Functional Correlates of Signaling Pathways
Author and Curator: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP
We here move on to a number of specific, key published work on signaling, and look at the possible therapeutic applications to disease states.
Scripps Research Professor Wolfram Ruf and colleagues have identified a key connection between
- the signaling pathways and the immune system spiraling out of control involving
- the coagulation system and vascular endothelium that,
- if disrupted may be a target for sepsis. (Science Daily, Feb 29, 2008).
It may be caused by a bacterial infection that enters the bloodstream, but
- we now recognize the same cascade not triggered by bacterial invasion.
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been defined as
- a severe form of acute lung injury featuring
- pulmonary inflammation and increased capillary leak.
ARDS is associated with a high mortality rate and accounts for 100,000 deaths annually in the United States. ARDS may arise in a number of clinical situations, especially in patients with sepsis. A well-described pathophysiological model of ARDS is one form of
- the acute lung inflammation mediated by
- neutrophils,
- cytokines, and
- oxidant stress.
Neutrophils are major effect cells at the frontier of
- innate immune responses, and they play
- a critical role in host defense against invading microorganisms.
The tissue injury appears to be related to
- proteases and toxic reactive oxygen radicals
- released from activated neutrophils.
In addition, neutrophils can produce cytokines and chemokines that
enhance the acute inflammatory response.
Neutrophil accumulation in the lung plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury during sepsis. Directed movement of neutrophils is
- mediated by a group of chemoattractants,
- especially CXC chemokines.
Local lung production of CXC chemokines is intensified during experimental sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP).
Sepsis, Multi-organ Dysfunction Syndrome, and Septic Shock: A Conundrum of Signaling Pathways Cascading Out of Control
Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction
Integrins are a family of cell surface receptors which
mediate cell–matrix and cell–cell adhesions.
Among other functions they provide an important
mechanical link between the cells external and intracellular environments while
the adhesions that they form also have critical roles in cellular signal-transduction.
Cell–matrix contacts occur at zones in the cell surface where
adhesion receptors cluster and when activated
the receptors bind to ligands in the extracellular matrix.
The extracellular matrix surrounds the cells of tissues and forms the
structural support of tissue which is particularly important in connective tissues.
Cells attach to the extracellular matrix through
specific cell-surface receptors and molecules
including integrins and transmembrane proteoglycans.
The integrin family of αβ heterodimeric receptors act as
cell adhesion molecules
connecting the ECM to the actin cytoskeleton.
The actin cytoskeleton is involved in the regulation of
1.cell motility,
2.cell polarity,
3.cell growth, and
4.cell survival.
The combination of αβ subunits determines
binding specificity and
signaling properties.
Both α and β integrin subunits contain two separate tails, which
penetrate the plasma membrane and possess small cytoplasmic domains which facilitate
the signaling functions of the receptor.
There is some evidence that the β subunit is the principal site for
binding of cytoskeletal and signaling molecules,
whereas the α subunit has a regulatory role. The integrin tails
link the ECM to the actin cytoskeleton within the cell and with cytoplasmic proteins,
such as talin, tensin, and filamin. The extracellular domains of integrin receptors bind the ECM ligands.
http://www.nature.com/nrm/journal/vaop/ncurrent/images/nrm3896-f4.jpg
Schematic of the ‘focal adhesion clutch’ on stiff (a) versus soft (b) extracellular matrix (ECM). In all cases, integrins are coupled to F-actin via linker proteins (for example, talin and vinculin). The linker proteins move backwards (as indicated by the small arrows) as F-actin also moves backwards, under pushing forces from actin polymerization and/or pulling forces from myosin II activity. This mechanism transfers force from actin to integrins, which pull on the ECM. A stiff ECM (a) resists this force so that the bound integrins remain immobile. A compliant matrix (b) deforms under this force (as indicated by the compressed ECM labelled as deformed matrix) so that the bound integrins can also move backwards. Their movement reduces the net loading rate on all the force-bearing elements, which results in altered cellular responses
The ECM is a complex mixture of matrix molecules, including –
- glycoproteins, collagens, laminins, glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans,
- and nonmatrix proteins, – including growth factors
The integrin receptor formed from the binding of α and β subunits is
- shaped like a globular head supported by two rod-like legs (Figure 1).
Most of the contact between the two subunits occurs in the head region, with
- the intracellular tails of the subunits forming the legs of the receptor.
Integrin recognition of ligands is not constitutive but
- is regulated by alteration of integrin affinity for ligand binding.
For integrin binding to ligands to occur
- the integrin must be primed and activated, both of which involve
- conformational changes to the receptor.
Linking integrin conformation to function
Figure Integrin binding to extracellular matrix (ECM). Conformational changes to integrin structure and clustering of subunits which allow enhanced function of the receptor.
Integrins work alongside other proteins such as
cadherins,
immunoglobulin superfamily
cell adhesion molecules,
selectins, and
syndecans
to mediate
cell–cell and
cell–matrix interactions and communication.
Activation of adhesion receptors triggers the formation of matrix contacts in which
bound matrix components,
adhesion receptors,
and associated intracellular cytoskeletal and signaling molecules
form large functional, localized multiprotein complexes.
Cell–matrix contacts are important in a variety of different cell and
tissue properties including
1.embryonic development,
2.inflammatory responses,
3.wound healing,
4.and adult tissue homeostasis.
Integrin extracellular binding activity is regulated from inside the cell and binding to the ECM induces signals that are transmitted into the cell. This bidirectional signaling requires
dynamic,
spatially, and
temporally regulated formation and
disassembly of multiprotein complexes that
form around the short cytoplasmic tails of integrins.
Ligand binding to integrin family members leads to clustering of integrin molecules in the plasma membrane and recruitment of actin filaments and intracellular signaling molecules to the cytoplasmic domain of the integrins. This forms focal adhesion complexes which are able to maintain
not only adhesion to the ECM
but are involved in complex signaling pathways
which include establishing
1.cell polarity,
2.directed cell migration, and
3.maintaining cell growth and survival.
Initial activation through integrin adhesion to matrix recruits up to around 50 diverse signaling molecules
to assemble the focal adhesion complex
which is capable of responding to environmental stimuli efficiently.
Mapping of the integrin
adhesome binding and signaling interactions
a network of 156 components linked together which can be modified by 690 interactions.
Genetic programming occurs with the binding of integrins to the ECM
Signal transduction pathway activation arising from integrin-ECM binding results in
- changes in gene expression of cells and
- leads to alterations in cell and tissue function.
Various different effects can arise depending on the
1.cell type,
2.matrix composition, and
3.integrins activated
It has been suggested that integrin-type I collagen interaction is necessary for
- the phosphorylation and activation of osteoblast-specific transcription factors
- present in committed osteoprogenitor cells.
During mechanical loading/stimulation of chondrocytes there is an
- influx of ions across the cell membrane resulting from
- activation of mechanosensitive ion channels
- which can be inhibited by subunit-specific anti-integrin blocking antibodies or RGD peptides.
Using these strategies it was identified that
- α5β1 integrin is a major mechanoreceptor in articular chondrocyte
- responses to mechanical loading/stimulation.
Osteoarthritic chondrocytes show a depolarization response to 0.33 Hz stimulation
- in contrast to the hyperpolarization response of normal chondrocytes.
The mechanotransduction pathway in chondrocytes derived from normal and osteoarthritic cartilage
- both involve recognition of the mechanical stimulus
- by integrin receptors resulting in
- the activation of integrin signaling pathways
- leading to the generation of a cytokine loop.
Normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes show differences
- at multiple stages of the mechanotransduction cascade.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2014.08.007
Chondrocyte integrins are important mediators of cell–matrix interactions in cartilage
- by regulating the response of the cells to signals from the ECM that
- control cell proliferation,
- survival,
- differentiation,
- matrix remodeling.
Integrins participate in development and maintenance of the tissue but also
- in pathological processes related to matrix destruction, where
- they likely play a role in the progression of OA.
Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels
Cells exhibited four types of mechanical responses:
(1) an immediate viscoelastic response;
(2) early adaptive behavior characterized by pulse-to-pulse attenuation in response to oscillatory forces;
(3) later adaptive cell stiffening with sustained (>15 second) static stresses; and
(4) a large-scale repositioning response with prolonged (>1 minute) stress.
Importantly, these adaptation responses differed biochemically.
The immediate and early responses were affected by
chemically dissipating cytoskeletal prestress (isometric tension), whereas
the later adaptive response was not.
The repositioning response was prevented by
inhibiting tension through interference with Rho signaling,
similar to the case of the immediate and early responses, but it was also prevented by
blocking mechanosensitive ion channels or
by inhibiting Src tyrosine kinases.
All adaptive responses were suppressed by cooling cells to 4°C to slow biochemical remodeling. Thus, cells use multiple mechanisms to sense and respond to static and dynamic changes in the level of mechanical stress applied to integrins.
Microtubule-Stimulated ADP Release, ATP Binding, and Force Generation In Transport Kinesins
All three classes of molecular motor proteins are now known to be
- large protein families with diverse cellular functions.
Both the kinesin family and the myosin family have been defined and their proteins grouped into subfamilies. Finally, the elusive cytoplasmic version of dynein was identified and a multigene family of flagellar and cytoplasmic dyneins defined. Members of a given motor protein family share
- significant homology in their motor domains with the defining member,
- kinesin, dynein or myosin; but they also contain
- unique protein domains that are specialized for interaction with different cargoes.
This large number of motor proteins may reflect
- the number of cellular functions that require force generation or movement,
- ranging from mitosis to morphogenesis to transport of vesicles.
Kinesins are a large family of microtubule (MT)-based motors that play important roles in many cellular activities including
mitosis,
motility, and
intracellular transport
Their involvement in a range of pathological processes
- also highlights their significance as therapeutic targets and
- the importance of understanding the molecular basis of their function
They are defined by their motor domains that contain both
- the microtubule (MT) and
- ATP binding sites.
Three ATP binding motifs—
- the P-loop,
- switch I,
- switch II–
are highly conserved among
- kinesins,
- myosin motors, and
- small GTPases.
They share a conserved mode of MT binding such that
- MT binding,
- ATP binding, and
- hydrolysis
are functionally coupled for efficient MT-based work.
The interior of a cell is a hive of activity, filled with
- proteins and other items moving from one location to another.
A network of filaments called microtubules forms tracks
- along which so-called motor proteins carry these items.
Kinesins are one group of motor proteins, and a typical kinesin protein has
- one end (called the ‘motor domain’) that can attach itself to the microtubules.
The other end links to the cargo being carried, and a ‘neck’ connects the two. When two of these proteins work together,
- flexible regions of the neck allow the two motor domains to move past one another,
- which enable the kinesin to essentially walk along a microtubule in a stepwise manner.
Although the two kinesins have been thought to move along the microtubule tracks in different ways, Atherton et al. find that the core mechanism used by their motor domains is the same.
When a motor domain binds to the microtubule, its shape changes,
- first stimulating release of the breakdown products of ATP from the previous cycle.
This release makes room for a new ATP molecule to bind. The structural changes caused by ATP binding
- produce larger changes in the flexible neck region that
- enable individual motor domains within a kinesin pair to
- co-ordinate their movement and move in a consistent direction.
The major and largely invariant point of contact between kinesin motor domains and the MT is helix-α4,
- which lies at the tubulin intradimer interface.
The conformational changes in functionally important regions of each motor domain are described,
- starting with the nucleotide-binding site,
- from which all other conformational changes emanate.
The nucleotide-binding site (Figure 2) has three major elements:
(1) the P-loop (brown) is visible in all our reconstructions;
(2) loop9 (yellow, contains switch I) undergoes major conformational changes through the ATPase cycle; and
(3) loop11 (red, contains switch II) that connects strand-β7 to helix-α4, the conformation and flexibility of which is
- determined by MT binding and motor nucleotide state.
Movement and extension of helix-α6 controls neck linker docking
the N-terminus of helix-α6 is closely associated with elements of the nucleotide binding site suggesting that
- its conformation alters in response to different nucleotide states.
Further,
- because the orientation of helix-α6 with respect to helix-α4 controls neck linker docking and
- because helix-α4 is held against the MT during the ATPase cycle,
- conformational changes in helix-α6 control movement of the neck linker.
Mechanical amplification and force generation involves conformational changes across the motor domain
A key conformational change in the motor domain following Mg-ATP binding is
- peeling of the central β-sheet from the C-terminus of helix-α4 increasing their separation;
- this is required to accommodate rotation of helix-α6 and consequent neck linker docking
ATP binding draws loop11 and loop9 closer together; causing
(1) tilting of most of the motor domain not contacting the MT towards the nucleotide-binding site,
(2) rotation, translation, and extension of helix-α6 which we propose contributes to force generation, and
(3) allows neck linker docking and biases movement of the 2nd head towards the MT plus end.
In both motors, microtubule binding promotes
ordered conformations of conserved loops that
stimulate ADP release,
enhance microtubule affinity and
prime the catalytic site for ATP binding.
ATP binding causes only small shifts of these nucleotide-coordinating loops but induces
large conformational changes elsewhere that
allow force generation and
neck linker docking towards the microtubule plus end.
The study presents evidence provide evidence for a conserved ATP-driven
mechanism for kinesins and
reveals the critical mechanistic contribution of the microtubule interface.
Phosphorylation at endothelial cell–cell junctions: Implications for VE-cadherin function
This review summarizes the role of VE-cadherin phosphorylation in the regulation of endothelial cell–cell junctions and highlights how this affects vascular permeability and leukocyte extravasation.
The vascular endothelium is the inner lining of blood vessels and
forms a physical barrier between the vessel lumen and surrounding tissue;
controlling the extravasation of fluids,
plasma proteins and leukocytes.
Changes in the permeability of the endothelium are tightly regulated. Under basal physiological conditions, there is a continuous transfer of substances across the capillary beds. In addition the endothelium can mediate inducible,
transient hyperpermeability
in response to stimulation with inflammatory mediators,
which takes place primarily in post-capillary venules
However, when severe, inflammation may result in dysfunction of the endothelial barrier
- in various parts of the vascular tree, including large veins, arterioles and capillaries.
Dysregulated permeability is observed in various pathological conditions, such as
- tumor-induced angiogenesis,
- cerebrovascular accident and
- atherosclerosis.
Two fundamentally different pathways regulate endothelial permeability,
- the transcellular and
- paracellular pathways.
Solutes and cells can pass through the body of endothelial cells via the transcellular pathway, which includes
- vesicular transport systems,
- fenestrae, and
- biochemical transporters.
The paracellular route is controlled by
- the coordinated opening and closing of endothelial junctions and
- thereby regulates traffic across the intercellular spaces between endothelial cells.
Endothelial cells are connected by
tight, gap and
adherens junctions,
of which the latter, and particularly the adherens junction component,
vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin,
are of central importance for the initiation and stabilization of cell–cell contacts.
Although multiple adhesion molecules are localized at endothelial junctions,
- blocking the adhesive function of VE-cadherin using antibodies
- is sufficient to disrupt endothelial junctions and
- to increase endothelial monolayer permeability both in vitro and in vivo.
Like other cadherins, VE-cadherin mediates adhesion via
- homophilic, calcium-dependent interactions.
This cell–cell adhesion
is strengthened by binding of cytoplasmic proteins, the catenins,
to the C-terminus of VE-cadherin.
VE-cadherin can directly bind
- β-catenin and plakoglobin, which
- both associate with the actin binding protein α-catenin.
Initially, α-catenin was thought to directly anchor cadherins to the actin cytoskeleton, but recently it became clear that
- α-catenin cannot bind to both β-catenin and actin simultaneously.
Numerous lines of evidence indicate that p120-catenin
- promotes VE-cadherin surface expression and stability at the plasma membrane.
Different models are proposed that describe how
- p120-catenin regulates cadherin membrane dynamics, including the hypothesis
- that p120-catenin functions as a ‘cap’ that prevents the interaction of VE-cadherin
- with the endocytic membrane trafficking machinery.
In addition, p120-catenin might regulate VE-cadherin internalization
- through interactions with small GTPases.
Cytoplasmic p120-catenin, which is not bound to VE-cadherin, has been shown to
decrease RhoA activity,
elevate active Rac1 and Cdc42, and thereby is thought
to regulate actin cytoskeleton organization and membrane trafficking.
The intact cadherin-catenin complex is required for proper functioning of the adherens junction.
Several mechanisms may be involved in the
- regulation of the organization and function of the cadherin–catenin complex, including
- endocytosis of the complex,
- VE-cadherin cleavage and
- actin cytoskeleton reorganization.
The remainder of this review primarily focuses on the
role of tyrosine phosphorylation in the control of VE-cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion.
Regulation of the adhesive function of VE-cadherin by tyrosine phosphorylation
It is a widely accepted concept that tyrosine phosphorylation of
- components of the VE–cadherin-catenin complex
- Correlates with the weakening of cell–cell adhesion.
A general idea has emerged that
tyrosine phosphorylation of the VE-cadherin complex
leads to the uncoupling of VE-cadherin from the actin cytoskeleton
through dissociation of catenins from the cadherin.
However, tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin
- is required for efficient transmigration of leukocytes.
This suggests that VE-cadherin-mediated cell–cell contacts
1.are not just pushed open by the migrating leukocytes, but play
2.a more active role in the transmigration process.
A schematic overview of leukocyte adhesion-induced signals leading to VE-cadherin phosphorylation
Regulation of the integrity of endothelial cell–cell contacts by phosphorylation of VE-cadherin.
N-glycosylation status of E-cadherin controls cytoskeletal dynamics through the organization of distinct β-catenin- and γ-catenin-containing AJs
N-glycosylation of E-cadherin has been shown to inhibit cell–cell adhesion.
Specifically, our recent studies have provided evidence that
- the reduction of E-cadherin N-glycosylation
- promoted the recruitment of stabilizing components,
- vinculin and serine/ threonine protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), to adherens junctions (AJs)
- and enhanced the association of AJs with the actin cytoskeleton.
Here, we examined the details of how
N-glycosylation of E-cadherin affected the molecular organization of AJs and their cytoskeletal interactions.
Using the hypoglycosylated E-cadherin variant, V13, we show that
V13/β-catenin complexes preferentially interacted with PP2A and with the microtubule motor protein dynein.
This correlated with dephosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau, suggesting that
increased association of PP2A with V13-containing AJs promoted their tethering to microtubules.
These studies provide the first mechanistic insights into how N-glycosylation of E-cadherin drives changes in AJ composition through
- the assembly of distinct β-catenin- and γ-catenin-containing scaffolds that impact the interaction with different cytoskeletal components
Cytoskeletal Basis of Ion Channel Function in Cardiac Muscle
In order to contract and accommodate the repetitive morphological changes induced by the cardiac cycle, cardiomyocytes
depend on their highly evolved and specialized cytoskeletal apparatus.
Defects in components of the cytoskeleton, in the long term,
affect the ability of the cell to compensate at both functional and structural levels.
In addition to the structural remodeling,
the myocardium becomes increasingly susceptible to altered electrical activity leading to arrhythmogenesis.
The development of arrhythmias secondary to structural remodeling defects has been noted, although the detailed molecular mechanisms are still elusive.
subjects with severe left ventricular chamber dilation such as in DCM can have left bundle branch block (LBBB), while right bundle branch block (RBBB) is more characteristic of right ventricular failure. LBBB and RBBB have both been repeatedly associated with AV block in heart failure.
The impact of volume overload on structural and electro-cardiographic alterations has been noted in cardiomyopathy patients treated with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, which puts the heart at mechanical rest.
In LVAD-treated subjects,
QRS- and both QT- and QTc duration decreased,
suggesting that QRS- and QT-duration are significantly influenced by mechanical load and
that the shortening of the action potential duration contributes to the improved contractile performance after LVAD support.
An early postoperative period study after cardiac unloading therapy in 17 HF patients showed that in the first two weeks after LVAD implantation,
HF was associated with a relatively high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias associated with QTc interval prolongation.
In addition, a recent retrospective study of 100 adult patients with advanced HF, treated with an axial-flow HeartMate LVAD suggested that
- the rate of new-onset monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT) was increased in LVAD treated patients compared to patients given only medical treatment,
The myocardium is exposed to severe and continuous biomechanical stress during each contraction-relaxation cycle. When fiber tension remains uncompensated or simply unbalanced,
it may represent a trigger for arrhythmogenesis caused by cytoskeletal stretching,
which ultimately leads to altered ion channel localization, and subsequent action potential and conduction alterations.
Cytoskeletal proteins not only provide the backbone of the cellular structure, but they also
maintain the shape and flexibility of the different sub-cellular compartments, including the
1.plasma membrane,
2.the double lipid layer, which defines the boundaries of the cell and where
ion channels are mainly localized.
The interaction between the sarcomere, which is the basic for the passive force during diastole and for the restoring force during systole.
Sarcomeric Proteins and Ion Channels
besides fiber stretch associated with mechanical and hemodynamic impairment, cytoskeletal alterations due to primary genetic defects or indirectly to alterations in response to cellular injury can potentially
1.affect ion channel anchoring, and trafficking, as well as
2.functional regulation by second messenger pathways,
3.causing an imbalance in cardiac ionic homeostasis that will trigger arrhythmogenesis.
Intense investigation of
the sarcomeric actin network,
the Z-line structure, and
chaperone molecules docking in the plasma membrane,
has shed new light on the molecular basis of
- cytoskeletal interactions in regulating ion channels
Actin disruption using cytochalasin D, an agent that interferes with actin polymerization, increased Na+ channel activity in 90% of excised patches tested within 2 min, which indicated that
the integrity of the filamentous actin (F-actin) network was essential for the maintenance of normal Na+ channel function
These data were the first to support a role for the cytoskeleton in cardiac arrhythmias.
Molecular interactions between the cytoskeleton and ion channels
The figure illustrates the interactions between the ion channels on the sarcolemma, and the sarcomere in cardiac myocytes. Note that the Z-line is connected to the cardiac T-tubules. The diagram illustrates the complex protein-protein interactions that occur between structural components of the cytoskeleton and ion channels. The cytoskeleton is involved in regulating the metabolism of ion channels, modifying their expression, localization, and electrical properties.
It is important to be aware of the enormous variety of clinical presentations that derive from distinct variants in the same pool of genetic factors. Knowledge of these variants could facilitate tailoring the therapy of choice for each patient. In particular,
the recent findings of structural and functional links between
the cytoskeleton and ion channels
could expand the therapeutic interventions in
arrhythmia management in structurally abnormal myocardium, where aberrant binding
between cytoskeletal proteins can directly or indirectly alter ion channel function.