Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical’ Category

Nitric Oxide Function in Coagulation – Part II

Curator and Author: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

Subtitle: Nitric oxide in hemostatic and bleeding mechanisms.  Part II.

 

Summary: This is the second of a coagulation series on PharmaceuticalIntelligence(wordpress.com)  treating the diverse effects of NO on platelets, the coagulation cascade, and protein-membrane interactions with low flow states, local and systemic inflammatory disease, oxidative stress, and hematologic disorders.  It is highly complex as the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic pathways become blurred as a result of  endothelial shear stress, distinctly different than penetrating or traumatic injury.  In addition, other factors that come into play are also considered.

Please refer to Part I.

Coagulation Pathway

The workhorse tests of the modern coagulation laboratory, the prothrombin time (PT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), are the basis for the published extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways.  This is, however, a much simpler model than one encounters delving into the mechanism and interactions involved in hemostasis and thrombosis, or in hemorrhagic disorders.

We first note that there are three components of the hemostatic system in all vertebrates:

  • Platelets,
  • vascular endothelium, and
  • plasma proteins.

The liver is the largest synthetic organ, which synthesizes

  • albumin,
  • acute phase proteins,
  • hormonal and metal binding proteins,
  • albumin,
  • IGF-1, and
  • prothrombin, mainly responsible for the distinction between plasma and serum (defibrinated plasma).

Role of vascular endothelium.

I have identified the importance of prothrombin, thrombin, and the divalent cation Ca 2+ (1% of the total body pool), mention of heparin action, and of vitamin K (inhibited by warfarin).  Endothelial functions are inherently related to procoagulation and anticoagulation. The subendothelial matrix is a complex of many materials, most important related to coagulation being collagen and von Willebrand factor.

What about extrinsic and intrinsic pathways?  Tissue factor, when bound to factor VIIa, is the major activator of the extrinsic pathway of coagulation. Classically, tissue factor is not present in the plasma but only presented on cell surfaces at a wound site, which is “extrinsic” to the circulation.  Or is it that simple?

Endothelium is the major synthetic and storage site for von Willebrand factor (vWF).  vWF is…

  • secreted from the endothelial cell both into the plasma and also
  • abluminally into the subendothelial matrix, and
  • acts as the intercellular glue binding platelets to one another and also to the subendothelial matrix at an injury site.
  • acts as a carrier protein for factor VIII (antihemophilic factor).
  • It  binds to the platelet glycoprotein Ib/IX/V receptor and
  • mediates platelet adhesion to the vascular wall under shear. [Lefkowitz JB. Coagulation Pathway and Physiology. Chapter I. in Hemostasis Physiology. In ( ???), pp1-12].

Ca++ and phospholipids are necessary for all of the reactions that result in the activation of prothrombin to thrombin. Coagulation is initiated by an extrinsic mechanism that

  • generates small amounts of factor Xa, which in turn
  • activates small amounts of thrombin.

The tissue factor/factorVIIa proteolysis of factor X is quickly inhibited by tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI).The small amounts of thrombin generated from the initial activation feedback

  • to create activated cofactors, factors Va and VIIIa, which in turn help to
  • generate more thrombin.
  • Tissue factor/factor VIIa is also capable of indirectly activating factor X through the activation of factor IX to factor IXa.
  • Finally, as more thrombin is created, it activates factor XI to factor XIa, thereby enhancing the ability to ultimately make more thrombin.

The reconceptualization of hemostasis 

The common theme in activation and regulation of plasma coagulation is the reduction in dimensionality. Most reactions take place in a 2D world that will increase the efficiency of the reactions dramatically. The localization and timing of the coagulation processes are also dependent on the formation of protein complexes on the surface of membranes. The coagulation processes can also be controlled by certain drugs that destroy the membrane binding ability of some coagulation proteins – these proteins will be lost in the 3D world and not able to form procoagulant complexes on surfaces.

Assembly of proteins on membranes – making a 3D world flat

• The timing and efficiency of coagulation processes are handled by reduction in dimensionality

– Make 3 dimensions to 2 dimensions

• Coagulation proteins have membrane binding capacity

• Membranes provide non-coagulant and procoagulant surfaces

– Intact cells/activated cells

• Membrane binding is a target for anticoagulant drugs

– Anti-vitamin K (e.g. warfarin)

Modern View

It can be divided into the phases of initiation, amplification and propagation.

  • In the initiation phase, small amounts of thrombin can be formed after exposure of tissue factor to blood.
  • In the amplification phase, the traces of thrombin will be inactivated or used for amplification of the coagulation process.

At this stage there is not enough thrombin to form insoluble fibrin. In order to proceed further thrombin  activates platelets, which provide a procoagulant surface for the coagulation factors. Thrombin will also activate the vital cofactors V and VIII that will assemble on the surface of activated platelets. Thrombin can also activate factor XI, which is important in a feedback mechanism.

In the final step, the propagation phase, the highly efficient tenase and prothrombinase complexes have been assembled on the membrane surface. This yields large amounts of thrombin at the site of injury that can cleave fibrinogen to insoluble fibrin. Factor XI activation by thrombin then activates factor IX, which leads to the formation of more tenase complexes. This ensures enough thrombin is formed, despite regulation of the initiating TF-FVIIa complex, thus ensuring formation of a stable fibrin clot. Factor XIII stabilizes the fibrin clot through crosslinking when activated by thrombin.

Platelet Aggregation

The activities of adenylate and guanylate cyclase and cyclic nucleotide 3′:5′-phosphodiesterase were determined during the aggregation of human blood platelets with

  • thrombin, ADP,
  • arachidonic acid and
  • epinephrine.

[Aggregation is dependent on an intact release mechanism since inhibition of aggregation occurred with adenosine, colchicine, or EDTA.  (Herman GE, Seegers WH, Henry RL. Autoprothrombin ii-a, thrombin, and epinephrine: interrelated effects on platelet aggregation. Bibl Haematol 1977;44:21-7)].

  1. The platelet guanylate cyclase activity during aggregation depends on the nature and mode of action of the inducing agent.
  2. The membrane adenylate cyclase activity during aggregation is independent of the aggregating agent and is associated with a reduction of activity and
  3. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase remains unchanged during the process of platelet aggregation and release.

The role of platelets in arterial thrombosis

Formation of a thrombus on a ruptured plaque is the product of a complex interaction between coagulation factors in the plasma and platelets.

  • Tissue factor (TF) released from the subendothelial tissue after endothelial damage induces a cascade of activation of coagulation factors ultimately leading to the formation of thrombin.
  • Thrombin cleaves fibrinogen to fibrin, which assembles into a mesh that supports the platelet aggregates.

The Platelet

The platelets are …

  • anucleated,
  • discoid shaped cell fragments
  • originating from megakaryocytes
  •  fragmented as they are released from the bone marrow

Whether they can in circumstances be developed at extramedullary sites (liver sinusoid) is another matter. They have a lifespan of 7-10 days.  Of special interest is:

  • They have a network of internal membranes forming a dense tubular system and the open canalicular system (OCS).
  • The plasma membrane is an extension of the OCS, thereby greatly increasing the surface area of the platelet.
  • The dense tubular system is comparable to the endoplasmatic reticulum in other cell types and is the main storage place of the majority of the platelet’s Ca2+.

Three types of secretory granules exist in platelets:

  • the dense granules
    •  In the dense granules serotonin
    • adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and
    • Ca2+ are stored.
    • a-granules contain
      • P-selectin,
      • fibrinogen,
      •  thrombospondin,
      • Von Willebrand Factor,
      • platelet factor 4 and
      • platelet derived growth factor
      • lysosomes.

Circulating platelets are kept in a resting state by endothelial cell derived

  • prostacyclin (PGI2) and
  • nitric oxide (NO).

PGI2 increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), the most potent platelet inhibitor.

Contact activation

The major regulator of the activation of the contact system is the plasma protease inhibitor, C1-INH, which inhibits activated fXII, kallikrein and fXIa. In addition, α2-macroglobulin is an important inhibitor of kallikrein and α1-antitrypsin for fXIa. Factor XII also converts the fXI to an active enzyme, fXIa, which, in turn, converts fIX to fIXa, thereby activating the intrinsic pathway of coagulation.

Activation

Several agonists can activate platelets;

  • ADP,
  • collagen,
  • thromboxane A2 (TxA2),
  • epinephrin,
  • serotonine and
  • thrombin,

which lead to activation previously referred to:

  • platelet shape change is
  • followed by aggregation and
  • granule secretion.

Upon activation the discoid shape changes into a spherical form.

Activation of platelets is increased by two positive feedback loops

  1. arachidonic acid is cleaved from phospholipids and transformed by cyclooxygenase

(COX) to prostaglandin G2 and H2,

  • followed by the formation of TxA2, a potent platelet agonist.

2.   the secretion of ADP by the dense granules,

  • resulting in activation of the ADP receptor P2Y12.

This causes inhibition of cyclic AMP and sustained aggregation.

Aggregation

The integrin receptor αIIbβ3 plays a vital role in platelet aggregation. The platelet agonists

  • induce a conformational change of the αIIbβ3 receptor and
  • exposition of binding domains for fibrinogen and von Willebrand Factor.

This allows cross-linking of platelets and the formation of aggregates.

In addition to shape change and aggregation, the membranes of the α- and dense granules fuse with the membranes of the OCS. This causes the release of their contents and the transportation of proteins embedded in their membrane to the plasma membrane.

This complex interaction between

  • endothelial cells
  • clotting factors
  • platelets and
  • other factors and cells

can be studied in both in vitro and in vivo model systems. The disadvantage of in vitro assays is that it studies the role of a certain protein or cell in isolation. Given the large number of participants and the complex interactions of thrombus formation there is need to study thrombosis and hemostasis in intact living animals, with all the components important for thrombus formation – a vessel wall and flowing blood – present.

Endothelial Damage and Role as “Primer”

  • Endothelial injury changes the permeability of the arterial wall.
  • This is followed by an influx of low-density lipoprotein (LDL).
  • This elicits an inflammatory response in the vascular wall.
  • Monocytes and T-cells bind to the endothelial cells promoting increased migration of the cells into the intima layer
  • The monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which take up modified lipoproteins and transform them into foam cells.
  • Concurrent with this process macrophages produce cytokines and proteases.

This is a vicious circle of lipid driven inflammation that leads to narrowing of the vessel’s lumen without early clinical consequences. Clinical manifestations of more advanced atherosclerotic disease are caused by destabilization of an atherosclerotic plaque formed as described.

  • The first recognizable lesion of the stable atherosclerotic plaque is the fatty streak, which consists of the above described foam cells and T-lymphocytes in the intima.
  • Further development of the lesion leads to the intermediate lesion, composed
  • of layers of macrophages and smooth muscle cells.
  • A more advanced stage is called the vulnerable plaque.
    • It has a large lipid core that is covered by a thin fibrous cap.
    • This cap separates the lipid contents of the plaque from the circulating blood.
    • The vulnerable plaque is prone to rupture, resulting in the formation of a thrombus on the site of disruption or the thrombus can be superimposed on plaque erosion without signs of plaque rupture.

The formation of a superimposed thrombus on a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque in the lumen of the artery leads to

  • an acute occlusion of the vessel
  • hypoxia of the downstream tissue.

Depending on the location of the atherosclerotic plaque this will cause a myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral vascular disease.

Endothelial regulation of coagulation

The endothelium attenuates platelet activity by releasing

  • nitric oxide and
  • prostacyclin.

Several coagulation inhibitors are produced by endothelial cells.

Endothelium-derived TFPI (on its surface) is rapidly released into circulation after heparin administration, reducing the pro-coagulant activities of TF-fVIIa. Endothelial cells also secrete heparin-sulphate, a glycosaminoglycan which catalyzes anti-coagulant activity of AT. Plasma AT binds to heparin-sulphate located on the luminal surface and in the basement membrane of the endothelium. Thrombomodulin is another endothelium-bound protein with anti-coagulant and anti-inflammatory functions. In response to systemic pro-coagulant stimuli, tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) is transiently released from the Weibel-Palade bodies of endothelial cells to promote fibrinolysis. Downstream of the vascular injury, the complex of TF-fVIIa/fXa is inhibited by TFPI. Plasma (free) fXa and thrombin are rapidly neutralized by heparan-bound AT. Thrombin is also taken up by endothelial surface-bound thrombomodulin.

The protein C pathway works in hemostasis to control thrombin formation in the area surrounding the clot. Thrombin, generated via the coagulation pathway, is localized to the endothelium by binding to the integral membrane protein, thrombomodulin (TM). TM by occupying exosite I on thrombin, which is required for fibrinogen binding and cleavage, reduces thrombin’s pro-coagulant activities. TM bound thrombin  on the endothelial cell surface is able to cleave PC producing activated protein C (APC), a serine protease.  In the presence of protein S, APC inactivates FVa and FVIIIa. The proteolytic activity of APC is regulated predominantly by a protein C inhibitor.

Fibrinolytic pathway

Fibrinolysis is the physiological breakdown of fibrin to limit and resolve blood clots. Fibrin is degraded primarily by the serine protease, plasmin, which circulates as plasminogen. In an auto-regulatory manner, fibrin serves as both the co-factor for the activation of plasminogen and the substrate for plasmin. In the presence of fibrin, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) cleaves plasminogen producing plasmin, which proteolyzes the fibrin. This reaction produces the protein fragment D-dimer, which is a useful marker of fibrinolysis, and a marker of thrombin activity because fibrin is cleaved from fibrinogen to fibrin.

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Energy Production

Nitric oxide (NO) has been increasingly recognized as an important intra- and intercellular messenger molecule with a physiological role in

  • vascular relaxation
  • platelet physiology
  • neurotransmission and
  • immune responses.

In vitro NO is a strong inhibitor of platelet adhesion and aggregation. In the blood stream, platelets remain in contact with NO that is permanently released from the endothelial cells and from activated macrophages. It  has been suggested that the activated platelet itself is able to produce NO. It has been proposed that the main intracellular target for NO in platelets is soluble cytosolic guanylate cyclase. NO activates the enzyme. When activated, intracellular cGMP elevation inhibits platelet activation. Further, elevated cGMP may not be the sole factor directly involved in the inhibition of platelet activation.

The reaction mechanism of Nitric oxide synthase
The reaction mechanism of Nitric oxide synthase (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Platelets are fairly active metabolically and have a total ATP turnover rate of about 3–8 times that of resting mammalian muscle. Platelets contain mitochondria which enable these cells to produce energy both in the oxidative and anaerobic pathways.

  • Under aerobic conditions, ATP is produced by aerobic glycolysis which can account for 30–50% of total ATP production,
  • by oxidative metabolism using glucose and glycogen (6–11%), amino-acids (7%) or free fatty acids (20–40%).

The inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by removing oxygen or by respiratory chain blockers (antimycin A, cyanide, rotenone) results in the stimulation of glycolytic flux. This phenomenon indicates that in platelets glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration are tightly functionally connected. It has been reported that the activation of human platelets by high concentration of thrombin is accompanied by an acceleration of lactate production and an increase in oxygen consumption.

The results (in porcine platelets) indicate that:

  • NO is able to diminish mitochondrial energy production through the inhibition of cytochrome oxidase
  • The inhibitory effect of NO on platelet secretion (but not aggregation) can be attributed to the reduction of mitochondrial energy production.

Porcine blood platelets stimulated by collagen produce more lactate. This indicates that both glycolytic and oxidative ATP production supports platelet responses, and blocking of energy production in platelets may decrease their responses. It is well established that platelet responses have different metabolic energy (ATP) requirements increasing in the order:

  • Aggregation
  • < dense and alfa granule secretion
  • < acid hydrolase secretion.

In addition, exogenously added NO (in the form of NO donors) stimulates glycolysis in intact porcine platelets. Since in platelets glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration are tightly functionally connected, this indicates the stimulatory effect of NO on glycolysis in intact platelets may be produced by non-functional mitochondria.

Can this be the case?

  • NO donors are able to inhibit both mitochondrial respiration and platelet cytochrome oxidase.
  • Interestingly, the concentrations of NO donors inhibiting mitochondrial respiration and cytochrome oxidase were similar to those stimulating glycolysis in intact platelets.

Studies have shown that mitochondrial complex I is inhibited only after a prolonged (6–18 h) exposure to NO and

  • This inhibition appears to result from S-nitrosylation of critical thiols in the enzyme complex.
  • Further studies are needed to establish whether long term exposure of platelets to NO affects Mitochondrial complexes I and II.

Comparison of the concentrations of SNAP and SNP affecting cytochrome oxidase activity and mitochondrial respiration with those reducing the platelet responses indicates that NO does not reduce platelet aggregation through the inhibition of oxidative energy production. The concentrations of the NO donors inhibiting platelet secretion, mitochondrial respiration and cytochrome oxidase were similar. Thus, the platelet release reaction strongly depends on the oxidative energy production, and  in porcine platelets NO inhibits mitochondrial energy production at the step of cytochrome oxidase.

Taking into account that platelets may contain NO synthase and are able to produce significant amounts of NO it seems possible that nitric oxide can function in these cells as a physiological regulator of mitochondrial energy production.

Key words: glycolysis, mitochondrial energy production, nitric oxide, porcine platelets.
Abbreviations: NO, nitric oxide; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicyllamine; SNP, sodium nitroprusside.

[M Tomasiak, H Stelmach, T Rusak and J Wysocka.  Nitric oxide and platelet energy metabolism.  Acta Biochimica Polonica 2004; 51(3):789–803.]

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Adhesion

The adhesion of human platelets to monolayers of bovine endothelial cells in culture was studied to determine the role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of platelet adhesion. The adhesion of unstimulated and thrombin-stimulated platelets, washed and labelled with indium-111, was lower in the presence than in the absence of bradykinin or exogenous nitric oxide. The inhibitory action of both bradykinin and nitric oxide was abolished by hemoglobin, but not by aspirin, and was potentiated by superoxide dismutase to a similar degree. It appears that the effect of bradykinin is mediated by the release of nitric oxide from the endothelial cells, and that nitric oxide release contributes to the non-adhesive properties of vascular endothelium.

(Radomski MW, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S.   Endogenous Nitric Oxide Inhibits Human Platelet Adhesion to Vascular Endothelium. The Lancet  1987 330; 8567(2): 1057–1058.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(87)91481-4)

1 The interactions between endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin as inhibitors of platelet aggregation were examined to determine whether release of NO accounts for the inhibition of platelet aggregation attributed to EDRF.

2 Porcine aortic endothelial cells treated with indomethacin and stimulated with bradykinin (10-100 nM) released NO in quantities sufficient to account for the inhibition of platelet aggregation attributed to endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF).

3 In the absence of indomethacin, stimulation of the cells with bradykinin (1-3 nM) released small amounts of prostacyclin and EDRF which synergistically inhibited platelet aggregation.

4 EDRF and authentic NO also caused disaggregation of platelets aggregated either with collagen or with U46619.

5 A reciprocal potentiation of both the anti- and the disaggregating activity was also observed between low concentrations of prostacyclin and authentic NO or EDRF released from endothelial cells.

6 It is likely that interactions between prostacyclin and NO released by the endothelium play a role in the homeostatic regulation of platelet-vessel wall interactions.

(Radomski MW, Palmer RMJ & Moncada S. The anti-aggregating properties of vascular endothelium: interactions between prostacyclin and nitric oxide. Br J Pharmac 1987; 92: 639-646.

 

Factor Xa–Nitric Oxide Signaling

Although primarily recognized for maintaining the hemostatic balance, blood proteases of the coagulation and fibrinolytic cascades elicit rapid cellular responses in

  • vascular
  • mesenchymal
  • inflammatory cell types.

Considerable effort has been devoted to elucidate the molecular interface between protease-dependent signaling and pleiotropic cellular responses. This led to the identification of several membrane protease receptors, initiating intracellular signal transduction and effector functions in vascular cells. In this context, thrombin receptor activation

  • generated second messengers in endothelium and smooth muscle cells,
  • released inflammatory cytokines from monocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelium, and
  • increased the expression of leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion molecules.

Similarly, binding of factor Xa to effector cell protease receptor-1 (EPR-1) participated in

  • in vivo acute inflammatory responses,
  • platelet and brain pericyte prothrombinase activity, and
  • endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell signaling and proliferation.

Factor Xa stimulated a 5- to 10-fold increased release of nitric oxide (NO) in a dose-dependent reaction (0.1–2.5 mgyml) unaffected by the thrombin inhibitor hirudin but abolished by active site inhibitors, tick anticoagulant peptide, or Glu-Gly-Arg-chloromethyl ketone. In contrast, the homologous clotting protease factor IXa or another endothelial cell ligand, fibrinogen, was ineffective.

A factor Xa inter-epidermal growth factor synthetic peptide L83FTRKL88(G) blocking ligand binding to effector cell protease receptor-1 inhibited NO release by factor Xa in a dose-dependent manner, whereas a control scrambled peptide KFTGRLL was ineffective.

Catalytically active factor Xa induced hypotension in rats and vasorelaxation in the isolated rat mesentery, which was blocked by the NO synthase inhibitor L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (LNAME) but not by D-NAME. Factor Xa/NO signaling also produced a dose-dependent endothelial cell release of interleukin 6 (range 0.55–3.1 ngyml) in a reaction

  • inhibited by L-NAME and by the
  • inter-epidermal growth factor peptide Leu83–Leu88 but
  • unaffected by hirudin.
We observe that incubation of HUVEC monolayers with factor Xa which resulted in a concentration-dependent release of NO, as determined by cGMP accumulation in these cells, was inhibited by the nitric oxide synthase antagonist L-NAME.

Catalytically inactive DEGR-factor Xa or TAP-treated factor Xa failed to stimulate NO release by HUVEC.

To determine whether factor Xa-induced NO release could also modulate acute phase/inflammatory cytokine gene expression we examined potential changes in IL-6 release following HUVEC stimulation with factor Xa. HUVEC stimulation with factor Xa resulted in a concentration-dependent release of IL-6.

The specificity of factor Xa-induced cytokine release was investigated. Factor Xa-induced IL-6 release from HUVEC was quantitatively indistinguishable from that obtained with tumor necrosis factor-a or thrombin stimulation. This response was abolished by heat denaturation of factor Xa.

Maximal induction of interleukin 6 mRNA required a brief, 30-min stimulation with factor Xa, and was unaffected by subsequent addition of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). These data suggest that factor Xa-induced NO release modulates endothelial cell-dependent vasorelaxation and IL-6 cytokine gene expression.

Here, we find that factor Xa induces the release of endothelial cell NO

  • regulating vasorelaxation in vivo and acute response cytokine gene expression in vitro.

This pathway requires a dual step cascade, involving

  • binding of factor Xa to EPR-1 and
  • a secondary as yet unidentified protease activated mechanism.

This pathway requiring factor Xa binding to effector cell protease receptor-1 and a secondary step of ligand-dependent proteolysis may preserve an anti-thrombotic phenotype of endothelium but also trigger acute phase responses during activation of coagulation in vivo.

In summary, these investigators have identified a signaling pathway centered on the ability of factor Xa to rapidly stimulate endothelial cell NO release. This involves a two-step cascade initiated by catalytic active site-independent binding of factor Xa to its receptor, EPR-1, followed by a second step of ligand dependent proteolysis.

(Papapetropoulos A, Piccardoni P, Cirino G, Bucci M, et al. Hypotension and inflammatory cytokine gene expression triggered by factor Xa–nitric oxide signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. Pharmacology. 1998; 95:4738–4742.)

Platelets and liver disease

Thrombocytopenia is a marked feature of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Traditionally, this thrombocytopenia was attributed to passive platelet sequestration in the spleen. More recent insights suggest an increased platelet breakdown and to a lesser extent decreased platelet production plays a more important role. Besides the reduction in number, other studies suggest functional platelet defects. This platelet dysfunction is probably both intrinsic to the platelets and secondary to soluble plasma factors. It reflects not only a decrease in aggregability, but also an activation of the intrinsic inhibitory pathways. (Witters P, Freson K, Verslype C, Peerlinck K, et al. Review article: blood platelet number and function in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1017–1029).

The shortcomings of the old Y-shaped model of normal coagulation are nowhere more apparent than in its clinical application to the complex coagulation disorders of acute and chronic liver disease. In this condition, the clotting cascade is heavily influenced by numerous currents and counter-currents resulting in a mixture of pro- and anticoagulant forces that are themselves further subject to change with altered physiological stress such as super-imposed infection or renal failure.

Multiple mechanisms exist for thrombocytopenia common in patients with cirrhosis besides hypersplenism and expected altered thrombopoietin metabolism. Increased production of two important endothelial derived platelet inhibitors

  • nitric oxide and
  • prostacyclin

may contribute to defective platelet activation in vivo. On the other hand, high plasma levels of vWF in cirrhosis appear to support platelet adhesion.

Reduced levels of coagulation factors V, VII, IX, X, XI, and prothrombin are also commonly observed in liver failure. Vitamin K–dependent clotting factors (II, VII, IX, X) may be defective in function as a result of decreased  y-carboxylation (from vitamin K deficiency or intrinsically impaired carboxylase activity). Fibrinogen levels are decreased with advanced cirrhosis and in patients with acute liver failure.

A hyperfibrinolytic state may develop when plasminogen activation by tPA is accelerated on the fibrin surface. Physiologic stress including infection may be key in tipping this process off through increased release of tPA.  Not uncommonly, laboratory abnormalities in decompensated cirrhosis come to resemble disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Relatively stable platelet levels and characteristically high factor VIII levels distinguish this process from DIC as does the absence of uncompensated thrombin generation. The features of both hyperfibrinolysis and DIC are often evident in the decompensated liver disease patient, and the term “accelerated intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis” (AICF) has been proposed as a way to encapsulate the process under a single heading. The essence of AICF can be postulated to be the result of formation of a fibrin clot that is more susceptible to plasmin degradation due to elevated levels of tPA coupled with inadequate release of PAI to control tPA and lack of a-2 plasmin inhibitor to quench plasmin activity and the maintenance of high local concentrations of plasminogen on clot surfaces despite lower total plasminogen production. These normally balanced processes become pronounced when disturbed by additional stress such as infection.

Normal hemostasis and coagulation is now viewed as primarily a cell-based process wherein key steps in the classical clotting cascade

  • occur on the phospholipid membrane surface of cells (especially platelets)
  • beginning with activation of tissue factor and factor VII at the site of vascular breach
    •  which produces an initial “priming” amount of thrombin and a
    • subsequent thrombin burst.

Coagulation and hemostasis in the liver failure patient is influenced by multiple, often opposing, and sometimes changing variables. A bleeding diathesis is usually predominant, but the assessment of bleeding risk based on conventional laboratory tests is inherently deficient.

(Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, Lisman T, Gail Macik B, et al. Coagulation Disorders and Hemostasis in Liver Disease: Pathophysiology and Critical Assessment of Current Management. Hepatology 2006;44:1039-1046.)

Bleeding after Coronary Artery bypass Graft

Cardiac surgery with concomitant CPB can profoundly alter haemostasis, predisposing patients to major haemorrhagic complications and possibly early bypass conduit-related thrombotic events as well. Five to seven percent of patients lose more than 2 litres of blood within the first 24 hours after surgery, between 1% and 5% require re-operation for bleeding. Re-operation for bleeding increases hospital mortality 3 to 4 fold, substantially increases post-operative hospital stay and has a sizeable effect on health care costs. Nevertheless, re-exploration is a strong risk factor associated with increased operative mortality and morbidity, including sepsis, renal failure, respiratory failure and arrhythmias.

(Gábor Veres. New Drug Therapies Reduce Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery. Ph.D. Doctoral Dissertation. 2010. Semmelweis University)

Hypercoagulable State in Thalassemia

As the life expectancy of β-thalassemia patients has increased in the last decade, several new complications are being recognized. The presence of a high incidence of thromboembolic events, mainly in thalassemia intermedia patients, has led to the identification of a hypercoagulable state in thalassemia. Patients with thalassemia intermedia (TI) have, in general, a milder clinical phenotype than those with TM and remain largely transfusion independent. The pathophysiology of TI is characterized by extravascular hemolysis, with the release into the peripheral circulation of damaged red blood cells (RBCs) and erythroid precursors because of a high degree of ineffective erythropoiesis. This has also been recently attributed to severe complications such as pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and thromboembolic phenomena.

Many investigators have reported changes in the levels of coagulation factors and inhibitors in thalassemic patients. Prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2), a marker of thrombin generation, is elevated in TI patients. The status of protein C and protein S was investigated in thalassemia in many studies and generally they were found to be decreased; this might be responsible for the occurrence of thromboembolic events in thalassemic patients.

The pathophysiological roles of hemolysis and the dysregulation of nitric oxide homeostasis are correlated with pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease and in thalassemia. Nitric oxide binds soluble guanylate cyclase, which converts GTP to cGMP, relaxing vascular smooth muscle and causing vasodilatation. When plasma hemoglobin liberated from intravascularly hemolyzed sickle erythrocytes consumes nitric oxide, the balance is shifted toward vasoconstriction. Pulmonary hypertension is aggravated and in sickle cell disease, it is linked to the intensity of hemolysis. Whether the same mechanism contributes to hypercoagulability in thalassemia is not yet known.

While there are diverse factors contributing to the hypercoagulable state observed in patients with thalassemia. In most cases, a combination of these abnormalities leads to clinical thrombosis. An argument has been made for the a higher incidence of thrombotic events in TI compared to TM patients  attributed to transfusion for TM. The higher rate of thrombosis in transfusion-independent TI compared to polytransused TM patients suggests a potential role for transfusions in decreasing the rate of thromboembolic events (TEE). The reduction of TEE in adequately transfused patients may be the result of decreased numbers of pathological RBCs.

(Cappellini MD, Musallam KM,  Marcon A, and Taher AT. Coagulopathy in Beta-Thalassemia: Current Understanding and Future Prospects. Medit J Hemat Infect Dis 2009; 1(1):22009029.
DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2009.0292.0), www.mjhid.org/article/view/5250.  ISSN 2035-3006.)

Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction

Severe sepsis, defined as sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction, results from a generalized inflammatory and procoagulant host response to infection. Coagulopathy in severe sepsis is commonly associated with multiple organ dysfunction, and often results in death. The molecule that is central to these effects is thrombin, although it may also have anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects through the activation of Protein C and induction of prostacyclin. In recent years, it has been recognized that chemicals produced by endothelial cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Thrombomodulin on endothelial cells coverts Protein C to Activated Protein C, which has important antithrombotic, profibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory properties. A number of studies have shown that Protein C levels are reduced in patients with severe infection, or even in inflammatory states without infection. Because coagulopathy is associated with high mortality rates, and animal studies have indicated that therapeutic intervention may result in improved outcomes, it was rational to initiate clinical studies.

Considering the coagulation cascade as a whole, it is the extrinsic pathway (via TF and thrombin activation) rather than the intrinsic pathway that is of primary importance in sepsis. Once coagulation has been triggered by TF activation, leading to thrombin formation, this can have further procoagulant effects, because thrombin itself can activate factors VIII, IX and X. This is normally balanced by the production of anticoagulant factors, such as TF pathway inhibitor, antithrombin and Activated Protein C.

It has been recognized that endothelial cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis, and that they produce important regulators of both coagulation and inflammation. They can express or release a number of substances, such as TF, endothelin-1 and PAI-1, which promote the coagulation process, as well as other substances, such as antithrombin, thrombomodulin, nitric oxide and prostacyclin, which inhibit it.

Protein C is the source of Activated Protein C. Although Protein C is a biomarker or indicator of sepsis, it has no known specific biological activity. Protein C is converted to Activated Protein C in the presence of normal endothelium. In patients with severe sepsis, the vascular endothelium becomes damaged. The level of thrombomodulin is significantly decreased, and the body’s ability to convert Protein C to Activated Protein C diminishes. Only when activated does Protein C have antithrombotic, profibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory properties.

Blood Coagulation (Thrombin) and Protein C Pat...

Blood Coagulation (Thrombin) and Protein C Pathways (Blood_Coagulation_and_Protein_C_Pathways.jpg) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Coagulation abnormalities can occur in all types of infection, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections, or even in the absence of infection, such as in inflammatory states secondary to trauma or neurosurgery. Interestingly, they can also occur in patients with localized disease, such as those with respiratory infection. In a study by Günther et al., procoagulant activity in bronchial lavage fluid from patients with pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome was found to be increased compared with that from control individuals, with a correlation between the severity of respiratory failure and level of coagulant activity.

Severe sepsis, defined as sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction, results from a generalized inflammatory and procoagulant host response to infection.  Once the endothelium becomes damaged, levels of endothelial thrombomodulin significantly decrease, and the body’s ability to convert Protein C to Activated Protein C diminishes. The ultimate cause of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis is injury to the vascular endothelium, which can result in microvascular coagulopathy.

(Vincent JL. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction: a renewed appreciation of sepsis pathophysiology.
Critical Care 2001; 5:S1–S5. http://ccforum.com/content/5/S2/S1)

Endothelial Cell Dysfunction in Severe Sepsis

During the past decade a unifying hypothesis has been developed to explain the vascular changes that occur in septic shock on the basis of the effect of inflammatory mediators on the vascular endothelium. The vascular endothelium plays a central role in the control of microvascular flow, and it has been proposed that widespread vascular endothelial activation, dysfunction and eventually injury occurs in septic shock, ultimately resulting in multiorgan failure. This has been characterized in various models of experimental septic shock. Now, direct and indirect evidence for endothelial cell alteration in humans during septic shock is emerging.

The vascular endothelium regulates the flow of nutrient substances, diverse biologically active molecules and the blood cells themselves. This role of endothelium is achieved through the presence of membrane-bound receptors for numerous molecules, including proteins, lipid transporting particles, metabolites and hormones, as well as through specific junction proteins and receptors that govern cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions. Endothelial dysfunction and/or injury with subendothelium exposure facilitates leucocyte and platelet aggregation, and aggravation of coagulopathy. Therefore, endothelial dysfunction and/or injury should favour impaired perfusion, tissue hypoxia and subsequent organ dysfunction.

Anatomical damage to the endothelium during septic shock has been assessed in several studies. A single injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has long been demonstrated to be a nonmechanical technique for removing endothelium. In endotoxic rabbits, observations tend to demonstrate that EC surface modification occurs easily and rapidly, with ECs being detached from the internal elastic lamina with an indication of subendothelial oedema.  Proinflammatory cytokines increase permeability of the ECs, and this is manifested approximately 6 hours after inflammation is triggered and becomes maximal over 12–24 hours as the combination of cytokines exert potentiating effects. Endothelial physical disruption allows inflammatory fluid and cells to shift from the blood into the interstitial space.

In sepsis

  • ECs become injured, prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic
  • They promote platelet adhesion
  • They promote leucocyte adhesion and inhibit vasodilation

An important point is that EC injury is sustained over time. In an endotoxic rabbit model, we demonstrated that endothelium denudation is present at the level of the abdominal aorta as early as after several hours following injury and persisted for at least 5 days afterward. After 21 days we observed that the endothelial surface had recovered. The de-endothelialized surface accounted for approximately 25% of the total surface.

Thrombomodulin and protein C activation at the microcirculatory level.

The endothelial cell surface thrombin (Th)-binding protein thrombomodulin (TM) is responsible for inhibition of thrombin activity. TM, when bound to Th, forms a potent protein C activator complex. Loss of TM and/or internalization results in Th–thrombin receptor (TR) interaction. Loss of TM and associated protein C activation represents the key event of decreased endothelial coagulation modulation ability and increased inflammation pathways.
( Iba T, Kidokoro A, Yagi Y: The role of the endothelium in changes in procoagulant activity in sepsis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187:321-329. Keywords: ATIII, antithrombin III; NF-κ, nuclear factor-κB; PAI,plasminogen activator inhibitor).

In order to test the role of the endothelial-derived relaxing factors NO and PGI2, we investigated, in dogs, the influence of a combination of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (an inhibitor of NO synthesis) and indomethacin (an inhibitor of PGI2 synthesis). In these dogs treated with indomethacin plus NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, the severity of the oxygen extraction defect was lower than that observed in the deoxycholate-treated dogs, suggesting that other mediators and/or mechanisms may be involved in microcirculatory control during hypoxia. One of these mediators or mechanisms could be related to hyperpolarization. Membrane potential is an important determinant of vascular smooth muscle tone through its influence on calcium influx via voltage-gated calcium channels. Hyperpolarization (as well as depolarization) has been shown to be a means of cell–cell communication in upstream vasodilatation and microcirculatory coordination. It is important to emphasize that intercell coupling exclusively involves ECs.

Interestingly, it was recently shown that sepsis, a situation that is characterized by impaired tissue perfusion and abnormal oxygen extraction, is associated with abnormal inter-EC coupling and reduction in the arteriolar conducted response.  An intra-organ defect in blood flow related to abnormal vascular reactivity, cell adhesion and coagulopathy may account for impaired organ oxygen regulation and function. If specific classes of microvessels must or must not be perfused to achieve efficient oxygen extraction during limitation in oxygen delivery, then impaired vascular reactivity and vessel injury might produce a pathological limitation in supply. In sepsis, the inflammatory response profoundly alters circulatory homeostasis, and this has been referred to as a ‘malignant intravascular inflammation’ that alters vasomotor tone and the distribution of blood flow among and within organs. These mechanisms might coexist with other types of sepsis associated cell dysfunction. For example, data suggest that endotoxin directly impairs oxygen uptake in ECs and indicate the importance of endothelium respiration in maintaining vascular homeostasis under conditions of sepsis.

Consistent with the hypothesis that alteration in endothelium plays a major in the pathophysiology of sepsis, it was observed that chronic ecNOS overexpression in the endothelium of mice resulted in resistance to LPS-induced hypotension, lung injury and death . This observation was confirmed by another group of investigators, who used transgenic mice overexpressing adrenomedullin  – a vasodilating peptide that acts at least in part via an NO-dependent pathway. They demonstrated resistance of these animals to LPS-induced shock, and lesser declines in blood pressure and less severe organ damage than occurred in the control animals. It might therefore be of importance to favour ecNOS expression and function during sepsis. The recent negative results obtained with therapeutic strategies aimed at blocking inducible NOS with the nonselective NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine in human septic shock further confirm the overall importance of favoring vessel dilatation.

(Vallet B. Bench-to-bedside review: Endothelial cell dysfunction in severe sepsis: a role in organ dysfunction?  Critical Care 2003; 7(2):130-138 (DOI 10.1186/cc1864). (Print ISSN 1364-8535; Online ISSN 1466-609X). http://ccforum.com/content/7/2/130

Thrombosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

An association between IBD and thrombosis has been recognized for more than 60 years. Not only are patients with IBD more likely to have thromboembolic complications, but it has also been suggested that thrombosis might be pathogenic in IBD.

Coagulation Described.  See Part I. (Cascade)

Endothelial injury exposes TF, which forms a complex with factor VII.  This complex activates factors X and, to a lesser extent, IX. TFPI prevents this activation progressing  further; for coagulation to progress, factor Xa must be produced via factors IX and VIII. Thrombin, generated by the initial production of factor Xa, activates factor VIII and, through factor XI, factor IX, resulting in further activation of factor X. This positive feedback loop allows coagulation to proceed. Fibrin polymers are stabilized by factor XIIIa. Activated proteins CS (APCS) together inhibit factors VIIIa and Va, whereas antithrombin (AT) inhibits factors VIIa, IXa, Xa, and XIa. Fibrinolysis balances this system through the action of plasmin on fibrin. Plasminogen activator inhibitor controls the plasminogen activator-induced conversion of plasminogen to plasmin.

Inflammation and Thrombotic Processes Linked

Although interest has recently moved away from the proposal that ischemia is a primary cause of IBD, it has become increasingly clear that inflammatory and thrombotic processes are linked.  A vascular component to the pathogenesis of CD was first proposed only a year after Crohn et al. described the condition.  Subsequently, in 1989, a series of changes comprising vascular injury, focal arteritis, fibrin deposition, arterial occlusion, and then microinfarction or neovascularization was proposed as a possible pathogenetic sequence in CD.  In this study, resin casts of the intestinal vasculature showed changes ranging from intravascular fibrin deposition to complete thrombotic occlusion. Furthermore, the early vascular changes appeared to precede mucosal changes, suggesting that they were more likely to cause rather than result from the pathologic features of CD. Subsequent studies showed that intravascular fibrin deposition occurred at the site of granulomatous destruction of mesenteric blood vessels, and positive immunostaining for platelet glycoprotein IIIa occurred in fibrinoid plugs of mucosal capillaries in CD. In addition, intracapillary thrombus has been identified in biopsies from inflamed rectal mucosa from patients with CD. When combined with evidence of ongoing intravascular coagulation in both active and quiescent CD, the above data point toward a thrombotic element contributing to the pathogenesis of CD.

Not only are many different prothrombotic changes described in association with IBD, but they can also have multiple causes. Hyperhomocysteinemia, for example, is known to predispose to thrombosis, and patients with IBD are more likely to have hyperhomocysteinemia than control subjects. Hyperhomocysteinemia in IBD might be due to multiple possible causes, such as deficiencies of vitamin B12 as a result of terminal ileal disease or resection; B6, which is commonly reduced in IBD.  A vegan diet can’t be discarded either because of seriously deficient methyl donors (S-adenosyl methionine).

The realization that platelets are not only prothrombotic but also proinflammatory has stimulated interest in their role in both the pathogenesis and complications of IBD. The association between thrombocytosis and active IBD was first described more than 30 years ago. More recent observations link decreased or normal platelet survival to IBD-related thrombocytosis, possibly due to increased thrombopoiesis. This in turn could be driven by an interleukin-6 –induced increase in thrombopoietin synthesis in the liver. Spontaneous in vitro platelet aggregation occurs in platelets isolated from 30% of patients with IBD but not in platelets from control subjects. Moreover, collagen, arachidonic acid, ristocetin, and ADP-induced platelet activation are more marked in platelets from patients with active IBD than in those from healthy volunteers.

The roles of activated platelets and PLAs in mucosal inflammation. Activated platelets can interact with other cells involved in the inflammatory response either through direct contact or through the release of soluble mediators. Activated platelets interact directly with activated vascular endothelium, causing the latter to express adhesion molecules and release inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines.

Platelet activation might be pathogenic in IBD in several ways. Platelet activation might increase platelet aggregation, hence increasing the likelihood of thrombus formation at sites of vascular injury, for example, within the mesenteric circulation. P-selectin is the major ligand for leukocyte-endothelial interaction and is responsible for the rolling of platelets, leukocytes, and PLAs on vascular endothelium. Moreover, platelets adherent to injured vascular endothelium support leukocyte adhesion via P-selectin, an effect that could contribute to leukocyte emigration from the vasculature into the lamina propria in patients with IBD. In addition, P-selectin is the major platelet ligand for platelet-leukocyte interaction, which in turn causes both leukocyte activation and further platelet activation.

Platelet-Leukocyte Aggregation

Recently, studies showing that platelets and leukocytes that circulate together in aggregates (PLA) are more activated than those that circulate alone have generated interest in the role of PLA in various inflammatory and thrombotic conditions. PLA numbers are increased in patients with ischemic heart disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, myeloproliferative disorders, and sepsis and are increased by smoking.

We have recently shown that patients with IBD have more PLAs than both healthy and inflammatory control subjects (patients with inflammatory arthritides).  As with platelet activation, there was no correlation with disease activity, suggesting that increased PLA formation might be an underlying abnormality. PLAs could contribute to the pathogenesis of IBD in a number of ways. As previously mentioned, TF is key to the initiation of thrombus formation. TF has recently been demonstrated on the surface of activated platelets and in platelet-derived microvesicles. Interaction between neutrophils and activated platelets or microvesicles vastly increases the activity of “intravascular” TF.

Conclusion        

It is becoming increasingly apparent that thrombosis and inflammation are intrinsically linked. Hence the involvement of thrombotic processes in the pathogenesis of IBD, although perhaps not as the primary event, seems likely. Indeed, with the recently mounting evidence of the role of activated platelets and of their interaction with leukocytes in the pathogenesis of IBD, it seems even more probable that thrombosis plays some role in the pathogenic process.

(Irving PM, Pasi KJ, and Rampton DS. Thrombosis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2005;3:617–628. PII: 10.1053/S1542-3565(05)00154-0.)

Bleeding in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

Approximately 20–40% of critically ill patients will have renal insufficiency at the time of admission or will develop it during their ICU stay, depending on the definition of renal insufficiency and the case mix of the ICU. Such patients are also predisposed to bleeding because of uremic platelet dysfunction, typically multiple comorbidities, coagulopathies and frequent concomitant treatment with antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents.

The impairment in hemostasis in uremic patients is multifactorial and includes physiological defects in platelet hemostasis, an imbalance of mediators of normal endothelial function and frequent comorbidities such as vascular disease, anemia and the frequent need for medical interventions required to treat such comorbidities. Physiologic alterations in uremia include:

  • decreased platelet glycoprotein IIb–IIIa binding to both von Willebrand factor (vWf) and fibrinogen, causing an impairment in platelet aggregation;
  • increased prostacyclin and nitric oxide production, both potent inhibitors of platelet activation and vasoconstriction; and
  • decreased levels of platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and serotonin, causing an impairment in platelet secretion.

In addition to other factors, small peptides containing the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) sequence of amino acids have been shown to be inhibitors of platelet aggregation that act by competing with vWf and fibrinogen for binding to the glycoprotein IIb–IIIa receptor.

Conclusion

ICU patients have dynamic risks of thrombosis and bleeding. Invasive procedures may require temporary interruption of anticoagulants. Consequently, approaches to thromboprophylaxis require daily reevaluation.

(Cook DJ, Douketis J, Arnold D, and Crowther MA. Bleeding and venous thromboembolism in the critically ill with emphasis on patients with renal insufficiency. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2009;15:455–462.)

Epicrisis

I have covered a large amount of material on one of the most complex systems in medicine, and still not comprehensive, with a sufficient dash of repetition.  The task is to have some grasp of the cell-mediated imbalances inherent if coagulation and bleeding disorders.  The key points are:

  • inflammation and oxidative stress invariably lurk in the background
  • the Y-shaped model with an extrinsic, intrinsic, and common pathway has no basis in understanding
  • the current model is based on a cell-mediated concept of endothelial damage and platelet-endothelial interaction
  • the model has 3 components: Initiation, Amplification, Propagation
  • NO and prostacyclin have key roles in the process
  • The plasma proteins involved are in the serine-protease class of enzymes
  • The conversion of Protein C to APC has a central role as anti-coagulant

Part II  has explored organ system abnormalities that are all related to impairment of the Nitric Oxide balance and dual platelet-endothelial roles.

Nov 9, 2012 by anamikasarkar
Nitric Oxide (NO) is highly regulated in the blood such that it can be released as vasodilator when needed. The importance and pathway of Nitric Oxide has been nicely reviewed by. “Discovery of NO and its effects of vascular biology”. Other articles which are good readings for the importance of NO are  – a) regulation of glycolysis b) NO in cardiovascular disease c) NO and Immune responses Part I and Part II d) NO signaling pathways. The  effects of NO in diseased states have been reviewed by the articles – “Crucial role of Nitric Oxide in Cancer”, “Nitric Oxide and Sepsis, Hemodynamic Collapse, and the Search for Therapeutic Options”.. (Also, please see Source for more articles on NO and its significance).

Computational models are very efficient tools to understand complex reactions like NO towards physiological conditions. Among them wall shear stress is one of the major factors which is reviewed in the article – “Differential Distribution of Nitric Oxide – A 3-D Mathematical Model”.

Moreover, decrease in availability of NO can lead to many complications like pulmonary hypertension. Some of the causes of decrease in NO have been identified as clinical hypertension,right ventricular overload which can lead to cardiac heart failure,low levels of zinc and high levels of cardiac necrosis.

Sickle Cell disease patients, a hereditary disease, are also known to have decreased levels of NO which can become physiologically challenging. In USA alone, there are 90,000 people who are affected by Sickle cell disease.

Sickle cell disease is breakage of red blood cells (RBC) membrane and resulting release of the hemoglobin (Hb) into blood plasma. This process is also known as Hemolysis. Sickle cell disease is caused by single mutation of Hb which changes RBC from round shape to sickle or crescent shapes (Figure 1).

Image
Figure 1 (A) shows normal red blood cells flowing freely through veins. The inset shows a cross section of a normal red blood cell with normal hemoglobin.
Figure 1 (B) shows abnormal, sickled red blood cells The inset image shows a cross-section of a sickle cell with long polymerized HbS strands stretching and distorting the cell shape.
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease

RBCs generally breakdown and release Hbs in blood plasma after they reach their end of life span. Thus, in case of Sickle cell disease, there is more cell free Hb than normal. Furthermore, it is known that NO has a very high affinity towards Hbs, which is one of the ways free NO is regulated in blood. As a result presence of larger amounts of cell free Hb in Sickle cell disease lead to less availability of NO.

As to “a quantitative relationship between cell free Hb and depletion of NO”, Deonikar and Kavdia (J. Appl. Physiol., 2012) addressed this question by developing a model of a single idealized arteriole, with different layers of blood vessels diffusing nutrients to tissue layers (Figure 2:  Deonikar and Kavdia Figure 1).

The model and its parameters are explained in the previously published paper by same authors Deonikar and Kavdia, Annals of Biomed., 2010, who reported that the reaction rate between NO and RBC is 0.2 x 105, M-1 s-1 than 1.4 x 105, M-1 s-1 as previously reported by Butler et.al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1998. Their results show that even small increase in cell free Hb, 0.5uM, can decrease NO concentrations by 3-7 fold.  Their mathematical analysis shows that the increase in diffusion resistance of NO from vascular lumen to cell free zone has no effect on NO distribution and concentration with available levels of cell free Hb.

Deonikar and Kavdia’s  model, a simple representation shows that for SC disease patients, decrease in levels of bioavailable NO is attributed to cell free Hb, which is in abundant for these patients. Their results show that small increase by 0.5 uM in cell free Hb can cause a large decrease in NO concentrations.

Sources:

Deonikar and Kavdia (2012):http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223452

Previous model explaining mathematical representation and parameters used in the model :Deonikar and Kavdia,Annals of Biomed., 2010.

Previous paper stating reaction rate of Hb and NO: Butleret.al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1998.

Causes of decrease in NO

Clinical Hypertension :http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11311074

Right ventricular overload :http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9559613

Low levels of zinc and high levels of cardiac necrosis :http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11243421

Sickle Cell Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/sca/

NO Sources:

Differential Distribution of Nitric Oxide – A 3-D Mathematical Model:

Discovery of NO and its effects of vascular biology

Nitric oxide: role in Cardiovascular health and disease

NO signaling pathways

Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB, Induction of NO production, stimulation of eNOS and Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD): cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction – A Bibliography

The rationale and use of inhaled NO in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension and Right Sided Heart Failure

Clinical Trials Results for Endothelin System: Pathophysiological role in Chronic Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndromes and MI – Marker of Disease Severity or Genetic Determination?

Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Disease

Interaction of Nitric Oxide and Prostacyclin in Vascular Endothelium

Endothelial Dysfunction, Diminished Availability of cEPCs,  Increasing  CVD Risk – Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production

 

Read Full Post »

Human Variome Project: encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #4: Human Variome Project: encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence. Published on 11/24/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

What is the Human Variome Project?

Abstract

The successor to the Human Genome Project intends to establish, by international cooperation, an encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence.

Introduction

Genomics is not just for rich countries any more. Anyone can contribute to the Human Variome Project (HVP; see Commentary,page 433). Indeed, the project might just be ambitious enough that everyone really will need to contribute. By stating that all human genetics and genomics contributes to a single aim, the HVP essentially reduces duplication of effort while increasing credit for participation.

However, it will have to find ways to coordinate the disparate activities of clinicians, researchers, database curators and bioinformaticians by providing the means and incentives to lodge the variants they have found in public databases. Variome aims to get all to use compatible nomenclature and phenotype reporting systems and to index variant and phenotype data to gene models in the coordinate system generated by the Human Genome Project. Automation and expert curation, and open comment and expert review, will all have a place in this endeavor. How will we do this without creating more than a necessary minimum of new databases, procedures and bureaucracy?

A very important point, but a tough one to get across, is that much of the necessary work is currently happening across the globe—but is just insufficiently coordinated. The individuals already hard at work aren’t getting the credit they deserve. In a sense, the rest of the world’s geneticists deserve the kind of service that US researchers receive from the excellent coordinating work of the National Human Genome Research Institute and the repositories of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), together with the kind of attention afforded by international journals. If only these kinds of coordination, recording and attention could be brought to bear, however briefly, on publication units as small as single instances of a variant gene! Thus, Variome aims to add value to databases such as OMIM, GenBank, dbSNP, dbGAP and the HapMap and organizations including NCBI and the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) by working with them all. It will start gene by gene, evaluating variants already found and curated for mendelian diseases, and will add rare and common variants in common diseases as they are reported. As it does so, HVP participants will develop mechanisms to expedite and automate reporting of variants and their occurrence.

In the consensus-building exercise of the first Human Variome meeting (page 433), delegates constructed a wish list of recommendations that numerically exceeded the number of participants at the meeting. We think that two points emerge as particularly important to the success of the project: publication and credit.

To be successful in persuading clinical and diagnostic laboratories to contribute variations and persuading researchers to evaluate the pathogenic potential of each variant, the HVP will need to introduce publishing innovations at both ends of the citation spectrum. It will need to track the citation of each variant’s accession code in papers, database entries and across the web. This closing of the online publication loop might be termed microattribution. Perhaps existing journals could be persuaded to take responsibility for monitoring and highlighting the citation of database entries in their papers, so that the HVP can readily aggregate this information. A journal devoted to the human variome could commission peer-reviewed, gene-based synopses of mendelian mutations based on information in locus-specific databases (see pages 425 and 427), meta-analyses of association studies and resequencing data such as those reported by Jonathan Cohen and colleagues in this issue (page 513, with News and Views on page 439). Phenotypic and diagnostic information might be linked to these synopses from existing databases such as the dysmorphology databases, PharmGKB (page 426) and GeneTests (http://www.genetests.org). Genome browsers including Ensembl and UCSC might then be persuaded to display a Variome track. We envisage such synopses to be a gene-based extension of the disease-based annual synopses for association studies we proposed last year (Nat. Genet. 38, 1; 2006). The first of these, on Alzheimer disease, was published by Lars Bertram and colleagues (Nat. Genet. 39, 17–23; 2007) using their newly created AlzGene database.

Which genes should the HVP annotate first to demonstrate the utility and impact of its coordinating activities? Perhaps we can learn from one of the most impressive recent exercises in evidence-based medicine: namely, the American College of Medical Genetics‘ systematic prioritization of genes for newborn screening (http://mchb.hrsa.gov/screening/). Variome synopses would take into account the prevalence, seriousness and treatability of the clinical condition(s), the value added by combining all three types of genetic study listed above and the availability of all three kinds of evidence in existing laboratories, databases and publications.

There are, inevitably, limits to what can be achieved by a gene-based view of human variation. Gene models are revised and re-annotated, and structural genomic variation plays havoc with reference genome builds and the context within which point variants and haplotypes are found. Physicians and the general public will want a disease-based view—and the associated diagnostic genetic tests, rather than genome annotation. Delaying the appearance of such alternative views, there is often a many-to-many correspondence between genes and disease phenotypes. On the brighter side, this complexity should provide good business for database designers and review journals.

As the participants of the Variome meeting note in their Commentary, the effort to index and evaluate all of human variation will provide many new opportunities in genomics for researchers whose home countries did not participate in the initial human genome sequencing project. They are right that this is both the project and the time to achieve the globalization of genomics.

SOURCE:

Nature Genetics 39, 423 (2007)
doi:10.1038/ng0407-423

Our Vision for the Future

E-mail

Imagine you are sick. For many, this is not a difficult task. Now imagine you are sick and none of your doctors know why. Your symptoms suggest that you have a rare genetic disease, and you’ve been tested for a mutation in the gene responsible, but the results are inconclusive. The laboratory found a change in your genetic sequence, but is unable to definitively state that it’s what’s causing your symptoms. And with no definitive result from the test, your doctor—and your insurance company—are unwilling to prescribe the expensive course of drugs needed to control your symptoms.While many people might be willing to dismiss the chances of this happening to them, when you start to look at the facts, things start to get a little frightening. There are over 6,000 diseases that can be caused by a mutation in a single gene and it is estimated that 1 child in every 200 born will suffer from one of these diseases. Add to that the number of cancers that have an inherited genetic component and the chances of you, or someone you know being in this position is quite high.

Now imagine that the information the laboratory and your doctor needed to make an accurate diagnosis was out there, but it wasn’t accessible to them: it was hidden away in an obscure academic paper, or in some researcher’s forgotten notes.

Unfortunately, this is the situation that is currently facing thousands of people across the globe who are suffering the devastating effects of genetic illnesses.

The role that our genes play in our health and well-being is well known. The genetic makeup of an individual can cause a host of genetic disorders that can manifest from early childhood (cystic fibrosis, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome) to adulthood (Alzheimer’s disease, polycystic kidney disease, Huntington’s disease) as well as significantly increase the risk of contracting more common diseases such as schizophrenia, diabetes, depression and cancer.

The world is rapidly moving towards an era where it is both economically and scientifically feasible to sequence the genome of every patient presenting with a chronic condition; already in the past decade the cost of a whole-genome sequence has dropped from several billion dollars to a few thousand.

But being able to sequence the genome of a patient cheaply and easily will be useless if we are unable to determine if the variations present in a sequence have an effect on human health. We are suffering from a critical lack of information about the consequences of the vast majority of the mutations possible within the human genome. And, even more concerning, is the fact that even when that information exists, it is not being shared and captured by the global medical research community in a manner that guarantees widespread dissemination and long-term preservation.

The Human Variome Project is trying to change this. We strongly believe in the free and open sharing of information on genetic variation and its consequences and are dedicated to developing and maintaining the standards, systems and infrastructure that will embed information sharing into routine clinical practice. We envision a world where the availability of, and access to, genetic variation information is not an impediment to diagnosis and treatment; where the burden of genetic disease on the human population is significantly decreased; where never again will a doctor have to look at a genetic sequence and ask, “What does this change mean for my patient?”

The Human Variome Project is motivated by the knowledge that by working together, we will be able to significantly reduce the needless physical, psychological, emotional and economic suffering of millions of people.

SOURCE:

http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/index.php/about/our-vision-for-the-future

Human Variome Project International Limited is a not-for-profit Australian public company limited by guarantee that was founded in 2010 to provide central coordination efforts to the global Human Variome Project effort and run the International Coordinating Office. The company has no shareholders and is endorsed by the Australian Tax Office as a deductible gift recipient as a Health Project Charity.

Human Variome Project International Limited, as a company limited by guarantee, is a public unlisted company. It must file accounts annually with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, it must be audited and, as a public company, the directors and officers of the company must comply with all the duties and responsibilities set out in the Australian Corporations Act. UNESCO also stipulates strict conditions for compliance with its functions and operation as a non-government and non-profit making organisation.

Human Variome Project International’s objects and powers include:

  • to promote the prevention or the control of diseases in human beings
  • to develop and provide educational programs, training and courses in public administration, public sector management, public policy, public affairs and any other related fields
  • to alleviate human suffering by collecting, organising and sharing data on genetic variation;
  • to further the Human Variome Project
  • to act as the co-ordinating office for the Human Variome Project
  • to attract and employ academics, researchers, practitioners and other staff as required to provide and support the services to further the objects of the Company
  • to provide facilities for research, study and education related to the Human Variome Project
  • to carry out and conduct the business of provider of administrative and consulting services;
  • to seek, encourage and accept gifts, grants, donations or endorsements
  • to affiliate with and enter into co-operative agreements with research educational institutions, government, local governments, practitioner bodies, non-government organisations, commercial, cultural and any other institutions or bodies

Company Members

  • Mr David Abraham
  • Professor Richard Cotton
  • Sir John Burn
  • Dr David Rimoin
  • Dr Eric Haan
  • Professor Jean-Jacques Cassiman
  • (representative of) National Institute of Gene Science and Technology Development (China)

SOURCE:
http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=164&Itemid=152

Scientific Advisory Committee E-mail
The Board of Directors is advised by the Scientific Advisory Committee in matters of strategic scientific direction for current and future projects. The Scientific Advisory Committee has a variety of {ln:roles and responsibilities}, as wells as the delegated authority of the Board of Directors on the publication of all HVP Standards and Guidelines, and the arbitration of any dispute resolution processes in the generation of HVP Standards and Guidelines.The Scientific Advisory Committee consists of twelve members including one Chair. The Scientific Advisory Committee members are elected by the two Advisory Councils every two years, with half the positions on the Committee becoming vacant every two years. The Chair of the Scientific Advisory Committee is appointed by the Coordinating Office from among the members of the Scientific Advisory Committee. Membership of the Committee, in an ex-officio capacity, is also extended to:

  • the Scientific Director of the Human Variome Project Coordinating Office;
  • the President of the Human Genome Variation Society;
  • the President of the International Federation of Human Genetics Societies; and
  • a representative from the central genetic databases, chosen from amongst themselves.

Any Individual Member of the Human Variome Project Consortium is eligible to stand for election to the Scientific Advisory Committee. Candidates must be nominated and seconded by a member of either of the Advisory Councils.

The Scientific Advisory Committee meets on a face–to–face basis once per year, usually in conjunction with the HVP Fora series. The Scientific Advisory Committee also regularly meets via telephone/video–conference.

Current Committee

Arleen Auerbach The Rockefeller University USA
Mireille Claustres IURC, Institut Universitaire Clinical Research France
Richard Cotton Human Variome Project Australia
Garry Cutting Johns Hopkins School of Medicine USA
Johan T. den Dunnen Leiden University Medical Center The Netherlands
Mona El Ruby National Research Centre Egypt
Aida Falcón de Vargas Venezuelan Central University Venezuela
Marc Greenblatt University of Vermont USA
Stephen Lam Hong Kong Department of Health Hong Kong
Finlay Macrae The Royal Melbourne Hospital Australia
Yoichi Matsubara Tohoku University School of Medicine Japan
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen Leiden University Medical Center The Netherlands
Mauno Vihinen Lund University Sweden
Non-Voting Members
Professor Sir John Burn National Institute of Health Research  UK
Ming Qi Zhejiang University Medical School and James Watson Institute of Genome Sciences China
Richard Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine USA

Document Repository

Documents (minutes, etc.) relating to the International Scientific Adviosry Committee can be found here.

SOURCE:

http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/index.php/about/scientific-advisory-committee

Nature Genetics Journal

Table of contents

November 2012, Volume 44 No11 pp1171-1285

  • Credit for clinical trial data –p1171

topof page

News and Views

Tracking the evolution of cancer methylomes –pp1173 – 1174

Arnaud R Krebs & Dirk Schübeler

doi:10.1038/ng.2451

Cellular transformation in cancer has long been associated with aberrant DNA methylation, most notably, hypermethylation of promoter sequences. A new study uses a clever approach of selective high-resolution profiling to follow DNA methylation over a time course of cellular transformation and challenges the notion that hypermethylation in cancer arises in an orchestrated fashion.

Full Text- Tracking the evolution of cancer methylomes | PDF (2,267 KB)- Tracking the evolution of cancer methylomes

See also: Article by Landan et al.

Older males beget more mutations –pp1174 – 1176

Matthew Hurles

doi:10.1038/ng.2448

Three papers characterizing human germline mutation rates bolster evidence for a relatively low rate of base substitution in modern humans and highlight a central role for paternal age in determining rates of mutation. These studies represent the advent of a transformation in our understanding of mutation rates and processes, which may ultimately have public health implications.

Full Text- Older males beget more mutations | PDF (2,319 KB)- Older males beget more mutations

See also: Letter by Campbell et al.

FOXA1 and breast cancer risk –pp1176 – 1177

Kerstin B Meyer & Jason S Carroll

doi:10.1038/ng.2449

Many SNPs associated with human disease are located in non-coding regions of the genome. A new study shows that SNPs associated with breast cancer risk are located in enhancer regions and alter binding affinity for the pioneer factor FOXA1.

Full Text- FOXA1 and breast cancer risk | PDF (254 KB)- FOXA1 and breast cancer risk

See also: Article by Cowper-Sal·lari et al.

Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis –pp1179 – 1181

Lambert Busque, Jay P Patel, Maria E Figueroa, Aparna Vasanthakumar, Sylvie Provost, Zineb Hamilou, Luigina Mollica, Juan Li, Agnes Viale, Adriana Heguy, Maryam Hassimi, Nicholas Socci, Parva K Bhatt, Mithat Gonen, Christopher E Mason, Ari Melnick, Lucy A Godley, Cameron W Brennan, Omar Abdel-Wahab & Ross L Levine

doi:10.1038/ng.2413

Ross Levine, Lambert Busque and colleagues report the identification of recurrent somatic mutations in TET2 in elderly female individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. The mutations were identified in individuals without clinically apparent hematological malignancies.

Abstract- Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis | Full Text- Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis | PDF (324 KB)- Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis | Supplementary information

Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk –pp1182 – 1184

Nick Orr, Alina Lemnrau, Rosie Cooke, Olivia Fletcher, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Michael Jones, Nichola Johnson, Christopher J Lord, Costas Mitsopoulos, Marketa Zvelebil, Simon S McDade, Gemma Buck, Christine Blancher, KConFab Consortium, Alison H Trainer, Paul A James, Stig E Bojesen, Susanne Bokmand, Heli Nevanlinna, Johanna Mattson, Eitan Friedman, Yael Laitman, Domenico Palli, Giovanna Masala, Ines Zanna, Laura Ottini, Giuseppe Giannini, Antoinette Hollestelle, Ans M W van den Ouweland, Srdjan Novaković, Mateja Krajc, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Jose Esteban Castelao, Håkan Olsson, Ingrid Hedenfalk, Douglas F Easton, Paul D P Pharoah, Alison M Dunning, D Timothy Bishop, Susan L Neuhausen, Linda Steele, Richard S Houlston, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Alan Ashworth & Anthony J Swerdlow

doi:10.1038/ng.2417

Nick Orr and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for male breast cancer. They identify a new susceptibility locus atRAD51B and examine association evidence for known female breast cancer loci in these cohorts.

Abstract- Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk | Full Text- Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk | PDF (301 KB)- Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk | Supplementary information

A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma –pp1185 – 1187

Nischalan Pillay, Vincent Plagnol, Patrick S Tarpey, Samira B Lobo, Nadège Presneau, Karoly Szuhai, Dina Halai, Fitim Berisha, Stephen R Cannon, Simon Mead, Dalia Kasperaviciute, Jutta Palmen, Philippa J Talmud, Lars-Gunnar Kindblom, M Fernanda Amary, Roberto Tirabosco & Adrienne M Flanagan

doi:10.1038/ng.2419

Adrienne Flanagan and colleagues identify a common variant in the T gene associated with strong risk of chordoma, a rare malignant bone tumor. The risk variant alters an amino acid in the DNA-binding domain of the T transcription factor and is associated with differential expression of T and its downstream targets.

Abstract- A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma | Full Text- A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma | PDF (317 KB)- A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma | Supplementary information

Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy –pp1188 – 1190

Sarah E Heron, Katherine R Smith, Melanie Bahlo, Lino Nobili, Esther Kahana, Laura Licchetta, Karen L Oliver, Aziz Mazarib, Zaid Afawi, Amos Korczyn, Giuseppe Plazzi, Steven Petrou, Samuel F Berkovic, Ingrid E Scheffer & Leanne M Dibbens

doi:10.1038/ng.2440

Samuel Berkovic and colleagues report the identification of missense mutations in KCNT1, which encodes a sodium-gated potassium channel, that cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy.

Abstract- Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy | Full Text- Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy | PDF (294 KB)- Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy | Supplementary information


Articles

Breast cancer risk–associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression –pp1191 – 1198

Richard Cowper-Sal·lari, Xiaoyang Zhang, Jason B Wright, Swneke D Bailey, Michael D Cole, Jerome Eeckhoute, Jason H Moore & Mathieu Lupien

doi:10.1038/ng.2416

Mathieu Lupien, Jason Moore and colleagues show that breast cancer risk–associated SNPs commonly disrupt the binding of FOXA1 to chromatin, thereby directly affecting gene expression.

Abstract- Breast cancer risk-associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression | Full Text- Breast cancer risk–associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression | PDF (1,353 KB)- Breast cancer risk–associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression | Supplementary information

See also: News and Views by Meyer & Carroll

LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression –pp1199 – 1206

Jan J Molenaar, Raquel Domingo-Fernández, Marli E Ebus, Sven Lindner, Jan Koster, Ksenija Drabek, Pieter Mestdagh, Peter van Sluis, Linda J Valentijn, Johan van Nes, Marloes Broekmans, Franciska Haneveld, Richard Volckmann, Isabella Bray, Lukas Heukamp, Annika Sprüssel, Theresa Thor, Kristina Kieckbusch, Ludger Klein-Hitpass, Matthias Fischer, Jo Vandesompele, Alexander Schramm, Max M van Noesel, Luigi Varesio, Frank Speleman, Angelika Eggert, Raymond L Stallings, Huib N Caron, Rogier Versteeg & Johannes H Schulte

doi:10.1038/ng.2436

Jan Molenaar and colleagues show that LIN28B is overexpressed and amplified in human neuroblastomas and that LIN28B regulates let-7 family miRNAs and MYCN. They create a transgenic mouse model of LIN28B overexpression and show that these mice develop neuroblastoma tumors.

Abstract- LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression | Full Text- LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression | PDF (1,453 KB)- LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression | Supplementary information

Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues –pp1207 – 1214

Gilad Landan, Netta Mendelson Cohen, Zohar Mukamel, Amir Bar, Alina Molchadsky, Ran Brosh, Shirley Horn-Saban, Daniela Amann Zalcenstein, Naomi Goldfinger, Adi Zundelevich, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Varda Rotter & Amos Tanay

doi:10.1038/ng.2442

Amos Tanay and colleagues characterize DNA methylation polymorphism within cell populations and track immortalized fibroblasts in culture for over 300 generations to show that formation of differentially methylated regions occurs through a stochastic process and nearly deterministic epigenetic remodeling.

Abstract- Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues | Full Text- Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues | PDF (1,518 KB)- Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues | Supplementary information

See also: News and Views by Krebs & Schübeler

Intracontinental spread of human invasive SalmonellaTyphimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa-pp1215 – 1221

Chinyere K Okoro, Robert A Kingsley, Thomas R Connor, Simon R Harris, Christopher M Parry, Manar N Al-Mashhadani, Samuel Kariuki, Chisomo L Msefula, Melita A Gordon, Elizabeth de Pinna, John Wain, Robert S Heyderman, Stephen Obaro, Pedro L Alonso, Inacio Mandomando, Calman A MacLennan, Milagritos D Tapia, Myron M Levine, Sharon M Tennant, Julian Parkhill & Gordon Dougan

doi:10.1038/ng.2423

Gordon Dougan and colleagues report whole-genome sequencing of a global collection of 179 Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, including 129 diverse sub-Saharan African isolates associated with invasive disease. They determine the phylogenetic structure of invasive Salmonella Typhimurium in sub-Saharan Africa and find that the majority are from two closely related highly conserved lineages, which emerged in the last 60 years in close temporal association with the current HIV epidemic.

Abstract- Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa | Full Text- Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa | PDF (1,126 KB)- Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa | Supplementary information


Letters

Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population –pp1222 – 1226

Tomomitsu Hirota, Atsushi Takahashi, Michiaki Kubo, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda, Kaori Tomita, Masafumi Sakashita, Takechiyo Yamada, Shigeharu Fujieda, Shota Tanaka, Satoru Doi, Akihiko Miyatake, Tadao Enomoto, Chiharu Nishiyama, Nobuhiro Nakano, Keiko Maeda, Ko Okumura, Hideoki Ogawa, Shigaku Ikeda, Emiko Noguchi, Tohru Sakamoto, Nobuyuki Hizawa, Koji Ebe, Hidehisa Saeki, Takashi Sasaki, Tamotsu Ebihara, Masayuki Amagai, Satoshi Takeuchi, Masutaka Furue, Yusuke Nakamura & Mayumi Tamari

doi:10.1038/ng.2438

Mayumi Tamari and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for atopic dermatitis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, in a Japanese population. They identify eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis and compare their results to those of previous studies in European and Chinese populations.

First Paragraph- Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population | Full Text- Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population | PDF (999 KB)- Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population | Supplementary information

CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation –pp1227 – 1230

Nataly Manjarrez-Orduño, Emiliano Marasco, Sharon A Chung, Matthew S Katz, Jenna F Kiridly, Kim R Simpfendorfer, Jan Freudenberg, David H Ballard, Emil Nashi, Thomas J Hopkins, Deborah S Cunninghame Graham, Annette T Lee, Marieke J H Coenen, Barbara Franke, Dorine W Swinkels, Robert R Graham, Robert P Kimberly, Patrick M Gaffney, Timothy J Vyse, Timothy W Behrens, Lindsey A Criswell, Betty Diamond & Peter K Gregersen

doi:10.1038/ng.2439

Peter Gregersen and colleagues identify a regulatory variant inCSK, coding for an intracellular kinase that physically interacts with Lyp (PTPN22), associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Their work suggests that the Lyp-Csk complex influences susceptibility to SLE through regulation of B-cell signaling, maturation and activation.

First Paragraph- CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation | Full Text- CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation | PDF (747 KB)- CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation | Supplementary information

Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 –pp1231 – 1235

Jianfeng Xu, Zengnan Mo, Dingwei Ye, Meilin Wang, Fang Liu, Guangfu Jin, Chuanliang Xu, Xiang Wang, Qiang Shao, Zhiwen Chen, Zhihua Tao, Jun Qi, Fangjian Zhou, Zhong Wang, Yaowen Fu, Dalin He, Qiang Wei, Jianming Guo, Denglong Wu, Xin Gao, Jianlin Yuan, Gongxian Wang, Yong Xu, Guozeng Wang, Haijun Yao, Pei Dong, Yang Jiao, Mo Shen, Jin Yang, Jun Ou-Yang, Haowen Jiang, Yao Zhu, Shancheng Ren, Zhengdong Zhang, Changjun Yin, Xu Gao, Bo Dai, Zhibin Hu, Yajun Yang, Qijun Wu, Hongyan Chen, Peng Peng, Ying Zheng, Xiaodong Zheng, Yongbing Xiang, Jirong Long, Jian Gong, Rong Na, Xiaoling Lin, Hongjie Yu, Zhong Wang, Sha Tao, Junjie Feng, Jishan Sun, Wennuan Liu, Ann Hsing, Jianyu Rao, Qiang Ding, Fredirik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Zheng, Hongbing Shen, Li Jin, Rong Shi, Daru Lu, Xuejun Zhang, Jielin Sun, S Lilly Zheng & Yinghao Sun

doi:10.1038/ng.2424

Yinghao Sun and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for prostate cancer in Han Chinese men. They identify two new risk-associated loci at chromosomes 9q31 and 19q13.

First Paragraph- Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 | Full Text- Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 | PDF (686 KB)- Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 | Supplementary information

Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-pp1236 – 1242

Marta Kulis, Simon Heath, Marina Bibikova, Ana C Queirós, Alba Navarro, Guillem Clot, Alejandra Martínez-Trillos, Giancarlo Castellano, Isabelle Brun-Heath, Magda Pinyol, Sergio Barberán-Soler, Panagiotis Papasaikas, Pedro Jares, Sílvia Beà, Daniel Rico, Simone Ecker, Miriam Rubio, Romina Royo, Vincent Ho, Brandy Klotzle, Lluis Hernández, Laura Conde, Mónica López-Guerra, Dolors Colomer, Neus Villamor, Marta Aymerich, María Rozman, Mónica Bayes, Marta Gut, Josep L Gelpí, Modesto Orozco, Jian-Bing Fan, Víctor Quesada, Xose S Puente, David G Pisano, Alfonso Valencia, Armando López-Guillermo, Ivo Gut, Carlos López-Otín, Elías Campo & José I Martín-Subero

doi:10.1038/ng.2443

José Martin-Subero and colleagues report whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and methylome analysis of two CLLs and three B-cell subpopulations using high-density microarrays on 139 CLLs. They identify widespread hypomethylation in the gene body that is largely associated with intragenic enhancer elements.

First Paragraph- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia | Full Text- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia | PDF (2,067 KB)- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia | Supplementary information

Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature –pp1243 – 1248

Gillian I Rice, Paul R Kasher, Gabriella M A Forte, Niamh M Mannion, Sam M Greenwood, Marcin Szynkiewicz, Jonathan E Dickerson, Sanjeev S Bhaskar, Massimiliano Zampini, Tracy A Briggs, Emma M Jenkinson, Carlos A Bacino, Roberta Battini, Enrico Bertini, Paul A Brogan, Louise A Brueton, Marialuisa Carpanelli, Corinne De Laet, Pascale de Lonlay, Mireia del Toro, Isabelle Desguerre, Elisa Fazzi, Àngels Garcia-Cazorla, Arvid Heiberg, Masakazu Kawaguchi, Ram Kumar, Jean-Pierre S-M Lin, Charles M Lourenco, Alison M Male, Wilson Marques Jr, Cyril Mignot, Ivana Olivieri, Simona Orcesi, Prab Prabhakar, Magnhild Rasmussen, Robert A Robinson, Flore Rozenberg, Johanna L Schmidt, Katharina Steindl, Tiong Y Tan, William G van der Merwe, Adeline Vanderver, Grace Vassallo, Emma L Wakeling, Evangeline Wassmer, Elizabeth Whittaker, John H Livingston, Pierre Lebon, Tamio Suzuki, Paul J McLaughlin, Liam P Keegan, Mary A O’Connell, Simon C Lovell & Yanick J Crow

doi:10.1038/ng.2414

Yanick Crow and colleagues show that mutations in ADAR1 cause the autoimmune disorder Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, accompanied by upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes.ADAR1 encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the deamination of adeonosine to inosine in double-stranded RNA, and the findings suggest a possible role for RNA editing in limiting the accumulation of repeat-derived RNA species.

First Paragraph- Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature | Full Text- Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature | PDF (844 KB)- Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature | Supplementary information

Mutations in the TGF-β repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm-pp1249 – 1254

Alexander J Doyle, Jefferson J Doyle, Seneca L Bessling, Samantha Maragh, Mark E Lindsay, Dorien Schepers, Elisabeth Gillis, Geert Mortier, Tessa Homfray, Kimberly Sauls, Russell A Norris, Nicholas D Huso, Dan Leahy, David W Mohr, Mark J Caulfield, Alan F Scott, Anne Destrée, Raoul C Hennekam, Pamela H Arn, Cynthia J Curry, Lut Van Laer, Andrew S McCallion, Bart L Loeys & Harry C Dietz

doi:10.1038/ng.2421

Harry Dietz and colleagues report the identification of mutations in SKI in Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, which shares features with Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome. SKI encodes a known repressor of TGF-β activity, and this work provides evidence for paradoxical increased TGF-β signaling as the mechanism underlying these related syndromes.

First Paragraph- Mutations in the TGF-[beta] repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm | Full Text- Mutations in the TGF-β repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm | PDF (1,158 KB)- Mutations in the TGF-β repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm | Supplementary information

De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy-pp1255 – 1259

Giulia Barcia, Matthew R Fleming, Aline Deligniere, Valeswara-Rao Gazula, Maile R Brown, Maeva Langouet, Haijun Chen, Jack Kronengold, Avinash Abhyankar, Roberta Cilio, Patrick Nitschke, Anna Kaminska, Nathalie Boddaert, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Isabelle Desguerre, Arnold Munnich, Olivier Dulac, Leonard K Kaczmarek, Laurence Colleaux & Rima Nabbout

doi:10.1038/ng.2441

Rima Nabbout and colleagues report the identification of de novomutations in the KCNT1 potassium channel gene in individuals with malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy, a rare epileptic encephalopathy with pharmacoresistant seizures and developmental delay. The authors show that the mutations have a gain-of-function effect on KCNT1 channel activity.

First Paragraph- De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy | Full Text- De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy | PDF (745 KB)- De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy | Supplementary information

CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development –pp1260 – 1264

Ganeshwaran H Mochida, Vijay S Ganesh, Maria I de Michelena, Hugo Dias, Kutay D Atabay, Katie L Kathrein, Hsuan-Ting Huang, R Sean Hill, Jillian M Felie, Daniel Rakiec, Danielle Gleason, Anthony D Hill, Athar N Malik, Brenda J Barry, Jennifer N Partlow, Wen-Hann Tan, Laurie J Glader, A James Barkovich, William B Dobyns, Leonard I Zon & Christopher A Walsh

doi:10.1038/ng.2425

Christopher Walsh and colleagues identify mutations in CHMP1Ain human cerebellar hypoplasia and microcephaly. Cells lackingCHMP1A show decreased cell proliferation and decreased expression of BMI1, a negative regulator of stem cell proliferation.

First Paragraph- CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development | Full Text- CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development | PDF (1,449 KB)- CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development | Supplementary information

Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 –pp1265 – 1271

Saima Riazuddin, Inna A Belyantseva, Arnaud P J Giese, Kwanghyuk Lee, Artur A Indzhykulian, Sri Pratima Nandamuri, Rizwan Yousaf, Ghanshyam P Sinha, Sue Lee, David Terrell, Rashmi S Hegde, Rana A Ali, Saima Anwar, Paula B Andrade-Elizondo, Asli Sirmaci, Leslie V Parise, Sulman Basit, Abdul Wali, Muhammad Ayub, Muhammad Ansar, Wasim Ahmad, Shaheen N Khan, Javed Akram, Mustafa Tekin, Sheikh Riazuddin, Tiffany Cook, Elke K Buschbeck, Gregory I Frolenkov, Suzanne M Leal, Thomas B Friedman & Zubair M Ahmed

doi:10.1038/ng.2426

Zubair Ahmed and colleagues identify homozygous mutations inCIB2, a gene that encodes a calcium- and integrin-binding protein, that cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48. CIB2 is required for hair cell development and retinal photoreceptor cells in zebrafish and Drosophila melanogaster.

First Paragraph- Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 | Full Text- Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 | PDF (1,380 KB)- Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 | Supplementary information

Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma –pp1272 – 1276

Elizabeth Pohler, Ons Mamai, Jennifer Hirst, Mozheh Zamiri, Helen Horn, Toshifumi Nomura, Alan D Irvine, Benvon Moran, Neil J Wilson, Frances J D Smith, Christabelle S M Goh, Aileen Sandilands, Christian Cole, Geoffrey J Barton, Alan T Evans, Hiroshi Shimizu, Masashi Akiyama, Mitsuhiro Suehiro, Izumi Konohana, Mohammad Shboul, Sebastien Teissier, Lobna Boussofara, Mohamed Denguezli, Ali Saad, Moez Gribaa, Patricia J Dopping-Hepenstal, John A McGrath, Sara J Brown, David R Goudie, Bruno Reversade, Colin S Munro & W H Irwin McLean

doi:10.1038/ng.2444

Irwin McLean and colleagues report that heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in AAGAB, which encodes a cytosolic protein implicated in vesicular trafficking, cause punctate palmoplantar keratoderma. They further show that knockdown of AAGAB in keratinocytes leads to increased cell proliferation accompanied by highly elevated levels of epidermal growth factor receptor.

First Paragraph- Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma | Full Text- Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma | PDF (848 KB)- Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma | Supplementary information

Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population –pp1277 – 1281

Catarina D Campbell, Jessica X Chong, Maika Malig, Arthur Ko, Beth L Dumont, Lide Han, Laura Vives, Brian J O’Roak, Peter H Sudmant, Jay Shendure, Mark Abney, Carole Ober & Evan E Eichler

doi:10.1038/ng.2418

Evan Eichler and colleagues report an estimate of the mutation rate in humans that is based on the whole-genome sequences of five parent-offspring trios from a Hutterite population and genotyping data from an extended pedigree. They use a new approach for estimating the mutation rate over multiple generations that takes into account the extensive autozygosity in this founder population.

First Paragraph- Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population | Full Text- Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population | PDF (620 KB)- Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population | Supplementary information

See also: News and Views by Hurles

Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission –pp1282 – 1285

Christoph Freyer, Lynsey M Cree, Arnaud Mourier, James B Stewart, Camilla Koolmeister, Dusanka Milenkovic, Timothy Wai, Vasileios I Floros, Erik Hagström, Emmanouella E Chatzidaki, Rudolf J Wiesner, David C Samuels, Nils-Göran Larsson & Patrick F Chinnery

doi:10.1038/ng.2427

Patrick Chinnery, Nils-Goran Larsson and colleagues show that mitochondrial heteroplasmy levels are principally determined prenatally within the developing female germline in mice transmitting a heteroplasmic single base-pair deletion in the mitochondrial tRNAMet gene.

First Paragraph- Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission | Full Text- Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission | PDF (523 KB)- Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission | Supplementary information

SOURCE:

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v44/n11/index.html 

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Personal Tale of JL’s Whole Genome Sequencing

Word Cloud by Daniel Menzin

Unexpected scary findings: the tale of John Lauerman’s whole genome sequencing

FEBRUARY 15, 2012
Joe Thakuria draws John Lauerman's blood
Joe Thakuria draws John Lauerman’s blood for whole genome sequencing. By Madeleine Price Ball, licensed under CC-BY-SA.

Madeleine Price Ball, PhD is a PGP research scientist in George Church’s lab at Harvard Medical School.

Several months ago John Lauerman, a reporter for Bloomberg News, approached the Personal Genome Project interested in having his whole genome sequenced. While we have hundreds of genomes in the sequencing pipeline, of the dozen or so genomes we have sequenced to-date, so far the results have been for the most part uneventful.

Lauerman’s case was different: we found something rare and “famous”, and something that nobody could have anticipated by looking through family history: a mutation that was acquired rather than inherited. This genetic variant (JAK2-V617F) is one of a number of mutations that can accumulate in blood stem cells, a precursor that could lead to several rare blood diseases.

Last night Lauerman published his experience, and we encourage all participants to read it. It confronts us with a scenario that seems likely to affect others who forge into this new and unknown territory: the very real possibility that whole genome sequencing may uncover something unexpected, ambiguous, and scary. This certainly isn’t an outcome we anticipate for most participants, but it is a rare possibility all should be aware of. Would you rather know that you carry such a variant, even if that knowledge might not help your health at all? Although some would decline, PGP participants are the sort of people who say: “Yes, I’ll take that risk, I’d rather know!” [see footnote]

His experience also illustrates potential for the Personal Genome Project to guide health care, for himself and for those who follow. The JAK2-V617F variant is so rarely seen in healthy individuals, we have very little understanding of what to expect. It has almost always been seen after a patient is diagnosed with a disease, not before. Will he develop one of these diseases? If so, which one? Perhaps many people carry the variant but never develop any symptoms of disease. In coming years Lauerman will likely continue to monitor his blood for signs of disease. It is possible that he will never develop the disease, and we hope this is the case. On the other hand, through monitoring he may detect disease sooner than he otherwise would have. By making his experiences public, his case can inform future individuals who confront the same finding.

As we move onward to sequencing hundreds and thousands of genomes, we can’t promise such interpretations will be made in a timely manner. We’re working with other groups to improve our ability to interpret genomes — and PGP participants are the perfect testbed for this development! — but it’s much harder than you might think. Genome data is made public in 30 days, but months or even years could pass before a serious and potentially scary variant is noticed. Participating in the PGP not only means that you risk learning ambiguous and scary news, but that it may be uncovered long after your data has been made public. We are always grateful to participants who choose to step into that unknown territory of genome sequencing, and who share their data so that others may learn.


Footnote: In the early stages of enrollment, individuals interested in joining the Personal Genome Project are asked to think about whether there are specific types of genetic information that they might not want to learn about themselves. Our examples include medical conditions with no effective cures or therapies, cancer, degenerative diseases, and stigmatized traits (e.g. mental illness). We do not offer the review or redacting of such information on a case-by-case basis. Only participants who wish to take the risk of learning such information are allowed to proceed with enrollment.

SOURCE:

http://blog.personalgenomes.org/2012/02/15/unexpected-scary-findings-the-tale-of-john-lauermans-whole-genome-sequencing-2/lauerman_blood_draw/

http://www.personalgenomes.org/

Harvard Mapping My DNA Turns Scary as Threatening Gene Emerges

By John Lauerman – Feb 15, 2012 12:01 AM ET

Four months after I walked into a lab at Harvard University and gave a vial of blood to have my genome sequenced, my search to understand my DNA led me to Mark Sanders, a former Indiana firefighter.

It took a little while to explain why I was calling and then he told me his story:

Sophie Liu, research scientist at Complete Genomics Inc., at a sequencing center at the company’s research facility in Mountain View, California. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg News reporter John Lauerman talks about the results of his genome sequencing. The genome contains the DNA instructions for making all the body’s cells and tissues. Lauerman discussed the report with a team from Harvard Medical School’s Personal Genome Project, who will use the results in their efforts to better understand variations in the human genome and their implications for health and disease. (Source: Bloomberg)

Joseph Thakuria, clinical director of the Personal Genome Project draws blood from Bloomberg reporter John Lauerman for the Project at Harvard Medical School in Boston on Sept. 13, 2011. Photographer: Madeleine Price Ball/Harvard Medical School via Bloomberg

Deep Breath

After recovering, Sanders retired from firefighting to garden and play the fiddle. He knows other myelofibrosis patients who haven’t fared as well.

“I had been so physically fit all my life,” he said. “There’s no reason or rhyme to why I have it or got it, and there’s not a lot of people around you can talk to who have it.”

I hung up the phone and took a deep breath. DNA in his blood cells carried the same rare genetic variant that my sequencing had revealed.

The variant is linked to a group of blood disorders, of which primary myelofibrosis is the most serious. Doctors don’t know whether this gene variant itself causes disease, yet it is seen so often in three blood disorders that its presence is used to confirm their diagnosis. I had to consider that my future might hold a fate similar to Sanders’s.

Genome-Sequencing Report

My path to Sanders began on Monday, Jan. 2, when I was sitting alone in my office in downtown Boston. Just after 4 p.m., I got an e-mail message from Madeleine Ball, a Harvard University researcher, telling me that the results of my genome sequencing were ready. The procedure is gaining use in cancer clinics and children’s hospitals, and will become increasingly common as the cost drops to $1,000, no more than that of many diagnostic procedures, such as MRI or colonoscopy, manufacturers and researchers say.

Before even a minute had gone by, the lengthy report was there for me to view.

“Here it is,” I thought, clicking on my inbox. “Mortality in an e-mail.”

Even as my DNA was chopped up, labeled, photographed and decoded by machines in California, the speed and power of sequencing was exploding. Life Technologies Corp. (LIFE) said Jan. 10 that its new Ion Proton machine will be able to sequence an entire genome in a day, for $1,000. Last month,Roche Holding AG (ROG) made a $5.7 billion hostile bid forIllumina Inc. (ILMN), which said it will also soon have machines that can provide 24-hour genome sequencing. Google Inc. (GOOG) and Amazon.com Inc. were investing in technologies to manage the tidal wave of information coming from these machines.

Personal Struggle

Now my own deciphered genome, the chemical instructions for making all the cells and tissues of my body, was complete. That evening marked the start of a medical and personal struggle to understand the report’s findings. The genome rules our bodies in ways that remain enigmatic. Many of the diseases and medical conditions I thought would emerge in the analysis, didn’t. At the same time, there were unpleasant surprises that cast a shadow on my future and now confront me and my family with tough medical decisions.

Before my sample was taken, I met with Denise Lautenbach, a genetic counselor who works in research programs at Harvard Medical School. We’d discussed the possible revelations that might come. My father, grandfather and some uncles have suffered from a shaking disorder called essential tremor. I worried about other conditions that run in my family, such as thyroid disease, diabetes and depression. While dementia isn’t a theme, I was curious about whether I have the APOE4 gene variant that raises the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

Breast Cancer Risk

I also prepared by speaking with others who have had their genomes sequenced. Greg Lucier, chief executive officer of sequencer maker Life Technologies, discovered he has a gene that might raise the risk of breast cancer in himself and his daughter. Would I find out the same thing? What about far rarer conditions, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington’s disease, both of which can be predicted by sequencing?

My mind raced as I scanned the results that late Monday afternoon, looking for familiar words and phrases that might be connected to other conditions that run in my family.

Good Report

It appeared to be a good report. I saw a genetic variant linked to slightly higher-than-normal risk of an age-related eye disease called macular degeneration. No surprise; about 10 percent of the U.S. develops this condition, and my mother has it. There was a variant linked to higher schizophrenia risk; again, not a huge boost in odds of a disease that affects about 1 percent of the population (and which I’m probably too old to develop). There were gene variants linked to liver and bowel disease, neither of which I suffer from.

Then my eyes were drawn back to the top of the report and a variant called JAK2-V617F. I realized then that the list was ranked in order of medical importance. Clicking on an entry brought me to a few pages of medical information, and those pages were linked to published scientific and medical studies. I began reading about JAK2 more closely.

This wasn’t good. The report classified the JAK2 variant’s clinical importance as “high,” and its impact as “well- established pathogenic,” meaning harmful. It’s seen frequently in people with rare “cancer-like” blood diseases. Indeed, as the report said, doctors test for the JAK2 variant to confirm cases of these diseases, called myeloproliferative disorders.

Unclear View

Did that mean that I already had a rare disease? My eyes widened. I read on.

Researchers currently see the variant as “one of an accumulation of changes that leads to the development of these cancer-like diseases,” the report said. “It is unclear how to view the presence of the variant in people who don’t have symptoms of the disease.”

After about 40 minutes of reading and thinking, I remained mystified. The report said “cancer-like.” I kept staring at the word “cancer,” while the companion “like” seemed to disappear. I’ve written about other people’s illnesses for years. What had started out as a cutting-edge science story was beginning to feel more like an unsettling visit to the doctor’s office with its confusion, struggles to understand, and shivers of dread.

Puzzling Medical News

“How worried should I be?” I kept thinking. Anticipation had been building inside me for months. Now my results were here and I barely knew what to make of the most important one.

I picked up the phone and called my wife, Judi, who’s a nurse. After 21 years of marriage, we’re accustomed to regular discussions of medical issues, in part because Judi has type 1 diabetes, which requires daily monitoring and insulin. Still, this was some of the most serious and puzzling medical news I’d ever received. I was careful to keep from sounding frightened.

“I got my results,” I said when she picked up the phone. I poured out the details, focusing on the JAK2 variant.

Judi’s voice was calm. I didn’t have any of the symptoms of diseases associated with the gene, she said. I’m usually energetic and active; that meant it wasn’t clear what the variant meant in my case.

“At least if there is a problem, we’ll find it earlier if you’re evaluated yearly,” she said.

“They told me that none of these results should be used to make medical decisions,” I said. “I’ll meet with the researchers later this week to talk about everything.”

New Chapter?

We agreed that, overall, the report was good news. I didn’t realize there was more news to come.

I left the office and got on my bike, which I had ridden to work that day. I pedaled carefully to make it home safely through the streets of Boston, which is never guaranteed, genes or no genes.

Three days after getting my results, I took a seat in the office of George Church, the Harvard scientist who started the Personal Genome Project that arranged my sequencing. Joe Thakuria, the clinical geneticist and project medical director who took my blood sample in this same office in September, was there to lead the discussion of my results. The team had been through meetings like this before, having analyzed and released the genomes of 10 people, including Church, in 2008. I was already feeling a stomach full of emotions: was this about to be a new chapter in my life? And if so, how long would that chapter be?

Thakuria asked if I had any questions before we began. I told them how thrilled I was that I hadn’t seen certain genes that I expected given my family’s medical history, such as the variant for essential tremor. I’d seen nothing in my report about Alzheimer’s risk, which I considered a good sign.

Not Bad News

The researchers stopped me. The technology used to sequence my DNA has difficulty penetrating certain portions of the genome. One such region contains the gene that makes a blood fat called apolipoprotein E. Consequently, my results might not show whether I have the version of a gene, called APOE4, which raises the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

Never mind, I thought. I can live without that knowledge.

The absence of the gene for benign tremor, the condition my father and grandfather had, wasn’t necessarily such good news, the team explained. As-yet unknown genes might cause the same condition. No news wasn’t always good news; it just wasn’t bad news.

‘Very Rare’

With the three of us, along with Ball and Alexander Zaranek, another project researcher, crowded around the table in Church’s office, the team then turned to the JAK2 variant. The appearance of the gene in my blood had surprised even the Harvard scientists.

“This is probably the most serious variant that we’ve actually seen to date in the study,” Thakuria said. “It’s very rare.”

The JAK2 gene contains the DNA code for making a protein used to send signals through cells. About two out of 1,000 people have the V617F variant, which was discovered in 2005 and appears to encourage blood cells to grow and divide.

Many scientists believe it’s an acquired gene variant, meaning that I wasn’t born with it and my children and other blood relatives probably don’t have it. While JAK2 may have arisen in response to my own habits, at this point, it’s unclear what may have led to the mutation.

Blood Disorders

The JAK2 variant is found in about 90 percent of people with polycythemia vera, an oversupply of red blood cells. This disease is usually treated with drugs or phlebotomy, the draining of some blood from the system. It’s also frequently found in patients with essential thrombocytosis, an overproduction of platelets that usually requires no treatment and can be addressed with blood-thinners when patients have symptoms. It’s also used to diagnose primary myelofibrosis, the condition Sanders, the former firefighter, had. About 10 percent of these cases can develop into dangerous leukemias.

That’s three conditions linked to one gene. One of the three has a possibility of becoming cancerous, Thakuria said.

“I don’t want you to fret about this,” he said. It was the first of several times I would hear him say it.

At that point, Thakuria opened up a link to a 2010 study attached to the report. Scientists have been conducting studies of individual genes for years. The team had found a study of 10,507 people in Copenhagen who gave blood samples and then were followed for as long as 18 years. The Copenhagen researchers went back and analyzed the blood samples; 18 had the JAK2 variant.

‘Very Scary Figure’

What it showed was that 14 of the 18 people with the variant developed cancer in their lifetimes. All of the 18 died within the study period.

“That’s a very scary figure,” Thakuria said.

Information was starting to wash over me without really penetrating. I struggled to keep thinking of good questions for the team. Instead, I started asking myself questions: “What am I doing here? What are these people telling me?” I searched the faces arrayed around me, trying to see whether any of the researchers looked as panicked as I felt.

I tried to listen closely as Thakuria explained what the variant and the study might mean. There were a number of shortcomings in the Copenhagen study that made it difficult to interpret, he said. For example, he said, the authors had been liberal in their use of the word “cancer.” Some of the disorders developed by patients with the JAK2 variant were of the milder variety such as polycythemia vera, which isn’t typically classified as a cancer.

Issue of Deaths

Then there was the issue of deaths. It wasn’t clear whether people with the variant had died of the conditions they had been diagnosed with, or other causes, Thakuria said. Half of them had died in their 80s, and seven had died in their 70s. This is not far from average life expectancy, he pointed out.

“Half of them could have died of bicycle accidents,” he said, smiling.

There were other reasons not to fret, Thakuria said. Although the JAK2 variant often shows up in these conditions, no one knows precisely what role it plays. It may be a cause of the disorders, or an effect of changes elsewhere in the genome. The JAK2 variant was unlikely to be the only cause of these diseases; several things — things that remain unknown to us — would probably have to go wrong before any disease would arise. In this context, the gene wasn’t quite so scary, Thakuria said.

Black and White

I thought about a conversation I’d had with Ball just a few days earlier, while my genome were still being analyzed. I had called to see when the results were coming. She said they were “interesting,” but didn’t want to discuss them until a clinical geneticist had a chance to review them. Her voice sounded like she didn’t want to reveal everything she knew.

“I wish everything were black and white,” she said. “Unfortunately, things just don’t turn out that way very often.”

The researchers said I now needed to confirm that the sequencing was correct with another round of testing using a different technique. I would give another blood sample. If the variant was there, we’d talk more about what steps to take.

The meeting lasted almost two hours, and I left Church’s office with Thakuria. We walked to a restaurant about halfway between Harvard Medical School and Fenway Park to sit and have a drink. I continued to quiz him on the relationship between the JAK2 variant and the diseases we’d been talking about.

Ask Again

Sitting on a barstool next to Thakuria and listening to him discuss the JAK2 variant, I felt reassured. It occurred to me that this wasn’t how most people would receive the news of their results. As a reporter working on a story about genomics, I had access to experts that many people wouldn’t. What will happen as more people get results from broad genome sequencing?

I spoke about this during a meeting with Harold Varmus, director of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, and a co-winner of a Nobel Prize in 1989 for his work to find genes that promote the growth of cancer cells. I mentioned I had just received my results.

“How do you feel?” he asked.

“It’s been an interesting process,” I said. “It’s still playing out.”

Varmus nodded. Gathering genetic data from thousands of people can help researchers understand health by correlating gene variations with diseases, he said. He was concerned, however, that companies may not always ensure that people who have undergone sequencing will get a full understanding of their results.

‘How to Deal’

“Accumulating the information and studying it is good,” he said. “My concern is whether individuals are getting guidance on how to deal with the information.”

“People are being told they have a certain gene variant. In a mass population, that increases the risk of some diseases by, say, two-fold. That might be true in a mass population, but in any single individual’s genome, it’s not certain what that means.”

The Harvard researchers are struggling with these same issues, and are still working to streamline and improve their approach to giving results to study participants, Thakuria said.

“As we get more information from participants like you, we’ll gain a much better understanding of how to do it,” Thakuria said.

Animal Studies

I still felt like someone who kept shaking a toy Magic 8 Ball and getting the message: “Concentrate and ask again.” I decided to do a little research on my own. I found a 2010 study in the journal Blood showing that when the JAK2 variant was added to the genomes of mice, the animals later suffered from disorders similar to those seen in people with the gene.

This is just one of several animal studies suggesting that the JAK2 variant contributes directly to blood disorders, said John Crispino, a professor at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, who studies the gene. Skeptics point out that drugs that interfere with JAK2 don’t cure patients suffering from the gene-linked blood disorders.

“The field is mixed,” he said. “My bias is that the JAK2 variant contributes to the pathology of the disease.”

I wanted to find out what kind of people have the JAK2 mutation I have, and what’s happened to them. In addition to Sanders, the Indiana firefighter, I spoke with Bob Rosen, chairman of theMPN Research Foundation, a Chicago-based advocacy group for people with myeloproliferative disorders, and he had a surprise for me.

Red Blood Cells

About 14 years ago, Rosen went to a doctor because of pain in his fingers and toes. A complete blood count revealed high levels of red blood cells. He was diagnosed with polycythemia vera and was first treated with phlebotomy. He now takes a drug that controls his blood cell levels. With his treatment, he’s still able to work out, and had been playing basketball on the day I called him.

“I’ve been lucky,” he said. “The risk is that, over time, new symptoms will emerge or there will be a progression to something worse.”

A small percentage of patients with polycythemia vera can develop more serious conditions, such as primary myelofibrosis and certain leukemias, Rosen said. I hadn’t realized this, or hadn’t absorbed it, until now.

Another Surprise

Then, another surprise arrived. Looking at my report, I saw it had been updated electronically, as the genome project research team had told me would happen from time to time. Now, the second entry on my list of variants was labeled “APOE- C130R” — that’s another name for the APOE4 gene associated with increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

I kept reading, recalling that I had been told my ApoE result wasn’t accessible with the technology used to sequence my genome. As it turned out, the technology had worked after all. I was at increased risk for Alzheimer’s.

This was exactly the kind of news I had hoped I wouldn’t receive.

A few days later I got an e-mail from Ball, of the Harvard team.

“Sorry this was missed earlier,” she said in the e-mail. She recommended that I look at the studies she’d collected on APOE4, some of which casts doubt on the role of the variant as a strong factor in causing Alzheimer’s. According to one estimate, people who have one copy of the gene, as I do, have a 3 percent increased risk of developing the disease by age 80.

Better to Know

One of my parents must have had this gene variant in order for me to get it. Yet my mother is in her late 70s and my father is 80; neither of them has Alzheimer’s disease. The longer I thought about it, the less I worried.

I talked with my two children, Hanna and James, about their feelings regarding the JAK2 and Alzheimer’s gene variants. My daughter, a sophomore in college, said she thinks it’s an advantage to be aware of a health threat.

“If there’s a treatment for it, you could start earlier,” she said. “It’s better to know.”

My next stop was to see my doctor. While she didn’t want her name used in this story, she agreed to let me write about our conversations and paraphrase her comments.

I followed an aide into an exam room. Nothing about my body had changed since the genome test was done. I still had normal blood pressure and pulse, and my weight was steady.

My doctor had heard of the JAK2 variant. If the result was confirmed, I would need to have my blood count tested. If there was an oversupply of red blood cells or platelets, or signs of damaged bone marrow, we would start thinking about treatment, such as removing blood. She asked me how I was feeling.

‘Not Sick’

“I feel fine,” I said. “I’m not sick.”

I didn’t mention that every time I thought about the JAK2 variant, itching followed. I had read that itching was one of the symptoms of polycythemia vera. Even as I write these words, I’m scratching my forehead. I never feel itchy when not thinking about my genome. I also started noticing memory lapses.

This kind of behavior is often called “medical student syndrome,” because doctors in training who are learning to diagnose new diseases turn their skills on themselves. I assumed it was this syndrome I was suffering from, rather than a blood disorder.

It seemed like a good time to return to the Boston office of Aubrey Milunsky, the director of the Boston University Center for Human Genetics who had warned me in May that having my genome sequenced would just cause me needless worry.

“Why would you want to know that?” he had asked me then.

Milunsky was well-acquainted with the JAK2 variant on my report. Just as the team at Harvard had said, he mentioned that there was little known about the long-term impact of the variant in people. He noted that it’s also associated with some cases of dangerous clotting in abdominal blood vessels.

“You know it’s there, but you don’t know what it means,” he said. “You’re smack in the territory of inviting anxiety into your life. And this may have no meaning whatsoever in your entire life.”

Useful Vigilance

I disagreed. The results had actually taken some uncertainty out of my life, I told Milunsky. We all bear some health risks, and that’s why doctors recommend, for instance, that everyone get regular checkups and those 50 and older undergo tests for colon cancer. I have a rare mutation linked to rare conditions, most cases of which can be treated. Wouldn’t it make sense for me to undergo a blood test regularly to see whether my blood counts had changed?

Such vigilance might be beneficial, and it might not, Milunsky said. I might live the rest of my life with my health unaffected by the variant. Yet the exercise had shown that I had discovered things I’d rather not know, he said. Others who undergo the same procedure will surely find out that they have mutations that practically guarantee they will develop serious and perhaps even fatal diseases, he said.

Huntington’s Disease

Indeed, a 1999 study in the American Journal of Human Genetics found that about 1 percent of 4,527 people who were told they had the gene that causes Huntington’s disease, a progressive nervous system disorder, attempted or committed suicide, or were hospitalized for psychiatric reasons.

Medical researchers are still trying to determine when it makes sense to do more common tests for breast and prostate cancer. A certain percentage of people who get positive results on these screening exams will go on to have unneeded treatment that may cause harm. In October, a government panel recommended that blood tests used to screen for prostate cancer should only be performed on men with symptoms. The same panel said in 2009 that women should start getting mammograms at age 50, rather than 40.

On Jan. 25, at about 11 p.m., I got a phone call from Thakuria. We had arranged to speak late in the day to accommodate busy schedules.

‘Mutation Confirmed’

“The mutation confirmed,” he said. He didn’t say “JAK2,” but I knew that was what he was talking about.

The next step for me is to have my white and red blood-cell levels measured, along with those of platelets. Doctors will also study the appearance of these cells under a microscope and check to see how much oxygen my blood can carry. I expect these tests to be normal. If they aren’t, it’s possible that I’ll start getting blood drawn from my system or drug treatment for polycythemia vera. I may need to take a blood thinner, such as aspirin, to counteract the effects of excess platelets. Should I have evidence of more serious disease, stronger treatment may be needed.

“I’m not going to lie to you: I’d rather you didn’t have it,” Thakuria said. “This isn’t like one of those mutations that have specific recommendations. There are no guidelines here. This is part of being on the frontier.”

To contact the reporter on this story: John Lauerman in Boston at jlauerman@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jonathan Kaufman at

jkaufman17@bloomberg.net

SOURCE:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-15/harvard-mapping-my-dna-turns-scary-as-threatening-gene-emerges.html

Read Full Post »

Neuroprotective Therapies: Pharmacogenomics vs Psychotropic drugs and Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #3: Neuroprotective Therapies: Pharmacogenomics vs Psychotropic drugs and Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Published on 11/23/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

Featured Researcher:

Prof. Beth Murinson, MD, PhD   of Technion’s Rappaport Faculty of Medicine came to Technion after being a professor at Johns Hopkins Medical School. She discusses her research in the field of Neurology and pain management.

Prof. Beth Murinson, MD, PhD, at Technion’s Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, has been a very busy person since coming to Israel in 2010 with her husband and two children. Before Technion she was an associate professor at Johns Hopkins Medical School. A neurologist who specializes in injury to the peripheral nerve, these days Murinson can be found in her laboratory and at Rambam hospital. She conducts research and works on educational projects that are designed to treat patients with acute and persistent pain; teaches medical students, both the Israeli students and those from the USA who are in TeAMS – Technion’s American medical school program; advises medical students in the USA; is an attending neurologist in the Department of Neurology at Rambam Health Care Campus and runs an outpatient clinic specializing in peripheral nerve injuries, chronic neuropathic pain and back injuries.

Murinson’s research is focused on chemotoxic and traumatic injuries to the nerve. Her two main research models address the response of growing peripheral nerve cells to exposure to a common pharmacological agent and deal with nerve injury. She is trying to determine what is the least amount of injury that will produce neuropathic pain; it is important to understand what injuries are painful and which injuries are not. Her goal is to find methodology or treatments that will help prevent induced nerve injury. There are some drugs that are widely used and taken by millions of people that have the potential to harm nerves. She also works in collaboration with the oncology group at Rambam.

VIEW VIDEO

researchStory1.asp

“To find methodology or treatments that will help prevent induced nerve injury.”

Murinson’s academic credentials are impressive; she got an early start by graduating high school early and proceeding to receive her Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Johns Hopkins, a Master’s from UCLA in biomathematics, and an MD/Phd (in physiology) from the University of Maryland, graduating with honors. After, she did her residency in neurology at Yale and she finished her education with a fellowship in neuroelectrophysiology back at Johns Hopkins.

It’s a wonder she found time to write a book.

Take Back Your Back is the volume to read if you are suffering from back pain. The book lets patients know everything they can do to regain control over their lives after a back injury. It provides a wealth of information on what can go wrong with the back and how patients can take charge of their own recovery.

SOURCE:

http://www.focus.technion.ac.il/Oct12/researchStory1.asp

Flaviogeranin, a new neuroprotective compound from Streptomyces sp.

Yoichi Hayakawa, Yumi Yamazaki, Maki Kurita, Takashi Kawasaki, Motoki Takagi and Kazuo Shin-ya

Abstract

Cerebral ischemic disorders are one of the main causes of death. In brain ischemia, blood flow disruptions limit the supply of oxygen and glucose to neurons, initiating excitotoxic events.

Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author
The Journal of Antibiotics 63, 379-380 (July 2010) | doi:10.1038/ja.2010.49

Sarcophytolide: a new neuroprotective compound from the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum.

F A BadriaA N GuirguisS PerovicR SteffenW E MüllerH C Schröder

Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Toxicology (impact factor: 3.68). 12/1998; 131(2-3):133-43.
Bioactivity-guided fractionation of an alcohol extract of the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum collected from the intertidal areas and the fringing coral reefs near Hurghada, Red Sea, Egypt resulted in the isolation of a new lactone cembrane diterpene, sarcophytolide. The structure of this compound was deduced from its spectroscopic data and by comparison of the spectral data with those of known closely related cembrane-type compounds. In antimicrobial assays, the isolated compound exhibited a good activity towards Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sarcophytolide was found to display a strong cytoprotective effect against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in primary cortical cells from rat embryos. Preincubation of the neurons with 1 or 10 microg/ml of sarcophytolide resulted in a significant increase of the percentage of viable cells from 33 +/- 4% (treatment of the cells with glutamate only) to 44 +/- 4 and 92 +/- 6%, respectively. Administration of sarcophytolide during the post-incubation period following glutamate treatment did not prevent neuronal cell death. Pretreatment of the cells with sarcophytolide for 30 min significantly suppressed the glutamate-caused increase in the intracellular Ca2+ level ([Ca2+]i). Evidence is presented that the neuroprotective effect of sarcophytolide against glutamate may be partially due to an increased expression of the proto-oncogene bcl-2. The coral secondary metabolite, sarcophytolide, might be of interest as a potential drug for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders.

Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer disease: From psychotropic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors to pharmacogenomics

Cacabelos, R., et al.

Drugs Today 2000, 36(7): 415
ISSN 1699-3993
Copyright 2000 Prous Science
CCC: 1699-3993

For the past 20 years the scientific community and the pharmaceutical industry have been searching for treatments to neutralize the devastating effects of Alzheimer disease (AD). During this period important changes in the etiopathogenic concept of AD have occurred and, as a consequence, the pharmacological approach for treating AD has also changed. During the past 2 decades only 3 drugs for AD have been formally approved by the FDA, although in many countries there are several drugs which are currently used as neuroprotecting agents in dementia alone or in combination with cholinesterase inhibitors. The interest of the pharmaceutical industry has also shifted from the cholinergic hypothesis which led to the development of cholinesterase inhibitors to enhance the bioavailability of acetylcholine at the synaptic cleft to a more “molecular approach” based on new data on the pathogenic events underlying neurodegeneration in AD.

In our opinion, the pharmacological treatment of AD should rely on a better understanding of AD etiopathogenesis in order to use current drugs that protect the AD brain against deleterious events and/or to develop new drugs specifically designed to inhibit and/or regulate those factors responsible for premature neuronal death in AD. The most relevant pathogenic events in AD can be classified into 4 main categories:

  • primary events (genetic factors, neuronal apoptosis),
  • secondary events (beta-amyloid deposition in senile plaques and brain vessels, neurofibrillary tangles due to hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins, synaptic loss),
  • tertiary events (neurotransmitter deficits, neurotrophic alterations, neuroimmune dysfunction, neuroinflammatory reactions) and
  • quaternary events (excitotoxic reactions, calcium homeostasis miscarriage, free radical formation, primary and/or reactive cerebrovascular dysfunction).

All of these pathogenic events are potential targets for treatment in AD. Potential therapeutic strategies for AD treatment include palliative treatment with nonspecific neuroprotecting agents, symptomatic treatment with psychotropic drugs for noncognitive symptoms, cognitive treatment with cognition enhancers, substitutive treatment with cholinergic enhancers to improve memory deficits, multifactorial treatment using several drugs in combination and etiopathogenic treatment designed to regulate molecular factors potentially associated with AD pathogenesis.

This review discusses the conventional cholinergic enhancers (cholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic agonists), noncholinergic strategies that have been developed with other compounds, novel combination drug strategies and future trends in drug development for AD treatment.

  • Stem-cell activation,
  • genetically manipulated cell transplantation,
  • gene therapy and
  • antisense oligonucleotide technology

constitute novel approaches for the treatment of gene-related brain damage and neuroregeneration.

The identification of an increasing number of genes associated with neuronal dysfunction along the human genome together with the influence of specific allelic associations and polymorphisms indicate that pharmacogenomics will become a preferential procedure for drug development in polygenic complex disorders. Furthermore, genetic screening of the population at risk will help to identify candidates for prevention among first-degree relatives in families with transgenerational dementia.

SOURCE:

http://journals.prous.com/journals/servlet/xmlxsl/pk_journals.xml_summary_pr?p_JournalId=4&p_RefId=589153&p_IsPs=N

Dementia is a major problem of health in developed countries. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the main cause of dementia, accounting for 50–70% of the cases, followed by vascular dementia (30–40%) and mixed dementia (15–20%). Approximately 10–15% of direct costs in dementia are attributed to pharmacological treatment, and only 10–20% of the patients are moderate responders to conventional anti-dementia drugs, with questionable cost-effectiveness. Primary pathogenic events underlying the dementia process include genetic factors in which more than 200 different genes distributed across the human genome are involved, accompanied by progressive cerebrovascular dysfunction and diverse environmental factors. Mutations in genes directly associated with the amyloid cascade (APP, PS1, PS2) are only present in less than 5% of the AD population; however, the presence of the APOE-4 allele in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene represents a major risk factor for more than 40% of patients with dementia. Genotype–phenotype correlation studies and functional genomics studies have revealed the association of specific mutations in primary loci (APP, PS1, PS2) and/or APOE-related polymorphic variants with the phenotypic expression of biological traits. It is estimated that genetics accounts for 20–95% of variability in drug disposition and pharmacodynamics. Recent studies indicate that the therapeutic response in AD is genotype-specific depending upon genes associated with AD pathogenesis and/or genes responsible for drug metabolism (CYPs). In monogenic-related studies, APOE-4/4 carriers are the worst responders. In trigenic (APOE-PS1-PS2 clusters)-related studies the best responders are those patients carrying the 331222-, 341122-, 341222-, and 441112- genomic profiles. The worst responders in all genomic clusters are patients with the 441122+ genotype, indicating the powerful, deleterious effect of the APOE-4/4 genotype on therapeutics in networking activity with other AD-related genes. Cholinesterase inhibitors of current use in AD are metabolized via CYP-related enzymes. These drugs can interact with many other drugs which are substrates, inhibitors or inducers of the cytochrome P-450 system; this interaction elicits liver toxicity and other adverse drug reactions. CYP2D6-related enzymes are involved in the metabolism of more than 20% of CNS drugs. The distribution of the CYP2D6 genotypes differentiates four major categories of CYP2D6-related metabolyzer types: (a) Extensive Metabolizers (EM)(*1/*1, *1/*10)(51.61%); (b) Intermediate Metabolizers (IM) (*1/*3, *1/*4, *1/*5, *1/*6, *1/*7, *10/*10, *4/*10, *6/*10, *7/*10) (32.26%); (c) Poor Metabolizers (PM) (*4/*4, *5/*5) (9.03%); and (d) Ultra-rapid Metabolizers (UM) (*1xN/*1, *1xN/*4, Dupl) (7.10%). PMs and UMs tend to show higher transaminase activity than EMs and IMs. EMs and IMs are the best responders, and PMs and UMs are the worst responders to pharmacological treatments in AD. It seems very plausible that the pharmacogenetic response in AD depends upon the interaction of genes involved in drug metabolism and genes associated with AD pathogenesis. The establishment of clinical protocols for the practical application of pharmacogenetic strategies in AD will foster important advances in drug development, pharmacological optimization and cost-effectiveness of drugs, and personalized treatments in dementia.

Key words  dementia – Alzheimer’s disease – APOE – CYP2D6 – pharmacogenetics – pharmacogenomics – multifactorial treatments

SOURCE:

Psychopharmacological Neuroprotection in Neurodegenerative Disease: Assessing the Preclinical Data

Edward C. Lauterbach; Jeff Victoroff; Kerry L. Coburn; Samuel D. Shillcutt; Suzanne M. Doonan; Mario F. Mendez

Abstract

This manuscript reviews the preclinical in vitro, ex vivo, and nonhuman in vivo effects of psychopharmacological agents in clinical use on cell physiology with a view toward identifying agents with neuroprotective properties in neurodegenerative disease. These agents are routinely used in the symptomatic treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Each agent is reviewed in terms of its effects on pathogenic proteins, proteasomal function, mitochondrial viability, mitochondrial function and metabolism, mitochondrial permeability transition pore development, cellular viability, and apoptosis. Effects on the metabolism of the neurodegenerative disease pathogenic proteins alpha-synuclein, beta-amyloid, and tau, including tau phosphorylation, are particularly addressed, with application to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Limitations of the current data are detailed and predictive criteria for translational clinical neuroprotection are proposed and discussed. Drugs that warrant further study for neuroprotection in neurodegenerative disease include pramipexole, thioridazine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, lithium, valproate, desipramine, maprotiline, fluoxetine, buspirone, clonazepam, diphenhydramine, and melatonin. Those with multiple neuroprotective mechanisms include pramipexole, thioridazine, olanzapine, quetiapine, lithium, valproate, desipramine, maprotiline, clonazepam, and melatonin. Those best viewed circumspectly in neurodegenerative disease until clinical disease course outcomes data become available, include several antipsychotics, lithium, oxcarbazepine, valproate, several tricyclic antidepressants, certain SSRIs, diazepam, and possibly diphenhydramine. A search for clinical studies of neuroprotection revealed only a single study demonstrating putatively positive results for ropinirole. An agenda for research on potentially neuroprotective agent is provided.

The most important detailed findings for each drug are briefly summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4 (located online at http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/22/1/8/DCI). The recently discovered TDP-43 was also considered while this project was underway, but no relevant articles were evident for this protein.

It is evident from the above that there is significant variation in degree of investigation, cell lines studied, and methodological approaches. Other limitations include the varying use of neural tissues, variance in the neuronal types studied, use of neuroblastoma lines instead of neurons, study of immature or poorly differentiated cells that may be more prone to apoptosis than more mature cells, and the infrequent characterization of effects on αSyn, tau, and Aβ. Such deficiencies in the data significantly confound the ability to draw definitive conclusions. In particular, the deficiencies in the data raise the question as to the most valid, clinically relevant, and appropriate standards of evidence to apply in determining which preclinical findings will predictably translate into clinical neuroprotection in patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

A number of concerns impact the selection of an appropriate standard of evidence. First, there are no established general criteria for judging preclinical neuroprotective data across the diversity of neurodegenerative diseases. Second, unlike clinical evidence-based medicine (EBM) standards, there do not appear to be established uniform criteria for judging the diversity of preclinical findings. From an EBM perspective, the data considered here are even less compelling than Class II or IV18 or Level C19clinical case reports since they generally do not pertain to findings in human patients. Third, there are considerable variabilities across the present preclinical findings with respect to intra- and extramodel replication, replications in neural tissue, the specific neural tissues studied, and the specific brain locus even when neurons are consistently studied. These are summarized in Table 5. Fourth, replications are still needed using the same physiological dose range, particularly because some have observed bell—shaped rather than sigmoid—shaped neuroprotective dose—response curves.20,21 Fifth, some drugs have mixed actions, simultaneously possessing some neuroprotective actions and other neurodegenerative actions. It is not yet clear whether the various actions should receive equal weight or whether one may trump others (for example, effects on apoptotic measures may be more determinative in importance than effects on more “upstream” processes such as mitochondrial potential or proteasomal function). Sixth, there is no gold-standard preclinical model but, instead, a diversity of models that each have their own select benefits and limitations. These and other factors likely contribute to the current disconnect between preclinical findings and neuroprotective clinical trial results.

Some criteria for considering neuroprotective candidate agents have been elaborated in Parkinson’s disease22 and stroke.23 In Parkinson’s disease, scientific rationale, penetration of the blood-brain barrier, safety and tolerability, and efficacy in relevant animal models of the disease or an indication of benefit in human clinical studies constitute criteria.22 In the case of FDA-approved psychotropics reviewed here, which essentially meet most of these criteria (with the exception of systematic, consistent application in relevant neurodegenerative disease models), the question then becomes: how good is the available preclinical evidence of neuroprotection? Ravina et al.22 noted that the most problematic issue in Parkinson’s disease was evaluating animal data given the many different models that were of uncertain value in predicting results in humans and noted further that a clinical trial would actually be needed to demonstrate the predictive validity of any preclinical model. Similarly, it is not possible to judge the quality of the present preclinical findings by the models used because the predictive validities of the models remain unclear. In stroke,23 potentially successful drug candidates have been considered to be inferable from preclinical data by the following criteria: (a) adequately defined dose-response relations; (b) time window studies showing a benefit period; (c) adequate physiological monitoring in unbiased, replicated, randomized, blinded animal studies; (d) lesion volume and functional outcome measures determined acutely and at longer term followup; (e) demonstration in two animal species; (f) submission of findings to a peer-reviewed journal. However, even with these criteria, Gladstone et al.24 have pointed out that translation of preclinical findings to clinical efficacy has been hampered by a lack of functional outcomes, long-term end points, permanent ischemia models, extended time windows, and selective white matter evaluation in preclinical models whereas clinical studies are plagued by insensitive outcome measures, lack of stroke subtype specificity, and inattention to the ischemic penumbra, among other concerns. Ford25 has also pointed out that a number of compounds fulfilling these stroke neuroprotectant criteria have failed to afford translational clinical neuroprotection. Analogous concerns obtain for neurodegenerative disease preclinical models and clinical methods, particularly whether putative criteria will reliably predict translation to clinical neuroprotection. Additionally, a nearly endless array of clinical variables including gender, age, pharmacogenomics, medical history, coadministered drugs, and other factors may contribute to an inability to predict clinical neuroprotection despite preclinical success. Thus, predictive criteria remain in need of development.

Reflection upon these translational issues in regard to psychotropic neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases first suggests the need for replication within and between specific preclinical models in specific neurons at specific loci to elucidate physiological dose-response relations that should then themselves be replicated as a first step. Additionally, other issues seem relevant to the problem of determining which candidate drugs may be most likely to effect clinical neuroprotection. We suggest preliminary neuroprotective drug selection criteria for assessing the likelihood of translational clinical neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases (Table 6). These criteria, including preclinical (at least two replicated neuroprotective actions at physiological doses in an established neuroprotective model, neural tissue, and disease-specific animal model in excess of the number of known neurodegenerative actions) and clinical (delayed progression on clinical markers and unexpected benign disease course not accounted for by symptomatic properties) criteria, can be evaluated over time and modified as future data indicate. Given the lack of information regarding the utility of specific preclinical paradigms in predicting clinical neuroprotective effects, it is premature to rank or weight these criteria. Rather, recent concerns26 notwithstanding and until a better study methodology is developed, we suspect that the greater the number of criteria met by a candidate drug, the greater the likelihood of demonstrating translational clinical neuroprotective efficacy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, delayed-start or randomized-withdrawal clinical trial.27 Such trials are needed because agents deemed promising based upon preclinical data often fail to demonstrate neuroprotection in clinical trials for reasons identified in the above paragraph. At present, preclinical demonstration of replicable neuroprotective effects in neural tissues at clinically-relevant doses does not assure a positive result in a clinical trial, nor does the absence of such evidence necessarily exclude clinical neuroprotective benefits. Until such clinical findings obtain, it is impossible to identify preclinical determinants predictive of translational clinical success and ascertain whether patients are actually being helped or harmed in a neuroprotective sense by the use of these drugs.

Beyond the methodological concerns expressed above, a practical assessment of these preclinical findings is still possible. Given the relative infancy of this field of research, the present state of the literature, the limitations of the data described above, and our current ignorance of preclinical evidence predictive of successful clinical translation, there is the very real possibility of prematurely disregarding findings that may ultimately prove to be of clinical significance with further research (a “type II” error) by applying an overly stringent standard of evidence. It seems that, at the present time, the proper approach is to instead look at the preponderance of the available findings and attempt some generalizations that constitute general impressions to be tested in future research, similar to the process of developing and refining clinical diagnostic criteria. Accordingly, the following observations are drawn from looking at all of the studies, without any exclusions, except where there are clearly contradictory data. As noted, many of the findings have not yet been independently replicated in the same model despite apparent replication in a different model (Table 5). Until the state of the literature develops to the point where independent replications in the same model are routinely observed, appropriate assessment criteria must be very liberal, resulting in conclusions that can only be viewed as preliminary. Adopting this approach with its attending caveats, some preliminary observations can be gleaned from the data. Below, we first consider drugs with respect to their neuroprotective potentials, distinguishing drugs meriting further study from those that have limitations dissuading further investigation and those for which too little data are available to form any conclusions. (We also summarize neuroprotective effects by drug class in Appendix 1 and drugs by neuroprotective actions in Appendix 2 [located online at http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/22/1/8/DCI%5D; Part 2 of this report focuses on the broader neuroprotective aspects of selected psychopharmacological classes.) Next, we assess the general properties of the various classes of psychotropics. We then consider each investigated cellular function with regard to the drugs that influence them. Finally, we detail a research agenda for drugs of interest and consider the progress made in clinical neuroprotective trials thus far, recommending a next step in their development.

Drugs of Neuroprotective Interest

Drugs meriting further study include:

  • pramipexole,
  • thioridazine,
  • risperidone,
  • olanzapine,
  • quetiapine,
  • lithium,
  • valproate,
  • nortriptyline,
  • desipramine,
  • maprotiline,
  • fluoxetine,
  • paroxetine,
  • buspirone,
  • clonazepam,
  • diphenhydramine, and
  • melatonin.

These are drugs with at least one significant neuroprotective action and relatively negligible countervailing neurodegeneration—promoting effects, as summarized in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 (especially the “Comments” column summarizing the data), and particularly Table 7 (tables located online at http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/22/1/8/DCI).

Drugs that are not recommended for further study at the present time due to more significant limiting issues (see Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3, especially “Comments” column summarizing the data). Haloperidol does not warrant further study because of tau hyperphosphorylation, reduced cell viability, and multiple proapoptotic actions, especially in hippocampus, cortex, striatum, and nigra. Fluphenazine, chlorpromazine, and clozapine, probably do not warrant further study because of multiple proapoptotic actions, and chlorpromazine inhibits tau dephosphorylation. Carbamazepine has variable neuroprotective properties. Oxcarbazepine promotes apoptosis. Clomipramine also generally promotes apoptosis. Diazepam has mixed effects on neural apoptosis, but uncouples oxidative phosphorylation, releases cytochrome c, and promotes apoptosis in a number of neuronal models, although it promoted ATP recovery and prevented cytochrome c release in a single study of ischemic hippocampal slices.

It should be emphasized that there are no convincing clinical data at present to indicate that these drugs are unsafe for clinical use due to neurodegenerative effects, only preclinical evidence to temper enthusiasm for clinical trial application as a neuroprotectant. Until such data become available, the use of these drugs continues to be guided by clinical symptomatic indications. The limiting actions described above are considered to be significant enough to likely detract from an overall neuroprotective effect, making positive findings less likely, hence our inability to recommend them at present. It must also be recognized that some of these limitations still await replication (Table 5), and that it is presently unknown precisely which neuroprotective modes of action are positively and negatively predictive of clinical neuroprotection.

Drugs for Which Limited Data Do Not Allow Recommendations

There are currently insufficient data for ropinirole, amantadine, thiothixene, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, amitriptyline, imipramine, trimipramine, doxepin, protriptyline, bupropion, sertraline, fluvoxamine, citalopram, trazodone, nefazodone, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, chlordiazepoxide, flurazepam, temazepam, chlorazepate, lorazepam, oxazepam, alprazolam, zolpidem, cyproheptadine, hydroxyzine, modafinil, ramelteon, benztropine, trihexyphenidyl, and biperiden.

Briefly, regarding the neuroprotective effects of psychopharmacological classes, certain generalizations are apparent (see Appendix 1 for details). There is some evidence to suggest that D2 agonists, lithium, some SSRIs, and melatonin reduce . D2 agonists, certain atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, and melatonin suppress . Neuroleptics, lithium, certain heterocyclic antidepressants, the central benzodiazepine receptor agonist clonazepam, and melatonin inhibit . D2 agonists, atypical antipsychotics, lithium, antidepressants, the 5HT1a agonist buspirone, and melatonin inhibit , whereas the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam promotes apoptosis. These, however, are gross generalizations, which are better explained in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2. Moreover, it is potentially erroneous to project neuroprotective effects upon a pharmacological class because neuroprotective properties may not relate to their currently recognized pharmacodynamic effects.

Above, we have indicated which drugs merit further study, those which cannot be recommended due to significant limiting issues, and those with inadequate data to allow assessment. Among drugs meriting further study, Table 8 discloses the various agents along with evidential weights for their various neuroprotective actions. It can be seen that drugs that inhibit apoptosis and have at least one other general antiapoptotic action (each demonstrated by a net of two or more studies supporting a neuroprotective action, without consideration of their effects on specific proteins) include pramipexole, olanzapine, lithium, desipramine, and melatonin. The remaining agents have less robust findings supporting general neuroprotective actions. Considering the effects of these drugs on proteins and at least one other neuroprotective action in a disease-specific model, the most promising drugs in Alzheimer’s disease would include olanzapine, lithium, and melatonin while drugs with less robust support in Alzheimer’s disease include pramipexole, quetiapine, valproate, and desipramine. Applying the same criteria, drugs of promise in Parkinson’s disease include pramipexole and melatonin, while drugs with less robust support in Parkinson’s disease include olanzapine, lithium, valproate, desipramine and clonazepam. Similarly, in Huntington’s disease, desipramine is the most promising, with less robust support for lithium, valproate, nortriptyline, and maprotiline. There is some support for pramipexole, olanzapine, lithium, and nortriptyline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, as we have pointed out above, it is premature to draw any clinical conclusions from these data because of the limitations we have described and because more data will be forthcoming.

Directions for Future Research

Given this inability to draw clinical conclusions, we provide the next steps that should be undertaken in developing psychotropic research to the point that results can guide the clinical application of these drugs for neuroprotection. While it is not clear what the most predictive models of clinical neuroprotection are, and what the most important neuroprotective mechanisms are, it is apparent that some drugs are further along in their preclinical research than others. It is also clear that some seemingly paradoxical neuroprotective outcomes are seen, such as modafinil’s ability to increase glutamate release and yet reduce glutamate toxicity, and paroxetine’s ability to reduce hippocampal Aβ production in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice despite its anticholinergic properties that would otherwise tend to increase Aβ production. These seeming contradictions point to the need to focus on research findings rather than our current limited theoretical understanding. Thus, we outline the next research steps to be taken to elaborate findings that will move us toward establishing neuroprotective drugs that can be applied by clinicians.

Apathy Treatments

It would be of interest to investigate pramipexole in normal neurons, especially dopaminergic and cholinergic neurons.

Pramipexole should be better characterized as to its effects on αSyn, Aβ, tau, and Aβ fibril and oligomer-induced reactive oxygen species formation as well as on the proteasome and on mitochondrial metabolism. It then should be investigated in clinical neuroprotection paradigms in neurodegenerative disease, particularly Parkinson’s disease.

The next step for amantadine involves investigations in neurons.

Antipsychotics

Risperidone needs more study to determine its neuroprotective potential. Its ability to reduce Complex I activity in regions of the brain, albeit not in the midbrain, indicates the need for further research as to its long-term safety in neurodegenerative diseases affecting the hippocampus, frontal lobe, and striatum, including Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and Huntington’s disease. Clinical effects tend to contraindicate its use in Parkinson’s disease.

Although olanzapine should be better characterized as to its multiple neuroprotective effects (especially on the proteasome and mitochondrial permeability transition pore development), antimuscarinic and parkinsonian clinical properties argue against its application in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.

Quetiapine should be better characterized as to its effects on αSyn, Aβ, tau, the proteasome, and protection against rotenone toxicity. Further studies using Aβ and initial studies using MPP+ should be carried out, with subsequent disease-modification studies in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease if the preceding studies indicate safety, although antihistaminic and anticholinergic clinical properties can constitute a limitation to use in Alzheimer’s disease.

Trifluoperazine, chlorpromazine, and thioridazine might be further studied in situations where inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore development is of utility.

Aripiprazole and ziprasidone should be studied for their neuroprotective properties, given their low proclivities to induce extrapyramidal side effects in people with neurodegenerative disease.

Mood Stabilizers

Lithium should be studied for neuroprotection in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and cerebral ischemia. A clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease is currently under way.

Investigation of valproate’s ability to induce mitochondrial permeability transition pore development but not mitochondrial membrane depolarization or cytochrome c release may yield information that may help develop neuroprotective mitochondrial strategies.

Valproate might be investigated in patients with Parkinson’s disease and oncological diseases for its antiapoptotic effects in the former and proapoptotic effects in microglia and the latter. Valproate’s ability to increase αSyn concentrations may be either beneficial or detrimental in Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies, and further research is needed. Activated microglia appear to be of importance in neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer’s disease. Results of a recent clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease are not yet available.

Antidepressants

Desipramine, nortriptyline, and maprotiline should be studied in other models of Huntington’s disease. If effective, they might be tried in other neurodegenerative disease models and in depressed patients with Huntington’s disease. Nortriptyline’s effects in Huntington’s disease yeast and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse models deserve replication.

Fluoxetine has inhibited neural stem cell apoptosis, hippocampal apoptosis in newborn mice and rats and serotonin-induced apoptosis. Although it has some proapoptotic properties, fluoxetine should be studied further as a neuroprotectant in Alzheimer’s disease.

Paroxetine should be studied further for neuroprotective properties, especially in regard to reductions in Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau.

Anxiolytics and Hypnotics

Buspirone has inhibited apoptosis in several neuronal models and now deserves study in regard to other related characteristics. If further studies indicate safety, studies in patients with neurodegenerative disease should then be undertaken.

Which types of GABA-A agonists protect against Aβ neurotoxicity and which do not requires clarification.

Clonazepam should be studied further for its restorative properties in Complex I deficiency, and should be better characterized in regard to apoptotic effects in neuronal models, especially on frontal lobe apoptosis in mature animals. If favorable results are forthcoming, it might then be tried in patients with neurodegenerative disease, especially Parkinson’s disease, although its association with falls in the elderly is a limitation.

Diphenhydramine should be further characterized in inflammatory, malignant, hypoxic, and other models where histamine plays a role.

Melatonin might now be investigated in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and in those with Parkinson’s disease.

Comprehensive Strategies

Deficiencies detailed in Table 5 deserve to be addressed in future studies. Validation of Table 6 translational predictive criteria awaits investigation. The relative predictive weightings of the various criteria also await outcome studies.

Combination therapies of psychotropics with differing profiles of neuroprotective actions may yield greater clinical impact than monotherapies. These varying profiles are depicted in Table 8. For example, across neurodegenerative diseases, the combination of lithium and melatonin might provide neuroprotective synergies, as might pramipexole, olanzapine, lithium, and nortriptyline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lithium, and desipramine in Huntington’s disease, and pramipexole, lithium, desipramine, and melatonin in Alzheimer’s disease (Table 8). In Alzheimer’s disease, lithium and melatonin together might synergize efficacy at Aβ, hyperphosphorylated tau, reactive oxygen species, transition pore development, and apoptosis, with lithium perhaps improving ubiquitylation. In Parkinson’s disease, this combination plus pramipexole may synergize benefits to reactive oxygen species, transition pore, and apoptosis, with lithium perhaps improving ubiquitylation and pramipexole and melatonin perhaps synergizing efficacy on αSyn. It should be remembered, however, that some combination therapies, applied in cancer chemotherapy, have sometimes resulted in a reduced efficacy of all drugs and an increase in side-effects.28 Animal trials of proposed combinations would be a first step in evaluating their safety and efficacy.

Progress Thus Far: Clinical Trials

So far, some preliminary progress has been made in identifying the clinical neuroprotective properties of some of these agents. A search performed on October 9, 2007 using the search terms “randomized clinical trial AND (neuroprotection OR disease-modifying OR disease-modification OR disease modifying OR disease modification) for each drug revealed only one clinical neuroprotection study (ropinirole versus -dopa), and two studies evaluating glutathione reductase and a gamma interferon, relevant to disease progression, but without evaluating actual indices of clinical neuroprotection. A 6-18F-fluorodopa PET study of 186 patients with Parkinson’s disease randomized to either ropinirole or -dopa revealed a significant one third reduction in the rate of loss of dopamine terminals in subjects treated with ropinirole.29 A study of valproate plus placebo versus valproate plus melatonin in patients with epilepsy demonstrated a significant increase in glutathione reductase in the melatonin group, but no clinical indices of actual neuroprotection were evaluated in that study.30 A study in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis identified a relationship between sertraline treatment of depression and attenuation of proinflammatory cytokine IFN-gamma, but again, actual indices of clinical neuroprotection were not assessed.31 In addition to the findings of the search, the CALM-Parkinson’s disease study involving the dopamine agonist pramipexole in Parkinson’s disease found faster progression (or at least less improvement on total UPDRS score) but slower dopamine transporter signal loss than with -dopa over 46 months,32 although the study has been criticized for lack of a placebo, group heterogeneity, and confounding influences on dopamine transporters. In contrast, a 2-year study of ropinirole found no significant difference in fluorodopa uptake compared to -dopa treatment (−13% versus −18%).33

A search of clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov) on October 9, 2007 using the terms (neuroprotection OR disease-modifying OR disease-modification OR disease modifying OR disease modification) and neurodegenerative diseases revealed only a few studies in progress. These included pramipexole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, early versus delayed pramipexole in Parkinson’s disease, and valproate in spinal muscular atrophy. Since that time, as of February 1, 2009, additional studies have been registered. In Alzheimer’s disease, these include a short-term study of CSF tau epitopes with lithium, brain volume and clinical progression with valproate, and hippocampal volume, brain volume, and clinical progression with escitalopram. In frontotemporal dementia, there is a single study of CSF and brain volume with quetiapine versus D-amphetamine. In Huntington’s disease, there is a study of CSF BDNF levels with lithium versus valproate. In dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD), there is a study of clinical progression with ramelteon. In Parkinson’s disease, there is a study of striatal dopamine transporter by β-CIT SPECT with pramipexole versus -dopa while an 8 year study of disability with pramipexole has been terminated. Only the spinal muscular atrophy and dementia with Lewy bodies/PDD studies employ clinical neuroprotective designs (delayed-start paradigm), and the validity of biomarker correlates, particularly dopamine transporter measures in Parkinson’s disease, continues to be studied.

The discussion above relies on multiple investigative approaches using a number of different psychotropics in a variety of models and a diversity of cell lines. A major caveat is that preclinical results do not necessarily translate into clinical realities. For example, favorable preclinical findings for the neuroprotectant minocycline exist in Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, stroke, spinal cord injury, and MS models, but a recent phase III trial in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was halted because of a 25% faster rate of neurological progression with the active drug than with placebo.34 Nevertheless, some generalizations seem possible at this stage. The considerations above are offered in hopes of stimulating the identification and development of pharmaceuticals that are useful both for symptomatic improvement and for long-term neuroprotection in neurodegenerative disease. Pursuit of the directions for research suggested above may contribute to that development.

 

Read Full Post »

FDA Guidelines For Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (DART) Studies for Small Molecules. Author-Writer: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.

This posting is a follow-up on the Report on the Fall Mid-Atlantic Society of Toxicology Meeting “Reproductive Toxicology of Biologics: Challenges and Considerations post and gives a brief synopsis of the current state of FDA regulatory guidelines with respect to DART studies on small molecule (non-biological based) therapeutics.    The following is adapted from the book Principles and Methods of Toxicology by Dr. A Wallace Hayes (1) and is an excellent reference on reproductive toxicology and testing methods.

Chemical insult occurs to the human reproductive system at a multitude of stages in development and the life cycle, leading to the extensive testing which must be performed to diligently the reproductive and development toxicity of a chemical/drug.  Abnormalities and toxic manifestations in the offspring may result from insult to the adult reproductive (either female or male) and neuroendocrine systems, as well as damage to the embryo resulting in embryolethality, fetus at any period during organogenesis, juvenile development or, in the case of certain antibody therapies, immune system development.  The latter, toxic insult to the developing immune system could possibly be manifested as either an immune defect in the newborn or, later in life, as tolerance to said therapy.  It is estimated that exposure to the pregnant woman, of either environmental contaminants or drug, is significant.  It is estimated that a mother may be taking an average of 8-9 different drug preparations, mostly over the counter preparations such as antacids, vitamin preparations, cathartics etc. with the maximal drug intake occurring between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation.

Toxic insult to the developing embryo is dependent on

  • Fetal development stage during drug/chemical exposure
  • Maternal/placental xenobiotic metabolism
  • Pharmacokinetic parameters affecting bioavailability and fetal/maternal drug binding

The following table shows the dependency of developmental stage to teratogenicity: adapted from J. Manson, H. Zenick, and R.D. Costlow from Principles and Methods of Toxicology.

Developmental Stage Major Susceptibility
Preimplantation Embryolethality
Organogenesis Births defects; embryolethality
Fetal Growth retardation, fetal death, functional deficits
Neonatal Growth retardation, nervous system alterations, immune and endocrine systems

It is not generally accepted that there is a dose dependency of teratogenesis however most teratogens have specific mechanisms of action and teratogenic effects occur at much lower doses than result in maternal toxicity.   However, the developmental toxicity may be manifested later in life, including as reproductive toxicity affecting adult fertility and familial generations.

FDA Guidelines for DART Studies on Non-Biologics (Small Molecule Therapeutics)

The basic design for DART studies incorporate the aforementioned principles of tetralogy:

  • developmental stage of fetal exposure
  • parental effects on reproduction and development
  • toxicity may be manifested over multiple generations including fertility rates

Therefore two designs are generally used for DART studies

  1. exposure across several generations
  2. exposure during one generation

FDA requires one control group and two treatment groups, and evaluation of at least two species.  However, most studies will use two rodent and one nonrodent species.

Multigenerational Design

Multigenerational DART studies are conducted for compounds likely to concentrate in the body following long-term exposure.  Examples of types of compounds include pesticides and food additives.

Figure 1.  General Design of a Multigenerational DART study.  Weanlings (30-30 days of age) from the parental generation are treated for a period up to 60 days. At 100-120 days of parental generation, animals are mated.  Fx = filialx .

Three Segment, Single Generation Tests

The single generation design is more suitable for DART studies on drugs, as most therapeutic would be taken over short periods (during pregnancy) and have relatively short half-lives in the body.  FDA guidelines separate these studies in three phases:

I.            Phase I: evaluation of fertility and general reproductive performance

II.            Phase II: assessment of teratogenicity and embryotoxicity

III.            Phase III: peri- and postnatal evaluations.

All figures are adapted from Principles and Methods of Toxicology.(1)

FDA guidelines Guidance for Industry Reproductive and Developmental Toxicities —Integrating Study Results to Assess Concerns can be found at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm079240.pdf

FDA Guideline for reproductive toxicity testing for small molecule therapeutics can be found at:

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm074950.pdf

1.            Hayes, A. W. (1986) Principles and Methods of Toxicology, Raven Press, New York

Other research papers on Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Reproductive Biology, Bio Insrumentation, Endocrinology Genetics were published on this Scientific Web site as follows

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer drugs – where does the Future lie?

Reboot evidence-based medicine and reconsider the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Every sperm is sacred: Sequencing DNA from individual cells vs “humans as a whole.”

Leptin and Puberty

Gene Trap Mutagenesis in Reproductive Research

Genes involved in Male Fertility and Sperm-egg Binding

Hope for Male Contraception: A small molecule that inhibits a protein important for chromatin organization can cause reversible sterility in male mice

Pregnancy with a Leptin-Receptor Mutation

The contribution of comparative genomic hybridization in reproductive medicine

Sperm collide and crawl the walls in chaotic journey to the ovum

Impact of evolutionary selection on functional regions: The imprint of evolutionary selection on ENCODE regulatory elements is manifested between species and within human populations

Biosimilars: CMC Issues and Regulatory Requirements

Biosimilars: Intellectual Property Creation and Protection by Pioneer and by Biosimilar Manufacturers

Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles and Cumulative Birth Rates

Innovations in Bio instrumentation in Reproductive Clinical and Male Fertility Labs in the US

Increased risks of obesity and cancer, Decreased risk of type 2 diabetes: The role of Tumor-suppressor phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)

Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research

Every sperm is sacred: Sequencing DNA from individual cells vs “humans as a whole.”

Read Full Post »

Recurrent somatic mutations in chromatin-remodeling and ubiquitin ligase complex genes in serous endometrial tumors

Reporter and Curator: Dr. Sudipta Saha, Ph.D.

Endometrial cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide, causing ~74,000 deaths annually1. Serous endometrial cancers are a clinically aggressive subtype with a poorly defined genetic etiology2–4.

Whole-exome sequencing was used to comprehensively search for somatic mutations within ~22,000 protein-encoding genes in 1 13 primary serous endometrial tumors. Subsequently 18 genes were resequenced, which were mutated in more than 1 1 1 tumor and/or were components of an enriched functional grouping, from 40 additional serous tumors. High frequencies of somatic mutations in CHD4 (17%), EP300 (8%), ARID1A (6%), TSPYL2 (6%), FBXW7 (29%), SPOP (8%), MAP3K4 (6%) and ABCC9 (6%) were identified. Overall, 36.5% of serous tumors had a mutated chromatin-remodeling gene, and 35% had a mutated ubiquitin ligase complex gene, implicating frequent mutational disruption of these processes in the molecular pathogenesis of one of the deadliest forms of endometrial cancer.

The study provides new insights into the somatic mutations present in serous endometrial cancer exomes. However, it is important to acknowledge that this discovery screen is underpowered to detect all somatically mutated genes that drive serous tumors. For example, PIK3R1, which was previously found to be somatically mutated in 8% of serous endometrial tumors58, was not somatically mutated in the tumors that formed this discovery screen.

It was estimated that, for genes that are mutated in 8% of all serous endometrial cancers, a discovery screen of 12 tumors has 25% power to detect 2 mutated tumors and 63% power to detect 1 mutated tumor; for genes that are mutated in 20% of all serous endometrial cancers, the discovery screen had an estimated 72.5% power to detect 2 mutated tumors and 93% power to detect 1 mutated tumor.

Massively parallel sequencing of additional cases will undoubtedly yield deeper insights into the mutational landscape of serous endometrial cancer. Here, it was reported one of the first exome sequencing analyses of serous endometrial cancers, which are clinically aggressive tumors that have been poorly characterized genomically.

The findings implicate the disruption of chromatin-remodeling and ubiquitin ligase complex genes in

  • 50% of serous endometrial tumors and
  • 35% of clear-cell endometrial tumors.

The high frequency and specific distributions of mutations in CHD4, FBXW7 and SPOP strongly suggest that these are likely to be driver events in serous endometrial cancer.

Source References:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Exome%20sequencing%20of%20serous%20endometrial%20tumors%20identifies%20recurrent%20somatic%20mutations%20in%20chromatin-remodeling%20and%20ubiquitin%20ligase%20complex%20genes

 

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Gates Foundation funds research to improve health in developing countries
Lauren Braun as a volunteer in Peru

Division of Nutritional Sciences
As a volunteer in the summer of 2008, Lauren Braun ’11 fills a prescription in a makeshift rural pharmacy in Peru.
Alma Sana bracelets

Provided/Alma Sana
Alma Sana bracelets use symbols to avoid language barriers.

A Cornell plant virologist, an alumna and three Weill Cornell Medical College researchers have each received grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation‘s Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative.

One grant awarded to Jeremy Thompson in the Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology will fund a project that takes advantage of new technology to rapidly determine the structure of RNA in viruses, which may lead to a new method for developing virus-resistant plants. Thompson, a research associate in the lab of Keith Perry, associate professor of plant pathology, will work with Perry to uncover new targets for plant virus resistance and with Julius Lucks, assistant professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering, who has developed new RNA structure mapping technology.

Viruses are known to use their RNA to hijack the replication machinery in host cells to make more copies of the virus. The researchers hope that determining the RNA structure will reveal plant proteins that are involved in viral replication.

“We want to try and map the structure of viral RNA, map the way it folds, and then we can potentially identify host proteins that are involved in virus replication and function,” said Thompson.

Once these plant proteins are identified, the researchers will look for genes that code for those proteins and try to alter their expression within the plant. “If we can affect the amount of protein involved, we can potentially hinder virus replication,” Thompson added. Using refined engineering methods to knock out or silence such protein-coding genes, the researchers may then create lines of virus-resistant plants.

The researchers will begin by examining viruses and host proteins in bean, tobacco and arabidopsis; bean, because of its importance as a staple in developing countries and the latter two because their genomes have been fully sequenced.

The one-and-a-half year, $100,000 grant represents a first phase that, if successful, allows the team to become eligible for phase two and an additional $1 million.

Lauren Braun

Braun

As the main objective of the Gates Foundation Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative is to improve the quality of life in developing countries, this project aims to “improve resistance against particular diseases for small-holder farmers, with all intellectual property being open to developing countries,” Thompson said. Plant viruses lead to billions of dollars in agricultural production losses each year.

Lauren Braun ’11 received a $100,000 grant to field-test in Peru a simple, inexpensive immunization-tracking bracelet for babies. Braun conceived the idea after spending the summer of 2008 as a volunteer at two rural health clinics in Peru, and she presented it on campus in the Entrepreneurship@Cornell’s 2011 Big Idea Competition.

The World Health Organization estimates that globally 1.5 million children die of vaccine-preventable diseases each year, and one in five children will die from such a disease before age 5.

Braun formed the nonprofit Alma Sana Inc. (Spanish for healthy soul) to manufacture and distribute the bracelets, which bypass language barriers and illiteracy by using symbols to show mothers the vaccinations their children need and numbers to show when they are due. The bracelet is to be worn by a child from birth to age 4, with the goal that more children will live to age 5.

A paper reminder system failed, Braun reports, because children are not brought in for their vaccinations and stored vaccine spoils and must be discarded, increasing costs. The bracelet also tells public health workers which vaccination each child needs.

The Gates Foundation initiative seeks new approaches to optimize immunization systems. In 2010, they said, a quarter of a million doses of pentavalent vaccine, costing nearly $1 million, expired in one country’s central store because the system charged with delivering them was not ready to manage it.

Three researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College have received Gates Foundation grants totaling $1.5 million from the Grand Challenges initiative for innovative research aimed at fighting HIV and tuberculosis.

SOURCE:

 

Read Full Post »

Artherogenesis: Predictor of CVD – the Smaller and Denser LDL Particles

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Updated 3/5/2013

Genetic Associations with Valvular Calcification and Aortic Stenosis

N Engl J Med 2013; 368:503-512

February 7, 2013DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109034

METHODS

We determined genomewide associations with the presence of aortic-valve calcification (among 6942 participants) and mitral annular calcification (among 3795 participants), as detected by computed tomographic (CT) scanning; the study population for this analysis included persons of white European ancestry from three cohorts participating in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium (discovery population). Findings were replicated in independent cohorts of persons with either CT-detected valvular calcification or clinical aortic stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic variation in the LPA locus, mediated by Lp(a) levels, is associated with aortic-valve calcification across multiple ethnic groups and with incident clinical aortic stenosis. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others.)

SOURCE:

N Engl J Med 2013; 368:503-512

HDL is more than an eNOS Agonist

 In addition to the modulation of NO production by signaling events that rapidly dictate the level of enzymatic activity, important control of eNOS involves changes in the abundance of the enzyme. In a clinical trial by the Karas laboratory of niacin therapy in patients with low HDL levels (nine males and two females), flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery was improved in association with a rise in HDL of 33% over 3 months (Kuvin et al., 2002).

Am. Heart J., 144:165–172.

They also demonstrated that eNOS expression in cultured human endothelial cells is increased by HDL exposure for 24 hours. They further showed that the increase in eNOS is related to an increase in the half-life of the protein, and that this is mediated by PI3K–Akt kinase and MAPK (Ramet et al., 2003).

J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 41:2288–2297.

Thus, the same mechanisms that underlie the acute activation of eNOS by HDL appear to be operative in upregulating the expression of the enzyme.

The current understanding of the mechanism by which HDL enhances endothelial NO production is summarized in Shaul & Mineo (2004), Figure 1.

J Clin Invest., 15; 113(4): 509–513.

It describes the mechanism of action for HDL enhancement of NO production by eNOS in vascular endothelium.

(a)   HDL causes membrane-initiated signaling, which stimulates eNOS activity. The eNOS protein is localized in cholesterol-enriched (orange circles) plasma membrane caveolae as a result of the myristoylation and palmitoylation of the protein. Binding of HDL to SR-BI via apoAI causes rapid activation of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase src, leading to PI3K activation and downstream activation of Akt kinase and MAPK. Akt enhances eNOS activity by phosphorylation, and independent MAPK-mediated processes are additionally required (Duarte, et al., 1997). Eur J Pharmacol, 338:25–33.

HDL also causes an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration (intracellular Ca2+ store shown in blue; Ca2+ channel shown in pink), which enhances binding of calmodulin (CM) to eNOS. HDL-induced signaling is mediated at least partially by the HDL-associated lysophospholipids SPC, S1P, and LSF acting through the G protein–coupled lysophospholipid receptor S1P3. HDL-associated estradiol (E2) may also activate signaling by binding to plasma membrane–associated estrogen receptors (ERs), which are also G protein coupled. It remains to be determined if signaling events are also directly mediated by SR-BI (Yuhanna et al., 2001), (Nofer et al., 2004), (Gong et al., 2003), (Mineo et al., 2003).

Nat. Med., 7:853–857.

J. Clin. Invest.,113:569–581.

J. Clin. Invest., 111:1579–1587.

J. Biol. Chem., 278:9142–9149.

(b)   HDL regulates eNOS abundance and subcellular distribution. In addition to modulating the acute response, the activation of the PI3K–Akt kinase pathway and MAPK by HDL upregulates eNOS expression (open arrows). HDL also regulates the lipid environment in caveolae (dashed arrows). Oxidized LDL (OxLDL) can serve as a cholesterol acceptor (orange circles), thereby disrupting caveolae and eNOS function. However, in the presence of OxLDL, HDL maintains the total cholesterol content of caveolae by the provision of cholesterol ester (blue circles), resulting in preservation of the eNOS signaling module (Ramet et al., 2003), (Blair et al., 1999), (Uittenbogaard et al., 2000).

J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 41:2288–2297.

J. Biol. Chem., 274:32512–32519.

J. Biol. Chem., 275:11278–11283.

SOURCE:

Shaul, PW and Mineo, C, (2004). HDL action on the vascular wall: is the answer NO? J Clin Invest., 15; 113(4): 509–513.

Are Additional Lipid Measures Useful?

Ryan D. Bradley, ND; and Erica B. Oberg, ND, MPH

http://www.imjournal.com/resources/web_pdfs/recent/1208_bradley.pdf

Total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are the well-established standards by which clinicians identify individuals at risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), yet nearly 50% of people who have a myocardial infarction have normal cholesterol levels. Measurement of additional biomarkers may be useful to more fully stratify patients according to disease risk. The typical lipid panel includes TC, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol  (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TGs). Emerging biomarkers for cardiovascular risk include measures of LDL-C pattern, size,  and density; LDL particle number; lipoprotein(a); apolipoproteins  (apoA1 and apoB100 being the most useful);  C-reactive protein; and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase

Some of these emerging biomarkers have been proven to add to, or be more accurate than, traditional risk factors in predicting coronary artery disease and, thus, may be useful for clinical decision-making in high-risk patients and in patients with borderline traditional risk factors.  However, we still believe that until treatment strategies can uniquely address these added risk factors—ie, until protocols to rectify unhealthy findings are shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes—healthcare providers should continue to focus primarily on helping patients reach optimal LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG levels

Table 1. Traditional Lipid Panel and Recommended Treatment

Goals for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention34

  • Total Cholesterol Desirable (low) < 200 mg/dL
  • Borderline high 200-239 mg/dL
  • High 240 mg/dL or greater
  • HDL Cholesterol Desirable (high) > 60 mg/dL
  • Acceptable 40-60 mg/dL
  • Low < 40 mg/dL
  • LDL Cholesterol Desirable (low) < 100 mg/dL
  • Acceptable 100-129 mg/dL
  • Borderline high 130-159 mg/dL
  • High 160-189 mg/dL
  • Very high 190 mg/dL or greater
  • Triglycerides Desirable (low) < 150 mg/dL
  • Borderline high 150-199 mg/dL
  • High 200-499 mg/dL
  • Very high 500 mg/dL or greater

LDL-C and HDL-C: Pattern, Size, and Density

Two patterns predominate and are used to describe the average size of LDL particles. Pattern A refers to a preponderance of large LDL particles, while Pattern B refers to a preponderance of small LDL particles; a minority of individuals displays an intermediate or mixed pattern. Some commercially available assays further subdivide LDL-C into 7 distinct designations based on particle size.9,10

LDL Lipoprotein Particle Number

LDL particle number (LDL-P) is a measure of the number of lipoprotein particles independent of the quantity of lipid within the cholesterol particle; ie, LDL-P measures the number of individual particles, not a concentration like LDL-C. It is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance technology and is unaffected by fasting status.21 Higher LDL-P measures have been associated with a higher risk of CAD. This might simply be because there are more particles susceptible to oxidation in circulation.

There are suggestions, but not definitive proof, that reducing LDL-P increases intra-LDL antioxidant capacity.  The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort, a study that has followed 25 663 participants  (men and women aged 45-79 years) over 6 years, evaluated associations between LDL-P and risk of CAD. Compared to controls,  cases of CAD had a higher number of LDL particles (LDL-P P<.0001), smaller average LDL-particle size (P=.002), and higher concentrations of small LDL particles (P<.0001).22

Once again,  small, dense LDL-C were positively associated with TG and negatively associated with HDL.  In another study investigating incident angina and MI with LDL-P, females, but not males, had a significantly increased odds ratio for incident MI and angina for higher LDL-P—but not for LDL size—after adjustment for LDL, age, and race.  Males had increased (but not significant) point estimates showing the same relationship.23 Of note, LDL-P and non-HDL-C (ie,  TC minus HDL-C, or, specifically, LDL-C plus VLDLs), added equivalently to Framingham-predicted CAD risk stratification, thus reducing our enthusiasm for this additional measurement when TC and HDL-C are routinely available.22 Based on these results, LDL-P is becoming recognized as a more-precise measure of LDL-related risk and, as it becomes more available, is likely to replace LDL-C in risk-stratification tools. Clinical availability is currently limited; however, Medicare recently began reimbursing for regular testing of LDL-P in highrisk patients, so we should see availability increase soon. There are no novel treatments based on LDL-P at this time, and data shows therapies that lower LDL-C lower LDL-P as well.

 Apolipoproteins

Apolipoproteins are the protein components of plasma lipoproteins. Several different apolipoproteins have been identified and numbered; however, apoB48, apoB100, and apoA are the most commonly referenced.  ApoB48 is associated with LDL particles that transport dietary cholesterol to the liver for processing. ApoB100 is found in lipoproteins originating from the liver (eg, LDL and VLDL); it transports these lipoproteins and, also, TGs to the periphery. In addition, ApoB100 is involved with the binding of LDL particles to the vascular wall, implicating itself as a key player in the development of atherogenic plaques. Importantly, there is one apoB100 molecule per hepatic-derived lipoprotein. Hence, it is possible to quantify the number of LDL/VLDL particles by noting the total apoB100 concentration.

Measurement of apoB100 has been shown in nearly all studies to outperform LDL-C and non-HDL-C as a predictor of CAD events and as an index of residual CAD risk, perhaps due to differences in measurement sensitivity between measurement methodologies. Direct measurement of apolipoproteins is superior to calculated lipid measurements. Yet, currently, apoB100 measurement is more costly than routine measurements and,  because apoB100 is so closely associated with non-HDL-C (which,  as mentioned previously, can be estimated by TC minus HDL-C),  our enthusiasm for the clinical use of this test is limited.24 For its part, apoA is associated with HDL particles; the 2 major proteins in HDL are apoAI and apoAII. Of these, apoAI has more frequently been used to estimate HDL-C, but, in contrast to apoB100, apoAI is not unique to HDL and so the ratio of apoAI to HDL is not 1 to 1.24

Lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a)—Lp(a)—is attached to apoB. The association of Lp(a) with CAD and its ability to act as a biomarker of risk appears to be strongest in patients with hypercholesterolemia and, in particular, in young patients with premature atherosclerosis (males younger than 55 and females younger than 65). Part of the reason for this is the observation that there seem to be important threshold effects such that only very high Lp(a) levels (> 30 mg/dL) are associated with elevated vascular risk; in this regard, these increased plasma levels of Lp(a) independently predict the presence of CAD, particularly in patients with elevated LDL-C levels.28

In the Cardiovascular Health Study, a relative risk of approximately 3-fold for death from vascular events and stroke was seen in the highest quintile compared to the lowest quintile of Lp(a) but for males only, whereas no such relation existed for women.29 Lp(a) is commonly considered a marker for familial hypercholesterolemia. Lp(a) may best be used in assessing the risk of younger males with strong family histories of CVD but  should not be used more generally.

Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease

(Exclusive of LDL Cholesterol)34

  • Cigarette smoking
  • Hypertension (BP > 140/90 mmHg or on antihypertensive medication)
  • Low HDL cholesterol (< 40 mg/dL)
  • Family history of premature CHD (CHD in first-degree male relative <
  • 55 years; CHD in first-degree female relative < 65 years)
  • Age (men > 44 years; women > 54 years

In addition,

  • Clinical coronary heart disease,
  • symptomatic carotid artery disease,
  • peripheral arterial disease, or
  • abdominal aortic aneurysm

Conclusion

In the United States, treatment guidelines for high CVD risk factors are set by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel, which developed the third report of the Adult Treatment Panel (ATPIII).34 Treatment goals are determined according to risk stratification by LDL-C and by known additional risk factors such as smoking, low HDL, hypertension,  family history, and age. Yet, clinically, decision-making is always more complex than this. Additional risk stratification can be accomplished by measuring the biomarkers discussed above, and this may potentially provide additive benefit beyond NCEP guidelines. However, we always encourage clinicians to treat known risks to goal levels before adding additional goals for treatment. In a future article we will provide further detail on treatment options for novel biomarkers.

REFERENCES

1. No authors listed. Cardiovascular disease statistics. American Heart Association.

Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4478.

Accessed October 28, 2008.

2. Tsimikas S, Willerson JT, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein and other emerging blood

biomarkers to optimize risk stratification of vulnerable patients. J Am Coll Cardiol.

2006;47(8 Suppl):C19-C31.

3. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Sipahi I, et al. Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,

and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA. 2007;297(5):499-508.

4. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: raising high-density

lipoprotein cholesterol levels. JAMA. 2007;297(5):499-508.

5. Bansal S, Buring JE, Rifai N, Mora S, Sacks FM, Ridker PM. Fasting compared with

nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women. JAMA.

2007;298(3):309-316.

6. Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Nonfasting triglycerides

and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and

women. JAMA. 2007;298(3):299-308.

7. Stampfer MJ, Krauss RM, Ma J, et al. A prospective study of triglyceride level, lowdensity

lipoprotein particle diameter, and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA.

1996;276(11):882-888.

8. Ceriello A. The post-prandial state and cardiovascular disease: relevance to diabetes

mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(2):125-132.

9. Carmena R, Duriez P, Fruchart JC. Atherogenic lipoprotein particles in artherosclerosis.

Circulation. 2004;109(23 Suppl 1):III2-III7.

10. Dormans TP, Swinkels DW, de Graaf J, Hendriks JC, Stalenhoef AF, Demacker PN.

Single-spin density-gradient ultracentrifugation vs gradient gel electrophoresis: two

methods for detecting low-density-lipoprotein heterogeneity compared. Clin Chem.

1991;37(6):853-858.

11. Roheim PS, Asztalos BF. Clinical significance of lipoprotein size and risk for coronary

atherosclerosis. Clin Chem. 1995;41(1):147-152.

12. Swinkels DW, Demacker PN, Hendriks JC, van ‘t Laar A. Low density lipoprotein

subfractions and relationship to other risk factors for coronary artery disease in

healthy individuals. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9(5):604-613.

13. Tan CE, Chew LS, Chio LF, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and LDL subfraction

profile in Type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects with good glycaemic control. Diabetes Res

Clin Pract. 2001;51(2):107-114.

14. Lamarche B, Tchernof A, Mauriège P, et al. Fasting insulin and apolipoprotein B levels

and low-density lipoprotein particle size as risk factors for ischemic heart disease.

JAMA. 1998;279(24):1955-1961.

15. St-Pierre AC, Ruel IL, Cantin B, et al. Comparison of various electrophoretic characteristics

of LDL particles and their relationship to the risk of ischemic heart disease.

Circulation. 2001;104(19):2295-2299.

16. Mora S, Szklo M, Otvos JD, et al. LDL particle subclasses, LDL particle size, and

carotid atherosclerosis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Atherosclerosis. 2007;192(1):211-217.

17. Singh IM, Shishehbor MH, Ansell BJ. High-density lipoprotein as a therapeutic target:

a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(7):786-798.

18. Lewis GF. Determinants of plasma HDL concentrations and reverse cholesterol

transport. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21(4):345-352.

19. Kontush A, de Faria EC, Chantepie S, Chapman MJ. A normotriglyceridemic, low

HDL-cholesterol phenotype is characterised by elevated oxidative stress and HDL

particles with attenuated antioxidative activity. Atherosclerosis. 2005;182(2):277-285.

20. Nobécourt E, Jacqueminet S, Hansel B, et al. Defective antioxidative activity of small

dense HDL3 particles in type 2 diabetes: relationship to elevated oxidative stress and

hyperglycaemia. Diabetologia. 2005;48(3):529-538.

21. Dungan KM, Guster T, DeWalt DA, Buse JB. A comparison of lipid and lipoprotein

measurements in the fasting and nonfasting states in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(11):2689-2695.

22. El Harchaoui K, van der Steeg WA, Stroes ES, et al. Value of low-density lipoprotein

particle number and size as predictors of coronary artery disease in apparently

healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. J Am Coll

Cardiol. 2007;49(5):547-553.

23. Kuller L, Arnold A, Tracy R, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of lipoproteins

and risk of coronary heart disease in the cardiovascular health study.

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(7):1175-1180.

24. Olofsson SO, Wiklund O, Borén J. Apolipoproteins A-I and B: biosynthesis, role in

the development of atherosclerosis and targets for intervention against cardiovascular

disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(4):491-502.

25. Walldius G, Jungner I. Is there a better marker of cardiovascular risk than LDL cholesterol?

Apolipoproteins B and A-I—new risk factors and targets for therapy. Nutr

Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;17(8):565-571.

26. Anand SS, Islam S, Rosengren A, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in

women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J.

2008;29(7):932-940.

27. McQueen MJ, Hawken S, Wang X, et al. Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as

risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a

case-control study. Lancet. 2008;372(9634):224-233.

28. Danesh J, Collins R, Peto R. Lipoprotein(a) and coronary heart disease. Metaanalysis

of prospective studies. Circulation. 2000;102(10):1082-1085.

29. Ariyo AA, Thach C, Tracy R; Cardiovascular Health Study Investigators. Lp(a) lipoprotein,

vascular disease, and mortality in the elderly. N Engl J Med.

2003;349(22):2108-2115.

30. Retterstol L, Eikvar L, Bohn M, Bakken A, Erikssen J, Berg K. C-reactive protein predicts

death in patients with previous premature myocardial infarction—a 10 year

follow-up study. Atherosclerosis. 2002;160(2):433-440.

31. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Mayr M, et al. Oxidized phospholipids, lipoprotein(a), lipoprotein-

associated phospholipase A2 activity, and 10-year cardiovascular outcomes:

prospective results from the Bruneck study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.

2007;27(8):1788-1795.

32. Kolko M, Rodriguez de Turco EB, Diemer NH, Bazan NG. Neuronal damage by

secretory phospholipase A2: modulation by cytosolic phospholipase A2, plateletactivating

factor, and cyclooxygenase-2 in neuronal cells in culture. Neurosci Lett.

2003;338(2):164-168.

33. Robins SJ, Collins D, Nelson JJ, Bloomfield HE, Asztalos BF. Cardiovascular events

with increased lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) and low high-density lipoprotein-

cholesterol: the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial. Arterioscler Thromb

Vasc Biol. 2008;28(6):1172-1178.

34. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in

Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol

Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment

of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA.

2001;285(19):2486-2497.

Other related articles on this Open Access Online Scientific Journal include the following:

Fight against Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Biologics not a Small Molecule – Recombinant Human lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (rhLCAT) attracted AstraZeneca to acquire AlphaCore

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/04/03/fight-against-atherosclerotic-cardiovascular-disease-a-biologics-not-a-small-molecule-recombinant-human-lecithin-cholesterol-acyltransferase-rhlcat-attracted-astrazeneca-to-acquire-alphacore/

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Inhibitor: Potential of Anacetrapib to treat Atherosclerosis and CAD

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/04/07/cholesteryl-ester-transfer-protein-cetp-inhibitor-potential-of-anacetrapib-to-treat-atherosclerosis-and-cad/

Hypertriglyceridemia concurrent Hyperlipidemia: Vertical Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation a Better Test to Prevent Undertreatment of High-Risk Cardiac Patients

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/04/04/hypertriglyceridemia-concurrent-hyperlipidemia-vertical-density-gradient-ultracentrifugation-a-better-test-to-prevent-undertreatment-of-high-risk-cardiac-patients/

High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL): An Independent Predictor of Endothelial Function & Atherosclerosis, A Modulator, An Agonist, A Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/03/31/high-density-lipoprotein-hdl-an-independent-predictor-of-endothelial-function-artherosclerosis-a-modulator-an-agonist-a-biomarker-for-cardiovascular-risk/

 

Read Full Post »

GSK for Personalized Medicine using Cancer Drugs needs Alacris systems biology model to determine the in silico effect of the inhibitor in its “virtual clinical trial”

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

German firm Alacris Theranostics today announced a deal with GlaxoSmithKline for the application of Alacris’ Modcell System for drug stratification.

The technology, which was developed at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics and is licensed exclusively to Alacris, will be used by GSK for early stage cancer drug discovery. GSK will provide Alacris with preclinical biology data from a cancer drug discovery project. Alacris will apply its systems biology model to determine the in silico effect of the inhibitor in its “virtual clinical trial,” and then suggest cancer cell lines, as well as cancers, that may be likely responders to the inhibitor.

The process will be based on whole-genome and transcriptome data integrated in Alacris’ cancer model ModCell.

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Based in Berlin, Alacris develops personalized medicine approaches directed at cancer. Its ModCell approach is based on next-generation sequencing and kinetic pathway information, as well as mutation and drug databases.

SOURCE:

http://www.genomeweb.com//node/1153161?hq_e=el&hq_m=1408239&hq_l=2&hq_v=e1df6f3681

What is the strategy of the Competition

Foundation Medicine, AstraZeneca to ID Genetic Mutations for Cancer Drug Development

November 12, 2012

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Foundation Medicine today announced a deal with AstraZeneca aimed at predicting a patient’s response or resistance to targeted medicines.

The firms are partnering to identify genomic mutations in cancer-related tumor genes that may prove helpful to AstraZeneca in developing new therapies for patients. Foundation Medicine also was granted right of first negotiation for developing potential diagnostic products.

According to Susan Galbraith, vice president and head of the AstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines Unit, the collaboration will allow the drug firm to “identify tumor-specific defects and alterations that can be used for patient segmentation.”

Financial and other terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

“We are helping companies like AstraZeneca achieve deeper insight into their programs and trials with our unique cancer expertise and our ability to provide genomic information that can impact clinical treatment decisions,” Michael Pellini, president and CEO of Foundation Medicine, said in a statement. “Together, we expect to enable a more individualized, targeted approach to cancer drug development and clinical trials.”

The partnership is the most recent in a string of deals that Cambridge, Mass.-based Foundation Medicine has forged in recent months with drug firms. It follows a collaboration with Eisai last month, Clovis Oncologyin August, and Novartis in June.

SOURCE:

 

Life Tech to Partner with Bristol-Myers Squibb for CDx Development

September 17, 2012
 

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Life Technologies said today that it would collaborate with Bristol-Myers Squibb to develop companion diagnostics. Initially, the companies will partner on an oncology project with the option to expand collaborative efforts across a range of disease areas.

Life Tech will utilize a variety of its technology platforms including both next-generation and Sanger sequencing instruments, qPCR, flow cytometry, and immuno-histochemistry.

“The pharmaceutical industry is increasingly turning its focus to discovering and delivering targeted, personalized medications,” Life Tech’s President of Medical Sciences, Ronnie Andrews, said in a statement. “As more and more targeted drugs come onto the market in the next decade, there will be a growing need for diagnostics that can help predict which patients will benefit from which drugs.”

The agreement is part of Life Tech’s strategy to expand and develop its diagnostic business through both internal development and also partnerships and acquisitions.

Internally, the company has said that it plans to build out its medical sciences business across multiple technologies and develop assays across five disease areas: oncology, inherited disease, neurological disorders, transplant diagnostics, and infectious diseases.

In addition, in July it acquired direct-to-consumer genomic testing company Navigenics, which gave Life Tech access to its CLIA certified laboratory.

SOURCE:

http://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/life-tech-partner-bristol-myers-squibb-cdx-development

Life Tech, Boston Children’s Hospital to Develop Sequencing Workflows on Ion Proton in CLIA Lab

June 20, 2012
 

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Life Technologies said today that it will collaborate with Boston Children’s Hospital to develop next-generation sequencing workflows in a CLIA and CAP certified laboratory.

As part of the collaboration, the hospital plans to purchase Life Tech’s Ion Proton, a benchtop, semiconductor sequencing machine.

David Margulies, director of the Gene Partnership Program at Boston Children’s Hospital, said in statement that the deal is an “important first step toward providing informed, personalized care for patients whose conditions are difficult to treat.”

The deal is Life Tech’s second announced this week to develop sequencing protocols for the Ion Proton in collaboration with a children’s hospital. Earlier this week, it said it would work with the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, which has launched a new Centre for Genetic Medicine and plans to install four Proton machines.

Paul Billings, Life Tech’s chief medical officer, commented in a statement that these kinds of partnerships are “essential to our medical sciences strategy as we seek to assist researchers in discovering improved diagnostics and treatments for genetic conditions.”

In a separate announcement today, Life Tech said that it is collaborating with the University of North Texas Health Science Center’s Institute of Applied Genetics to use the firm’s Ion Personal Genome Machine system to further the center’s forensic DNA research. Life Tech said that it will collaborate with the center to train forensic analysts in applying next-gen sequencing to their research.

Foundation Medicine, Novartis Ink New Deal for Clinical Oncology Programs

June 07, 2012
 

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Foundation Medicine today said it and Novartis have reached a new agreement to use Foundation’s clinical grade, next-generation sequencing to support the drug firm’s clinical oncology programs.

The three-year agreement builds on a 2011 deal between the firms and calls for the use of Foundation Medicine’s molecular information platform across many of Novartis’ Phase 1 and Phase 2 oncology clinical programs. The initial collaboration generated “very interesting” data, and this type of tumor genomic profiling has become an important part of Novartis’ clinical trials, Foundation Medicine said.

Foundation Medicine’s sequencing capabilities allow for the rapid analysis of hundreds of cancer-related genes from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples, and earlier this year its laboratory in Cambridge, Mass., gained Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments certification. Novartis plans to use the technology to align clinical trial enrollment and outcome analysis with the genomic profile of patient tumors, accelerating the development of Novartis’ portfolio of targeted cancer therapeutics and expanding treatment options for patients.

Foundation Medicine added that it may develop additional diagnostic products from the partnership.

“The comprehensive molecular assessment of Novartis’ Oncology clinical trial samples is expected to help to bring potentially lifesaving therapies to the right patients more quickly, and we expect that the wealth of molecular information will help fundamentally improve the way cancer is understood and treated,” Michael Pellini, president and CEO of Foundation Medicine, said in a statement.

Financial and other terms of the deal were not disclosed.

SOURCE:

 

Carestream Teams with Beatson Institute on Molecular Imaging Efforts

May 14, 2012
NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Carestream Molecular Imaging announced today that it will collaborate with the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research on preclinical imaging approaches in oncology.

The partners will use Carestream’s Alibri trimodal imaging system, which combines PET, SPECT, and CT modalities in one platform. The system is being used by the Beatson Institute in its research into cancer cell behavior, as well as the development of new therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic tools.

The Beatson Institute, which is a core-funded institute of Cancer Research UK and is based in Glasgow, Scotland, said the Carestream technology would be used by its own researchers, as well as its close collaborators including the West of Scotland Cancer Center.

“The combination of PET, SPECT, and CT technologies in one instrument provides investigators at our institutions the flexibility to support research programs across many areas of cancer research such as biomarker, theranostics, and drug development,” Kurt Anderson, research professor and director of the Beatson Advanced Imaging Resource, said in a statement.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-gamma) Receptors Activation: PPARγ transrepression for Angiogenesis in Cardiovascular Disease and PPARγ transactivation for Treatment of Diabetes

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-gamma) Receptors Activation: PPARγ transrepression  for Angiogenesis in Cardiovascular Disease and PPARγ transactivation for Treatment of Diabetes

 

UPDATED on 11/27/2018

A new combination drug therapy for CVD patients with co-morbidity of DM2 is presented in the following article, representing different mechanism of actions, pathways and a novel treatment proposed in 2018:

Cardiovascular (CV) Disease and Diabetes: New ACC Guidelines for use of two major new classes of diabetes drugs — sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for reduction of adverse outcomes

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2018/11/27/cardiovascular-cv-disease-and-diabetes-new-acc-guidelines-for-use-of-two-major-new-classes-of-diabetes-drugs-sodium-glucose-cotransporter-type-2-sglt2-inhibitors-and-glucagon-like/

The title of this article

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-gamma) Receptors Activation: PPARγ transrepression  for Angiogenesis in Cardiovascular Disease and PPARγ transactivation for Treatment of Diabetes

represents an explanation for pathways and mechanism of actions of combination drug therapy novel in its conceptualization in 2013.

 

 

The research is presented in the following three parts. References for each part are at the end.

 

PART I:             Genetics and Biochemistry of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

PART II:             Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as stimulants of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease and diabetes

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

PART III:            PPAR-gamma Role in Activation of eNOS: The Cardiovascular Benefit

Author and Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

PART I:

Genetics and Biochemistry of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

PPAR -alpha and -gamma pathways

In the field of molecular biology, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of nuclear receptor proteins that function as transcription factors regulating the expression of genes.[1] PPARs play essential roles in the regulation of cellular differentiation, development, and metabolism (carbohydrate, lipid, protein), and tumorigenesis[2] of higher organisms.[3][4]

Three types of PPARs have been identified: alpha, gamma, and delta (beta):[3]

Physiological function

All PPARs heterodimerize with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and bind to specific regions on the DNA of target genes. These DNA sequences are termed PPREs (peroxisome proliferator hormone response elements). The DNA consensus sequence is AGGTCANAGGTCA, with N being a random nucleotide. In general, this sequence occurs in the promotor region of a gene, and, when the PPAR binds its ligand, transcription of target genes is increased or decreased, depending on the gene. The RXR also forms a heterodimer with a number of other receptors (e.g., vitamin D and thyroid hormone).

The function of PPARs is modified by the precise shape of their ligand-binding domain (see below) induced by ligand binding and by a number of coactivator and corepressor proteins, the presence of which can stimulate or inhibit receptor function, respectively.[9]

Endogenous ligands for the PPARs include free fatty acids and eicosanoids. PPARγ is activated by PGJ2 (a prostaglandin). In contrast, PPARα is activated by leukotriene B4. PPARγ activation by agonist RS5444 may inhibit anaplastic thyroid cancer growth.[10]

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Genetics

The three main forms are transcribed from different genes:

  •                PPARα – chromosome 22q12-13.1 (OMIM 170998)
  •                PPARβ/δ – chromosome 6p21.2-21.1 (OMIM 600409)
  •                PPARγ – chromosome 3p25 (OMIM 601487).

Hereditary disorders of all PPARs have been described, generally leading to a loss in function and concomitant lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, and/or acanthosis nigricans.[11] Of PPARγ, a gain-of-function mutation has been described and studied (Pro12Ala) which decreased the risk of insulin resistance; it is quite prevalent (allele frequency 0.03 – 0.12 in some populations).[12] In contrast, pro115gln is associated with obesity. Some other polymorphisms have high incidence in populations with elevated body mass indexes.

SOURCE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peroxisome_proliferator-activated_receptor

 

Mechanism of action

Thiazolidinediones or TZDs act by activating PPARs (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors), a group of nuclear receptors with greatest specificity for PPARγ (gamma). The endogenous ligands for these receptors are free fatty acids (FFAs) and eicosanoids. When activated, the receptor binds to DNA in complex with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), another nuclear receptor, increasing transcription of a number of specific genes and decreasing transcription of others.

PPARγ transactivation

Thiazolidinedione ligand dependent transactivation is responsible for the majority of anti-diabetic effects.

The activated PPAR/RXR dimer binds to peroxisome proliferator hormone response elements upstream of target genes in complex with a number of coactivators such as nuclear receptor coactivator 1 and CREB binding protein, this causes upregulation of genes (for a full list see PPARγ:

TZDs also increase the synthesis of certain proteins involved in fat and glucose metabolism, which reduces levels of certain types of lipids, and circulating free fatty acids. TZDs generally decrease triglycerides and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Although the increase in LDL-C may be more focused on the larger LDL particles, which may be less atherogenic, the clinical significance of this is currently unknown. Nonetheless, rosiglitazone, a certain glitazone, was suspended from allowed use by medical authorities in Europe, as it has been linked to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.[3]

PPARγ transrepression

Thiazolidinedione ligand dependent transrepression mediates the majority of anti-inflammatory effects.

Binding of PPARγ to coactivators appears to reduce the levels of coactivators available for binding to pro-inflammatory transcription factors such as NF-κB, this causes a decrease in transcription of a number of pro inflammatory genes, including various interleukins and tumour necrosis factors.

SOURCE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiazolidinedione

 1. Waki H, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T (February 2010). “[Regulation of differentiation and hypertrophy of adipocytes and adipokine network by PPARgamma]” (in Japanese). Nippon Rinsho 68 (2): 210–6. PMID 20158086.

2. Panigrahy D, Singer S, Shen LQ, et al. (2002). “PPARγ ligands inhibit primary tumor growth and metastasis by inhibiting angiogenesis”. J. Clin. Invest. 110 (7): 923–32. doi:10.1172/JCI15634. PMC 151148. PMID 12370270.

3. NHS: Avandia diabetes drug suspended, Friday 24th September 2010

 

Members of the class

The chemical structure of thiazolidinedione

Chemically, the members of this class are derivatives of the parent compound thiazolidinedione, and include:

  •                Rosiglitazone (Avandia), which was put under selling restrictions in the US and withdrawn from the market in            Europe due to an increased risk of cardiovascular events.
  •                Pioglitazone (Actos), France and Germany have suspended the sale of the diabetes drug Actos after a study suggested the drug, also known as pioglitazone, could raise the risk of bladder cancer.[4]
  •                Troglitazone (Rezulin), which was withdrawn from the market due to an increased incidence of drug-induced hepatitis.

Experimental agents include netoglitazone, an antidiabetic agent, rivoglitazone, and the early non-marketed thiazolidinedione ciglitazone.

Replacing one oxygen atom in a thiazolidinedione with an atom of sulfur gives a rhodanine.

SOURCE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiazolidinedione

PART II:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as Stimulants of Angiogenesis in Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes

In 2009 in Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes a seminal paper was published on the topic by  Desouza, Rentschler and Fonseca. (2009). This work constitutes Part II. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048019/

Mechanisms by which PPARs may stimulate angiogenesis

PPARs seem to have a protective role in ischemic tissues, including brain, cardiac and skin. A part of this may be by stimulating angiogenesis and improving blood supply. Hypoxia is a trigger for the development of angiogenesis. One of the key mediators in hypoxia-induced angiogenesis is hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1), which is induced in hypoxic cells and binds to hypoxia response element (HRE). HIF-1 mediates the transcriptional activation of several genes that promote angiogenesis, including VEGF, angiopoeitin (Ang-1, Ang-2), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-9).55 15-deoxy-delta(12, 14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)), a PPAR-γ agonist, has been shown to induce HIF-1 expression and thereby angiogenesis (Figure 1).34 However pioglitazone has been shown to suppress the induction of HIF-1.56 Conditions that influence the stimulation or suppression of HIF activation by PPAR-γ are largely unknown.

Several studies suggest that eNOS synthase activation is required for angiogenesis that may be protective under certain conditions.5759 In one study pioglitazone reduced the myocardial infarct size in part via activation of eNOS.60 PPAR-α activation has also been shown to protect the type 2 diabetic rat myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury via the activation of the NO pathway (Table 1, Figure 1).61 However, stimulation of the inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) pathway can lead to undesirable angiogenesis that may be contribute to pathological states such as proliferative retinopathy. PPARs in fact have been shown to suppress iNOS expression, thereby suppressing undesirable angiogenesis.62,63 Here again the factors that allow for activation of eNOS and suppression of iNOS is largely unknown.

The most studied pathway by which PPARs may stimulate angiogenesis is the VEGF pathway. VEGF can stimulate angiogenesis via stimulation of the ERK1/2 pathway. PPAR-β/δ activation has been shown to increase VEGF expression and thereby stimulate angiogenesis (Figure 1).26 In some studies PPAR-α and PPAR-γ have also been shown to increase VEGF expression.47,48 However the majority of studies still show that PPAR activation suppresses VEGF expression. The end result of whether PPAR activation suppresses or stimulates VEGF expression seems to lie in the pathological condition in which its actions are observed (Figure 1). It is likely that PPAR activation results in increased VEGF expression in conditions where new blood vessel formation is required, such as ischemic skin flaps, brain, or cardiac tissue ischemia. On the other hand, pathological angiogenesis such as in the eye or within an atherosclerotic plaque is suppressed by PPAR activation via a suppression of VEGF (Figure 1).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> Object name is dmso-2-165f1.jpg Object name is dmso-2-165f1.jpg

Mechanisms by which PPARs effect angiogenesis.

Table 1

Effect of PPARs on angiogenesis

Recently some studies indicate that PPARs may increase the expression and activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K/AKT) pathway.61,64 The PI3K/AKT pathway stimulates angiogenesis.59,65 Again the majority of studies show that PPAR activation inhibits PI3K/AKT activation.

It is very likely that a large amount of variation found in different studies is due to the use of agonists and antagonists of the PPAR receptors that exhibit direct PPAR-independent effects. Most study designs do not distinguish between direct effects and indirect effects of various pharmacological agonists/antagonist used. Fibrates and TZDs have both been shown to have direct independent effects on inflammation, proliferation and angiogenesis. Hence it is difficult to conclude that all the pro and antiangiogenic effects seen in various studies are a result of PPAR activation exclusively.

Clinical significance and conclusions

Some compounds such as TZDs and fibrates are routinely used in patients with diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. Other compounds such as partial agonists or dual agonists of PPAR-α and PPAR-γ are in development. The effects of these newer compounds, on angiogenesis and cardiovascular disease are yet to be determined. Current evidence from clinical trials suggest a mixed picture. TZD treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes has been shown to be associated with macular edema. On the other hand, the FIELD study using fenofibrate showed a decrease in the need for laser treatments in patients with diabetic retinopathy. The PROACTIVE study showed that pioglitazone trended to decrease certain cardiovascular endpoints. In some studies, rosiglitazone increased the risk of cardiovascular events. In other studies such as ACCORD and VADT, TZD treatment was not associated with increased cardiovascular event risk. Several factors, including the study design, PPAR receptor affinity, and the PPAR-independent actions of these compounds, possibly play a role in the differences in results seen. The duration of the pathological state and the vasculature of the effected organ likely play a role in whether PPARs prove beneficial or harmful. In conclusion it may be prudent to summarize that at this point the evidence suggests that PPARs can either stimulate or inhibit angiogenesis, depending on the biological context and pathological process.

Clinical Trials: Controversial Research Results

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of nuclear hormone receptors that regulate lipid and glucose metabolism. PPAR-α agonists such as fenofibrate and PPAR-γ agonists such as the thiozolidinediones have been used to treat dyslipidemia and insulin resistance in diabetes. Over the past few years research has discovered the role of PPARs in the regulation of inflammation, proliferation, and angiogenesis. Clinical trials looking at the effect of PPAR agonists on cardiovascular outcomes have produced controversial results. Studies looking at angiogenesis and proliferation in various animal models and cell lines have shown a wide variation in results. This may be due to the differential effects of PPARs on proliferation and angiogenesis in various tissues and pathologic states. This review discusses the role of PPARs in stimulating angiogenesis. It also reviews the settings in which stimulation of angiogenesis may be either beneficial or harmful.

affect inflammation, proliferation, immune function and angiogenesis.3 There are three PPAR isotypes, PPAR-α, PPAR-β/δ, and PPAR-γ. They form heterodimers with the retinoid X receptors and bind to specific DNA sequences, called peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPRE), in the promoter regions of their target genes. PPARs exhibit isotype-specific tissue expression patterns. PPAR-α is primarily expressed in organs with significant fatty acid catabolism. PPAR-β/δ is expressed in nearly all cell types and the level of expression seems to depend on the amount of angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and differentiation occurring in that specific tissue.4 PPAR-γ is found in adipose tissue and at lower levels in immune cells vascular tissue and some organs. PPAR-γ exists in two protein isoforms, PPAR-γ1 and PPAR-γ2, with different lengths of the N-terminal. The PPAR-γ2 isoform is predominantly expressed in adipose tissue, whereas PPAR-γ1 is relatively widely expressed.5 Expression of each isoform is driven by a specific promoter that confers the distinct tissue expression patterns. There are also two other mRNA variants of PPAR-γ, proteins identical to PPAR-γ1: PPAR-γ3, which is restricted to macrophages, adipose tissue, and colon, and PPAR-γ4, the tissue distribution of which is unclear at this time.5 Human PPAR-γ plays a critical physiological role as a central transcriptional regulator of both adipogenic and lipogenic programs. Its transcriptional activity is induced by the binding of endogenous and synthetic lipophilic ligands, which has led to the determination of many roles for PPAR-γ in pathological states such as type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, inflammation, and cancer.

The role of PPARs has traditionally been recognized as antiproliferative and antiangiogenic in a large number of disease states including cancer and cardiovascular disease.4 These studies have led to clinical trials with PPAR agonists to evaluate their benefits in cancer and cardiovascular disease. The results of some of these trials especially in cardiovascular disease have been mixed and hence controversial.

The results obtained with a PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone do suggest a better impact on the lipid profile compared to rosiglitazone (the former lowers triglyceride significantly and has less adverse effects on low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol), and at least a mixed result (the primary composite endpoint was not reduced significantly but myocardial infarction, stroke, and death were reduced by 16%), in an outcome trial – PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROACTIVE).6 Rosiglitazone on the other hand was found to increase cardiovascular events in a large restrospective analysis study.7

This has led to a lot of recent research into PPARs that is contrary to the traditional literature in their role as inhibitors of angiogenesis. This review will examine the role and evidence of PPARs as promoters of angiogenesis, the mechanisms involved, and the implications thereof.

SOURCE:

 Desouza, Rentschler and Fonseca. (2009).

Angiogenesis is described as the formation of new capillaries from the existing vasculature. This process involves the breakdown of the extracellular matrix and formation of an endothelial tube. Angiogenesis is an important physiologic process in the female reproductive cycle, wound healing, and bone formation. Angiogenesis is also a crucial step in several disease states including cancer, diabetic retinopathy, rheumatoid arthritis, stroke, and ischemic coronary artery disease.810 Neoangiogenesis has harmful as well as beneficial effects in the setting of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.10 In the setting of diabetes, there is abnormal regulation and signaling of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor Flk-1.11 This may lead to increased levels of circulating VEGF, resulting in increased permeability of vascular structures throughout the body. In the retina, this results in the formation of protein-rich exudates containing VEGF that induces a local inflammatory response resulting in capillary sprouting. A similar process might take place in the arterial wall, thereby promoting capillary sprouting and plaque destabilization.12 At the same time, the lack of Flk-1 activation in endothelial cells and abnormal VEGF-dependent activation of monocytes impair the arteriogenic response that requires monocyte recruitment, and monocyte and endothelial cell migration and proliferation.11 This could lead to a deficient angiogenic response in ischemic tissue. VEGF/Flk-1 signaling may also be required for bone marrow release of circulating endothelial progenitor cells that play a role in endothelial function and arteriogenesis.13 The abnormal release of endothelial progenitors could further reduce arteriogenic response. This has therapeutic implications in terms of vascularization and survival of skin grafts in patients with diabetes as well as vascularization of the ischemic myocardium. An important mechanism by which PPARs seem to regulate angiogenesis is via VEGF.11,12 It would therefore appear that PPARs have a role in regulating both beneficial and harmful effects of angiogenesis thereby leading to controversial results (Figure 1).

The other factor influencing the results of angiogenesis studies is the use of PPAR agonists that have pleotropic effects. PPAR-α agonists such as fibrates stimulate pathways that do not depend on PPAR-α.14 PPAR-γ agonists such as thiozolidinediones (TZDs) have PPARγ independent actions on proliferative and inflammatory pathways.14 Therefore to conclude that the effects of commonly used PPAR agonists on angiogenesis are specifically due to PPAR activation is at best controversial.15

Although the majority of studies point towards the antiproliferative, antiangiogenic properties of PPAR-α, this may be due to the use of fibrates as agonists in these experiments. A lot more research needs to be done using methods such as spontaneous PPAR-α activation, overexpression, silencing and knockout mice, rather than using chemical agonists and antagonists which might have pleotropic effects unrelated to PPAR-α.

 

PPAR-γ and angiogenesis

PPAR-γ is probably the most studied PPAR, likely due to the use and development of several PPAR-γ agonists such as thiozolidinediones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Endogenous ligands for PPAR-γ include long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and their derivatives, 15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2).4 Other natural ligands include nitrolinoleic acids. 15d-PGJ2 has been found to upregulate the expression of PPAR-γ and also the DNA binding and transcriptional activity.34 Synthetic ligands include TZDs and various nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.35

Studies supporting antiproliferative properties of PPAR-γ

PPAR-γ has widespread effects involving, inflammation, atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes, and cancer.36 PPAR-γ agonists directly inhibit tumor cell growth, induce cell differentiation, and apoptosis in various cancer types (Table 1).37 TZDs have been shown to decrease post angioplasty neointimal hyperplasia in both animals and humans (Table 1).38,39 PPAR-γ ligands have been shown to inhibit and stimulate angiogenesis (Table 1). Inhibition by PPAR-γ ligands can occur through direct effects on the endothelium or through indirect effects on the net balance of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic mediators.37 PPAR-γ expressed in choroidal endothelial cells inhibits the differentiation and proliferation of those cells.38,39 Rosiglitazone inhibited endothelial cell proliferation and migration and decreased VEGF-induced tubule formation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.40,41 In another study PPAR-γ ligands stimulated endothelial cell caspase-mediated apoptosis.42 15d-PGJ2, an endogenous ligand of PPAR-γ, induces growth inhibition, differentiation, and apoptosis of tumor cells.43 PPAR-γ activation interrupts NF-kβ signaling with subsequent blockade of proinflammatory gene expression.43 Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone inhibit the effects of growth factors such as bFGF and VEGF. Endothelial cell migration is also inhibited by both compounds.44 Thus natural and synthetic ligands of PPAR-γ exhibit antiangiogenic properties under certain conditions.

Studies supporting proangiogenic role of PPAR-γ

However, PPAR- ligands have also been shown to stimulate the angiogenic pathway (Table 1). In bovine aortic endothelial cells, prolonged treatment with troglitazone increased VEGF and endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production with no change in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression.45 In cultured rat myofibroblasts, activation of PPAR-γ by troglitazone and 15-dPGJ2 induced VEGF expression and augmented tubule formation.46 In mice treated with rosiglitazone, angiogenesis was stimulated in adipose tissue with increased expression of VEGF and angiopoeitin-4 (Ang-4). Ang-4 stimulated endothelial cell growth and tubule formation. 47 In rats with focal cerebral ischemia, rosiglitazone treatment enhanced neurologic improvement and reduced the infarct size by reducing caspase-3 activity, increasing the number of endothelial cells, and increasing eNOS expression.48 In the setting of diabetes, PPAR-γ agonists may promote revascularization of ischemic tissue. Diabetic mice with induced unilateral hind limb ischemia, when treated with pioglitazone showed normalization of VEGF, upregulation of eNOS activity, and partial restoration of blood flow recovery.49 In mice treated with pioglitazone, VEGR-receptor-2 positive EPCs were upregulated and migratory capacity was increased. In vivo angiogenesis was increased 2-fold.50 In an endothelial/interstitial cell co-culture assay, treatment with PPAR-γ agonists stimulated production of VEGF. In the same study, corneas treated with the same PPAR-γ agonists increased phosphorylation of eNOS.20

Few studies have evaluated angiogenesis in humans. Pioglitazone treatment has been shown to increase serum VEGF, IL-8, and angiogenin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.51 In another study thiozolidinedione use in patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with diabetic macular edema.52

PGC-1α and angiogenesis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1α) is a nuclear transcriptional coactivator that regulates several important metabolic processes, including mitochondrial biogenesis, adaptive thermogenesis, respiration, insulin secretion and gluconeogenesis. 53 PGC-1α also co-activates PPAR-α, PPAR-β/δ, and PPAR-γ which are important transcription factors of genes regulating lipid and glucose metabolism.53 Recently Arany and colleagues have shown that PGC-1α stimulates angiogenesis in ischemic tissues. Using a combination of muscle cell assays and genetically modified mice that over or underexpess PGC-1α, they showed that PGC-1α is a powerful inducer of VEGF expression. PGC-1α did not involve HIF-1 but activated the nuclear receptor, estrogen-related receptor-α (ERR-α).33 PGC-1α−/− mice are viable, suggesting that PGC-1α is not essential in embryonic vascularization but they show a striking failure to reconstitute blood flow in a normal manner to the limb after an ischaemic insult.54 Transgenic expression of PGC-1α in skeletal muscle is protective against ischemic insults. This suggests that PGC-1α plays a more important role in a disease state rather than a physiologically healthy state.

 

PART III: PPAR-gamma Role in Activation of eNOS: The Cardiovascular Benefit

Author and Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Mechanism of Action (MOA) for ElectEagle‘s component 3

Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZDs)

For ElectEagle‘s component 1:

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012 X). Clinical Trials Results for Endothelin System: Pathophysiological role in Chronic Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndromes and MI – Marker of Disease Severity or Genetic Determination?

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/19/clinical-trials-results-for-endothelin-system-pathophysiological-role-in-chronic-heart-failure-acute-coronary-syndromes-and-mi-marker-of-disease-severity-or-genetic-determination/

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012W). Endothelin Receptors in Cardiovascular Diseases: The Role of eNOS Stimulation

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/endothelin-receptors-in-cardiovascular-diseases-the-role-of-enos-stimulation/

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012V). Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB, Induction of NO production, stimulation of eNOS and Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD): cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction – A Bibliography

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/inhibition-of-et-1-eta-and-eta-etb-induction-of-no-production-and-stimulation-of-enos-and-treatment-regime-with-ppar-gamma-agonists-tzd-cepcs-endogenous-augmentation-for-cardiovascular-risk-reduc/

For ElectEagle‘s component 2:

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012L).. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/19/cardiovascular-disease-cvd-and-the-role-of-agent-alternatives-in-endothelial-nitric-oxide-synthase-enos-activation-and-nitric-oxide-production/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012i). Bystolic’s generic Nebivolol – positive effect on circulating Endothelial Proginetor Cells endogenous augmentation

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/16/bystolics-generic-nebivolol-positive-effect-on-circulating-endothilial-progrnetor-cells-endogenous-augmentation/

Three indications for PPAR-gamma agonist (TZD): Experimental agents include netoglitazone, an antidiabetic agent, rivoglitazone, and the early non-marketed thiazolidinedione ciglitazone

  •                Antisclerosis, angiogenic progenitor cell differentiation and endogenous augmentation of cEPCs
  •                Stimulation of eNOS
  •                Decrease insulin resistance

Classic indication: action to decrease insulin resistance. PPAR-gamma receptors are complex and modulate the expression of the genes involved in lipid and glucose metabolism, insulin signal transduction and adipocyte and other tissue differentiation. TZDs have significant effects on vascular endothilium, the immune system, the ovaries, and tumor cells. Some of these responses may be independent of the PPAR-gamma pathway (Nolte and Karam, 2004). TZDs are ligands of PPAR-gamma receptors part of the steroid (estrogen receptor ligands) and thyroid superfamily of nuclear receptors found in muscle, liver and adipocytes. In the gold standard of all pharmacology books, the cardinal indication for TZDs is action to decrease insulin resistance (Nolte and Karam, 2004 in Katzung). However, the recent research has proposed two new indications for Rosiglitazone in addition to the original insulin sensitivity reduction indication.

As implied in Part I of the ElectEagle Project, TDZs were selected for a new indication in the domain of modulation of atherosclerosis (Verma and Szmitko, 2006), (Li et al., 2004)and facilitation of the differentiation of angiogenic progenitor cells, inhibition of vascular smooth muscle, proliferation and migration to improve endothelial function (Wang et al., 2004).

The following three seminal papers on the function of TDZs in modulation of vascular disease served as an inspiration for our extension of their new indication for TDZs in the anti-atherosclerosis domain into the cEPCs endogenous augmentation proposed treatment area.

Verma S, Szmitko, PE, (2006). The vascular biology of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Modulation of atherosclerosis. Can J Cardiol, 22 (Suppl B):12B-17B.

Wang C-H, Ciliberti N, Li S-H, Szmitko PE, Weisel RD, Fedak PWM, Al-Omran M, Cherng W-J, Li R-K, Stanford WL, Verma S., (2004). Rosiglitazone facilitates angiogenic progenitor cell differentiation toward endothelial lineage: a new paradigm in glitazone pleiotropy. Circulation, 109:1392-1400.

Li AC, Binder CJ, Gutierrez A, Brown KK, Plotkin CR, Pattison JW, Valledor AF, Davis RA, Wilson TM, Wizttum JL, Palinski W, Glass CK., (2004). Differential inhibition of macrophage foam-cell formation and atherosclerosis in mice by PPAR alpha, beta/delta, and gamma. J. Clin. Invest., 114:1564-1576.

Namely, in the ElectEagleProject, a finely tuned interpretation is provided. We assume that TZDs may have a potential therapeutic effect on augmentation of cEPCs in a significant way should a combination drug therapy be designed to include Rosiglitazoneand two other drugsonewhich inhibits receptors ETA and ETA-ETB and the other which induces eNOS. TDZs were selected for a new indication related to anti-atherosclerosis, however, we extend and emphasize TZDs function in cell differentiation and cell migration of EPCs following encouraging results by Wang et al., (2004). Thus, we are shifting the indication from atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular disease to cardiovascular and CAD.

In 2005 a new indication for TZDs emerged from new finding about the PPAR-gamma receptors function in cell nitric oxide (NO) release without increasing the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (Polikandriotis et al., 2005). This is an important finding for the drug combination components selected for ElectEagleProject. This subject is covered in the following section, Role of PPAR-gamma in eNOS stimulation.

Mechanism of action (MOA) for ElectEagle‘s components 2 & 3

Role of PPAR-gamma in eNOS stimulation

Polikandriotis et al. (2005), recently reported that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) ligands 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) and ciglitazone increased cultured endothelial cell nitric oxide (NO) release without increasing the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Their study was designed to characterize further the molecular mechanisms underlying PPARgamma-ligand-stimulated increases in endothelial cell NO production.

Their methods and Results: Treating human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) with PPARgamma ligands (10 micromol/L 15d-PGJ2, ciglitazone, or rosiglitazone) for 24 hours increased NOS activity and NO release. In selected studies, HUVEC were treated with PPARgamma ligands and with the PPARgamma antagonist GW9662 (2 micromol/L), which fully inhibited stimulation of a luciferase reporter gene, or with small interfering RNA to PPARgamma, which reduced HUVEC PPARgamma expression. Treatment with either small interfering RNA to PPARgamma or GW9662 inhibited 15d-PGJ2-, ciglitazone-, and rosiglitazone-induced increases in endothelial cell NO release. Rosiglitazone and 15d-PGJ2, but not ciglitazone, increased heat shock protein 90-eNOS interaction and eNOS ser1177 phosphorylation. The heat shock protein 90 inhibitor geldanamycin attenuated 15d-PGJ2- and rosiglitazone-stimulated NOS activity and NO production. Their Conclusion: These findings further clarify mechanisms involved in PPARgamma-stimulated endothelial cell NO release and emphasize that individual ligands exert their effects through distinct PPARgamma-dependent mechanisms

Originally, Rosiglitazone was indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are already treated with combination rosiglitazone and metformin or who are not adequately controlled on metformin alone. As a result of the FDA drug recall of Rosiglitazone, we suggest here several alternatives: Experimental agents include netoglitazone, an antidiabetic agent, rivoglitazone, and the early non-marketed thiazolidinedione ciglitazone

In the ElectEagle project, Rosiglitazone was identified for a new indication – as a PPAR-gamma agonist implicated with efficacy for endogenous augmentation of cEPCs which serves as a biomarker for CVD risk reduction — an extension of the anti-atherosclerosis indication or the confinement to perileral vascular endothelium (Verma & Szmitko), (Wang et al., 2004), (Li et al., 2004).

Polikandriotis et al. (2005) is a very import publication for ElectEagle project for the following critical five reasons:

  •                Polikandriotis et al. (2005) clarify the mechanism of action of PPAR-gamma agonists at the protein level in a set of novel experiments, thus contributes to the understanding of the physiological process of the mechanism of action of PPAReceptor-gamma and its relations to L-arginine: NO pathway and its impact in many areas of research, notably vascular biology.
  •                Polikandriotis et al. (2005) compare two PPAR-gamma agonist agents and confirm Rosiglitazone to be the more potent among the two for the experiments described above
  •                Polikandriotis et al. (2005) identify Rosiglitazone capability to stimulate endothelial cell NO release, which is a third indication for Rosiglitazone.
  •                The combination drug therapy selected in May 2006, for the ElectEagle project involved three drugs. Two of which where a PPAR-gamma agonist, specifically, Rosiglitazone. The other drug was an eNOS agonist to stimulate NO production and reuptake. By identifying Rosiglitazone capability to stimulate endothelial cell NO release, Polikandriotis et al. (2005) offer reassurance for the selection of Rosiglitazone in the first place, and further more we became aware that it will exert synergies with the drug chosen as an eNOS agonist.
  •                In the ElectEagle project, a new experiment is called for following Polikandriotis et al. (2005) findings on Rosiglitazone impact on NO release. It will be needed to measure the incremental induction of NO release resulting from a combination therapy which includes an eNOS agonist and a PPAR-gamma agonist implicated in 2005 with stimulant effects on the release NO.

Moncada & Higgs, (2006) explain that the low concentrations of NO generated by eNOS protect against atherosclerosis by promoting vasodilatation, inhibiting leucocyte and platelet adhesion and/or aggregation and smooth muscle cell proliferation. However, higher concentrations of NO generated by iNOS promote atherosclerosis, either directly or via the formation of NO adducts, such as peroxynitrite. Such a paradox in the action of NO was apparent from their experiments some years ago, in which they found that the acute vascular injury in the ileum and colon following administration of lipopolysaccharide is aggravated by early treatment with a NO synthase inhibitor, whereas delayed administration of such a compound provides protection against the damage to the intestinal vasculature (Laszlo et al., 1994). A prominent example of this comes from experiments in Apo-Emutant mice in which the concomitant knocking out of eNOS leads to an increase in atherosclerosis, while the knocking out of iNOS reduces atherosclerosis (Moncada, 2005).

Research Goals in characterization of ElectEagle Version I

 

Provided rationale for agent selection for

ElectEagle Version I – Component 3: Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD)

agent selection: Rosiglitazone

As a result of the FDA drug recall of Rosiglitazone, we suggest here several alternatives: Experimental agents include netoglitazone, an antidiabetic agentrivoglitazone, and the early non-marketed thiazolidinedione ciglitazone

 

Retionale:            See discussion on TZDs MOA, above

a-priori postulates presented in Part I for Component 3: PPAR-gamma

  • dose concentration dependence on PPAReceptor-gamma – confirmed by a study for Rosiglitazone and a study for Ciglitazone
PPAReceptor-gamma agonists time concentration dependence manner dose concentration dependencemanner time and dose dose 
Rosiglitazone Polikandriotis et al., (2005) maximum recommended daily dose of 8 mg to 2,000 mg.
Ciglitazone   Polikandriotis et al., (2005)

 

Proposed integration plan for ElectEagle’s Version I with CVD patients current medication regimen for selective medical diagnoses

Blood Pressure Medicine:

Beta blockers, Verapamil (Calan), Reserpine (Hydropes), Clonidine (Catapres), Methyldopa (Aldomet)

Diuretics:

Thiazides, Spironolactone (Aldactone), Hydralazine

Antidepressants:

Prozac, Lithium, MOA’s, Tricyclics

Stomach Medicine:

Tagamet and Zantac, plus other compounds containing Cimetidine and Ranitidine or associated compounds in Anticholesterol Drugs

Antipsychotics:

Chlorpromazine (Thorazine), Pimozide (Orap), Thiothixine (Navane), Thiordazine (Mellaril), Sulpiride, Haloperidol (haldol), Fluphenazine (Modecate, Prolixin)

Heart Medicine:

Clofibrate (Atromid), Gemfibrozil, Diagoxin

Hormones:

Estrogen, Progesterone, Proscar, Casodex, Eulexin, Corticosteroids Gonadotropin releasing antagonists: Zoladex and Lupron

Cytotoxic agents:

Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Roferon Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories

Others-

Alprazolam, Amoxapine, Chlordiazepoxide, Sertraline, Paroxetine, Clomipramine, Fluvoxamine, Fluoxetine, Imipramine, Doxepine, Desipramine, Clorprothixine, Bethanidine, Naproxen, Nortriptyline, Thioridazine, Tranylcypromine, Venlafaxine, Citalopram.

INTERACTIONS for Nebivolol – Component 2

Calcium Antagonists:

Caution should be exercised when administering beta-blockers with calcium antagonists of the verapamil or diltiazem type because of their negative effect on contractility and atrio-ventricular conduction. Exaggeration of these effects can occur particularly in patients with impaired ventricular function and/or SA or AV conduction abnormalities. Neither medicine should therefore be administered intravenously within 48 hours of discontinuing the other.

Anti-arrhythmics:

Caution should be exercised when administering beta-blockers with Class I anti-arrhythmic drugs and amiodarone as their effect on atrial conduction time and their negative inotropic effect may be potentiated. Such interactions can have life threatening consequences.

Clonidine:

Beta-blockers increase the risk of rebound hypertension after sudden withdrawal of chronic clonidine treatment.

Digitalis:

Digitalis glycosides associated with beta-blockers may increase atrio-ventricular conduction times. Nebivolol does not influence the kinetics of digoxin & clinical trials have not shown any evidence of an interaction.

Special note: Digitalisation of patients receiving long term beta-blocker therapy may be necessary if congestive cardiac failure is likely to develop. The combination can be considered despite the potentiation of the negative chronotropic effect of the two medicines. Careful control of dosages and of individual patient’s response (notably pulse rate) is essential in this situation.

Insulin & Oral Antidiabetic drugs:

Glucose levels are unaffected, however symptoms of hypoglycemia may be masked.

Anaesthetics:

Concomitant use of beta-blockers & anaesthetics e.g. ether, cyclopropane & trichloroethylene may attenuate reflex tachycardia & increase the risk of hypotension

Medical Diagnoses Current medication regiment ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETBinhibition eNOS agonistsproduction stimulation of NO PPAR-gamma agonist (TZD) PPAR-gamma agonist (TZD) as eNOS stimulant
CAD patients Beta blockers, ACEI, ARB, CCB, Diagoxin, Coumadin yes yes yes
Endothelial Dysfunction in DM patients with or without Erectile Dysfunction Insulin yes yes yes yes
Atherosclerosis patients: Arteries and or veins AntihypertensiveCoumadin yes yes yes yes
pre-stenting treatment phase Beta blockers, Verapamil (Calan), Reserpine (Hydropes), Clonidine (Catapres), Methyldopa (Aldomet) yes yes yes
post-stenting treatment phase Antiplatelets yes yes
if stent is a Bare Mesh stent (BMS) CoumadinBeta blockers yes yes
if stent is Drug Eluting stent (DES) antibiotics yes
if stent is EPC antibody coated yes yes
post CABG patients CoumadinBeta blockers, Verapamil(Calan), Reserpine (Hydropes), Clonidine (Catapres), Methyldopa (Aldomet) yes yes
CVD patients on blood thinner Coumadin yes yes yes

Conclusions

  •       Most favorable and unexpected to us was finding in the literature new indications for TDZs as stimulators of eNOS, in addition to the new indication for atherosclerosis besides the classic indication in pharmacology books, being in the reduction of insulin resistance. Reassuring our selection of Rosiglitazone. As a result of the FDA recoll, the drug substitute will be an Experimental agents include netoglitazone, an antidiabetic agentrivoglitazone, and the early non-marketed thiazolidinedione ciglitazone 
  •       Most favorable and unexpected to us was finding in the literature new indications for beta blockers as NO stimulant, nebivolol, a case in point, thus, fulfilling two indications in one drug along the direction of the study to identify eNOS agonists.
  •       The following combination of drugs was selected for ElectEagle Version I

Bosentan (Tracleer), Oral: 62.5 mg tablets

Nebivolol, Oral: 5mg once daily

Experimental agents include netoglitazone, an antidiabetic agent, rivoglitazone, and the early non-marketed thiazolidinedione ciglitazone

  •       We confirmed time and dose concentrations postulating apriori in most cases. Additional literature searches will benefit the project for the three drugs selected
  •       We have identified Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB as one of the agent in the drug combination. The entire literature on cEPCs does not implicate Endothelin with impact on eEPCs while it is known that mechanical stress increase its secretion, this type of stress is implicated with hypertension. To leave out ET-1 from the cEPCs function in CVD risk equates to leaving out Thrombin from the coagulation cascade. ElectEagle Version I corrects that ommission.

REFERENCES for PART I:

1. Michalik L, Auwerx J, Berger JP, Chatterjee VK, Glass CK, Gonzalez FJ, Grimaldi PA, Kadowaki T, Lazar MA, O’Rahilly S, Palmer CN, Plutzky J, Reddy JK, Spiegelman BM, Staels B, Wahli W (2006). “International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors”. Pharmacol. Rev. 58 (4): 726–41. doi:10.1124/pr.58.4.5. PMID 17132851.

2. Belfiore A, Genua M, Malaguarnera R (2009). “PPAR-gamma Agonists and Their Effects on IGF-I Receptor Signaling: Implications for Cancer”. PPAR Res 2009: 830501. doi:10.1155/2009/830501. PMC 2709717. PMID 19609453.

3.a b Berger J, Moller DE (2002). “The mechanisms of action of PPARs”. Annu. Rev. Med. 53: 409–35. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104018. PMID 11818483.

4 Feige JN, Gelman L, Michalik L, Desvergne B, Wahli W (2006). “From molecular action to physiological outputs: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are nuclear receptors at the crossroads of key cellular functions”. Prog. Lipid Res. 45 (2): 120–59. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2005.12.002. PMID 16476485.

5 Tyagi S, Gupta P, Saini AS, Kaushal C, Sharma S (October 2011). “The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor: A family of nuclear receptors role in various diseases”. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2 (4): 236–40. doi:10.4103/2231-4040.90879. PMC 3255347. PMID 22247890.

6 Dreyer C, Krey G, Keller H, Givel F, Helftenbein G, Wahli W (1992). “Control of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation pathway by a novel family of nuclear hormone receptors”. Cell 68 (5): 879–87. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90031-7. PMID 1312391.

7 Issemann I, Green S (1990). “Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators”. Nature 347 (6294): 645–50. doi:10.1038/347645a0. PMID 2129546.

8 Schmidt A, Endo N, Rutledge SJ, Vogel R, Shinar D, Rodan GA (1992). “Identification of a new member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily that is activated by a peroxisome proliferator and fatty acids”. Mol. Endocrinol. 6 (10): 1634–41. doi:10.1210/me.6.10.1634. PMID 1333051.

9 Yu S, Reddy JK (2007). “Transcription coactivators for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors”. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1771 (8): 936–51. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.01.008. PMID 17306620.

10 Marlow LA, Reynolds LA, Cleland AS, Cooper SJ, Gumz ML, Kurakata S, Fujiwara K, Zhang Y, Sebo T, Grant C, McIver B, Wadsworth JT, Radisky DC, Smallridge RC, Copland JA (February 2009). “Reactivation of suppressed RhoB is a critical step for the inhibition of anaplastic thyroid cancer growth”. Cancer Res. 69 (4): 1536–44. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3718. PMC 2644344. PMID 19208833.

11 Meirhaeghe A, Amouyel P (2004). “Impact of genetic variation of PPARgamma in humans”. Mol. Genet. Metab. 83 (1-2): 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.08.014. PMID 15464424.

12 Buzzetti R, Petrone A, Ribaudo MC, Alemanno I, Zavarella S, Mein CA, Maiani F, Tiberti C, Baroni MG, Vecci E, Arca M, Leonetti F, Di Mario U (2004). “The common PPAR-gamma2 Pro12Ala variant is associated with greater insulin sensitivity”. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 12 (12): 1050–4. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201283. PMID 15367918.

13 Zoete V, Grosdidier A, Michielin O (2007). “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor structures: ligand specificity, molecular switch and interactions with regulators”. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1771 (8): 915–25. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.01.007. PMID 17317294.

REFERENCES for PART II:

Part II is based on the following:

Cyrus V Desouza, Lindsey Rentschler, and Vivian Fonseca

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as stimulants of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease and diabetes Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2009; 2: 165–172. Published online 2009 September 25 PMCID: PMC3048019

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048019/

1. Wee CC, Hamel MB, Huang A, Davis RB, Mittleman MA, McCarthy EP. Obesity and undiagnosed diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1813–1815. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

2. Westphal SA. Obesity, abdominal obesity, and insulin resistance. Clin Cornerstone. 2008;9:23–31. [PubMed]

3. Calkin AC, Thomas MC. PPAR agonists and cardiovascular disease in diabetes. PPAR Res. 2008;245410

4. Duan SZ, Ivashchenko CY, Usher MG, Mortensen RM. PPAR-gamma in the cardiovascular system. PPAR Res. 2008;745804

5. Knouff C, Auwerx J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma calls for activation in moderation: lessons from genetics and pharmacology. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:899–918. [PubMed]

6. Erdmann E, Dormandy J, Wilcox R, Massi-Benedetti M, Charbonnel B. PROactive 07: pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: results of the PROactive study. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3:355–370. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

7. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–2471. [PubMed]

8. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med. 1995;1:27–31. [PubMed]

9. Carmeliet P, Baes M. Metabolism and therapeutic angiogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2511–2512. [PubMed]

10. Martin A, Komada MR, Sane DC. Abnormal angiogenesis in diabetes mellitus. Med Res Rev. 2003;23:117–145. [PubMed]

11. Simons M. Angiogenesis, arteriogenesis, and diabetes: paradigm reassessed? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:835–837. [PubMed]

12. Qaum T, Xu Q, Joussen AM, et al. VEGF-initiated blood-retinal barrier breakdown in early diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2408–2413. [PubMed]

13. Pitchford SC, Furze RC, Jones CP, Wengner AM, Rankin SM. Differential mobilization of subsets of progenitor cells from the bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:62–72. [PubMed]

14. Jandeleit-Dahm KA, Calkin A, Tikellis C, Thomas M. Direct antiatherosclerotic effects of PPAR agonists. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2009;20:24–29. [PubMed]

15. Pozzi A, Ibanez MR, Gatica AE, et al. Peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-alpha-dependent inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:17685–17695. [PubMed]

16. Grabacka M, Reiss K. Anticancer properties of PPARalpha – effects on cellular metabolism and inflammation. PPAR Res. 2008;930705

17. Scott R, O’Brien R, Fulcher G, et al. Effects of fenofibrate treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in 9,795 individuals with type 2 diabetes and various components of the metabolic syndrome: the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:493–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

18. Kasai T, Miyauchi K, Yokoyama T, Aihara K, Daida H. Efficacy of peroxisome proliferative activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha ligands, fenofibrate, on intimal hyperplasia and constrictive remodeling after coronary angioplasty in porcine models. Atherosclerosis. 2006;188:274–280. [PubMed]

19. Gizard F, Amant C, Barbier O, et al. PPAR alpha inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation underlying intimal hyperplasia by inducing the tumor suppressor p16INK4a. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3228–3238. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

20. Biscetti F, Gaetani E, Flex A, et al. Selective activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha and PPAR gamma induces neoangiogenesis through a vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent mechanism. Diabetes. 2008;57:1394–1404. [PubMed]

21. Biscetti F, Gaetani E, Flex A, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha is crucial for iloprost-induced in vivo angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor upregulation. J Vasc Res. 2009;46:103–108. [PubMed]

22. Fauconnet S, Lascombe I, Chabannes E, et al. Differential regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in bladder cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:23534–23543. [PubMed]

23. Wang N. PPAR-delta in Vascular Pathophysiology. PPAR Res. 2008;164163

24. Berry DC, Noy N. All-trans-retinoic acid represses obesity and insulin resistance by activating both PPAR{beta}/{delta} and RAR. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3286–3296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

25. Stephen RL, Gustafsson MC, Jarvis M, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta stimulates the proliferation of human breast and prostate cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3162–3170. [PubMed]

26. Piqueras L, Reynolds AR, Hodivala-Dilke KM, et al. Activation of PPARbeta/delta induces endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:63–69. [PubMed]

27. Gaudel C, Schwartz C, Giordano C, Abumrad NA, Grimaldi PA. Pharmacological activation of PPARbeta promotes rapid and calcineurin-dependent fiber remodeling and angiogenesis in mouse skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295:E297–E304. [PubMed]

28. Yoshinaga M, Kitamura Y, Chaen T, et al. The simultaneous expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta and cyclooxygenase-2 may enhance angiogenesis and tumor venous invasion in tissues of colorectal cancers. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:1108–1114. [PubMed]

29. He T, Lu T, d’Uscio LV, Lam CF, Lee HC, Katusic ZS. Angiogenic function of prostacyclin biosynthesis in human endothelial progenitor cells. Circ Res. 2008;103:80–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

30. Muller-Brusselbach S, Komhoff M, Rieck M, et al. Deregulation of tumor angiogenesis and blockade of tumor growth in PPARbeta-deficient mice. Embo J. 2007;26:3686–3698. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

31. Muller R, Komhoff M, Peters JM, Muller-Brusselbach S. A Role for PPARbeta/delta in Tumor Stroma and Tumorigenesis. PPAR Res. 2008;534294

32. Wang D, Wang H, Guo Y, et al. Crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta and VEGF stimulates cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:19069–19074. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

33. Hollingshead HE, Killins RL, Borland MG, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta) ligands do not potentiate growth of human cancer cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:2641–2649. [PubMed]

34. Kim EH, Surh YJ. 15-deoxy-Delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2 as a potential endogenous regulator of redox-sensitive transcription factors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72:1516–1528. [PubMed]

35. Lehmann JM, Lenhard JM, Oliver BB, Ringold GM, Kliewer SA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3406–3410. [PubMed]

36. Pershadsingh HA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma: therapeutic target for diseases beyond diabetes: quo vadis? Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2004;13:215–228.

37. Giaginis C, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A, Theocharis S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands: potential pharmacological agents for targeting the angiogenesis signaling cascade in cancer. PPAR Res. 2008;431763

38. Rosmarakis ES, Falagas ME. Effect of thiazolidinedione therapy on restenosis after coronary stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2007;154:144–150. [PubMed]

39. Desouza CV, Gerety M, Hamel FG. Long-term effects of a PPAR-gamma agonist, pioglitazone, on neointimal hyperplasia and endothelial regrowth in insulin resistant rats. Vascul Pharmacol. 2007;46:188–194. [PubMed]

40. Panigrahy D, Singer S, Shen LQ, et al. PPARgamma ligands inhibit primary tumor growth and metastasis by inhibiting angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:923–932. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

41. Sheu WH, Ou HC, Chou FP, Lin TM, Yang CH. Rosiglitazone inhibits endothelial proliferation and angiogenesis. Life Sci. 2006;78:1520–1528. [PubMed]

42. Bishop-Bailey D, Hla T. Endothelial cell apoptosis induced by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) ligand 15-deoxy-Delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:17042–17048. [PubMed]

43. Giri S, Rattan R, Singh AK, Singh I. The 15-deoxy-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits the inflammatory response in primary rat astrocytes via down-regulating multiple steps in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt-NF-kappaB- p300 pathway independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J Immunol. 2004;173:5196–5208. [PubMed]

44. Aljada A, O’Connor L, Fu YY, Mousa SA. PPAR gamma ligands, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, inhibit bFGF- and VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2008;11:361–367. [PubMed]

45. Cho DH, Choi YJ, Jo SA, Jo I. Nitric oxide production and regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation by prolonged treatment with troglitazone: evidence for involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma-dependent and PPARgamma-independent signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2499–2506. [PubMed]

46. Chintalgattu V, Harris GS, Akula SM, Katwa LC. PPAR-gamma agonists induce the expression of VEGF and its receptors in cultured cardiac myofibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;74:140–150. [PubMed]

47. Gealekman O, Burkart A, Chouinard M, Nicoloro SM, Straubhaar J, Corvera S. Enhanced angiogenesis in obesity and in response to PPAR-gamma activators through adipocyte VEGF and ANGPTL4 production. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295:E1056–E1064. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

48. Chu K, Lee ST, Koo JS, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-agonist, rosiglitazone, promotes angiogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2006;1093:208–218. [PubMed]

49. Huang PH, Sata M, Nishimatsu H, Sumi M, Hirata Y, Nagai R. Pioglitazone ameliorates endothelial dysfunction and restores ischemia-induced angiogenesis in diabetic mice. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62:46–52. [PubMed]

50. Gensch C, Clever YP, Werner C, Hanhoun M, Bohm M, Laufs U. The PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone increases neoangiogenesis and prevents apoptosis of endothelial progenitor cells. Atherosclerosis. 2007;192:67–74. [PubMed]

51. Vijay SK, Mishra M, Kumar H, Tripathi K. Effect of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on mediators of endothelial dysfunction, markers of angiogenesis and inflammatory cytokines in type-2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2009;46:27–33. [PubMed]

52. Fong DS, Contreras R. Glitazone use associated with diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:583–586. e1. [PubMed]

53. Finck BN, Kelly DP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) regulatory cascade in cardiac physiology and disease. Circulation. 2007;115:2540–2548. [PubMed]

54. Arany Z, Foo SY, Ma Y, et al. HIF-independent regulation of VEGF and angiogenesis by the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1alpha. Nature. 2008;451:1008–1012. [PubMed]

55. Hickey MM, Simon MC. Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;76:217–257. [PubMed]

56. Lee KS, Kim SR, Park SJ, et al. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma modulates reactive oxygen species generation and activation of nuclear factor-kappaB and hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in allergic airway disease of mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:120–127. [PubMed]

57. Chen J, Cui X, Zacharek A, Roberts C, Chopp M. eNOS mediates TO90317 treatment-induced angiogenesis and functional outcome after stroke in mice. Stroke. 2009;40:2532–2538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

58. Howell K, Costello CM, Sands M, Dooley I, McLoughlin P. L-arginine promotes angiogenesis in the chronically hypoxic lung: a novel mechanism ameliorating pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009;296:L1042–L1050. [PubMed]

59. Namkoong S, Kim CK, Cho YL, et al. Forskolin increases angiogenesis through the coordinated cross-talk of PKA-dependent VEGF expression and Epac-mediated PI3K/Akt/eNOS signaling. Cell Signal. 2009;21:906–915. [PubMed]

60. Yasuda S, Kobayashi H, Iwasa M, et al. Antidiabetic drug pioglitazone protects the heart via activation of PPAR-{gamma} receptors, PI3-kinase, Akt, and eNOS pathway in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;296:H1558–H1565. [PubMed]

61. Bulhak AA, Jung C, Ostenson CG, Lundberg JO, Sjoquist PO, Pernow J. PPAR-alpha activation protects the type 2 diabetic myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury: involvement of the PI3-Kinase/Akt and NO pathway. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;296:H719–H727. [PubMed]

62. Cuzzocrea S, Pisano B, Dugo L, et al. Rosiglitazone, a ligand of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, reduces acute inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;483:79–93. [PubMed]

63. Tao L, Liu HR, Gao E, et al. Antioxidative, antinitrative, and vasculoprotective effects of a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist in hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2003;108:2805–2811. [PubMed]

64. Pedchenko TV, Gonzalez AL, Wang D, DuBois RN, Massion PP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta expression and activation in lung cancer. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;39:689–696. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

65. Ma J, Sawai H, Ochi N, et al. PTEN regulate angiogenesis through PI3K/Akt/VEGF signaling pathway in human pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009 May 13; Epub ahead of print.

66. Panigrahy D, Kaipainen A, Huang S, et al. PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate suppresses tumor growth through direct and indirect angiogenesis inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:985–990. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

67. Minutoli L, Antonuccio P, Polito F, et al. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor beta/delta activation prevents extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation and protects the testis from ischemia and reperfusion injury. J Urol. 2009;181:1913–1921. [PubMed]

68. Lim HJ, Lee S, Park JH, et al. PPAR delta agonist L-165041 inhibits rat vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration via inhibition of cell cycle. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:446–454. [PubMed]

69. Borland MG, Foreman JE, Girroir EE, et al. Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta inhibits cell proliferation in human HaCaT keratinocytes. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:1429–1442. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

70. Piqueras L, Sanz MJ, Perretti M, et al. Activation of PPAR{beta}/{delta} inhibits leukocyte recruitment, cell adhesion molecule expression, and chemokine release. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:115–122. [PubMed]

REFERENCES for PART III:

 

Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB, Induction of NO production, stimulation of eNOS and Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD): cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction – A Bibliography

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/inhibition-of-et-1-eta-and-eta-etb-induction-of-no-production-and-stimulation-of-enos-and-treatment-regime-with-ppar-gamma-agonists-tzd-cepcs-endogenous-augmentation-for-cardiovascular-risk-reduc/

 

Additional References to Studies on PPAR-Gamma

 

Repository on BioInfoBank Library on Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

http://lib.bioinfo.pl/paper:11030710

 

Repository on Science.gov on Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

http://www.science.gov/topicpages/e/exhibits+ppargamma+ligand.html

 

On this Open Access OnLine Scientific Journal, Dr. Lev-Ari’s research on Pharmaco-Therapy of Cardiovascular Diseases includes the following:

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012 X). Clinical Trials Results for Endothelin System: Pathophysiological role in Chronic Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndromes and MI – Marker of Disease Severity or Genetic Determination?

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/19/clinical-trials-results-for-endothelin-system-pathophysiological-role-in-chronic-heart-failure-acute-coronary-syndromes-and-mi-marker-of-disease-severity-or-genetic-determination/

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012W). Endothelin Receptors in Cardiovascular Diseases: The Role of eNOS Stimulation

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/endothelin-receptors-in-cardiovascular-diseases-the-role-of-enos-stimulation/

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012V). Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB, Induction of NO production, stimulation of eNOS and Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD): cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction – A Bibliography

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/04/inhibition-of-et-1-eta-and-eta-etb-induction-of-no-production-and-stimulation-of-enos-and-treatment-regime-with-ppar-gamma-agonists-tzd-cepcs-endogenous-augmentation-for-cardiovascular-risk-reduc/

 

Lev-Ari, A., (2012U). Cardiovascular Outcomes: Function of circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells (cEPCs): Exploring Pharmaco-therapy targeted at Endogenous Augmentation of cEPCs

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/28/cardiovascular-outcomes-function-of-circulating-endothelial-progenitor-cells-cepcs-exploring-pharmaco-therapy-targeted-at-endogenous-augmentation-of-cepcs/

Lev-Ari, A., (2012T). Endothelial Dysfunction, Diminished Availability of cEPCs, Increasing CVD Risk for Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/27/endothelial-dysfunction-diminished-availability-of-cepcs-increasing-cvd-risk-for-macrovascular-disease-therapeutic-potential-of-cepcs/

Lev-Ari, A., (2012S). Vascular Medicine and Biology: CLASSIFICATION OF FAST ACTING THERAPY FOR PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR MACROVASCULAR EVENTS Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/24/vascular-medicine-and-biology-classification-of-fast-acting-therapy-for-patients-at-high-risk-for-macrovascular-events-macrovascular-disease-therapeutic-potential-of-cepcs/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012L).. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/19/cardiovascular-disease-cvd-and-the-role-of-agent-alternatives-in-endothelial-nitric-oxide-synthase-enos-activation-and-nitric-oxide-production/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012a). Resident-cell-based Therapy in Human Ischaemic Heart Disease: Evolution in the PROMISE of Thymosin beta4 for Cardiac Repair

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/04/30/93/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012b). Triple Antihypertensive Combination Therapy Significantly Lowers Blood Pressure in Hard-to-Treat Patients with Hypertension and Diabetes

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/05/29/445/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012h). Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs: Reduction Methods for CV Risk

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/02/macrovascular-disease-therapeutic-potential-of-cepcs-reduction-methods-for-cv-risk/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012j) Mitochondria Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease – Mitochondria: More than just the “powerhouse of the cell”

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/09/mitochondria-more-than-just-the-powerhouse-of-the-cell/

Lev-Ari, A. (2012i). Bystolic’s generic Nebivolol – positive effect on circulating Endothelial Proginetor Cells endogenous augmentation

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/16/bystolics-generic-nebivolol-positive-effect-on-circulating-endothilial-progrnetor-cells-endogenous-augmentation/

 

Electronic versions NOT available for:

Lev-Ari, A. & Abourjaily, P. (2006a) “An Investigation of the Potential of circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells (cEPC) as a Therapeutic Target for Pharmacologic Therapy Design for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.”Part I: Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs – Reduction methods for CV risk. Part II: (2006b) Therapeutic Strategy for cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation: A Concept-based Treatment Protocol for a Combined Three Drug Regimen. Part III: (2006c) Biomarker for Therapeutic Targets of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation using New Combination Drug Therapy of Three Drug Classes and Several Drug Indications. Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115

Lev-Ari, A. (2007) Heart Vasculature Regeneration and Protection of Coronary Artery Endothelium and Smooth Muscle: A Concept-based Pharmacological Therapy of a Combined Three Drug Regimen. Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »