Reporter: Stephen J. Williams, PhD
10:00-10:45 AM The Davids vs. the Cancer Goliath Part 1
Startups from diagnostics, biopharma, medtech, digital health and emerging tech will have 8 minutes to articulate their visions on how they aim to tame the beast.
| Start Time |
End Time |
Company |
| 10:00 |
10:08 |
Belong.Life |
| 10:09 |
10:17 |
Care+Wear |
| 10:18 |
10:26 |
OncoPower |
| 10:27 |
10:35 |
PolyAurum LLC |
| 10:36 |
10:44 |
Seeker Health |
Speakers:
, Co-Founder and Chief Oncologist, OncoPower
, Co-Founder and CEO, Belong.Life
, Co-founder and CEO, Care+Wear @_crazdan
, President & CEO, PolyAurum LLC @polyaurum
, Founder and CEO, Seeker Health @sandrashpilberg
Belong Life
- 10,000 cancer patients a month helping patients navigate cancer care with Belong App
- Belong Eco system includes all their practitioners and using a trigger based content delivery (posts, articles etc)
- most important taking unstructured health data (images, social activity, patient compilance) and converting to structured data
Care+Wear
personally design picc line cover for oncology patients
partners include NBA Major league baseball, Oscar de la Renta,
designs easy access pic line gowns and shirts
OncoPower :Digital Health in a Blockchain Ecosystem
problems associated with patient adherence and developed a product to address this
- OncoPower Blockchain: HIPAA compliant using the coin Oncopower security token to incentiavize patients and oncologists to consult with each other or oncologists with tumor boards; this is not an initial coin offering
PolyArum
- spinout from UPENN; developing a nanoparticle based radiation therapy; glioblastoma muse model showed great response with gold based nanoparticle and radiation
- they see enhanced tumor penetration, and retention of the gold nanoparticles
- however most nanoparticles need to be a large size greater than 5 nm to see effect so they used a polymer based particle; see good uptake but excretion past a week so need to re-dose with Au nanoparticles
- they are looking for capital and expect to start trials in 2020
Seeker Health
- tying to improve the efficiency of clinical trial enrollment
- using social networks to find the patients to enroll in clinical trials
- steps they use 1) find patients on Facebook, Google, Twitter 2) engage patient screen 3) screening at clinical sites
- Seeker Portal is a patient management system: patients referred to a clinical site now can be tracked
11:00- 11:45 AM Breakout: How to Scale Precision Medicine
The potential for precision medicine is real, but is limited by access to patient datasets. How are government entities, hospitals and startups bringing the promise of precision medicine to the masses of oncology patients
Moderator: , Senior Manager, Real World Data Innovation, Pfizer @sandeepburug
Speakers:
, President and CEO, Navican @IngoChakravarty
, Senior Research Analyst for Medical Policy & Technology Evaluation , Independence Blue Cross @IBX
, Chief Medical Officer, Cota @ANordenMD
, Medical Director of Precision Medicine, Cancer Treatment Centers of America @CancerCenter
Ingo: data is not ordered, only half of patients are tracked in some database, reimbursement a challenge
Eugean: identifying mutations as patients getting more comprehensive genomic coverage, clinical trials are expanding more rapidly as seen in 2018 ASCO
Ingo: general principals related to health outcomes or policy or reimbursement.. human studies are paramount but payers may not allowing for general principals (i.e. an Alk mutation in lung cancer and crizotanib treatment may be covered but maybe not for glioblastoma or another cancer containing similar ALK mutation; payers still depend on clinical trial results)
Andrew: using gene panels and NGS but only want to look for actionable targets; they establish an expert panel which reviews these NGS sequence results to determine actionable mutations
Ankur: they have molecular tumor boards but still if want to prescribe off label and can’t find a clinical trial there is no reimbursement
Andrew: going beyond actionable mutations, although many are doing WES (whole exome sequencing) can we use machine learning to see if there are actionable data from a WES
Ingo: we forget in datasets is that patients have needs today and we need those payment systems and structures today
Eugean: problem is the start from cost (where the cost starts at and was it truly medically necessary)
Norden: there are not enough data sharing to make a decision; an enormous amount of effort to get businesses and technical limitations in data sharing; possibly there are policies needed to be put in place to assimilate datasets and promote collaborations
Ingo: need to take out the middle men between sequencing of patient tumor and treatment decision; middle men are taking out value out of the ‘supply chain’;
Andrew: PATIENTS DON’T OWN their DATA but MOST clinicians agree THEY SHOULD
Ankur: patients are willing to share data but the HIPAA compliance is a barrier
11:50- 12:30 AM Fireside Chat with Michael Pellini, M.D.
Building a Precision Medicine Business from the Ground Up: An Operating and Venture Perspective
Dr. Pellini has spent more than 20 years working on the operating side of four companies, each of which has pushed the boundaries of the standard of care. He will describe his most recent experience at Foundation Medicine, at the forefront of precision medicine, and how that experience can be leveraged on the venture side, where he now evaluates new healthcare technologies.
Speaker:
, Managing Partner, Section 32 and Chairman, Foundation Medicine @MichaelPellini
Roche just bought Foundation Medicine for $2.5 billion. They negotiated over 7 months but aside from critics they felt it was a great deal because it gives them, as a diagnostic venture, the international reach and biotech expertise. Foundation Medicine offered Roche expertise on the diagnostic space including ability to navigate payers and regulatory aspects of the diagnostic business. He feels it benefits all aspects of patient care and the work they do with other companies.
Moderatore: Roche is doing multiple deals to ‘own’ a disease state.
Dr. Pellini: Roche is closing a deal with Flatiron just like how Merck closed deals with genomics companies. He feels best to build the best company on a stand alone basis and provide for patients, then good things will happen. However the problem of achieving scale for Precision Medicine is reimbursement by payers. They still have to keep collecting data and evolving services to suit pharma. They didn’t know if there model would work but when he met with FDA in 2011 they worked with Precision Medicine, said collect the data and we will keep working with you,
However the payers aren’t contributing to the effort. They need to assist some of the young companies that can’t raise the billion dollars needed for all the evidence that payers require. Precision Medicine still have problems, even though they have collected tremendous amounts of data and raised significant money. From the private payer perspective there is no clear roadmap for success.
They recognized that the payers would be difficult but they had a plan but won’t invest in companies that don’t have a plan for getting reimbursement from payers.
Moderator: What is section 32?
Pellini: Their investment arm invests in the spectrum of precision healtcare companies including tech companies. They started with a digital path imaging system that went from looking through a scope and now looking at a monitor with software integrated with medical records. Section 32 has $130 million under management and may go to $400 Million but they want to stay small.
Pellini: we get 4-5 AI pitches a week.
Moderator: Are you interested in companion diagnostics?
Pellini: There may be 24 expected 2018 drug approvals and 35% of them have a companion diagnostic (CDX) with them. however going out ten years 70% may have a CDX associated with them. Payers need to work with companies to figure out how to pay with these CDXs.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Read Full Post »
2012pharmaceutical
sjwilliamspa
