Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Abbott Laboratories’

Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: An International Launch by Abbott Laboratories

Posted in Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research, Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment, Ecosystems & Industrial Concentration in the Medical Device Sector, Exec Compensation in the Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment, FDA Regulatory Affairs, Frontiers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disorders, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Health Law & Patient Safety, HTN, Massachusetts Niche Suppliers and National Leaders, Medical Devices R&D and Inventions, Medical Devices R&D Investment, Origins of Cardiovascular Disease, PCI, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease, Regulated Clinical Trials: Design, Methods, Components and IRB related issues, Stents & Tools, Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical, tagged , , , , , on September 29, 2012| 12 Comments »


Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: An International Launch by Abbott Laboratories

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) Announces International Launch of the Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

9/25/2012 10:26:30 AM

ABBOTT PARK, Ill., Sept. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire/ — Abbott (NYSE: ABT) announced today that Absorb, the world’s first drug eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS), is now widely available across Europe and parts of Asia Pacific and Latin America. Absorb is a first-of-its-kind device for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). It works by restoring blood flow to the heart similar to a metallic stent, but then dissolves into the body, leaving behind a treated vessel that may resume more natural function and movement because it is free of a permanent metallic stent. Absorb is made of polylactide, a naturally dissolvable material that is commonly used in medical implants such as dissolving sutures.

The potential long-term benefits of a scaffold that dissolves are significant. The vessel may expand and contract as needed to increase the flow of blood to the heart in response to normal activities such as exercising; treatment and diagnostic options are broadened; the need for long-term treatment with anti-clotting medications may be reduced; and future interventions would be unobstructed by a permanent implant.

“This innovation represents a true paradigm shift in how we treat coronary artery disease. With the launch of Absorb, a scaffold that disappears after doing its job is no longer a dream, but a reality,” said Patrick W. Serruys, M.D., Ph.D., professor of interventional cardiology at the Thoraxcentre, Erasmus University Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. “Patients are excited about Absorb since it may allow blood vessels to return to a more natural state and expand long-term diagnostic and treatment options.”

The international launch of Absorb is supported by a robust clinical trial program that encompasses five studies in more than 20 countries around the world. Study data indicate that Absorb performs similar to a best-in-class drug eluting stent across traditional measures such as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), while providing patients with the added benefits associated with a device that dissolves over time. As the Absorb scaffold dissolves, vascular function is potentially restored to the blood vessel, allowing more blood to flow through the vessel as the body requires.

“Absorb is a leading example of Abbott’s dedication to advancing patient outcomes through innovative technology. Abbott has remained committed to meeting the growing physician and patient demand for a bioresorbable vascular scaffold from the initial device developed nearly 10 years ago to the expansion of our manufacturing capabilities to support this international launch,” said John M. Capek, executive vice president, Medical Devices, Abbott. “We are proud to be the first company to commercialize a drug eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold, which has the potential to revolutionize the way physicians treat their patients with coronary artery disease.”

Heart disease is the leading cause of death for men and women around the world, and CAD is the most common type of heart disease.1,2 CAD occurs when arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed or blocked, leading to chest pain or shortness of breath and increased risk of heart attack.

About the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

Absorb is now available in a broad size matrix to support the needs of physicians treating patients with CAD.

The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold, similar to a small mesh tube, is designed to open a blocked heart vessel and restore blood flow to the heart. Absorb is referred to as a scaffold to indicate that it is a temporary structure, unlike a stent, which is a permanent implant. The scaffold provides support to the vessel until the artery can stay open on its own, and then dissolves naturally. Absorb leaves patients with a vessel free of a permanent metallic stent and may allow the vessel to resume more natural function and movement, enabling long-term benefits.3,4

Abbott’s BVS delivers everolimus, an anti-proliferative drug used in Abbott’s XIENCE coronary stent systems. Everolimus was developed by Novartis Pharma AG and is licensed to Abbott by Novartis for use on its drug eluting vascular devices. Everolimus has been shown to inhibit in-stent neointimal growth in the coronary vessels following stent implantation, due to its anti-proliferative properties.

Absorb is neither approved nor authorized for sale and currently is in development with no regulatory status in the United States. Absorb is authorized for sale in CE Mark countries. Absorb is now available in Europe, the Middle East, parts of Asia Pacific, including Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia and New Zealand, and parts of Latin America.

About Abbott Vascular

Abbott Vascular is the world’s leader in drug eluting stents. Abbott Vascular has an industry-leading pipeline and a comprehensive portfolio of market-leading products for cardiac and vascular care, including products for coronary artery disease, vessel closure, endovascular disease and structural heart disease.

About Abbott

Abbott is a global, broad-based health care company devoted to the discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of pharmaceuticals and medical products, including nutritionals, devices and diagnostics. The company employs approximately 91,000 people and markets its products in more than 130 countries.

Abbott’s news releases and other information are available on the company’s Web site at www.abbott.com.

1The top 10 causes of death, World Health Organization. June 2011 Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index.html 2 Coronary Artery Disease. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. May 2011 Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/cad/ 3Absorb completely dissolves except for two pairs of tiny metallic markers, which help guide placement and remain in the artery to enable a physician to see where the device was placed.4Early evidence indicates natural vessel function is possible to achieve improved long term outcomes. Absorb is a trademark of the Abbott Group of Companies.

On this Scientific Web Site the, Cardiovascular Medical Devices are addressed in the following posts:

Lev-Ari, A. (2012U). Imbalance of Autonomic Tone: The Promise of Intravascular Stimulation of Autonomics

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/09/02/imbalance-of-autonomic-tone-the-promise-of-intravascular-stimulation-of-autonomics/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012R). Coronary Artery Disease – Medical Devices Solutions: From First-In-Man Stent Implantation, via Medical Ethical Dilemmas to Drug Eluting Stents https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/13/coronary-artery-disease-medical-devices-solutions-from-first-in-man-stent-implantation-via-medical-ethical-dilemmas-to-drug-eluting-stents/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012K). Percutaneous Endocardial Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/18/percutaneous-endocardial-ablation-of-scar-related-ventricular-tachycardia/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012C). Treatment of Refractory Hypertension via Percutaneous Renal Denervation

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/06/13/treatment-of-refractory-hypertension-via-percutaneous-renal-denervation/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012D). Competition in the Ecosystem of Medical Devices in Cardiac and Vascular Repair: Heart Valves, Stents, Catheterization Tools and Kits for Open Heart and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS)

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/06/22/competition-in-the-ecosystem-of-medical-devices-in-cardiac-and-vascular-repair-heart-valves-stents-catheterization-tools-and-kits-for-open-heart-and-minimally-invasive-surgery-mis/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012E). Executive Compensation and Comparator Group Definition in the Cardiac and Vascular Medical Devices Sector: A Bright Future for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in the Transcatheter Heart Valve Replacement Market

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/06/19/executive-compensation-and-comparator-group-definition-in-the-cardiac-and-vascular-medical-devices-sector-a-bright-future-for-edwards-lifesciences-corporation-in-the-transcatheter-heart-valve-replace/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012F). Global Supplier Strategy for Market Penetration & Partnership Options (Niche Suppliers vs. National Leaders) in the Massachusetts Cardiology & Vascular Surgery Tools and Devices Market for Cardiac Operating Rooms and Angioplasty Suites

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/06/22/global-supplier-strategy-for-market-penetration-partnership-options-niche-suppliers-vs-national-leaders-in-the-massachusetts-cardiology-vascular-surgery-tools-and-devices-market-for-car/

 

Lev-Ari, A. (2012G).  Heart Remodeling by Design: Implantable Synchronized Cardiac Assist Device: Abiomed’s Symphony

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/23/heart-remodeling-by-design-implantable-synchronized-cardiac-assist-device-abiomeds-symphony/

 

SOURCE Abbott

Read Full Post »

TransCelerate BioPharma Inc. to Accelerate the Development of New Meds

Posted in Bio Instrumentation in Experimental Life Sciences Research, Biomarkers & Medical Diagnostics, BioSimilars, Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics, Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs, FDA Regulatory Affairs, Genome Biology, Genomic Testing: Methodology for Diagnosis, Glycobiology: Biopharmaceutical Production, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Health Law & Patient Safety, HealthCare IT, Infectious Disease & New Antibiotic Targets, International Global Work in Pharmaceutical, Medical and Population Genetics, Molecular Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Pain: Etiology, Genetics & Innovations in Treatment, Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research, Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Proteomics, Regulated Clinical Trials: Design, Methods, Components and IRB related issues, Scientist: Career considerations, Technology Transfer: Biotech and Pharmaceutical, tagged , , , , , , , on September 19, 2012| 2 Comments »


 

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Ten Biotech Powerhouses Such as Abbott Laboratories (ABT),AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) Unite to Form TransCelerate BioPharma Inc. to Accelerate the Development of New Meds

TransCelerate – New Non-Profit Organization to Speed Pharmaceutical R&D,  headquartered in Philadelphia

“This initiative is complementary to efforts of CTTI, and we look forward to working with TransCelerate BioPharma to improve the conduct of clinical trials.”
As shared solutions in clinical research and other areas are developed, TransCelerate will involve industry alliances including:

9/19/2012 9:29:28 AM

PHILADELPHIA, Sept. 19, 2012 /PRNewswire/ — Ten leading biopharmaceutical companies announced today that they have formed a non-profit organization to accelerate the development of new medicines. Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Genentech a member of the Roche Group, and Sanofi launched TransCelerate BioPharma Inc. (“TransCelerate”), the largest ever initiative of its kind, to identify and solve common drug development challenges with the end goals of improving the quality of clinical studies and bringing new medicines to patients faster.

 

Through participation in TransCelerate, each of the ten founding companies will combine financial and other resources, including personnel, to solve industry-wide challenges in a collaborative environment. Together, member companies have agreed to specific outcome-oriented objectives and established guidelines for sharing meaningful information and expertise to advance collaboration.

“There is widespread alignment among the heads of R&D at major pharmaceutical companies that there is a critical need to substantially increase the number of innovative new medicines, while eliminating inefficiencies that drive up R&D costs,” said newly appointed acting CEO of TransCelerate BioPharma, Garry Neil, MD, Partner at Apple Tree Partners and formerly Corporate Vice President, Science & Technology, Johnson & Johnson. “Our mission at TransCelerate BioPharma is to work together across the global research and development community and share research and solutions that will simplify and accelerate the delivery of exciting new medicines for patients.”

Members of TransCelerate have identified clinical study execution as the initiative’s initial area of focus. Five projects have been selected by the group for funding and development, including: development of a shared user interface for investigator site portals, mutual recognition of study site qualification and training, development of risk-based site monitoring approach and standards, development of clinical data standards, and establishment of a comparator drug supply model.

As shared solutions in clinical research and other areas are developed, TransCelerate will involve industry alliances including Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC), Critical-Path Institute (C-Path), Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI), Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), regulatory bodies including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Contract Research Organizations (CROs).

Janet Woodcock, MD, director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said, “We applaud the companies in TransCelerate BioPharma for joining forces to address a series of longstanding challenges in new drug development. This collaborative approach in the pre-competitive arena, utilizing the collective experience and resources of 10 leading drug companies and others to follow, has the promise to lead to new paradigms and cost savings in drug development, all of which would strengthen the industry and its ability to develop innovative and much-needed therapies for patients.”

“These leading pharmaceutical companies are in a position to significantly influence changes in the way that clinical trials are done, so that better answers about the benefits and risks of drugs and other therapies are provided in a more efficient manner,” said Robert Califf, MD, Co-Chair of CTTI and Director of the Duke Translational Medicine Institute. “This initiative is complementary to efforts of CTTI, and we look forward to working with TransCelerate BioPharma to improve the conduct of clinical trials.”

TransCelerate BioPharma evolved from relationships fostered via the Hever Group, a forum for executive R&D leadership to discuss relevant issues facing the industry and solutions for addressing common challenges. TransCelerate was incorporated in early August 2012 and will file for non-profit status this fall. The Board of Directors includes R&D heads of ten member companies. Membership in TransCelerate is open to all pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies who can contribute to and benefit from these shared solutions. TransCelerate’s headquarters will be located in Philadelphia, PA.

http://news.bms.com/press-release/rd-news/ten-pharmaceutical-companies-unite-accelerate-development-new-medicines-0&t=634836499683795253

 

Read Full Post »

Exec Compensation: Big Pharma Sector – one case study

Posted in Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, tagged , , , , , on August 16, 2012| Leave a Comment »


Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Among companies topping the institute’s list:

* Citigroup, the financial services giant, with a tax refund of $144 million based on prior losses, paid CEO Vikram Pandit $14.9 million in 2011, despite an advisory vote against it by 55 percent of shareholders.

* Telecoms group AT&T paid CEO Randall Stephenson $18.7 million, but was entitled to a $420 million tax refund thanks to billions in tax savings from recent rules accelerating depreciation of assets.

* Drugmaker Abbott Laboratories paid CEO Miles White $19 million, while garnering a $586 million refund. Abbott has 64 subsidiaries in 16 countries considered by authorities to be tax havens, the institute said.

ABBOTT TAKES ISSUE

“This is a blatant misrepresentation of the facts,” Abbott spokesman Scott Stoffel said.

He said Abbott did not get a rebate, but paid the U.S. government $700 million in federal income taxes in 2011, and that the report’s numbers reflect a non-cash accounting adjustment caused by the resolution of various tax matters.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/16/citigroup-att-ceo-pay-taxes_n_1786492.html?utm_hp_ref=business

Instructions:

Read entire post here

then —>>> To watch a video on Top 20 US Companies who have been Paying  their  CEO More Than Taxes To Uncle Sam  —>>>>  click on Exec Comp (live link. below) on HuffingtonPost Web Page —>>> scroll down to the video in a Slide format

Exec Comp

Citigroup, Abbott Laboratories, and AT&T are among the 26 companies that paid more to their CEOsin 2011 than they did in US federal taxes, according to a study released on Thursday.Tax breaks on research and development, past losses, and foreign-held earnings were among those lightening the tax load for many companies on the list, said theInstitute for Policy Studies, a left-leaning think tank in Washington, D.C.

Citi, Abbott and AT&T all took issue with the institute’s methodology. All three said they paid all taxes owed in 2011.

During a presidential election cycle in which wealth and taxes are often debated, the study’s authors said the US tax code has become an enabler of large CEO pay, while also offering companies ways to reduce their tax bills.

Four pay-related tax breaks combined to cost taxpayers $14 billion in uncollected federal taxes, the report said.

The four included breaks dealing with performance-based chief executive pay and stock options, as well as the preferential 15 per cent tax rate on carried interest enjoyed by private equity partners and other financiers, it said.

Compensation for the 26 CEOs whose pay surpassed their companies’ corporate tax bills averaged $20.4 million, according to the study. That average was up 23 per cent over last year.

The average was also significantly higher than pay tracked by separate studies of broader groups. For instance, $10.3 million was the average 2011 direct compensation for 300 large-company CEOs tracked by pay consultants Hay Group.

Current US taxes paid eyed

To get its list, the institute compared CEO pay to current US taxes paid, excluding foreign and state and local taxes that may also have been paid, as well as deferred taxes that can often be far larger than current taxes paid.

The group’s rationale was that US taxes paid are the closest approximation available in public documents to what companies may have actually written in their checks for last year to the US Internal Revenue Service.

Among companies topping the institute’s list: * Citigroup, the financial services giant, with a tax refund of $144 million based on prior losses, paid CEO Vikram Pandit $14.9 million in 2011, despite an advisory vote against it by 55 per cent of shareholders.

Telecoms group AT&T paid CEO Randall Stephenson $18.7 million, but was entitled to a $420 million tax refund thanks to billions in tax savings from recent rules accelerating depreciation of assets.

Drugmaker Abbott Laboratories paid CEO Miles White $19 million, while garnering a $586 million refund. Abbott has 64 subsidiaries in 16 countries considered by authorities to be tax havens, the institute said.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international-business/us-companies-like-citigroup-abbott-att-pay-more-to-ceos-than-to-us-government-as-taxes-study/articleshow/15512943.cms

Abbott Paid CEO More Than Taxes To Uncle Sam

By Ed Silverman // August 16th, 2012 // 9:09 am

In this era of increasing scrutiny given to ceo compensation, yet another report has taken a look at how some companies are making use of tax laws and how this compares with the payouts given to the c-suite. Specifically, the Institute for Policy Studies has found that 26 companies last year paid more to their CEOs than they paid in US federal taxes. And one drugmaker had the dubious distinction of making the list: Abbott Laboratories and its ceo, Miles White.

“Our nation’s tax code has become a powerful enabler of bloated CEO pay,” IPS says in discussing its study, which it calls “Executive Excess” and explores such loopholes as unlimited tax deductibility of executive pay, unlimited deferred compensation, preferential treatment of carried interest and stock option accounting double standards. The non-profit think tank also looks at ceo’s who saved the most from Bush-era tax cuts.

“Some tax rules on the books today essentially encourage corporations to compensate their executives at unconscionably higher multiples of what their average workers are paid. Other rules let executives who run major corporations routinely reduce their corporate tax bills. The fewer dollars these corporations pay in taxes, the more robust their eventual earnings and the higher the ‘performance-based’ pay for the CEOs who produce them,” ISP writes.

A few bottom-line findings: last year, 25 of the 100 highest-paid US corporate ceo’s took home more in compensation than their companies paid in federal income taxes, with seven companies making the list in both 2011 and 2010. On average, the 26 companies on the 2011 list had more than $1 billion in US pre-tax income but still received net tax benefits that averaged $163 million. The 26 CEOs on the latest list received $20.4 million in average total compensation last year, a 23 percent increase over the average in 2010 (there is a link to the complete report here).

As for Miles White, IPS calculates that he received total compensation of $19 million, a 5 percent drop. But the drugmaker – which is about to split into two different companies, one of which has a funny name (back story) – purportedly received a $586 million refund. IPS maintains this was achieved, in part, thanks to 64 subsidiaries that operate in 16 countries and are considered tax havens. In a bit of sarcasm, IPS dubs this maneuver “take 64 tax havens and call me in the morning.”

IPS writes “those millions in tax savings are likely to come in handy. After a May 2012 settlement with the Justice Department, the drugmaker must now pay out $1.6 billion for promoting unapproved uses of Depakote, an epilepsy medication. Abbott (allegedly) marketed the drug to nursing homes as a cost-effective way to control patients with dementia and downplayed (its) own research that indicated high risks for the elderly” (read here). The think tank adds that 41 percent of sales reported last year were in the US market, but US operations accounted for 7 percent of overall profits.

An Abbott spokesman, however, essentially called the report flawed. “This is a blatant misrepresentation of the facts,” he writes us, adding that the drugmaker did not receive a refund, but actually paid the US government $700 million in federal income taxes last year. The numbers in the IPS report, he argues, reflect a non-cash accounting adjustment caused by resolution of various tax matters.

http://www.pharmalot.com/2012/08/abbott-paid-ceo-more-than-taxes-to-uncle-sam/ 

Read Full Post »

Biosimilars: Financials 2012 vs. 2008

Posted in BioSimilars, Cell Biology, Signaling & Cell Circuits, Chemical Biology and its relations to Metabolic Disease, Computational Biology/Systems and Bioinformatics, Disease Biology, Small Molecules in Development of Therapeutic Drugs, FDA Regulatory Affairs, Genome Biology, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Personalized and Precision Medicine & Genomic Research, Pharmaceutical Analytics, Pharmaceutical Industry Competitive Intelligence, Pharmaceutical R&D Investment, Population Health Management, Genetics & Pharmaceutical, Uncategorized, tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on July 30, 2012| 8 Comments »


Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

For IP and Legal aspects of Biosimilars, go to:

Biosimilars: Intellectual Property Creation and Protection by Pioneer and by Biosimilar Manufacturers

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/30/biosimilars-intellectual-property-creation-and-protection-by-pioneer-and-by-biosimilar-manufacturers/

For CMC and Regulatory Affairs of Biosimilars, go to:

Biosimilars: CMC Issues and Regulatory Requirements

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/29/biosimilars-cmc-issues-and-regulatory-requirements/

The patent provisions of the Biosimilar Act, 2009 establish demanding and time-sensitive disclosure requirements. ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court is a victory for future development of pathways for biosimilar regulatory approval and eventually biosimilar generic drugs.

With the upheld ObamaCare, critical parts of the PPACA constitutional, and with it the BPCIA giving the FDA authority to approve biosimilars.

Had the PPACA been stricken in part or in its entirety, it would have presented obstacles to the BPCIA surviving in its present form. The US government has been critical of the 12-year data exclusivity period for Pioneer Innovators, calling for it to be shortened to 7 years (12 years is favorable to Pioneer Innovators and less favorable for Biosimilar manufacturers). The upheld ObamaCare, PPACA and BPCIA, constitutional, has prevented a multiyear delay in biosimilar approval. Thus, it was the best scenario for the biologics industry.

Thus, projection of Sales for Biosmilars as % of top 100 U.S. Pharmaceutical will receive a special meaning and an expected enhanced market share for 2012 year end and beyond 2012.

Biosimilars are occupying the Following ranking in the U.S. Pharmacuetical Sales – 2012: Top 100 Drugs for Q1 2012 by Sales: 10, 11, 12 13, 15, 24, 27, 29, 33, 35, 39, 57, 58, 62, 65, 70,  72, 74, 90, 98, 99. In addition the following biosimilars did not make the Top 100 list:

Biosimilar Drugs by US Sales – not included in the Top 100 Drug List 

Recombinate $2.9 1998 — Antihemophilic Factor VIII (Recombinant) by Baxter 5.7 Billion in 2012

Cerezyme $1.5 1994 —  Gaucher disease and Fabrazyme for Fabry disease by Genzyme 200 millions in sales

TYSABRI(R) (natalizumab) revenues were $280 million, in-line with the second quarter of 2011 by Elan and Biogen

NovoSeven $1.4 1999 —  Anti-fibrinolytics by Novo Nordisk – $1.5Billion

Synagis $1.3 1998 — Generic Name:  palivizumab     Anti-virals by AstraZeneca  $570 millions

Humulin $1.1 1992 Insulin Human by Eli Lilly $ 1.2 Billion

Kogenate FS $1.1 1993 — octocog alfa    Anti-fibrinolytics By Bayer $1.4 billion

U.S. Pharmacuetical Sales – 2012: Top 100 Drugs for Q1 2012 by Sales – Small Molecule Drugs (in green) and Biosimilars (in red)

The following is a list of the top 100 pharmaceutical drugs by retail sales in 2012, listed by U.S. sales value and drug name. Last updated: July 2012 (updated quarterly)

http://www.drugs.com/stats/top100/sales

Rank Drug

Sales ($000)

    
1 PlavixBristol-Myers Squibb Company

1,620,790

Stats
2 NexiumAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

1,395,981

Stats
3 AbilifyOtsuka Pharmaceutical Co.

1,340,200

Stats
4 SingulairMerck & Co., Inc.

1,238,134

Stats
5 SeroquelAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

1,161,141

Stats
6 Advair DiskusGlaxoSmithKline

1,139,182

Stats
7 CrestorAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

1,117,904

Stats
8 CymbaltaEli Lilly and Company

1,029,262

Stats
9 atorvastatinGeneric Drug

952,407

Stats
10 HumiraAbbott Laboratories

928,124

  

Stats
11 RemicadeCentocor Ortho Biotech, Inc

899,453

  

Stats
12 EnbrelAmgen Inc.

890,135

  

Stats
13 NeulastaAmgen Inc.

849,971

  

Stats
14 LipitorPfizer Inc

840,715

Stats
15 RituxanGenentech, Inc

756,875

  

Stats
16 CopaxoneTeva Pharmaceuticals

748,585

Stats
17 AtriplaGilead Sciences, Inc.

694,901

Stats
18 OxyContin

662,876

Stats
19 SpirivaBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc

659,818

Stats
20 AvastinGenentech, Inc

632,183

Stats
21 ActosTakeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc

630,970

Stats
22 JanuviaMerck & Co., Inc.

583,603

Stats
23 TruvadaGilead Sciences, Inc.

546,098

Stats
24 LantusSanofi-Aventis

520,584

Stats
25 DiovanNovartis Corporation

509,615

Stats
26 LexaproForest Pharmaceuticals, Inc

491,053

Stats
27 EpogenAmgen Inc.

489,570

  

Stats
28 LyricaPfizer Inc

458,171

Stats
29 Lantus SolostarSanofi-Aventis

448,388

  

Stats
30 enoxaparinGeneric Drug

442,263

Stats
31 EloxatinSanofi-Aventis

431,928

Stats
32 CelebrexPfizer Inc

430,993

Stats
33 HerceptinGenentech, Inc

425,687

  

Stats
34 Diovan HCTNovartis Corporation

415,475

Stats
35 LucentisGenentech, Inc

409,547

  

Stats
36 SynagisMedImmune, Inc

396,556

Stats
37 NamendaForest Pharmaceuticals, Inc

391,638

Stats
38 GleevecNovartis Corporation

391,072

Stats
39 AvonexBiogen Idec

388,623

  

Stats
40 VyvanseShire US Inc

387,167

Stats
41 olanzapineGeneric Drug

385,867

Stats
42 IncivekVertex Pharmaceuticals

371,349

Stats
43 One Touch Ultra

366,294

Stats
44 SuboxoneReckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc.

338,840

Stats
45 methylphenidateGeneric Drug

337,211

Stats
46 ZetiaMerck & Co., Inc.

328,653

Stats
47 AndroGelAbbott Laboratories

311,850

Stats
48 ProvigilCephalon, Inc.

303,029

Stats
49 LidodermEndo Pharmaceuticals

301,354

Stats
50 TriCorAbbott Laboratories

298,834

Stats
51 SymbicortAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

290,669

Stats
52 CombiventBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc

285,487

Stats
53 ProAir HFATeva Pharmaceuticals

284,647

Stats
54 Seroquel XRAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

282,416

Stats
55 amphetamine/dextroamphetamineGeneric Drug

275,447

Stats
56 NasonexMerck & Co., Inc.

274,748

Stats
57 NovologNovo Nordisk Inc.

266,305

  

Stats
58 ProcritJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

264,190

  

Stats
59 AlimtaEli Lilly and Company

263,024

Stats
60 ViagraPfizer Inc

260,678

Stats
61 GeodonPfizer Inc

260,514

Stats
62 Rebif

258,088

  

Stats
63 budesonideGeneric Drug

257,243

Stats
64 NiaspanAbbott Laboratories

255,383

Stats
65 HumalogEli Lilly and Company

244,587

  

Stats
66 Flovent HFAGlaxoSmithKline

241,552

Stats
67 LovazaGlaxoSmithKline

239,845

Stats
68 LevemirNovo Nordisk Inc.

239,576

Stats
69 Adderall XRShire US Inc

239,097

Stats
70 NeupogenAmgen Inc.

238,427

  

Stats
71 ReyatazBristol-Myers Squibb Company

238,151

Stats
72 AranespAmgen Inc.

231,643

  

Stats
73 metoprololGeneric Drug

231,395

Stats
74 NovoLog FlexPenNovo Nordisk Inc.

227,228

  

Stats
75 VytorinMerck & Co., Inc.

218,215

Stats
76 JanumetMerck & Co., Inc.

212,596

Stats
77 IsentressMerck & Co., Inc.

211,526

Stats
78 escitalopramGeneric Drug

210,171

Stats
79 CialisEli Lilly and Company

206,996

Stats
80 AciphexEisai Corporation

203,097

Stats
81 PradaxaBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc

201,065

Stats
82 SolodynMedicis Pharmaceutical Corporation

198,909

Stats
83 fentanylGeneric Drug

197,350

Stats
84 ZyprexaEli Lilly and Company

194,460

Stats
85 VelcadeTakeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc

188,583

Stats
86 RestasisAllergan, Inc

188,501

Stats
87 LunestaSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

187,941

Stats
88 acetaminophen/hydrocodoneGeneric Drug

185,374

Stats
89 PrezistaJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

182,859

Stats
90 PegasysGenentech, Inc

181,693

  

Stats
91 ZyvoxPfizer Inc

179,523

Stats
92 Prevnar 13Wyeth

179,085

Stats
93 LovenoxSanofi-Aventis

178,957

Stats
94 BenicarDaiichi Sankyo

174,619

Stats
95 VESIcareAstellas Pharma US

174,524

Stats
96 Ventolin HFAGlaxoSmithKline

172,707

Stats
97 OrenciaBristol-Myers Squibb Company

172,202

Stats
98 BetaseronBayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals

172,143

  

Stats
99 ErbituxBristol-Myers Squibb Company

171,513

  

Stats
100 DexilantTakeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc

171,179

Stats

Source: IMS Health (Midas).

Biosimilars Drugs by US Sales – not included in the Top 100 Drug List 

Recombinate $2.9 1998 — Antihemophilic Factor VIII (Recombinant) by Baxter 5.7 Billion in 2012

Cerezyme $1.5 1994 —  Gaucher disease and Fabrazyme for Fabry disease by Genzyme 200 millions in sales

TYSABRI(R) (natalizumab) revenues were $280 million, in-line with the second quarter of 2011 by Elan and Biogen

NovoSeven $1.4 1999 —  Anti-fibrinolytics by Novo Nordisk – $1.5Billion

Synagis $1.3 1998 — Generic Name:  palivizumab     Anti-virals by AstraZeneca  $570 millions

Humulin $1.1 1992 Insulin Human by Eli Lilly $ 1.2 Billion

Kogenate FS $1.1 1993 — octocog alfa    Anti-fibrinolytics By Bayer $1.4 billion

2011 US Sales vs. 2008 US Sales (in Billions) for Top Selling Biologics

Source for 2008 Sales

http://www.tbiweb.org/tbi/file_dir/TBI2009/Bao-lu%20Chen.pdf 

Source for 20011, Q1 2012 Sales

http://www.drugs.com/stats/top100/sales

Drug Name,  2008 Sales, Year approved , Indication

[i.e. Drug Name Enbrel,  2008 Sales $8.0B, Year approved 1998 , Indication RA]

Enbrel $8.0 1998 — RA, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis indication

Q1 2012 12 (1) $890,135 1.92% 823 -4.63%
Q4 2011 11 (1) $873,343 1.67% 863 1.77%
Q3 2011 12 (1) $858,997 1.27% 848 -2.97%
Q2 2011 13 (2) $848,230 3.77% 874 3.19%
Q1 2011 11 $817,401 847

http://www.drugs.com/stats/enbrel

Remicade $7.9 1998 — RA & Chron’s Disease

Q1 2012 11 (2) $899,453 10.04% 1,556 10.04%
Q4 2011 13 (3) $817,365 -7.02% 1,414 -9.82%
Q3 2011 10 $879,054 1.52% 1,568 1.03%
Q2 2011 10 (2) $865,903 7.61% 1,552 7.11%
Q1 2011 12 $804,699 1,449

http://www.drugs.com/stats/remicade

Humira $7.3 2002  — treat rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and plaque psoriasis

Q1 2012 10 $928,124 2.50% 546 -2.85%
Q4 2011 10 (1) $905,527 3.18% 562 2.55%
Q3 2011 11 (3) $877,641 3.95% 548 3.01%
Q2 2011 14 $844,296 6.32% 532 2.31%
Q1 2011 14 $794,076 520

http://www.drugs.com/stats/humira

Rituxan $7.3 1997 — cancer medicines to treat non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Q1 2012 15 (1) $756,875 -1.91% 547 -0.91%
Q4 2011 14 (2) $771,622 6.96% 552 4.74%
Q3 2011 16 $721,408 -1.77% 527 -1.86%
Q2 2011 16 (4) $734,378 7.26% 537 5.09%
Q1 2011 20 $684,666

http://www.drugs.com/stats/rituxan

Second Quarter 2012 Highlights: RITUXAN(R) (rituximab) revenues from our unconsolidated joint business arrangement were $285 million for the quarter, an increase of 31% year-over-year. As previously disclosed, during the second quarter of 2011 our share of RITUXAN revenues from unconsolidated joint business was reduced by approximately $50 million to reflect our share of damages and interest that might be awarded in relation to an intermediate decision in Genentech, Inc.’s ongoing arbitration with Hoechst GmbH

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/correcting-and-replacing-biogen-idec-increases-revenue-18-to-14-billion-in-the-second-quarter-2012-07-24

Herceptin $5.7 1998 —  treat metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after treatment with other chemotherapy

Q1 2012 33 $425,687 -0.06% 155
Q4 2011 33 (2) $425,931 7.61% 155 4.73%
Q3 2011 31 (1) $395,804 -0.64% 148 -0.67%
Q2 2011 32 (4) $398,348 3.62% 149 1.36%
Q1 2011 36 $384,428 147

http://www.drugs.com/stats/herceptin

Lantus $5.1 2000 — long-acting form of the hormone insulin.

Q1 2012 29 (5) $448,388 9.81% 3,737 7.32%
Q4 2011 34 $408,336 8.54% 3,482 7.07%
Q3 2011 34 (2) $376,208 4.53% 3,252 6.00%
Q2 2011 36 (5) $359,907 7.80% 3,068 8.30%
Q1 2011 41 $333,878 2,833

http://www.drugs.com/stats/lantus-solostar

Epogen/Procrit $5.1 1989 — Anemia, low RBC

Worldwide, sales of the two drugs – sold under the brand names Epogen, Procrit and Aranesp – exceeded $9 billion in 2005 for Amgen and Johnson & Johnson, their makers.  Johnson & Johnson, which sells epoetin under the brand names Procrit in the United States and Eprex everywhere else, reported sales of $2.4 billion in the first nine months of 2006, down slightly from 2005.

Amgen Recalls Anemia Medications for Glass Fragments09/24/2010 – Drug-makers Amgen (AMGN) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) are voluntarily recalling two brandsof an injectable anemia medication because vials containing the drug may have tiny glass flakes. The drug, Epoetin alfa, is marketed under the brand names Epogen and Procrit.Known as lamellae, the glass fragments are created by the interaction of the drug with glass vials during storage, Amgen said in a statement announcing the recall. The recall is being conducted in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration, Amgen said.

Latest study shows anemia drugs Epogen, Aranesp and Procrit cause strokes, says FDA

Posted on January 7, 2010

Anemia drugs sold by Amgen and Johnson & Johnson have been reported to cause strokes when prescribed in high doses, according to an article from the FDA, recently published in the The New England Journal of Medicine. The law firm of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz is investigating the FDA’s recent announcement.

The FDA commentary said the latest study and previous studies “raise major concerns” about the use of these drugs to treat anemia caused by kidney disease. The drugs are also used to treat anemia caused by chemotherapy. Studies over the past several years have revealed a link between the drugs and heart attacks, strokes, and other problems.

Amgen’s anemia drugs include Epogen and Aranesp. Johnson & Johnson sells anemia drug Procrit, which is produced by Amgen. The drugs are designed to raise red blood cell levels, to promote delivery of oxygen to body tissues.

http://www.awkolaw.com/news/heart-attacks/anemia-drugs-epogen-aranesp-procrit-cause-strokes-says-fda/

Epogen / Procrit / Aranesp: The July 2012 News Report Which Tells Story Of Big Pharma Profits Over Patient Safety And Drug Efficacy

Once The FDA Started Paying Attention The Writing On The Wall Became Apparent, Albeit Too Late For Some

(Posted by  at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

This lengthy and well-presented news report, “Anemia drugs made billions, but at what cost?”, written by Peter Whoriskey and published July 19, 2012 by The Washington Post (free registration required), is a must-read for anyone with a concern or interest in how larger pharmaceutical companies might put corporate profits ahead of patient safety and drug efficacy.

Here is an excerpt from this Washington Post article which will give you a sense of what went on that, in hindsight, is so disturbing:

For years, a trio of anemia drugs known as Epogen, Procrit and Aranesp ranked among the best-selling prescription drugs in the United States, generating more than $8 billion a year for two companies, Amgen and Johnson & Johnson. Even compared with other pharmaceutical successes, they were superstars. For several years, Epogen ranked as the single costliest medicine under Medicare: U.S. taxpayers put up as much as $3 billion a year for the drugs.

The trouble, as a growing body of research has shown, is that for about two decades, the benefits of the drug — including “life satisfaction and happiness” according to the FDA-approved label — were wildly overstated, and potentially lethal side effects, such as cancer and strokes, were overlooked.

Last year, Medicare researchers issued an 84-page study declaring that among most kidney patients, the original and largest market for the drugs, there was no solid evidence that they made people feel better, improved their survival or had any “clinical benefit” besides elevating a statistic for red blood cell count.

As for some of the key events which led up to this revelation of sorts, we start with a June 24, 2011 FDA press release, “FDA modifies dosing recommendations for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents — Cites increased risk of cardiovascular events when used to treat chronic kidney disease”, which included the following:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today recommended more conservative dosing guidelines for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) when used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because of the increased risks of cardiovascular events such as stroke, thrombosis, and death….

Procrit —  (epoetin alfa) is a man-made form of a protein that helps your body produce red blood cells

Q1 2012 58 (3) $264,190 -2.13% 295 -4.22%
Q4 2011 55 (2) $269,937 3.58% 308 3.01%
Q3 2011 53 (12) $260,610 -21.61% 299 -21.32%
Q2 2011 41 (7) $332,466 7.04% 380 5.56%
Q1 2011 48 $310,606 360

http://www.drugs.com/stats/procrit

Epogen —  (epoetin alfa) is a man-made form of a protein that helps your body produce red blood cells

Q1 2012 27 (7) $489,570 -24.54% 555 -17.04%
Q4 2011 20 (2) $648,794 4.67% 669 3.40%
Q3 2011 22 (2) $619,828 -13.96% 647 -18.41%
Q2 2011 20 (1) $720,376 3.32% 793 4.48%
Q1 2011 19 $697,224 759

http://www.drugs.com/stats/epogen

Neulasta $4.2 2002 — used to prevent neutropenia, a lack of certain white blood cells caused by receiving chemotherapy. stimulates the bone marrow and promotes the growth of white blood cells called neutrophils

Q1 2012 13 (1) $849,971 3.33% 331 1.53%
Q4 2011 12 (2) $822,578 4.59% 326 3.49%
Q3 2011 14 (1) $786,464 -3.86% 315 -5.69%
Q2 2011 15 $818,068 4.04% 334 3.41%
Q1 2011 15 $786,288 323

http://www.drugs.com/stats/neulasta

Novolog $3.7 2000 —  Insulin aspart is a fast-acting form of insulin. NovoLog is used to treat type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes in adults and children who are at least 2 years old. It is usually given together with a long-acting insulin.

Q1 2012 57 (6) $266,305 5.67% 2,980 3.72%
Q4 2011 63 (3) $252,015 0.97% 2,873 -0.48%
Q3 2011 60 (1) $249,591 -0.96% 2,887 -2.66%
Q2 2011 61 (5) $252,010 3.16% 2,966 -0.70%
Q1 2011 66 $244,297 2,987

http://www.drugs.com/stats/novolog

Erbitux $3.6 2004 — used to treat cancers of the colon and rectum. It is also used to treat head and neck cancer.

Q1 2012 99 (2) $171,513 2.30% 266 3.91%
Q4 2011 97 (7) $167,657 -0.15% 256 0.79%
Q3 2011 90 (3) $167,909 -2.48% 254 -1.93%
Q2 2011 93 (2) $172,185 -0.89% 259 -0.38%
Q1 2011 95 $173,735 260

http://www.drugs.com/stats/erbitux

Aranesp $3.2 2001 — Anemia, low RBC,  (darbepoetin alfa) is a man-made form of a protein that helps your body produce red blood cells. 

Q1 2012 72 (6) $231,643 -5.86% 293 -7.86%
Q4 2011 66 (15) $246,056 -6.07% 318 -3.64%
Q3 2011 51 (3) $261,967 -10.25% 330 -11.29%
Q2 2011 48 (3) $291,873 -1.03% 372 -1.33%
Q1 2011 51 $294,912 377

http://www.drugs.com/stats/aranesp

The article reports on the decline of worldwide sales of Aranesp drug from Thousand Oaks, California-based Amgen Inc. as of the second quarter of 2007. According to Amgen, the 10% decrease of Aranesp worldwide sales was due to the reimbursement issues related to the anemia drug and the drop of U.S. demand for drug, in which the U.S. Aranesp reported sales in the second quarter of 2007 was only $578 million from $713 million in 2006.

http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/26375335/amgen-posts-lower-aranesp-sales

1/24/2011, Amgen boosts prices to offset Aranesp sales

Amgen is hiking prices to make up for the shrinking sales volume of its anemia drug Aranesp. Bloomberg reports that Amgen raised the price tag on Aranesp itself by 4.4 percent, but also marked up the white-blood-cell-boosting meds Neulasta and Neupogen by 2.9 percent.

http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/amgen-boosts-prices-offset-aranesp-sales/2011-01-24

Recombinate $2.9 1998 — Antihemophilic Factor VIII (Recombinant)

BioScience core franchises include: Hemophilia, Biotherapeutics, BioSurgery and Vaccines. BioScience products represent approximately 45 percent of Baxter’s annual sales, totaling $5.7 billion in 2010.

2007 Outlook – Sales within Baxter’s BioScience business totaled $1.2 billion, an increase of 18 percent from the same period last year. This growth was driven by record sales of ADVATE, Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) for the treatment of hemophilia A, antibody therapy products, including GAMMAGARD LIQUID(TM) [Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)] (IVIG) 10% Solution for the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies, specialty plasma therapeutics and biosurgery products. Medication Delivery sales increased 7 percent to $1.0 billion, with increased sales of infusion systems, intraveneous solutions and parenteral nutrition products, along with accelerated growth in the company’s drug delivery business. Renal sales increased 6 percent to $537 million reflecting accelerating gains in peritoneal dialysis patients globally.

Lucentis $2.7 2006 intraocular injection. (ranibizumab injection) is a recombinant humanized IgG1 kappa isotype monoclonal antibody fragment designed for intraocular use. Ranibizumab binds to and inhibits the biologic activity of human vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A).

Date Range Sales Rank Sales ($000) Units (000)
Q1 2012 35 (5) $409,547 -6.89% 224 -5.88%
Q4 2011 30 (2) $439,867 2.44% 238 2.59%
Q3 2011 28 (2) $429,393 1.13% 232 0.87%
Q2 2011 30 (3) $424,611 0.95% 230 1.32%
Q1 2011 33 $420,635 227

http://www.drugs.com/stats/lucentis

http://www.gene.com/gene/about/ir/historical/product-sales/lucentis.html

Lucentis brought in $1.7 billion for Roche last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.Alimera Sciences Inc. (ALIM), based in Alpharetta, Georgia, and Psivida Corp. (PSDV) also are developing a diabetic macular edema treatment known as Iluvien. The FDA has twice rejected Iluvien, most recently in November.

The FDA pooled results from two Roche clinical trials and found 39 percent of patients who used the 0.3 milligram dose were able to read three additional lines of letters on an eye chart after two years compared to 41 percent who had the same effect on the 0.5 milligram dose, according to an FDA staff report released July 24.

Genentech recommended approval of the 0.3 milligram dose in its application to the FDA since there isn’t evidence of additional benefit of the higher dose, Terence Hurley, a spokesman for the company, said in an e-mail.

Patients who received the monthly injection also were significantly more likely than those who received fake doses of the drug to achieve 20/40 vision, enough eyesight to drive.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-26/roche-s-lucentis-backed-by-fda-panel-for-diabetic-blindness-1-.html

Avonex $2.6 1996 —  Multiple Sclerosis, a form of protein called beta interferon that occurs naturally in the body. Interferons help the body fight viral infections. Avonex is used to treat patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis to slow the accumulation of physical disability. This medication will not cure MS, it will only decrease the frequency of relapse symptoms.

Q1 2012 39 (1) $388,623 2.22% 130 -3.70%
Q4 2011 38 (5) $380,189 0.19% 135 -2.17%
Q3 2011 33 $379,457 -0.05% 138 -1.43%
Q2 2011 33 (4) $379,639 2.45% 140 -1.41%
Q1 2011 37 $370,570 142

http://www.drugs.com/stats/avonex

Second-quarter net income surged 34 percent to $386.8 million, or $1.61 a share, from $288 million, or $1.18, a year earlier, the Weston, Massachusetts-based company said today in a statement. Earnings excluding some items of $1.82 topped by 26 cents the average of 21 analysts’ estimates (BIIB) compiled by Bloomberg. Revenue beat estimates by about $90 million.

Biogen said profit this year is expected to be more than $6.20 a share, 5 cents higher than its May 1 forecast (BIIB). The company has been increasing sales of Avonex, Rituxan and Tysabri, another MS therapy, while developing new medicines to introduce to the market.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-07-24/biogen-second-quarter-profit-rises-as-avonex-sales-increase

AVONEX(R) (interferon beta-1a) revenues increased 16% year-over-year to $762 million.

Novolin $2.5 1991  —  Novolin R (insulin regular) is a short-acting form of human insulin, Diabetes, Type 1 Type 2

Date Range Sales Rank Sales ($000) Units (000)
Q1 2012 74 (2) $227,228 8.96% 2,489 13.81%
Q4 2011 76 (4) $208,552 10.19% 2,187 6.73%
Q3 2011 80 (6) $189,267 4.15% 2,049 4.92%
Q2 2011 86 (7) $181,733 3.71% 1,953 29.60%
Q1 2011 93 $175,235 1,507
http://www.drugs.com/stats/novolog-flexpen
Novo Nordisk launches iPhone app Posted 17th September 2010, 15:11:54
An iPhone app has been launched by Novo Nordisk in the US which lets healthcare staff check dosage guidelines for diabetes patients.

Novo Dose provides product-specific data for the company’s insulin analog agents Levemir (insulin detemir), NovoLog (insulin aspart) and NovoLog Mix (insulin aspart protamine/insulin aspart injectable).

Combined sales of the three medications increased by 24% last year, feeding a double-digit growth in Novo Nordisk sales and profits.

Novo Dose, the second diabetes app created by the industry, tells professionals when and how to dose the drugs, how to titrate and provides information on the blood glucose goals of patients.

Commenting on the new technology, Anup Kumar Sabharwal, an endocrinologist at the University of Miami Clinics’ Diabetes Research Institute, said: “This is where modern medicine is headed.”

Humalog $2.2 1996  Humalog is used to treat type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes in adults. Insulin lispro is a fast-acting form of insulin. It is usually given together with another long-acting insulin. It works by lowering levels of glucose in the blood. Humalog is also used together with oral (taken by mouth) medications to treat type 2 (non insulin-dependent) diabetes in adults.

Q1 2012 65 $244,587 -2.70% 2,570 -3.85%
Q4 2011 65 (2) $251,367 3.78% 2,673 2.81%
Q3 2011 63 (4) $242,208 -0.75% 2,600 -1.78%
Q2 2011 67 (5) $244,050 4.83% 2,647 1.15%
Q1 2011 72 $232,809 2,617

http://www.drugs.com/stats/humalog

Pegasys $2.0 2002 — (peginterferon alfa-2a) is made from human proteins that help the body fight viral infections. Pegasys is used to treat chronic hepatitis B or C. It is often used together with another medication called ribavirin (Copegus, Rebetol, RibaPak, Ribasphere, RibaTab).

Q1 2012 90 (1) $181,693 3.92% 87 3.57%
Q4 2011 91 () $174,833 84

http://www.drugs.com/stats/pegasys

Rebif $1.7 2002 — (interferon beta-1a) is a protein identical to one found in the body. Interferon beta-1a is made from human proteins. Interferons help the body fight viral infections. Rebif is used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This medication will not cure MS, it will only decrease the frequency of relapse symptoms.

Q1 2012 62 (1) $258,088 -0.21% 540 -9.09%
Q4 2011 61 (7) $258,643 0.43% 594 -0.34%
Q3 2011 54 (5) $257,535 1.48% 596 -1.49%
Q2 2011 59 (2) $253,780 0.25% 605 -0.66%
Q1 2011 61 $253,143 609

http://www.drugs.com/stats/rebif

Cerezyme $1.5 1994 —  Gaucher disease and Fabrazyme for Fabry disease.

Last year Genzyme was forced to temporarily close its manufacturing plant in Boston due to a viral contamination. The interruption lead to shortages of two key drugs: Cerezyme for Gaucher disease and Fabrazyme for Fabry disease.

That crisis sent the company’s stock price plummeting from nearly $84 in 2008 to a low earlier this year of $45.39. Sanofi’s offer to acquire the company for $18.5 billion, or $69 a share — along with a 14 percent rise in the NYSE Arca Biotech Index since late July — have helped the shares rebound.

But Genzyme is now on a mission to prove to shareholders that it is worth more than Sanofi is offering, and executives told investors on a conference call that the third quarter marks the beginning of its financial turnaround.

Third-quarter sales of Cerezyme, the company’s top drug, rose to $179.8 million from $93.6 million a year earlier, beating analysts’ average forecast of $175 million.

“In the third quarter we saw our financial recovery start to take effect, and we expect that this will accelerate during the fourth quarter as Cerezyme patients are able to return to normal dosing levels and we begin to increase shipments of Fabrazyme,” Genzyme CEO Henri Termeer said in a statement.

Cerezyme is the principal drug for Gaucher patients. In the first quarter of 2012 Genzyme (now part of Sanofi (SNY))reported Cerezyme sales of 149 million euros (approx. $194 million), up 5.8% from the same quarter of the previous year. The other supplier Shire (SHPGY) reported $72 million in Vpriv sales, up 22%. There is now a third supplier, Pfizer (PFE), teamed up with the Israeli company Protalix Biotherapeutics (PLX), whose product was approved by the FDA in May 2012. Elelyso (taliglucerase alfa) is now available in the US.
Product Cerezyme
2009 2010 2011
 Total 793 720 885
 Ann. Growth Total -9% 23%

http://www.evaluatepharma.com/Universal/View.aspx?type=Entity&entityType=Product&lType=modData&id=15461&componentID=1002

Tysabri $1.4 2004 — Multiple Sclerosis by Elan and Biogen

Global in-market sales of TYSABRI in the second quarter of 2012 were $395 million, an increase of 2% over the second quarter of 2011. The total was comprised of $211 million in U.S. sales and $184 million in sales outside the U.S.

TYSABRI(R) (natalizumab) revenues were $280 million, in-line with the second quarter of 2011.
ITALIAN DISPUTE

Elan derives its revenue almost exclusively from Tysabri and it reported total sales for the three months to June 30 of $288 million, up 6 percent on a year ago once sales from its since-divested drug delivery business are omitted.

That compared to the $299 million forecast by four analysts surveyed by Reuters and was driven by in-market sales of Tysabri that rose 2 percent year-on-year to $395 million, also shy of the $419 million expected by analysts.

Biogen, which detailed the sales numbers when it reported second quarter results on Tuesday, attributed the softer-than-expected Tysabri sales to a dispute with the Italian government over pricing.

The number of patients on Tysabri rose 4 percent to 69,100, maintaining Elan and Biogen’s 10 to 12 percent share of the MS drug market in the face of competition from Swiss drugmaker Novartis AG’s Gilenya treatment, the first multiple sclerosis pill to come on the market.

The average addition of 185 new patients per week was the highest quarterly run-rate since the fourth quarter of 2009.

http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/07/25/elan-idINL6E8IP1VV20120725

NovoSeven $1.4 1999 —  Anti-fibrinolytics by Novo Nordisk —

Generic Name:   eptacog alfa
Product NovoSeven
2009 2010 2011
 Total 1,324 1,431 1,559
 Ann. Growth Total 8% 9%

http://www.evaluatepharma.com/Universal/View.aspx?type=Entity&entityType=Product&id=13483&lType=modData&componentID=1002

Synagis $1.3 1998 — Generic Name:  palivizumab     Anti-virals by AstraZeneca

Product Synagis
2009 2010 2011
 Total 1,042 906 570
 Ann. Growth Total -13% -37%

http://www.evaluatepharma.com/Universal/View.aspx?type=Entity&entityType=Product&lType=modData&id=91&componentID=1002

Neupogen $1.3 1991 —  (filgrastim) is a man-made form of a protein that stimulates the growth of whiteblood cells in your body. White blood cells help your body fight against infection. Neupogen is used to treat neutropenia, a lack of certain white blood cells caused by cancer,bone marrow transplant, receiving chemotherapy, or by other conditions.

Q1 2012 70 $238,427 0.06% 170 -2.86%
Q4 2011 70 (5) $238,289 0.16% 175 10.76%
Q3 2011 65 (5) $237,915 0.69% 158 0.64%
Q2 2011 70 (4) $236,294 2.51% 157 0.64%
Q1 2011 74 $230,515 156

http://www.drugs.com/stats/neupogen

Betaseron $1.2 1993 — (interferon) is made from human proteins. Interferons help the body fight viral infections. Betaseron is used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Betaseron will not cure MS, it will only decrease the frequency of relapse symptoms.

Q1 2012 98 (1) $172,143 2.93% 67 -10.67%
Q4 2011 99 (12) $167,236 -3.76% 75 -5.06%
Q3 2011 87 (2) $173,769 -2.89% 79 -2.47%
Q2 2011 89 (4) $178,938 -2.17% 81 -7.95%
Q1 2011 85 $182,908 88

http://www.drugs.com/stats/betaseron

Humulin $1.1 1992 Insulin Human by Eli Lilly 

Product Humulin R
2009 2010 2011
 Total 1,022 1,089 1,249
 Ann. Growth Total 7% 15%

http://www.evaluatepharma.com/Universal/View.aspx?type=Entity&entityType=Product&lType=modData&id=12399&componentID=1002

Kogenate FS $1.1 1993 — octocog alfa    Anti-fibrinolytics By Bayer

Product Kogenate
2009 2010 2011
 Total 1,238 1,332 1,496
 Ann. Growth Total 8% 12%

http://www.evaluatepharma.com/Universal/View.aspx?type=Entity&entityType=Product&lType=modData&id=11681&componentID=1002

Conclusion

Biosimilars are defined as biological products similar, but not identical, to the reference biological products that are submitted for separate marketing approval following patent expiration of the reference biological products. As one of the ICH members, the US needs to catch up with the EU and Japan as those two countries have already issued regulatory guidelines for biosimilars.

Once Congress establishes a legal framework, FDA is expected to set up a biosimilar approval pathway which will be similar to those in the EU and Japan and harmonized under ICH. The biosimilar will need a full CMC development package plus demonstration of comparable quality attributes and comparable efficacy and safety to the innovator’s product. Table 5 provides a comparison summary between small-molecule generics and biosimilars. It will take a much bigger effort to develop a biosimilar than a generic drug. Automatic substitution between the innovator product and a biosimilar is not appropriate as a biosimilar is not a generic version of the innovator product and is approved based on comparability to the innovator product.

REFERENCES

http://www.wolfgreenfield.com/files/2426_biosimilars_2_final_pdf.pdf

Read Full Post »