Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘CRISPR/Cas9 & Gene Editing’ Category

LIVE 9/21 8AM to 10:55 AM Expoloring the Versatility of CRISPR/Cas9 at CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group is a

Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Targettaking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

#BostonDOT16

@BostonDOT

 

COMMENTS BY Stephen J Williams, PhD

EXPLORING THE VERSATILITY OF CRISPR/Cas9

 

8:00 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

TJ Cradick , Ph.D., Head of Genome Editing, CRISPR Therapeutics

 

@CRISPRTX

 

8:10 Functional Genomics Using CRISPR-Cas9: Technology and Applications

Neville Sanjana, Ph.D., Core Faculty Member, New York Genome Center and Assistant Professor, Department of Biology & Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University

 

CRISPR Cas9 is easier to target to multiple genomic loci; RNA specifies DNA targeting; with zinc finger nucleases or TALEEN in the protein specifies DNA targeting

 

  • This feature of crisper allows you to make a quick big and cheap array of a GENOME SCALE Crisper Knock out (GeCKO) screening library
  • How do you scale up the sgRNA for whole genome?; for all genes in RefSeq, identify consitutive exons using RNA-sequencing data from 16 primary human tissue (alot of genes end with ‘gg’) changing the bases on 3’ side negates crisper system but changing on 5’ then crisper works fine
  • Rank sequences to be specific for target
  • Cloned array into lentiviral and put in selectable markers
  • GeCKO displays high consistency betweens reagents for the same gene versus siRNA; GeCKO has high screening sensitivity
  • 98% of genome is noncoding so what about making a library for intronic regions (miRNA, promoter regions?)
  • So you design the sgRNA library by taking 100kb of gene-adjacent regions
  • They looked at CUL3; (data will soon be published in Science)
  • Do a transcription CHIP to verify the lack of binding of transcription factor of interest
  • Can also target histone marks on promoter and enhancer elements
  • NYU wants to explore this noncoding screens
  • sanjanalab.org

 

@nyuniversity

 

8:40 Therapeutic Gene Editing With CRISPR/Cas9

TJ Cradick , Ph.D., Head of Genome Editing, CRISPR Therapeutics

 

NEHJ is down and dirty repair of single nonhomologous end but when have two breaks the NEHJ repair can introduce the inversions or deletions

 

    • High-throughput screens are fine but can limit your view of genomic context; genome searches pick unique sites so use bioinformatic programs  to design specific guide Rna
    • Bioinformatic directed, genome wide, functional screens
    • Compared COSMID and CCTOP; 320 COSMID off-target sites, 333 CCtop off target
    • Young lab GUIDESeq program genome wide assay useful to design guides
    • If shorten guide may improve specificity; also sometime better sensitivity if lengthen guide

 

  • Manufacturing of autologous gene corrected product ex vivo gene correction (Vertex, Bayer, are partners in this)

 

 

They need to use a clones from multiple microarrays before using the GUidESeq but GUIDEseq is better for REMOVING the off targets than actually producing the sgRNA library you want (seems the methods for library development are not fully advanced to do this)

 

The score sometimes for the sgRNA design programs do not always give the best result because some sgRNAs are genome context dependent

9:10 Towards Combinatorial Drug Discovery: Mining Heterogeneous Phenotypes from Large Scale RNAi/Drug Perturbations

Arvind Rao, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

 

Bioinformatics in CRISPR screens:  they looked at image analysis of light microscopy of breast cancer cells and looked for phenotypic changes

 

  • Then they modeled in a small pilot and then used the algorithm for 20,000 images (made morphometric measurements)
  • Can formulate training statistical algorithms to make a decision tree how you classify data points
  • Although their algorithms worked well there was also human input from scientists

Aggregate ranking of hits programs available on web like LINKS

 

@MDAndersonNews

 

10:25 CRISPR in Stem Cell Models of Eye Disease

Alexander Bassuk, M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Iowa

 

Blind athlete Michael Stone, biathlete, had eye disease since teenager helped fund and start the clinical trial for Starbardt disease; had one bad copy of ABCA4, heterozygous (inheritable in Ahkenazi Jewish) – a recessive inheritable mutation with juvenile macular degeneration

  • Also had another male in family with disease but he had another mutation in the RPGR gene
  • December 2015 paper Precision Medicine: Genetic Repair of retinitis pigmentosa in patient derived stem cells
  • They were able to correct the iPSCs in the RPGR gene derived from patient however low efficiency of repair, scarless repair, leaves changes in DNA, need clinical grade iPSCs, and need a humanized model of RPGR

@uiowa

10:55 CRISPR in Mouse Models of Eye Disease

Vinit Mahajan, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa College of Medicine

  • degeneration of the retina will see brown spots, the macula will often be preserved but retinal cells damaged but with RPGR have problems with peripheral vision, retinitis pigmentosa get tunnel vision with no peripheral vision (a mouse model of PDE6 Knockout recapitulates this phenotype)
  • the PDE6 is linked to the rhodopsin GTP pathway
  • rd1 -/- mouse has something that looks like retinal pigmentosa; has mutant PDE6; is actually a nonsense mutation in rd1 so they tried a crisper to fix in mice
  • with crisper fix of rd1 nonsense mutation the optic nerve looked comparible to normal and the retina structure restored
  • photoreceptors layers- some recovery but not complete
  • sequence results show the DNA is a mosaic so not correcting 100% but only 35% but stil leads to a phenotypic recovery; NHEJ was about 12% to 25% with large deletions
  • histology is restored in crspr repaired mice
  • CRSPR off target effects: WGS and analyze for variants SNV/indels, also looked at on target and off target regions; there were no off target SNVs indels while variants that did not pass quality control screening not a single SNV
  • Rhodopsin mutation accounts for a large % of patients (RhoD190N)
  • injection of gene therapy vectors: AAV vector carrying CRSPR and cas9 repair templates

CAPN mouse models

  • family in Iowa have dominant mutation in CAPN5; retinal degenerates
  • used CRSPR to generate mouse model with mutation in CAPN5 similar to family mutation
  • compared to other transgenic methods CRSPR is faster to produce a mouse model

To Follow LIVE CONFERENCE COVERAGE PLEASE FOLLOW ON TWITTER USING

Meeting #: #BostonDOT16

Meeting @: @BostonDOT

 

Overall good meeting #s:

#personalizedmedicine

#innovation

#cancer

#immunology

#immunooncology

#pharmanews

#CRSPR

#geneediting

#crisper

#biotech

 

AND FOLLOW these @

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@BiotechNews

@CHI

@FierceBiotech

Read Full Post »

LIVE 9/20 2PM to 5:30PM New Viruses for Therapeutic Gene Delivery at CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group is a

Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target taking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

#BostonDOT16

@BostonDOT

 

COMMENTS BY Stephen J Williams, PhD

Gene Therapy Breakthroughs

New Strategies for Better Specificity and Delivery

 

2:05  Chairman’s Remarks

Joseph Gold, Ph.D. Director Manufacturing Center for Biomedicine and Genetics, Beckman Research Institute City of Hope

 

  • CBG (center for biomedicine and Genetics) 20000 sq feet
  • CTPC (center therapy production) mainly CART
  • CBG 16 years operation do all stem cells and >400 products
  • New stem cell Beta cell progenitor
  • Do oncolytic VSV
  • CTPC is investigator driven CART islet cells,
  • Like to do novel work so work with CIRM
  • Banking of modified stem cells
  • Adherent scale out limitations: cost,inefficient; solution can be suspension
  • Establish hESC; plate on CELLstart > Accutase>StemPRO SFM>differentiation process; defined reagents — they use this for cardiomyocyte differentiation: they are functional (inotropy, chronotropy response to isoproterenol) can freeze back cells
  • Create a bank of intermediate cells and when you need it for surgery they will put on their matrix, enrich, expand and ship out
  • Allogeneic cells: project where take allogeneic neural stem cells to deliver a chemotherapy payload as they like to migrate to brain tumors
  • Allogeneic cells: for ALS modified to express GDNF
  • HIV resistance with engineered CCR5 negative blood stem cells
  • Release assay considerations: viability, sterility, if cryopreserved then can determine identity, viral insertions, VSV-G copy number, endotoxin and potency (FDA is wanting phase I potency assays) for CART potency is % transduced
  • Good in vivo activity of the neural stem cells loaded with chemotherapeutic

 

ALS  

  • If deliver GDNF to muscle  using genetically modified myoblasts
  • Best to use fetal stem cells – less issues

 

Canavan disease: progressive fatal neurologic disorder that begins in infancy and don’t make it past teenage years

  • Rossbach is taking autologous cells reprogramming generating iPS cells and then modifying by CRISPR but the CRISPR issues of off target effects persist as well the time required for process and verification; also don’t want to use a selectable marker and put in patients; so you can differentiate the cells and hit them with a lentiviral vector system

 

They have been named a PACT Center Production Assistance for Cell Therapy where you can apply for a project grant.  Applicable for startups up to larger mature companies

www.pactgroup.net

 

They do a standard panel of tests for viral infections.

They work with investigators or companies at all stages of manufacturing processes.

 

@BeckmanInst

@cityofhope

 

2:15 Large-Scale Production of Cell Therapies for Regenerative Medicine

Joseph Gold, Ph.D. Director Manufacturing Center for Biomedicine and Genetics, Beckman Research Institute

 

2:45  Directed Evolution of New Viruses for Therapeutic Gene Delivery

David Schaffer, Ph.D.  Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, BioEngineering, Molecular and Cell Biology and Neuroscience;

 

AAV is very safe as many people already infected with it

 

  • Spark (Leber’s cogenital anaurosis
  • Hemophilia B
  • Lipoprotein lipase deficiency
  • Spinal muscular atrophy
  • Challenges: are we just getting the ‘low hanging fruit’ eg Spark therapy must be injected after retinal therapy, hemo B needs to be given at high doses
  • Their theory was AAV had been evolving for its own purposes so hence the limitations of AAV;
  • Utilized 25 different techniques to generate variants of AAV in a library then packaged (each will have its own barcode)
  • Broad platform technology: retina, lung, brain and spinal cord

Retinal:  AAV may be too large to get through layers of the eye, problems; subretinal injections and damage or retinal detachment.  Then they used their whole library in an in-vivo screen (as hard to recapitulate the multi cell layers of the retina).  

 

Cystic Fibrosis

  • AAV2H22 variant worked very well to supply the CFTR gene in pig model of cystic fibrosis and increases chloride transport and reduce bacterial load
  • Then found pig variant AAV did not work well on human tissue so designed a human variant and worked well in human tissues
  • The variant AAV2.5T surrounds sialic acid binding pockets and increases binding and endocytosis

 

Brain and Spinal Cord:  Sanfilippo B trial  8 holes drilled into skull followed by 16 AAV injections

 

  • Injected a generated AAV variant (by evolution process) : engineered AAV2 is 100 fold better getting through blood brain barrier… novel variant undergoes retrograde transport to cortex ; made a cas9 to remove a tdTomato gene overexpressed in mouse and found 90% knockdown
  • Also interesting point: the porcine variant did not work in human and the human variant did not work in porcine.  Implication for FDA safety and efficacy testing must do in monkeys

They started a spinout 4D Molecular Therapeutics

 

4:25 Lentiviral Vectors for Gene Therapy

 

Munapaty Swani, Ph.D. Texas Tech Health Science Center

 

  • Can express multiple shRNA under a separate promoter but toxic so if expressed in miRNA backbone could be safer under a pol II
  • How much of flanking sequence is needed?
  • 30 nt flanking sequence is enough for Drosha processing
  • Constructed 1 to 7 shRNA-miR targeting CCR5 and 6 viral genes; all constructs were functional
  • Problem with pol ii promoter
  • These 7 shRNA miRNA protect against HIV entry if against CCR5 and the 7 viral elements
  • Used the non-integrating lentivirus for transient to see if infect T cells or not versus integrating lentivirus ; results non-integrating lentivirus did not infect t cells so safer to use
  • CCR5 disruption reduced HIV infection in T cells in vitro;
  • ZFN treatment of HIV+ PBMC prevents activation of HIV
  • Encapsulted CAS9 within LV; cas9 protein is incorporated within LV and is functional
  • First transduce then come in with the Cas9 so made all in one lentivirus with Cas9 and an sgRNA expression vector *******
  • This shows that it is possible to put all in a nanoparticle based lentivirus and an all in one may make it easier and safer (supposedly)

 

4:55 AAV Capsid Design

Miguel Seria Esteves, PhD Associate Professor Neurology, Gene Therapy Center University of Massachusetts Medical School

 

-AAV replication dependent no known human disease with native AAV

  •  Multiple barriers to get across blood brain barrier
  • AAV9 preferentially target neonatal neurons and adult astrocytes
  • Multiple capsids can be used for AAV9 infection in brain but not complete
  • Can we design better capsids to give it better tropic properties and better penetration to blood brain barrier
  • Using a polyalanine in the 5’ end of the caspid was most efficeint
  • Increases gene transfer efficiency especially IN SELECT CELL TYPES; Glial transduction and increased in striatum: increase is structure specific so little in thalamus but good in cerebellum and spinal cord
  • AAV9 tranduces also in peripheral tissues with or without modified capsid

 

Huntington’s Disease

  • Polyglutamate disease polyy glu on huntingtin protein
  • They get a 40 to 50% reduction of huntingtin but not significant between capsid design
  • They did a directed evolution of AAV capsid and generated capsid gene delivery diversity: DNA shuffling and in vivo selection
  • AAV-B1 is a new tropic capsid showing transduction of different structures
  • Five fold reduction in tropism to the liver but massive increases in muscle and beta exocrine cells and lung
  • Presence of neutralizing antibodies is a problem with AAV therapy
  • In conclusion unknown mechanisms by whivh a highly hydrophobic string of 19 alanines modifies the CHS tropism of AAV9 kvariants
  • Chimeric capsids identified from in vivo screen can reveal interesting patterns of tropism

12:45 PM Screening with shRNA and CRISPR

Ryan Raver, PhD Global Product Manager, Functional Genomics, MilliporeSigma

  • KO – Knock Out
  • KD – Knock Down
  1. RNAi -KD
  2. CRISPR-Cas9 – KO

NEW STRATEGIES FOR BETTER SPECIFICITY AND DELIVERY

2:05 Chairperson’s Remarks

Joseph Gold, Center for Biomedicine and Genetics Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope

2:15 Large Scale Production of cell Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: COmbination Cell and Gene Therapy products

Joseph Gold, Center for Biomedicine and Genetics Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope

  • Biological & Cellular GMP manufacturing Core at COH
  • Establishing scalable hESC suspension Culture
  • Optimized small molecule concentration, induction timing, stirring rates
  1. Almost Xeno free
  2. defined
  3. very good reproducibility
  4. high purity and yield:
  • Immuno-staining,
  • FACS – cTnT, sMHC, Alpha-actinin
  • Cryopreservation, Multi-electrode Array (MEA)
  • hESC-RPE monolayer on synthetic substrate

Combination cell/gene therapy products at COH

  1. CAR T CCR5-inactivated CD34+ HSPC – Target: AIDS
  • adoptive immunotherapy using CAR-Engineering T cells – glioblastoma

2. HIV resistance with engineering CCR5-negative blood stem cells: gene KO by ZFNs

  • assay considerations 0 If cryopreservation : Identify, viral insertion, endotoxin, residual beads Potency: CAR T- % transduced cells, CCR5-?-CD34 cells: HIV resistance

3. Glioblastoma

4.  In vivo activity of transduced NSCs: Assay consideration – viability, sterility, mycobatom,

5.  ALS: degeneration of neurones

  • Embryonic stem cells
  • Fetal neural stem cells
  • Adult stem cells – human Proginetor neural cells

6.  Canavan Disease – Y.Shi – ASPA gene mutations cause Canavan disease

Strategy: autologous iPSC-derived, modified neural progenitors: DIferentiate to neural progenitors

Gene therapy: Correction (Off-taregt effects, correct individual cell lines)  or Over expression (Copy number, selection, transduce iPSC)

  • release assay consideration
  • identity – markers and HLA, contaminants, Potency: in vivo efficacy modified autologous
  • production Assistance for Cell therapy
  • cell therapy manufacturing development
  • roles of Biobanks

 

2:45 Directed Evolution of New Viruses for Therapeutic Gene Delivery

David Schaffer, Ph.D., Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Bioengineering, Molecular and Cell Biology, and Neuroscience; Director, Berkeley Stem Cell Center, University of California, Berkeley

Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors have been increasingly successful in clinical trials; however, viruses face many delivery barriers that limit their efficacy for most disease targets. We have developed directed vector evolution – the iterative genetic diversification of a viral genome and functional selection for desired properties – to engineer novel, optimized AAV vectors for efficient, selective delivery for a range of tissue and disease targets.

  • DNA (gene therapy and editing) >> RNAi (antisense) >> Protein: Small molecules and monoclonal antibodies
  • Dlivery
  • Adeno Associated Viral Vectors Adenoviral helper genes
  • AAV2, efficacy in Leber’s Congenital samaurosis (AAV)
  • Spinal muscular, lipolrotein lipase deficiency (AAV)

Gene Delivery

  1. neutralization of pre-esisting antibodies
  2. target tissue – deep penetration
  3. Inefficient transduction to target cells
  4. target specific cells

Fitness as Therapy – virus evolutionary: Tropism and immunity

  • AAV directed Vector evolution : Input /sequence >> Diversity/generation >> Packaging
  • Retinoschisis Model – Eye therapeutic gene to protect vision – AAV – transduction of retinal cell, vitreas in Human different scale — eventually Macualr degeneration Therapy for: Photo receptor is the target for therapy
  • Dog: Fundus Imaging of Engineered AAV: Variant Expression GFP Pool Carrying

Lung- Cystic Fibrosis (mucus production amplifies (enhanced transduction) due to MAC3 translation error) – Gene Therapy – cilia function to restore ability to clear mucos: Variant evolved on Human airway epithelia – AA  particles

  1. AAV2>>> AAV%>> T mutation
  • efficacy must be improved

Brain and Spinal Cord

  1. Scull – 8 drills followed by 16 AAV injections
  2. Spinal cord: injuction in muscle

Synthetic version of AAV — Engineered AAV for enhanced Retrograde Transport

  • AAV2-retrograded transport – Noval variant Undergoes Transport along multiple Projections
  • Cas9 – Retrograde Delivery of Cas9 to cortex of mouse – KD –

Summary

  • Virus as gene delivery mechanism
  • designer AAV variants

 

3:15 Sponsored Presentation (Opportunity Available)

3:45 Refreshment Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing and Poster Competition Winner Announced

4:25 Lentiviral Vectors for Gene Therapy

Manjunath N. Swamy, MD, Professor of Biomedical Sciences and Co-DIrector of the Center of Emphasis in Infectious Diseases. Paul L Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center

  • RNAi targets for HIV
  • Expression of multiple shRNAs
  • COnstruction od 7 shRNA-miR targeting CCR5 and 6 viral genes – protect against both 5 ans x4 tropic HIV-1
  • shRNA expression does not decrease with distance from promoter
  • Lentiviral vector to express ZFNs: HIV envelop – ZFN-mediated CCR5 gene editing in Primary T cells
  • ZFN treatment of HIV+PBMC prevents activation of HIV
  • Strategy to encapsulate Cas9 Protein wihtin LV : AIm to deliver Cas9 protein deliver sgRNA expression vector. A Lentiviral
  • Gene editing by all-in-one Lentivirus = to prepack

 

4:55 AAV Caspid Engineering

Miguel Sena Esteves, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Gene Therapy Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School

Adeno-associated virus vectors have become the leading platform for development of in vivo gene therapies for neurological diseases. We have developed new AAV vectors for widespread gene delivery to the CNS through vascular infusion in adult animals through peptide grafting and in vivo library selection. These new neurotropic AAVs have achieved CNS-wide silencing of gene expression using gene-specific microRNAs.

  • Adeno-associated virus – Paravovirus family
  • Recombinant AAV vectors carry gene expression cassette of choice flanked by two
  • CNS – route of gene delivery
  • Crossing BBB
  • Systemic delivery of AAV9 vectors: IV
  • Peptide grafting – in vivo selection of novel CNS: DIstribution of GFP transduced cells – robust neuronal transducture with transduction AAV-AS
  • motor cortex, Straiatum, thalamus, motor cortex, ventral horn of spinal cord, cerebelum, liver, muscle, oculomotor nerve, nucleus of oculomotor nerve

Huntington’s Disease > 40 CAG vs <26 CAG in normal – Peptide grafting of AAV vectors for CNS

  • DNA shuffling and in vivo selection: Brain vs Liver

Next generation of AAV vectors for CNS 

  • Liver, pancreas, lung — same pattern

neural transduction after vascular delivery

  • AAV-B1 caspid vs AAV8 – 19 amino acids

Conclusion

New capsids with improved CNS tropism

19 alanines modifies the CNS tropism of AAV9 variants

Chimeric caspids identified from in vivo screens

 

5:25 Welcome Reception in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing

 

Read Full Post »

LIVE 9/20 8AM to noon GENE THERAPIES BREAKTHROUGHS at CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

#BostonDOT16

@BostonDOT

 

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group is a

Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target taking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

COMMENTS BY Stephen J Williams, PhD

Gene Therapy Breakthroughs

New Strategies for Better Specificity and Delivery

 

2:05  Chairman’s Remarks

Joseph Gold, Ph.D. Director Manufacturing Center for Biomedicine and Genetics, Beckman Research Institute City of Hope

 

  • CBG (center for biomedicine and Genetics) 20000 sq feet
  • CTPC (center therapy production) mainly CART
  • CBG 16 years operation do all stem cells and >400 products
  • New stem cell Beta cell progenitor
  • Do oncolytic VSV
  • CTPC is investigator driven CART islet cells,
  • Like to do novel work so work with CIRM
  • Banking of modified stem cells
  • Adherent scale out limitations: cost,inefficient; solution can be suspension
  • Establish hESC; plate on CELLstart > Accutase>StemPRO SFM>differentiation process; defined reagents — they use this for cardiomyocyte differentiation: they are functional (inotropy, chronotropy response to isoproterenol) can freeze back cells
  • Create a bank of intermediate cells and when you need it for surgery they will put on their matrix, enrich, expand and ship out
  • Allogeneic cells: project where take allogeneic neural stem cells to deliver a chemotherapy payload as they like to migrate to brain tumors
  • Allogeneic cells: for ALS modified to express GDNF
  • HIV resistance with engineered CCR5 negative blood stem cells
  • Release assay considerations: viability, sterility, if cryopreserved then can determine identity, viral insertions, VSV-G copy number, endotoxin and potency (FDA is wanting phase I potency assays) for CART potency is % transduced
  • Good in vivo activity of the neural stem cells loaded with chemotherapeutic

 

ALS  

  • If deliver GDNF to muscle  using genetically modified myoblasts
  • Best to use fetal stem cells – less issues

 

Canavan disease: progressive fatal neurologic disorder that begins in infancy and don’t make it past teenage years

  • Rossbach is taking autologous cells reprogramming generating iPS cells and then modifying by CRISPR but the CRISPR issues of off target effects persist as well the time required for process and verification; also don’t want to use a selectable marker and put in patients; so you can differentiate the cells and hit them with a lentiviral vector system

 

They have been named a PACT Center Production Assistance for Cell Therapy where you can apply for a project grant.  Applicable for startups up to larger mature companies

www.pactgroup.net

 

They do a standard panel of tests for viral infections.

They work with investigators or companies at all stages of manufacturing processes.

 

@BeckmanInst

@cityofhope

 

2:15 Large-Scale Production of Cell Therapies for Regenerative Medicine

Joseph Gold, Ph.D. Director Manufacturing Center for Biomedicine and Genetics, Beckman Research Institute

 

2:45  Directed Evolution of New Viruses for Therapeutic Gene Delivery

David Schaffer, Ph.D.  Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, BioEngineering, Molecular and Cell Biology and Neuroscience;

 

AAV is very safe as many people already infected with it

 

  • Spark (Leber’s cogenital anaurosis
  • Hemophilia B
  • Lipoprotein lipase deficiency
  • Spinal muscular atrophy
  • Challenges: are we just getting the ‘low hanging fruit’ eg Spark therapy must be injected after retinal therapy, hemo B needs to be given at high doses
  • Their theory was AAV had been evolving for its own purposes so hence the limitations of AAV;
  • Utilized 25 different techniques to generate variants of AAV in a library then packaged (each will have its own barcode)
  • Broad platform technology: retina, lung, brain and spinal cord

Retinal:  AAV may be too large to get through layers of the eye, problems; subretinal injections and damage or retinal detachment.  Then they used their whole library in an in-vivo screen (as hard to recapitulate the multi cell layers of the retina).  

 

Cystic Fibrosis

  • AAV2H22 variant worked very well to supply the CFTR gene in pig model of cystic fibrosis and increases chloride transport and reduce bacterial load
  • Then found pig variant AAV did not work well on human tissue so designed a human variant and worked well in human tissues
  • The variant AAV2.5T surrounds sialic acid binding pockets and increases binding and endocytosis

 

Brain and Spinal Cord:  Sanfilippo B trial  8 holes drilled into skull followed by 16 AAV injections

 

  • Injected a generated AAV variant (by evolution process) : engineered AAV2 is 100 fold better getting through blood brain barrier… novel variant undergoes retrograde transport to cortex ; made a cas9 to remove a tdTomato gene overexpressed in mouse and found 90% knockdown
  • Also interesting point: the porcine variant did not work in human and the human variant did not work in porcine.  Implication for FDA safety and efficacy testing must do in monkeys

They started a spinout 4D Molecular Therapeutics

 

4:25 Lentiviral Vectors for Gene Therapy

 

Munapaty Swani, Ph.D. Texas Tech Health Science Center

 

  • Can express multiple shRNA under a separate promoter but toxic so if expressed in miRNA backbone could be safer under a pol II
  • How much of flanking sequence is needed?
  • 30 nt flanking sequence is enough for Drosha processing
  • Constructed 1 to 7 shRNA-miR targeting CCR5 and 6 viral genes; all constructs were functional
  • Problem with pol ii promoter
  • These 7 shRNA miRNA protect against HIV entry if against CCR5 and the 7 viral elements
  • Used the non-integrating lentivirus for transient to see if infect T cells or not versus integrating lentivirus ; results non-integrating lentivirus did not infect t cells so safer to use
  • CCR5 disruption reduced HIV infection in T cells in vitro;
  • ZFN treatment of HIV+ PBMC prevents activation of HIV
  • Encapsulted CAS9 within LV; cas9 protein is incorporated within LV and is functional
  • First transduce then come in with the Cas9 so made all in one lentivirus with Cas9 and an sgRNA expression vector *******
  • This shows that it is possible to put all in a nanoparticle based lentivirus and an all in one may make it easier and safer (supposedly)

 

4:55 AAV Capsid Design

Miguel Seria Esteves, PhD Associate Professor Neurology, Gene Therapy Center University of Massachusetts Medical School

 

-AAV replication dependent no known human disease with native AAV

  •  Multiple barriers to get across blood brain barrier
  • AAV9 preferentially target neonatal neurons and adult astrocytes
  • Multiple capsids can be used for AAV9 infection in brain but not complete
  • Can we design better capsids to give it better tropic properties and better penetration to blood brain barrier
  • Using a polyalanine in the 5’ end of the caspid was most efficeint
  • Increases gene transfer efficiency especially IN SELECT CELL TYPES; Glial transduction and increased in striatum: increase is structure specific so little in thalamus but good in cerebellum and spinal cord
  • AAV9 tranduces also in peripheral tissues with or without modified capsid

 

Huntington’s Disease

  • Polyglutamate disease polyy glu on huntingtin protein
  • They get a 40 to 50% reduction of huntingtin but not significant between capsid design
  • They did a directed evolution of AAV capsid and generated capsid gene delivery diversity: DNA shuffling and in vivo selection
  • AAV-B1 is a new tropic capsid showing transduction of different structures
  • Five fold reduction in tropism to the liver but massive increases in muscle and beta exocrine cells and lung
  • Presence of neutralizing antibodies is a problem with AAV therapy
  • In conclusion unknown mechanisms by whivh a highly hydrophobic string of 19 alanines modifies the CHS tropism of AAV9 kvariants
  • Chimeric capsids identified from in vivo screen can reveal interesting patterns of tropism

8:20 AAV for Gene Therapy and Genome Editing

James Wilson, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine; Director, Orphan Disease Center and Director, Gene Therapy Program, University of Pennsylvania

AAV delivery for CNS can be direct into brain or into CSF but AAV are big and vectors usually don’t cross BBB

Mucopolysaccharidoses a lysosomal storage disease including Hunter, Morquio

  • There are canine models for these diseases
  • Data show that intrathecal delivery has good distribution to the CSF not the serum
  • With IV you only get spinal distribution but IT you get good distribution to cerebellum and frontal cortex
  • Intrathecal superior for clearing lesions in cortex of dogs
  • In the dog the disease is more skeletal and less neurologic so with IT dogs were better than control but still some problems
  • Avaxis: AAV9 gene therapy for SMA and ALS but trials are very small but seems to be dose dependent effect ; phase I/II done; Pfizer, Esteves and REGENEXBIO have trials
  • Liver transduction of AAV has always been a success; early vectors were not efficient for uptake but AAV9 hemophelia B (factor 9) was
  • OCTD disease of urea acid cycle (neonatal versus late onset); proteins altered metabolism
  • Have to create a metabolic sink to detoxify metabolites; not lie a gene replacement therapy
  • They got stable expression in mouse adult  model of OCTD with AAV and had rapid onset of expression; but when done in newborn mice they saw transient expression
  • Newborn liver is proliferating so gene vector may be diluted out versus the adult liver
  • So turned to gene editing (ZFN:NEHJ, TALEN:HR gene correction, CRSPR:transgene addition by HR
  • Staph aureus cas9 is smaller than most and can fit in a 4.79kb vector*****
  • Put in 2.6 kb doner OCTD gRNA
  • With a CRSPR-Cas9 mediated deliverycould maintain the expression of OCTD for over a week in newborn mice
  • BUT in adults the gene corrected animals started to die; they were losing their ability to break down protein
  • In newborns you got 10% gene editing with 30% indels but with adults 30% resulted only in 1% gene editing
  • There is a propensity to create large (>50bp) indels in the adult
  • NGS was needed to fully detect the target transgene integration, PCR is not good enough
  • Says that large animal models are needed for safety/efficacy studies
  • Problem with Rhesus monkey: started with a humanized mouse in Rag mice because did not want to do monkey studies; but did not get good expression in the monkeys (it was not the vector which was the problem)
  • AAV may be good enough of a donor to cause the HR recombination

 

Summary:  AAV vectors combined with a CRSPR CAS9 system is effective in neonatal delivery however 1) AAV by itself may be a good delivery system by itself but need the crsipir guide RNA to make the break to promote HR and get the best efficiency of integration 2) use of CRSPR CAS9 may direct the proper integration you want to deliver the OCTD exons to correct gene loci

 

Talk specific @ and #

#genetherapy

#virology

@PennMedicine

9:20 Using CRISPR/Cas9 to Target and Destroy Viral DNA Genomes; Inactivating HBV

 

Bryan R. Cullen, Ph.D., James B. Duke Professor of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Director, Center for Virology, Duke University

 

The CRISPR array is an evolutionary record of the bacteriophage that the bacteria have encountered.

  • Incredible that a bacteria that never encountered a chromosomal structure would scan the genome with these gRNAs and then initiate HR and NEHJ (error prone in mammalian cells usually 3 nt
  • HBV is a very confused retrovirus because it first goes into the nucleus then becomes a template for RNA synthesis to make the particles that reinfect the cell and invisible to immune response
  • Although they do not produce infectious virus it still remains in genome
  • sgRNA screening: use a luciferase based assay to correct or knock out luc so looking for decrease of luciferase activity
  • In a model of HBV infection where they have an inducible HBV cccDNA in a single integrated copy the cas9 reduced the DNA but protein was not decreased that much (if you hit episomal DNA you see loss and the disintegration of cut out DNA but if you hit integrated DNA you see repair
  • In their case the integrated DNA was just mutated (A or AA insertion) so in essence a frameshift mutation
  • Future strategies: use two guide RNAs to permit deletions or allow use of nickase. Currently these gRNA use polIII which is very large
  • They are editing the VEGF loci using Sau Cas9 and two sgRNAs
  • In mice with HBV integrated in their genome get some cutting but they need to go to higher doses of Cas9 system
  • Potential future success if reduce viral load as HBV continually release antigen which results in T cell anergy and if reduce the viral load may help to reduce anergy and wake up the immune system

 

Meeting specific # and @

 

#genetherapy

#virology

#adenovirus

@Duke

10:35 Targeted Endonucleases as Antiviral Agents: Promises and Pitfalls

Keith R. Jerome, M.D., Ph.D., Member, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Professor and Head, Virology Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

 

  • Can cure Hepatititis C because can stop replication
  • HSV in neurons and live for life: long lived form like HBV
  • Herpes simplex (HSV) establishes in dorsal root ganglion: acyclovir might be useful but came off patent
  • He reached out to advocacy groups to get data on need for HSV cure to convince funding agencies this is important
  • They found it is important to people; 90% want a cure if 5 years away
  • Homing endonucleases: small 800bp high specificity easy to put in vectors more difficult retargeting to other DNA targets
  • www.ltk.uzh.ch/de/dyn
  • HSV homing endonuclease from Cellectis AG targets a 24bp sequence in Ul19; introduces a DSB at target site with 4 bp 3’ overhang;
  • AAV targeted endonuclease delivery; nonimmunogenic; persists in episomal state
  • Exposure to HSV specific HE decreases virus production from neuronal cultures at all stages of replication cycle; if infect and let go for a month but the HE disrupts HSV in acute late-acute and late cycle
  • Developed a mouse model of HSV infection and AAV delivery in vivo system; so the AAV was accessing the nerve endings and going down to the trigenital dorsal ganglia; transport is independent of AAV serotype but transgene expression is HIGHLY dependent on AAV serotype
  • The in vivo HE treatment appears well tolerated however just a casual observation
  • Used NGS with bioinformatic approach to determine off target sites for the most likely mouse loci
  • HE suppresses viral reactivation (used PCR based reactivation assay)

 

Talk Specific @ and #

#drugdelivery

#genedelivery

#AIDS

#genetherapy

#HIV

@fredhutch

@defeatHIV

12:05 pm CRISPR/Cas9 for the Screening of the Human Kinome – A Pilot Study in an Aggressive Pediatric Cancer Cell Line

Simone T. Sredni, M.D., Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor, Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago

 

LentiArray CRISPR Kinase Array

  • Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT); among most aggressive of pediatric tumors rare but lethal
  • Inactivating mutations in SMARCB1 (INI1 gene)
  • Component of swi/snf chromatin remodeling complex
  • Can originate anywhere in kidney brain and spine
  • Kinase inhibitors may be effective (PLK1, ERBB2, AURAKA) : AURKA inhibitor in phase 2 and giving promising response
  • Used LentiArray viral vector system and stable expressed Cas9
  • Tested 160 kinases in screen; high transfection efficiency
  • PIMs; protooncogenes (proviral common integrations sites in Maloney leukemia; overexpressed in prostate  and hematologic; effects cell cycle cdc25a is a target and cell survival targets as well; PIM3 high copy number in MRT as well as PIM2
  • KO limits proliferation increases senescence and confirmed by MTT with pan PIM inhibitor CS6258 (Cyclene Pharmaceuticals)
  • PLK4 overexpression in peds haploinsufficient mice do make tumors; is it mutated? Yes inactivating mutations
  • PLK4 expression higher through cell cycle – dependent?
  • KI67 was down with Knockdown
  • Decrease in clonogenic assay on plastic not soft agar
  • CFI-400945 is PLK4 inhibitor is ovarian trials
  • Is effective in MRT and comparable to their cas9 knockdown

ssreni@luriechildrens.org

 

@NorthwesternMed

#cancer

#kinome

#brain

#ChildhoodCancerAwareness

 

GENE THERAPIES BREAKTHROUGHS

Tuesday, September 20

7:00 am Registration Open and Morning Coffee

 

KEYNOTE SESSION: GENOME EDITING FOR IN VIVO APPLICATIONS

8:05 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

Bryan R. Cullen, Ph.D., James B. Duke Professor of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Director, Center for Virology, Duke University

8:20 AAV for Gene Therapy and Genome Editing

James Wilson, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine; Director, Orphan Disease Center and Director, Gene Therapy Program, University of Pennsylvania

In vivo delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics remains the primary barrier to success. My lab has focused on the use of vectors based on adeno-associated virus (AAV) for achieving success in pre-clinical and clinical applications of gene replacement therapy. Most of the current academic and commercial applications of in vivo gene replacement therapy are based on endogenous AAVs we discovered as latent viral genomes in primates. These vectors are reasonably safe and efficient for application of gene replacement therapy. The emergence of genome editing methods has suggested more precise and effective methods to treat inherited diseases in which genes are silenced or mutations are corrected. AAV vectors have been the most efficient platform for achieving genome editing in vivo. We will review our attempts to achieve therapeutic genome editing in animal models of liver disease using AAV.

  • AAV for delivery of vector to CNS
  • Novel AAV Platform – capsid platform – distributed by PENN Vector
  • direct
  • IV
  • into CNS: Head and Spinal MPS – Mucopolysaccharidosis – Class of lyposomal Storage Disorder
  1. AAV9: Binds Glycans with Terminal Gal – BBB

CNS gene transfer in canine model of MPS VII following IV and intrathecal AA( administration

  • Serum
  • CSF: Frontal cortex, Cerebelum, Spinal Cord
  • Intravenous (IV) and Intracisternal (IC) – AA9

Gene Therapy for Motor Neuron Disease: SMA and ALS: PhaseI/II clinical trial of AAV9-SMN IV in infants with SMA1 – Nationwide Children’s

  • High dose +23.3 Month survival

Summary

  • Avexis
  • Abeona
  • Pfizer
  • Nationwide
  • Esteves
  • REGENXBIO

Liver Transduction Following IV Adm of AAV8 Vectors

  • Mouth liver Day 3 vs Day 90
  • Hemophilia B: Therapeutic protein

Urea Cycle Disorder

  • newborn OTCD infant in HA crisis

Goals: efficient but Transient vorrection following AAV* Gene Therapy in Newborn

transfer of caspid – promoter vector  to correct diffect

  • Survival: neonatal gene therapy – two doses of vector, three injections – immunogenic
  • Liver transplantation of neonatal before 1 year of age

Gene Editing

  • gene targeting by ZFNs, TALENs or CRISPR/Cas9
  • WT donor DNA
  • Transgene donor DNA
  • Gene disruptions

In Vivo correction – liver mouse by AAV. CRISPR-SaCas9

  • OTC donor template
  • efficient restoration of OTC Expression in the liver  – mice treated at Neonatal Stage by AAV8.CRISPR-SaCas9 – Vector administration
  • Cas9 – Kinetics of Cas9 – Week 1,3,8 – dilutes with time
  • Should work in Adult mice vs Neonatal mice: Low dose vs High dose
  • Ureogensis increased
  • On-target Deep Sequensing and their Distribution in Neonatal-treated and Adult-treated Animals

In vivo gene editing: mixed results: Site-directed Insertion of hOTCco Gene Cassette in the OTC gene : Controls: WT and spf(ash)

Western Blot: NGS analysis demonstrates on target transgene integration 20 to 32%

High Protein DIet to Evaluate the Efficacy

  • NEW BORN – Gene Targeting in FIX-KO Mouse by CRISPR/Cas9: Infron1, Exon 2 Infron2 Exon 3
  • ADULTS – Gene Targeting in FIX-KO Mouse by CRISPR/Cas9:

Gene therapy must accumulate experience in Animal models: Safety and Efficacy

NEGATIVE RESULTS IN MONKEYS: Analysis of Liver Tissue for Editing and SaCas9

  • CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated Gene knock down of rhPCSK9 in Monkeys (Rhesus Macaque) in LIVER
  • In vitro sgRNAs in monkeys and human cells
  • EGFP sgRNA vs hrPCSK
  • In vivo does not infer In vitro
  • Gene Editing in Human — we are not yet there

9:20 Using CRISPR/Cas to Target and Destroy Viral DNA Genomes

Bryan R. Cullen, Ph.D., James B. Duke Professor of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Director, Center for Virology, Duke University

A number of pathogenic human DNA viruses, including HBV, HIV-1 and HSV1, cause chronic diseases in humans that remain refractory to cure, though these diseases can be controlled by antivirals. In addition the DNA virus HPV causes tumors that depend on the continued expression of viral genes. Here, I will present data demonstrating that several of these viruses can be efficiently cleaved and destroyed using viral vectors that express Cas9 and virus-specific guide RNAs, thus providing a potential novel approach to treatment.

  • HBV – as target intervention
  • CRISPR/Cas9 RNA Guided Nuclease System (RGN)
  • NGG- PAM >> dsDNA cleavage >> NHEJ Repair >> Prfect repair >> Completion Repair Cycle
  • vs Mutagenesis – cycle exit
  1. HBV – Inactivation with CRISPR/Cas9: HBV lifecycle of the virus — reverse transcripatse (RT) of caspid and envelope – release antigens in blood invisible to Immune response, SUrfacce Antigen,COre Antigen, X-protein,
  2. Inhibitors of HBV  – cccDNA is stable for decades – virus in blood do not create new virus
  3. tetracycline represses HBV expression
  4. HBsAG va HBeAG: on core, surface, RT and N.S. sgRNA

Vector Delivery Strategies to the Liver

  • Strep pyogenes Cas9 – a diffrence PAM (5′ – NNGRRT-3′) – too large – ~4.8kb, including th ITRs.
  • Can we identify smaller Promoters
  • Packaging Sau Cas9 and two sgRNAs into AAV

Summary

  • using HBV-infected hepatocytes of a humanized liver or transgenic mouse – HBV Dual Target

Using HBV with RT and CRISPR Cas9 — viral load reduced to awake the immune response – allergy stage  – potential for future therapeutics

 

 

9:50 Grand Opening Coffee Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing

10:35 Targeted Endonucleases as Antiviral Agents: Promises and Pitfalls

Keith R. Jerome, M.D., Ph.D., Member, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Professor and Head, Virology Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

Genome editing offers the prospect of cure for infections such as HIV, hepatitis B virus, herpes simplex, and human papillomavirus, by disruption of essential viral nucleic acids or the human genes encoding receptors needed for viral entry. This talk will highlight the most recent laboratory data and the challenges still ahead in bringing this technology to the clinic.

  • Anti HSV – episonal DNA in Neuron, Acylovar – willingness to Participate in studies
  • Anti-HBV –
  • cART – HIV –

Viral replication returns if medication is taken away in two weeks

Herpes Simplex Virus HSV -1 – 50% HSV-2 16%

  1. CRISPR/Cas – difficult vectorization
  2. Targeted endonucleases
  3. Rare-cutting endonucleases in Gene Therapy – target distruction
  4. Derived from Crel enzyme by CELLECTIS AG (Paris) – co-expressed with Trex2 to remove 3″ hangover
  5. AAV as a targeted endonuclease delivery vector – mediated delivery to primary neuronal cultures
  6. Exposure to HSV-specific HE decreases virus production from neuronal cultures – virus production in treated cells
  • HSV-specific HE can disrupt HSV at all stages of the replication cycle – established in vivo
  1. cell planting
  2. AAV-mediated transgene delivery to the mouse TG in vivo – injection whiskerpad – eye scarified vs Eye not scarified
  3. AAV serotype: Transgene expression in TG is highly dependent on AAV serotype
  4. Dose dependence – Trigeminal ganglion (TG) – AAV-mediated transgene delivery to all branches ot TG
  5. In vivo mutugenesis of latent HSV
  6. Specificity – NGS analysis of Off target activity of NV1: Insertion vs Deletion vs NGS analysis of On and Off target activity of HSV1m8
  7. Endonuclease therapy suppresses viral reactivation
  8. Viral eradication: critical determinant: 3 of doses before cure occurs

Conclusion

Delivery system is the most important factor

 

11:05 Nucleic Acid Delivery Systems for RNA Therapy and Gene Editing

Daniel Anderson, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute for Medical Engineering & Science, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology and David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

High throughput, combinatorial approaches have revolutionized small molecule drug discovery. Here we describe our high throughput methods for developing and characterizing RNA delivery and gene editing systems. Libraries of degradable polymers and lipid-like materials have been synthesized, formulated and screened for their ability to deliver RNA, both in vitro and in vivo. A number of delivery formulations have been developed with in vivo efficacy, and show potential applications for the treatment of genetic diseases, viral infections and cancers.

  1. Nanoparticulate approaches – repair your DNA while you still use it
  2. Barriers to Intracellular Delivery – What organs are most amenable to Targeting
  3. Liver, spleen, bone marrow, kidney
  4. Intracellular Drug Delivery:
  • Modular Pharmaci=ology with siRNA siRNA silences mRNA
  • Turning Nuclaic Acids into Drugs: Sequence Selection,  Mechanical modification (ligand conjugation), Encapsulation

Materials used for RNA Delivery – increase diversity of materials

  • Liquid light material: Combinatorial synthesis of lipid-like materials
  • RNA NAnoparticles – Lipid -siRNA-Nanoformulations targeting TTR in the liver of Primates
  • Mechanism of ApoE mediated iLNP Delivery [Phil Sharp/Alnylam]
  • si delivery to ENdothelium
  • Lipid modified Polymers: Short amino polymers – Total Dose 5 siRNA
  • Nanoformulation Chemistry: Endothelium in many organs(preferred) vs Hepatocytes
  • Immune cells as a target: CD45 or control
  • In vivo mediated Homologous Recombination Gene repair:  Nanoformulation deliver sgRNA
  1. In vivo delivery of sgRNA to endothelium wiht nanoparticle: mediated guide RNA delivery to endothilium: DNA Repair and Protein delivery
  2. Can CRISPR be used to repair a disease gene in vivo – PLASMID encoding Cas9 and GuideRNA + 199nt ss DNA repair template
  3. in vivo CRISPR rescue repairs defect, restores body weight and stops
  4. mRNA with nanoparticles: In vivo delivery- EPO Protein: Mean Human EPO
  • AAV Only
  • AAV +CAs9 – nano – 6% repain is therapeutic
  • In vivo mediated Gene Knockout without the Virus
  1. PCSK( Blood Cholesterol Liver PCSK9 Analysis – 60% gene mutated 65% reduction in CHolesterol — Synthetic system to do gene knockout

 

11:35 PANEL DISCUSSION: CRISPR/Cas: A Realistic and Practical Look at What the Future Could Hold

Moderator: Bryan R. Cullen, Ph.D., James B. Duke Professor of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Director, Center for Virology, Duke University

Participants: Session Speakers

Each speaker will spend a few minutes sharing their viewpoints and experiences on where things stand with using the CRISPR/Cas system for in vivo applications. Attendees will have an opportunity to ask questions and share their opinions.

Discussion

  • Ex vivo delivery to Immune cell rather than to the tumor itself
  • solid cells therapy needs to reach each cell alternatives are needed

12:05 pm CRISPR/Cas9 for the Screening of the Human Kinome – A Pilot Study in an Aggressive Pediatric Cancer Cell Line

Simone T. Sredni, M.D., Ph.D., Research Associate Professor, Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago

The CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome editing is a powerful tool to identify genes involved in vital biological processes. A systematic functional screening of the human kinome has the potential to reveal molecules that are essential for tumor survival, growth, and migration. We will describe our experience using the Invitrogen LentiArray™CRISPR library to mutate 160kinases in a highly malignant pediatric tumor cell line. We will discuss our approach for screening, monitoring of cells lines, and validation.

  • LentiArray CRISPR Kinase Library – Bet Test 160 Kinase inhibitors
  • MRT – Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors – Children lexx 3 Years old
  • Genetic landmark, histology anatomical location: Kidney, Brain, Spine
  • Kinase Inhibitors and MRT
  • Finding Novel Targets
  1. Invitrogen – lentiArray CRISPR Library – edit 160 kinase genes – Viral Vector design
  • Cas9
  • gRNA-Kinase
  • Positive Control
  • Negative Control

2.  Kinome Screening – Impact on Proliferation 160 – only EIGHT were tested – significal=nly impaired cell profiferation

Retransaction and Confirmation of the identified  targets

PIM – Leukemia virus induce lymphomas: Proviral – PIM-1,2,3 KO

  • Verification of Genome Editing
  • PIMs – Proliferation
  • PIMs – Senescence – Adult hematological diseases and refractory solid tumors
  • PLK4 – Direct Mitosis Regulator – Activated Protein (mRNA) – expression in cytoplasm
  • PLK-4 and Cancer: Over-expression vs Deregulation – Colony Formation – colonygenic
  • Gene expression – Frozen Tumors – abnormality in children and in adults
  • Verification of Gene Editing: Cleavage and deletion
  • PLK-4 as a Cancer Drug Target – inhibitor enzymatic  – PLK-4 Inhibitor Xenografs

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

LIVE 9/19 4PM – 5:30PM NK CELL-BASED CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY @CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

 

 

CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

#BostonDOT16

@BostonDOT

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group is a Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target taking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

COMMENTS BY Stephen J Williams, PhD

Technological Innovations enabling NK Cell based Cancer immunotherapies

 

4 PM Autologous ex-vivo expanded NK cells for Solid Tumor Immunotherapies

Ali Ashkar DVM PhD McMaster university

 

NK cells

  1. Healer reg NK cells
  2. Inflammatory NK like TAMS
  3. Cytotoxic 90% in blood but in healthy tissue not that much

 

CD56+ CD16- healer NK near fetal maternal interface

 

Ex vivo expansion from breastCA donor most wind up cd56+ they produce IFN gamma

Their model is using ascites and testing in a PDX model but that is immunosuppressed, what about immunocompetent

 

Her2+ cell lines are extremely sensitive what about her2- then? Or triple negative?

 

Do NK cells from lung kill lung cancer cells? Yes both stimulated and unstimulated NK cells specifically

 

Ovarian ascites NK cells can purify and expand and produce cytokine

However they used survival as endpoint so possibly not reflective of NK effect on tumor

 

Other problem with model have to give them IL2 or IL15 or human NK cells would not survive in mice; however humanized mice might work better as don’t need exogenous IL2 or IL15 (mice produce the humanized version of these

 

4:30 Novel CARs introduced into NK cells facilitate Potent Tumor Cell Killing

 

NK-92 based CAR-tumor targeting (TNK) CEA CARTNK

 

CD19 CARTNK  CD123 CARTNK CD38 CAR-TNK

 

The CEA CAR work on colon cancer cell lines and all CEA positive lines however there is a NK resistant LS174T cell line

 

Early killing using a CAR NK don’t see with just NK and introducing a CAR provides killing for resiistant tumors

So the CD18 CARTNK worked well on Raji cells

 

Used the CD123 CARTNK on RPMI 8226 cell line so it would appear that you have to personalize the CAR NK cell model with the markers on each tumor – what about tumor heterogeneity?

In Raji they get about a 50% improvement in tumor killing using a CAR

There is significantly higher CD38 expression in the tumor setting

 

5) Understanding of NK Cell Effector Functions: A Single Cell Lab on a Chip Perspective

 

Tania Konry Northeastern University

 

Dynamics of cancer cell signaling responses to immune cell signals

 

High throughput single cell characterization of the effects of immune cell heterogeneity

 

Phenotypic drug profiling for better targeting of drug-resistant tumors

 

So with a microfluidic can encapsulate a cell with an assay/reagent

Could you encapsulte with nanoparticle?

 

They hold IP for a bead based multiplex assay.  The microfluidic system is a platform to detect heterogeneity among tumor cells.

 

Looking at interaction of T-cell tumor cell and NK cell using multiplex bead assays in a microfluidic system

 

Can detect cell killing within the droplet in the microfluidic system and test different drugs as well as cell death kinetics

For Example they had looked at the interaction of PD-L1 with the NK cell and tumor cell by coencapsulating the tumor and effector cells

 

With breast cancer cell spheroids you can use alginate as a polymer to generate those spheres and can perfuse with drug of your choice

 

TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS ENABLING NK CELL-BASED CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY

4:00 Autologous ex vivo Expanded NK Cells for Solid Tumor Immunotherapy

Ali_Ashkar

Ali Ashkar, D.V.M., Ph.D., Professor, Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University

In healthy individuals, the innate immune system, particularly natural killer (NK) cells, are crucial for immune surveillance. In patients with advanced tumors number and activity of NK cells decline significantly. Recent advances in NK cell expansion and activation have generated renewed interest in adoptive NK cell therapy for cancers. We have expanded NK cells from blood of breast, lung and ovarian cancer patients and have investigated their activities against autologous primary tumor cells. In addition, we have established xenograft models with the primary tumors to study the antitumor activities of autologous NK cells against primary tumor cells in vivo. Ex vivo expanded NK cells survive and proliferate in vivo in the presence of autologous PBMCs.

  • CD56 and CD16 – phynotype in Human
  • Healer NK cells (regNK)
  • Inflammatory NK cells (Similar to TAM)
  • In Malignant Ascites – NK cells CD16 negative – changed phynotype from positive
  • Model of autologous NK Cell CAncer Immunotherapy for OC, BC and LC
  • Cytokine Activated Cancer patients vs Health donors
  • Expanded NK cells IV control group and NK injected
  • Stimulated vs unstimulated NK cells: All cells, non-Epithelial, Epithelial cells
  • NK treated and IL-2 + NK Treated vs COntrol (IL-12): Liver vs Lung
  • Ex vivo expanded autologous PB-NK vs allogenous PB-NK – NK from ovarian cancer patients: Peripheral blood vs Ascites
  • Expand NK to produce IFN-gamma
  • Can expanded-NK cells from ascites kill aotologous primary ovarian cancer cells in vivo? Untreated vs NK treated
  • CD3 vs CD56 – in vivo expansion of NK cells in the peritoneal cavity?

4:30 Novel CARs Introduced into NK Cells Facilitate Potent Tumor Cell Killing that Results in Tumor Regression

Rohit_Duggal

Rohit Duggal, Ph.D., Director, Experimental Cellular Therapy, Sorrento Therapeutics

This presentation features an introduction of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), which provide homing and specificity to cytotoxic cells of the immune system. Novel CARs isolated from Sorrento’s G-MAB library targeting various tumor antigens will be described. The characterization of the NK cells modified to express these CARs will also be described.

  • NK Cell therapy
  1. mmodification od existing NK tumor cells engineered
  2. stem-cells
  • Proof of Concept:
  1. NK-92 antiCEA – CD28z 4inf  – specificity – colon cancer carcinoma : NK-92 vs Anti CEA
  2. improve potency of CAN upon expression of the anti CEA CAR in NK-resistant
  3. STI-NK 0n targeting NK (TNK)
  4. tumor control in orthotopic colon cancer model
  5. Tumor regression in Colon Cancer upon treatment with anti CEA
  6. NK-resistant LS74T colon carcinoma cells
  • GBM patient segmentation by TCGA
  1. STI NK line cytotoxicity against K562 LEUKEMIA LINE
  2. CAR-TNK
  3. Anti CD38 CAR-TNK killing specific to CD38 expressing cells – low killing

Conclution

  • NK Products in Tumor models
  • Tumorigenic capabilities of NK and of STI NK

 

5:00 Understanding of NK Cell Effector Functions: A Single-Cell Lab-on-a-Chip Perspective

Tania_Konry

Tania Konry, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University

Natural Killer (NK) cells are an essential component of innate immunity that actively inhibit tumor development. Here we present a novel single-cell method of analyzing the mechanisms underlying the cellular interactions of NK cells with multiple myeloma cells. The integrated droplet microfluidics device developed by our group permits compartmentalization of cell pairs and secreted products within sub-nanoliter volumes and thereby controls cell-to-cell communication by limiting it to interactions between the co-encapsulated cells. It allows monitoring of both contact-dependent (immune synapse formation, delivery of lytic hits) and contact-independent cellular interactions (release of cytokines, chemokines) simultaneously. This dynamic single-cell experimental model is expected to provide preclinical information particularly relevant to the scenario of NK cell-cancer cell interactions.

  • DC- T cell
  • Antigen on DC-T interaction
  • DC-T-Tumor cell interaction
  • cytotoxic molecule – secretion
  • Beads
  • modeling Myeloma Cell
  • Dynamic analysis of NK-tumor cell interaction: cell motility >> conjugation >> detachment >> lytic hit >> cell death
  • Brefeldin inhibits cytokine secretion – in presence of NK cells: FAst vs slow kill
  • Cancer cell lysis: EGTA blocks calcium-dependent perforin polymerization
  • Duration od contact, killing time: contact dependent and Independent and Target cell death: Response to PD-L1 blockage
  • Immunotherapy regulation
  • conjugate duration, detection of lytic hit and cell death

Conclusion

  1. Novel 3D Tumor mimicking microenvironment to differentiate aggressive breast cancer from Indolent Cancers and to evaluate cancer Drugs
  2. LAB-on-a CHIP: 3D Tumor cell model

DFCI/NEW Joint Program in Cancer Drug Development

 

5:30 Close of Symposium

Read Full Post »

LIVE 9/19 1:40 – 3:20 EMERGING APPLICATIONS OF CRISPR/CAS9 at CHI’s 2nd Annual Symposium CRISPR: Mechanisms and Applications @ CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

 

CHI’s 2nd Annual Symposium CRISPR: Mechanisms and Applications @ CHI’s 14th 

Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

#BostonDOT16

@BostonDOT

 

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group is a

Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target taking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

COMMENTS BY Stephen J Williams, PhD

1:50 MicroRNA Target Site Editing of Chondrocyte Master-Regulators in Primary Human Cells Using CRISPR-Cas9

Christine Seidl, Ph.D., Post-Doctoral Research Associate, Cell Signaling, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University

 

Osteoarthritis -most common for in UK

33% of people 45 years older

49% of women over 75 years

In US 1 in 2 will have knee OA

Chondrocyte: hyalronic acid, chondroitin

The problem in OA is more breakdown of these proteins than synthesis

Some of these governed by microRNA

Microrna changes during cartiledge differentiation

They found noncoding RNA during cartiledge degradation important

microRNA and RNA silencing complex

Mir675 cola2 mmp13

mir 145      sox9

Mir 138       Hif2alpha

Mir140      adamts5

 

  • Need selectivity: avoid manipulation miRNA but mutate the miRNA target at DNA level
  • Chondrocyte experiments are tricky since the primary cell type quickly differentiates into a fibroblastic phenotype
  • Use PCR barcodes to determine if targeting is specific
  • So you use a ribonucleotide protein (RNP with cas9 to make the cas9 guide RNP complex
  • Transfection ofguide RNA
  • RNP transfection delivers to the DNA
  • They wanted to target sox9 which is upstream of aggrecan and col2a1
  • Cartiledge is hypoxic so have to work in hypoxic conditions; mir145 downregulates sox9
  • Use CRSPR to uncover functional and individual microRNAs

 

#inflammation

@UniofOxford

#CMT

#geneediting

#CRISPR

#Cas9

#NIH

#CMT

#drugdiscovery

#pharmanews

#CRSPR

#genomics

 

@BiotechNews

@PharmaNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@DrugDiscover365

2:20 Massively Parallel Combinatorial Genetic Perturbation Screening with CRISPR-Cas9 in Human studies

Cheryl H. Cui, Ph.D. Candidate, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology, MIT

 

With annotationof the genome is critical for developing the field of genome screening

  • With barcoded based assays can increase the library size dramatically
  • Limitation of combinatorial studies: hypothesis driven, plasmid co-transfection tricky, pooled PCR stitching method
  • Limits the combinatorial high throughput
  • COMBIGEM from MIT: pooled digestion plasmid library
  • Pooled digest of barcoded clones and can reconstruct them in a lentiviral based library for infection
  • They made a barcoded gRNA library to use for screening
  • They reported knock out of two genes at same time (8 day post infection); get a multiplexed CRSPR
  • Dual gene repression occurred in a single cell
  • Useful for combinatorial drug ? NCI estimates 4 million $ to fully screen their nci60 pael
  • Used cell proliferation as their screen after transfecting OVCAR8 with their COMBIGEM library
  • Question: how do you know that you are not targeting an epigenetic mechanism; found targets and validated with two known drugs so look for targets and validate with drugs, ? but drug usually have multiple targets?
  • Could increase bioproduction of vaccines? possible

 

We are going from single-gene to paired gene studies

 

TALK SPECIFIC # and @

 

#systems_biology

#genetics

@MIT

@Harvard

#genomics

2:50 The Scientist’s Guide to CRISPR Law

Paul Enríquez, J.D., LL.M., Ph.D. Candidate, Structural and Molecular Biochemistry, North Carolina State University

 

Case 2013: Myriad Genetics – can genes be patented; Justice Scalia “joined the court but”… did not believe the court’s judgement even though did not know anything about the molecular biology

 

Anthony Kennedy – “ I thought cDNA was an kind of an economy class gene”

 

James Watson:  homosexualtiy, stupid people etc

 

Kary Mullis – invented PCR but “little evidence HIV causes AIDS”

 

Law is not directed by impericism – there is no CRSPR law yet!

 

USDA, EPA and FDA have authority over DNA derived GMO for example so possible anything a CRSPR scientist does could be under this jurisdiction

 

Researchers at Penn State trying to grow CRSPR crops and USDA came in and said no reason to believe CRSPR crop is not a pest… first time CRSPR got a regulatory pass

 

NIH trying to release bacteria in 1985 genetically recombined and second circuit court came in and stopped it

Oxytec was making a transgenic mosquitos in Brazil Panama with gene-driven inheritance (altered gene preferentially inherited) HOWEVER senate democrats voiced concern when they tried to release them in Florida

 

CRSPR animal research guidelines   

Genome wide inactivation of PERV (George Church): United Technologies signs $100 million to develop humanized pigs

 

WOW every state in US has stem cell clinic BUT NOT REGULATED by FDA!!!

 

In 2014 FDA defined stem cells as a drug –  title 21 so CRSPR could fall under this title

 

George Church initially was against germ line editing but now has changed his mind

NIH greenlights a CRSPR trial in human cancer if FDA gives them the green light

Constitutional law sometimes follows the mob e.g. sterilization of mentally challenged in 1928

#FDA

#CRSPR

#regulatory

@NCarolinaSt

EMERGING APPLICATIONS OF CRISPR/CAS9

1:40 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

James Inglese, Ph.D., Head Assay Development & Screening Technologies, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health

1:50 MicroRNA Target Site Editing of Chondrocyte Master-Regulators in Primary Human Cells Using CRISPR-Cas9

Christine Seidl, Ph.D., Post-Doctoral Research Associate, Cell Signaling, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University

MicroRNAs (miR) are important regulators of gene expression. Frequently, several potential target sites are located on a transcript but only one constitutes the dominant regulatory element. In this talk, a method will be discussed that allows for endogenous miR target site identification in primary human chondrocytes using CRISPR-Cas9 without the need of clonal selection of edited cells.

  • chondrocyte only cell type with articular cartilage – change in gene expression pattern:
  1. Protein coding genes
  2. non-coding RNA
  • MicroRNA generation and theur function: Seed sequence target site
  • Colagene – COL2A1, MMP-13 (mouse)
  1. Transcription factor – need selectivity – effect mRNA
  2. CRISPR-Cas9 : Cartilage Chondrocyte with cartilage matrix — enzymatic transfer
  3. Plasmid transfection not possible
  4. In vivo by site-specific genome engineering
  5. Barcode tagging by T7 / T3 primer sequence insertion – bDNA vs RNA: Silent MTS vs active MTS
  6. RiboNucleoProtein (RNP) –>> Cas9 >> single guide RNA (cr/tracr) –.. Cas9-gRNA by RNR >90% viability of HACs
  7. TF Cas9-RNR – Cas9 – RNAPII
  8. Hypoxic env: Cartilage – avascualar, low oxygen tension: MiR-145 regulate SOX9

2:20 Massively Parallel Combinatorial Genetic Perturbation Screening with CRISPR-Cas9 in Human Cells

Cheryl H. Cui, Ph.D. Candidate, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology, MIT

The systematic analysis of combinatorial gene functions is labor-intensive and challenging to scale. Our platform enables massively parallel screening of barcoded combinatorial gene perturbations in human cells. This technology leverages the simplicity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system for multiplexed targeting of specific genomic loci and the scalability of CombiGEM (Combinatorial Genetics En Masse)-based DNA assembly to construct barcoded combinatorial genetic libraries that can be quantified with high-throughput sequencing.

  • Annotation and Screening Libraries
  • Barcoded-based pooled screening
  • high throuput NGS
  1. Engineering cell behavior – gene by gene aproach, gene combination
  2. plasmid co-transfection or multiple viral infection
  3. pooled Combinatorial Genetics En Masse (CombiGEM)
  • Barcoded of assorted genetic elements
  • Barcoded (n)-wise combinatorial library
  • Programmable Genetic Pertubations
  •  Oligonucleotide array: Lentiviral vector: Guide sequence A and B
  1. Deep sequencing of targeted genomic loci
  2. immunoblot analysis of targeted protein targeted genomic loci sequencing in single cell
  • DIscovery and Drug COmbination: NCI tested 5000 Pair-wise
  • Epigenetic states are reversible
  • Global alteratuons of epigenetics landscape
  • gRNA Libraries targeting epigenetics regulators –
  • Lentiviral delivery of barcoded combinatorial tat inhibit cancer cell growth of Ovarian Cancer cells
  • CombiGEM-CRISPER results are reproducible
  • synergistic suppression of ovarian cancer cells with drug combination

Summary

  • massive parallel genotype-to-phynotype ampping in human cells
  • high reprodicibility Broad applications of CombiGEM in Human cells
  • Mapping and Deciphering dynamic and Combinatorial Genetic Networks
  • use combinatorial genetic networks for drug discovery

2:50 The Scientist’s Guide to CRISPR Law

Paul Enríquez, J.D., LL.M., Ph.D. Candidate, Structural and Molecular Biochemistry, North Carolina State University

CRISPR systems are revolutionizing science and biotechnology. However, great uncertainty exists surrounding how the law will treat this nascent biotechnology. This talk provides an overview of the key regulatory issues every CRISPR scientist should know. Drawing parallels from stem cells and gene therapy, the talk highlights the importance of law and policy in fostering CRIPSR-based research, and makes recommendations for scientists studying CRISPR mechanisms and applications.

  • GMO – can cause Cancer
  • Hacking Genomes: Gene driven inheritance – Trandgenial musquitos – Oxitec – bite human
  • Endogenous modifications – crop advantage
  • Endogenous modifications – confer pest resistance
  • CRISPR in animal research – NIH – ban use of Monkeys for researrch funded by NIH – Animal Welfare right
  • autism-like behavior replicated in Porcine
  • development of human organs in pigs
  • Stem cell tourism – Stem cell Clinic not regulated by FDA
  • Gene therapy by CRISPR
  • FDA Jurisdiction: COsmetic Act, Public Health
  • Human Germ Line gene modification

 

3:20 Close of Symposium

Read Full Post »

LIVE 9/19 10:40 – noon CRISPR Engineering Lymphoma Lines & Will Interference from CRISPR Silence RNAi? CHI’s 2nd Annual Symposium CRISPR: Mechanisms and Applications @ CHI’s 14th   Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

 

CHI’s 2nd Annual Symposium CRISPR: Mechanisms and Applications @ CHI’s 14th 

Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

Meeting #: #BostonDOT16

Meeting @: @BostonDOT

 

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group is a

Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target taking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

 

10:40 Vignettes From the Bench: CRISPR Engineering Lymphoma Lines

Arthur L. Shaffer, III, Ph.D., Staff Scientist, Laboratory of Dr. Louis Staudt, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

CRISPR/CAS9 technology is a powerful tool that permits the easy exploration of human genetics using cell line models. Our lab focuses on understanding the wiring of lymphoma cells in an effort to discover new therapeutic options. I will relate some lessons we’ve learned as we adapt CRISPR/Cas9 to the study of lymphoma.

COMMENTS by Stephen J Williams, PhD

 

 

10:40 Vignettes From the Bench: CRISPR Engineering Lymphoma Lines

Arthur L. Shaffer, III, Ph.D., Staff Scientist, Laboratory of Dr. Louis Staudt, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

 

RNAi screens first used to identify some of the genetic features of lymphomas

 

Generating the system

  • Produce Cas9 viral particles
  • Transduce cells 3 to 4 times with cas9
  • Validate select pools
  • Takes long time

 

Increase efficiently of transductions

  • GFP tag cells and with selection marker to monitor and select; increase the selectable marker and get a more enriched pool
  • Some cell lines behave well but some cell lines hate lentivirus so maybe electroporation
  • Test toxiicity with sgRNA targeting RPL6
  • Target a surface marker with sgRNA to validate the function of system (then can do by FACS) eg like CD20 or ICAM (CD54)
  • They used a DOX inducible Cas9 but some cells can be leaky (hidden activated promoter?)
  • Important to characterize all lines but he says keep even the leaky lines they might be useful down the line

 

Is AASV a good locus to use (as a control; low toxicity)?

 

  • On chromosome 19 but has lots of copies of other genes and you could get close to off target “Genomic copy number dictates a gene-independent cell line response to CRSPR”
  • Know your system!

 

  • The level of big data with CRSPR screens is in the order of magnitute of 100s compared to other transcription analyses like expression arrays
  • Need huge servers
  • Need a good programmer to use the software packages as they are not plug and play SO A GOOD BIOCURATION SYSTEM IS NEEDED

 

Question/Comment:  Many cancer cell lines have different DNA repair systems active and may be why some are good lines to use and some bad but this has not been characterized yet.

 

Question/Comment:  Broad Institute has reported the CRSPR HIV system and remove 60 plus copies of a retrovirus.

 

Question: can you use p glyoprotien for a positive control?

 

Use these Twitter #

#geneediting

#CRISPR

#Cas9

#NIH

#CMT

#drugdiscovery

#pharmanews

#CRSPR

#genomics

 

 

11:10 PANEL DISCUSSION: Will Interference from CRISPR Silence RNAi?

 

Moderator: Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

 

MMSK: New CRSPR systems being developed are looking positve for the field.  The predisigned systems are well defined but you can’t modify them in screens.  CRSPRi looks interesting but not wide penetrance of people using it in the field.  They would like to be able to offer packets to clients but many genes will be better served by using siRNA.  Not going to retire siRNA any time soon nor shRNA (some want knockdown and also knockout).

 

NIH:  CRSPR screens are showing better results than shRNA.  Off target effects are better minimized.  Drawback of CRSPRi is the limited coverage of the genome.  Must have a strong phenotype to get high coverage. Useful to get hits out of shRNA screening and then use the CRSPR as a method to interogate a pathway.  RNAi works better though to look at pathway members.

 

Abbvie:  cas9 is not easy to deliver.  So sometimes siRNA might just be good enough.  However for screens most important is to minimize off target

 

NIH:  CRSPR best way to generate cell lines. Combinitorial chemistry was thought to be panacea but now it is used to optimize a lead.

 

It is a tricky system that can turn systems on that were intitally off.  And there were alot of cell optimization problems so for NIH from NCI 60 panel maybe 25 behave and the rest are problematic.
NIH has used germinal cell lines as a surrogate for primary lines and used shRNA.  

 

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma @ NIH, NCI

  • 500,000 people affected in the US, increases with age, refractory 50%, diagnostic biopsies are undistinguishable

Gene expression profile

  • Activated B Cells
  • Germinal line – aggressive

Genomic Assult of Cancer

Making lines that effectively express Cas9 – in ~3 months

  1. produce concentrate virus for Cas9
  2. Transduce selective Blasticinin – Select cells efficiently – place in 8pt Blast
  3. Making lines that cuts well
  • 28 pass for cells for single cell cloning
  • 17 effective clones – Transduce cells with sgRNA (gfp+) targeting a surface marker line CD20 and CD54 Cutters vs Partial cutters vs Leaky
  • ABC  Amplification – TMD8 – false positive toxicity
  • Big DATA — Gene expression, RNA sequencing, Terabyte Servers needed for CRISPR – Cas9

11:10 PANEL DISCUSSION: Will Interference from CRISPR Silence RNAi?

Moderator: Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

Participants: Session Speakers

Each speaker will spend a few minutes sharing their viewpoints and experiences using CRISPR/Cas system for functional screening and complementing it with RNAi screening. Attendees will have an opportunity to ask questions and share their opinions.

Two sources of Noise in identifying the Cutting Point of CRISPR – Cas9 are coming from:

  • Guideline design
  • Cell amplification

Read Full Post »

LIVE 9/19 8AM – 10AM USING CRISPR/Cas9 FOR FUNCTIONAL SCREENING

CHI’s 2nd Annual Symposium CRISPR: Mechanisms and Applications @CHI’s 14th Discovery On Target, 9/19 – 9/22/2016, Westin Boston Waterfront, Boston

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/

http://www.discoveryontarget.com/crispr-therapies/

Meeting #: #BostonDOT16

Meeting @: @BostonDOT

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group

is a Media Partner of CHI for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target taking place September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston.

 

In Attendance, streaming LIVE using Social Media

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Editor-in-Chief

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

 

Monday, September 19

7:00 am Registration Open and Morning Coffee

COMMENTS BY Stephen J Williams, PhD

8:10 Comparing Arrayed siRNA and CRISPR Approaches Towards Functional Genomics Screening

Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

  • Array screening: microplate screens: genome wide pooled screens take a long time under gold standard;  pooled screens use alot of cell culture
  • Enrichment screens many assays are not compatible with pooled screens; assays that look at cytokines released from cells so need an arrayed format
  • Off target effect dominate sirna screens: hope 2 sirna target the same thing so most of what we see is off target
  • The CRSPRCas9 system: indels to change function
  • Use pooled gRNA plasmid libraries and use lentiviral infections, pcr amplification of gRNAs, use NGS to verify and sequence
  • Negative selection screens are more noisy than positive selection screens eg. a hairpin screens would give you offtarget (50 more than CRSPR
  • Issues with lentivirus: doing a large screen and upscaling 1) safety 2) reproduceability of infection 3) can take 7 to 10 days to see effect in small 96 well
  • Dharmacon has synthetic cRNAs so basically you need cells with Cas9 and precomplexing crRNA and tacrRNA prior to transfection in cell (reverse transfection)
  • Can use this strategy for cell cycle proteins
  • crRNAs are dependent on Cas9 so little off target effect: however a portion of cells that are resistant to editing (polyclonal population of Cas9 cells: **** SO YOU MUST pick clones
  • Then you will see 80% indels: good editing
  • NOT all crRNAs are equal: see heterogenous response
  • When do a larger screen get more hits with crRNA than siRNA
  • You can use CRSPR also to verify the hits by introduce the gene by CRSPR into same cells that have Cas9 and recapitulate phenotype (good control)
  • QuESTION: does picking Cas9 clones alter the phenotype of original cell source?
  • They did not see their target phenotype later (are there false negatives hidden in the screen?); can we identify workhorse systems where this works well?  MANY crRNAs are NOT EFFECTIVE: risk of high false negatives

 

QUESTION: Are you getting better editing?  Use the positive control genes to establish system, refine CRSPR algorithms

 

QUESTION: some of the guides are targeting isoforms that don’t exist in the cells so that is why you don’t get high % of hits (1:4, 1: 8).  Some toxicity with tracer RNAs (interferon response)

TALK SPECIFIC # and @

#Crisper

#CRSPR

#Cas9

#geneediting

#genomics

@genentech

8:40 Getting from Alpha to Omega: Successfully Conceptualizing, Starting and Finishing CRISPR/Cas Screens

Ralph Garippa, Ph.D., Director, RNAi & Gene Editing Core Facility, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

 

Collaborated with Danwei Huangfu, PhD: generates iPSC lines particular beta cell in pancreas

  • Using HDAC inhibitors and demethylase inhibitors valproic acid increases efficiencies of reprogramming
  • Biocyte with Tacra taking these iPSC cells did a deal with academia
  • Viacyte 22015 putting the iPSC in a semipermeable membrane so don’t get immune and no glucose tolerance (lifespan 32 days in rodents), deep in phase 1 and 2
  • Have to use WNT and activin A to bring to endoderm ; each lineage requires its own factors
  • EOMES is necessary but not fully sufficient for differentiation
  • So generated a iCas9 SOX17 (gives GFP signal off to on)
  • Focused on OCT4 and NANOG from Activin (TGFB dependent)
  • So with screens you are always looking for the outliers away from controls and rank and file of library (use the z score best more than a log fold outlier e.g. log2)
  • Problem: if doing these screens need to get IP from Genentech
  • Linkes Gecko version 2 over one for crgRNA libraries; avialable at Broad but must do NGS to verify library

TALK SPECIFIC # and @

#Crisper

#CRSPR

#Cas9

#geneediting

#genomics

#diabetes

@CHI

@sloan_kettering

@MSKCC_OncoNotes

@Boston

@BiotechNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

9:10 Genome Editing-Enabled HTS Assays for Genetically Inherited Disease Drug Discovery

James Inglese, Ph.D., Head Assay Development & Screening Technologies, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH

 

  • GAN giant axonal neuropathy loss of gene gigaxon (involved in protein clearance build up proteins (fibrils)  in neuronal axons)
  • Most HTS looked at promoter regions but now with CRSPR can make more physiologically relevant
  • Screening insoluble compounds: might be potent but insoluble (potent but flat DR) and chemists could make more soluble form
  • Using a intronic enhancer in promoter region could get random integration and strong transcriptional repression in a chemical screen (problems: small sequence of regulation so small section of gene regulatory elements, would not be susceptible to miRNA regulation, context epigenetic responses)
  • Genome editing can help solve these problems
  • Use two reporters (orthogonality); important to have two target pathways
  • These orthogonal assays pulled out a very effective compound which not seen in single reporter assay
  • LOSS of ACTION ASSAY: looking for modulators, loss vs gain of signal finding molecules that have off target usually; looking for the release of inhibitors of your target (could do this for transcriptionally repressed genes?); do this by generating a bicistronic reporter (coincidence reporter cell lines)
  • They did this with parkin gene and put in a coincidence reporter and allows the detection of concordant activities (determine if artifacts are in fact good signals) then run the HTS
  • Genome editing allowed for detection of new pathways not detectable with previous  promoter based strategy

TALK SPECIFIC # and @

 

#geneediting

#raredisease

#genetics

#AssayDevelopment

#NIH

#CMT

#drugdiscovery

@BostonDOT

@NIH

@BiotechNews

@PharmaNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@DrugDiscover365

9:40 Use of CRISPR and Other Genomic Technologies to Advance Drug Discovery

Namjin Chung, Ph.D., Head, Functional Genomics Platform, Discovery Research, AbbVie, Inc.

They are interested in finding VHL targets using genome wide CRSPR KO screen for renal cancer *VHL also involved in hypoxic response but look at our other posts on other factors effecting VHL hypoxic response including AMPK

  • So for isogenic cell lines if Cas9 active KO if cas9 not active no VHL KO; so can use an exogenous delivery of Cas9, the talks previously used cells that already contain Cas9
  • MAGeCK software enables robust identification of essential genes from genome scale CRSPR KO screens (2014 Nature Biology)
  • Used a bait screen to screen for immuno-suppressive molecules
  • Replicates don’t reflect what is in the library high signal to noise; should run orthogonal screens
  • Inducible CRSPR: cas9 under tet inducible promoter
  • Can get around problems with in vivo by doing an ex vivo strategy
  • For primary cells it is work in progress (multiple issues including lentiviral transfection of cas9

TALK SPECIFIC # and @

#geneediting

#CRISPR

#Cas9

#NIH

#CMT

#drugdiscovery

#pharmanews

#CRSPR

#genomics

@BostonDOT

@abbvie

@BiotechNews

@PharmaNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@DrugDiscover365

USING CRISPR/Cas9 FOR FUNCTIONAL SCREENING

8:00 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

  • Off target effects emerged and interpretation difficulties emerged as well.
  • CRISPR – and screening and how using the Screening technology for experiments

8:10 Comparing Arrayed siRNA and CRISPR Approaches Towards Functional Genomics Screening

Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

RNAi has been a workhorse for loss-of-function screening. Although powerful, RNAi is hampered by false positives. New screening technologies based on CRISPR/Cas9 appear less prone to off-target effects. CRISPR/Cas9 screens are conducted in pooled formats. However, this format is not amenable to many assays. In an effort to expand its utility, we explored the use of arrayed CRISPR/Cas9 screening with synthetic CRISPR RNAs.

Arrayed Screens vs Genome-wide pooled screens for proliferation-type assays. Many assays are not compatible with pooled screening Like: Cytokines, assays need remain unpooled.

  • Off target effects Dominate siRNA Screens
  • CRISPR-Cas9 Nuclease, crRNA tracrRNA
  • Edit genes for Pooled gRNA plasmid libraries
  • positive selection screen of a few thousand genes reveals very clean screen – 50 non-targeting controls show very little activity
  • Arrayed CRISPR: Lenti delivery of gsRNA to Cas9 expressing cells can induce penetrant phenotypes in plate-based format.
  • Evaluating Synthetic and Tracer RNA: crRNA (CRISPR RNA) – an Alternative to siRNAs (tracrRNA)– scalable abd automatable with CRSPR reagents
  • DNA replication – the knockdown of certain proteins: COntrols agains geminin (GMNN) – maximum phynotype at transfuction
  • Synthetic crRNA Effects are dependent on CRISPR Cas9
  • More expressing clone expess more Cas9
  • loss of protein in GMNN editing clone
  • Nor all crRNAs are equal: Heterogenous response
  • Screening with Synthetic crRNA
  1. targeting 650 ubiquitin-related genes with 4 crRNAs per gene
  2. siRNA: DIfferent crRNA targeting the same gene exhibiting more correlation than siRNA designed to target the same gene.
  3. better correlation guides targeting same gene
  4. top crRNA Screen Candidates – more responsive
  5. GO Term ENrichment
  • Testing Edit-R with a Different System -1
  1. Novel candidate genes
  2. known control genes
  • Immunofluorescence assays: DNA replication controls
  • comparison of siRNAs vs crRNAs

Key question: is one active crRNA good enough if OTEs are not as big a factor? identify few workhorses systems that crRNA work well in like HAP1

Summary

  • GMNN responsive in screening
  • Sequence Scoring algorithms for targeting editing
  • assay effective stability of the agent — phynotype is stable, clone population – several days
  • Interferon response – toxicity with crRNA
  • Pooled vs Arrays RNA – some labs do both some do only one of these

 

 

8:40 Getting from Alpha to Omega: Successfully Conceptualizing, Starting and Finishing CRISPR/Cas Screens

Ralph Garippa, Ph.D., Director, RNAi & Gene Editing Core Facility, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

For certain molecular targets, to unravel the underlying biology of loss-of-function studies, it is simply not enough to potently knockdown the protein. In some cases, a complete functional knockout is called for. Here we summarize our early experiences, highlighting the strengths of this new powerful system but also calling attention to technical areas which need to be addressed and further improved as the technology moves deeper into the mainstream.

  • Custom individual Crispr construct:
  1. cut, nick
  2. custome pooled libraries
  3. select lentiviral vectors
  4. Off-the-shelf Library Expansion and QC: Human and Mouse
  5. Genomic DNA: CRISPR
  6. human pluripotent stem cells hPSC
  7. Forward Genetics vs Reverse Genetics
  8. Endodermal: all the GI – Beta cells in Pancereas
  9. Viacyte.com – create cells for implantation, Beta cells in Pancreas – after 75 implantation balabced glycemia in rats
  10. Markers; Wnt, ActA
  11. sgRNA vs shRNA – pooled screens
  12. Endoderm differntiation relies on TGF betaand WNT Activation
  13. Positive control: EOMES – mouse embryo
  14. Whole-genome Library Infection >> Mutagenesis >> Differentiation – % of Total cells Infected 30%
  15. SMAD2 SOX17 – Endodermal differentiation
  16. Hit validation – tested 22 od the top 50 positive regulators
  17. Known positive regulators in the tGFBeta Pathway

Conclutions

  • Organogenesis regulation of — new understanding of
  • Gene knockout strong phynotype identification

 

9:10 Genome Editing-Enabled HTS Assays for Genetically Inherited Disease Drug Discovery

James Inglese, Ph.D., Head Assay Development & Screening Technologies, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health

The targeted precision of genome editing was used in combination with advances in reporter gene design to modify the genetic loci of neurologic target genes to create HTS assays for compound library interrogation. Our goal was to identify transcriptionally active pharmacological agents acting by a variety of mechanisms, including through chromatin co-regulators accessible by our assay design. Specific case studies will serve to illustrate progress and findings to date.

  • ADST Lab: Assay Development & Screening Technology Lab
  • Disease Foundation
  • Postdocs working on NCATS
  1. GAN – Giant Axonal Neuropathy: Gigaxonin – gene responsible for filaments causing disease – dementing cells as a result of gene dysfunction
  2. Gene Therapy: Clear aggregates from Exon: Flanking primers Exon Targeting region PAM
  3. Evaluation of chemical libraries with quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS)
  4. Structure Activity Relationship (SAR) – Robots – Automated large scale screening
  • CMT – CHarcot-Marie-Tooth two copies of mylan sheet – pmp22 – Degenerative neuropaty – HTS assay development strategies for transcriptional PMP22 down-regulation – Swann cells in Rat of the Sciatic nerve
  • Limitation:
  1. not sensitive to posttransctitional mechanisms microRNA
  2. context-dependent epigenetic regulation unrelated to naive
  3. Pharmacology of active compounds from PMP22 reporter assays
  4. Compound tested: Bryostatin
  • Reporter Gee Assays: Loss-of-signal vs Gain-of-signal: Basal output va Treatment output: ENzyme assay vs Cell assay
  • SOlving compound-mediated reporter t1/2 effects with coincedence detection
  • Ribosome “Skipping”
  • CHemical biology and Drug discovery to install CR parkin in Parkinson Disease
  • Activity signature from a chemical ibrary qHIS
  • New MOA which regulate
  • Recommendations for reporter gene assays
  • New genome editing
  • Targeted phyenotypic assays designed using geneome editied

9:40 Use of CRISPR and Other Genomic Technologies to Advance Drug Discovery

Namjin Chung, Ph.D., Head, Functional Genomics Platform, Discovery Research, AbbVie, Inc.

Advances in CRISPR gene editing and genomics technologies are rapidly changing biopharmaceutical R&D landscape, from target ID and validation, to drug mechanism of action, and to translational science. We will use vignettes of various genomics research applications within AbbVie R&D environment as a witness to this paradigm shift currently ongoing in the drug industry.

Data fro Cook 2014 NRDD

  • right biology .. right target.. right molecule .. right dose .. right patient
  • Functional Genomics: CRISPR

I.   Gene pertubation libraries allow functional analysis of all genes

  • Two types of NGS application
  • Screening design for VHL-synthetic lethal KO
  • Construction of VHL isogenic pair cell line: VHL-mutant cell lines (786-O, A-498)
  • TCGA 2013 Nature
  • Genome-wide CRISPR KO screen to identify novel VHL synthetic lethal targets
  • Pooled lentiviral screening based cellualr barcoding: Pooled Infection and Screening Assays
  • NA Seq
  • Pooled screening deconvolution
  • VHL CRISPR KO screening hits: mTOR inhibitors, temsirolimus, everolimus – 1st and 2nd line therapies – VHL protects cells from essential gene KO
  • Receptor ID screen for an orphan immunosupressive ligand – receptor for ligand not known – detect aAb –>> IgG1-APC
  • ligand binding – FACS sorting and NGS – Normalizeation of hits against noise – critical for eliminating bias present in screening library
  • CRISPR/CRISPRi vs CRISPR KO: Transcription Activation & Supression
  • Inducible CRISPR KO system

II.     In vivo Immuno-oncology screening: Tumor target and immuno targets

III.    Challenges in Primary Human cells

functional genomic analysis of human genetic variants based on CRISPR KO and KI larger role in new target discovery in the post-genome era

Read Full Post »

Hashtags and Handles for CHI’s 14th Annual Discovery on Target, September 19 – 22, 2016 in Boston, Westin Boston Waterfront

Curator: Stephen J Williams, PhD

 

CAMBRIDGE HEALTHTECH INSTITUTE’S 2016 Discovery on Target

attend

http://www.DiscoveryOnTarget.com

DOT-150x150

  • CHI’s Discovery on Target in Boston, September 19-22, 2016,

  • CRISPR: Mechanisms to Applications on 9/19/2016

 

To Follow LIVE CONFERENCE COVERAGE PLEASE FOLLOW ON TWITTER USING

Meeting #: #BostonDOT16

Meeting @: @BostonDOT

 

 

Overall good meeting #s:

#personalizedmedicine

#innovation

#cancer

#immunology

#immunooncology

#pharmanews

#CRSPR

#geneediting

#crisper

#biotech

 

AND FOLLOW these @

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@BiotechNews

@CHI

@FierceBiotech

 

TALK SPECIFIC # and @

 

Monday Sept. 19th Understanding CRISPR: Mechanisms and Applications

 

Day Time Talk Title # @
Monday Sept. 19, 2016 8:00 AM 8:00 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc

 

#BostonDOT16

#personalizedmedicine

#oncology

#Boston

#immunology

#biotech

#CRSPR

#geneediting

#genomics

@BostonDOT

@CHI

@genentech

@Boston

@BiotechNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@GeneEditing

@Genomeresearch

 

 

 

         
  8:10 AM 8:10 Comparing Arrayed siRNA and CRISPR Approaches Towards Functional Genomics Screening

Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

 

#Crisper

#CRSPR

#Cas9

#geneediting

#genomics

 

 

@genentech

 

 

  8:40 AM 8:40 Getting from Alpha to Omega: Successfully Conceptualizing, Starting and Finishing CRISPR/Cas Screens

Ralph Garippa, Ph.D., Director, RNAi & Gene Editing Core Facility, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

 

 

 

#Crisper

#CRSPR

#Cas9

#geneediting

#genomics

@CHI

@Boston

@BiotechNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

 

  9:10 AM 9:10 Genome Editing-Enabled HTS Assays for Genetically Inherited Disease Drug Discovery

James Inglese, Ph.D., Head Assay Development & Screening Technologies, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health

 

 

#geneediting

#raredisease

#genetics

#AssayDevelopment

#NIH

#CMT

#drugdiscovery

 

 

@BostonDOT

@NIH

@BiotechNews

@PharmaNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@DrugDiscover365

 

 

 

 

  9:40 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10:40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11:40

9:40 Use of CRISPR and Other Genomic Technologies to Advance Drug Discovery

Namjin Chung, Ph.D., Head, Functional Genomics Platform, Discovery Research, AbbVie, Inc.

10:40 Vignettes From the Bench: CRISPR Engineering Lymphoma Lines

Arthur L. Shaffer, III, Ph.D., Staff Scientist, Laboratory of Dr. Louis Staudt, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

 

11:10 PANEL DISCUSSION: Will Interference from CRISPR Silence RNAi?

Moderator: Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

 

 

 

#geneediting

#CRISPR

#Cas9

#NIH

#CMT

#drugdiscovery

#pharmanews

#CRSPR

#genomics

@BostonDOT

@abbvie

@BiotechNews

@PharmaNews

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA_1950

@DrugDiscover365

 

  1:40 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:50 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:50

EMERGING APPLICATIONS OF CRISPR/CAS9

1:40 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

James Inglese, Ph.D., Head Assay Development & Screening Technologies, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health

 

1:50 MicroRNA Target Site Editing of Chondrocyte Master-Regulators in Primary Human Cells Using CRISPR-Cas9

Christine Seidl, Ph.D., Post-Doctoral Research Associate, Cell Signaling, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University

 

2:20 Massively Parallel Combinatorial Genetic Perturbation Screening with CRISPR-Cas9 in Human Cells

Cheryl H. Cui, Ph.D. Candidate, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology, MIT

 

2:50 The Scientist’s Guide to CRISPR Law

Paul Enríquez, J.D., LL.M., Ph.D. Candidate, Structural and Molecular Biochemistry, North Carolina State University

 

 

 

note use above hashtags including these specific ones

 

 

#CMT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#inflammation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#systembiology

#genetics

 

 

 

note use above @ and these talk specific ones

 

 

@NIH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@UniofOxford

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MIT

@Harvard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@NCarolinaSt

 

 

 

 

 

12-3:00 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3:30-6 PM

Special Conference Short Courses

SC7: Using IP Landscape Studies to Improve Your Confidence While Navigating a Crowded IP and Technology Space – Detailed Agenda

 

Instructors:

David Berry, M.D., Ph.D., General Partner, Flagship Ventures

Ananda Chakrabarty, Ph.D., Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Illinois College of Medicine

Anu Daniel, Ph.D., Licensing Manager, Innovation, Partners Healthcare

Drew Lowery, Ph.D., Director of Life Sciences and Group Leader, Biotechnology Pharmaceuticals Group, Global Prior Art, Inc.

Amy Mendel, J.D., SVP, Intellectual Property, Evelo Biosciences

Daniel Neuman, Ph.D., Group Leader, Chemistry & Materials, Global Prior Art, Inc.

 

SC12: Introduction to Gene Editing – Detailed Agenda

Instructors:

Stephanie Mohr, Ph.D., Lecturer, Genetics & Director, Drosophila RNAi Screening Center at Harvard Medical School

Claire Yanhui Hu, Ph.D., Senior Bioinformatician, Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School

Paul Enríquez, J.D., LL.M., Ph.D. Candidate, Structural and Molecular Biochemistry, North Carolina State University

 

#IP

#patent

#partnership

#innovation

#biotech

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#genetics

#CRSPR

#Cas9

#molecularscreen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@FlagshipVenture

@PartnersNews

@GlobalArtAgency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@harvardmed

@NCarolinaSt

 

 

     

 

   

 

Tuesday Sept. 21   Advances in Gene Editing and Gene Silencing   Conference Part 1

 

   

 

    KEYNOTE SESSION:

GENOME EDITING FOR IN VIVO APPLICATIONS

 

 
  8:05 AM 8:05 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

Bryan R. Cullen, Ph.D., James B. Duke Professor of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Director, Center for Virology, Duke University

 

#genetherapy

#virology

#adenovirus

 

@Duke

 

  8:20 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10:35 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11:05 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11:35 AM

 

8:20 AAV for Gene Therapy and Genome Editing

James Wilson, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine; Director, Orphan Disease Center and Director, Gene Therapy Program, University of Pennsylvania

 

10:35 Targeted Endonucleases as Antiviral Agents: Promises and Pitfalls

Keith R. Jerome, M.D., Ph.D., Member, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Professor and Head, Virology Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

 

11:05 Nucleic Acid Delivery Systems for RNA Therapy and Gene Editing

Daniel Anderson, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute for Medical Engineering & Science, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology and David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

 

11:35 PANEL DISCUSSION: CRISPR/Cas: A Realistic and Practical Look at What the Future Could Hold

Moderator: Bryan R. Cullen, Ph.D., James B. Duke Professor of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Director, Center for Virology, Duke University

Participants: Session Speakers

 

 

 

 

#genetherapy

#virology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#drugdelivery

#genedelivery

#cancer

 

@PennMedicine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@UW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MIT

@kochinstitute

@Duke

 

 

  12:05 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12:45 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12:05 pm CRISPR/Cas9 for the Screening of the Human Kinome – A Pilot Study in an Aggressive Pediatric Cancer Cell Line

Simone T. Sredni, M.D., Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor, Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago

 

12:45 Luncheon Presentation: Building a Better Research Story: Screening with shRNA and CRISPR

Ryan Raver, Ph.D., Global Product Manager, Functional Genomics, MilliporeSigma

 

 

 

 

 

 

#cancer

#kinome

#brain

#ChildhoodCancerAwareness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#genomics

 

 

 

@NorthwesternMed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MilliporeSigma

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

COMPLEMENTING THE USE CRISPR & RNAi FOR DISEASE MODELING

 

   
  2:05 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:15 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:45 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3:15 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4:25 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4:55 PM

2:05 Chairperson’s Remarks

Ralph Garippa, Ph.D., Director, RNAi Core Facility, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

 

2:15 Comparing Arrayed siRNA and CRISPR Approaches Towards Functional Genomics Screening

Scott Martin, Ph.D., Group Lead, Functional Genomics, Genentech Inc.

 

2:45 Use of CRISPR/Cas9-Based Gene Editing to Model and Treat Retinal Degenerative Disease

Donald Zack, M.D., Ph.D., Guerrieri Professor of Genetic Engineering and Molecular Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University

 

3:15 HP Inkjet Technology for Enhancing Gene Editing Experiments

Erica Squires, Ph.D., Senior Applications Scientist, HP Inc.

 

4:25 Harnessing the Versatile CRISPR-Cas9 Systems for Cancer Modeling Platforms

Geoffrey Bartholomeusz, Ph.D., Associate Professor and Director, Target Identification and Validation Program, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

 

4:55 Technology Panel: Trends in CRISPR & RNAi Technologies

Moderator: Ralph Garippa, Ph.D., Director, RNAi Core Facility, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Panelists:

Louise Baskin, Senior Product Manager, Dharmacon, GE Healthcare

Paul Diehl, Ph.D., Director, Business Development, Cellecta Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#eyedisease

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#bioprinting

#3D_printing

#tech

#innovation

#geneediting

 

 

 

 

 

#endcancer

#cancer

#drugdiscovery

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@sloan_kettering

@MSKCC_OncoNotes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@genentech

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MacularHope

@HopkinsMedicine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@HP

@My3DPrinting

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MDAndersonNews

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MMSK

@sloan_kettering

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@CELLECTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday Sept. 21 2016   EXPLORING THE VERSATILITY OF CRISPR/Cas9    
   

8:00 AM

 

 

 

 

 

8:10 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8:40 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9:10 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10:25 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10:55 AM

8:00 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

TJ Cradick , Ph.D., Head of Genome Editing, CRISPR Therapeutics

 

8:10 Functional Genomics Using CRISPR-Cas9: Technology and Applications

Neville Sanjana, Ph.D., Core Faculty Member, New York Genome Center and Assistant Professor, Department of Biology & Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University

 

8:40 Therapeutic Gene Editing With CRISPR/Cas9

TJ Cradick , Ph.D., Head of Genome Editing, CRISPR Therapeutics

 

9:10 Towards Combinatorial Drug Discovery: Mining Heterogenous Phenotypes from Large Scale RNAi/Drug Perturbations

Arvind Rao, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

 

10:25 CRISPR in Stem Cell Models of Eye Disease

Alexander Bassuk, M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Iowa

 

10:55 CRISPR in Mouse Models of Eye Disease

Vinit Mahajan, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa College of Medicine

 

 

 

 

 

 

  @CRISPRTX

 

 

 

 

 

 

@nyuniversity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@CRISPRTX

 

 

 

 

 

 

@MDAndersonNews

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@uiowa

 

         
Wednesday 21, 2016 12:55 – 2:40 Plenary Keynote Sessions

 

   
  12:55 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:15 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:00 PM

12:55 Event Chairperson’s Opening Remarks

Cindy Crowninshield, RDN, LDN, Conference Director, Cambridge Healthtech Institute

 

1:15 Open Innovation Partnerships to Bridge the Gap from GWAS to Drug Targets Jeffrey Barrett, D.Phil., Founding Director, Open Targets; Group Leader, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

 

Aaron Day-Williams, Ph.D., Biogen Scientific Lead, Open Targets; Associate Director and Head, Statistical Genetics, Biogen

 

2:00 Cell-Penetrating Mini-Proteins Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D., Erving Professor, Chemistry, Departments of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Chemistry and Chemical Biology, and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University and Harvard Medical School

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#openinnovation

#openscience

#bioinformatics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#openinnovation

 

@CHI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@Biogen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@HarvardMed

 

 

 

 

 

         
Thursday September 22,2016 Part 2 USING CRISPR/RNAi FOR TARGET DISCOVERY & PATHWAY ANALYSIS    
   

8:30 AM

8:30 Chairperson’s Remarks

John Doench, Ph.D., Associate Director, Genetic Perturbation Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT

 

8:45 Strategies and Applications Using shRNA and CRISPR Technology for Identification of New Druggable Targets

Donald Apanovitch, Ph.D., Director, Functional Genomics (Oncology), Pfizer Research

9:15 High Throughput Phenotypic Screening in Drug Discovery Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System

Greg Hoffman, Ph.D., Investigator III, Developmental & Molecular Pathways Department, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research

 

9:45 CRISPR Libraries for Functional Genomics: Optimizing On-Target Activity and Avoiding Off-Target Effects

John Doench, Ph.D., Associate Director, Genetic Perturbation Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT

 

11:10 A High Throughput Functional Genomics Screening Approach to Identify Modulators of Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay to Treat Mendelian Disorders

Madhu Lal-Nag, Ph.D., Group Leader, Trans-NIH RNAi Facility, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health

 

11:40 Fas-Mediated Apoptosis Overcomes Resistance to Kras-Silencing in Lung Cancer Cells

Haiwei Mou, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Fellow, Laboratory of Dr. Wen Xue, RNA Therapeutics Institute and Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School

 

12:10 pm Arrayed CRISPR Screening with Synthetic crRNA Libraries for High-Throughput Loss-of-Function Studies

Louise Baskin, Senior Product Manager, Dharmacon, GE Healthcare

 

 

 

   
Thursday

Sept. 22 2016

12:50 PM 12:50 Luncheon Presentation: Optimizing CRISPR for in vitro and in vivo Pooled Functional Genetic Screens

Paul Diehl, Ph.D., Director, Business Development, Cellecta, Inc.

 

 

   
    CRISPR-BASED FUNCTIONAL SCREENING FOR ONCOLOGY    
  2:15 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:20 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:50 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3:30 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4:00 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:15 Chairperson’s Remarks

Roderick Beijersbergen, Ph.D., Group Leader, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Head, NKI Robotics and Screening Center

 

2:20 Large Scale CRISPR Screens for Discovery of Genotype Specific Combination Therapies

Roderick Beijersbergen, Ph.D., Group Leader, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Head, NKI Robotics and Screening Center

 

2:50 GPCR-Mediated cAMP as an Immune Checkpoint in Cancer Identified by RNAi Screening

Tillmann Michels, Head of Research Group, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Department of Interventional Immunology, Regensburg Center for Interventional Immunology; Member, Department of Translational Immunology, German Cancer Research Center

 

3:30 CRISPR-Based Mutagenesis Approach for Cancer Drug Target Identification

Junwei Shi, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

 

4:00 Applying Functional Genomics in Mouse Models of Human Cancer

Yejing Ge, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Fellow, Laboratory of Dr. Elaine Fuchs, Department of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, Rockefeller University

 

4:30 A CRISPR/Cas9 System to Increase Homologous Recombination Repair

Ciro Bonetti, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Scientist, Laboratory of Dr. Andrea Ventura, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

 

 

 

 

   
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         

 

Read Full Post »

genomicsinpersonalizedmedicinecovervolumeone

Content Consultant: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

2.1.5.12

2.1.5.12   Genomics Orientations for Personalized Medicine: Request for Book Review Writing on Amazon.com, Volume 2 (Volume Two: Latest in Genomics Methodologies for Therapeutics: Gene Editing, NGS and BioInformatics, Simulations and the Genome Ontology), Part 2: CRISPR for Gene Editing and DNA Repair

Genomics Orientations for Personalized Medicine

Volume One

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B018DHBUO6

electronic Table of Contents

Chapter 1

1.1 Advances in the Understanding of the Human Genome The Initiation and Growth of Molecular Biology and Genomics – Part I

1.2 CRACKING THE CODE OF HUMAN LIFE: Milestones along the Way – Part IIA

1.3 DNA – The Next-Generation Storage Media for Digital Information

1.4 CRACKING THE CODE OF HUMAN LIFE: Recent Advances in Genomic Analysis and Disease – Part IIC

1.5 Advances in Separations Technology for the “OMICs” and Clarification of Therapeutic Targets

1.6 Genomic Analysis: FLUIDIGM Technology in the Life Science and Agricultural Biotechnology

Chapter 2

2.1 2013 Genomics: The Era Beyond the Sequencing of the Human Genome: Francis Collins, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, et al.

2.2 DNA structure and Oligonucleotides

2.3 Genome-Wide Detection of Single-Nucleotide and Copy-Number Variation of a Single Human Cell 

2.4 Genomics and Evolution

2.5 Protein-folding Simulation: Stanford’s Framework for Testing and Predicting Evolutionary Outcomes in Living Organisms – Work by Marcus Feldman

2.6 The Binding of Oligonucleotides in DNA and 3-D Lattice Structures

2.7 Finding the Genetic Links in Common Disease: Caveats of Whole Genome Sequencing Studies

Chapter 3

3.1 Big Data in Genomic Medicine

3.2 CRACKING THE CODE OF HUMAN LIFE: The Birth of Bioinformatics & Computational Genomics – Part IIB 

3.3 Expanding the Genetic Alphabet and linking the Genome to the Metabolome

3.4 Metabolite Identification Combining Genetic and Metabolic Information: Genetic Association Links Unknown Metabolites to Functionally Related Genes

3.5 MIT Scientists on Proteomics: All the Proteins in the Mitochondrial Matrix identified

3.6 Identification of Biomarkers that are Related to the Actin Cytoskeleton

3.7 Genetic basis of Complex Human Diseases: Dan Koboldt’s Advice to Next-Generation Sequencing Neophytes

3.8 MIT Team Researches Regulatory Motifs and Gene Expression of Erythroleukemia (K562) and Liver Carcinoma (HepG2) Cell Lines

Chapter 4

4.1 ENCODE Findings as Consortium

4.2 ENCODE: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Complex Genetic Diseases

4.3 Reveals from ENCODE Project will Invite High Synergistic Collaborations to Discover Specific Targets  

4.4 Human Variome Project: encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence

4.5 Human Genome Project – 10th Anniversary: Interview with Kevin Davies, PhD – The $1000 Genome

4.6 Quantum Biology And Computational Medicine

4.7 The Underappreciated EpiGenome

4.8 Unraveling Retrograde Signaling Pathways

4.9  “The SILENCE of the Lambs” Introducing The Power of Uncoded RNA

4.10  DNA: One man’s trash is another man’s treasure, but there is no JUNK after all

Chapter 5

5.1 Paradigm Shift in Human Genomics – Predictive Biomarkers and Personalized Medicine – Part 1 

5.2 Computational Genomics Center: New Unification of Computational Technologies at Stanford

5.3 Personalized Medicine: An Institute Profile – Coriell Institute for Medical Research: Part 3

5.4 Cancer Genomics – Leading the Way by Cancer Genomics Program at UC Santa Cruz

5.5 Genome and Genetics: Resources @Stanford, @MIT, @NIH’s NCBCS

5.6 NGS Market: Trends and Development for Genotype-Phenotype Associations Research

5.7 Speeding Up Genome Analysis: MIT Algorithms for Direct Computation on Compressed Genomic Datasets

5.8  Modeling Targeted Therapy

5.9 Transphosphorylation of E-coli Proteins and Kinase Specificity

5.10 Genomics of Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses

Chapter 6

6.1  Directions for Genomics in Personalized Medicine

6.2 Ubiquinin-Proteosome pathway, Autophagy, the Mitochondrion, Proteolysis and Cell Apoptosis: Part III

6.3 Mitochondrial Damage and Repair under Oxidative Stress

6.4 Mitochondria: More than just the “Powerhouse of the Cell”

6.5 Mechanism of Variegation in Immutans

6.6 Impact of Evolutionary Selection on Functional Regions: The imprint of Evolutionary Selection on ENCODE Regulatory Elements is Manifested between Species and within Human Populations

6.7 Cardiac Ca2+ Signaling: Transcriptional Control

6.8 Unraveling Retrograde Signaling Pathways

6.9 Reprogramming Cell Fate

6.10 How Genes Function

6.11 TALENs and ZFNs

6.12 Zebrafish—Susceptible to Cancer

6.13 RNA Virus Genome as Bacterial Chromosome

6.14 Cloning the Vaccinia Virus Genome as a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome 

6.15 Telling NO to Cardiac Risk- DDAH Says NO to ADMA(1); The DDAH/ADMA/NOS Pathway(2)

6.16  Transphosphorylation of E-coli proteins and kinase specificity

6.17 Genomics of Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses

6.18  Diagnosing Diseases & Gene Therapy: Precision Genome Editing and Cost-effective microRNA Profiling

Chapter 7

7.1 Harnessing Personalized Medicine for Cancer Management, Prospects of Prevention and Cure: Opinions of Cancer Scientific Leaders @ http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com

7.2 Consumer Market for Personal DNA Sequencing: Part 4

7.3 GSK for Personalized Medicine using Cancer Drugs Needs Alacris Systems Biology Model to Determine the In Silico Effect of the Inhibitor in its “Virtual Clinical Trial”

7.4 Drugging the Epigenome

7.5 Nation’s Biobanks: Academic institutions, Research institutes and Hospitals – vary by Collections Size, Types of Specimens and Applications: Regulations are Needed

7.6 Personalized Medicine: Clinical Aspiration of Microarrays

Chapter 8

8.1 Personalized Medicine as Key Area for Future Pharmaceutical Growth

8.2 Inaugural Genomics in Medicine – The Conference Program, 2/11-12/2013, San Francisco, CA

8.3 The Way With Personalized Medicine: Reporters’ Voice at the 8th Annual Personalized Medicine Conference, 11/28-29, 2012, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

8.4 Nanotechnology, Personalized Medicine and DNA Sequencing

8.5 Targeted Nucleases

8.6 Transcript Dynamics of Proinflammatory Genes

8.7 Helping Physicians identify Gene-Drug Interactions for Treatment Decisions: New ‘CLIPMERGE’ program – Personalized Medicine @ The Mount Sinai Medical Center

8.8 Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing[1]

8.9 Diagnosing Diseases & Gene Therapy: Precision Genome Editing and Cost-effective microRNA Profiling

Chapter 9

9.1 Personal Tale of JL’s Whole Genome Sequencing

9.2 Inspiration From Dr. Maureen Cronin’s Achievements in Applying Genomic Sequencing to Cancer Diagnostics

9.3 Inform Genomics Developing SNP Test to Predict Side Effects, Help MDs Choose among Chemo Regimens

9.4 SNAP: Predict Effect of Non-synonymous Polymorphisms: How Well Genome Interpretation Tools could Translate to the Clinic

9.5  LEADERS in Genome Sequencing of Genetic Mutations for Therapeutic Drug Selection in Cancer Personalized Treatment: Part 2

9.6 The Initiation and Growth of Molecular Biology and Genomics – Part I

9.7 Personalized Medicine-based Cure for Cancer Might Not Be Far Away

9.8 Personalized Medicine: Cancer Cell Biology and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS)

 Chapter 10

10.1 Pfizer’s Kidney Cancer Drug Sutent Effectively caused REMISSION to Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

10.2 Imatinib (Gleevec) May Help Treat Aggressive Lymphoma: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

10.3 Winning Over Cancer Progression: New Oncology Drugs to Suppress Passengers Mutations vs. Driver Mutations

10.4 Treatment for Metastatic HER2 Breast Cancer

10.5 Personalized Medicine in NSCLC

10.6 Gene Sequencing – to the Bedside

10.7 DNA Sequencing Technology

10.8 Nobel Laureate Jack Szostak Previews his Plenary Keynote for Drug Discovery Chemistry

Chapter 11

11.1 mRNA Interference with Cancer Expression

11.2 Angiogenic Disease Research Utilizing microRNA Technology: UCSD and Regulus Therapeutics

11.3 Sunitinib brings Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to Remission – RNA Sequencing – FLT3 Receptor Blockade

11.4 A microRNA Prognostic Marker Identified in Acute Leukemia 

11.5 MIT Team: Microfluidic-based approach – A Vectorless delivery of Functional siRNAs into Cells.

11.6 Targeted Tumor-Penetrating siRNA Nanocomplexes for Credentialing the Ovarian Cancer Oncogene ID4

11.7 When Clinical Application of miRNAs?

11.8 How mobile elements in “Junk” DNA promote cancer. Part 1: Transposon-mediated tumorigenesis,

11.9 Potential Drug Target: Glycolysis Regulation – Oxidative Stress-responsive microRNA-320

11.10  MicroRNA Molecule May Serve as Biomarker

11.11 What about Circular RNAs?

Chapter 12

12.1 The “Cancer Establishments” Examined by James Watson, Co-discoverer of DNA w/Crick, 4/1953

12.2 Otto Warburg, A Giant of Modern Cellular Biology

12.3 Is the Warburg Effect the Cause or the Effect of Cancer: A 21st Century View?

12.4 Hypothesis – Following on James Watson

12.5 AMPK Is a Negative Regulator of the Warburg Effect and Suppresses Tumor Growth In Vivo

12.6 AKT signaling variable effects

12.7 Rewriting the Mathematics of Tumor Growth; Teams Use Math Models to Sort Drivers from Passengers

12.8 Phosphatidyl-5-Inositol signaling by Pin1

Chapter 13

13.1 Nanotech Therapy for Breast Cancer

13.2 BRCA1 a tumour suppressor in breast and ovarian cancer – functions in transcription, ubiquitination and DNA repair

13.3 Exome sequencing of serous endometrial tumors shows recurrent somatic mutations in chromatin-remodeling and ubiquitin ligase complex genes

13.4 Recurrent somatic mutations in chromatin-remodeling and ubiquitin ligase complex genes in serous endometrial tumors

13.5 Prostate Cancer: Androgen-driven “Pathomechanism” in Early onset Forms of the Disease

13.6 In focus: Melanoma Genetics

13.7 Head and Neck Cancer Studies Suggest Alternative Markers More Prognostically Useful than HPV DNA Testing

13.8 Breast Cancer and Mitochondrial Mutations

13.9  Long noncoding RNA network regulates PTEN transcription

Chapter 14

14.1 HBV and HCV-associated Liver Cancer: Important Insights from the Genome

14.2 Nanotechnology and HIV/AIDS treatment

14.3 IRF-1 Deficiency Skews the Differentiation of Dendritic Cells

14.4 Sepsis, Multi-organ Dysfunction Syndrome, and Septic Shock: A Conundrum of Signaling Pathways Cascading Out of Control

14.5  Five Malaria Genomes Sequenced

14.6 Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk

14.7 Approach to Controlling Pathogenic Inflammation in Arthritis

14.8 RNA Virus Genome as Bacterial Chromosome

14.9 Cloning the Vaccinia Virus Genome as a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome

Chapter 15

15.1 Personalized Cardiovascular Genetic Medicine at Partners HealthCare and Harvard Medical School

15.2 Congestive Heart Failure & Personalized Medicine: Two-gene Test predicts response to Beta Blocker Bucindolol

15.3 DDAH Says NO to ADMA(1); The DDAH/ADMA/NOS Pathway(2)

15.4 Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR-gamma) Receptors Activation: PPARγ Transrepression for Angiogenesis in Cardiovascular Disease and PPARγ Transactivation for Treatment of Diabetes

15.5 BARI 2D Trial Outcomes

15.6 Gene Therapy Into Healthy Heart Muscle: Reprogramming Scar Tissue In Damaged Hearts

15.7 Obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by RNA levels of 23 genes – CardioDx, a Pioneer in the Field of Cardiovascular Genomic  Diagnostics

15.8 Ca2+ signaling: transcriptional control

15.9 Lp(a) Gene Variant Association

15.9.1 Two Mutations, in the PCSK9 Gene: Eliminates a Protein involved in Controlling LDL Cholesterol

15.9.2. Genomics & Genetics of Cardiovascular Disease Diagnoses: A Literature Survey of AHA’s Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics, 3/2010 – 3/2013

15.9.3 Synthetic Biology: On Advanced Genome Interpretation for Gene Variants and Pathways: What is the Genetic Base of Atherosclerosis and Loss of Arterial Elasticity with Aging

15.9.4 The Implications of a Newly Discovered CYP2J2 Gene Polymorphism Associated with Coronary Vascular Disease in the Uygur Chinese Population

15.9.5  Gene, Meis1, Regulates the Heart’s Ability to Regenerate after Injuries.

15.10 Genetics of Conduction Disease: Atrioventricular (AV) Conduction Disease (block): Gene Mutations – Transcription, Excitability, and Energy Homeostasis

15.11 How Might Sleep Apnea Lead to Serious Health Concerns like Cardiac and Cancers?

Chapter 16

16.1 Can Resolvins Suppress Acute Lung Injury?

16.2 Lipoxin A4 Regulates Natural Killer Cell in Asthma

16.3 Biological Therapeutics for Asthma

16.4 Genomics of Bronchial Epithelial Dysplasia

16.5 Progression in Bronchial Dysplasia

Chapter 17

17.1 Breakthrough Digestive Disorders Research: Conditions Affecting the Gastrointestinal Tract.

17.2 Liver Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Hepatosteatosis

17.3 Biomarkers-identified-for-recurrence-in-hbv-related-hcc-patients-post-surgery

17.4  Usp9x: Promising Therapeutic Target for Pancreatic Cancer

17.5 Battle of Steve Jobs and Ralph Steinman with Pancreatic cancer: How We Lost

Chapter 18

18.1 Ubiquitin Pathway Involved in Neurodegenerative Disease

18.2 Genomic Promise for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Dementias, Autism Spectrum, Schizophrenia, and Serious Depression

18.3 Neuroprotective Therapies: Pharmacogenomics vs Psychotropic Drugs and Cholinesterase Inhibitors

18.4 Ustekinumab New Drug Therapy for Cognitive Decline Resulting from Neuroinflammatory Cytokine Signaling and Alzheimer’s Disease

18.5 Cell Transplantation in Brain Repair

18.6 Alzheimer’s Disease Conundrum – Are We Near the End of the Puzzle?

Chapter 19

19.1 Genetics and Male Endocrinology

19.2 Genomic Endocrinology and its Future

19.3 Commentary on Dr. Baker’s post “Junk DNA Codes for Valuable miRNAs: Non-coding DNA Controls Diabetes”

19.4 Therapeutic Targets for Diabetes and Related Metabolic Disorders

19.5 Secondary Hypertension caused by Aldosterone-producing Adenomas caused by Somatic Mutations in ATP1A1 and ATP2B3 (adrenal cortical; medullary or Organ of Zuckerkandl is pheochromocytoma)

19.6 Personal Recombination Map from Individual’s Sperm Cell and its Importance

19.7 Gene Trap Mutagenesis in Reproductive Research

19.8 Pregnancy with a Leptin-Receptor Mutation

19.9 Whole-genome Sequencing in Probing the Meiotic Recombination and Aneuploidy of Single Sperm Cells

19.10 Reproductive Genetic Testing

Chapter 20

20.1 Genomics & Ethics: DNA Fragments are Products of Nature or Patentable Genes?

20.2 Understanding the Role of Personalized Medicine

20.3 Attitudes of Patients about Personalized Medicine

20.4  Genome Sequencing of the Healthy

20.5   Genomics in Medicine – Tomorrow’s Promise

20.6  The Promise of Personalized Medicine

20.7 Ethical Concerns in Personalized Medicine: BRCA1/2 Testing in Minors and Communication of Breast Cancer Risk

 20.8 Genomic Liberty of Ownership, Genome Medicine and Patenting the Human Genome

Chapter 21

Recent Advances in Gene Editing Technology Adds New Therapeutic Potential for the Genomic Era:  Medical Interpretation of the Genomics Frontier – CRISPR – Cas9

Introduction

21.1 Introducing CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Technology – Works by Jennifer A. Doudna

21.1.1 Ribozymes and RNA Machines – Work of Jennifer A. Doudna

21.1.2 Evaluate your Cas9 gene editing vectors: CRISPR/Cas Mediated Genome Engineering – Is your CRISPR gRNA optimized for your cell lines?

21.1.3 2:15 – 2:45, 6/13/2014, Jennifer Doudna “The biology of CRISPRs: from genome defense to genetic engineering”

21.1.4  Prediction of the Winner RNA Technology, the FRONTIER of SCIENCE on RNA Biology, Cancer and Therapeutics  & The Start Up Landscape in BostonGene Editing – New Technology The Missing link for Gene Therapy?

21.2 CRISPR in Other Labs

21.2.1 CRISPR @MIT – Genome Surgery

21.2.2 The CRISPR-Cas9 System: A Powerful Tool for Genome Engineering and Regulation

Yongmin Yan and Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer, Houston, USADaoyan Wei*

21.2.3 New Frontiers in Gene Editing: Transitioning From the Lab to the Clinic, February 19-20, 2015 | The InterContinental San Francisco | San Francisco, CA

21.2.4 Gene Therapy and the Genetic Study of Disease: @Berkeley and @UCSF – New DNA-editing technology spawns bold UC initiative as Crispr Goes Global

21.2.5 CRISPR & MAGE @ George Church’s Lab @ Harvard

21.3 Patents Awarded and Pending for CRISPR

21.3.1 Litigation on the Way: Broad Institute Gets Patent on Revolutionary Gene-Editing Method

21.3.2 The Patents for CRISPR, the DNA editing technology as the Biggest Biotech Discovery of the Century

2.4 CRISPR/Cas9 Applications

21.4.1  Inactivation of the human papillomavirus E6 or E7 gene in cervical carcinoma cells using a bacterial CRISPR/Cas 

21.4.2 CRISPR: Applications for Autoimmune Diseases @UCSF

21.4.3 In vivo validated mRNAs

21.4.6 Level of Comfort with Making Changes to the DNA of an Organism

21.4.7 Who will be the the First to IPO: Novartis bought in to Intellia (UC, Berkeley) as well as Caribou (UC, Berkeley) vs Editas (MIT)??

21.4.8 CRISPR/Cas9 Finds Its Way As an Important Tool For Drug Discovery & Development

Summary

Read Full Post »

Licensing Agreements for CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patent, Volume 2 (Volume Two: Latest in Genomics Methodologies for Therapeutics: Gene Editing, NGS and BioInformatics, Simulations and the Genome Ontology), Part 2: CRISPR for Gene Editing and DNA Repair

Licensing Agreements for CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patent

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

AstraZeneca’s CRISPR research collaborations are with the following institutions:

The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK

Under the terms of the collaboration with the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, research will focus on deleting specific genes relevant to cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory, autoimmune & inflammatory diseases and regenerative medicine to understand their precise role in these conditions. AstraZeneca will provide cell lines that can be targeted using the Sanger Institute’s collection of genome-wide CRISPR guide-RNA libraries to generate populations of cells in which defined genes are switched off. Genes will subsequently be identified by next-generation sequencing and cell populations tested to validate the effects of a given gene on a wide range of physical and biological traits.

“The Sanger Institute’s guide-RNA library enables researchers to target genes with incredible specificity,” said Dr. Kosuke Yusa, Member of Faculty at the Sanger Institute. “CRISPR has transformed the way we study the behaviour of cells and now the application of this powerful technology to the search for effective drugs has the potential to benefit patients.”

The Innovative Genomics Initiative, California

The Innovative Genomics Initiative (IGI) is a joint venture between the University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco. The research collaboration will focus on either inhibiting (CRISPRi) or activating (CRISPRa) genes to understand their role in disease pathology. The IGI and AstraZeneca will work closely together to identify and validate gene targets relevant to cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases and regenerative medicine to understand their precise role in these conditions.

“We are excited to pair the IGI’s premier expertise in CRISPR gene editing and regulation with AstraZeneca’s deep experience in therapeutics,” said Jacob Corn, Scientific Director of the Innovative Genomics Initiative. “I’m confident that, working side-by-side with scientists at AstraZeneca, our collaboration will positively impact drug discovery and development to hasten treatments to patients.”

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts

Under the terms of the collaboration with Thermo Fisher Scientific, a world-leading reagent and instrument provider, AstraZeneca will receive RNA-guide libraries that target individual known human genes and gene families. AstraZeneca can screen these guides against cell lines to identify new disease targets.

“Through this research collaboration with AstraZeneca, Thermo Fisher is helping to accelerate access to cutting edge genome-editing applications for next generation drug discovery. Enabling more relevant disease models will improve target identification and translation to therapeutics,” said Dr. Jon Chesnut, Director of Synthetic Biology R&D at Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Broad Institute/Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts

The collaboration with the Broad Institute and Whitehead Institute will evaluate a genome-wide CRISPR library against a panel of cancer cell lines with a view to identifying new targets for cancer drug discovery.

In addition to the new collaborations, AstraZeneca’s in-house programme is currently adapting CRISPR technology to streamline and accelerate the production of cell lines and translational models that mimic complex genomic and disease-relevant scenarios.

“Application of the CRISPR technology for precise genome editing in recombinant cell lines and in relevant disease models should enable us to identify novel targets, build better test systems for drug discovery and enhance the translatability of our efficacy and safety models,” said Dr. Lorenz Mayr, Vice President, Reagents & Assay Development, AstraZeneca.

The short video above explaining how CRISPR technology works is available in English, Mandarin and Spanish, and a still image illustrating the technology is available.

Download broadcast video and high-resolution image

About The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is one of the world’s leading genome centres. Through its ability to conduct research at scale, it is able to engage in bold and long-term exploratory projects that are designed to influence and empower medical science globally. Institute research findings, generated through its own research programmes and through its leading role in international consortia, are being used to develop new diagnostics and treatments for human disease.http://www.sanger.ac.uk/

About Innovative Genomics Initiative

The Innovative Genomics Initiative (IGI) was established in early 2014 at the Li Ka Shing Center for Genomic Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, and is a joint UC Berkeley/UC San Francisco initiative catalyzing and guiding the global effort in both the academic and commercial research communities to unleash the transformative potential of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for positive human impact.

About the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT

The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT was launched in 2004 to empower this generation of creative scientists to transform medicine. The Broad Institute seeks to describe all the molecular components of life and their connections; discover the molecular basis of major human diseases; develop effective new approaches to diagnostics and therapeutics; and disseminate discoveries, tools, methods and data openly to the entire scientific community.

Founded by MIT, Harvard and its affiliated hospitals, and the visionary Los Angeles philanthropists Eli and Edythe L. Broad, the Broad Institute includes faculty, professional staff and students from throughout the MIT and Harvard biomedical research communities and beyond, with collaborations spanning over a hundred private and public institutions in more than 40 countries worldwide. For further information about the Broad Institute, go to http://www.broadinstitute.org.

About Whitehead Institute

Whitehead Institute is a world-renowned non-profit research institution dedicated to improving human health through basic biomedical research. Wholly independent in its governance, finances, and research programs, Whitehead shares a close affiliation with Massachusetts Institute of Technology through its faculty, who hold joint MIT appointments. http://wi.mit.edu

About Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is the world leader in serving science, with revenues of $17 billion and 50,000 employees in 50 countries. Our mission is to enable our customers to make the world healthier, cleaner and safer. We help our customers accelerate life sciences research, solve complex analytical challenges, improve patient diagnostics and increase laboratory productivity. Through our four premier brands – Thermo Scientific, Life Technologies, Fisher Scientific and Unity Lab Services – we offer an unmatched combination of innovative technologies, purchasing convenience and comprehensive support. For more information, please visit www.thermofisher.com.

SOURCE

https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2015/astrazeneca-crispr-technology-genome-editing-29012015.html

Novartis

  • Caribou BioSciences – Jennifer Daudna
  • Intellia

Novartis bought in to Intellia–as well as Caribou, which out-licensed some pioneering CRISPR tech created by Jennifer Doudna at UC Berkeley–with a clear interest in tapping the science for its ambitious CAR-T work reengineering T cells into cancer weapons. John Leonard was wooed in from the Big Pharma world, after a stint in charge of R&D at AbbVie ($ABBV). And gene editing–deleting, repairing and inserting genetic information to correct an ailment–has what is widely viewed as a potent future in devising a new generation of potential cures.

“CRISPR/Cas9 technology has potential to transform medicine by addressing previously untreatable genetic targets and serving as the basis for new and better therapies,” said Leonard in a statement. “This novel technology could potentially eliminate many severely disabling and life-threatening diseases for patients.”

But after the Big Vision, detailed insights into the company’s plans can be hard to glean. Asked about the apparent likelihood of an IPO in the offing, CEO Nessan Bermingham declined comment.

SOURCE

SOURCE

http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/crispr-player-intellia-looks-ipo-ready-after-70m-round/2015-09-01?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Bayer LifeScience Center (BLSC)

  • ERS Genomics – Emmanuelle Charpentier
  • CRISPR Therapeutics – Emmanuelle Charpentier and

Bayer Inks CRISPR Patent Licensing Agreement

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb) – Bayer and ERS Genomics announced today that they have signed a patent license agreement, giving the Bayer LifeScience Center (BLSC) access to ERS’s foundational CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology.

Financial and other details of the agreement were not disclosed.

ERS Genomics was formed to commercialize patents held by CRISPR pioneer Emmanuelle Charpentier, now director of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology. She is a co-inventor on a foundational CRISPR/Cas9 patent application currently at the center of a patent interference trial being conducted by the US Patent and Trademark Office. A team led by the Broad Institute currently holds the key patent for CRISPR/Cas9 technology.

The BLSC has also recently created a joint venture with CRISPR Therapeutics, a firm Charpentier co-founded, to develop new CRISPR-based therapies.

SOURCE

https://www.genomeweb.com/business-news/bayer-inks-crispr-patent-licensing-agreement

Vertex Therapeutics

  • CRISPR Therapeutics – Emmanuelle Charpentier

IDT

  • Caribou BioSciences – Jennifer Daudna

DuPont

  • Caribou BioSciences – Jennifer Daudna

Evotec

  • Broad Institute

Regeneron

  • ERS Genomics – Emmanuelle Charpentier
  • Intellia – Jennifer Daudna

Licensing deal with Regeneron to accelerate CRISPR biotech Intellia (Jennifer Doudna’s Start Up) for an IPO

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/04/12/licensing-deal-with-regeneron-to-accelerate-crispr-biotech-intellia-jennifer-doudnas-start-up-for-an-ipo/

Albany Molecular Research (AMRI)

  • Broad Institute

https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/broad-institute-licenses-crisprcas9-amri?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20News:%20Broad%20Institute%20Licenses%20CRISPR/Cas9%20to%20AMRI%20-%2008/24/2016%2011:15:00%20AM

MERCK

  • Moderna Therapeutics

Cases in Biotech Entrepreneurship: Selective Start Ups in 2016

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/03/06/cases-in-biotech-entrepreneurship-selective-start-ups-in-2016/

Moderna Therapeutics Deal with Merck: Are Personalized Vaccines here?

Curator & Reporter: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/08/11/moderna-therapeutics-deal-with-merck-are-personalized-vaccines-here/

at #JPM16 – Moderna Therapeutics turns away an extra $200 million: with AstraZeneca (collaboration) & with Merck ($100 million investment)

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/01/13/at-jpm16-moderna-therapeutics-turns-away-an-extra-200-million-with-astrazeneca-collaboration-with-merck-100-million-investment/

Related Articles

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »