IFN-γ) cultured enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot reactions. Bars represent the mean number of IFN-γ spot-forming cells per 1000 popliteal node-derived cells, from six mice treated with vehicle and seven with FTY720-P. **P , 0.01. (not shown)
Fingolimod (INN, trade name Gilenya, Novartis) is an immunomodulating drug, approved for treating multiple sclerosis. It has reduced the rate of relapses in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis by over half. Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, which sequesters lymphocytes in lymph nodes, preventing them from contributing to an autoimmune reaction.
The S1P antagonist FTY720 has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to be used as a drug against multiple sclerosis (MS). FTY720 is in fact a prodrug, since it is phosphorylated in vivo by SphK2 into FTY720-P, an S1P structural analog, which can activate S1PR1, 3, 4, and 5. FTY720-P binding to S1PR1 causes internalization of the receptor, as does S1P – but instead of recycling it back to the cell surface, it promotes its ubiquitination and degradation at the proteasome. This has a direct effect on lymphocyte trafficking through the lymph nodes, since it relies on S1PR1 signaling and S1P gradient (Figure 2). In MS, it stops migrating lymphocytes into the brain, but it may also have direct effects on the CNS through neuroprotection. FTY720 can pass the blood–brain barrier and it could be phosphorylated by local sphingosine kinases to act through S1PR1 and S1PR3 receptors that are mainly expressed in the CNS. In MS lesions, astrocytes upregulate those two receptors and it has been shown that FTY720-P treatment in vitro inhibits astrocyte production of inflammatory cytokines. A recent study confirms the importance of S1PR3 signaling on activated astrocytes, as well as SphK1, that are upregulated and promote the secretion of the potentially neuroprotective cytokine CXCL-1.
There are several studies implicating the intracellular S1P ceramide rheostat to cancer cell survival or apoptosis and resistance to chemotherapy or irradiation in vitro. Studies with SphK1 inhibition in pancreatic, prostate cancers, and leukemia, show increased ceramide/S1P ratio and induction of apoptosis. However, S1P receptor signaling plays conflicting roles in cancer cell migration and metastasis.
Modulation of S1P signaling: therapeutic potential
S1P signaling can be involved in many pathophysiological conditions. This means that we could look for therapeutic targets in all the molecules taking part in S1P signaling and production, most importantly the S1P receptors and the sphingosine kinases. S1P agonists and antagonists could also be used to modulate S1P signaling during pathological conditions.
S1P can have direct effects on the cardiovascular system. During IRI, intracellular S1P can protect the cardiomyocytes and promote their survival. Pre- or post-conditioning of the heart with S1P could be used as a treatment, but upregulation of sphingosine kinases could also increase intracellular S1P bioavailability. S1P could also have effects on endothelial cells and neutrophil trafficking. Vascular endothelial cells mainly express S1PR1 and S1PR3; only a few types express S1PR2. S1PR1 and S1PR3 activation on these cells has been shown to enhance their chemotactic migration, probably through direct phosphorylation of S1PR1 by Akt, in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rac1-dependent signaling pathway. Moreover, it stimulates endothelial cell proliferation through an ERK pathway. S1PR2 activation, however, inhibits endothelial cell migration, morphogenesis, and angiogenesis, most likely through Rho-dependent inhibition of Rac signaling pathway, as Inoki et al showed in mouse cells with the use of S1PR1 and S1PR3 specific antagonists.
Regarding permeability of the vascular endothelium and endothelial barrier integrity, S1P receptors can have different effects. S1PR1 activation enhances endothelial barrier integrity by stimulation of cellular adhesion and upregulation of adhesion molecules. However, S1PR2 and S1PR3 have been shown to have barrier-disrupting effects in vitro, and vascular permeability increasing effects in vivo. All the effects S1P can have on vascular endothelium and smooth muscle cells suggest that activation of S1PR2, not S1PR1 and S1PR3, signaling, perhaps with the use of S1PR2 specific agonists, could be used therapeutically to inhibit angiogenesis and disrupt vasculature, suppressing tumor growth and progression.
An important aspect of S1P signaling that is being already therapeutically targeted, but could be further investigated, is immune cell trafficking. Attempts have already been made to regulate lymphocyte cell migration with the use of the drug FTY720, whose phosphorylated form can inhibit the cells S1PR1-dependent egress from the lymph nodes, causing lymphopenia. FTY720 is used as an immunosuppressant for MS but is also being investigated for other autoimmune conditions and for transplantation. Unfortunately, Phase II and III clinical trials for the prevention of kidney graft rejection have not shown an advantage over standard therapies. Moreover, FTY720 can have some adverse cardiac effects, such as bradycardia. However, there are other S1PR1 antagonists that could be considered instead, including KRP-203, AUY954, and SEW2871. KRP-203 in particular has been shown to prolong rat skin and heart allograft survival and attenuate chronic rejection without causing bradycardia, especially when combined with other immunomodulators.
There are studies that argue S1P pretreatment has a negative effect on neutrophil chemotaxis toward the chemokine CXCL-8 (interleukin-8) or the potent chemoattractant formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine. S1P pretreatment might also inhibit trans-endothelial migration of neutrophils, without affecting their adhesion to the endothelium. S1P effects on neutrophil migration toward CXCL-8 might be the result of S1PRs cross-linking with the CXCL-8 receptors in neutrophils, CXCR-1 and CXCR-2. Indeed, there is evidence suggesting S1PR4 and S1PR3 form heterodimers with CXCR-1 in neutrophils. Another indication that S1P plays a role in neutrophil trafficking is a recent paper on S1P lyase deficiency, a deficiency that impairs neutrophil migration from blood to tissue in knockout mice.
S1P lyase and S1PRs in neutrophils may be new therapeutic targets against IRI and inflammatory conditions in general. Consistent with these results, another study has shown that inhibition of S1P lyase can have a protective effect on the heart after IRI and this effect is alleviated when pretreated with an S1PR1 and S1PR3 antagonist. Inhibition was achieved with a US Food and Drug Administration-approved food additive, 2-acetyl-4-tetrahydroxybutylimidazole, providing a possible new drug perspective. Another S1P lyase inhibitor, LX2931, a synthetic analog of 2-acetyl-4-tetrahydroxybutylimidazole, has been shown to cause peripheral lymphopenia when administered in mice, providing a potential treatment for autoimmune diseases and prevention of graft rejection in transplantation. This molecule is currently under Phase II clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
S1P signaling research has the potential to discover novel therapeutic targets. S1P signaling is involved in many physiological and pathological processes. However, the complexity of S1P signaling makes it necessary to consider every possible pathway, either through its GPCRs, or intracellularly, with S1P as a second messenger. Where the activation of one S1P receptor may lead to the desired outcome, the simultaneous activation of another S1P receptor may lead to the opposite outcome. Thus, if we are to target a specific signaling pathway, we might need specific agonists for S1P receptors to activate one S1P receptor pathway, while, at the same time, we might need to inhibit another through S1P receptor antagonists.
Evidence of sphingolipid signaling in cancer
Biologically active lipids are important cellular signaling molecules and play a role in cell communication and cancer cell proliferation, and cancer stem cell biology. A recent study in ovarian cancer cell lines shows that exogenous sphingosine 1 phosphate (SIP1) or overexpression of the sphingosine kinase (SPHK1) increases ovarian cancer cell proliferation, invasion and contributes to cancer stem cell like phenotype. The diabetes drug metformin was shown to be an inhibitor of SPHK1 and reduce ovarian cancer tumor growth.
Mol Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;17(4):870-881. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0409. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
SPHK1 Is a Novel Target of Metformin in Ovarian Cancer.
The role of phospholipid signaling in ovarian cancer is poorly understood. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive metabolite of sphingosine that has been associated with tumor progression through enhanced cell proliferation and motility. Similarly, sphingosine kinases (SPHK), which catalyze the formation of S1P and thus regulate the sphingolipid rheostat, have been reported to promote tumor growth in a variety of cancers. The findings reported here show that exogenous S1P or overexpression of SPHK1 increased proliferation, migration, invasion, and stem-like phenotypes in ovarian cancer cell lines. Likewise, overexpression of SPHK1 markedly enhanced tumor growth in a xenograft model of ovarian cancer, which was associated with elevation of key markers of proliferation and stemness. The diabetes drug, metformin, has been shown to have anticancer effects. Here, we found that ovarian cancer patients taking metformin had significantly reduced serum S1P levels, a finding that was recapitulated when ovarian cancer cells were treated with metformin and analyzed by lipidomics. These findings suggested that in cancer the sphingolipid rheostat may be a novel metabolic target of metformin. In support of this, metformin blocked hypoxia-induced SPHK1, which was associated with inhibited nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF1α and HIF2α). Further, ovarian cancer cells with high SPHK1 were found to be highly sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of metformin, whereas ovarian cancer cells with low SPHK1 were resistant. Together, the findings reported here show that hypoxia-induced SPHK1 expression and downstream S1P signaling promote ovarian cancer progression and that tumors with high expression of SPHK1 or S1P levels might have increased sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of metformin. IMPLICATIONS: Metformin targets sphingolipid metabolism through inhibiting SPHK1, thereby impeding ovarian cancer cell migration, proliferation, and self-renewal.
Nrf2:INrf2(Keap1) Signaling in Oxidative Stress
James W. Kaspar, Suresh K. Niture, and Anil K. Jaiswal*
Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Nrf2:INrf2(Keap1) are cellular sensors of chemical and radiation induced oxidative and electrophilic stress. Nrf2 is a nuclear transcription factor that
controls the expression and coordinated induction of a battery of defensive genes encoding detoxifying enzymes and antioxidant proteins.
This is a mechanism of critical importance for cellular protection and cell survival. Nrf2 is retained in the cytoplasm by an inhibitor INrf2. INrf2 functions as an adapter for
Cul3/Rbx1 mediated degradation of Nrf2.
In response to oxidative/electrophilic stress,
Nrf2 is switched on and then off by distinct
early and delayed mechanisms.
Oxidative/electrophilic modification of INrf2cysteine151 and/or PKC phosphorylation of Nrf2serine40 results in the escape or release of Nrf2 from INrf2. Nrf2 is stabilized and translocates to the nucleus, forms heterodimers with unknown proteins, and binds antioxidant response element (ARE) that leads to coordinated activation of gene expression. It takes less than fifteen minutes from the time of exposure
to switch on nuclear import of Nrf2.
This is followed by activation of a delayed mechanism that controls
switching off of Nrf2 activation of gene expression.
GSK3β phosphorylates Fyn at unknown threonine residue(s) leading to
nuclear localization of Fyn.
Fyn phosphorylates Nrf2tyrosine568 resulting in
nuclear export of Nrf2,
binding with INrf2 and
degradation of Nrf2.
The switching on and off of Nrf2 protects cells against free radical damage, prevents apoptosis and promotes cell survival.
NPRA-mediated suppression of AngII-induced ROS production contributes to the antiproliferative effects of B-type natriuretic peptide in VSMC
Pan Gao, De-Hui Qian, Wei Li, Lan Huang
Mol Cell Biochem (2009) 324:165–172
Excessive proliferation of vascular smooth cells (VSMCs) plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of diverse vascular disorders, and inhibition of VSMCs proliferation has been proved to be beneficial to these diseases.
In this study, we investigated the antiproliferative effect of
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), a natriuretic peptide with potent antioxidant capacity,
on rat aortic VSMCs, and the possible mechanisms involved. The results indicate that
BNP potently inhibited Angiotensin II (AngII)-induced VSMCs proliferation,
as evaluated by [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay. Consistently, BNP significantly decreased
AngII-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)
and NAD(P)H oxidase activity.
8-Br-cGMP, a cGMP analog,
mimicked these effects.
To confirm its mechanism, siRNA of natriuretic peptide receptor-A(NRPA) strategy technology was used
to block cGMP production in VSMCs, and
siNPRA attenuated the inhibitory effects of BNP in VSMCs.
Taken together, these results indicate that
BNP was capable of inhibiting VSMCs proliferation by
NPRA/cGMP pathway,
which might be associated with
the suppression of ROS production.
These results might be related, at least partly, to the anti-oxidant property of BNP.
Cellular prion protein is required for neuritogenesis: fine-tuning of multiple signaling pathways involved in focal adhesions and actin cytoskeleton dynamics
A Alleaume-Butaux, C Dakowski, M Pietri, S Mouillet-Richard, Jean-Marie Launay, O Kellermann, B Schneider
1INSERM, UMR-S 747, 2Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris, 3Public Hospital of Paris, Department of Biochemistry, Paris, France; 4Pharma Research Department, Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
Cell Health and Cytoskeleton 2013; 5: 1–12
Neuritogenesis is a complex morphological phenomena accompanying neuronal differentiation. Neuritogenesis relies on the initial breakage of the rather spherical symmetry of neuroblasts and the formation of buds emerging from the postmitotic neuronal soma. Buds then evolve into neurites, which later convert into an axon or dendrites. At the distal tip of neurites, the growth cone integrates extracellular signals and guides the neurite to its target. The acquisition of neuronal polarity depends on deep modifications of the neuroblast cytoskeleton characterized by the remodeling and activation of focal adhesions (FAs) and localized destabilization of the actin network in the neuronal sphere.Actin instability in unpolarized neurons allows neurite sprouting, ie, the protrusion of microtubules, and subsequent neurite outgrowth. Once the neurite is formed, actin microfilaments recover their stability and exert a sheathed action on neurites, a dynamic process necessary for the maintenance and integrity of neurites.
A combination of extrinsic and intrinsic cues pilots the architectural and functional changes in FAs and the actin network along neuritogenesis. This process includes neurotrophic factors (nerve growth factor, brain derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin, ciliary neurotrophic factor, glial derived neurotrophic factor) and their receptors, protein components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) (laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin), plasma membrane integrins and neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAM), and intracellular molecular protagonists such as small G proteins (RhoA, Rac, Cdc42) and their downstream targets.
Neuritogenesis is a dynamic phenomenon associated with neuronal differentiation that allows a rather spherical neuronal stem cell to develop dendrites and axon, a prerequisite for the integration and transmission of signals. The acquisition of neuronal polarity occurs in three steps:
(1) neurite sprouting, which consists of the formation of buds emerging from the postmitotic neuronal soma;
(2) neurite outgrowth, which represents the conversion of buds into neurites, their elongation and evolution into axon or dendrites; and
(3) the stability and plasticity of neuronal polarity.
In neuronal stem cells, remodeling and activation of focal adhesions (FAs) associated with deep modifications of the actin cytoskeleton is a prerequisite for neurite sprouting and subsequent neurite outgrowth. A multiple set of growth factors and interactors located in the extracellular matrix and the plasma membrane orchestrate neuritogenesis
by acting on intracellular signaling effectors,
notably small G proteins such as RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42,
which are involved in actin turnover and the dynamics of FAs.
The cellular prion protein (PrPC), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol
(GPI)-anchored membrane protein
mainly known for its role in a group of fatal
neurodegenerative diseases,
has emerged as a central player in neuritogenesis.
Here, we review the contribution of PrPC to neuronal polarization and detail the current knowledge on the
signaling pathways fine-tuned by PrPC
to promote neurite sprouting, outgrowth, and maintenance.
We emphasize that PrPC-dependent neurite sprouting is a process in which PrPC
governs the dynamics of FAs and the actin cytoskeleton
via β1 integrin signaling.
The presence of PrPC is necessary to render neuronal stem cells
competent to respond to neuronal inducers and
to develop neurites.
In differentiating neurons, PrPC exerts
a facilitator role towards neurite elongation.
This function relies on the interaction of PrPC with a set of diverse partners such as
elements of the extracellular matrix,
plasma membrane receptors,
adhesion molecules, and
soluble factors that control actin cytoskeleton turnover through Rho-GTPase signaling.
Once neurons have reached their terminal stage of differentiation and acquired their polarized morphology, PrPC also
takes part in the maintenance of neurites.
By acting on tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase, or
Heroes in Medical Research: Green Fluorescent Protein and the Rough Road in Science
Curator: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.
In this series, “Heroes in Medical Research”, I like to discuss the people who made some important contributions to science and medicine which underlie the great transformative changes but don’t usually get the notoriety given to Nobel Laureates or who seem to fly under the radar of popular news. Their work may be the development of research tools which allowed a great discovery leading to a line of transformative research, a moment of serendipity leading to discovery of a cure, or just contributions to the development of a new field or the mentoring of a new generation of scientists and clinicians. One such discovery, which has probably been pivotal in many of our research, is the discovery of the green fluorescent protein (GFP), commonly used as an invaluable tool to monitor protein for cellular expression and localization studies. Although the development of research tools, whether imaging tools, vectors, animal models, cell lines, and such are not heralded, they always assist in the pivotal discoveries of our time. The following is a heartwarming story by Discover Magazine’s Yudhijit Bhattacharjee behind Dr. Douglas Prasher’s discovery of the green fluorescent protein, his successful efforts to sequence the gene and subsequent struggles in science and finally scientific recognition for his work. In addition the story describes Dr. Prather’s perseverance, a trait necessary for every scientist.
In summary, Dr. Prather had been working at Wood’s Hole in Massachusetts trying to discover, isolate, then clone the protein which allowed a species of jellyfish living in the cold waters of the North Pacific, Aequorea victoria, to emit a green glow. Eventually he cloned the GFP gene, but gave up on work to express the gene in mammalian cells. Before leaving Wood’s Hole he gave the gene to Dr. Roger Tsien, who with Dr. Martin Chalfie and Osamu Shimomura showed the utility of GFP as an intracellular tracer to visualize, in real time, the expression and localization of GFP-tagged proteins (all three shared the 2008 Nobel Prize for this work). Dr. Tsien however realized the importance of Douglas’s cloning work as pivotal for their research, contacted Douglas (who now due to the bad economy was working at a Toyota dealership in Alabama) and invited him to the Nobel Prize Award Ceremony in Sweden as his guest. Although Dr. Prasher had “left academic science” he never really stopped his quest for a scientific career, using his spare time to review manuscripts.
Other researchers have invited their colleagues who made important contributions to the ultimate Nobel work. One such guest was one of my colleagues Dr. Leonard Cohen, who worked with Dr. Irwin Rose and Avram Hershko at the Institute for Cancer Research in Philadelphia a cell-free system from clams to discover the mechanism how cyclin B is degraded during the exit from the cell cycle (from A. Hershko’s Nobel speech). Dr. Hershko had acknowledged a slew of colleagues and highlighted their contributions to the ultimate work. It shows how even small discoveries can contribute to the sphere of scientific knowledge and breakthrough.
1. Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W.W., Prasher, D.C., Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science, 263(5148), 802-805 (1994).
Nitric oxide (NO) is a lipophilic, highly diffusible and short-lived molecule that acts as a physiological messenger and has been known to regulate a variety of important physiological responses including vasodilation, respiration, cell migration, immune response and apoptosis. Jordi Muntané et al
NO is synthesized by the Nitric Oxide synthase (NOS) enzyme and the enzyme is encoded in three different forms in mammals: neuronal NOS (nNOS or NOS-1), inducible NOS (iNOS or NOS-2), and endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS-3). The three isoforms, although similar in structure and catalytic function, differ in the way their activity and synthesis in controlled inside a cell. NOS-2, for example is induced in response to inflammatory stimuli, while NOS-1 and NOS-3 are constitutively expressed.
Regulation by Nitric oxide
NO is a versatile signaling molecule and the net effect of NO on gene regulation is variable and ranges from activation to inhibition of transcription.
The intracellular localization is relevant for the activity of NOS. Infact, NOSs are subject to specific targeting to subcellular compartments (plasma membrane, Golgi, cytosol, nucleus and mitochondria) and that this trafficking is crucial for NO production and specific post-translational modifications of target proteins.
Role of Nitric oxide in Cancer
One in four cases of cancer worldwide are a result of chronic inflammation. An inflammatory response causes high levels of activated macrophages. Macrophage activation, in turn, leads to the induction of iNOS gene that results in the generation of large amount of NO. The expression of iNOS induced by inflammatory stimuli coupled with the constitutive expression of nNOS and eNOS may contribute to increased cancer risk. NO can have varied roles in the tumor environment influencing DNA repair, cell cycle, and apoptosis. It can result in antagonistic actions including DNA damage and protection from cytotoxicity, inhibiting and stimulation cell proliferation, and being both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic. Genotoxicity due to high levels of NO could be through direct modification of DNA (nitrosative deamination of nucleic acid bases, transition and/or transversion of nucleic acids, alkylation and DNA strand breakage) and inhibition of DNA repair enzymes (such as alkyltransferase and DNA ligase) through direct or indirect mechanisms. The Multiple actions of NO are probably the result of its chemical (post-translational modifications) and biological heterogeneity (cellular production, consumption and responses). Post-translational modifications of proteins by nitration, nitrosation, phosphorylation, acetylation or polyADP-ribosylation could lead to an increase in the cancer risk. This process can drive carcinogenesis by altering targets and pathways that are crucial for cancer progression much faster than would otherwise occur in healthy tissue.
NO can have several effects even within the tumor microenvironment where it could originate from several cell types including cancer cells, host cells, tumor endothelial cells. Tumor-derived NO could have several functional roles. It can affect cancer progression by augmenting cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness. Infact, it has been proposed that NO promotes tumor growth by regulating blood flow and maintaining the vasodilated tumor microenvironment.NO can stimulate angiogenesis and can also promote metastasis by increasing vascular permeability and upregulating matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMPs have been associated with several functions including cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, differentiation, angiogenesis and so on. Recently, it was reported that metastatic tumor-released NO might impair the immune system, which enables them to escape the immunosurveillance mechanism of cells. Molecular regulation of tumour angiogenesis by nitric oxide.
S-nitrosylation and Cancer
The most prominent and recognized NO reaction with thiols groups of cysteineresidues is called S-nitrosylation or S-nitrosation, which leads to the formation of more stable nitrosothiols. High concentrations of intracellular NO can result in high concentrations of S-nitrosylated proteins and dysregulated S-nitrosylation has been implicated in cancer. Oxidative and nitrosative stress is sensed and closely associated with transcriptional regulation of multiple target genes.
Following are a few proteins that are modified via NO and modification of these proteins, in turn, has been known to play direct or indirect roles in cancer.
NO mediated aberrant proteins in Cancer
Bcl2
Bcl-2 is an important anti-apoptotic protein. It works by inhibiting mitochondrial Cytochrome C that is released in response to apoptotic stimuli. In a variety of tumors, Bcl-2 has been shown to be upregulated, and it has additionally been implicated with cancer chemo-resistance through dysregulation of apoptosis. NO exposure causes S-nitrosylation at the two cysteine residues – Cys158 and Cys229 that prevents ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway mediated degradation of the protein. Once prevented from degradation, the protein attenuates its anti-apoptotic effects in cancer progression. The S-nitrosylation based modification of Bcl-2 has been observed to be relevant in drug treatment studies (for eg. Cisplatin). Thus, the impairment of S-nitrosylated Bcl-2 proteins might serve as an effective therapeutic target to decrease cancer-drug resistance.
p53
p53 has been well documented as a tumor suppressor protein and acts as a major player in response to DNA damage and other genomic alterations within the cell. The activation of p53 can lead to cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, however, in case of irrepairable DNA damage, p53 can lead to apoptosis. Nuclear p53 accumulation has been related to NO-mediated anti-tumoral properties. High concentration of NO has been found to cause conformational changes in p53 resulting in biological dysfunction.. In RAW264.7, a murine macrophage cell line, NO donors induce p53 accumulation and apoptosis through JNK-1/2.
HIF-1a
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) is a heterodimeric transcription factor that is predominantly active under hypoxic conditions because the HIF-1a subunit is rapidly degraded in normoxic conditions by proteasomal degradation. It regulates the transciption of several genes including those involved in angiogenesis, cell cycle, cell metabolism, and apoptosis. Hypoxic conditions within the tumor can lead to overexpression of HIF-1a. Similar to hypoxia-mediated stress, nitrosative stress can stabilize HIF-1a. NO derivatives have also been shown to participate in hypoxia signaling. Resistance to radiotherapy has been traced back to NO-mediated HIF-1a in solid tumors in some cases.
PTEN
Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN), is again a tumor suppressor protein. It is a phosphatase and has been implicated in many human cancers. PTEN is a crucial negative regulator of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Over-activation of PI3K/Akt mediated signaling pathway is known to play a major role in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. S-nitrosylation of PTEN, that could be a result of NO stress, inhibits PTEN. Inhibition of PTEN phosphatase activity, in turn, leads to promotion of angiogenesis.
C-Src
C-src belongs to the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases and has been implicated in the promotion of cancer cell invasion and metastasis. It was demonstrated that S-nitrosylation of c-Src at cysteine 498 enhanced its kinase activity, thus, resulting in the enhancement of cancer cell invasion and metastasis.
Jaiswal M, et al. Nitric oxide in gastrointestinal epithelial cell carcinogenesis: linking inflammation to oncogenesis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Sep;281(3):G626-34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11518674
2012pharmaceutical
Amandeep Kaur
Aashir Awan, Phd
Abhisar Anand
Adina Hazan
Alan F. Kaul, PharmD., MS, MBA, FCCP
alexcrystal6
anamikasarkar
apreconasia
aviralvatsa
David Orchard-Webb, PhD
danutdaagmailcom
Demet Sag, Ph.D., CRA, GCP
Daniel Menzin
Dror Nir
dsmolyar
Ethan Coomber
evelinacohn
Gail S Thornton
Irina Robu
jayzmit48
jdpmd
jshertok
kellyperlman
Ed Kislauskis
komal23ingle
larryhbern
Madison Davis
marzankhan
megbaker58
ofermar2020
Dr. Pati
pkandala
Rosalind Codrington, PhD
ritusaxena
Rick Mandahl
satwik Sunnam
sjwilliamspa
Srinivas Sriram
stuartlpbi
Dr. Sudipta Saha
tildabarliya
vaishnavee24
zraviv06
zs22
