Feeds:
Posts
Comments
English: Schematic sketch showing the transpor...

English: Schematic sketch showing the transport types at the blood-brain barrier. Deutsch: Schematische Darstellung der Transportmechanismen an der Blut-Hirn-Schranke. Français : Schéma des types de transport à travers la barrière hémato-encéphalique (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Larry H Bernstein, MD
Reporter

Provided without comment.  Quite interesting.

novel protease resistant peptide shuttles able to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by binding to a specific brain receptor

Description

A Catalan Research Institute based in Barcelona (Spain) has identified novel protease resistant peptide shuttles able to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by binding to a specific brain receptor. These shuttles are a powerful alternative to carry a wide variety of small and large molecules as cargos. This represents a novel opportunity to develop new delivery carriers able to cross actively a range of biological barriers.

New and innovative aspects

These compounds are novel drug delivery carriers that provide a non-invasive, non-antigenic, stable and receptor-specific way to transport drugs across the Blood-Brain Barrier and into the Central Nervous System.

These compounds show high permeability, biocompatibility, good solubility in water and resistance to proteases.

Specifications

The treatment of most neurological disorders has not been fully addressed mainly because of the neuroprotective role of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that hinders the delivery of many diagnostic and therapeutic agents into the brain. Consequently, therapeutic molecules and genes that might otherwise be effective in diagnosis and therapy do not cross the BBB in adequate amounts: 98% of compounds smaller than 400Da and 100% of larger ones do not reach further drug development stages.

Most central nervous system (CNS) diseases, however, are complex disorders with difficult molecular targets that require larger, safer and more selective drugs. As a result, brain tumors, neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, and central nervous system (CNS) diseases such as schizophrenia are not successfully treated. Therefore, finding an efficient CNS delivery system is one of the major challenges in neurological treatment and one our technology can potentially overcome.

One of the best approaches for drug delivery to the brain is the use of endogenous transport mechanisms, such as receptor-mediated transcystosis. Peptides are biocompatible molecules able to transport cargos (i.e. therapeutic compounds) to specific tissues such as the brain. However, one of the main limitations of peptides as therapeutic agents is their low stability in plasma.

The use of non-natural amino acids in peptidic sequences can circumvent this problem because they are resistant to human serum proteases. Using this approach, we obtained several modified peptides. Two of them were selected based on their protease resistance and transport capacity across the blood-brain barrier, using a specific endogenous receptor. Both peptides showed enhanced membrane permeability in vitro in comparison to standard peptides and even greater stability in plasma (over 24h).

Main advantages of its use

Novel delivery technology that provides a non-invasive, non-antigenic, permeable, stable, soluble and receptor-specific way to transport drugs across the BBB and into the CNS.

This technology may ultimately allow the delivery of therapeutic agents, even large ones, across the BBB and other biological barriers, thus increasing the effectiveness of existing or new drugs.

Potential of application in a wide number of fields and in transport through various biological barriers.

Applications

Biotechnological and Pharmaceutical companies specialized in drug discovery, drug delivery, neurological disorders, tools to cross the Blood-brain barrier. The final aim is to increase the efficiency of existing molecules for the treatment of neurological disorders.

Molecule and treatment design, drug manufacture, treatment of neurological disorders, drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

Intellectual property status

This invention is protected by a priority application in Spain and we plan to apply for a PCT in due time.

 

Author: Tilda Barliya PhD

Title: Factors affecting the PK of the nanocarrier.

Category: Nanotechnology in drug delivery

A plethora of new products are emerging as potential therapeutic agents. This calls for detailed studies of their unique pharmacologic characteristics and mechanisms of action in humans. This review written by Caron WP et al (Zamboni’s group) provides a major overview of the factors that affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of nanoparticle carries in preclinical models and patients (1). I will use this article as the main source as it was so nicely written yet many other references are added within.

The disposition of carrier-mediated agents (CMAs) is dependent on the carrier and not on the parent drug, until the drug is released from the carrier into the system and includes encapsulated (the drug within or bound to the carrier), released (the active drug that gets released from the carrier), and sum total (encapsulated drug plus released drug).

After the drug has been released from its carrier, it is pharmacologically active and subjected to the same routes of metabolism and clearance (CL) as the non-carrier form of the drug (1,2).

In theory, the PK disposition of the drug after it is released from the carrier should be the same as after administration of the small-molecule or standard formulations. Therefore, the pharmacology and PK of CMAs are complex and call for comprehensive analytical studies to assess the disposition of encapsulated and released forms of the drug in plasma and tumor.

Interindividual variability in drug exposure, represented by area under the plasma concentration– time curve (AUC) of the encapsulated drug and several factor can potentially affect it:

  • Physical characteristics of the CMA (size, charge, surface modification). Figure 1
  • Host-associated characteristics such as gender and age as well as the host mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), which is a collective term for the immune cells.

F3.large.jpg (1280×843)

Figure 1 here (=figure 3 in the original paper. ref 1) : Nanoparticle clearance and biocompatibility are dependent on various factors including physical characteristics of the carrier as well as physiologic parameters such as the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) (reticuloendothelial system (RES)) recognition and enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. There are qualitative relationships between the independent variables, namely, particle size, particle zeta-potential (surface charge), and solubility, and the dependent variable, namely, biocompatibility. Biocompatibility, or extent of exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve), includes the route of uptake and clearance (shown in green as the EPR effect and renal and biliary clearance), cytotoxicity (shown in red, can represent either efficacy or toxicities/ adverse events in anticancer treatment), and MPS/RES recognition (shown in blue).

The effect on the immune cells is divided into two categories:  (i) responses to nanoparticles that are specifically modified to stimulate the immune system (e.g., vaccine carriers) and (ii) undesirable interactions and/or side-effects.

Immune cells that participate in nanoparticle uptake are circulating monocytes, platelets, leukocytes, and dendritic cells in the bloodstream (3,4).  In addition, nanoparticles can be taken up in tissues by phagocytes, e.g., by Kupffer cells in the liver, by dendritic cells in the lymph nodes, by B cells in the spleen, and by macrophages

Uptake mechanisms may occur through different pathways and can often be facilitated by the adsorption of opsonins to the nanoparticle surface

Physical characteristics:

  • Particle size: In one study of liposomes, particles that had a hydrodynamic diameter between 100 and 200 nm had a fourfold higher rate of uptake in tumors than particles <50 nm or >300 nm.
  • Surface modification: Conjugated PEG polymer onto the surface- is known to minimize opsonization and thus subsequent decreased rate of MPS uptake overall plasma exposures of drugs contained within PEGylated liposomes were six fold higher than those contained within non-PEGylated liposomes
  • Surface charge: Uncharged liposomes have lower CLs than either positively or negatively charged liposomes (probably due to reduced opsonization by MPS. rate of CL from blood was significantly higher for negatively charged particles than for uncharged particles

It can be summarized as for their rate of clearance from highest (left) to lowest (right) as:

positive>negative> neutral

Note: PEGylation can alter the alter this rate significantly for example,

Levchenko et al. showed that the negative charge on liposomes can be shielded with this physical alteration, leading to a significantly reduced rate of liver uptake and consequent prolongation of their presence in circulating blood (5).

Host characteristics

  • Age: In some cases, age-related effects on the PK of some PEGylated liposomal agents have been reported, where in younger male patients (<60) there was a higher rate of clearance of two different agents (Doxil and CDK602) compared to older patients (>60). In other words, in older age, the CL rate was lower and therefore higher AUC/dose. No relation to age was observed for female patients, in the same study.

Alterations in the PK and PD of CMAs may involve accerelated decline in immune system functioning, specifically the association between aging and the functioning of monocytes (6). In theory, there is a loss of MPS activity or function in elderly patients, and this decreases the CL of CMAs by the MPS, leading to increased drug exposures and toxicity in elderly patients. In terms of efficacy, greater age was inversely proportional to progression-free survival; however, no correlation was found between age and overall survival.

  •  Gender: In similar study to the one presented above, female patients had overall lower CL of DOXIL, IHL-305 and CDK602 compared to male patients of the same age.

The basis for the gender-related differences in the PK and PD of CMAs is unclear. It has been hypothesized that some of the differences may be attributed to the effects of sex hormones such as testosterone and estrogen on immune cell function.

Delivery of CMAs Into Tumor

Major advances in the understanding of tumor biology have led to the discovery of targeted agents that can deliver drugs to the desired site while minimizing exposure in normal tissues, thereby minimizing the associated adverse effects. Whereas conventional drugs encounter numerous obstacles en route to their target, CMAs can take advantage of a tumor’s leaky vasculature to extravasate into tissue, via the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR).

Note: The extend of the EPR effect is highly debated since although passive targeting through the EPR effect has been a key concept in delivering CMAs to tumors, it does not ensure uniform delivery to all regions of tumor. Furthermore, not all tumors exhibit an EPR effect, and the permeability of vessels may not be the same across any single tumor.

Active targeting may overcome these limitations. The CMAs can be enabled to bind to specific cells in a tumor by using surface attached ligands that are capable of recognizing and binding to cells of interest.

Antibody-mediated targeting has been the method of choice, other targeting strategies using nucleic acids, carbohydrates, peptides, aptamers, vitamins, and other agents are also being evaluated.

Other major points that can affect the PK disposition

  • The linearity and nonlinearity of the CLs of a drug (might be associated with the dose like with S-CKD602)(7).
  • Drug-drug interaction (single agent vs combination)
  • Body composition (Body surface area, body weight)

There are a multitude of properties of CMAs that differ from those of the active small-molecule drugs they contain. These differences lead to significant variability in the PK and PD of carrier- mediated drugs. It has been shown that physical properties, the MPS, the presence of tumors in the liver, EPRs, drug–drug interactions, age, and gender all contribute in varying degrees to the PK disposition and PD end points of CMAs in patients.

Areas of research that can aid in an understanding of how these agents should be used and how we may predict their actions in patients include pharmacogenomics, cellular function (probing the MPS), more sensitive and accurate analytical PK methods, and identification of the optimal preclinical (animal and in vitro) models.

References:

1. W P Caron, G Song, P Kumar, S Rawal and W C Zamboni.Interpatient PK and PD variability of carrier-mediated anticancer agent.  Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2012 91, 802-812 http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/clpt201212a.html

2. Zamboni, W.C. Liposomal, nanoparticle, and conjugated formulations of anticancer agents. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 8230–8234 (2005).

http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/11/23/8230.long

http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/11/23/8230.full.pdf+html

3. Dobrovolskaia, M.A., Aggarwal, P., Hall, J.B. & McNeil, S.E. Preclinical studies to understand nanoparticle interaction with the immune system and its potential effects on nanoparticle biodistribution. Mol. Pharm. 5, 487–495 (2008). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613572/

4. Dobrovolskaia, M.A. & McNeil, S.E. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 469–478 (2007). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18654343

5. Levchenko, T.S., Rammohan, R., Lukyanov, A.N., Whiteman, K.R. & Torchilin, V.P. Liposome clearance in mice: the effect of a separate and combined presence of surface charge and polymer coating. Int. J. Pharm. 240, 95–102 (2002). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12062505

6. Lloberas, J. & Celada, A. Effect of aging on macrophage function. Exp. Gerontol. 37, 1325–1331 (2002). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12559402

7. Zamboni, W.C. et al. Pharmacokinetic study of pegylated liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 86, 519–526 (2009). http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/v86/n5/abs/clpt2009141a.html

Introducing smart-imaging into radiologists’ daily practice.

Author and Curator: Dror Nir, PhD

Radiology congresses are all about imaging in medicine. Interestingly, radiology originates from radiation. It was the discovery of X-ray radiation at the beginning of the 20th century that opened the road to “seeing” the inside of the human body without harming it (at that time that meant cutting into the body).

Radiology meetings are about sharing experience and knowhow on imaging-based management patients. The main topic is always image-interpretation: the bottom line of clinical radiology! This year’s European Congress of Radiology (ECR) dedicated few of its sessions to recent developments in image-interpretation tools. I chose to discuss the one that I consider contributing the most to the future of cancer patients’ management.

In the refresher course dedicated to computer application the discussion was aimed at understanding the question “How do image processing and CAD impact radiological daily practice?” Experts’ reviews gave the audience some background information on the following subjects:

  1. A.     The link between image reconstruction and image analysis.
  2. B.     Semantic web technologies for sharing and reusing imaging-related information
  3. C.     Image processing and CAD: workflow in clinical practice.

I find item A to be a fundamental education item. Not once did I hear a radiologist saying: “I know this is the lesion because it’s different on the image”.  Being aware of the computational concepts behind image rendering, even if it is at a very high level and lacking deep understanding of the computational processes,  will contribute to more balanced interpretations.

Item B is addressing the dream of investigators worldwide. Imagine that we could perform a web search and find educating, curated materials linking visuals and related clinical information, including standardized pathology reporting. We would only need to remember that search engines used certain search methods and agree, worldwide, on the method and language to be used when describing things. Having such tools is a pre-requisite to successful pharmaceutical and bio-tech development.

I find item C strongly linked to A, as all methods for better image interpretation must fit into a workflow. This is a design goal that is not trivial to achieve. To understand what I mean by that, try to think about how you could integrate the following examples in your daily workflow: i.e. what kind of expertise is needed for execution, how much time it will take, do you have the infrastructure?

In the rest of this post, I would like to highlight, through examples that were discussed during ECR 2012, the aspect of improving cancer patients’ clinical assessment by using information fusion to support better image interpretation.

  • Adding up quantitative information from MR spectroscopy (quantifies biochemical property of a target lesion) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR imaging (highlights lesion vasculature).

Image provided by: Dr. Pascal Baltzer, director of mammography at the centre for radiology at Friedrich Schiller University in Jena, Germany

 
  • Registration of images generated by different imaging modalities (Multi-modal imaging registration).

The following examples: Fig 2 demonstrates registration of a mammography image of a breast lesion to an MRI image of this lesion. Fig3 demonstrates registration of an ultrasound image of a breast lesion scanned by an Automatic Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) system and an MRI image of the same lesion.

Images provided by members of the HAMAM project (an EU, FP7 funded research project: Highly Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis through Integration of Biological Knowledge, Novel Imaging Modalities, and Modelling): http://www.hamam-project.org

 

 Multi-modality image registration is usually based on the alignment of image-features apparent in the scanned regions. For ABUS-MRI matching these were: the location of the nipple and the breast thickness; the posterior of the nipple in both modalities; the medial-lateral distance of the nipple to the breast edge on ultrasound; and an approximation of the rib­cage using a cylinder on the MRI. A mean accuracy of 14mm was achieved.

Also from the HAMAM project, registration of ABUS image to a mammography image:

registration of ABUS image to a mammography image, Image provided by members of the HAMAM project (an EU, FP7 funded research project: Highly Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis through Integration of Biological Knowledge, Novel Imaging Modalities, and Modelling): http://www.hamam-project.org

  • Automatic segmentation of suspicious regions of interest seen in breast MRI images

Segmentation of suspicious the lesions on the image is the preliminary step in tumor evaluation; e.g. finding its size and location. Since lesions have different signal/image character­istics to the rest of the breast tissue, it gives hope for the development of computerized segmentation techniques. If successful, such techniques bear the promise of enhancing standardization in the reporting of lesions size and location: Very important information for the success of the treatment step.

Roberta Fusco of the National Cancer Institute of Naples Pascal Foundation, Naples/IT suggested the following automatic method for suspi­cious ROI selection within the breast using dynamic-derived information from DCE-MRI data.

 

Automatic segmentation of suspicious ROI in breast MRI images, image provided by Roberta Fusco of the National Cancer Institute of Naples Pascal Foundation, Naples/IT

 

 Her algorithm includes three steps (Figure 2): (i) breast mask extraction by means of automatic intensity threshold estimation (Otsu Thresh-holding) on the par­ametric map obtained through the sum of intensity differences (SOD) calculated pixel by pixel; (ii) hole-filling and leakage repair by means of morphological operators: closing is required to fill the holes on the boundaries of breast mask, filling is required to fill the holes within the breasts, erosion is required to reduce the dilation obtained by the closing operation; (iii) suspicious ROIs extraction: a pixel is assigned to a suspicious ROI if it satisfies two conditions: the maximum of its normalized time-intensity curve should be greater than 0.3 and the maximum signal intensity should be reached before the end of the scan time. The first condition assures that the pixels within the ROI have a significant contrast agent uptake (thus excluding type I and type II curves) and the second condition is required for the time-intensity pattern to be of type IV or V (thus excluding type III curves).

Written by: Dror Nir, PhD

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Meningitis outbreak: 13,000 got shots of recalled steroid but how many at risk unclear

(Kristin M. Hall/ Associated Press ) – A vial of injectable steroids from the New England Compounding Center is displayed in the Tennessee Department of Health in Nashville, Tenn., on Monday, Oct. 8, 2012. The CDC has said an outbreak of fungal meningitis may have been caused by steroids from the Massachusetts specialty pharmacy.

By Associated Press, Published: October 8

NEW YORK — As many as 13,000 people received steroid shots suspected in a national meningitis outbreak, health officials said Monday. But it’s not clear how many are in danger.Officials don’t how many of the shots may have been contaminated with meningitis-causing fungus. And the figure includes not only those who got them in the back for pain — who are most at risk — but also those who got the shots in other places, like knees and shoulders.

There was no breakdown on the number of back injections, said Curtis Allen, a spokesman for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Those injected in joints are not believed to be at risk for meningitis, he said.The number of people sickened in the outbreak reached 105 on Monday. Deaths rose to eight, with another fatality in Tennessee, the CDC said. Tennessee has the most cases, followed by Michigan, Virginia, Indiana, Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina and Ohio.

Investigators suspect a steroid medication made by a specialty pharmacy may be to blame. About 17,700 single-dose vials of the steroid were sent to 23 states. Inspectors found at least one sealed vial contaminated with fungus, and tests were being done on other vials.

The first known case of the rarely seen fungal meningitis was diagnosed last month in Tennessee. The steroid maker, New England Compounding Center of Framingham, Mass., recalled the drug, and over the weekend recalled everything else it makes.

“While there is no indication at this time of any contamination in other NECC products, this recall is being taken as a precautionary measure,” the company said in a statement.

Meningitis is an inflammation of the lining of the brain and spinal cord, and a back injection would put any contaminant in more direct contact with that lining.

Symptoms on meningitis include severe headache, nausea, dizziness and fever. The CDC said many of the cases have been mild and some people had strokes. Symptoms have been appearing between one and four weeks after patients got the shots.

A Michigan man whose wife’s death was linked to the outbreak said Monday that he, too, was treated with steroids from one of the recalled batches.

“Not only have I lost my wife, but I’m watching the clock to see if anything develops,” George Cary said, as friends and family gathered for his wife’s wake in Howell, 60 miles northwest of Detroit.

His wife, Lilian, 67, had been ill since late August, but meningitis wasn’t detected until Sept. 22, her husband said. She died Sept. 30.

Michigan officials have not released the names of two people who have died in the outbreak in that state, but did say one was a 67-year-old woman.

Fungal meningitis is not contagious like the more common forms. The two types of fungus linked so far to the outbreak are all around, but very rarely causes illness. Fungal meningitis is treated with high-dose antifungal medications, usually given intravenously in a hospital.

The steroid is known as preservative-free methylprednisolone acetate, which the compounding pharmacy creates by combining a powder with a liquid.

Doctors should contact any patient who got doses from any of the recalled lots, and should look back at their records as far back as mid-May, CDC officials say.

___

AP writer Ed White in Detroit contributed to this report.

___

Online:

CDC information: http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/outbreaks/meningitis.html

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-cases-of-a-rare-fungal-meningitis-rise-to-105-outbreak-tied-to-steroid-shots/2012/10/08/15f2468a-116e-11e2-9a39-1f5a7f6fe945_story.html

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Watch Out SF, Boston Is Turning Into Biotech’s No. 1 Cluster

http://www.xconomy.com/national/2012/10/08/watch-out-sf-boston-is-becoming-biotechs-no-1-cluster/2/

10/8/12Follow @ldtimmerman
BioBeatlogo

Luke Timmerman is the National Biotech Editor of Xconomy. E-mail him at

ltimmerman@xconomy.com

Follow @ldtimmerman

Biotech has never concentrated in just one place. This industry tends to grow up in geographic clusters, but it will always be spread around the map, partly because great science comes from hundreds of academic hotspots around the world.

But there have always been two places—San Francisco and Boston—that have stood out way above all the other hubs of biotech. And something truly special is happening now in Boston’s biotech cluster, and it’s a long-term mega-trend. Boston, I’m convinced, is very close to taking the title as the world’s No. 1 biotech hub, and holding onto that distinction for a generation.

Before going too much further, I should say a little bit about where I come from on this question. I started covering biotech 11 years ago in Seattle, which is where I call home. But a few years ago, I spent an academic year on a fellowship in Cambridge, MA, that gave me freedom to attend classes and meet innovators at Harvard, MIT, and the Longwood Medical Area. Then I moved to San Francisco for a little more than a year to cover biotech’s biggest companies for Bloomberg News. Four years ago, I made the startup leap to Xconomy, where my job has been to build up our biotech coverage in Boston, Seattle, San Francisco, and San Diego. I’ve spent a lot of time meeting and interviewing people in those places, and writing about life sciences innovation at startups as well as big companies like Amgen and Genentech.

San Francisco, as I think most people in the industry would agree, is still an amazing place for life sciences and has earned its ranking as the No. 1 cluster of biotech. This dates back to the late ‘70s and the formation of Genentech. Even today, if you look at the categories Ernst & Young uses to rank geographic clusters in its most recent “Beyond Borders” report, the San Francisco Bay Area ranks No. 1 in six of the seven. The Bay Area is tops in number of public biotech companies, public company revenue, R&D spending, profits, cash balances, and total assets. Boston was No. 1 in public company market valuations (a number that fluctuates daily), and was second in every other category.

Those numbers tell a much of the story at public companies, but not the whole story, because it leaves out private companies and Big Pharma investment. If you think that private companies and startup funding are an important part of the story, and a leading indicator of future success, Boston has the edge. New England surpassed the Bay Area in seed/early stage biotech financing, and the number of startup companies in 2009/2010. New England had 124 seed/early stage companies that pulled in $1.17 billion in financing that fiscal period, compared with 99 companies that got $938 million that fiscal year, according to figures from PricewaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association.

While plenty of people in Boston can scratch the startup itch, quite a few others can find steady work and experience in Big Pharma. Those companies have decided over the last decade to invest big money, and hire a lot of people, in Boston. There’s Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and more. When Paris-based Sanofi bought Cambridge, MA-based Genzyme for $20 billion last year, at a point when it was closing R&D centers around the world, it created combinedoperations in Boston. When Tokyo-based Takeda Pharmaceuticals bought Cambridge, MA-based Millennium Pharmaceuticals a few years ago for $8.8 billion, it didn’t just pick up the company’s crown jewel and leave. It consolidated its global cancer drug R&D operation in Boston, instead a lot more money there, and charged CEO Deborah Dunsire and her team with creating more products like bortezomib (Velcade).

Now look at the independent biotech companies based there. Biogen Idec (NASDAQ: BIIB) has undergone a resurgence the past couple years under a new management team. Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: VRTX) has broken out to become a regional anchor, and regional role model for dozens of startups, thanks to two important new FDA approved drugs. And during a time when manyVCs are cutting back investment or going out of business, Third Rock Ventures has burst on the Boston biotech scene, injecting big money into bold new startup ideas coming out of Boston’s research institutions. Companies like Agios Pharmaceuticals, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Foundation Medicine, Bluebird Bio, Warp Drive Bio, and Zafgen are a few of these high-impact kind of opportunities that you rarely see sprouting up anywhere else. It will take a few more years to see if this strategy really pays off, but the early indications are encouraging, and have emboldened Third Rock to expand this model to San Francisco.

Cutting-edge science at Harvard University and MIT put Boston on the map in the first place, and Boston is always working hard to keep its edge in fields like genomics, where the Broad Institute rules. But what is interesting to me is how many visionary decisions about transportation and land use—intentional or not—have been made to support that science, and that will pay dividends for generations. Without question, Kendall Square in Cambridge is the most

highly concentrated place in the world for life sciences innovation, in terms of bright people and bright ideas per square foot. There’s no other place in the world with biotech companies big and small, Big Pharma, world-class biomedical researchers, top clinical collaborators, thousands and thousands of talented employees, and venture capitalists all within walking distance.

When I travel to Boston, all I need is a hotel room, a subway pass, and good walking shoes to pack an amazingly efficient day of meetings with innovators. If I need to go to meet companies along Route 128, I’ll just rent a Zipcar from Kendall Square for a day. Travel to San Francisco or San Diego, and you have to rent a car (often way overpriced) and spend a fair amount of time traveling around suburban office parks, sitting in traffic.

The difference in land use and transportation has helped turn Boston into a tight-knit community. When it’s easy for a bench scientist, a business development director, or a CEO from different companies to talk shop or commiserate, they do. And they help each other. “When you are struggling with some kind of issue, you call up five of your friends at other companies and ask how they dealt with something like that,” says Adelene Perkins, CEO of Cambridge-based Infinity Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: INFI).

Adelene Perkins, CEO of Infinity Pharmaceuticals

David Schenkein, the CEO of Cambridge, MA-based Agios Pharmaceuticals, has had the experience of living in both the East and West Coast’s top biotech hubs, and he says the density of Boston translates into a competitive advantage. He joined the biotech industry in 2001 at Cambridge-based Millennium Pharmaceuticals, moved to Genentech from 2006 to 2009, and returned to Boston to run Agios. He says Genentech was an amazing place that lived up to its reputation for excellence, but it’s also geographically isolated at its campus on a hilltop in South San Francisco. That isolation doesn’t help foster the kind of company-to-company networking and cross-pollination of ideas that happens when so many people in the industry are within walking distance.

David Schenkein, CEO of Agios Pharmaceuticals

“The thing in Boston is proximity,” Schenkein says. “At least twice a week, somebody from the Broad Institute, the Whitehead Institute, or Harvard walks to our building to share some data they want to review with us, or I just walk over to their building. It makes life a whole lot easier to not have to get in your car.”

OK, you might say, getting in a car for 20-30 minutes and finding a place to park is no big deal. And people often argue that the West Coast has greater recreation/outdoor/quality of life opportunities that Boston can’t compete with. But the Bay Area also has some real problems with stratospheric housing costs that discourage young people getting started in their careers. Bad transportation and land use policies from decades ago tend to isolate people, keeping them walled off in their professional silos. That isolation keeps people from gaining that kind of peer-to-peer understanding that Perkins says she can get in the Boston network.

Having such a tight-knit industrial community creates a lasting competitive advantage. When people feel connected to a community, they tend to put down roots, knowing that while their company might be risky, they will easily find another job down the street without having to move their families. And they can easily diversify their skill sets in Boston by moving around a few times in their career to different kinds of organizations.

“The biggest advantage I can see building Agios in Boston rather than San Francisco or New York or Boulder is my ability to go from 15 employees to 75 employees in two years, and keep getting A-players,” Schenkein says.

Of course, once a place attracts this many smart people and gets this much critical mass, the advantage tends to create a virtuous cycle. Look at Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: SRPT). This company recently nailed an important clinical trial with a drug for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. It needed to recruit a bunch of new people with expertise in rare diseases. When it couldn’t get the people it said it wanted to move to its headquarters in Seattle, the companymoved its headquarters where the recruits were—Boston.

One other advantage, not to be underestimated, is Boston biotech’s edge in status and clout. When I traveled to the Biotechnology Industry Organization’s conference in Boston in June, I was amazed that the hometown paper, the Boston Globe, considered BIO’s convention to be front-page, above-the-fold news in the Sunday paper. Flipping channels that evening in the hotel, I saw the CEO of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council being interviewed on New England Cable News about what the Bay State can do to flex even more biotech muscle.

Coming from the West Coast, this amount of attention for biotech is eye-opening. Unless anti-industry activists raise an enormous stink about biotech, it doesn’t make mainstream news. If you live in the Bay Area, your town is dominated by Apple, Google, Facebook, etc.—and unless you work in the industry, you may never have heard of Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ: [[ticker:GILD]). San Diego has some good biotech assets, but most folks think of it first as a military town, or as a wireless infrastructure (Qualcomm) town. Seattle has Boeing, Microsoft, Amazon, Starbucks, Nordstrom, Costco, and no flagship biotech company.

In Boston, if you define healthcare loosely to include all the hospitals, biomedical research, and biotech and Big Pharma, then healthcare is the state’s undisputed No. 1 industry. As Millennium’s Dunsire said at an Xconomy event last week, there are 450,000 people working in healthcare in Massachusetts. That many people in one group creates clout. In Massachusetts, elected officials know this and want to do what they can to help biotech. Even though elected officials can’t always throw big bucks into the industry, this support can mean the difference when a company needs a permit or some smaller issue. And it provides a psychological boost to the companies who know they will be heard, and not just get a cold shoulder from their elected officials.

Aveo Oncology CEO Tuan Ha-Ngoc

One last point about culture. There’s always been some cultural divide between the coasts, and I suppose people will probably never stop arguing about it. People on the West Coast sometimes like to trot out stereotypes about the sharp-elbowed competitors in Boston, how they just can’t collaborate as well as us laid-back West Coasters. That’s just not consistent with the Boston I’ve experienced. If anything, there’s more of a tight-knit collaborative community in Boston than in San Francisco. There’s a can-do spirit, an energy in Boston that is palpable. It will endure. Boston is reaping what it has sown for decades.

“You can feel the sense of common purpose,” says Tuan Ha-Ngoc, the CEO of Cambridge-based Aveo Oncology (NASDAQ: AVEO), who started his biotech career at Genetics Institute in Boston in 1984. “We are all here, we run scientific organizations, we run hospitals, we run companies. We know the future is out there for us.”

Statins’ Nonlipid Effects on Vascular Endothelium through eNOS Activation

 

Curator, Author,Writer, Reporter: Larry Bernstein, MD, FACP

 
Categories of Research:

Disease biology, Cell Biology and Cell Signaling, Biological Networks and Gene Regulation, Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease, Nitric Oxide, HMG Co A inhibitors, Endothelial Receptor, Hypertension, Therapeutic Targets

Introduction

Statins have an effect on the vascular endothelium, which plays an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and angiogenesis, a role independent of the lipid lowering effect. The vascular endothelium plays an important role regulating vascular wall contraction and as a mediator for the vascular wall. Endothelial dysfunction, the hallmark of which is reduced activity of endothelial cell derived nitric oxide (NO), is a key factor in developing atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Vascular endothelial cells play a pivotal role in modulation of leukocyte and platelet adherence, thrombogenicity, anticoagulation, and vessel wall contraction and relaxation, so that endothelial dysfunction has become almost a synonym for vascular disease. A single layer of endothelial cells is the only constituent of capillaries, which differ from other vessels, which contain smooth muscle cells and adventitia. Capillaries directly mediate nutritional supply as well as gas exchange within all organs. The failure of the microcirculation leads to tissue apoptosis/necrosis. expanded cultured EPC transplantation and cytokine-induced EPC mobilization from bone marrow have been shown to enhance angiogenesis with significant improvement of microcirculation in ischemic tissue.

It has been generally assumed that cholesterol reduction by statins mechanism underlying their beneficial effects in cardiovascular disease. The statins — potent inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, an enzyme that plays a critical role in cholesterol metabolism — block substrate accessibility to HMG-CoA reductase , effectively subverting cholesterol metabolism. Sufficient evidence now supports a hypothesis that cholesterol-independent or “pleiotropic” effects of statins improve endothelial dysfunction, effects on angiogenesis, and reduce vascular inflammation. The statins’ cholesterol-independent vascular effects appear to directly restore or improve endothelial function by increasing NO production, promote endothelial repair after arterial injury, and decrease vascular inflammation. Statins improve endothelial function by:

  • increasing production of nitric oxide,
  • promoting blood flow,
  • dampening inflammation,
  • antagonizing thrombogenicity, and
  • reducing endothelial vasoresponses.

The HMG-CoA reductase pathway, which is blocke...

The HMG-CoA reductase pathway, which is blocked by statins via inhibiting the rate limiting enzyme HMG-CoA reductase. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

We review effects of statins on endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells that identifies a novel therapeutic potential of statin drugs.

  • Evidence in support of the new “pleiotrophic” non-lipid effects of Statins
  • Endothelial cell progenitors leave the bone marrow in response to cytokines or ischemic Injury.
  • They proliferate, migrate, and acquire resistance to apoptotic cell death.

Transplanting mice with the bone marrow of a transgenic animal carrying the LacZ reporter gene under control of the Tie2 promoter, which is active in endothelial cells…showed that statin-treated animals accumulate marrow-derived endothelial cells at the site of corneal neovascularization, administering statins is probably safer than giving VEGF to promote angiogenesis or vasculogenesis.

  1. Akt activation has emerged as an indispensable signaling gateway at the crossroads between angiogenesis and endothelial stem cell recruitment and differentiation
  2. Placental growth factor, which seems preferentially involved in facilitating postnatal blood vessel formation, is another “vasculogenic factor” that acts very much like the statins
  3. Increase in endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and activity is clearly stimulated by statins, which results in Akt activation a multifaceted developmental pathway of stem cell mobilization and differentiation is exploited by statins

Altieri DC. Statins’ benefits begin to sprout. J. Clin. Invest. 108:365–366 (2001). DOI:10.1172/JCI200113556

“Pleiotropic” Effect of statins

Recent studies have shown the restoration of endothelial function before significant reduction of serum cholesterol levels effect of statins on the endothelium were first defined by their ability to enhance endothelial NO production, upregulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) PI3 kinase/Akt signaling, which is a crucial regulator of cell metabolism and apoptosis, appears to mediate statin-induced eNOS upregulation.
The mechanism of eNOS activation by phosphorylation by statins
Statins can also inhibit Rho isoprenylation/activation resulting in enhanced eNOS mRNA stability and increased eNOS expression statins inhibit ox-LDL-induced endothelin-1 (ET-1) expression and the biological function of angiotensin II, and its receptor subtype 1 (AT1), which are both potent vasoconstrictors/mitogens thought to contribute to the development of atherosclerotic lesions.

Vascular inflammation

Statins have been shown to reduce the number of inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic lesions.  Inhibitory effects of statins on adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) and E-selectin, which are involved in the adhesion/rolling/extravasation of inflammatory cells.

Statin therapy in humans has also been shown to lower high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP), which reflects low-grade systemic/vascular inflammation, in hypercholesterolemic patients. This has been shown to correlate with reductions in the rates of acute major or recurrent coronary events.

Re-endothelialization

Accelerated re-endothelialization after angioplasty/de-endothelialization is known to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia, which leads to luminal narrowing or restenosis at the injured site. Re-endothelialization has been shown to be promoted by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), estrogen, prostacyclin, blockade of TNFα, and now Statins.
Ii M, Losordo DW. Statins and the endothelium. Vascular Pharmacology 2007; 46: 1–9.
Altieri DC. Statins’ benefits begin to sprout. J. Clin. Invest. 108:365–366 (2001). DOI:10.1172/JCI200113556

Further observations

  • Statins exert cholesterol-independent effects on the endothelium, which lead to the improvement of endothelial function.
  • Statins exert biphasic, dose dependent effects on angiogenesis. At low doses, statins induce angiogenesis, whereas angiogenesis is inhibited at higher doses. These biphasic activities of statins on endothelial cell biology can be explained by the properties of the biosynthetic pathways that originate from mevalonic acid.
  1. It appears that low concentrations of statins (such as those achieved in vivo) induce pro-angiogenic effects through activating PI3 kinase/Akt signaling leading to eNOS phosphorylation and NO production.
  2. High (supra-physiologic) concentrations of statins will inhibit the synthesis of the non-sterol products mevalonate, leading to decreases in protein prenylation, inhibition of cell growth, or apoptosis.

The sum-up of two factors: the loss of the vascular relaxation directly dependent of the endothelium (flow – dependent) and the NO dependent are the main reason for endothelial dysfunction and play a very important role in the pathogenesis of heart failure.

  1. Endothelial dysfunction on vascular peripheral levels contributes to the increased peripheral resistance in patients with heart failure. Endothelial dysfunction, as a pathophysiology disorder, is present early.
  2. Statins’ benefits begin to sprout in the initiation of the atherosclerotic process.
  3. The injury of eNOS activity seems to occur with impaired coronary vasodilatation in response to acetylcholine in patients with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smokers.

Summary of Key Points

Mechanisms which are essential for the impairment of eNOS activity for the appearance of endothelial dysfunction are:

• dysfunctional signal transduction receptor – endothelial cell;
• decreased bioavailability of the substrate L- arginine;
• altered expression of gene NOS3 and stability of mARN; polymorphism NOS3;
• altered eNOS activity;
• increased destruction of NO;
• changes in the balance between NO derived endothelium and the hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF);
• decreased sensitivity of atherosclerotic smooth muscle to NO.

Effects other than those due to lowering LDL levels and independent of the LDL level

• improved endothelial function
• diminish vascular inflammation
• improve ventricular function of heart failure
• antithrombotic effect
• reduce the rate of vascular events
• antioxidant effect

Statins improve endothelial function through the following mechanisms:

• enhanced endothelial NO production by decrease of cholesterol, by up regulating posttranscriptional mRNA of eNOS and by antioxidative effects (reduction of reactive oxygen species, increase of super oxide elimination and decrease of oxidized LDL);
• reduced production of endothelin-1, endothelial vasoconstrictor factor;
• diminish the affinity for AT1 receptors ;
• stimulation of angiogenesis through proliferation, migration and survival of the circulating endothelial progenitor cells

Statins decrease the swell of the vascular wall  by:

• decreasing the level of C – Reactive Protein
• decreasing the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF α)
• diminishing the leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells inhibiting macrophage growth and smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation

Suciu M. The Role Of Nitric Oxide (No) And Statins In Endothelial Dysfunction And Atherosclerosis. Farmacia 2009; 57 (2): 131-139

Relevant observations

ECs treated with rosuvastatin increase eNOS activation. The increased NO production is involved in modulating S-nitrosylation and translation of proteins.
Bin Huang, Fu An Li, Chien Hsing Wu, Danny Ling Wang. The role of nitric oxide on rosuvastatin-mediated S-nitrosylation and translational proteomes in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Proteome Science 2012, 10:43. doi:10.1186/1477-5956-10-43

Emerging evidence from both clinical trials and basic science studies suggest that statins have anti-inflammatory properties, which may additionally lead to clinical efficacy. Measurement of markers of inflammation such as high sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in addition to lipid parameters may help identify those patients who will benefit most from statin therapy.
Blake GJ and Ridker PM. Are statins anti-inflammatory? Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2000, 1:161–165.

Most favorable and unexpected findings were:

  •  new indications for TDZs as stimulators of eNOS, in addition to the new indication for atherosclerosis besides the classic indication in pharmacology books, being in the reduction of insulin resistance.
  •  new indications for beta blockers as NO stimulant, nebivolol, a case in point, thus, fulfilling two indications in one drug along the direction of the study to identify eNOS agonists. Nebivolol is a vasodilator, thus functions as an antihypertensive.

Aviva Lev-Ari. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production. July 19, 2012 pharmaceuticalintelligence.com 

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/19/cardiovascular-disease-cvd-and-the-role-of-agent-alternatives-in-endothelial-nitric-oxide-synthase-enos-activation-and-nitric-oxide-production/

References

Heeba G, Hassan MK, Khalifa, M; Malinski T. Adverse Balance of Nitric Oxide/ Peroxynitrite in the Dysfunctional Endothelium Can be Reversed by Statins. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 2007; 50(4):391-398.
Tandon VR, Gupta BM, Tandon R. Non-lipid Actions of Statins. JK Science 2004; 6(3): 124-126.
Sacks FM. Do statins play a role in the early management of the acute coronary syndrome? European Heart Journal Supplements (2004) 6 (Supplement A), A32–A36.
Alonso D, Radomski MW. Nitric oxide, platelet function, myocardial infarction and reperfusion therapies. Heart Fail Rev 2003; 8:47–54.
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production. PharmaceuticalIntelligence.WordPress.com
Nitric oxide and signalling pathways. PharmaceuticalIntelligence.WordPress.com
Rationale of NO use in hypertension and heart failure. PharmaceuticalIntelligence.WordPress.com
LH Bernstein. Mitochondria: Origin from oxygen free environment, role in aerobic glycolysis, metabolic adaptation in cancer (Warburg effect). PharmaIntell.Wordpress.com
R Saxena. Mitochondria: More than just the powerhouse of the cell. PharmaIntell.WordPress.com
Bernstein LH. Expanding the Genetic Alphabet and linking the genome to the metabolome. PharmaIntell.wordpress.com. luly 24, 2012.
R saxena. β Integrin emerges as an important player in mitochondrial dysfunction associated Gastric Cancer. PharmaIntell.wordpress.com 2012

Related articles

 

Reporter and Curator: Dr. Sudipta Saha, Ph.D.

 

An estimated 10 to 15% of couples suffer from infertility, and many treatment decisions rely on trial and error. A team of international scientists has found a common genetic variant which may explain why some men with normal sperm counts and good quality sperm are affected by infertility.

The study findings suggested that men with a variation in a gene which codes for a sperm-coating protein called beta defensin 126 (DEFB126) have a reduction in the protein coat on the outside of the sperm which makes it difficult for the sperm to ‘swim’ to the egg.

Dr Edward Hollox of the University of Leicester and co-author of the study said: ‘If you’ve got this gene variant you should allow that little bit longer if your partner’s planning to get pregnant’. The researchers, including scientists from the University of California and the Anhui Medical University in China, carried out the study on over 500 newly-wed Chinese couples who were trying for a baby.

They found that when men’s sperm lacked a coat of the DEFB126 protein, their wives were significantly less likely than expected to become pregnant.

Previous studies have shown that two copies of the genetic variant may be found in up to one quarter of men around the world, with about half of all men having one copy. The DEFB126 protein coat helps sperm to swim through cervical mucus and evade the woman’s immune system, as well as enabling it to attach to the walls of fallopian tubes.

The study showed, however, that men with two copies of the variant produced sperm that were less able to swim through a substitute to cervical mucus, hyaluronic acid gel. In macaques, it has already been shown that this protein is important in evading the immune system and the researchers believe the protein coat plays the same role in humans. Commenting on the study, Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in Andrology at the University of Sheffield, said: ‘We actually understand very little about the subtle molecular events which occur in sperm as they make their journey through the woman’s body to fertilise an egg’. The research was published in the journal Science Translational Medicine. If replicated in future studies, these findings promise to guide choices about the timing and type of assisted reproduction interventions—and further hint at the possibility of treating sperm from del/del homozygotes to promote fertility.

A gene which helps sperm bind to an egg has been identified by scientists. Sperm-to-egg binding is an essential process during fertilization and although the preliminary studies were performed on mice, the gene may represent a new target for infertility treatments. Sperm from mice that had the gene switched off were only able to fertilise eggs from female mice three percent of the time compared to 80 percent fertilisation success in normal mice.

The gene codes for a protein called PDILT which helps another gene product to form and assemble correctly and then to reach the surface of a sperm. Once this happens the sperm is able to navigate the uterus and oviduct and penetrate the sticky outer layers of an egg. The study, which is published in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), also demonstrates the importance of cumulus cells, a cluster of cells that surround and protect the egg, as their presence allows sperm to bind to their target. Sperm from mice that had their PDILT gene switched off would not bind to a bare egg, but would bind to an egg surrounded by cumulus cells.

Co-author Dr Adam Benham from Durham University in the UK said that the PDILT protein is ‘an essential part of the navigation system of sperm. Like any navigation system, you have to programme where it is that you want to go and this protein plays an essential role in getting sperm to the right destination, in good shape, and in good time’. A question now for the scientists is whether the PDILT gene has as much importance in human fertility as it does in mice. ‘Mutations in the gene may be responsible for unexplained male fertility problems and further research may aid more effective IVF treatment‘, said Dr Benham.

Source References:

http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/3/92/92ps31.abstract

http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_142955.asp

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-05-01/scientists-discover-new-gene-key-to-fertility/

http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_102705.asp

 

The eTNS System. (PRNewsFoto/NeuroSigma)

Reporter: Howard Donohue, PhD (EAW)

Following the arrival in the 1990s of a drug for treating depression called fluoxetine (better known by its brand name, Prozac) – a “selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor” (SSRI) – it’s probably fair to say that not many drugs have become as deeply engrained in the public’s general awareness as those of this type. Perhaps one reason for this could be the sheer number of people affected by depression and to whom SSRIs are relevant as a possible treatment (one study has estimated that depression affected upwards of 30 million Europeans in the year 2010 [1]). Perhaps another reason could be the various controversies that have surrounded SSRIs over the years, from stories of increased suicide risk in children [2] to evidence of biases and the “selective” publishing of clinical data favoring the effectiveness of these drugs [3]. Of course, despite the controversies, SSRIs (along with other classes of antidepressant drug) continue to be a mainstay, but let’s not forget, amid their popularity, that there are other ways to treat depressive illnesses. And in maximizing the benefits of treatment for the individual, it’s important to realize that any one of these approaches might work well for one person, but not for another. Among the non-pharmacologic ways to treat depression are psychological approaches, for example cognitive behavioral therapy, or alternatively, “brain stimulation” approaches such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). ECT is a method to induce a mild seizure in the patient by means of electrical activity applied to the brain via electrodes connected to the temples.

On the subject of ECT; you could be forgiven for thinking that it’s not very nice, especially if you’ve seen the plights of characters like Randle Patrick “Mac” McMurphy, portrayed by Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest or Russell Crowe’s portrayal of Dr. John Nash (based on the real-life Nobel Laureate in Economics by the same name) in A Beautiful Mind. Nonetheless, despite the treatment in Hollywood of ECT as a sinister, repressive, and even brutal procedure, the reality is obviously different and it continues to have a place in medical practice for the treatment of severely depressed patients to this day. This isn’t to say that controversies don’t exist within the medical community concerning certain side effects (such as memory loss), but in balancing this, we should remember that many – if not most – medical procedures have their drawbacks (hopefully, the benefits will far outweigh the drawbacks). Putting aside any thoughts on whether ECT is good or bad, it is recognition and consideration of the drawbacks that helps drive the evolution of medical technologies.

So, in illustrating the evolution that is happening in the field of brain stimulation for treating neurological disorders (in this case, depression and also epilepsy), the recent approval in Europe of an “external Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation” (eTNS) technique provides an excellent example. The technique, called the MonarchTM and exclusively licensed to Neurosigma Inc. (a Los Angeles-based medical device company) “for the adjunctive treatment of epilepsy and major depressive disorder, for adults and children 9 years and older”, is a non-invasive form of neuromodulation therapy [4]. It was invented at the University of California, Los Angleles (UCLA) and has been in development for over 10 years [4]. It works by using a low-energy stimulus to stimulate branches of the trigeminal nerve, a nerve that can affect the activity of several key brain regions believed to be involved in depression and epilepsy. In contrast to ECT, the stimulus is restricted to the soft tissues of the forehead without direct penetration to the brain, which thereby facilitates a non-invasive form of neuromodulation [4]. Following European approval, Neurosigma affirmed in a press release that eTNS is “supported by years of safety and compelling efficacy data generated in clinical trials conducted at UCLA and the University of Southern California (USC)” [4]. In realizing the future potential of eTNS, Neurosigma’s business strategy is now geared toward steps for its adoption at major epilepsy and depression centers in the EU, as well as endeavors to make it available to patients in the US and other countries [4].

To answer the question of whether eTNS will rise to prominence as an effective treatment in the fight against depression and epilepsy, only time will tell. But if it does, as well as being a valuable addition to the armamentarium against these debilitating diseases, maybe its non-invasive nature will mean that the film directors have a harder time in “demonizing” it for dramatic effect. Well anyway, let’s hope so.

References

  1. Wittchen et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011: 21:655-79.
  2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3656110.stm
  3. Turner et al. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:252-60.
  4. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/neurosigma-receives-ce-certification-168578146.html

Author and Reporter: Meg Baker, Ph.D., Registered Patent Agent

The 1998 Noble Prize for medicine was for the discovery that nitric oxide (NO) was the chemical messenger responsible for relaxing vascular tissue and thereby increasing blood flow and reducing blood pressure. Alfred Noble himself had been prescribed nitro-glycerin for heart problems over 100 years before, a compound which is metabolized to NO.

NO, a gas at room temperature, has an exceedingly short half-life in the body. Normally, NO is produced from an amino acid, L-arginine (L-Arg), a normal component of the dietary protein, and molecular oxygen (O2) by the one of the several Nitric Oxide Synthases (EC 1.14.13.39): endothelial (eNOS, NOS III), inducible (iNOS, NOS II), and neural (nNOS, NOS I). In human studies, supplementation with l-arginine improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation.

The reaction of iNOS with L-Arg to produce NO leaves another amino acid, citrulline. Excess L-Arg can also be degraded by arginase (enzyme having two isoforms, I and II) which may be coinduced with iNOS in some cell types.

Citrulline formed as a by-product of the NOS reaction can be recycled to arginine by argininosuccinate synthetase (AS) and argininosuccinate lyase (AL).

Mori (2007)  http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/ 17513437 found that AS and sometimes AL are coinduced with inducible NOS (iNOS) in various cells. In these cells, NO was synthesized from citrulline (via arginine) as well as from arginine, indicating operation of the citrulline-NO cycle.

Whereas, low concentrations of NO protect cells from apoptosis, excessive NO causes apoptosis. NO causes endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, induces a transcription factor, CAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) homologous protein (CHOP), and leads to apoptosis.

The active site of NOS is formed by a heme-containing substrate-binding cavity, where L-arginine (Arg) and O2 are converted to L-citrulline and NO. The electrons required for reductive O2 activation are transferred from NADPH via the NOS-bound flavins (riboflavin, Vitamin B2) FMN and FAD. All NOS isoforms are only active as homodimers.

Generation of NO occurs in two discrete O2-requiring steps, with intermediate formation of N-hydroxy-L-arginine (NHA or NOHLA). NHA formation consumes one molecule of O2 and two electrons. Conversion of NHA to L-citrulline and NO requires another molecule of O2 and one more electron (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitric_oxide_synthase).  The overall stoichiometry, reflecting the three electrons derived from NADPH, that pass through the flavin co-factors and are transferred one by one via the heme iron,  is then:

L-arginine + 3/2 NADPH + H+ + 2 O2 = citrulline + nitric oxide + 3/2 NADP+

Another factor affecting NOS activity is the availability of essential co-factors such as tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) (Boeger et al. Cardiovasc Res (2003) 59 (4): 824-833 http://cardiovascres.oxfordjournals.org/content/59/4/824.full, Vasquez-Vivar J., et al . Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: the influence of cofactors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998;95:9220-9225 http://www.pnas.org/content/95/16/9220.full). H4-biopterin binds in the immediate vicinity of the heme at the dimer interface, interacting with residues from both subunits. When BH4 availability is limiting, electron transfer from NOS flavins becomes “uncoupled” from l-arginine oxidation and the ferrous-dioxygen complex formed as an intermediate in the reaction sequence, dissociates and superoxide(O2−·) is produced.

See Figure 1 in Werner et al.  2003 Exp Biol  Med 228: 1291-1302.

RADICALS

The conversion of Arg to NHA and of NHA to L-citrulline and NO both depend on the presence of H4-biopterin. In the absence of substrate or pterin, NADPH oxidation by NOS is accompanied by formation of O2 and peroxide (H2O2). Uncoupled eNOS is assumed to produce superoxide (O2−·) in addition to or instead of NO (·NO) which will react with itself, with NO, or with -hydroxyl, -sulfhydryl, or or side groups of proteins, lipids, or glycans. Reaction of ·NO produced by eNOS, with O2−· produced by eNOS or by other enzymes, such as NADPH and xanthine oxidases, decreases the amount of ·NO available to stimulate vascular relaxation. At the very low BH4 concentration of 100 nmol/L, recombinant human eNOS activity is fully developed. However, biopterin is formed from the pterin heterocycle also present in folic acid (Vitamin B9,
pteroyl-L-glutamate)
and which is synthesized from GTP. Human GTP cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH), is the rate-limiting enzyme in BH4 synthesis (Crabtree et al. JBC 2008, http://www.jbc.org/content/284/2/1136.full).

In addition to the NOS reaction, which generates a H3-biopterin radical cation, a neutral H3-biopterin radical is formed when H4-biopterin reacts with various radicals and which can be reduced back to H4-biopterin by ascorbate (Vitamin C). Folate species are also required to synthesize pyrimidines and purines (for DNA synthesis and repair and NADH and NADPH).

Enhancing NO Synthesis

The normal way to increase vascular nitric oxide is through vascular stress, such as exercise. As oxygen demand increases, cardiac output increases and the endothelial lining of the arteries releases nitric oxide into the blood, which, in turn, relaxes and widens the vessel wall, allowing for enhanced blood flow.

Enhancing the presence of L-Arg or the one or more of the NOS enzymes are obviously essential for NO production. However, NOS enzymes are co-valently bound to heme (heme, iron), and flavin co-factors (Vit B2), and require soluble co-factors NADPH (a dinucleotide phosphate, containing niacin, Vitamin B3), and BH4 (from Vit B9).

Foods high in Arginine and Citrulline include melons and cucumber, peanuts, salmon, and soy. Arginine is found in varying degrees (3-15% by weight) in all animal proteins. Blue-fin tuna has 1.8 g of arginine per 100 g so 2 oz. of tuna will provide about 1 g of arginine. Other sources of 1 g of L-Arg: 2.7 oz. of chicken thighs, about 4 oz. of chicken breast, 2 oz. of 75 percent lean hamburger or about 2.5 oz. of pork.

Foods rich in antioxidants and polyphenols will provide protection against free radical assault on proteins and, in particular, act to protect the NOS enzyme and cofactors. Almost all fruit and vegetables such as blueberries, cranberries, carrots, grapefruit, soybeans, apples, and spinach contain high levels of antioxidants. In addition, nuts, tea, seeds, dark chocolate, red wine, and seafood generally contain antioxidants such as resveratrol, ascorbate, and other phytochemicals. Other free radical scavengers, tocopherols (alpha-tocopherol, Vit E) work predominantly in the lipid environment such as in cell membranes, while the sulfur-containing soluble molecule, glutathione (GSH) protects the cytosolic milieu.

Supplements

Both L-Arg or L-citrulline can be purchased over the counter. Dietary L-arginine will be taken up by the intestine and transported directly to the liver by the hepatic artery as are most of the products of digestion. Much of this L-Arg will be used in metabolic steps related to the urea cycle which is co-ordinated with the kidney to rid the body of excess nitrogen and prevent ammonia concentration from building. A small amount will enter the blood stream and be used for NO synthesis.

Proargi-9 Plus® is one product being sold containing mutltigram doses of L-Arg plus L-Citrulline in combination with anti-oxidants and folate. Proargi-9 Plus® is a registered trademark and copyright of Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc. L-arginine Plus™ is formulation with similar ingredients and stated amounts of L-Arg and L-Citrulline and is not affiliated with the makers of Proargi-9-Plus. Niteworks® is a registered trademark and copyright of Herbalife International, Inc. and is not affiliated with or a sponsor of L-arginine Plus™.

Dr. Joe Prendergast is an endocrinologist using L-Arg therapy who, over 19 years, never had to admit any of his 7200 diabetes patients to the hospital for peripheral artery disease, recommends supplemental L-Arg formulations to his patients. The combination of L-Arg with L-citrulline a longer acting NO forming product. http://www.livingwithoutdisease.com/?route=references/prendergast

Supplements of L-Arg and, in particular, in combination with L-citrulline other B-vitamins and antioxidents may be an effective way to boost vascular NO synthesis for anyone not exercising or eating a balanced diet, having a deficiency in any of the L-Arg recycling enzymes, NOS enzymes, co-factor recycling or synthetic enzymes, or other risk factor. Specific risk factors, such as inherently elevated levels of the natural NOS inhibitor ADMA (asymmetric-dimethyl-L-arginine) are beginning to be uncovered and will be the subject of another post.

 Additional References

Nitric Oxide: Biology and Pathobiology,  LJ Ignarro Editor, Sep 13, 2000 http://books.google.com/books?id=h5FugARr4bgC&dq=pterin+ring&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Mori, M. Regulation of nitric oxide synthesis and apoptosis by arginase and arginine recycling.  J Nutr. 2007 Jun;137(6 Suppl 2):1616S-1620S.   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513437

Werner, et al.  Tetrahydrobiopterin and Nitric Oxide: Mechanistic and Pharmacological Aspects Exp Biol Med December 2003 vol. 228 no. 11 1291-1302  Werner et al. Exp Biol Med 2003

Davel AP, Wenceslau CF, Akamine EH, Xavier FE, Couto GK, Oliveira HT, Rossoni LV. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular and endocrine-metabolic diseases: an update.  Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Sep;44(9):920-32. Epub 2011 Aug 19. Davel et al. Braz J Med Biol Res 2011

Rainer H Boeger. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of oral L-citrulline and L-arginine: impact on nitric oxide metabolism   Schwedhelm E, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008_65_51-9

Louise Ignarro, UCLA, Nobel Prize Recipient, Author “NO More Heart Disease”

John Cook, Peripheral artery disease study, Author “Cardiovascular Cure”

Other aspects of Nitric Oxide involvement in biological systems in humans are covered in the following posts on this site:

Nitric Oxide in bone metabolism July 16, 2012

Author: Aviral Vatsa PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/16/nitric-oxide-in-bone-metabolism/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_134751669

 

Nitric Oxide production in Systemic sclerosis July 25, 2012

Curator: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/25/nitric-oxide-production-in-systemic-sclerosis/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_138370383

 

Nitric Oxide Signalling Pathways August 22, 2012 by

Curator/ Author: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/22/nitric-oxide-signalling-pathways/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_151245569

 

Nitric Oxide: a short historic perspective August 5, 2012

Author/Curator: Aviral Vatsa PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/05/nitric-oxide-a-short-historic-perspective-7/

 

Nitric Oxide: Chemistry and function August 10, 2012

Curator/Author: Aviral Vatsa PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/10/nitric-oxide-chemistry-and-function/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_145137865

 

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Aggregation August 16, 2012 by

Author: Dr. Venkat S. Karra, Ph.D.

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/16/no-and-platelet-aggregation/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_147475405

 

The rationale and use of inhaled NO in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension and Right Sided Heart Failure August 20, 2012

Author: Larry Bernstein, MD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/20/the-rationale-and-use-of-inhaled-no-in-pulmonary-artery-hypertension-and-right-sided-heart-failure/

Nitric Oxide: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1998 Robert F. Furchgott, Louis J. Ignarro, Ferid Murad August 16, 2012

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/16/nitric-oxide-the-nobel-prize-in-physiology-or-medicine-1998-robert-f-furchgott-louis-j-ignarro-ferid-murad/

 

Coronary Artery Disease – Medical Devices Solutions: From First-In-Man Stent Implantation, via Medical Ethical Dilemmas to Drug Eluting Stents August 13, 2012

Author: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/13/coronary-artery-disease-medical-devices-solutions-from-first-in-man-stent-implantation-via-medical-ethical-dilemmas-to-drug-eluting-stents/

 

Nano-particles as Synthetic Platelets to Stop Internal Bleeding Resulting from Trauma

August 22, 2012

Reported by: Dr. V. S. Karra, Ph.D.

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/22/nano-particles-as-synthetic-platelets-to-stop-internal-bleeding-resulting-from-trauma/

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production July 19, 2012

Curator and Research Study Originator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/19/cardiovascular-disease-cvd-and-the-role-of-agent-alternatives-in-endothelial-nitric-oxide-synthase-enos-activation-and-nitric-oxide-production/

Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs: Reduction Methods for CV Risk

July 2, 2012

An Investigation of the Potential of circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells (cEPCs) as a Therapeutic Target for Pharmacological Therapy Design for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A New Multimarker Biomarker Discovery

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/02/macrovascular-disease-therapeutic-potential-of-cepcs-reduction-methods-for-cv-risk/

 

Bone remodelling in a nutshell June 22, 2012

Author: Aviral Vatsa, Ph.D., MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/06/22/bone-remodelling-in-a-nutshell/

Targeted delivery of therapeutics to bone and connective tissues: current status and challenges- Part, September  

AuthorL Aviral Vatsa, PhD, September 23, 2012

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/23/targeted-delivery-of-therapeutics-to-bone-and-connective-tissues-current-status-and-challenges-part-i/

Calcium dependent NOS induction by sex hormones: Estrogen

Curator: S. Saha, PhD, October 3, 2012

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/03/calcium-dependent-nos-induction-by-sex-hormones/

 

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Aggregation,

Author V. Karra, PhD, August 16, 2012

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/16/no-and-platelet-aggregation/

Bystolic’s generic Nebivolol – positive effect on circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells endogenous augmentation

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, July 16, 2012

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/?s=Nebivolol

 

Endothelin Receptors in Cardiovascular Diseases: The Role of eNOS Stimulation

Author: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, 10/4/2012

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/endothelin-receptors-in-cardiovascular-diseases-the-role-of-enos-stimulation/

 

Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB, Induction of NO production, stimulation of eNOS and Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD): cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction – A Bibliography

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, 10/4/2012.

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/inhibition-of-et-1-eta-and-eta-etb-induction-of-no-production-and-stimulation-of-enos-and-treatment-regime-with-ppar-gamma-agonists-tzd-cepcs-endogenous-augmentation-for-cardiovascular-risk-reduc/