Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Clinical & Translational’ Category

Autocrine selection of GLP-1 binding site

Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator

LPBI

Update 12/15/2015

TSRI Team Finds Unique Anti-Diabetes Compound

Scientists from The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have deployed a powerful new drug discovery technique to identify an anti-diabetes compound with a novel mechanism of action

http://www.technologynetworks.com/HTS/news.aspx?ID=186055

The finding may lead to a new type of diabetes treatment. Just as importantly, it demonstrates the potential of the new technique, which enables researchers to quickly find drug candidates that activate cellular receptors in desired ways.

“In principle, we can apply this technique to hundreds of other receptors like the one we targeted in this study to find disease treatments that are more potent and have fewer side effects than existing therapies. It has been a very productive cross-campus collaboration, so we’re hoping to build on its success as we continue to collaborate on interrogating potential therapeutic targets,” said Patricia H. McDonald, an assistant professor at TSRI’s Jupiter, Florida campus and a senior investigator of the study.

McDonald’s laboratory collaborated on the study with the laboratory of Richard A. Lerner, the Lita Annenberg Hazen Professor of Immunochemistry at TSRI’s La Jolla campus, and with other TSRI groups. Lerner has pioneered techniques for generating and screening large libraries of antibodies or proteins to find new therapies.

In Search of a Better Activator

Three years ago, Lerner and colleagues devised a technique called autocrine selection, which enables scientists to screen very large libraries of molecules to find those that not only bind a given cellular receptor but also activate it to bring about a desired therapeutic effect. Since then, the Lerner laboratory and collaborating scientists have used the technique to find new molecules that block cold virus infection, boost red blood cell production and kill cancer cells, among other effects.

For the new study, Lerner and his laboratory used the technique to target a receptor linked to type 2 diabetes, a life-shortening disease estimated to affect 30 million people in the US alone.

The GLP-1 receptor, as it is known, is expressed by insulin-producing “beta cells” in the pancreas. Several drugs that activate this receptor—drugs called GLP-1 receptor agonists—are already approved for treating type 2 diabetes. In this case, the TSRI team’s aim was to find a molecule that activates the GLP-1 receptor in a unique way.

The GLP-1 receptor belongs to a large class of receptors known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Scientists recently have come to understand that when a molecule activates a GPCR, it doesn’t necessarily trigger a single chain of biochemical signals within the cell. In fact, most GPCR agonists trigger signals via multiple distinct pathways—one being via a so-called G protein and another via a protein known as beta-arrestin. In some cases, a “biased agonist” that principally activates just one of these pathways would work better than one that activates both.

In this case, Lerner and his laboratory teamed up with McDonald, an expert on GPCRs and metabolic disease, to find a molecule that would preferentially activate the GLP-1 receptor’s G protein pathway.

To start, researchers in Lerner’s laboratory, including Hongkai Zhang, a senior staff scientist and co-first author of the study, generated a library of candidate molecules—based on a known GLP-1 receptor agonist, Exendin-4, a small protein (peptide) originally found in the venom of Gila monster lizards; a synthetic version of this protein is now used as a type 2 diabetes medication. Zhang created about one million new peptides by randomly varying one end of Exendin-4—the end that normally activates the G protein and beta arrestin pathways.

“The idea was that at least one of these many variants would induce a change in the shape of the GLP-1 receptor that would activate the G-protein pathway without activating the beta arrestin pathway,” Zhang said.

Using the autocrine selection system, Zhang and colleagues rapidly screened these variant peptides and eventually isolated one, P5, that potently and selectively activated the GLP-1 receptor’s G-protein pathway. An initial test in healthy mice showed that P5 worked well at boosting glucose tolerance—at about one-hundredth the dose of Exendin-4 needed for the same effect.

Protein expert Philip E. Dawson, an associate professor at TSRI’s La Jolla campus, synthesized sufficient quantities of P5, and McDonald and her laboratory performed more advanced tests in cultured cells and in mice.

A Different Mechanism

Exendin-4 and and other GLP-1 receptor agonists work in part by strongly stimulating pancreatic beta cells to produce more insulin—which signals muscle and fat cells to draw glucose from the blood, thus lowering blood glucose levels.

McDonald and her team found that although P5 equals or outperforms Exendin-4 in standard mouse models of diabetes, it stimulates insulin production only weakly.

“We didn’t expect that, but in fact, it was a nice finding because less reliance on stimulating insulin could mean less stress on the beta cells,” said Emmanuel Sturchler, staff scientist in the McDonald laboratory and co-first author of the study.

Investigating further, the team found that while the peptide doesn’t make mice fatter or heavier, it triggers the growth of new fat cells. In typical obesity-related diabetes, fat cells grow larger, not more numerous, and as they grow larger, they lose their ability to respond to insulin (insulin resistance). The proliferation of fat cells with P5 was accompanied by signs of increased insulin sensitivity in those cells, suggesting that the peptide works in part by alleviating insulin resistance.

Exendin-4 induces a feeling of satiety, causing mice (and people) to modestly lower food intake and thus lose weight. But the researchers found that P5 lacks this mechanism and appears to have no effect on appetite or weight.

“P5’s mechanisms of action turned out to be quite different from Exendin-4’s, and we think that this finding could lead to new therapeutics,” Sturchler said.

The team will now look for opportunities to develop P5 into a new diabetes drug. The researchers also see this as the first of many discoveries of GPCR-targeting compounds with unique and potentially valuable properties—as well as discoveries in basic GPCR biology.

 

New screening tech at Scripps spotlights diabetes drug candidates

Wednesday, December 9, 2015 | By John Carrol

 

The Scripps Research Institute has used a new drug screening platform to identify a drug which researchers believe has strong potential for treating diabetes.

Working with a technique dubbed autocrine selection, investigators are able to screen molecules in search of targets that can bind to and activate cellular receptors in order to achieve a sought-after drug effect.

In this latest study, published in Nature Communications, the Scripps team went after the GLP-1 receptor, which is already the target of a number of GLP-1 agonists. Scripps, though, wanted to activate the GLP-1 receptor’s G protein pathway.

Hongkai Zhang focused on the GLP-1 agonist Extendin-4, whipping up a million peptides that could alter the end of the protein that activates the G protein and beta arrestin pathways.

“The idea was that at least one of these many variants would induce a change in the shape of the GLP-1 receptor that would activate the G-protein pathway without activating the beta arrestin pathway,” Zhang said.

They then identified the one in a million that improved glucose tolerance at a radically reduced dose of Extendin-4, testing it on mice.

“P5’s mechanisms of action turned out to be quite different from Exendin-4’s, and we think that this finding could lead to new therapeutics,” said Emmanuel Sturchler, a staff scientist in the McDonald laboratory and co-first author of the study.

https://www.scripps.edu/news/press/2015/20151207lerner-mcdonald.html

Scientists from The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have deployed a powerful new drug discovery technique to identify an anti-diabetes compound with a novel mechanism of action.

The finding, which appeared online ahead of print in Nature Communications, may lead to a new type of diabetes treatment. Just as importantly, it demonstrates the potential of the new technique, which enables researchers to quickly find drug candidates that activate cellular receptors in desired ways.

“In principle, we can apply this technique to hundreds of other receptors like the one we targeted in this study to find disease treatments that are more potent and have fewer side effects than existing therapies. It has been a very productive cross-campus collaboration, so we’re hoping to build on its success as we continue to collaborate on interrogating potential therapeutic targets,” said Patricia H. McDonald, an assistant professor at TSRI’s Jupiter, Florida campus and a senior investigator of the study.

 

‘Fingerprints’ for Major Drug Development Targets

For the first time, scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have created detailed “fingerprints” of a class of surface receptors that have proven highly useful for drug development.

http://www.technologynetworks.com/HTS/news.aspx?ID=185860

These detailed “fingerprints” show the surprising complexity of how these receptors activate their binding partners to produce a wide range of signaling actions.

The study focuses on interactions of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with their signaling mediators known as G proteins. GPCRs—currently accounting for about 40 percent of all prescription pharmaceuticals on the market—play key roles in many physiological functions because they transmit signals from outside the cell to the interior. When an outside substance binds to a GPCR, it activates a G protein inside the cell to release components and create a specific cellular response.

“Until now, it was generally believed that GPCRs are very selective, activating only a few G proteins they were designed to work with,” said TSRI Associate Professor Kirill Martemyanov, who led the study. “It turns out the reality is much more complex.”

Ikuo Masuho, a senior research associate in the Martemyanov lab, added, “Our imaging technology opens a unique avenue of developing drugs that would precisely control complex GPCR-G protein coupling, maximizing therapeutic potency by activating G proteins that contribute to therapeutic efficacy while inhibiting other G proteins that cause adverse side effects.”

The study found that individual GPCRs engage multiple G proteins with varying efficacy and rates, much like a dance where the most desirable partner, the GPCR, is surrounded by 14 suitors all vying for attention. The results, as in any dance, depend on which G proteins bind to the receptor—and for how long. The same receptor changes G protein partners—and the signaling outcome—depending on the action of the signal received from outside of the cell.

This finding was made possible by novel imaging technology used by the Martemyanov lab to monitor G protein activation in live cells. Using a pair of light-emitting proteins, one attached to the G protein, the other attached to what’s known as a reporter molecule, Martemyanov and his colleagues were able to measure simultaneously both the signal and activation rates of most G proteins present in the body.

“Our approach looks at 14 different types of G proteins at once—and we only have 16 in our bodies,” he said. “This is as close as it can get to what is actually happening in real time.”

In the accompanying commentary in Science Signaling, Alan Smrcka, a professor at University of Rochester Medical School and a prominent GPCR researcher, wrote, “[The findings] suggest the power of the GPCR fingerprinting approach, in that it could predict the G protein coupling specificity of a GPCR in a native system, which was previously undetected by conventional analysis. This could be very helpful for identifying previously unappreciated signaling pathways downstream of individual GPCRs that could be useful therapeutically or identified as potential side effects of GPCRs.”

 

Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists  

A review of their efficacy and tolerability

Alan J. Garber, MD, PHD

Diabetes Care May 2011; 34(Supplement 2): S279-S284    http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-s231

Targeting the incretin system has become an important therapeutic approach for treating type 2 diabetes. Two drug classes have been developed: glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Clinical data have revealed that these therapies improve glycemic control while reducing body weight (GLP-1 receptor agonists, specifically) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, incidence of hypoglycemia is relatively low with these treatments (except when used in combination with a sulfonylurea) because of their glucose-dependent mechanism of action. There are currently two GLP-1 receptor agonists available (exenatide and liraglutide), with several more currently being developed. This review considers the efficacy and safety of both the short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists. Head-to-head clinical trial data suggest that long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists produce superior glycemic control when compared with their short-acting counterparts. Furthermore, these long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists were generally well tolerated, with transient nausea being the most frequently reported adverse effect.

Careful consideration should be given to the selection of therapies for managing type 2 diabetes. In particular, antidiabetic agents that offer improved glycemic control without increasing cardiovascular risk factors or rates of hypoglycemia are warranted. At present, many available treatments for type 2 diabetes fail to maintain glycemic control in the longer term because of gradual disease progression as β-cell function declines. Where sulfonylureas or thiazolidinediones (common oral antidiabetic drugs) are used, the risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain can increase (1,2). The development of new therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes that, in addition to maintaining glycemic control, could reduce body weight and hypoglycemia risk (3,4), may help with patient management. Indeed, guidelines have been developed that support the consensus that blood pressure, weight reduction, and avoidance of hypoglycemic events should be targeted in type 2 diabetes management alongside glycemic targets. For example, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) defines multiple goals of therapy that include A1C <7.0% and SBP <130 mmHg and no weight gain (or, in the case of obese subjects, weight loss) (5). In particular, incretin-based therapies (GLP-1 receptor agonists, specifically) can help meet these new targets by offering weight reduction, blood pressure reduction, and reduced hypoglycemia in addition to glycemic control.

WHAT IS GLP-1?

The incretin effect, responsible for 50–70% of total insulin secretion after oral glucose administration, is defined as the difference in insulin secretory response from an oral glucose load compared with intravenous glucose administration (6) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

There are two naturally occurring incretin hormones that play a role in the maintenance of glycemic control: glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1, both of which have a short half-life because of their rapid inactivation by DPP-4 (7). In patients with type 2 diabetes, the incretin effect is reduced or, in some cases, absent (8). In particular, the insulinoptropic action of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide is lost in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, it has been shown that, after administration of pharmacological levels of GLP-1, the insulin secretory function can be restored in this population (9), and thus GLP-1 has become an important target for research into new therapies for type 2 diabetes.

GLP-1 has multiple physiological effects that make it an attractive candidate for type 2 diabetes therapy. It increases insulin secretion while inhibiting glucagon release, but only when glucose levels are elevated (6,10), thus offering the potential to lower plasma glucose while reducing the likelihood of hypoglycemia. Furthermore, gastric emptying is delayed (10) and food intake is decreased after GLP-1 administration. Indeed, in a 6-week study investigating continuous GLP-1 infusion, patients with type 2 diabetes achieved a significant weight loss of 1.9 kg and a reduction in appetite from baseline compared with patients receiving placebo, where there was no significant change in weight or appetite (11). Preclinical studies reveal other potential benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes, which include the promotion of β-cell proliferation (12) and reduced β-cell apoptosis (13). These preclinical results indicate that GLP-1 could be beneficial in treating patients with type 2 diabetes. However, because native GLP-1 is rapidly inactivated and degraded by the enzyme DPP-4 and has a very short half-life of 1.5 min (14), to achieve the clinical potential for native GLP-1, patients would require 24-h administration of native GLP-1 (15). Because this is impractical as a therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes, it was necessary to develop longer-acting derivatives of GLP-1.

DEVELOPMENT OF DPP-4–RESISTANT GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS

Two classes of incretin-based therapy have been developed to overcome the clinical limitations of native GLP-1: GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide and exenatide), which exhibit increased resistance to DPP-4 degradation and thus provide pharmacological levels of GLP-1, and DPP-4 inhibitors (e.g., sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin), which reduce endogenous GLP-1 degradation, thereby providing physiological levels of GLP-1. In this review, we focus on the GLP-1 receptor agonist class of incretin-based therapies. The efficacy and tolerability of the DPP-4 inhibitors have been reviewed elsewhere (16). Two GLP-1 receptor agonists are licensed at present in Europe, the U.S., and Japan: exenatide (Byetta, Eli Lilly) (17) and liraglutide (Victoza, Novo Nordisk) (18). For the purposes of this review, we refer to “short-acting” GLP-1 receptor agonists as those agents having duration of action of <24 h and “long-acting” as those agents with duration of action >24 h (Table 1).

….. more        http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/34/Supplement_2/S279.full.pdf+html

 

Autocrine selection of a GLP-1R G-protein biased agonist with potent antidiabetic effects

Hongkai ZhangEmmanuel SturchlerJiang ZhuAinhoa NietoPhilip A. Cistrone,…., Patricia H. McDonald & Richard A. Lerner
Nature Communications Dec 2015; 6(8918)
       
     http://dx.doi.org:/10.1038/ncomms9918

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have emerged as treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1R signals through G-protein-dependent, and G-protein-independent pathways by engaging the scaffold protein β-arrestin; preferential signalling of ligands through one or the other of these branches is known as ‘ligand bias’. Here we report the discovery of the potent and selective GLP-1R G-protein-biased agonist, P5. We identified P5 in a high-throughput autocrine-based screening of large combinatorial peptide libraries, and show that P5 promotes G-protein signalling comparable to GLP-1 and Exendin-4, but exhibited a significantly reduced β-arrestin response. Preclinical studies using different mouse models of T2DM demonstrate that P5 is a weak insulin secretagogue. Nevertheless, chronic treatment of diabetic mice with P5 increased adipogenesis, reduced adipose tissue inflammation as well as hepatic steatosis and was more effective at correcting hyperglycemia and lowering hemoglobin A1clevels than Exendin-4, suggesting that GLP-1R G-protein-biased agonists may provide a novel therapeutic approach to T2DM.

Figure 1: Autocrine-based system for selection of agonists from large combinatorial peptide libraries

Autocrine-based system for selection of agonists from large combinatorial peptide libraries.

(a) Schematic representation of the peptide libraries. (b) Schematic representation of the membrane-tethered Exendin-4 (top) and FACS analysis of mCherry and GFP expression 2 days after transduction of HEK293-GLP-1R-GFP cells with the membrane-tethered Exendin-4 displaying different linker size (bottom). (c) Schematic representation of the autocrine-based selection of combinatorial peptide library. The lentivirus peptide libraries are preparred from lentiviral plasmids (step 1). The CRE-responsive GLP-1R reporter cell line is transduced with lentiviral library (step 2). GFP expressing cells are sorted (step 3) and peptide-encoding genes are amplified from genomic DNA of sorted cells to make the library for the next selection round (step 4). After iterative rounds of selection, enriched peptide sequences are analysed by deep sequencing (step 5). (d) Enrichment of GFP positive cells during three rounds of FACS selection. (e) N termini sequences of top 13 peptides (frequency>1.0% representation).

 

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia arising from a combination of insufficient insulin secretion together with the development of insulin resistance. The incretin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an endogenous peptide hormone secreted from intestinal endocrine cells in response to food intake1. GLP-1 lowers postprandial glucose excursion by potentiating glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells and has also recently been shown to promote β-cell survival in rodents2. In addition, GLP-1 exerts extra-pancreatic actions such as promoting gastric emptying, weight loss and increasing insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues3. Hence, incretin-based therapies represent a strategy for the treatment of T2DM.

GLP-1 exerts its action through the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R)4 expressed in the pancreas, other peripheral tissues, and the central nervous system. Activation of GLP-1R triggers Gαs-protein coupling leading to an elevation of cyclic AMP (cAMP), modulates intracellular calcium concentration5 and induces β-arrestin recruitment6, 7. Historically, β-arrestins were believed to serve an exclusive role in G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization8. However, it has since been shown that β-arrestins can also function to activate signalling cascades9, 10. In this regard, in the pancreatic β-cell, elevation of both cAMP and cytosolic Ca2+ and β-arrestin signalling downstream of GLP-1R activation are critical events in promoting glucose-dependent insulin secretion.

Recently, the concept of ‘functional selectivity’ or ‘ligand bias’ has emerged whereby ligand binding promotes engagement of only a particular subset of the full GPCR signalling repertoire to the exclusion of others11. A better understanding of GLP-1R pleiotropic signalling and the underlying physiological consequences might provide new avenues for the development of drugs with novel modes of action that have the potential to provide greater therapeutic value while possibly avoiding unwanted side effects12, 13. Therefore we developed an autocrine-based system, to screen large and diverse, combinatorial peptide libraries containing up to 100 million different members with the aim of identifying potent, selective, G-protein-biased GLP-1R agonists. We identified one such ligand, designated P5 and have characterized its in vitro pharmacological phenotype, and explored its therapeutic potential.

P5 is a selective and potent G-protein-biased GLP-1R agonist

To assess potential signalling bias, the active peptides were further characterized in vitro using distinct assays that monitor receptor proximal signals. Cell-based assays for Gαs-protein (cAMP production), Gαq-protein (intracellular Ca2+ mobilization) and β-arrestin (1 and 2) signalling were used to determine the potency (EC50; effector concentration for half-maximum response) and maximal efficacy (Emax (%)) of peptides relative to the reference ligand Ex4 (Table 1). Peptides P1, P2, P5 and P10 all stimulated cAMP production. However, only P5 functioned as a full agonist (Emax=100%) displaying sub-nanomolar potency at both the human (hGLP-1R) and mouse receptor (mGLP-1R) (Fig. 2a,b; Table 1). The P5 EC50 was similar to the endogenous ligand GLP-1 but was slightly right shifted when compared with the reference peptide Ex4 (Fig. 2a,b; Table 1). Importantly, P5-induced cAMP production was inhibited by the selective GLP-1R antagonist Ex 9–39 in a concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 1a,b). In addition, P5-induced cAMP production was negligible in HEK293 cells expressing the human glucagon receptor (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These data suggest that P5 selectively interacts with the GLP-1R.

 

In line with previous reports43, 44, 45 our data support the notion that non β-cell actions of GLP-1 agonists can improve glycaemic control. Importantly, GLP-1R is expressed in adipose tissue, in both the stromal vascular and the adipocyte fraction and its expression level has been found to correlate with the degree of insulin resistance46. In addition, the GLP-1 peptide has been reported to regulate adipogenesis in vitro47, 48. Given that P5, a G-protein-biased agonist with a severely blunted β-arrestin response has less propensity to induce GLP-1R desensitization, sustained activation of the receptor in adipose tissue may lead to the changes we observed in eWAT. Consistent with this notion, increased expression of adipogenic genes and a decrease in resistin expression was reported in β-arrestin 1 knockout mice49. Nevertheless, considering the multitude of metabolic pathways regulated by β-arrestin, further studies are warranted to determine the role of β-arrestin signalling downstream of GLP-1R activation in adipogenesis. Additionally, we found that chronic treatment with P5 increased circulating level of GIP to a greater extent than Ex4. Several studies demonstrated that GIP acts as an insulin sensitizer in adipocytes and disruption of the GIP/GIP-R axis has been reported in insulin-resistant states such as obesity50, 51. Interestingly, PPARγ activation was shown to increase GIP-R levels during adipocyte differentiation52. Thus, by increasing GIP and PPARγ levels, P5 chronic treatment may restore GIP/GIP-R signalling in adipocytes. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that the simultaneous activation of the GLP-1R and the GIP-R results in enhanced glycaemic control, and lower HbA1c levels in human and rat, when compared with GLP-1R alone53, suggesting a GIP and GLP-1 synergism. Thus, the superior glycaemic control observed with the G-protein-biased agonist may result from P5-induced increases in GIP level and concomitant receptor activation. In addition, the GLP-1R can form homodimers as well as ligand-induced heterodimers with the GIP-R54. It is conceivable, that P5 may promote the formation of new and pharmacologically distinct homo/heterodimers displaying different signalling capacity. However, further studies are required to delineate more precisely the molecular and cellular mechanisms and the consequences of P5-induced increase in GIP levels.

In summary, high-throughput autocrine-based functional screening of combinatorial peptide libraries enabled the discovery of a high potency G-protein-biased GLP-1R agonist demonstrating new pharmacological virtues. In a series of translational preclinical studies we demonstrate that P5 is a weak insulin secretagogue yet displays superior antidiabetic effect (Fig. 7). Thus, GLP-1R G-protein-biased ligands may offer new and unappreciated advantages in the context of chronic treatment such as promoting adipocyte hyperplasia, restoring insulin responsiveness and long-term glycaemic control while preserving pancreatic β-cell function by minimizing the insulin secretory burden.

 

Figure 7: Schematic depicting the identification and characterization of a novel GLP-1R-biased agonist.

Schematic depicting the identification and characterization of a novel GLP-1R-biased agonist.

Using an autocrine-based system coupled to FACS, we screened large, diverse, combinatorial peptide libraries and identified P5, a potent and selective G-protein-biased GLP-1R agonist. P5 displayed a decreased insulinotropic effect, yet significantly improved glucose tolerance and insulin responsiveness by promoting white adipocyte tissue hyperplasia.

 

Exendin-4 Is a High Potency Agonist and Truncated Exendin-(9-39)- amide an Antagonist at the Glucagon-like Peptide 1-(7-36)-amide Receptor of Insulin-secreting ,&Cells*

Riidiger Goke, Hans-Christoph Fehmann, Thomas LinnS, Harald Schmidt, Michael Krause9, John EngT, and Burkhard GokeII
J Biol Chem  Sept 1993;268(26):19650-19655      http://www.jbc.org/content/268/26/19650.full.pdf

Exendin-4 purified from Heloderma suspecturn venom shows structural relationship to the important incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1-(7-36)- amide (GLP-1). We demonstrate that exendin-4 and truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide specifically interact with the GLP-1 receptor on insulinoma-derived cells and on lung membranes. Exendin-4 displaced “‘IGLP- 1, and unlabeled GLP- 1 displaced lZ6I-exendin-4 from the binding site at rat insulinoma-derived RINmSF cells. Exendin-4 had, like GLP-1, a pronounced effect on intracellular CAMP generation, which was reduced by exendin-(9-39)-amide. When combined, GLP-1 and exendin-4 showed additive action on CAMP. They each competed with the radiolabeled version of the other peptide in cross-linking experiments. The apparent molecular mass of the respective ligand-binding protein complex was 63,000 Da. Exendin-(9-39)-amide abolished the cross-linking of both peptides. Exendin-4, like GLP-1, stimulated dose dependently the glucose-induced insulin wcretion in isolated rat islets, and, in mouse insulinoma TC-1 cells, both peptides stimulated the proinsulin gene expression at the level of transcription. Exendin- (9-39)-amide reduced these effects. In conclusion, exendin-4 is an agonist and exendin-(9-39)-amide is a specific GLP- 1 receptor antagonist.

 

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Kathleen Dungan, MDAnthony DeSantis, MD
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/glucagon-like-peptide-1-receptor-agonists-for-the-treatment-of-type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Despite advances in options for the treatment of diabetes, optimal glycemic control is often not achieved. Hypoglycemia and weight gain associated with many antidiabetic medications may interfere with the implementation and long-term application of “intensive” therapies [1]. Current treatments have centered on increasing insulin availability (either through direct insulin administration or through agents that promote insulin secretion), improving sensitivity to insulin, delaying the delivery and absorption of carbohydrate from the gastrointestinal tract, or increasing urinary glucose excretion.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies (eg, GLP-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP-4] inhibitors) affect glucose control through several mechanisms, including enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, slowed gastric emptying, and reduction of postprandial glucagon and of food intake (table 1). These agents do not usually cause hypoglycemia in the absence of therapies that otherwise cause hypoglycemia.

This topic will review the mechanism of action and therapeutic utility of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP-4 inhibitors are discussed separately. A general discussion of the initial management of blood glucose and the management of persistent hyperglycemia in adults with type 2 diabetes is also presented separately. (See “Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus”.)

GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1

Glucose homeostasis is dependent upon a complex interplay of multiple hormones: insulin and amylin, produced by pancreatic beta cells; glucagon, produced by pancreatic alpha cells; and gastrointestinal peptides, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP; gastric inhibitory polypeptide) (figure 1). Abnormal regulation of these substances may contribute to the clinical presentation of diabetes. The role of GLP-1 in glucose homeostasis is illustrative of the incretin effect, in which oral glucose has a greater stimulatory effect on insulin secretion than intravenous glucose [2]. This effect is mediated by several gastrointestinal peptides, particularly GLP-1, that are released in the setting of a meal and stimulate insulin synthesis and insulin secretion, which does not occur when carbohydrate is administered intravenously.

GLP-1 is produced from the proglucagon gene in L-cells of the small intestine and is secreted in response to nutrients (figure 1) [3]. GLP-1 binds to a specific GLP-1 receptor, which is expressed in various tissues including pancreatic beta cells, pancreatic ducts, gastric mucosa, kidney, lung, heart, skin, immune cells, and the hypothalamus [2,4]. GLP-1 exerts its main effect by stimulating glucose-dependent insulin release from the pancreatic islets [2]. It has also been shown to slow gastric emptying [5], inhibit inappropriate post-meal glucagon release [3,6], and reduce food intake (table 1) [3]. Owing in part to the effects of GLP-1 on slowed gastric emptying and appetite centers in the brain, therapy with GLP-1 and its receptor agonists is associated with weight loss, even among patients without significant nausea and vomiting.

 

Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduces Alzheimer disease-associated tau hyperphosphorylation in the hippocampus of rats with type 2 diabetes.
Impaired insulin signaling pathway in the brain in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD). Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and its receptor agonist are widely used for treatment of T2D. Here we studied whether the effects of exendin-4 (EX-4), a long-lasting GLP-1 receptor agonist, could reduce the risk of AD in T2D.  RESULTS: The levels of phosphorylated tau protein at site Ser199/202 and Thr217 level in the hippocampus of T2D rats were found to be raised notably and evidently decreased after EX-4 intervention. In addition, brain insulin signaling pathway was ameliorated after EX-4 treatment, and this result was reflected by a decreased activity of PI3K/AKT and an increased activity of GSK-3β in the hippocampus of T2D rats as well as a rise in PI3K/AKT activity and a decline in GSK-3β activity after 4 weeks intervention of EX-4. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that multiple days with EX-4 appears to prevent the hyperphosphorylation of AD-associated tau protein due to increased insulin signaling pathway in the brain. These findings support the potential use of GLP-1 for the prevention and treatment of AD in individuals with T2D.

Read Full Post »

von Willebrand Factor

Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator

LPBI

 

FDA approves first recombinant von Willebrand factor to treat bleeding episodes

Dr. Anthony Melvin Castro

 

 

12/08/2015 02:44
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Vonvendi, von Willebrand factor (Recombinant), for use in adults 18 years of age and older who have von Willebrand disease (VWD). Vonvendi is the first FDA-approved recombinant von Willebrand factor, and is approved for the on-demand (as needed) treatment and control of bleeding episodes in adults diagnosed with VWD.
Company Baxalta Inc.
Description Recombinant human von Willebrand factor (vWF)
Molecular Target von Willebrand factor (vWF)
Mechanism of Action
Therapeutic Modality Biologic: Protein
Latest Stage of Development Registration
Standard Indication Bleeding
Indication Details Treat and prevent bleeding episodes in von Willebrand disease (vWD) patients; Treat von Willebrand disease (vWD)
Regulatory Designation U.S. – Orphan Drug (Treat and prevent bleeding episodes in von Willebrand disease (vWD) patients);
EU – Orphan Drug (Treat and prevent bleeding episodes in von Willebrand disease (vWD) patients);
Japan – Orphan Drug (Treat and prevent bleeding episodes in von Willebrand disease (vWD) patients)

 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Vonvendi, von Willebrand factor (Recombinant), for use in adults 18 years of age and older who have von Willebrand disease (VWD). Vonvendi is the first FDA-approved recombinant von Willebrand factor, and is approved for the on-demand (as needed) treatment and control of bleeding episodes in adults diagnosed with VWD.

VWD is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting approximately 1 percent of the U.S. population. Men and women are equally affected by VWD, which is caused by a deficiency or defect in von Willebrand factor, a protein that is critical for normal blood clotting. Patients with VWD can develop severe bleeding from the nose, gums, and intestines, as well as into muscles and joints. Women with VWD may have heavy menstrual periods lasting longer than average and may experience excessive bleeding after childbirth.

“Patients with heritable bleeding disorders should meet with their health care provider to discuss appropriate measures to reduce blood loss,” said Karen Midthun, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “The approval of Vonvendi provides an additional therapeutic option for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with von Willebrand disease.”

The safety and efficacy of Vonvendi were evaluated in two clinical trials of 69 adult participants with VWD. These trials demonstrated that Vonvendi was safe and effective for the on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes from a variety of different sites in the body. No safety concerns were identified in the trials. The most common adverse reaction observed was generalized pruritus (itching).

The FDA granted Vonvendi orphan product designation for these uses.Orphan product designation is given to drugs intended to treat rare diseases in order to promote their development.

Vonvendi is manufactured by Baxalta U.S., Inc., based in Westlake Village, California.

 

von Willebrand Disease

Author: Eleanor S Pollak; Chief Editor: Srikanth Nagalla

Von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a common, inherited, genetically and clinically heterogeneous hemorrhagic disorder caused by a deficiency or dysfunction of the protein termed von Willebrand factor (vWF). Consequently, defective vWF interaction between platelets and the vessel wall impairs primary hemostasis.

vWF, a large, multimeric glycoprotein, circulates in blood plasma at concentrations of approximately 10 mg/mL. In response to numerous stimuli, vWF is released from storage granules in platelets and endothelial cells. It performs two major roles in hemostasis. First, it mediates the adhesion of platelets to sites of vascular injury. Second, it binds and stabilizes the procoagulant protein factor VIII (FVIII). (See Etiology.)

vWD is divided into three major categories: (1) partial quantitative deficiency (type I), (2) qualitative deficiency (type II), and (3) total deficiency (type III). vWD type II is further divided into four variants (IIA, IIB, IIN, IIM), based on characteristics of dysfunctional vWF. These categories correspond to distinct molecular mechanisms, with corresponding clinical features and therapeutic recommendations.

For discussion of vWD in children, see Pediatric Von Willebrand Disease.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/206996-overview

 

 

Read Full Post »

 

Leaders in the CAR-T Field Are Proceeding With Cautious Hope

Reporter: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.

It wasn’t a long time ago, in fact the May 26, 2014 Cover Story in Forbes entitled “Is This How We’ll Cure Cancer” with cover photo of Novartis CEO Joseph Jimenez and subtitle “Will This man Cure Cancer?” highlighted the promise of CAR-T therapy as the ‘magic bullet’ therapy which will eventually cure all cancer. However, over the years, the pioneers of such therapy, while offering impressive clinical results, caution not to get to eager in calling CAR-T as the end-all-be-all cure but insist there are many issues that need be resolved.

The Allogenic Approach

In an interview for LabBiotech.eu Phillip Hemme had a discussion (and wonderful writeup) with André Choulika, the CEO of the French CAR-T miracle Cellectis on the current state of CAR-T therapy for cancer. Below is the interview in full as ther ae multiple important point Dr. Choulika mentioned, including how much is needed to be done in the field.

Cellectis’ CEO: “I’m just trying to be realistic, CAR-T is not THE miracle cure for Cancer”

 

 

Cellectis

CAR-T is solidifying in everybody’s mind as the next revolution in Cancer treatment. But there is still a lot to do…That’s basically what came out from my discussion with André Choulika, the CEO of the French CAR-T miracle Cellectis.

Cellectis is probably the most successful Biotech in France. It was founded in 1999 by Choulika himself (not alone though), following the discovery of meganucleases ability to change gene editing. Today, Cellectis is a well-known Biotech company counting over 100 employees end of October and having a market cap north of 1 Billion euros.

The company is now focused on the development of allogenic CAR-T (from generic donors  – i.e. not from the patient themself). With these universal CAR-T candidates (UCARTs). Cellectis has signed a massive partnership with the French pharma Servier, as well as Pfizer (which owns 8% of Cellectis), and has just announced two big milestones for the company within the last few weeks.

It is now able to produce it’s allogenic CAR-T in a GMP settings and it releases results from the “miracle” treatment of a 11-month old girl from the UK with multi-resistant leukemia.

 

Let’s start directly with the latest news…People seemed over-enthusiastic about UCART19…even the New York Times wrote about it. What do you think?

It’s a great news for Cellectis even though it’s still a very early result, in a single patient only. What’s important for us is that the first human patient received our treatment without showing any adverse effects (such as no cytokinetic storm) and our CAR-T cells were still active in the body 3 months after the injections.

Now, we have to expand the clinical trials to several patients and showing data from a cohort of patients. We are now on track to file the clinical trial application by the end of the year.

Your approach in the CAR-T is pretty unique. You are using donor’s cells to treat many different patients, whereas most CAR-T approaches are autologous (i.e. engineered the patient’s own cells).  Is the future in CAR-T the allogenic approach alone?

When we started to move into the CAR-T field we were pretty reluctant because there are not many examples of commercial success in the field yet. But CAR-T has still attracted many big players such as Novartis, Celgene, Juno or Kite. These each have a strong involvement in making autologous therapies work commercially (Celgene especially, which makes most of its revenue from groundbreaking and pricey cancer drugs).

On our side, we want to make this therapy accessible to a larger population and have good market access at the end. We have already pretty good reason to think it could work out well for us. We’ll see though…

Comment: Reuters published a report a few weeks ago estimating the cost of autologous CAR-T could be above $450K per treatment, which would make it economically not realistic for the healthcare payers.

CAR-T seems to be extremely hype right now. At BIO-Europe 2015, I had the impression everybody was talking about CAR-T. Do you think it could have the same impact as monoclonal antibodies?

What’s interesting with CAR-T is that you can target cells which expresses less receptors (10k receptors instead of 100k for monoclonal antibodies). This increases the targets for CAR-T and the possibilities linked.

But there are also downsides. Tissues with low expressions can become targets too and CAR-T cells would start attacking healthy cells.

People should not overemphasise CAR-T. We are still at the beginning of the beginning of this technology. And it will probably have to be combined with surgery or checkpoint inhibitors.

 

You seem pessimistic about CAR-T…?

I am just trying to be more realistic, even though I am super positive about the technology. It will bring something really great to Haematology field, but is not a cure for Cancer. It’s more of a long-haul race in the right direction as opposed to fast results, and we expect great things perhaps 20 years down the line as opposed to 2016.

But yes, it will probably not be the miracle product some people are talking about.

As for every early technology, there are many challenges associated with its development. What are the main ones worth discussing?

I would say you have four main challenges…

The administration of the cells will be challenging. We have to find way of injecting repeated doses of the product (to ensure the therapy is fully effective seeing as CAR-T cells have a limited lifespan). This is difficult because of immunogenicty against the therapy.

Secondly, combination will play an essential role too and checkpoint inhibitors should be involved.

The last two are linked to the targets.

As I mentioned before, CAR-T can be too sensitive and one way to control that would be to induce “logic gates” where the cells would only act if a combination of receptors would be present. The last challenge is to find other antigens.

Most of the CAR-T cells today target the same antigen: CD19+. We should find new antigens and many companies are on the track, including us.

 

CD19 CART

An anti-CD19 CAR-expressing T cell recognizing a CD19+ (Source: Kochenderfer et al., Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 10, 267-276, doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.46)

Autologous CART therapy

Dr. Carl June of University of Pennsylvania, who has helped pioneer the field of CAR-T therapy for leukemia, has also been cautiously hopeful on the progress of the therapy. In his 2015 AACR National Meeting address, he highlighted some achievements they had with CAR-T therapy in both hematologic as well as solid tumors however it was stressed that there is much work to do with regards to optimization of the system, characterization of new tumor antigens for diverse tumor types, as well as the need to develop optimal treatment strategies to mitigate toxicities. Indeed many of the pioneers in the field have been proactive in helping to develop pharmacovigilance, safety, and regulatory strategies (highlighted in a post found here: NIH Considers Guidelines for CAR-T therapy: Report from Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee and mitigating toxicities in a post Steroids, Inflammation, and CAR-T Therapy) and much credit should be given to these researchers.

https://youtu.be/1sA_oz_1P5E

Cancer Research Institute’s Breakthroughs in Cancer Immunotherapy Webinar Series are offered free to the public and feature informative updates from leaders in cancer immunotherapy, followed by a moderated Q&A. On June 10, 2013, Carl H. June, M.D., a specialist in T cell biology and lymphocyte activation at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, discussed his groundbreaking work that has led to remarkable remissions of advanced cancer. He focused on recent and ongoing successes in developing treatments with T cells that have been genetically engineered to target cancer. Called chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells), these modified immune cells have proven effective at eliminating cancer in some patients, and offer great hope for this emerging strategy in cancer immunotherapy. For more information on this webinar, or to register for upcoming webinars, please visit www.cancerresearch.org/webinars.

Below are reports from the 2015 American Society of Hematology Conference by Novartis on results from CTL109 CART therapy trials. One trial is on response rate in B-cell lymphomas and follicular cell lymphomas while the second report is ongoing trial results in childhood refractory ALL, both conducted at University of Pennsylvania.

Novartis presents response rate data for CART therapy CTL019 in lymphoma

(Ref: Global Post, NASDAQ, PR Newswire)

posted on FirstWorldPharma.com December 6th, 2015

By: Matthew Dennis

Novartis announced Sunday data from an ongoing Phase IIa study demonstrating that the experimental chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy CTL019 led to an overall response rate (ORR) at three months of 47 percent in adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and an ORR of 73 percent in adults with follicular lymphoma. The results of the trial were presented at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

Findings from the study, which was conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, include 15 adults with DLBCL and 11 with follicular lymphoma who were evaluable for response. Results showed that three patients with DLBCL who achieved a partial response (PR) to treatment at three months converted to complete response (CR) by six months. In addition, three patients with follicular lymphoma who achieved a PR at three months converted to CR by six months.

Novartis added that one DLBCL patient with a PR at three months experienced disease progression at six months after treatment. Further, one follicular lymphoma patient with a PR at three months who remained in PR at nine months experienced disease progression at approximately 12 months after treatment. The company indicated that median progression-free survival was 11.9 months for patients with follicular lymphoma and 3 months for those with DLBCL.

In the study, four patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of grade 3 or higher. Novartis noted that during CRS, patients typically experience varying degrees of influenza-like symptoms with high fevers, nausea, muscle pain, and in some cases, low blood pressure and breathing difficulties. Meanwhile, neurologic toxicity occurred in two patients in the trial, including one grade three episode of delirium and one possibly related grade five encephalopathy.

“These data add to the growing body of clinical evidence on CTL019 and illustrate its potential benefit in the treatment of relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” commented lead investigator Stephen Schuster. Novartis indicated that the findings keep CTL019 on track for submission to the FDA in 2017. Usman Azam, global head of Novartis’ cell and gene therapies unit, said “we remain consistent again with the data set.”

“It’s an attractive population, it’s a population that continues to have a huge unmet need, it’s a cornerstone of our investments,” Azam remarked. Analysts expect CART therapies, once approved, to cost up to $450 000 per patient. Novartis acknowledged that prices will be high, but declined to give further details. “With any disruptive innovation that comes, initially, cost of goods is very challenging,” Azam said, adding “as time goes on, and more patients are treated, we will simplify that cost base.”

Source: http://www.firstwordpharma.com/node/1338217?tsid=28&region_id=2#axzz3tfDVaT1f

 

 

Novartis AG (NVS)’s Experimental Therapy Wipes Out Blood Cancer in 93 Percent of Patients

Reported in Biospace.com (for full article see here)

Novaritis and University of Pennsylvania reported results of the CTL019 CART trials for the treatment of children with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia at the 2015 Annual Hemotologic Society Meeting. 55 of 59 patients, or 93 percent, experienced complete remissions with CTL019. The study did show that at the end of one year, 55 percent of patients had a remission-free survival rate and that 18 patients continued to show complete remission following one year

 

Other posts on the Open Access Journal on CAR-T therapy include

 

CAR-T therapy in leukemia

Steroids, Inflammation, and CAR-T Therapy

NIH Considers Guidelines for CAR-T therapy: Report from Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee

 

Read Full Post »

Dipeptydil peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes

Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator

LPBI

 

 

Dipeptydil peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

M. Monami, I. Iacomelli, N. Marchionni, E. Mannucci
Unit of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Florence, Italy
Nutrition, Metabolism & Cardiovascular Diseases (NMCD) May 2010; 20(4):224–235  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2009.03.015

Background and Aim

The role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes is debated; many recent trials, which were not included in previous meta-analyses, could add relevant information.

Methods and Results

All available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), either published or unpublished, performed in type 2 diabetic patients with DPP-4 inhibitors, with a duration >12 weeks were meta-analyzed for HbA1c, BMI, hypoglycemia, and other adverse events. A total of 41 RCTs (9 of which are unpublished) was retrieved and included in the analysis. Gliptins determine a significant improvement of HbA1c in comparison with a placebo (−0.7 [−0.8:−0.6]), with a low risk of hypoglycemia. DPP-4 inhibitors show a similar efficacy in monotherapy and in combination with other agents. The risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause death with DPP-4 inhibitors is 0.76 [0.46–1.28] and 0.78 [0.40–1.51], respectively.

Conclusions

DPP-4 inhibitors reduce HbA1c, although to a lesser extent than sulphonylureas, with no weight gain and no hypoglycemic risk; further data are needed to assess their long-term safety.

 

 

Oral Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors sitagliptin [1] and vildagliptin [2], which increase circulating levels of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1), have recently been approved for use in type 2 diabetes; other molecules of the same class (such as saxagliptin and alogliptin) are under development.

The role of those new drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes is debated. The consensus algorithm of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes [[3], [4]], in its revised version [4], suggests limiting the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors only in some specific cases, without considering those agents in the mainstream (“Tier 1”) of the algorithm. Conversely, DPP-4 inhibitors are not even included as a second choice, although their use is contemplated in selected patients. The reasons for this exclusion are their perceived limited efficacy on HbA1c in comparison with other agents, their poorly defined safety profile, and their cost [[3], [4]].

Efficacy and safety need to be assessed through a comprehensive review of currently available clinical trials. Some detailed reviews of published studies have been recently published [[1], [2], [5]]; furthermore, some meta-analyses have been performed [[1], [6], [7], [8]]. However, currently available meta-analyses included only published studies, without any attempt at retrieving data from completed and publicly disclosed, although not formally published, clinical trials. Furthermore, several trials have been published in the last few months, increasing in a relevant manner the available data base for the assessment of the clinical profile of DPP-4 inhibitors.

The aim of the present study is to offer a comprehensive and updated synthesis of all available clinical data on the safety and efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors.

The trial flow is summarized in Fig. 1, and the characteristics of the trials included in the meta-analysis are summarized in Table 1. Among the trials included, 32 were described in publications in peer-reviewed journals; results of 9 unpublished trials were disclosed on different websites. Furthermore, 10 unpublished trials, the results of which were undisclosed, could be identified (Table 2). Notably, results could be retrieved for the large majority of trials on currently available DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin and vildagliptin), while only results of preliminary phase II studies were available for products currently under development (saxagliptin).

Thumbnail image of Figure 1. Opens large image

Figure 1

Trial flow diagram. RCT: randomized clinical trial.

Table 1Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
Study (Ref.) Dose (mg/die) Comparator Add-on to Description of randomization Description of blinding Reporting of drop-out Intention-to-treat
Vildagliptin
Pan [33] 100 Acarbose None NA NA A Yes
Schweizer [28] 100 Metformin None NA NA A Yes
Rosenstock [34] 50–100 Rosiglitazone None NA NA A Yes
2329 [14] 50–100 Pioglitazone None NR NR NR Yes
Bolli [21] 100 Pioglitazone Metformin NA NA A No
  • Rosenstock [35]

  • 100

  • Pioglitazone

  • None

  • NA

  • A

  • A

  • Yes

  • 50–100

  • Placebo

  • Pioglitazone

  • NA

  • A

  • A

  • Yes

Dejager [36] 50–100 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Scherbaum [37] 50 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Mari [38] 50 Placebo None NA NA A NR
Scherbaum [39] 50 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Pratley [27] 50 Placebo None NA A A Yes
Pi-Sunyer [40] 50–100 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Ristic [41] 25–100 Placebo None NA NA NA Yes
1202 [14] 20–100 Placebo None NR NR NR Yes
Ahren [42] 50 Placebo Metformin NA NA A NR
Bosi [22] 50–100 Placebo Metformin NA NA A Yes
Garber [43] 50–100 Placebo Pioglitazone NA NA A Yes
Garber [19] 50–100 Placebo Glimepiride A NA A Yes
1302 [14] 100 Placebo Glimepiride NR NR NR Yes
Fonseca [20] 100 Placebo Insulin NA NA A Yes
1303 [14] 50–100 Placebo NR NR NR NR Yes
D’Alessio [44] 100 Placebo Metf./None NA NA A Yes
Sitagliptin
PN-036 [15] 50–100 Metformin None NA A A Yes
  • Scott [45]

  • 100

  • Rosiglitazone

  • Metformin

  • NA

  • NA

  • A

  • Yes

  • 100

  • Placebo

  • Metformin

  • NA

  • NA

  • A

  • Yes

PN-035 [15] 100 Pioglitazone Glim±Met NA NA A Yes
Nauck [17] 100 Glipizide Metformin NA NA A Yes
PN-028 [15] 25–50 Placebo/Glip. OAD/Insulin NR NR NR Yes
  • Scott [18]

  • 10–100

  • Glipizide

  • None

  • A

  • A

  • A

  • Yes

  • 10–100

  • Placebo

  • None

  • A

  • A

  • A

  • Yes

Nonaka [46] 100 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Hanefeld [16] 25–100 Placebo None NA A A No
Raz [47] 100–200 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Goldstein [23] 50–100 Placebo None NA A A Yes
Rosenstock [35] 100 Placebo Pioglitazone NA NA A Yes
Hermansen [24] 100 Placebo Glim±Metf NA NA A Yes
Goldstein [23] 50–100 Placebo Metformin NA A A Yes
Charbonnel [48] 100 Placebo Metformin NA NA A Yes
Aschner [49] 100–200 Placebo None NA NA A Yes
Raz [50] 100 Placebo Metformin A NA A Yes
PN-040 [15] 100 Placebo OAD/None NR NR NR Yes
PN-044 [15] 25–200 Placebo OAD/None NR NR NR Yes
Saxagliptin
Rosenstock [51] 2.5–40 Placebo None NA NA A Yes

NA: not adequate or not adequately reported; A: adequate; NR: not reported; glip.: glipizide; glim±metf: glimepiride and/or metformin; metf.: metformin; OAD: oral antidiabetic drugs; and SU/metf: sulfonylureas or metformin.

Table 2Characteristics of the unpublished and undisclosed studies.
Study # Patients planned Comparator Add-on to Trial duration (weeks) Design Randomization Study end datea
DPP-4 inhibitors
Vildagliptin
 NCT00368134 [52] 370 Voglibose None 12 PS Double blind June 2007
 NCT00396227 [52] 2665 Glitazones Metformin 12 PS Open label October 2007
Sitagliptin
 NCT00411554 [52] 310 Voglibose None 12 PS Double blind August 2007
Saxagliptin
 NCT00327015 [52] 1396 Placebo Metformin 52 PS Double blind November 2007
Metformin None 52 PS Double blind
 NCT00121641 [52] 460 Placebo None 24 PS Double blind August 2007
 NCT00374907 [52] 36 Placebo None 12 PS Double blind October 2007
 NCT00295633 [52] 555 Placebo Glitazones 24 PS Double blind October 2007
 NCT00121667 [52] 720 Placebo Metformin 24 PS Double blind August 2006
 NCT00313313 [52] 780 Placebo Glyburide 24 PS Double blind September 2007
 NCT00316082 [52] 365 Placebo None 24 PS Double blind November 2007

PS: parallel series.

aFinal data collection date for primary outcome measure.

The Begg adjusted rank correlation test (Kendall tau: −74; p=0.13) and the Egger regression approach (intercept, −2.81 [CI, –6.91–1.27]) suggested no major publication bias.

…………….

Table 3Moderators and outcome variables in individual studies included in the meta-analysis.
Study (Ref.) # Patients (ID/C) Comparator Trial duration (weeks) >Agea(years) Duration of DMa(years) HbA1c baselinea(%) HbA1c endpoint (%, ID/C) BMI baselinea(Kg/m2) BMI endpoint (Kg/m2)
DPP-4 inhibitors
Vildagliptin
 Pan [33] 440/220 Acarbose 24 52 1.2 8.6 7.2/7.3 26.1 26.3/25.2
 Schweizer [28] 526/254 Metformin 52 53 1.0 8.7 7.7/7.3 32.4 32.5/31.8
 Rosenstock [34] 459/238 Rosiglitazone 24 54 2.5 8.7 7.6/7.4 32.5 32.1/33.5
 2329 [14] 218/55 Pioglitazone 12 52 2.0 10.0 NR NR NR
 Bolli [21] 295/280 Pioglitazone 24 56 6.4 8.4 7.5/7.5 32.1 32.1/32.8
  •  Rosenstock [35]

  • 154/161

  • Pioglitazone

24 51 2.0 8.7
  • 7.0/7.3

29.4
  • 29.9/29.4

  • 292/161

  • Placebo

24 52 2.0 8.7
  • 7.5/7.3

29.3
  • 29.5/29.4

 Dejager [36] 472/160 Placebo 24 54 2.1 8.4 7.6/8.1 32.9 NR
 Scherbaum [37] 67/61 Placebo 52 64 3.3 6.6 6.6/7.1 30.2 NR
 Mari [38] 156/150 Placebo 52 63 2.6 6.7 6.5/6.9 30.2 NR
 Scherbaum [39] 156/150 Placebo 52 63 2.5 6.7 6.5/6.9 30.2 30.2/29.9
 Pratley [27] 70/28 Placebo 12 55 4.0 8.0 7.4/8.1 29.9 NR
 Pi-Sunyer [40] 262/92 Placebo 24 51 2.1 8.4 7.7/8.4 32.2 31.9/32.2
 Ristic [41] 221/58 Placebo 12 56 3.0 7.7 7.2/7.7 31.1 31.0/31.4
 1202 [14] 219/72 Placebo 12 59 NR 7.4 6.7/7. 24.0 NR
 Ahren [42] 56/51 Placebo 12 57 5.5 7.8 7.1/7.8 29.7 NR
 Bosi [22] 349/171 Placebo 24 54 6.2 8.4 7.5/8.4 32.7 32.5/31.7
 Garber [43] 260/138 Placebo 24 54 4.7 8.7 7.6/8.1 32.4 NR
 Garber [19] 264/144 Placebo 16 58 7.1 8.5 7.9/8.6 31.4 31.8/31.2
 1302 102/100 Placebo 12 60 9.0 7.9 6.8/7.9 NR NR
 Fonseca [20] 144/152 Placebo 24 59 14.7 8.4 7.9/8.2 33.1 33.8/33.1
 1303 [14] 178/61 Placebo 12 60 6.5 7.4 6.5/7.7 NR NR
 D’Alessio [44] 20/19 Placebo 12 55 3.5 6.7 6.3/6.3 32.3 NR
Sitagliptin
 PN-036 [15] 179/176 Metformin 30 53 4.5 8.9 8.1/7.6 31.9 NR
  •  Scott [45]

  • 94/87

  • Rosiglitazone

18 55 5.0 7.7
  • 7.0/6.9

30.2
  • 30.1/30.9

  • 94/92

  • Placebo

18 55 5.0 7.7
  • 7.0/7.5

30.1
  • 30.1/29.8

 PN-035 [15] 91/68 Pioglitazone 30 56 8.7 8.2 7.6/8.0 31.2 NR
 Nauck [17] 576/559 Glipizide 52 57 6.3 7.7 7.2/7.0 31.2 30.7/31.7
 PN-028 [15] 65/26 Placebo/Glip 54 68 13.5 7.7 7.0/7.6 NR NR
  •  Scott [18]

  • 595/123

  • Glipizide

12 55 5.0 7.9
  • 7.5/7.1

30.8
  • NR

  • 595/125

  • Placebo

12 55 5.0 7.9
  • 7.5/8.1

31.0
  • NR

 Nonaka [46] 75/76 Placebo 12 55 4.0 7.6 6.9/8.1 25.2 NR
 Hanefeld [16] 444/111 Placebo 12 56 3.7 7.7 7.4/7.8 31.7 NR
 Raz [47] 411/110 Placebo 18 55 4.6 8.0 7.7/8.2 32.1 31.8/32.3
 Goldstein [23] 179/176 Placebo 24 53 4.5 8.7 8.2/8.9 31.9 NR
 Rosenstock [35] 175/178 Placebo 24 56 6.1 8.1 7.2/7.8 31.5 32.6/31.5
 Hermansen [24] 222/219 Placebo 24 56 8.7 8.3 7.8/8.6 31.0 31.5/31.2
 Goldstein [23] 372/364 Placebo 54 53 4.4 8.8 7.1/7.8 32.2 NR
 Charbonnel [48] 429/206 Placebo 24 54 6.3 8.0 7.3/7.9 31.3 NR
 Aschner [49] 488/253 Placebo 24 54 4.4 8.0 7.3/8.2 30.5 30.3/30.5
 Raz [50] 96/94 Placebo 30 55 8.0 9.2 8.3/9.1 30.2 NR
 PN-040 [15] 352/178 Placebo 18 NR NR 8.7 NR NR NR
 PN-044 [15] 290/73 Placebo 12 NR NR 7.6 NR NR NR
Saxagliptin
 Rosenstock [51] 271/67 Placebo 12 53 1.0 7.9 7.1/7.7 31.0 30.7/30.7

ID/C: investigational drug/comparator; DM: diabetes mellitus; and glip.: glipizide.

aMean values.
Thumbnail image of Figure 2. Opens large image

Figure 2

Standardized differences (with 95% CI) of mean HbA1c at endpoint.

……………………….

DPP-4 inhibitors have been proposed as an alternative to currently available therapies (sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones or insulin), mainly as an add-on treatment in patients failing with metformin monotherapy. However, even the most recent version of the ADA–EASD consensus algorithm does not consider these drugs a viable option, except for selected cases [4]. The reasons for exclusion from the main treatment algorithm are scarce efficacy, limited amount of available evidence and high cost. With respect to available evidence, it should be recognized that several trials, which had not been included in previous meta-analyses [6], have been recently published [[19], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]]. Furthermore, there are a relevant number of unpublished trials, the results of which have been disclosed on different websites, and are therefore available. The decision to publish a trial is, in most instances, performed by the sponsor which has a specific interest in pursuing the greater safety and tolerability of the new drug. This bias is unfortunate and limits the reliability of this and other meta-analysis, often based only on data provided from manufacturers; however, the retrieval of all available information should always be attempted, although the possibility of including some information of poorer methodological quality should be taken into account. The overall amount of evidence from randomized clinical trials which can be retrieved using this comprehensive approach is relevant, and probably sufficient for a reliable assessment of the clinical profile of this new class.

The overall efficacy on HbA1c of DPP-4 inhibitors in placebo-controlled trials is similar to that reported in previous meta-analyses [[1], [6], [7], [8]]. However, the greater number of available studies allowed separate analyses of trials in which DPP-4 inhibitors were used either as monotherapy or as an add-on to other agents. In fact, most currently available hypoglycemic treatments show a smaller additional effect on HbA1c when used as an add-on to metformin, in comparison with monotherapy trials [26]. Conversely, DPP-4 inhibitors produce a similar placebo-subtracted reduction of HbA1c either in monotherapy or as an add-on to other agents. This pattern resembles that of other drugs specifically active on post-prandial glucose, such as acarbose or glinides [26]. In fact, DPP-4 inhibitors, as well as GLP-1 receptor agonists, show a relevant effect on post-prandial hyperglycemia. Although data on post-prandial glucose measured through self-monitoring were not available, the results obtained in many trials with meal tests [[7], [27]] support the hypothesis of a specific action of DPP-4 inhibitors on post-prandial hyperglycemia.

Based on the considerations reported above, DPP-4 inhibitors, when used in combination with other drugs, should not be expected to be less effective on HbA1c than other agents (such as sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones or insulin). Unfortunately, only a small number of head-to-head comparisons with other drugs are currently available. The efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors on HbA1c, either in monotherapy or in combination with metformin, appears to be somewhat smaller than that of sulphonylureas, and similar to thiazolidinediones; the only two available comparisons with metformin, both in monotherapy, one with vildagliptin [28] and one with sitagliptin (PN-036 on www.merck.com/mrl/clinical_trials/results.html) suggest a smaller effect on HbA1c. It should be considered that most trials are of a relatively short duration and it is possible that sulphonylureas, which are known to produce a less durable effect on glucose than other available agents, [29] could provide less favorable results in the long-term.

Taken together, the present results on efficacy do not support the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in monotherapy as an alternative to metformin. On the other hand, these drugs appear to be effective as add-on treatments in patients failing with metformin monotherapy, with a specific effect on post-prandial glucose, although the short-term efficacy of sulphonylureas on HbA1c could be greater than that of DPP-4 inhibitors.

With respect to body mass index, this meta-analysis confirms the neutrality of DPP-4 inhibitors [[1], [6], [7], [8]]. In direct comparison, DPP-4 inhibitors appear to have an advantage in this respect over thiazolidinediones.

GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion and inhibits glucagon production in a glucose-dependent manner, i.e. its effects are blunted when blood glucose reaches the lower limits of the normal range [30]. Therefore, DPP-4 inhibitors are expected to reduce glycemia with a low hypoglycemic risk. In fact, DPP-4 inhibitors do not induce any additional risk, in comparison with a placebo, either in monotherapy or in combination with sulphonylureas or insulin. This confirms the results of a recent meta-analysis performed on patient-level data from randomized clinical trials with sitagliptin [31]. Interestingly, in the only trial performed in insulin-treated patients, vildagliptin reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia in comparison with a placebo [20]. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon need to be further elucidated. As expected, DPP-4 inhibitors do not increase the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes when compared with insulin-sensitizing drugs; on the other hand, they show a markedly reduced risk of hypoglycemia in head-to-head comparisons with sulphonylureas. This difference, which could be partly determined by a marginally greater efficacy of sulphonylureas on HbA1c, is consistent with the different mechanisms of action of the classes of drugs.

No patient experienced severe hypoglycemia during vildagliptin therapy. Unexpectedly, episodes of severe hypoglycemia occurred in five patients treated with sitagliptin, either in monotherapy or in combination with metformin, in three different trials [[16], [17], [18]]. Notably, two of those trials [[16], [18]], although published, did not report those events but since those trials were included in the registration data for drug approval in the US, the information on severe hypoglycemia can be retrieved from the FDA website. Furthermore, episodes of severe hypoglycemia were not considered in a recent meta-analysis of trials with sitagliptin, although a greater number of such events had occurred in comparator groups, which included sulphonylureas [31]. It should also be considered that some of the trials did not report any information on severe hypoglycemia, raising the possibility of a selective reporting bias. The occurrence of cases of severe hypoglycemia with DPP-4 inhibitor monotherapy is difficult to explain on the basis of the current knowledge of the mechanism of action of those drugs, and deserved further investigation.

Among other expected adverse events, the previously reported increased incidence of some infections during DPP-4 inhibitor therapy [[6], [8]] is confirmed, with sitagliptin, but not vildagliptin, associated with nasopharyngitis, and with a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of urinary tract infections. These results are consistent with those of a recent meta-analysis on patient-level data from trials with sitagliptin, which included only a fraction of the studies summarized in the present meta-analysis, and which showed a similar trend toward the increase of risk of nasopharyngitis with the DPP-4 inhibitor, although it failed to reach statistical significance [31]. It should be considered that DPP-4 is involved in the interaction between immune cells and that it could therefore modulate immune responses [32]; however, there is no evidence from mechanistic studies that inhibition of DPP-4 with currently available agents has an immunodepressant effect. Consistently, treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors does not appear to increase the risk of infections other than nasopharyngitis and urinary tract infections.

The introduction of a new class of drugs which are designed for long-term use always raises some concerns about safety during prolonged treatment. The possibility of rare, unexpected serious adverse events, which could not be detected in registration trials, should be considered. The number of reported deaths in available trials is still very small; however, there is no evidence suggesting an increase in mortality during treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors. The number of cardiovascular events registered in clinical trials is remarkably greater, although still inadequate to detect minor differences between groups. The two drugs which have been more thoroughly studied (sitagliptin and vildagliptin) do not seem to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk; in fact, the actual risk is lower than with comparators, although differences do not reach statistical significance. In fact, available data do not rule out the possibility of an increase of cardiovascular risk up to 28%, or of a reduction up to 54%. It should be considered that the duration of the available trials (up to one year) is insufficient to detect any effect of treatment (either detrimental or beneficial) on atherogenesis.

The addition of unpublished trials does not substantially modify the estimates of efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors. However, the retrieval of unpublished, but publicly disclosed, information allowed the identification of some potentially interesting phenomena, such as cases of severe hypoglycemia with DPP-4 inhibitor monotherapy, which could not be detected in published papers.

The limitations of the present meta-analysis should be recognized and considered when interpreting the results. The analysis was performed on summary data, therefore lacking the accuracy of assessment which can be obtained when using patient-level data. For the very same reason, a time-to-event analysis for categorial outcomes (including cardiovascular events) could not be performed; the proportion of patients experiencing at least one event during the trial, which was used for meta-analysis, approximates the actual incidence of events only if this incidence is assumed to be constant throughout the duration of the trial. Furthermore, the number of subject studies and the duration of trials performed is insufficient to draw any definitive conclusion on the long-term cardiovascular safety of DPP-4 inhibitors.

In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibitors are effective in reducing HbA1c and post-prandial glucose; when used as an add-on to metformin, they show a medium-term efficacy on HbA1c similar to thiazolidinediones and marginally inferior to sulphonylureas, with a reassuring short- and medium-term safety profile. In fact, the hypoglycemic risk is low, and there is no evidence of detrimental effects on cardiovascular disease. In comparison with sulphonylureas or insulin, which have been proposed as first-choice agents in patients failing with metformin [4], DPP-4 inhibitors exhibit, at least in the short- and medium-term, a lower hypoglycemic risk and a more favorable action on body weight, at the price of a somewhat smaller efficacy and higher cost. The choice of the drugs to be used as add-ons to metformin in monotherapy failure largely depends on the relative weight attributed to each of these three components (safety, efficacy on HbA1c and cost).

 

Read Full Post »

newly developed oxazolidinone antibiotics

Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator

LPBI

 

 

New Antibacterial oxazolidinones in pipeline by Wockhardt

by DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

 

WCK ?

(5S)-N-{3-[3,5-difluoro-4-(4-hydroxy-4-methoxymethyl-piperidin-1-yl)-phenyl]-2-oxo-oxazolidin-5-ylmethyl}-acetamide

MF C19 H25 F2 N3 O5, MW 413.42

Acetamide, N-​[[(5S)​-​3-​[3,​5-​difluoro-​4-​[4-​hydroxy-​4-​(methoxymethyl)​-​1-​piperidinyl]​phenyl]​-​2-​oxo-​5-​oxazolidinyl]​methyl]​-

CAS 957796-51-9

Antibacterial oxazolidinones

THIS MAY BE WCK 4086?????

PATENT

WO 2015173664, US8217058, WO 2012059823, 

 

Oxazolidinone represent a novel chemical class of synthetic antimicrobial agents.Linezolid represents the first member of this class to be used clinically. Oxazolidinones display activity against important Gram-positive human and veterinary pathogens including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) and β-lactam Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP). The oxazolidinones also show activity against Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, Gram-positive and Gram-negative anaerobes. (Diekema D J et al., Lancet 2001 ; 358: 1975-82).

Various oxazolidinones and their methods of preparation are disclosed in the literature. International Publication No. WO 1995/25106 discloses substituted piperidino phenyloxazolidinones and International Publication No. WO 1996/13502 discloses phenyloxazolidinones having a multisubstituted azetidinyl or pyrrolidinyl moiety. US Patent Publication No. 2004/0063954, International Publication Nos. WO 2004/007489 and WO 2004/007488 disclose piperidinyl phenyl oxazolidinones for antimicrobial use.

Pyrrolidinyl/piperidinyl phenyl oxazohdinone antibacterial agents are also described in Kim H Y et al., Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett., (2003), 13:2227-2230. International Publication No. WO 1996/35691 discloses spirocyclic and bicyclic diazinyl and carbazinyl oxazolidinone derivatives. Diazepeno phenyloxazolidinone derivatives are disclosed in the International Publication No. WO 1999/24428. International Publication No. WO 2002/06278 discloses substituted aminopiperidino phenyloxazolidinone derivatives.

Various other methods of preparation of oxazolidinones are reported in US Patent No. 7087784, US Patent No. 6740754, US Patent No. 4948801 , US Patent No. 3654298, US Patent No. 5837870, Canadian Patent No. 681830, J. Med. Chem., 32, 1673 (1989), Tetrahedron, 45, 1323 (1989), J. Med. Chem., 33, 2569 (1990), Tetrahedron Letters, 37, 7937-40 (1996) and Organic Process Research and Development, 11 , 739-741(2007).

Indian Patent Application No. 2534/MUM/2007 discloses a process for the preparation of substituted piperidino phenyloxazolidinones. International Publication No. WO2012/059823 further discloses the process for the preparation of phosphoric acid mono-(L-{4-[(5)-5-(acetylaminomethyl)-2-oxo-oxazolidin-3-yl]-2,6-difluorophenyl}4-methoxymethyl piperidine-4-yl)ester.

US Patent No. 8217058 discloses (5S)-N-{3-[3,5-difluoro-4-(4-hydroxy-4-methoxymethyl-piperidin-l-yl)-phenyl]-2-oxo-oxazolidin-5-ylmethyl}-acetamide as an antibacterial agent and its process for preparation.

PATENT

WO2015173664

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2015173664&recNum=1&maxRec=&office=&prevFilter=&sortOption=&queryString=&tab=PCTDescription

 

 

PATENT

http://www.google.st/patents/WO2007132314A2?cl=en

 

Figure imgf000004_0001

Wockhardt Ltd,

Figure imgf000006_0001
Figure imgf000006_0002

(3) (4)

 

PATENT

WO 2012059823

http://www.google.co.in/patents/WO2012059823A1?cl=en

Phosphoric acid mono-(l-{4-[(S)-5-(acetylamino- methyl)-2-oxo-oxazolidin-3-yl]-2,6-difluorophenyl}-4-methoxymethyl-piperidin-4-yl) ester of Formula (A),
Figure imgf000022_0001
the process comprising the steps of:
a) Converting intermediate of Formula (1) into intermediate of Formula (3)
Figure imgf000022_0002
b) Converting intermediate of Formula (3) into intermediate of Formula (5)
Figure imgf000022_0003

c) Converting intermediate of Formula (5) into intermediate of structure (6)

Figure imgf000022_0004
(5) <6> d) Converting intermediate of Formula (6) into intermediate of Formula (10)
Figure imgf000023_0001
e) Converting intermediate of Formula (10) into intermediate of Formula (11),
Figure imgf000023_0002

f) Converting intermediate of Formula (11) into compound of Formula (A) or Pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof

Figure imgf000023_0003

 

 

Figure imgf000006_0001
Figure imgf000006_0002
Figure imgf000006_0003

 

Read Full Post »

Glucokinase target for type 2 diabetes

Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator

LPBI

 

 

Pfizer’s PF 04991532 a Hepatoselective Glucokinase Activator Clinical Candidate for Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLD DRUG TRACKER
http://newdrugapprovals.org/2015/11/27/pfizers-pf-04991532-a-hepatoselective-glucokinase-activator-clinical-candidate-for-treating-type-2-diabetes-mellitus/

 

PF 04991532

GKA PF-04991532

(S)-6-{3-cyclopentyl-2-[4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl]propanamido}nicotinic acid

(S)-6-(3-Cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic Acid

(S)-6-(3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic acid

MW 396.36, MF C18 H19 F3 N4 O3

CAS 1215197-37-7

3-​Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-​[[(2S)​-​3-​cyclopentyl-​1-​oxo-​2-​[4-​(trifluoromethyl)​-​1H-​imidazol-​1-​yl]​propyl]​amino]​-

http://www.biochemj.org/content/441/3/881

 

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a rapidly expanding public epidemic affecting over 300 million people worldwide. This disease is characterized by elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin resistance, abnormally elevated hepatic glucose production (HGP), and reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Moreover, long-term lack of glycemic control increases risk of complications from neuropathic, microvascular, and macrovascular diseases.

The standard of care for T2DM is metformin followed by sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones (TZD) as second line oral therapies. As disease progression continues, patients typically require injectable agents such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues and, ultimately, insulin to help maintain glycemic control. Despite these current therapies, many patients still remain unable to safely achieve and maintain tight glycemic control, placing them at risk of diabetic complications and highlighting the need for novel therapeutic options.

 

Glucokinase (hexokinase IV) continues to be a compelling target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes given the wealth of supporting human genetics data and numerous reports of robust clinical glucose lowering in patients treated with small molecule allosteric activators. Recent work has demonstrated the ability of hepatoselective activators to deliver glucose lowering efficacy with minimal risk of hypoglycemia.

While orally administered agents require a considerable degree of passive permeability to promote suitable exposures, there is no such restriction on intravenously delivered drugs. Therefore, minimization of membrane diffusion in the context of an intravenously agent should ensure optimal hepatic targeting and therapeutic index.

 

Diabetes is a major public health concern because of its increasing prevalence and associated health risks. The disease is characterized by metabolic defects in the production and utilization of carbohydrates which result in the failure to maintain appropriate blood glucose levels. Two major forms of diabetes are recognized. Type I diabetes, or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), is the result of an absolute deficiency of insulin. Type II diabetes, or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), often occurs with normal, or even elevated levels of insulin and appears to be the result of the inability of tissues and cells to respond appropriately to insulin. Aggressive control of NIDDM with medication is essential; otherwise it can progress into IDDM.

As blood glucose increases, it is transported into pancreatic beta cells via a glucose transporter. Intracellular mammalian glucokinase (GK) senses the rise in glucose and activates cellular glycolysis, i.e. the conversion of glucose to glucose-6-phosphate, and subsequent insulin release. Glucokinase is found principally in pancreatic β-cells and liver parenchymal cells. Because transfer of glucose from the blood into muscle and fatty tissue is insulin dependent, diabetics lack the ability to utilize glucose adequately which leads to undesired accumulation of blood glucose (hyperglycemia). Chronic hyperglycemia leads to decreases in insulin secretion and contributes to increased insulin resistance. Glucokinase also acts as a sensor in hepatic parenchymal cells which induces glycogen synthesis, thus preventing the release of glucose into the blood. The GK processes are thus critical for the maintenance of whole body glucose homeostasis.

It is expected that an agent that activates cellular GK will facilitate glucose-dependent secretion from pancreatic beta cells, correct postprandial hyperglycemia, increase hepatic glucose utilization and potentially inhibit hepatic glucose release. Consequently, a GK activator may provide therapeutic treatment for NIDDM and associated complications, inter alia, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, and obesity.

Several drugs in five major categories, each acting by different mechanisms, are available for treating hyperglycemia and subsequently, NIDDM (Moller, D. E., “New drug targets for Type II diabetes and the metabolic syndrome” Nature414; 821-827, (2001)): (A) Insulin secretogogues, including sulphonyl-ureas (e.g., glipizide, glimepiride, glyburide) and meglitinides (e.g., nateglidine and repaglinide) enhance secretion of insulin by acting on the pancreatic beta-cells. While this therapy can decrease blood glucose level, it has limited efficacy and tolerability, causes weight gain and often induces hypoglycemia. (B) Biguanides (e.g., metformin) are thought to act primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose production. Biguanides often cause gastrointestinal disturbances and lactic acidosis, further limiting their use. (C) Inhibitors of alpha-glucosidase (e.g., acarbose) decrease intestinal glucose absorption. These agents often cause gastrointestinal disturbances. (D) Thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) act on a specific receptor (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma) in the liver, muscle and fat tissues. They regulate lipid metabolism subsequently enhancing the response of these tissues to the actions of insulin. Frequent use of these drugs may lead to weight gain and may induce edema and anemia. (E) Insulin is used in more severe cases, either alone or in combination with the above agents.

Ideally, an effective new treatment for NIDDM would meet the following criteria: (a) it would not have significant side effects including induction of hypoglycemia; (b) it would not cause weight gain; (c) it would at least partially replace insulin by acting via mechanism(s) that are independent from the actions of insulin; (d) it would desirably be metabolically stable to allow less frequent usage; and (e) it would be usable in combination with tolerable amounts of any of the categories of drugs listed herein.

Substituted heteroaryls, particularly pyridones, have been implicated in mediating GK and may play a significant role in the treatment of NIDDM. For example, U.S. Patent publication No. 2006/0058353 and PCT publication Nos. WO2007/043638, WO2007/043638, and WO2007/117995 recite certain heterocyclic derivatives with utility for the treatment of diabetes. Although investigations are on-going, there still exists a need for a more effective and safe therapeutic treatment for diabetes, particularly NIDDM.

 

s1

s1

 

s1

 

PATENT

US 20100063063

http://www.google.com/patents/US20100063063

SYNTHESIS CONSTRUCTION

6-aminonicotinic acid

 

BENZYL BROMIDE

 

Figure US20100063063A1-20100311-C00076

FIRST KEY INTERMEDIATE

 

SECOND SERIES FOR NEXT INTERMEDIATE

CONDENSED WITH

4-Trifluoromethyl-1H-imidazole

TO  GIVE PRODUCT SHOWN BELOW

 

Figure US20100063063A1-20100311-C00025

(S)-methyl 3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanoate (I-8a)

 

CONVERTED TO ACID CHLORIDE, (S)-3-cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanoyl chloride (I-8c)

AND CONDENSED WITH

Figure US20100063063A1-20100311-C00076

WILL GIVE BENZYL DERIVATIVE

THEN DEBENZYLATION TO FINAL PRODUCT

 

 

 

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.10-13.25 (1H), 11.44 (1H), 8.83 (1H), 8.23-8.26 (1H), 8.09-8.12 (1H), 7.94-7.95 (2H), 5.22-5.26 (1H), 2.06-2.17 (2H), 1.29-1.64 (8H), 1.04-1.07 (1H); m/z 397.3 (M+H)+.

 

Organic Process Research & Development (2012), 16(10), 1635-1645

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/op300194c

Abstract Image

This work describes the process development and manufacture of early-stage clinical supplies of a hepatoselective glucokinase activator, a potential therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Critical issues centered on challenges associated with the synthesis of intermediates and API bearing a particularly racemization-prone α-aryl carboxylate functionality. In particular, a T3P-mediated amidation process was optimized for the coupling of a racemization-prone acid substrate and a relatively non-nucleophilic amine. Furthermore, an unusually hydrolytically-labile amide in the API also complicated the synthesis and isolation of drug substance. The evolution of the process over multiple campaigns is presented, resulting in the preparation of over 110 kg of glucokinase activator.

(S)-6-(3-Cyclopentyl-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-yl)propanamido)nicotinic Acid (1)

 

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2012), 55(3), 1318-1333

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm2014887

Abstract Image

Glucokinase is a key regulator of glucose homeostasis, and small molecule allosteric activators of this enzyme represent a promising opportunity for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Systemically acting glucokinase activators (liver and pancreas) have been reported to be efficacious but in many cases present hypoglycaemia risk due to activation of the enzyme at low glucose levels in the pancreas, leading to inappropriately excessive insulin secretion. It was therefore postulated that a liver selective activator may offer effective glycemic control with reduced hypoglycemia risk. Herein, we report structure–activity studies on a carboxylic acid containing series of glucokinase activators with preferential activity in hepatocytes versus pancreatic β-cells. These activators were designed to have low passive permeability thereby minimizing distribution into extrahepatic tissues; concurrently, they were also optimized as substrates for active liver uptake via members of the organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) family. These studies lead to the identification of 19 as a potent glucokinase activator with a greater than 50-fold liver-to-pancreas ratio of tissue distribution in rodent and non-rodent species. In preclinical diabetic animals, 19 was found to robustly lower fasting and postprandial glucose with no hypoglycemia, leading to its selection as a clinical development candidate for treating type 2 diabetes.

Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2013), 23(24), 6588-6592

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960894X13012638

Image for unlabelled figure

 

Structure of Hepatoselective GKA PF-04991532 (1).

Figure 1.

Structure of Hepatoselective GKA PF-04991532 (1).

 

Pfizer’s PF 04937319 glucokinase activators for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLD DRUG TRACKER
http://newdrugapprovals.org/2015/11/27/pfizers-pf-04937319-glucokinase-activators-for-the-treatment-of-type-2-diabetes/

Graphical abstract: Designing glucokinase activators with reduced hypoglycemia risk: discovery of N,N-dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide as a clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

PF 04937319

N,N-dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide

MW 432.43

MF C22 H20 N6 O4
CAS 1245603-92-2
2-​Pyrimidinecarboxamid​e, N,​N-​dimethyl-​5-​[[2-​methyl-​6-​[[(5-​methyl-​2-​pyrazinyl)​amino]​carbonyl]​-​4-​benzofuranyl]​oxy]​-
N,N-Dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)carbamoyl)-benzofuran-4- yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide
Pfizer Inc. clinical candidate currently in Phase 2 development.
CLINICAL TRIALS

A trial to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single doses of PF-04937319 in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (NCT01044537)

Multiple dose study of PF-04937319 in patients with type 2 diabetes (NCT01272804)
Phase 2 study to evaluate safety and efficacy of investigational drug – PF04937319 in patients with type 2 diabetes (NCT01475461)

 

SYNTHESIS

PF 319 SYN

Glucokinase is a key regulator of glucose homeostasis and small molecule activators of this enzyme represent a promising opportunity for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. Several glucokinase activators have advanced to clinical studies and demonstrated promising efficacy; however, many of these early candidates also revealed hypoglycemia as a key risk. In an effort to mitigate this hypoglycemia risk while maintaining the promising efficacy of this mechanism, we have investigated a series of substituted 2-methylbenzofurans as “partial activators” of the glucokinase enzyme leading to the identification ofN,N-dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide as an early development candidate.

 

It is expected that an agent that activates cellular GK will facilitate glucose-dependent secretion from pancreatic beta cells, correct postprandial hyperglycemia, increase hepatic glucose utilization and potentially inhibit hepatic glucose release. Consequently, a GK activator may provide therapeutic treatment for NIDDM and associated complications, inter alia, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, and obesity. Several drugs in five major categories, each acting by different mechanisms, are available for treating hyperglycemia and subsequently, NIDDM (Moller, D. E., “New drug targets for Type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome” Nature 414; 821 -827, (2001 )): (A) Insulin secretogogues, including sulphonyl-ureas (e.g., glipizide, glimepiride, glyburide) and meglitinides (e.g., nateglidine and repaglinide) enhance secretion of insulin by acting on the pancreatic beta-cells. While this therapy can decrease blood glucose level, it has limited efficacy and tolerability, causes weight gain and often induces hypoglycemia. (B) Biguanides (e.g., metformin) are thought to act primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose production. Biguanides often cause gastrointestinal disturbances and lactic acidosis, further limiting their use. (C) Inhibitors of alpha-glucosidase (e.g., acarbose) decrease intestinal glucose absorption. These agents often cause gastrointestinal disturbances. (D) Thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) act on a specific receptor (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma) in the liver, muscle and fat tissues. They regulate lipid metabolism subsequently enhancing the response of these tissues to the actions of insulin. Frequent use of these drugs may lead to weight gain and may induce edema and anemia. (E) Insulin is used in more severe cases, either alone or in combination with the above agents. Ideally, an effective new treatment for NIDDM would meet the following criteria: (a) it would not have significant side effects including induction of hypoglycemia; (b) it would not cause weight gain; (c) it would at least partially replace insulin by acting via mechanism(s) that are independent from the actions of insulin; (d) it would desirably be metabolically stable to allow less frequent usage; and (e) it would be usable in combination with tolerable amounts of any of the categories of drugs listed herein.

Substituted heteroaryls, particularly pyridones, have been implicated in mediating GK and may play a significant role in the treatment of NIDDM. For example, U.S. Patent publication No. 2006/0058353 and PCT publication No’s. WO2007/043638, WO2007/043638, and WO2007/117995 recite certain heterocyclic derivatives with utility for the treatment of diabetes. Although investigations are on-going, there still exists a need for a more effective and safe therapeutic treatment for diabetes, particularly NIDDM.

 

Designing glucokinase activators with reduced hypoglycemia risk: discovery of N,N-dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide as a clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

*Corresponding authors
aPfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton
E-mail: jeffrey.a.pfefferkorn@pfizer.com
Tel: +860 686 3421
Med. Chem. Commun., 2011,2, 828-839

DOI: 10.1039/C1MD00116G

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2011/md/c1md00116g/unauth#!divAbstract

http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/md/c1/c1md00116g/c1md00116g.pdf

Glucokinase is a key regulator of glucose homeostasis and small molecule activators of this enzyme represent a promising opportunity for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. Several glucokinase activators have advanced to clinical studies and demonstrated promising efficacy; however, many of these early candidates also revealed hypoglycemia as a key risk. In an effort to mitigate this hypoglycemia risk while maintaining the promising efficacy of this mechanism, we have investigated a series of substituted 2-methylbenzofurans as “partial activators” of the glucokinase enzyme leading to the identification ofN,N-dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide as an early development candidate.

Graphical abstract: Designing glucokinase activators with reduced hypoglycemia risk: discovery of N,N-dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-carbamoyl)benzofuran-4-yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide as a clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

N,N-Dimethyl-5-(2-methyl-6-((5-methylpyrazin-2-yl)carbamoyl)-benzofuran-4- yloxy)pyrimidine-2-carboxamide (28).

 

PAPER

 

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/md/c2md20317k#!divAbstract

 

PAPER

Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2013), 23(16), 4571-4578

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960894X13007452

Glucokinase activators 1 and 2.

Figure 1.

Glucokinase activators 1 and 2.

 

PATENT

Pfizer Inc.

WO 2010103437

https://www.google.co.in/patents/WO2010103437A1?cl=en

Scheme I outlines the general procedures one could use to provide compounds of the present invention having Formula (I).

Figure imgf000011_0001
PF 319 SYN

Preparations of Starting Materials and Key Intermediates

 

 

Beebe, D.A.; Ross, T.T.; Rolph, T.P.; Pfefferkorn, J.A.; Esler, W.P.
The glucokinase activator PF-04937319 improves glycemic control in combination with exercise without causing hypoglycemia in diabetic rats
74th Annu Meet Sci Sess Am Diabetes Assoc (ADA) (June 13-17, San Francisco) 2014, Abst 1113-P

 

Amin, N.B.; Aggarwal, N.; Pall, D.; Paragh, G.; Denney, W.S.; Le, V.; Riggs, M.; Calle, R.A.
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes
Diabetes Obes Metab 2015, 17(8): 751

 

Study to compare single dose of three modified release formulations of PF-04937319 with immediate release material-sparing-tablet (IR MST) formulation previously studied in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (NCT02206607)

Read Full Post »

An ambiguous course of psychosis

Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator

LPBI

 

It is not always clear what the diagnosis is when a young person develops a psychosis, which is usually a clear break, but the features are not typical.  In the New York Times Opinion Page of Nov 17, 2015, Norman Ornstein describes the development of such in his son – How to help save the mentally ill from themselves.  He describes legislation in process to deal with the problem of when you institutionalize a potentially suicidal patient.  This was the situation that I described in the murder of Rabbi Adler on the podium by Richard Wishnetsky so many years ago.  In the case of Ornstein, his oldest son Mathhew died at 34 of carbon monoxide poisoning 10 years after his problem was discovered.

The son was a brilliant student, and he excelled in debating.  He was compassionate and empathetic.  This young man was a standup comedian and after graduating from Princeton wh went to Hollywood. The father describes his son’s condition as anosognosia, meaning lack of recognition of his illness.  I recall that a prominent cancer surgeon who was manic depressive psychotic and required lithium might have behaved that way when he failed to take his medication. He had a tragic surgical failure that ended his career when he was doing a rectal dissection and got into the posterior vascular bed and was in trouble, needing the assistance of the Chief of Urology.  The patient who died received over 100 units of blood. This very intelligent surgeon would throw the specimen he removed to the pathologist who entered the operating room in poor judgement.  I also recall a valued colleague of mine, a mathematical genius with MD and PhD tell me how the great surgeon and father of kidney transplantation could work tirelessly, but he died in a plane crash – himself as the pilot. I’m not in a position to disagree with Norman Ornstein’s conclusion that the son had a serious mood disorder, but the presentation he describes is similar to the two cases I mention.  In addition, I did not mention that my dear colleague was himself manic depressive, and he would work tirelessly, except when he was down and out.  He wrote an incredible program to diagnose heart attach from the serum enzymes for the IBM PC-XT in apl.  He sailed through difficult mathematics classes without taking notes.  He bacame interested in Shannon Information Theory when he heard a lecture by a microbiologist colleague who had done seminal work in classifying organisms by their biochemical features, which led to extending the use of feature extraction and combinatorial classes.

Ornstein points out that his son was over age 18, so that neither the family or professionals had any legal authority to make a decision about his hospitalization or related matters.  This is not quite like what I had seen with my brother.  But in my brother’s case, he was completely fractured, but he also was in no way belligerent.  In the case of Mathew Ornstein, he was never belligerent, but he was unkempt, kept himself poorly, and grew a beard.  He also becaame ultra religious.  The religiosity was also a feature of my own brother’s illness.  Matthew took a position that he could not take medication.  What is not clear is what medication he would have been on, which might be informative.

see more at – http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/opinion/how-to-help-save-the-mentally-ill-from-themselves

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

An Emotional and Thoughtful Decision Over BRAC1 and Surgery

Curator: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

In the last several years, no celebrity decision has been more instructive and influential than the decision after childbirth and many child adoptions than that of Angelina Jolie Pitt.  She was celebrated for for her many movies at a still young age prior to moving to directing movies, known for unflinting courage in action movies by a woman gifted and excelling at actions considered to be done by a substitute.  The athleticism might recall that of Lucille Ball or of Katharine Hepburn in another generation.   She developed a small resectable breast lesion not so long after her marriage, and her mother had had breast cancer previously.  Genetic testing revealed that she had a BAC1 genetic typing.  Having consulted with the best physician advice available and with discussions with her husband, Brad Pitt, she undertook a double mastectomy.  This was still not the end of the story.  Her mutation, which is associated usually with a jewish heritage, is also associated with risk of ovarian cancer.  This led to a later decision to have an oophorectomy.  She made two of the most difficult decisions that women face, especially if they are of childbearing age.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-strength_5637abc7e4b0631799132888

 

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt sat down for an emotional interview with the “Today” show to discuss their new movie “By the Sea” and her decision to undergo a double mastectomy and have her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed to avoid cancer. During the moving discussion, Pitt praised his wife’s braveness.

“I just remember there was no vanity to my wife’s approach,” he said, after explaining how he found out about the blood test results that showed she could have signs of early-stage ovarian cancer while away in France. “It was mature. [There] was an excitement to where this is our life, we’re gonna make the best of it. There was a strength in that. It’s just another one of those things in life that makes you tighter. She was doing it for her kids, and she was doing it for her family, so we can be together. It trumped everything, everything and anything.”

The mother of six said her husband’s support was paramount.

“He made it very, very clear to me that what he loved and what was a woman to him was somebody who was smart and capable and cared about her family. It’s not about your physical body. I knew through the surgeries that he was on my side and that that wasn’t somewhere where I was going to feel like less of a woman, because my husband wasn’t going to let that happen.”

Jolie used the same doctor as her late mother, Marcheline Bertrand, to remove her ovaries. Bertrand, who died in 2007 after an eight-year battle with ovarian cancer, made the doctors and nurses “promise” to remove her daughter’s ovaries.

 

Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie: When is it Time to Seek Help?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-jane-greer/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-_1_b_7242196.html

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s marriage has been reinvigorated by couples’ counseling. Although things are on the mend now, there was trouble in paradise less than a year after they tied the knot. Not only did Brad see ex Jennifer Aniston alone, but he alsodidn’t accompany Angelina to the Critics’ Choice Awards in January. After months of fighting, they decided to seek out the help of a therapist. Now they plan to always keep counseling in their lives, because they say it has transformed their marriage and helped them fall in love with each other again. And they are not alone. Cameron Diazand Benji Madden have enlisted some outside support after just five months of marriage, as they work to put a strong foundation underneath them. This proves that it is never too early to get help.

The secret to having a lasting relationship is to not let the anger and resentment build up to the point where it drives you apart. A lot of people don’t realize that a lasting union is full of angry and questioning feelings which go hand in hand with the adoring ones, not unlike a seesaw. I call them “love you, mean it” and “hate you, mean it” moments, which I talk about in my book What About Me? Stop Selfishness From Ruining Your Relationship. It is natural to shift in and out of these emotions. The challenge is to make sure the positive ones always balance the negative ones so that they don’t consume you. The goal is always to continue to or to get back to loving and feeling connected to your partner. What happens, though, when that becomes more and more difficult to do, and you aren’t able to get past the anger anymore? How do you know when it is time to bring in a trained professional to help you sort out the issues?

Even in today’s sophisticated age, people are often reluctant to air their marital problems with an outsider, especially when it comes to sexual troubles. There are many reasons for this which include feeling embarrassed, the fear that you think something is really wrong with you or your partner, the concern that you will be told there is something wrong with your relationship that is unfixable, or maybe you do want to go but your partner doesn’t. There are also those people who think that because the idea of divorce hasn’t come up things can’t be that bad, so you don’t really need help.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001401/

Angelina Jolie is an Oscar-winning actress who became popular after playing the title role in the “Lara Croft” blockbuster movies, as well as Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005),Wanted (2008), Salt (2010) and Maleficent (2014). Off-screen, Jolie has become prominently involved in international charity projects, especially those involving refugees.

 

 

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, she said, “I actually love being in menopause,” shocking women worldwide. The star said she’s “very fortunate” that her experience with menopause hasn’t been all that bad.

Jolie-Pitt had a double mastectomy in 2013 and then decided in March to have her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed to decrease her chance of getting cancer, as she carries the BRCA1 gene mutation. Her most recent surgery is one that “puts women into a forced menopause,” she wrote in a heartfelt New York Times op-ed publicly announcing her decision.

“I feel older, and I feel settled being older. I feel happy that I’ve grown up,” she said. “I don’t want to be young again.”

Her husband, Brad Pitt, has been helped her overcome the physical effects of the surgery.

 

She described her experience in two op-ed articles in the New York Times. These articles have been highly influential in the lives of other women.

 

Angelina Jolie PittDiary of a Surgery – The New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/opinion/angelina-jolie-pitt-diary-of-a-surgery.html

Angelina Jolie Pitt Diary of a … Surgery YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DpzGYLJddQrE

Experts Back Angelina Jolie Pitt in Choices for Cancer Prevention 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/25/science/experts-back-angelina-jolie-pitt-in-choices-for-cancer-prevention.html

Read Full Post »

Experience with Thyroid Cancer

Author: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

 

I retired from my position as pathologist in charge of clinical laboratories after five years at New York Methodist Hospital, with great satisfaction in mentoring students from the high schools and university undergraduate programs nearby interested in science.  I was fortunate to experience the Brooklyn “cityscape” and vibrance, and to work with other physician educators in surgery and cardiology and pulmonary medicine. Most of my students participated in presenting papers at professional meetings, and some coauthored published work.  But I was about to enter a new phase of life.  I returned to my home in Connecticut and immediately accepted a temporary position for less than a year as the Blood Bank – Transfusion Medicine Director at Norwalk Hospital, which also afforded the opportunity to help with the installation of an automated hematology system, and to help in the quality monitoring in Chemistry.  It was a good reprieve from the anxiety of having nothing to do after an intense professional  career.  When that ended I went to Yale University Department of Mathematics  and found a collaborative project with a brilliant postdoc and his mentor, Professor and Emeritus Chairman Ronald Coifman.  A colleague of mine many years ago had done a project with the automated hematology, but it was too early for a good interpretive hemogram.  I had sufficient data in 8,000 lines of data containing all of the important information.  We managed to develop an algorithm in over a year that would interpret the data and provide a list of probabilities for the physician, and we used part of the data set for creating the algorithm and another set for validation.   In the meantime I also became engaged in twice weekly sessions in Yoga, Pilates, and massage therapy, and did some swimming.  I also participated in discussions with a group of retired men up to 20 years senior to me. I also did two rounds of walking around the condonium that was home to my wife and I.

 

Then I noticed that I became weak and short of breath in walking around the condominium streets and had to stop and hold a tree or streetlamp.  I was long-term diabetic and was followed by a pulmonologist for sleep apnea for some five years.  This was an insidious health presentation, as I had had good pulmonary and cardiac status at that point in time.  Then an “aha!” moment occurred when my laboratory results showed a high level of thyroid stimulating hormone.  It was one of a rare instances of hyperparathyroidism occurring with a thyroid tumor.

I then had radiological testing of the head and neck, which led to a thyroid biopsy.  I then chose to referral to Yale University Health Sciences Center, where there was an excellent endocrinologist, and it was a leading center for head and neck surgery.  All of this took many trips, much testing, biopsies of thyroid and its removal.  There also were 3 proximate lymph nodes.  In undergoing the tests the technicians said that they had never had a patient like me because of my questions and comments.  It was a papillary thyroid cancer involving the center and right lobe, with a characteristic appearance and identified by a histologically stained biomarker that I reviewed with my longtime friend and colleague, Dr. Marguerite Pinto.  The surgery and followup went well.

 

However, I developed  double-vision (diplopia) and was referent to one of a handful of neuro-ophthalmologists in Connecticut.  Perhaps related to the hyperthyroid condition, I had developed an anti-thyroid antibody that disturbed the lower muscle that moves the right eye.  This required many test over months, and my wearing a special attachable lens gradient to equalize the vision in both eyes.  The next requirement was to watch and wait. It could be corrected by surgery if it remained after a year.  Nevertheless, it subsided over a period of perhaps 9 months and I removed the attachment with sufficient return of my previous sight.

In the meantime I was writing a lot over this period, and I also began to watch MSNBC and Turner Classic Movies on a regular basis and found relief.  I’m not a “laugher” and have had a long-term anxiety state.  I enjoyed watching the magic of Charlie Chaplin, Al Jolson, Lassie, and whatever caught my fancy.

My daughter was accepted for a tenure earning faculty position competing against a large field of candidates for an Assistant Professorship at Holyoke Community College in Western Massachusetts. Her husband had invested 15 years as a Navy physician and neurologist, having graduated from the Armed Services Medical School in Bethesda, and given this opportunity, decided to forgo further service  would pay for their child’s future college education.  He is very bright, knowledgable, and a blessing for a son-in-law.  We went through the sale of our house and the search for a living arrangement near our daughter, all while I was going through my therapy.  It was undoubtedly the best thing to moving near the daughter.

The move became an enormous challenge.  It took time to sell the condominium, which was  desirable in  a difficult market.  I became engaged in trashing what I need not save, but I had to review hundreds of published work, unpublished papers, saved publications, and hundreds of photographs large and small, that I had kept over many years.  I had to dispense of my darkroom equipment, and we managed to give much away.  It was very engaging.  It was impossible to be overwhelmed, but also tiring over the long haul.

Prior to moving, my wife had trouble swallowing, and she was subsequently found to have an esophageal carcinoma at 20 cm, and invading the submucosa.  We made arrangement for treatment by Massachusetts General Hospital, which could be done at its cancer affiliate in Northampton, MA.  The move was made, and we have temporary residence in a townhouse in Northampton, woon to move to an adult living facility.  My wife is lucky enough to have a squamous cell carcinoma, not adenocarcinoma.  Her treatment needed careful adjustments.  She decided to live it out whatever the outcome.  However, she has done well.  She maintained her weight, underwent radiation and chemotherapy, which is finished, and is returning to eating more than soft food and protein shakes. She has enjoyed being a grandmother to an incredible kid in kindergarten only a block away, and engaged in reading and all sorts of puzzles and games.

My own health has seen a decline in ease of motion. I am starting physical therapy and also pulmonary therapy for my asthma.  Having a grandson is both a pleasure and an education. Being a grandparent, one is relieved of the responsibility of being a parent.

In following my wife’s serious illness, which precluded surgery, we have had phone calls from her sister daily, weekend visits nonstop, and more to come.  She has been very satisfied with the quality of care.
My triplet sister calls often for both of us.  We also call my 95 year old aunt, who is my mother’s sister.  My mother’s younger brother enjoyed life, left Hungary as a medical student in 1941 and became an insurance salesman in Cleveland. He lived to 99 years old.  He outlived 3 wives, all friends of my mother.
His daughter has called me for a medical second opinion for a good fifteen years.  She was a very rare patient who had a pituitary growth hormone secreting adenocarcinoma (Addison’s Disease) for which she had two surgeries, and regularly visits the Cleveland Clinic and the Jewish Hospital of Los Angeles.

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Is Patient Engagement with Medicine different than World View?

Curator: Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

In Mark Twain’s later years he had personal and financial losses.  I think that was when he wrote “why do we laugh at a birth and cry at a funeral? It is because it is not I!”

The first Chairman of Medicine at John Hopkins Medical School was William Osler.  He taught that a physician must be broadly knowledgeable about the arts and culture in order to make a difference in engaging the patient.  This has come into play in the republican primaries for the first time, regardless of other requirements.

When I was a freshman medical student we had a special course on Inborn Errors of Metabolism.  I think it was a first, given a new and energetic Chairman of Biochemistry from Harvard.  Nevertheless, over the next decade, the influence of “Oslerism” was fading, to be replaced by the concept of a British physician, Archibald Garrod (1857–1936), in the early 20th century (1908). He is known for work that prefigured the “one gene-one enzyme” hypothesis, based on his studies on the nature and inheritance of alkaptonuria. His seminal text, Inborn Errors of Metabolism was published in 1923.[1] Some years later I learned that the selection of students entering was weighted in success with organic chemistry.

 

Type of inborn error Incidence
Disease involving amino acids (e.g. PKU), organic acids,
primary lactic acidosis, galactosemia, or a urea cycle disease
24 per 100 000 births[3] 1 in 4,200[3]
Lysosomal storage disease 8 per 100 000 births[3] 1 in 12,500[3]
Peroxisomal disorder ~3 to 4 per 100 000 of births[3] ~1 in 30,000[3]
Respiratory chain-based mitochondrial disease ~3 per 100 000 births[3] 1 in 33,000[3]
Glycogen storage disease 2.3 per 100 000 births[3] 1 in 43,000[3]

 

  1.  http://www.esp.org/books/garrod/inborn-errors/facsimile/
  2. Jump up^ Vernon, Hilary (Jun 2015). “Inborn Errors of Metabolism: Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy”. JAMA Pediatrics.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l Applegarth DA, Toone JR, Lowry RB (January 2000). “Incidence of inborn errors of metabolism in British Columbia, 1969-1996”. Pediatrics 105 (1): e10. doi:10.1542/peds.105.1.e10PMID 10617747.

When I entered my third year of medical school, I had a huge awakening. I was now engaged with patients at Detroit Receiving Hospital.  It was not unlike Cook County, LA County, Charity Hospital, King County or Belleview Hospital.  This was a year before the Detroit riots.  Receiving Hospital (later Detroit General) had a large population of indigent patients and was a trauma center located adjacent to skid row.  There were students who looked down on the patients, many on welfare, and who took a taxi to the hospital.
Most of my colleagues did not have that view.  However, I would guess that my view was transcended some time later when I recall students concerned about “racial balancing” for entry to colleges.

I saw the victims of gun, knife and other violence in the Emergency Room (ER).  On one occasion, the entire surgery staff was called out of the weekly Grand Rounds to attend to 3 cases with massive bleeding in the ER. One of the cases was presented the following week with a discussion of whether the patient should have been taken to the operating room instead of handling the emergent case in the ER.

I also recall a woman who might have been 45 years old who was extremely anxious and had had 5 divorces. Nobody came to visit her.  We were taking her blood pressure when it spiked very high.  My classmate might well have said holy smoke and ran to the library to check things out.  She had a very rare occurrence of pheochromocytoma, a tumor of the adrenal medulla that secretes adrenaline.  It was probably also a factor in her social history.  It was the first such case to be seen by the Chairman of Surgery.

I don’t know that preparation in the great city hospitals has changed.  It is an important experience.  I did see some anger expressed by patients in the ER, mainly related to the life experiences of the patient.  In my 20 years at Bridgeport Hospital, there was a large admission population from “Father Panic Village”.  I recall vividly a patient saying to me, when he learned my last name is Bernstein, get away from me.

Over the years, not that much has changed.  There is a much larger uneducated, unemployed, and ignorant population that has no hope of a future.  It is most disconcerting at this time because they are bereft of a dream, and they don’t participate in our society.  Moreover, large disparities influence voting patterns and also the use of tight public resources.

It would be difficult for me to consider this to be unrelated to an emerging world crisis that we are observing today.  There is an increased downward pressure on the lower class with a vanished middle class.  The entering well prepared medical staff is inundated, but more skilled at the inadequate medical information systems they have to use.  There has been emigration to the UD for decades, but now we have more openly advocated do not come unless you have value to provide.  We are in the midst of a Middle East crisis, and despite economic recovery since the Wall Street collapse, there is a “doomsday” chronicle.  Emma Lazarus wrote “Give me your poor, … and your huddled masses yearning to be free”.

TS Elliott wrote “The Hollow Men” in 1925, post WWI . We remember “This is the way the world ends. This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper.  I hope that it hasn’t come to that.

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »