Biochemical Insights of Dr. Jose Eduardo de Salles Roselino
Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Interviewer, Curator
Leaders in Pharmaceutical Intelligence
Biochemical Insights of Dr. Jose Eduardo de Salles Roselino
http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/12/24/2014/larryhbern/Biochemical_
Insights_of_Dr._Jose_Eduardo_de_Salles_Roselino/
WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman
Biochemical Insights of Dr. Jose Eduardo de Salles Roselino
How is it that developments late in the 20th century diverted the attention of
biological processes from a dynamic construct involving interacting chemical
reactions under rapidly changing external conditions effecting tissues and cell
function to a rigid construct that is determined unilaterally by the genome
construct, diverting attention from mechanisms essential for seeing the complete
cellular construct?
Larry, I assume that in case you read the article titled Neo – Darwinism, The
Modern Synthesis and Selfish Genes that bares no relationship with Physiology
with Molecular Biology J. Physiol 2011; 589(5): 1007-11 by Denis Noble, you might
find that it was the key factor required in order to understand the dislodgment
of physiology as a foundation of medical reasoning. In the near unilateral emphasis
of genomic activity as a determinant of cellular activity all of the required general
support for the understanding of my reasoning. The DNA to protein link goes
from triplet sequence to amino acid sequence. That is the realm of genetics.
Further, protein conformation, activity and function requires that environmental
and micro-environmental factors should be considered (Biochemistry). If that
were not the case, we have no way to bridge the gap between the genetic
code and the evolution of cells, tissues, organs, and organisms.
- Consider this example of hormonal function. I would like to stress in
the cAMP dependent hormonal response, the transfer of information
that occurs through conformation changes after protein interactions.
This mechanism therefore, requires that proteins must not have their
conformation determined by sequence alone.
Regulatory protein conformation is determined by its sequence plus
the interaction it has in its micro-environment. For instance, if your
scheme takes into account what happens inside the membrane and
that occurs before cAMP, then production is increased by hormone
action. A dynamic scheme will show an effect initially, over hormone
receptor (hormone binding causing change in its conformation) followed
by GTPase change in conformation caused by receptor interaction and
finally, Adenylate cyclase change in conformation and in activity after
GTPase protein binding in a complex system that is dependent on self-
assembly and also, on changes in their conformation in response to
hormonal signals (see R. A Kahn and A. G Gilman 1984 J. Biol. Chem.
v. 259,n 10 pp6235-6240. In this case, trimeric or dimeric G does not
matter). Furthermore, after the step of cAMP increased production we
also can see changes in protein conformation. The effect of increased
cAMP levels over (inhibitor protein and protein kinase protein complex)
also is an effect upon protein conformation. Increased cAMP levels led
to the separation of inhibitor protein (R ) from cAMP dependent protein
kinase (C ) causing removal of the inhibitor R and the increase in C activity.
R stands for regulatory subunit and C for catalytic subunit of the protein
complex. - This cAMP effect over the quaternary structure of the enzyme complex
(C protein kinase + R the inhibitor) may be better understood as an
environmental information producing an effect in opposition to
what may be considered as a tendency towards a conformation
“determined” by the genetic code. This “ideal” conformation
“determined” by the genome would be only seen in crystalline
protein. In carbohydrate metabolism in the liver the hormonal signal
causes a biochemical regulatory response that preserves homeostatic
levels of glucose (one function) and in the muscle, it is a biochemical
regulatory response that preserves intracellular levels of ATP (another
function). - Therefore, sequence alone does not explain conformation, activity
and function of regulatory proteins. If this important regulatory
mechanism was not ignored, the work of S. Prusiner (Prion diseases
and the BSE crisis Stanley B. Prusiner 1997 Science; 278: 245 – 251,
10 October) would be easily understood. We would be accustomed
to reason about changes in protein conformation caused by protein
interaction with other proteins, lipids, small molecules and even ions. - In case this wrong biochemical reasoning is used in microorganisms.
Still it is wrong but, it will cause a minor error most of the time, since
we may reduce almost all activity of microorganism´s proteins to a
single function – The production of another microorganism. However,
even microorganisms respond differently to their micro-environment
despite a single genome (See M. Rouxii dimorphic fungus works,
later). The reason for the reasoning error is, proteins are proteins
and DNA are DNA quite different in chemical terms. Proteins must
change their conformation to allow for fast regulatory responses and
DNA must preserve its sequence to allow for genetic inheritance.
Leave a Reply