Feeds:
Posts
Comments

See on Scoop.itCardiovascular Disease: PHARMACO-THERAPY

Meta-analysis: Heart Failure Worsens Short-term Prognosis of NSTE-ACS Patients
TCTMD
However, beta-blockers were less commonly prescribed for patients with HF at presentation than those without (69.3% vs.

See on www.tctmd.com

Ultrasound imaging as an instrument for measuring tissue elasticity: “Shear-wave Elastography” VS. “Strain-Imaging”

Writer and curator: Dror Nir, PhD

In the context of cancer-management, imaging is pivotal. For decades, ultrasound is used by clinicians to support every step in cancer pathways. Its popularity within clinicians is steadily increasing despite the perception of it being less accurate and less informative than CT and MRI. This is not only because ultrasound is easily accessible and relatively low cost, but also because advances in ultrasound technology, mainly the conversion into PC-based modalities allows better, more reproducible, imaging and more importantly; clinically-effective image interpretation.

The idea to rely on ultrasound’s physics in order to measure the stiffness of tissue lesions is not new. The motivation for such measurement has to do with the fact that many times malignant lesions are stiffer than non-malignant lesions.

The article I bring below; http://digital.studio-web.be/digitalMagazine?issue_id=254 by Dr. Georg Salomon and his colleagues, is written for lay-readers. I found it on one of the many portals that are bringing quasi-professional and usually industry-sponsored information on health issues; http://www.dieurope.com/ – The European Portal for Diagnostic Imaging. Note, that when it comes to using ultrasound as a diagnostic aid in urology, Dr. Georg Salomon is known to be one of the early adopters for new technologies and an established opinion leader who published many peer-review, frequently quoted, papers on Elastography.

The important take-away I would like to highlight for the reader: Quantified measure of tissue’s elasticity (doesn’t matter if is done by ShearWave or another “Elastography” measure implementation) is information that has real clinical value for the urologists who needs to decide on the right pathway for his patient!

Note: the highlights in the article below are added by me for the benefit of the reader.

Improvement in the visualization of prostate cancer through the use of ShearWave Elastography

by:

Dr Georg Salomon1 Dr Lars Budaeus1, Dr L Durner2 & Dr K Boe1

1. Martini-Clinic — Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Martinistrasse 52, 20253 Hamburg, Germany

2. Urologische Kilnik Dr. Castringius Munchen-Planegg Germeringer Str. 32, 82152 Planegg, Germany

Corresponding author; PD Dr. Georg Salomon

Associate Professor of Urology

Martini Clinic

Tel: 0049 40 7410 51300

gsalornon@uke.de

 

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in males with more than 910,000 annual cases worldwide. With early detection, excellent cure rates can be achieved. Today, prostate cancer is diagnosed by a randomized transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. However, such randomized “blind” biopsies can miss cancer because of the inability of conventional TRUS to visualize small cancerous spots in most cases.

Elastography has been shown to improve visualization of prostate cancer.

The innovative ShearWave Elastography technique is an automated, user-friendly and quantifiable method for the determination of prostatic tissue stiffness.

The detection of prostate cancer (PCA) has become easier thanks to Prostate Specific Anti­gen (PSA) testing; the diagnosis of PCA has been shifted towards an earlier stage of the disease.

Prostate cancer is, in more than 80 % of the cases, a heterogeneous and multifocal tumor. Conventional ultra­sound has limitations to accurately define tumor foci within the prostate. This is due to the fact that most PCA foci are isoechogenic, so in these cases there is no dif­ferentiation of benign and malignant tissue. Because of this, a randomized biopsy is performed under ultrasound guidance with at least 10 to 12 biopsy cores, which should represent all areas of the prostate. Tumors, however, can be missed by this biopsy regimen since it is not a lesion-targeted biopsy. When PSA is rising — which usually occurs in most men — the originally negative biopsy has to be repeated.

What urologists expect from imag­ing and biopsy procedures is the detection of prostate cancer at an early stage and an accurate description of all foci within the prostate with different (Gleason) grades of differentiation for best treatment options.

In the past 10 years a couple of new innovative ultrasound techniques (computerized, contrast enhanced and real time elastography) have been introduced to the market and their impact on the detection of early prostate cancer has been evaluated. The major benefit of elastography compared to the other techniques is its ability to provide visualization of sus­picious areas and to guide the biopsy needle, in real time, to the suspicious and potentially malignant area.

Ultrasound-based elastography has been investigated over the years and has had a lot of success for increasing the detection rate of prostate cancer or reducing the number of biopsy sam­ples required. [1-3]. Different compa­nies have used different approaches to the ultrasound elastography technique (strain elastography vs. shear wave elastography). Medical centers have seen an evolution in better image qual­ity with more stable and reproducible results from these techniques.

One drawback of real time strain elastography is that there is a sig­nificant learning curve to be climbed before reproducible elastograms can be generated. The technique has to be performed by compressing and then decompressing the ultrasound probe to derive a measurement of tissue displacement.

Today there are ultrasound scanners on the market, which have the ability to produce elastograms without this “manual” assistance: this technique is called shear-wave elastography. While the ultrasound probe is being inserted transrectally, the “elastograms” are generated automatically by the calcu­lation of shear wave velocity as the waves travel through the tissue being examined, thus providing measure­ments of tissue stiffness and not dis­placement measurements.

There are several different tech­niques for this type of elastography. The FibroScan system, which is not an ultrasound unit, uses shear waves (transient elastography) to evaluate the advancement of the stiffness of the liver. Another technique is Acous­tic Radiation Force Impulse or ARF1 technique, also used for the liver. These non-real-time techniques only provide a shear wave velocity estimation for a single region of interest and are not currently used in prostate imaging.

A shear wave technology that pro­vides specific quantification of tissue elasticity in real-time is ShearWave Elastography, developed by Super-Sonic Imagine. This technique mea­sures elasticity in kilopascals and can provide visual representation of tis­sue stiffness over the entire region of interest in a color-coded map on the ultrasound screen. On a split screen the investigator can see the conven­tional ultrasound B-mode image and the color-coded elastogram at the same time. This enables an anatomi­cal view of the prostate along with the elasticity image of the tissue to guide the biopsy needle.

In short, ShearWave Elastography (SWE) is a different elastography technique that can be used for several applications. It automatically gener­ates a real-time, reproducible, fully quantifiable color-coded image of tissue elasticity.

QUANTIFICATION OF TISSUE STIFFNESS Such quantification can help to increase the chance that a targeted biopsy is positive for cancer.

It has been shown that elastography-targeted biopsies have an up to 4.7 times higher chance to be positive for cancer than a randomized biopsy [4J. Shear-Wave Elastography can not only visual­ize the tissue stiffness in color but also quantify (in kPa) the stiffness in real time, for several organs including the prostate. Correas et al, reported that with tissue stiffness higher than 45 to 50 kPa the chance of prostate cancer is very high in patients undergoing a pros­tate biopsy. The data from Gorreas et al showed a sensitivity of 80 % and a high negative predictive value of up to 9096. Another group (Barr et A) achieved a negative predictive value of up to 99.6% with a sensitivity of 96.2% and specific­ity of 962%. With a cut-off of 4D kPa the positive biopsy rate for the ShearWave Elastography targeted biopsy was 50%, whereas for randomized biopsy it was 20.8 95. In total 53 men were enrolled in this study.

Our group used SWE prior to radical prostatectomy to determine if the Shear-Wave Elastography threshold had a high accuracy using a cutoff >55 kPa. (Fig 1)

We then compared the ShearWave results with the final histopathological results. [Figure I], Our results showed the accuracy was around 78 % for all tumor foci We were also able to verify that ShearWave Elastography targeted biopsies were more likely to be posi­tive compared to randomized biopsies. [Figures 2, 3]

F1

F2F3 

CONCLUSION

SWE is a non-invasive method to visualize prostate cancer foci with high accuracy, in a user-friendly way. As Steven Kaplan puts it in an edi­torial comment in the Journal of Urology 2013: “Obviously, large-scale studies with multicenter corroboration need to be performed. Nevertheless, SWE is a potentially promising modality to increase our efficiency in evaluating prostate diseases:’

 

REFERENCES

  1. Pallweln, L. et al-. Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients. European journal of radiology, 2008. 65(2): p. 304-10.
  2. Pallwein, L., et al., Comparison of sono-elastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: Impact on prostate cancer detecton. European radiology, 2007_ 17.(9) p. 2278-85.
  3. Salomon, G., et al., Evaluation of prostate can cer detection with ultrasound real-time elas-tographyl a companion with step section path­ological analysis after radical prostatectomy. European urology, 2008. 5446): p. 135462-
  4. Aigner, F., at al., Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 125 ng/mi or greater and 4-00 ng/ml or Lass. The Journal of urology, 2010. 184{3): p. 813.7,

Other research papers related to the management of Prostate cancer and Elastography were published on this Scientific Web site:

Imaging: seeing or imagining? (Part 1)

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline

Today’s fundamental challenge in Prostate cancer screening

State of the art in oncologic imaging of Prostate.

From AUA2013: “HistoScanning”- aided template biopsies for patients with previous negative TRUS biopsies 

On the road to improve prostate biopsy

 

Impact of Sequestration on the National Institutes of Health

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #59: Impact of Sequestration on the National Institutes of Health. Published on 6/4/2013

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

UPDATED 6/5/2013

GenomeWeb Feature: Researchers Weigh in on Grants in the Time of Sequester

June 05, 2013

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – When Nicholas Navin’s R01 grant to use single-cell sequencing to study tumor evolution in breast cancer was first funded in 2012, it was funded at 83 percent of the requested budget.

Because of the sequester, Navin’s grant now will be cut a further 6 percent. In addition, he has only been given funding for the next three months.

“After those three months, I assume that it will continue to be funded for the rest of the year,” said Navin, an assistant professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, “but they only give you enough funding to support you for three months.”

The sequester — the across-the-board cuts to the US budget that were implemented at the beginning of March — has led to budget decreases across the federal government, including at research funding agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. The cuts exacerbated what was seen by many as an already tight funding situation that was not keeping pace with inflation, making it increasingly difficult for researchers to fund their work.

Steven Salzberg, a professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, recently had a grant rejected that was ranked in the top 11th percent of applications. In the past, he’s had grants funded that were in the 16th percentile or 17th percentile.

“They are funding, one would hope, grants at the 11th percentile, but not this particular one,” he said. “So you have to resubmit it or you can give up. Those are your two choices.”

As budgets decline and competition for grants increase, researchers are submitting more proposals and are beginning to look elsewhere for funding. At the same time, they are wondering what the effect of sequestration will be on science and scientists, particularly early career investigators. Still, there are steps investigators can take to try to get their proposal to stand out.

Cuts and effect

Because of the sequester, both NIH and NSF have seen their budgets fall about 5 percent. For this fiscal year, NIH’s budget is about $29.15 billion, as compared to $30.86 billion for fiscal year 2012. At the same time, NSF has about $6.9 billion for 2013, compared to last year’s $7.0 billion.

To cope with these decreases, NIH has cut all noncompeting renewals by 4.5 percent, but other changes were mostly left up to the various institutes that comprise NIH. For example, NHGRI, like other parts of NIH, is cutting noncompeting renewals, but it is not touching small grants, which it defines as ones with commitments of $250,000 or less and that typically are funded through R03 or R21 mechanisms. In addition, NHGRI won’t be giving future inflationary increases to competing applications.

“NHGRI deals with such a relatively small number of grants that we can look at each one individually and make decisions on the basis of how that particular application addresses institute aims and what the application needs in order to be successful,” Mark Guyer, the deputy director of NHGRI, told GenomeWeb Daily News. “Almost everything we do is really on a case-by-case basis beyond the across-the-board cuts to non-competing.”

The sequester, though, comes on the heels of years of small increases to funding agencies’ budgets. While the NIH budget went through an unprecedented doubling between about 1998 and 2003, it has since languished, with increases that typically did not keep pace with inflation.

“The field generally was in dire straits [heading into the sequester], given the very low payline by NIH, for example, and even NSF,” said Sarah Tishkoff, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

Salzberg noted that the two NIH R01 grants that he already has — awarded prior to the sequester — were cut about 15 percent to 20 percent. This, he added, was done “administratively because of budget reasons, not because of the peer review.”

“Now [the sequester] comes along and makes it even worse,” Tishkoff added.

Overall, NIH has estimated that it will fund nearly 8,300 competing research grants for FY2013, a decrease of about 700 from last year.

NHGRI also said that, in the face of the sequester, it is aiming to keep the average size of the awards it makes for FY2013 similar to the sizes of those it gave out in FY2012 — meaning that it will be giving out fewer total awards. Competition for grants, then, will become increasingly competitive.

“The [scientific] opportunities over the last decade at least and certainly into the foreseeable future are increasing hand over fist … and available funding is not keeping up with that,” Guyer said. “So necessarily things have gotten more competitive, and the sequester approach to managing the federal budget has only exacerbated the competitive aspects of things.”

As fewer proposals get funded and there’s less money to go around, many investigators may find themselves submitting more proposals to a number of funders.

“I am looking at submitting [more] proposals because it looks like funding is tight, and it is going to remain tight,” Salzberg told GWDN. “Unfortunately this produces a vicious cycle where many of us feel like our chances of getting funded are lower, therefore we should submit more proposals, but that then in return reduces the percentage that gets funded.”

It also increases the amount of time researchers spend reviewing proposals.

Others are looking to supplement their funds by turning to alternative funding sources. Navin, for example, is looking at private foundations and other organizations that fund cancer research, such as the Susan G. Komen Foundation or the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation.

There, he said, he may have a few options given that he studies breast cancer. Other researchers, he noted, may not have such options. “I know some of my colleagues that work on colon cancer or some of the more rare cancers like testicular cancer or bladder cancer, they really have a hard time finding funding now,” he said.

In addition, cuts and uncertainty about future reductions in funding could make a lab a precarious place. After such budget cuts or in anticipation of cuts, some labs have slowed down their growth or have even begun to let people go.

Salzberg said that, as a computational biologist, his main expenses are the salaries of the students, postdocs, and staff who power his lab.

“[The funding situation] also makes me much more reluctant to hire postdocs or any new staff because I don’t have any more money coming in. You need more money to hire new people,” he said. He added that he still gets a number of requests from people looking for positions, but “I don’t have the funding for a new postdoc. Until I get some new funding that’s what I’ll keep saying.”

“I’ve seen [colleagues’] grants just get slashed by huge amounts,” Tishkoff added, noting that she’s seen technicians beginning to lose their jobs.”[Investigators] either have to cut some of the staff or they have to cut one of the aims.”

And as grant budgets are cut, researchers have to accomplish their research aims with less, and this often means cutting back on some of the science they would like to have done.

“Because they cut the budget, you have to cut the scope,” Salzberg said. “You still do the work, but you don’t do all the things that you want to do.”

Navin, for example, is looking to use a smaller study size, even though that’ll affect the statistical power of his work.

And that’s for the grants that get funded.

“Some projects just aren’t getting done,” Salzberg added. “[My grant] that wasn’t funded was a different project and we’re not going to do it.”

This, he said, may lead to delays in improvements to healthcare. New treatments and drugs will come, he said, but it may be in 20 years rather than in 10 years or 15 years.

Concern for new investigators

One common fear is that the sequester will disproportionately affect new investigators as they try to start labs and fund them or even dissuade them from pursuing a career in academia.

“It looks like it is disturbing a lot of young people and influencing the way that they are thinking about a potential career,” Guyer said.

Tishkoff added that she is worried that junior scientists will see how the more senior people are struggling to find funding, and opt out. “[New investigators] have to get grants if they want to get tenure. They have to get grants to be successful and to continue to be a scientist in the future,” she said.

“That’s the question that I get over and over again” from students and postdocs, Navin added. “What’s it going to be like in … five to 10 years?”

“I try to stay optimistic and tell them that there will be funding, but it is hard to predict the future,” he said.

Still, junior scientists may look for careers in industry or outside of the research realm.

“I think that when they hear all of this gloom and doom talk going on, it is really discouraging them. And that makes me really worried that we are losing talented scientists,” Tishkoff said. She added that she’s noticed that people with computational biology or bioinformatic backgrounds seem to be heading to industry.

Salzberg added that the field may never even know what it is losing. “People will leave the field — they won’t announce it — they just go get a job doing something else,” he said. “Generally, you lose that [talent] forever because that person doesn’t come back.”

Funding agencies like NIH do have mechanisms in place to try to help new investigators get grants. For example, proposals from new investigators are reviewed separately from ones submitted by established PIs. That way, early-career researchers compete against each other, rather than against those with more experience.

Further, in its policy statement for this fiscal year, NIH said that it would continue to support new investigators applying for R01 grants with success rates similar to those of established PIs.

“I really think they are doing as much as they can, but there is a bottom line,” Tishkoff noted. “If you do not have the money to give out, then it is going to be more and more and more competitive. That’s just how it is.”

NHGRI, in its own policy statement, said that it is “very flexible” in supporting early-stage investigators by not reducing recommended budgets if possible, by giving special consideration when applying for renewals to avoid gaps in funding, and by its Pathway to Independence Awards, which are targeted to postdocs who are moving toward running their own lab.

Outside of federal support, there are also a number of grants that specifically fund new investigators, such as the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Fellowships for Science and Engineering, Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards, or the Sloan Research Fellowship, among others.

Tips for getting a grant

With increased competition for a smaller pot of money, submitting a well-crafted grant proposal might help it stick out from the rest in the pile. While some researchers may be quickly churning out as many proposals as they can, Tishkoff said that approach may not be the best one.

“The fact is it’s now even more competitive, it is even more important that people are taking time to really work on the grants carefully and not try to rush through them,” she told GWDN.

Still, submit a proposal quickly. “Don’t wait to apply for your first grant,” Salzberg said. “Very few people get funded on their first time around. You learn a lot from the reviews you get back.”

For his first grant, Salzberg partnered with a senior colleague to be a co-PI on the grant. “You can learn a lot about grantsmanship that way,” he said. “And then if the senior colleague gets funded, then you get some money out of that.” In addition, “you also learn some of the administrative hoops.”

Once on a grant, investigators begin to be invited to review panels that evaluate such grant proposals. “That’s a very valuable experience,” Salzberg said. “The first couple of times you are on a review panel, you learn a tremendous amount because you see a lot of other people’s grant applications and you see what the reviewers are saying about them.”

Tishkoff said one common problem she’s seen, particularly among new investigators, is that the proposals can feel hurried and too full of jargon. “You’ve got to take your time, write clearly in a manner that a general scientist can understand,” she said, adding that investigators have to sell their idea to a “broad scientific audience [and] make the point of why it is cutting edge and important and advances the field.”

Having other, more senior people look over a proposal is often a key step, she added, saying that she’s seen applications in which there were simple errors like numbers not adding up that could have easily been avoided by having someone else take a look at it.

An oft-overlooked step, by new and established PIs alike, is getting in touch with their program officers. “Start out talking to NIH program people as soon as possible,” Guyer said.

Program officers can provide information on funding mechanisms, initiatives, and budgets, and offer feedback on how project ideas fit within institutes’ priorities. “And we think, at least we tell ourselves, that it can help save people a lot of wasted time,” he added.

Tishkoff said that she typically calls up her program officer when she’s thinking about and applying for a grant to see how her idea fits with what the institute is interested in funding and to discuss a potentially reasonable budget.

“You could say, ‘I am thinking about applying for this, this, and this. Is that something that you or this institute would be interested in funding?'” she said. “And so you can try to aim to make your proposal fit with what their goals are at the moment.”

“Secondly, I always tell them, ‘OK, here’s the budget I have in mind. Is that going to be realistic or not?'” she added.

And once, she said, she was told her budget for what she called an “all-in-one, big giant grant” was too high to be funded. Instead, Tishkoff broke that large, all-inclusive grant into smaller, more focused projects, and she stripped the budgets to the bare bones.

However, not all proposals will be funded, even well-written ones. “There’s no magic bullet here, though, it’s just times are tough,” Salzberg added. “If they are only funding 10 percent of proposals, then whatever happens, 90 percent of them are going to be rejected, so try to be in the top 10 percent, but we can’t all be in the top 10 percent all the time.”

Navin added that those who get rejected should not give up and should keep submitting. “I just think you have to be very optimistic, be an eternal optimist and just keep submitting your grants to as many different funding agencies as possible,” he said. “And eventually, if it is a good idea, it’ll get funded.”

The next fiscal cycle

While fiscal year 2013 is more than half over, the US federal budget for fiscal year 2014 isn’t yet set, so what is in store for research funding — and whether the sequester will continue —isn’t clear.

The Obama administration released its budget proposal for FY 2014 in April, which would replace the sequester. It called for $31.3 billion for the National Institutes of Health — an increase of 1.5 percent over the FY 2012 budget — and $7.6 billion for the National Science Foundation — an 8.4 percent increase over its FY 2012 appropriation.

The budget, though, needs to pass Congress.

“We’re making plans for FY ’14 on the basis of what the administration presented as a budget,” Guyer said. “We’re hoping the Congress can do better than that. On the other hand, we are realistic.”

Ciara Curtin is GenomeWeb’s science features editor as well as the editor of the Daily Scan and Careers blogs. E-mail Ciara Curtinand follow @DailyScan, and @CareersGW on Twitter.

Fact sheet: Impact of Sequestration on the National Institutes of Health

The National Institutes of Health is the nation’s medical research agency and the leading supporter of biomedical research in the world. NIH’smission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and apply that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce the burdens of illness and disability. Due in large measure to NIH research, a person born in the United States today can expect to live nearly 30 years longer than someone born in 1900.

More than 80 percent of the NIH’s budget goes to over 300,000 research personnel at more than 2,500 universities and research institutions throughout the United States. In addition, about 6,000 scientists work in NIH’s own Intramural Research laboratories, most of which are on the NIH main campus in Bethesda, Md. The main campus is also home to theNIH Clinical Center, the largest hospital in the world totally dedicated to clinical research.

Sequestration:

On March 1, 2013, as required by statute, President Obama signed an order initiating sequestration. The sequestration requires NIH to cut 5 percent or $1.55 billion of its fiscal year (FY) 2013 budget. NIH must apply the cut evenly across all programs, projects, and activities (PPAs), which are primarily NIH institutes and centers. This means every area of medical research will be affected.

NIH FY2013 operating plans:

NIH FY2013 Operating Plan

NIH FY2013 Operating Plan Mechanism Table

NIH Guide Notice: Fiscal Policy for Grant Awards FY2013

NIH Institutes and Centers FY2013 Funding Strategies

The estimated numbers:

(FY 2013 figures compared to FY 2012)

While much of these decreases are due to sequester, NIH funding is always a dynamic situation with multiple drivers:

  • Approximately 700 fewer competitive research project grants issued
  • Approximately 750 fewer new patients admitted to the NIH Clinical Center
  • No increase in stipends for National Research Service Award recipients in FY2013

The impact:

  • Delay in medical progress:
    • Medical breakthroughs do not happen overnight. In almost all instances, breakthrough discoveries result from years of incremental research to understand how disease starts and progresses.
    • Even after the cause and potential drug target of a disease is discovered, it takes on average 13 years and $1 billion to develop a treatment for that target.
    • Therefore, cuts to research are delaying progress in medical breakthroughs, including:
      • development of better cancer drugs that zero in on a tumor with fewer side effects
      • research on a universal flu vaccine that could fight every strain of influenza without needing a yearly shot.
      • prevention of debilitating chronic conditions that are costly to society and delay development of more effective treatments for common and rare diseases affecting millions of Americans.
  • Risk to scientific workforce:
    • NIH drives job creation and economic growth. NIH research funding directly supports hundreds of thousands of American jobs and serves as a foundation for the medical innovation sector, which employs 1 million U.S. citizens. Cuts to NIH funding will have an economic impact in communities throughout the U.S. For every six applications submitted to the NIH, only one will be funded. Sequestration is reducing the overall funding available for grants. See the history of NIH funding success rates.

Frequently asked questions:

How many fewer grants will be awarded?
Approximately 700 fewer research project grants compared to FY 2012.

Have the institutes and centers announced their adjusted paylines based on these cuts?
The adjusted NIH Institute and Center (IC) paylines and funding strategies can be found here:http://grants.nih.gov/grants/financial/index.htm#strategies

What percent cut will be made to existing grants?
Reductions to noncompeting research project grants (RPG) vary depending on the circumstances of the particular IC. The NIH-wide average is -4.7 percent.

Will the duration of existing grants be shortened to accommodate the cuts?
In general, no.

Will all grants receive the same percentage cut or will some grants be cut more than others?
Institutes and centers have flexibility to accommodate the new budget level in a fashion that allows them to meet their scientific and strategic goals. As noted above, there are different percentages for different ICs, and in some cases for different mechanisms within an IC (RPGs, Centers, etc.). In addition, there may be reductions to grants for reasons other than sequestration, as is the case every year.

Will certain areas of science that are at a critical juncture be affected by these cuts? 
All areas of science are expected to be affected.

Will some areas of science be affected more than others?
The sequester does not stipulate the precise reduction to each scientific area. However, it is likely that most scientific areas will be reduced by about 5 percent because the sequester is being applied broadly at the NIH institute and center level.

What will be the impact of these cuts to NIH’s intramural research at its Bethesda campus and off-campus facilities?
The impact on NIH’s intramural research is substantial, especially because it applies retroactively to spending since Oct. 1, 2012. That can double the effect — a full year’s cut has to be absorbed in less than half a year.

Will NIH be furloughing or cutting employees at its NIH campus and off-campus facilities?
There are no current plans to do so. At present, HHS is pursuing non-furlough administrative cost savings such as delayed/forgone hiring and reducing administrative services contracts so that furloughs and layoffs can be avoided. Additionally, employee salaries at NIH make up a very small percentage (only 7 percent) of the NIH budget.

How will current patients at the NIH Clinical Center be affected?
Services to patients will not be reduced.

Will the NIH Clinical Center see fewer patients because of the cuts?
Approximately 750 fewer new patients will be admitted to the NIH Clinical Center hospital in 2013 or a decrease from 10,695 new patients in 2012 to approximately 9,945 new patients in 2013. While much of this decrease is due to funding, clinical activity is always a dynamic situation with multiple drivers.

Will the sequester cut need to be applied to the FY 2014 budget?
The President’s FY 2014 Budget would replace sequestration and reduce the deficit in a balanced way. The President is ready to work with Congress to further reduce deficits while continuing to make critical investments.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation’s medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

NIH…Turning Discovery Into Health®

OrCam – Computer Vision & AI Technology of Optical Character Recognition gives the Visually Impaired a Way to Read

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #58: OrCam – Computer Vision & AI Technology of Optical Character Recognition gives the Visually Impaired a Way to Read. Published on 6/4/2013

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

 

Device from Israeli Start-Up Gives the Visually Impaired a Way to Read

By John Markoff |  June 4, 2013

 

JERUSALEM — Liat Negrin, an Israeli who has been visually impaired since childhood, walked into a grocery store here recently, picked up a can of vegetables and easily read its label using a simple and unobtrusive camera attached to her glasses.

Watch video

Ms. Negrin, who has coloboma, a birth defect that perforates a structure of the eye and afflicts about 1 in 10,000 people, is an employee at OrCam, an Israeli start-up that has developed a camera-based system intended to gice the visually impaired the ability to both “read” and esily move freely.

In contrast, the OrCam device is a small camera worn in the style of Google Glass, connected by a thin cable to a portable computer designed to fit in the wearer’s pocket. The system clips on to the wearer’s glasses with a small magnet and uses a bone-conduction speaker to offer clear speech as it reads aloud the words or object pointed to by the user.

The system is designed to both recognize and speak “text in the wild,” a term used to describe newspaper articles as well as bus numbers, and objects as diverse as landmarks, traffic lights and the faces of friends.

It currently recognizes English-language text and beginning this week will be sold through the company’s Web site for $2,500, about the cost of a midrange hearing aid. It is the only product, so far, of the privately held company, which is part of the high-tech boom in Israel.

The device is quite different from other technology that has been developed to give some vision to people who are blind, like the artificial retina system called Argus II, made by Second Sight Medical Products. That system, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February, allows visual signals to bypass a damaged retina and be transmitted to the brain.

The OrCam device is also drastically different from Google Glass, which also offers the wearer a camera but is designed for people with normal vision and has limited visual recognition and local computing power.

OrCam was founded several years ago by Amnon Shashua, a well-known researcher who is a computer science professor at Hebrew University here. It is based on computer vision algorithms that he has pioneered with another faculty member, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, and one of his former graduate students, Yonatan Wexler.

“What is remarkable is that the device learns from the user to recognize a new product,” said Tomaso Poggio, a computer scientist at M.I.T. who is a computer vision expert and with whom Dr. Shashua studied as a graduate student. “This is more complex than it appears, and, as an expert, I find it really impressive.”

The advance is the result of both rapidly improving computing processing power that can now be carried comfortably in a wearer’s pocket and the computer vision algorithm developed by the scientists.

On a broader technology level, the OrCam system is representative of a wide range of rapid improvements being made in the field of artificial intelligence, in particular with vision systems for manufacturing as well as fields like autonomous motor vehicles. (Dr. Shashua previously founded Mobileye, a corporation that supplies camera technology to the automobile industry that can recognize objects like pedestrians and bicyclists and can keep a car in a lane on a freeway.)

Speech recognition is now routinely used by tens of millions of people on both iPhones and Android smartphones. Moreover, natural language processing is making it possible for computer systems to “read” documents, which is having a significant impact in the legal field, among others.

There are now at least six competing approaches in the field of computer vision. For example, researchers at Google and elsewhere have begun using what are known as “deep learning” techniques that attempt to mimic biological vision systems. However, they require vast computing resources for accurate recognition.

In contrast, the OrCam technique, which was described in a technical paper in 2011 by the Hebrew University researchers, offers a reasonable trade-off between recognition accuracy and speed. The technique, known as Shareboost, is distinguished by the fact that as the number of objects it needs to recognize grows, the system minimizes the amount of additional computer power required.

“The challenges are huge,” said Dr. Wexler, a co-author of the paper and vice president of research and development at OrCam. “People who have low vision will continue to have low vision, but we want to harness computer science to help them.”

Additionally the OrCam system is designed to have a minimal control system, or user interface. To recognize an object or text, the wearer simply points at it with his or her finger, and the device then interprets the scene.

The system recognizes a pre-stored set of objects and allows the user to add to its library — for example, text on a label or billboard, or a stop light or street sign — by simply waving his or her hand, or the object, in the camera’s field of view.

One of the key challenges, Dr. Shashua said, was allowing quick optical character recognition in a variety of lighting conditions as well as on flexible surfaces.

“The professional optical character readers today will work very well when the image is good, but we have additional challenges — we must read text on flexible surfaces like a hand-held newspaper,” he said.

Although the system is usable by the blind, OrCam is initially planning to sell the device to people in the United States who are visually impaired, which means that their vision cannot be adequately corrected with glasses.

In the United States, 21.2 million people over the age of 18 have some kind of visual impairment, including age-related conditions, diseases and birth defects, according to the 2011 National Health Survey by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics. OrCam said that worldwide there were 342 million adults with significant visual impairment, and that 52 million of them had middle-class incomes.

 http://www.afhu.org/device-israeli-start-gives-visually-impaired-way-read

 

 

Reporter and Curator: Dr. Sudipta Saha, Ph.D.

Screen Shot 2021-07-19 at 6.17.32 PM

Word Cloud By Danielle Smolyar

Cancer is one of the most devastating and widespread diseases today. The development of cancer is a multi-step process involving genetic or epigenetic changes often occurring over a longer period of time. Moreover, cancer occurs in more or less all organs and tissues and is characterized by extensive heterogeneity both concerning the type and aggressiveness of the disease. Although some substantial progress in some areas has been made, there are still huge unmet needs in treatment methods and the efficacy of currently available drugs. The pharmaceutical industry has struggled with the ever increasing costs in drug development and unfortunately novel drugs have not seldom demonstrated only marginal improvement in efficacy often at the cost of quality of life of the patients. For these reasons, new approaches are focusing on disease prevention instead of only treating the symptoms. Recently, much attention has been paid to prevention of the disease in parallel to continuous drug discovery.

Intervention in food intake has been demonstrated to play an enormous role in both prevention as well as treatment of diseases. Numerous studies indicate a clear link between cancer and diet. The substantial development of sequencing technologies has resulted in access to enormous amounts of genomics information, which resulted in the establishment of nutrigenomics as an emerging approach to link genomics research to studies on nutrition. Increased understanding has demonstrated how nutrition can influence human health both at genetic and epigenetic levels. It investigates the effects of nutrition and bioactive food compounds on gene expression. This approach has allowed the investigation of the effect on nutrition on individuals with specific genetic features. Moreover, it has provided the basis for nutritional intervention in prevention and treatment of disease and the inauguration of personalized nutrition. However, differences in types of cancer, the level of aggressiveness, and their occurrence at different stages of life have seriously complicated the understanding of the effect of nutrition on cancer prevention and treatment. Other individual variations such as the amounts of food consumed, digestion, metabolism and other factors like geographical, ethnic and sociological diversity has hampered the identification of which food components are most important for human health. Dramatic dietary modifications have proven essential in reducing risk and even prevention of cancer. Moreover, intense revision of diet in cancer patients has revealed significant changes in gene expression and also has provided therapeutic efficacy even after short-term application.

Obviously, a multitude of diets have been evaluated, but probably the common factor for achieving both prophylactic and therapeutic responses is to consume predominantly diets rich in fruits, vegetables, fish and fibers and reduced quantities of especially red meat. There are numerous examples of how dietary intake can promote health on both a preventive as well as therapeutic level. Radical change in diet has resulted in dramatic changes in gene expression in prostate cancer patients revealing that many of those genes involved in cancer development were down-regulated. The importance of nutrigenomics as a multi-task approach involving genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, et cetera has further provided novel possibilities to address the effect of nutrition on human health. Despite encouraging findings on how dietary modifications can prevent disease and restore health, there are a number of factors which complicate the outcome. There are variations in response to dietary changes depending on age and gender. However, the vast amount of accumulated nutrigenomics data should not overshadow the needs to take into account other important factors such as lifestyle, social, geographical and economic factors affecting diet and health.

Source References:

http://www.lifescienceglobal.com/home/cart?view=product&id=121

http://www.frontiersin.org/Nutrigenomics/10.3389/fgene.2011.00091/abstract

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822308021871

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/89/5/1553S

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438350800390X

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Clinical Indications for Use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) in the Adult Patient Market: Clinical Outcomes after Use of iNO in the Institutional Market,  Therapy Demand and Cost of Care vs. Existing Supply Solutions

Inhaled NO

Word Cloud Created by Noam Steiner Tomer 8/10/2020

Introduction  to Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults

Part 1:             Clinical Indications for Use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) in the Adult Patient Market

Part 2:            Clinical Outcomes after Use of iNO in the Institutional Market

Part 3:            Therapy Demand and Cost of Care vs. Existing Supply Solutions

Part 4:            Product Development Concepts for New Medical Devices to Deliver Inhaled Nitric Oxide

Introduction  to Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults: Evidence-based Medicine 

This Introduction section of the article is based on research results and literature survey in:

Mark J.D. Griffiths, M.R.C.P., Ph.D., and Timothy W. Evans, M.D., Ph.D.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults, n engl j med 353;25 http://www.nejm.org December 22, 2005

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra051884

  • On the basis of the evidence, inhaled nitric oxide is not an effective therapeutic intervention in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS, and its routine use to achieve this end is inappropriate. However, inhaled nitric oxide may be useful as a short-term adjunct to cardiorespiratory support in patients with acute hypoxemia, life-threatening pulmonary hypertension, or both.
  • Inhaled nitric oxide is a selective pulmonary vasodilator that improves ventilation–perfusion matching at low doses in patients with acute respiratory failure, potentially improving oxygenation and lowering pulmonary vascular resistance.
  • Large clinical trials have indicated that physiologic benefits are short-lived in adults with acute lung injury or ARDS, and no associated improvement in mortality rates has been demonstrated. However, clinical trials involving patients with acute lung injury or ARDS have been statistically underpowered to show a decrease in mortality rates and have not considered recent insights into the effect of continuous inhalation on the dose– response relationship of this agent. In patients with acute respiratory failure, the potential toxicity or protective effects of inhaled nitric oxide, particularly any effects on cell survival and inflammation, are poorly understood.
  • Ideal Treatment Goals for Inhaled Nitric Oxide
  1. Improved oxygenation
  2. Decreased pulmonary vascular resistance
  3. Decreased pulmonary edema
  4. Reduction or prevention of inflammation – rebound phenomena may be avoided by withdrawing inhaled nitric oxide gradually. Despite these concerns, in large clinical studies of patients with ARDS, the abrupt discontinuation of inhaled nitric oxide has not caused a deterioration in oxygenation
  5. Cytoprotection
  6. Protection against infection
  • Administration of Inhaled Nitric Oxide to Adults: Routes and Safety Monitoring

Nitric oxide is most commonly administered to patients receiving mechanical ventilation, although it may also be given through a face mask or nasal cannulae. Limiting the mixing of nitric oxide and high concentrations of inspired oxygen reduces the risk of adverse effects resulting from the formation of nitrogen dioxide. This is minimized further by introducing the mixture of nitric oxide and nitrogen into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator tubing as near to the patient as possible and synchronizing injection of the mixture with inspiration

  • Electrochemical analyzers can be used to monitor the concentrations of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide in the inspired gas mixture to an accuracy of 1 ppm.
  • More sensitive Chemiluminescence monitors can detect nitric oxide and its oxidative derivatives in parts per billion.
  • Dose-Response for Respiratory Failure in the Adult Patient – a response is defined as a 20 percent increase in oxygenation. For example, a 10 percentage point improvement in hemoglobin saturation in a patient with hypoxemia who is breathing 100 percent oxygen may be clinically very important.
  • Dose-Response for Pulmonary Hypertension in the Adult Patient – a 30 percent decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance during the inhalation of nitric oxide (10 ppm for 10 minutes) has been used to identify an association with vascular responsiveness to agents that can be helpful in the long term. A positive response to nitric oxide was associated with a favorable response to calcium-channel blockers in a small cohort of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension
  • Time-dependent variation in the dose–response relationship of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with severe ARDS – Observations imply that the optimal dose of inhaled nitric oxide must be determined by titration against the therapeutic target in each patient at least every two days, and probably more frequently.
  • Other Inhaled Vasodilators – Alternatives and Adjuncts to Inhaled Nitric Oxide
  1. Aerosolized sodium nitrite caused potent, selective, nitric oxide–dependent pulmonary vasodilatation through its reaction with deoxyhemoglobin at a low pH, suggesting that nitrite may be a cheap and stable alternative to inhaled nitric oxide
  2. Epoprostenol, the most extensively studied alternative to inhaled nitric oxide, is also an endothelium- derived vasodilator with antithrombotic effects. Inhaled epoprostenol has an effect on hemodynamics and oxygenation similar to that of nitric oxide in patients with ARDS, sepsis, or severe heart failure. Nebulized epoprostenol has been studied less frequently than inhaled nitric oxide, but at therapeutic doses (10 to 50 ng per kilogram per minute), the rates of predicted side effects, such as systemic hypotension and bleeding after surgery, have not been clinically important.
  3. Iloprost, a long-acting prostacyclin analogue (half-life, 20 to 30 minutes), improves the exercise tolerance of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension when administered by intermittent rather than by continuous nebulization. Inhaled prostaglandin E1 (6 to 15 ng per kilogram of body weight per minute) has effects similar to those of inhaled nitric oxide (2 to 10 ppm) in patients with ARDS
  • Agonists to Nitric Oxide – Adjunctive Therapies That Increase the Effectiveness of Inhaled Nitric Oxide

1. Orally administered sildenafil, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, is a selective pulmonary vasodilator, partially because phosphodiesterase type 5 is highly expressed in the lung. Sildenafil has augmented pulmonary vasodilatation induced by inhaled nitric oxide,  although a second inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, zaprinast, predictably worsened oxygenation through the attenuation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in an ovine model of acute lung injury.  Such agents may therefore be most useful when pulmonary hypertension rather than respiratory failure is the chief concern.

2. Almitrine, an agonist at peripheral arterial chemoreceptors, is a selective pulmonary vasoconstrictor that specifically enhances hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. The addition of almitrine to low-dose inhaled nitric oxide improves oxygenation in patients with ARDS, but concern about the effects of long-term infusion has hampered the wider investigation of this combination. In patients with acute respiratory failure, the effect of nitric oxide depends on the degree of recruitment of injured lung units by — for example — positive end-expiratory pressure, prone positioning, or ventilatory maneuvers designed to inflate collapsed lung, which may explain how the response to nitric oxide varies over short periods. Partial liquid ventilation with perfluorocarbons facilitates the delivery of dissolved gases to alveoli by enhancing recruitment of the injured lung units. Inhaled nitric oxide has enhanced the effects of partial liquid ventilation on gas exchange in animal models, demonstrating the potential benefit of combining therapeutic strategies in patients with ARDS.

For 2005 – 2013 List of References on Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults, see the list of article that has cited  at the bottom of the following seminal paper:

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/109/25/3106.full

 

Part 1:

Clinical Indications for Use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) in the Adult Patient Market:

SOURCE:

George, Isaac, Xydas, Steve, Topkara, Veli K., Ferdinando, Corrina, Barnwell, Eileen C., Gableman, Larissa, Sladen, Robert N., Naka, Yoshifumi, Oz, Mehmet C.
Clinical Indication for Use and Outcomes After Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy
Ann Thorac Surg 2006 82: 2161-2169

Abbreviations and Acronyms

ARDS  adult respiratory distress syndrome

iNO  inhaled nitric oxide

OHT  orthotopic heart transplantation

OLT  orthotopic lung transplantation

PAP  pulmonary artery pressure

PVR  pulmonary vascular resistance

ROC  receiver operating curve

RV  right ventricular

VAD  ventricular assist device

Institutional Guidelines for Inhaled Nitric Oxide Administration – Table 1 in the Study

1. Heart transplantation with evidence of pulmonary hypertension

2. Complicated coronary surgery with evidence of right ventricular failure based on at least one of the following

criteria

  • Mean pulmonary artery pressure 25 mm Hg
  • Echocardiographic evidence of moderate to severe right
  • ventricular dysfunction; severe right atrial or ventricular enlargement
  • Cardiac index 2.2 L · min1 · m2

3. Precapillary pulmonary hypertension diagnosis

4. Congenital cardiac disease

5. Acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease

6. The starting dose for all above indications was 10 to 20 ppm, with an initial trial for 60 minutes before up-titration.

Indication for inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) use – Surgical Patient

1.  orthotopic heart transplantation [OHT] with pulmonary hypertension;

2. precapillary pulmonary hypertension;

3. coronary surgery with right ventricular failure;

4. congenital cardiac disease;

  • OLT – orthotopic lung transplantation- patients received iNO for treatment of pulmonary hypertension, 
  • OHT – orthotopic heart transplant  –  right ventricular failure was the most common indication for patients undergoing cardiac surgery and ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation.

Indication for inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) use – Medical Patients in ICU

5. hypoxemia                                                                                                                                                                                                    

  • Other surgical and medical patients received iNO predominantly for hypoxemia use.

A trend toward a lower average duration of iNO use was seen:

  • after OHT (n 67) and OLT (n 45)

versus

  • cardiac surgery (n 105),
  • VAD (n 66),
  • other surgery (n 34), and
  • medical patients (n 59; p 0.09).

Primary Surgical Procedure –  Table 4. in the Study – All Patients in the Study

Abbreviations and Acronyms

BiVAD biventricular assist device;

CABG coronary artery bypass grafting;

LVAD left ventricular assist device;

MVR mitral valve replacement or repair;

OHT orthotopic heart transplantation;

OLT orthotopic lung transplanatation;

RVAD right ventricular assist device;

Txp transplant;

VAD ventricular assist device.

AVR aortic valve replacement;

OHT = 67 OLT = 45 Cardiac Surgery = 105  VAD = 66  Other Surgery = 34  Medical (No Surgery) = 59

N (%)

OHT – Heart Txp – 67 (100)

OLT – Lung Txp – 45 (100)

Cardiac Surgery = 105

  • AVR, 10 (9.5) 59 (100)
  • AVR/MVR, 10 (9.5)
  • CABG, 23 (21.9)
  • CABG/Valve, 23 (21.9)
  • MVR, 22 (20.9)
  • Other cardiac, 11 (10.5)
  • Other valve, 3 (2.9)

VAD = 66

  • LVAD, 54 (81.8)
  • BiVAD, 12 (18.2)
  • RVAD, 0

Other surgery = 34

  • Other surgery 21 (61.8)
  • Thoracic surgery, 8 (23.5)
  • Other Txp. 5 (14.7)

Medical =59 in ICU

  • No Surgery, 59 (100)

 

Part 2:

Clinical Outcomes after Use of iNO in the Institutional Market

Use of iNO for pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing

  • OHT and orthotopic lung transplantation was associated with a significantly lower overall mortality rate compared with its use after cardiac surgery or for hypoxemia in medical patients.
  • Inhaled nitric oxide does not appear to be cost effective when treating hypoxemia in medical patients with high-risk scores and irreversible disease.

In conclusion,

  • the present study reports comprehensive long-term survival data from a critically ill adult population receiving iNO therapy.
  • Inhaled nitric oxide treatment is a valuable pharmacologic adjunct in OHT and OLT for short-term hemodynamic improvements, and long-term data from the present study suggest a translation into long-term survival benefits.
  • Mortality outcomes after iNO are directly related to the clinical indication for use, and prolonged therapy for patients with irreversible systemic disease processes, such as hypoxemia or respiratory failure in medical patients, is not warranted.
  • Poor outcomes and high cost for medical patients with respiratory failure and hypoxemia in this study require further investigation to determine the appropriate duration of iNO use based on clinical response and appropriate endpoints of treatment.
  • A prospective clinical study controlling for severity of illness and addressing clinical efficacy in both surgical and medical populations is needed to definitively answer these questions, and may help reduce the burden of intensive care expenses.

Comment

Inhaled nitric oxide therapy has been shown to lead to reductions in PAP and PVR and improvement in oxygenation in several populations, including neonates and adult patients with ARDS and RV dysfunction, and after OHT or OLT [3, 6, 9, 10, 14]. These effects may improve short-term outcomes, but a study of long-term outcomes, costs, and clinical use of iNO use in other populations has not been conducted to date. This study is the first to describe outcomes and cost of iNO therapy in an unselected population of critically ill adult patients in a tertiary care center. These study results demonstrate that (1) outcomes after iNO vary substantially based on clinical indication of use, (2) iNO may benefit transplant patients more than other patients, and (3) iNO does not appear to alter the natural history or long-term clinical course of hypoxemic respiratory failure. This study also identifies the medical patient population with respiratory failure as one with substantial morbidity whose high mortality after iNO precludes prolonged therapy.

In the present study, OHT and OLT patients had a 1-year survival rate four times greater than medical patients not undergoing surgery, as well as higher survival rates compared with patients undergoing other types of surgery. The large differences in mortality after iNO therapy may be attributed to differences in the underlying etiology of the cardiac or respiratory failure (pulmonary hypertension versus hypoxemia) and the reversibility of pulmonary hypertension versus respira- tory failure.

In OHT, acutely elevated PAP, which accounts for 19% of early deaths after heart transplantation [24], may be secondary to both increases in flow (increased backward transmission of elevated left ventricular pressure) and increases in resistance in the pulmonary bed. With iNO use, PVR and PAP are reduced [25], decreasing RV afterload, ameliorating the wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, and preventing RV failure without affecting systemic vascular resistance. By providing temporary support, iNO therapy after transplant allows for the stabilization of hemodynamics until PVR returns to normal levels, which is attained in 80% of patients 1 year after OHT [26], reinforcing its reversible nature after cardiac transplantation. Short-term use of iNO after OHT has been demonstrated to improve RV function, PVR, and mean PAP after 12 to 76 hours of iNO use in 16 OHT patients, although there were no statistically significant differences in survival [9]. In 23 OLT patients, iNO therapy has been shown to reduce reimplantation edema, increase PaO2/FIO2, decrease the need for mechanical ventilation, and reduce the 2-month mortality rate [10].

The observed improvement in pulmonary hypertension also predicts significant outcome benefits, as OHT patients with reversible preoperative PVR have a much lower mortality than do those with a fixed elevated PVR [27, 28]. Survival at 4 years after iNO therapy was 68% in the transplant cohort in the present study, comparing favorably to reported 5-year survival rates of 71% for OHT [29] and 63% for OLT [30]. This study confirms prior studies that have shown acute benefits with iNO therapy after transplantation and shows that long-term survival in OHT and OLT after iNO therapy is comparable to that of patients not requiring iNO. In addition, although mortality in the VAD group was not appreciably different than that in the cardiac surgery group, a likely benefit of iNO in these patients was the avoidance of right ventricular assist device placement, as evidenced by the low rate of left ventricular assist device patients requiring a right ventricular assist device (5 of 66, 7.6%).

Furthermore, iNO therapy has not been shown to lead to long-term benefits in the treatment of severe respiratory failure, which was present in 80% of the medical cohort in this study, or hypoxemia, which was the primary indication in 85% of the medical patients. No benefit beyond 1 day of therapy was seen in indices of lung function in a randomized controlled clinical trial of 30 medical patients with severe respiratory failure and ARDS, yielding a 30-day mortality rate of 60% in iNOtreated patients and 53% in nontreated patients (p _ 0.71) [31]. More importantly, nonresponders had a 30-day mortality rate of 80%, whereas responders had a 50% mortality rate. The lack of short-term mortality benefit was confirmed by Michael and colleagues [32] in a randomized controlled trial of iNO in ARDS patients that showed transient improvements after 1 hour but no sustained improvements after 72 hours in PaO2, FIO2, and PaO2/FIO2. These two studies highlight important findings that iNO initially improves indices of lung function but does not produce lasting effects on oxygenation.

The inability to produce sustained effects on hypoxia and respiratory failure may explain the striking 1-year survival of only 17.3% and 4-year survival of 0% in our medical cohort, rates higher than the 90-day mortality rates of 40% to 50% that have been previously reported [33, 34]. Medical patients with severe cardiac or respiratory failure requiring iNO therapy represent a critically ill, challenging population with numerous comorbidities.

Judicious use of iNO is warranted for such patients if the immediate mortality risk is estimated to be high. The risk-scoring model reported here allows stratification of patients based on clinical history and provides prognostic information on mortality outcomes. The model predicted a mortality of 76.5% versus 37.2% (p _ 0.001) for a risk score greater than 1, with a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 79%, and area under ROC of 0.731.

For cases in which the benefit is likely to be limited with a risk score greater than 1 (namely, respiratory failure in any non-OHT patient), efforts should be made to determine whether a patient responds to iNO therapy before prolonged administration is undertaken. As expected, hours of iNO use were highest in the medical group at 133 hours, and lowest after OHT and OLT at 71 and 57 hours, respectively. However, longer average duration of use did not produce higher iNO costs using the 2000 to 2003 charging practice, as many patients in all subgroups reached the maximal monthly charge after the first 4 days of therapy. This cap on iNO charges served to equalize costs in surgical and nonsurgical groups, and healthcare providers may continue iNO use in nonresponders as salvage therapy, given that it may not increase iNO-associated charges. However, the cost difference was more pronounced for OLT patients compared with medical and VAD patients using the current hourly charging practice, which was intended to reduce the overall cost of iNO therapy through more precise hourly billing. These findings confirm that prolonged iNO use is associated with higher cost and provides a financial rationale for limiting therapy for patients without expected survival benefit.

The study limitations include those inherent to an observational study. The lack of a randomized design and a control cohort not receiving iNO therapy precludes any definitive conclusions regarding the long-term clinical efficacy or cost effectiveness of iNO use, as long-term hemodynamics were unable to be measured and costeffectiveness measurements were not calculated. The transient but clinically important appearance of RV dysfunction in the operating room may only be apparent on hemodynamic analysis rather than on echocardiography, and RV dysfunction may be underreported using our echocardiographic definition. The poor survival rates observed in the medical cohort may be attributed to late initiation of iNO therapy in this group; it cannot, therefore, be excluded that earlier iNO administration may have led to higher survival rates. Finally, the absence of indirect hospital costs is a major limiting factor in the description of iNO costs, which may be significant.

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:2161-2169

 

Part 3:

Therapy Demand and Cost of Care vs. Existing Supply Solutions

Acquisition Cost of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy

Charges for each iNO therapy encounter were calculated based on the charging practice of INO Therapeutics (AGA Healthcare, Clinton, New Jersey) between 2000 and 2003, and recalculated using the current 2005 charging practice. For the years 2000 to 2003, the charge to hospitals was $3,000 per 24 hours of therapy, up to a maximum charge of $12,000 per month, independent of  total hourly usage. Using the current 2005 charging practice, the charge for iNO was changed to an hourly rate of $125, with a maximum charge of $12,000 per month, independent of hourly usage. Indirect costs associated with iNO administration, including those for respiratory personnel, intensive care unit care, and daily monitoring were not included in this analysis.

Estimated Cost of iNO Therapy

The cost for iNO therapy is summarized in Table 6 using the 2000 to 2003 charging practice and current 2005 charging practice, demonstrating a higher cost of therapy in VAD and medical patients. Under the current 2005 pricing, a significantly lower proportion of OHT and OLT patients reached the maximal charge versus medical patients (23% versus 51%, 0.001).

Acquisition Cost of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy – Table 6 in the Study

2000–2003 Charge Scale ($) || Current Charge Scale ($)

OHT 9,121 + or – 4,226  ||  7,010 + or – 5,072

OLT 8,040 + or – 3,659a  ||  5,710 + or – 4,132b

Cardiac surgery 9,179  + or – 5,319   ||  7,349 + or – 6,543

VAD 10,726 + or – 4,121   ||  8,722 + or – 4,966

Other surgery 9,324 + or – 4,110 ||  7,056 + or – 4,826

Medical 10,075 + or – 5,215  || 8,867 + or – 7,233

a p 0.05 versus VAD. b p 0.05 versus VAD, medical.

OHT orthotopic heart transplantation; OLT orthotopic lung transplantation; VAD ventricular assist device.

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:2161-2169

Present Market Demand for inhaled Nitric Oxide Gas

Clinical Policy Bulletin: Nitric Oxide, Inhalational (INO) Number: 0518

Aetna Policy

  • Aetna considers inhaled nitric oxide (INO) therapy medically necessary as a component of the treatment of hypoxic respiratory

failure in term and near-term (born at 34 or more weeks of gestation) neonates when both of the following criteria are met:

Neonates do not have congenital diaphragmatic hernia; and  When conventional therapies such as administration of high concentrations of oxygen, hyperventilation, high-frequency ventilation, the induction of alkalosis, neuromuscular blockade, and sedation have failed or are expected to fail.

Note: Use of INO therapy for more than 4 days is subject to medical necessity review.

  • Aetna considers the diagnostic use of INO medically necessary as a method of assessing pulmonary vaso-reactivity in persons

with pulmonary hypertension.

  • Aetna considers INO therapy experimental and investigational for all other indications because of insufficient evidence in the

peer-reviewed literature, including any of the following:

  • Acute bronchiolitis; or
  • Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children (other than those who meet the medical necessity criteria above) and in adults; or
  • Adult respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury; or
  • Post-operative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease; or
  • Premature neonates (less than 34 weeks of gestation); or
  • Prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury/acute rejection following lung transplantation; or
  • Treatment of persons with congenital diaphragmatic hernia; or
  • Treatment of vaso-occlusive crises or acute chest syndrome in persons with sickle cell disease (sickle cell vasculopathy).

Part 4:

Product Development Concepts

A. Institutional Applications – Adult Patient Market

Dr. Pearlman’s Flywheel Concept, presents a solution in this Space, with potential NEW product design for POC for the Institutional Market and the HomeCare Market

Protected: Flywheel iNO, Three Novel Adult Patient Inhaled Nitric Oxide Product Concepts by Justin D. Pearlman MD ME PhD FACC

INDICATIONS for Flywheel

a.                  Hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF)

Aa.1      Neonatal market – Solution in Existence, [NOT COVERED BY LPBI]

Aa.2     Adult market hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) associated with pulmonary hypertension or from other etiologies

b.                  Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

Ab.1    Neonatal market [NOT COVERED BY LPBI]

Ab.2   Adult market

c.                  Diagnostic Use of inhaled Nitric Oxide

Ac.1 Pulmonary Vasoreactivity Testing in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

Ac2 Treatment of Perioperative Pulmonary Hypertension With Inhaled NO for  Congenital Heart Disease

Ac3 Cardiac Transplantation

Ac4 Insertion of Left Ventricular Assist Device

Ac5 Inhaled NO to Treat Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Ac6 Inhaled NO and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Ac7 Lung Transplantation

Ac8 Sickle Cell Disease

Ac9 Airway chronic inflammation: Nebulized epoprostenol, Iloprost, a long acting prostacyclin analogue, inhaled prostaglandin E1, Adjuctive therapy with inhaled Nitric Oxide

B. Home Care Applications –

Applications for the HomeCare Segment, as the POC is the Home – Types of Products:

For the Institutional Market:

A1. PiNO
A2. SiNO

For the HomeCare Market

Bx. HiNO –   Dr. Pearlman’s solution

B1. HiNO –    LPBI’s PORTABLE inspiratory pulsing device with option to turn off pulsing feature

B2. HiNO –   LPBI’s Home Care Facial Inhaling Device

a.                 COPD

b                  Unstable Angina

Present Market Supply for inhaled Nitric Oxide gas

The market supply of inhaled Nitric Oxide gas experience the structure of a Monopoly. No competition, one product type very expensive in use by Institutions, i.e., Hospitals, only AND Pediatric population, primarily

The Massachusetts General Hospital owns patents covering the use of nitric oxide inhalation, which it has licensed to INO Therapeutics, a division of AGA Linde, and Dr Zapol receives a portion of the royalties.

Dr Roberts is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of INOTherapeutics, a company that sells inhaled nitric oxide gas. Dr Roberts is not compensated for this activity by the company.

http://inomax.com/

Clinical Trials – Newborns, full-term and nearly full-term infants

Hypoxic Respiratory Failure (HRF)

Clinical trials have shown that INOMAX is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of HRF associated with pulmonary hypertension.3 Its safety has been demonstrated in clinical trials and through post-marketing experience.

NINOS
Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group (NINOS). Inhaled nitric oxide in full-term and nearly full-term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:597-604. Detailed description.

CINRGI
Clark RH, Kuesser RJ, Walker MW, et al. Clinical Inhaled Nitric Oxide Research Group (CINRGI). Low-dose nitric oxide therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:469-474. Detailed description.

I-NO/PPHN 
Davidson D, Barefield ES, Kattwinkel J, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide for the early treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the term newborn: a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, dose-response, multicenter study. Pediatrics. 1998;101:325-334.

Wessel DL, Adatia I, Van Marter LJ, Thompson JE, Kane JW, Stark AR, Kourebanas S. Improved oxygenation in a randomized trial of inhaled nitric oxide for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. J Pediatr. 1997;100:E7. [PubMed]

Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Group. Inhaled nitric oxide in full term and nearly full term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:597–604. [PubMed]

Roberts JD, Fineman JR, Morin FC, Shaul PW, Rimer S, Schreiber MD, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. The Inhaled Nitric Oxide Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:605–610. [PubMed]

Wessel DL, Adatia I, Giglia TM, Thompson JE, Kulik TJ. Use of inhaled nitric oxide and acetylcholine in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension and endothelial function after cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 1993;88:2128–2138. [PubMed]

Petros AJ, Turner SC, Nunn AJ. Cost implications of using inhaled nitric oxide compared with epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension. J Pharm Technol. 1995;11:163–166. [PubMed]

 

Industry LEADER for the Neonatal Market : INOMAX®

http://inomax.com/about-inomax/

Nitric oxide delivery systems designed for critical care

With the INOMAX® delivery systems, you can be confident that you have continual innovative devices.

Dedication to developing next-generation technologies.

Continuous innovation supports evolving information and technology needs

Compatible with 60 ventilation systems, including HFOV and noninvasive modalities

Allow for operator-determined concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) in the breathing unit

Provide for a concentration that is constant throughout the respiratory cycle

Monitor for NO, oxygen (FiO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)

Prevent generation of excessive inhaled NO2

INOMAX® demostrates safety and efficacy in the treatment of hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF)

Clinical trials have shown that INOMAX is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of HRF associated with pulmonary hypertension.3 Its safety has been demonstrated in clinical trials and through post-marketing experience.

INOMAX has a well-established safety profile

More than 530,000 patients treated worldwide*2

Meet all FDA-required specifications

In the US in 2013 – Inhaled Nitric Oxide is NOT a FDA approved Drug  Therapy for the Adult Patient

CLINICAL TRIALS on the Use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide by Adult Patients, include:

Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Lung Injury in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

  1. Arash Afshari, MD*,
  2. Jesper Brok, MD, PhD§,
  3. Ann M. Møller, MD, MSDC and
  4. Jørn Wetterslev, MD, PhD§

Published online before print March 3, 2011, doi:10.1213/​ANE.0b013e31820bd185A & A June 2011 vol. 112 no. 6 1411-1421

http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/content/112/6/1411.short

CONCLUSION: iNO cannot be recommended for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. iNO results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful.

Michael JR, Barton RG, Saffle JR, Mone M, Markewitz BA. Inhaled nitric oxide versus conventional therapy: effect on oxygenation in ARDS Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1998;157:1361-1362. [Free Full Text]

Abstract  A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed with patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to compare the effect of conventional therapy or inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) on oxygenation. Patients were randomized to either conventional therapy or conventional therapy plus iNO for 72 h. We tested the following hypotheses: (1) that iNO would improve oxygenation during the 72 h after randomization, as compared with conventional therapy; and (2) that iNO would increase the likelihood that patients would improve to the extent that the FI(O2) could be decreased by > or = 0.15 within 72 h after randomization. There were two major findings. First, That iNO as compared with conventional therapy increased Pa(O2)/FI(O2) at 1 h, 12 h, and possibly 24 h. Beyond 24 h, the two groups had an equivalent improvement in Pa(O2)/FI(O2). Second, that patients treated with iNO therapy were no more likely to improve so that they could be managed with a persistent decrease in FI(O2) > or = 0.15 during the 72 h following randomization (11 of 20 patients with iNO versus 9 of 20 patients with conventional therapy, p = 0.55). In patients with severe ARDS, our results indicate that iNO does not lead to a sustained improvement in oxygenation as compared with conventional therapy.

Dellinger RPZimmerman JLTaylor RWStraube RCHauser DLCriner GJDavis K JrHyers TMPapadakos PEffects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group.

Conclusions: From this placebo-controlled study, inhaled NO appears to be well tolerated in the population of ARDS patients studied. With mechanical ventilation held constant, inhaled NO is associated with a significant improvement in oxygenation compared with placebo over the first 4 hrs of treatment. An improvement in oxygenation index was observed over the first 4 days. Larger phase III studies are needed to ascertain if these acute physiologic improvements can lead to altered clinical outcome.

Conclusions: Inhaled nitric oxide at a dose of 5 ppm in patients with acute lung injury not due to sepsis and without evidence of nonpulmonary organ system dysfunction results in short-term oxygenation improvements but has no substantial impact on the duration of ventilatory support or mortality.

Lundin S, Mang H, Smithies M, Stenqvist O, Frostell C. Inhalation of nitric oxide in acute lung injury: results of a European multicentre study. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:911-9.

Conclusions: Improvement of oxygenation by INO did not increase the frequency of reversal of ALI. Use of inhaled NO in early ALI did not alter mortality although it did reduce the frequency of severe respiratory failure in patients developing severe hypoxaemia.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide as Drug Therapy continue to be a very HOT research subject as 2004 article was cited by the following studies, 2004-2013:

The Pharmacological Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension 
Pharmacol. Rev.. 2012;64:583-620,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Transpulmonary Flux of S-Nitrosothiols and Pulmonary Vasodilation during Nitric Oxide Inhalation: Role of Transport 
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.. 2012;47:37-43,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase reduces experimental dermal fibrosis 
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1019-1026,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Elevated Cavopulmonary Pressure and Hypoxemia After Cavopulmonary Operations 
World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. 2012;3:26-31,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Inhaled Nitric Oxide Improves Outcomes After Successful Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Mice 
Circulation. 2011;124:1645-1653,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Nitrite Potently Inhibits Hypoxic and Inflammatory Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Smooth Muscle Proliferation via Xanthine Oxidoreductase-Dependent Nitric Oxide Generation 
Circulation. 2010;121:98-109,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulation: an emerging option in pulmonary hypertension therapy 
Eur Respir Rev. 2009;18:35-41,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate vs. Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Moderate, Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn. A Multicentre, Retrospective Study 
J Trop Pediatr. 2008;54:196-199,

AbstractFull TextPDF

RETRACTED: Treating pulmonary hypertension post cardiopulmonary bypass in pigs: milrinone vs. sildenafil analog 
Perfusion. 2008;23:117-125,

AbstractPDF

Inhaled Agonists of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Induce Selective Pulmonary Vasodilation 
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.. 2007;176:1138-1145,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Nitric Oxide in the Pulmonary Vasculature 
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.. 2007;27:1877-1885,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-{alpha}1 Deficiency Selectively Inhibits the Pulmonary Vasodilator Response to Nitric Oxide and Increases the Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling Response to Chronic Hypoxia 
Circulation. 2007;116:936-943,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease 
Physiol. Rev.. 2007;87:315-424,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Sleeping Beauty-mediated eNOS gene therapy attenuates monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats 
FASEB J.. 2006;20:2594-2596,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Inhaled nitric oxide decreases infarction size and improves left ventricular function in a murine model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury 
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.. 2006;291:H379-H384,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Inhaled nitric oxide does not reduce systemic vascular resistance in mice 
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.. 2006;290:H1826-H1829,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 1 augments the pulmonary vasodilator response to inhaled nitric oxide in awake lambs with acute pulmonary hypertension 
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.. 2006;290:L723-L729,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Treatment with phosphodiesterase inhibitors type III and V: milrinone and sildenafil is an effective combination during thromboxane-induced acute pulmonary hypertension 
Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:317-322,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Extrapulmonary effects of inhaled nitric oxide: role of reversible s-nitrosylation of erythrocytic hemoglobin. 
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:153-160,

AbstractFull TextPDF

Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Activator Reverses Acute Pulmonary Hypertension and Augments the Pulmonary Vasodilator Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Awake Lambs 
Circulation. 2004;110:2253-2259,

AbstractFull TextPDF

REFERENCES for the Introduction, Part 1,2,3,4

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/109/25/3106.full

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra051884

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:2161-2169
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Clinical Indication for Use and Outcomes After Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy

Isaac George, MDa,*, Steve Xydas, MDa, Veli K. Topkara, MDa, Corrina Ferdinando, MDa, Eileen C. Barnwell, MS, RRTb,Larissa Gablemana, Robert N. Sladen, MDc, Yoshifumi Naka, MD, PhDa, Mehmet C. Oz, MDa

a Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
b Department of Respiratory Therapy, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
c Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York 

References in this article

  1. Steudel W, Hurford WE, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide: basic biology and clinical applications Anesthesiology 1999;91:1090-1121.[Medline]
  2. Gianetti J, Bevilacqua S, De Caterina R. Inhaled nitric oxide: more than a selective pulmonary vasodilator Eur J Clin Invest 2002;32:628-635.[Medline]
  3. Roberts JD, Polaner DM, Lang P, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn Lancet 1992;340:818-820.[Medline]
  4. Kinsella JP, Neish SR, Shaffer E, Abman SH. Low-dose inhalational nitric oxide in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn Lancet 1992;340:819-820.[Medline]
  5. Ashutosh K, Phadke K, Jackson JF, Steele D. Use of NO inhalation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Thorax 2000;55:109-113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rossaint R, Falke KJ, Lopez F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med 2004;328:399-405.
  7. Gladwin MT, Schecter AN, Shelhamer JH, Pannell LK, Conway DA. Inhaled NO augments NO transport on sickle cell hemoglobin without affecting oxygen affinity J Clin Invest 1999;104:847-848.[Medline]
  8. Stobierska-Dzierzek B, Awad H, Michler RE. The evolving management of acute right-sided heart failure in cardiac transplant recipients J Am Coll Card 2001;38:923-931.[Medline]
  9. Ardehali A, Hughes K, Sadeghi A, Esmailian F, Marelli D, Moriguchi J. Inhaled NO for pulmonary hypertension after heart transplantation Transplantation 2001;72:638-641.[Medline]
  10. Thabut G, Brugiere O, Leseche G, Stern JB, Fradj K. Preventive effect of inhaled NO and pentoxyfylline on ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation Transplantation 2001;71:1295-1300.[Medline]
  11. Sitbon O, Brunet B, Denjan A, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide as a screening vasodilator agent in primary pulmonary hypertension Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:384-389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Semigran MJ, Cockrill BA, Kacmarek R, et al. Hemodynamic effects of inhaled nitric oxide in heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:982-988.[Medline]
  13. Girard C, Lehot J, Pannetier J, Filley S, Ffrench P, Estenove S. Inhaled nitric oxide after mitral valve replacement in patients with chronic pulmonary artery hypertension Anesthesiology 1992;77:880-883.[Medline]
  14. Bhorade S, Christenson J, O’Connor M, Lavoie A, Pohman A, Hall JB. Response to inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute right heart syndrome Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:571-579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Radermacher P, Santak B, Wust HJ, Tarnon J, Falke KJ. Prostacyclin and right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with ARDS Intens Care Med 1990;16:227-232.[Medline]
  16. Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group Inhaled nitric oxide in full-term and nearly full-term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure N Engl J Med 1997;336:597-604.[Medline]
  17. Roberts JD, Fineman JR, Morin FC, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide and persistent pulmonary hypertension in the newborn N Engl J Med 1997;336:605-610.[Medline]
  18. Lonnquist PA. Efficacy and economy of inhaled nitric oxide in neonates accepted for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation Acta Physiol Scand 1999;167:175-179.[Medline]
  19. Baigorri F, Joseph D, Artigas A, Blanch L. Inhaled NO does not improve cardiac or pulmonary function in patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Crit Care Med 1999;27:2153-2158.[Medline]
  20. Kaisers U, Busch T, Deja M, Donaubauer B, Falke K. Selective pulmonary vasodilatation in acute respiratory distress syndrome Crit Care Med 2003;31(Suppl):337-342.[Medline]
  21. Abman AH, Griebel JL, Parker DK, et al. Acute effects of inhaled nitric oxide in children with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure J Pediatr 1994;124:881-888.[Medline]
  22. Dellinger RP, Zimmerman JL, Taylor RW, et al. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Crit Care Med 1998;26:15-23.[Medline]
  23. Jacobs PD, Finer NN, Robertson CMT, Etches P, Hall E, Saunders LD. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the application of nitric oxide versus oxygen gas for near-term newborns with respiratory failure: results from a Canadian randomized clinical trial Crit Care Med 2000;28:872-878.[Medline]
  24. Hosenpud JD, Bennett LE, Keck BM, Boucek MM, Novick RJ. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: seventeeth official report–2000 J Heart Lung Transplant 2000;19:909-931.[Medline]
  25. Doyle AR, Dhir AK, Moors AH, Latimer RD. Treatment of perioperative low cardiac output syndrome Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59(Suppl 2):3-11.
  26. Bhatia SJ, Kirshenbaum JM, Shemin RJ, et al. Time course of resolution of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular remodeling after orthotopic cardiac transplantation Circulation 1987;76:819-826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chen JM, Levin HR, Micheler RE, et al. Reevaluating the significance of pulmonary hypertension before cardiac transplantation: determination of optimal thresholds and quantification of the effect of reversibility on perioperative mortality J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:627-634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Tenderich G, Koerner MM, Stuettgen B, et al. Does preexisting elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (transpulmonary gradient >15 mmHg or >5 Wood) predict early and long-term results after othotopic heart transplantation? Transplant Proc 1998;30:1130-1131.[Medline]
  29. Bennett LE, Keck BM, Hertz MI, Trulock EP, Taylor DO. Worldwide thoracic organ transplantation: a report from the UNO/ISHLT international registry for thoracic organ transplantation Clin Transplant 2001;15:25-40.
  30. Harringer W, Wiebe K, Struber M, et al. Lung transplantation—10 year experience Eur J CardioThorac Surg 1999;16:546-554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Troncy E, Collet JP, Shapiro S, et al. Should we treat acute respiratory distress syndrome with inhaled nitric oxide? Lancet 1997;350:111-118.[Medline]
  32. Michael JR, Barton RG, Saffle JR, Mone M, Markewitz BA. Inhaled nitric oxide versus conventional therapy: effect on oxygenation in ARDS Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1998;157:1361-1362.[Free Full Text]
  33. Luhr OR, Antonsen K, Karlsson M, et al. Incidence and mortality after acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in Sweden, Denmark, and Iceland Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1999;159:1849-1861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Krafft P, Fridrich P, Pernerstorfer T, et al. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: definitions, severity, and clinical outcome Intens Care Med 1996;22:519-529.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

M. M. Hoeper and J. Granton
Intensive Care Unit Management of Patients with Severe Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Heart Failure
, November 15, 2011; 184(10): 1114 – 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A. N. Tavare and T. Tsakok
Does prophylactic inhaled nitric oxide reduce morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation?
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, November 1, 2011; 13(5): 516 – 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A. Hoskote, C. Carter, P. Rees, M. Elliott, M. Burch, and K. Brown
Acute right ventricular failure after pediatric cardiac transplant: Predictors and long-term outcome in current era of transplantation medicine
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2010; 139(1): 146 – 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

 

RESOURCES on this Open Access Online Scientific Journal

1. electronic Book on Nitric Oxide by Nitric Oxide Team @ Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI), Amazon-Kindle, 2013

Perspectives on Nitric Oxide in Disease Mechanisms

 The Nitric Oxide Discovery, Function, and Targeted Therapy  Opportunities

From Discovery to Innovation

     From Innovation to Therapeutic Targets

From Therapeutic Targets to Clinical Applications

Aviral Vatsa, PhD, Editor

Larry H Bernstein, MD, Editor

2. The rationale and use of inhaled NO in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension and Right Sided Heart Failure Larry H. Bernstein 8/20/2012

3. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Adults: Clinical Trials and Meta Analysis Studies – Recent Findings Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN, 6/2/2013

See on Scoop.itCardiovascular Disease: PHARMACO-THERAPY

NPR First drug to improve heart failure mortality in over a decade HealthCanal.com CoQ10 is the first medication to improve survival in chronic heart failure since ACE inhibitors and beta blockers more than a decade ago and should be added to…

See on www.healthcanal.com

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

iNO – Clinical Trials and Meta Analysis Studies: Recent Findings

Clinical perspectives with long-term pulsed inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

1Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, US
2Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, US
3Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, US
4Ikaria, Inc., Hampton, New Jersey, USA
Address correspondence to: Dr. Robyn J. Barst, 31 Murray Hill Road, Scarsdale, NY 10583, USA ; Email: robyn.barst@gmail.com
This article has been corrected. See Pulm Circ. 2012; 2(3): iv.

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic, progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature with a high morbidity and mortality. Its pathobiology involves at least three interacting pathways –
  • prostacyclin (PGI2),
  • endothelin, and
  • nitric oxide (NO).
Current treatments target these three pathways utilizing PGI2 and its analogs, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors.
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is approved for the treatment of hypoxic respiratory failure associated with pulmonary hypertension in term/near-term neonates. As a selective pulmonary vasodilator, iNO can acutely decrease pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance without affecting cardiac index or systemic vascular resistance. In addition to delivery via the endotracheal tube, iNO can also be administered as continuous inhalation via a facemask or a pulsed nasal delivery. Consistent with a deficiency in endogenously produced NO, long-term pulsed iNO dosing appears to favorably affect hemodynamics in PAH patients, observations that appear to correlate with benefit in uncontrolled settings. Clinical studies and case reports involving patients receiving long-term continuous pulsed iNO have shown minimal risk in terms of adverse events, changes in methemoglobin levels, and detectable exhaled or ambient NO or NO2. Advances in gas delivery technology and strategies to optimize iNO dosing may enable broad-scale application to long-term treatment of chronic diseases such as PAH.
Keywords: drug, hypertension, inhalation administration, nitric oxide, pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary/physiopathology, pulse therapy, vasodilator agents

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

In summary, uncontrolled observational studies of long-term use (>1 month) of continuous pulsed iNO (as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy) in a total of 14 patients with PAH across five studies [Ref 46-48, 54,55]

have reported no significant adverse events, no elevated metHb levels, and no detectable exhaled or ambient NO or NO2. In one study, a patient experienced three episodes of severe epistaxis over two years while on a combination of pulsed iNO and epoprostenol.[46]

In a case report of a patient awaiting heart-lung transplantation, the patient experienced hypotensive bradycardia upon an attempt to wean from iNO therapy. In addition, a recurrence in hypotensive bradycardia resulted in the increase of iNO dose (40–106 ppm), followed by a decrease to 70 ppm (along with administration of bicarbonate and reintroduction of prostacyclin) after increasing metabolic acidosis.[55]

There is evidence that pulsed delivery may allow utilization of lower NO concentrations compared with continuous face mask administration, potentially minimizing the risk of associated adverse events as well as resulting in a more practical delivery system.[49]

The consensus on treatment for PAH encompasses numerous goals, the most important being to improve overall quality of life by decreasing symptoms while minimizing treatment-related side effects.[2]

Additional goals include enhancing functional capacity, i.e., exercise capacity, improving hemodynamic derangements (lowering PVR and PAP, and normalizing RAP and CO), and preventing, if not reversing, disease progression. Finally, improving survival, although certainly desirable, is rarely an end point in trials examining PAH treatment.[2]

The availability of novel treatments and the improvement in survival rates have allowed the goals of PAH therapy to expand from improving survival and preventing disease progression to also improving HRQOL.[71]

Potential advances in long-term PAH treatment, such as ambulatory iNO administration, may allow for greater improvements in HRQOL. Pérez–Peñate et al. observed that ambulatory pulsed iNO treatment did not diminish quality of life beyond the consequences of the disease itself.[47]

Eight of eleven patients who led a nonsedentary life were able to leave their home daily, with four returning to work while on long-term iNO therapy.

An ideal drug-device for long-term PAH treatment should emphasize portability and safety features for outpatient use. Advances in iNO gas delivery technology and strategies to optimize dosing should allow for randomized controlled trials of iNO and, hopefully, may lead to broad-scale application of iNO in the treatment of chronic diseases such as PAH.[45]

REFERENCES

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401867/

Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1411-21. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820bd185.
Epub 2011 Mar 3.

Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury in adults and children: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Afshari ABrok JMøller AMWetterslev J.

Source

Department of Anesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Anestheisa, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, defined as acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, are critical conditions associated with frequent mortality and morbidity in all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, International Web of Science, LILACS, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and CINHAL (up to January 31, 2010). Additionally, we hand-searched reference lists, contacted authors and experts, and searched registers of ongoing trials. Two reviewers independently selected all parallel group RCTs comparing iNO with placebo or no intervention and extracted data related to study methods, interventions, outcomes, bias risk, and adverse events. All trials, irrespective of blinding or language status were included. Retrieved trials were evaluated with Cochrane methodology. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of iNO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components. We assessed the risk of random error by applying trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS:

We included 14 RCTs with a total of 1303 participants; 10 of these trials had a high risk of bias. iNO showed no statistically significant effect on overall mortality (40.2%versus 38.6%) (relative risks [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 1.22; I² = 0) and in several subgroup and sensitivity analyses, indicating robust results. Limited data demonstrated a statistically insignificant effect of iNO on duration of ventilation, ventilator-free days, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. We found a statistically significant but transient improvement in oxygenation in the first 24 hours, expressed as the ratio of Po₂ to fraction of inspired oxygen (mean difference [MD] 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² = 25%). However, iNO appears to increase the risk of renal impairment among adults (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² = 0) but not the risk of bleeding or methemoglobin or nitrogen dioxide formation.

CONCLUSION:

iNO cannot be recommended for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. iNO results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful.

 SOURCE:
 

Clinical Policy Bulletin:

Nitric Oxide, Inhalational (INO) Number: 0518

Aetna Policy

      Aetna considers inhaled nitric oxide (INO) therapy medically necessary as a component of the treatment of hypoxic respiratory

      failure in term and near-term (born at 34 or more weeks of gestation) neonates when both of the following criteria are met:

  •                         Neonates do not have congenital diaphragmatic hernia; and
  •                         When conventional therapies such as administration of high concentrations of oxygen, hyperventilation, high-frequency
  •                         ventilation, the induction of alkalosis, neuromuscular blockade, and sedation have failed or are expected to fail.

      Note: Use of INO therapy for more than 4 days is subject to medical necessity review.

      Aetna considers the diagnostic use of INO medically necessary as a method of assessing pulmonary vaso-reactivity in persons

      with pulmonary hypertension.

      Aetna considers INO therapy experimental and investigational for all other indications because of insufficient evidence in the

      peer-reviewed literature, including any of the following:

                        Acute bronchiolitis; or

                        Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children (other than those who meet the medical necessity criteria above) and in adults; or

Adult respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury; or

Post-operative management of pulmonary hypertension in infants and children with congenital heart disease; or

Premature neonates (less than 34 weeks of gestation); or

Prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury/acute rejection following lung transplantation; or

Treatment of persons with congenital diaphragmatic hernia; or

Treatment of vaso-occlusive crises or acute chest syndrome in persons with sickle cell disease (sickle cell vasculopathy).

http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/500_599/0518.html

 

Discussion

NO is naturally produced in the body by the enzyme NO synthase, which converts L-arginine to L-citrulline and NO in the presence of oxygen and certain cofactors. Both constitutive and inducible forms of NO synthase are present in endothelium and various other tissues.39–,41 NO has several important physiological roles, including involvement in smooth muscle relaxation, neurotransmission, host defense responses, and platelet function. NO produced by the vascular endothelium causes local vasodilatation, thereby regulating vasomotor tone. Circulating NO is present in only picomolar amounts and is rapidly inactivated by reaction with hemoglobin. Because of this short circulating half-life (3–5 seconds), inhalation of subtoxic levels of NO causes vasodilatation of the pulmonary vasculature with little or no systemic vasodilatation. Therapeutic administration of NO by inhalation thus provides a means of selectively lowering pulmonary arterial blood pressure, potentially improving hemodynamic status and gas exchange.11–13,15,17,18,23

Inhaled NO has been widely studied in adults with pulmonary hypertension and acute lung injury, and it is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of hypoxic respiratory failure in neonates with pulmonary hypertension. Three potential hazards associated with inhaled NO therapy are recognized:

(1) direct pulmonary toxic effects of NO,

(2) pulmonary toxic effects due to NO2 produced by oxidation of NO, and

(3) development of methemoglobinemia.

Studies of exposure to toxic levels of NO and NO2 in various species indicated that high concentrations of these gases can be lethal. Pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, acidosis, and hypotension developed in dogs exposed to 0.5% to 2% NO or NO2, and most animals died within 7 to 50 minutes of exposure.42 In rats, inhaled NO2 concentrations of 127 ppm were lethal within 30 minutes in 50% of animals (LC50).43 The LC50 in primates exposed to NO2 for 30 to 60 minutes is 100 to 200 ppm.43 Methemoglobinemia is detectable by measurement of blood levels of methemoglobin and is manifested clinically as cyanosis and hypoxia. Methemoglobinemia developed in animals exposed to high concentrations of NO or NO2, although not uniformly. In one instance, a methemoglobin level of 1.00 developed in a dog exposed to 2% NO for 50 minutes.42

In humans, NO at 10 to 20 ppm can cause irritation of the eyes and nose, 25 ppm can be irritating to the respiratory tract and cause chest pain, 50 ppm can cause pulmonary edema, and 100 ppm can be fatal.1,4

Legally permissible exposure limits for NO and NO2 have been issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. For NO, this threshold is 25 ppm (30 mg/m3), averaged over an 8-hour work shift.10 This value corresponds to the threshold limit value promulgated by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.2 Adherence to this limit is thought to provide adequate protection against methemoglobinemia and other toxic effects. Concentrations of 100 ppm and higher (30-minute mean) are deemed to be an immediate threat to life and health by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.44 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ceiling limit for NO2 is 1 ppm (1.8 mg/m3), and this limit is not to be exceeded at any time during the work shift.10 The threshold limit for TWA concentration of NO2 issued by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists is 3 ppm,2 and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health requires that NO2exposures not exceed 1 ppm.10,44

These threshold values are thought to represent maximum concentrations to which nearly all workers can be exposed on a regular basis without adverse effects. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that lower levels of exposure can have deleterious effects. For example, irreversible emphysematous changes to the lungs occurred in beagles exposed to 0.6 ppm NO2 for 16 h/d for 68 months and then to clean air for 32 to 36 months.45 In a study of exposure of humans to NO at 1.0 ppm, small but significant increases in airway resistance occurred in half the subjects.46 Similarly, inhalation of NO2 at 0.7 to 2 ppm for 10 minutes increased airflow resistance in healthy subjects.1 Exposure to NO2 at 2.3 ppm for 5 hours reportedly altered alveolar permeability in humans.47 Brief exposure to NO2 levels as low as 0.4 ppm may augment the response to challenge with specific allergens, and exposure to 0.1 to 0.5 ppm may affect pulmonary function in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease.1,5,7,48,49

Limited information is available on occupational exposure to NO in the healthcare setting. Using stationary chemiluminescence monitoring, Mourgeon et al50 determined ambient concentrations of NO and NO2 in the main corridor of an ICU. They found that mean ambient NO concentrations within the ICU were 0.237 ppm (SD 0.147 ppm) during the therapeutic use of inhaled NO at 5 ppm or less in 1 or more patients and 0.289 ppm (SD 0.147 ppm) during times when inhaled NO therapy was not used. The institution where this study50 was performed is located on a main street in Paris, and Mourgeon et al concluded that the ICU corridor values were entirely dependent on prevailing outdoor concentrations. Markhorst et al51 examined ambient levels of NO and NO2 in well-ventilated and poorly ventilated pediatric ICU rooms in which administration of inhaled NO at 20 ppm was simulated. As in the study by Mourgeon et al, sampling was done from a stationary position (in the study by Markhorst et al, 65 cm from the high-frequency oscillator used) at a height of 150 cm. During the simulation, maximum NO and NO2levels were 0.462 and 0.064 ppm, respectively. Phillips et al52 used occupational hygiene techniques similar to those we used to examine exposure levels in medical personnel during administration of inhaled NO to 6 patients in a pediatric ICU. In all instances, TWA concentrations were less than the limits of detection for the assay used. The patients’ sizes and minute volumes were not specified, although 3 of the patients were classified as neonatal.

▪ Nitric oxide therapy does not appear to expose nurses to excessive levels of nitric oxide or nitrogen dioxide during routine patient care in the ICU.

We examined the occupational exposure of ICU nurses to NO during NO therapy at delivery levels of 5 and 20 ppm in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The maximum TWA exposures in our study were 0.45 ppm for NO and 0.28 ppm for NO2, well below the legally permissible exposure limits mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the involved nurses reported no respiratory or other signs or symptoms. The maximum outdoor background concentrations of NO and NO2 in our county during the periods of study ranged from 0.006 to 0.030 ppm for NO and 0.018 to 0.090 ppm for NO2. For comparison, the primary national ambient air quality standard issued by the Environmental Protection Agency is 0.053 ppm (100 μg/m3), calculated as an annual arithmetic mean.53 We did not assess methemoglobin levels in the nurses; however, methemoglobinemia did not develop in the treated patients. Marked methemoglobinemia is uncommon in patients treated with inhaled NO at concentrations similar to those used in our study.11,12,15,16,18,23

In the simulation study of Markhorst et al,51 ambient NO concentrations were measured at distances of 15 to 200 cm from a high-frequency oscillator, yielding levels ranging from 1.2 to 0.4 ppm. Our measurements yielded similar results (see Figure); however, in our study, NO levels at the ventilator exhaust port were nearly 10 times higher (9.2 ppm) than those 15 cm away (1.0 ppm). NO concentrations decreased rapidly; the mean was about 0.030 ppm in the area between 0.6 m from the ventilator and 0.6 m outside the patient’s room. For comparison, in homes with gas cooking stoves, ambient NOx levels of 0.025 to 0.075 ppm are typical.9

A number of factors determine the concentrations of NO and NO2 to which personnel are exposed during the therapeutic use of inhaled NO. These include the concentration of NO delivered to the patient, the patient’s minute volume, room size, room ventilation, and whether special ventilator exhaust routing or chemical scavenging devices are used. Baseline ambient levels of NO and NO2 depend on outdoor environmental factors such as proximity to motor vehicle traffic or heavy industry, climate, wind, and sky clarity.50Depending on the mode of administration, the actual concentration of NO delivered to a patient can fluctuate from the intended level. Continuous delivery during the entire respiratory cycle can produce more atmospheric contamination than does sequential administration limited to the inspiratory phase.54 The amount of NO2 formed during NO therapy varies according to the concentrations of oxygen and NO delivered, the time the 2 gases remain in contact, total gas flow, and minute volume.55 Thus, higher fractions of inspired oxygen will lead to increased formation of NO2 during inhaled NO therapy.

Because of differences in minute volume, therapeutic administration of inhaled NO to adult patients will result in substantially greater release of NO than will administration to infants or children. For example, to achieve a delivered NO concentration of 20 ppm, the required flow from a 1000-ppm NO source varies from 20 mL/min for a minute volume of 1 L/min to more than 200 mL/min for a minute volume of 11 L/min19 (our patients’ minute volumes exceeded 11 L/min). Simultaneous treatment of multiple patients in the same room or unit might increase exposure levels. The time spent by healthcare providers in the patient’s room and their average exposure distance from the ventilator exhaust port are also important factors. Room ventilation is clearly a factor. Ventilation in our negative-pressure isolation rooms exceeded that mandated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (ie, ≥6 air changes per hour for existing rooms and ≥12 air changes per hour where possible and in new hospital construction).56 Our study design did not allow analysis of the effects of any of these factors; however, the methods we used provide data for real-world examples of ICU nurses caring for typical adult patients receiving inhaled NO. These techniques also constitute the standard method for evaluations of occupational exposure to toxic gases. Studies in which these methods are used, but involving larger samples of nurses and patients in various settings, would allow better definition of variance and the effects that factors such as room ventilation have on exposure to ambient NO and NO2.

In summary, we found that inhaled NO therapy at doses up to 20 ppm does not appear to pose a risk of excessive occupational exposure to NO or NO2 to healthcare workers during the routine delivery of critical care nursing in typical adult ICU settings. These findings lend support to the occupational safety of this therapeutic modality.

REFERENCES

  1. Beard RR. Inorganic compounds of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE, eds. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 3rd ed. Vol. 2C. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1982:4053–4139.
  2. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances in the Workroom Environment. 4th ed. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Inc; 1980.
  3. Budavari S, O’Neil MJ, Smith A, Heckelman PE, Kinneary JF, eds. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. 12th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck; 1996:1131.
  4. Sittig M. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens. 3rd ed. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications; 1991:1201–1203, 1217–1219.
  5. Lipsett M. Oxides of nitrogen and sulfur. In: Sullivan JB Jr, Krieger GR, eds.Hazardous Materials Toxicology: Clinical Principles of Environmental Health.Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1992:964–972.
  6. Clayton GD. Air pollution. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE, eds. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1991:195–258.
  7. Lipsett MJ, Shusterman DJ, Beard RR. Inorganic compounds of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE, eds. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1994: 4523–4643.
  8. Modrak JE, Frampton MW, Utell MJ. Community air pollution: what a pulmonologist should know. Clin Pulm Med. 1997;4:266–272.
  9. Samet JM, Marbury MC, Spengler JD. Health effects and sources of indoor air pollution: part I. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136:1486–1508.
  10. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, US Department of Labor. OSHA Regulated Hazardous Substances: Health, Toxicity, Economic and Technological Data. Vol. 2. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corp; 1990:1419–1421, 1437–1440.
  11. Krafft P, Metnitz PGH, Fridrich P, Krenn CG, Hammerle AF, Steltzer H. Impact of inhaled nitric oxide on cardiopulmonary performance and outcome of ARDS patients: a literature review. Clin Intensive Care. 1997;8:27–32.
  12. Dellinger RP, Zimmerman JL, Taylor RW, et al. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:15–23.
  13. Michael JR, Barton RG, Saffle JR, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide versus conventional therapy: effect on oxygenation in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.1998;157:1372–1380.
  14. The Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group. Inhaled nitric oxide in full-term and nearly full-term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med.1997;336:597–604.
  15. Okamoto K, Hamaguchi M, Kukita I, Kikuta K, Sato T. Efficacy of inhaled nitric oxide in children with ARDS. Chest. 1998;114:827–833.
  16. Johannigman JA, Davis K Jr, Campbell RS, Luchette F, Hurst JM, Branson RD. Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Trauma. 1997;43:904–909.
  17. Johannigman JA, Davis K Jr, Miller SL, et al. Prone positioning and inhaled nitric oxide: synergistic therapies for acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Trauma. 2001;50:589–595.
  18. Gerlach H, Rossaint R, Pappert D, Falke KJ. Time-course and dose-response of nitric oxide inhalation for systemic oxygenation and pulmonary hypertension in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Eur J Clin Invest. 1993;23:499–502.
  19. Young JD, Dyar OJ. Delivery and monitoring of inhaled nitric oxide. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:77–86.
  20. Cuthbertson BH, Galley HF, Webster NR. Effect of inhaled nitric oxide on key mediators of the inflammatory response in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1736–1741.
  21. Hoehn T, Krause MF. Response to inhaled nitric oxide in premature and term neonates. Drugs. 2001;61:27–39.
  22. Tworetzky W, Bristow J, Moore P, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension [letter]. Lancet. 2001;357:118–120.
  23. Journois D, Pouard P, Mauriat P, Malhère T, Vouhé P, Safran D. Inhaled nitric oxide as a therapy for pulmonary hypertension after operation for congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:1129–1135.
  24. Gothberg S, Edberg KE. Inhaled nitric oxide to newborns and infants after congenital heart surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass: a dose-response study.Scand Cardiovasc J. 2000;34:154–158.
  25. Solina AR, Ginsberg SH, Papp D, et al. Dose response to nitric oxide in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13:281–286.
  26. Ardehali A, Hughes K, Sadeghi A, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide for pulmonary hypertension after heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;72:638–641.
  27. Ardehali A, Laks H, Levine M, et al. A prospective trial of inhaled nitric oxide in clinical lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;72:112–115.
  28. Crerar-Gilbert A, Boots R. Use of inhaled nitric oxide in pulmonary embolism.Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999;27:412–414.
  29. Gladwin MT, Schechter AN, Shelhamer JH, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide augments nitric oxide transport on sickle cell hemoglobin without affecting oxygen affinity. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:937–945.
  30. Rabkin DG, Sladen RN, DeMango A, Steinglass KM, Goldstein DJ. Nitric oxide for the treatment of postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg.2001;72:272–274.
  31. Nakagawa TA, Johnston SJ, Falkos SA, Gomez RJ, Morris A. Life-threatening status asthmaticus treated with inhaled nitric oxide. J Pediatr. 2000;137: 119–122.
  32. Perez-Penate G, Julia-Serda G, Pulido-Duque JM, Gorriz-Gomez E, Cabrera-Navarro P. One-year continuous inhaled nitric oxide for primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2001;119:970–973.
  33. Jones C. Inhaled nitric oxide: are the safety issues being addressed? Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1998;14:271–275.
  34. Goldman AP, Cook PD, Macrae DJ. Exposure of intensive-care staff to nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide [letter]. Lancet. 1995;345:923–924.
  35. Kalweit S. Inhaled nitric oxide in the ICU. Crit Care Nurse. August 1997;17: 26–32.
  36. Bathe D, Berssenbrugge A, Kohlmann T, Montgomery F. Monitoring accuracy for the measurement of nitric oxide in the 0 to 80 ppm range [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:A103.
  37. Guidelines for Protecting the Safety and Health of Health Care Workers.Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Standards Development and Technology Transfer; 1988:2–9. DHHS (NIOSH) publication 88–119.
  38. Nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide. In: Eller PM, Cassinelli ME, eds. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering; 1994:(6014)1–4. DHHS (NIOSH) publication 94–113.
  39. Stuehr DJ, Griffith OW. Mammalian nitric oxide synthases. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1992;65:287–346.
  40. Kobzik L, Bredt DS, Lowenstein CJ, et al. Nitric oxide synthase in human and rat lung: immunocytochemical and histochemical localization. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1993;9:371–377.
  41. Gaston B, Drazen M, Loscalzo J, Stamler JS. The biology of nitrogen oxides in the airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:538–551.
  42. Greenbaum R, Bay J, Hargreaves MD, et al. Effects of higher oxides of nitrogen on the anaesthetized dog. Br J Anaesth. 1967;39:393–404.
  43. Harris LR, Sarvadi DG. Synthetic polymers. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE, eds.Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 4th ed. Vol. 2, part E. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1991:3673–4005.
  44. Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Oxides of Nitrogen (Nitrogen Dioxide and Nitric Oxide). Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1976:2. DHHS (NIOSH) publication 76–149.
  45. Hyde D, Orthoefer J, Dungworth D, Tyler W, Carter R, Lum H. Morphometric and morphologic evaluation of pulmonary lesions in beagle dogs chronically exposed to high ambient levels of air pollutants. Lab Invest. 1978;38:455–469.
  46. Kagawa J. Respiratory effects of 2-hr exposure to 1.0 ppm nitric oxide in normal subjects. Environ Res. 1982;27:485–490.
  47. Rasmussen TR, Kjaergaard SK, Tarp U, Pedersen OF. Delayed effects of NO2 exposure on alveolar permeability and glutathione peroxidase in healthy humans.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:654–659.
  48. Tunnicliffe WS, Burge PS, Ayres JG. Effect of domestic concentrations of nitrogen dioxide on airway responses to inhaled allergen in asthmatic patients.Lancet. 1994;344:1733–1736.
  49. Morrow PE, Utell MJ, Bauer MA, et al. Pulmonary performance of elderly normal subjects and subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exposed to 0.3 ppm nitrogen dioxide. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:291–300.
  50. Mourgeon E, Levesque E, Duveau C, et al. Factors influencing indoor concentrations of nitric oxide in a Parisian intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:1692–1695.
  51. Markhorst DG, Leenhoven T, Uiterwijk JW, Meulenbelt J, van Vught AJ. Occupational exposure during nitric oxide inhalational therapy in a pediatric intensive care setting. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:954–958.
  52. Phillips ML, Hall TA, Sekar K, Tomey JL. Assessment of medical personnel exposure to nitrogen oxides during inhaled nitric oxide treatment of neonatal and pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1095–1100.
  53. Sixth Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency; 1975. Publication 040-000-00337-1.
  54. Mourgeon E, Gallart L, Umamaheswara Rao GS, et al. Distribution of inhaled nitric oxide during sequential and continuous administration into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:849–858.
  55. Losa M, Tibballs J, Carter B, Holt MP. Generation of nitrogen dioxide during nitric oxide therapy and mechanical ventilation of children with a Servo 900C ventilator. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:450–455.

Guidelines for preventing transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep.1994;43(RR-13):1–132.
SOURCE:

Exposure of Intensive Care Unit Nurses to Nitric Oxide and Nitrogen Dioxide During Therapeutic Use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1.  Mohammed A. Qureshi, MD,

2. Nipurn J. Shah, MD,

3. Carol W. Hemmen, RN, BSN

4. Mary C. Thill, RN, MSN and

5. James A. Kruse, MD

Am J Crit Care March 2003 vol. 12 no. 2 147-153

 

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Genome.gov National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes of Health

Online Research Resources

Contents

From NHGRI
Online Research Resources Developed at NHGRI
NHGRI Reports and Publications
The NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP)
Beyond NHGRI
The Completed Human Sequence
Other Federal Agencies Involved in Genomics
Human Genome Sequence Assemblies and Other Genomic Data Resources
Underlying Map Information
Sequencing Centers of the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium
Model Organism Genome Projects
Archaea and Bacteria
Eukaryotes
Databases
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Databases and Tools
Nucleotide Sequence Databases
Trace Archives (Raw Sequence Data Repositories)
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)
cDNAs and Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs)
Model Organism Databases
Additional Sequence, Gene and Protein Databases
Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) Information
Funding Agencies
Additional Genome Resources
Biology Resources
Selected Journals

From NHGRI

Online Research Resources Developed at NHGRI
Software, databases and research project Web sites from NHGRI’s Division of Intramural Research (DIR).

NHGRI Reports and Publications

The NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP) 
Genome sequencing projects currently in production and funded by NHGRI.

Beyond NHGRI

The Completed Human Sequence:
Other Federal Agencies Involved in Genomics
Human Genome Sequence Assemblies and Other Genomic Data Resources

 

Underlying Map Information
Sequencing Centers of the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium

(Listed in order of total sequence contributed to the draft human sequence published February 15, 2001, Nature, 409:860-921)

Model Organism Genome Projects

Archaea and Bacteria

Eukaryotes

Databases

National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Databases and Tools

Nucleotide Sequence Databases

Trace Archives (Raw Sequence Data Repositories)

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)

cDNAs and Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs)

Model Organism Databases

Additional Sequence, Gene and Protein Databases

  • InterPro protein sequence analysis & classification [ebi.ac.uk]
    An integrated database of predictive protein signatures used for the classification and automatic annotation of proteins and genomes.
  • Eukaryotic Promoter Database [epd.isb-sib.ch]
  • PROSITE [expasy.org]
    A database of protein families and domains.
  • SWISS-PROT [web.expasy.org]
    A protein knowledgebase.
  • BioMagResBank [bmrb.wisc.edu]
    NMR spectroscopy data on proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids.
  • Protein Data Bank (PDB) [rcsb.org]
    The repository for 3-D biological macromolecular structure data.
  • DSSP [swift.cmbi.ru.nl]
    A database of secondary structure protein assignments.
  • FSSP [biocenter.helsinki.fi]
    A database of fold classifications based on structure-structure alignment of proteins.
  • HSSP [cmbi.kun.nl]
    A database of homology-derived secondary structure of proteins.
  • Nucleic Acid Database Project (NDB) [ndbserver.rutgers.edu]
    Structural information about nucleic acids.
  • The I.M.A.G.E. Consortium [image.hudsonalpha.org]
    A public collection of genes.
Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) Research Program
Funding Agencies
Additional Genome Resources
Biology Resources
Selected Journals

Last Updated: October 16, 2012

SOURCE:

http://www.genome.gov/10000375