Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for November, 2012

Nitric Oxide Function in Coagulation – Part II

Curator and Author: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

Subtitle: Nitric oxide in hemostatic and bleeding mechanisms.  Part II.

 

Summary: This is the second of a coagulation series on PharmaceuticalIntelligence(wordpress.com)  treating the diverse effects of NO on platelets, the coagulation cascade, and protein-membrane interactions with low flow states, local and systemic inflammatory disease, oxidative stress, and hematologic disorders.  It is highly complex as the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic pathways become blurred as a result of  endothelial shear stress, distinctly different than penetrating or traumatic injury.  In addition, other factors that come into play are also considered.

Please refer to Part I.

Coagulation Pathway

The workhorse tests of the modern coagulation laboratory, the prothrombin time (PT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), are the basis for the published extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways.  This is, however, a much simpler model than one encounters delving into the mechanism and interactions involved in hemostasis and thrombosis, or in hemorrhagic disorders.

We first note that there are three components of the hemostatic system in all vertebrates:

  • Platelets,
  • vascular endothelium, and
  • plasma proteins.

The liver is the largest synthetic organ, which synthesizes

  • albumin,
  • acute phase proteins,
  • hormonal and metal binding proteins,
  • albumin,
  • IGF-1, and
  • prothrombin, mainly responsible for the distinction between plasma and serum (defibrinated plasma).

Role of vascular endothelium.

I have identified the importance of prothrombin, thrombin, and the divalent cation Ca 2+ (1% of the total body pool), mention of heparin action, and of vitamin K (inhibited by warfarin).  Endothelial functions are inherently related to procoagulation and anticoagulation. The subendothelial matrix is a complex of many materials, most important related to coagulation being collagen and von Willebrand factor.

What about extrinsic and intrinsic pathways?  Tissue factor, when bound to factor VIIa, is the major activator of the extrinsic pathway of coagulation. Classically, tissue factor is not present in the plasma but only presented on cell surfaces at a wound site, which is “extrinsic” to the circulation.  Or is it that simple?

Endothelium is the major synthetic and storage site for von Willebrand factor (vWF).  vWF is…

  • secreted from the endothelial cell both into the plasma and also
  • abluminally into the subendothelial matrix, and
  • acts as the intercellular glue binding platelets to one another and also to the subendothelial matrix at an injury site.
  • acts as a carrier protein for factor VIII (antihemophilic factor).
  • It  binds to the platelet glycoprotein Ib/IX/V receptor and
  • mediates platelet adhesion to the vascular wall under shear. [Lefkowitz JB. Coagulation Pathway and Physiology. Chapter I. in Hemostasis Physiology. In ( ???), pp1-12].

Ca++ and phospholipids are necessary for all of the reactions that result in the activation of prothrombin to thrombin. Coagulation is initiated by an extrinsic mechanism that

  • generates small amounts of factor Xa, which in turn
  • activates small amounts of thrombin.

The tissue factor/factorVIIa proteolysis of factor X is quickly inhibited by tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI).The small amounts of thrombin generated from the initial activation feedback

  • to create activated cofactors, factors Va and VIIIa, which in turn help to
  • generate more thrombin.
  • Tissue factor/factor VIIa is also capable of indirectly activating factor X through the activation of factor IX to factor IXa.
  • Finally, as more thrombin is created, it activates factor XI to factor XIa, thereby enhancing the ability to ultimately make more thrombin.

The reconceptualization of hemostasis 

The common theme in activation and regulation of plasma coagulation is the reduction in dimensionality. Most reactions take place in a 2D world that will increase the efficiency of the reactions dramatically. The localization and timing of the coagulation processes are also dependent on the formation of protein complexes on the surface of membranes. The coagulation processes can also be controlled by certain drugs that destroy the membrane binding ability of some coagulation proteins – these proteins will be lost in the 3D world and not able to form procoagulant complexes on surfaces.

Assembly of proteins on membranes – making a 3D world flat

• The timing and efficiency of coagulation processes are handled by reduction in dimensionality

– Make 3 dimensions to 2 dimensions

• Coagulation proteins have membrane binding capacity

• Membranes provide non-coagulant and procoagulant surfaces

– Intact cells/activated cells

• Membrane binding is a target for anticoagulant drugs

– Anti-vitamin K (e.g. warfarin)

Modern View

It can be divided into the phases of initiation, amplification and propagation.

  • In the initiation phase, small amounts of thrombin can be formed after exposure of tissue factor to blood.
  • In the amplification phase, the traces of thrombin will be inactivated or used for amplification of the coagulation process.

At this stage there is not enough thrombin to form insoluble fibrin. In order to proceed further thrombin  activates platelets, which provide a procoagulant surface for the coagulation factors. Thrombin will also activate the vital cofactors V and VIII that will assemble on the surface of activated platelets. Thrombin can also activate factor XI, which is important in a feedback mechanism.

In the final step, the propagation phase, the highly efficient tenase and prothrombinase complexes have been assembled on the membrane surface. This yields large amounts of thrombin at the site of injury that can cleave fibrinogen to insoluble fibrin. Factor XI activation by thrombin then activates factor IX, which leads to the formation of more tenase complexes. This ensures enough thrombin is formed, despite regulation of the initiating TF-FVIIa complex, thus ensuring formation of a stable fibrin clot. Factor XIII stabilizes the fibrin clot through crosslinking when activated by thrombin.

Platelet Aggregation

The activities of adenylate and guanylate cyclase and cyclic nucleotide 3′:5′-phosphodiesterase were determined during the aggregation of human blood platelets with

  • thrombin, ADP,
  • arachidonic acid and
  • epinephrine.

[Aggregation is dependent on an intact release mechanism since inhibition of aggregation occurred with adenosine, colchicine, or EDTA.  (Herman GE, Seegers WH, Henry RL. Autoprothrombin ii-a, thrombin, and epinephrine: interrelated effects on platelet aggregation. Bibl Haematol 1977;44:21-7)].

  1. The platelet guanylate cyclase activity during aggregation depends on the nature and mode of action of the inducing agent.
  2. The membrane adenylate cyclase activity during aggregation is independent of the aggregating agent and is associated with a reduction of activity and
  3. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase remains unchanged during the process of platelet aggregation and release.

The role of platelets in arterial thrombosis

Formation of a thrombus on a ruptured plaque is the product of a complex interaction between coagulation factors in the plasma and platelets.

  • Tissue factor (TF) released from the subendothelial tissue after endothelial damage induces a cascade of activation of coagulation factors ultimately leading to the formation of thrombin.
  • Thrombin cleaves fibrinogen to fibrin, which assembles into a mesh that supports the platelet aggregates.

The Platelet

The platelets are …

  • anucleated,
  • discoid shaped cell fragments
  • originating from megakaryocytes
  •  fragmented as they are released from the bone marrow

Whether they can in circumstances be developed at extramedullary sites (liver sinusoid) is another matter. They have a lifespan of 7-10 days.  Of special interest is:

  • They have a network of internal membranes forming a dense tubular system and the open canalicular system (OCS).
  • The plasma membrane is an extension of the OCS, thereby greatly increasing the surface area of the platelet.
  • The dense tubular system is comparable to the endoplasmatic reticulum in other cell types and is the main storage place of the majority of the platelet’s Ca2+.

Three types of secretory granules exist in platelets:

  • the dense granules
    •  In the dense granules serotonin
    • adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and
    • Ca2+ are stored.
    • a-granules contain
      • P-selectin,
      • fibrinogen,
      •  thrombospondin,
      • Von Willebrand Factor,
      • platelet factor 4 and
      • platelet derived growth factor
      • lysosomes.

Circulating platelets are kept in a resting state by endothelial cell derived

  • prostacyclin (PGI2) and
  • nitric oxide (NO).

PGI2 increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), the most potent platelet inhibitor.

Contact activation

The major regulator of the activation of the contact system is the plasma protease inhibitor, C1-INH, which inhibits activated fXII, kallikrein and fXIa. In addition, α2-macroglobulin is an important inhibitor of kallikrein and α1-antitrypsin for fXIa. Factor XII also converts the fXI to an active enzyme, fXIa, which, in turn, converts fIX to fIXa, thereby activating the intrinsic pathway of coagulation.

Activation

Several agonists can activate platelets;

  • ADP,
  • collagen,
  • thromboxane A2 (TxA2),
  • epinephrin,
  • serotonine and
  • thrombin,

which lead to activation previously referred to:

  • platelet shape change is
  • followed by aggregation and
  • granule secretion.

Upon activation the discoid shape changes into a spherical form.

Activation of platelets is increased by two positive feedback loops

  1. arachidonic acid is cleaved from phospholipids and transformed by cyclooxygenase

(COX) to prostaglandin G2 and H2,

  • followed by the formation of TxA2, a potent platelet agonist.

2.   the secretion of ADP by the dense granules,

  • resulting in activation of the ADP receptor P2Y12.

This causes inhibition of cyclic AMP and sustained aggregation.

Aggregation

The integrin receptor αIIbβ3 plays a vital role in platelet aggregation. The platelet agonists

  • induce a conformational change of the αIIbβ3 receptor and
  • exposition of binding domains for fibrinogen and von Willebrand Factor.

This allows cross-linking of platelets and the formation of aggregates.

In addition to shape change and aggregation, the membranes of the α- and dense granules fuse with the membranes of the OCS. This causes the release of their contents and the transportation of proteins embedded in their membrane to the plasma membrane.

This complex interaction between

  • endothelial cells
  • clotting factors
  • platelets and
  • other factors and cells

can be studied in both in vitro and in vivo model systems. The disadvantage of in vitro assays is that it studies the role of a certain protein or cell in isolation. Given the large number of participants and the complex interactions of thrombus formation there is need to study thrombosis and hemostasis in intact living animals, with all the components important for thrombus formation – a vessel wall and flowing blood – present.

Endothelial Damage and Role as “Primer”

  • Endothelial injury changes the permeability of the arterial wall.
  • This is followed by an influx of low-density lipoprotein (LDL).
  • This elicits an inflammatory response in the vascular wall.
  • Monocytes and T-cells bind to the endothelial cells promoting increased migration of the cells into the intima layer
  • The monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which take up modified lipoproteins and transform them into foam cells.
  • Concurrent with this process macrophages produce cytokines and proteases.

This is a vicious circle of lipid driven inflammation that leads to narrowing of the vessel’s lumen without early clinical consequences. Clinical manifestations of more advanced atherosclerotic disease are caused by destabilization of an atherosclerotic plaque formed as described.

  • The first recognizable lesion of the stable atherosclerotic plaque is the fatty streak, which consists of the above described foam cells and T-lymphocytes in the intima.
  • Further development of the lesion leads to the intermediate lesion, composed
  • of layers of macrophages and smooth muscle cells.
  • A more advanced stage is called the vulnerable plaque.
    • It has a large lipid core that is covered by a thin fibrous cap.
    • This cap separates the lipid contents of the plaque from the circulating blood.
    • The vulnerable plaque is prone to rupture, resulting in the formation of a thrombus on the site of disruption or the thrombus can be superimposed on plaque erosion without signs of plaque rupture.

The formation of a superimposed thrombus on a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque in the lumen of the artery leads to

  • an acute occlusion of the vessel
  • hypoxia of the downstream tissue.

Depending on the location of the atherosclerotic plaque this will cause a myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral vascular disease.

Endothelial regulation of coagulation

The endothelium attenuates platelet activity by releasing

  • nitric oxide and
  • prostacyclin.

Several coagulation inhibitors are produced by endothelial cells.

Endothelium-derived TFPI (on its surface) is rapidly released into circulation after heparin administration, reducing the pro-coagulant activities of TF-fVIIa. Endothelial cells also secrete heparin-sulphate, a glycosaminoglycan which catalyzes anti-coagulant activity of AT. Plasma AT binds to heparin-sulphate located on the luminal surface and in the basement membrane of the endothelium. Thrombomodulin is another endothelium-bound protein with anti-coagulant and anti-inflammatory functions. In response to systemic pro-coagulant stimuli, tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) is transiently released from the Weibel-Palade bodies of endothelial cells to promote fibrinolysis. Downstream of the vascular injury, the complex of TF-fVIIa/fXa is inhibited by TFPI. Plasma (free) fXa and thrombin are rapidly neutralized by heparan-bound AT. Thrombin is also taken up by endothelial surface-bound thrombomodulin.

The protein C pathway works in hemostasis to control thrombin formation in the area surrounding the clot. Thrombin, generated via the coagulation pathway, is localized to the endothelium by binding to the integral membrane protein, thrombomodulin (TM). TM by occupying exosite I on thrombin, which is required for fibrinogen binding and cleavage, reduces thrombin’s pro-coagulant activities. TM bound thrombin  on the endothelial cell surface is able to cleave PC producing activated protein C (APC), a serine protease.  In the presence of protein S, APC inactivates FVa and FVIIIa. The proteolytic activity of APC is regulated predominantly by a protein C inhibitor.

Fibrinolytic pathway

Fibrinolysis is the physiological breakdown of fibrin to limit and resolve blood clots. Fibrin is degraded primarily by the serine protease, plasmin, which circulates as plasminogen. In an auto-regulatory manner, fibrin serves as both the co-factor for the activation of plasminogen and the substrate for plasmin. In the presence of fibrin, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) cleaves plasminogen producing plasmin, which proteolyzes the fibrin. This reaction produces the protein fragment D-dimer, which is a useful marker of fibrinolysis, and a marker of thrombin activity because fibrin is cleaved from fibrinogen to fibrin.

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Energy Production

Nitric oxide (NO) has been increasingly recognized as an important intra- and intercellular messenger molecule with a physiological role in

  • vascular relaxation
  • platelet physiology
  • neurotransmission and
  • immune responses.

In vitro NO is a strong inhibitor of platelet adhesion and aggregation. In the blood stream, platelets remain in contact with NO that is permanently released from the endothelial cells and from activated macrophages. It  has been suggested that the activated platelet itself is able to produce NO. It has been proposed that the main intracellular target for NO in platelets is soluble cytosolic guanylate cyclase. NO activates the enzyme. When activated, intracellular cGMP elevation inhibits platelet activation. Further, elevated cGMP may not be the sole factor directly involved in the inhibition of platelet activation.

The reaction mechanism of Nitric oxide synthase
The reaction mechanism of Nitric oxide synthase (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Platelets are fairly active metabolically and have a total ATP turnover rate of about 3–8 times that of resting mammalian muscle. Platelets contain mitochondria which enable these cells to produce energy both in the oxidative and anaerobic pathways.

  • Under aerobic conditions, ATP is produced by aerobic glycolysis which can account for 30–50% of total ATP production,
  • by oxidative metabolism using glucose and glycogen (6–11%), amino-acids (7%) or free fatty acids (20–40%).

The inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by removing oxygen or by respiratory chain blockers (antimycin A, cyanide, rotenone) results in the stimulation of glycolytic flux. This phenomenon indicates that in platelets glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration are tightly functionally connected. It has been reported that the activation of human platelets by high concentration of thrombin is accompanied by an acceleration of lactate production and an increase in oxygen consumption.

The results (in porcine platelets) indicate that:

  • NO is able to diminish mitochondrial energy production through the inhibition of cytochrome oxidase
  • The inhibitory effect of NO on platelet secretion (but not aggregation) can be attributed to the reduction of mitochondrial energy production.

Porcine blood platelets stimulated by collagen produce more lactate. This indicates that both glycolytic and oxidative ATP production supports platelet responses, and blocking of energy production in platelets may decrease their responses. It is well established that platelet responses have different metabolic energy (ATP) requirements increasing in the order:

  • Aggregation
  • < dense and alfa granule secretion
  • < acid hydrolase secretion.

In addition, exogenously added NO (in the form of NO donors) stimulates glycolysis in intact porcine platelets. Since in platelets glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration are tightly functionally connected, this indicates the stimulatory effect of NO on glycolysis in intact platelets may be produced by non-functional mitochondria.

Can this be the case?

  • NO donors are able to inhibit both mitochondrial respiration and platelet cytochrome oxidase.
  • Interestingly, the concentrations of NO donors inhibiting mitochondrial respiration and cytochrome oxidase were similar to those stimulating glycolysis in intact platelets.

Studies have shown that mitochondrial complex I is inhibited only after a prolonged (6–18 h) exposure to NO and

  • This inhibition appears to result from S-nitrosylation of critical thiols in the enzyme complex.
  • Further studies are needed to establish whether long term exposure of platelets to NO affects Mitochondrial complexes I and II.

Comparison of the concentrations of SNAP and SNP affecting cytochrome oxidase activity and mitochondrial respiration with those reducing the platelet responses indicates that NO does not reduce platelet aggregation through the inhibition of oxidative energy production. The concentrations of the NO donors inhibiting platelet secretion, mitochondrial respiration and cytochrome oxidase were similar. Thus, the platelet release reaction strongly depends on the oxidative energy production, and  in porcine platelets NO inhibits mitochondrial energy production at the step of cytochrome oxidase.

Taking into account that platelets may contain NO synthase and are able to produce significant amounts of NO it seems possible that nitric oxide can function in these cells as a physiological regulator of mitochondrial energy production.

Key words: glycolysis, mitochondrial energy production, nitric oxide, porcine platelets.
Abbreviations: NO, nitric oxide; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicyllamine; SNP, sodium nitroprusside.

[M Tomasiak, H Stelmach, T Rusak and J Wysocka.  Nitric oxide and platelet energy metabolism.  Acta Biochimica Polonica 2004; 51(3):789–803.]

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Adhesion

The adhesion of human platelets to monolayers of bovine endothelial cells in culture was studied to determine the role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of platelet adhesion. The adhesion of unstimulated and thrombin-stimulated platelets, washed and labelled with indium-111, was lower in the presence than in the absence of bradykinin or exogenous nitric oxide. The inhibitory action of both bradykinin and nitric oxide was abolished by hemoglobin, but not by aspirin, and was potentiated by superoxide dismutase to a similar degree. It appears that the effect of bradykinin is mediated by the release of nitric oxide from the endothelial cells, and that nitric oxide release contributes to the non-adhesive properties of vascular endothelium.

(Radomski MW, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S.   Endogenous Nitric Oxide Inhibits Human Platelet Adhesion to Vascular Endothelium. The Lancet  1987 330; 8567(2): 1057–1058.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(87)91481-4)

1 The interactions between endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin as inhibitors of platelet aggregation were examined to determine whether release of NO accounts for the inhibition of platelet aggregation attributed to EDRF.

2 Porcine aortic endothelial cells treated with indomethacin and stimulated with bradykinin (10-100 nM) released NO in quantities sufficient to account for the inhibition of platelet aggregation attributed to endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF).

3 In the absence of indomethacin, stimulation of the cells with bradykinin (1-3 nM) released small amounts of prostacyclin and EDRF which synergistically inhibited platelet aggregation.

4 EDRF and authentic NO also caused disaggregation of platelets aggregated either with collagen or with U46619.

5 A reciprocal potentiation of both the anti- and the disaggregating activity was also observed between low concentrations of prostacyclin and authentic NO or EDRF released from endothelial cells.

6 It is likely that interactions between prostacyclin and NO released by the endothelium play a role in the homeostatic regulation of platelet-vessel wall interactions.

(Radomski MW, Palmer RMJ & Moncada S. The anti-aggregating properties of vascular endothelium: interactions between prostacyclin and nitric oxide. Br J Pharmac 1987; 92: 639-646.

 

Factor Xa–Nitric Oxide Signaling

Although primarily recognized for maintaining the hemostatic balance, blood proteases of the coagulation and fibrinolytic cascades elicit rapid cellular responses in

  • vascular
  • mesenchymal
  • inflammatory cell types.

Considerable effort has been devoted to elucidate the molecular interface between protease-dependent signaling and pleiotropic cellular responses. This led to the identification of several membrane protease receptors, initiating intracellular signal transduction and effector functions in vascular cells. In this context, thrombin receptor activation

  • generated second messengers in endothelium and smooth muscle cells,
  • released inflammatory cytokines from monocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelium, and
  • increased the expression of leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion molecules.

Similarly, binding of factor Xa to effector cell protease receptor-1 (EPR-1) participated in

  • in vivo acute inflammatory responses,
  • platelet and brain pericyte prothrombinase activity, and
  • endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell signaling and proliferation.

Factor Xa stimulated a 5- to 10-fold increased release of nitric oxide (NO) in a dose-dependent reaction (0.1–2.5 mgyml) unaffected by the thrombin inhibitor hirudin but abolished by active site inhibitors, tick anticoagulant peptide, or Glu-Gly-Arg-chloromethyl ketone. In contrast, the homologous clotting protease factor IXa or another endothelial cell ligand, fibrinogen, was ineffective.

A factor Xa inter-epidermal growth factor synthetic peptide L83FTRKL88(G) blocking ligand binding to effector cell protease receptor-1 inhibited NO release by factor Xa in a dose-dependent manner, whereas a control scrambled peptide KFTGRLL was ineffective.

Catalytically active factor Xa induced hypotension in rats and vasorelaxation in the isolated rat mesentery, which was blocked by the NO synthase inhibitor L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (LNAME) but not by D-NAME. Factor Xa/NO signaling also produced a dose-dependent endothelial cell release of interleukin 6 (range 0.55–3.1 ngyml) in a reaction

  • inhibited by L-NAME and by the
  • inter-epidermal growth factor peptide Leu83–Leu88 but
  • unaffected by hirudin.
We observe that incubation of HUVEC monolayers with factor Xa which resulted in a concentration-dependent release of NO, as determined by cGMP accumulation in these cells, was inhibited by the nitric oxide synthase antagonist L-NAME.

Catalytically inactive DEGR-factor Xa or TAP-treated factor Xa failed to stimulate NO release by HUVEC.

To determine whether factor Xa-induced NO release could also modulate acute phase/inflammatory cytokine gene expression we examined potential changes in IL-6 release following HUVEC stimulation with factor Xa. HUVEC stimulation with factor Xa resulted in a concentration-dependent release of IL-6.

The specificity of factor Xa-induced cytokine release was investigated. Factor Xa-induced IL-6 release from HUVEC was quantitatively indistinguishable from that obtained with tumor necrosis factor-a or thrombin stimulation. This response was abolished by heat denaturation of factor Xa.

Maximal induction of interleukin 6 mRNA required a brief, 30-min stimulation with factor Xa, and was unaffected by subsequent addition of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). These data suggest that factor Xa-induced NO release modulates endothelial cell-dependent vasorelaxation and IL-6 cytokine gene expression.

Here, we find that factor Xa induces the release of endothelial cell NO

  • regulating vasorelaxation in vivo and acute response cytokine gene expression in vitro.

This pathway requires a dual step cascade, involving

  • binding of factor Xa to EPR-1 and
  • a secondary as yet unidentified protease activated mechanism.

This pathway requiring factor Xa binding to effector cell protease receptor-1 and a secondary step of ligand-dependent proteolysis may preserve an anti-thrombotic phenotype of endothelium but also trigger acute phase responses during activation of coagulation in vivo.

In summary, these investigators have identified a signaling pathway centered on the ability of factor Xa to rapidly stimulate endothelial cell NO release. This involves a two-step cascade initiated by catalytic active site-independent binding of factor Xa to its receptor, EPR-1, followed by a second step of ligand dependent proteolysis.

(Papapetropoulos A, Piccardoni P, Cirino G, Bucci M, et al. Hypotension and inflammatory cytokine gene expression triggered by factor Xa–nitric oxide signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. Pharmacology. 1998; 95:4738–4742.)

Platelets and liver disease

Thrombocytopenia is a marked feature of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Traditionally, this thrombocytopenia was attributed to passive platelet sequestration in the spleen. More recent insights suggest an increased platelet breakdown and to a lesser extent decreased platelet production plays a more important role. Besides the reduction in number, other studies suggest functional platelet defects. This platelet dysfunction is probably both intrinsic to the platelets and secondary to soluble plasma factors. It reflects not only a decrease in aggregability, but also an activation of the intrinsic inhibitory pathways. (Witters P, Freson K, Verslype C, Peerlinck K, et al. Review article: blood platelet number and function in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1017–1029).

The shortcomings of the old Y-shaped model of normal coagulation are nowhere more apparent than in its clinical application to the complex coagulation disorders of acute and chronic liver disease. In this condition, the clotting cascade is heavily influenced by numerous currents and counter-currents resulting in a mixture of pro- and anticoagulant forces that are themselves further subject to change with altered physiological stress such as super-imposed infection or renal failure.

Multiple mechanisms exist for thrombocytopenia common in patients with cirrhosis besides hypersplenism and expected altered thrombopoietin metabolism. Increased production of two important endothelial derived platelet inhibitors

  • nitric oxide and
  • prostacyclin

may contribute to defective platelet activation in vivo. On the other hand, high plasma levels of vWF in cirrhosis appear to support platelet adhesion.

Reduced levels of coagulation factors V, VII, IX, X, XI, and prothrombin are also commonly observed in liver failure. Vitamin K–dependent clotting factors (II, VII, IX, X) may be defective in function as a result of decreased  y-carboxylation (from vitamin K deficiency or intrinsically impaired carboxylase activity). Fibrinogen levels are decreased with advanced cirrhosis and in patients with acute liver failure.

A hyperfibrinolytic state may develop when plasminogen activation by tPA is accelerated on the fibrin surface. Physiologic stress including infection may be key in tipping this process off through increased release of tPA.  Not uncommonly, laboratory abnormalities in decompensated cirrhosis come to resemble disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Relatively stable platelet levels and characteristically high factor VIII levels distinguish this process from DIC as does the absence of uncompensated thrombin generation. The features of both hyperfibrinolysis and DIC are often evident in the decompensated liver disease patient, and the term “accelerated intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis” (AICF) has been proposed as a way to encapsulate the process under a single heading. The essence of AICF can be postulated to be the result of formation of a fibrin clot that is more susceptible to plasmin degradation due to elevated levels of tPA coupled with inadequate release of PAI to control tPA and lack of a-2 plasmin inhibitor to quench plasmin activity and the maintenance of high local concentrations of plasminogen on clot surfaces despite lower total plasminogen production. These normally balanced processes become pronounced when disturbed by additional stress such as infection.

Normal hemostasis and coagulation is now viewed as primarily a cell-based process wherein key steps in the classical clotting cascade

  • occur on the phospholipid membrane surface of cells (especially platelets)
  • beginning with activation of tissue factor and factor VII at the site of vascular breach
    •  which produces an initial “priming” amount of thrombin and a
    • subsequent thrombin burst.

Coagulation and hemostasis in the liver failure patient is influenced by multiple, often opposing, and sometimes changing variables. A bleeding diathesis is usually predominant, but the assessment of bleeding risk based on conventional laboratory tests is inherently deficient.

(Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, Lisman T, Gail Macik B, et al. Coagulation Disorders and Hemostasis in Liver Disease: Pathophysiology and Critical Assessment of Current Management. Hepatology 2006;44:1039-1046.)

Bleeding after Coronary Artery bypass Graft

Cardiac surgery with concomitant CPB can profoundly alter haemostasis, predisposing patients to major haemorrhagic complications and possibly early bypass conduit-related thrombotic events as well. Five to seven percent of patients lose more than 2 litres of blood within the first 24 hours after surgery, between 1% and 5% require re-operation for bleeding. Re-operation for bleeding increases hospital mortality 3 to 4 fold, substantially increases post-operative hospital stay and has a sizeable effect on health care costs. Nevertheless, re-exploration is a strong risk factor associated with increased operative mortality and morbidity, including sepsis, renal failure, respiratory failure and arrhythmias.

(Gábor Veres. New Drug Therapies Reduce Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery. Ph.D. Doctoral Dissertation. 2010. Semmelweis University)

Hypercoagulable State in Thalassemia

As the life expectancy of β-thalassemia patients has increased in the last decade, several new complications are being recognized. The presence of a high incidence of thromboembolic events, mainly in thalassemia intermedia patients, has led to the identification of a hypercoagulable state in thalassemia. Patients with thalassemia intermedia (TI) have, in general, a milder clinical phenotype than those with TM and remain largely transfusion independent. The pathophysiology of TI is characterized by extravascular hemolysis, with the release into the peripheral circulation of damaged red blood cells (RBCs) and erythroid precursors because of a high degree of ineffective erythropoiesis. This has also been recently attributed to severe complications such as pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and thromboembolic phenomena.

Many investigators have reported changes in the levels of coagulation factors and inhibitors in thalassemic patients. Prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2), a marker of thrombin generation, is elevated in TI patients. The status of protein C and protein S was investigated in thalassemia in many studies and generally they were found to be decreased; this might be responsible for the occurrence of thromboembolic events in thalassemic patients.

The pathophysiological roles of hemolysis and the dysregulation of nitric oxide homeostasis are correlated with pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease and in thalassemia. Nitric oxide binds soluble guanylate cyclase, which converts GTP to cGMP, relaxing vascular smooth muscle and causing vasodilatation. When plasma hemoglobin liberated from intravascularly hemolyzed sickle erythrocytes consumes nitric oxide, the balance is shifted toward vasoconstriction. Pulmonary hypertension is aggravated and in sickle cell disease, it is linked to the intensity of hemolysis. Whether the same mechanism contributes to hypercoagulability in thalassemia is not yet known.

While there are diverse factors contributing to the hypercoagulable state observed in patients with thalassemia. In most cases, a combination of these abnormalities leads to clinical thrombosis. An argument has been made for the a higher incidence of thrombotic events in TI compared to TM patients  attributed to transfusion for TM. The higher rate of thrombosis in transfusion-independent TI compared to polytransused TM patients suggests a potential role for transfusions in decreasing the rate of thromboembolic events (TEE). The reduction of TEE in adequately transfused patients may be the result of decreased numbers of pathological RBCs.

(Cappellini MD, Musallam KM,  Marcon A, and Taher AT. Coagulopathy in Beta-Thalassemia: Current Understanding and Future Prospects. Medit J Hemat Infect Dis 2009; 1(1):22009029.
DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2009.0292.0), www.mjhid.org/article/view/5250.  ISSN 2035-3006.)

Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction

Severe sepsis, defined as sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction, results from a generalized inflammatory and procoagulant host response to infection. Coagulopathy in severe sepsis is commonly associated with multiple organ dysfunction, and often results in death. The molecule that is central to these effects is thrombin, although it may also have anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects through the activation of Protein C and induction of prostacyclin. In recent years, it has been recognized that chemicals produced by endothelial cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Thrombomodulin on endothelial cells coverts Protein C to Activated Protein C, which has important antithrombotic, profibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory properties. A number of studies have shown that Protein C levels are reduced in patients with severe infection, or even in inflammatory states without infection. Because coagulopathy is associated with high mortality rates, and animal studies have indicated that therapeutic intervention may result in improved outcomes, it was rational to initiate clinical studies.

Considering the coagulation cascade as a whole, it is the extrinsic pathway (via TF and thrombin activation) rather than the intrinsic pathway that is of primary importance in sepsis. Once coagulation has been triggered by TF activation, leading to thrombin formation, this can have further procoagulant effects, because thrombin itself can activate factors VIII, IX and X. This is normally balanced by the production of anticoagulant factors, such as TF pathway inhibitor, antithrombin and Activated Protein C.

It has been recognized that endothelial cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis, and that they produce important regulators of both coagulation and inflammation. They can express or release a number of substances, such as TF, endothelin-1 and PAI-1, which promote the coagulation process, as well as other substances, such as antithrombin, thrombomodulin, nitric oxide and prostacyclin, which inhibit it.

Protein C is the source of Activated Protein C. Although Protein C is a biomarker or indicator of sepsis, it has no known specific biological activity. Protein C is converted to Activated Protein C in the presence of normal endothelium. In patients with severe sepsis, the vascular endothelium becomes damaged. The level of thrombomodulin is significantly decreased, and the body’s ability to convert Protein C to Activated Protein C diminishes. Only when activated does Protein C have antithrombotic, profibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory properties.

Blood Coagulation (Thrombin) and Protein C Pat...

Blood Coagulation (Thrombin) and Protein C Pathways (Blood_Coagulation_and_Protein_C_Pathways.jpg) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Coagulation abnormalities can occur in all types of infection, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections, or even in the absence of infection, such as in inflammatory states secondary to trauma or neurosurgery. Interestingly, they can also occur in patients with localized disease, such as those with respiratory infection. In a study by Günther et al., procoagulant activity in bronchial lavage fluid from patients with pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome was found to be increased compared with that from control individuals, with a correlation between the severity of respiratory failure and level of coagulant activity.

Severe sepsis, defined as sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction, results from a generalized inflammatory and procoagulant host response to infection.  Once the endothelium becomes damaged, levels of endothelial thrombomodulin significantly decrease, and the body’s ability to convert Protein C to Activated Protein C diminishes. The ultimate cause of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis is injury to the vascular endothelium, which can result in microvascular coagulopathy.

(Vincent JL. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction: a renewed appreciation of sepsis pathophysiology.
Critical Care 2001; 5:S1–S5. http://ccforum.com/content/5/S2/S1)

Endothelial Cell Dysfunction in Severe Sepsis

During the past decade a unifying hypothesis has been developed to explain the vascular changes that occur in septic shock on the basis of the effect of inflammatory mediators on the vascular endothelium. The vascular endothelium plays a central role in the control of microvascular flow, and it has been proposed that widespread vascular endothelial activation, dysfunction and eventually injury occurs in septic shock, ultimately resulting in multiorgan failure. This has been characterized in various models of experimental septic shock. Now, direct and indirect evidence for endothelial cell alteration in humans during septic shock is emerging.

The vascular endothelium regulates the flow of nutrient substances, diverse biologically active molecules and the blood cells themselves. This role of endothelium is achieved through the presence of membrane-bound receptors for numerous molecules, including proteins, lipid transporting particles, metabolites and hormones, as well as through specific junction proteins and receptors that govern cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions. Endothelial dysfunction and/or injury with subendothelium exposure facilitates leucocyte and platelet aggregation, and aggravation of coagulopathy. Therefore, endothelial dysfunction and/or injury should favour impaired perfusion, tissue hypoxia and subsequent organ dysfunction.

Anatomical damage to the endothelium during septic shock has been assessed in several studies. A single injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has long been demonstrated to be a nonmechanical technique for removing endothelium. In endotoxic rabbits, observations tend to demonstrate that EC surface modification occurs easily and rapidly, with ECs being detached from the internal elastic lamina with an indication of subendothelial oedema.  Proinflammatory cytokines increase permeability of the ECs, and this is manifested approximately 6 hours after inflammation is triggered and becomes maximal over 12–24 hours as the combination of cytokines exert potentiating effects. Endothelial physical disruption allows inflammatory fluid and cells to shift from the blood into the interstitial space.

In sepsis

  • ECs become injured, prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic
  • They promote platelet adhesion
  • They promote leucocyte adhesion and inhibit vasodilation

An important point is that EC injury is sustained over time. In an endotoxic rabbit model, we demonstrated that endothelium denudation is present at the level of the abdominal aorta as early as after several hours following injury and persisted for at least 5 days afterward. After 21 days we observed that the endothelial surface had recovered. The de-endothelialized surface accounted for approximately 25% of the total surface.

Thrombomodulin and protein C activation at the microcirculatory level.

The endothelial cell surface thrombin (Th)-binding protein thrombomodulin (TM) is responsible for inhibition of thrombin activity. TM, when bound to Th, forms a potent protein C activator complex. Loss of TM and/or internalization results in Th–thrombin receptor (TR) interaction. Loss of TM and associated protein C activation represents the key event of decreased endothelial coagulation modulation ability and increased inflammation pathways.
( Iba T, Kidokoro A, Yagi Y: The role of the endothelium in changes in procoagulant activity in sepsis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187:321-329. Keywords: ATIII, antithrombin III; NF-κ, nuclear factor-κB; PAI,plasminogen activator inhibitor).

In order to test the role of the endothelial-derived relaxing factors NO and PGI2, we investigated, in dogs, the influence of a combination of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (an inhibitor of NO synthesis) and indomethacin (an inhibitor of PGI2 synthesis). In these dogs treated with indomethacin plus NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, the severity of the oxygen extraction defect was lower than that observed in the deoxycholate-treated dogs, suggesting that other mediators and/or mechanisms may be involved in microcirculatory control during hypoxia. One of these mediators or mechanisms could be related to hyperpolarization. Membrane potential is an important determinant of vascular smooth muscle tone through its influence on calcium influx via voltage-gated calcium channels. Hyperpolarization (as well as depolarization) has been shown to be a means of cell–cell communication in upstream vasodilatation and microcirculatory coordination. It is important to emphasize that intercell coupling exclusively involves ECs.

Interestingly, it was recently shown that sepsis, a situation that is characterized by impaired tissue perfusion and abnormal oxygen extraction, is associated with abnormal inter-EC coupling and reduction in the arteriolar conducted response.  An intra-organ defect in blood flow related to abnormal vascular reactivity, cell adhesion and coagulopathy may account for impaired organ oxygen regulation and function. If specific classes of microvessels must or must not be perfused to achieve efficient oxygen extraction during limitation in oxygen delivery, then impaired vascular reactivity and vessel injury might produce a pathological limitation in supply. In sepsis, the inflammatory response profoundly alters circulatory homeostasis, and this has been referred to as a ‘malignant intravascular inflammation’ that alters vasomotor tone and the distribution of blood flow among and within organs. These mechanisms might coexist with other types of sepsis associated cell dysfunction. For example, data suggest that endotoxin directly impairs oxygen uptake in ECs and indicate the importance of endothelium respiration in maintaining vascular homeostasis under conditions of sepsis.

Consistent with the hypothesis that alteration in endothelium plays a major in the pathophysiology of sepsis, it was observed that chronic ecNOS overexpression in the endothelium of mice resulted in resistance to LPS-induced hypotension, lung injury and death . This observation was confirmed by another group of investigators, who used transgenic mice overexpressing adrenomedullin  – a vasodilating peptide that acts at least in part via an NO-dependent pathway. They demonstrated resistance of these animals to LPS-induced shock, and lesser declines in blood pressure and less severe organ damage than occurred in the control animals. It might therefore be of importance to favour ecNOS expression and function during sepsis. The recent negative results obtained with therapeutic strategies aimed at blocking inducible NOS with the nonselective NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine in human septic shock further confirm the overall importance of favoring vessel dilatation.

(Vallet B. Bench-to-bedside review: Endothelial cell dysfunction in severe sepsis: a role in organ dysfunction?  Critical Care 2003; 7(2):130-138 (DOI 10.1186/cc1864). (Print ISSN 1364-8535; Online ISSN 1466-609X). http://ccforum.com/content/7/2/130

Thrombosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

An association between IBD and thrombosis has been recognized for more than 60 years. Not only are patients with IBD more likely to have thromboembolic complications, but it has also been suggested that thrombosis might be pathogenic in IBD.

Coagulation Described.  See Part I. (Cascade)

Endothelial injury exposes TF, which forms a complex with factor VII.  This complex activates factors X and, to a lesser extent, IX. TFPI prevents this activation progressing  further; for coagulation to progress, factor Xa must be produced via factors IX and VIII. Thrombin, generated by the initial production of factor Xa, activates factor VIII and, through factor XI, factor IX, resulting in further activation of factor X. This positive feedback loop allows coagulation to proceed. Fibrin polymers are stabilized by factor XIIIa. Activated proteins CS (APCS) together inhibit factors VIIIa and Va, whereas antithrombin (AT) inhibits factors VIIa, IXa, Xa, and XIa. Fibrinolysis balances this system through the action of plasmin on fibrin. Plasminogen activator inhibitor controls the plasminogen activator-induced conversion of plasminogen to plasmin.

Inflammation and Thrombotic Processes Linked

Although interest has recently moved away from the proposal that ischemia is a primary cause of IBD, it has become increasingly clear that inflammatory and thrombotic processes are linked.  A vascular component to the pathogenesis of CD was first proposed only a year after Crohn et al. described the condition.  Subsequently, in 1989, a series of changes comprising vascular injury, focal arteritis, fibrin deposition, arterial occlusion, and then microinfarction or neovascularization was proposed as a possible pathogenetic sequence in CD.  In this study, resin casts of the intestinal vasculature showed changes ranging from intravascular fibrin deposition to complete thrombotic occlusion. Furthermore, the early vascular changes appeared to precede mucosal changes, suggesting that they were more likely to cause rather than result from the pathologic features of CD. Subsequent studies showed that intravascular fibrin deposition occurred at the site of granulomatous destruction of mesenteric blood vessels, and positive immunostaining for platelet glycoprotein IIIa occurred in fibrinoid plugs of mucosal capillaries in CD. In addition, intracapillary thrombus has been identified in biopsies from inflamed rectal mucosa from patients with CD. When combined with evidence of ongoing intravascular coagulation in both active and quiescent CD, the above data point toward a thrombotic element contributing to the pathogenesis of CD.

Not only are many different prothrombotic changes described in association with IBD, but they can also have multiple causes. Hyperhomocysteinemia, for example, is known to predispose to thrombosis, and patients with IBD are more likely to have hyperhomocysteinemia than control subjects. Hyperhomocysteinemia in IBD might be due to multiple possible causes, such as deficiencies of vitamin B12 as a result of terminal ileal disease or resection; B6, which is commonly reduced in IBD.  A vegan diet can’t be discarded either because of seriously deficient methyl donors (S-adenosyl methionine).

The realization that platelets are not only prothrombotic but also proinflammatory has stimulated interest in their role in both the pathogenesis and complications of IBD. The association between thrombocytosis and active IBD was first described more than 30 years ago. More recent observations link decreased or normal platelet survival to IBD-related thrombocytosis, possibly due to increased thrombopoiesis. This in turn could be driven by an interleukin-6 –induced increase in thrombopoietin synthesis in the liver. Spontaneous in vitro platelet aggregation occurs in platelets isolated from 30% of patients with IBD but not in platelets from control subjects. Moreover, collagen, arachidonic acid, ristocetin, and ADP-induced platelet activation are more marked in platelets from patients with active IBD than in those from healthy volunteers.

The roles of activated platelets and PLAs in mucosal inflammation. Activated platelets can interact with other cells involved in the inflammatory response either through direct contact or through the release of soluble mediators. Activated platelets interact directly with activated vascular endothelium, causing the latter to express adhesion molecules and release inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines.

Platelet activation might be pathogenic in IBD in several ways. Platelet activation might increase platelet aggregation, hence increasing the likelihood of thrombus formation at sites of vascular injury, for example, within the mesenteric circulation. P-selectin is the major ligand for leukocyte-endothelial interaction and is responsible for the rolling of platelets, leukocytes, and PLAs on vascular endothelium. Moreover, platelets adherent to injured vascular endothelium support leukocyte adhesion via P-selectin, an effect that could contribute to leukocyte emigration from the vasculature into the lamina propria in patients with IBD. In addition, P-selectin is the major platelet ligand for platelet-leukocyte interaction, which in turn causes both leukocyte activation and further platelet activation.

Platelet-Leukocyte Aggregation

Recently, studies showing that platelets and leukocytes that circulate together in aggregates (PLA) are more activated than those that circulate alone have generated interest in the role of PLA in various inflammatory and thrombotic conditions. PLA numbers are increased in patients with ischemic heart disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, myeloproliferative disorders, and sepsis and are increased by smoking.

We have recently shown that patients with IBD have more PLAs than both healthy and inflammatory control subjects (patients with inflammatory arthritides).  As with platelet activation, there was no correlation with disease activity, suggesting that increased PLA formation might be an underlying abnormality. PLAs could contribute to the pathogenesis of IBD in a number of ways. As previously mentioned, TF is key to the initiation of thrombus formation. TF has recently been demonstrated on the surface of activated platelets and in platelet-derived microvesicles. Interaction between neutrophils and activated platelets or microvesicles vastly increases the activity of “intravascular” TF.

Conclusion        

It is becoming increasingly apparent that thrombosis and inflammation are intrinsically linked. Hence the involvement of thrombotic processes in the pathogenesis of IBD, although perhaps not as the primary event, seems likely. Indeed, with the recently mounting evidence of the role of activated platelets and of their interaction with leukocytes in the pathogenesis of IBD, it seems even more probable that thrombosis plays some role in the pathogenic process.

(Irving PM, Pasi KJ, and Rampton DS. Thrombosis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2005;3:617–628. PII: 10.1053/S1542-3565(05)00154-0.)

Bleeding in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

Approximately 20–40% of critically ill patients will have renal insufficiency at the time of admission or will develop it during their ICU stay, depending on the definition of renal insufficiency and the case mix of the ICU. Such patients are also predisposed to bleeding because of uremic platelet dysfunction, typically multiple comorbidities, coagulopathies and frequent concomitant treatment with antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents.

The impairment in hemostasis in uremic patients is multifactorial and includes physiological defects in platelet hemostasis, an imbalance of mediators of normal endothelial function and frequent comorbidities such as vascular disease, anemia and the frequent need for medical interventions required to treat such comorbidities. Physiologic alterations in uremia include:

  • decreased platelet glycoprotein IIb–IIIa binding to both von Willebrand factor (vWf) and fibrinogen, causing an impairment in platelet aggregation;
  • increased prostacyclin and nitric oxide production, both potent inhibitors of platelet activation and vasoconstriction; and
  • decreased levels of platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and serotonin, causing an impairment in platelet secretion.

In addition to other factors, small peptides containing the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) sequence of amino acids have been shown to be inhibitors of platelet aggregation that act by competing with vWf and fibrinogen for binding to the glycoprotein IIb–IIIa receptor.

Conclusion

ICU patients have dynamic risks of thrombosis and bleeding. Invasive procedures may require temporary interruption of anticoagulants. Consequently, approaches to thromboprophylaxis require daily reevaluation.

(Cook DJ, Douketis J, Arnold D, and Crowther MA. Bleeding and venous thromboembolism in the critically ill with emphasis on patients with renal insufficiency. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2009;15:455–462.)

Epicrisis

I have covered a large amount of material on one of the most complex systems in medicine, and still not comprehensive, with a sufficient dash of repetition.  The task is to have some grasp of the cell-mediated imbalances inherent if coagulation and bleeding disorders.  The key points are:

  • inflammation and oxidative stress invariably lurk in the background
  • the Y-shaped model with an extrinsic, intrinsic, and common pathway has no basis in understanding
  • the current model is based on a cell-mediated concept of endothelial damage and platelet-endothelial interaction
  • the model has 3 components: Initiation, Amplification, Propagation
  • NO and prostacyclin have key roles in the process
  • The plasma proteins involved are in the serine-protease class of enzymes
  • The conversion of Protein C to APC has a central role as anti-coagulant

Part II  has explored organ system abnormalities that are all related to impairment of the Nitric Oxide balance and dual platelet-endothelial roles.

Nov 9, 2012 by anamikasarkar
Nitric Oxide (NO) is highly regulated in the blood such that it can be released as vasodilator when needed. The importance and pathway of Nitric Oxide has been nicely reviewed by. “Discovery of NO and its effects of vascular biology”. Other articles which are good readings for the importance of NO are  – a) regulation of glycolysis b) NO in cardiovascular disease c) NO and Immune responses Part I and Part II d) NO signaling pathways. The  effects of NO in diseased states have been reviewed by the articles – “Crucial role of Nitric Oxide in Cancer”, “Nitric Oxide and Sepsis, Hemodynamic Collapse, and the Search for Therapeutic Options”.. (Also, please see Source for more articles on NO and its significance).

Computational models are very efficient tools to understand complex reactions like NO towards physiological conditions. Among them wall shear stress is one of the major factors which is reviewed in the article – “Differential Distribution of Nitric Oxide – A 3-D Mathematical Model”.

Moreover, decrease in availability of NO can lead to many complications like pulmonary hypertension. Some of the causes of decrease in NO have been identified as clinical hypertension,right ventricular overload which can lead to cardiac heart failure,low levels of zinc and high levels of cardiac necrosis.

Sickle Cell disease patients, a hereditary disease, are also known to have decreased levels of NO which can become physiologically challenging. In USA alone, there are 90,000 people who are affected by Sickle cell disease.

Sickle cell disease is breakage of red blood cells (RBC) membrane and resulting release of the hemoglobin (Hb) into blood plasma. This process is also known as Hemolysis. Sickle cell disease is caused by single mutation of Hb which changes RBC from round shape to sickle or crescent shapes (Figure 1).

Image
Figure 1 (A) shows normal red blood cells flowing freely through veins. The inset shows a cross section of a normal red blood cell with normal hemoglobin.
Figure 1 (B) shows abnormal, sickled red blood cells The inset image shows a cross-section of a sickle cell with long polymerized HbS strands stretching and distorting the cell shape.
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease

RBCs generally breakdown and release Hbs in blood plasma after they reach their end of life span. Thus, in case of Sickle cell disease, there is more cell free Hb than normal. Furthermore, it is known that NO has a very high affinity towards Hbs, which is one of the ways free NO is regulated in blood. As a result presence of larger amounts of cell free Hb in Sickle cell disease lead to less availability of NO.

As to “a quantitative relationship between cell free Hb and depletion of NO”, Deonikar and Kavdia (J. Appl. Physiol., 2012) addressed this question by developing a model of a single idealized arteriole, with different layers of blood vessels diffusing nutrients to tissue layers (Figure 2:  Deonikar and Kavdia Figure 1).

The model and its parameters are explained in the previously published paper by same authors Deonikar and Kavdia, Annals of Biomed., 2010, who reported that the reaction rate between NO and RBC is 0.2 x 105, M-1 s-1 than 1.4 x 105, M-1 s-1 as previously reported by Butler et.al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1998. Their results show that even small increase in cell free Hb, 0.5uM, can decrease NO concentrations by 3-7 fold.  Their mathematical analysis shows that the increase in diffusion resistance of NO from vascular lumen to cell free zone has no effect on NO distribution and concentration with available levels of cell free Hb.

Deonikar and Kavdia’s  model, a simple representation shows that for SC disease patients, decrease in levels of bioavailable NO is attributed to cell free Hb, which is in abundant for these patients. Their results show that small increase by 0.5 uM in cell free Hb can cause a large decrease in NO concentrations.

Sources:

Deonikar and Kavdia (2012):http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223452

Previous model explaining mathematical representation and parameters used in the model :Deonikar and Kavdia,Annals of Biomed., 2010.

Previous paper stating reaction rate of Hb and NO: Butleret.al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1998.

Causes of decrease in NO

Clinical Hypertension :http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11311074

Right ventricular overload :http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9559613

Low levels of zinc and high levels of cardiac necrosis :http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11243421

Sickle Cell Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/sca/

NO Sources:

Differential Distribution of Nitric Oxide – A 3-D Mathematical Model:

Discovery of NO and its effects of vascular biology

Nitric oxide: role in Cardiovascular health and disease

NO signaling pathways

Inhibition of ET-1, ETA and ETA-ETB, Induction of NO production, stimulation of eNOS and Treatment Regime with PPAR-gamma agonists (TZD): cEPCs Endogenous Augmentation for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction – A Bibliography

The rationale and use of inhaled NO in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension and Right Sided Heart Failure

Clinical Trials Results for Endothelin System: Pathophysiological role in Chronic Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndromes and MI – Marker of Disease Severity or Genetic Determination?

Endothelial Function and Cardiovascular Disease

Interaction of Nitric Oxide and Prostacyclin in Vascular Endothelium

Endothelial Dysfunction, Diminished Availability of cEPCs,  Increasing  CVD Risk – Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production

 

Read Full Post »

Reporter and Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Oldest picture

http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~jr/physpiceinstein.html

my favorite picture of Albert Eistein

http://www.google.com/search?q=albert+einstein+pictures&hl=en&tbo=u&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ei=sXKyUI6RJ4j-0gG7m4DIDA&sqi=2&ved=0CDUQsAQ&biw=779&bih=776

http://www.albert-einstein.org/

A new study on the neuroanatomy of Albert Einstein was

Released: 11/15/2012 10:00 AM EST
Embargo expired: 11/15/2012 7:00 PM EST
Source: Florida State University

Portions of Albert Einstein’s brain have been found to be unlike those of most people and could be related to his extraordinary cognitive abilities, according to a new study led by Florida State University evolutionary anthropologist Dean Falk.

Brain

Uncommon Features of Einstein’s Brain Might Explain His Remarkable Cognitive Abilities

Released: 11/15/2012 10:00 AM EST
Embargo expired: 11/15/2012 7:00 PM EST
Source: Florida State University

Newswise — TALLAHASSEE, Fla. ⎯ Portions of Albert Einstein’s brain have been found to be unlike those of most people and could be related to his extraordinary cognitive abilities, according to a new study led by Florida State University evolutionary anthropologist Dean Falk.

Falk, along with colleagues Frederick E. Lepore of the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Adrianne Noe, director of the National Museum of Health and Medicine, describe for the first time the entire cerebral cortex of Einstein’s brain from an examination of 14 recently discovered photographs. The researchers compared Einstein’s brain to 85 “normal” human brains and, in light of current functional imaging studies, interpreted its unusual features.

“Although the overall size and asymmetrical shape of Einstein’s brain were normal, the prefrontal, somatosensory, primary motor, parietal, temporal and occipital cortices were extraordinary,” said Falk, the Hale G. Smith Professor of Anthropology at Florida State. “These may have provided the neurological underpinnings for some of his visuospatial and mathematical abilities, for instance.”

The study, “The Cerebral Cortex of Albert Einstein: A Description and Preliminary Analysis of Unpublished Photographs,” will be published Nov. 16 in the journal Brain.

Upon Einstein’s death in 1955, his brain was removed and photographed from multiple angles with the permission of his family. Furthermore, it was sectioned into 240 blocks from which histological slides were prepared. Unfortunately, a great majority of the photographs, blocks and slides were lost from public sight for more than 55 years. The 14 photographs used by the researchers now are held by the National Museum of Health and Medicine.

The paper also publishes the “roadmap” to Einstein’s brain prepared in 1955 by Dr. Thomas Harvey to illustrate the locations within Einstein’s previously whole brain of 240 dissected blocks of tissue, which provides a key to locating the origins within the brain of the newly emerged histological slides.

SOURCE:

http://www.newswise.com/articles/uncommon-features-of-einstein-s-brain-might-explain-his-remarkable-cognitive-abilities

Albert Einstein died 50 years ago Monday. While that day marked the end of his life, it was only the beginning of a long, strange journey for his brain.

Thomas Harvey, a doctor at the hospital where Einstein died, removed the famous scientist’s brain and kept it with him over the next four decades. Harvey wanted to know what made Einstein a genius.

As Brian Burrell writes in his new book Postcards from the Brain Museum, Harvey wasn’t alone.

Scientists have long sought to understand the nature of genius and before computers and imaging technology, they had few options other than studying the actual brain.

Burrell discusses the long, strange journey of Einstein’s brain.

The Long, Strange Journey of Einstein’s Brain

April 18, 2005

Albert Einstein’s Brain May Provide Clues To His Genius, Study Says

By  Posted: 11/17/2012 12:08 am EST Updated: 11/19/2012 6:26 pm EST

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/17/albert-einstein-brain-study-genius_n_2144865.html

ORIGINAL PAPER  in BRAIN, A JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, OCCASIONAL PAPER – November 16, 2012

The cerebral cortex of Albert Einstein: a description and preliminary analysis of unpublished

photographs

http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/brainj/press_releases/prpaper.pdf

Paper Authors’ Affiliations:

Dean Falk,1,2 Frederick E. Lepore3,4 and Adrianne Noe5

1 Department of Anthropology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-7772, USA

2 School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe, NM 87505, USA

3 Department of Neurology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA

4 Department of Ophthalmology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA

5 National Museum of Health and Medicine, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA

Correspondence to:

Dean Falk,

School for Advanced Research,

660 Garcia Street,

Santa Fe, NM 87505, USA

E-mail: dfalk@fsu.edu or falk@sarsf.org

Summary and conclusions

Quote from Brain, 2012, November 16, 2012, green color added

Einstein’s brain is of unexceptional size and its combination of a relatively wide and forward-projecting right frontal lobe with a relatively wide and posteriorly protruding left occipital lobe is the most prevalent pattern seen in right-handed adult males.

We have identified the sulci that delimit expansions of cortex (gyri or convolutions) on the external surfaces of all of the lobes of the brain and on the medial surfaces of both hemispheres. The morphology 25 in some parts of Einstein’s cerebral cortex is highly unusual compared with 25 (Ono et al., 1990) and 60 (Connolly, 1950) human brains for which sulcal patterns have been thoroughly described. To the extent possible, the blocks of brain from particularly interesting areas are identified on the ‘roadmap’ that was prepared when Einstein’s brain was sectioned, as a guide for researchers who may wish to explore the histological correlates of Einstein’s gross cortical morphology.

Contrary to earlier reports, newly available photographs reveal that Einstein’s brain is not spherical in shape. The surface area of Einstein’s inferior parietal lobule is larger on the left than the right side, whereas that of his superior parietal lobule appears markedly larger in the right hemisphere. The photographs also suggest that the primary somatosensory and motor cortices representing the face and tongue are differentially expanded in the left hemisphere, that the posterior ascending limb of the Sylvian fissure is separate from (rather than confluent with) the postcentral inferior sulcus,and that parietal opercula are present. Nevertheless, our findings are concordant with the earlier suggestion that unusual morphology in Einstein’s parietal lobes may have provided neurological substrates for his visuospatial and mathematical abilities (Witelson  et al., 1999a, b).

Our results also suggest that Einstein had relatively expanded prefrontal cortices, which may have provided underpinnings for some of his extraordinary cognitive abilities, including his productive use of thought experiments. From an evolutionary perspective, the specific parts of Einstein’s prefrontal cortex that appear to be differentially expanded are of interest because recent findings indicate that these same areas increased differentially in size and became neurologically reorganized at microanatomical levels during hominin evolution in association with the emergence of higher cognitive abilities (Semendeferi et al., 2011).

It would be interesting therefore to investigate the histological correlates of these (as well as parietal) regions of Einstein’s brain from the newly available slides. We hope that future research on comparative primate neuroanatomy, paleoneurology and functional neuroanatomy will provide insight about some of the unusually convoluted parts of Einstein’s brain that we have described with little, if any, interpretation (e.g. the external neuroanatomy of the occipital lobes, posterolateral temporal cortex, and inferior temporal gyri). 

Figure 12 The remainder of the original ‘road map’ to the 240 blocks sectioned from Einstein’s brain. A–D correspond with Fig. 8.

The figure is reproduced with permission from the National Museum of Health and Medicine.

| Brain 2012: Page 22 of 24 D. Falk et al.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the estate of Thomas S. Harvey, MD, for

donating the materials that form the basis for this article to the

National Museum of Health and Medicine, Elizabeth Lockett and

5 Emily Wilson for help in accessing materials, and Jessica Calzada

for preparation of figures. Kurt Rockenstein is thanked for extensive

technical support. We also received help from Eric Boyle, Tim

Clarke, Jr., Laura Cutter, Elizabeth Eubanks, Albert Galaburda, Lois

Hawkes, Sam Huckaba and Micah Vandegrift. The National

Museum of Health and Medicine is acknowledged for permission

to reproduce the 12 images that appear in this article. The views

expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official

policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United

States Government.

Individuals who are interested in studying the newly emerged

Harvey Collection should contact medicalmuseum@amedd

.army.mil.

Funding

Publication costs were provided by the College of Arts and

20 Sciences at Florida State University, and travel support for DF

was provided by the School for Advanced Research in Santa Fe,

New Mexico.

REFERENCES

Abraham C. Possessing genius. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 2002.

25 Allen JS, Bruss J, Damasio H. Looking for the lunate sulcus: a magnetic

resonance imaging study in modern humans. Anat Rec A Discov Mol

Cell Evol Biol 2006; 288: 867–76.

Allman JM, Tetreault NA, Hakeem AY, Manaye KF, Semendeferi K,

Erwin JM, et al. The von Economo neurons in frontoinsular and an-

 terior cingulate cortex in great apes and humans. Brain Struct Funct

2010; 214: 495–517.

Amunts K, Schleicher A, Burgel U, Mohlberg H, Uylings HB, Zilles K.

Broca’s region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability.

J Comp Neurol 1999; 412: 319–41.

Amunts K, Schleicher A, Ditterich A, Zilles K. Broca’s region: cytoarchitectonic

asymmetry and developmental changes. J Comp Neurol 2003;

465: 72–89.

Anderson B, Harvey T. Alterations in cortical thickness and neuronal

density in the frontal cortex of Albert Einstein. Neurosci Lett 1996;

210: 161–4.

Bailey P, Von Bonin G. The isocortex of man. Urbana, IL: University of

Illinois Press; 1951.

Bangert M, Schlaug G. Specialization of the specialized in features of

external human brain morphology. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 24: 1832–4.

Broca P. Remarques sur le sie´ ge de la faculte´ du langage articule´ , suivies

d’une observation d’aphe´ mie (Perte de la Parole). Bulletin de la Socie´ te´

Anatomique de Paris 1861; 6: 330–57.

Clark GM, Mackay CE, Davidson ME, Iversen SD, Collinson SL,

James AC, et al. Paracingulate sulcus asymmetry; sex difference, cor-

relation with semantic fluency and change over time in adolescent

onset psychosis. Psychiatry Res 2010; 184: 10–15.

Cole MW, Yeung N, Freiwald WA, Botvinick M. Conflict over cingulate

cortex: between-species differences in cingulate may support

enhanced cognitive flexibility in humans. Brain Behav Evol 2010; 75:

239–40.

Colombo JA, Reisin HD, Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Rajkowska G. Cerebral cortex

astroglia and the brain of a genius: a propos of A. Einstein’s. Brain Res

Rev 2006; 52: 257–63.

Connolly JC. External morphology of the primate brain. Springfield, IL: C.

C. Thomas; 1950. 60

Courchesne E, Chisum HJ, Townsend J, Cowles A, Covington J, Egaas B,

et al. Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at

in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2000; 216:

672–82.

Dehaene S. Reading in the Brain. New York: Viking; 2009. 65

Diamond MC, Scheibel AB, Murphy GM Jr, Harvey T. On the brain of a

scientist: Albert Einstein. Exp Neurol 1985; 88: 198–204.

Duvernoy HM, Bourqouin P, Cabanis EA, Cattin F, Maeder P. The

human brain: surface, blood supply, and three-dimensional sectional

anatomy. 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999. 70

Falk D. New information about Albert Einstein’s brain. Front Evol

Neurosci 2009; 1: 3.

Falk D. Hominin paleoneurology: where are we now? In: Hofman MA,

Falk D, editors Evolution of the primate brain: from neuron to behav-

ior. London: Elsevier; 2012. p. 255–72. 75

Filosa A, Paixao S, Honsek SD, Carmona MA, Becker L, Feddersen B,

et al. Neuron-glia communication via EphA4/ephrin-A3 modulates

LTP through glial glutamate transport. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12:

1285–92.

Finlay BL, Darlington RB. Linked regularities in the development and 80

evolution of mammalian brains. Science 1995; 268: 1578–84.

Galaburda AM. [Broca’s region: anatomic remarks made a century

after the death of its discoverer]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1980; 136:

609–16.

Galaburda AM. Albert Einstein’s brain. Lancet 1999; 354: 1821. 85

Galaburda AM, Geschwind N. Anatomical asymmetries in the adult and

developing brain and their implications for function. Adv Pediatr 1981;

28: 271–92.

Galaburda AM, Kosslyn SM, Christen Y. The Languages of the brain.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2002. 90

Galaburda AM, LeMay M, Kemper TL, Geschwind N. Right-left asymmetrics

in the brain. Science 1978; 199: 852–6.

Geschwind N, Levitsky W. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal

speech region. Science 1968; 161: 186–7.

Gilbert DT, Wilson TD. Prospection: experiencing the future. Science 95

2007; 317: 1351–4.

Hadamard J. The psychology of invention in the mathematical field.

Princeton, NJ: Dover Publications; 1945.

Hines T. Further on Einstein’s brain. Exp Neurol 1998; 150: 343–4.

Hofman MA. Design principles of the human brain: an evolutionary 100

perspective. In: Hofman MA, Falk D, editors. Evolution of the primate

brain: from neuron to behavior. London: Elsevier; 2012.

p. 373–90.

Iaria G, Petrides M. Occipital sulci of the human brain: variability and

probability maps. J Comp Neurol 2007; 501: 243–59. 105

Isaacson W. Einstein, his life and universe. New York: Simon and

Schuster; 2007.

Jerison HJ. Evolution of the brain and intelligence. New York: Academic

Press; 1973.

Keller SS, Crow T, Foundas A, Amunts K, Roberts N. Broca’s area: no- 110

menclature, anatomy, typology and asymmetry. Brain Lang 2009; 109:

29–48.

Keller SS, Highley JR, Garcia-Finana M, Sluming V, Rezaie R, Roberts N.

Sulcal variability, stereological measurement and asymmetry of Broca’s

area on MR images. J Anat 2007; 211: 534–55. 115

Kigar DL, Witelson SF, Glezer II, Harvey T. Estimates of cell number in

temporal neocortex in the brain of Albert Einstein. Soc Neurosci Abst

1997; 23: 89.9.

Knops A, Thirion B, Hubbard EM, Michel V, Dehaene S. Recruitment of

an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science 120

2009; 324: 1583–5.

Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL. Neural foundations of imagery.

Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 635–42.

The brain of Albert Einstein Brain 2012: Page 23 of 24 | 23

Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Kim IJ, Alpert NM. Topographical representations

of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature 1995; 378:

496–8.

LeMay M. Morphological cerebral asymmetries of modern man,

5 fossil man, and nonhuman primate. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1976; 280:

349–66.

LeMay M. Asymmetries of the skull and handedness. Phrenology revisited.

J Neurol Sci 1977; 32: 243–53.

LeMay M. Left-right dissymmetry, handedness. Am J Neuroradiol 1992;

10 13: 493–504.

Lepore FE. Dissecting genius—Einstein’s brain and the search for the

neural basis of intellect. Vol. 3. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on

Brain Science; 2001. p. 11–26.

Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, Schultz SK, Harris G, Cizadlo T, Heckel D,

15 et al. Quantitative in vivo measurement of gyrification in the

human brain: changes associated with aging. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9:

151–60.

Ono M, Kubik S, Abernathy CD. Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci. New York:

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 1990.

20 Penfield W, Rasmussen T. The cerebral cortex of man: a clinical study of

localization of function. New York: Hafner Publishing Company; 1968.

Posner MI, Rothbart MK, Sheese BE, Tang Y. The anterior cingulate

gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation. Cogn Affect Behav

Neurosci 2007; 7: 391–5.

25 Sack AT, Sperling JM, Prvulovic D, Formisano E, Goebel R, Di Salle F,

et al. Tracking the mind’s image in the brain II: transcranial magnetic

stimulation reveals parietal asymmetry in visuospatial imagery. Neuron

2002; 35: 195–204.

Schenker NM, Buxhoeveden DP, Blackmon WL, Amunts K, Zilles K,

30 Semendeferi K. A comparative quantitative analysis of cytoarchitecture

and minicolumnar organization in Broca’s area in humans and great

apes. J Comp Neurol 2008; 510: 117–28.

Semendeferi K, Teffer K, Buxhoeveden DP, Park MS, Bludau S,

Amunts K, et al. Spatial organization of neurons in the frontal pole

35 sets humans apart from great apes. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21: 1485–97.

Smith GE. The fossil anthropoid ape from Taungs. Nature 1925; 115:

235.

Smith GE. The morphology of the occipital region of the cerebral hemisphere

in man and the apes. Anatomisher Anzeiger 1904; 24: 436–51.

Teffer K, Semendeferi K. Human prefrontal cortex: evolution, develop- 40

ment, and pathology. In: Hofman MA, Falk D, editors. Evolution of

the primate brain: from neuron to behavior. London: Elsevier; 2012.

p. 191–218.

Toga AW, Narr KL, Thompson PM, Luders E. Brain asymmetry: evolu-

tion. Encyclopedia Neurosci 2009; 2: 303–11. 45

Tu¨ re U, Yasargil DC, Al-Mefty O, Yasargil MG. Topographic anatomy of

the insular region. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 720–33.

Van Essen DC. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and

compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 1997; 385:

313–18. 50

Van Essen DC. Cerebral cortical folding patterns in primates: why they

vary and what they signify. In: Kass JH, Preuss TM, editors. Evolution

of nervous systems. Vol. 4. London: Elsevier; 2007. p. 267–89.

Vein AA, Maat-Schieman ML. Famous Russian brains: historical attempts

to understand intelligence. Brain 2008; 131: 583–90. 55

Watkins KE, Paus T, Lerch JP, Zijdenbos A, Collins DL, Neelin P, et al.

Structural asymmetries in the human brain: a voxel-based statistical

analysis of 142 MRI scans. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 868–77.

Witelson SF, Kigar DL, Harvey T. Authors’ reply. Lancet 1999a; 354:

1822. 60

Witelson SF, Kigar DL, Harvey T. The exceptional brain of Albert

Einstein. Lancet 1999b; 353: 2149–53.

Yu¨ cel M, Stuart GW, Maruff P, Velakoulis D, Crowe SF, Savage G, et al.

Hemispheric and gender-related differences in the gross morphology

of the anterior cingulate/paracingulate cortex in normal volunteers: an 65

MRI morphometric study. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 17–25.

Zilles K, Dabringhaus A, Geyer S, Amunts K, Qu M, Schleicher A, et al.

Structural asymmetries in the human forebrain and the forebrain of

non-human primates and rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1996; 20:

593–605. 70

Read Full Post »

Highlights from 8th Annual Personalized Medicine Conference, November 28-29,  2012, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA — Method used “Tweets Content Analysis”

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #5: Highlights from 8th Annual Personalized Medicine Conference, November 28-29, 2012, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Published on 11/24/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

 

 

 

  • Audience poll: 75% think a hypothetical cancer diagnostic is patentable, but the number plummets to 25% if that Dx is DNA-based.

 

 

 

  • 30% of #PMConf audience says lack of physician education & awareness is biggest obstacle to adoption of #personalizedmedicine in the clinic

 

 

 

  • 30% of #PMConf audience says lack of physician education & awareness is biggest obstacle to adoption of #personalizedmedicine in the clinic

 

 

 

  • Cost of informatics can be a bottleneck, but technology pushes boundaries & advances

 

 

 

  • “next generation sequencing will become the sole platform for molecular diagnostics”

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • 56% of #PMConf audience thinks that DNA sequence will become a routine part of an individual’s medical record within the next 10 years

 

 

 

  • Programs @AmerMedicalAssn are being developed to support physicians as genetic medicine is put into practice

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • “We have the ability and the technology. It just needs to be applied appropriately”

 

 

 

 

 

  • Information is only going to grow & change over time. We’ll always be interpreting our genomes

 

 

 

  • audience comment on need to adjust insurance system to use genetic info, encourage prevention and disease management

 

 

 

  • We need to be cognizant of how economics can affect the delivery of healthcare

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Audience poll: 75% think clinical whole-genome sequencing useful in select situations only (vs say standard for all…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • After 10 years of the genomic revolution, #genomics is entering clinical medicine at an accelerated rate

 

SELECTIVE Live TWEETS from the conference are recorded below:

Tweets

David Resnick (@NixonPeabodyLLP): Patents have the potential to prevent folks from getting into next generation sequencing #PMConf#NGS

David Resnick @NixonPeabodyLLP & Laura Coruzzi @JonesDaydiscuss Myriad gene patent case @ #PMConf

Audience poll: 75% think a hypothetical cancer diagnostic is patentable, but the number plummets to 25% if that Dx is DNA-based. #PMConf

RT @nixonpeabodyllp: We’ll be live tweeting the next hour of the@HarvardPMConf. NP’s David Resnick talking #genetics & law.#PMConf

 

Dr. Bob Tepper (Third Rock) introduces panelists from @JonesDay@NixonPeabodyLLP @kpcb for a discussion on genetics & the law#PMConf

Dr. Joshi (@Oracle) – Clinicians must communicate w/ researchers to faithfully implement standards & avoid redundant infrastructures#PMConf

30% of #PMConf audience says lack of physician education & awareness is biggest obstacle to adoption of #personalizedmedicinein the clinic

Joshi (@Oracle) – Cost of informatics can be a bottleneck, but technology pushes boundaries & advances #personalizedmedicine#PMConf

 

Trevor Hawkins (@SiemensHealth) says “next generation sequencing will become the sole platform for molecular diagnostics” #PMConf

 

Kevin Hrusovsky @PerkinElmer Personalized medicine evolving into personalized health with addition of prevention & detection #PMConf

 Retweeted by PM Conference

 

56% of #PMConf audience thinks that DNA sequence will become a routine part of an individual’s medical record within the next 10 years

Kris Joshi @Oracle_at_HIMSS comments on the likely transformation of healthcare into a truly global network #PMConf

 

Beginning now: panel discussion on “Business Models for Use of Genetic Information,” moderated by Dr. Brophy of @GEHealthcare#PMConf

 

Dr. Scott says “In next 10-20 yrs, anyone in any developed healthcare system will have access to #genomesequencing#PMConf

 

RT @bioitworld: Randy Scott: It’s Metcalfe’s Law on network effect — not Moore’s Law — that drove computing boom, and will by…

 

Dr. Randall Scott (@Genomic_Health & InVitae Corporation): “Every disease is a rare disease & #genomics will help us prove this”#PMConf

 

Ed Abrahams & Stafford O’Kelly (PMC) present Award for Leadership in #PersonalizedMedicine to Randall Scott (InVitae Corporation) at#PMConf

 

Panel highlights need for drug developers to collaborate with Dx companies & build partnerships throughout development process.#PMConf

 Retweeted by PM Conference

 

Pharma engaging in solid partnerships w/ FDA to try new approaches to #drugdevelopment, says Dr. Yancopoulos #PMConf

 

Dr. Hakan Sakul @pfizer_news begins Q&A session, asking about changing attitudes of the use of #genetics in #drugdevelopment#PMConf

 

Dr. Yancopoulos @ Regeneron Pharma comments that the ability to humanize mouse models has had great impact on#drugdevelopment #PMConf

 

Michael Streit @GSKUS: “One size does not fit all. Thinking beyond one pathway mutation is necessary to help #cancer patients”#PMConf

 

Jeff Leiden @VertexPharma on Genetics & #DrugDevelopment panel @ #PMConf “Need to think about diff molecules to treat specific disease”

 

Biggest barrier to widespread use of genetics in drug dvlpmt: 29% say attitude of drug dvlprs, 22% say regulatory considerations#PMConf

Retweeted by PM Conference

 

Audience poll at #PMConf: 84% say #genetics is making a meaningful impact on #drugdevelopment

 

Heidi Rehm @PartnersNews @harvardmed expresses need for more communication btw physicians & scientists in world of genomic analysis #PMConf

 

Jon Retzlaff explains @AACR work to advance#personalizedmedicine, including Cancer Biomarkers Collaborative w/ @theNCI @US_FDA #PMConf

Retweeted by PM Conference

 

Programs @AmerMedicalAssn are being developed to support physicians as genetic medicine is put into practice #PMConf – Katie Johansen Taber

Randy Burkholder @PhRMA – “#personalizedmedicine is the solution to the healthcare cost challenge that we all face” #PMConf

 

Joe Beery (@LIFECorporation): “We have the ability and the technology. It just needs to be applied appropriately” #PMConf

 

Dr. Snyder @SUMedicine: Information is only going to grow & change over time. We’ll always be interpreting our genomes#PMConf

 

Beery agrees w/ audience comment on need to adjust insurance system to use genetic info, encourage prevention and disease management #PMConf

 Retweeted by PM Conference

 

Dr. Holmes Morton (The Clinic for Special Children): We need to be cognizant of how economics can affect the delivery of healthcare#PMConf

 

John Lauerman, reporter @BloombergNews comments on his diagnosis with the JAK-2 gene variation and benefits of#genomesequencing #PMConf

 

Joe Beery @LIFECorporation shares the “medical odyssey” of his children and his personal experience with #rarediseases at #PMConf

 

Dr. Michael Snyder @SUMedicine discusses #genomics integration into medicine, may lead to a shift to predictive healthcare #PMConf

 

RT @bioitworld: Audience poll: 75% think clinical whole-genome sequencing useful in select situations only (vs say standard for all…

 

Dr. Stephen Eck of @AstellasUS begins a panel discussion on the impact of #genomesequencing #PMConf

 

Dr. Kucherlapati @harvardmed polls #PMConf audience: 75% of attendees think #personalizedmedicine is being built into medical practice

 

Dr. Jeffrey Filer @harvardmed discusses key impacts of#personalizedmedicine across multiple disease areas #PMConf

 

Dr. Weiss @PartnersNews: After 10 years of the genomic revolution,#genomics is entering clinical medicine at an accelerated rate#PMConf

 

Conference Introduction

The past few years have witnessed a revolution in the understanding of health and disease, brought on in large part by the sequencing of the human genome and the creation of a map of human genetic variation. Personalized medicine is the translation of this knowledge to patient care by using genetic and genomic information in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. The goal of personalized medicine is to provide the right diagnosis and treatment to the right patient at the right time at the right cost. Already there are abundant examples that personalized medicine is poised to transform healthcare by offering the possibility of improved health outcomes and the potential to make healthcare more cost-effective.

The eighth annual Personalized Medicine conference will take place November 28-29, 2012 at The Joseph B. Martin Conference Center at Harvard Medical School in Boston. This year’s two-day conference will once again bring the most current updates on Personalized Medicine and how recent experience may guide and inform the policies, plans and actions of stakeholders among government, academe and the private sector. Widely considered the premier event in the field, the conference attracts over 600 national and international thought leaders.

The conference reflects a distinctive collaboration of the Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Business School. The alliance of these renowned academic enterprises presents an exceptional opportunity to address the integrating of medicine and business in facilitating personalized medicine.

PROGRAM
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
7:00 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast
8:00 a.m.
Welcome & Opening Remarks
Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D.
Paul C. Cabot Professor of Genetics, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Scott Weiss, M.D., M.S.
Scientific Director, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine; Associate Director, Channing Laboratory; Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Jeffrey Flier, M.D.
Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Introducer:  Jeffrey Leerink
Chair and CEO, Leerink Swann LLC
8:30 a.m.
Panel:
Impact of Genome Sequencing
on Health
Human genome sequencing promises to be an important tool in assessing risk, diagnosing disease and stratifying patient populations for targeted therapy.  The panelists will describe some personal experiences of receiving sequence information and talk about how this rapidly growing technology is transforming medical practice.
Moderator: Stephen Eck, M.D., Ph.D.
Vice President, Global Head of Medical Oncology, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Joe Beery
Senior Vice President & Chief Information Officer, Life Technologies
John Lauerman
Reporter-at-Large, Bloomberg News
D. Holmes Morton, M.D.
Clinic Director, The Clinic for Special Children
Michael Snyder, Ph.D.
Stanford University School of Medicine
9:45 a.m. Perspectives From Professional Organizations
Randy Burkholder
Deputy Vice President, Policy
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
Heidi Rehm, Ph.D., FACMG
Director, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine; Assistant Professor of Pathology, Harvard Medical School
Jon Retzlaff
Managing Director, Office of Science Policy & Government Affairs, American Association for Cancer Research (AARC)
Katherine Johansen Taber, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist, American Medical Association
10:15 a.m.
Networking Break
11:00 a.m.
Speakers:

Genetic Basis for Drug Development

Many drug developers are beginning to successfully use genetic information and genetic markers in drug development.  This panel will provide perspectives from three different companies on how they have used and are using genetic information in successful drug development.
Moderator:  Hakan Sakul, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Head of Diagnostics, Worldwide R&D, Clinical Research and Precision Medicine, Pfizer, Inc.
Jeffrey Leiden, M.D., Ph.D.
President & CEO, Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Michael Streit, M.D., M.B.A.
Executive Director, GlaxoSmithKline-Oncology
George D. Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D.
President, Research Laboratories and  Chief Scientific Officer , Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
12:00 noon
Presentation of Personalized Medicine Coalition’s Eighth Annual Award for Leadership in Personalized Medicine

 

Award Recipient: Randall Scott, Ph.D.
Founder and Director, Genomic Health, CEO, InVitae Corporation
Introduction:  Edward Abrahams, Ph.D.
President, Personalized Medicine Coalition
Presenter: D. Stafford O’Kelly
Chairman of the Board, Personalized Medicine Coalition
12:30 p.m.
Luncheon
1:45 p.m.
Panel:
Business Models for Use of Genetic Information
The discussion should highlight new business opportunities for large companies, such as the three represented on the panel and for small businesses in the services and IT sectors.
Moderator:  Ger Brophy, Ph.D.General Manager, New Product Development, Medical Diagnostics, GE Healthcare
Kris Joshi, Ph.D.
Global Vice President, Healthcare Strategy, Oracle
Trevor Hawkins, Ph.D.
Chief Strategy Officer, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics
Kevin Hrusovsky
President of Life Sciences & Technology, PerkinElmer
2:45 p.m.
Conversation:

Genetics and the Law

There are conflicting views regarding Intellectual Property for genetic tests.  The panel will offer opposing views on prominent recent litigation and consider how investors see the impact of the legal decisions.
Moderator: Robert Tepper, M.D.
Partner, Third Rock Ventures
Laura Coruzzi, Ph.D., J.D.
Partner, Jones Day
David Resnick, Esq.
Partner, Co-Leader Patents, Nixon Peabody
Risa Stack, Ph.D.
Partner, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
3:45 p.m.
Networking Break
4:15 p.m.
Panel:
International  Commitments to Personalized Medicine
Many countries are considering and developing plans to implement the principles of personalized medicine.  Are there lessons from these efforts that the U.S. can learn from?  How can we make personalized medicine a world-wide effort?
Moderator: Jeffrey Elton, Ph.D.
Managing Director, Accenture
Prof. Abraham Israeli, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A.
Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Health, Head, Department of Health Policy, Health Care Management and Health Economics, Hebrew University – Hadassah Faculty of Medicine; Professor, Hewbrew University – Hadassah School of Public Health, Jerusalem, Israel
Michael Hayden, M.D., Ph.D.
Director and Senior Scientist, Center for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Canada
Prof. Ola Myklebost, Ph.D.
Senior Scientist and Group Leader, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
Ming Qi, Ph.D.Professor, Zhejiang UniversitySchool of Medicine, China
5:15 p.m.
Reception at Elements Café
Thursday, November 29, 2012
7:30 a.m.
Registration & Continental Breakfast
8:30 a.m.
Keynote
William Hait, M.D., Ph.D.
Global Head of Janssen R&D, Johnson & Johnson

Introducer: John Niederhuber, M.D.
Professor of Oncology & Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Former Director of the National Cancer Institute; Executive Vice President, Inova Health System; CEO, Inova Translational Medicine Institute
9:00 a.m.
Panel:

Genetics in Medical Practice

Each institution represented in this panel is making efforts to bring personalized medicine to their patients What are the different approaches that are being used? How are they evolving? What kinds of investments are necessary to build these enterprises? How do these efforts inform us about the progress of personalized medicine?
Moderator: M. Kathleen Behrens Wilsey, Ph.D.
President & CEO, KEW Group
Joe Vockley, Ph.D.
Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Scientific Officer
Inova Translational Medicine Institute
A. John Iafrate, M.D., Ph.D.
Associate Chief of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Integrated Diagnostics
Mia Levy, M.D., Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Cancer Clinical Informatics Officer, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center
10:00 a.m. Networking Break
10:30 a.m.
Panel:
Molecular Diagnostics and Public Policy
Will bringing molecular diagnostics into routine practice require bringing together many interest groups and educating and informing regulatory and legislative bodies about the importance of personalized medicine and the need for policy change? What changes are needed? How and by whom the views can best be presented to policy makers and legislators?
Moderator: Amy Miller, Ph.D.
Vice President, Public Policy, Personalized Medicine Coalition
Alan Mertz
President, American Clinical Laboratory Association
Richard Naples
Sr. Vice President, Regulatory Affairs,
BD Biosciences
Paul Radensky, M.D.
Partner, McDermott Will & Emery
11:30 a.m.
Ethical Aspects of Whole Genome Sequencing
Lisa Lee, Ph.D., M.S.
Executive Director, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Robert Green, M.D., M.P.H.
Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Associate Director for Research, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine
12:00 noon
 Bag Lunch
 Open Seating
1:00 p.m.
Conversation:
Decision Making in the Development
of Zelboraf
Roche and Plexxicon collaborated in developing a targeted therapy for a subset of melanoma patients.  How did the two companies decide to collaborate?  What were the mechanics of the collaboration?  How did the submission of a NDA with a companion diagnostic come about?  What lessons can be drawn from this experience?
K. Peter Hirth, Ph.D.
CEO, Plexxikon
Suzanne Cheng, Ph.D.
Director, Genomics & Oncology Research, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D.
Paul C. Cabot Professor of Genetics, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
1:45 p.m.
Keynote
Lt. Col.  Cecili K. Sessions, M.D., M.P.H., FAAP
Chief, AFMS Personalized Medicine, Air Force Medical Support Agency (AFMSA), Medical Research &  Innovations (SG5I)
Introducer: Heidi Rehm, Ph.D., FACMG
Director, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine; Assistant Professor of Pathology, Harvard Medical School
2:15 p.m. Industry Study on Interpretation
Anthony Flynn
Chief Marketing Officer, Director of Healthcare Strategy and Commercialization, GenomeQuest
2:20 p.m.
Interactive Case Study on Business Strategies for Personalized Medicine
Case: Companion Diagnostics: Uncertainties for Approval and Reimbursement
Richard Hamermesh, D.B.A.
MBA Class of 1961 Professor of Management Practice, Faculty Chair, HBS Healthcare Initiative, Harvard Business School
Norman Selby
Executive Chairman, Physicians Interactive Inc. and Real Endpoints llc
3:35 p.m.
Closing Remarks
Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D.
Paul C. Cabot Professor of Genetics, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
SPEAKERS
 
Joe Beery
Joe Beery is Chief Information Officer for Life Technologies and served the same role at Invitrogen since September 2008. Prior to Invitrogen, Mr. Beery held the executive position of Chief Information Officer at US Airways and America West Airlines. Previously, Mr. Beery spent ten years at Motorola Semiconductor, holding various positions in the computer integrated manufacturing group. Mr. Beery also served as a manufacturing and software engineer at NV Philips in Albuquerque, N.M. Mr. Beery holds a B.S. in business administration and business computer systems from the University of New Mexico.

Ger Brophy, Ph.D.
Ger Brophy, Ph.D. is General Manager, New Product Development at GE Healthcare Medical Diagnostics. In this role, Ger is responsible for the overarching R&D strategy encompassing in vivo and in vitro diagnostic technologies, with oversight of discovery (research) and clinical development; regulatory and medical affairs; project and portfolio management; product acquisition and licensing; R&D efficiency projects and collaborations across GE.
Previously, Ger led Strategic Planning & Licensing within Medical Diagnostics business. He was centrally involved in the expansion of the business into the Personalized Medicine space through inorganic and organic investments in in vitro diagnostics and pathology.
Ger joined GE Healthcare through the acquisition of Amersham in 2004. Before joining the Medical Diagnostics business, Ger ran the Life Sciences Advanced Systems business in Sweden. The focus on that business was in the commercialization of improved tools for drug discovery. In that capacity he lead an R&D group of 200 researchers developing new products and services used in academia and Pharma to better understand disease.
Ger began his career in R&D developing high throughput drug screening tools. He advanced to become Development Director for Amersham’s Bioassay’s business unit, leading a group of 60 people. Within GE Healthcare he has held positions in Licensing, Business Development and R&D.
Ger has had international assignments in the UK, Sweden and in Chicago & New Jersey. He relocated to New Jersey in August 2009.
Ger holds a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology.

Randy Burkholder
Randy Burkholder is Deputy Vice President of Policy at the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Mr. Burkholder directs PhRMA work on issues related to use of evidence in healthcare decision-making, health technology assessment, comparative and cost-effectiveness research, Medicare coverage policy, and innovation and personalized medicine. Mr. Burkholder represents PhRMA at federal agencies and advisory bodies including the Medicare Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee, the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Institute of Medicine Committees, and President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. He also is a founding member of the Board of Directors of the Personalized Medicine Coalition and serves on the Steering Committee of the Partnership to Improve Patient Care.
Mr. Burkholder has over 17 years experience in health care policy, advocacy and communications in the medical technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Prior to joining PhRMA, Mr. Burkholder was Associate Vice President for Public Affairs at AdvaMed, the leading association of the medical device and diagnostics industries.
Suzanne Cheng, Ph.D.
Suzanne Cheng, Ph.D. is currently a Director in the Genomics and Oncology Research Department at Roche Molecular Systems, overseeing several assay teams that support the early development of companion diagnostic assays in oncology. She was the IVD Lead for vemurafenib, a targeted therapy for treatment of patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic or inoperable melanoma that was approved in 2011 together with a companion diagnostic, the cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test. She has experienced first-hand the challenges of drug and diagnostic co-development from early development through to successful FDA approvals.
Prior to joining Genomics and Oncology, Dr. Cheng was a member of the Human Genetics Department, contributing to the development of long PCR technology and the evaluation of genetic predisposition markers for the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. She received her degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Laura Coruzzi, Ph.D., J.D.
Laura Coruzzi, Ph.D., J.D. has represented clients in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals for close to 30 years. Prior to joining Jones Day, she practiced at Pennie & Edmonds LLP and was one of the first members of that firm’s biotechnology group founded by S. Leslie Misrock, affectionately known as the “father of biotechnology patent law.” Laura’s practice has evolved with the patent laws and matured with the needs of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Her practice involves all aspects of patent law as it relates to a variety of disciplines in the life sciences, including genetic engineering, molecular biology, virology, vaccines, immunology, therapeutic antibodies, biologic and small molecule therapeutics, diagnostics, drug discovery, and drug delivery.
Laura’s patent procurement practice focuses on strategic planning and management of patent portfolios designed to protect emerging new technologies as well as mature biologic and pharmaceutical therapeutics and diagnostics. She counsels clients on portfolio evaluation, due diligence investigations, patent prosecution and interferences, European oppositions, and licensing. Laura’s practice also encompasses patent litigation and appeals before the USPTO Board of Appeals and the Federal Circuit. She is a member of the Jones Day team representing Myriad in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics (2011) upholding the patent-eligibility of isolated human genes. Prior to joining Jones Day, she and her team won reversal of an $18 million jury verdict in 2000 for Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation in a case involving cell-based assays for drug screening.
Laura is frequently invited to speak at symposia on patent law issues related to life sciences.

Stephen Eck, M.D., Ph.D.
Stephen Eck, M.D., Ph.D is Vice President and Global Head of Oncology Medical Sciences at Astellas Pharma Global Development (Headquartered in Northbrook, IL). He is directly responsible for the oversight of oncology drug development plans. Much of this work is focused on special cancer populations for which unique biology enables the development of personalized cancer therapies. Dr. Eck previously served as Vice President, Translational Medicine & Pharmacogenomics at Eli Lilly and Company (2007-2011) where he was responsible for the clinical pharmacology components of drug development including both early phase clinical studies and late stage drug development studies.  His group also developed the biomarkers and companion diagnostics needed for effective decision-making and for tailoring therapeutics to the right patient population.  An essential part of this work was conducted in the Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine Group and the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine. Prior to Joining Lilly, Dr. Eck served in a variety of drug development leadership roles at Pfizer, Inc (2002-2007).
Dr. Eck is a board certified Hematologist/Oncologist with broad drug development experience in Oncology and Neuroscience. He is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of the ACGT Foundation, which supports academic cancer research, and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Fairbanks Institute, an institution dedicated to developing data banks to enable personalized medicine. He also serves on the Advisory Board of the Keck Graduate School (Claremont, CA), and is a Board member of the Personalized Medicine Coalition.

Jeffrey Elton, Ph.D.
Jeff Elton, Ph.D. is Managing Director in Life Sciences in Accenture. Jeff has over 20 years of experience as a global executive and consultant in the biopharmaceutical and healthcare sectors. Jeff serves clients in pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and health provider sectors. Jeff also co-leads Accenture’s pilot initiative in the application of health data analytics to pharmaceutical managed markets, commercial, and clinical development analytics.
Recently, Jeff was founding CEO of a Personalized Oncology Company, and Board member and senior advisor to four early stage companies in protein therapeutics, diabetes, oncology therapeutics, and oncology diagnostics.
From 2004 through 2009, Jeff served as Senior Vice President of Strategy and Global Chief Operating Officer at Novartis Institutes of BioMedical Research, Inc. (NIBR) in Cambridge, MA. He led the definition of therapeutic area strategies, formed strategic partnerships, and oversaw global operations in the US, Europe, and Asia.
Prior to Novartis, Jeff was a senior partner with McKinsey & Company for pharmaceutical & medical products practice where he focused on healthcare delivery strategies, new product launches, global commercial management structures, and R&D performance.
Jeff is currently a board member of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, a board and executive committee member of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and faculty member of the Boston University School of Management, Health Management Program.

 
Jeffrey Flier, M.D.
Jeffrey Flier, M.D. is one of the country’s leading investigators in the areas of obesity and diabetes. His research has produced major insights into the molecular mechanism of insulin action, the molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance in human disease, and the molecular pathophysiology of obesity.
Flier was born in New York City. He received a BS from City College of New York in 1968, and an MD from Mount Sinai School of Medicine in 1972, graduating with the Elster Award for Highest Academic Standing. Following residency training in internal medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital from 1972 to 1974, Flier moved to the National Institutes of Health as a Clinical Associate. In 1978, he joined the Faculty of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, serving as Chief of the Diabetes Unit at Beth Israel Hospital until 1990, when he was named chief of the hospital’s Endocrine Division.
In 2002, Flier was named Chief Academic Officer of BIDMC, a newly created senior position responsible for research and academic programs. He worked with Beth Israel Deaconess academic department chairs to ensure the quality and breadth of academic programs at the Medical Center, through which most Harvard Medical School students pass. He also served as the formal liaison to Harvard Medical School, sitting on the Council of Academic Deans.
Flier has authored over 200 scholarly papers and reviews and has held many editorial positions. An elected member of the Institute of Medicine and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Flier’s honors also include the Eli Lilly Award of the American Diabetes Association, the Berson Lecture of the American Physiological Society, and Honorary Doctorates from the University of Athens and the University of Edinburgh. He was the recipient of the 2003 Edwin B. Astwood Lecture Award from the Endocrine Society, and In 2005, he received the Banting Medal from the American Diabetes Association, its highest scientific honor.
Flier, the father of two daughters, lives in Newton, MA with his wife Eleftheria Maratos-Flier, MD, who is a Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and with whom he has collaborated on research in the area of neuroendocrine

Robert C. Green, M.D., M.P.H.
Robert C. Green, M.D., M.P.H. is a medical geneticist and a clinical researcher who directs the G2P research program (genomes2people.org) in translational genomics and health outcomes in the Division of Genetics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Dr. Green is principal investigator of the NIH-funded REVEAL Study, in which a cross-disciplinary team has conducted 4 separate multi-center randomized clinical trials collectively enrolling 1100 individuals to disclose a genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease in order to explore emerging themes in translational genomics. Dr. Green also co-directs the NIH-funded PGen Study, the first prospective study of direct-to-consumer genetic testing services and leads the MedSeq Project, the first NIH-funded research study to explore the use of whole genome sequencing in the clinical practice of medicine.
Dr. Green is currently Associate Director for Research of the Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, a Board Member of the Council for Responsible Genetics and a member of the Informed Cohort Oversight Boards for both the Children’s Hospital Boston Gene Partnership Program and the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative. He co-chairs the ACMG working group that is currently developing recommendations for management of incidental findings in clinical sequencing.

William N. Hait, M.D., Ph.D.
William N. Hait, M.D., Ph.D. is Global Head, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, the global research and development arm of Janssen, the pharmaceutical companies of Johnson & Johnson. In this role, he leads the global R&D group in its mission to discover and develop innovative new medicines to address the world’s most serious unmet medical needs.
Dr. Hait joined Johnson & Johnson in 2007 as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Head of Hematology and Oncology, Ortho Biotech Oncology R&D, and assumed the role of Global TA Head, Oncology, in 2009.
Prior to joining Johnson & Johnson, he was the founding Director of The Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology and Associate Dean for Oncology Programs at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School from January 1993 to March 2007. Under Dr. Hait’s leadership, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey was successful in obtaining cancer center designation from the National Cancer Institute in 1996 and received the National Cancer Institute’s highest designation of Comprehensive Cancer Center in 2002.
After earning his B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Hait received his M.D. and Ph.D. (Pharmacology) cum laude from the Medical College of Pennsylvania, where he was elected to Alpha Omega Alpha. He joined the Yale University School of Medicine faculty in 1984 and was quickly promoted to Associate Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology. Dr. Hait served as Associate Director of the Yale University Comprehensive Cancer Center and Director of the Breast Cancer Unit and Co-Director of the Lung Cancer Unit at the Yale University School of Medicine. He was appointed Chief of Medical Oncology at the Yale University School of Medicine in 1988. Dr. Hait is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology.
Dr. Hait is a member of the Medical Advisory Board of both the New Jersey Breast Cancer Coalition and Susan G. Komen Foundation and is an active member on Scientific Advisory Boards of several universities. He served on various committees for the American Association for Cancer Research (Chair, Clinical Cancer Research Committee), American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Association of American Cancer Institutes (Board of Directors), and the National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors. Dr. Hait served as President of the American Association for Cancer Research from 2007 – 2008, and is currently serving as treasurer.

 
Richard Hamermesh, D.B.A.
Richard Hamermesh is the MBA Class of 1961 Professor of Management Practice at the Harvard Business School where he teaches in the MBA Program and is the Faculty Chair of the HBS Healthcare Initiative. Richard created and teaches the second-year MBA elective, Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital in Healthcare. Previously, he was the Course Head for the required first year course entitled The Entrepreneurial Manager. In addition Richard participates in several HBS Executive Education programs.
From 1987 to 2001, Richard was a co-founder and a Managing Partner of The Center for Executive Development, an executive education and development consulting firm. Prior to this, from 1976 to 1987, he was a member of the faculty of the Harvard Business School.

Richard is also an active investor and entrepreneur, having participated as a principal, director, and investor in the founding and early stages of over 20 organizations. These have included start-ups, leveraged buy-outs, industry roll-ups, and non-profit foundations. He was the founding president of the Newton (MA) Schools Foundation and served on the editorial board of the Harvard Business Review. He is currently on the Boards of one public and two private corporations, as well as two non-profit Boards. From 1991 to 1996, he was the founding Chairman of Synthes Spine, Inc. Richard is the author or co-author of five books, including New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur. His best-known book, Fad-Free Management, was published in 1996. He has published numerous articles and more than 100 case studies. His most recent article, “Realizing the Potential of Personalized Medicine”, appeared in the Harvard Business Review(October 2007). Richard received his AB from the University of California, and his MBA and DBA from HBS. He is married, has two children, and his hobbies include tennis, skiing, and yoga.


 
Trevor Hawkins, Ph.D.
Trevor Hawkins, Ph.D., as the past Director of the Human Genome Project for the US DOE, has built a recognized career in the healthcare industry over the past 20 years spanning business, academic innovation and as an entrepreneur.
Dr. Hawkins is the Senior Vice President of Strategy and Innovation for Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics.
Prior to joining Siemens he has held several senior executive roles, as Chief Scientific Officer of Royal Philips Electronics focusing on healthcare, CEO of Philips Molecular Healthcare business unit, CEO of GEs Molecular diagnostics business and President of Amershams Genomics business. He was also Chairman & CEO of ProGenTech, a privately held company based in Shanghai & San Francisco.
Dr. Hawkins invented SPRI, Solid Phase Reversible Immobilization the magnetic bead nucleic acid isolation method that was used extensively as the sample prep method for the Human Genome Project. The SPRI patent remains as one of the most important in the field of magnetic bead use for life sciences and diagnostics.
Dr. Hawkins has published over 50 peer-reviewed articles on automation, genomics, human diseases and the human genome project. He was also a founder of the Beijing Genome Institute (BGI), Chinas’ genome program and remains an Honorary Professor of the BGI.
Dr. Hawkins has served on several public and private Boards and is currently involved in non-profit organizations in California.

 
Michael Hayden, M.D., Ph.D.
Michael Hayden, M.D., Ph.D. is the Killam Professor of Medical Genetics at the UBC and Canada Research Chair in Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine. He is the Director of the Center for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics (CMMT) and founder of three biotechnology companies: NeuroVir Therapeutics Inc., Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Aspreva Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Author of over 700 peer-reviewed publications and invited submissions, Michael focuses his research primarily on genetic diseases, including genetics of lipoprotein disorders, Huntington disease, predictive and personalized medicine. Michael and his research group have identified 10 disease-causing genes which includes the identification of the major gene underlying high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in humans. Michael also identified the first mutations underlying Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) Deficiency and developed gene therapy approaches to treat this condition. Michael is also the most cited author in the world for ABCA1 and Huntington Disease.
Michael is the recipient of numerous recent prestigious honours and awards, including the Margolese National Brain Disorder Prize (2011), awarded to Canadians who have made outstanding contributions to the treatment, amelioration, or cure of brain diseases; the Killam Prize by the Canada Council of the Arts (2011), in recognition of his outstanding career achievements; and the Canada Gairdner Wightman award (2011), recognizing him as a physician-scientist who has demonstrated outstanding leadership in medicine and medical science. Michael has also been awarded the Order of Canada (2011), and the Order of British Columbia (2010). He was named Canada’s Health Researcher of the Year by CIHR in 2008, and he received the Prix Galien in 2007, which recognizes the outstanding contribution of a researcher to Canadian pharmaceutical research.

 
K. Peter Hirth, Ph.D.
K. Peter Hirth, Ph.D. co-founded Plexxikon in December 2000, and has over 25 years of biotechnology and pharmaceutical discovery and development experience. Plexxikon was built as a novel, structure-guided drug discovery platform. Over the last ten years, Plexxikon has brought several NCEs into the clinic in a variety of indications. Most advanced from this portfolio is a selective B-raf V600 inhibitor that has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive inoperable or metastatic melanoma, as detected by an FDA-approved test, and is sold under the brand name Zelboraf®. Plexxikon was acquired in April 2011 by Daiichi Sankyo and is now a member of the Daiichi Sankyo Group.
Previously, Peter was president of Sugen, Inc. until the sale of the company to Pharmacia Corporation in 1999. At Sugen, he helped build the company from its inception and advanced several kinase inhibitors through clinical trials for the treatment of oncology. This includes the drug Sutent, now owned by Pfizer through its acquisition of Pharmacia. Prior to Sugen, Dr. Hirth was a vice president in research with Boehringer Mannheim where, among other responsibilities, he successfully led the company’s erythropoietin program. Previously, he also was a research scientist with the Max Planck Institute, following the completion of his post doctoral work at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Hirth received his Ph.D. in molecular genetics from Heidelberg University, Germany.

E. Kevin Hrusovsky
E. Kevin Hrusovsky was appointed President, Life Sciences & Technology, PerkinElmer in November 2011 when Caliper Life Sciences (CALP) was acquired. This transaction was the culmination of significant value creation for the CALP stakeholders. In July 2003, Hrusovsky became CEO of Caliper Life Sciences, when Zymark Corporation was acquired by Caliper. Subsequently, Caliper acquired and integrated three additional innovative tools companies and made substantial R&D and commercialization investments. Through these actions, Hrusovsky and Team transformed Caliper into a leading edge personalized medicine / health technology company. The Company’s rapid growth in sales and market valuation over the past three years made Caliper one of the fastest growing innovative life science technology companies in the industry, and a credible resource for articulating these important trends in medicine and health. Prior to the acquisition, Hrusovsky served as President and CEO for Zymark starting in late 1996, where he successfully transformed Zymark from a custom robotics company into a formidable Life Sciences tools company. From 1992 to 1996, he was Director of International Business, Agricultural Chemical Division, and President of the Pharmaceutical Division, for FMC Corporation. From 1983 to 1992, he held several management positions at E.I. DuPont de Nemours, including North American Sales and Marketing Head, Teflon.
Hrusovsky currently sits on the Educational Board of the Massachusetts Biotech Council, the Advisory Committee for the Center for Biomedical Engineering at Brown University, the Association for Laboratory Automation, the JALA Editorial Board, and the Strategy Committee of Children’s Hospital Boston. He formerly served on the boards of SeraCare Life Sciences, Caliper Life Sciences, Xenogen Corporation and Alliant Medical Technology. Hrusovsky received an Honorary Doctorate degree from Framingham State University for contributions to life sciences. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Ohio State University and an M.B.A. from Ohio University. He and his family are authentic Buckeyes!

Professor Abraham Israeli, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A.
Professor Abraham (Avi) Israeli, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. is Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Health, and the Head of the Health Policy, Health Care Management and Health Economics Department at the Hebrew University – Hadassah Faculty of Medicine. Prior to this he was the Director General of the Israel Ministry of Health (2003-2009) and the Director – General of Hadassah Medical Organization (1998 -2001).  He holds the Chair of Dr. Julien Rozan Professorship of Family Medicine and Health Promotion Chair at the Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem (since 1996) and teaches there regularly.
Professor Israeli chaired the national committee to update the Israeli national standard basket of health services.
Professor Israeli received his medical degree and his master in public health from the Hadassah – Hebrew University Medical School. He completed residencies in Internal Medicine and in Health-Care Management at Hadassah University Hospital and has certification in both specialties. He received his Master’s Degree from the Sloan School of Management at MIT, Boston.
His scientific activities are related to applied, methodological and theoretical research in the fields of health policy, health care management, and the epidemiological, economic, social and cultural basis for decision-making.
His publications deal with translation of academic knowledge and inputs from the field into policy setting and decision-making processes.
Two additional key research foci are rationing / priority setting and comparative health care systems.

Kris Joshi, Ph.D.
Kris Joshi, Ph.D.  is Global Vice President responsible for Oracle’s Healthcare product portfolio. Kris helped launch the Health Sciences Global Business Unit within Oracle, and led the business unit’s growth strategy, including the acquisitions of Relsys and Phase Forward. He oversees a product portfolio that covers Analytics, Health Information Exchange, Care Management, and solutions for Personalized Medicine and Translational Research serving healthcare payer, provider and life sciences segments.
Prior to Oracle, Kris served in senior strategy roles in IBM’s Global Sales & Distribution organization where he helped shape IBM’s global distribution strategy and emerging markets strategy. Prior to IBM, Kris spent several years as a consultant with McKinsey and Co where he served Fortune 500 clients in Banking, Media, Healthcare and Life Sciences industries on business strategy issues. Kris has a long-standing personal commitment to help bridge the gap between the social and business worlds through entrepreneurship, innovation, and public-private partnerships. He has championed numerous initiatives aimed at leveraging technology to improve the quality, safety, and affordability of healthcare globally.
Kris holds a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics from CalTech and a Ph.D. in Astrophysics from MIT.

Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D.
Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D. is the Paul C.Cabot Professor in the Harvard Medical School Department of Genetics. He is also a professor in the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Kucherlapati was the first Scientific Director of the Harvard Medical School-Partners Healthcare Center for Genetics and Genomics. His research focuses on gene mapping, gene modification, and cloning disease genes. During 1989-2001, Dr. Kucherlapati was the Lola and Saul Kramer Professor of Molecular Genetics and Chairman of the Department of Molecular Genetics at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. He was previously a professor in the Department of Genetics at the University of Illinois, College of Medicine. He began his research as an assistant professor in the Department of Biochemical Sciences at Princeton University.
He has chaired numerous NIH committees and served on the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research and the NCI Mouse Models for Human Cancer Consortium. He is also a member of the Cancer Genome Atlas project of the National Institutes of Health. He is a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is a member of Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
Dr. Kucherlapati received his B.S. and M.S. in Biology from universities in India, and he received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana, as well as conducting post-doctoral work at Yale University.

John Lauerman
John Lauerman is a reporter-at-large at Bloomberg News writing about health and higher education. Lauerman and his colleagues won a Polk Award and were Pulitzer finalists in 2011 for a series of stories on for-profit colleges that recruit low-income students, often to leave them with debt and no degree. The series also won a Gerald Loeb Award, a National Headliner Award, and the Education Writers Association Grand Prize. In 2010, he won a New York Press Club award for coverage of Harvard University’s $1 billion loss on risky investments. He won a 2009 award from the Society of the Silurians for his stories on the failed search for a vaccine against HIV. His team won a 2005 award from the Society of American Business Writers and Editors for coverage of Merck & Co.’s withdrawal of the painkiller Vioxx after it was linked to heart disease. He has been a fellow of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Health Coverage program and the Kaiser Family Foundation’s program for science journalists. Before coming to Bloomberg, Lauerman was a science writer at Harvard Medical School from 1985 thorugh 1988. Later, as a freelance journalist, he wrote a health column for Harvard Magazine, contributed to newspapers and magazines across the U.S., and edited the public health journal “Health and Human Rights.” He is the co-author of two books: “Diabetes: Understand Your Condition, Make the Right Treatment Choices, and Cope Effectively,” and “Living to 100.” He lives with his wife and two children in Brookline, Massachusetts.

Lisa M. Lee, Ph.D., M.S.
Lisa M. Lee, Ph.D., M.S., is the Executive Director of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Lee previously had been with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) since 1998, most recently serving as Chief Science Officer in the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Sciences.
Lee, who has a Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins and an M.S. in bioethics from Alden March Bioethics Institute at Albany Medical College, is an epidemiologist, surveillance scientist, and public health ethicist. Lee’s work at CDC has included ethics of public health surveillance, scientific integrity, development and evaluation of surveillance systems, research on HIV and fertility, HIV/AIDS survival, HIV and tuberculosis, and data quality. She has led several agency and cross-agency committees working to establish and maintain an environment of scientific integrity and excellence.
Lee is the lead editor of Principles and Practice of Public Health Surveillance, 3d edition (Oxford University Press, 2010). She has authored numerous scientific publications and has served as a peer and guest reviewer for many scientific conferences and scientific journals. She serves on the Board of Advisors and is adjunct faculty at Georgia State University’s Institute of Public Health, where she teaches ethics.

 
Jeffrey Leiden, M.D., Ph.D.
Jeffrey Leiden, M.D., Ph.D., President, CEO and Chairmanjoined Vertex Pharmaceuticals in December 2011 and served on Vertex’s board since 2009. Dr. Leiden brings to Vertex more than 20 years of scientific, commercial and financial experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries and clinical experience in academia as a practicing cardiologist and molecular biologist. Dr. Leiden is a Senior Advisor for Clarus Ventures, a life sciences venture capital firm he joined in 2006. In 2000, he joined Abbott Laboratories as President and Chief Operating Officer where he had responsibility for running Abbott’s global pharmaceuticals business. While at Abbott, Dr. Leiden helped launch multiple breakthrough medicines, including Humira for rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases and Kaletra for HIV infection, among others. He also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Abbott Laboratories from 2001 to 2006.
Dr. Leiden began his career in academia as a practicing cardiologist and molecular biologist. From 1987 to 2000, Dr. Leiden held several academic appointments, including roles as Chief of Cardiology at the University of Chicago and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital. During his academic career, Dr. Leiden was also involved in starting several biotechnology companies including Vical and Cardiogene.
Dr. Leiden held a number of board positions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including the role of non-executive Vice Chairman for Shire Pharmaceuticals plc. He was also a member of the Board of Directors of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. He is an elected member of both the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Leiden received his M.D., Ph.D. and B.A. degrees from the University of Chicago.
 
Mia Levy, M.D., Ph.D.
Dr. Mia A. Levy is the Director of Cancer Clinical Informatics for the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine.
Dr. Levy received her undergraduate degree in Bioengineering from The University of Pennsylvania in 1997 and her Medical Doctorate from Rush University in 2003. She then spent 6 years at Stanford University completing post-graduate training in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology while completing her PhD in Biomedical Informatics. She joined the faculty at Vanderbilt as an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Informatics and Medicine in August 2009. She is a practicing medical oncologist specializing in the treatment of breast cancer.
Dr. Levy’s research interests include biomedical informatics methods to support the continuum of cancer care and cancer research. Current research projects include informatics methods for 1) image based cancer treatment response assessment using quantitative imaging, 2) clinical decision support for treatment prioritization of molecular subtypes of cancer, 3) protocol based plan management and 4) learning cancer systems.

 
Alan Mertz
Alan Mertz became President of ACLA in 2003 and since that time he has exponentially grown ACLA’s membership, visibility and advocacy efforts.  ACLA has led a series of successful advocacy campaigns on laboratory reimbursement, regulation, coding, health IT and many other issues, including stopping legislation imposing laboratory co-pays in Medicare and repealing a laboratory Medicare competitive bidding project.  ACLA also led industry efforts to ensure that regulatory changes with respect to genetic and molecular testing do not stifle innovation or harm patient care.  ACLA launched the “Results for Life” educational campaign in 2007 to promote the value of laboratory services and in 2009, ACLA started its Associate Member program for non-laboratory health care companies and organizations.
Prior to his current position, Mertz was Executive Vice President and Acting President of the Healthcare Leadership Council (HLC), and prior to that served in three senior staff positions in the House and Senate over 18 years.  He is a frequent lecturer at American University, and was an adjunct professor at George Washington University (both in Washington, DC).  Mertz holds a Masters Degree in American Politics from American University and a BA in Government from Monmouth College (IL).

 
Amy Miller, Ph.D
Amy Miller, Ph.D. is the Vice President of Public Policy for the Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC) which represents a broad spectrum of academic, industrial, patient, provider, and payer organizations that seek to advance the understanding and adoption of personalized medicine concepts and products for the benefit of patients. Dr. Miller works with these communities to reach consensus on policy issues impacting personalized medicine and share those views with policy makers.
Before joining the PMC, Dr. Miller worked in the office of the Director of the National Institute of Mental Health where she served as a liaison among the scientific community, the legislative branch, and the consumers of mental health care and their families. A former AAAS fellow, she also served as a domestic policy advisor to Senator Jay Rockefeller. She began her career as a researcher at National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Dr. Miller received a BA from the University of New Orleans and holds a doctoral degree in Human Development from the University of Connecticut.

D. Holmes Morton, M.D.
D. Holmes Morton M.D. is a pediatrician and was the cofounder with his wife Caroline of the Clinic for Special Children in Strasburg Pennsylvania, which Clinic is a non-profit medical center that provides care for children with complex medical problems arising from inherited predispositions to disease. The Clinic for Special Children is located on an Amish farm near Strasburg in Lancaster County Pennsylvania. Although it is a local pediatric medical center, the Clinic has become recognized internationally for innovative studies in the discovery and treatment of inherited disorders. The Clinic’s publications about the treatment of maple syrup urine disease can be found in Pediatrics, Current Treatment Options in Neurology, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Brain, Journal of Pediatrics, Pediatric Transplant, Nature, and Gene Reviews.
Holmes Morton graduated from Trinity College in 1979 with Honors in Biology and Psychology and was elected to Pi Beta Kappa. He studied medicine at Harvard Medical School and completed a 3-year Residency in Pediatrics at Children’s Hospital. In 1986 Dr. Morton moved to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to study biochemical genetics under Richard Kelley. In 1988, with the support of Hugo Moser, he moved Dr. Kelley’s new laboratory at Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins to develop methods for diagnosis and treatment of the Amish variant of Glutaric Aciduria Type 1. This work led to the establishment of the Clinic for Special Children in Lancaster County Pennsylvania in 1989.
Dr. Morton is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Society for Inherited Metabolic Disorders. In 1993, he was given the Albert Schweitzer Prize for Humanitarianism, a prize awarded jointly by the Alexander von Humbolt Foundation of Germany and Johns Hopkins University. In 2006 Dr. Morton was awarded a John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Fellowship

Professor Ola Myklebost, Ph.D.

Ola Myklebost, Ph.D. is Senior Scientist and Group Leader at the Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, and Professor at the Department for Molecular Biosciences at the University of Oslo. He is also Assistant Director of CAST, the Centre for research-based Innovation (SFI) on Cancer Stem Cells, and previous head of the Norwegian Genomics Consortium. Currently he is heading the Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, with the aim to introduce and investigate the use of tumor genome profiles for therapeutic decisions.

Dr. Myklebost took his MSc under Per Seglen at what is now Dept. of Cell Biology in 1982, then went to St. Mary’s Hospital in London where he worked with recombinant DNA technology under the leadership of Bob Williamson. Returning to Oslo, he worked at the Institute for Internal Medicine at the National Hospital under Hans Prydz until 1987, when he had a research stay in the group of Keith Stanley at EMBL. Since 1988 he has again been employed at the Institute of Cancer Research, now at the Dept. of Tumor Biology. Dr. Myklebost received his Doctor of philosophia from the Medical Faculty, University of Oslo.

Richard Naples
Richard Naples, Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, is responsible for global market access and regulatory compliance functions, including premarket submissions, reimbursement and public policy. He has been with BD for a total of five years.
Mr. Naples has over 30 years experience in medical devices and diagnostics. He has been a chief corporate regulatory officer, an FDA regulator, and a clinical laboratory manager. He is currently co-chair of the AdvaMed Diagnostics Task Force and has been recognized as one of the top regulatory professionals in the industry. His experience includes over 300 successful regulatory submissions and leadership of numerous industry-wide initiatives to ensure more timely patient access to innovative new technologies.
Most recently prior to joining BD, Rick was Roche Diagnostics VP of Regulatory and Government Affairs after serving as a Consumer Safety Officer at FDA HQ Center for Biologics, Evaluation and Research (CBER). He also served on the boards of the New England Healthcare Institute (NEHI) and the Indiana Medical Device Manufacturers Council (IMDMC). Rick holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry/Medical Technology from Youngstown State University (Ohio).

Ming Qi, Ph.D.
Ming Qi, Ph.D. received his B.S. from South China Normal University in 1982. He received his M.S. from Fudan University, Shanghai in 1985 and was mentored by Dr. C.C. Tan, the “Father of Genetics at China”. He succeeded in the national competition to be a student of the CUSBEA (China-USA Biochemistry / Molecular Biology) Program and received his Ph.D. from the University of Pittsburgh in 1991. Dr. Qi did his postdoctoral training in Dr. Stan McKnight’s Lab, University of Washington from 1991-1994. Dr. Qi had his clinical postdoctoral fellowship in Molecular Genetics with Dr. Peter Byers at the University of Washington from 1994-1998 and was certified in clinical molecular genetics by American Board of Medical Genetics in 1999. He is a Fellow of American College of Medical Genetics. He has been the faculty of University of Rochester Medical School since 1998 as a Assistant Professor, Associate Professor and Professor. Dr. Qi served as a consultant of Harvard Medical School-Partner Center for Genetics and Genomics and Visiting Geneticist of the Laboratory of Molecular Medicine in 2006. His research has been published in numerous peer reviewed scientific journals, including in Nat Genet, PNAS, Cell, Human Mol Genetics, JAMA, Circulation, Am J Med Genet, Human Mutation, etc. He is the Chief Advisor of the Chinese National Gene Health Committee, and the coordinator of the international Human Variome Project Chinese Consortium. He is an editorial board member of several international journals including Human Mutation, Giga-Science and ANE. He also serves as a reviewer for a number of international journals. Dr. Qi has recently been news-report interviewed by Nature and Science (http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110125/full/469455a.html;

Paul Radensky, M.D.
Paul Radensky, M.D. is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C. and Miami offices. Paul is co-chair of the Firm’s Life Sciences Government Strategies team and a member of the Personalized Medicine team.
Paul is a recognized authority on the full range of legal, regulatory and reimbursement issues pertaining to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and clinical laboratory development and marketing. His background as a clinical researcher and medical practitioner informs his practical and scientific understanding of both product manufacturers and clinical laboratories. He advises manufacturers at every stage of product development, including the design and monitoring of clinical trials, positioning and applying for FDA approval, maintaining regulatory compliance, and obtaining coverage, coding and payment for new technologies by Medicare, Medicaid and other third party payors. Paul also advises clinical laboratories on CLIA and state licensure compliance as well as evolving policies on FDA regulation of  laboratory-developed tests.
Paul is ranked in The Best Lawyers in America (2009-2012).
Paul is board certified in internal medicine and is a member of the American College of Physicians and the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society. He is a member of the District of Columbia Bar as well as the Florida Bar.

 
Heidi Rehm, Ph.D., FACMG
Heidi Rehm, Ph.D., FACMG is the Chief Laboratory Director for the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine at the Partners Healthcare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine and Assistant Professor of Pathology at Harvard Medical School. She was recruited in 2001 to build the CLIA lab after completing her graduate degree in Genetics from Harvard University and her postdoctoral and fellowship training at Harvard Medical School. The lab focuses on the rapid translation of new genetic discoveries into clinical tests that can be used to improve patient outcomes, supporting the model of personalized medicine. In addition, the lab focuses on bringing novel technologies and software systems into molecular diagnostics to support the integration of genetics into clinical use. The laboratory has been a leader in translational medicine, launching the first clinical tests for cardiomyopathy and lung cancer treatment among many achievements. In 2012, the lab will launch a CLIA-approved interpretive service for whole genome sequencing. Dr. Rehm is involved in defining standards for the use of next generation sequencing in clinical diagnostics through her committee roles at the American College of Medical Genetics and collaborative efforts with the CDC. Dr. Rehm is also involved in a major effort to develop and curate a universal clinical genomic variant database through collaborative efforts with NCBI and many other groups. Dr. Rehm also conducts research in hearing loss, Usher syndrome, cardiomyopathy, and healthcare IT.

David Resnick, Esq.

David Resnick, Esq. is the co-leader of the Patents practice group at Nixon Peabody. His practice is focused on patent prosecution and overall portfolio management, transactional matters, and associated client counseling. David represents, and manages the portfolios of, some of the leading academic research institutions in the U.S., as well as some of the world’s most recognized life science companies. He has extensive experience in the life sciences and is widely regarded as a thought leader in the area of personalized medicine, particularly with respect to pharmacogenomics, proteomics, and disease biomarkers, and their application in the field of personalized medicine.
Jon Retzlaff
Jon Retzlaff is the Managing Director of Science Policy and Government Affairs. Before joining the AACR in 2010, Mr. Retzlaff worked in government relations for Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC and led the firm’s health and biomedical research practice. Previously, he served as legislative director for the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology from 2004-2007.
Additionally, he worked for the National Institutes of Health, first as a program analyst within the Office of the Director’s legislative office; then as a senior legislative advisor to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; and finally as the Executive Officer of the National Library of Medicine. Mr. Retzlaff was assigned to the House (1998) and Senate (2000-2001) appropriations subcommittees on labor, health and human services, education and related agencies on health research funding issues, as well as within the Office of the Secretary for Legislation at the Department of Health and Human Services. He entered the Federal Government as a Presidential Management Intern in 1993 and completed a rotation in the Office of Senator Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) during his training.
Mr. Retzlaff earned a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Minnesota, a master’s degree in public administration from Indiana University and a master’s degree in business administration from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

 
Hakan Sakul, Ph.D.
Hakan Sakul, Ph.D. is a Senior Director in the Translational Oncology Group where he serves as a program manager for Companion Diagnostics. He received his BS and MS degrees from Ankara University in Turkey. He was a recipient of the “Freedom from Hunger Scholarship” from The Rotary Foundation, and completed his PhD degree in Quantitative Genetics from the University of Minnesota (1990) as a Rotary Foundation Scholar. Subsequently, he conducted postdoctoral studies at the University of California-Davis. After spending four years in the biotech industry working in human genetics, pharmacogenomics and statistical genetics fields, Hakan spent a few years at Parke-Davis Pharmaceuticals as the Director of Human Genetics, Statistical Genetics and Pharmacogenetics programs. He then served as Vice President of Statistical Genomics at Ardais Corporation in Boston briefly before returning to Pfizer in 2001 as Director and Site Head for Clinical Pharmacogenomics in Groton/New London Laboratories, with responsibilities across all therapeutic areas. Hakan was promoted to Senior Director in mid-2005 and took on the role of Global Head of Companion Diagnostics for about four years to oversee the companion diagnostics needs across Pfizer’s pharmaceutical portfolio. In 2010, Hakan assumed his current role in the Oncology Business Unit where most of Pfizer’s companion diagnostics needs reside. A member of the Editorial Board of the Personalized Medicine Journal, the Organizing Committee of the annual Personalized Medicine meeting at Harvard, and the author of over 30 scientific refereed articles and several book chapters, Hakan has served as an invited speaker on many scientific meetings and panel discussions. His external representation of Pfizer includes memberships on the Clinical Science and Technology Committee of The Personalized Medicine Coalition, the Research Tools and Molecular Diagnostics Sub Team of BIO, and the California Healthcare Institute’s Diagnostics Working Group. Hakan currently serves as the Co-Chair of Pfizer’s Personalized Medicine team, and is keenly interested in applications of companion diagnostics, pharmacogenomics and related technologies to the pharmaceutical pipeline to advance Personalized Medicine for the improvement of individualized healthcare.

 


 
Randall Scott, Ph.D.
Randall Scott, Ph.D. founded Genomic Health in 2000 and led the company as CEO for 9 years with a focus on improving the quality of treatment decisions for patients with cancer. Genomic Health was one of the first companies to translate genomic information into clinical practice by developing the Oncotype DX series of tests for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, each ofwhich is designed to improve the quality of care and reduce healthcare costs. Under his leadership, Genomic Health led a transformation in medical and business practice to incorporate complex genomic tests into routine medical practice with full reimbursement support by national payers. Dr. Scott has played a role in founding several successful biotech companies in addition to Genomic Health Inc. such as Incyte, a leading biopharmaceutical company as well as his newest enterprise InVitae Corporation where he is focused on expanding beyond cancer to bring the power of the human genome into routine medical practice for every individual at risk for common or rare genetic conditions. He is the author of over 40 scientific publications, 20 patents, and is the recipient of numerous awards.

Norman C. Selby

Norman C. Selby has spent 30 years in the healthcare world in a variety of consulting, managerial, investment and Board roles. He is currently Executive Chairman of two innovative healthcare information businesses: Real Endpoints llc and Physicians Interactive Inc. In addition, Mr. Selby serves as a Senior Advisor to Perseus llc, a private equity firm based in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Selby is currently on the Board of three healthcare product companies: Infinity Pharmaceuticals, a leading public (INFI) oncology biotech company, Metamark Genetics, an oncology diagnostics company, and Merz Group GmbH, a global specialty pharma company based in Frankfurt, Germany. In the decade of the 2000s he was on the Board of three other companies all of which had successful exits: Millennium Pharmaceuticals (MLNM) which was acquired by Takeda; TransForm Pharmaceuticals (where he was also CEO) which was acquired by Johnson & Johnson; and Windhover Information (where he was Executice Chairman) which was acquired by Reed Elsevier.
Mr. Selby spent the bulk of his career at McKinsey & Company where he was Director (Senior Partner) in the firm’s New York office. He held several leadership roles at McKinsey, including head of the firm’s Global Pharmaceuticals and Medical Products Practice. From 1987-1989, Mr. Selby took a leave of absence from McKinsey to serve as Chief Operating Officer of the New York Blood Center, the largest community blood organization in the country, where he led its financial and operational turnaround. After McKinsey he went to Citicorp/Citigroup where he was an Executive Vice President.
Mr. Selby serves on the Board of Trustees of the Central Park Conservancy, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention, all based in New York City. He is also a member of the advisory board of the Harvard Business School’s Healthcare Initiative, and a Board member of the National Parks Conservation Association in Washington D.C.
Mr. Selby holds a B.A. in Architecture from Yale College and an M.B.A. with Distinction from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.

Lt. Col. Cecili Sessions, M.D., M.P.H., FAAP
Lt Col Cecili K. Sessions, MD, MPH, FAAP is assigned to the United States Air Force Medical Support Agency, Medical Research & Innovations Division, as Chief, Personalized Medicine, and directs the Patient-Centered Precision Care Genomic Medicine Research Program (PC2-Z). Prior to this assignment, she served as the Air Force Liaison to the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, the central strategic epidemiological resource for the Armed Forces of the United States. As an active duty pediatrician, she was stationed at Incirlik AB, Turkey, and Kadena AB, Okinawa.
Dr. Sessions received her degree from the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California in 2000, after which she completed a Pediatric Residency at Georgetown University, where she was selected Resident of the Year in her graduating class of 2003.Both her undergraduate degree at Stanford University (AB, 1996) and graduate coursework (MPH, 2007) during the General Preventive Medicine Residency at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences focused on International Health. During her graduate medical education, Dr Sessions completed two externships with the Pan American Health Organization at their headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Michael Snyder, Ph.D.
Michael Snyder, Ph.D. is the Stanford Ascherman Professor and Chair of Genetics and the Director of the Center of Genomics and Personalized Medicine. Dr. Snyder received his Ph.D. training at the California Institute of Technology and carried out postdoctoral training at Stanford University. He is a leader in the field of functional genomics and proteomics. His laboratory study was the first to perform a large-scale functional genomics project in any organism, and has launched many technologies in genomics and proteomics. These including the development of proteome chips, high resolution tiling arrays for the entire human genome, methods for global mapping of transcription factor binding sites (ChIP-chip now replaced by ChIP-seq), paired end sequencing for mapping of structural variation in eukaryotes, and RNA-Seq. These technologies have been used for characterizing genomes, proteomes and regulatory networks. Seminal findings from the Snyder laboratory include the discovery that much more of the human genome is transcribed and contains regulatory information than was previously appreciated, and a high diversity of transcription factor binding occurs between and within species. He is a cofounder of several biotechnology companies, including Protometrix (now part of Life Tehcnologies), Affomix (now part of Illumina), Excelix, and Personalis, and he presently serves on the board of a number of companies.

Risa Stack, Ph.D.
Risa Stack, Ph.D. is a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Since joining the firm in 2003, she has worked to build and support KPCB’s personalized medicine portfolio. Risa has been the founding CEO and a board member of several personalized medicine companies, including CardioDx and Nodality. Risa is a board observer at Tethys, Veracyte and Xdx. In addition to her work directly with portfolio companies, Risa is involved in developing public policy in molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Risa is also involved in the development of therapeutics companies, including Corthera and Trius. She was most recently a board member of Corthera (sold to Novartis in 2009), and she is a board observer at Epizyme and Pacific Biosciences.
Risa has 15 years of experience investing in personalized medicine, therapeutics and platform technologies. Her investment career spans from incubations to public companies. Most recently, she has focused on starting companies, often taking operational roles. Before joining KPCB, Risa was a principal at J.P. Morgan Partners in the life science practice for six years. While at J.P. Morgan Partners, she sponsored a series of investments including Acurian, Connetics (acquired by Steifel Laboratories), Diatide (acquired by Berlex), Ilex Oncology (acquired by Genzyme), Illumina, and Triangle Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Gilead). Risa was also involved in JP Morgan Partners’ international investing efforts, which included European life sciences companies and managing a portfolio of Israeli early stage life sciences and IT companies. Before joining the venture capital industry, Risa worked as a derivative specialist on the Chicago Board of Trade, where she traded futures and options on government securities.
Risa received her B.S. degree in genetics and development with distinction from the University of Illinois and her Ph.D. in immunology from the University of Chicago. She was also a member of the second class of Kauffman Fellows. Risa also serves as a member of the advisory board of the National Summit on Personalized Healthcare and GE’s Healthymagination effort. In 2004, Risa was named as one of the 100 Most Influential Women in Business by the San Francisco Business Times.

 


Michael Streit, M.D., M.B.A.
Michael R. Streit, M.D., M.B.A., is Executive Director at GlaxoSmithKline-Oncology and the Program Physician Leader for the small-molecule GSK1120212 (MEK-inhibitor) clinical development program.
Dr. Streit received his MD from the Free University of Berlin (Germany) in 1985 and did postgraduate training at the Benjamin Franklin Medical Center in Berlin and the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.  Prior to joining GSK in 2011, Dr. Streit worked in the field of clinical drug research and development for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, and Berlex Biosciences.
Katherine Johansen Taber, Ph.D.
Katherine Johansen Taber, PhD has been a Senior Scientist at the American Medical Association since 2006. She leads the AMA’s Program in Genetics and Molecular Medicine, which focuses on educating physicians about the clinical implementation of genetics and on identifying emerging genetic policy issues affecting health care providers. She also advises the AMA Board of Trustees and the House of Delegates on genetics issues such as the oversight of genetic testing, gene patenting, stem cell research, and newborn screening. Dr. Johansen Taber has held a position on the Board of NCHPEG since 2006, and will be Vice Chair beginning in 2012. She also serves as the AMA appointment to the Institute of Medicine’s Roundtable on Genomics, and has served as an Advisory Board member for Genetic Services Policy Project and as an advisor for the Illinois Humanities Council’s community genetics education program Future Perfect. Dr. Johansen Taber earned her PhD in Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and conducted post-doctoral research at the USDA. She has held teaching appointments at UCLA, California State Polytechnic University, University of Idaho, and Columbia College Chicago.

Robert I. Tepper, M.D.
Robert I. Tepper, M.D. is a distinguished scientist with over 25 years of experience building and operating leading R&D operations. Bob co-founded Third Rock Ventures in 2007 and focuses on the formation, development and scientific strategy of our portfolio companies as well as actively identifying and evaluating new investments. He also assumes active leadership roles in our portfolio companies, functioning as Chief Scientific Officer through the first 12-18 months post launch.
Prior to joining Third Rock Ventures, Bob was President of R&D at Millennium Pharmaceuticals and was vital in its expansion from a drug discovery company to a fully-integrated biopharmaceutical company. Prior to Millennium, Bob co-founded Cell Genesys/Abgenix.
Bob holds an AB in Biochemistry from Princeton University and received his MD degree from Harvard Medical School. Bob serves as an adjunct faculty member at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital and is an advisory board member of several leading health care institutions including the Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, the Massachusetts General Hospital and Tufts Medical School.

Joe Vockley, Ph.D.
Joe Vockley, Ph.D., is Chief Operating Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of the Inova Translational Medicine Institute. Dr. Vockley brings 25 years of experience in academic, pharmaceutical, biotechnology CROs and government research. He has broad and deep expertise in the fields of genetics, genomics, molecular diagnostics, bioinformatics and large program management.
Dr. Vockley is a results-oriented manager and scientist. He is an inventor on numerous US and international genomic and bioinformatic technology patents in the areas of DNA diagnostics, laboratory methods for microarray analysis, gene discoveries and bioinformatic tool development. His basic research interests are in the fields of cancer and inborn errors of metabolism.
Dr. Vockley has previously held the positions of Chief Scientific Officer, Vice President of Research, Director of Genomics and Director of Bioinformatics. Most recently, he was the director of National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Genome Atlas Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas Program Office.

Scott Weiss, M.D., M.S.
Scott Weiss, M.D., M.S. is currently Scientific Director of the Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine (PCPGM) and Associate Director, Channing Laboratory, and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. In this latter capacity, he leads a 28 investigator, 120 person research group examining the environmental and genetic origins of asthma and COPD.
He has authored or coauthored over 500 publications and four books in the area of asthma and COPD risk factors, natural history, and genetics. His initial work concerned the role of airways responsiveness and environmental tobacco smoke exposure in asthma and COPD, the effect of allergen exposure and airways responsiveness on markers of inflammation and the combined effect of these factors on the development of COPD. In 1996, he developed a strong interest in the genetics of asthma and his work over the past 14 years has focused on this, and novel environmental exposures such as vitamin D and the bowel flora. His laboratory is the only laboratory in the world that has active NIH research in the areas of asthma genetics, asthma pharmacogenetics, and COPD genetics. He is the principal investigator or co-investigator on a total of six separate NHLBI-funded grant proposals in the area of the genetics of asthma and Asthma Pharmacogenetics, including a MERIT award.

M. Kathleen Behrens Wilsey, Ph.D.
M. Kathleen Behrens Wilsey, Ph.D. served as a Member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), from 2001 to 2009, working on multiple national policy matters. She Chaired PCAST’s Subcommittee on Personalized Medicine and led a two year study that culminated in the September 15, 2008 report, Priorities for Personalized Medicine. Kathy was a director of the Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy (STEP) for the National Research Council from 1997-2005, at which time she participated as a member of the Institute of Medicine Committee on New Approaches to Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Kathy was a director of the National Venture Capital Association from 1993 to 2000, also serving as President, Chairman and Past Chairman from October of1999 through April of 2000. Dr. Behrens Wilsey currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and KEW Group Inc. Kathy holds a Ph.D. in Microbiology from the University of California, Davis.
Kathy established a career in the financial services industry, working with Robertson Stephens & Co. until 1996, where she became a general partner and managing director. Dr. Behrens Wilsey continued in her capacity as a General Partner for selected venture funds for RS Investments, after management led a buy-out of that firm from Bank of America. Her professional career includes tenures as a public-market life-sciences securities analyst, as well as venture capitalist focusing on healthcare and technology investments. She was instrumental in the founding of several life-sciences companies including Protein Design Labs, Inc. and COR Therapeutics, Inc. and participated in financing a broad range of health care services and products companies.
Dr. Behrens Wilsey served as a director of Abgenix, Inc. in a role that spanned that firm’s early rounds of private financings through the company’s sale in 2006 to Amgen, Inc. and was a director of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2009 until the company’s recent sale in 2012 to Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Dr. Behrens Wilsey has worked for the last several years with KEW Group Inc. in developing a personalized medicine oncology management company and currently serves as KEW Group’s President & CEO.

 


Pascale Witz
Pascale Witz is the President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Healthcare’s Medical Diagnostics business (MDx), and an officer of the General Electric Company.
MDx is a $2bn global leader in pharmaceutical and molecular diagnostics which are used by physicians in the early detection, diagnosis, and management of disease.
Since joining MDx in 2009, Pascale has successfully expanded GE Healthcare’s diagnostics capabilities to include molecular diagnostics, broadening the portfolio through acquisition, investment and partnership. Pascale is deeply committed to enabling personalized medicine. She believes that combining in vivo and in vitro diagnostics will drive an integrated solution encompassing risk stratification, early detection, prediction and monitoring, which will enable physicians to diagnose and treat disease more effectively. According to Pascale, precision diagnostics allow us to interrogate the pathways that drive cancer and age-related neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease.
Pascale has more than 16 years of leadership at GE Healthcare including heading the Functional Imaging (Nuclear Medicine and PET) and the CT (Computed Tomography) businesses in EMEA. Prior to her current position, she led GEHC’s global Interventional business, developing innovative medical technologies for interventional radiology and cardiology. Prior to joining GE, Pascale spent five years in the pharmaceutical industry, having started her career working in a molecular biology research laboratory.
She is an active leader in the GE Women’s Network and now serves on its executive board. The GE Women’s Network boasts a membership of over 180,000 women globally with a goal of focusing on the professional development of women throughout the company.
Pascale holds a Master’s degree in life sciences/molecular biology from INSA Lyon, and an MBA from INSEAD.

George Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D.
George Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D. graduated as valedictorian of both the Bronx High School of Science and Columbia College, and earned his advanced degrees at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons. Following widely-recognized work in the field of molecular immunology at Columbia with Dr. Fred Alt, Dr. Yancopoulos left academia in 1989 as founding scientist for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, where he continues to serve as President of the Laboratories and Chief Scientific Officer. He is also adjunct full professor at Columbia University and was awarded Columbia’s Stevens Triennial prize for Research and the University Medal of Excellence for Distinguished Achievement. Dr. Yancopoulos is widely regarded as a world leader in several fields of biology and has authored more than 350 scientific manuscripts. According to a study by the Institute for Scientific Information, Dr. Yancopoulos was the eleventh most highly cited scientist in the world during the 1990’s. In 2004, he was elected to both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Sciences. Dr. Yancopoulos’ scientific efforts have focused on the discovery of growth factors (such as the neurotrophins, ephrins and angiopoietins), their receptors, and their signaling pathways, as well as on developing new platforms for target and drug discovery such as Trap TechnologyVelociGene and VelocImmune. His research has led to unifying models of molecular and biologic function, as well as new approaches to treating disease. Dr. Yancopoulos and his team have progressed numerous drug candidates to human trials, including the IL1-Trap (ARCALYST®) which has recently been approved for treatment of an orphan inflammatory disease, the VEGF Trap-Eye (EYLEA®) which has recently been approved for age-related macular degeneration (the most common cause of blindness in the elderly), the VEGF Trap-Onc (ZALTRAP®) for cancer, and several fully human monoclonal antibodies derived using VelocImmune technology for various indications including cholesterol-lowering and inflammatory diseases.

 

Register online at www.personalizedmedicineconference.org .
Follow the conversation online at @HarvardPMConf and #PMConf.
BLOG UPDATES

 SOURCE:

http://pcpgm.partners.org/education/pmconference

 

Read Full Post »

Human Variome Project: encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #4: Human Variome Project: encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence. Published on 11/24/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

What is the Human Variome Project?

Abstract

The successor to the Human Genome Project intends to establish, by international cooperation, an encyclopedic catalog of sequence variants indexed to the human genome sequence.

Introduction

Genomics is not just for rich countries any more. Anyone can contribute to the Human Variome Project (HVP; see Commentary,page 433). Indeed, the project might just be ambitious enough that everyone really will need to contribute. By stating that all human genetics and genomics contributes to a single aim, the HVP essentially reduces duplication of effort while increasing credit for participation.

However, it will have to find ways to coordinate the disparate activities of clinicians, researchers, database curators and bioinformaticians by providing the means and incentives to lodge the variants they have found in public databases. Variome aims to get all to use compatible nomenclature and phenotype reporting systems and to index variant and phenotype data to gene models in the coordinate system generated by the Human Genome Project. Automation and expert curation, and open comment and expert review, will all have a place in this endeavor. How will we do this without creating more than a necessary minimum of new databases, procedures and bureaucracy?

A very important point, but a tough one to get across, is that much of the necessary work is currently happening across the globe—but is just insufficiently coordinated. The individuals already hard at work aren’t getting the credit they deserve. In a sense, the rest of the world’s geneticists deserve the kind of service that US researchers receive from the excellent coordinating work of the National Human Genome Research Institute and the repositories of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), together with the kind of attention afforded by international journals. If only these kinds of coordination, recording and attention could be brought to bear, however briefly, on publication units as small as single instances of a variant gene! Thus, Variome aims to add value to databases such as OMIM, GenBank, dbSNP, dbGAP and the HapMap and organizations including NCBI and the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) by working with them all. It will start gene by gene, evaluating variants already found and curated for mendelian diseases, and will add rare and common variants in common diseases as they are reported. As it does so, HVP participants will develop mechanisms to expedite and automate reporting of variants and their occurrence.

In the consensus-building exercise of the first Human Variome meeting (page 433), delegates constructed a wish list of recommendations that numerically exceeded the number of participants at the meeting. We think that two points emerge as particularly important to the success of the project: publication and credit.

To be successful in persuading clinical and diagnostic laboratories to contribute variations and persuading researchers to evaluate the pathogenic potential of each variant, the HVP will need to introduce publishing innovations at both ends of the citation spectrum. It will need to track the citation of each variant’s accession code in papers, database entries and across the web. This closing of the online publication loop might be termed microattribution. Perhaps existing journals could be persuaded to take responsibility for monitoring and highlighting the citation of database entries in their papers, so that the HVP can readily aggregate this information. A journal devoted to the human variome could commission peer-reviewed, gene-based synopses of mendelian mutations based on information in locus-specific databases (see pages 425 and 427), meta-analyses of association studies and resequencing data such as those reported by Jonathan Cohen and colleagues in this issue (page 513, with News and Views on page 439). Phenotypic and diagnostic information might be linked to these synopses from existing databases such as the dysmorphology databases, PharmGKB (page 426) and GeneTests (http://www.genetests.org). Genome browsers including Ensembl and UCSC might then be persuaded to display a Variome track. We envisage such synopses to be a gene-based extension of the disease-based annual synopses for association studies we proposed last year (Nat. Genet. 38, 1; 2006). The first of these, on Alzheimer disease, was published by Lars Bertram and colleagues (Nat. Genet. 39, 17–23; 2007) using their newly created AlzGene database.

Which genes should the HVP annotate first to demonstrate the utility and impact of its coordinating activities? Perhaps we can learn from one of the most impressive recent exercises in evidence-based medicine: namely, the American College of Medical Genetics‘ systematic prioritization of genes for newborn screening (http://mchb.hrsa.gov/screening/). Variome synopses would take into account the prevalence, seriousness and treatability of the clinical condition(s), the value added by combining all three types of genetic study listed above and the availability of all three kinds of evidence in existing laboratories, databases and publications.

There are, inevitably, limits to what can be achieved by a gene-based view of human variation. Gene models are revised and re-annotated, and structural genomic variation plays havoc with reference genome builds and the context within which point variants and haplotypes are found. Physicians and the general public will want a disease-based view—and the associated diagnostic genetic tests, rather than genome annotation. Delaying the appearance of such alternative views, there is often a many-to-many correspondence between genes and disease phenotypes. On the brighter side, this complexity should provide good business for database designers and review journals.

As the participants of the Variome meeting note in their Commentary, the effort to index and evaluate all of human variation will provide many new opportunities in genomics for researchers whose home countries did not participate in the initial human genome sequencing project. They are right that this is both the project and the time to achieve the globalization of genomics.

SOURCE:

Nature Genetics 39, 423 (2007)
doi:10.1038/ng0407-423

Our Vision for the Future

E-mail

Imagine you are sick. For many, this is not a difficult task. Now imagine you are sick and none of your doctors know why. Your symptoms suggest that you have a rare genetic disease, and you’ve been tested for a mutation in the gene responsible, but the results are inconclusive. The laboratory found a change in your genetic sequence, but is unable to definitively state that it’s what’s causing your symptoms. And with no definitive result from the test, your doctor—and your insurance company—are unwilling to prescribe the expensive course of drugs needed to control your symptoms.While many people might be willing to dismiss the chances of this happening to them, when you start to look at the facts, things start to get a little frightening. There are over 6,000 diseases that can be caused by a mutation in a single gene and it is estimated that 1 child in every 200 born will suffer from one of these diseases. Add to that the number of cancers that have an inherited genetic component and the chances of you, or someone you know being in this position is quite high.

Now imagine that the information the laboratory and your doctor needed to make an accurate diagnosis was out there, but it wasn’t accessible to them: it was hidden away in an obscure academic paper, or in some researcher’s forgotten notes.

Unfortunately, this is the situation that is currently facing thousands of people across the globe who are suffering the devastating effects of genetic illnesses.

The role that our genes play in our health and well-being is well known. The genetic makeup of an individual can cause a host of genetic disorders that can manifest from early childhood (cystic fibrosis, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome) to adulthood (Alzheimer’s disease, polycystic kidney disease, Huntington’s disease) as well as significantly increase the risk of contracting more common diseases such as schizophrenia, diabetes, depression and cancer.

The world is rapidly moving towards an era where it is both economically and scientifically feasible to sequence the genome of every patient presenting with a chronic condition; already in the past decade the cost of a whole-genome sequence has dropped from several billion dollars to a few thousand.

But being able to sequence the genome of a patient cheaply and easily will be useless if we are unable to determine if the variations present in a sequence have an effect on human health. We are suffering from a critical lack of information about the consequences of the vast majority of the mutations possible within the human genome. And, even more concerning, is the fact that even when that information exists, it is not being shared and captured by the global medical research community in a manner that guarantees widespread dissemination and long-term preservation.

The Human Variome Project is trying to change this. We strongly believe in the free and open sharing of information on genetic variation and its consequences and are dedicated to developing and maintaining the standards, systems and infrastructure that will embed information sharing into routine clinical practice. We envision a world where the availability of, and access to, genetic variation information is not an impediment to diagnosis and treatment; where the burden of genetic disease on the human population is significantly decreased; where never again will a doctor have to look at a genetic sequence and ask, “What does this change mean for my patient?”

The Human Variome Project is motivated by the knowledge that by working together, we will be able to significantly reduce the needless physical, psychological, emotional and economic suffering of millions of people.

SOURCE:

http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/index.php/about/our-vision-for-the-future

Human Variome Project International Limited is a not-for-profit Australian public company limited by guarantee that was founded in 2010 to provide central coordination efforts to the global Human Variome Project effort and run the International Coordinating Office. The company has no shareholders and is endorsed by the Australian Tax Office as a deductible gift recipient as a Health Project Charity.

Human Variome Project International Limited, as a company limited by guarantee, is a public unlisted company. It must file accounts annually with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, it must be audited and, as a public company, the directors and officers of the company must comply with all the duties and responsibilities set out in the Australian Corporations Act. UNESCO also stipulates strict conditions for compliance with its functions and operation as a non-government and non-profit making organisation.

Human Variome Project International’s objects and powers include:

  • to promote the prevention or the control of diseases in human beings
  • to develop and provide educational programs, training and courses in public administration, public sector management, public policy, public affairs and any other related fields
  • to alleviate human suffering by collecting, organising and sharing data on genetic variation;
  • to further the Human Variome Project
  • to act as the co-ordinating office for the Human Variome Project
  • to attract and employ academics, researchers, practitioners and other staff as required to provide and support the services to further the objects of the Company
  • to provide facilities for research, study and education related to the Human Variome Project
  • to carry out and conduct the business of provider of administrative and consulting services;
  • to seek, encourage and accept gifts, grants, donations or endorsements
  • to affiliate with and enter into co-operative agreements with research educational institutions, government, local governments, practitioner bodies, non-government organisations, commercial, cultural and any other institutions or bodies

Company Members

  • Mr David Abraham
  • Professor Richard Cotton
  • Sir John Burn
  • Dr David Rimoin
  • Dr Eric Haan
  • Professor Jean-Jacques Cassiman
  • (representative of) National Institute of Gene Science and Technology Development (China)

SOURCE:
http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=164&Itemid=152

Scientific Advisory Committee E-mail
The Board of Directors is advised by the Scientific Advisory Committee in matters of strategic scientific direction for current and future projects. The Scientific Advisory Committee has a variety of {ln:roles and responsibilities}, as wells as the delegated authority of the Board of Directors on the publication of all HVP Standards and Guidelines, and the arbitration of any dispute resolution processes in the generation of HVP Standards and Guidelines.The Scientific Advisory Committee consists of twelve members including one Chair. The Scientific Advisory Committee members are elected by the two Advisory Councils every two years, with half the positions on the Committee becoming vacant every two years. The Chair of the Scientific Advisory Committee is appointed by the Coordinating Office from among the members of the Scientific Advisory Committee. Membership of the Committee, in an ex-officio capacity, is also extended to:

  • the Scientific Director of the Human Variome Project Coordinating Office;
  • the President of the Human Genome Variation Society;
  • the President of the International Federation of Human Genetics Societies; and
  • a representative from the central genetic databases, chosen from amongst themselves.

Any Individual Member of the Human Variome Project Consortium is eligible to stand for election to the Scientific Advisory Committee. Candidates must be nominated and seconded by a member of either of the Advisory Councils.

The Scientific Advisory Committee meets on a face–to–face basis once per year, usually in conjunction with the HVP Fora series. The Scientific Advisory Committee also regularly meets via telephone/video–conference.

Current Committee

Arleen Auerbach The Rockefeller University USA
Mireille Claustres IURC, Institut Universitaire Clinical Research France
Richard Cotton Human Variome Project Australia
Garry Cutting Johns Hopkins School of Medicine USA
Johan T. den Dunnen Leiden University Medical Center The Netherlands
Mona El Ruby National Research Centre Egypt
Aida Falcón de Vargas Venezuelan Central University Venezuela
Marc Greenblatt University of Vermont USA
Stephen Lam Hong Kong Department of Health Hong Kong
Finlay Macrae The Royal Melbourne Hospital Australia
Yoichi Matsubara Tohoku University School of Medicine Japan
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen Leiden University Medical Center The Netherlands
Mauno Vihinen Lund University Sweden
Non-Voting Members
Professor Sir John Burn National Institute of Health Research  UK
Ming Qi Zhejiang University Medical School and James Watson Institute of Genome Sciences China
Richard Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine USA

Document Repository

Documents (minutes, etc.) relating to the International Scientific Adviosry Committee can be found here.

SOURCE:

http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/index.php/about/scientific-advisory-committee

Nature Genetics Journal

Table of contents

November 2012, Volume 44 No11 pp1171-1285

  • Credit for clinical trial data –p1171

topof page

News and Views

Tracking the evolution of cancer methylomes –pp1173 – 1174

Arnaud R Krebs & Dirk Schübeler

doi:10.1038/ng.2451

Cellular transformation in cancer has long been associated with aberrant DNA methylation, most notably, hypermethylation of promoter sequences. A new study uses a clever approach of selective high-resolution profiling to follow DNA methylation over a time course of cellular transformation and challenges the notion that hypermethylation in cancer arises in an orchestrated fashion.

Full Text- Tracking the evolution of cancer methylomes | PDF (2,267 KB)- Tracking the evolution of cancer methylomes

See also: Article by Landan et al.

Older males beget more mutations –pp1174 – 1176

Matthew Hurles

doi:10.1038/ng.2448

Three papers characterizing human germline mutation rates bolster evidence for a relatively low rate of base substitution in modern humans and highlight a central role for paternal age in determining rates of mutation. These studies represent the advent of a transformation in our understanding of mutation rates and processes, which may ultimately have public health implications.

Full Text- Older males beget more mutations | PDF (2,319 KB)- Older males beget more mutations

See also: Letter by Campbell et al.

FOXA1 and breast cancer risk –pp1176 – 1177

Kerstin B Meyer & Jason S Carroll

doi:10.1038/ng.2449

Many SNPs associated with human disease are located in non-coding regions of the genome. A new study shows that SNPs associated with breast cancer risk are located in enhancer regions and alter binding affinity for the pioneer factor FOXA1.

Full Text- FOXA1 and breast cancer risk | PDF (254 KB)- FOXA1 and breast cancer risk

See also: Article by Cowper-Sal·lari et al.

Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis –pp1179 – 1181

Lambert Busque, Jay P Patel, Maria E Figueroa, Aparna Vasanthakumar, Sylvie Provost, Zineb Hamilou, Luigina Mollica, Juan Li, Agnes Viale, Adriana Heguy, Maryam Hassimi, Nicholas Socci, Parva K Bhatt, Mithat Gonen, Christopher E Mason, Ari Melnick, Lucy A Godley, Cameron W Brennan, Omar Abdel-Wahab & Ross L Levine

doi:10.1038/ng.2413

Ross Levine, Lambert Busque and colleagues report the identification of recurrent somatic mutations in TET2 in elderly female individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. The mutations were identified in individuals without clinically apparent hematological malignancies.

Abstract- Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis | Full Text- Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis | PDF (324 KB)- Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis | Supplementary information

Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk –pp1182 – 1184

Nick Orr, Alina Lemnrau, Rosie Cooke, Olivia Fletcher, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Michael Jones, Nichola Johnson, Christopher J Lord, Costas Mitsopoulos, Marketa Zvelebil, Simon S McDade, Gemma Buck, Christine Blancher, KConFab Consortium, Alison H Trainer, Paul A James, Stig E Bojesen, Susanne Bokmand, Heli Nevanlinna, Johanna Mattson, Eitan Friedman, Yael Laitman, Domenico Palli, Giovanna Masala, Ines Zanna, Laura Ottini, Giuseppe Giannini, Antoinette Hollestelle, Ans M W van den Ouweland, Srdjan Novaković, Mateja Krajc, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Jose Esteban Castelao, Håkan Olsson, Ingrid Hedenfalk, Douglas F Easton, Paul D P Pharoah, Alison M Dunning, D Timothy Bishop, Susan L Neuhausen, Linda Steele, Richard S Houlston, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Alan Ashworth & Anthony J Swerdlow

doi:10.1038/ng.2417

Nick Orr and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for male breast cancer. They identify a new susceptibility locus atRAD51B and examine association evidence for known female breast cancer loci in these cohorts.

Abstract- Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk | Full Text- Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk | PDF (301 KB)- Genome-wide association study identifies a common variant in RAD51B associated with male breast cancer risk | Supplementary information

A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma –pp1185 – 1187

Nischalan Pillay, Vincent Plagnol, Patrick S Tarpey, Samira B Lobo, Nadège Presneau, Karoly Szuhai, Dina Halai, Fitim Berisha, Stephen R Cannon, Simon Mead, Dalia Kasperaviciute, Jutta Palmen, Philippa J Talmud, Lars-Gunnar Kindblom, M Fernanda Amary, Roberto Tirabosco & Adrienne M Flanagan

doi:10.1038/ng.2419

Adrienne Flanagan and colleagues identify a common variant in the T gene associated with strong risk of chordoma, a rare malignant bone tumor. The risk variant alters an amino acid in the DNA-binding domain of the T transcription factor and is associated with differential expression of T and its downstream targets.

Abstract- A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma | Full Text- A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma | PDF (317 KB)- A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma | Supplementary information

Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy –pp1188 – 1190

Sarah E Heron, Katherine R Smith, Melanie Bahlo, Lino Nobili, Esther Kahana, Laura Licchetta, Karen L Oliver, Aziz Mazarib, Zaid Afawi, Amos Korczyn, Giuseppe Plazzi, Steven Petrou, Samuel F Berkovic, Ingrid E Scheffer & Leanne M Dibbens

doi:10.1038/ng.2440

Samuel Berkovic and colleagues report the identification of missense mutations in KCNT1, which encodes a sodium-gated potassium channel, that cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy.

Abstract- Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy | Full Text- Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy | PDF (294 KB)- Missense mutations in the sodium-gated potassium channel gene KCNT1 cause severe autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy | Supplementary information


Articles

Breast cancer risk–associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression –pp1191 – 1198

Richard Cowper-Sal·lari, Xiaoyang Zhang, Jason B Wright, Swneke D Bailey, Michael D Cole, Jerome Eeckhoute, Jason H Moore & Mathieu Lupien

doi:10.1038/ng.2416

Mathieu Lupien, Jason Moore and colleagues show that breast cancer risk–associated SNPs commonly disrupt the binding of FOXA1 to chromatin, thereby directly affecting gene expression.

Abstract- Breast cancer risk-associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression | Full Text- Breast cancer risk–associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression | PDF (1,353 KB)- Breast cancer risk–associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression | Supplementary information

See also: News and Views by Meyer & Carroll

LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression –pp1199 – 1206

Jan J Molenaar, Raquel Domingo-Fernández, Marli E Ebus, Sven Lindner, Jan Koster, Ksenija Drabek, Pieter Mestdagh, Peter van Sluis, Linda J Valentijn, Johan van Nes, Marloes Broekmans, Franciska Haneveld, Richard Volckmann, Isabella Bray, Lukas Heukamp, Annika Sprüssel, Theresa Thor, Kristina Kieckbusch, Ludger Klein-Hitpass, Matthias Fischer, Jo Vandesompele, Alexander Schramm, Max M van Noesel, Luigi Varesio, Frank Speleman, Angelika Eggert, Raymond L Stallings, Huib N Caron, Rogier Versteeg & Johannes H Schulte

doi:10.1038/ng.2436

Jan Molenaar and colleagues show that LIN28B is overexpressed and amplified in human neuroblastomas and that LIN28B regulates let-7 family miRNAs and MYCN. They create a transgenic mouse model of LIN28B overexpression and show that these mice develop neuroblastoma tumors.

Abstract- LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression | Full Text- LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression | PDF (1,453 KB)- LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression | Supplementary information

Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues –pp1207 – 1214

Gilad Landan, Netta Mendelson Cohen, Zohar Mukamel, Amir Bar, Alina Molchadsky, Ran Brosh, Shirley Horn-Saban, Daniela Amann Zalcenstein, Naomi Goldfinger, Adi Zundelevich, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Varda Rotter & Amos Tanay

doi:10.1038/ng.2442

Amos Tanay and colleagues characterize DNA methylation polymorphism within cell populations and track immortalized fibroblasts in culture for over 300 generations to show that formation of differentially methylated regions occurs through a stochastic process and nearly deterministic epigenetic remodeling.

Abstract- Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues | Full Text- Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues | PDF (1,518 KB)- Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues | Supplementary information

See also: News and Views by Krebs & Schübeler

Intracontinental spread of human invasive SalmonellaTyphimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa-pp1215 – 1221

Chinyere K Okoro, Robert A Kingsley, Thomas R Connor, Simon R Harris, Christopher M Parry, Manar N Al-Mashhadani, Samuel Kariuki, Chisomo L Msefula, Melita A Gordon, Elizabeth de Pinna, John Wain, Robert S Heyderman, Stephen Obaro, Pedro L Alonso, Inacio Mandomando, Calman A MacLennan, Milagritos D Tapia, Myron M Levine, Sharon M Tennant, Julian Parkhill & Gordon Dougan

doi:10.1038/ng.2423

Gordon Dougan and colleagues report whole-genome sequencing of a global collection of 179 Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, including 129 diverse sub-Saharan African isolates associated with invasive disease. They determine the phylogenetic structure of invasive Salmonella Typhimurium in sub-Saharan Africa and find that the majority are from two closely related highly conserved lineages, which emerged in the last 60 years in close temporal association with the current HIV epidemic.

Abstract- Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa | Full Text- Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa | PDF (1,126 KB)- Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa | Supplementary information


Letters

Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population –pp1222 – 1226

Tomomitsu Hirota, Atsushi Takahashi, Michiaki Kubo, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda, Kaori Tomita, Masafumi Sakashita, Takechiyo Yamada, Shigeharu Fujieda, Shota Tanaka, Satoru Doi, Akihiko Miyatake, Tadao Enomoto, Chiharu Nishiyama, Nobuhiro Nakano, Keiko Maeda, Ko Okumura, Hideoki Ogawa, Shigaku Ikeda, Emiko Noguchi, Tohru Sakamoto, Nobuyuki Hizawa, Koji Ebe, Hidehisa Saeki, Takashi Sasaki, Tamotsu Ebihara, Masayuki Amagai, Satoshi Takeuchi, Masutaka Furue, Yusuke Nakamura & Mayumi Tamari

doi:10.1038/ng.2438

Mayumi Tamari and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for atopic dermatitis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, in a Japanese population. They identify eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis and compare their results to those of previous studies in European and Chinese populations.

First Paragraph- Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population | Full Text- Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population | PDF (999 KB)- Genome-wide association study identifies eight new susceptibility loci for atopic dermatitis in the Japanese population | Supplementary information

CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation –pp1227 – 1230

Nataly Manjarrez-Orduño, Emiliano Marasco, Sharon A Chung, Matthew S Katz, Jenna F Kiridly, Kim R Simpfendorfer, Jan Freudenberg, David H Ballard, Emil Nashi, Thomas J Hopkins, Deborah S Cunninghame Graham, Annette T Lee, Marieke J H Coenen, Barbara Franke, Dorine W Swinkels, Robert R Graham, Robert P Kimberly, Patrick M Gaffney, Timothy J Vyse, Timothy W Behrens, Lindsey A Criswell, Betty Diamond & Peter K Gregersen

doi:10.1038/ng.2439

Peter Gregersen and colleagues identify a regulatory variant inCSK, coding for an intracellular kinase that physically interacts with Lyp (PTPN22), associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Their work suggests that the Lyp-Csk complex influences susceptibility to SLE through regulation of B-cell signaling, maturation and activation.

First Paragraph- CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation | Full Text- CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation | PDF (747 KB)- CSK regulatory polymorphism is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and influences B-cell signaling and activation | Supplementary information

Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 –pp1231 – 1235

Jianfeng Xu, Zengnan Mo, Dingwei Ye, Meilin Wang, Fang Liu, Guangfu Jin, Chuanliang Xu, Xiang Wang, Qiang Shao, Zhiwen Chen, Zhihua Tao, Jun Qi, Fangjian Zhou, Zhong Wang, Yaowen Fu, Dalin He, Qiang Wei, Jianming Guo, Denglong Wu, Xin Gao, Jianlin Yuan, Gongxian Wang, Yong Xu, Guozeng Wang, Haijun Yao, Pei Dong, Yang Jiao, Mo Shen, Jin Yang, Jun Ou-Yang, Haowen Jiang, Yao Zhu, Shancheng Ren, Zhengdong Zhang, Changjun Yin, Xu Gao, Bo Dai, Zhibin Hu, Yajun Yang, Qijun Wu, Hongyan Chen, Peng Peng, Ying Zheng, Xiaodong Zheng, Yongbing Xiang, Jirong Long, Jian Gong, Rong Na, Xiaoling Lin, Hongjie Yu, Zhong Wang, Sha Tao, Junjie Feng, Jishan Sun, Wennuan Liu, Ann Hsing, Jianyu Rao, Qiang Ding, Fredirik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Zheng, Hongbing Shen, Li Jin, Rong Shi, Daru Lu, Xuejun Zhang, Jielin Sun, S Lilly Zheng & Yinghao Sun

doi:10.1038/ng.2424

Yinghao Sun and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for prostate cancer in Han Chinese men. They identify two new risk-associated loci at chromosomes 9q31 and 19q13.

First Paragraph- Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 | Full Text- Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 | PDF (686 KB)- Genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies two new prostate cancer risk loci at 9q31.2 and 19q13.4 | Supplementary information

Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-pp1236 – 1242

Marta Kulis, Simon Heath, Marina Bibikova, Ana C Queirós, Alba Navarro, Guillem Clot, Alejandra Martínez-Trillos, Giancarlo Castellano, Isabelle Brun-Heath, Magda Pinyol, Sergio Barberán-Soler, Panagiotis Papasaikas, Pedro Jares, Sílvia Beà, Daniel Rico, Simone Ecker, Miriam Rubio, Romina Royo, Vincent Ho, Brandy Klotzle, Lluis Hernández, Laura Conde, Mónica López-Guerra, Dolors Colomer, Neus Villamor, Marta Aymerich, María Rozman, Mónica Bayes, Marta Gut, Josep L Gelpí, Modesto Orozco, Jian-Bing Fan, Víctor Quesada, Xose S Puente, David G Pisano, Alfonso Valencia, Armando López-Guillermo, Ivo Gut, Carlos López-Otín, Elías Campo & José I Martín-Subero

doi:10.1038/ng.2443

José Martin-Subero and colleagues report whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and methylome analysis of two CLLs and three B-cell subpopulations using high-density microarrays on 139 CLLs. They identify widespread hypomethylation in the gene body that is largely associated with intragenic enhancer elements.

First Paragraph- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia | Full Text- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia | PDF (2,067 KB)- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia | Supplementary information

Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature –pp1243 – 1248

Gillian I Rice, Paul R Kasher, Gabriella M A Forte, Niamh M Mannion, Sam M Greenwood, Marcin Szynkiewicz, Jonathan E Dickerson, Sanjeev S Bhaskar, Massimiliano Zampini, Tracy A Briggs, Emma M Jenkinson, Carlos A Bacino, Roberta Battini, Enrico Bertini, Paul A Brogan, Louise A Brueton, Marialuisa Carpanelli, Corinne De Laet, Pascale de Lonlay, Mireia del Toro, Isabelle Desguerre, Elisa Fazzi, Àngels Garcia-Cazorla, Arvid Heiberg, Masakazu Kawaguchi, Ram Kumar, Jean-Pierre S-M Lin, Charles M Lourenco, Alison M Male, Wilson Marques Jr, Cyril Mignot, Ivana Olivieri, Simona Orcesi, Prab Prabhakar, Magnhild Rasmussen, Robert A Robinson, Flore Rozenberg, Johanna L Schmidt, Katharina Steindl, Tiong Y Tan, William G van der Merwe, Adeline Vanderver, Grace Vassallo, Emma L Wakeling, Evangeline Wassmer, Elizabeth Whittaker, John H Livingston, Pierre Lebon, Tamio Suzuki, Paul J McLaughlin, Liam P Keegan, Mary A O’Connell, Simon C Lovell & Yanick J Crow

doi:10.1038/ng.2414

Yanick Crow and colleagues show that mutations in ADAR1 cause the autoimmune disorder Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, accompanied by upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes.ADAR1 encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the deamination of adeonosine to inosine in double-stranded RNA, and the findings suggest a possible role for RNA editing in limiting the accumulation of repeat-derived RNA species.

First Paragraph- Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature | Full Text- Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature | PDF (844 KB)- Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature | Supplementary information

Mutations in the TGF-β repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm-pp1249 – 1254

Alexander J Doyle, Jefferson J Doyle, Seneca L Bessling, Samantha Maragh, Mark E Lindsay, Dorien Schepers, Elisabeth Gillis, Geert Mortier, Tessa Homfray, Kimberly Sauls, Russell A Norris, Nicholas D Huso, Dan Leahy, David W Mohr, Mark J Caulfield, Alan F Scott, Anne Destrée, Raoul C Hennekam, Pamela H Arn, Cynthia J Curry, Lut Van Laer, Andrew S McCallion, Bart L Loeys & Harry C Dietz

doi:10.1038/ng.2421

Harry Dietz and colleagues report the identification of mutations in SKI in Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, which shares features with Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome. SKI encodes a known repressor of TGF-β activity, and this work provides evidence for paradoxical increased TGF-β signaling as the mechanism underlying these related syndromes.

First Paragraph- Mutations in the TGF-[beta] repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm | Full Text- Mutations in the TGF-β repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm | PDF (1,158 KB)- Mutations in the TGF-β repressor SKI cause Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome with aortic aneurysm | Supplementary information

De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy-pp1255 – 1259

Giulia Barcia, Matthew R Fleming, Aline Deligniere, Valeswara-Rao Gazula, Maile R Brown, Maeva Langouet, Haijun Chen, Jack Kronengold, Avinash Abhyankar, Roberta Cilio, Patrick Nitschke, Anna Kaminska, Nathalie Boddaert, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Isabelle Desguerre, Arnold Munnich, Olivier Dulac, Leonard K Kaczmarek, Laurence Colleaux & Rima Nabbout

doi:10.1038/ng.2441

Rima Nabbout and colleagues report the identification of de novomutations in the KCNT1 potassium channel gene in individuals with malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy, a rare epileptic encephalopathy with pharmacoresistant seizures and developmental delay. The authors show that the mutations have a gain-of-function effect on KCNT1 channel activity.

First Paragraph- De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy | Full Text- De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy | PDF (745 KB)- De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy | Supplementary information

CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development –pp1260 – 1264

Ganeshwaran H Mochida, Vijay S Ganesh, Maria I de Michelena, Hugo Dias, Kutay D Atabay, Katie L Kathrein, Hsuan-Ting Huang, R Sean Hill, Jillian M Felie, Daniel Rakiec, Danielle Gleason, Anthony D Hill, Athar N Malik, Brenda J Barry, Jennifer N Partlow, Wen-Hann Tan, Laurie J Glader, A James Barkovich, William B Dobyns, Leonard I Zon & Christopher A Walsh

doi:10.1038/ng.2425

Christopher Walsh and colleagues identify mutations in CHMP1Ain human cerebellar hypoplasia and microcephaly. Cells lackingCHMP1A show decreased cell proliferation and decreased expression of BMI1, a negative regulator of stem cell proliferation.

First Paragraph- CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development | Full Text- CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development | PDF (1,449 KB)- CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development | Supplementary information

Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 –pp1265 – 1271

Saima Riazuddin, Inna A Belyantseva, Arnaud P J Giese, Kwanghyuk Lee, Artur A Indzhykulian, Sri Pratima Nandamuri, Rizwan Yousaf, Ghanshyam P Sinha, Sue Lee, David Terrell, Rashmi S Hegde, Rana A Ali, Saima Anwar, Paula B Andrade-Elizondo, Asli Sirmaci, Leslie V Parise, Sulman Basit, Abdul Wali, Muhammad Ayub, Muhammad Ansar, Wasim Ahmad, Shaheen N Khan, Javed Akram, Mustafa Tekin, Sheikh Riazuddin, Tiffany Cook, Elke K Buschbeck, Gregory I Frolenkov, Suzanne M Leal, Thomas B Friedman & Zubair M Ahmed

doi:10.1038/ng.2426

Zubair Ahmed and colleagues identify homozygous mutations inCIB2, a gene that encodes a calcium- and integrin-binding protein, that cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48. CIB2 is required for hair cell development and retinal photoreceptor cells in zebrafish and Drosophila melanogaster.

First Paragraph- Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 | Full Text- Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 | PDF (1,380 KB)- Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48 | Supplementary information

Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma –pp1272 – 1276

Elizabeth Pohler, Ons Mamai, Jennifer Hirst, Mozheh Zamiri, Helen Horn, Toshifumi Nomura, Alan D Irvine, Benvon Moran, Neil J Wilson, Frances J D Smith, Christabelle S M Goh, Aileen Sandilands, Christian Cole, Geoffrey J Barton, Alan T Evans, Hiroshi Shimizu, Masashi Akiyama, Mitsuhiro Suehiro, Izumi Konohana, Mohammad Shboul, Sebastien Teissier, Lobna Boussofara, Mohamed Denguezli, Ali Saad, Moez Gribaa, Patricia J Dopping-Hepenstal, John A McGrath, Sara J Brown, David R Goudie, Bruno Reversade, Colin S Munro & W H Irwin McLean

doi:10.1038/ng.2444

Irwin McLean and colleagues report that heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in AAGAB, which encodes a cytosolic protein implicated in vesicular trafficking, cause punctate palmoplantar keratoderma. They further show that knockdown of AAGAB in keratinocytes leads to increased cell proliferation accompanied by highly elevated levels of epidermal growth factor receptor.

First Paragraph- Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma | Full Text- Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma | PDF (848 KB)- Haploinsufficiency for AAGAB causes clinically heterogeneous forms of punctate palmoplantar keratoderma | Supplementary information

Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population –pp1277 – 1281

Catarina D Campbell, Jessica X Chong, Maika Malig, Arthur Ko, Beth L Dumont, Lide Han, Laura Vives, Brian J O’Roak, Peter H Sudmant, Jay Shendure, Mark Abney, Carole Ober & Evan E Eichler

doi:10.1038/ng.2418

Evan Eichler and colleagues report an estimate of the mutation rate in humans that is based on the whole-genome sequences of five parent-offspring trios from a Hutterite population and genotyping data from an extended pedigree. They use a new approach for estimating the mutation rate over multiple generations that takes into account the extensive autozygosity in this founder population.

First Paragraph- Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population | Full Text- Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population | PDF (620 KB)- Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population | Supplementary information

See also: News and Views by Hurles

Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission –pp1282 – 1285

Christoph Freyer, Lynsey M Cree, Arnaud Mourier, James B Stewart, Camilla Koolmeister, Dusanka Milenkovic, Timothy Wai, Vasileios I Floros, Erik Hagström, Emmanouella E Chatzidaki, Rudolf J Wiesner, David C Samuels, Nils-Göran Larsson & Patrick F Chinnery

doi:10.1038/ng.2427

Patrick Chinnery, Nils-Goran Larsson and colleagues show that mitochondrial heteroplasmy levels are principally determined prenatally within the developing female germline in mice transmitting a heteroplasmic single base-pair deletion in the mitochondrial tRNAMet gene.

First Paragraph- Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission | Full Text- Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission | PDF (523 KB)- Variation in germline mtDNA heteroplasmy is determined prenatally but modified during subsequent transmission | Supplementary information

SOURCE:

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v44/n11/index.html 

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Personal Tale of JL’s Whole Genome Sequencing

Word Cloud by Daniel Menzin

Unexpected scary findings: the tale of John Lauerman’s whole genome sequencing

FEBRUARY 15, 2012
Joe Thakuria draws John Lauerman's blood
Joe Thakuria draws John Lauerman’s blood for whole genome sequencing. By Madeleine Price Ball, licensed under CC-BY-SA.

Madeleine Price Ball, PhD is a PGP research scientist in George Church’s lab at Harvard Medical School.

Several months ago John Lauerman, a reporter for Bloomberg News, approached the Personal Genome Project interested in having his whole genome sequenced. While we have hundreds of genomes in the sequencing pipeline, of the dozen or so genomes we have sequenced to-date, so far the results have been for the most part uneventful.

Lauerman’s case was different: we found something rare and “famous”, and something that nobody could have anticipated by looking through family history: a mutation that was acquired rather than inherited. This genetic variant (JAK2-V617F) is one of a number of mutations that can accumulate in blood stem cells, a precursor that could lead to several rare blood diseases.

Last night Lauerman published his experience, and we encourage all participants to read it. It confronts us with a scenario that seems likely to affect others who forge into this new and unknown territory: the very real possibility that whole genome sequencing may uncover something unexpected, ambiguous, and scary. This certainly isn’t an outcome we anticipate for most participants, but it is a rare possibility all should be aware of. Would you rather know that you carry such a variant, even if that knowledge might not help your health at all? Although some would decline, PGP participants are the sort of people who say: “Yes, I’ll take that risk, I’d rather know!” [see footnote]

His experience also illustrates potential for the Personal Genome Project to guide health care, for himself and for those who follow. The JAK2-V617F variant is so rarely seen in healthy individuals, we have very little understanding of what to expect. It has almost always been seen after a patient is diagnosed with a disease, not before. Will he develop one of these diseases? If so, which one? Perhaps many people carry the variant but never develop any symptoms of disease. In coming years Lauerman will likely continue to monitor his blood for signs of disease. It is possible that he will never develop the disease, and we hope this is the case. On the other hand, through monitoring he may detect disease sooner than he otherwise would have. By making his experiences public, his case can inform future individuals who confront the same finding.

As we move onward to sequencing hundreds and thousands of genomes, we can’t promise such interpretations will be made in a timely manner. We’re working with other groups to improve our ability to interpret genomes — and PGP participants are the perfect testbed for this development! — but it’s much harder than you might think. Genome data is made public in 30 days, but months or even years could pass before a serious and potentially scary variant is noticed. Participating in the PGP not only means that you risk learning ambiguous and scary news, but that it may be uncovered long after your data has been made public. We are always grateful to participants who choose to step into that unknown territory of genome sequencing, and who share their data so that others may learn.


Footnote: In the early stages of enrollment, individuals interested in joining the Personal Genome Project are asked to think about whether there are specific types of genetic information that they might not want to learn about themselves. Our examples include medical conditions with no effective cures or therapies, cancer, degenerative diseases, and stigmatized traits (e.g. mental illness). We do not offer the review or redacting of such information on a case-by-case basis. Only participants who wish to take the risk of learning such information are allowed to proceed with enrollment.

SOURCE:

http://blog.personalgenomes.org/2012/02/15/unexpected-scary-findings-the-tale-of-john-lauermans-whole-genome-sequencing-2/lauerman_blood_draw/

http://www.personalgenomes.org/

Harvard Mapping My DNA Turns Scary as Threatening Gene Emerges

By John Lauerman – Feb 15, 2012 12:01 AM ET

Four months after I walked into a lab at Harvard University and gave a vial of blood to have my genome sequenced, my search to understand my DNA led me to Mark Sanders, a former Indiana firefighter.

It took a little while to explain why I was calling and then he told me his story:

Sophie Liu, research scientist at Complete Genomics Inc., at a sequencing center at the company’s research facility in Mountain View, California. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg News reporter John Lauerman talks about the results of his genome sequencing. The genome contains the DNA instructions for making all the body’s cells and tissues. Lauerman discussed the report with a team from Harvard Medical School’s Personal Genome Project, who will use the results in their efforts to better understand variations in the human genome and their implications for health and disease. (Source: Bloomberg)

Joseph Thakuria, clinical director of the Personal Genome Project draws blood from Bloomberg reporter John Lauerman for the Project at Harvard Medical School in Boston on Sept. 13, 2011. Photographer: Madeleine Price Ball/Harvard Medical School via Bloomberg

Deep Breath

After recovering, Sanders retired from firefighting to garden and play the fiddle. He knows other myelofibrosis patients who haven’t fared as well.

“I had been so physically fit all my life,” he said. “There’s no reason or rhyme to why I have it or got it, and there’s not a lot of people around you can talk to who have it.”

I hung up the phone and took a deep breath. DNA in his blood cells carried the same rare genetic variant that my sequencing had revealed.

The variant is linked to a group of blood disorders, of which primary myelofibrosis is the most serious. Doctors don’t know whether this gene variant itself causes disease, yet it is seen so often in three blood disorders that its presence is used to confirm their diagnosis. I had to consider that my future might hold a fate similar to Sanders’s.

Genome-Sequencing Report

My path to Sanders began on Monday, Jan. 2, when I was sitting alone in my office in downtown Boston. Just after 4 p.m., I got an e-mail message from Madeleine Ball, a Harvard University researcher, telling me that the results of my genome sequencing were ready. The procedure is gaining use in cancer clinics and children’s hospitals, and will become increasingly common as the cost drops to $1,000, no more than that of many diagnostic procedures, such as MRI or colonoscopy, manufacturers and researchers say.

Before even a minute had gone by, the lengthy report was there for me to view.

“Here it is,” I thought, clicking on my inbox. “Mortality in an e-mail.”

Even as my DNA was chopped up, labeled, photographed and decoded by machines in California, the speed and power of sequencing was exploding. Life Technologies Corp. (LIFE) said Jan. 10 that its new Ion Proton machine will be able to sequence an entire genome in a day, for $1,000. Last month,Roche Holding AG (ROG) made a $5.7 billion hostile bid forIllumina Inc. (ILMN), which said it will also soon have machines that can provide 24-hour genome sequencing. Google Inc. (GOOG) and Amazon.com Inc. were investing in technologies to manage the tidal wave of information coming from these machines.

Personal Struggle

Now my own deciphered genome, the chemical instructions for making all the cells and tissues of my body, was complete. That evening marked the start of a medical and personal struggle to understand the report’s findings. The genome rules our bodies in ways that remain enigmatic. Many of the diseases and medical conditions I thought would emerge in the analysis, didn’t. At the same time, there were unpleasant surprises that cast a shadow on my future and now confront me and my family with tough medical decisions.

Before my sample was taken, I met with Denise Lautenbach, a genetic counselor who works in research programs at Harvard Medical School. We’d discussed the possible revelations that might come. My father, grandfather and some uncles have suffered from a shaking disorder called essential tremor. I worried about other conditions that run in my family, such as thyroid disease, diabetes and depression. While dementia isn’t a theme, I was curious about whether I have the APOE4 gene variant that raises the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

Breast Cancer Risk

I also prepared by speaking with others who have had their genomes sequenced. Greg Lucier, chief executive officer of sequencer maker Life Technologies, discovered he has a gene that might raise the risk of breast cancer in himself and his daughter. Would I find out the same thing? What about far rarer conditions, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington’s disease, both of which can be predicted by sequencing?

My mind raced as I scanned the results that late Monday afternoon, looking for familiar words and phrases that might be connected to other conditions that run in my family.

Good Report

It appeared to be a good report. I saw a genetic variant linked to slightly higher-than-normal risk of an age-related eye disease called macular degeneration. No surprise; about 10 percent of the U.S. develops this condition, and my mother has it. There was a variant linked to higher schizophrenia risk; again, not a huge boost in odds of a disease that affects about 1 percent of the population (and which I’m probably too old to develop). There were gene variants linked to liver and bowel disease, neither of which I suffer from.

Then my eyes were drawn back to the top of the report and a variant called JAK2-V617F. I realized then that the list was ranked in order of medical importance. Clicking on an entry brought me to a few pages of medical information, and those pages were linked to published scientific and medical studies. I began reading about JAK2 more closely.

This wasn’t good. The report classified the JAK2 variant’s clinical importance as “high,” and its impact as “well- established pathogenic,” meaning harmful. It’s seen frequently in people with rare “cancer-like” blood diseases. Indeed, as the report said, doctors test for the JAK2 variant to confirm cases of these diseases, called myeloproliferative disorders.

Unclear View

Did that mean that I already had a rare disease? My eyes widened. I read on.

Researchers currently see the variant as “one of an accumulation of changes that leads to the development of these cancer-like diseases,” the report said. “It is unclear how to view the presence of the variant in people who don’t have symptoms of the disease.”

After about 40 minutes of reading and thinking, I remained mystified. The report said “cancer-like.” I kept staring at the word “cancer,” while the companion “like” seemed to disappear. I’ve written about other people’s illnesses for years. What had started out as a cutting-edge science story was beginning to feel more like an unsettling visit to the doctor’s office with its confusion, struggles to understand, and shivers of dread.

Puzzling Medical News

“How worried should I be?” I kept thinking. Anticipation had been building inside me for months. Now my results were here and I barely knew what to make of the most important one.

I picked up the phone and called my wife, Judi, who’s a nurse. After 21 years of marriage, we’re accustomed to regular discussions of medical issues, in part because Judi has type 1 diabetes, which requires daily monitoring and insulin. Still, this was some of the most serious and puzzling medical news I’d ever received. I was careful to keep from sounding frightened.

“I got my results,” I said when she picked up the phone. I poured out the details, focusing on the JAK2 variant.

Judi’s voice was calm. I didn’t have any of the symptoms of diseases associated with the gene, she said. I’m usually energetic and active; that meant it wasn’t clear what the variant meant in my case.

“At least if there is a problem, we’ll find it earlier if you’re evaluated yearly,” she said.

“They told me that none of these results should be used to make medical decisions,” I said. “I’ll meet with the researchers later this week to talk about everything.”

New Chapter?

We agreed that, overall, the report was good news. I didn’t realize there was more news to come.

I left the office and got on my bike, which I had ridden to work that day. I pedaled carefully to make it home safely through the streets of Boston, which is never guaranteed, genes or no genes.

Three days after getting my results, I took a seat in the office of George Church, the Harvard scientist who started the Personal Genome Project that arranged my sequencing. Joe Thakuria, the clinical geneticist and project medical director who took my blood sample in this same office in September, was there to lead the discussion of my results. The team had been through meetings like this before, having analyzed and released the genomes of 10 people, including Church, in 2008. I was already feeling a stomach full of emotions: was this about to be a new chapter in my life? And if so, how long would that chapter be?

Thakuria asked if I had any questions before we began. I told them how thrilled I was that I hadn’t seen certain genes that I expected given my family’s medical history, such as the variant for essential tremor. I’d seen nothing in my report about Alzheimer’s risk, which I considered a good sign.

Not Bad News

The researchers stopped me. The technology used to sequence my DNA has difficulty penetrating certain portions of the genome. One such region contains the gene that makes a blood fat called apolipoprotein E. Consequently, my results might not show whether I have the version of a gene, called APOE4, which raises the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

Never mind, I thought. I can live without that knowledge.

The absence of the gene for benign tremor, the condition my father and grandfather had, wasn’t necessarily such good news, the team explained. As-yet unknown genes might cause the same condition. No news wasn’t always good news; it just wasn’t bad news.

‘Very Rare’

With the three of us, along with Ball and Alexander Zaranek, another project researcher, crowded around the table in Church’s office, the team then turned to the JAK2 variant. The appearance of the gene in my blood had surprised even the Harvard scientists.

“This is probably the most serious variant that we’ve actually seen to date in the study,” Thakuria said. “It’s very rare.”

The JAK2 gene contains the DNA code for making a protein used to send signals through cells. About two out of 1,000 people have the V617F variant, which was discovered in 2005 and appears to encourage blood cells to grow and divide.

Many scientists believe it’s an acquired gene variant, meaning that I wasn’t born with it and my children and other blood relatives probably don’t have it. While JAK2 may have arisen in response to my own habits, at this point, it’s unclear what may have led to the mutation.

Blood Disorders

The JAK2 variant is found in about 90 percent of people with polycythemia vera, an oversupply of red blood cells. This disease is usually treated with drugs or phlebotomy, the draining of some blood from the system. It’s also frequently found in patients with essential thrombocytosis, an overproduction of platelets that usually requires no treatment and can be addressed with blood-thinners when patients have symptoms. It’s also used to diagnose primary myelofibrosis, the condition Sanders, the former firefighter, had. About 10 percent of these cases can develop into dangerous leukemias.

That’s three conditions linked to one gene. One of the three has a possibility of becoming cancerous, Thakuria said.

“I don’t want you to fret about this,” he said. It was the first of several times I would hear him say it.

At that point, Thakuria opened up a link to a 2010 study attached to the report. Scientists have been conducting studies of individual genes for years. The team had found a study of 10,507 people in Copenhagen who gave blood samples and then were followed for as long as 18 years. The Copenhagen researchers went back and analyzed the blood samples; 18 had the JAK2 variant.

‘Very Scary Figure’

What it showed was that 14 of the 18 people with the variant developed cancer in their lifetimes. All of the 18 died within the study period.

“That’s a very scary figure,” Thakuria said.

Information was starting to wash over me without really penetrating. I struggled to keep thinking of good questions for the team. Instead, I started asking myself questions: “What am I doing here? What are these people telling me?” I searched the faces arrayed around me, trying to see whether any of the researchers looked as panicked as I felt.

I tried to listen closely as Thakuria explained what the variant and the study might mean. There were a number of shortcomings in the Copenhagen study that made it difficult to interpret, he said. For example, he said, the authors had been liberal in their use of the word “cancer.” Some of the disorders developed by patients with the JAK2 variant were of the milder variety such as polycythemia vera, which isn’t typically classified as a cancer.

Issue of Deaths

Then there was the issue of deaths. It wasn’t clear whether people with the variant had died of the conditions they had been diagnosed with, or other causes, Thakuria said. Half of them had died in their 80s, and seven had died in their 70s. This is not far from average life expectancy, he pointed out.

“Half of them could have died of bicycle accidents,” he said, smiling.

There were other reasons not to fret, Thakuria said. Although the JAK2 variant often shows up in these conditions, no one knows precisely what role it plays. It may be a cause of the disorders, or an effect of changes elsewhere in the genome. The JAK2 variant was unlikely to be the only cause of these diseases; several things — things that remain unknown to us — would probably have to go wrong before any disease would arise. In this context, the gene wasn’t quite so scary, Thakuria said.

Black and White

I thought about a conversation I’d had with Ball just a few days earlier, while my genome were still being analyzed. I had called to see when the results were coming. She said they were “interesting,” but didn’t want to discuss them until a clinical geneticist had a chance to review them. Her voice sounded like she didn’t want to reveal everything she knew.

“I wish everything were black and white,” she said. “Unfortunately, things just don’t turn out that way very often.”

The researchers said I now needed to confirm that the sequencing was correct with another round of testing using a different technique. I would give another blood sample. If the variant was there, we’d talk more about what steps to take.

The meeting lasted almost two hours, and I left Church’s office with Thakuria. We walked to a restaurant about halfway between Harvard Medical School and Fenway Park to sit and have a drink. I continued to quiz him on the relationship between the JAK2 variant and the diseases we’d been talking about.

Ask Again

Sitting on a barstool next to Thakuria and listening to him discuss the JAK2 variant, I felt reassured. It occurred to me that this wasn’t how most people would receive the news of their results. As a reporter working on a story about genomics, I had access to experts that many people wouldn’t. What will happen as more people get results from broad genome sequencing?

I spoke about this during a meeting with Harold Varmus, director of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, and a co-winner of a Nobel Prize in 1989 for his work to find genes that promote the growth of cancer cells. I mentioned I had just received my results.

“How do you feel?” he asked.

“It’s been an interesting process,” I said. “It’s still playing out.”

Varmus nodded. Gathering genetic data from thousands of people can help researchers understand health by correlating gene variations with diseases, he said. He was concerned, however, that companies may not always ensure that people who have undergone sequencing will get a full understanding of their results.

‘How to Deal’

“Accumulating the information and studying it is good,” he said. “My concern is whether individuals are getting guidance on how to deal with the information.”

“People are being told they have a certain gene variant. In a mass population, that increases the risk of some diseases by, say, two-fold. That might be true in a mass population, but in any single individual’s genome, it’s not certain what that means.”

The Harvard researchers are struggling with these same issues, and are still working to streamline and improve their approach to giving results to study participants, Thakuria said.

“As we get more information from participants like you, we’ll gain a much better understanding of how to do it,” Thakuria said.

Animal Studies

I still felt like someone who kept shaking a toy Magic 8 Ball and getting the message: “Concentrate and ask again.” I decided to do a little research on my own. I found a 2010 study in the journal Blood showing that when the JAK2 variant was added to the genomes of mice, the animals later suffered from disorders similar to those seen in people with the gene.

This is just one of several animal studies suggesting that the JAK2 variant contributes directly to blood disorders, said John Crispino, a professor at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, who studies the gene. Skeptics point out that drugs that interfere with JAK2 don’t cure patients suffering from the gene-linked blood disorders.

“The field is mixed,” he said. “My bias is that the JAK2 variant contributes to the pathology of the disease.”

I wanted to find out what kind of people have the JAK2 mutation I have, and what’s happened to them. In addition to Sanders, the Indiana firefighter, I spoke with Bob Rosen, chairman of theMPN Research Foundation, a Chicago-based advocacy group for people with myeloproliferative disorders, and he had a surprise for me.

Red Blood Cells

About 14 years ago, Rosen went to a doctor because of pain in his fingers and toes. A complete blood count revealed high levels of red blood cells. He was diagnosed with polycythemia vera and was first treated with phlebotomy. He now takes a drug that controls his blood cell levels. With his treatment, he’s still able to work out, and had been playing basketball on the day I called him.

“I’ve been lucky,” he said. “The risk is that, over time, new symptoms will emerge or there will be a progression to something worse.”

A small percentage of patients with polycythemia vera can develop more serious conditions, such as primary myelofibrosis and certain leukemias, Rosen said. I hadn’t realized this, or hadn’t absorbed it, until now.

Another Surprise

Then, another surprise arrived. Looking at my report, I saw it had been updated electronically, as the genome project research team had told me would happen from time to time. Now, the second entry on my list of variants was labeled “APOE- C130R” — that’s another name for the APOE4 gene associated with increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

I kept reading, recalling that I had been told my ApoE result wasn’t accessible with the technology used to sequence my genome. As it turned out, the technology had worked after all. I was at increased risk for Alzheimer’s.

This was exactly the kind of news I had hoped I wouldn’t receive.

A few days later I got an e-mail from Ball, of the Harvard team.

“Sorry this was missed earlier,” she said in the e-mail. She recommended that I look at the studies she’d collected on APOE4, some of which casts doubt on the role of the variant as a strong factor in causing Alzheimer’s. According to one estimate, people who have one copy of the gene, as I do, have a 3 percent increased risk of developing the disease by age 80.

Better to Know

One of my parents must have had this gene variant in order for me to get it. Yet my mother is in her late 70s and my father is 80; neither of them has Alzheimer’s disease. The longer I thought about it, the less I worried.

I talked with my two children, Hanna and James, about their feelings regarding the JAK2 and Alzheimer’s gene variants. My daughter, a sophomore in college, said she thinks it’s an advantage to be aware of a health threat.

“If there’s a treatment for it, you could start earlier,” she said. “It’s better to know.”

My next stop was to see my doctor. While she didn’t want her name used in this story, she agreed to let me write about our conversations and paraphrase her comments.

I followed an aide into an exam room. Nothing about my body had changed since the genome test was done. I still had normal blood pressure and pulse, and my weight was steady.

My doctor had heard of the JAK2 variant. If the result was confirmed, I would need to have my blood count tested. If there was an oversupply of red blood cells or platelets, or signs of damaged bone marrow, we would start thinking about treatment, such as removing blood. She asked me how I was feeling.

‘Not Sick’

“I feel fine,” I said. “I’m not sick.”

I didn’t mention that every time I thought about the JAK2 variant, itching followed. I had read that itching was one of the symptoms of polycythemia vera. Even as I write these words, I’m scratching my forehead. I never feel itchy when not thinking about my genome. I also started noticing memory lapses.

This kind of behavior is often called “medical student syndrome,” because doctors in training who are learning to diagnose new diseases turn their skills on themselves. I assumed it was this syndrome I was suffering from, rather than a blood disorder.

It seemed like a good time to return to the Boston office of Aubrey Milunsky, the director of the Boston University Center for Human Genetics who had warned me in May that having my genome sequenced would just cause me needless worry.

“Why would you want to know that?” he had asked me then.

Milunsky was well-acquainted with the JAK2 variant on my report. Just as the team at Harvard had said, he mentioned that there was little known about the long-term impact of the variant in people. He noted that it’s also associated with some cases of dangerous clotting in abdominal blood vessels.

“You know it’s there, but you don’t know what it means,” he said. “You’re smack in the territory of inviting anxiety into your life. And this may have no meaning whatsoever in your entire life.”

Useful Vigilance

I disagreed. The results had actually taken some uncertainty out of my life, I told Milunsky. We all bear some health risks, and that’s why doctors recommend, for instance, that everyone get regular checkups and those 50 and older undergo tests for colon cancer. I have a rare mutation linked to rare conditions, most cases of which can be treated. Wouldn’t it make sense for me to undergo a blood test regularly to see whether my blood counts had changed?

Such vigilance might be beneficial, and it might not, Milunsky said. I might live the rest of my life with my health unaffected by the variant. Yet the exercise had shown that I had discovered things I’d rather not know, he said. Others who undergo the same procedure will surely find out that they have mutations that practically guarantee they will develop serious and perhaps even fatal diseases, he said.

Huntington’s Disease

Indeed, a 1999 study in the American Journal of Human Genetics found that about 1 percent of 4,527 people who were told they had the gene that causes Huntington’s disease, a progressive nervous system disorder, attempted or committed suicide, or were hospitalized for psychiatric reasons.

Medical researchers are still trying to determine when it makes sense to do more common tests for breast and prostate cancer. A certain percentage of people who get positive results on these screening exams will go on to have unneeded treatment that may cause harm. In October, a government panel recommended that blood tests used to screen for prostate cancer should only be performed on men with symptoms. The same panel said in 2009 that women should start getting mammograms at age 50, rather than 40.

On Jan. 25, at about 11 p.m., I got a phone call from Thakuria. We had arranged to speak late in the day to accommodate busy schedules.

‘Mutation Confirmed’

“The mutation confirmed,” he said. He didn’t say “JAK2,” but I knew that was what he was talking about.

The next step for me is to have my white and red blood-cell levels measured, along with those of platelets. Doctors will also study the appearance of these cells under a microscope and check to see how much oxygen my blood can carry. I expect these tests to be normal. If they aren’t, it’s possible that I’ll start getting blood drawn from my system or drug treatment for polycythemia vera. I may need to take a blood thinner, such as aspirin, to counteract the effects of excess platelets. Should I have evidence of more serious disease, stronger treatment may be needed.

“I’m not going to lie to you: I’d rather you didn’t have it,” Thakuria said. “This isn’t like one of those mutations that have specific recommendations. There are no guidelines here. This is part of being on the frontier.”

To contact the reporter on this story: John Lauerman in Boston at jlauerman@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jonathan Kaufman at

jkaufman17@bloomberg.net

SOURCE:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-15/harvard-mapping-my-dna-turns-scary-as-threatening-gene-emerges.html

Read Full Post »

Nanotechnology Tackles Brain Cancer

Author: Tilda Barliya PhD

Primary malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors only represent about 2% of all cancers.  But treatment is elusive. Tumors may be embedded in regions of the brain that are critical to orchestrating the body’s vital functions, while they shed cells to invade other parts of the brain, forming more tumors too small to detect using conventional imaging techniques. Brain cancer’s location and ability to spread quickly makes treatment with surgery or radiation like fighting an enemy hiding out among minefields and caves, and explains why the term “brain cancer” is all too often associated with the word “inoperable.” Nanotechnology may alter this situation. It offers a new promise for cancer diagnosis and treatment. This emerging technology, by developing and manufacturing materials using atomic and molecular elements, can provide a platform for the combination of diagnostics, therapeutics and delivery to the tumor, with subsequent monitoring of the response. This review focuses on recent developments in cancer nanotechnology with particular attention to nanoparticle systems, important tools for the improvement of drug delivery in brain tumor.

Making treatment even more challenging, there is a system of blood vessels and protective cells in the brain — the blood brain barrier — that admits only essential nutrients and oxygen, and keeps out everything else, including about 95 percent of all drugs. This natural barrier puts serious limits on how much a patient can benefit from traditional chemotherapy and new cancer drugs.

The blood-brain barrier permits the exchange of essential nutrients and gases between the bloodstream and the brain, while blocking larger entities such as microbes, immune cells and most drugs from entering. This barrier system is a perfectly logical arrangement, since the brain is the most sensitive and complex organ in the human body and it would not make sense for it to become the battleground of infection and immune response.

This biological “demilitarization zone” is enforced by an elaborate and dense network of capillary vessels that feeds the brain and removes waste products. Each capillary vessel is bound by a single layer of endothelial cells, connected by “tight junctions,” thereby making it very difficult for most molecules to exit the capillaries and permeate into the brain.  Instead of “leaking” material, brain capillary walls closely regulate the flow of material using molecular pumps and receptors that recognize and transport nutrients such as glucose, nucleosides, and specific proteins into the brain. In other words, substances need to be pre-recognized to enter.

Since most drugs. including old-school chemotherapy, can not cross the BBB it very hard to treat brain-tumor patients.  In certain conditions such as grade IV glioblastoma, the BBB is loosened up (becomes more permeable  due to changes in the gene expression and tight-junction protein expression, making the cross over of materials much easier. Having  said that,  the loosened up BBB represent a double-edge sword as it not only allows the transfer of drugs but allow the escape of metastatic tumor cells.

Therefore, in order to enable drugs to enter the brain regardless of the presence of the BBB, nanotechnology has designed drugs that used the already-existing transporters located at the barrier. Among them are: glucose transporter,  transferrin transporter and LDL receptor.

Trojan Horse approach:

 Nanoparticles have excellent potential as carriers of drugs, because if they are small enough, they can penetrate the BBB. That way, a treatment could be injected into the bloodstream rather than performing surgery to insert it. Many researchers are exploring using nanoparticles in the manner of a Trojan horse, to carry treatments including chemotherapy, gene therapy, or immune boosters into the brain. As impressive as it may sound, receptor uptake of nanocarriers (Trojan horses) have also limitations;  this can limit the amount of therapy one person can have—if all of the receptors are taken up (filled) no more of the drug could get in.

 

Some of these extensive beautiful work conducted by several research labs including Dr. Raoul Kopleman, Dr. Miqin Zhang and Dr. Panos Fatouros  are summaried in this article “Nanotechnology Tackles Brain Tumors” (http://www.fightplga.org/files/monthly_feature_2005_dec.pdf).

I’d like to shift the discussion to FDA/EU-approved nanomedicine to treat brain tumors.

Using nanomedicines to treat brain tumors was first proposed more than three decades ago . Currently there is one nanoparticle treatment available to people with hard brain tumors: Nano-Therm therapy. Available at a clinic in Berlin, the treatment has been through trials in humans to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness. (http://www.dana.org/news/brainwork/detail.aspx?id=35524)

In the study, 59 patients with recurring glioblastoma treated with Nano-Therm therapy survived a median time of more than 13 months—more than double the control group, published in Neuro-Oncology in 2010.  The EU approved the treatment developed by Magforce, in July 2010.

Nano-Therm uses “thermotherapy,” which involves surgery to insert a liquid containing 15 nanometer-wide magnetic particles into the brain tumor. Next, the patient being treated lies in a machine that emits an alternating magnetic field. This causes the nanoparticles, which have an iron oxide core, to oscillate, penetrating the tumor cells. The longer the magnetic field is on, the warmer the nanoparticles grow. Doctors can take the heat up to about 45 degrees Celsius, where the tumor cells are primed for chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or even higher, which can destroy the tumor cells. It important thought to ensure that normal brain cells are not affected.

The main aim is to build a multifunctional nano-carrier; one that contains 3  aspects :

  • A target moiety- that will guide the nanoparticle (NP) to the brain tumors. Preferably will use a specific receptor to penetrate through the BBB.
  • An imaging agent- that will enable visualization of the target ” i.e brain rumor” .  MRI contrast agent are good such as gadolinium, fluorescent probes and quantum dots  are good candidates.
  • A destructive drug/toxin- that will eliminate the tumor cells.

In summary:

Nanotechnology has huge potential and a long way to go, thought there is a growing consensus that brain cancer is a problem in need of a radically different solution, and that nanotechnology fits the bill. Functionalized nanoparticles could provide precision detection, targeted treatment, and real-time tracking that conventional technology lacks. For a disease in which only 5 percent to 32 percent of patients are likely to survive after five years, large hope is riding on the potential success of “small” technology.

 

Ref:

Click to access monthly_feature_2005_dec.pdf

http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=6269.php#axzz2D4yx1btl

Click to access amiji.pdf

http://www.dana.org/news/brainwork/detail.aspx?id=35524

 

 

Read Full Post »

Neuroprotective Therapies: Pharmacogenomics vs Psychotropic drugs and Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #3: Neuroprotective Therapies: Pharmacogenomics vs Psychotropic drugs and Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Published on 11/23/2012

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

Featured Researcher:

Prof. Beth Murinson, MD, PhD   of Technion’s Rappaport Faculty of Medicine came to Technion after being a professor at Johns Hopkins Medical School. She discusses her research in the field of Neurology and pain management.

Prof. Beth Murinson, MD, PhD, at Technion’s Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, has been a very busy person since coming to Israel in 2010 with her husband and two children. Before Technion she was an associate professor at Johns Hopkins Medical School. A neurologist who specializes in injury to the peripheral nerve, these days Murinson can be found in her laboratory and at Rambam hospital. She conducts research and works on educational projects that are designed to treat patients with acute and persistent pain; teaches medical students, both the Israeli students and those from the USA who are in TeAMS – Technion’s American medical school program; advises medical students in the USA; is an attending neurologist in the Department of Neurology at Rambam Health Care Campus and runs an outpatient clinic specializing in peripheral nerve injuries, chronic neuropathic pain and back injuries.

Murinson’s research is focused on chemotoxic and traumatic injuries to the nerve. Her two main research models address the response of growing peripheral nerve cells to exposure to a common pharmacological agent and deal with nerve injury. She is trying to determine what is the least amount of injury that will produce neuropathic pain; it is important to understand what injuries are painful and which injuries are not. Her goal is to find methodology or treatments that will help prevent induced nerve injury. There are some drugs that are widely used and taken by millions of people that have the potential to harm nerves. She also works in collaboration with the oncology group at Rambam.

VIEW VIDEO

researchStory1.asp

“To find methodology or treatments that will help prevent induced nerve injury.”

Murinson’s academic credentials are impressive; she got an early start by graduating high school early and proceeding to receive her Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Johns Hopkins, a Master’s from UCLA in biomathematics, and an MD/Phd (in physiology) from the University of Maryland, graduating with honors. After, she did her residency in neurology at Yale and she finished her education with a fellowship in neuroelectrophysiology back at Johns Hopkins.

It’s a wonder she found time to write a book.

Take Back Your Back is the volume to read if you are suffering from back pain. The book lets patients know everything they can do to regain control over their lives after a back injury. It provides a wealth of information on what can go wrong with the back and how patients can take charge of their own recovery.

SOURCE:

http://www.focus.technion.ac.il/Oct12/researchStory1.asp

Flaviogeranin, a new neuroprotective compound from Streptomyces sp.

Yoichi Hayakawa, Yumi Yamazaki, Maki Kurita, Takashi Kawasaki, Motoki Takagi and Kazuo Shin-ya

Abstract

Cerebral ischemic disorders are one of the main causes of death. In brain ischemia, blood flow disruptions limit the supply of oxygen and glucose to neurons, initiating excitotoxic events.

Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author
The Journal of Antibiotics 63, 379-380 (July 2010) | doi:10.1038/ja.2010.49

Sarcophytolide: a new neuroprotective compound from the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum.

F A BadriaA N GuirguisS PerovicR SteffenW E MüllerH C Schröder

Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Toxicology (impact factor: 3.68). 12/1998; 131(2-3):133-43.
Bioactivity-guided fractionation of an alcohol extract of the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum collected from the intertidal areas and the fringing coral reefs near Hurghada, Red Sea, Egypt resulted in the isolation of a new lactone cembrane diterpene, sarcophytolide. The structure of this compound was deduced from its spectroscopic data and by comparison of the spectral data with those of known closely related cembrane-type compounds. In antimicrobial assays, the isolated compound exhibited a good activity towards Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sarcophytolide was found to display a strong cytoprotective effect against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in primary cortical cells from rat embryos. Preincubation of the neurons with 1 or 10 microg/ml of sarcophytolide resulted in a significant increase of the percentage of viable cells from 33 +/- 4% (treatment of the cells with glutamate only) to 44 +/- 4 and 92 +/- 6%, respectively. Administration of sarcophytolide during the post-incubation period following glutamate treatment did not prevent neuronal cell death. Pretreatment of the cells with sarcophytolide for 30 min significantly suppressed the glutamate-caused increase in the intracellular Ca2+ level ([Ca2+]i). Evidence is presented that the neuroprotective effect of sarcophytolide against glutamate may be partially due to an increased expression of the proto-oncogene bcl-2. The coral secondary metabolite, sarcophytolide, might be of interest as a potential drug for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders.

Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer disease: From psychotropic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors to pharmacogenomics

Cacabelos, R., et al.

Drugs Today 2000, 36(7): 415
ISSN 1699-3993
Copyright 2000 Prous Science
CCC: 1699-3993

For the past 20 years the scientific community and the pharmaceutical industry have been searching for treatments to neutralize the devastating effects of Alzheimer disease (AD). During this period important changes in the etiopathogenic concept of AD have occurred and, as a consequence, the pharmacological approach for treating AD has also changed. During the past 2 decades only 3 drugs for AD have been formally approved by the FDA, although in many countries there are several drugs which are currently used as neuroprotecting agents in dementia alone or in combination with cholinesterase inhibitors. The interest of the pharmaceutical industry has also shifted from the cholinergic hypothesis which led to the development of cholinesterase inhibitors to enhance the bioavailability of acetylcholine at the synaptic cleft to a more “molecular approach” based on new data on the pathogenic events underlying neurodegeneration in AD.

In our opinion, the pharmacological treatment of AD should rely on a better understanding of AD etiopathogenesis in order to use current drugs that protect the AD brain against deleterious events and/or to develop new drugs specifically designed to inhibit and/or regulate those factors responsible for premature neuronal death in AD. The most relevant pathogenic events in AD can be classified into 4 main categories:

  • primary events (genetic factors, neuronal apoptosis),
  • secondary events (beta-amyloid deposition in senile plaques and brain vessels, neurofibrillary tangles due to hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins, synaptic loss),
  • tertiary events (neurotransmitter deficits, neurotrophic alterations, neuroimmune dysfunction, neuroinflammatory reactions) and
  • quaternary events (excitotoxic reactions, calcium homeostasis miscarriage, free radical formation, primary and/or reactive cerebrovascular dysfunction).

All of these pathogenic events are potential targets for treatment in AD. Potential therapeutic strategies for AD treatment include palliative treatment with nonspecific neuroprotecting agents, symptomatic treatment with psychotropic drugs for noncognitive symptoms, cognitive treatment with cognition enhancers, substitutive treatment with cholinergic enhancers to improve memory deficits, multifactorial treatment using several drugs in combination and etiopathogenic treatment designed to regulate molecular factors potentially associated with AD pathogenesis.

This review discusses the conventional cholinergic enhancers (cholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic agonists), noncholinergic strategies that have been developed with other compounds, novel combination drug strategies and future trends in drug development for AD treatment.

  • Stem-cell activation,
  • genetically manipulated cell transplantation,
  • gene therapy and
  • antisense oligonucleotide technology

constitute novel approaches for the treatment of gene-related brain damage and neuroregeneration.

The identification of an increasing number of genes associated with neuronal dysfunction along the human genome together with the influence of specific allelic associations and polymorphisms indicate that pharmacogenomics will become a preferential procedure for drug development in polygenic complex disorders. Furthermore, genetic screening of the population at risk will help to identify candidates for prevention among first-degree relatives in families with transgenerational dementia.

SOURCE:

http://journals.prous.com/journals/servlet/xmlxsl/pk_journals.xml_summary_pr?p_JournalId=4&p_RefId=589153&p_IsPs=N

Dementia is a major problem of health in developed countries. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the main cause of dementia, accounting for 50–70% of the cases, followed by vascular dementia (30–40%) and mixed dementia (15–20%). Approximately 10–15% of direct costs in dementia are attributed to pharmacological treatment, and only 10–20% of the patients are moderate responders to conventional anti-dementia drugs, with questionable cost-effectiveness. Primary pathogenic events underlying the dementia process include genetic factors in which more than 200 different genes distributed across the human genome are involved, accompanied by progressive cerebrovascular dysfunction and diverse environmental factors. Mutations in genes directly associated with the amyloid cascade (APP, PS1, PS2) are only present in less than 5% of the AD population; however, the presence of the APOE-4 allele in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene represents a major risk factor for more than 40% of patients with dementia. Genotype–phenotype correlation studies and functional genomics studies have revealed the association of specific mutations in primary loci (APP, PS1, PS2) and/or APOE-related polymorphic variants with the phenotypic expression of biological traits. It is estimated that genetics accounts for 20–95% of variability in drug disposition and pharmacodynamics. Recent studies indicate that the therapeutic response in AD is genotype-specific depending upon genes associated with AD pathogenesis and/or genes responsible for drug metabolism (CYPs). In monogenic-related studies, APOE-4/4 carriers are the worst responders. In trigenic (APOE-PS1-PS2 clusters)-related studies the best responders are those patients carrying the 331222-, 341122-, 341222-, and 441112- genomic profiles. The worst responders in all genomic clusters are patients with the 441122+ genotype, indicating the powerful, deleterious effect of the APOE-4/4 genotype on therapeutics in networking activity with other AD-related genes. Cholinesterase inhibitors of current use in AD are metabolized via CYP-related enzymes. These drugs can interact with many other drugs which are substrates, inhibitors or inducers of the cytochrome P-450 system; this interaction elicits liver toxicity and other adverse drug reactions. CYP2D6-related enzymes are involved in the metabolism of more than 20% of CNS drugs. The distribution of the CYP2D6 genotypes differentiates four major categories of CYP2D6-related metabolyzer types: (a) Extensive Metabolizers (EM)(*1/*1, *1/*10)(51.61%); (b) Intermediate Metabolizers (IM) (*1/*3, *1/*4, *1/*5, *1/*6, *1/*7, *10/*10, *4/*10, *6/*10, *7/*10) (32.26%); (c) Poor Metabolizers (PM) (*4/*4, *5/*5) (9.03%); and (d) Ultra-rapid Metabolizers (UM) (*1xN/*1, *1xN/*4, Dupl) (7.10%). PMs and UMs tend to show higher transaminase activity than EMs and IMs. EMs and IMs are the best responders, and PMs and UMs are the worst responders to pharmacological treatments in AD. It seems very plausible that the pharmacogenetic response in AD depends upon the interaction of genes involved in drug metabolism and genes associated with AD pathogenesis. The establishment of clinical protocols for the practical application of pharmacogenetic strategies in AD will foster important advances in drug development, pharmacological optimization and cost-effectiveness of drugs, and personalized treatments in dementia.

Key words  dementia – Alzheimer’s disease – APOE – CYP2D6 – pharmacogenetics – pharmacogenomics – multifactorial treatments

SOURCE:

Psychopharmacological Neuroprotection in Neurodegenerative Disease: Assessing the Preclinical Data

Edward C. Lauterbach; Jeff Victoroff; Kerry L. Coburn; Samuel D. Shillcutt; Suzanne M. Doonan; Mario F. Mendez

Abstract

This manuscript reviews the preclinical in vitro, ex vivo, and nonhuman in vivo effects of psychopharmacological agents in clinical use on cell physiology with a view toward identifying agents with neuroprotective properties in neurodegenerative disease. These agents are routinely used in the symptomatic treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Each agent is reviewed in terms of its effects on pathogenic proteins, proteasomal function, mitochondrial viability, mitochondrial function and metabolism, mitochondrial permeability transition pore development, cellular viability, and apoptosis. Effects on the metabolism of the neurodegenerative disease pathogenic proteins alpha-synuclein, beta-amyloid, and tau, including tau phosphorylation, are particularly addressed, with application to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Limitations of the current data are detailed and predictive criteria for translational clinical neuroprotection are proposed and discussed. Drugs that warrant further study for neuroprotection in neurodegenerative disease include pramipexole, thioridazine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, lithium, valproate, desipramine, maprotiline, fluoxetine, buspirone, clonazepam, diphenhydramine, and melatonin. Those with multiple neuroprotective mechanisms include pramipexole, thioridazine, olanzapine, quetiapine, lithium, valproate, desipramine, maprotiline, clonazepam, and melatonin. Those best viewed circumspectly in neurodegenerative disease until clinical disease course outcomes data become available, include several antipsychotics, lithium, oxcarbazepine, valproate, several tricyclic antidepressants, certain SSRIs, diazepam, and possibly diphenhydramine. A search for clinical studies of neuroprotection revealed only a single study demonstrating putatively positive results for ropinirole. An agenda for research on potentially neuroprotective agent is provided.

The most important detailed findings for each drug are briefly summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4 (located online at http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/22/1/8/DCI). The recently discovered TDP-43 was also considered while this project was underway, but no relevant articles were evident for this protein.

It is evident from the above that there is significant variation in degree of investigation, cell lines studied, and methodological approaches. Other limitations include the varying use of neural tissues, variance in the neuronal types studied, use of neuroblastoma lines instead of neurons, study of immature or poorly differentiated cells that may be more prone to apoptosis than more mature cells, and the infrequent characterization of effects on αSyn, tau, and Aβ. Such deficiencies in the data significantly confound the ability to draw definitive conclusions. In particular, the deficiencies in the data raise the question as to the most valid, clinically relevant, and appropriate standards of evidence to apply in determining which preclinical findings will predictably translate into clinical neuroprotection in patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

A number of concerns impact the selection of an appropriate standard of evidence. First, there are no established general criteria for judging preclinical neuroprotective data across the diversity of neurodegenerative diseases. Second, unlike clinical evidence-based medicine (EBM) standards, there do not appear to be established uniform criteria for judging the diversity of preclinical findings. From an EBM perspective, the data considered here are even less compelling than Class II or IV18 or Level C19clinical case reports since they generally do not pertain to findings in human patients. Third, there are considerable variabilities across the present preclinical findings with respect to intra- and extramodel replication, replications in neural tissue, the specific neural tissues studied, and the specific brain locus even when neurons are consistently studied. These are summarized in Table 5. Fourth, replications are still needed using the same physiological dose range, particularly because some have observed bell—shaped rather than sigmoid—shaped neuroprotective dose—response curves.20,21 Fifth, some drugs have mixed actions, simultaneously possessing some neuroprotective actions and other neurodegenerative actions. It is not yet clear whether the various actions should receive equal weight or whether one may trump others (for example, effects on apoptotic measures may be more determinative in importance than effects on more “upstream” processes such as mitochondrial potential or proteasomal function). Sixth, there is no gold-standard preclinical model but, instead, a diversity of models that each have their own select benefits and limitations. These and other factors likely contribute to the current disconnect between preclinical findings and neuroprotective clinical trial results.

Some criteria for considering neuroprotective candidate agents have been elaborated in Parkinson’s disease22 and stroke.23 In Parkinson’s disease, scientific rationale, penetration of the blood-brain barrier, safety and tolerability, and efficacy in relevant animal models of the disease or an indication of benefit in human clinical studies constitute criteria.22 In the case of FDA-approved psychotropics reviewed here, which essentially meet most of these criteria (with the exception of systematic, consistent application in relevant neurodegenerative disease models), the question then becomes: how good is the available preclinical evidence of neuroprotection? Ravina et al.22 noted that the most problematic issue in Parkinson’s disease was evaluating animal data given the many different models that were of uncertain value in predicting results in humans and noted further that a clinical trial would actually be needed to demonstrate the predictive validity of any preclinical model. Similarly, it is not possible to judge the quality of the present preclinical findings by the models used because the predictive validities of the models remain unclear. In stroke,23 potentially successful drug candidates have been considered to be inferable from preclinical data by the following criteria: (a) adequately defined dose-response relations; (b) time window studies showing a benefit period; (c) adequate physiological monitoring in unbiased, replicated, randomized, blinded animal studies; (d) lesion volume and functional outcome measures determined acutely and at longer term followup; (e) demonstration in two animal species; (f) submission of findings to a peer-reviewed journal. However, even with these criteria, Gladstone et al.24 have pointed out that translation of preclinical findings to clinical efficacy has been hampered by a lack of functional outcomes, long-term end points, permanent ischemia models, extended time windows, and selective white matter evaluation in preclinical models whereas clinical studies are plagued by insensitive outcome measures, lack of stroke subtype specificity, and inattention to the ischemic penumbra, among other concerns. Ford25 has also pointed out that a number of compounds fulfilling these stroke neuroprotectant criteria have failed to afford translational clinical neuroprotection. Analogous concerns obtain for neurodegenerative disease preclinical models and clinical methods, particularly whether putative criteria will reliably predict translation to clinical neuroprotection. Additionally, a nearly endless array of clinical variables including gender, age, pharmacogenomics, medical history, coadministered drugs, and other factors may contribute to an inability to predict clinical neuroprotection despite preclinical success. Thus, predictive criteria remain in need of development.

Reflection upon these translational issues in regard to psychotropic neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases first suggests the need for replication within and between specific preclinical models in specific neurons at specific loci to elucidate physiological dose-response relations that should then themselves be replicated as a first step. Additionally, other issues seem relevant to the problem of determining which candidate drugs may be most likely to effect clinical neuroprotection. We suggest preliminary neuroprotective drug selection criteria for assessing the likelihood of translational clinical neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases (Table 6). These criteria, including preclinical (at least two replicated neuroprotective actions at physiological doses in an established neuroprotective model, neural tissue, and disease-specific animal model in excess of the number of known neurodegenerative actions) and clinical (delayed progression on clinical markers and unexpected benign disease course not accounted for by symptomatic properties) criteria, can be evaluated over time and modified as future data indicate. Given the lack of information regarding the utility of specific preclinical paradigms in predicting clinical neuroprotective effects, it is premature to rank or weight these criteria. Rather, recent concerns26 notwithstanding and until a better study methodology is developed, we suspect that the greater the number of criteria met by a candidate drug, the greater the likelihood of demonstrating translational clinical neuroprotective efficacy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, delayed-start or randomized-withdrawal clinical trial.27 Such trials are needed because agents deemed promising based upon preclinical data often fail to demonstrate neuroprotection in clinical trials for reasons identified in the above paragraph. At present, preclinical demonstration of replicable neuroprotective effects in neural tissues at clinically-relevant doses does not assure a positive result in a clinical trial, nor does the absence of such evidence necessarily exclude clinical neuroprotective benefits. Until such clinical findings obtain, it is impossible to identify preclinical determinants predictive of translational clinical success and ascertain whether patients are actually being helped or harmed in a neuroprotective sense by the use of these drugs.

Beyond the methodological concerns expressed above, a practical assessment of these preclinical findings is still possible. Given the relative infancy of this field of research, the present state of the literature, the limitations of the data described above, and our current ignorance of preclinical evidence predictive of successful clinical translation, there is the very real possibility of prematurely disregarding findings that may ultimately prove to be of clinical significance with further research (a “type II” error) by applying an overly stringent standard of evidence. It seems that, at the present time, the proper approach is to instead look at the preponderance of the available findings and attempt some generalizations that constitute general impressions to be tested in future research, similar to the process of developing and refining clinical diagnostic criteria. Accordingly, the following observations are drawn from looking at all of the studies, without any exclusions, except where there are clearly contradictory data. As noted, many of the findings have not yet been independently replicated in the same model despite apparent replication in a different model (Table 5). Until the state of the literature develops to the point where independent replications in the same model are routinely observed, appropriate assessment criteria must be very liberal, resulting in conclusions that can only be viewed as preliminary. Adopting this approach with its attending caveats, some preliminary observations can be gleaned from the data. Below, we first consider drugs with respect to their neuroprotective potentials, distinguishing drugs meriting further study from those that have limitations dissuading further investigation and those for which too little data are available to form any conclusions. (We also summarize neuroprotective effects by drug class in Appendix 1 and drugs by neuroprotective actions in Appendix 2 [located online at http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/22/1/8/DCI%5D; Part 2 of this report focuses on the broader neuroprotective aspects of selected psychopharmacological classes.) Next, we assess the general properties of the various classes of psychotropics. We then consider each investigated cellular function with regard to the drugs that influence them. Finally, we detail a research agenda for drugs of interest and consider the progress made in clinical neuroprotective trials thus far, recommending a next step in their development.

Drugs of Neuroprotective Interest

Drugs meriting further study include:

  • pramipexole,
  • thioridazine,
  • risperidone,
  • olanzapine,
  • quetiapine,
  • lithium,
  • valproate,
  • nortriptyline,
  • desipramine,
  • maprotiline,
  • fluoxetine,
  • paroxetine,
  • buspirone,
  • clonazepam,
  • diphenhydramine, and
  • melatonin.

These are drugs with at least one significant neuroprotective action and relatively negligible countervailing neurodegeneration—promoting effects, as summarized in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 (especially the “Comments” column summarizing the data), and particularly Table 7 (tables located online at http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/22/1/8/DCI).

Drugs that are not recommended for further study at the present time due to more significant limiting issues (see Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3, especially “Comments” column summarizing the data). Haloperidol does not warrant further study because of tau hyperphosphorylation, reduced cell viability, and multiple proapoptotic actions, especially in hippocampus, cortex, striatum, and nigra. Fluphenazine, chlorpromazine, and clozapine, probably do not warrant further study because of multiple proapoptotic actions, and chlorpromazine inhibits tau dephosphorylation. Carbamazepine has variable neuroprotective properties. Oxcarbazepine promotes apoptosis. Clomipramine also generally promotes apoptosis. Diazepam has mixed effects on neural apoptosis, but uncouples oxidative phosphorylation, releases cytochrome c, and promotes apoptosis in a number of neuronal models, although it promoted ATP recovery and prevented cytochrome c release in a single study of ischemic hippocampal slices.

It should be emphasized that there are no convincing clinical data at present to indicate that these drugs are unsafe for clinical use due to neurodegenerative effects, only preclinical evidence to temper enthusiasm for clinical trial application as a neuroprotectant. Until such data become available, the use of these drugs continues to be guided by clinical symptomatic indications. The limiting actions described above are considered to be significant enough to likely detract from an overall neuroprotective effect, making positive findings less likely, hence our inability to recommend them at present. It must also be recognized that some of these limitations still await replication (Table 5), and that it is presently unknown precisely which neuroprotective modes of action are positively and negatively predictive of clinical neuroprotection.

Drugs for Which Limited Data Do Not Allow Recommendations

There are currently insufficient data for ropinirole, amantadine, thiothixene, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, amitriptyline, imipramine, trimipramine, doxepin, protriptyline, bupropion, sertraline, fluvoxamine, citalopram, trazodone, nefazodone, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, chlordiazepoxide, flurazepam, temazepam, chlorazepate, lorazepam, oxazepam, alprazolam, zolpidem, cyproheptadine, hydroxyzine, modafinil, ramelteon, benztropine, trihexyphenidyl, and biperiden.

Briefly, regarding the neuroprotective effects of psychopharmacological classes, certain generalizations are apparent (see Appendix 1 for details). There is some evidence to suggest that D2 agonists, lithium, some SSRIs, and melatonin reduce . D2 agonists, certain atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, and melatonin suppress . Neuroleptics, lithium, certain heterocyclic antidepressants, the central benzodiazepine receptor agonist clonazepam, and melatonin inhibit . D2 agonists, atypical antipsychotics, lithium, antidepressants, the 5HT1a agonist buspirone, and melatonin inhibit , whereas the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam promotes apoptosis. These, however, are gross generalizations, which are better explained in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2. Moreover, it is potentially erroneous to project neuroprotective effects upon a pharmacological class because neuroprotective properties may not relate to their currently recognized pharmacodynamic effects.

Above, we have indicated which drugs merit further study, those which cannot be recommended due to significant limiting issues, and those with inadequate data to allow assessment. Among drugs meriting further study, Table 8 discloses the various agents along with evidential weights for their various neuroprotective actions. It can be seen that drugs that inhibit apoptosis and have at least one other general antiapoptotic action (each demonstrated by a net of two or more studies supporting a neuroprotective action, without consideration of their effects on specific proteins) include pramipexole, olanzapine, lithium, desipramine, and melatonin. The remaining agents have less robust findings supporting general neuroprotective actions. Considering the effects of these drugs on proteins and at least one other neuroprotective action in a disease-specific model, the most promising drugs in Alzheimer’s disease would include olanzapine, lithium, and melatonin while drugs with less robust support in Alzheimer’s disease include pramipexole, quetiapine, valproate, and desipramine. Applying the same criteria, drugs of promise in Parkinson’s disease include pramipexole and melatonin, while drugs with less robust support in Parkinson’s disease include olanzapine, lithium, valproate, desipramine and clonazepam. Similarly, in Huntington’s disease, desipramine is the most promising, with less robust support for lithium, valproate, nortriptyline, and maprotiline. There is some support for pramipexole, olanzapine, lithium, and nortriptyline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, as we have pointed out above, it is premature to draw any clinical conclusions from these data because of the limitations we have described and because more data will be forthcoming.

Directions for Future Research

Given this inability to draw clinical conclusions, we provide the next steps that should be undertaken in developing psychotropic research to the point that results can guide the clinical application of these drugs for neuroprotection. While it is not clear what the most predictive models of clinical neuroprotection are, and what the most important neuroprotective mechanisms are, it is apparent that some drugs are further along in their preclinical research than others. It is also clear that some seemingly paradoxical neuroprotective outcomes are seen, such as modafinil’s ability to increase glutamate release and yet reduce glutamate toxicity, and paroxetine’s ability to reduce hippocampal Aβ production in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice despite its anticholinergic properties that would otherwise tend to increase Aβ production. These seeming contradictions point to the need to focus on research findings rather than our current limited theoretical understanding. Thus, we outline the next research steps to be taken to elaborate findings that will move us toward establishing neuroprotective drugs that can be applied by clinicians.

Apathy Treatments

It would be of interest to investigate pramipexole in normal neurons, especially dopaminergic and cholinergic neurons.

Pramipexole should be better characterized as to its effects on αSyn, Aβ, tau, and Aβ fibril and oligomer-induced reactive oxygen species formation as well as on the proteasome and on mitochondrial metabolism. It then should be investigated in clinical neuroprotection paradigms in neurodegenerative disease, particularly Parkinson’s disease.

The next step for amantadine involves investigations in neurons.

Antipsychotics

Risperidone needs more study to determine its neuroprotective potential. Its ability to reduce Complex I activity in regions of the brain, albeit not in the midbrain, indicates the need for further research as to its long-term safety in neurodegenerative diseases affecting the hippocampus, frontal lobe, and striatum, including Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and Huntington’s disease. Clinical effects tend to contraindicate its use in Parkinson’s disease.

Although olanzapine should be better characterized as to its multiple neuroprotective effects (especially on the proteasome and mitochondrial permeability transition pore development), antimuscarinic and parkinsonian clinical properties argue against its application in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.

Quetiapine should be better characterized as to its effects on αSyn, Aβ, tau, the proteasome, and protection against rotenone toxicity. Further studies using Aβ and initial studies using MPP+ should be carried out, with subsequent disease-modification studies in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease if the preceding studies indicate safety, although antihistaminic and anticholinergic clinical properties can constitute a limitation to use in Alzheimer’s disease.

Trifluoperazine, chlorpromazine, and thioridazine might be further studied in situations where inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore development is of utility.

Aripiprazole and ziprasidone should be studied for their neuroprotective properties, given their low proclivities to induce extrapyramidal side effects in people with neurodegenerative disease.

Mood Stabilizers

Lithium should be studied for neuroprotection in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and cerebral ischemia. A clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease is currently under way.

Investigation of valproate’s ability to induce mitochondrial permeability transition pore development but not mitochondrial membrane depolarization or cytochrome c release may yield information that may help develop neuroprotective mitochondrial strategies.

Valproate might be investigated in patients with Parkinson’s disease and oncological diseases for its antiapoptotic effects in the former and proapoptotic effects in microglia and the latter. Valproate’s ability to increase αSyn concentrations may be either beneficial or detrimental in Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies, and further research is needed. Activated microglia appear to be of importance in neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer’s disease. Results of a recent clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease are not yet available.

Antidepressants

Desipramine, nortriptyline, and maprotiline should be studied in other models of Huntington’s disease. If effective, they might be tried in other neurodegenerative disease models and in depressed patients with Huntington’s disease. Nortriptyline’s effects in Huntington’s disease yeast and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse models deserve replication.

Fluoxetine has inhibited neural stem cell apoptosis, hippocampal apoptosis in newborn mice and rats and serotonin-induced apoptosis. Although it has some proapoptotic properties, fluoxetine should be studied further as a neuroprotectant in Alzheimer’s disease.

Paroxetine should be studied further for neuroprotective properties, especially in regard to reductions in Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau.

Anxiolytics and Hypnotics

Buspirone has inhibited apoptosis in several neuronal models and now deserves study in regard to other related characteristics. If further studies indicate safety, studies in patients with neurodegenerative disease should then be undertaken.

Which types of GABA-A agonists protect against Aβ neurotoxicity and which do not requires clarification.

Clonazepam should be studied further for its restorative properties in Complex I deficiency, and should be better characterized in regard to apoptotic effects in neuronal models, especially on frontal lobe apoptosis in mature animals. If favorable results are forthcoming, it might then be tried in patients with neurodegenerative disease, especially Parkinson’s disease, although its association with falls in the elderly is a limitation.

Diphenhydramine should be further characterized in inflammatory, malignant, hypoxic, and other models where histamine plays a role.

Melatonin might now be investigated in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and in those with Parkinson’s disease.

Comprehensive Strategies

Deficiencies detailed in Table 5 deserve to be addressed in future studies. Validation of Table 6 translational predictive criteria awaits investigation. The relative predictive weightings of the various criteria also await outcome studies.

Combination therapies of psychotropics with differing profiles of neuroprotective actions may yield greater clinical impact than monotherapies. These varying profiles are depicted in Table 8. For example, across neurodegenerative diseases, the combination of lithium and melatonin might provide neuroprotective synergies, as might pramipexole, olanzapine, lithium, and nortriptyline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lithium, and desipramine in Huntington’s disease, and pramipexole, lithium, desipramine, and melatonin in Alzheimer’s disease (Table 8). In Alzheimer’s disease, lithium and melatonin together might synergize efficacy at Aβ, hyperphosphorylated tau, reactive oxygen species, transition pore development, and apoptosis, with lithium perhaps improving ubiquitylation. In Parkinson’s disease, this combination plus pramipexole may synergize benefits to reactive oxygen species, transition pore, and apoptosis, with lithium perhaps improving ubiquitylation and pramipexole and melatonin perhaps synergizing efficacy on αSyn. It should be remembered, however, that some combination therapies, applied in cancer chemotherapy, have sometimes resulted in a reduced efficacy of all drugs and an increase in side-effects.28 Animal trials of proposed combinations would be a first step in evaluating their safety and efficacy.

Progress Thus Far: Clinical Trials

So far, some preliminary progress has been made in identifying the clinical neuroprotective properties of some of these agents. A search performed on October 9, 2007 using the search terms “randomized clinical trial AND (neuroprotection OR disease-modifying OR disease-modification OR disease modifying OR disease modification) for each drug revealed only one clinical neuroprotection study (ropinirole versus -dopa), and two studies evaluating glutathione reductase and a gamma interferon, relevant to disease progression, but without evaluating actual indices of clinical neuroprotection. A 6-18F-fluorodopa PET study of 186 patients with Parkinson’s disease randomized to either ropinirole or -dopa revealed a significant one third reduction in the rate of loss of dopamine terminals in subjects treated with ropinirole.29 A study of valproate plus placebo versus valproate plus melatonin in patients with epilepsy demonstrated a significant increase in glutathione reductase in the melatonin group, but no clinical indices of actual neuroprotection were evaluated in that study.30 A study in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis identified a relationship between sertraline treatment of depression and attenuation of proinflammatory cytokine IFN-gamma, but again, actual indices of clinical neuroprotection were not assessed.31 In addition to the findings of the search, the CALM-Parkinson’s disease study involving the dopamine agonist pramipexole in Parkinson’s disease found faster progression (or at least less improvement on total UPDRS score) but slower dopamine transporter signal loss than with -dopa over 46 months,32 although the study has been criticized for lack of a placebo, group heterogeneity, and confounding influences on dopamine transporters. In contrast, a 2-year study of ropinirole found no significant difference in fluorodopa uptake compared to -dopa treatment (−13% versus −18%).33

A search of clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov) on October 9, 2007 using the terms (neuroprotection OR disease-modifying OR disease-modification OR disease modifying OR disease modification) and neurodegenerative diseases revealed only a few studies in progress. These included pramipexole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, early versus delayed pramipexole in Parkinson’s disease, and valproate in spinal muscular atrophy. Since that time, as of February 1, 2009, additional studies have been registered. In Alzheimer’s disease, these include a short-term study of CSF tau epitopes with lithium, brain volume and clinical progression with valproate, and hippocampal volume, brain volume, and clinical progression with escitalopram. In frontotemporal dementia, there is a single study of CSF and brain volume with quetiapine versus D-amphetamine. In Huntington’s disease, there is a study of CSF BDNF levels with lithium versus valproate. In dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD), there is a study of clinical progression with ramelteon. In Parkinson’s disease, there is a study of striatal dopamine transporter by β-CIT SPECT with pramipexole versus -dopa while an 8 year study of disability with pramipexole has been terminated. Only the spinal muscular atrophy and dementia with Lewy bodies/PDD studies employ clinical neuroprotective designs (delayed-start paradigm), and the validity of biomarker correlates, particularly dopamine transporter measures in Parkinson’s disease, continues to be studied.

The discussion above relies on multiple investigative approaches using a number of different psychotropics in a variety of models and a diversity of cell lines. A major caveat is that preclinical results do not necessarily translate into clinical realities. For example, favorable preclinical findings for the neuroprotectant minocycline exist in Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, stroke, spinal cord injury, and MS models, but a recent phase III trial in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was halted because of a 25% faster rate of neurological progression with the active drug than with placebo.34 Nevertheless, some generalizations seem possible at this stage. The considerations above are offered in hopes of stimulating the identification and development of pharmaceuticals that are useful both for symptomatic improvement and for long-term neuroprotection in neurodegenerative disease. Pursuit of the directions for research suggested above may contribute to that development.

 

Read Full Post »

Overview of New Strategy for Treatment of T2DM: SGLT2 Inhibiting Oral Antidiabetic Agents

 

Author and Curator: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease, which is affecting widespread populations in epidemic proportions across the globe 1. It is characterised by hyperglycemia, which if not controlled adequately, eventually leads to microvascular and metabolic complications (Fig 1). Traditionally, T2DM management includes alteration in lifestyle, oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin. The present pharmacological approaches predominantly target glucose metabolism by compensating for reduction in insulin secretion and/or insulin action. However, these approaches are often limited by inadequate glucose control and the the possibility of severe adverse effects such as hypoglycemia, weight gain, nausea, and sometimes lactic acidosis 2–4 (Fig 1). Hence the search for new drugs with different mechanism of action and with little side affects is key in providing better glycemic control in T2DM patients and hence offering better prognosis with reduced morbidity and mortality.

Figure 1 (credit: aviral vatsa): Short overview of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): complications, present therapeutic approaches and their limitations.

Along with pancreas, our kidneys play a vital role in regulating glucose levels in the plasma. Under physiological conditions, kidneys absorb 99% of the plasma glucose filtered through the renal glomeruli tubules. Majority i.e. 80-90% of this renal glucose resorbtion is mediated via the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) 5,6. SGLT2 is a high-capacity low-affinity transporter that is mainly located in the proximal segment S1 of the proximal convoluted tubule 6. Inhibition of SGLT2 activity can thus induce glucosuria which inturn can lower blood glucose levels without targeting insulin resistance and insulin secretion pathways of glucose modulation (Fig 2).

Figure 2 (credit: aviral vatsa): Schematic overview of regulation of plasma glucose by sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT).

Thus inhibition of SGLT2 provides a novel way to modulate blood glucose levels and consequently limit long term complications of hyperglycemia 7,8. Moreover, SGLT2 inhibitors will selectively target the renal glucose transportation and spare the counter regulatory hormones involved in glucose metabolism because SGLT2 is almost exclusively located in the kidneys. This novel way of glucose modulation will likely avoid severe side affects, e.g. hypoglycemia and weight gain, that are seen with present antidiabetic pharmacological agents.

Agents currently under development

Table below gives an overview of the SGLT2 inhibotors in development.

(Credit: Chao et al 2010)

 

In summary, increasing urinary glucose excretion represents a new approach to addressing the challenge of hyperglycaemia. SGLT2 inhibitors may have indications both in the prevention and treatment of T2DM, and perhaps T1DM, with a possible application in obesity. Further studies in large numbers of human subjects are necessary to delineate efficacy, safety and how to most effectively use these agents in the treatment of diabetes.

Bibliography

  1. Diabetes Atlas. International Diabetes Federation, (2009) at <www.diabetesatlas.org>
  2. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 352, 837–853 (1998).
  3. Buse, J. B. et al. Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in sulfonylurea-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27, 2628–2635 (2004).
  4. Inzucchi, S. E. Oral antihyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes: scientific review. JAMA 287, 360–372 (2002).
  5. Brown, G. K. Glucose transporters: Structure, function and consequences of deficiency. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 23, 237–246 (2000).
  6. Wright, E. M. Renal Na+-glucose cotransporters. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280, F10–F18 (2001).
  7. Chao, E. C. & Henry, R. R. SGLT2 inhibition — a novel strategy for diabetes treatment. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9, 551–559 (2010).
  8. Ferrannini, E. & Solini, A. SGLT2 inhibition in diabetes mellitus: rationale and clinical prospects. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 8, 495–502 (2012).

 

Read Full Post »

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

MED12 Controls the Response to Multiple Cancer Drugs through Regulation of TGF-β Receptor Signaling

Cell, Volume 151, Issue 5, 937-950, 21 November 2012
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.035

Referred to by: A Mediator Lost in the War on Cancer

Authors

  • Highlights
  • MED12 loss causes resistance to many cancer drugs through enhanced TGF-β signaling
  • MED12 inhibits TGF-β receptor signaling through physical interaction in the cytoplasm
  • MED12-regulated genes are predictive for responses to cancer drugs in patients
  • MED12-deficient tumors may benefit from therapy that includes a TGF-β inhibitor

Summary

Inhibitors of the ALK and EGF receptor tyrosine kinases provoke dramatic but short-lived responses in lung cancers harboring EML4-ALK translocations or activating mutations of EGFR, respectively. We used a large-scale RNAi screen to identify MED12, a component of the transcriptional MEDIATOR complex that is mutated in cancers, as a determinant of response to ALK and EGFR inhibitors. MED12 is in part cytoplasmic where it negatively regulates TGF-βR2 through physical interaction. MED12 suppression therefore results in activation of TGF-βR signaling, which is both necessary and sufficient for drug resistance. TGF-β signaling causes MEK/ERK activation, and consequently MED12 suppression also confers resistance to MEK and BRAF inhibitors in other cancers. MED12 loss induces an EMT-like phenotype, which is associated with chemotherapy resistance in colon cancer patients and to gefitinib in lung cancer. Inhibition of TGF-βR signaling restores drug responsiveness in MED12KD cells, suggesting a strategy to treat drug-resistant tumors that have lost MED12.

Read Full Post »

Personalized medicine-based cure for cancer might not be far away

Reporter: Ritu Saxena, Ph.D.

Image

 

Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center Initiative.

Researchers at the MD Anderson Cancer center initiated a personalized medicine program by moving to phase I early clinical trials. The tumors were analyzed for molecular aberrations and matched with suitable targeted agents. Treatment assignment was not randomized. With a study involving 144 patients with advanced cancer stages, the authors found that the patients that underwent matched therapy based on their single aberration type, showed better results in terms of survival as compared to similar single aberration carrying patients who underwent systemic therapy (median, 13.4 vs. 9.0 months; p = 0.017).

The findings have been published a few days ago in the November 15th issue of Clinical Cancer Research Journal.

Abstract: Tsimberidou AM et al, Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD anderson cancer center initiative. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 15;18(22):6373-83.

Authors’ Affiliations: Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program; and Departments of Hematopathology and Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

PURPOSE:

We initiated a personalized medicine program in the context of early clinical trials, using targeted agents matched with tumor molecular aberrations. Herein, we report our observations. Patient and Methods: Patients with advanced cancer were treated in the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy. Molecular analysis was conducted in the MD Anderson Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory. Patients whose tumors had an aberration were treated with matched targeted therapy, when available. Treatment assignment was not randomized. The clinical outcomes of patients with molecular aberrations treated with matched targeted therapy were compared with those of consecutive patients who were not treated with matched targeted therapy.

RESULTS:

Of 1,144 patients analyzed, 460 (40.2%) had 1 or more aberration. In patients with 1 molecular aberration, matched therapy (n = 175) compared with treatment without matching (n = 116) was associated with a higher overall response rate (27% vs. 5%; P < 0.0001), longer time-to-treatment failure (TTF; median, 5.2 vs. 2.2 months; P < 0.0001), and longer survival (median, 13.4 vs. 9.0 months; P = 0.017). Matched targeted therapy was associated with longer TTF compared with their prior systemic therapy in patients with 1 mutation (5.2 vs. 3.1 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis in patients with 1 molecular aberration, matched therapy was an independent factor predicting response (P = 0.001) and TTF (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION:

Keeping in mind that the study was not randomized and patients had diverse tumor types and a median of 5 prior therapies, our results suggest that identifying specific molecular abnormalities and choosing therapy based on these abnormalities is relevant in phase I clinical trials.

Sources:

Research article by Tsimberidou AM et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 15;18(22):6373-83.

News brief by Virginia Postrel, a Bloomberg View Columnist, Cancer Breakthroughs Meet Market Realities, November, 2012.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »