Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘MicroRNA’

Modulating Stem Cells with Unread Genome: microRNAs

Author, Demet Sag, PhD

Life is simple but complicated. Both simple specific sequences and the big picture approach as a system are necessary in applications for a coherent outcome. Thus, providing an engineered whole cell as a system of correction for “Stem Cell Therapy” may resolve unmet health problems.  Only 1% of the genome is read and the remaining 99% is not a junk but useful. The energy is never getting lost and there is a tight conservation economy in living organisms.  As an example microRNAs that are one of the families of untranslated sequences can be utilized for a stem cell therapy for cancer.  Their power lies at transcription control that may direct the cell expression at exact time, and place for diagnosing, imaging and treatment.  The development of cell biology and understanding of genetic data from model organisms will assist to design a well-working mechanism.

In 1964, after their elegant experiment Till et. al demonstrated that special stimulating factors caused the differentiation and made new colonies. They suggested that “…since stem cells are responsible for continued cell production, it would appear probable that such stem cells are the sites of action for control mechanisms.”  They also pointed out simply that some cells do continue to be stem cells and some do loose the plasticity as they differentiate. Regardless of the two major unescapable events, “the birth” and “the death”, even though can be less predictable than the other, life must go on.  This nature brought an attention to regenerate the cells for our need.

One of the main issues in stem cell biology is figuring out how to re-activate once upon a time fast dividing cells, while the rest of the cells were not even active. The short answer is escaping the control gates with the precise keys without creating any immune responses or toxicity. The easiest and safest method is to re-write instructions of the cells for making a function based on comparative system biology and development. These retrained, resensitized and reprogrammed cells make possible changes to produce right amount of protein(s) on time and its place.

Functional genomics approach to a system within conserved life mechanisms of organisms (C elegans, D. melanogaster, A. nidulans, S. cerevisiae and M. musculus) is necessary for sound principles development.

The first resolution comes from the worm, C. elegans.  The early founding fathers of these special 20-22 bp untranslated specific sequences that control time in development and possible mRNA regulation are called microRNAs. This significant signature sequences and biomarkers control gene regulation for a proper protein expression even though these whistles and bells are not even expressed. Since they are included in 99% of the genome, they must have a voice in the system.  These miRNAs are shown first time in C.elegans were lin4 and let7.  When they were mutated, the cells went onto extra cell proliferation like it would in cancer. Later, in many metazoans it was discovered and shown that these special RNAs negatively regulate specific gene expression during important developmental stages of life such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and stress response.  For example the famous Drosha and Dicer, members of the RNA H III family, is acting sequentially in Drosophila bind to un-translated region of mRNA that either preventing the expression of the protein or causing to be degraded by RISC (He and Hannon 2004).

Dicer is important in biogenesis of miRNA pathway and Drosophila ovary is a great tool to study embryonic stem cells.   Analysis of Dicer-1 (dcr-1) germline mutants showed that these mutants have fewer cysts because at G1/S checkpoint the activity of Decapo, a cyclin kinase inhibitor, depends on Dicer-1.  As a result, cell division mechanisms require functional miRNA. In addition, these miRNAs also make the cells “insensitive” to the environmental influences. The new epigenetic studies  include their function for oncology RD to increase efficacy and survival rate of the treatment along with personalized genomic data.

The new technologies screening of the genome or doing chromosome walk became less labor intense and more informative like miccroarray technology, faster sequencing. Lu’s group designed a microarray analysis on comparative differential expression of miRNAs between healthy and tumor in human.  Their data show that there is a difference between these populations besides having specific loci for miRNAs in the genome (Lu et al. 2005).  The study by O’Dennel’s group reaffirmed their finding. Microarray screening showed several miRNAs are residing at the chromosome 13 region.  These miRNAs are also interacting specifically with MYC to modulate the cell genesis during cancer development (O’Dennel et al. 2005).

Yet, recent evidences show that miRNAs also manipulate regulation of transcription and epigenetics (Wang et. al 2013).  As a result, nanomolecules without affecting the cellular life with specific miRNAs help us to imagine of this complexity and to receive the snapshot of the condition (Conde et al. 2013).

Furthermore, there is a complexity to be included in the design of molecules.  The system mechanism may bring solutions for human health.  Thus, modulated stem cells with engineered special future based on not only one gene-one enzyme theory but also many/one gene, one/many enzyme. For example, Schwartz group showed that polycomb group of genes made up of several hundred genes manipulate a complete function in the system of organism (Schwartz et al. 2007). First polycombs were found in fruit flies (Drosophila), but they are recognized that they function to regulate homeotic genes both in mammals and insects. Now, it is known that these polycomb complexes play a huge global role in organizing epigenetics by enforcing repressed states, but balanced by Trithorax.  Interestingly, even same genes function in both germline and somatic sex determination pathway, there are different cell-cell communications, signal transductions and players in regulation mechanisms of Drosophila (Salz 2013; Ng et al. 2013).

Therefore, the studies modulating cells by engineering oligos may fix a health problem. Immunomodulation of immune cells APC (antigen presenting cells) / DC (dentritic cells) / T (T/B), reprogramming stem cells and restructuring of the membrane receptors for increased sensitivity to protect/locate/activate are few examples of possible platforms to develop products.

Life is simple but complex, also there is a simple solution, since human is the most resilient living who will answer how to cure what is broken to survive.

References:

  1. A Stochastic model of stem cell proliferation,based on th egrowth of spleen xcolony-forming cells. J. E. Till, E. A. McCulloch, L. Siminovitch Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 January; 51(1): 29–36.  PMCID: PMC300599. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC300599/)
  2. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation L. He, G.J. Hannon Nat. Rev. Genet., 5 (2004), pp. 522–531 (http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v5/n7/full/nrg1379.html)
  3. Stem cell division is regulated by the microRNA pathway.  S.D. Hatfield, H.R. Shcherbata, K.A. Fischer, K. Nakahara, R.W. Carthew, H. Ruohola-Baker Nature, 435 (2005), pp. 974–978 (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7044/full/nature03816.html)
  4. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. J. Lu, G. Getz, E.A. Miska, E. Alvarez-Saavedra, J. Lamb, D. Peck, A. Sweet-Cordero, B.L. Ebert, R.H. Mak, A.A. Ferrando et al. Nature, 435 (2005), pp. 834–838 (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/full/nature03702.html)
  5. c-Myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression. K.A. O’Donnell, E.A. Wentzel, K.I. Zeller, C.V. Dang, J.T. Mendell Nature, 435 (2005), pp. 839–843 (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/full/nature03677.html)
  6. Gold-nanobeacons for simultaneous gene specific silencing and intracellular tracking of the silencing events. J. Conde, J, Rosa, J. M. la Fuente, P. V. Baptista.  Biomaterials, Vol. 34, issue 10, March 2013, pp. 2516-2523 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961212013956)
  7. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of human microRNAs.
  8. Zifeng Wang,Hong Yao, Sheng Lin, Xiao Zhu, Zan Shen, Gang Lu, Wai Sang Poon, Dan Xie, Marie Chia-mi Lin, Hsiang-fu KungCancer Letters Volume 331, Issue 1 , Pages 1-10, 30 April 2013. (http://www.cancerletters.info/article/S0304-3835(12)00723-9/abstract)
  9. The MSC: An Injury Drugstore. A. I. Caplan and D. Correa Cell Stem Cell. 2011 July 8; 9(1): 11–15. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.008.
  10. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V (January 2007). Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 (1): 9–22. doi:10.1038/nrg1981. PMID 17173055. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173055)
  11. Sex, stem cells and tumors in the Drosophila ovary. HK Salz, Fly, 2013 (http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/fly/article/22687/)
  12. In Vivo Epigenomic Profiling of Germ Cells Reveals Germ Cell Molecular Signatures. J. Ng, V. Kumar, M. Muratani, P. Kraus, JC. Yeo, L-P. Yaw, K. XUe, T. Lufkin, S. Prabhakar, H-H, Ng. Developmental Cell, Vol. 24, Issue 3, 11 February 2013, Pages 324–333. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580712005850)

Other related article appeared on this Open Access Online Scientific Journal, including:

 

When Clinical Application of miRNAs?

Larry H Bernstein, MD, FACP, 3/3/2013

 

Read Full Post »

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

On 3/13/2013 Forbes Science Writer, Metthew Herper, presented a curated article about the protein Cas9. With a compelling title like 

This Protein Could Change Biotech Forever, we drew over 40 comments. 

A tiny molecular machine used by bacteria to kill attacking viruses could change the way that scientists edit the DNA of plants, animals and fungi, revolutionizing genetic engineering. The protein, called Cas9, is quite simply a way to more accurately cut a piece of DNA.

“This could significantly accelerate the rate of discovery in all areas of biology, including gene therapy in medicine, the generation of improved agricultural goods, and the engineering of energy-producing microbes,” says Luciano Marraffini of Rockefeller University.

The ability to make modular changes in the DNA of bacteria and primitive algae has resulted in drug and biofuel companies such as Amyris and LS9. But figuring out how to make changes in the genomes of more complicated organisms has been tough.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2013/03/19/the-protein-that-could-change-biotech-forever/?goback=.gde_48920_member_227143277

In this article we bring all the pieces to one place, telling the evolution of a series of discoveries, which together may have the Protein, Cas9,  changing the Biotech Industry forever with its contributions to Diagnosing Diseases and Gene Therapy by Precision Genome Editing and Cost-effective microRNA Profiling. 

MicroRNA detection on the cheap

MIT alumni’s startup provides rapid, cost-effective microRNA profiling, which is beneficial for diagnosing diseases.
Rob Matheson, MIT News Office
March 28, 2013
Current methods of detecting microRNA (miRNA) — gene-regulating molecules implicated in the onset of various diseases — can be time-consuming and costly: The custom equipment used in such tests costs more than $100,000, and the limited throughput of these systems further hinders progress.
Two MIT alumni are helping to rectify these issues through their fast-growing, Cambridge-headquartered startup, Firefly BioWorks Inc., which provides technology that allows for rapid miRNA detection in a large number of samples using standard lab equipment. This technology has helped the company thrive — and also has the potential to increase the body of research on miRNA, which could help lead to better disease diagnosis and screening.The company’s core technology, called Optical Liquid Stamping (OLS) — which was invented at MIT by Firefly co-founder and Chief Technical Officer Daniel C. Pregibon PhD ’08 — works by imprinting (or stamping) microparticle structures onto photosensitive fluids. The resulting three-dimensional hydrogel particles, encoded with unique “barcodes,” can be used for the detection of miRNAs across large numbers of samples. These particles are custom-designed for readout in virtually any flow cytometer, a cost-effective device that’s accessible to most scientists.“Our manufacturing process allows us to make very sophisticated particles that can be read on the most basic instruments,” says co-founder and CEO Davide Marini PhD ’03.The company’s first commercial product, FirePlex miRSelect, an miRNA-detection kit that uses an assay based on OLS-manufactured particles and custom software, began selling about a year ago. Since then, the company has drawn a steady influx of customers (primarily academic and clinical scientists) while seeing rapid revenue growth.

To date, most of the company’s revenue has come from backers who see value in Firefly’s novel technology. In addition to a cumulative $2.5 million awarded through Small Business Innovation Research grants — primarily from the National Cancer Institute — the company has attracted $3 million from roughly 20 independent investors. Its most recent funding came from a $500,000 grant from the Massachusetts Life Sciences Center.

Pregibon developed the technology in the lab of MIT chemical engineering professorPatrick Doyle, a Firefly co-founder who serves on the company’s scientific advisory board. Firefly’s intellectual property is partially licensed through the Technology Licensing Office at MIT, along with several other Firefly patents. Firefly’s technology, from OLS to miRNA detection, has been described in papers published in several leading journals, including ScienceNature MaterialsNature Protocols and Analytical Chemistry.

Shifting complexity from equipment to particle

The success of the technology, Marini says, derives from an early business decision to focus attention on the development of the hydrogel particle instead of the equipment needed. Essentially, this allowed the co-founders to focus on developing a high-quality miRNA assay and hit the market quickly with particles that are universally readable on basic lab instrumentation.

“Imagine sticking a microscopic barcode on a microscopic product,” Marini says. “How do you scan it? At the beginning we thought we would have to build our own scanner. This would have been an expensive proposition. Instead, by using a few clever tricks, we redesigned the barcode to make it readable by existing instruments. You can write these ‘barcodes,’ and all you need is one scanner to read different codes. To quote an investor: ‘It shifts the complexity from the equipment to the particle.’”

Firefly’s particles appear to a standard flow cytometer as a series of closely spaced cells; these data are recorded and the company’s FireCode software then regroups them into particle information, including miRNA target identification and quantity.

But why, specifically, did the company choose a flow cytometer as its primary “scanner”? Pregibon answers: “To start, there are nearly 100,000 cytometers worldwide. In addition, we are now seeing a trend where flow cytometers are getting smaller and closer to the bench — closer to the actual researcher. We’re finding that people are tight for money because of the economy and are trying to conserve capital as much as possible. In order to use our products, they can either buy a very inexpensive bench-top flow cytometer or use one that already exists in their core facility.”

In turn, opting out of equipment development and manufacturing costs has helped the company stay financially sound, says Marini, who worked in London’s financial sector before coming to MIT. As an additional perk, the manufacturers of flow cytometers have begun “courting” Firefly, Marini says, because “our products help expand the capability of their systems, which are now exclusively used to analyze cells.”

The company’s FirePlex kit allows researchers to assay (or analyze) roughly 70 miRNA targets simultaneously across 96 samples of a wide variety — including serum, plasma and crude cell digests — in approximately three hours.

This is actually a “middle-ground” assaying technique, Pregibon says, and saves researchers time and money: Until now, scientists were forced to use separate techniques to look at a few miRNA targets over thousands of samples, or vice versa.

Marini adds that if a scientist suspects a number of miRNAs, perhaps 50 or so, could be involved in a pancreatic-cancer pathway, the only way to know for sure is to test those 50 targets over hundreds of samples. “There’s nowhere to do this today in a cost-effective, timely manner. Our tech now allows that,” he says.

‘Over the bridge of validation’

Because miRNAs are so important in the regulation of genes, and ultimately proteins, they have implications in a broad range of diseases, from cancer to Alzheimer’s disease. Several studies have suggested these relationships, but the field currently lacks the validation required to definitively demonstrate clinical utility.

With that in mind, Pregibon hopes that Firefly’s technology will help push miRNA-based diagnoses “over the bridge of validation,” giving scientists the means to validate miRNA signatures they discover in diagnosing diseases such as cancer. “That’s where we want to fit in,” he says. “With the help of a technology like ours, you’ll start to see more tests hitting the market and ultimately, more people benefitting from early cancer detection.”

Firefly’s aim is to strengthen preventive medicine in the United States. “In the long term, we see these products helping in the shift from reactive to preventative medicine,” Marini says. “We believe we will see a proliferation of tools for detection of diseases. We want to move away from the system we have now, which is curing before it’s too late.”

Pregibon says Firefly’s technology can be used across several molecule classes that are important in development and disease research: proteins, messenger RNA and DNA, among many others. “Essentially, the possibilities are endless,” Pregibon says.

Editing the genome with high precision

New method allows scientists to insert multiple genes in specific locations, delete defective genes.
Anne Trafton, MIT News Office
 
Researchers at MIT, the Broad Institute and Rockefeller University have developed a new technique for precisely altering the genomes of living cells by adding or deleting genes. The researchers say the technology could offer an easy-to-use, less-expensive way to engineer organisms that produce biofuels; to design animal models to study human disease; and  to develop new therapies, among other potential applications.To create their new genome-editing technique, the researchers modified a set of bacterial proteins that normally defend against viral invaders. Using this system, scientists can alter several genome sites simultaneously and can achieve much greater control over where new genes are inserted, says Feng Zhang, an assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at MIT and leader of the research team.“Anything that requires engineering of an organism to put in new genes or to modify what’s in the genome will be able to benefit from this,” says Zhang, who is a core member of the Broad Institute and MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research.Zhang and his colleagues describe the new technique in the Jan. 3 online edition ofScience. Lead authors of the paper are graduate students Le Cong and Ann Ran.Early effortsThe first genetically altered mice were created in the 1980s by adding small pieces of DNA to mouse embryonic cells. This method is now widely used to create transgenic mice for the study of human disease, but, because it inserts DNA randomly in the genome, researchers can’t target the newly delivered genes to replace existing ones.

In recent years, scientists have sought more precise ways to edit the genome. One such method, known as homologous recombination, involves delivering a piece of DNA that includes the gene of interest flanked by sequences that match the genome region where the gene is to be inserted. However, this technique’s success rate is very low because the natural recombination process is rare in normal cells.

More recently, biologists discovered that they could improve the efficiency of this process by adding enzymes called nucleases, which can cut DNA. Zinc fingers are commonly used to deliver the nuclease to a specific location, but zinc finger arrays can’t target every possible sequence of DNA, limiting their usefulness. Furthermore, assembling the proteins is a labor-intensive and expensive process.

Complexes known as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) can also cut the genome in specific locations, but these complexes can also be expensive and difficult to assemble.

Precise targeting

The new system is much more user-friendly, Zhang says. Making use of naturally occurring bacterial protein-RNA systems that recognize and snip viral DNA, the researchers can create DNA-editing complexes that include a nuclease called Cas9 bound to short RNA sequences. These sequences are designed to target specific locations in the genome; when they encounter a match, Cas9 cuts the DNA.

This approach can be used either to disrupt the function of a gene or to replace it with a new one. To replace the gene, the researchers must also add a DNA template for the new gene, which would be copied into the genome after the DNA is cut.

Each of the RNA segments can target a different sequence. “That’s the beauty of this — you can easily program a nuclease to target one or more positions in the genome,” Zhang says.

The method is also very precise — if there is a single base-pair difference between the RNA targeting sequence and the genome sequence, Cas9 is not activated. This is not the case for zinc fingers or TALEN. The new system also appears to be more efficient than TALEN, and much less expensive.

The new system “is a significant advancement in the field of genome editing and, in its first iteration, already appears comparable in efficiency to what zinc finger nucleases and TALENs have to offer,” says Aron Geurts, an associate professor of physiology at the Medical College of Wisconsin. “Deciphering the ever-increasing data emerging on genetic variation as it relates to human health and disease will require this type of scalable and precise genome editing in model systems.”

The research team has deposited the necessary genetic components with a nonprofit called Addgene, making the components widely available to other researchers who want to use the system. The researchers have also created a website with tips and tools for using this new technique.

Engineering new therapies

Among other possible applications, this system could be used to design new therapies for diseases such as Huntington’s disease, which appears to be caused by a single abnormal gene. Clinical trials that use zinc finger nucleases to disable genes are now under way, and the new technology could offer a more efficient alternative.

The system might also be useful for treating HIV by removing patients’ lymphocytes and mutating the CCR5 receptor, through which the virus enters cells. After being put back in the patient, such cells would resist infection.

This approach could also make it easier to study human disease by inducing specific mutations in human stem cells. “Using this genome editing system, you can very systematically put in individual mutations and differentiate the stem cells into neurons or cardiomyocytes and see how the mutations alter the biology of the cells,” Zhang says.

In the Science study, the researchers tested the system in cells grown in the lab, but they plan to apply the new technology to study brain function and diseases.

The research was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health; the W.M. Keck Foundation; the McKnight Foundation; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation; the Searle Scholars Program; and philanthropic support from MIT alumni Mike Boylan and Bob Metcalfe, as well as the newscaster Jane Pauley.

SOURCE:
Published online 2012 September 4. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1208507109
PMCID: PMC3465414
PNAS Plus

Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria

ABSTRACT

Clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems provide adaptive immunity against viruses and plasmids in bacteria and archaea. The silencing of invading nucleic acids is executed by ribonucleoprotein complexes preloaded with small, interfering CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) that act as guides for targeting and degradation of foreign nucleic acid. Here, we demonstrate that the Cas9–crRNA complex of the Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR3/Cas system introduces in vitro a double-strand break at a specific site in DNA containing a sequence complementary to crRNA. DNA cleavage is executed by Cas9, which uses two distinct active sites, RuvC and HNH, to generate site-specific nicks on opposite DNA strands. Results demonstrate that the Cas9–crRNA complex functions as an RNA-guided endonuclease with RNA-directed target sequence recognition and protein-mediated DNA cleavage. These findings pave the way for engineering of universal programmable RNA-guided DNA endonucleases.

Keywords: nuclease, site-directed mutagenesis, RNA interference, DNA interference

Comparison with Other RNAi Complexes

The mechanism proposed here for the cleavage of dsDNA by the Cas9–crRNA complex differs significantly from that for the type I-E (former “Ecoli”) system (7). In the E. coli type I-E system crRNA and Cas proteins assemble into a large ribonucleoprotein complex, Cascade, that facilitates target recognition by enhancing sequence-specific hybridization between the crRNA and complementary target sequences (7). Target recognition is dependent on the PAM and governed by the seed crRNA sequence located at the 5′ end of the spacer region (24). However, although the Cascade–crRNA complex alone is able to bind dsDNA containing a PAM and a protospacer, it requires an accessory Cas3 protein for DNA cleavage. Cas3 is an ssDNA nuclease and helicase that is able to cleave ssDNA, producing multiple cuts (10). It has been demonstrated recently that Cas3 degrades E. coli plasmid DNA in vitro in the presence of the Cascade–crRNA complex (25). Thus, current data clearly show that the mechanistic details of the interference step for the type I-E system differ from those of type II systems, both in the catalytic machinery involved and the nature of the molecular mechanisms.

In type IIIB CRISPR/Cas systems, present in many archaea and some bacteria, Cmr proteins and cRNA assemble into an effector complex that targets RNA (612). In Pyrococcus furiosus the RNA-silencing complex, comprising six proteins (Cmr1–Cmr6) and crRNA, binds to the target RNA and cleaves it at fixed distance from the 3′ end. The cleavage activity depends on Mg2+ ions; however, individual Cmr proteins responsible for target RNA cleavage have yet to be identified. The effector complex of Sulfolobus solfataricus, comprising seven proteins (Cmr1–Cmr7) and crRNA, cuts invading RNA in an endonucleolytic reaction at UA dinucleotides (13). Importantly, these two archaeal Cmr–crRNA complexes perform RNA cleavage in a PAM-independent manner.

Overall, we have shown that the Cas9–crRNA complex in type II CRISPR/Cas systems is a functional homolog of Cascade in type I systems and represents a minimal DNAi complex. The simple modular organization of the Cas9–crRNA complex, in which specificity for DNA targets is encoded by crRNAs and the cleavage enzymatic machinery is brought by a single, multidomain Cas protein, provides a versatile platform for engineering universal RNA-guided DNA endonucleases. Indeed, by altering the RNA sequence within the Cas9–crRNA complex, programmable endonucleases can be designed both for in vitro and in vivo applications. To provide proof of principle of such a strategy, we engineered de novo into a CRISPR locus a spacer targeted to a specific sequence on a plasmid and demonstrated that such a plasmid is cleaved by the Cas9–crRNA complex at a sequence specified by the designed crRNA. Experimental demonstration that RuvC and HNH active-site mutants of Cas9 are functional as strand-specific nicking enzymes opens the possibility of generating programmed DNA single-strand breaks de novo. Taken together, these findings pave the way for the development of unique molecular tools for RNA-directed DNA surgery.

SOURCE:

Cheap and easy technique to snip DNA could revolutionize gene therapy

By Robert Sanders, Media Relations | January 7, 2013

BERKELEY —A simple, precise and inexpensive method for cutting DNA to insert genes into human cells could transform genetic medicine, making routine what now are expensive, complicated and rare procedures for replacing defective genes in order to fix genetic disease or even cure AIDS.

Cas9 protein on DNA
The bacterial enzyme Cas9 is the engine of RNA-programmed genome engineering in human cells. Graphic by Jennifer Doudna/UC Berkeley.
IMAGE SOURCE:

Discovered last year by Jennifer Doudna and Martin Jinek of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and University of California, Berkeley, and Emmanuelle Charpentier of the Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine-Sweden, the technique was labeled a “tour de force” in a 2012 review in the journal Nature Biotechnology.

That review was based solely on the team’s June 28, 2012, Science paper, in which the researchers described a new method of precisely targeting and cutting DNA in bacteria.

Two new papers published last week in the journal Science Express demonstrate that the technique also works in human cells. A paper by Doudna and her team reporting similarly successful results in human cells has been accepted for publication by the new open-access journal eLife.

“The ability to modify specific elements of an organism’s genes has been essential to advance our understanding of biology, including human health,” said Doudna, a professor of molecular and cell biology and of chemistry and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator at UC Berkeley. “However, the techniques for making these modifications in animals and humans have been a huge bottleneck in both research and the development of human therapeutics.

“This is going to remove a major bottleneck in the field, because it means that essentially anybody can use this kind of genome editing or reprogramming to introduce genetic changes into mammalian or, quite likely, other eukaryotic systems.”

“I think this is going to be a real hit,” said George Church, professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School and principal author of one of the Science Express papers. “There are going to be a lot of people practicing this method because it is easier and about 100 times more compact than other techniques.”

“Based on the feedback we’ve received, it’s possible that this technique will completely revolutionize genome engineering in animals and plants,” said Doudna, who also holds an appointment at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. “It’s easy to program and could potentially be as powerful as the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).”

The latter technique made it easy to generate millions of copies of small pieces of DNA and permanently altered biological research and medical genetics.

Cruise missiles

Two developments – zinc-finger nucleases and TALEN (Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases) proteins – have gotten a lot of attention recently, including being together named one of the top 10 scientific breakthroughs of 2012 by Science magazine. The magazine labeled them “cruise missiles” because both techniques allow researchers to home in on a particular part of a genome and snip the double-stranded DNA there and there only.

Researchers can use these methods to make two precise cuts to remove a piece of DNA and, if an alternative piece of DNA is supplied, the cell will plug it into the cut instead. In this way, doctors can excise a defective or mutated gene and replace it with a normal copy. Sangamo Biosciences, a clinical stage biospharmaceutical company, has already shown that replacing one specific gene in a person infected with HIV can make him or her resistant to AIDS.

Both the zinc finger and TALEN techniques require synthesizing a large new gene encoding a specific protein for each new site in the DNA that is to be changed. By contrast, the new technique uses a single protein that requires only a short RNA molecule to program it for site-specific DNA recognition, Doudna said.

In the new Science Express paper, Church compared the new technique, which involves an enzyme called Cas9, with the TALEN method for inserting a gene into a mammalian cell and found it five times more efficient.

“It (the Cas9-RNA complex) is easier to make than TALEN proteins, and it’s smaller,” making it easier to slip into cells and even to program hundreds of snips simultaneously, he said. The complex also has lower toxicity in mammalian cells than other techniques, he added.

“It’s too early to declare total victory” over TALENs and zinc-fingers, Church said, “but it looks promising.”

Based on the immune systems of bacteria

Doudna discovered the Cas9 enzyme while working on the immune system of bacteria that have evolved enzymes that cut DNA to defend themselves against viruses. These bacteria cut up viral DNA and stick pieces of it into their own DNA, from which they make RNA that binds and inactivates the viruses.

UC Berkeley professor of earth and planetary science Jill Banfield brought this unusual viral immune system to Doudna’s attention a few years ago, and Doudna became intrigued. Her research focuses on how cells use RNA (ribonucleic acids), which are essentially the working copies that cells make of the DNA in their genes.

Doudna and her team worked out the details of how the enzyme-RNA complex cuts DNA: the Cas9 protein assembles with two short lengths of RNA, and together the complex binds a very specific area of DNA determined by the RNA sequence. The scientists then simplified the system to work with only one piece of RNA and showed in the earlier Science paper that they could target and snip specific areas of bacterial DNA.

“The beauty of this compared to any of the other systems that have come along over the past few decades for doing genome engineering is that it uses a single enzyme,” Doudna said. “The enzyme doesn’t have to change for every site that you want to target – you simply have to reprogram it with a different RNA transcript, which is easy to design and implement.”

The three new papers show this bacterial system works beautifully in human cells as well as in bacteria.

“Out of this somewhat obscure bacterial immune system comes a technology that has the potential to really transform the way that we work on and manipulate mammalian cells and other types of animal and plant cells,” Doudna said. “This is a poster child for the role of basic science in making fundamental discoveries that affect human health.”

Doudna’s coauthors include Jinek and Alexandra East, Aaron Cheng and Enbo Ma of UC Berkeley’s Department of Molecular and Cell Biology.

Doudna’s work was sponsored by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

RELATED INFORMATION

SOURCE:
http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2013/01/07/cheap-and-easy-technique-to-snip-dna-could-revolutionize-gene-therapy/

Matthew Herper, Forbes Staff on 3/24/2013

 A Cancer Patient’s Quest Hits DNA Pay Dirt

 

Kathy Giusti

Kathy Giusti has faced her cancer with the verve of an entrepreneur. Now her fight with multiple myeloma has moved to a new front: DNA.

Giusti was a 37-year-old marketing executive at Searle (now part of Pfizer) when she was diagnosed in 1996 with myeloma, a deadly blood and bone marrow cancer. She had a 1-year-old daughter. Sixty percent of myeloma patients die within five years, but Giusti beat the odds, living for a decade and a half through multiple rounds of drug therapy and a bone marrow transplant from her twin sister.

She has also changed the way her disease is treated. Giusti founded an advocacy group, the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, that works with companies like NovartisCelgene, and Merck to develop new treatments. It played a key role in the development of Velcade and Revlimid, two of the biggest advances in treating the disease, which is diagnosed in 20,000 patients a year.

Now a new research effort, funded with $14 million of MMRF money, has revealed new hints at what causes the disease and potential avenues for treating it. “This is going to be the next wave of how health care gets changed over time,” Giusti says. The results are published in the current issue of Nature.

Working with patient samples collected by the MMRF and using DNA sequencers made by Illumina of San Diego, researchers at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard sequenced the genes of 38 myeloma tumors and the DNA of the patients in whom they were growing. Tumors are twisted versions of the people in which they are growing; their DNA is mutated and disfigured, turning them deadly. By comparing DNA from healthy cells with malignant ones, researchers can find genetic differences that might be what led the tumors to go bad in the first place.

This experiment would have been unthinkable just a few years ago, when sequencing a human being was so expensive that all the people whose DNA had been read out could fit in a small room. In 2005, the idea of producing 38 DNA sequences was laughable. Now it’s par for the course, and researchers expect thousands of genomes will be sequenced by the end of the year – and experiments like this are expected to become commonplace.

What’s so exciting is that sometimes the DNA changes scientists find are completely unexpected. “There were genes we found to be recurrently mutated and yet no one had any clue that they had anything to do with multiple myeloma or any other cancer,” says Todd Golub, the Broad researcher who led the study. He splits his time with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

One gene, called FAM46C, was mutated in 13% of the cancers, but has never been studied in humans. “It appears no one had been working on it,” says Golub, but from studies in yeast and bacteria it appears that it has to do with how the recipes in genes are used to make proteins, the building blocks of just about everything in the body.

Another surprise gene, called BRAF, is generating excitement because it is the target of a skin cancer drug developed by Plexxikon, a small biotech firm that is partnered with Roch and is being purchased by Daiichi Sankyo. For the 4% of myeloma patients who have this mutation, this drug might be an option. The challenge will be testing it: it will be difficult to find enough of these patients to conduct a clinical trial. The MMRF says early discussions on such a study are moving forward. Giusti imagines that in the future, the MMRF may fund studies not of myeloma, but of a mix of different cancers caused by similar genetic mutations.

Several of the genes seem involved in the proteins that help guide epigenetics, a kind of molecular code written on DNA that may represent another kind of genetic code. The MMRF is already supporting some small drug companies that hope to create cancer drugs that target this second code.

Golub, the Broad scientist, says that right now it doesn’t make sense for most multiple myeloma patients to get their full DNA sequences outside of clinical trials, although he can imagine that for patients who have failed every available treatment it might make sense as a way to come up with another drug to try.

Giusti says, however, that the kinds of genetic tests that are done are changing the way that patients understand their disease. “Patients like me are starting to know, ‘I have this DNA translocation, maybe a proteasome inhibitor [a type of drug] is better for me.’ We become forerunners in the role patient can plan and the importance it has in drug development.”

Moving past old ways of thinking about inventing new medicines to a new path that is based on genetics and a flood of biological data is going to be difficult. But Giusti has never been afraid of hard — and she is sure there will be ways to drive the science forward.

SOURCE:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2011/03/24/a-cancer-patients-quest-hits-dna-pay-dirt/

REFERENCES

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3465414/

1. Barrangou R, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science.2007;315:1709–1712. [PubMed]

2. Jansen R, Embden JD, Gaastra W, Schouls LM. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1565–1575. [PubMed]

3. Makarova KS, Grishin NV, Shabalina SA, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: Computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action. Biol Direct. 2006;1:7.[PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Carte J, Wang R, Li H, Terns RM, Terns MP. Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3489–3496. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Brouns SJJ, et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science. 2008;321:960–964. [PubMed]
6. Hale CR, et al. RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex. Cell.2009;139:945–956. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Jore MM, et al. Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:529–536. [PubMed]
8. Makarova KS, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol.2011;9:467–477. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature. 2012;482:331–338. [PubMed]
10. Sinkunas T, et al. Cas3 is a single-stranded DNA nuclease and ATP-dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system. EMBO J. 2011;30:1335–1342. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Beloglazova N, et al. Structure and activity of the Cas3 HD nuclease MJ0384, an effector enzyme of the CRISPR interference. EMBO J. 2011;30:4616–4627. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Hale CR, et al. Essential features and rational design of CRISPR RNAs that function with the Cas RAMP module complex to cleave RNAs. Mol Cell. 2012;45:292–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Zhang J, et al. Structure and mechanism of the CMR complex for CRISPR-mediated antiviral immunity. Mol Cell. 2012;45:303–313. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science. 2008;322:1843–1845. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science.2010;327:167–170. [PubMed]
16. Sapranauskas R, et al. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity inEscherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:9275–9282. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Deveau H, et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1390–1400. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Horvath P, et al. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1401–1412. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Mojica FJM, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, Almendros C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology. 2009;155:733–740. [PubMed]
20. Garneau JE, et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature. 2010;468:67–71. [PubMed]
21. Deltcheva E, et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.Nature. 2011;471:602–607. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Armalyte E, et al. Mva1269I: A monomeric type IIS restriction endonuclease from Micrococcus varians with two EcoRI- and FokI-like catalytic domains. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:41584–41594.[PubMed]
23. Chan SH, Stoddard BL, Xu SY. Natural and engineered nicking endonucleases—from cleavage mechanism to engineering of strand-specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:1–18. [PMC free article][PubMed]
24. Semenova E, et al. Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:10098–10103. [PMC free article][PubMed]
25. Westra ER, et al. CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. Mol Cell. 2012;46:595–605. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Tamulaitis G, Zaremba M, Szczepanowski RH, Bochtler M, Siksnys V. Nucleotide flipping by restriction enzymes analyzed by 2-aminopurine steady-state fluorescence. Nucleic Acids Res.2007;35:4792–4799. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Read Full Post »

What about Circular RNAs?

Reporter: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

Circular RNAs throw genetics for a loop

RNA ‘sponges’ mop up sequences that curb gene expression.
Heidi Ledford       27 Feb 2013

At least some of the loops, described in two papers published this week by Nature1, 2,

  • act as molecular sponges’,
    • binding to and
    • blocking tiny gene modulators called microRNAs.

The researchers suspect that the circular RNAs have many other functions. The molecules comprise “a hidden, parallel universe” of unexplored RNAs, says Nikolaus Rajewsky, the lead author of one of the studies and a systems biologist at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in Berlin. The discovery is yet another a reminder that

  • RNA is much more than a mundane messenger ­between DNA and the proteins it encodes.
1. Memczak , S. et al. Nature 2013         http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11928/
2. Hansen, T. B. et al. Nature 2013        http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11993/
3. Salzman, J., Gawad, C., Wang, P. L., Lacayo, N. & Brown, P. O. 2012        http://www.PLoSONE.org/7/30733
Consensus secondary structure of yjdF RNAs. Th...

Consensus secondary structure of yjdF RNAs. This figure is adapted from a previous publication. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

RNA

RNA (Photo credit: AJC1)

By Richard Wheeler (Zephyris) 2007. Lambda rep...

By Richard Wheeler (Zephyris) 2007. Lambda repressor protein bound to a lambda operator DNA sequence. From . (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Consensus secondary structure of mini-ykkC RNA...

Consensus secondary structure of mini-ykkC RNAs. Layout is similar to that used in a previously published drawing. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Read Full Post »

When Clinical Application of miRNAs?

Author: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

Clinical Application of miRNAs Remains a Ways Off
When its time comes, prognostic tests will be first.
Patricia Fitzpatrick Dimond, Ph.D             GEN Insight & Intelligence

It’s still early to tell how well microRNAs (miRNAs) will prove clinically useful.  Preclinical research findings indicate their central role in controlling cellular pathways.
This novel class of nucleotides, about 20–25 nucleotides in length, affects gene expression by interacting with messenger RNAs. But unlike Small Interfering RNA,  siRNAs, miRNAs are encoded in the human genome and function as natural regulators of global gene expression.
Each of the more than 1,500 encoded miRNAs appears to regulate the expression of tens to hundreds of different genes, on-off switches, regulating multiple cellular functions including
  • growth and
  • proliferation.
miRNAs regulate the translation of genes through
  • sequence-specific binding to mRNA.

Depending on the degree of sequence complimentarity, they can inhibit

  • the translation and/or degradation of their target mRNAs.

Because of their role in controlling “suites” of genes and, ultimately, pathway function, these molecules have attracted considerable scientific and investor interest in the control of diseases ranging from cardiovascular diseases to cancer.

miRNAs target numerous biomolecules that play a role in carcinogenesis,
  • functioning as both tumor promoters or suppressors.
Aberrant expression of miRNAs
  • correlates with the development and progression of tumors;

inhibition of their expression can

  1. modulate the cancer phenotype,
  2. suggesting their potential as anticancer drug targets.

Further supporting their potential use as drug targets, miRNA expression profiling in a variety of tissue, cell, and disease types has revealed

  • a “miRNA signature” specific to those cell types or disease states.
Research

Carlo Croce, M.D., director of Human Cancer Genetics at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, and colleagues reported that

  • they identified a 9-miRNA signature that differentiated invasive (IDC) from in situ carcinoma (DCIS).

In studying the global changes of the miRNA repertoire along the transitions defining breast cancer progression, the scientists found that

  1. let-7d, miR-210, and miR-221 were downregulated in the in situ and
  2. upregulated in the invasive transition, thus
  3. featuring an expression reversal along the cancer progression path.
  4. in addition,  miRNAs for overall survival and time to metastasis.
Dr. Croce posed that targeted prognostic tests using miRNA will be available within the next two years.
  • the problem he suggests is validating the signature in a large enough cohort of patients.
They used deep sequencing, an extremely sensitive approach to the determination of miRNAs because you count the molecules. Studies have used microarrays and RT-PCR, and his group used general microarrays and validated RT-PCR.  Their method avoided the possibility of artifacts (by counting).  Sequencing permits counts of molecules to provide good data.

John F. McDonald, Ph.D., CSO Ovarian Cancer Institute, and colleagues at the Georgia Institute of Technology

  1. separately transfected two miRNAs (miR-7 and miR-128) into the ovarian cancer cell line (HEY) and
  2. then monitored global changes in gene expression levels.
  • 20% of the changes in expression patterns of hundreds to thousands of genes
  • could be attributed to direct miRNA–mRNA interactions, but
  • the majority of the changes were indirect,
involving the downstream consequences of miRNA-mediated changes in regulatory gene expression.
The pathways most significantly affected by miR-7 transfection, are involved with
  1. cell adhesion and
  2. developmental networks previously associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transitions and
  3. processes linked with metastasis.

http://www.genengnews.com/insight-and-intelligenceand153/clinical-application-of-mirnas-remains-a-ways-off/77899650/

ATVB in Focus
MicroRNAs 
From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Application in Cardiovascular Medicine
Christian Weber, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ and German Centre for Cardiovasc Res, Munich, Germany
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:168-169.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300920
MicroRNAs (miRs) are small noncoding RNAs (≈23 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression at a posttranscriptional level by degradation or translational inhibition of target mRNAs. Initially discovered as regulators of development in plants, worms, and fruitflies,
miRs are emerging as
  • pivotal modulators of cardiovascular biology and disease in mice and men.
Besides a cell-specific transcription factor profile,
  • cell-specific miR-regulated gene expression is integral to cell fate and activation decisions.
Thus, the cell types involved in
  • atherosclerosis,
  • vascular disease, and
    • its myocardial sequelae may be
  • differentially regulated by distinct miRs, thereby
    • controlling highly complex processes
      • smooth muscle cell phenotype and
      • inflammatory responses of endothelial cells or macrophages.
The generation of mature miR strands requires several steps of processing of the primary miR gene transcript, including
  • cleavage of the terminal loop of miR-precursors by the RNase III enzyme,Dicer, to produce miR duplexes.
Although either strand of the miR duplex can be stably associated with an Argonaute (Ago) family protein,
  • preferential loading of a specific strand (ie, the guide strand) onto the miR-induced silencing complex (RISC) is common.
The strand that is not loaded into the RISC (ie, the passenger strand or miR*) is typically degraded.3 Strand selection may be tissue-specific, and an accumulation observed for both strands implies that
  • each strand can separately enter the silencing complex.4
Because of the often imperfect complementary binding of the miR seed sequence to the mRNA recognition element,
  • an individual miR can affect the expression of hundreds of target mRNAs.
http://atvb.ahajournals.org/content/33/2/168.extract

Life’s Tiniest Architects Pinpointed by Yale Researchers
If a genome is the blueprint for life, then the chief architects are
  • tiny slices of genetic material that orchestrate how we are assembled and function.
The study pinpoints the molecular regulators of epigenetics — the process by which unchanging genes along our DNA are switched on and off at precisely right time and place.
“Our genome is like a landscape with lakes, mountains, and rivers, but it is not yet a community or a city full of buildings,” said Haifan Lin, director of the Yale Stem Cell Center and senior author of the study. “What this system does is decide where and when to send out the masons, carpenters, and electricians to build a city or a community.”
In the past 20 years, scientists have discovered that some proteins, called epigenetic factors, traverse the static genome and turn the genes on or off. The staggering number of potential combinations of active and inactive genes explains why a relatively small number of genes can carry out such a wide range of functions.
What guides these epigenetic factors to their target? The answer:

  • specialized RNAs called piRNAs.
In the latest study, the Yale team discovered that
  • piRNAs guide epigenetic factors to numerous sites throughout the genome of the fruit fly Drosophila, where
    • these switches  work to turn genes on or off.
The dramatic change in gene expression patterns found illustrated
  • piRNAs key role in coordinating biological activity.
“This is the first major mechanism discovered that controls where epigenetic factors —the gene switches — are to be placed in the genome,” Lin said.
Several types of cancers appeared to be
  • triggered when the wrong kinds of piRNAs guide epigenetic factors to activate the wrong genes.
Blocking the action of these piRNAs should become a new opportunity to treat cancers, Lin said.
Xiao A. Huang and Hang Yin of Yale are co-lead authors of the paper.
The research was funded by a National Institutes of Health Pioneer Award to Haifan Lin and a grant from Connecticut Stem Cell Research Fund to
Lin and former Yale professor and co-author Michael Snyder, now of Stanford University.
English: A diagram showing at which stages in ...

English: A diagram showing at which stages in the DNA-mRNA-protein pathway expression can be controlled. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Virus-Encoded microRNAs

Virus-Encoded microRNAs (Photo credit: AJC1)

English: A Tet-ON doxycycline inducible transg...

English: A Tet-ON doxycycline inducible transgene expression system. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Read Full Post »

microRNA Biomarker

Reporter: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

MicroRNA Molecule May Serve as Biomarker

miRNA molecule called miR-7 decreased in highly metastatic cancer stem-like cells.
February 18, 2013
Researchers have identified two molecules that could potentially serve as biomarkers in

MicroRNAs are involved in

  • tumor initiation and
  • progression, and
  • may play a role in metastasis, particularly in relation to
  • cancer stem-like cells.
miR-7 is a metastasis

  • suppressor in cancer stem-like cells, and when they
  • increased expression of miR-7 in cancer stem-like cells from
    • it suppressed their metastatic properties.

miR-7 suppressed ………….expression of KLF4.
However, miR-7 significantly suppressed the ability of cancer stem-like cells to metastasize to the brain but not the bone.

A gram illustrating the disctinction between c...

A gram illustrating the disctinction between cancer stem cell targeted (above) and conventional (below) cancer therapies (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Related articles

 

Read Full Post »

Author and Curator: Ritu Saxena, Ph.D.

Introduction: Mitochondrial fission & fusion

Mitochondria, double membranous and semi-autonomous organelles, are known to convert energy into forms that are usable to the cell. Apart from being sites of cellular respiration, multiple roles of mitochondria have been emphasized in processes such as cell division, growth and cell death. Mitochondria are semi-autonomous in that they are only partially dependent on the cell to replicate and grow. They have their own DNA, ribosomes, and can make their own proteins. Mitochondria have been discussed in several posts published in the Pharmaceutical Intelligence blog.

Mitochondria do not exist as lone organelles, but are part of a dynamic network that continuously undergoes fusion and fission in response to various metabolic and environmental stimuli. Nucleoids, the assemblies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) with its associated proteins, are distributed during fission in such a way that each mitochondrion contains at least one nucleoid. Mitochondrial fusion and fission within a cell is speculated to be involved in several functions including mtDNA DNA protection, alteration of cellular energetics, and regulation of cell division.

Proteins involved in mitochondrial fission & fusion

Multiple mitochondrial membrane GTPases that regulate mitochondrial networking have recently been identified. They are classified as fission and fusion proteins:

Fusion proteins: Members of dynamin family of protein, mitofusin 1 (Mfn-1) and mitofusin 2 (Mfn-2), are involved in fusion between mitochondria by tethering adjacent mitochondria. These proteins have two transmembrane segments that anchor them in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Mutations in Mitofusin proteins gives rise to fragmented mitochondria, but this can be reversed by mutations in mammalian Drp1. Mitochondrial inner membranes are fused by dynamin family members called Opa1.

Fission proteins: Another member of the dynamin family of proteins, dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp-1) mediates fission of mitochondria. Drp-1 is activated by phosphorylation. Drp-1 proteins are largely cytosolic, but cycle on and off of mitochondria as needed for fission. Fission is a complex process and involves a series of well-defined stages and proteins. Cytosolic Drp-1 is activated by calcineurin or other cytosolic signaling proteins after which it translocates to the mitochondrial tubules where it assembles into foci through its interaction with another protein, hFis1. Once Drp-1 rings assemble on the constricted spots, outer membrane of mitochondria undergoes fission through GTP hydrolysis. Drp-1 is now left bound to one of the newly formed mitochondrial ends after which it slowly disassembles before returning to the cytoplasm.

Control of mitochondrial fission & fusion

  • Mitochondrial fission and fusion are controlled by several regulatory mechanisms. Few of which are mentioned as follows:
  • Drp-1 activation by Cdk1/Cyclin B mediated phosphorylation during mitosis – triggers fission
  • Drp-1 inactivation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in quiescent cells- prevents fission
  • Drp-1 activation after reversal of PKA phosphorylation by Calcineurin- triggers fission
  • Ubiquination of fission and fusion proteins by E3 ubiquitin ligase- alters fission
  • Sumoylation of fission proteins – regulates fission

Imparied mitochondrial fission leads to loss of mtDNA

Mitochondrial fission plays an important role in mitochondrial and cellular homeostasis. It was reported by Parone et al (2008) that preventing mitochondrial fission by down-regulating expression of Drp-1 lead to loss of mtDNA and mitochondrial dysfunction. An increase in cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was observed. Other cellular implications included depletion of cellular ATP, inhibition of cell proliferation and autophagy. The observations were made in HeLa cells.

MicroRNA regulation of mitochondrial fission

Although several factors have been attributed to the regulation of mitochondrial fission, the mechanism still remains poorly understood. Recently, regulation of mitochondrial fission via miRNAs has become a topic of interest. Following miRNAs have been found to be involved in mitochondrial fission:

  • miR-484:  Wang et al (2012) demonstrated that miR-484 was able to regulate mitochondrial fission by suppressing the translation of a fission protein Fis1, leading to inhibition of Fis1-mediated fission and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes and in the adrenocortical cancer cells. The authors showed that Fis1 is necessary for mitochondrial fission and apoptosis, and is upregulated during anoxia, whereas miR-484 is downregulated. Underlying mechanism involved transactivation of miR-484 by a transcription factor, Foxo3a and miR-484 is able to attenuate Fis1 upregulation and mitochondrial fission, by binding to the amino acid coding sequence of Fis1 and inhibiting its translation.
  • miR-499: miR-499 was reported by Wang et al (2011) to be able to directly target both the α- and β-isoforms of the calcineurin catalytic subunit. Suppression of calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of  Drp-1 lead to inhibition of the fission machinery ultimately resulting in the inhibition of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. miR-499 levels, by altering mitochondrial fusion were able affect the severity of myocardial infarction and cardiac dysfunction induced by ischemia-reperfusion. Modulation of miR-499 expression could provide a therapeutic approach for myocardial infarction treatment.
  • miR-30: It was reported by Li et al (2010) that miR-30 family members were able to inhibit mitochondrial fission and also the resulting apoptosis. While exploring the underlying molecular mechanism, the authors identified that miR-30 family members can suppress p53 expression. When cell received apoptotic stimulation, p53 was found to transcriptionally activate the fission protein, Drp-1. Drp-1 was able to induce mitochondrial fission. miR-30 family members were observed to inhibit mitochondrial fission through attenuation of p53 expression and its downstream target Drp-1.

Mitochondrial fission & fusion as a therapeutic target

Since alteration of mitochondrial fission and fusion have been reported to affect various cellular processes including apoptosis, proliferation, ATP consumption, the proteins involved in the process of fission and fusion might be harnessed as therapeutic target.

Mentioned below is a description of research where dynamics of the mitochondrial organelle has been utilized as a therapeutic target:

Inhibition of mitochondrial fission prevents cell cycle progression in lung cancer

A recent article published by Rehman et al (2012) in the FASEB journal drew much attention after interesting observations were made in the mitochondria of lung adenocarcinoma cells. The mitochondrial network of these cells exhibited both impaired fusion and enhanced fission. It was also found that the fragmented phenotype in multiple lung adenocarcinoma cell lines was associated with both a down-regulation of the fusion protein, Mfn-2 and an upregulation of expression of fission protein, Drp-1. The imbalance of Drp-1/Mfn-2 expression in human lung cancer cell lines was reported to promote a state of mitochondrial fission. Similar increase in Drp-1 and decrease in Mfn-2 was observed in the tissue samples from patients compared to adjacent healthy lung. Authors used complementary approaches of Mfn-2 overexpression, Drp-1 inhibition, or Drp-1 knockdown and were able to observe reduction of cancer cell proliferation and an increase spontaneous apoptosis. Thus, the study identified mitochondrial fission and Drp-1 activation as a novel therapeutic target in lung cancer.

Image

Reference:

Research articles-

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20556877

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=18806874

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22510686

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21186368

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=20062521

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22321727

News brief:

http://www.uchospitals.edu/news/2012/20120221-mitochondria.html

http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2012/02/23/energy-network-within-cells-may-be-new-target-cancer-therapy

http://www.doctortipster.com/7881-mitochondria-could-represent-a-new-target-for-cancer-therapy-according-to-new-study.html

Related reading:

Reviewer: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FACP

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/10/28/mitochondrial-damage-and-repair-under-oxidative-stress/

Author and Curator: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FACP http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/26/mitochondria-origin-from-oxygen-free-environment-role-in-aerobic-glycolysis-metabolic-adaptation/

Reporter and Editor: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FACP

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/16/nitric-oxide-has-a-ubiquitous-role-in-the-regulation-of-glycolysis-with-a-concomitant-influence-on-mitochondrial-function/

Author and Reporter: Ritu Saxena, PhD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/10/%CE%B2-integrin-emerges-as-an-important-player-in-mitochondrial-dysfunction-associated-gastric-cancer/

Author: Ritu Saxena, PhD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/01/mitochondria-and-cancer-an-overview/

Author and Reporter: Ritu Saxena, PhD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/14/mitochondrial-mutation-analysis-might-be-1-step-away/

Reporter: Venkat S. Karra, PhD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/14/detecting-potential-toxicity-in-mitochondria/

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/01/mitochondrial-mechanisms-of-disease-in-diabetes-mellitus/

Author and Curator: Ritu Saxena, PhD; Consultants: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN and Pnina G. Abir-Am, PhD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/09/mitochondria-more-than-just-the-powerhouse-of-the-cell/

Read Full Post »

mRNA Interference with Cancer Expression

Reporter: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

Genetic switch shuts down lung cancer tumors

Genetic switch shuts down lung cancer tumors in mice October 25, 2012 in Cancer Yale researchers manipulated a tiny genetic switch and halted growth of aggressive lung cancer tumors in mice and even prevented tumors from forming. Ads by Google Stage 4 Cancer Treatments – Chat w/a Cancer Info Expert About Stage 4 Cancer Treatment Options. – http://www.CancerCenter.com The activation of a single microRNA managed to neutralize the effects of two of the most notorious genes in cancer’s arsenal, suggesting it may have a role treating several forms of cancer, the researchers report in the Nov. 1 issue of the journal Cancer Research. “This is pretty much the best pre-clinical data that show microRNAs can be effective in lung cancer treatment,” said Frank Slack, professor of molecular, cellular & developmental biology, researcher for the Yale Cancer Center, and senior author of the paper. “These cancer genes are identical to ones found in many forms of human cancers and we are hopeful the microRNA will be of therapeutic benefit in human cancer.” Unlike drugs that act upon existing proteins, microRNAs are small pieces of genetic material that can shut down and turn off genes that produce the proteins. Slack and co-author Andrea Kasinski wanted to see if one of these microRNAs, miR-34, could block the actions of K-Ras and p53 genes, which promote proliferation and survival of cancer cells, respectively. Mice with these two mutant genes invariably develop tumors but were cancer-free when researchers activated miR-34. Also, tumor growth was halted in mice that were treated with miR-34 after they had developed cancer. Journal reference: Cancer Research Provided by Yale University

Read more at: http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-genetic-lung-cancer-tumors-mice.html#jCp

Read Full Post »

 

Author and Curator: Ritu Saxena, Ph.D.

A recent post by Dr. Margaret Baker entitled “Junk DNA codes for valuable miRNAs: non-coding DNA controls Diabetes” talks about how the ENCODE project is revealing new insights into the functions of non-coding region of the human genome previously labeled as “junk DNA”. MicroRNA or miRNA, which as stated by Dr. Baker, “are among the non-gene encoding sequences in the genome and have been shown to play a major post-transcriptional role in expression of multiple genes.”

The post has touched upon several aspects of miRNA including origin, function, and mechanism of action. This commentary is an extension of Dr. Baker’s post, expanding upon the mechanism of action of miRNAs along with their role in potential disease therapy.

microRNA: Revisiting the past

MicroRNA were not discovered long back, infact, it was in 1998 when the presence of the non-coding RNAs that could be involved in switching ‘on’ and ‘off’ of certain genes. In the last decade, 2006 Nobel Prize for medicine or physiology was awarded to scientists Andrew Fire and Craig Mello for their discovery of this new role of RNA molecules.

A breakthrough research was published in the September 2010 issue of Nature journal, stating that mammalian microRNAs predominantly act by decreasing the levels of target mRNA. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. miRNAs were initially thought to repress protein output without changes in the corresponding mRNA levels. Guo et al challenged the previous notion of ‘translational repression’ and concluded on the basis of their experimental results that ‘mRNA-destabilization’ scenario for the major part is responsible for the repression in protein expression via miRNAs. Authors utilized the method of ‘ribosome profiling’ to measure the overall effects of miRNA on protein production and then compared these to simultaneously measured effects on mRNA levels. Ribosome profiling prepares maps that exact positions of ribosomes on transcripts after nucleases chew upon the exposed part of transcripts that are not covered by ribosomes. MiR-1 and miR-155 were introduced into the HeLa-cell line. Both of these miRNAs are not  normally expressed in HeLa cells. Another miRNA used was mir-223 which is expressed in significant amounts in neutrophils. The reason for choosing the set of these miRNAs was that they had already been shown to repress protein levels via proteomics research. It was deciphered that miRNA-mediated repression was similar regardless of target expression level and further stated that “for both ectopic and endogenous miRNA regulatory interactions, lowered mRNA levels account for lowered mRNA levels accounted for most for most (>/=84%) of the decreased protein production.” These results show that changes in mRNA levels closely reflect the impact of miRNAs on gene expression and indicate that destabilization of target mRNAs is the predominant reason for reduced protein output.

Authors concluded that the discovery “will apply broadly to the vast majority of miRNA targeting interactions. If indeed general, this conclusion will be welcome news to biologists wanting to measure the ultimate impact of miRNAs on their direct regulatory targets.”

Since then and even before the paper was published, several other miRNAs and their roles have been discovered. Information on miRNAs has been consolidated in a database that can be accessed online at http://www.mirbase.org/

microRNA: From bench to bedside

Scientific community had speculated the role of non-coding RNAs in disease treatment right after their discovery. One such study demonstrating the utilization of microRNA for Cancer treatment was published in the September 2010 issue of the journal Nature Medicine. miR-380-5p represses p53 to control cellular survival and is associated with poor outcome inMYCN-amplified neuroblastoma

The p53 gene is known as a tumor suppressor gene and its inactivation has been associated in some cancers such as neuroblastoma. The study reported that microRNA-380 (miR-380) was able to repress the expression of p53 gene in cancer patients causing uninhibited cell survival and proliferation. The research group was able to decrease the tumor size in vivo in a mouse model of the neuroblastoma by delivering miR-380 antagonist. The researchers also observed that the inhibition of endogenous miR-380 in embryonic stem or neuroblastoma cells resulted in induction of p53, and extensive apoptotic cell death.

Thus, the success of miR antagonist for decreasing tumor size speaks of the effectiveness of miR as a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment.

In conclusion, as stated by Dr. Baker in her post, “the miRNA data for tissues and specific cell types involved in disease pathology form a new approach to either detecting or possibly correcting gene (coding or non-coding) dysregulation. miRNA mimics and anti-miRNA agents are being developed as new therapeutic modalities.”

Reference:

Pharmaceutical Intelligence post, Author, Dr. Margaret Baker: Junk DNA codes for valuable miRNAs: non-coding DNA controls Diabetes

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/24/junk-dna-codes-for-valuable-mirnas/

 

Research articles: Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels

miR-380-5p represses p53 to control cellular survival and is associated with poor outcome inMYCN-amplified neuroblastoma

Expert reviews- miRNA and Cancer treatment

 

News briefs: http://ygoy.com/2010/10/02/new-treatment-for-junk-dna-induced-cancers-discovered/

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/10/micrornas–once_dismissed_as_j038861.html

 

Read Full Post »

Author: Margaret Baker, PhD, Registered Patent Agent

The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project was launched in September of 2003. In 2007 the ENCODE project was expanded to study the entire human genome, Genome-wide association studies or GWAS, and published a Nature paper entitled “An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome,” this month also all data are available at http://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE/.  Novel functional roles have been discovered for both transcribed and non-transcribed portions of DNA.  See several articles and commentary in Science 7 September 2012: Vol. 337 no. 6099 including Maurano et al. pp. 1190-1195  DOI: 10.1126/science.1222794b

For the first time, the 3-dimensional connections that cross the genome have been mapped as long-range looping interactions between functional elements and the genes controlled. These regions of the genome, formerly referred to as “junk DNA”, have the potential to be involved in disease initiation, pathophysiology, and complications. Further, epigenetic factors may be seen to play a more direct role in the expression or silencing of protein coding genes as DNase I hot spots, nucleosomal anchor points, and DNA methylation sites are added to the map.

Non-coding transcribed DNA includes a large percentage of sequences coding for RNA. In fact, RNA encoding genes number nearly equal to the protein encoding genes- 18,400 v 20,687 – and previously unknown non-coding RNA (ncRNA) have also been characterized.

Some of the known elements that were cataloged include:

  • cis elements – promoters, transcription factor binding sites;
  • gene contiguous non-coding stretches such as introns, polyA, and UTR, splice variants;
  • pseudogenes (11,224);
  • long range gene associated elements – enhancers, insulators, suppressors, and predicted promoter flanking regions;
  • ribosomal RNA genes; and
  • sequences for 7,052 small RNAs of which 85% are small nuclear(sn)RNA, small nucleolar(sno)RNA), transfer(t)RNA, and micro(mi)RNA.

What has been found is that distinct non-coding regions, including ncRNA, can be associated with distinct disease traits. miRNA are among the non-gene encoding sequences in the genome which have already been shown to play a major post-transcriptional role in expression of multiple genes..

Most miRNA genes are intergenic or oriented antisense to neighboring genes and therefore assumed to be controlled by independent promoter units. However, in some cases a microRNA gene is transcribed together with its target gene implying coupled regulation of miRNA and protein-coding gene. About one third of miRNA genes reside in polycistronic clusters. miRNA genes can occupy the introns of protein, non-protein coding genes, or nonprotein-coding transcripts. The promoters have been shown to have some similarities in their motifs to promoters of other genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II such as protein coding genes. The ENCODE project also noted that miRNA promoters were in chromatin regions of high promiscuity. There may be up to 1000 miRNA genes in the human genome. In addition, human miRNAs show RNA editing of sequences to yield products different from those encoded by their DNA.  miRNA are implicated in cellular roles as diverse as developmental timing in worms, cell death and fat metabolism in flies, haematopoiesis in mammals, and leaf development and floral patterning in plants

The final miRNA gene product is a ∼22 nt functional RNA molecule. The mature miRNA (designated miR-#) is processed from a characteristic stem–loop sequence (called a pre-mir), which in turn may be excised from a longer primary transcript (or pri-mir). It is processed by the same enzyme (DICER) that processes short hairpin RNA, forming interfering RNA, which provides and additional level of control.

MiRNA controls gene expression by binding to complementary regions of messenger transcripts in the 3’ untranslated region to repress their translation or regulate degradation. What makes the mechanism more powerful (or complicated) is the imperfect but specific binding motif associates with a large number of mRNAs in the 3’ untranslated region having the complimentary motif.  Conversely then, each mRNA can potentially associate with a number miRNA. Mature processed cytosolic miRNA can act in a manner akin to small interfering(si)RNA, and form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to block translation. Computational methods have been used to identify potential gene targets based on complimentarity between the miRNA and mRNA sequences.

Gerstein et al. explored the “Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data” Nature 489:91-100 (06 Sep 2012) focusing on the regulation of transcription factors (TF) and association between TF and miRNAs, miRNA and miRNA, protein-protein interactions, and protein phosphorylation. Not surprisingly, not all TF are the upstream factor in each network.

These new and remarkably detailed examinations of the different elements within and transcribed from the human genome perhaps do more to aid our knowledge of why we have stumbled in attempts to eradicate diseases, initially by focusing on a single gene or constellation of coding regions. The miRNA wikipedia is also being re-written on a daily basis and new disease associations made*.  As an example of a pathological state that may be linked to miRNA controlled elements, in vitro as well as in small population studies have examined miRNA species in diabetogenic conditions and patients with diabetes (Type I and Type II).

Diabetes and miRNA

In adult β-cell islets, miR-375 is low when glucose is freely available and low miR-375 induces insulin secretion. Interestingly, miR-375 is found only in brain and β-cells which share a secretion pathway.

Diabetic Complications

Organ specific miRNA have been identified in liver, skeletal muscle, kidney, vascular, and adipose tissue which are responsive to transient or sustained hyperglycemia.

miR-17-5p and miR-132 were reported to show significant differences between obese and non obese omental fat and were also abnormal in the blood of obese subjects.  Altered expression of miR-17-5p and miR-132 were found to correlate significantly with BMI, fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin. (Kloting et al. PLoS ONE 4(3), e4699 (2009).

Clinical practice related to miRNA in diabetes may be possible as one group has identified eight miRNAs (miR-144, miR-146a, miR-150, miR-182, miR-192, miR-29a, miR-30d and miR-320) as potential ‘signature miRNAs’ that could distinguish prediabetic patients from those with overt T2D (Karolina DS, Armugam A, Tavintharan S et al. MicroRNA 144 impairs insulin signaling by inhibiting the expression of insulin receptor substrate 1 in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 6(8), e22839 (2011).

Due to the autoimmune component of T1D, the constellation of miRNA would be expected to be different: upregulation of miR-510 and underexpression of miR-191 and miR-342 were observed in the Tregs (regulatory T-cells) of T1D patients (Hezova R, Slaby O, Faltejskova P et al. microRNA-342, microRNA-191 and microRNA-510 are differentially expressed in T regulatory cells of Type 1 diabetic patients. Cell. Immunol. 260(2),70–74 (2010).

Taken together with the “physical” mapping of miRNA genes in the context of the 3-dimensional genome provided by the ENCODE studies and new understanding of potential concerted regulatory mechanisms, the miRNA data for tissues and specific cell types involved in disease pathology form a new approach to either detecting or possibly correcting gene (coding or non-coding) dysregulation.  miRNA mimics and anti-miRNA agents are being developed as new therapeutic modalities.

References

Bartel, DP et al. MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function” Cell 2004, 116:281-297.

Fernandez-Valverde, SL et al. MicroRNAs in beta-cell Biology, insulin resistance, diabetes and its complications. Diabetes July 2011 60 (7):1825-31.

Kantharidis, et al.  Diabetes Complications: The MicroRNA Perspective http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/60/7/1832.short

MEDSCAPE Review article: “miRNAs and Diabetes Mellitus: miRNAs in Diabetic Complicatons”  http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/763729_6

*Based on initial studies in the worm C. elegans showing the temporal appearance of 21- and 22-nt RNAs during development, a family of highly conserved micro RNA sequences (miRNA) existing in invertebrates and vertebrates, were cataloged by Tuschl et al. at the Max-Planck-Institute and others (see Eddy, SR  Non-coding RNA genes and the modern RNA world Nature Reviews Genetics, 2:920-929, 2001). The sequence-specific post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms mediated by these miRNAs have been associated with certain disease states such as cancer miR-21) and more specifically, lung cancer (miR-124) or breast cancer (miR-7, miR-21) and new species and function continue to be found (see http://www.mirbase.org/ ).

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Regulus Therapeutics and UC San Diego to Collaborate on Angiogenic Disease Research Utilizing microRNA Technology

http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/regulus-therapeutics-and-uc-san-diego-collaborate-angiogenic-disease-resear-0

– UC Discovery Grant award to support collaborative research –

La Jolla, Calif., April 14, 2011 – Regulus Therapeutics Inc., a biopharmaceutical company leading the discovery and development of innovative new medicines targeting microRNAs, today announced it is collaborating with researchers at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine seeking novel treatments for angiogenic diseases using microRNA therapeutics. The research will combine Regulus’ leading microRNA platform with UCSD’s expertise in animal models of angiogenesis to discover anti-angiogenic microRNA-targeted therapies that could be rapidly translated for treatment of human disease.  The collaborative research program was the recent recipient of a UC Discovery Grant that promotes collaborations between the university’s researchers and industry partners.  Financial terms of the grant were not disclosed.

“We are pleased to collaborate with leading scientific institutes like UCSD and to provide industry support for programs such as the UC Discovery Grant,” said Hubert C. Chen, M.D., Regulus’ vice president of translational medicine. “Regulus continues to demonstrate a leadership position in the field of microRNA therapeutics and is committed to forging partnerships with leading academic and clinical laboratories to advance microRNA biology and therapeutic discovery.  Our network of nearly 30 academic collaborations assists us with the investigation of new microRNAs and supports microRNA discovery efforts that feed the Company’s pipeline.”

Angiogenesis, which is the formation of new blood vessels, is an important event that contributes to the severity of cancer, diabetes, macular degeneration, inflammatory disease and arthritis.  microRNAs have been implicated in regulating biological networks involved in angiogenesis.

“Our research published last year in Nature Medicine demonstrated that microRNA-132 functions as a novel angiogenic switch that turns on angiogenesis in quiescent endothelial cells, and that targeting with an anti-miR-132 decreases blood vessel formation,” said David A. Cheresh, Ph.D., professor of pathology in the UCSD School of Medicine, associate director for translational research at UCSD Moores Cancer Center and principal investigator on the grant. “The objective of our collaborative work with Regulus is to advance these initial discoveries and discover additional microRNAs involved in angiogenic diseases.”

The UC Discovery Grant program promotes collaborations between the university’s researchers and industry partners in the interest of supporting cutting-edge research, strengthening the state’s economy and serving the public good.

About microRNAs

The discovery of microRNA in humans during the last decade is one of the most exciting scientific breakthroughs in recent history. microRNAs are small RNA molecules, typically 20 to 25 nucleotides in length, that do not encode proteins but instead regulate gene expression. More than 700 microRNAs have been identified in the human genome, and over one-third of all human genes are believed to be regulated by microRNAs. A single microRNA can regulate entire networks of genes. As such, these molecules are considered master regulators of the human genome. microRNAs have been shown to play an integral role in numerous biological processes, including the immune response, cell-cycle control, metabolism, viral replication, stem cell differentiation and human development. Most microRNAs are conserved across multiple species, indicating the evolutionary importance of these molecules as modulators of critical biological pathways. Indeed, microRNA expression or function, has been shown to be significantly altered in many disease states, including cancer, heart failure and viral infections. Targeting microRNAs with anti-miRs, antisense oligonucleotide inhibitors of microRNAs, or miR-mimics, double-stranded oligonucleotides to replace microRNA function opens potential for a novel class of therapeutics and offers a unique approach to treating disease by modulating entire biological pathways. To learn more about microRNAs, please visit http://www.regulusrx.com/microrna/microrna-explained.php.

About Regulus Therapeutics Inc.

Regulus Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company leading the discovery and development of innovative new medicines targeting microRNAs. Regulus is using a mature therapeutic platform based on technology that has been developed over 20 years and tested in more than 5,000 humans. In addition, Regulus works with a broad network of academic collaborators and leverages the oligonucleotide drug discovery and development expertise of its founding companies, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ALNY) and Isis Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ISIS). Regulus is advancing microRNA therapeutics towards the clinic in several key areas including hepatitis C infection, immuno-inflammatory diseases, fibrosis, oncology and cardiovascular/metabolic diseases. Regulus’ intellectual property estate contains both the fundamental and core patents in the field and includes over 600 patents and more than 300 pending patent applications pertaining primarily to chemical modifications of oligonucleotides targeting microRNAs for therapeutic applications. In April 2008, Regulus formed a major alliance with GlaxoSmithKline to discover and develop microRNA therapeutics for immuno-inflammatory diseases. In February 2010, Regulus and GlaxoSmithKline entered into a new collaboration to develop and commercialize microRNA therapeutics targeting microRNA-122 for the treatment of hepatitis C infection. In June 2010, Regulus and sanofi-aventis entered into the largest-to-date strategic alliance for the development of microRNA therapeutics. This alliance is focused initially on fibrosis. For more information, please visit http://www.regulusrx.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release includes forward-looking statements regarding the future therapeutic and commercial potential of Regulus’ business plans, technologies and intellectual property related to microRNA therapeutics being discovered and developed by Regulus. Any statement describing Regulus’ goals, expectations, financial or other projections, intentions or beliefs is a forward-looking statement and should be considered an at-risk statement. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, particularly those inherent in the process of discovering, developing and commercializing drugs that are safe and effective for use as human therapeutics, and in the endeavor of building a business around such products. Such forward-looking statements also involve assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove correct, could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although these forward-looking statements reflect the good faith judgment of Regulus’ management, these statements are based only on facts and factors currently known by Regulus. As a result, you are cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These and other risks concerning Regulus’ programs are described in additional detail in each of Alnylam’s and Isis’ annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which are on file with the SEC. Copies of these and other documents are available from either Alnylam or Isis.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »