See on Scoop.it – Cardiovascular and vascular imaging
Amiodarone in the Prehospital Environment
EMS1.com
… from myocardial ischemia is correction of the ischemic state.
See on www.ems1.com
See on Scoop.it – Cardiovascular and vascular imaging
Amiodarone in the Prehospital Environment
EMS1.com
… from myocardial ischemia is correction of the ischemic state.
See on www.ems1.com
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Reporter and Curator: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP
This is a novel concept in regenerative medicine that needs attention.
Shyh-Chang N, Zhu H, Yvanka de Soysa T, Shinoda G, Seligson M T, Tsanov K M, Nguyen L, Asara J M, Cantley L C and Daley G Q.
Stem Cell Transplantation Program,Boston Children’s Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School; Harvard Stem Cell Institute;
Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Department of Medicine, Division of Signal Transduction, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115.
Cell. 7 Nov 2013; 155(4):778-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.059.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. PMID: 23561442 PMCID: PMC3652335
Abstract
In recent years, the highly conserved Lin28 RNA-binding proteins have emerged as factors that define stemness in several tissue lineages. Lin28 proteins repress let-7 microRNAs and influence mRNA translation, thereby regulating the self-renewal of mammalian embryonic stem cells. Subsequent discoveries revealed that Lin28a and Lin28b are also important in organismal growth and metabolism, tissue development, somatic reprogramming, and cancer. In this review, we discuss the Lin28 pathway and its regulation, outline its roles in stem cells, tissue development, and pathogenesis, and examine the ramifications for re-engineering mammalian physiology.
Figure 1. Overview of Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Lin28 Function. From: Lin28: Primal Regulator of Growth and Metabolism in Stem Cells.
Both Lin28a and Lin28b have been observed to shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm, binding both mRNAs and pri-/prelet-7. In the nucleus, Lin28a/b could potentially work in tandem with the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) to regulate splicing, or with Musashi-1 (Msi1) to block pri-let-7 processing. In the cytoplasm, Lin28a recruits Tut4/7 to oligouridylate pre-let-7, and block Dicer processing to mature let-7 miRNA (right, violet). Lin28a also recruits RNA helicase A (RHA) to regulate mRNA processing in messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes, in tandem with the Igf2bp’s, poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), and the eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs). In response to unknown signals and stimuli, the mRNAs are either shuttled into poly-ribosomes for translation, stress granules for temporary sequestering, or P-bodies for degradation, in part via miRNAs and the Ago2 endonuclease (left, orange).
Figure 2. Signals Upstream and Targets Downstream of Lin28 in the Lin28 Pathway. From: Lin28: Primal Regulator of Growth and Metabolism in Stem Cells.
The lin-4 homolog miR-125a/b represses both Lin28a and Lin28b during stem cell differentiation. The core pluripotency transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Tcf3 can activate Lin28a transcription in ESCs and iPSCs, whereas the growth regulator Myc and the inflammation-/stress-responsive NF-κB can transactivate Lin28b. A putative steroid hormone-activated nuclear receptor, conserved from C. elegans daf-12, might also regulate both Lin28a/b and let-7 expression. Downstream of Lin28a/b, the let-7 family represses a network of proto-oncogenes, including the insulin-PI3K-mTOR pathway, Ras, Myc, Hmga2, and the Igf2bp’s. At the same time, Lin28a can also directly bind to and regulate translation of mRNAs, including Igf2bp’s, Igf2, Hmga1, and mRNAs encoding metabolic enzymes, ribosomal peptides, and cell-cycle regulators. Together, this broad network of targets allows Lin28 to program both metabolism and growth to regulate self-renewal.
Figure 3. Potential of Lin28 in Re-Engineering Adult Mammalian Physiology. From: Lin28: Primal Regulator of Growth and Metabolism in Stem Cells.
Lin28a, in conjunction with the pluripotency factors Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog, can reprogram somatic cells into iPSCs. Alone, Lin28a/b can reprogram adult HSPCs into a fetal-like state, and enhance insulin sensitivity in the skeletal muscles to improve glucose homeostasis, resist obesity and prevent diabetes. Emergent clues suggest that optimal doses of Lin28a/b might have the potential to re-engineer adult mammalian tissue repair capacities and extend longevity, although Lin28a/b could also cooperate with oncogenes to initiate tumorigenesis. Future work might elucidate these mysteries.
Cell. 2013 Nov 7;155(4):778-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.059.
Posted in Genome Biology, Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine | Tagged Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Lin28, RNA-binding protein, self-renewlal, somatic reprogramming, Stem cell, tissue re-engineering | Leave a Comment »
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Reporter: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP
This recent publication was reported in MedPage today. It is different than, but highly suggestive of our recent report about the Univesity of Iowa discovery of “Oxidized CaKMII inhibition” as a therapeutic target for atrial arrhythmia.
Posted in Calcium Signaling, Calmodulin Kinase and Contraction, Cardiovascular Research, Cell Biology, Signaling & Cell Circuits, Diabetes Mellitus, Frontiers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disorders, Proteomics, Translational Research, Translational Science | Tagged Atrial fibrillation, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, CaKMII, CaKMII overactive in obesity, CaMKII-insulin induced p-Akt, CaMKII-p38-FOXO1 dependent hepatic glucose production, cardiac contraction, Cardiac muscle, Diabetes, Heart Failure, hyperglycemia, inhibitor of glucose elevation, Larry H. Bernstein, Mark E. Anderson, MK2 inhibitors, p38, target of both insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, target of MK2 binding site, University of Iowa, upregulated in prediabetes | Leave a Comment »
Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN
October 22, 2013 | By Damian Garde
![]() |
| Cardiovascular Solutions won FDA approval for its Diamondback 360 system.–Courtesy of Cardiovascular Solutions |
Cardiovascular Systems ($CSII) has won FDA approval to sell its Diamondback 360 device for patients with calcified coronary arteries, a long-awaited signoff that gives the company a chance to serve a large unmet need and significantly expand the market for its technology.
Diamondback 360 is an orbital atherectomy system designed to get rid of arterial calcium buildups in vessels before stenting, improving outcomes for patients and slashing rates of major adverse cardiac events, the company said. The device has been FDA-cleared to treat calcified plaque in arterial vessels throughout the leg and heart since 2007, and now approval for coronary lesions exposes Cardiovascular Systems to a $1.5 billion market dominated by last-generation technologies, CEO David Martin said.
“FDA approval of our Diamondback 360 Coronary OAS allows us to bring to market the first new coronary atherectomy system in more than two decades,” Martin said in a statement. “Severe coronary arterial calcium is an underestimated problem in medicine, with limited options for treatment.”
This 200-page book takes an in-depth look at the biotech industry and the science that drives it. Although the industry itself is constantly changing, these fundamental concepts upon which it is built will remain important for years to come – and decision-makers who understand these fundamentals will be better able to evaluate and predict new trends. Click here to buy today!
In its pivotal trial, Diamondback 360 exceeded its two primary endpoints, charting a procedural success rate of 89.1% and leaving 89.8% of patients free of major adverse cardiac events.
The company has poured millions into the device’s development, and despite growing revenue 26% to $103.9 million last fiscal year, Cardiovascular Systems has yet to turn a profit. Now, with FDA approval in hand for an in-demand technology, Martin and his team have their work cut out for them.
Cardiovascular Systems said it’s planning a phased rollout of the device, targeting the country’s top medical centers over the next few quarters and in the meantime running postmarket studies to affirm Diamondback 360’s value in coronary atherectomy.
– read the announcement
Related Articles:
Cardiovascular Systems’ Q3 revenue grows
Cardiovascular Systems addresses U.S. govt. info request in insider trader investigation
Cardiovascular Systems pursues $33M public offering
SOURCE
Posted in Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures | Tagged Clinical trial, Food and Drug Administration | Leave a Comment »
Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN
NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – Myriad Genetics has sued a fifth firm alleging infringement of its patents covering BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene testing.
In a lawsuit filed on Monday in US District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Myriad claims that Invitae infringes 11 patents held by Myriad, along with other assignees – the University of Utah Research Foundation, the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, HSC Research Development Limited Partnership (Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto), and Endorecherche.
Each of the assignees are listed as plaintiffs in the case, the latest volley by Myriad as it tries to fend off competitors following a decision by the US Supreme Court in Junethat invalidated certain claims by Myriad. The court found that human genes cannot be patented, but that synthetic DNA is patentable.
In its complaint, Myriad accuses Invitae – which was formed in the summer of 2012 from a Genomic Health subsidiary, also called InVitae, combined with a genetics firm called Locus Development – of infringing 11 patents. They are US Patent No. 5,747,282; No. 5,753,441; No. 6,033,857; No. 6,051.379; No. 6.951,721; No. 7,250,497; No. 7,470,510; No. 7,622,258; No. 7,838,237; No. 7,670,776; and No. 7,563,571.
Myriad asks the court for damages, a temporary and permanent injunction against Invitae from selling or using products it believes infringes on its patents, and the delivery of all products to Myriad that it believes infringes the patents.
Invitae in a statement on Tuesday called the lawsuit meritless and said it would defend itself vigorously, noting the June SCOTUS ruling, as well as an earlier SCOTUS ruling, Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs.
“The breast cancer community will benefit from these decisions with the introduction of multiple new diagnostic tests to analyze BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, increasing the availability and options for patients and physicians,” Invitae said.
The company’s Co-founder Randy Scott added, “The issue of DNA patents goes far beyond BRCA testing. Our company was founded around the core belief that every individual has the right to self-knowledge (meaning they have a right to know their own DNA sequence information), and we believe that the Supreme Court rulings validate our view that no company can claim ownership over naturally occurring genetic information.”
Invitae offers full gene sequencing for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 with deletion and duplication analysis for $1,500, it said.
The company is one of several that since the SCOTUS ruling have launched their own BRCA1/2 gene tests, going head to head with Myriad’s BRACAnalysis test, which prior to the ruling had had a monopoly on the US BRCA1/2 test market.
Myriad has responded to those launches by taking its competitors to court. Before this week’s lawsuit, the Salt Lake City-based firm sued Ambry Genetics, Gene by Gene,GeneDx, and most recently Quest Diagnostics.
Ambry and Gene by Gene have countersued Myriad alleging it of antitrust violations, while Quest and another firm, Counsyl, separately sued Myriad seeking preemptive declarations that they do not infringe Myriad’s patents.
SOURCE
Genomics & Ethics: DNA Fragments are Products of Nature or Patentable Genes?
Genomic Liberty of Ownership, Genome Medicine and Patenting the Human Genome
Posted in Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research | Tagged Invitae, Myriad Genetic | Leave a Comment »
Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN
VIEW VIDEO
The last few months have seen story after story about Goggle Glass being used by physicians. But as far back as a year ago, when Pelu Tran, a third-year medical student at Stanford, and Ian Shakil, a consultant at a West Coast start-up, saw and tried out Google Glass, they realized that the implications in medicine alone would be compelling. So much so that they founded a startup exclusively to investigate the use of Glass for medicine.
Basically, Google Glass is a small hands-free computer, head-mounted as a small glass block, on a conventional glass frame, that can have Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and a camera and voice activation. Proponents see the potential for the device’s use over a wide range of medical applications, from cutting down the time a physician has to do paperwork — thus giving the physician more time to focus on the patient’s problem — to assisting in surgery.
Dr. Pierre Theodore, M.D., was the first surgeon to receive permission to utilize Google Glass as an auxiliary surgical tool, while performing thoracic surgery in October. He was able to preload his patient’s information, like CT scans and X-rays, so that access to it would be right there on the “screen,” and he would not have to turn away during the surgery.
Theodore described it as similar to looking at the rearview mirror of your car: “That rearview is always there when I need it, but it’s not there when I don’t.”
Wikipedia
Using Google Glass to consult with a distant colleague, Dr. Christopher Kaeding, a surgeon at the Ohio State University Medical Center, streamed a live, point-of-view video while he operated to repair a torn ACL in August. At the same time across town, medical students at OSU College of Medicine were able to view the surgery real-time.
One of Kaeding’s colleagues watched the surgery sitting in his office. According to Kaeding: “Once we got into the surgery, I often forgot the device was there. It just seemed very intuitive and fit seamlessly.”
In early 2012, a surgical team at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) performed the first surgery using a technology called VIPAAR partnered with Google Glass. VIPAAR, which stands for virtual interactive presence in augmented reality, is a technology developed by UAB in 2003, which provides real-time, two-way interactive video conferencing to enhance surgery.
In this surgery, UAB orthopedic surgeon Brent Ponce, M.D., performed shoulder replacement surgery using Google Glass during the operation. At the same time, Dr. P. Danturuli, a surgeon sitting in his Atlanta office, was interacting with Ponce. The built-in camera in Google Glass transmitted the image of the surgical field to Atlanta. VIPAAR allowed Danturuli to introduce his hands into the virtual operating room. At the same time, Ponce saw Danturuli’s hands as a ghostly image in his heads-up display.
This technology can revolutionize telemedicine. What used to be a telephone call between two physicians, now has the potential for a small regional hospital to get hands and instruments into the field of a surgeon who has the skill but has perhaps performed the surgery only a few times. Obviously, adjustments will need to be made to fine tune VIPAAR and Google Glass.
And, of course, the potential goes beyond medicine. Imagine having the potential to connect to an expert in any field and have that expert be able to reach in to show you how to solve a problem.
Right now, Google Glass is in the hands of only about 10,000 people, (1,000 only in medical fields) using and experimenting with the technology. The thinking is that in less than five years, this kind of innovation has the potential to improve many fields and afford greater teaching opportunities through better high-tech access to information.

Rosemary Sparacio is a freelance medical and technical writer, and she substitute teaches in her current home in South Carolina. Rosemary has always been involved in healthcare and education, starting out in the lab as a med tech and in R&D. Her career lead her to teaching microbiology at a community college, while working in the pharmaceutical industry for Pfizer.
SOURCE
Posted in Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures | Tagged Google, Google Glass, University of Alabama at Birmingham, VIPAAR | Leave a Comment »
Larry H Bernstein, MD, Reporter

Article ID #89: Stanford Dropout is Already Drawing Comparisons with Steve Jobs. Published on 11/26/2013
WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman
An interview by Eric Topol on Medscape of a 29 year-old Stanford University dropout is fascinating.
Editor’s Note:
If 29-year-old Elizabeth Holmes has her way, patients will no longer have to go to physicians’ offices, hospitals or laboratories to get high-complexity diagnostic blood tests. Nor will vial after vial of blood draws be necessary to do these tests.
Barely out of the gate after a decade of secrecy, the Stanford dropout is already drawing comparisons with Steve Jobs (she often wears the same black turtleneck). And her company, Theranos, Inc., which emerged from the shadows in September, just might be healthcare’s answer to Apple.[1] The so-called disruptive technology that Ms. Holmes, a former engineering major, and Theranos have created is said to have the potential to shake up and forever change the way laboratory medicine is conducted. Since forgoing college at 19, Ms. Holmes has secured millions of dollars in funding for her new venture, including $45 million in private equity funding in 2010.[2] The board of directors of her company is a Who’s Who of distinguished former and current technology, academic, and government officials.[2,3]
In an exclusive interview, Ms. Holmes talks to Medscape Editor-in-Chief Eric J. Topol, MD, about the decade she spent building her company; plans for the present and the future, including a recent deal with Walgreens drugstores; and whether she’s on the path to the creative destruction of laboratory medicine.
Leaving Stanford at Age 19
Dr. Topol: Hello. I’m Dr. Eric Topol, Editor-in-Chief of Medscape. Joining me today for Medscape One-on-One is Elizabeth Holmes, Founder, President, and CEO of Theranos. We are here in Palo Alto, California, at the company’s headquarters. Elizabeth, welcome. This is going to be a fascinating discussion.
Ms. Holmes: Thank you. It’s wonderful to be here and have you here.
Dr. Topol: This is a story that has been brewing for a long time. You were at Stanford University, and at age 19 you decided to change your path. Is that right?
Ms. Holmes: Yes.
Dr. Topol: What made you think, “I’m on to something, and I don’t want to do college; I’ve got something else that’s probably bigger than that”?
Ms. Holmes: I knew that I wanted to do something that could make a difference in the world.
To me, there was nothing greater that I could build than something that would change the reality in our healthcare system today, which is that when someone you love gets really, really sick, usually by the time you find that out, it’s too late to be able to do something about it. And in those moments it’s heartbreaking, because there is nothing you wouldn’t do.
Posted in Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics, Biomedical Measurement Science, Healthcare costs and reimbursement, HealthCare IT, Healthcare Reform, Interviews with Scientific Leaders, Technology Capital Expenses, Uninsured and Underinsured | Tagged computerized report, Elizabeth Holmes, Eric Topol, instantaneous reporting, microsample analysis, point of care technology, smart phone, Stanford University, Steve Jobs, testing near the patient, Theranos | Leave a Comment »