Larry Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Reporter
http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/1/16/2015/Complete-Pathology-Reports
Complete Pathology Reports and Their Importance for Clinical Decision Making
Posted by Michael Doyle on Jan 15, 2015 10:17:00 AM
Pathology reports provide care teams with crucial diagnostic and prognostic
data. For population-level research and quality assurance initiatives, it’s
important that reports are consistently complete. But report consistency
can also be important for the medical outcomes of a single person.
Today, I’ll discuss the unique experience of a friend of mine, and I’ll
explain how his isolated incident is connected to large-scale initiatives
in pathology reporting quality assurance.
Incomplete Pathology Reports
A friend of mine has particularly fair skin, and is at thus at increased
risk for skin cancers. His family physician has recommended he have
various moles removed to prevent the development of possible
skin cancers.
Over time, my friend and his family physician became troubled by
the inconsistencies they found in comparing the pathology reports
from his five different biopsies.
Five out of five reports identified that the moles were dysplastic—
irregular and potentially cancerous. Yet only three reports identified
that this dysplasia was in his skin’s basal cells as opposed to
squamous cells or melanocytes.
The the type of skin cells exhibiting dysplasia is important to clinical
decision making: dysplasia affecting melanocytes is the basis for
melanomas, the most serious forms of skin cancer. Lacking this
information makes it more difficult for care teams to develop the
comprehensive understanding of an individual’s medical history
that guides clinical decision making.
In response to the incompleteness of the pathology reports, the
family physician remarked, “I rarely have to query a pathologist
about what’s in a report. It’s usually about what’s left out.”
And it’s not just one physician who’s seeking better reports.
Synoptic Reporting for Complete Consistency in Pathology
For over 20 years, the College of American Pathologists (CAP)
has been developing protocols and templates to standardize
pathology reporting, substantially improving the completeness and
consistency of pathology reports through the use of the synoptic—
i.e. structured—format.
Synoptic reporting uses coded data templates to produce standardized
reports that are more complete and consistent than reports generated
using narrative methods. Since 2014, the use of synoptic reporting has
been among the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program requirements.
Cancer Care Ontario introduced synoptic reporting for pathologist across
the province—the largest jurisdiction to do so. Clinicians have shown
over- whelming support for this initiative, finding that synoptic reports
have facilitated consistent intepretation of diagnostic and prognostic data.
The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer is building on Ontario’s
success to help implement synoptic pathology reporting across
Canada, strengthening provincial cancer registries and fostering
cross-jurisdictional research and quality assurance initiatives.
Clinical research has continually found that the use of synoptic reporting
improves the completeness of pathology reports [1, 2, 3, 4]. These
conclusions have been upheld in research on synoptic reporting
for surgery as well [5, 6].
An important goal of synoptic reporting implementation initiatives is equipping
pathologists and surgeons with clinical documentation software that enables
them to provide each other with specific, reliable and actionable data—through
complete and consistent reports.
- McLeod RS, Kirsh R. What impact has the introduction of synoptic
reporting for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist
gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists? Archives of
Pathology & Lab Medicine2011;135(11):1471-5. - Pignol JP, et al. Accuracy and completeness of pathology reporting–
impact on partial breast irradiation eligibility. Clinical Oncology (Royal
College of Radiology). 2012 Apr; 24(3):177-82. - Branston LK, Greening S, Newcombe RG et al. The implementation
of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness
of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised
controlled trial in pathology. EuropeanJournal of Cancer
2002;38(6):764-72 - Karim RZ et al. The advantage of using synoptic pathology report
format for cutaneous Histopathology 2008 Jan;52(2);130-8. - Edhemovic I, Temple WJ, de Gara CJ, Stuart GC. The computer
synoptic operative report–a leap forward in the science of surgery.
Annals of Surgical Oncology 2004;11(10):941-7. - Donahoe L, Bennett S, et al. Completenes of dictated operative
reports in breast cancer –the case for synoptic reporting.
Journal of Surgical Oncology2012;106(1):79-83.
Topics: Pathology, Medical Reporting Errors