Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for November, 2012

Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Induce Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Prostate Cancer Cells(1)

Screen Shot 2021-07-19 at 7.44.44 PM

Word Cloud By Danielle Smolyar

Authors: Dejuan Kong, Aamir Ahmad, Bin Bao, Yiwei Li, Sanjeev Banarjee, Fazlul H. Sarkar, Wayne State University School of Medicine

Reporter-Curator: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.

Clinically, there has not been much success in treating solid tumors with histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). Histone acetylation and deacetylation play an important role in transcriptional regulation of genes and increased activity is associated with many cancers, therefore it was thought that HDAC inhibition might be fruitful as a therapy.  There have been several phase I and II clinical trials using HDACi for treatment of various malignancies, including hematological and solid malignancies(2), with most success seen in hematologic malignancies such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma and little or no positive outcome with solid tumors.  Many mechanisms of resistance to HDACi in solid tumors have been described, most of which are seen with other chemotherapeutics such as increased multidrug resistance gene MDR1, increased anti-apoptotic proteins and activation of cell survival pathways(3).

A report in PLOS One by Dr. Dejuan Kong, Dr. Fazlul Sarkar, and colleagues from Wayne State University School of Medicine, demonstrate another possible mechanism of resistance to HDACi in prostate cancer, by induction of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which has been associated with the development of resistance to chemotherapies in other malignancies of epithelial origin(4,5).

EMT is an important differentiation process in embryogenesis and felt to be important in progression of cancer.  Epithelial cells will acquire a mesenchymal morphology (on plastic this looks like a cuboidal epithelial cell gaining a more flattened, elongated, tri-corner morphology; see paper Figure 1) and down-regulate epithelial markers such as cytokeratin, up-regulation of mesenchymal markers, increased migration and invasiveness in standard assays, and increased resistance to chemotherapeutics, and similarity to cancer stem cells(6-10).

ImageFigure 1. HDACis led to the induction of EMT phemotype. (A and B) PC3 cells treated with TSA and SAHA for 24 h at indicated doses.  The photomicrographs of PC3 cells treated with TSA and SAHA exhibited a fibroblastic-type phenotype, while cells treated with DMAO control displayed rounded epithelial cell morphology (original magnification, x 100). (C) Treated PC3 cells show increased mesenchymal markers vimentin and ZEB1 and F-actin reorganization.  Figure taken from Kong, D., Ahmad, A., Bao, B., Li, Y., Banerjee, S., and Sarkar, F. H. (2012) PloS one 7, e45045

In this study the authors found that treatment of prostate carcinoma cells with two different HDACis (trichostatin A (TSA) and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)) induced EMT phenotype mediated through up-regulation of transcription factors ZEB1, ZEB2 and Slug, increased expression of mesenchymal markers vimentin, N-cadherin and fibronectin by promoting histone 3 acetylation on gene promoters.  In addition TSA increased the stem cell markers Sox2 and Nanog with concomitant EMT morphology and increased cell motility.

Below is the abstract of this paper(1):

ABSTRACT

Clinical experience of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) in patients with solid tumors has been disappointing; however, the molecular mechanism of treatment failure is not known. Therefore, we sought to investigate the molecular mechanism of treatment failure of HDACIs in the present study. We found that HDACIs Trichostatin A (TSA) and Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) could induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype in prostate cancer (PCa) cells, which was associated with changes in cellular morphology consistent with increased expression of transcription factors ZEB1, ZEB2 and Slug, and mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, N-cadherin and Fibronectin. CHIP assay showed acetylation of histone 3 on proximal promoters of selected genes, which was in part responsible for increased expression of EMT markers. Moreover, TSA treatment led to further increase in the expression of Sox2 and Nanog in PCa cells with EMT phenotype, which was associated with cancer stem-like cell (CSLC) characteristics consistent with increased cell motility. Our results suggest that HDACIs alone would lead to tumor aggressiveness, and thus strategies for reverting EMT-phenotype to mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) phenotype or the reversal of CSLC characteristics prior to the use of HDACIs would be beneficial to realize the value of HDACIs for the treatment of solid tumors especially PCa.

Highlights of the research include:

  • TSA and SAHA induce morphologic changes  in prostate carcinoma LNCaP and PC3 cells related to EMT by microscopy as well as accumulation of mesenchymal markers ZEB1, vimentin, and F-actin reorganization shown by immunofluorescence microscopy and increased expression of these markers shown by real-time PCR
  • Western blotting showed TSA treatment resulted in hyperacetyulation of histone 3 whi8le CHIP analysis revealed increased histone 3 acetylation on the promoters of vimentin, ZEB2, Slug, and MMP2
  • Western analysis revealed that HDACi not only induced EMT but increased the expression of cancer stem cell markers associated with increased motility such as Sox2 and Nanog.  Increased cell migration was measured by Transwell migration assays and increased cell motility was measured via cell detachment assays

1.            Kong, D., Ahmad, A., Bao, B., Li, Y., Banerjee, S., and Sarkar, F. H. (2012) PloS one 7, e45045

2.            Bertino, E. M., and Otterson, G. A. (2011) Expert opinion on investigational drugs 20, 1151-1158

3.            Robey, R. W., Chakraborty, A. R., Basseville, A., Luchenko, V., Bahr, J., Zhan, Z., and Bates, S. E. (2011) Molecular pharmaceutics 8, 2021-2031

4.            Wang, Z., Li, Y., Kong, D., Banerjee, S., Ahmad, A., Azmi, A. S., Ali, S., Abbruzzese, J. L., Gallick, G. E., and Sarkar, F. H. (2009) Cancer research 69, 2400-2407

5.            Wang, Z., Li, Y., Ahmad, A., Azmi, A. S., Kong, D., Banerjee, S., and Sarkar, F. H. (2010) Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy 13, 109-118

6.            Hugo, H., Ackland, M. L., Blick, T., Lawrence, M. G., Clements, J. A., Williams, E. D., and Thompson, E. W. (2007) Journal of cellular physiology 213, 374-383

7.            Thiery, J. P. (2002) Nature reviews. Cancer 2, 442-454

8.            Kong, D., Banerjee, S., Ahmad, A., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Sethi, S., and Sarkar, F. H. (2010) PloS one 5, e12445

9.            Kong, D., Li, Y., Wang, Z., and Sarkar, F. H. (2011) Cancers 3, 716-729

10.          Bao, B., Wang, Z., Ali, S., Kong, D., Li, Y., Ahmad, A., Banerjee, S., Azmi, A. S., Miele, L., and Sarkar, F. H. (2011) Cancer letters 307, 26-36

Other research papers on Cancer and Cancer Therapeutics were published on this Scientific Web site as follows:

PIK3CA mutation in Colorectal Cancer may serve as a Predictive Molecular Biomarker for adjuvant Aspirin therapy

Nanotechnology Tackles Brain Cancer

Response to Multiple Cancer Drugs through Regulation of TGF-β Receptor Signaling: a MED12 Control

Personalized medicine-based cure for cancer might not be far away

GSK for Personalized Medicine using Cancer Drugs needs Alacris systems biology model to determine the in silico effect of the inhibitor in its “virtual clinical trial”

Lung Cancer (NSCLC), drug administration and nanotechnology

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer drugs – where does the Future lie?

Cancer Innovations from across the Web

arrayMap: Genomic Feature Mining of Cancer Entities of Copy Number Abnormalities (CNAs) Data

How mobile elements in “Junk” DNA promote cancer. Part 1: Transposon-mediated tumorigenesis.

Cancer Genomics – Leading the Way by Cancer Genomics Program at UC Santa Cruz

Closing the gap towards real-time, imaging-guided treatment of cancer patients.

Closing the gap towards real-time, imaging-guided treatment of cancer patients.

mRNA interference with cancer expression

Search Results for ‘cancer’ on this web site

Cancer Genomics – Leading the Way by Cancer Genomics Program at UC Santa Cruz

Closing the gap towards real-time, imaging-guided treatment of cancer patients.

Lipid Profile, Saturated Fats, Raman Spectrosopy, Cancer Cytology

mRNA interference with cancer expression

Pancreatic cancer genomes: Axon guidance pathway genes – aberrations revealed

Biomarker tool development for Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Van Andel Institute and Emory University

Is the Warburg Effect the cause or the effect of cancer: A 21st Century View?

Crucial role of Nitric Oxide in Cancer

Targeting Glucose Deprived Network Along with Targeted Cancer Therapy Can be a Possible Method of Treatment

Read Full Post »

A revolutionary microchip-based human disease model for testing drugs

Reporter: Ritu Saxena, Ph.D.

Researchers at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, have developed lung-on-a-microfluid chip and shown that it mimic human lung function in response to Interluekin-2 (IL-2) and mechanical strain. Authors describe it as “a “lung-on-a-chip” that reconstituted the alveolar-capillary interface of the human lung and exposed it to physiological mechanical deformation and flow; in other words, it breathed rhythmically much like a living lung”.

The model was developed by Hu et al and reported earlier in the journal Science in 2010. The group has now been successful in demonstrating that lung-on-a-chip can act as a drug-testing model for pulmonary edema. Infact, Hu et al were able to predict the activity of a new drug, GSK2193874, for edema. Authors stated “These studies also led to identification of potential new therapeutics, including angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and a new transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) ion channel inhibitor (GSK2193874), which might prevent this life-threatening toxicity of IL-2 in the future.” The findings have been published recently in the November 7 issue of Science Translational Medicine.

Research

To recreate lung on the microchip, the authors cultured two toes of human lung cells in parallel microchannels separated by a thin membrane. It was observed that the upper channel (alveolar) was filled with air, while the lower channel (microvascular) was filled with liquid. The observation was similar to what occurs in human lung. Breathing motion of the lung was mimicked on the chip by applying vacuum cyclically to the sides of the channels.

Mimicking pulmonary edema

Pulmonary edema is a condition characterized by the abnormal buildup of fluid in the air sacs of the lungs, which leads to shortness of breath. It is often caused when the heart is not able to pump blood to the body efficiently, it can back up into the veins that take blood through the lungs to the left side of the heart. As the pressure in these blood vessels increases, fluid is pushed into the air spaces (alveoli) in the lungs. This fluid reduces normal oxygen movement through the lungs. This and the increased pressure can lead to shortness of breath.

Hu and colleagues observed that when IL-2 was added to the microvascular channel, the fluid started to leak into the alveolar compartment of the chip. This process is a reproduction of what happens in edema. Further, adding cyclic mechanical strain along with IL-2 compromised the pulmonary barrier even further and leading to a threefold increase in leakage.

Drug-testing model

Once the authors established the pulmonary disease model on the microchip, they tested against a novel pharmacological agent, GSK2193874, which blocks certain ion channels activated by mechanical strain. This drug was able to inhibit leakage suggesting that it might be a viable treatment option for patients with pulmonary edema who are being mechanically ventilated. A major advantage of using this model is avoiding the use of animal models for research.

Future perspective

The lung-on-a-chip model developed by Hu et al could be used to test novel agents for pulmonary edema.

Editorial note on the article in Science translational medicine article states “The next step is to hook this lung up to other chip-based organs− heart, liver, pancreas, etc.−with the goal of one day being able to rapidly screen many drugs and conditions that could affect patient health.”

Source:

Journal articles

Hul D, et al. A Human Disease Model of Drug Toxicity−Induced Pulmonary Edema in aLung-on-a-Chip. Microdevice Sci Transl Med. 2012 Nov 7;4(159):159ra147.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23136042

Hul D et al Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chipScience. 2010 Jun 25;328(5986):1662-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576885

News brief

Video link to lung-on-a-chip http://wyss.harvard.edu/viewpage/240/

Sciencedaily report, November 7, 2012 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121107141044.htm

Read Full Post »

Special Considerations in Blood Lipoproteins, Viscosity, Assessment and Treatment

Special Considerations in Blood Lipoproteins, Viscosity, Assessment and Treatment

Author: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP

and

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

This is the second of a two part discussion of viscosity, hemostasis, and vascular risk

This is Part II of a series on blood flow and shear stress effects on hemostasis and vascular disease.

See Part I on viscosity, triglycerides and LDL, and thrombotic risk.

 

Hemostatic Factors in Thrombophilia

Objectives.—To review the state of the art relating to elevated hemostatic factor levels as a potential risk factor for thrombosis, as reflected by the medical literature and the consensus opinion of recognized experts in the field, and to make recommendations for the use of specific measurements of hemostatic factor levels in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individual patients.

Data Sources.—Review of the medical literature, primarily from the last 10 years.

Data Extraction and Synthesis.—After an initial assessment of the literature, key points were identified. Experts were assigned to do an in-depth review of the literature and to prepare a summary of their findings and recommendations.

A draft manuscript was prepared and circulated to every participant in the College of American Pathologists Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia prior to the conference. Each of the key points and associated recommendations was then presented for discussion at the conference. Recommendations were accepted if a consensus of the 27 experts attending the conference was reached. The results of the discussion were used to revise the manuscript into its final form.

Consensus was reached on 8 recommendations concerning the use of hemostatic factor levels in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individual patients.

The underlying premise for measuring elevated coagulation factor levels is that if the average level of the factor is increased in the patient long-term, then the patient may be at increased risk of thrombosis long-term. Both risk of thrombosis and certain factors increase with age (eg, fibrinogen, factor VII, factor VIII, factor IX, and von Willebrand factor). Are these effects linked or do we need age specific ranges? Do acquired effects like other diseases or medications affect factor levels, and do the same risk thresholds apply in these instances? How do we assure that the level we are measuring is a true indication of the patient’s average baseline level and not a transient change? Fibrinogen, factor VIII, and von Willebrand factor are all strong acute-phase reactants.

Risk of bleeding associated with coagulation factor levels increases with roughly log decreases in factor levels. Compared to normal (100%), 60% to 90% decreases in a coagulation factor may be associated with excess bleeding with major trauma, 95% to 98% decreases with minor trauma, and .99% decrease with spontaneous hemorrhage. In contrast, the difference between low risk and high risk for thrombosis may be separated by as little as 15% above normal.

It may be possible to define relative cutoffs for specific factors, for example, 50% above the mean level determined locally in healthy subjects for a certain factor. Before coagulation factor levels can be routinely used to assess individual risk, work must be done to better standardize and calibrate the assays used.

Detailed discussion of the rationale for each of these recommendations is presented in the article. This is an evolving area of research. While routine use of factor level measurements is not recommended, improvements in assay methodology and further clinical studies may change these recommendations in the future.

Chandler WL, Rodgers GM, Sprouse JT, Thompson AR.  Elevated Hemostatic Factor Levels as Potential Risk Factors for Thrombosis.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:1405–1414

Model System for Hemostatic Behavior

This study explores the behavior of a model system in response to perturbations in

  • tissue factor
  • thrombomodulin surface densities
  • tissue factor site dimensions
  • wall shear rate.

The classic time course is characterized by

  • initiation and
  • amplification of thrombin generation
  • the existence of threshold-like responses

This author defines a new parameter, the „effective prothrombotic zone‟,  and its dependence on model parameters. It was found that prothrombotic effects may extend significantly beyond the dimensions of the spatially discrete site of tissue factor expression in both axial and radial directions. Furthermore, he takes advantage of the finite element modeling approach to explore the behavior of systems containing multiple spatially distinct sites of TF expression in a physiologic model. The computational model is applied to assess individualized thrombotic risk from clinical data of plasma coagulation factor levels. He proposes a systems-based parameter with deep venous thrombosis using computational methods in combination with biochemical panels to predict hypercoagulability for high risk populations.

 

The Vascular Surface

The ‘resting’ endothelium synthesizes and presents a number of antithrombogenic molecules including

  • heparan sulfate proteoglycans
  • ecto-adenosine diphosphatase
  • prostacyclin
  • nitric oxide
  • thrombomodulin.

In response to various stimuli

  • inflammatory mediators
  • hypoxia
  • oxidative stress
  • fluid shear stress

the cell surface becomes ‘activated’ and serves to organize membrane-associated enzyme complexes of coagulation.

Fluid Phase Models of Coagulation

Leipold et al. developed a model of the tissue factor pathway as a design aid for the development of exogenous serine protease inhibitors. In contrast, Guo et al. focused on the reactions of the contact, or intrinsic pathway, to study parameters relevant to material-induced thrombosis, including procoagulant surface area.

Alternative approaches to modeling the coagulation cascade have been pursued including the use of stochastic activity networks to represent the intrinsic, extrinsic, and common pathways through fibrin formation and a kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of TF-initiated thrombin generation. Generally, fluid phase models of the kinetics of coagulation are both computationally and experimentally less complex. As such, the computational models are able to incorporate a large number of species and their reactions, and empirical data is often available for regression analysis and model validation. The range of complexity and motivations for these models is wide, and the models have been used to describe various phenomena including the ‘all-or-none’ threshold behavior of thrombin generation. However, the role of blood flow in coagulation is well recognized in promoting the delivery of substrates to the vessel wall and in regulating the thrombin response by removing activated clotting factors.

Flow Based Models of Coagulation

In 1990, Basmadjian presented a mathematical analysis of the effect of flow and mass transport on a single reactive event at the vessel wall and consequently laid the foundation for the first flow-based models of coagulation. It was proposed that for vessels greater than 0.1 mm in diameter, reactive events at the vessel wall could be adequately described by the assumption of a concentration boundary layer very close to the reactive surface, within which the majority of concentration changes took place. The height of the boundary layer and the mass transfer coefficient that described transport to and from the vessel wall were shown to stabilize on a time scale much shorter than the time scale over which concentration changes were empirically observed. Thus, the vascular space could be divided into two compartments, a boundary volume and a bulk volume, and furthermore, changes within the bulk phase could be considered negligible, thereby reducing the previously intractable problem to a pseudo-one compartment model described by a system of ordinary differential equations.

Basmadjian et al. subsequently published a limited model of six reactions, including two positive feedback reactions and two inhibitory reactions, of the common pathway of coagulation triggered by exogenous factor IXa under flow. As a consequence of the definition of the mass transfer coefficient, the kinetic parameters were dependent on the boundary layer height. Furthermore, the model did not explicitly account for intrinsic tenase or prothrombinase formation, but rather derived a rate expression for reaction in the presence of a cofactor. The major finding of the study was the predicted effect of increased mass transport to enhance thrombin generation by decreasing the induction time up to a critical mass transfer rate, beyond which transport significantly decreased peak thrombin levels thereby reducing overall thrombin production.

Kuharsky and Fogelson formulated a more comprehensive, pseudo-one compartment model of tissue factor-initiated coagulation under flow, which included the description of 59 distinct fluid- and surface-bound species. In contrast to the Baldwin-Basmadjian model, which defined a mass transfer coefficient as a rate of transport to the vessel surface, the Kuharsky-Fogelson model defined the mass transfer coefficient as a rate of transport into the boundary volume, thus eliminating the dependence of kinetic parameters on transport parameters. The computational study focused on the threshold response of thrombin generation to the availability of membrane binding sites. Additionally, the model suggested that adhered platelets may play a role in blocking the activity of the TF/ VIIa complex. Fogelson and Tania later expanded the model to include the protein C and TFPI pathways.

Modeling surface-associated reactions under flow uses finite element method (FEM), which is a technique for solving partial differential equations by dividing the vascular space into a finite number of discrete elements. Hall et al. used FEM to simulate factor X activation over a surface presenting TF in a parallel plate flow reactor. The steady state model was defined by the convection-diffusion equation and Michaelis-Menten reaction kinetics at the surface. The computational results were compared to experimental data for the generation of factor Xa by cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells expressing TF.

Based on discrepancies between numerical and experimental studies, the catalytic activity of the TF/ VIIa complex may be shear-dependent. Towards the overall objective of developing an antithrombogenic biomaterial, Tummala and Hall studied the kinetics of factor Xa inhibition by surface-immobilized recombinant TFPI under unsteady flow conditions. Similarly, Byun et al. investigated the association and dissociation kinetics of ATIII inactivation of thrombin accelerated by surface-immobilized heparin under steady flow conditions. To date, finite element models that detail surface-bound reactions under flow have been restricted to no more than a single reaction catalyzed by a single surface-immobilized species.

 

Models of Coagulation Incorporating Spatial Parameter

Major findings include the roles of these specific coagulation pathways in the

  • initiation
  • amplification
  • termination phases of coagulation.

Coagulation near the activating surface was determined by TF/VIIa catalyzed factor Xa production, which was rapidly inhibited close to the wall. In contrast, factor IXa diffused farther from the surface, and thus factor Xa generation and clot formation away from the reactive wall was dependent on intrinsic tenase (IXa/ VIIIa) activity. Additionally, the concentration wave of thrombin propagated away from the activation zone at a rate which was dependent on the efficiency of inhibitory mechanisms.

Experimental and ‘virtual’ addition of plasma-phase thrombomodulin resulted in dose-dependent termination of thrombin generation and provided evidence of spatial localization of clot formation by TM with final clot lengths of 0.2-2 mm under diffusive conditions.

These studies provide an interesting analysis of the roles of specific factors in relation to space due to diffusive effects, but neglect the essential role of blood flow in the transport analysis. Additionally, the spatial dynamics of clot localization by thrombomodulin would likely be affected by restricting the inhibitor to its physiologic site on the vessel surface.

Finite Element Modeling

Finite element method (FEM) is a numerical technique for solving partial differential equations. Originally proposed in the 1940s to approach structural analysis problems in civil engineering, FEM now finds application in a wide variety of disciplines. The computational method relies on mesh discretization of a continuous domain which subdivides the space into a finite number of ‘elements’. The physics of each element are defined by its own set of physical properties and boundary conditions, and the simultaneous solution of the equations describing the individual elements approximate the behavior of the overall domain.

Sumanas W. Jordan, PhD Thesis. A Mathematical Model of Tissue Factor-Induced Blood Coagulation: Discrete Sites of Initiation and Regulation under Conditions of Flow.

Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Engineering. Emory University, Georgia Institute of Technology. May 2010.  Under supervision of: Dr. Elliot L. Chaikof, Departments of Surgery and Biomedical Engineering.

Blood Coagulation (Thrombin) and Protein C Pat...

Blood Coagulation (Thrombin) and Protein C Pathways (Blood_Coagulation_and_Protein_C_Pathways.jpg) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Coagulation cascade

Coagulation cascade (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Cardiovascular Physiology: Modeling, Estimation and Signal Processing

With cardiovascular diseases being among the main causes of death in the world, quantitative modeling, assessment and monitoring of cardiovascular dynamics, and functioning play a critical role in bringing important breakthroughs to cardiovascular care. Quantification of cardiovascular physiology and its control mechanisms from physiological recordings, by use of mathematical models and algorithms, has been proved to be of important value in understanding the causes of cardiovascular diseases and assisting the diagnostic and prognostic process. This E-Book is derived from the Frontiers in Computational Physiology and Medicine Research Topic entitled “Engineering Approaches to Study Cardiovascular Physiology: Modeling, Estimation and Signal Processing.”

There are two review articles. The first review article by Chen et al. (2012) presents a unified point process probabilistic framework to assess heart beat dynamics and autonomic cardiovascular control. Using clinical recordings of healthy subjects during Propofol anesthesia, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach by applying the proposed paradigm to estimate

  • instantaneous heart rate (HR),
  • heart rate variability (HRV),
  • respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
  • baroreflex sensitivity (BRS).

The second review article, contributed by Zhang et al. (2011), provides a comprehensive overview of tube-load model parameter estimation for monitoring arterial hemodynamics.

The remaining eight original research articles can be mainly classified into two categories. The two articles from the first category emphasize modeling and estimation methods. In particular, the paper “Modeling the autonomic and metabolic effects of obstructive sleep apnea: a simulation study” by Cheng and Khoo (2012), combines computational modeling and simulations to study the autonomic and metabolic effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

The second paper, “Estimation of cardiac output and peripheral resistance using square-wave-approximated aortic flow signal” by Fazeli and Hahn (2012), presents a model-based approach to estimate cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR), and validates the proposed approach via in vivo experimental data from animal subjects.

The six articles in the second category focus on application of signal processing techniques and statistical tools to analyze cardiovascular or physiological signals in practical applications. the paper “Modulation of the sympatho-vagal balance during sleep: frequency domain study of heart rate variability and respiration” by Cabiddu et al. (2012), uses spectral and cross-spectral analysis of heartbeat and respiration signals to assess autonomic cardiac regulation and cardiopulmonary coupling variations during different sleep stages in healthy subjects.

The paper “increased non-gaussianity of heart rate variability predicts cardiac mortality after an acute myocardial infarction” by Hayano et al. (2011) uses a new non-gaussian index to assess the HRV of cardiac mortality using 670 post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. the paper “non-gaussianity of low frequency heart rate variability and sympathetic activation: lack of increases in multiple system atrophy and parkinson disease” by Kiyono et al. (2012), applies a non-gaussian index to assess HRV in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and parkinson diseases and reports the relation between the non-gaussian intermittency of the heartbeat and increased sympathetic activity. The paper “Information domain approach to the investigation of cardio-vascular, cardio-pulmonary, and vasculo-pulmonary causal couplings” by Faes et al. (2011), proposes an information domain approach to evaluate nonlinear causality among heartbeat, arterial pressure, and respiration measures during tilt testing and paced breathing protocols. The paper “integrated central-autonomic multifractal complexity in the heart rate variability of healthy humans” by Lin and Sharif (2012), uses a relative multifractal complexity measure to assess HRV in healthy humans and discusses the related implications in central autonomic interactions. Lastly, the paper “Time scales of autonomic information flow in near-term fetal sheep” by Frasch et al. (2012), analyzes the autonomic information flow (AIF) with kullback–leibler entropy in fetal sheep as a function of vagal and sympathetic modulation of fetal HRV during atropine and propranolol blockade.

In summary, this Research Topic attempts to give a general panorama of the possible state-of-the-art modeling methodologies, practical tools in signal processing and estimation, as well as several important clinical applications, which can altogether help deepen our understanding about heart physiology and pathology and further lead to new scientific findings. We hope that the readership of Frontiers will appreciate this collected volume and enjoy reading the presented contributions. Finally, we are grateful to all contributed authors, reviewers, and editorial staffs who had all put tremendous effort to make this E-Book a reality.

Cabiddu, R., Cerutti, S., Viardot, G., Werner, S., and Bianchi, A. M. (2012). Modulation of the sympatho-vagal balance during sleep: frequency domain study of heart rate variability and respiration. Front. Physio. 3:45. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00045

Chen, Z., Purdon, P. L., Brown, E. N., and Barbieri, R. (2012). A unified point process probabilistic framework to assess heartbeat dynamics and autonomic cardiovascular control. Front. Physio. 3:4. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00004

Cheng, L., and Khoo, M. C. K. (2012). Modeling the autonomic and metabolic effects of obstructive sleep apnea: a simulation study. Front. Physio. 2:111. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00111

Faes, L., Nollo, G., and Porta, A. (2011). Information domain approach to the investigation of cardio-vascular, cardio-pulmonary, and vasculo-pulmonary causal couplings. Front. Physio. 2:80. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00080

Fazeli, N., and Hahn, J.-O. (2012). Estimation of cardiac output and peripheral resistance using square-wave-approximated aortic flow signal. Front. Physio. 3:298. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00298

Frasch, M. G., Frank, B., Last, M., and Müller, T. (2012). Time scales of autonomic information flow in near-term fetal sheep. Front. Physio. 3:378. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00378

Hayano, J., Kiyono, K., Struzik, Z. R., Yamamoto, Y., Watanabe, E., Stein, P. K., et al. (2011). Increased non-gaussianity of heart rate variability predicts cardiac mortality after an acute myocardial infarction. Front. Physio. 2:65. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00065

Kiyono, K., Hayano, J., Kwak, S., Watanabe, E., and Yamamoto, Y. (2012). Non-Gaussianity of low frequency heart rate variability and sympathetic activation: lack of increases in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson disease. Front. Physio. 3:34. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00034

Lin, D. C., and Sharif, A. (2012). Integrated central-autonomic multifractal complexity in the heart rate variability of healthy humans. Front. Physio. 2:123. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00123

Zhang, G., Hahn, J., and Mukkamala, R. (2011). Tube-load model parameter estimation for monitoring arterial hemodynamics. Front. Physio. 2:72. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00072

Citation: Chen Z and Barbieri R (2012) Editorial: engineering approaches to study cardiovascular physiology: modeling, estimation, and signal processing. Front. Physio. 3:425. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00425

fluctuations of cerebral blood flow and metabolic demand following hypoxia in neonatal brain

Most of the research investigating the pathogenesis of perinatal brain injury following hypoxia-ischemia has focused on excitotoxicity, oxidative stress and an inflammatory response, with the response of the developing cerebrovasculature receiving less attention. This is surprising as the presentation of devastating and permanent injury such as germinal matrix-intraventricular haemorrhage (GM-IVH) and perinatal stroke are of vascular origin, and the origin of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) may also arise from poor perfusion of the white matter. This highlights that cerebrovasculature injury following hypoxia could primarily be responsible for the injury seen in the brain of many infants diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

The highly dynamic nature of the cerebral blood vessels in the fetus, and the fluctuations of cerebral blood flow and metabolic demand that occur following hypoxia suggest that the response of blood vessels could explain both regional protection and vulnerability in the developing brain.

This review discusses the current concepts on the pathogenesis of perinatal brain injury, the development of the fetal cerebrovasculature and the blood brain barrier (BBB), and key mediators involved with the response of cerebral blood vessels to hypoxia.

Baburamani AA, Ek CJ, Walker DW and Castillo-Melendez M. Vulnerability of the developing brain to hypoxic-ischemic damage: contribution of the cerebral vasculature to injury and repair? Front. Physio. 2012;  3:424. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00424

remodeling of coronary and cerebral arteries and arterioles 

Effects of hypertension on arteries and arterioles often manifest first as a thickened wall, with associated changes in passive material properties (e.g., stiffness) or function (e.g., cellular phenotype, synthesis and removal rates, and vasomotor responsiveness). Less is known, however, regarding the relative evolution of such changes in vessels from different vascular beds.

We used an aortic coarctation model of hypertension in the mini-pig to elucidate spatiotemporal changes in geometry and wall composition (including layer-specific thicknesses as well as presence of collagen, elastin, smooth muscle, endothelial, macrophage, and hematopoietic cells) in three different arterial beds, specifically aortic, cerebral, and coronary, and vasodilator function in two different arteriolar beds, the cerebral and coronary.

Marked geometric and structural changes occurred in the thoracic aorta and left anterior descending coronary artery within 2 weeks of the establishment of hypertension and continued to increase over the 8-week study period. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the middle cerebral arteries from the same animals. Consistent with these differential findings at the arterial level, we also found a diminished nitric oxide-mediated dilation to adenosine at 8 weeks of hypertension in coronary arterioles, but not cerebral arterioles.

These findings, coupled with the observation that temporal changes in wall constituents and the presence of macrophages differed significantly between the thoracic aorta and coronary arteries, confirm a strong differential progressive remodeling within different vascular beds.

These results suggest a spatiotemporal progression of vascular remodeling, beginning first in large elastic arteries and delayed in distal vessels.

Hayenga HN, Hu J-J, Meyer CA, Wilson E, Hein TW, Kuo L and Humphrey JD  Differential progressive remodeling of coronary and cerebral arteries and arterioles in an aortic coarctation model of hypertension. Front. Physio. 2012; 3:420. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00420

C-reactive protein oxidant-mediated release of pro-thrombotic  factor

Inflammation and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Although C-reactive protein (CRP) has traditionally been considered to be a biomarker of inflammation, recent in vitro and in vivo studies have provided evidence that CRP, itself, exerts pro-thrombotic effects on vascular cells and may thus play a critical role in the development of atherothrombosis. Of particular importance is that CRP interacts with Fcγ receptors on cells of the vascular wall giving rise to the release of pro-thrombotic factors. The present review focuses on distinct sources of CRP-mediated ROS generation as well as the pivotal role of ROS in CRP-induced tissue factor expression. These studies provide considerable insight into the role of the oxidative mechanisms in CRP-mediated stimulation of pro-thrombotic factors and activation of platelets. Collectively, the available data provide strong support for ROS playing an important intermediary role in the relationship between CRP and atherothrombosis.

Zhang Z, Yang Y, Hill MA and Wu J.  Does C-reactive protein contribute to atherothrombosis via oxidant-mediated release of pro-thrombotic factors and activation of platelets? Front. Physio.  2012; 3:433. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00433

CRP association with Peripheral Vascular Disease

To determine whether the increase in plasma levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a non-specifi c reactant in the acute-phase of systemic infl ammation, is associated with clinical severity of peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

This is a cross-sectional study at a referral hospital center of institutional practice in Madrid, Spain.  These investigators took a stratifi ed random sampling of 3370 patients with symptomatic PAD from the outpatient vascular laboratory database in 2007 in the order of their clinical severity:

  • the fi rst group of patients with mild chronological clinical severity who did not require surgical revascularization,
  • the second group consisted of patients with moderate clinical severity who had only undergone only one surgical revascularization procedure and
  • the third group consisted of patients who were severely affected and had undergone two or more surgical revascularization procedures of the lower extremities in different areas or needed late re-interventions.

The Neyman affi xation was used to calculate the sample size with a fi xed relative error of 0.1.

A homogeneity analysis between groups and a unifactorial analysis of comparison of medians for CRP was done.

The groups were homogeneous for

  • age
  • smoking status
  • Arterial Hypertension
  • diabetes mellitus
  • dyslipemia
  • homocysteinemia and
  • specifi c markers of infl ammation.

In the unifactorial analysis of multiple comparisons of medians according to Scheffé, it was observed that

the median values of CRP plasma levels were increased in association with higher clinical severity of PAD

  • 3.81 mg/L [2.14–5.48] vs.
  • 8.33 [4.38–9.19] vs.
  • 12.83 [9.5–14.16]; p  0.05

as a unique factor of tested ones.

Plasma levels of CRP are associated with not only the presence of atherosclerosis but also with its chronological clinical severity.

De Haro J, Acin F, Medina FJ, Lopez-Quintana A, and  March JR.  Relationship Between the Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and Severity of Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Clinical Medicine: Cardiology 2009;3: 1–7

Hemostasis induced by hyperhomocysteinemia

Elevated concentration of homocysteine (Hcy) in human tissues, defined as hyperhomocysteinemia has been correlated with some diseases, such as

  • cardiovascular
  • neurodegenerative
  • kidney disorders

L-Homocysteine (Hcy) is an endogenous amino acid, containing a free thiol group, which in healthy cells is involved in methionine and cysteine synthesis/resynthesis. Indirectly, Hcy participates in methyl, folate, and cellular thiol metabolism. Approximately 80% of total plasma Hcy is protein-bound, and only a small amount exists as a free reduced Hcy (about 0.1 μM). The majority of the unbound fraction of Hcy is oxidized, and forms dimers (homocystine) or mixed disulphides consisting of cysteine and Hcy.

Two main pathways of Hcy biotoxicity are discussed:

  1. Hcy-dependent oxidative stress – generated during oxidation of the free thiol group of Hcy. Hcy binds via a disulphide bridge with

—     plasma proteins

—     or with other low-molecular plasma  thiols

—     or with a second Hcy molecule.

Accumulation of oxidized biomolecules alters the biological functions of many cellular pathways.

  1. Hcy-induced protein structure modifications, named homocysteinylation.

Two main types of homocysteinylation exist: S-homocysteinylation and N-homocysteinylation; both considered as posttranslational protein modifications.

a)      S-homocysteinylation occurs when Hcy reacts, by its free thiol group, with another free thiol derived from a cysteine residue in a protein molecule.

These changes can alter the thiol-dependent redox status of proteins.

b)      N-homocysteinylation takes place after acylation of the free ε-amino lysine groups of proteins by the most reactive form of Hcy — its cyclic thioester (Hcy thiolactone — HTL), representing up to 0.29% of total plasma Hcy.

Homocysteine occurs in human blood plasma in several forms, including the most reactive one, the homocysteine thiolactone (HTL) — a cyclic thioester, which represents up to 0.29% of total plasma Hcy. In human blood, N-homocysteinylated (N-Hcy-protein) and S-homocysteinylated proteins (S-Hcy-protein) such as NHcy-hemoglobin, N-(Hcy-S-S-Cys)-albumin, and S-Hcyalbumin are known. Other pathways of Hcy biotoxicity might be apoptosis and excitotoxicity mediated through glutamate receptors. The relationship between homocysteine and risk appears to hold for total plasma concentrations of homocysteine between 10 and 30 μM.

Different forms of homocysteine present in human blood.

*Total level of homocysteine — the term “total homocysteine” describes the pool of homocysteine released by reduction of all disulphide bonds in the sample (Perla-Kajan et al., 2007; Zimny, 2008; Manolescu et al., 2010, modified).

The form of Hcy The concentration in human blood
Homocysteine thiolactone (HTL) 0–35 nM
Protein N-linked homocysteine:
N-Hcy-hemoglobin, N-(Hcy-S-S-Cys)-albumin
about 15.5 μM: 12.7 μM, 2.8 μM
Protein S-linked homocysteine — S-Hcy-albumin about 7.3 μM*
Homocystine (Hcy-S-S-Hcy) and combined with cysteine to from mixed disulphides (Hcy-S-S-Cys) about 2 μM*
Free reduced Hcy about 0.1 μM*

As early as in the 1960s it was noted that the risk of atherosclerosis is markedly increased in patients with homocystinuria, an inherited disease resulting from homozygous CBS deficiency and characterized by episodes of

—     thromboembolism

—     mental retardation

—     lens dislocation

—     hepatic steatosis

—     osteoporosis.

—     very high concentrations of plasma homocysteine and methionine.

Patients with homocystinuria have very severe hyperhomocysteinemia, with plasma homocysteine concentration reaching even 400 μM, and represent a very small proportion of the population (approximately 1 in 200,000 individuals). Heterozygous lack of CBS, CBS mutations and polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are considered to be the most probable causes of hyperhomocysteinemia.

The effects of hyperhomocysteinemia include the complex process of hemostasis, which regulates the properties of blood flow. Interactions of homocysteine and its different derivatives, including homocysteine thiolactone, with the major components of hemostasis are:

  • endothelial cells
  • platelets
  • fibrinogen
  • plasminogen

Elevated plasma Hcy (>15 μM; Hcy) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases

  • thrombosis
  • thrombosis related diseases
  • ischemic brain stroke (independent of other, conventional risk factors of this disease)

Every increase of 2.5 μM in plasma Hcy may be associated with an increase of stroke risk of about 20%.  Total plasma Hcy level above 20 μM are associated with a nine-fold increase of the myocardial infarction and stroke risk, in comparison to the concentrations below 9 μM. The increase of Hcy concentration has been also found in other human pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases

Modifications of hemostatic proteins (N-homocysteinylation or S-homocysteinylation) induced by Hcy or its thiolactone seem to be the main cause of homocysteine biotoxicity in hemostatic abnormalities.

Hcy and HTL may act as oxidants, but various polyphenolic antioxidants are able to inhibit the oxidative damage induced by Hcy or HTL. Therefore, we have to consider the role of phenolic antioxidants in hyperhomocysteinemia –induced changes in hemostasis.

The synthesis of homocysteine thiolactone is associated with the activation of the amino acid by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS). Hcy may also undergo erroneous activation, e.g. by methionyl-t-RNA synthetase (MetRS). In the first step of conversion of Hcy to HTL, MetRS misactivates Hcy giving rise to homocysteinyl-adenylate. In the next phase, the homocysteine side chain thiol group reacts with the activated carboxyl group and HTL is produced. The level of HTL synthesis in cultured cells depends on Hcy and Met levels.

Hyperhomocysteinemia and Changes in Fibrinolysis and Coagulation Process

The fibrinolytic activity of blood is regulated by specific inhibitors; the inhibition of fibrinolysis takes place at the level of plasminogen activation (by PA-inhibitors: plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, -2; PAI-1 or PAI-2) or at the level of plasmin activity (mainly by α2-antiplasmin). Hyperhomocysteinemia disturbs hemostasis and shifts the hemostatic mechanisms in favor of thrombosis. The recent reports indicate that the prothrombotic state observed in hyperhomocysteinemia may arise not only due to endothelium dysfunction or blood platelet and coagulation activation, but also due to impaired fibrinolysis. Hcy-modified fibrinogen is more resistant to the fibrinolytic action. Oral methionine load increases total Hcy, but may diminish the fibrinolytic activity of the euglobulin plasma fraction. Homocysteine-lowering therapies may increase fibrinolytic activity, thereby, prevent atherothrombotic events in patients with cardiovascular diseases after the first myocardial infarction.

Homocysteine — Fibronectin Interaction and its Consequences

Fibronectin (Fn) plays key roles in

  • cell adhesion
  • migration
  • embryogenesis
  • differentiation
  • hemostasis
  • thrombosis
  • wound healing
  • tissue remodeling

Interaction of FN with fibrin, mediated by factor XIII transglutaminase, is thought to be important for cell adhesion or cell migration into fibrin clots. After tissue injury, a blood clot formation serves the dual role of restoring vascular integrity and serving as a temporary scaffold for the wound healing process. Fibrin and plasma FN, the major protein components of blood clots, are essential to perform these functions. In the blood clotting process, after fibrin deposition, plasma FN-fibrin matrix is covalently crosslinked, and it then promotes fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and migration into the clot.

Homocysteine binds to several human plasma proteins, including fibronectin. If homocysteine binds to fibronectin via a disulphide linkage, this binding results in a functional change, namely, the inhibition of fibrin binding by fibronectin. This inhibition may lead to a prolonged recovery from a thrombotic event and contribute to vascular occlusion.

Grape seeds are one of the richest plant sources of phenolic substances, and grape seed extract reduces the toxic effect of Hcys and HTL on fibrinolysis. The grape seed extract (12.5–50 μg/ml) supported plasminogen to plasmin conversion inhibited by Hcys or HTL. In vitro experiments showed in the presence of grape seed extract (at the highest tested concentration — 50 μg/ml) the increase of about 78% (for human plasminogen-treated with Hcys) and 56% (for human plasma-treated with Hcys). Thus, in the in vitro model system, that the grape seed extract (12.5–50 μg/ml) diminished the reduction of thiol groups and of lysine ε-amino groups in plasma proteins treated with Hcys (0.1 mM) or HTL (1 μM). In the presence of the grape seed extract at the concentration of 50 μg/ml, the level of reduction of thiol groups reached about 45% (for plasma treated with Hcys) and about 15% (for plasma treated with HTL).

In the presence of the grape seed extract at the concentration of 50 μg/ml, the level of reduction of thiol groups reached about 45% (for plasma treated with Hcys) and about 15% (for plasma treated with HTL).Very similar protective effects of the grape seed extract were observed in the measurements of lysine ε-amino groups in plasma proteins treated with Hcys or HTL. These results indicated that the extract from berries of Aronia melanocarpa (a rich source of phenolic substances) reduces the toxic effects of Hcy and HTL on the hemostatic properties of fibrinogen and plasma. These findings indicate a possible protective action of the A. melanocarpa extract in hyperhomocysteinemia-induced cardiovascular disorders. Moreover, the extract from berries of A. melanocarpa, due to its antioxidant action, significantly attenuated the oxidative stress (assessed by measuring of the total antioxidant status — TAS) in plasma in a model of hyperhomocysteinemia.

Proposed model for the protective role of phenolic antioxidants on selected elements of hemostasis during hyperhomocysteinemia.

various antioxidants (present in human diet), including phenolic compounds, may reduce the toxic effects of Hcy or its derivatives on hemostasis. These findings give hope for the develop development of dietary supplements, which will be capable of preventing thrombosis which occurs under pathological conditions, observed also in hyperhomocysteinemia, such as plasma procoagulant activity and oxidative stress.

Malinowska J,  Kolodziejczyk J and Olas B. The disturbance of hemostasis induced by hyper-homocysteinemia; the role of antioxidants. Acta Biochimica Polonica 2012; 59(2): 185–194.

Lipoprotein (a)

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), for the first time described in 1963 by Berg belongs to the lipoproteins with the strongest atherogenic effect. Its importance for the development of various atherosclerotic vasculopathies (coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, peripheral vasculopathy, abdominal aneurysm) was recognized considerably later.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), an established risk marker of cardiovascular diseases, is independent from other risk markers. The main difference of Lp(a) compared to low density lipoprotein (LDL) is the apo(a) residue, covalently bound to apoB is covalently by a disulfide-bridge. Apo(a) synthesis is performed in the liver, probably followed by extracellular assembly to the apoB location of the LDL.

 

ApoB-100_______LDL¬¬___ S-S –    9

Apo(a) has been detected bound to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (Very Low Density Lipoproteins; VLDL). Corresponding to the structural similarity to LDL, both particles are very similar to each other with regard to their composition. It is a glycoprotein which underlies a large genetic polymorphism caused by a variation of the kringle-IV-type-2 repeats of the protein, characterized by a structural homology to plasminogen. Apo(a)’s structural homology to plasminogen, shares the gene localization on chromosome 6. The kringle repeats present a particularly characteristic structure, which have a high similarity to kringle IV (K IV) of plasminogen. Apo(a) also has a kringle V structure of plasminogen and also a protease domain, which cannot be activated, as opposed to the one of plasminogen. At least 30 genetically determined apo(a) isoforms were identified in man.

Features:

  • Non covalent binding of kringle -4 types 7 and 8 of apo (a) to apo B
  • Disulfide bond at Cys4326 of ApoB (near its receptor binding domain ) and the only free cysteine group in K –IV type 9 (Cys4057) of apo(a )
  • Binding to fibrin and cell membranes
  • Enhancement by small isoforms ; high concentrations compared to plasminogen and homocysteine
  • Binding to different lysine rich components of the coagulation system (e. g. TFPI)
  • Intense homology to plasminogen but no protease activity
ApoB-100_______LDL¬¬___ S-S – 9

The synthesis of Lp(a), which thus occurs as part of an assembly, is a two-step process.

  • In a first step, which can be competitively inhibited by lysine analogues, the free sulfhydryl groups of apo(a) and apoB are brought close together.
  • The binding of apo(a) then occurs near the apoB domain which binds to the LDL receptor, resulting in a reduced affinity of Lp(a) to the LDL-receptor.

Particles that show a reduced affinity to the LDL receptor are not able to form stable compounds with apo(a). Thus the largest part of apo(a) is present as apo(a) bound to LDL. Only a small, quantitatively variable part of apo(a) remains as free apo(a) and probably plays an important role in the metabolism and physiological function of Lp(a).

The Lp(a) plasma concentration in the population is highly skewed and determined to more than 90 % by genetic factors. In healthy subjects the Lp(a)-concentration is correlated with its synthesis.

It is assumed that the kidney has a specific function in Lp(a) catabolizm, since nephrotic syndrome and terminal kidney failure are associated with an elevation of the Lp(a) plasma concentration. One consequence of the poor knowledge of the metabolic path of Lp(a) is the fact that so far pharmaceutical science has failed to develop drugs that are able to reduce elevated Lp(a) plasma concentrations to a desirable level.

Plasma concentrations of Lp(a) are affected by different diseases (e.g. diseases of liver and kidney), hormonal factors (e.g. sexual steroids, glucocorticoids, thyroid hormones), individual and environmental factors (e.g. age, cigarette smoking) as well as pharmaceuticals (e.g. derivatives of nicotinic acid) and therapeutic procedures (lipid apheresis). This review describes the physiological regulation of Lp(a) as well as factors influencing its plasma concentration.

Apart from its significance as an important agent in the development of atherosclerosis, Lp(a) has even more physiological functions, e.g. in

  • wound healing
  • angiogenesis
  • hemostasis

However, in the meaning of a pleiotropic mechanism the favorable action mechanisms are opposed by pathogenic mechanisms, whereby the importance of Lp(a) in atherogenesis is stressed.

Lp(a) in Atherosclerosis

In transgenic, hyperlipidemic and Lp(a) expressing Watanabe rabbits, Lp(a) leads to enhanced atherosclerosis. Under the influence of Lp(a), the binding of Lp(a) to glycoproteins, e.g. laminin, results – via its apo(a)-part – both in

  • an increased invasion of inflammatory cells and in
  • an activation of smooth vascular muscle cells

with subsequent calcifications in the vascular wall.

The inhibition of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) activation is another mechanism via which Lp(a) contributes to the development of atherosclerotic vasculopathies. TGF-β1 is subject to proteolytic activation by plasmin and its active form leads to an inhibition of the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells, which play a central role in the formation and progression of atherosclerotic vascular diseases.

In man, Lp(a) is an important risk marker which is independent of other risk markers. Its importance, partly also under consideration of the molecular weight and other genetic polymorphisms, could be demonstrated by a high number of epidemiological and clinical studies investigating the formation and progression of atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke.

Lp(a) in Hemostasis

Lp(a) is able to competitively inhibit the binding of plasminogen to fibrinogen and fibrin, and to inhibit the fibrin-dependent activation of plasminogen to plasmin via the tissue plasminogen activator, whereby apo(a) isoforms of low molecular weight have a higher affinity to fibrin than apo(a) isoforms of higher molecular weight. Like other compounds containing sulfhydryl groups, homocysteine enhances the binding of Lp(a) to fibrin.

Pleiotropic effect of Lp(a).

Prothrombotic :

  • Binding to fibrin
  • Competitive inhibition of plasminogen
  • Stimulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor I and II (PAI -I, PAI -II)
  • Inactivation of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)

Antithrombotic :

  • Inhibition of platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF -AH)
  • Inhibition of platelet activating factor
  • Inhibition of collagen dependent platelet aggregation
  • Inhibition of secretion of serotonin und thromboxane

Lp(a) in Angiogenesis

Lp(a) is also important for the process of angiogenesis and the sprouting of new vessels.

  • angiogenesis starts with the remodelling of matrix proteins and
  • activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP).

The latter ones are usually synthesised as

  • inactive zymogens and
  • require activation by proteases,

Recall that Apo(a) is not activated by proteases. The angiogenesis is also accomplished by plasminogen. Lp(a) and apo(a) and its fragments has an antiangiogenetic and metastasis inhibiting effect related to the structural homology with plasminogen without the protease activity.

Siekmeier R, Scharnagl H, Kostner GM, T. Grammer T, Stojakovic T and März W.  Variation of Lp(a) Plasma Concentrations in Health and Disease.  The Open Clinical Chemistry Journal, 2010; 3: 72-89.

LDL-Apheresis

In 1985, Brown and Goldstein were awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine for their work on the regulation of cholesterol metabolism. On the basis of numerous studies, they were able to demonstrate that circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is absorbed into the cell through receptor linked endocytosis. The absorption of LDL into the cell is specific and is mediated by a LDL receptor. In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, this receptor is changed, and the LDL particles can no longer be recognized. Their absorption can thus no longer be mediated, leading to an accumulation of LDL in blood.

Furthermore, an excess supply of cholesterol also blocks the 3-hydrox-3 methylglutaryl-Co enzyme A (HMG CoA), reductase enzyme, which otherwise inhibits the cholesterol synthesis rate. Brown and Goldstein also determined the structure of the LDL receptor. They discovered structural defects in this receptor in many patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Thus, familial hypercholesterolemia was the first metabolic disease that could be tracked back to the mutation of a receptor gene.

Dyslipoproteinemia in combination with diabetes mellitus causes a cumulative insult to the vasculature resulting in more severe disease which occurs at an earlier age in large and small vessels as well as capillaries. The most common clinical conditions resulting from this combination are myocardial infarction and lower extremity vascular disease. Ceriello et al. show an independent and cumulative effect of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia on endothelial function, suggesting oxidative stress as common mediator of such effect. The combination produces greater morbidity and mortality than either alone.

As an antiatherogenic factor, HDL cholesterol correlates inversely to the extent of postprandial lipemia. A high concentration of HDL is a sign that triglyceride-rich particles are quickly decomposed in the postprandial phase of lipemia. Conversely, with a low HDL concentration this decomposition is delayed. Thus, excessively high triglyceride concentrations are accompanied by very low HDL counts. This combination has also been associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis.

The importance of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as an atherogenic substance has also been recognized in recent years. Lp(a) is very similar to LDL. But it also contains Apo(a), which is very similar to plasminogen, enabling Lp(a) to bind to fibrin clots. Binding of plasminogen is prevented and fibrinolysis obstructed. Thrombi are integrated into the walls of the arteries and become plaque components.

Another strong risk factor for accelerated atherogenesis, which must be mentioned here, are the widespread high homocysteine levels found in dialysis patients. This risk factor is independent of classic risk factors such as high cholesterol and LDL levels, smoking, hypertension, and obesity, and much more predictive of coronary events in dialysis patients than are these better-known factors. Homocysteine is a sulfur aminoacid produced in the metabolism of methionine. Under normal conditions, about 50 percent of homocysteine is remethylated to methionine and the remaining via the transsulfuration pathway.

Defining hyperhomocysteinemia as levels greater than the 90th percentile of controls and elevated Lp(a) level as greater than 30mg/dL, the frequency of the combination increased with declining renal function. Fifty-eight percent of patients with a GFR less than 10mL/min had both hyperhomocysteinemia and elevated Lp(a) levels, and even in patients with mild renal impairment, 20 percent of patients had both risk factors present.

The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, and coronary heart disease refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are five different LDL-apheresis systems available: cascade filtration or lipid filtration, immunoadsorption, heparin-induced LDL precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption, and the LDL hemoperfusion. The requirement that the original level of cholesterol is to be reduced by at least 60 percent is fulfilled by all these systems.

There is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors, in severe hyperlipidemia therapeutic strategies should focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. Despite maximum conventional therapy with a combination of different kinds of lipid-lowering drugs, sometimes the goal of therapy cannot be reached. Hence, in such patients, treatment with LDL-apheresis is indicated. Technical and clinical aspects of these five different LDL-apheresis methods are depicted. There were no significant differences with respect to or concerning all cholesterols, or triglycerides observed.

High plasma levels of Lp(a) are associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic coronary heart       disease
(CHD) by a mechanism yet to be determined. Because of its structural properties, Lp(a) can have both atherogenic and thrombogenic potentials. The means for correcting the high plasma levels of Lp(a) are still limited in effectiveness. All drug therapies tried thus far have failed. The most effective therapeutic methods in lowering Lp(a) are the LDL-apheresismethods. Since 1993, special immunoadsorption polyclonal antibody columns (Pocard, Moscow, Russia) containing sepharose bound anti-Lp(a) have been available for the treatment of patients with elevated Lp(a) serum concentrations.

With respect to elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be most effective. The different published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL-apheresis in patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia refractory to maximum conservative therapy is effective and safe in long-term application.

LDL-apheresis decreases not only LDL mass but also improves the patient’s life expectancy. LDL-apheresis performed with different techniques decreases the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation. This decrease may be related to a temporary mass imbalance between freshly produced and older LDL particles. Furthermore, the baseline fatty acid pattern influences pretreatment and postreatment susceptibility to oxidation.

Bambauer R, Bambauer C, Lehmann B, Latza R, and Ralf Schiel R. LDL-Apheresis: Technical and Clinical Aspects. The Scientific World Journal 2012; Article ID 314283, pp 1-19. doi:10.1100/2012/314283

Summary:  This discussion is a two part sequence that first establishes the known strong relationship between blood flow viscosity, shear stress, and plasma triglycerides (VLDL) as risk factors for hemostatic disorders leading to thromboembolic disease, and the association with atherosclerotic disease affecting the heart, the brain (via carotid blood flow), peripheral circulation,the kidneys, and retinopathy as well.

The second part discusses the modeling of hemostasis and takes into account the effects of plasma proteins involved with red cell and endothelial interaction, which is related to part I.  The current laboratory assessment of thrombophilias is taken from a consensus document of the American Society for Clinical Pathology.  The problems encountered are sufficient for the most common problems of coagulation testing and monitoring, but don’t address the large number of patients who are at risk for complications of accelerated vasoconstrictive systemic disease that precede serious hemostatic problems.  Special attention is given to Lp(a) and to homocysteine.  Lp(a) is a protein that has both prothrombotic and antithrombotic characteristics, and is a homologue of plasminogen and is composed of an apo(a) bound to LDL.  Unlike plasminogen, it has no protease activity.   Homocysteine elevation is a known risk factor for downstream myocardial infarct.  Homocysteine is a mirror into sulfur metabolism, so an increase is an independent predictor of risk, not fully discussed here.  The modification of risk is discussed by diet modification.  In the most serious cases of lipoprotein disorders, often including Lp(a) the long term use of LDL-apheresis is described.

see Relevent article that appears in NEJM from American College of Cardiology

Apolipoprotein(a) Genetic Sequence Variants Associated With Systemic Atherosclerosis and Coronary Atherosclerotic Burden but Not With Venous Thromboembolism

Helgadottir A, Gretarsdottir S, Thorleifsson G, et al

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:722-729

Study Summary

The LPA gene codes for apolipoprotein(a), which, when linked with low-density lipoprotein particles, forms lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] — a well-studied molecule associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). The Lp(a) molecule has both atherogenic and thrombogenic effects in vitro , but the extent to which these translate to differences in how atherothrombotic disease presents is unknown.

LPA contains many single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and 2 have been identified by previous groups as being strongly associated with levels of Lp(a) and, as a consequence, strongly associated with CAD. However, because atherosclerosis is thought to be a systemic disease, it is unclear to what extent Lp(a) leads to atherosclerosis in other arterial beds (eg, carotid, abdominal aorta, and lower extremity), as well as to other thrombotic disorders (eg, ischemic/cardioembolic stroke and venous thromboembolism). Such distinctions are important, because therapies that might lower Lp(a) could potentially reduce forms of atherosclerosis beyond the coronary tree.

To answer this question, Helgadottir and colleagues compiled clinical and genetic data on the LPA gene from thousands of previous participants in genetic research studies from across the world. They did not have access to Lp(a) levels, but by knowing the genotypes for 2 LPA variants, they inferred the levels of Lp(a) on the basis of prior associations between these variants and Lp(a) levels. [1] Their studies included not only individuals of white European descent but also a significant proportion of black persons, in order to widen the generalizability of their results.

Their main findings are that LPA variants (and, by proxy, Lp(a) levels) are associated with CAD,  peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, number of CAD vessels, age at onset of CAD diagnosis, and large-artery atherosclerosis-type stroke. They did not find an association with cardioembolic or small-vessel disease-type stroke; intracranial aneurysm; venous thrombosis; carotid intima thickness; or, in a small subset of individuals, myocardial infarction.

Viewpoint

The main conclusion to draw from this work is that Lp(a) is probably a strong causal factor in not only CAD, but also the development of atherosclerosis in other arterial trees. Although there is no evidence from this study that Lp(a) levels contribute to venous thrombosis, the investigators do not exclude a role for Lp(a) in arterial thrombosis.

Large-artery atherosclerosis stroke is thought to involve some element of arterial thrombosis or thromboembolism, [2] and genetic substudies of randomized trials of aspirin demonstrate that individuals with LPA variants predicted to have elevated levels of Lp(a) benefit the most from antiplatelet therapy. [3] Together, these data suggest that Lp(a) probably has clinically relevant effects on the development of atherosclerosis and arterial thrombosis.

Of  note, the investigators found no association between Lp(a) and carotid intima thickness, suggesting that either intima thickness is a poor surrogate for the clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis or that Lp(a) affects a distinct step in the atherosclerotic disease process that is not demonstrable in the carotid arteries.

Although Lp(a) testing is available, these studies do not provide any evidence that testing for Lp(a) is of clinical benefit, or that screening for atherosclerosis should go beyond well-described clinical risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, high-density lipoprotein levels, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and family history. Until evidence demonstrates that adding information on Lp(a) levels to routine clinical practice improves the ability of physicians to identify those at highest risk for atherosclerosis, Lp(a) testing should remain a research tool. Nevertheless, these findings do suggest that therapies to lower Lp(a) may have benefits that extend to forms of atherothrombosis beyond the coronary tree.

The finding of this study is interesting:

[1] It consistent with Dr. William LaFramboise..   examination specifically at APO B100, which is part of Lp(a) with some 14 candidate predictors for a more accurate exclusion of patients who don’t need intervention.          Apo B100 was not one of 5 top candidates.

William LaFramboise • Our study (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216991) comprised discovery research using targeted immunochemical screening of retrospective patient samples using both Luminex and Aushon platforms as opposed to shotgun proteomics. Hence the costs constrained sample numbers. Nevertheless, our ability to predict outcome substantially exceeded available methods:

The Framingham CHD scores were statistically different between groups (P <0.001, unpaired Student’s t test) but they classified only 16% of the subjects without significant CAD (10 of 63) at a 95% sensitivity for patients with CAD. In contrast, our algorithm incorporating serum values for OPN, RES, CRP, MMP7 and IFNγ identified 63% of the subjects without significant CAD (40 of 63) at 95% sensitivity for patients with CAD. Thus, our multiplex serum protein classifier correctly identified four times as many patients as the Framingham index.

This study is consistent with the concept of CAD, PVD, and atheromatous disease is a systemic vascular disease, but the point that is made is that it appears to have no relationship to venous thrombosis. The importance for predicting thrombotic events is considered serious.   The venous flow does not have the turbulence of large arteries, so the conclusion is no surprise.  The flow in capillary beds is a linear cell passage with minimal viscosity or turbulence.  The finding of no association with carotid artery disease  is interpreted to mean that the Lp(a) might be an earlier finding than carotid intimal thickness.  It is reassuring to find a recommendation for antiplatelet therapy for individuals with LPA variants based on randomized trials of aspirin substudies.

If that is the conclusion from the studies, and based on the strong association between the prothrombotic (pleiotropic) effect and the association with hyperhomocysteinemia, my own impression is that the recommendation is short-sighted.

[2]  Lp(a) is able to competitively inhibit the binding of plasminogen to fibrinogen and fibrin, and to inhibit the fibrin-dependent activation of plasminogen to plasmin via the tissue plasminogen activator, whereby apo(a) isoforms of low molecular weight have a higher affinity to fibrin than apo(a) isoforms of higher molecular weight. Like other compounds containing sulfhydryl groups, homocysteine enhances the binding of Lp(a) to fibrin.

Prothrombotic :

  • Binding to fibrin
  • Competitive inhibition of plasminogen
  • Stimulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor I and II (PAI -I, PAI -II)
  • Inactivation of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)

Source for Lp(a)

Artherogenesis: Predictor of CVD – the Smaller and Denser LDL Particles

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/11/15/artherogenesis-predictor-of-cvd-the-smaller-and-denser-ldl-particles/

References on Triglycerides and blood viscosity

Lowe GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, et al. Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Br J Haematol 1997; 96:168-173.


Sloop GD. A unifying theory of atherogenesis. Med Hypotheses. 1996; 47:321-5.
Smith WC, Lowe GD, et al. Rheological determinants of blood pressure in a Scottish adult population. J Hypertens 1992; 10:467-72.

Letcher RL, Chien S, et al. Direct relationship between blood pressure and blood viscosity in normal and hypertensive subjects. Role of fibrinogen and concentration. Am J Med 1981; 70:1195-1202.


Devereux RB, Case DB, Alderman MH, et al. Possible role of increased blood viscosity in the hemodynamics of systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:1265-1268.


Levenson J, Simon AC, Cambien FA, Beretti C. Cigarette smoking and hypertension. Factors independently associated with blood hyperviscosity and arterial rigidity. Arteriosclerosis 1987; 7:572-577.


Sloop GD, Garber DW. The effects of low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein on blood viscosity correlate with their association with risk of atherosclerosis in humans. Clin Sci 1997; 92:473-479.

Lowe GD. Blood viscosity, lipoproteins, and cardiovascular risk. Circulation 1992; 85:2329-2331.


Rosenson RS, Shott S, Tangney CC. Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with an elevated blood viscosity: triglycerides and blood viscosity. Atherosclerosis 2002; 161:433-9.


Stamos TD, Rosenson RS. Low high density lipoprotein levels are associated with an elevated blood viscosity. Atherosclerosis 1999; 146:161-5.


Hoieggen A, Fossum E, Moan A, Enger E, Kjeldsen SE. Whole-blood viscosity and the insulin-resistance syndrome. J Hypertens 1998; 16:203-10.


de Simone G, Devereux RB, Chien S, et al. Relation of blood viscosity to demographic and physiologic variables and to cardiovascular risk factors in apparently normal adults. Circulation 1990; 81:107-17.


Rosenson RS, McCormick A, Uretz EF. Distribution of blood viscosity values and biochemical correlates in healthy adults. Clin Chem 1996; 42:1189-95.


Tamariz LJ, Young JH, Pankow JS, et al. Blood viscosity and hematocrit as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 168:1153-60.


Jax TW, Peters AJ, Plehn G, Schoebel FC. Hemostatic risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes – a two year follow-up of 243 patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009; 8:48.


Ernst E, Weihmayr T, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and hemorheology. Physical fitness, stress and obesity. Atherosclerosis 1986; 59:263-9.


Hoieggen A, Fossum E, et al. Whole-blood viscosity and the insulin-resistance syndrome. J Hypertens 1998; 16:203-10.


Carroll S, Cooke CB, Butterly RJ. Plasma viscosity, fibrinogen and the metabolic syndrome: effect of obesity and cardiorespiratory fitness. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2000; 11:71-8.


Ernst E, Koenig W, Matrai A, et al. Blood rheology in healthy cigarette smokers. Results from the MONICA project, Augsburg. Arteriosclerosis 1988; 8:385-8.


Ernst E. Haemorheological consequences of chronic cigarette smoking. J Cardiovasc Risk 1995; 2:435-9.


Lowe GD, Drummond MM, Forbes CD, Barbenel JC. The effects of age and cigarette-smoking on blood and plasma viscosity in men. Scott Med J 1980; 25:13-7.


Kameneva MV, Watach MJ, Borovetz HS. Gender difference in rheologic properties of blood and risk of cardiovascular diseases. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 1999; 21:357-363.


Fowkes FG, Pell JP, Donnan PT, et al. Sex differences in susceptibility to etiologic factors for peripheral atherosclerosis. Importance of plasma fibrinogen and blood viscosity. Arterioscler Thromb 1994; 14:862-8.


Coppola L, Caserta F, De Lucia D, et al. Blood viscosity and aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2000; 31:35-42.

 

Read Full Post »

What is the Role of Plasma Viscosity in Hemostasis and Vascular Disease Risk?

Author: Larry H Bernstein, MD

and

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

This is the first of a two part discussion of viscosity, hemostasis, and vascular risk

Part II:  Special Considerations in Blood Lipoproteins, Viscosity, Assessment and Treatment

Thesis Statement: The effects of low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein on blood viscosity correlate with their association with risk of atherosclerosis in humans.  (Seminal study)

G. D. Sloop, MD.
Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine,
New Orleans, LA 70112, U.S.A.

  •  Increased blood or plasma viscosity has been associated with increased atherogenesis, and that the effects of low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein on blood viscosity correlate with their association with atherosclerosis risk.
  • Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was more strongly correlated with blood viscosity than was total cholesterol (r = 0.4149, P = 0.0281, compared with r = 0.2790, P = 0.1505). High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were inversely associated with blood viscosity (r = – 0.4018, P = 0.0341).
  • To confirm these effects, viscometry was performed on erythrocytes, suspended in saline, which had been incubated in plasma of various low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratios. Viscosity correlated directly with low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio (n = 23, r = 0.8561, P < 0.01).
  • Low-density lipoprotein receptor occupancy data suggests that these effects on viscosity are mediated by erythrocyte aggregation.
  • These results demonstrate that the effects of low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein on blood viscosity in healthy subjects may play a role in atherogenesis by modulating the dwell or residence time of atherogenic particles in the vicinity of the endothelium.

This discussion is an additional perspective on the series on coagulation, and earlier posts that were on flow dynamics.

Stroke and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation with Chronic Kidney Disease

Atrial Fibrillation: The Latest Management Strategies

Outcomes in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients: Prasugrel (Effient) vs. Clopidogrel (Plavix); Aliskiren (Tekturna) added to ACE or added to ARB

Positioning a Therapeutic Concept for Endogenous Augmentation of cEPCs — Therapeutic Indications for Macrovascular Disease: Coronary, Cerebrovascular and Peripheral

New Definition of MI Unveiled, Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)CT for Tagging Ischemia

Nitric Oxide Signalling Pathways            AviralvatsaEndothelial Dysfunction, Diminished Availability of cEPCs, Increasing CVD Risk for Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs

Endothelin Receptors in Cardiovascular Diseases: The Role of eNOS Stimulation

Repair damaged blood vessels in heart disease, stroke, diabetes and trauma: Cellular Reprogramming amniotic fluid-derived cells into Endothelial Cells

Septic Shock: Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Septic Shock

Statins’ Nonlipid Effects on Vascular Endothelium through eNOS Activation   LHB

Nitric Oxide Covalent Modifications: A Putative Therapeutic Target?  SJWilliamspa

Vascular Wall Shear Stress

Shear Stress

  1. The basic principles concerning mechanical stress applies to pathophysiological mechanisms in the vascular bed. In physics, stress is the internal distribution of forces within a body that balance and react to the external loads applied to it. Blood flow in the circulation leads to the development of superficial stresses near the vessel walls in either of two categories:

a) circumferential stress due to pulse pressure variation inside the vessel;
b) shear stress due to blood flow.

  1. The direction of the shear stress vector is determined the blood flow velocity vector adjacent to applied against the vessel wall.
  2. Friction is the opposing force applied by the wall.
  3. Shear stresses are disturbed by turbulent flow, regions of flow recirculation or flow separation.
  4. The notions of shear rate and fluid viscosity are crucial for the assessment of shear stress.

Fluid Flow and Shear Stress

  1. Shear rate is defined as the rate at which adjacent layers of fluid move with respect to each other, usually expressed as reciprocal seconds.
  2. The size of the shear rate gives an indication of the shape of the velocity profile for a given situation.
  3. The determination of shear stresses on a surface is based on the fundamental assumption of fluid mechanics, according to which the velocity of fluid upon the surface is zero (no-slip condition).
  4. Assuming that the blood is an ideal Newtonian fluid with constant viscosity, the flow is steady and laminar and the vessel is straight, cylindrical and inelastic, which is not the case. Under ideal conditions a parabolic velocity profile could be assumed.

The following assumptions have been made:

  1. The blood is considered as a Newtonian fluid.
  2. The vessel cross sectional area is cylindrical.
  3. The vessel is straight with inelastic walls.
  4. The blood flow is steady and laminar.

The Haagen-Poisseuille equation indicates that shear stress is directly proportional to blood flow rate and inversely proportional to vessel diameter.

  1. Viscosity is a property of a fluid that offers resistance to flow, and it is a measure of the combined effects of adhesion and cohesion.
  2. Viscosity increases as temperature decreases.
  3. Blood viscosity (non-Newtonian fluid) depends on shear rate, which is determined by blood platelets, red cells, etc.
  4. Blood viscosity is slightly affected by shear rate changes at low levels of hematocrit, but as hematocrit increases, the effect of shear rate changes becomes greater.
  5. the dependence of blood viscosity on hematocrit is more pronounced in the microcirculation than in larger vessels, due to hematocrit variations observed in small vessels (lumen diameter <100 Ìm).

The significant change of hematocrit in relation to vessel diameter is associated with the tendency of red blood cells to travel closer to the centre of the vessels. Thus, the greater the decrease in vessel lumen, the smaller the number of red blood cells that pass through, resulting in a decrease in blood viscosity.

Shear stress and vascular endothelium

  1. Endothelium responds to shear stress depending on the kind and the magnitude of shear stresses.
  2. the exposure of vascular endothelium to shear forces in the normal value range stimulates endothelial cells to release agents with direct or indirect antithrombotic properties, such as
  • prostacyclin,
  • nitric oxide (NO),
  • calcium,
  • thrombomodulin, etc.

Changes in shear stress magnitude activate cellular proliferation mechanisms as well as vascular remodeling processes.

  1. a high grade of shear stress increases wall thickness and expands the vessel’s diameter
  2. low shear stress induces a reduction in vessel diameter.
  3. Shear stresses are maintained at a mean of about 15 dynes/cm2.
  4. The presence of low shear stresses is frequently accompanied by unstable flow conditions
  • turbulence flow,
  • regions of blood recirculation,
  • “stagnant” blood areas.

(Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C. Vascular Wall Shear Stress: Basic Principles and Methods. Hellenic J Cardiol 2005; 46: 9-15.)

Hemorheology and Microvascular Disorders

Blood flow in large arteries is dominated by inertial forces exhibited at high flow velocities, while viscosity is negligible. When the flow velocity is compromised by deceleration at a bifurcation, endothelial cell dysfunction can occur along the outer wall at the bifurcation.

In sharp contrast, the flow of blood in micro-vessels is dominated by viscous shear forces since the inertial forces are negligible due to low flow velocities. Shear stress is a critical parameter in micro-vascular flow, and a force-balance approach is proposed for determining micro-vascular shear stress. When the attractive forces between erythrocytes are greater than the shear force produced by micro-vascular flow, tissue perfusion itself cannot be sustained.

The yield stress parameter is presented as a diagnostic candidate for future clinical research, specifically, as a fluid dynamic biomarker for micro-vascular disorders. The relation between the yield stress and diastolic blood viscosity (DBV) is described using the Casson model for viscosity, from which one may be able determine thresholds of DBV where the risk of microvascular disorders is high.

Cho Y-Il, and Cho DJ. Hemorheology and Microvascular Disorders. Korean Circ J 2011; 41:287-295.
Print ISSN 1738-5520 / On-line ISSN 1738-5555

Blood Rheology in Genesis of Atherothrombosis

Elevated blood viscosity is an integral component of vascular shear stress that contributes to the

  • site specificity of atherogenesis,
  • rapid growth of atherosclerotic lesions, and
  • increases their propensity to rupture.

Ex vivo measurements of whole blood viscosity (WBV) is a predictor of cardiovascular events in apparently both healthy individuals and cardiovascular disease patients. The association of an elevated WBV and incident cardiovascular events remains significant in multivariate models that adjust for major cardiovascular risk factors.

These prospective data suggest that measurement of WBV may be valuable as part of routine cardiovascular profiling, thereby potentially useful data for risk stratification and therapeutic interventions.

The recent development of a high throughput blood viscometer, which is capable of rapidly performing blood viscosity measurements across 10,000 shear rates using a single blood sample, enables the assessment of blood flow characteristics in different regions of the circulatory system and opens new opportunities for detecting and monitoring cardiovascular diseases.

Cowan AQ, Cho DJ, & Rosenson RS. Importance of Blood Rheology in the Pathophysiology of Athero-thrombosis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2012; 26:339–348. DOI 10.1007/s10557-012-6402-4

 

English: shear stress

English: shear stress (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: Shear rate dependency on fluid type a...

English: Shear rate dependency on fluid type and applied shear stress. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Inflammatory, haemostatic, and rheological markers

Markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and blood rheology have been ascertained to be risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke. Their role in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not well established and some of them, including the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), have not been examined before in prospective epidemiological studies.

In the Edinburgh Artery Study, we studied the development of PAD in the general population and evaluated 17 potential blood markers as predictors of incident PAD. At baseline (1987), 1519 men and women free of PAD aged 55–74 were recruited. After 17 years, 208 subjects had developed symptomatic PAD. In analysis adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD), only

  1. C-reactive protein 1.30 (1.08, 1.56)
  2. fibrinogen               1.16 (1.05, 1.17)
  3. lipoprotein (a)        1.22 (1.04, 1.44),
  4. hematocrit 1.22 (1.08, 1.38) [hazard ratio (95% CI) ]

-corresponding to an increase equal to the inter-tertile range-

were significantly (P , 0.01) associated with PAD.

These markers provided very little prognostic information for incident PAD to that obtained by cardiovascular risk factors and the ankle brachial index. Other markers included:

  • IL-6
  • intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1)
  • D-dimer
  • tissue plasminogen activator antigen
  • plasma and blood viscosities

having weak associations, were considerably attenuated when accounting for CVD risk factors.

Tzoulaki I, Murray GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, et al. Inflammatory, haemostatic, and rheological markers for incident peripheral arterial disease: Edinburgh Artery Study. European Heart Journal (2007) 28, 354–362. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl441

 

Leukocyte and platelet adhesion under flow

Leukocyte adhesion under flow in the microvasculature is mediated by

  • binding between cell surface receptors and
  • complementary ligands expressed on the surface of the endothelium.

Leukocytes adhere to endothelium in a two-step mechanism:

  1. rolling (primarily mediated by selectins) followed by
  2. firm adhesion (primarily mediated by integrins).

These investigators simulated the adhesion of a cell to a surface in flow, and elucidated the relationship between receptor–ligand functional properties and the dynamics of adhesion using a computational method called ‘‘Adhesive Dynamics.’’

Behaviors that are observed in simulations include

  • firm adhesion,
  • transient adhesion (rolling), and
  • no adhesion.

They varied the

  • dissociative properties,
  • association rate,
  • bond elasticity, and
  • shear rate

and found that the

  1. unstressed dissociation rate, kro,
  2. and the bond interaction length, γ,

are the most important molecular properties controlling the dynamics of adhesion.

(Chang KC, Tees DFJ andHammer DA. The state diagram for cell adhesion under flow: Leukocyte rolling and firm adhesion. PNAS 2000; 97(21):11262-11267.)

  • The effect of leukocyte adhesion on blood flow in small vessels is treated as a homogeneous Newtonian fluid is sufficient to explain resistance changes in venular microcirculation.
  • The Casson model represents the effect of red blood cell aggregation and requires the non-Newtonian fluid flow model of resistance changes in small venules.

In this model the blood vessel is considered as a circular cylinder and the leukocyte is considered as a truncated spherical protrusion in the inner side of the blood vessel.

Numerical simulations demonstrated that for a Casson fluid with hematocrit of 0.4 and flow rate Q = 0:072 nl/s, a single leukocyte increases flow resistance by 5% in a 32 m diameter and 100 m long vessel. For a smaller vessel of 18 m, the flow resistance increases by 15%.

(Das B, Johnson PC, and Popel AS. Computational fluid dynamic studies of leukocyte adhesion effects on non-Newtonian blood flow through microvessels. Biorheology  2000; 37:239–258.)

Adhesive interactions between leukocytes

The mechanics of how blood cells interact with one another and with biological or synthetic surfaces is quite complex: owing to

  • the deformability of cells,
  • the variation in vessel geometry, and
  • the large number of competing chemistries present

(Lipowski et al., 1991, 1996).

Adhesive interactions between white blood cells and the interior surface of the blood vessels they contact are important in

  • inflammation and in
  • the progression of heart disease.

Parallel-plate micro-channels have been used to characterize the strength of these interactions. Recent computational and experimental work by several laboratories are directed at bridging the gap between

  • behavior observed in flow chamber experiments, and
  • cell surface interactions observed in the micro-vessels

What follows is a computational simulation of specific adhesive interactions between cells and surfaces under flow. In the adhesive dynamics formulation, adhesion molecules are modeled as compliant springs. The Bell model is used to describe the kinetics of single biomolecular bond failure, which relates

  1. the rate of dissociation kr to
  2. the magnitude of the force on the bond F.

The rate of formation directly follows from the Boltzmann distribution for affinity. The expression for the binding rate must also incorporate the effect of the relative motion of the two surfaces. Unless firmly adhered to a surface, white blood cells can be effectively modeled as rigid spherical particles. This is consistent with good agreement between bead versus cell in vitro experiments (Chang and Hammer, 2000).

Various methods have been used to bring clarity to the complex range of transient interactions between

  • cells,
  • neighboring cells, and
  • bounding surfaces under flow.

Knowledge gained from these investigations of flow systems may prove useful in microfluidic applications where the transport of

  • blood cells and
  • solubilized, bioactive molecules is needed, or
  • in miniaturized diagnostic devices

where cell mechanics or binding affinities can be correlated with clinical pathologies.

(King MR. Cell-Surface Adhesive Interactions in Microchannels and Microvessels.   First International Conference on Microchannels and Minichannels. 2003, Rochester, NY. Pp 1-6. ICMM2003-1012.

Monitoring Blood Viscosity to Improve Cognitive Function

Blood viscosity, the metric for the thickness and stickiness of blood, is associated with all major risk factors for cardiovascular disease, complications of diabetes, and it is highly predictive of stroke and MI, as well as cognitive decline. While elevated blood viscosity has a role in the etiology of atherosclerosis,  there is strong evidence for a causal role in the development of dementia.  It follows that improving blood viscosity should lead to improvements in cognitive as well as cardiovascular function.

Factors Affecting Blood Viscosity

Five cardinal factors are:

  1. Hematocrit,
  2. erythrocyte deformability,
  3. plasma viscosity,
  4. erythrocyte aggregation, and
  5. temperature

First to consider is hematocrit. Erythrocyte deformability is the ability of red blood cells to elongate and fold themselves for better hemodynamic flow in large vessels as well as for more efficient passage through capillaries.  The more deformable the red blood cells, the less viscous the blood.  Young red blood cells are flexible and tend to stiffen over their 120 day life-span.  Erythrocyte deformability is, after hematocrit, the second most important determinant of blood viscosity.

The third factor is plasma viscosity.  An important determinant of plasma viscosity is hydration status, but it is also determined by the presence of high molecular-weight proteins, especially immune globulins and fibrinogen.

Erythrocyte aggregation, the tendency of red blood cells to be attracted to each other and stick together is not well understood, but erythrocyte deformability and plasma proteins play important roles.

Blood, like most other fluids, is less viscous at higher temperatures. It is estimated that a 1°C increase in temperature results in a 2% decrease in blood viscosity.

Viscous Blood is Abrasive Blood

Maintaining efficient blood flow through the vessels forms layers, or lamina, that slide easily over each other.

  • Faster flowing blood can be found in the central layers and
  • Slower moving blood in the outer layers near the vessel walls.
  • Hyper-viscous blood doesn’t slide as smoothly as less viscous blood.
  • The turbulence damages the delicate intima of the blood vessel.

One of the most common locations for the development of atherosclerotic plaques is at the bifurcation of the carotid arteries, and the positioning of these plaques can be mapped to the turbulent blood flow patterns of this region.

Blood viscosity is highly correlated with thickening of the carotid intima-media, a prelude to plaque formation.  As the carotid arteries become progressively more occluded, there is decreased blood supply to the brain.

Hyper-viscosity also impacts the brain at the level of micro-perfusion.  Stiffened red blood cells have a decreased ability to bend and fold as they pass through capillaries. This leads to endothelial abrasion.  The capillary walls thicken and diffusion of oxygen and nutrients into the tissues decreases. The effect is most pronounced in those tissues where perfusion is essential for unimpaired function, such as the brain.

Diabetes, Blood Viscosity, and Dementia

While diabetics have elevated blood viscosity, blood viscosity is a risk factor that predicts progression from metabolic syndrome to diabetes. Red blood cell flexibility is greatly reduced by fluctuations in the osmolality of the blood which is affected by blood glucose concentration.  Uncontrolled, this leads to  small vessel disease.

  • Blindness,
  • kidney insufficiency, and
  • leg ischemia

develop as these organs are the dependent on micro-perfusion.

The Rotterdam Study and other research point to decreased cognitive function and increased dementia among diabetics as being further manifestations of the decreased perfusion that accompanies elevated blood viscosity.

 

Blood Viscosity, Cognitive Decline, and Alzheimer’s

Multiple forms of cognitive decline, including dementia and Alzheimers’ are impacted by increased blood viscosity. The Edinburgh Artery Study (2010) showed that blood viscosity predicted cognitive decline over a four year period in 452 elderly subjects (p<0.05).  Blood viscosity, an important determinant of the circulatory flow, was significantly linked with cognitive function.  The associations between cardiovascular risk factors, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease were presented by de la Torre (2002) (nine points of evidence) in a compelling argument that Alzheimer’s is a vascular disorder characterized by impaired micro-perfusion to the brain.

Testing for Blood Viscosity

The most recent technology uses an automated scanning capillary tube viscometer capable of measuring viscosity over the complete range of physiologic values experienced in a cardiac cycle (10,000 shear rates) with a single continuous measurement. This test provides clinicians with measurements of blood viscosity at both systolic and diastolic pressures.

Blood viscosity testing is indicated for a wide range of patients, as good tissue perfusion is central to good health regardless of what system is being addressed.  Patients with signs of cognitive decline should be high on the list of those appropriate to test, and those patients with a history or family history of heart disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, migraines, smoking, alcoholism or other risk factors associated with the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

Source: Larsen P, Monitoring Blood Viscosity to Improve Cognitive Function

  1. World Health Organization. Dementia: A Public Health Priority. April, 2012.
  2. Sloop GD. A unifying theory of atherogenesis. Med Hypotheses. 1996; 47:321-5.
  3. Kensey KR and Cho, Y. Physical Principles and Circulation: Hemodynamics. In: The Origin of Atherosclerosis: What Really Initiates the Inflammatory Process. 2nd Ed. Summersville, WV: SegMedica; 2007:33-50.
  4. Hofman A., Ott A, et. al. Atherosclerosis, apolipoprotein E, and prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in the Rotterdam Study. Lancet, 1997, 349 (9046): 151-154

 

 Sleep Apnea and Blood Viscosity.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an important public health concern, which affects around 2–4% of the population. Left untreated, it causes a decrease not only in quality of life, but also of life expectancy. Despite the fact that knowledge about the mechanisms of development of cardiovascular disease in patients with OSA is still incomplete, observations confirm a relationship between sleep disordered breathing and the rheological properties of blood.

Tażbirek M, Słowińska L, Kawalski M, Pierzchała W.   The rheological properties of blood and the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica 2011; 49(2):206–210.

Hemostatic and Rheological Risk Factors and the Risk Stratification

Backgound: Thrombosis is regarded to be a key factor in the development of acute coronary syndromes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We hypothesize, that hemostatic
and rheological risk factors may be of major relevance for the incidence and the risk stratification of these patients.

  • Methods: In 243 patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina pectoris parameters of metabolism, hemostasis, blood rheology and endogenous fibrinolysis were assessed.

Patients were prospectively followed for 2 years in respect to elective revascularizations and acute coronary syndromes.

Results: During follow-up 88 patients presented with cardiac events, 22 of those were admitted to the hospital because of acute events, 5 Patients were excluded due to non- cardiac death.

Patients with clinical events were found to be more frequently diabetic and presented with a more progressed coronary atherosclerosis. Even though patients with diabetes mellitus demonstrated a comparable level of multivessel disease (71% vs. 70%) the rate of elective revascularization was higher (41% vs. 28%, p < 0.05). The results were also unfavorable for
the incidence of acute cardiovascular events (18% vs. 8%, p < 0.01).

In comparison to non-diabetic patients diabetics demonstrated significantly elevated levels of

  • fibrinogen (352 ± 76 vs. 312 ± 64 mg/dl, p < 0.01),
  • plasma viscosity (1.38 ± 0.23 vs. 1.31 ± 0.16 mPas, p < 0.01),
  • red blood cell aggregation (13.2 ± 2.5 vs. 12.1 ± 3.1 E, p < 0.05) and

plasmin-activator-inhibitor (6.11 ± 3.4 vs. 4.7 ± 2.7 U/l, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Pathological alterations of fibrinogen, blood rheology and plasminogen-activatorinhibtor as indicators of a procoagulant state are of major relevance for the
short-term incidence of cardiac events, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, and may be used to stratify patients to specific therapies.

parameters of metabolism, hemostasis, endogenous fibrinolysis and blood rheology for patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

diabetes mellitus non-diabetic patients p-value
glucose (mg/dl) 157 ± 67 88 ± 12 <0,0001
fibrinogen (mg/dl) 351 ± 76 312 ± 64 <0,01
plasma viscosity (mPa × s-1) 1,38 ± 0,23 1,31 ± 0,16 <0,01

Jax TW, Peters AJ, Plehn G, and  Schoebel FC. Hemostatic risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes – a two year follow-up of 243 patients. Cardiovascular Diabetology 2009; 8:48-57.  doi:10.1186/1475-2840-8-48

 

Abnormal Viscosity in Pregnancy

Abnormal hemorheology has been shown to be in almost all conditions associated with accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disorders. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that high concentration of plasma Triglyceride (TG) predicts altered hemorheological variables in normal pregnancy.

Sixty pregnant women attending antenatal clinic of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital at 14-36 weeks of gestation (aged 21-36 years) were recruited after giving informed consent to participate in the study. They consisted of 28 primigravidae and 32 multigravidae. Twenty-four healthy non-pregnant women of similar age and socioeconomical status were also recruited. The study showed that fasting plasma Triglyceride (TG) increased significantly in primigravidae and multigravidae.

There was a positive correlation between plasma TG level and blood viscosity (r = 0.36, p<0.01). TG also correlated positively with hematocrit (r = 0.48, p<0.001), hemoglobin concentration (r = 0.43, p<0.001) and white blood cell count (r = 0.38, p<0.01) in the pregnant group as a whole. In primigravidae, there was a strong correlation between TG and

o          blood viscosity (r = 0.63, p<0.001),

o          hematocrit (r = 0.88, p<0.001),

o          hemoglobin concentration (r = 0.85, p<0.001).

However, there was an insignificant correlation between TG and the hemorheological variables in multigravidae.

Plasma TG concentration in primigravidae is strongly associated with blood viscosity also with hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration, but the association is lost in multigravidae. Therefore, TG could be considered as an important potential indicator of altered blood rheology in primigravidae, but not in multigravidae.

Olatunji LA, Soladoye AO, Fawole AA, Jimoh RO and Olatunji VA. Association between Plasma Triglyceride and Hemorheological Variables in Nigerian Primigravidae and Multigravidae.

Research Journal of Medical Sciences 2008; 2(3):116-120. ISSN: 1815-9346.

 

Retinal Vein Occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is an important cause of permanent visual loss. Hyperviscosity, due to alterations of blood cells and plasma components, may play a role in the pathogenesis of RVO. Aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the possible association between hemorheology and RVO. In 180 RVO patients and in 180 healthy subjects comparable for age and gender we analysed the whole hemorheological profile: [whole blood viscosity (WBV), erythrocyte deformability index (DI), plasma viscosity (PLV), and fibrinogen]. WBV and PLV were measured using a rotational viscosimeter, whereas DI was measured by a microcomputer-assisted filtrometer. WBV at 0.512 sec-1 and 94.5 sec-1 shear rates as well as DI, but not PLV, were significantly different in patients as compared to healthy subjects.

At the logistic univariate analysis, a significant association between the

  • highest tertiles of WBV at 94.5 sec-1 shear rate (OR:4.91,95%CI 2.95–8.17;p<0.0001),
  • WBV at 0.512 sec-1 shear rate (OR: 2.31, 95%CI 1.42–3.77; p<0.0001), and
  • the lowest tertile of DI (OR: 0.18, 95%CI 0.10–0.32; p<0.0001) and RVO was found.

After adjustment for potential confounders,

  • the highest tertiles of WBV at 0.512 sec-1 shear rate (OR: 3.23, 95%CI 1.39–7.48; p=0.006),
  • WBV at 94.5 sec-1 shear rate (OR: 6.74, 95%CI 3.06–14.86; p<0.0001) and
  • the lowest tertile of DI (OR:0.20,95%CI 0.09–0.44,p<0.0001)

remained significantly associated with the disease. In conclusion, the data indicate that an alteration of hemorheological parameters may modulate the susceptibility to the RVO.

Sofi F, Mannini L, Marcucci R, Bolli P, Sodi A, et al.  Role of hemorheological factors in patients with retinal vein occlusion. In Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis.  Thromb Haemost 2007; 98:1215–1219.

Summary:  This discussion is a two part sequence that first establishes the known strong relationship between blood flow viscosity, shear stress, and plasma triglycerides (VLDL) as risk factors for hemostatic disorders leading to thromboembolic disease, and the association with atherosclerotic disease affecting the heart, the brain (via carotid blood flow), peripheral circulation, the kidneys, and retinopathy as well.

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Aspirin Use, Tumor PIK3CA Mutation, and Colorectal-Cancer Survival

N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1596-1606 October 25, 2012DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207756

Screen Shot 2021-07-19 at 7.30.04 PM

Word Cloud By Danielle Smolyar

BACKGROUND

Regular use of aspirin after a diagnosis of colon cancer has been associated with a superior clinical outcome. Experimental evidence suggests that inhibition of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) (also known as cyclooxygenase-2) by aspirin down-regulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling activity. We hypothesized that the effect of aspirin on survival and prognosis in patients with cancers characterized by mutated PIK3CA (the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphonate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha polypeptide gene) might differ from the effect among those with wild-type PIK3CA cancers.

METHODS

We obtained data on 964 patients with rectal or colon cancer from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, including data on aspirin use after diagnosis and the presence or absence of PIK3CA mutation. We used a Cox proportional-hazards model to compute the multivariate hazard ratio for death. We examined tumor markers, including PTGS2, phosphorylated AKT,KRAS, BRAF, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and methylation of long interspersed nucleotide element 1.

RESULTS

Among patients with mutated-PIK3CA colorectal cancers, regular use of aspirin after diagnosis was associated with superior colorectal cancer–specific survival (multivariate hazard ratio for cancer-related death, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.61; P<0.001 by the log-rank test) and overall survival (multivariate hazard ratio for death from any cause, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.94; P=0.01 by the log-rank test). In contrast, among patients with wild-type PIK3CA, regular use of aspirin after diagnosis was not associated with colorectal cancer–specific survival (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P=0.76 by the log-rank test; P=0.009 for interaction between aspirin and PIK3CA variables) or overall survival (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.17; P=0.96 by the log-rank test; P=0.07 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of aspirin after diagnosis was associated with longer survival among patients with mutated-PIK3CA colorectal cancer, but not among patients with wild-type PIK3CA cancer. The findings from this molecular pathological epidemiology study suggest that thePIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer may serve as a predictive molecular biomarker for adjuvant aspirin therapy. (Funded by The National Institutes of Health and others.)

SOURCE:

http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1207756

Study Shows Aspirin Could Increase Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients with PIK3CA Mutations

November 28, 2012

By mining epidemiological data from several long-term health studies and combining it with genomic data, a team led by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School has shown that colorectal cancer patients with PIK3CA mutations may benefit from treatment with aspirin, and that PIK3CA mutation status could serve as biomarker to predict response to aspirin treatment.

The study, published last month in the New England Journal of Medicine, evaluated data from 964 patients with colon or rectal cancer from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. It found that patients with PIK3CA-mutated cancers who regularly took aspirin after their diagnosis had significantly longer survival, while those with wild-type cancers showed no benefit from aspirin treatment.

According to the researchers, led by Dana Farber’s Shuji Ogino, the results suggest that aspirin might be worth testing as an adjuvant treatment for the approximately 20 percent of colorectal cancer patients with PIK3CA mutations.

“What we conclude is that this PK3CA mutation can be a predictive biomarker and based on molecular testing, doctors could strongly or weakly recommend aspirin,” Ogino told PGx Reporter.

According to the group, numerous observational and other studies have suggested that aspirin might play a protective role in colorectal cancer. Aspirin is currently prescribed to some colorectal cancer patients, Ogino said, but so far there has been no way to predict which patients are likely to actually benefit from it.

Ogino said his team’s previous research found that levels of the enzyme PTGS2 could predict response to aspirin treatment, but the association didn’t reach statistical significance. And because of a lack of good standards for measuring PTGS2 using immunohistochemistry, the group wanted to search for a better, more objective marker.

According to the group, other experiments have suggested that as aspirin inhibits PTGS2 it also down-regulates PI3K signaling, which hinted that PIK3CA mutations could be a potential marker as well.

“Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that PIK3CA mutation may be a good marker for aspirin response,” Ogino said. Testing this hypothesis prospectively, he said, would have taken decades, but by using epidemiological data coupled with molecular data the group was able to find an answer much more quickly.

In the recent NEJM study, Ogino and his colleagues compared the survival of colorectal patients who reported that they regularly used aspirin after their diagnosis with those who didn’t, and further subdivided the group into those with PIK3CA mutations and those without.

The team studied samples from a subset of 964 patients from the two large longitudinal health studies for which the relevant aspirin use data was available, collecting specimens from the registries and using pyrosequencing to establish PIK3CA mutation status for each patient’s tumor. The group also recorded whether samples had BRAF or KRAS mutations.

The researchers found that patients with PIK3CA mutations who reported regular aspirin use had a significantly improved five-year survival rate — 97 percent — over those who didn’t take aspirin — 74 percent.

In contrast, patients without the mutation showed no difference in survival whether they took aspirin regularly or not.

Because the group had previously found that PTGS2 levels were also predictive of response to aspirin use, the researchers evaluated whether a combination of both markers could serve an even greater predictor. According to the study authors, the strongest effect of aspirin use was indeed in patients with both markers, though this finding did not have high statistical significance.

Because the study sampled patients treated before 2006, the group assumed that chemotherapy treatment was similar for the PIK3CA-mutated cases and the wild-type cases. According to the researchers, information on patients’ mutation status was not available to treating physicians at the time of the studies.

The team also distinguished between aspirin use before and after diagnosis, finding that pre-diagnosis use did not seem to influence the relationship between PIK3CA and post-diagnosis aspirin.

Ogino said that the group is pursuing avenues to validate the findings. Unfortunately, relatively few trials of aspirin treatment in colorectal cancer have been conducted.

One option, he said, would be to analyze data from a trial of celecoxib (Pfizer’s Celebrex), a similar drug to aspirin, instead. But it’s not an ideal solution. If the results reflect what the group found in its aspirin study it would shore up the aspirin finding. However, if the results do not match up it would be unclear what that might mean about the group’s original findings.

Potentially, the researchers could also use mouse models or cell lines, but this route has several downsides. Most important, Ogino said, is the fact that aspirin likely affects inflammation more than cancer cells themselves. “Cancer is not just the cancer cell, it’s a much more complicated system so you can’t assess it in the test tube, basically,” he said.

Molika Ashford is a GenomeWeb contributing editor and covers personalized medicine and molecular diagnostics. E-mail her here.

Related Stories

SOURCE:

Read Full Post »

 Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Ernst & Young (“E&Y”) has published their fifth annual report on the state of the medical technology industry.

Below are the link to this report and also a link to an excerpt from the report displaying charts of the industry’s performance.

Definition of the Global Medical Technology Industry

In this report, medical technology (medtech) companies are defined as companies that primarily design and manufacture medical

technology equipment and supplies and are headquartered within the United States or Europe. For the purposes of this report, we have placed Israel’s data and analysis within the European market, and any grouping of the US and Europe has been referred to as “global.”

This wide ranging definition includes medical device, diagnostic, drug delivery and analytical/life science tool companies, but excludes distributors and service providers such as contract research organizations or contract manufacturing organizations.

By any measure, medical technology is an extraordinarily diverse industry. While developing a consistent and meaningful classification system is important, it is anything but straightforward. Existing taxonomies sometimes segregate companies into scores of thinly populated categories, making it difficult to identify and analyze industry trends.

Furthermore, they tend to combine categories based on products (such as imaging or tools) with those based on diseases targeted by those products (such as cardiovascular or oncology), which makes it harder to analyze trends consistently across either dimension. To address some of these challenges, we have categorized medtech companies across both dimensions —products and diseases targeted.

All publicly traded medtech companies were classified as belonging to one of five broad product groups:

Imaging:

companies developing products used to diagnose or monitor conditions via imaging technologies, including products such as MRI machines, computed tomography (CT) and X-ray imaging and optical biopsy systems

Non-imaging diagnostics:

companies developing products used to diagnose or monitor conditions via non-imaging technologies, which can include patient monitoring and in vitro testing equipment

Research and other equipment:

companies developing equipment used for research or other purposes, including analytical and life science tools, specialized laboratory equipment and furniture

Therapeutic devices:

companies developing products used to treat patients, including therapeutic medical devices, tools or drug delivery/infusion technologies

Other:

companies developing products that do not fi t in any of the above categories were classifi ed in this segment

In addition to product groups, this report tracks conglomerate companies that derive a significant part of their revenues from medical technologies. While a conglomerate medtech division’s technology could technically fall into one of the product groups listed above (e.g., General Electric into “imaging” and Allergan into “therapeutic devices”), all conglomerate data is kept separate from that of the nonconglomerates.

This is due to the fact that, while conglomerates report revenues for their medtech divisions, they typically do not report other financial results for their medtech divisions, such as research and development or net income.

Conglomerate companies:

United States

3M Health Care

Abbott: Medical Products

Agilent Technologies: Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis

Allergan: Medical Devices

Baxter International: Medical Products

Corning: Life Sciences

Danaher: Life Sciences & Diagnostics

Endo Health Solutions: AMS and HealthTronics

GE Healthcare

Hospira: Devices

IDEX: Health & Science Technologies

Johnson & Johnson: Medical Devices & Diagnostics

Kimberly-Clark: Health Care

Pall: Life Sciences

Europe

Agfa HealthCare

Bayer HealthCare: Medical Care

Beiersdorf: Hansaplast

Carl Zeiss Meditec

Dräger: Medical

Eckert & Ziegler: Medizintechnik

Fresenius Kabi

Halma: Health and Analysis

Jenoptik: Medical

Novartis: Alcon

Philips Healthcare

Quantel Medical

Roche Diagnostics

Sanofi : Genzyme Biosurgery

SCA Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget: Personal Care

Sempermed

Siemens Healthcare

Smiths Medical

The big picture

Despite lingering financial and regulatory uncertainties, US and European publicly held medtech companies delivered another strong performance in 2011. For both conglomerates and pure-play companies, revenue growth in 2011 outpaced 2010 growth rates. Net income increased by 14% — the third consecutive year of double digit growth, and certainly impressive in today’s challenging economic climate.

So far, the medical technology industry appears to be weathering a period of slower global economic growth. However, for an industry that was accustomed to double-digit revenue growth, considerable margins and a predictable sales-and regulatory environment, the long-term future may still be turbulent. The industry’s financial performance will likely continue to be challenged by low economic growth in developed markets, the prospect of austerity measures in many countries, a looming Eurozone debt crisis and an imminent 2.3% medical device tax in the US. And while the US Supreme Court’s upholding of the Affordable Care Act has removed some of the uncertainty in the US, the regulatory environment continues to grow ever more complex around the globe.

As payers tackle runaway health care costs, medtech will face rising pricing pressures and expanded use of comparative effectiveness — making organic growth in western markets more challenging. Efforts to heighten disease management and preventive care, and other efforts to drive efficiency within the health care system, may impact both product utilization and profitability. The cost of not adapting the traditional medtech business model to stay ahead of these trends could be disastrous.

Public company data 2011                 2010 % change

Revenues $331.7                                          $313.9 6%

Conglomerates $142.3                                $132.8 7%

Pure-play companies $189.4                     $181.0 5%

R&D expense $12.6                                        $12.1 4%

SG&A expense $60.3                                    $57.4 5%

Net income $19.9                                          $17.4 14%

Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments $39.2      $39.4 -1%

Market capitalization $436.1                                                              $465.9 -6%

Number of employees 725,900                                                           702,200 3%

Number of public companies 411                                                        423 -3%

Source: Ernst & Young and company financial statement data.

Numbers may appear to be inconsistent due to rounding.

Data shown for US and European public companies.

Market capitalization data is shown for 30 June 2011 and 30 June 2012.

Medical technology at a glance, 2010–2011

(US$b, data for pure-play companies except where indicated)

Medtech companies — long known for innovation, reinvention and risk-taking in product development — will need to apply the same principles to business model development. These trends and implications are discussed more fully in this year’s point of view article.

US and European publicly held medtech companies delivered another strong performance in 2011

Since we first published Pulse of the industry back in 2008 (using 2007 figures), a number of medtech firms have seen their revenues grow significantly. It is notable that 6 of the 10 fastest-growing companies over the period 2007–11 — led by spinal device company NuVasive and Intuitive Surgical (maker of the da Vinci Surgical System) — expanded their top lines mostly through organic growth and without the assistance of sizeable mergers or acquisitions. Corning Life Sciences was the only conglomerate to make the top 10 list.

Selected fast-growing US medtechs by revenue growth, 2007–2011

(US$m)

Companies 2007                          2011 CAGR

NuVasive $154                                 $541 37%

Alere $767                                       $2,387 33%

Life Technologies $1,282             $3,776 31%

Intuitive Surgical $601                 $1,757 31%

Illumina $367                                 $1,056 30%

Hologic $738                                   $1,789 25%

Corning Life Sciences $305            $595 18%

Thoratec $235                                   $423 16%

Greatbatch $319                                $569 16%

ResMed $716                                    $1,243 15%

Source: Ernst & Young and company financial statement data.

Companies in italics have made significant acquisitions between 2007 and 2011.

CAGR= Compounded Annual Growth Rate. 6 of the 10 fastest-growing companies expanded their top lines mostly through organic growth

Selected fast-growing European medtechs by revenue growth, 2007–2011

(US$m)

Source: Ernst & Young and company financial statement data.

Companies in italics have made significant acquisitions between 2007 and 2011.

CAGR= Compounded Annual Growth Rate.

Companies        Location          2007                   2011                CAGR

Fresenius Kabi        Germany        $2,782                $5,515                     19%

Sonova Holding      Switzerland      $926                 $1,827                   19%

ELEKTA                   Sweden              $674                 $1,217                    16%

Qiagen                     Netherlands       $650               $1,170                    16%

Stratec Biomedical Systems Germany $94               $165                     15%

Sempermed             Austria               $300                 $517                      15%

Syneron Medical         Israel               $141                  $228                    13%

Given Imaging             Israel               $113                  $178                     12%

William Demant Holding Denmark $1,010             $1,501                    10%

Essilor International France            $3,986               $5,829                  10%

While the fastest-growing companies in the US were fueled largely by organic growth, the four fastest-growing firms in Europe were aided by significant acquisitions. Germany’s Fresenius Kabi holds the distinction of having the biggest expansion in both real dollar and percentage terms on this list.

The company’s growth was in large part fueled by the addition of APP Pharmaceuticals, which it acquired for US$3.7 billion in 2008. Of the six commercial leaders on this list, five had made sizeable purchases, while the smaller “other” companies grew mostly through organic means.

Future Growth

Fueling future growth Mergers & acquisitions

The big picture

Merger and acquisition (M&A) activity among US and European medical technology companies remained vibrant in the year ended June 30, 2012. While 2011–12’s total of US$35.0 billion was well below the levels seen over the last two years, those two years were driven by megadeals done by Novartis (which paid US$41.2 billion to Nestlé for the remaining 75% of Alcon it didn’t already control) and Johnson & Johnson (which paid US$19.7 billion for Synthes). On a normalized basis (after removing the impact of the aforementioned megadeals), 2011–12’s total deal value was more in line with previous years — 25% below the prior year and 16% above the year before that.

Although no megadeals were consummated in 2011–12, there were eight transactions valued at more than US$1 billion, versus 12 the year before. The year’s largest deal was between private equity firm Apax Partners, two Canadian pension funds and Texas-based wound care company Kinetic Concepts Inc. (KCI). The US$6.3 billion Apax/KCI deal was particularly notable, as the US$6.3 billion represented one of the largest leveraged buyouts — across all industries — since the onset of the financial crisis in 2008. Two other private equity firms were also involved in multibillion-dollar M&As: Cinven sold off Swedish diagnostics company Phadia to Thermo Fisher Scientific for US$3.5 billion, and TPG Capital acquired in vitro diagnostics maker Immucor for nearly US$2 billion.

SOURCES:

Pulse of the Industry – Ernst & Young

http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Pulse_medical_technology_report_2012/$FILE/Pulse_medical_technology_report_2012.pdf

Pulse of the Industry: Medical Technology Report 2012 – Industry performance

http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Industries/Life-Sciences/Pulse–medical-technology-report-2012—Mergers-and-acquisitions—medtechdata 

Read Full Post »

The Way With Personalized Medicine: Reporters’ Voice at the 8th Annual Personalized Medicine Conference,11/28-29, 2012, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #8: The Way With Personalized Medicine: Reporters’ Voice at the 8th Annual Personalized Medicine Conference,11/28-29, 2012, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Published on 11/28/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

Stanford’s Mike Snyder is Showing the Way With Personalized Medicine

 

11/19/12
Follow @ldtimmerman

Say the words “personalized medicine” to people from various walks of life, and you’re likely to get one of about four different reactions.

A. “Personalized medicine? What’s that?” (Usually spoken by 99 percent of patients.)

B. “Personalized medicine will bankrupt the country with expensive new diagnostic tests, and overrated targeted drugs.” (Usually spoken by health economists.)

C. “Personalized medicine is overhyped, a load of bunk.” (Usually spoken by grizzled pharma industry vets who remember the genomics crash of a decade ago, and have a financial interest in preserving the status quo.)

D. “Personalized medicine will revolutionize healthcare, moving us away from reactive sick-care and more toward predictive and preventive strategies focused on wellness.” (Usually spoken by the subset of true believers in science and the biotech industry.)

You can make arguments, buttressed with data, to support any of the last three positions. But none of these positions quite captures the truth. We are in the early days of the personalized medicine movement, and don’t know how the story will unfold. As a journalist who’s followed many different threads of this story for thelast decade, I keep getting the feeling that we’re moving further away from one-size-fits-all medicine, and more toward treatment based on extremely detailed molecular readouts on your state of health or disease. People may havesnickered at Internet pioneer Larry Smarr and his friends in the “Quantified Self” movement for being weird a couple years ago, but I can easily envision people jumping on this bandwagon sometime not too far out.

I was fascinated this past week when I had a chance to talk with Mike Snyder, a geneticist who has turned himself into a poster child for personalized medicine through his work at Stanford University. After talking with him for about a half hour last week, I hung up thinking his experience today could seem mainstream in another 10 or 20 years.

Stanford geneticist Mike Snyder

Snyder, for those who are unfamiliar, was the guy at the center of an important paper published in the journal Cell back in March. This paper described how researchers sequenced Snyder’s genome, and then really got rolling in their quest to understand his biochemical state of being at 20 different snapshots in time over a 14-month period. The scientists took blood samples from him when he was feeling fine, and a few times when he was sick with viral infections. They then ran the samples through instruments that captured an extremely detailed look at 40,000 molecular parameters in his blood. These were metabolites, proteins, RNA transcripts, self-directed antibodies. This hard-core genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic and proteomic approach (which the scientists called an integrative personal ‘omics profile) could have been just a demonstration of technological overkill, offering very little information that could lead anyone to make better decisions about their health.

But that’s not what happened. It turned out that the results, surprisingly, showed this healthy white guy in his mid-50s was at high risk of getting Type 2 diabetes—which if it’s not controlled, it can lead down the path to blindness, amputations, stroke, or heart attack.

At the time the molecular analysis revealed this trend, it was hard to believe. Snyder had no family history of the disease, and most everybody in his family is thin. His genome said he was at low risk of obesity, and at a shade under 5-foot-10, and 160 pounds, Snyder’s general practitioner thought the idea of him becoming diabetic was far-fetched.

But just as the pan-‘omics tests had predicted, researchers saw over time that something was amiss with Snyder’s ability to control his blood sugar—especially, and oddly, when he had viral infections. When looking at two traditional blood measurements of diabetes—blood sugar concentration levels and hemoglobin A1C counts—both of those numbers progressively climbed into worrisome territory. As the sweeping ‘omics-driven analysis had predicted, Snyder was diagnosed with diabetes.

He remembers the day that word came, April 11, 2011. He decided it was time to change his health habits.

“Up until that point, I had been eating lots of sweets. I’d have ice cream all the time after dinner. It really was a pretty bad diet,” Snyder says. After the diagnosis, it took him six months to get his blood sugar levels back to normal. “I completely cut out all dessert, and have had one bite of wedding cake since,” he says. That one exception came when one of his postdocs got married, he says.

That might be how anybody in this situation would react to a diabetes diagnosis, with enough self-discipline. But what makes this story even more interesting is that when Snyder changed his diet, and ramped up his daily exercise routines, he could see how his biochemical profile changed when his behavior changed. The scientists have kept looking at measurements of 40,000 different molecules in Snyder’s blood, before, during, and after his diagnosis. Suddenly, you can see not only that bicycling 40-50 miles a week instead of 20-30 miles has helped him lose 15 pounds. You can also see the molecular warning signs of diabetes have returned roughly to normal, along with his blood sugar and hemoglobin A1c scores.

“This study is a landmark for personalized medicine,” Eric Topol, a professor of genomics at the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego, told the New York Times.

Months later, Snyder reports that even though he’s not technically cured of diabetes, he’s been able to keep it in remission through these behavior changes, without taking any drugs. That doesn’t mean he’s completely in the clear. He knows his risk will go up again as he gets older. He also knows from his genome that if he gets diabetes, and needs to take the generic drug metformin, he should take a lower-than-usual dose. But most importantly, because he’s a scientist willing to make himself a laboratory subject, he’s more likely to catch diabetes or some other ailment at an early and treatable stage.

After giving 50 samples to his research team over the past 34 months, Snyder says he expects much more interesting data to come. This wasn’t just a case of a single paper which generates some buzz, maybe a few new research ideas, and then fades into the ether. It’s really just the first step in a long-range study of Snyder at the molecular level, and what that means for his health. “I’m sure I’ll be doing this the rest of my life,” Snyder says.

No question, this is all still very much at a research stage. This kind of hard-core data-gathering approach is many years away from being reduced to practical use, or lending itself to new products for diagnosis or treatment. The Stanford team used a next-generation gene sequencing machine, and two different mass spectrometers, which are expensive pieces of equipment. The first study of Snyder’s ‘omics profile generated 50 terabytes of data, and he says the next phase of research will probably double the amount of data. It cost tens of thousands of dollars, and he doesn’t really have a full accounting that includes computer analysis and staff time. And the costs keep recurring. While the team only had to sequence his genome once—because his unique DNA signature doesn’t change over time—the battery of other ‘omic tests will probably cost at least $2,000 each time he gives blood, just for the chemical reagents required, not counting costs for analysis and staff time.

Still, every day as the costs come down, more research ideas become feasible. Snyder’s story, which got a fair bit of media attention in the spring, has inspired a number of volunteers who want to help. The Stanford team is broadening the scope of their personalized medicine vision by looking to analyze the microbes in Snyder’s gut—the microbiome—and his epigenome, which will show how his genes get expressed. Those extra analyses will add cost, but Snyder says he believes it will be soon be possible to capture a simple version of the molecular analysis for maybe $600 each time he gives blood. Once the costs get down into that range, it will be feasible to do one continuous study of 10 volunteers like Snyder, who are willing to subject themselves to all these regular blood draws, when they’re feeling well and when they’re not.

Beyond that study, Snyder says he and his team are exploring a 250-person study of people at high risk for diabetes, or who are pre-diabetic. The idea will be to take these regular personal ‘omic snapshots, connect it with a detailed picture of the person’s environmental stimuli (particularly their diet/exercise habits), and watch over a 5-year period to see whether certain biochemical pathways are truly predictive of whether a person will get diabetes. That kind of study would be clearly more informative to the practice of medicine than just one man’s experience, which could be a fluke.

Certainly, there are going to be experiments that fail, or just give us vague ideas of where an individual’s health is headed. People, being human, won’t always follow their doctor’s advice, even if they know they can stop themselves from getting diabetes. Insurance companies may use this data to their own advantage, and to the disadvantage of the individual. (In fact, Snyder says his life insurance premiums went up once he told his insurer about his diabetes diagnosis. That action is perfectly legal, he notes, because life insurance firms aren’t subject to theGenetic Information Non-Discrimination Act of 2008.)

The whole march of science, the business implications, and the ethics of this movement will surely lurch along in fits and starts over the coming decades. It will be messy. It won’t happen overnight.

But I do believe we’re going to learn amazing things that will change our behavior. And I think that within the next decade, a whole lot more people in the U.S. will have the same kind of visibility Snyder got into his individual health, because it really ought to save the whole system money if it scares people into leading healthier lives. The 99 percent of patients will no longer say “Personalized Medicine? What’s that?” People will want this information, they’ll demand it, and many will act on it. Some of today’s skeptics will turn into believers, and they’ll find ways to profit from this movement, by helping people prevent bad things from happening. As Snyder puts it, “This is what personalized medicine is all about. You can look at your altered biochemical state, and you can change things when you catch them early. It’s the name of the game.”

Luke Timmerman is the National Biotech Editor of Xconomy. E-mail him at

ltimmerman@xconomy.com Follow @ldtimmerman

SOURCE:

http://www.xconomy.com/national/2012/11/19/stanfords-mike-snyder-starts-living-the-personalized-medicine-story/2/

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

For coverage of

8th Annual Personalized Medicine Conference, November 28-29, 2012, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

go to 

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/11/24/8th-annual-personalized-medicine-conference-november-28-29-2012-harvard-medical-school-boston-ma/

 

Upcoming Events: Conferences on Personalized medicine

http://www.personalizedmedicinecoalition.org/events

November 27, 2012
Personalized Medicine Coalition Boston Cocktail Reception
Hotel Commonwealth
Boston, MA
Personalized Medicine Coalition (Organizer)
Event Web
site

November 28-29, 2012
Personalized Medicine Conference
The Joseph B. Martin Conference Center at Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine (Organizer)
Event Website

November 28-30, 2012
Partnering for Cures
Grand Hyatt
New York, NY
FasterCures (Organizer)
Event Website

November 30, 2012
The Myth of Average: Why Individual Patient Differences Matter
Omni Shoreham Hotel
Washington, DC
National Pharmaceutical Council (Organizer)
Event Website

December 3, 2012
Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Genomic Science Translation: A Workshop
Beckman Center
Irvine, CA
Institute of Medicine (Organizer)
Event Website

December 4-6, 2012
The Cancer Genome Summit
Boston,
MA
Hanson Wade (Organizer)
Event Website

January 28-29, 2013
Personalized Medicine World Conference
PMC
members may enter the code “PMC” for a 10% discount.
Computer History Museum
Mountain View, CA
Silicom Ventures (Organizer)
Event Website

January 29-31, 2013
Next Generation Sequencing Pharma
PMC members may enter the code “PMC” for a 10% discount.
Le Meridien Parkhotel Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
Hanson Wade (Organizer)
Event Website

February 11-15, 2013
20th Anniversary Molecular Med Tri-Con
PMC members are eligible for a 20% discount.
Moscone North Convention Center
San Francisco, CA
Cambridge Healthtech Institute (Organizer)
Event Website

February 11, 2013
Moffitt Business of Biotech 2013
Vincent A. Stabile Research Building
Tampa, F
L
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute (Organizer)
Event Website

March 19-21, 2013
World CDx Frankfurt
PMC members may enter the code “PMC” for a 15% discount.
Sheraton Offenbach Hotel
Offenbach Germany
Hanson Wade (Organizer)
Event Website

April 8-9, 2013
About Medical Informatics World
World Trade Center
Boston, MA
Cambridge Healthtech Institute (Organizer)
Event Website

April 30-May 2, 2013
World PGx
PMC members may enter the code “PMC” for a 15% discount.
Hotel Monaco
San Francisco, CA
Hanson Wad
e (Organizer)
Event Website

May 6-7, 2013
Personalized Healthcare Summit
InterContinental Hotel and Conference Center
Cleveland, OH
Cleveland Clinic (Organizer)
Event W
ebsite

October 4-6, 2013
Global Biomarkers Consortium Annual Conference
Seaport Hotel
Boston, MA
Global Biomarkers Consortium (Organizer)
Event Website

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://www.elsevierbi.com/mkt/conf/fda-cms/2012?elsca1=fda&elsca2=fdafierce112612&utm_source=fda&utm_medium=fda&utm_campaign=%20fierce112612

The FDA/CMS Summit For Biopharma Executives
2013: Year One For PDUFA V – And The Last Chance To Prepare For Health Reform

The Affordable Care Act is a go, after surviving Supreme Court review mostly intact—and especially after the re-election of Barack Obama as President. For the biopharma industry, that means preparing to reap the benefits of insurance market expansion that industry has already paid billions of dollars for in rebates, discounts and fees. The new markets start up in 2014. That means 2013 is the last chance to prepare.

But 2013 is also the first full year to adjust to the new rules for new drug reviews at FDA and adjust to important changes ushered in by the FDA Safety & Innovation Act of 2012. And it is also the year when deficit reduction will be tops on Congress’ agenda.

What will all this mean for you and your company? Come to The Pink Sheet and The RPM Report’s FDA/CMS Summit for Biopharma Executives on December 10-11 in Washington DC to hear from FDA and industry leaders about how health reform implementation will (and won’t) change the rules of the road for drug development and commercialization.

Our jam-packed two-day agenda will also tackle urgent topics like:

        • Drug reviews and PDUFA
        • The evolving biosimilars pathway in the US
        • The implementation of the FDA Safety & Innovation Act
        • The changing rules of pharmaceutical marketing
        • Creation of new generic drug and biosimilar user fee programs
        • And much, much more!

Don’t be caught unprepared. Join us at the eighth annual FDA/CMS Summit for Biopharma Executives.

Last year was standing room only and spaces are limited so please register now!

Key Benefits for Attending FDA/CMS Summit:

  • Hear about critical trends and changes so you can create successful strategies for dealing with FDA and CMS
  • Walk away with practical, real life lessons from some of the most experienced pharmaceutical and biotechnology executives on how they handle regulatory obstacles
  • Get face-to-face access to the top regulatory thought leaders and policy makers
  • Benchmark your regulatory strategy against all the major pharmaceutical and biotech companies

 

Here is what your peers have to say about FDA/CMS Summit:

“I would like to thank the whole Windhover/RPM team for putting together this conference. Conferences are made by its participants and the group assembled here today is so diverse and truly experienced.” – Mark McClellan, MD/PhD, Former FDA Commissioner and CMS Administrator

 

 

2012 FDA/CMS Summit Preliminary Agenda

December 10 & 11, 2012

Mayflower Hotel
1127 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036

 

Monday, December 10, 2012
7:00-8:00am Registration and Continental Breakfast
8:00am Welcome and Opening Remarks

Michael McCaughan
Editor, The RPM Report
Founding Member, Prevision Policy LLC

8:15-9:00am  

KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Priorities for FDA’s Drug Center in 2012

Douglas Throckmorton, MD
Deputy Director
Center for Drug Evaluation & Research
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

9:00-10:30am  

The New Rules of New Drug Reviews: A Roundtable

FDA’s top new drug and drug safety officials join industry leaders to discuss trends in the new drug review process and the changes enacted by the Prescription Drug User Fee Act reauthorization.

John Jenkins, MD
Director
Office of New Drugs
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

Gerald Dal Pan, MD
Director
Office of Surveillance & Epidemiology
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

Richard Pops
CEO
Alkermes

Francois Nader, MD
President and CEO
NPS Pharmaceuticals

Kay Holcombe
Senior Policy Advisor
Genzyme

Moderator: 
Kate Rawson
The RPM Report
Prevision Policy

10:30-11:00am  

Networking Break

11:00-12:00pm 2012 Elections: Implications for Pharma

What to expect from the new Administration and the new Congressional line-up for 2013.

John McManus
President
The McManus Group

Tracy Spicer
Partner
Avenue Solutions

Jeff Forbes
Partner
Forbes-Tate

Presenter/Moderator:

Marc Samuels
Founding Member & President
Hillco Health

12:00-1:00 pm  

Lunch

 

1:15-2:00pm

 

 

Fireside Chat

Jonathan Blum
Principal Deputy Administrator
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

 

2:00pm-3:30 pm

 

 

Hot Topics in Health Reform

The politics of health care reform aside, biopharma companies need to prepare for changes in the US health care system that emphasis quality and affordability of care. This session will feature presentations on different aspects of the upcoming changes in payment and delivery of care and how they will affect pharma.

 

Health Reform and The Climate for Innovation

Ron Cohen, MD
President and CEO
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.What is Essential in Essential Health Benefits?

Ian Spatz 
Senior Advisor
Manatt Health Solutions

Medication Adherence in the Context of Health Reform

William Shrank, MD, MSHS 
Director
Rapid-Cycle Evaluation Group
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

 

Commercial Implications of Health Reform

Will Suvari
Vice President
Campbell Alliance

Moderator:
Michael McCaughan
Editor, The RPM Report
Founding Member, Prevision Policy LLC

 

3:30-4:00pm  

Networking Break

4:00-4:30pm  

Keynote: Implementing Reform
Joshua Sharfstein
Secretary
Maryland Department of Health
Former Deputy Commissioner
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

4:30-5:00pm Closing Keynote: Reimbursable Labeling

Chuck Stevens
Vice President
PAREXEL

5:30-7:30pm Cocktail Reception
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
7:00-8:00am Registration and Continental Breakfast
8:00-8:30am  

 

KEYNOTE ADDRESS

Robert J. Hugin
Chairman and CEO
Celgene Corporation

8:30-9:45am  

Biosimilars Update

Mark A. McCamish, MD, PhD
Global Head of Biopharmaceutical Development
Sandoz International

Diem Nguyen
General Manager, Biosimilars
Emerging Markets/Established Products Business Unit
Pfizer Inc.

Leah Christl, PhD
Associate Director for Biosimilars
Office of New Drugs
Center for Drug Evaluation & Research
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

9:45-10:00am Networking Break
10:00-11:15am  

Reinventing the Approval Pathway

PDUFA V makes important changes in drug regulation, but it doesn’t fundamentally change the standard for new drug approvals. Is it time for the US to consider moving to new models like progressive approval/adaptive licensing?

 

Mary Ellen Cosenza
Executive Director Regulatory Affairs and North America Regulatory Head
Amgen, Inc.

Steven Nissen, MD, MACC
Chairman, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

 

Barry Sickels, Ph.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Wilmington R&D Site Leader
AstraZeneca

Moderator:
Cole Werble
Editor, The RPM Report
Founding Member, Prevision Policy LLC

 

11:15-12:00pm  

A Regulator’s Perspective

Robert Temple, MD
Deputy Director for Clinical Science
Center for Drug Evaluation & Research
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

Moderator
Ramsey Baghdadi
The RPM Report
Founding Member, Prevision Policy

12:00-1:00pm Lunch – Sponsored by
1:00-1:45pm  

CMS Coverage Priorities: CED, NCDs and Parallel Reviews

The Medicare agency is moving forward with innovative models to use coverage policy to encourage development of better evidence for new technologies. Devices are the primary focus, but drugs won’t be far behind.

Louis Jacques, MD
Director
Coverage & Analysis Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Tamara Syrek Jensen, JD 
Deputy Director
Coverage and Analysis Group
Office of Clinical Standards and Quality
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Moderator
Ramsey Baghdadi
The RPM Report
Founding Member, Prevision Policy

1:45-3:00pm Right-Sizing the Demands for Evidence

FDA’s pre-market and post-market regulatory demands are increasing, and so are the expectations of public and private payors for “real world” comparative effectiveness data. How can policy makers and biopharmaceutical companies work together to assure that the need for evidence doesn’t overwhelm the capacity of innovators?

Jonathan Leff
Managing Director, Healthcare
Warburg Pincus

Martin Marciniak
Vice-President, US Health Outcomes
GlaxoSmithKline

Moderator:
Gillian Woollett

Vice President
Avalere Health

3:00-3:15pm Networking Break
3:15-4:30pm The New Generic Drug Era

The Generic Drug User Fee Act will usher in a new era for the generic drug industry, one with greater emphasis on global production quality and tough-to-copy products. What will the new era bring?

Gregory Geba
Director
Office of Generic Drugs
Food & Drug Administration (FDA) 

David Gaugh
VP-Regulatory Sciences
Generic Pharmaceutical Association

Gary Buehler
Vice President-Regulatory Strategic Operations
Teva Pharmaceuticals

Lara Ramsburg
VP-Government Relations
Mylan Inc.

Moderator:
Nancy Myers
President
Catalyst Healthcare

4:30-5:00pm A Fireside chat with:

Geno Germano
President
Pfizer Specialty Care and Oncology

2012 FDA/CMS Speakers

   
  Douglas Throckmorton, MD

Deputy Director, FDA Center for Drug Evaluation & Research

Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD is the Deputy Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), FDA. In this role, he shares responsibility for overseeing the regulation of research, development, manufacture and marketing of prescription, over-the-counter and generic drugs in the U.S. Previously, he served as the Director of CDER’s Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Drug Products (DCRDP). Dr. Throckmorton joined DCRDP in 1997 as a Medical Officer, was promoted to Deputy Director in 2000 and to the Director position in 2002. Prior to joining FDA, he practiced medicine and held academic appointments at the Medical College of Georgia and the VA Medical Center in Augusta, GA. Dr. Throckmorton received an undergraduate degree in English and Chemistry from Hastings College and is Board-certified in Internal Medicine and Nephrology, having received his training at the University of Nebraska Medical School, Case Western Reserve University and Yale University.

   
  Robert J. Hugin

Chairman and CEO

Celgene Corporation

Mr. Hugin serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Celgene Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for unmet medical needs in cancer and immune-inflammatory disease. He joined Celgene in June 1999 and has been a Director of Celgene since December 2001. Mr. Hugin also serves as a Director of The Medicines Company, Atlantic Health System, Inc. and of Family Promise, a national non-profit network assisting homeless families. He serves on the Board of Trustees of Princeton University and is Chairman-Elect of The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of The Darden Foundation, University of Virginia as well as a founding Board member of Choose NJ. Prior to joining Celgene, Mr. Hugin was a Managing Director with J.P. Morgan & Co. Inc. Mr. Hugin received an AB degree from Princeton University in 1976 and an MBA from the University of Virginia in 1985 and served as a United States Marine Corps infantry officer during the intervening period. Bob and his wife Kathy have three children and live in Summit, New Jersey.

   
  John Jenkins, MD

Director, Office of New Drugs

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Jenkins is currently the Director of the Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration.  Dr. Jenkins received his undergraduate degree in biology from East Tennessee State University in 1979 and his medical degree from the University of Tennessee at Memphis in 1983.  Dr. Jenkins completed his postgraduate medical training in internal medicine, pulmonary disease, and critical care medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia from 1983 until 1988.  Dr. Jenkins is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Pulmonary Diseases by the American Board of Internal Medicine.  Dr. Jenkins is also a Fellow of the American College of Chest Physicians.  Following completion of his medical training, Dr. Jenkins joined the faculty of MCV as an Assistant Professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and as a Staff Physician at the McGuire VA Medical Center in Richmond.  Dr. Jenkins joined FDA as a medical officer in the Division of Oncology and Pulmonary Drug Products in 1992.  He subsequently served as Pulmonary Medical Group Leader and Acting Division Director before being appointed as Director of the newly created Division of Pulmonary Drug Products in 1995.  Dr. Jenkins became the Director of the Office of Drug Evaluation II in 1999 and served in that position until he was appointed to his current position in January 2002.

   
  John McManus

President

The McManus Group

John McManus is President and founder of The McManus Group, a consulting firm specializing in policy and political counsel for health care clients with issues before Congress and the Administration. The McManus Group services clients from the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries, the physician organization and employee benefits managers.

Prior to founding The McManus Group in 2004, McManus served Chairman Bill Thomas as the Staff Director of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, where he led the policy development, negotiations and drafting of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. The MMA provided a market-based, comprehensive prescription drug benefit, reformed Medicare and established Health Savings Accounts. McManus worked for Chairman Thomas for six years, where he also played an instrumental role in the Medicare Commission, Patients’ Bill of Rights and other Medicare legislation.

Before working for Chairman Thomas on Capitol Hill, McManus worked for Eli Lilly & Company as a Senior Associate from 1994-97 and for the Maryland House of Delegates from 1993-94 as a Research Analyst, briefing the Chairman of the Economic Matters Committee and the members of the Health Subcommittee.

McManus earned his Master of Public Policy from Duke University and Bachelor of Arts from Washington and Lee University.

   
  Tracy Spicer

Partner

Avenue Solutions

Avenue Solutions’ founding partner Tracy Spicer is a 20-year veteran of political campaigns at every level.  Ms. Spicer began her involvement in politics in 1992 in former U.S. Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s Senate office before transitioning to his campaign staff in 1994 to assist in his successful re-election campaign against Mitt Romney.  Since that time, she has worked with and coordinated numerous campaigns, ranging from municipal and state candidates to the U.S. Congress as well as the White House.

Ms. Spicer served as a longtime aide to former Senator Kennedy, quickly rising to Political Director and Deputy Chief of Staff.  During her decade of experience on Capitol Hill, she coordinated successful political and legislative strategies for Senator Kennedy.  Ms. Spicer managed Senator Kennedy’s legislative priorities in the areas of healthcare, education, labor and economic development and strategically worked with Democratic Senators and their political campaign committees to position legislative priorities for political success.

Ms. Spicer is widely recognized for her political acumen and expertise in designing legislative and regulatory strategies and her established network of long-standing professional contacts among elected officials, appointed policymakers and their staffs.  She draws on her vast political and legislative experience to help clients in navigate the labyrinth of Capitol Hill and government bureaucracy and to position them strategically to head off obstacles, find common ground and achieve success.

As founding partner of Avenue Solutions, Ms. Spicer advises a broad array of clients, including Fortune 100 companies, non-profit organizations, associations and coalitions.  She is particularly noted for her expertise in healthcare policy.  On behalf of her clients, Ms. Spicer has played a leading role in the consideration, negotiation and implementation of the Affordable Care Act (healthcare reform); Medicare and Medicaid legislation; healthcare information technology initiatives; mental health parity legislation; genetic non-discrimination legislation; small business incentive proposals; and prescription drug coverage legislation.

Ms. Spicer is a graduate of Hobart and William Smith Colleges in Geneva, NY where she earned her bachelor’s degree in Political Science.  She is married to George Spicer and has three children, Dylan, Tess and Callie and a loveable, albeit irreverent dog, Linus.

   
  Jeff Forbes

Partner

Forbes-Tate

Founding partner Jeff Forbes is a twenty-year veteran of political campaigns at every level.  Mr. Forbes began his involvement in politics in 1987 on then Senator Al Gore’s 1988 Presidential bid.  Since that time, he has worked with and coordinated more than nine different campaigns, ranging from municipal candidates to the US Congress as well as the White House.

Mr. Forbes served most recently as the Democratic Staff Director for the US Senate Committee on Finance in 2003.  Before assuming this role at the Committee, he served as chief of staff to Senator Max Baucus from 1999-2002.  Beyond his knowledge of the intricacies of tax and trade, Forbes is a veteran strategist for the Democratic National Committee.  From 1993-1995 he served as Midwest Political Director.  Mr. Forbes later served the national committee as Chief of Strategy in 1999.

A stalwart of Clinton-Gore Administration, Mr. Forbes was the New Hampshire Field Director for then Gov. Clinton’s 1992 Presidential campaign.  In President Clinton’s 1996 re-election bid, Forbes was Deputy Political Director and Director of Delegate Selection.  Following the campaign, Mr. Forbes went on to serve as a Special Assistant to the President and Staff Director for Legislative Affairs in 1997.  From 1998-99, Mr. Forbes served as the Deputy Assistant to President Clinton and was the Deputy Director of Scheduling at the White House.

Mr. Forbes is married to Linda Moore Forbes.  He earned a BA in Political Science with an Economics minor from Denison University in Granville, Ohio, in 1987.

   
  Gerald Dal Pan, MD

Director, Office of Surveillance & Epidemiology

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS is the Director of the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (formerly known as the Office of Drug Safety) in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, a position he has held since November 2005. From December 2003 through November 0225, he was the Director of the Division of Surveillance, Research, and Communication Support in CDER’s Office of Drug Safety. He received his medical degree from Columbia University, and his Master’s degree in clinical epidemiology from Johns Hopkins University. He trained in Internal Medicine at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and in Neurology at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He is board certified in Internal Medicine and Neurology. He was an instructor in the Neurology Department at Johns Hopkins. He next worked for Guilford Pharmaceuticals in Baltimore, and then for HHI Clinical Research and Statistical Services in Hunt Valley, MD. He joined the FDA in July 2000 as a medical officer in the Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care, and Addiction Drug Products.

   
  Louis Jacques, MD

Director, Coverage & Analysis Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Dr Jacques joined CMS in 2003 and has been director of the Coverage and Analysis Group (CAG) since October 2009.  The group reviews evidence and develops Medicare national coverage policy. From 2004 through 2009 he was Director of the Division of Items and Devices within CAG.

Prior to his arrival at CMS, Dr. Jacques was the Associate Dean for Curriculum at Georgetown University School of Medicine, where he retains a faculty appointment.  He served on a number of university committees including the Executive Faculty, Committee on Admissions and the Institutional Review Board.  He previously worked in the Palliative Care program at Georgetown’s Lombardi Cancer Center where he covered the gynecologic oncology service and he made home visits as a volunteer physician for a rural hospice on the Maryland Eastern Shore.

   
  Steven Nissen
Chairman, Department of Cardiology
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Steven Nissen, MD, is the Chairman of the Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine located on the main campus of Cleveland Clinic. He was appointed in 2006. Prior to this, he served nine years as Vice-Chairman of the Department of Cardiology and five years as Medical Director of the Cleveland Clinic Cardiovascular Coordinating Center (C5), an organization that directs multicenter clinical trials.

Dr. Nissen’s research during the last two decades has focused on the application of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging for the assessment of progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. He has served as International Principal Investigator for several large IVUS multi-center atherosclerosis trials.

Contributions to scientific literature include more than 350 journal articles and 60 book chapters including many manuscripts in NEJM andJAMA. In recent years, he has also written on the subject of drug safety and was the author of manuscripts highlighting concerns about the COX-2 inhibitors (Vioxx™), muraglitazar and rosiglitazone (Avandia™).

Other contributions include current service as editor of Current Cardiology Report, and senior consulting editor to the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Dr. Nissen’s national positions include:

One-year term as president of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) from March 2006 to March 2007. He served on the ACC Executive Committee 2004-2008. He served 10 years as a member of Board of Trustees of the ACC. He has served several terms on the Program Committee for ACC Annual Scientific Sessions.

Dr. Nissen served as a member of the CardioRenal Advisory Panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for five years, and as chair of the final year of his membership. He continues to serve as a periodic advisor to several FDA committees as a Special Government Employee.

Dr. Nissen is a frequent lecturer before national and international meetings. He has served as visiting professor, or provided Grand Rounds, at nearly 100 institutions.

   
  Richard Pops 

CEO

Alkermes

Richard Pops serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Alkermes. He joined Alkermes as CEO in 1991. Under his leadership, Alkermes has grown from a privately held company with 25 employees to an international, publicly traded biopharmaceutical company with more than 1,200 employees and a portfolio of more than 20 commercial products. Mr. Pops currently serves on the Board of Directors of Neurocrine Biosciences, Acceleron Pharma, Epizyme, the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) and is also a member of the Harvard Medical School Board of Fellows.

   
  Francois Nader, MD

President and CEO

NPS Pharmaceuticals

Francois Nader, MD, has been president and chief executive officer of NPS Pharmaceuticals since March 2008. During his tenure he transformed NPS into a leading biopharmaceutical company focused on orphan treatments for patients with rare diseases.

Dr. Nader is a 25-year veteran of the healthcare industry. Dr. Nader joined NPS in 2006 as chief medical and commercial officer. He was promoted to chief operating officer in 2007 and named a director in January 2008. Previously, he was a venture partner at Care Capital, LLC and chief medical officer of its Clinical Development Capital unit. He was also senior vice president, integrated healthcare markets and North America medical and regulatory affairs with Aventis Pharmaceuticals, serving on the North America Leadership Team (NALT), and held senior executive positions at its predecessor companies, Hoechst Marion Roussel and Marion Merrell Dow. Prior, Dr. Nader served as head of global commercial operations at the Pasteur Vaccines division of Rhone-Poulenc.

Dr. Nader served as director for Noven Pharmaceuticals and currently serves as treasurer and trustee of Bio NJ, New Jersey’s trade association for the biotechnology community and as trustee of the Healthcare Institute of New Jersey (HINJ), a trade association for the research-based pharmaceutical and medical technology industry in New Jersey.

Dr. Nader received a French State Doctorate in Medicine from St. Joseph University (Lebanon) and a Physician Executive MBA from the University of Tennessee.

   
  Diem Nguyen
General Manager, Biosimilars

Emerging Markets/Established Products Business Unit

Pfizer Inc.

Diem Nguyen is General Manager, Biosimilars for the Emerging Markets/Established Products Business Units. As General Manager Biosimilars, Diem Nguyen is the driving a core component of the EPBU strategy through the development and commercialization of a portfolio of post-LOE biologics through close collaboration with WRD’s Biosimilars Development Unit. Prior to this position, Diem held the position of VP, Strategy for EPBU where she was responsible for developing growth strategies for the off patent market.

Before Pfizer, Diem was a consultant for Danaher, a leading industrial and life sciences company. In 2004, she was appointed Senior Director of Corporate Development and Biotechnology at Serologicals Corporation, where she worked directly with the CEO, CFO and the Board of Directors and led enterprise level strategic planning and external development efforts. Her responsibilities included strategic planning, leading corporate development efforts and investor relations. In 2003, she took on the role of Director of Strategic Marketing, Research and Biotechnology at the Upstate Group, Inc. Diem has also previously held positions at Deloitte Consulting as a life sciences consultant and the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center as a medical researcher.

Diem received a B.A. and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics from the University of Virginia. She attended Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, where she earned her MBA.

   
  Jonathan Blum

Principal Deputy Administrator

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Jonathan Blum, Acting Principal Deputy Administrator and Director of the Center for Medicare at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), is responsible for overseeing the regulation and payment of Medicare fee-for service providers, privately-administered Medicare health plans, and the Medicare prescription drug program.  The benefits pay for health care for approximately 45 million elderly and disabled Americans, with an annual budget in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Over the course of his career, Jonathan has become an expert in the gamut of CMS programs.  He served as an advisor to Senate Finance Committee members and its current chairman, Sen. Max Baucus, where he worked on prescription drug and Medicare Advantage policies during the development of the Medicare Modernization Act.  He focused on Medicare as a program analyst at the White House Office of Management and Budget.  Prior to joining CMS, Jonathan was a Vice President at Avalere Health, overseeing its Medicaid and Long-Term Care Practice.

Most recently, Jonathan served as a health policy advisor to the Obama-Biden Transition Team.  He holds a Master’s degree from the Kennedy School of Government and a BA from the University of Pennsylvania.

   
  Ian Spatz
Senior Advisor

Manatt Health Solutions

Mr. Spatz is a Senior Advisor in the national healthcare practice of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP and Manatt Health Solutions.  Mr. Spatz provides highly experienced insights into ongoing health reform efforts, helps develop public and private strategies and guidance on a broad array of issues affecting healthcare providers and insurers, pharmaceutical companies, the consuming public and U.S. healthcare initiatives generally, as well as the development and implementation of communication and advocacy efforts at the federal and state levels. Among his areas of expertise are national healthcare policies and programs; pharmaceutical pricing, including Medicare and Medicaid; intellectual property protection; and policies related to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of the research, approval, manufacturing and marketing of medicines.

Mr. Spatz is also the founder and principal of the policy consulting firm Rock Creek Policy Group, LLP.  Beforefounding Rock Creek Policy Group, Mr. Spatz served for 15 years in increasingly responsible positions with Merck & Co., Inc., one of the world’s leading research-based pharmaceutical and vaccine companies.  As Merck’s Vice President for Global Health Policy, he directed U.S. public policy and related public affairs activities and represented the company before Congress, the Administration, and to the media.  He also directed grassroots, employee communications and political action programs.

While at Merck, Mr. Spatz led the successful five-year campaign that helped to develop and gain enactment of the Medicare prescription drug benefit, providing millions of American elderly and persons with disabilities with drug insurance for the first time.  He promoted legislation to create the highly successful program of market exclusivity incentives for research on the pediatric uses of medicines and guided company efforts that resulted in resolution of international trade dispute on the licensing of medicines in the developing world.

Before joining Merck, Mr. Spatz served as Legislative Director for U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ).  In that role, he directed the Senator’s legislative staff including developing and supervising the implementation of legislative strategies, proposal drafting and floor action.  During his tenure, he coordinated the successful development and passage of two transportation appropriations bills.  He began his career in the nonprofit sector where he led the public policy and government affairs activities of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the nation’s leading heritage conservation organization. While with the National Trust, he conceived the highly successful Eleven Most Endangered Historic Places list that has served as a model public relations tool for many conservation organizations.  He advocated successfully for the creation of the transportation enhancements funding in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act (ISTEA) that has resulted in more than $8 billion in spending on conservation projects.

   
  Kate Rawson
The RPM Report
Prevision Policy LLC

Kate Rawson is a Senior Editor at The RPM Report. She was formerly an editor at “The Pink Sheet” where she covered drug regulation and reimbursement issues. During her ten-year tenure at FDC Reports and Elsevier Business Intelligence, she helped launch “The Pink Sheet DAILY,” and served as Managing Editor of “The Rose Sheet,” which covers regulatory and business news of the cosmetics industry.

   
  Michael McCaughan
Founding Member
Prevision Policy LLC

Michael McCaughan is a founding member of Prevision Policy LLC and an editor with The RPM Report. He was formerly editor-in-chief of EBI’s biopharma editorial group. McCaughan has 20 years of experience providing analysis and insight for EBI’s products, including The Pink Sheet, The Pink Sheet DAILY and The RPM Report. He speaks frequently on regulatory and policy developments affecting the industry.

   
  Ramsey Baghdadi
Founding Member
Prevision Policy LLC

Ramsey Baghdadi is a founding member of Prevision Policy and an editor with The RPM Report.

   
  Marc Samuels
CEO
HillCo HEALTH

Widely regarded as “effective,” “resourceful,” “tireless,” well prepared” and “irreplaceable,” by clients and colleagues alike Marc Samuels is CEO of HillCo HEALTH, a boutique group of seasoned principals providing advisory services to leading health care delivery, financing, manufacturing, and service entities.

Samuels joined HillCo in 2001 and became a partner in 2004, working both in Austin and Washington, DC. He co-founded HillCo HEALTH soon thereafter. From 1998 to 2000, Samuels served as founder of and a partner in the Health Policy Group, a Washington, D.C.-based healthcare public policy and business strategy firm, along with J. Michael Hudson, former Deputy (and Acting) Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Prior to that, he held various positions within state and federal government, including advising both former President George Herbert Walker Bush and then-Texas Governor George W. Bush on healthcare issues, as well as serving as Executive Assistant to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC).

Samuels is a graduate of The University of Texas School of Law, Yale School of Medicine and the University of Michigan. His comments and analyses have appeared in Medical Economics, Health Systems Review, Journal of Health Care Finance, Disease Management News, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, the Dallas Morning News, and Texas Medicine. He is a contributor to the third edition of the Managed Care Answer Book and the second edition of the HMO and Capitation Answer Book, published by Panel Publishers, New York.

   
  Ron Cohen, MD
President and CEO
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc

Ron Cohen, M.D., President and CEO, founded Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. in 1995. Previously he was a principal in the startup and an officer of Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc., a biotechnology company engaged in the growth of human organ tissues for transplantation. Dr. Cohen received his B.A. with honors in Psychology from Princeton University, and his M.D. from the Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons. He completed his residency in Internal Medicine at the University of Virginia Medical Center, and is Board Certified in Internal Medicine.

Dr. Cohen is a member of the Executive Committee of the Board of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) and is Chairman of the Emerging Company Section of BIO. He previously served as Director and Chairman of the New York Biotechnology Association (NYBA). He also serves as a member the Columbia-Presbyterian Health Sciences Advisory Council and was awarded Columbia University’s Alumni Medal for Distinguished Service.

Dr. Cohen was named NeuroInvestment’s CEO of the Year and was recognized by PharmaVoice Magazine as one of the 100 Most Inspirational People in the Biopharmaceutical Industry. He is a recipient of the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award for the New York Metropolitan Region and is an inductee of the National Spinal Cord Injury Association’s “Spinal Cord Injury Hall of Fame.” In 2010, Dr. Cohen was recognized by the New York Biotechnology Association as the NYBA “The Cure Starts Here” Business Leader of the Year.

   
  Tamara Syrek Jensen, JD, 
Deputy Director Coverage and Analysis Group (CAG)
CMS

Tamara Syrek Jensen is the deputy director for the Coverage and Analysis Group (CAG) at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CAG develops, interprets, communicates, and updates evidence based national coverage policies. These policies help provide timely access to reasonable and necessary services and technologies to improve health outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries.

Before her current position at CAG, she was the Special Assistant for the CMS Chief Medical Officer and Director of Office of Clinical Standards and Quality (OCSQ). Prior to working at CMS, she worked as a legislative assistant in the U.S. House of Representatives. Tamara is an attorney, licensed in Maryland.

   
  Mark A. McCamish, MD, PhD
Global Head of Biopharmaceutical Development
Sandoz International

Dr. McCamish is the Global Head of Biopharmaceutical Development for Sandoz International, a Division of Novartis. He leads research and development of all biologics at Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, which is the world leader in development and commercialization of follow-on biologics or biosimilars. His responsibilities include leadership involving selection of the target, cloning, technical development, scale-up, pre-clinical and clinical development and interfaces with regulatory authorities worldwide. He is a senior executive with extensive therapeutic and commercial experience in global pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Previously he was Senior VP and Chief Medical Officer at three biotechnology companies and held senior positions at Amgen and Abbott Laboratories. He has held professorships and maintained academic practices at the University of California, Davis and The Ohio State University.He has published broadly in several therapeutic areas in multiple journals including The New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Lancet.

He earned his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in exercise physiology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. His PhD is in human nutrition from Penn State University and his M.D. is from the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. McCamish is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Nutrition and Metabolism and he is licensed as a physician and surgeon in California.

He has published broadly in several therapeutic areas in multiple journals including The New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Lancet. He earned his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in exercise physiology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. His PhD is in human nutrition from Penn State University and his M.D. is from the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. McCamish is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Nutrition and Metabolism and he is licensed as a physician and surgeon in California.

   
  William Shrank, MD, MSHS
Director of the Rapid-Cycle Evaluation Group
CMS

William Shrank, MD, MSHS, is the Director of the Rapid-Cycle Evaluation Group at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. In this capacity, Dr. Shrank leads the evaluation efforts of programs supported by the Innovation Center to reduce the cost and improve the quality of care in the U.S. He also leads the intramural research enterprise at CMS.
Dr. Shrank has served as an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and an Associate Physician in the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. His research is focused on improving the safe, appropriate and cost-effective use of prescription medications. His research interests also include evaluating quality in pharmacologic care, enhancing adherence to chronic medications, and improving prescription drug labels.

Dr. Shrank serves or has served on national advisory committees for the FDA, AHRQ, CMS, USP, and the American College of Physicians Foundation. He attended Brown University, received his M.D. from Cornell University, and trained in Internal Medicine at Georgetown University. He finished a health services research fellowship at UCLA, Rand, and the West Los Angeles VA Hospital where he earned an M.S. in Health Services.

   
  Geno Germano 
President
Pfizer Specialty Care and Oncology

Geno Germano is President and General Manager of Specialty Care and Oncology, Pfizer Inc.

The Specialty Care Business Unit (SCBU) works closely with specialty physicians and stakeholders to provide medicines to help treat a variety of serious and life-threatening conditions. Specialty Care holds leadership positions in vaccines and in key disease areas such as inflammation, infectious disease, hemophilia and ophthalmology. SCBU’s current portfolio includes more than 20 medicines in 11 disease areas, and the pipeline contains more than 25 compounds in late-stage development.

The Oncology Business Unit (OBU) is focused on improving the standard of care for cancer patients globally. With the full scale and scope of Pfizer support, the OBU has made rapid progress, with more than 20 molecules in development for various tumors including lung, breast, prostate, liver, kidney, colon and gastric diseases.

Geno joined Pfizer from Wyeth, where he was President, U.S. and Pharmaceutical Business Units for Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, responsible for its U.S. based Pharmaceuticals, Biologics and Vaccines businesses. In addition, he led Global Strategy for the Pharmaceutical and Institutional business units for major products in Neuroscience, Gastroenterology, Women’s Health, Infectious Diseases and Immunology.

In his more than 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry, Geno has held diverse positions, including Executive Vice President and General Manager for Wyeth Global Vaccines; Managing Director, Wyeth Australia and New Zealand; and Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Pharmaceutical Business Unit. He led numerous key product launches in primary and specialty care in gastroenterology, arthritis, infectious diseases, hemophilia, transplantation and oncology. Prior to joining Wyeth, Geno held leadership positions at several Johnson & Johnson companies.

Geno serves on the Advisory Board of the Healthcare Businesswomen’s Association, is a member of the Board of the Biotechnology Industry Organization and is a Trustee of the Albany College of Pharmacy, where he received his Bachelor of Science degree in Pharmacy in 1983.

   
  Joshua Sharfstein 
Secretary
Maryland Department of Health
Former Deputy Commissioner
Food & Drug Administration

Dr. Joshua M. Sharfstein was appointed by Governor Martin O’Malley as Secretary of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene in January 2011.

In March 2009, President Obama appointed Dr. Sharfstein to serve as the Principal Deputy Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. He served as the Acting Commissioner from March 2009 through May 2009 and as Principal Deputy Commissioner through January 2011.

From December 2005 through March 2009, Dr. Sharfstein served as the Commissioner of Health for the City of Baltimore, Maryland. In this position, he led efforts to expand literacy efforts in pediatric primary care, facilitate the transition to Medicare Part D for disabled adults, engage college students in public health activities, increase influenza vaccination of healthcare workers, and expand access to effective treatment for opioid addiction. In 2008, Dr. Sharfstein was named Public Official of the Year by Governing Magazine.

Dr. Sharfstein is a 1991 graduate of Harvard College, a 1996 graduate of Harvard Medical School, a 1999 graduate of the combined residency program in pediatrics at Boston Children’s Hospital and Boston Medical Center, and a 2001 graduate of the fellowship in general pediatrics at the Boston University School of Medicine.

   
  Gillian Woollett 
Vice President
Avalere Health

Gillian Woollett, Vice President, leads the FDA Practice within Avalere’s Center on Evidence-Based Medicine. She provides the “prequel” of scientific and regulatory strategic policy expertise that supports medicinal products gaining approval at the FDA in a manner that allows them to be successful in the public and private reimbursement world. She is building a bridge for Avalere clients from the FDA space into the traditionally separate Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and healthcare policy/business world.

Trained as a molecular biologist/immunologist before coming to Washington, Gillian still publishes in peer-reviewed literature on biotechnology topics, and is also a frequent speaker educating on the core prospects and promises of the emerging biosciences and their ability to support better and more focused therapies.

Immediately prior to joining Avalere, Gillian was Chief Scientist at Engel & Novitt, LLP. She was Vice President, Science and Regulatory Affairs at the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), where she established and led a new department to support BIO companies’ interactions with regulatory agencies in all aspects of the discovery, development, and manufacture of biotechnology-based medicines. She joined BIO after being Associate Vice President at the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. She has been an appointee on federal advisory committees to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Commerce.

Gillian earned her B.A., M.A. in the Natural Sciences Tripos (Biochemistry) from the University of Cambridge, and her D.Phil. in Immunology from the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.

   
  Robert Temple, MD

Deputy Director for Clinical Science

Center for Drug Evaluation & Research

Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Robert Temple is Deputy Center Director for Clinical Science of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and is also Acting Deputy Director of the Office of Drug Evaluation I (ODE-I).     Dr. Temple received his medical degree from the New York University School of Medicine in 1967.    In 1972 he joined CDER as a review Medical Officer in the Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Drug Products.  He later moved into the position of Director of the Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products.  In his current position, Dr. Temple oversees ODE-1 which is responsible for the regulation of cardio-renal, neuropharmacologic, and psychopharmacologic drug products.  Dr. Temple has a long-standing interest in the design and conduct of clinical trials and has written extensively on this subject, especially on choice of control group in clinical trials, evaluation of active control trials, trials to evaluate dose-response, and trials using “enrichment” designs. He also has a long-standing interest in hepatotoxicity of drugs, having participated in the first detailed FDA-NIH-outside discussion of the subject in 1978.

   
  Jonathan S. Leff

Managing Director

Warburg Pincus

Jonathan S. Leff is a managing director with Warburg Pincus, where he has been a member of the firm’s HealthCare Group since 1996. Mr. Leff is currently a Director of InterMune, ReSearch Pharmaceutical Services, Rib-X Pharmaceuticals, Sophiris Bio and Talon Therapeutics. In addition, he serves on the Executive Committee of the Board of the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) and leads the NVCA’s life sciences industry efforts as Chairman of NVCA’s Medical Innovation and Competitiveness Coalition, and serves as a member of the Board of the Biotechnology Industry Organization. He is also a member of the Boards of Friends of Cancer Research and the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation and the Board of Advisors of Columbia University Medical Center. Mr. Leff received an A.B. in Government from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.

   
  Lara Ramsburg

Vice President, Government Relations

Mylan

Lara Ramsburg is Vice President of Government Relations for Mylan, the largest global generics company headquartered in the United States. During the Generic Drug User Fee (GDUFA) negotiation process, she participated on behalf of Mylan as a member of the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) negotiating team. Lara also previously served as Chief of Staff in Mylan’s Office of the President.

Prior to joining Mylan, Lara was Director of Communications and then Director of Policy for the West Virginia Governor’s Office. She also worked previously for Rowan & Blewitt, an issue and crisis management consulting firm, and media outlet CNN, among other professional experiences. Lara holds a Bachelor of Science in communication from Ohio University and a Master of Science in corporate and professional communication from Radford University.

   
  Nancy Bradish Myers

President

Catalyst Healthcare

Nancy Bradish Myers, JD, is a Washington-based attorney with expertise in health care law and regulation, policy development, government relations and political analysis for investors. She is the President of Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc., a niche consulting firm that provides clients with strategic regulatory insight and advice as they position biopharmaceutical and medical device companies, trade associations, and patient advocacy organizations on regulatory and health policy matters before the FDA and other regulatory agencies.

Ms. Myers has served in FDA’s Office of the Commissioner in various positions, including as Senior Strategic Advisor. She has also served as Special Counsel for Science Policy for PhRMA, Vice Presidential-level political healthcare analyst for a Wall Street financial services firm, Reimbursement Counsel and Director of Government Affairs for BIO, a lobbyist for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and staff person to a Member of Congress on Capitol Hill.

She is also an expert on FDA user fees and served as co-editor of the book PDUFA and the Expansion of FDA User Fees: Lessons from Negotiators, published by the Food and Drug Law Institute in 2011.

She is a founding Board member and past-President of the Alliance for a Stronger FDA. This 200-member coalition of former regulators, patient and consumer advocates and industry leaders works with the Administration and Congress to increase FDA federally appropriated funds. She is also a Board member of the FDA Alumni Association and is actively involved in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) and the Drug Information Association (DIA).

Ms. Myers is the 2012 recipient of FDA’s Distinguished Alumni Award, for outstanding contributions in advancing FDA’s mission, creating a strong coalition to advocate for agency resources, and establishing enduring connections between FDA alumni and staff.  Ms. Myers received her law degree from Temple University School of Law and her undergraduate degree from Duke University.

   
  Leah Christl, PhD

Associate Director for Biosimilars

Office of New Drugs

Center for Drug Evaluation & Research

Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Christl is the Associate Director for Therapeutic Biologics in the Office of New Drugs (OND) in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Dr. Christl leads the Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars Team (TBBT) in OND. TBBT is responsible for ensuring consistency in the regulatory approach and guidance to sponsors regarding development programs for proposed biosimilar biological products and related issues regarding development programs for therapeutic biologics, for developing the procedures and staff training necessary to implement the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 in a consistent manner across all OND review divisions, and for managing the CDER Biosimilar Review Committee.

Dr. Christl joined the FDA in 2003 as a Regulatory Project Manager in the Division of Over-the-Counter Drug Products. From 2004 – 2008, she was the Chief Regulatory Project Manager in the Division of Nonprescription Clinical Evaluation. Dr. Christl served as the Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs for the Office of Nonprescription Products, now the Office of Drug Evaluation IV, from 2005 – 2010. Prior to joining the FDA, Dr. Christl received her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Biology and Pathobiology – Marine Biomedicine and Environmental Science from the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. She also spent 2 years at the University of South Carolina as an Associate Research Professor.

   
  Will Suvari
Vice President
Campbell Alliance

Will Suvari is a Vice President in Campbell Alliance’s Pricing & Market Access practice.  He focuses on commercialization strategy and organizational structure design within the context of the reform-driven evolution of provider and payer markets.   Will brings 20 years of research, industry and consulting experience from his work with life sciences firms, leading provider networks/institutions, as well as national payers.

Prior to joining Campbell Alliance, will was an Associate Partner at Oliver Wyman.  Before Oliver Wyman, Will worked in Deloitte Consulting’s Life Sciences practice.  He worked in various functions at Amgen prior to his career in consulting.

Will holds degrees from Northwestern University in Biochemistry and English Literature.  He has an MBA from The Kellogg Graduate School of Management.

   
  Barry Sickels, Ph.D.

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Wilmington R&D Site Leader

AstraZeneca

Barry Sickels is Vice President, Regulatory Affairs at AstraZeneca and the R&D Site Leader for the Wilmington, Delaware campus.  He has more than 25 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry and has worked in discovery research, clinical research and development and, for the past 18 years, Regulatory Affairs. Barry has worked in many therapy areas including oncology, infectious disease, central nervous system, respiratory disease, GI and diabetes. Prior to his current role, Barry served as Vice President and Global Regulatory Therapy Area Leader for Oncology and Infection projects at AstraZeneca.  Barry also previously served as Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Global Therapy Areas and North America at Pfizer/Wyeth.   Barry earned his BS in biology from Rider University and holds an MS in toxicology/environmental science from Rutgers University. He also holds a Master of Jurisprudence and a Doctorate in Health Law from the Widener University School of Law’s Health Law Institute.

   
  Kay Holcombe

Senior Policy Advisor

Genzyme

Kay Holcombe is Senior Policy Advisor at Genzyme, a Sanofi Company.  From Genzyme’s Washington, DC, government relations office, Kay participates in developing and implementing corporate policies and responses to government regulatory and policy initiatives.  She works with members of Congress and their staffs and with officials of government agencies.

Before joining Genzyme, Kay was Executive Vice President of Policy Directions Inc., a government relations firm specializing in strategic planning and legislative and regulatory advocacy regarding health care and related issues.  She represented a variety of clients in academia and in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology, food, and consumer products industries.

Earlier, she served as professional health legislative staff and senior health policy advisor,  House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce, and professional health staff, Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources; Deputy Associate Commissioner for Legislative Affairs, Food and Drug Administration; Executive Vice President, Foundation for Biomedical Research; Associate Director for Public Health Legislation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Legislation,  Department of Health and Human Services; Deputy Associate Administrator for Planning, Evaluation, and Legislation, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Public Health Service; Special Assistant to the Director, Division of Legislative Affairs, National Institutes of Health; Executive Secretary, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Advisory Council; and researcher, National Institutes of Health.

Kay received her B.S. in chemistry education from the University of Illinois and her M.S. in chemistry from the University of Virginia.  She was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, Phi Kappa Phi, and Iota Sigma Pi.

   
  Martin Marciniak

Vice-President, US Health Outcomes

GlaxoSmithKline

Dr. Marciniak has 13 years of strategic and health outcomes research experience in the pharmaceutical industry, most recently with GlaxoSmithKline.  His experience and leadership has been both Global and US oriented, internally and externally facing, and has included specific therapeutic research focus in the areas of oncology, neurosciences, and cardiovascular disease.  Martin’s research has been published in scholarly journals, and has been presented at both national and international congresses.  In addition to his research activities, he also serves as an ad hoc peer reviewer for scientific journals and research foundations.  Currently, Martin is one of the nonvoting industry representatives to Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Dr Marciniak has a broad academic career which includes scientific and public policy research, as well as the tactical implementation and strategic management of observational research programs.  He received his Ph.D. in Health Services and Policy Analysis with a concentration in Health Economics from the University of California at Berkeley, and a Masters in Public Policy from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.  His B.S is in Pharmacy from Purdue University.  Additionally, Martin also holds an executive education certificate from the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology focusing on innovation and management.

   
  Charles A. (Chuck) Stevens, JD, MBA

Vice President & General Manager, Commercialization Strategy

PAREXEL Consulting

Mr. Stevens is responsible for leading the practice including managing all reimbursement, market access and commercial strategy consulting, tactical reimbursement support help lines and PAP’s (Patient Assistance Programs) designed to provide workable solutions to support commercial success and patient access to therapy. Mr. Stevens has over 17 years of bio and pharma industry experience, including responsibility for strategic reimbursement, pricing, public and private payer strategy, product distribution/channel management and pharmaco-economics for both commercialized and non-commercialized products at the senior director level.

He has specialized expertise in Hematology, Oncology, HIV/AIDS, Addiction Medicine, Gastroenterology and Urology. He has worked extensively on issues involving the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003, the Single Drug Pricer (SDP) system and obtaining product specific HCPCS codes. In 2006, he was the first person to be successful in obtaining an individual product HCPCS from CMS by making application in advance of FDA product approval, resulting in the specific code being available at time of product launch.

Chuck is a frequent presenter at national conferences, has authored articles on Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and has been quoted in publications such as PharmaVoice, FDA Week and the Grey Sheet.

   
  Gregory Geba

Director

Office of Generic Drugs

Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

After nearly a decade at Yale where he was a faculty member in Pulmonary and Critical Care in the School of Medicine, Dr. Geba served in senior-level clinical/managerial positions in the pharmaceutical industry for the past 15 years.  In his most recent position, he served as Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Sanofi US, where he provided medical and scientific leadership and managerial direction to multidisciplinary scientific and regulatory professionals engaged in drug development activities across all therapeutic areas, as well as to the company’s field medical group.

He has contributed to the registration of more than 20 currently marketed drugs or devices across multiple therapeutic areas. In so doing, he successfully employed his working knowledge and demonstrated practical application of drug manufacturing processes, current quality and risk management processes, and standards relevant to FDA’s laws and regulations. He brings extensive clinical research experience, including leading or serving as the key point in filing new drug applications, biologic license applications, and promotional studies comparing efficacy and effectiveness of novel biopharmaceuticals versus standard of care (including regimens containing branded or generic drugs), and has provided or supervised key safety updates and presentations to FDA Advisory Committees. Dr. Geba’s experience also includes leading medical affairs activities while serving in a variety of senior-level positions. His scope of responsibility in those activities included contribution to the design of experimental protocols and assessment of data from pre-clinical, animal, and first-in-human studies; design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation of phase 2a proof-of-concept and 2b dose ranging studies; and production of important comparative effectiveness and safety data when assessing benefit-risk relationships during phase 3, phase 3b, and phase 4 studies.

Dr. Geba received his medical degree from the University of Navarre and his M.P.H. from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. He joins OGD to lead the expanding generic program into a reorganization of both structure and process to improve coordination, communication, and efficiency, and to enhance the Office’s ability to ensure that all generic drugs-which make up nearly 80 percent of prescriptions filled in the United States-are safe, effective, of high quality, and interchangeable with the brand name drug product/reference listed drug.

   
  Mary Ellen Cosenza

Executive Director Regulatory Affairs and North America Regulatory Head

Amgen, Inc.

Mary Ellen Cosenza has almost 30 years experience in the Bio-Pharmaceutical Industry, with the last 17 years being at Amgen Inc. Mary Ellen is currently Executive Director of U.S. Regulatory Affairs with Amgen. Her role is to provide management and leadership by overseeing the execution and by providing advice on the development of regulatory strategy and plans for the FDA.  In addition, she supervises the Regulatory Promotion and Material Compliance Group, as well as supervising Amgen Regulatory policy activities and priorities in the U.S.

Prior to taking on the U.S. Regulatory team she managed the International Emerging Markets Regulatory team. She has also served at the Regulatory Therapeutic Area Head for Inflammation and Early Development and overseen the Global Regulatory Writing department.  Prior to joining Regulatory Affairs, Dr. Cosenza was Senior Director of Toxicology where she managed a department of scientists that are involved in the safety assessment of both traditional small molecules and biotechnology products.  She set policy concerning study type, study design, approval of contract laboratories and interacted with FDA and other Boards of Health.

Prior to joining Amgen (1995), Dr. Cosenza worked for the Medical Research Division of American Cyanamid Company (now Pfizer) in Toxicology Research as a Principal Scientist.  At Cyanamid, Dr. Cosenza held several positions including Group Leader of Regulatory Toxicology, Manager of the Quality Assurance Unit for GLPs and GMPs and later managed the Toxicology Operations group.

Mary Ellen received her PhD from St. John’s University, New York.  She recently received her MS in Regulatory Affairs from University Southern California, Los Angeles.  Mary Ellen also teaches a course on Food and Drug Toxicology at USC.

Dr. Cosenza is a Diplomat of the American Board of Toxicology, has her Regulatory Affairs Certification (US and EU) and is a member of the Society of Toxicology (SOT), the American College of Toxicology (ACT), Drug Information Association (DIA) and Regulatory Affairs Professional Society (RAPS).  Mary Ellen was the representative for BIO on the ICH M3 Expert working group for the most recent revision.

   
  David Gaugh

VP-Regulatory Sciences

Generic Pharmaceutical Association

David Gaugh has over 25 years of leadership experience in the Healthcare and Pharmaceutical business and has been an outstanding contributor to the industry over the years. He has been employed by GPhA since February 2012 as the Senior Vice President for Sciences and Regulatory, where he is responsible for the science, regulatory and professional liaison functions between member companies, agencies of the US Government and Legislative bodies. Prior to joining GPhA, David was the Vice President and General Manager of Bedford Laboratories, a Division of Ben Venue Laboratories (a wholly owned subsidiary of Boehringer Ingelheim). David was responsible for Strategic Planning, Financial Management, Business Development, Marketing and Sales for a $500 million multi-source injectable business.

Prior to joining Ben Venue, David was Senior Director, Pharmacy Contracting and Marketing at VHA/Novation; the largest Group Purchasing Organization in the US. Prior to Novation, he was System Director of Pharmacy for St. Luke’s Health-System, a tertiary-care hospital in Kansas City, MO.

David is a registered Pharmacist and is engaged in several pharmacy-related activities such as the ASHP Education and Research Foundation Board of Directors and various Pharmacy Internship and Residency Programs.

   
  Gary Buehler
Vice President-Regulatory Strategic Operations
Teva Pharmaceuticals

Mr.  Buehler is the VP for Regulatory Strategic Operations for Teva Pharmaceuticals.  Prior to joining Teva, he worked for 24 years at the US Food and Drug Administration, starting as a Project  Manager in OND’s Cardio Renal Division.  In 1999, he joined the Office of Generic Drugs as the Deputy Director.  In 2001, after serving for over a year as Acting Director, he became the Director of OGD and served in that position until 2010. Mr. Buehler retired from the U.S. Public Health Service in April of 2000 after serving in a variety of duty stations including Indian Health Service positions in Nevada and Montana.  He graduated from Temple University School of Pharmacy.

 

  SOURCE:

 

Read Full Post »

Ethical Differences: US Physicians vs UK Physicians

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #7: Ethical Differences: US Physicians vs UK Physicians. Published on 11/28/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

Spotted on

Exclusive: How US and UK Physicians’ Ethics Differ

Harris Meyer

Nov 20, 2012

 

Introduction

US and UK physicians receive medical training so similar that they can readily practice in either the United States or the United Kingdom. They share a common history and culture and speak the same language, more or less.

There were notable contrasts on attitudes toward what doctors regard as

  • futile care,
  • maintaining patient confidentiality in certain situations,
  • alerting patients about poor-quality physicians, and
  • telling patients the truth about terminal conditions.
  • Their biggest difference seen was about whether to defer to the treatment wishes of patients’ families (Table).

But a newMedscape survey of nearly 25,000 US and UK physicians found that doctors in the 2 nations hold markedly different views on some thorny medical ethics issues.

Table. Differences in Attitudes Between US and UK Physicians, Medscape 2012 Ethics Report

Question US Physicians UK Physicians
Would you ever go against a family’s wishes to end treatment and continue treating a patient whom you felt had a chance to recover? Yes: 23% Yes: 57%
Is it ever acceptable to perform “unnecessary” procedures due to malpractice concerns? Yes: 23% Yes: 9%
Is it right to provide intensive care to a newborn who either will die soon or survive with an objectively terrible quality of life? Yes: 34% Yes: 22%
Would you ever hide information from a patient about a terminal or pre-terminal diagnosis if you believed it would help bolster the patient’s spirit? Yes: 10% Yes: 14%
Would you give life-sustaining therapy if you believed it to be futile? Yes: 35% Yes: 22%
Should physician-assisted suicides be allowed in some situations? Yes: 47% Yes: 37%
Would you inform a patient if he or she were scheduled to have a procedure done by a physician whose skill you knew to be substandard? Yes: 47% Yes: 32%
Is it acceptable to breach patient confidentiality if a patient’s health status could harm others? Yes: 63% Yes: 74%
Would you ever decide to devote scarce or costly resources to a younger patient rather than to one who was older but not facing imminent death? Yes: 27% Yes: 24%

© Medscape 2012

Several factors contribute to the differences: different views toward patient-centeredness; different medical liability climate; the way physicians are paid; national religious attitudes; and the nature of the relationship between physicians, patients, and patients’ families.

The survey was conducted as part of Medscape’s Physician Ethics Report 2012. Survey questionnaires were sent to physicians in a wide range of medical specialties in each country. Completed questionnaires were received from more than 24,000 US physicians and 940 UK physicians. The statistical significance of the differences in responses between US and UK doctors was not calculated.

One obvious difference that could affect attitudes is that most US physicians work either independently or for private hospital and medical groups and receive fee-for-service payment, while most UK physicians work directly or indirectly for the country’s socialized National Health Service (NHS). In Great Britain, most medical specialists work as salaried staff in publicly operated hospitals, while most primary care physicians work independently and receive a mix of fee-for-service payments, per-patient global payments, and salary.

“The big difference is the way the system is funded and the culture of the United Kingdom,” says Brian Jarman, MD, a medical professor at Imperial College in London who serves on the NHS’s advisory committee on resource allocation. “I don’t think our decisions are as affected by financial considerations as in the US.”

Another major distinction: There’s less medical malpractice litigation in the UK. On top of that, UK medical specialists receive liability coverage through their hospital, while general practitioners have their premiums offset by NHS payments. In the US, physicians worry a lot more about malpractice suits, and doctors in independent practice are responsible for paying sizable liability premiums on their own.

The largest percentage difference in the survey — and one of the most provocative findings — was seen on the question of whether the doctor would ever go against a family’s wishes to end treatment and continue treating a patient who the doctor felt had a chance to recover. Most UK physicians in the survey — 57% — said yes, compared with just 23% of US physicians. That finding cut against the view that UK doctors are more likely to ration, and it also highlighted an important cultural gap.

“In most places in the world, doctors think they know the right treatment and do it,” says Dr. Lachlan Forrow, MD, a Harvard University medical ethicist and palliative care specialist. “My German friends say patients and families expect doctors to make decisions. In the US we might defer more to the patient and family.”

On top of that, he adds, families in the US probably express their wishes with more vehemence than in the UK and are more likely to file a lawsuit if the doctor goes against their wishes.

Differences Were Surprising

But differing attitudes and responses to survey questions didn’t always fall along lines predictable by economics.

It’s often thought that UK doctors are more cost-conscious and more apt to ration services than US doctors are, given that US doctors are paid more for providing more procedures and services, while UK doctors work in a budgeted, socialized medicine environment. The responses to the survey, however, suggest that this is true in some situations and not true in others.

Even so, the experts found more similarities than differences in the responses, with large percentages of doctors from both countries responding to many of these tough ethical questions by choosing “it depends.” Indeed, the responses of US and UK doctors were comparable on most of the questions, including informing patients about medical errors, reporting impaired colleagues, performing abortions regardless of personal beliefs, and notifying patients about risks of a procedure when obtaining informed consent.

“One of the findings is how remarkably small the differences are,” says Don Berwick, MD, a pediatrics and health policy professor at Harvard University and former head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services who has done extensive quality-improvement consulting work with the UK’s NHS.

For a majority of issues, US and UK physicians are generally in agreement. For example, on the question of whether it’s right to provide intensive care to a newborn who either will die soon or survive with poor quality of life, US physicians were more likely than UK physicians to say yes — 34% to 22% . But the largest group in both countries — about 40% — said that it depends.

Dr. Forrow says this finding shows that doctors in both countries properly base decisions on individual circumstances. “What if grandma wants to see the baby before she dies and the baby won’t suffer? So it does depend.”

Candor With Patients

Another intriguing difference came on the question of whether the doctor would hide information from a patient about a terminal or pre-terminal diagnosis if the doctor believed it would help the patient’s spirit. Far more US than UK doctors – 72% vs 54% — said, “No, I am always completely truthful about diagnoses,” while more UK than US doctors — 33% vs 18% — said that it depends.

Dr. Berwick says this difference may result from a stronger sense of customer focus in the US. “Patient-centeredness as a fundamental property is better developed in the US than in the UK,” he says. “US doctors say it’s the patient’s right to know, while British doctors might say, ‘In my judgment it would be better for patients for me to not always be completely truthful.'”

Doctors in the 2 countries also differed on the question of whether they would ever give life-sustaining therapy that they believed to be futile, with 35% of US doctors and just 22% of UK doctors saying yes. About 40% of both groups said that it depends.

“The implication is that there is a financial incentive in the US to maintain the end-of-life patient in the hospital, and that incentive is not there in the UK,” Dr. Jarman says.

Societal and Religious Differences

Similarly, US and UK doctors differed on the question of whether it’s right to provide intensive care to a newborn who either will die soon or survive with poor quality of life, with US physicians more likely to say yes.

Both Dr. Forrow and Dr. Jarman agreed that there likely are societal religious factors influencing these differences over whether to provide what could be called futile care.

“The US is a more religious society,” Dr. Forrow says. “We do all kinds of things that are not medically necessary but the patient thinks they are necessary. When doctors think something is futile, patients and families object more. They say, ‘Give God a chance.'”

In contrast, Dr. Jarman says, “The UK is not a religious country and people don’t go to church as much, so those considerations wouldn’t be there.”

Despite greater religiosity in the US, American doctors were somewhat more likely than UK doctors to say that physician-assisted suicide should be allowed in some situations — 47% to 37%. That could be related to the fact that physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients is legal in 3 US states but remains illegal in the UK.

Protecting Other Physicians?

US doctors also were more likely than UK doctors to say that they would inform a patient if they felt a doctor scheduled to perform a procedure on the patient had substandard skill levels — 47% to 32%. Nearly 40% in both countries said that it depends.

“British doctors are more protective of their colleagues than US doctors are,” Dr. Berwick says. “This implies that US doctors are getting a little more comfortable about transparency on clinical performance.”

Dr. Jarman said that this difference in attitude could be a holdover from his country’s old General Medical Council rule, abolished in the 1980s, under which a doctor who reported a colleague for doing something wrong risked being barred from practice.

Finally, the survey showed a difference in attitude toward patient confidentiality and reporting communicable diseases. UK doctors were more likely than US doctors to say that it’s acceptable to breach patient confidentiality if a patient’s health status could harm others — 74% to 63%.

Dr. Berwick explained that by saying that more UK doctors than US doctors receive public training that encourages reporting of communicable diseases, and that the US has a very strong patient confidentiality and privacy law.

Dr. Jarman noted that the General Medical Council rules encourage physicians to break confidentiality and report patients’ communicable diseases or other conditions posing harm or risk to others. “If someone is causing harm to others, doctors are correct in breaking confidentiality for the good of the state,” he says.

Dr. Berwick says that the results of the Medscape survey are complex, revealing some important differences between US and UK physicians. But overall he feels reassured by their shared ethical values.

“A significant portion in both countries say that they will make decisions based on the details of the case,” he says. “They are willing to consider treatment efficacy. They are sensitive to the social world of the patient and what the families are feeling. They are connecting in the most humane way to the patient’s entire circumstance.”

Dr. Jarman says he found the survey interesting and challenging. “You know the correct answers but you also know that with certain patients you’ve got to be human and not totally follow the rules,” he says. “You have to be a little bit human about it.”

SOURCE:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/774737

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »