Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Scientist: Career considerations’ Category

 

The Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #88: For Accomplishments in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases: 2015 The Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research. Published on 11/22/2013

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

UPDATED on 7/16/2018

2015 ARRIGO RECORDATI INTERNATIONAL PRIZE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AWARDED TO JOHN JOSEPH VALENTINE MCMURRAY AND SALIM YUSUF

The Prize was awarded to the two scientists for their contribution in researching secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Milan, June 13, 2015

Today the Eighth Edition of the Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research came to its conclusion with 100,000 Euros being awarded to Professor John Joseph Valentine McMurray, Professor of Medical Cardiology and convener for clinical research in the Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences at the University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK and Professor Salim Yusuf, Professor of Medicine, Executive Director of the Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

The ceremony took place during the 25th European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Annual Meeting in Milan.

The Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research was established in 2000, in memory of the Italian pharmaceutical entrepreneur Arrigo Recordati, who led the homonymous company through a period of intense growth and development for 48 years until his premature death in February 1999. The Prize recognizes the seminal work of an individual who has demonstrated, through dedication to research, the values recognized by Arrigo Recordati, by granting every two years a prize of 100,000 Euros to a distinguished scientist, of any nationality, working in an institutional setting and not affiliated with pharmaceutical or medical device companies, for his/her commitment and accomplishments in the field of cardiovascular disease. Each edition of the Prize is devoted to a specific theme in this field.

For the 2015 Edition of the Prize, relevant International Societies and organizations specializing in the areas of Cardiology and Internal Medicine were invited to nominate candidates that they felt merited the Award for lifetime ARRIGO RECORDATI INTERNATIONAL PRIZE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AWARDED TO JOHN JOSEPH VALENTINE MCMURRAY AND SALIM YUSUF achievement in researching secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases.Self-nominations were not considered. The Jury panel of the 2015 Edition of the Prize, who announced the final decision, is composed of experts who have provided leadership throughout their long careers in the field of cardiology and secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases.

The Jury is chaired by M. John Chapman B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., D.Sc., FESC, Research Professor, Medical Faculty of the Pierre and Marie Curie University (UPMC), Paris, Director Emeritus of the Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Research Unit, (INSERM), Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France, Past-President of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Members of the Jury are Thomas F. Lüscher MD, FRCP, Professor and Chairman of Cardiology, University Heart Center, Zurich, Director of Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland and Chris J. Packard CBE, Ph.D., FRCPath, D.Sc. FRCP(Gla), FRSE, Director of Research and Development, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Honorary Professor of Vascular Biochemistry at the University of Glasgow, Consultant Clinical Scientist, Department of Biochemistry, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Scotland, UK. Professor Chapman, on behalf of the Jury, officially awarded the winners with the following motivation:

“Unique and exceptional contributions of each candidate to studies and clinical trials in secondary prevention, to the impact of their works on development of new strategies for risk reduction in subjects with CVD”. The winners of the Arrigo Recordati Prize, after expressing their satisfaction for the important Award, gave a brief lecture summarizing their research efforts and results in the study of the secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Over the last 3 decades, Professor Salim Yusuf has built capacity for clinical and population research across the world by establishing networks at over 1500 sites in 85 countries, spanning all inhabited continents of the world. He has trained over 100 researchers, many of whom are internationally renowned leaders in medical research. He has helped develop major research institutes or programs in Canada, India, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and China. Throughout his professional career, Professor John Joseph Valentine McMurray has published approximately 700 original papers, reviews, and book chapters, including several in leading medical (e.g. Goldman Cecil’s) and cardiology textbooks (e.g. The ESC Textbook on Cardiovascular Medicine). He is the primary author or editor of thirteen books.

Professor McMurray was recently identified as one of the 400 most influential biomedical researchers in the world and the only cardiovascular researcher on this list from the UK (Boyack KW, Klavans R, Sorensen AA, Ioannidis JP. A list of highly influential biomedical researchers,1996-2011. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43:1339-65). He was also included in the new 2014 Highly Cited Researchers listing and one of The World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds.

The theme of the 2017 Edition of the Arrigo Recordati Prize will be: “Biological therapies for the treatment of diseases and conditions with high cardiovascular risk”.

Finally, Giovanni Recordati, Arrigo Recordati’s son and current Chairman and CEO of the Recordati pharmaceutical company, renewed the Company‘s strong commitment to research and officially announced that the theme chosen for the Nineth Edition of the Arrigo Recordati Prize is: “Biological therapies for the treatment of diseases and conditions with high cardiovascular risk”. A large body of evidence now indicates that several chronic diseases and conditions are associated with a high cardiovascular (CV) risk. This is largely documented also for autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Indeed, it is now well established that in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the risk of CV morbidity and mortality is increased by almost 50%, as compared with the general population, and that CV disease is the leading cause of death in these patients. Large studies in RA patients have shown an almost 2-fold increase in their risk for myocardial infarction, to a level comparable to that observed in patients with type-2 diabetes. Recognized CV risk factors (such as hypertension, smoking and type-2 diabetes) certainly contribute to the increased CV risk level in RA patients, but do not fully explain it. Rather, growing evidence suggests that the chronic systemic inflammatory burden associated with RA is a key element of the increased CV risk. In the past decade, important new findings have emerged linking also psoriasis with chronic systemic inflammation and a subsequent increase in CV risk. High-need psoriatic patients show a high prevalence of CV risk factors, and may consequently be predisposed to CV diseases. A significantly higher prevalence of obesity, smoking, and hypertension was found for high-need psoriatic patients compared with controls. Striking differences were found with respect to body mass index and obesity (more than 35% of all high-need psoriatic patients were found to be obese). Furthermore, the associations between psoriasis and CV risk factors are reported to be stronger as psoriasis severity increases. As this is relevant for therapy management in everyday clinical practice, CV risk should be evaluated for each high-need psoriasis patient, before and during systemic treatment. All the above evidence indicates that the study and survey of the prevalence of CV risk factors in patients with chronic diseases and conditions, and in particular with autoimmune diseases, is highly relevant. It has been proposed that an effective control of inflammation could help reduce CV risk and illness in patients with autoimmune diseases. Growing clinical evidence has shown the increasing efficacy of therapies and therapeutic strategies, largely based on the use of biological products, in significantly reducing disease activity and the CV risk level in autoimmune diseases. On the other hand, it also has to be carefully assessed whether these biological therapies are safe for the treatment of diseases and conditions with high CV risk. At this point, it is encouraging that a recent meta-analysis evaluating a possible association between biological therapies for psoriasis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) did not show a significant increase in risk associated with the use of biological therapies.

SOURCE

http://www.recordati.com/resources/Pubblicazione/___f62376e579e74cea87b51c3f84292263_/2015-arrigo-recordati-prize.pdf

THE PIVOTAL ROLE OF MICROCIRCULATION IN SYSTEMIC AND ORGAN DISEASES

The term “microcirculation” describes the network of small vessels embedded within the organs that are responsible for the distribution of blood and the fluid exchanges within the tissues. Thus, microcirculation differs from macrocirculation, which is formed by larger vessels that transport blood to and from the organs.

The vessels on the arterial side of the microcirculation, the arterioles (10-100 µm in diameter) are well innervated and surrounded by smooth muscle cells. Arterioles carry the blood to the capillaries (about 5-8 µm in diameter) which are not innervated and have no smooth muscle cells. Fluid exchange between the capillaries and the tissues takes place at the capillary bed. Blood then flows out of the capillaries into the venules (10-200 µm in diameter) which have little smooth muscle, and finally blood flows from the venules into the veins. In addition to these blood vessels, the microcirculation also includes lymphatic capillaries and collecting ducts. It is important to note that blood is supplied to all parts of the body at all times, but all capillary beds do not contain blood at all times. Blood is diverted to the parts of the body that need it most at a particular time.

The main functions of the microcirculation include the regulation of:
1. blood flow and tissue perfusion
2. blood pressure,
3. tissue fluid (swelling or edema),
4. delivery of oxygen and other nutrients and removal of CO2 and other metabolic waste products, and
5. body temperature.

Therefore, microcirculation is a complex system that plays an important role in the hemodynamics of the body, by regulating blood pressure and venous return to the heart. It regulates the balance between oxygen demand and supply of parenchymal cells. In addition, microcirculation interacts extensively with the immune system and the body’s defense mechanisms.

The pivotal role of microcirculation in many disease conditions is well established. Indeed, microcirculation abnormalities often occur in subjects with high blood pressure. Also, metabolic diseases such as dislipidemia and type-2 diabetes induce destructive changes in the microvascular system that feeds the heart, the retina and the kidneys. As a consequence, early symptoms affecting patients, often the first signs of an underlying and more serious disease, can be due to a disturbance of microcirculation. Thus, microcirculation is an essential factor, albeit often poorly recognized, in the pathogenesis of many disease conditions.

With the constant improvement of diagnostic tools, scientists and physicians have realized that many problems affecting patients may occur in the microcirculatory system. Novel techniques have made it possible for the microcirculation to be observed directly at the patient’s bedside. Currently, research using these new techniques is focusing at the central role of the microcirculation in critical diseases. Experimental studies have demonstrated differences in microvascular alterations between models of septic and hypovolemic shock. In human studies, the microcirculation has most extensively been investigated in septic syndromes and has revealed highly heterogeneous alterations with clear evidence of arteriolar-venular shunting. Until now, the microcirculation in acute heart failure syndromes such as cardiogenic shock has scarcely been investigated.

Recordati at a Glance

Recordati is an international pharmaceutical group dedicated to the research, development, manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceuticals for primary care as well as orphan drugs for the treatment of rare diseases. Headquartered in Milan, it has operations in the main European countries, in Russia and other Central and Eastern European countries, in Turkey and in the United States of America. Recordati has been listed on the Italian Stock Exchange since 1984.

Recordati offers a wide range of innovative pharmaceuticals, both proprietary and under license, in a number of therapeutic areas including a specialized segment dedicated to treatments for rare diseases. A field force of more than 1700 medical representatives promotes these products in all countries where subsidiaries have been established. The company’s leading products are drugs for the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders as well as treatments for disorders of the lower urinary tract such as benign prostatic hyperplasia. Drugs for rare diseases are mainly treatments for metabolic deficiencies of a genetic nature. Recordati sells its proprietary pharmaceuticals directly to the market in the countries where it is present and through licensees elsewhere. Pharmaceutical production is based mainly in Italy (Milan), France (Montluçon) and Turkey (Esenyurt). Plants for the production of proprietary active ingredients are situated in Italy (Campoverde, Latina) and in Cork (Ireland).

Pharmaceutical research is focused on the discovery of new chemical entities for the treatment of urogenital conditions while development activities are concentrated on urology, on the area of rare diseases and on the cardiovascular therapeutic area.

Recordati also has a minor pharmaceutical chemicals business. Recordati produces active ingredients for both its own proprietary pharmaceuticals and for the generic drugs industry. Over 90% of third party production is for the export markets.

Key consolidated data

  • Consolidated revenue for 2012 is € 828.3 million.
  • Operating income for 2012 is € 167.0 million.
  • Net income for 2012 is € 118.5 million.

Strategy

  • Continue its commitment to research and development mainly in the urological and cardiovascular areas and in treatments for rare diseases. Special care is a priority in the product development pipeline.
  • Expand through organic development and through acquisitions.
  • Pursue geographical expansion by entering new markets characterized by high growth potential.
  • Develop sales of orphan drugs globally.

HISTORY OF THE AWARD

Arrigo Recordati Profile

“Research is the only true engine of growth for the pharmaceutical industry”
Arrigo Recordati

Arrigo Recordati believed research was the most powerful asset for the pharmaceutical industry. He became head of the family business in 1951, at the age of 23, and transformed the family pharmaceutical laboratory employing 325 people into an international company listed on the Italian Stock Exchange. Arrigo Recordati’s remarkable life came to a premature end at the age of 71, in 1999.

Under his direction, in 1953 the company’s headquarters and pharmaceutical plant moved from Correggio, a small town in the Emilia region of Italy, to Milan, the capital of Italian business. During this time Arrigo Recordati provided the company with a stronger competitive advantage by updating its research facilities with advanced pharmacological laboratories.

In the 1950s and 60s, Arrigo Recordati relied on two strong beliefs: scientific research and internationalization. To maximize the results of Recordati research, he established subsidiaries in Brazil and Mexico. Arrigo Recordati also fostered a close relationship with the United States, signing among other things a strategic partnership agreement with Syntex Corporation (acquired by Roche Corporation in 1990) – at that time a company involved in cutting-edge research on the synthesis of steroid hormones.

Arrigo Recordati strongly believed in the power of scientific research to drive the growth of the pharmaceutical industry and provide products beneficial to public health and individual well being. Efloxate (1955), a coronary vasodilator for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, was the first compound to originate from Recordati’s research laboratories during Arrigo Recordati’s leadership. Other original molecules developed and marketed during his leadership include: dimefline (1958), a respiratory analeptic, flavoxate (1957), a urinary anti-spasmodic, tibezonium iodide (1971), an oral antiseptic, fenticonazole (1978), an antimycotic and lercanidipine (1984), a calcium channel blocker for the treatment of hypertension. In particular, flavoxate was the first original New Chemical Entity developed by an Italian company to be approved by FDA.

Arrigo Recordati also believed that even small companies – if managed with vigor and imagination – can compete effectively in the pharmaceutical arena. In 1984 Recordati was listed on the Italian Stock Exchange, completing its transformation from a small, family-run operation to a modern, professional, publicly listed company.

Recordati continues to dedicate a substantial amount of its resources to research and development, specializing in urological and cardiovascular therapies as well as treatments for rare diseases.

After 48 years of intense and challenging leadership, Arrigo Recordati passed away, leaving a solid, international business projected into the future.

INFORMATION ON THE AWARD

Mission

The Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research was established in the year 2000 in memory of the Italian pharmaceutical entrepreneur Arrigo Recordati and aims to promote scientific research in the field of cardiovascular disease.

The award is presented every two years to a scientist who has demonstrated dedication to the advancement of scientific knowledge in cardiology.

The Prize 2013

The seventh edition of the International Prize in 2013 was awarded to a clinical or basic science investigator who, through his work, has achieved distinction in the study of the pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases.

The Prize awarded 100,000 Euros to the winner.

Scientists of all nationalities who work in an institutional setting and are not affiliated with a pharmaceutical company or medical device company are eligible.

The winner of the Prize was announced during an awards ceremony on the 15th of June 2013 in Milan, Italy, during the 23rdESH (European Society of Hypertension) Annual Meeting.

Latest Press Release

2013 Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research.
The pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases

Award Regulations

The Prize

The Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research is awarded every two years to a scientist who has shown special distinction in the area of cardiovascular disease or the study of biochemical mechanisms of particular importance in the same therapeutic field.

Each edition is devoted to a specific theme in the cardiovascular therapeutic field. The Prize is open to researchers of all nationalities who are not in any case directly affiliated with a pharmaceutical company or medical device company.

The Prize winner receives a sum of 100,000 Euros.

The Theme

The seventh edition of the Prize in 2013 recognized a clinical or basic science investigator who has achieved distinction in the study of the pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases.

Selection Procedures

The candidates were selected on the basis of nominations from scientific societies around the world.

The nominees were evaluated and a winner selected by a Judging Panel of three world-renowned cardiologists.

Jury

Members of the Jury of the 2013 edition:

Mara Lorenzi, MD (Panel Chairman), Professor of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Senior Scientist and George and Frances Levin Scholar in Diabetic Retinopathy, Schepens Eye Research Institute Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.

Dr Ignatios Ikonomidis, MD, Ph.D., FESC, Assistant Professor in Cardiology, Director of the Laboratory of Preventive Cardiology, 2nd Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Can Ince, Ph.D., Professor in Clinical Physiology, Dept. of Translational Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Dept. of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Nomination Procedures
Nominations have to be decided and proposed by scientific societies and organizations invited to submit their candidates.

Each nominator is allowed to submit more than one nominee for the Award.

Self nominations will not be considered.

Nominations will be sent in electronic format, through the dedicated website www.recordati.com/prizewith the use of a password assigned to scientific societies invited to nominate.

The deadline for nominations for the 2013 award was February 28, 2013.

The information received is held strictly confidential. Only those involved in the Prize selection procedure have access to the material submitted. The Judging Panel requires the same discretion by those making nominations.

Announcement of the Winner

The winner was notified with an official letter following the Judging Panel decision and was invited to give a lecture during the awards Ceremony.

Award Ceremony

The winner of the Prize was announced during an awards ceremony on the 15th of June 2013 in Milan, Italy, during the 23rd ESH (European Society of Hypertension) Annual Meeting.

Prize Winners: 2001 – 2013

Filippo Crea, MD
2013 Prize Winner

The Prize was awarded to the scientist for his contribution in researching the pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases.

The theme of the 2015 Edition of the Arrigo Recordati Prize will be: “Secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases”.

Milan, June 15, 2013

Today the seventh edition of the Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research came to its conclusion with 100,000 Euros being awarded to Prof. Filippo Crea, Full Professor in Cardiology at Policlinico “Agostino Gemelli”, Rome, Italy. The ceremony took place during the 23rd ESH (European Society of Hypertension) Annual Meeting in Milan.

The Arrigo Recordati International Prize for Scientific Research was established in 2000, in memory of the Italian pharmaceutical entrepreneur Arrigo Recordati, who led the homonymous company through a period of intense growth and development for 48 years until his premature death in February 1999. The Prize recognizes the seminal work of an individual who has demonstrated, through dedication to research, the values recognized by Arrigo Recordati, by granting every two years a prize of 100,000 Euros to a distinguished scientist, of any nationality, working in an institutional setting and not affiliated with pharmaceutical or medical device companies, for his/her commitment and accomplishments in the field of cardiovascular disease. Each edition of the Prize is devoted to a specific theme in this field.

For the 2013 edition of the Prize, relevant international societies and organizations were invited to nominate candidates that they felt merited the award for lifetime achievement in researching the pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases. Self-nominations were not considered.

The Jury panel of the 2013 edition of the Prize, who announced the final decision, is composed of experts who have provided leadership throughout their long careers in the field of cardiology and microcirculation. The jury is chaired by Mara Lorenzi, MD, Professor of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Senior Scientist and George and Frances Levin Scholar in Diabetic Retinopathy, Schepens Eye Research Institute Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA. Members of the Jury are Ignatios Ikonomidis, MD, Ph.D., FESC, Assistant Professor in Cardiology, Director of the Laboratory of Preventive Cardiology, 2nd Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece and Can Ince, Ph.D., Professor of Clinical Physiology, Dept. of Translational Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Dept. of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Professor Lorenzi, on behalf of the Jury, officially awarded the winner with the following motivation: “The Recordati Prize recognizes Professor Filippo Crea for his outstanding contributions in researching the pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases”.

The winner of the Arrigo Recordati Prize, after expressing his satisfaction for the important award, gave a brief lecture summarizing his research efforts and results in the study of the pivotal role of microcirculation in systemic and organ diseases.

Throughout his professional career, Professor Filippo Crea has kept a consistent focus on clinical conditions related to dysfunction of the coronary microcirculation, identifying the clinical impact of events occurring in the coronary microcirculation, uncovering mechanisms, and pioneering therapeutic approaches.

Finally, Giovanni Recordati, Arrigo Recordati’s son and current Chairman and CEO of the Recordati pharmaceutical company, renewed the Company‘s strong commitment to research and officially announced that the theme chosen for the eighth edition of the Arrigo Recordati Prize is: “Secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases”.

Every year, millions of people are admitted to hospitals and intensive care units following acute cardiovascular events. Most of these patients receive “state of the art” medical and interventional care during their hospitalization.

However, observational data suggest that, after discharge from the hospital, patients are neither properly followed nor receive appropriate evidence-based treatments, even though a large body of evidence supporting the value and effectiveness of secondary prevention of acute cardiovascular events is currently available.

Thus, it seems clear that secondary prevention is not fully implemented in many cases of acute cardiovascular events. Secondary prevention should aim to reduce the risk of these events, thus reducing the need for interventional procedures, improving quality of life and in the end, extend survival of the affected patients.

Important new evidence has emerged that further supports and broadens the merits of intensive and comprehensive risk-reduction therapies for patients with cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerotic vascular disease and peripheral artery diseases. Evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for secondary cardiovascular prevention are available, and are the key reference for clinical intervention. Therapeutic lifestyle changes including identification and treatment of established risk factors (especially hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, obesity or poor diet, and physical inactivity) are of proven benefit and are regarded as major strategies to improve outcomes and diminish premature morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Adjunctive drug therapies (such as aspirin, statins, anti-hypertensive drugs) have proven benefits.

The great impact of innovative scientific and clinical research accomplished in the field of secondary prevention and risk reduction strategies for patients with cardiovascular diseases must be recognized and acknowledged.

The Arrigo Recordati Prize in its next edition of 2015 will seek to identify a leading contributor in this highly relevant area of medical research.

Filippo Crea was born in Cosenza, Italy on 19 September 1953. He graduated from Pisa Medical School with full honours in 1977 and passed the Postgraduate Boards in both Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Diseases, again with full honours, at Pisa Medical School in 1980 and 1983 respectively. During the whole of 1984 he was Research Fellow at the Division of Cardiology of the University of Florida, directed by Professor Richard C. Conti. From 1985 to 1991 he was Honorary Clinical Assistant and then Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant at the Cardiovascular Research Unit of the Hammersmith Hospital in London, directed by Professor Attilio Maseri. He returned to Italy upon his appointment as Chief of the Catheterization Laboratory at the Institute of Cardiology of the Catholic University in Rome. In 2000 he became Associate Professor of Cardiology and Chief of the Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care Units. In 2001 he became Professor of Cardiology, Director of the Institute of Cardiology and Director of the Postgraduate School in Cardiology at the Catholic University in Rome. Since October 2008 he has been Director of the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences.

He is a Fellow of the American College of Cardiology and of the European Society of Cardiology, Past Chairman of the Working Group on “Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation” and Past Member of the Congress Programme Committee of the European Society of Cardiology.

He is Associate Editor of the “European Heart Journal”, member of the Editorial Board of “Circulation”, “Clinical Cardiology” and “Revista Espagñola de Cardiologia”, past Associate Editor of “Heart” and past Deputy Editor of the “Italian Heart Journal”.

In 1992 he received the Newburg Prize for his scientific contribution to cardiovascular research from Professor Rita Levi Montalcini.

His main fields of interest are coronary microvascular dysfunction, mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and pathophysiology of stem cells in coronary artery disease.

He is the author of more than 650 publications in peer-reviewed journals with an impact factor of more than 3900 and H-Index of 60. He has contributed to several multi-author textbooks. In particular, he is the author of the Chapter on Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease of the ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine published in 2009 and author of a book entitled Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (in press).

2011 Prize Winner

Lindsey D. Allan

Lindsey Allan is currently Professor of Fetal Cardiology at King’s College, London. She started her research in fetal cardiology in 1980 with a grant from the British Heart Foundation. Subsequent grant requests were also successful and led to the establishment of a BHF group under her direction, which continued until 1993. In 1992, she was awarded a personal chair by the Foundation. She then held an appointment as Professor of Pediatrics at Columbia University of New York between 1993 and 2000. She returned to London to her current post at King’s College Hospital, London in 2001.

She has published almost 200 peer-reviewed original articles on the subject of fetal cardiology, as well as many review articles. She is on the Editorial Board of several journals, including Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prenatal Diagnosis and Cardiology in the Young. She has published 4 textbooks, “Manual of Fetal Echocardiography” in 1986, “Atlas of Fetal Cardiology” in 1992, “Fetal Cardiology” in 2000 and “A Practical guide to Fetal Echocardiography” in 2008, as well as contributing to several multi-author textbooks. She was awarded the Ian Donald Gold Medal for ultrasound in 1998 and is an honorary member of the American Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

After receiving her medical degree from Glasgow University in 1969, she became a member of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow in 1972. A research year in Genetics in 1973 stimulated her interest in prenatal diagnosis, which later became focused on the heart when ultrasound technology advanced to a stage where real-time imaging of the heart became possible in 1980. She was a fellow in paediatric cardiology between 1980-82 at Guy’s Hospital in London, where she continued her research until 1993. She completed her MD thesis in 1983. She became a Fellow of the Royal College in 1986. She was an attending physician at Babies Hospital, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center between 1993 and 2000 and has been a consultant at King’s College, London since 2001.

2009 Prize Winner

Valentin Fuster

Dr. Fuster serves The Mount Sinai Medical Center as Director of Mount Sinai Heart, the Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and the Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health. He is the Richard Gorlin, MD/Heart Research Foundation Professor, Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Dr. Fuster is also the President of Science of the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC) in Madrid, Spain.

Among the seemingly countless positions of distinction that he holds are Past President of the American Heart Association, Immediate Past President of the World Heart Federation, a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences where he serves as Chair of the committee on Preventing the Global Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease, a former member of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Advisory Council, and former Chairman of the Fellowship Training Directors Program of the American College of Cardiology. Twenty-six distinguished universities throughout the world have granted him Doctor Honoris Causa.

Dr. Fuster is the recipient of one major ongoing NIH grant. He has published more than 750 articles on the subjects of coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis and thrombosis, and he has become the lead Editor of two major textbooks on cardiology, ‘The Heart’ (previously edited by Dr. J. Willis Hurst) and “Atherothrombosis and Coronary Artery Disease” (with Dr. Eric Topol and Dr. Elizabeth Nabel). Dr. Fuster has been appointed Editor-in-Chief of the Nature journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine (Nature Reviews, Cardiology, April 2009) and he is the Editor of the new “AHA Guidelines and Scientific Statements Handbook”, which compiles all the latest information.

Dr. Fuster is the only cardiologist to receive the two highest gold medal awards and all four major research awards from the four major cardiovascular organizations: The Distinguished Researcher Award (Interamerican Society of Cardiology, 2005 and 2009), Andreas Gruntzig Scientific Award and Gold Medal Award (European Society of Cardiology, 1992 and 2007 respectively), Gold Medal Award and Distinguished Scientist (American Heart Association, 2001 and 2003 respectively), and the Distinguished Scientist Award (American College of Cardiology, 1993).

In addition, he has received the Lewis A. Conner Memorial Award by the American Heart Association, the James B. Herrick Achievement Award from the Council of Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association, and the 1996 Principe de Asturias Award of Science and Technology (the highest award given to Spanish-speaking scientists). In 2008, Dr. Fuster received the Kurt Polzer Cardiovascular Award from the European Academy of Science and Arts. In March 2009, he received the Distinguished Teacher Award of the American College of Cardiology.

After receiving his medical degree from Barcelona University and completing an internship at Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, Dr. Fuster spent several years at the Mayo Clinic, first as a resident and later as Professor of Medicine and Consultant in Cardiology. In 1981, he came to Mount Sinai School of Medicine as head of Cardiology. From 1991 to 1994, he was Mallinckrodt Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Chief of Cardiology at the Massachusetts General Hospital. He returned to Mount Sinai in 1994 as Director of the Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and most recently, he has been named the Director of the Mount Sinai Heart.

2007 Prize Winner

Patrick W. Serruys

Dr. Serruys received the M.D. degree (1972) from the Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain, Belgium and his PhD degree (1986) from the Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Patrick W. Serruys is Professor of Interventional Cardiology at the Interuniversity Cardiological Institute of the Netherlands (1988-1998), and the Erasmus University.

Since 1980 he has been Director of the Clinical Research Program of the Catheterization Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and since 1997 the Head of the Interventional Department, Heartcenter Rotterdam. He is a Fellow of the American College of Cardiology and a Fellow of the European Society of Cardiology and scientific council of the International College of Angiology. He is the author or coauthor of over 1400 papers and editor or coeditor of 32 books, and a member of 14 Editorial Boards of Scientific Journals. He has been associate editor of Circulation for Europe for five years and he recently co-edited the Textbook of Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

In 1996 he received the TCT Career Achievement Award and in 1997 he was awarded the Wenkebach Prize of the Dutch Heart Foundation. In 2000 he was awarded the Gruentzig Award of the European Society of Cardiology. In 2001 he held the Paul Dudley White Lecture at the American Heart Association in the USA. In 2004 he held the 4th International Lecture at the AHA and Mikamo Lecture at the Japanese heart Association. In 2006 he received the highest award of the Clinical Council of the American Heart Association: the James Herrick Award.

Summary of Achievements

Patrick Washington Serruys was born on April 27, 1947 (current age 63 years) in Belgium. He graduated from the University of Leuven (MD 1972) and was trained in Cardiology at the same hospital. In 1976 doctor Serruys moved to the Thoraxcenter Erasmus University Rotterdam, which was led at that time by Paul Hugenholtz. He was appointed senior cardiology staff member in 1977 and became director of the clinical research programme in diagnostic and interventional cardiology in 1980. In 1986 he obtained his PhD-degree (cum laude) after defending his thesis on « transluminal coronary angioplasty : an investigational tool of acute myocardial ischemia ». In 1988 doctor Serruys was appointed as Professor of Interventional Cardiology at Erasmus University in Rotterdam and the Inter Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (ICIN), an institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Science (KNAW). Today, professor Serruys is the director of Interventional Cardiology at the Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center.

Professor Serruys is fellow, member and/or honorary member of a number of medical organisations and societies, including the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. He has been associate editor of Circulation (2001- 2004) and is a member of the editorial boards of 14 scientific journals. In 2002 he was invited to edit a textbook of cardiology, which will be published by the European Society of Cardiology in the second half of 2005. He has received six significant international awards: the Career Achievement Award (TCT Washington 1996), the Wenckebach Price from the Dutch Heart Foundation (1997), the Andreas Gruentzig Award (European Society of Cardiology, 2000), the Kurt Polzer Price (Austria, 2001), and the Paul Dudley White Award from the American Heart Association (2001).

The research interests of professor Serruys are coronary artery disease and interventional cardiology, ranging from basic science to clinical trials. He has used clinical investigation and interventions as a method for research of coronary pathology and pathophysiology, employing different imaging and measurement techniques including quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, Doppler flow measurements, and more recently palpography as well as optical coherence tomography. Recently a combination of intracoronary imaging and proteomic research has led to increased insight in the pathophysiology of the vulnerable plaque.

Three major developments in interventional cardiology can largely be attributed to Patrick Serruys. First, in the early years of interventional cardiology (1984) he has described the process of restenosis, using a systematic quantitative approach. He systematically studied by quantitative angiography patients at different intervals after balloon angioplasty, and concluded that the restenosis process appeared between 2 and 4 months after the intervention. Therefore, quantitative angiography after 6 months became the world standard for studies of the restenosis process, and of interventions to reduce restenosis. In different animal models, different drugs seemed to be effective to reduce the restenosis process. However, clinical trials, part of which were led by professor Serruys failed to show a systematic reduction of restenosis by antithrombotic therapy, inflammatory therapy, ACE inhibitors and other medication.

Second, professor Serruys was the initiator of the first study comparing stents with balloon angioplasty (Benestent I) and subsequent studies with improved stent design (Benestent II). These studies demonstrated a significant reduction in restenosis using stents. Together with a parallel study in the USA this resulted in the general application of stents in clinical practice, and approval by the regulator authorities (FDA).

Third, in 2000, a new concept has been introduced: drug-eluting stents. These stents are covered with drugs inhibiting the cell cycle, which are slowly released and prevent proliferation of the intima, which is responsible for restenosis. Professor Serruys was the driving force of the concept of the drug eluting stent, assisted in the preclinicial evaluation, the first in man studies, and initiated clinical trials to test the concept. These trials demonstrated that drug eluting stents almost abolish in stent restenosis.

Over the years, the research led by professor Serruys, has been conducted in collaboration with other academic centers in the Netherlands (Inter University Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands), in Europe and in North and South America. He has established close collaboration with different pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Professor Serruys has coached 38 PhD-students who defended their thesis between 1991 and 2005, 24 of these came from abroad, exemplifying his strong international network of research collaboration.

Since 2002, research conducted at the Thoraxcenter has been brought under the newly established cardiovascular research school at the Erasmus University Rotterdam (CŒUR). In CŒUR research is organised in six teams. Professor Serruys is the leader of theme 4: surgical, interventional and device therapy in cardiovascular diseases. Within this context professor Serruys continues to stimulate and lead preclinical and clinical studies of atherosclerosis, the vulnerable plaque, neoangiogenesis and implantation of stam cells or skeletal muscle cells to improve cardiac function after myocardial function. The multidisciplinary interest of professor Serruys has stimulated several technical innovations and the introduction into clinical practice of different technologies developed by engineers at the Thoraxcenter and other institutions, including quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and elastography. The same multidisciplinary approach is evident from the series of meetings organised in 2003, 2004 and 2005 to coordinate worldwide research on the “vulnerable plaque”.

Professor Serruys has been editor or (co) editor of 32 books and he has published over 1.400 papers (up to end 2005) most in international peer reviewed journals. He has been invited to edit the new prestigious Textbook by the European Society of Cardiology. The scope and quality of these papers is outstanding with 10 original articles in the New England Journal of Medicine, 1 in JAMA, 4 in Lancet, 131 in Circulation, 95 in the European Heart Journal and 73 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

His colleagues have enjoyed working with Professor Serruys at the Thoraxcenter for more than 30 years and to share his enthusiasm and energy. He is indeed a creative, imaginative and visionary scientist, a champion for basic and applied research and an active mentor for fellows in training to become an interventional cardiologist as well as PhD-students. While professor Serruys strives for the best research, and high quality patient care, he also has an enthusiastic and warm personality. Professor Serruys is fluent in French, his native language and he is member honoraire de la Societe Francaise de Cardiologie.

2005 Prize Winner

Leonard A. Cobb, MD, Hemeritus Professor, American College of Cardiology, Seattle WA, USA; Peter J. Schwartz, MD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Cardiology, Policlinico San Matteo IRCCS, Pavia, Italy and Hein J.J. Wellens, MD, Honoré Retired Professor, University of Maastricht; Director of Arrhythmology, Interventional Electrophysiology and Cardiology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands, were the winners of the 2005 Edition of the Arrigo Recordati International Prize.

2003 Prize Winner

Jay N. Cohn , MD, Professor of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Departement of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis and John K. Kjekshus, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo have been selected by the judging panel as the winners of the 2003 edition of the Prize.

2001 Prize Winner

Giuseppe Mancia, PhD

Giuseppe Mancia is Professor of medicine and chairman of the department of clinical medicine, prevention and applied biotechnologies of the University of Milan – Bicocca. He is also chairman of the department of medicine at the S. Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Milan, Italy.

Giuseppe Mancia has been honored for his scientific contributions many times and was the recipient of the Heymans lecture and award from the International Society of Pharmacology, the International Merck Sharp & Dohme Award from the International Society of Hypertension, and the Folkow award from the European Society of Hypertension.

Professor Mancia is president of the European Society of Hypertension and member of the Executive Scientific Council of the American Society of Hypertension. He is also past-president and secretary of the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and chairman of the World Health Organization-ISH liaison committee for the guidelines on hypertension.

Giuseppe Mancia’s special research interest concerns pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy of hypertension, heart failure, coronary and other cardiovascular diseases. His expertise includes ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, neural control of the circulation, large artery mechanics and clinical trials.

In addition to publishing hundreds of scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals and a book on hypertension, Professor Mancia is deputy editor of the Journal of Hypertension, past-editor of various international journals on hypertension, and he serves on the editorial board of more than 30 international journals on cardiology, hypertension and internal medicine.

Professor Mancia graduated from the University of Siena, Medical School where he earned his Ph.D. in Physiology. After graduation he spent 3 years in the United States as a postdoctoral fellow at Mayo Clinic and Foundation, and as a resident in cardiology at Virginia Commonwealth University before being appointed professor of medicine at the University of Milan.

 SOURCE

Read Full Post »

Hebrew University’s Professor Haim Sompolinsky and Columbia University Prof. Larry Abbott Win First New $100,000 Mathematical Neuroscience Prize

 
Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Article ID #84: Mathematical Neuroscience Prize goes to Hebrew University’s Professor Haim Sompolinsky and Columbia University Prof. Larry Abbott. Published on 11/2/2013

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

Professor Haim Sompolinsky of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem has been awarded the 1st Annual Mathematical Neuroscience Prize by Israel Brain Technologies (IBT), a non-profit organization committed to advancing Israel’s neurotechnology industry and establishing the country as a global hub of brain technology innovation.

Professor Sompolinsky, who pioneered the field of computational neuroscience, is the William N. Skirball Professor of Neuroscience at The Hebrew University’s Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC).

ELSC is one of the most ambitious neuroscience centers in the world, providing a multi-disciplinary environment where theorists, computer scientists, cognitive psychologists and biologists collaborate to revolutionize brain science.

IBT’s $100,000 Mathematical Neuroscience Prize, awarded at the 1st annual BrainTech Israel 2013 Conference in Tel Aviv, honors researchers worldwide who have significantly advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of perception, behavior and thought through the application of mathematical analysis and theoretical modeling.

Professor Sompolinsky specializes in building mathematical models that describe the collective behavior and the informational processing in neural circuits in the brain. The principles that emerge from Professor Sompolinsky’s work contribute to our understanding of the system-wide failures that take place in brain diseases, from epilepsy to psychiatric disorders.

According to Sompolinsky, “Computational neuroscience is a vibrant and ambitious field that uses mathematical theories and models to cope with the most daunting challenges — from answering fundamental questions about the brain and its relation to the mind to answering questions posed by the quest to heal the brain’s debilitating diseases.”

Also winning a $100,000 Mathematical Neuroscience Prize was Professor Larry Abbott, Bloor Professor of Theoretical Neuroscience at Columbia University, who developed models ranging from the level of neurons and synapses to large-scale networks, and showed how plasticity mechanisms that change the properties of neural circuits can maintain their proper operation and allow them to change during the learning process.

Nobel Laureate Professor Bert Sakmann, inaugural Scientific Director of the Max Planck Florida Institute, presented the awards at the conference. “This prize honors the founders of mathematical neuroscience, and is a milestone because it gives due recognition to this field,” said Sakmann.

“This prize recognizes leaders in the important field of mathematical neuroscience, whose advances support our ultimate quest to find new solutions for the betterment of all humankind,” said Miri Polachek, Executive Director of IBT.

In the future, the Prize Selection Committee will consist of previous prize winners, including Sompolinsky and Abbott.

IBT’s BrainTech Israel 2013 Conference is exploring developments in brain technology and their commercialization through a “meeting of the minds” among government leaders, entrepreneurs, researchers, leading companies and investors from Israel and around the world.

Inspired by the vision of Israeli President Shimon Peres and building on Israel’s position as a global technology powerhouse, IBT aims to make Israel both the “Startup Nation” and the “Brain Nation.”  IBT is also focused on increasing collaboration between the Israeli neurotechnology ecosystem and its counterparts around the world. IBT is led by a team of technology entrepreneurs and life science professionals and is advised by a panel of renowned academic, industry and public sector representatives including two Nobel Prize Laureates.

 SOURCE

From: AFHU <AFHU@mail.vresp.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:04:16 +0000
To: <avivalev-ari@alum.berkeley.edu>

Download CV

please use the above link to download a PDF copy of my CV

Professor of Physics, Racah Institute of Physics
William N. Skirball Professor of Neuroscience
The Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation
The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences
The Hebrew University
Jerusalem, 91904, Israel
(t) 972-2-658-4563; (f) 972-2-658-4440
haim@fiz.huji.ac.il

Personal Information
Born:  Copenhagen, Denmark, 1949
Israeli citizen: 1951
Married with five children

RESEARCH:

Sompolinsky’s research goal is to uncover the fundamental principles of the organization, the dynamics and the function of the brain, viewing the brain through multiscale lenses, spanning the molecular, the cellular, and the circuit levels. To achieve this goal, Sompolinsky has developed new theoretical approaches to computational neuroscience based on the principles and methods of statistical physics, and physics of dynamical and stochastic systems. This new field, Neurophysics, builds in part on Sompolinsky’s earlier work on critical phenomena, random systems, spin glasses, and chaos. His research areas cover theoretical and computational investigations of cortical dynamics, sensory processing, motor control, neuronal population coding, long and short-term memory, and neural learning. The highlights of his research include theories and models of local cortical circuits, visual cortex, associative memory, statistical mechanics of learning, chaos and excitation-inhibition balance in neuronal networks, principles of neural population codes, statistical mechanics of compressed sensing and sparse coding in neuronal systems, and the Tempotron model of spike time based neural learning. He also studies the neuronal mechanisms of volition and the impact of physics and neuroscience on the foundations of human freedom and agency.

http://elsc.huji.ac.il/sompolinsky/biocv

ELSC VIDEOS

VIEW VIDEOS

http://elsc.huji.ac.il/sompolinsky/biocv

Latest videos from our media center

See video
The Future of Brain Research: Yadin Dudai and Haim Sompolinsky
See video
Physics, Brain and Free Will
See video
ELSC Seminar: Dora Angelaki
See video
ELSC Seminar: Itzhak Fried

Other VIDEOS from the Hebrew University

Israeli, US Profs win 1st annual Mathematical Neuroscience Prize

$100,000 prizes awarded for outstanding work in human brain modeling at BrainTech Israel 2013 Conference in Tel Aviv.

From left, Nobel Laureate Prof. Bert Sakmann; Hebrew University of Jerusalem Prof. Haim Sompolinsky; Columbia University Prof. Larry Abbott; and Dr. Rafi Gidron, founder and chairman of Israel Brain Technologies, at BrainTech Israel 2013. Sompolinsky won IBT’s inaugural Mathematical Neuroscience Prize.From left, Nobel Laureate Prof. Bert Sakmann; Hebrew University of Jerusalem Prof. Haim Sompolinsky; Columbia University Prof. Larry Abbott; and Dr. Rafi Gidron, founder and chairman of Israel Brain Technologies, at BrainTech Israel 2013. Sompolinsky won IBT’s inaugural Mathematical Neuroscience Prize.

Hebrew University of Jerusalem Prof. Haim Sompolinsky and Columbia University Prof. Larry Abbott are the winners of the 1st Annual Mathematical Neuroscience Prize by Israel Brain Technologies (IBT). The two $100,000 prizes were awarded at the 1st annual BrainTech Israel 2013 Conference in Tel Aviv.

Prof. Haim Sompolinsky (photo: Hebrew University)

IBT’s Mathematical Neuroscience Prize honors researchers worldwide who have significantly advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of perception, behavior and thought through the application of mathematical analysis and theoretical modeling.

Prof. Sompolinsky is considered a pioneer in the field of computational neuroscience. He specializes in building mathematical models that describe the collective behavior and the informational processing in neural circuits in the brain. His work helps researchers understand the system-wide failures that take place in brain diseases, from epilepsy to psychiatric disorders.

“Computational neuroscience is a vibrant and ambitious field that uses mathematical theories and models to cope with the most daunting challenges – from answering fundamental questions about the brain and its relation to the mind to answering questions posed by the quest to heal the brain’s debilitating diseases,” said Sompolinsky.

Meanwhile, Prof. Abbott won for showing how plasticity mechanisms that change the properties of neural circuits can maintain their proper operation and allow them to change during the learning process.

Inspired by the vision of Israeli President Shimon Peres, IBT was set up to advance Israel’s neurotechnology industry and establish the country as a global hub of brain technology innovation.

“This prize recognizes leaders in the important field of mathematical neuroscience, whose advances support our ultimate quest to find new solutions for the betterment of all humankind,” said Miri Polachek, Executive Director of IBT.

Read Full Post »

Heroes in Medical Research: Dr. Carmine Paul Bianchi Pharmacologist, Leader, and Mentor

Writer/Curator: Stephen J. Williams, Ph.D.

Article ID #83: Heroes in Medical Research: Dr. Carmine Paul Bianchi Pharmacologist, Leader, and Mentor. Published on 10/29/2013

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

Past articles in this Heroes in Medical Research series had focused on those seemingly small discoveries, sometimes gained serendipitously and through careful observation and experimentation, which led to some of our most important breakthroughs of our time.  I have tried to make the posts more about the people and less about the discoveries

However, though seminal discoveries are so important to the future of science (and should be celebrated), equally if not MORE IMPORTANT is the MENTORING of future scientists and the PROMOTION of fields of study.  One person who exemplified these values was Dr. Carmine Paul Bianchi, who had recently just passed away this August, and will be sorely missed in the field of pharmacology and toxicology.

For those who were not familiar with Dr. Bianchi I have curated some pertinent information about his work as a scientist, professor and Chairman in pharmacology, and leader and spokesperson for the field of pharmacology.  He was one of the founders of the Mid-Atlantic Pharmacology Society and was an advocate and influential in the careers of many pharmacologists and toxicologists.

Comments from fellow colleagues are very welcome (in comment section at end of post)

The following is separated in 3 sections:

  • An obituary from the Philadelphia Inquirer
  •  A section of the history of the Pharmacology Department at Thomas Jefferson University where Dr. Bianchi was Chairman
  • A few important textbooks and scientific articles he had authored

 

Carmine Paul Bianchi, 86, pharmacology professor

Paul Bianchi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carmine Paul Bianchi

By Bonnie L. Cook, Inquirer Staff Writer

Posted: August 20, 2013

Carmine Paul Bianchi, 86, of Boothwyn, a professor of pharmacology in Philadelphia for many years, died Tuesday, Aug. 13, of a digestive ailment at Taylor Hospice House in Ridley Park.

Born in Newark, N.J., and raised in Maplewood, Dr. Bianchi served as an Army surgical technician in Tilton General Hospital at Fort Dix from 1945 to 1947.

He earned a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Columbia University in 1950, a master’s in physiology and biochemistry from Rutgers University in 1953, and a doctorate in physiology and physical chemistry in 1956 from Rutgers.

In the 1950s, he did research at Rutgers and was a public health fellow and visiting scientist at the National Institutes of Health in Maryland.

From 1961 to 1976, he held a number of jobs in the department of pharmacology in the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. That culminated in his being named professor of pharmacology.

Dr. Bianchi left in 1976 for Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, where he became pharmacology professor and chairman of the pharmacology department from 1976 to 1987. In 1987, he stepped down from the chairmanship but remained professor of pharmacology. He retired in 1997 as professor emeritus.

Dr. Bianchi was a member of many professional groups, including the New York Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

He was a leader and author in pharmacology, helping edit an industry journal and making himself available for consultation to medical examiners and experts in toxicology.

He wrote or contributed to three books and 200 scientific papers and lectured widely. He enjoyed mentoring medical and graduate students.

His family called Dr. Bianchi “a true renaissance man” who was as comfortable discussing English, history, and politics as he was the sciences.

 

 

 

The following was taken from a history of  Department of Pharmacology  at Thomas Jefferson University  and can be viewed at: http://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=wagner2

 

 

Carmine Paul Bianchi, Ph.D;

Third Chairman (1976-1986)

The new Chairman of the Department, effective

July 1, 1976, was Carmine Paul Bianchi, Ph.D.

(Figure 8-3) from the University of Pennsylvania

School of Medicine, where he had been Professor

of Pharmacology since [969 and a member of the

faculty of that Department since 1961.

Dr. Bianchi was born on April 9, [927, in

Newark, New Jersey. After receiving his diploma

at Columbia High School in 1945, he spent two

years in the Army Medical Corps as Technical Sgt.

Fourth Grade. He then attended Columbia

University, where he majored in chemistry and

obtained the B.A. degree in 1950. Like Dr.

Gruber, the first Chairman of the Pharmacology

Department at Jefferson, Bianchi earned his Ph.D.

in physiology. He pursued his graduate studies at

Rutgers University, supplementing his physiology

major with a biochemistry minor for the M.S.

degree in [953 and with a physical chemistry minor

for the Ph.D. degree in 1956. Dr. Bianchi then

spent several years at the National Institutes of

Health-two years as a Public Health Fellow and

one as a Visiting Scientist. Following that he was

Assistant Member of the Institute for Muscle

Disease in New York for one year. In 1961 Dr.

Bianchi became classified professionally as a

pharmacologist by becoming an Associate in the

Department of Pharmacology at the University of

Pennsylvania School of Medicine. There he

advanced to Professorship in 1969 and remained

until he came to Jefferson. The evolution of Dr.

Bianchi’s career from physiology to pharmacology

was the logical result of his investigations of the

effect of various drugs on the metabolism and

distribution of some of the important elements of

the body, notably calcium. His major field of

interest became classified and remained in

electrolyte pharmacology.

Throughout his career Dr. Bianchi has been

very active in the affairs of outside professional

organizations. He is a member of the American

Society for Pharmacology and Experimental

Therapeutics, the American Physiological Society,

the American Chemical Society, and the

International Society of Toxicology, to name

only a few. He served as President of both the

Philadelphia Physiological Society and the John

Morgan Society in the same year (1973-1974), and

of the Philadelphia Chapter of the Society for

Neuroscience (1979-1980). He gave much time

and valuable services as Field Editor for the

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental

Therapeutics ([970-1979) and as a member of the

Pharmacology Section of the National Board of

Medical Examiners (1981-1985).

After Dr. Bianchi became Chairman no

immediate changes in the general structure and

activities of the Department took place. He

enlarged the Department and filled vacancies

occasioned by the retirement of some faculty

members. The didactic schedules and subject

matter offered to the medical and graduate

students underwent only minor annual changes.

Research activities were augmented by the

addition of Dr. Bianchi’s specialty in electrolyte

pharmacology and the appointments of new staff

members for investigations in that and related

flelds. Through the following decade there was a

marked change in the faculty structure of the

Department. The [975 Jefferson catalogue, for

example, listed 15 faculty appointments in

Pharmacology, of which eight were on a primary

full-time basis with offices and laboratories in the

Department. In 1985 there were 36 faculty

appointments of which eight were on a primary

full-time basis. The large increase in the total

number of faculty resulted from adjunct

appointments from outside organizations and from

secondary appointments of faculty members of the

Clinical Departments at Jefferson. This expansion

reflected a broadening of interests and interactions

on both the scientific and clinical fronts in clinical

pharmacology and clinical toxicology.

A notable addition to the faculty of the

Department in 1978 was Dr. Hyman Menduke

as Professor of Pharmacology

(Biostatistics). After receiving his Ph.D. in

Economic Statistics at the University of

Pennsylvania, Menduke came to Jefferson in 1953

as Assistant Professor of Biostatistics with no

official Departmental affiliation until 1963, when

he was appointed Professor of Preventive

Medicine (Biostatistics). When Dr. Menduke first

came to Jefferson he gave a ten-hour course in

biostatistics to the second-year medical students in

time provided during their pharmacology course.

Through the years his offerings expanded to a

12-hour course for freshman medical students and

introductory and advanced courses for graduate

students. An early and valuable contribution was a

series of individual conferences with graduate

students on the statistical planning of their

research problems and the later analysis of their

data.

 

The interests and activities of the Department in

research in toxicology have been emphasized.

Toxicology continued as an important part of the

research program after Dr. Bianchi became

Chairman in 1976, although under his direction

the major emphasis in research became redirected

toward the general areas of cell pharmacology and

neuropharmacology.

In accord with its continuing research and

teaching activities in toxicology, the Department

starting in 1977 organized a series of annual

workshops on Industrial Toxicology sponsored by

the College of Graduate Studies. These were

four-day symposia on important toxicologic

problems in industry and the general environment,

presented by toxicologically involved Jefferson

faculty and by invited experts from other

universities, industry, and government.

In 1979 the Department was awarded a training

grant in Industrial and Environmental Toxicology

by the National Institute of Environmental Health

Sciences. The purpose of this award was to

provide postdoctoral training in toxicology for

individuals who had previously received their

Ph.D. degrees in other sciences. Ten M.S. degrees

were subsequently awarded in this program

through the years from 1981 to 1986.

On December 14, 1978, a full day’s workshop

with outside invited experts was held to discuss

the formation of a Toxicology Center and the

establishment of a Chair in Toxicology-Pathology

to broaden the base of research and training in

toxicology at Jefferson. It was envisioned that the

Center would be an administrative Division within

the Department of Pharmacology, with research

participation from other basic science departments

and the Department of Medicine. Although funds

accumulated in support of a Toxicology Center,

disagreements developed relating to the

administrative base of the Center.

 

A few articles from Dr. Bianchi showing the diversity of his research interests including calcium mobilization, neurotoxicology, and cellular metabolism and physiology.

Muscle fatigue and the role of transverse tubules.

Bianchi CP, Narayan S.

Science. 1982 Jan 15;215(4530):295-6. No abstract available.

 

Effect of adenosine on oxygen uptake and electrolyte content of frog sartorius muscle.

Prosdocimi M, Bianchi CP.

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Jul;218(1):92-6.

 

The effect of diazepam on tension and electrolyte distribution in frog muscle.

Degroof RC, Bianchi CP, Narayan S.

Eur J Pharmacol. 1980 Aug 29;66(2-3):193-9.

 

Steady state maintenance of electrolytes in the spinal cord of the frog.

Bianchi CP, Erulkar SD.

J Neurochem. 1979 Jun;32(6):1671-7. No abstract available.

An in-vitro model of anesthetic hypertonic hyperpyrexia, halothane–caffeine-induced muscle contractures: prevention of contracture by procainamide.

Strobel GE, Bianchi CP.

Anesthesiology. 1971 Nov;35(5):465-73. No abstract available.

 

The effects of psychoactive agents on calcium uptake by preparations of rat brain mitochondria.

Tjioe S, Haugaard N, Bianchi CP.

J Neurochem. 1971 Nov;18(11):2171-8. No abstract available.

 

The effect of veratridine on sodium-sensitive radiocalcium uptake in frog sartorius muscle.

Johnson P, Bianchi CP.

Eur J Pharmacol. 1971 Sep;16(1):90-9. No abstract available.

 

The function of ATP in Ca2+ uptake by rat brain mitochondria.

Tjioe S, Bianchi CP, Haugaard N.

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970 Sep 1;216(2):270-3. No abstract availabl

 

The effects of pH gradients on the uptake and distribution of C14-procaine and lidocaine in intact and desheathed sciatic nerve trunks.

Strobel GE, Bianchi CP.

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1970 Mar;172(1):18-32. No abstract available

 

 

More articles by CP Bianchi  can be found at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Bianchi%20CP[auth]

The following is one of the seminal books Dr. Bianchi authored:

 

Role of Calcium Channels of the Sarcolemma and the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Skeletal Muscle Functions

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-3362-7_17/lookinside/000.png

AND

Advances in General and Cellular Pharmacology (1976)

Toshio Narahashi; Carmine Paul Bianchi

The author of the Advances in General and Cellular Pharmacology is Toshio Narahashi; Carmine Paul Bianchi – very good writer. You can download this e-book absolutely for free. This ebook’s ISBN number is 9781461582007. if you were searching for for free download of kindle books, google books, free pdf books, pdf ebooks, e-books, pdf files or pdf ebooks just stay here for a while, download what you wanted for free and enjoy!

Advances in General and Cellular Pharmacology – Toshio Narahashi; Carmine Paul Bianchi – PDF Free Download Ebook also for Kindle

 

Other articles in this series published on this site include:

Heroes in Medical Research: Dr. Robert Ting, Ph.D. and Retrovirus in AIDS and Cancer

Heroes in Medical Research: Barnett Rosenberg and the Discovery of Cisplatin

Volume Two: Interviews with Scientific Leaders

 

 

Read Full Post »

Gene Expression: Algorithms for Protein Dynamics

Reporter:  Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Stanford-developed algorithm reveals complex protein dynamics behind gene expression

BY KRISTA CONGER

Michael Snyder

In yet another coup for a research concept known as “big data,” researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine have developed a computerized algorithm to understand the complex and rapid choreography of hundreds of proteins that interact in mindboggling combinations to govern how genes are flipped on and off within a cell.

To do so, they coupled findings from 238 DNA-protein-binding experiments performed by the ENCODE project — a massive, multiyear international effort to identify the functional elements of the human genome — with a laboratory-based technique to identify binding patterns among the proteins themselves.

The analysis is sensitive enough to have identified many previously unsuspected, multipartner trysts. It can also be performed quickly and repeatedly to track how a cell responds to environmental changes or crucial developmental signals.

“At a very basic level, we are learning who likes to work with whom to regulate around 20,000 human genes,” said Michael Snyder, PhD, professor and chair of genetics at Stanford. “If you had to look through all possible interactions pair-wise, it would be ridiculously impossible. Here we can look at thousands of combinations in an unbiased manner and pull out important and powerful information. It gives us an unprecedented level of understanding.”

Snyder is the senior author of a paper describing the research published Oct. 24 in Cell. The lead authors are postdoctoral scholars Dan Xie, PhD, Alan Boyle, PhD, and Linfeng Wu, PhD.

Proteins control gene expression by either binding to specific regions of DNA, or by interacting with other DNA-bound proteins to modulate their function. Previously, researchers could only analyze two to three proteins and DNA sequences at a time, and were unable to see the true complexities of the interactions among proteins and DNA that occur in living cells.

The challenge resembled trying to figure out interactions in a crowded mosh pit by studying a few waltzing couples in an otherwise empty ballroom, and it has severely limited what could be learned about the dynamics of gene expression.

The ENCODE, for the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements, project was a five-year collaboration of more than 440 scientists in 32 labs around the world to reveal the complex interplay among regulatory regions, proteins and RNA molecules that governs when and how genes are expressed. The project has been generating a treasure trove of data for researchers to analyze for the last eight years.

In this study, the researchers combined data from genomics (a field devoted to the study of genes) and proteomics (which focuses on proteins and their interactions). They studied 128 proteins, called trans-acting factors, which are known to regulate gene expression by binding to regulatory regions within the genome. Some of the regions control the expression of nearby genes; others affect the expression of genes great distances away.

The researchers used 238 data sets generated by the ENCODE project to study the specific DNA sequences bound by each of the 128 trans-acting factors. But these factors aren’t monogamous; they bind many different sequences in a variety of protein-DNA combinations. Xie, Boyle and Snyder designed a machine-learning algorithm to analyze all the data and identify which trans-acting factors tend to be seen together and which DNA sequences they prefer.

Wu then performed immunoprecipitation experiments, which use antibodies to identify protein interactions in the cell nucleus. In this way, they were able to tell which proteins interacted directly with one another, and which were seen together because their preferred DNA binding sites were adjoining.

“Before our work, only the combination of two or three regulatory proteins were studied, which oversimplified how gene regulators collaborate to find their targets,” Xie said. “With our method we are able to study the combination of more than 100 regulators and see a much more complex structure of collaboration. For example, it had been believed that a key regulator of cell proliferation called FOS typically only works with JUN protein family members. We show, in addition to JUN, FOS has different partners under different circumstances. In fact, we found almost all the canonical combinations of two or three trans-acting factors have many more partners than we previously thought.”

To broaden their analysis, the researchers included data from other sources that explored protein-binding patterns in five cell types. They found that patterns of co-localization among proteins, in which several proteins are found clustered closely on the DNA to govern gene expression, vary according to cell type and the conditions under which the cells are grown. They also found that many of these clusters can be explained through interactions among proteins, and that not every protein bound to DNA directly.

“We’d like to understand how these interactions work together to make different cell types and how they gain their unique identities in development,” Snyder said. “Furthermore, diseased cells will have a very different type of wiring diagram. We hope to understand how these cells go astray.”

Other Stanford co-authors include life science research assistant Jie Zhai and life science research associate Trupti Kawli, PhD.

The research was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute (grants U54HG004558 and U54HG006996).

Information about Stanford’s Department of Genetics, which also supported the work, is available at http://genetics.stanford.edu.

PRINT MEDIA CONTACT
Krista Conger | Tel (650) 725-5371
kristac@stanford.edu
BROADCAST MEDIA CONTACT
M.A. Malone | Tel (650) 723-6912
mamalone@stanford.edu

Stanford Medicine integrates research, medical education and patient care at its three institutions – Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital. For more information, please visit the Office of Communication & Public Affairs site at

http://mednews.stanford.edu/.http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2013/october/snyder.html?goback=%2Egde_5180384_member_5799368448383397888#sthash%2EhU03LKIX%2Edpuf

 

Dynamic trans-Acting Factor Colocalization in Human Cells

Cell, Volume 155, Issue 3, 713-724, 24 October 2013
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.043

Authors

    • Highlights
    • Colocalization patterns of 128 TFs in human cells
    • An application of SOMs to study high-dimensional TF colocalization patterns
    • Colocalization patterns are dynamic through stimulation and across cell types
    • Many TF colocalizations can be explained by protein-protein interaction

    Summary

    Different trans-acting factors (TFs) collaborate and act in concert at distinct loci to perform accurate regulation of their target genes. To date, the cobinding of TF pairs has been investigated in a limited context both in terms of the number of factors within a cell type and across cell types and the extent of combinatorial colocalizations. Here, we use an approach to analyze TF colocalization within a cell type and across multiple cell lines at an unprecedented level. We extend this approach with large-scale mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitations of 50 TFs. Our combined approach reveals large numbers of interesting TF-TF associations. We observe extensive change in TF colocalizations both within a cell type exposed to different conditions and across multiple cell types. We show distinct functional annotations and properties of different TF cobinding patterns and provide insights into the complex regulatory landscape of the cell.

    http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674%2813%2901217-8#!

    Personalized medicine aims to assess medical risks, monitor, diagnose and treat patients according to their specific genetic composition and molecular phenotype. The advent of genome sequencing and the analysis of physiological states has proven to be powerful (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2011). However, its implementation for the analysis of otherwise healthy individuals for estimation of disease risk and medical interpretation is less clear. Much of the genome is difficult to interpret and many complex diseases, such as diabetes, neurological disorders and cancer, likely involve a large number of different genes and biological pathways (Ashley et al., 2010,Grayson et al., 2011,Li et al., 2011), as well as environmental contributors that can be difficult to assess. As such, the combination of genomic information along with a detailed molecular analysis of samples will be important for predicting, diagnosing and treating diseases as well as for understanding the onset, progression, and prevalence of disease states (Snyder et al., 2009).

    Presently, healthy and diseased states are typically followed using a limited number of assays that analyze a small number of markers of distinct types. With the advancement of many new technologies, it is now possible to analyze upward of 105 molecular constituents. For example, DNA microarrays have allowed the subcategorization of lymphomas and gliomas (Mischel et al., 2003), and RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has identified breast cancer transcript isoforms (Li et al., 2011,van der Werf et al., 2007,Wu et al., 2010,Lapuk et al., 2010). Although transcriptome and RNA splicing profiling are powerful and convenient, they provide a partial portrait of an organism’s physiological state. Transcriptomic data, when combined with genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data are expected to provide a much deeper understanding of normal and diseased states (Snyder et al., 2010). To date, comprehensive integrative omics profiles have been limited and have not been applied to the analysis of generally healthy individuals.

    To obtain a better understanding of: (1) how to generate an integrative personal omics profile (iPOP) and examine as many biological components as possible, (2) how these components change during healthy and diseased states, and (3) how this information can be combined with genomic information to estimate disease risk and gain new insights into diseased states, we performed extensive omics profiling of blood components from a generally healthy individual over a 14 month period (24 months total when including time points with other molecular analyses). We determined the whole-genome sequence (WGS) of the subject, and together with transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and autoantibody profiles, used this information to generate an iPOP. We analyzed the iPOP of the individual over the course of healthy states and two viral infections (Figure 1A). Our results indicate that disease risk can be estimated by a whole-genome sequence and by regularly monitoring health states with iPOP disease onset may also be observed. The wealth of information provided by detailed longitudinal iPOP revealed unexpected molecular complexity, which exhibited dynamic changes during healthy and diseased states, and provided insight into multiple biological processes. Detailed omics profiling coupled with genome sequencing can provide molecular and physiological information of medical significance. This approach can be generalized for personalized health monitoring and medicine.

     

    Read Full Post »

    Healthcare Startups Accelerator is Reaching Out: Deadline November 11, 2013

    Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    Applications for companies are due November 11, 2013.

    We are also seeking exceptional individuals looking to join a team, particularly those with software development or data science skills. Individuals interested in working with one of the startups can also apply to the program and applications for individuals are due December 16, 2013. Individuals will be matched with companies throughout January.

    DreamIt Health Baltimore 2014

    baltimorebrought to you byAPPLY TODAY

    Applications are due November 11, 2013

    Apply as a company | Apply as an individual

    Follow us on Twitter | DreamIt Ventures on Facebook

    DreamIt Health Baltimore is designed to speed the growth and success of early-stage health IT companies through its program in Central Maryland. Powered by the Johns Hopkins University, BioHealth Innovation, and DreamIt Ventures – the program gives participants access and advantages typically out-of-reach to healthcare startups.

    DreamIt works with extraordinary teams to create exceptional companies, accomplishing in 3-6 months what would otherwise take years. DreamIt accelerators are characterized by seed capital, intense 1-on-1 mentorship from dedicated, previously successful tech entrepreneurs, access to key people, expertise, and information typically beyond the reach of a startup, informal education from leading industry practitioners, a robust network of DreamIt alumni, and a wide range of free services.  Following a lean startup methodology, the selected teams focus on rapid, iterative interactions with their target markets to reduce risk and find product-market fit as quickly as possible.

    DreamIt Health Baltimore 2014 will select up to ten companies from around the world to participate in a four-month accelerator program. In addition to receiving up to a $50,000 stipend and professional services, the startups will be paired with and work closely with exited entrepreneurs-turned-mentors with domain expertise specific to their needs; benefit from an intense startup and healthcare curriculum taught by accomplished practitioners; meet with subject matter experts and investors; and enjoy access to executives, information systems, and data from leading industry players including providers, payers, biopharma, device makers, and federal agencies. Participating teams will also benefit from DreamIt’s extensive network and expertise in guiding the growth of young technology companies.

    DreamIt Health Baltimore is expected to take advantage of many of the strengths of the region, giving participating startups the opportunity to work closely with Johns Hopkins Medicine for potential pilots and also access to key individuals throughout the region’s wealth of federal health care institutions including the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    The program will be led by Elliot Menschik, MD PhD, a Johns Hopkins alum and successfully-exited health IT entrepreneur.

    Learn more about DreamIt Health Baltimore…
    Apply to DreamIt Health Baltimore
    Apply as an individual
    Questions? Ask us.

    Press Highlights DreamIt Health Philadelphia (Held April 8th 2013-August 8th 2013)
    DreamIt Ventures Teams Up with Blue Cross, Penn Medicine to Launch and Accelerator for Health Startups

    Improving outcomes, speeding up diagnoses among goals of Dreamit Venture’s first health IT accelerator

    New incubator DreamIt Health launches first class

    Next Big Thing In Health Care May Come From Philly Business Incubator

    DreamIt ‘boot camp’ boosts health-care info start-ups

    DreamIt Health startup accelerator are recruiting ten healthtech startups

    Founder at UACTIFY

    DreamIt Health startup accelerator is reaching out in the hopes that you might be open to getting the word out among Health 2.0 Israel members about the upcoming DreamIt Health startup accelerator in partnership with Johns Hopkins.

    DreamIt Health startup accelerator are recruiting for (and applications are open for) up to ten healthtech startups from around the world to come to Baltimore for a four-month program to achieve significant business milestones in delivering products that solve real problems for key healthcare stakeholders. DreamIt Health startup accelerator do this by removing as many obstacles as possible from the team’s path and providing guidance and access to people and resources otherwise out of their reach. The capstone of the program, Demo Day, gives these teams the opportunity to unveil their products and progress before a few hundred early stage investors and key industry figures.

    In addition to receiving up to a $50,000 stipend, free workspace and top-shelf legal services, the startups will be paired 1-on-1 with previously successful entrepreneurs customized to the needs of each team. These mentors will contribute considerable time and effort to guide and assist the founders. Participants will also benefit from an intense startup and healthcare curriculum taught by accomplished practitioners, meet regularly with subject matter experts and investors, and enjoy access to executives, systems, and data from leading industry players including providers, payers, biopharma, device makers, and federal agencies. Participating teams will also benefit from DreamIt’s extensive network and expertise in guiding the growth of young technology companies.

    DreamIt Health startup accelerator were founded in 2008 and are run by a group of successful tech entrepreneurs. To date, DreamIt has worked closely with 127 companies from around the world through accelerators in Philadelphia, New York, Austin, and Tel Aviv. These programs are characterized by seed capital, intense 1-on-1 mentorship from dedicated, previously successful tech entrepreneurs, access to key people, expertise, and information typically beyond the reach of a startup, informal education from leading industry practitioners, a robust network of DreamIt alumni, and a wide range of free services. Following a lean startup methodology, the selected teams focus on rapid, iterative interactions with their target markets to reduce risk and find product-market fit as quickly as possible. Forbes has named DreamIt among the top three accelerators in the world and DreamIt companies have gone on to raise nearly $100M in follow-on capital with an aggregate value north of $400M.

    DreamIt Health startup accelerator are looking for extraordinary people and teams developing IT-based products with the potential to solve significant problems faced by key stakeholders in the industry including providers, payers, public health, biopharma, device makers, employers and patients themselves. Interested teams can apply at http://www.dreamithealth.com. Applications for companies are due November 11, 2013. We are also seeking exceptional individuals looking to join a team, particularly those with software development or data science skills. Individuals interested in working with one of the startups can also apply to the program and applications for individuals are due December 16, 2013. Individuals will be matched with companies throughout January.

    Read Full Post »

    Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2013 for Cell Transport: James E. Rothman of Yale University; Randy W. Schekman of the University of California, Berkeley; and Dr. Thomas C. Südhof of Stanford University

    Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    Comments by Graduate Students of the nobel Prize Recipients and other in NYT, 10/7/2013:

    I had the privilege of meeting Randy Schekman a few times when I was a postdoc at Berkeley. In addition to pioneering the understand of cellular trafficking, he was also a great colleague and educator (of undergrads, grad students, postdocs). Hats off to a wonderful scientist who also pays it forward to future generations as a mentor!

    Last couple years, including this year, the Nobel for Physiology or Medicine Award has been dominated by Cell Biologists. I think this highlights how understanding cells is really the key to most medicine.
    Paul Knoepfler
    http://www.ipscell.com

    I guess UC Berkeley will have to add a few more Nobel Laureate Parking Spots on their campus now!
    Yes, in parking-challenged Berkeley campus, some of the best parking spots are reserved for the Nobel Laureate Faculty. They have so many winners, and rather spotty on-campus parking, so they don’t want such brains to go hunt for parking. They reason that the Laureates should be doing better things, like more research, or assisting newer researchers and students. A most elegant solution!
    I don’t think there is any other institution anywhere in the world that has dedicated parking for their Nobel-winning employees. Or has so many Nobels on the payroll. But then, there is just one Cal.
    This prize is another testament to UC Berkeley’s standing.
    Congratulations to the scientists, and a big thank you to their institutions that allowed them the freedom and resources to pursue their ideas.

    Randy Schekman awarded 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

    By Robert Sanders, Media Relations | October 7, 2013

    BERKELEY —

    ScheckmanRandy Schekman, who will share the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (Peg Skorpinski photo)

    Randy W. Schekman, professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, has won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his role in revealing the machinery that regulates the transport and secretion of proteins in our cells. He shares the prize with James E. Rothman of Yale University and Thomas C. Südhof of Stanford University.

    Discoveries by Schekman about how yeast secrete proteins led directly to the success of the biotechnology industry, which was able to coax yeast to release useful protein drugs, such as insulin and human growth hormone. The three scientists’ research on protein transport in cells, and how cells control this trafficking to secrete hormones and enzymes, illuminated the workings of a fundamental process in cell physiology.

    Schekman is UC Berkeley’s 22nd Nobel Laureate, and the first to receive the prize in the area of physiology or medicine.

    In a statement, the 50-member Nobel Assembly lauded Rothman, Schekman and Südhof for making known “the exquisitely precise control system for the transport and delivery of cellular cargo. Disturbances in this system have deleterious effects and contribute to conditions such as neurological diseases, diabetes, and immunological disorders.”

    “My first reaction was, ‘Oh, my god!’ said Schekman, 64, who was awakened at his El Cerrito home with the good news at 1:30 a.m. “That was also my second reaction.”

    Be part of our developing story on Storify and Twitter: Tweet your congratulations to Professor Schekman, using hashtag #BerkeleyNobel.

    Also see:

    Happy ending for Berkeley’s newest Nobel winner

    Schekman and Rothman separately mapped out one of the body’s critical networks, the system in all cells that shuttles hormones and enzymes out and adds to the cell surface so it can grow and divide. This system, which utilizes little membrane bubbles to ferry molecules around the cell interior, is so critical that errors in the machinery inevitably lead to death.

    “Ten percent of the proteins that cells make are secreted, including growth factors and hormones, neurotransmitters by nerve cells and insulin from pancreas cells,” said Schekman, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and a faculty member in the Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences.

    Schekman on the phoneSchekman takes a call at home after getting the news. (Carol Ness photo)

    In what some thought was a foolish decision, Schekman decided in 1976, when he first joined the College of Letters and Science at UC Berkeley, to explore this system in yeast. In the ensuing years, he mapped out the machinery by which yeast cells sort, package and deliver proteins via membrane bubbles to the cell surface, secreting proteins important in yeast communication and mating. Yeast also use the process to deliver receptors to the surface, the cells’ main way of controlling activities such as the intake of nutrients like glucose.

    In the 1980s and ’90s, these findings enabled the biotechnology industry to exploit the secretion system in yeast to create and release pharmaceutical products and industrial enzymes. Today, diabetics worldwide use insulin produced and discharged by yeast, and most of the hepatitis B vaccine used around the world is secreted by yeast. Both systems were developed by Chiron Corp. of Emeryville, Calif., now part of Novartis International AG, during the 20 years Schekman consulted for the company.

    Various diseases, including some forms of diabetes and a form of hemophilia, involve a hitch in the secretion system of cells, and Schekman is now investigating a possible link to Alzheimer’s disease.

    “Our findings have aided people in understanding these diseases,” said Schekman.

    Based on the machinery discovered by Schekman and Rothman, Südhof subsequently discovered how nerve cells release signaling molecules, called neurotransmitters, which they use to communicate.

    For his scientific contributions, Schekman was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1992, received the Gairdner International Award in 1996 and the Lasker Award for basic and clinical research in 2002. He was elected president of the American Society for Cell Biology in 1999. On Oct. 3, Schekman received the Otto Warburg Medal of the German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, which is considered the highest German award in the fields of biochemistry and molecular biology.

    Schekman, formerly editor of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, currently is editor-in-chief of the new open access journal eLife.

    Schekman and his wife, Nancy Walls, have two adult children.

    MORE INFORMATION

    SOURCE

    tanford Report, October 7, 2013

    Thomas Südhof wins Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

    Neuroscientist Thomas Südhof, MD, professor of molecular and cellular physiology at the Stanford School of Medicine, won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

    BY KRISTA CONGER

    Steve FischThomas SudhofThomas Sudhof won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

    Neuroscientist Thomas Südhof, MD, professor of molecular and cellular physiology at the Stanford University School of Medicine, won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

    He shared the prize with James Rothman, PhD, a former Stanford professor of biochemistry, andRandy Schekman, PhD, who earned his doctorate at Stanford under the late Arthur Kornberg, MD, another winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

    The three were awarded the prize “for their discoveries of machinery regulating vesicle traffic, a major transport system in our cells.” Rothman is now a professor at Yale University, and Schekman is a professor at UC-Berkeley.

    “I’m absolutely surprised,” said Südhof, who was in the remote town of Baeza in Spain to attend a conference and give a lecture. “Every scientist dreams of this. I didn’t realize there was chance I would be awarded the prize. I am stunned and really happy to share the prize with James Rothman and Randy Schekman.”

    The three winners will share a prize that totals roughly $1.2 million, with about $413,600 going to each.

    Robert Malenka, MD, Stanford’s Nancy Friend Pritzker Professor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, is at the conference with Südhof, a close collaborator. “He’s dazed, tired and happy,” Malenka said by phone. “The only time I’ve seen him happier was when his children were born.”

    Südhof, the Avram Goldstein Professor in the School of Medicine, received the award for his work in exploring how neurons in the brain communicate with one another across gaps called synapses. Although his work has focused on the minutiae of how molecules interact on the cell membranes, the fundamental questions he’s pursuing are large.

    “The brain works by neurons communicating via synapses,” Südhof said in a phone conversation this morning. “We’d like to understand how synapse communication leads to learning on a larger scale. How are the specific connections established? How do they form? And what happens in schizophrenia and autism when these connections are compromised?” In 2009, he published research describing how a gene implicated in autism and schizophrenia alters mice’s synapses and produces behavioral changes in the mice, such as excessive grooming and impaired nest building, that are reminiscent of these human neuropsychiatric disorders.

    Lloyd Minor, MD, dean of the School of Medicine, said, “Thomas Südhof is a consummate citizen of science. His unrelenting curiosity, his collaborative spirit, his drive to ascertain the minute details of cellular workings, and his skill to carefully uncover these truths — taken together it’s truly awe-inspiring.

    “He has patiently but relentlessly probed one of the fundamental questions of medical science — perhaps the fundamental question in neuroscience: How nerve cells communicate with each other. The answer is at the crux of human biology and of monumental importance to human health. Dr. Südhof’s receipt of this prize is inordinately well-deserved, and I offer him my heartfelt congratulations. His accomplishment represents what Stanford Medicine and the biomedical revolution are all about.”

    The Nobel committee called Südhof on his cell phone after trying his home in Menlo Park, Calif. His wife, Lu Chen, PhD, associate professor of neurosurgery and of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, then gave the committee his cell phone number to reach him in Spain.

    “The phone rang three times before I decided to go downstairs and pick it up,” Chen said. “I thought it was one of my Chinese relatives who couldn’t figure out the time zone.”

    Chen and Südhof have two young children, and Südhof has four adult children from a previous marriage. “I was very surprised,” Chen said, “but he’s more concerned about how I’ll get the kids up this morning in time for school.”

    “I was expecting a call from a colleague about the conference I’m here to attend, so I pulled off in a parking lot,” said Südhof, who was driving from Madrid to Baeza at the time he received the announcement. “I hadn’t slept at all the previous night, and I certainly wasn’t expecting a call from the Nobel committee.”

    On the day he got the call from the Nobel committee, he was scheduled to give a talk at a conference, Membrane Traffic at the Synapse: The Cell Biology of Synaptic Plasticity, held in a 17th-century building that now serves as a conference center.

    “Professor Sudhof’s contributions to the understanding of how cells operate have been of enormous importance to medicine, and to his own work in understanding how connections form within the human brain,” said Stanford President John Hennessy. “The recognition by the Nobel committee is a remarkable achievement.”

    Südhof, who is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator, has spent the past 30 years prying loose the secrets of the synapse, the all-important junction where information, in the form of chemical messengers called neurotransmitters, is passed from one neuron to another. The firing patterns of our synapses underwrite our consciousness, emotions and behavior. The simple act of taking a step forward, experiencing a fleeting twinge of regret, recalling an incident from the morning commute or tasting a doughnut requires millions of simultaneous and precise synaptic firing events throughout the brain and peripheral nervous system.

    Even a moment’s consideration of the total number of synapses in the typical human brain adds up to instant regard for that organ’s complexity. Coupling neuroscientists’ ballpark estimate of 200 billion neurons in a healthy adult brain with the fact that any single neuron may share synaptic contacts with as few as one or as many as 1 million other neurons (the median is somewhere in the vicinity of 10,000) suggests that your brain holds perhaps 2 quadrillion synapses — 10,000 times the number of stars in the Milky Way.

    “The computing power of a human or animal brain is much, much higher than that of any computer,” said Südhof. “A synapse is not just a relay station. It is not even like a computer chip, which is an immutable element. Every synapse is like a nanocomputer all by itself. The amount of neurotransmitter released, or even whether that release occurs at all, depends on that particular synapse’s previous experience.”

    Much of a neuron can be visualized as a long, hollow cord whose outer surface conducts electrical impulses in one direction. At various points along this cordlike extension are bulbous nozzles known as presynaptic terminals, each one housing myriad tiny, balloon-like vesicles containing neurotransmitters and each one abutting a downstream (or postsynaptic) neuron.

    When an electrical impulse traveling along a neuron reaches one of these presynaptic terminals, calcium from outside the neuron floods in through channels that open temporarily, and a portion of the neurotransmitter-containing vesicles fuse with the surrounding bulb’s outer membrane and spill their contents into the narrow gap separating the presynaptic terminal from the postsynaptic neuron’s receiving end.

    Südhof, along with other researchers worldwide, has identified integral protein components critical to the membrane fusion process. Südhof purified key protein constituents sticking out of the surfaces of neurotransmitter-containing vesicles, protruding from nearby presynaptic-terminal membranes, or bridging them. Then, using biochemical, genetic and physiological techniques, he elucidated the ways in which the interactions among these proteins contribute to carefully orchestrated membrane fusion: As a result, synaptic transmission is today one of the best-understood phenomena in neuroscience.

    Südhof, who was born in Germany in 1955, received an MD in 1982 from Georg-August-Universität in Göttingen. He came to Stanford in 2008 after 25 years at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, where he first worked as a postdoctoral fellow at the laboratories of Michael Brown, MD, and Joseph Goldstein, MD.. Brown and Goldstein were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1985 for their work in understanding the regulation of cholesterol metabolism. In 1986, Südhof established his own laboratory at the university.

    Südhof became an HHMI investigator in 1991, and moved to Stanford as a professor in molecular and cellular physiology in 2008.

    The proteins Südhof has focused on for close to three decades are disciplined specialists. They recruit vesicles, bring them into “docked” positions near the terminals, herd calcium channels to the terminal membrane, and, cued by calcium, interweave like two sides of a zipper and force the vesicles into such close contact with terminal membranes that they fuse with them and release neurotransmitters into the synaptic gap. Although these specialists perform defined roles at the synapses, similar proteins, discovered later by Südhof and others, play comparable roles in other biological processes ranging from hormone secretion to fertilization of an egg during conception to immune cells’ defense against foreign invaders.

    “We’ve made so many major advances during the past 50 years in this field, but there’s still much more to learn,” said Südhof, who in a 2010 interview with The Lancet credited his bassoon instructor as his most influential teacher for helping him to learn the discipline to practice for hours on end. “Understanding how the brain works is one of the most fundamental problems in neuroscience.”

    Südhof’s accomplishments also earned him the 2013 Lasker Basic Medical Research Award. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine and the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. He also is a recipient of the 2010 Kavli Prize in neuroscience.

    In the Lancet interview, Südhof defined basic research as an approach often neglected in the pursuit of medicine. “This ‘solid descriptive science,’ like neuroanatomy or biochemistry, [are] disciplines that cannot claim to immediately understand functions or provide cures, but which form the basis for everything we do.”

    Südhof said this morning he is excited to speak with his family about the prize, although it may be too much for his youngest children, ages 3 and 4, to grasp. “I will try to explain it to them,” he said. “It will be a wonderful occasion.” He noted that he has already received congratulatory calls from two of his four adult children. For them, the news may have come as less of a surprise.

    “The Nobel prize became an inevitable topic of conversation when Tom won the Lasker award,” Chen said. “But the two of us share a feeling that one should never work for prizes.”

    “Everyone has pegged him as a potential Nobel prize winner for many years,” said Malenka, who described the scene at the conference during the lunch hour. “It was just a matter of time. The attendees were clapping and cheering for him.”

    Although he plans to return to the United States as soon as possible, Südhof has no plans to let the award slow his research — or even his plans for the day. He responded to an inquiry with a characteristically low-key reply. “Well, I think I’ll go ahead and give my talk.”

    SOURCE

    Rothman Lab

    Membrane fusion is a fundamental biological process for organelle formation, nutrient uptake, and the secretion of hormones and neurotransmitters.

    It is central to vesicular transport, storage, and release in many areas of endocrine and exocrine physiology, and imbalances in these processes give rise to important diseases, such as diabetes.

    We employ diverse biophysical, biochemical, and cell biological approaches to characterize the fundamental participants in intracellular transport processes.

    flippedcellfull
    Time lapse images of fusing flipped-SNARE cells.

    SNARE Overview

    Over 30 years ago, we observed what we interpreted to be vesicular transport in crude extracts of tissue culture cells. In subsequent years we found that we had reconstituted vesicle trafficking in the Golgi, including the process of membrane fusion. Using this assay as a guide, we purified as a required factor the NEM-Sensitive Fusion protein (NSF). This led to the purification of the Soluble NSF Attachment Factor (SNAP), which bound NSF to Golgi membranes, and then with these tools discovered that the receptors for SNAP in membranes were actually complexes of proteins (which we called SNAREs) which we envisioned could potentially partner as a bridge between membranes to contribute to the process of membrane fusion and provide specificity to it (as captured in the ‘SNARE hypothesis’ proposed at the time).

    We now know that organisms have a large family of SNARE proteins that indeed form cognate partnerships in just this way, and that NSF is an ATPase that (using SNAP as an adaptor protein) disrupts the SNARE complex after fusion is complete so its subunits can be recycled for repeated use. Recombinant cognate SNAREs introduced into artificial bilayers or expressed ectopically on the outside of cells ( “flipped SNAREs”) spontaneously and efficiently result in membrane (or cell) fusion, demonstrating that the SNARE complex is not only necessary but is sufficient for fusion. There are many proteins known and rapidly being discovered which closely regulate this vital process, but the muscle – if not always the brains – is in the SNAREs. Compartmental specificity is encoded to a remarkable degree in the functional partnering of SNARE proteins, a fact which is in no way inconsistent with the emerging contribution of upstream regulatory components (like rabGTPases and tethering complexes) to domain/compartment specificity.

    Current Research & Projects

    Our lab is working to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of vesicular transport within cells and the secretion of proteins and neurotransmitters.

    Projects include:

    1. The biochemical and biophysical mechanisms of vesicle budding and fusion;
    2. Cellular regulation of vesicle fusion in exocytosis and synaptic transmission;
    3. Structural and functional organization of the Golgi apparatus from a cellular systems view.

    We take an interdisciplinary approach which includes cell-free biochemistry, single molecule biophysics, high resolution optical imaging of single events/single molecules in the cell and in cell-free formats.

    The overall goal is to understand transport pathways form structural mechanism to cellular physiology. The latter is facilitated by high throughput functional genomics at the cellular level (see Yale Center for High Throughput Cell Biology).

    SNAREpins

    We have a strong interest in new lab members who bring backgrounds in chemistry, physics, and engineering.

    SOURCE

    http://medicine.yale.edu/cellbio/rothman/index.aspx

    3 Americans Win Joint Nobel Prize in Medicine

    Reuters

    From left: Randy W. Schekman, Thomas C. Südhof and James E. Rothman.

    <nyt_byline>

    By 
    Published: October 7, 2013 151 Comments

    Three Americans won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Monday for discovering the machinery that regulates how cells transport major molecules in a cargo system that delivers them to the right place at the right time in cells.

    Science Twitter Logo.
     

    The Karolinska Institute in Stockholmannounced the winners: James E. Rothman of Yale University; Randy W. Schekman of the University of California, Berkeley; and Dr. Thomas C. Südhof of Stanford University.

    The molecules are moved around cells in small packages called vesicles, and each scientist discovered different facets that are needed to ensure that the right cargo is shipped to the correct destination at precisely the right time.

    Their research solved the mystery of how cells organize their transport system, the Karolinska committee said. Dr. Schekman discovered a set of genes that were required for vesicle traffic. Dr. Rothman unraveled protein machinery that allows vesicles to fuse with their targets to permit transfer of cargo. Dr. Südhof revealed how signals instruct vesicles to release their cargo with precision.

    The tiny vesicles, which have a covering known as membranes, shuttle the cargo between different compartments or fuse with the membrane. The transport system activates nerves. It also controls the release of hormones.

    Disturbances in this exquisitely precise control system cause serious damage that, in turn, can contribute to conditions like neurological diseases, diabetes and immunological disorders.

    Dr. Schekman, 64, who was born in St. Paul, used yeast cells as a model system when he began his research in the 1970s. He found that vesicles piled up in parts of the cell and that the cause was genetic. He went on to identify three classes of genes that control different facets of the cell’s transport system. Dr. Schekman studied at the University of California in Los Angeles and at Stanford University, where he obtained his Ph.D. in 1974.

    In 1976, he joined the faculty of the University of California, Berkeley, where he is currently professor in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology. Dr. Schekman is also an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

    Dr. Rothman, 63, who was born in Haverhill, Mass., studied vesicle transport in mammalian cells in the 1980s and 1990s. He discovered that a protein complex allows vesicles to dock and fuse with their target membranes. In the fusion process, proteins on the vesicles and target membranes bind to each other like the two sides of a zipper. The fact that there are many such proteins and that they bind only in specific combinations ensures that cargo is delivered to a precise location.

    The same principle operates inside the cell and when a vesicle binds to the cell’s outer membrane to release its contents. Dr. Rothman received a Ph.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1976, was a postdoctoral fellow at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and moved in 1978 to Stanford University, where he started his research on the vesicles of the cell. Dr. Rothman has also worked at Princeton University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute and Columbia University.

    In 2008, he joined the faculty of Yale University where he is currently professor and chairman in the Department of Cell Biology. Some of the genes Dr. Schekman discovered in yeast coded for proteins correspond to those Dr. Rothman identified in mammals. Collectively, they mapped critical components of the cell´s transport machinery.

    Dr. Südhof, 57, who was born in Göttingen, Germany, studied neurotransmission, the process by which nerve cells communicate with other cells in the brain. At the time he set out to explore the field 25 years ago, much of it was virgin scientific territory. Researchers had not identified a single protein in the neurotransmission process.

    Dr. Südhof helped transform what had been a rough outline into a number of molecular activities to provide insights into the elaborate mechanisms at the crux of neurological activities, from the simplest to the most sophisticated. He did so by systematically identifying, purifying and analyzing proteins that can rapidly release chemicals that underlie the brain’s activities. The transmission process can take less than a thousandth of a second.

    Dr. Südhof studied at the Georg-August-Universität in Göttingen, where he received a medical degree in 1982 and a doctorate in neurochemistry the same year. In 1983, he moved to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. Dr. Südhof, who has American citizenship, became an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 1991 and was appointed professor of molecular and cellular physiology at Stanford University in 2008.

    All three scientists have won other awards, including the Lasker Prize, for their research.

    <nyt_correction_bottom>

    This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

    Correction: October 7, 2013

    An earlier version of this article misstated Randy W. Schekman’s age. He is 64, not 65.

    SOURCE

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/08/health/3-win-joint-nobel-prize-in-medicine.html?_r=0

    Nobel for Cell Transport

    October 07, 2013

    This year’s Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is going jointly to three scientists for their work figuring out how cells transport their cargo, according to the Karolinska Institute. They will share the $1.25 million prize.

    “Imagine hundreds of thousands of people who are traveling around hundreds of miles of streets; how are they going to find the right way? Where will the bus stop and open its doors so that people can get out?” says Nobel committee secretary Goran Hansson, according to the Associated Press. “There are similar problems in the cell.”

    By studying yeast cells with defective vesicles, Randy Schekman from the University of California, Berkeley, uncovered three classes of genes that control transportation within the cell, the New York Times adds. Schekman was awakened in California by the call from Stockholm. “I wasn’t thinking too straight. I didn’t have anything elegant to say,” he tells the AP. “All I could say was ‘Oh my God,’ and that was that.” Schekman adds that he called his lab manager to arrange a celebration in the lab.

    Meanwhile, Yale University’s James Rothman discovered a protein complex that allows vesicles to bind to their intended membrane targets, getting the vesicle contents to a specific location. Rothman notes that he recently lost funding for work building on his discovery, and says that he hopes that having won the Nobel will help him when he reapplies.

    And Thomas Südhof at Stanford University systematically studied how nerve cells communicate, finding that vesicles full of neurotransmitters bind to cell membranes to release their contents through a molecular mechanism that responds to the presence of calcium ions. He was on his way to a give a talk when he got his call. “I got the call while I was driving and like a good citizen I pulled over and picked up the phone,” Südhof says to the AP. “To be honest, I thought at first it was a joke. I have a lot of friends who might play these kinds of tricks.”

    SOURCE

    Other related articles published on these Open Access Online Scientific Journal include the following:

    The Series on Cardiovascular Disease and the role of Calcium Signaling consists of the following articles:

    Part I: Identification of Biomarkers that are Related to the Actin Cytoskeleton

    Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/12/10/identification-of-biomarkers-that-are-related-to-the-actin-cytoskeleton/

    Part II: Role of Calcium, the Actin Skeleton, and Lipid Structures in Signaling and Cell Motility

    Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Stephen Williams, PhD and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/08/26/role-of-calcium-the-actin-skeleton-and-lipid-structures-in-signaling-and-cell-motility/

    Part III: Renal Distal Tubular Ca2+ Exchange Mechanism in Health and Disease

    Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Stephen J. Williams, PhD
 and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/09/02/renal-distal-tubular-ca2-exchange-mechanism-in-health-and-disease/

    Part IV: The Centrality of Ca(2+) Signaling and Cytoskeleton Involving Calmodulin Kinases and Ryanodine Receptors in Cardiac Failure, Arterial Smooth Muscle, Post-ischemic Arrhythmia, Similarities and Differences, and Pharmaceutical Targets

    Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Justin Pearlman, MD, PhD, FACC and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/09/08/the-centrality-of-ca2-signaling-and-cytoskeleton-involving-calmodulin-kinases-and-ryanodine-receptors-in-cardiac-failure-arterial-smooth-muscle-post-ischemic-arrhythmia-similarities-and-differen/

    Part V: Heart, Vascular Smooth Muscle, Excitation-Contraction Coupling (E-CC), Cytoskeleton, Cellular Dynamics and Ca2 Signaling

    Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Justin Pearlman, MD, PhD, FACC and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/08/26/heart-smooth-muscle-excitation-contraction-coupling-cytoskeleton-cellular-dynamics-and-ca2-signaling/

    Part VI: Calcium Cycling (ATPase Pump) in Cardiac Gene Therapy: Inhalable Gene Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Percutaneous Intra-coronary Artery Infusion for Heart Failure: Contributions by Roger J. Hajjar, MD

    Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/08/01/calcium-molecule-in-cardiac-gene-therapy-inhalable-gene-therapy-for-pulmonary-arterial-hypertension-and-percutaneous-intra-coronary-artery-infusion-for-heart-failure-contributions-by-roger-j-hajjar/

    Part VII: Cardiac Contractility & Myocardium Performance: Ventricular Arrhythmiasand Non-ischemic Heart Failure – Therapeutic Implications for Cardiomyocyte Ryanopathy (Calcium Release-related Contractile Dysfunction) and Catecholamine Responses

    Justin Pearlman, MD, PhD, FACC, Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/08/28/cardiac-contractility-myocardium-performance-ventricular-arrhythmias-and-non-ischemic-heart-failure-therapeutic-implications-for-cardiomyocyte-ryanopathy-calcium-release-related-contractile/

    Part VIII: Disruption of Calcium Homeostasis: Cardiomyocytes and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: The Cardiac and Cardiovascular Calcium Signaling Mechanism

    Justin Pearlman, MD, PhD, FACC, Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/09/12/disruption-of-calcium-homeostasis-cardiomyocytes-and-vascular-smooth-muscle-cells-the-cardiac-and-cardiovascular-calcium-signaling-mechanism/

    Part IX: Calcium-Channel Blockers, Calcium Release-related Contractile Dysfunction (Ryanopathy) and Calcium as Neurotransmitter Sensor

    Justin Pearlman, MD, PhD, FACC, Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    Part X: Synaptotagmin functions as a Calcium Sensor: How Calcium Ions Regulate the fusion of vesicles with cell membranes during Neurotransmission

    Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP and Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/09/10/synaptotagmin-functions-as-a-calcium-sensor-how-calcium-ions-regulate-the-fusion-of-vesicles-with-cell-membranes-during-neurotransmission/

    Read Full Post »

    24 New MacArthur Fellows: 13 men and 11 women — Now so-called “Geniuses”

    Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

     

    Meet the 2013 MacArthur Fellows

    http://www.macfound.org/fellows/class/2013/

    • Profile portrait of Kyle Abraham

      Kyle Abraham

      Kyle Abraham/Abraham.in.Motion

      New York, NY

      Age: 36

      Choreographer and Dancerexploring the relationship between identity and personal history through a unique hybrid of traditional and informal dance styles.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Donald Antrim

      Donald Antrim

      Columbia University

      New York, NY

      Age: 55

      Writercomposing works of fiction and nonfiction that are characterized by tightly controlled prose juxtaposed with absurd and surreal events.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Phil Baran

      Phil Baran

      Scripps Research Institute

      La Jolla, CA

      Age: 36

      Organic Chemistinventing efficient, scalable, and environmentally sound methods for recreating in the laboratory natural products with potential pharmaceutical applications.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of C. Kevin Boyce

      C. Kevin Boyce

      Stanford University

      Stanford, CA

      Age: 39

      Paleobotanistestablishing links between ancient plant remains and present-day ecosystems through a pioneering and integrative approach to evolutionary plant biology.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Jeffrey Brenner

      Jeffrey Brenner

      Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers

      Camden, NJ

      Age: 44

      Primary Care Physiciancreating a comprehensive health care delivery model that addresses the medical and social service needs of high-risk patients in impoverished communities.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Colin Camerer

      Colin Camerer

      California Institute of Technology

      Pasadena, CA

      Age: 53

      Behavioral Economistexpanding our knowledge of individual behavior and challenging models of human interaction that form the basis of classic economic theory.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Jeremy Denk

      Jeremy Denk

      New York, NY

      Age: 43

      Pianist and Writerengaging listeners and readers in a deeper appreciation of classical music through unmatched musical ability paired with an unusual eloquence with words.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Angela Duckworth

      Angela Duckworth

      University of Pennsylvania

      Philadelphia, PA

      Age: 43

      Research Psychologisttransforming our understanding of the roles that grit and self-control play in educational achievement.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Craig Fennie

      Craig Fennie

      Cornell University

      Ithaca, NY

      Age: 40

      Materials Scientistdesigning new materials, atom by atom, that have electrical, magnetic, and optical properties desirable for electronics and improved communication technology.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Robin Fleming

      Robin Fleming

      Boston College

      Chestnut Hill, MA

      Age: 57

      Medieval Historiandrawing on archaeological and textual sources to provide fresh insight into the social, economic, and cultural lives of inhabitants of late Roman and medieval Britain.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Carl Haber

      Carl Haber

      Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

      Berkeley, CA

      Age: 54

      Audio Preservationistdeveloping new technologies for the preservation of rare, damaged, and deteriorating sound recordings of immense value to our cultural heritage.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Vijay Iyer

      Vijay Iyer

      New York, NY

      Age: 41

      Jazz Pianist and Composerforging a new conception of the practice of American music in compositions for his ensembles, cross-disciplinary collaborations, and scholarly work.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Dina Katabi

      Dina Katabi

      Massachusetts Institute of Technology

      Cambridge, MA

      Age: 42

      Computer Scientistworking at the interface of computer science and electrical engineering to improve the speed, reliability, and security of data exchange, particularly in wireless networks.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Julie Livingston

      Julie Livingston

      Rutgers University

      New Brunswick, NJ

      Age: 46

      Public Health Historian and Anthropologistcombining archival research and ethnographic observation to illuminate largely ignored crises of care in both the developing and developed world.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of David Lobell

      David Lobell

      Stanford University

      Stanford, CA

      Age: 34

      Agricultural Ecologistunearthing richly informative, but often underutilized, sources of data to investigate the impact of climate change on crop production and global food security.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Tarell McCraney

      Tarell McCraney

      Steppenwolf Theatre Company

      Chicago, IL

      Age: 32

      Playwrightevoking a sense of our shared humanity in works that explore the diversity of the African American experience and imbue the lives of ordinary people with epic significance.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Susan Murphy

      Susan Murphy

      University of Michigan

      Ann Arbor, MI

      Age: 55

      Statisticiantranslating statistical theory into powerful tools for evaluating and customizing treatment regimens for individuals coping with chronic or relapsing disorders.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Sheila Nirenberg

      Sheila Nirenberg

      Weill Cornell Medical College

      New York, NY

      Neuroscientistinvestigating fundamental questions about the nervous system and developing new kinds of prosthetic devices and robots.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Alexei Ratmansky

      Alexei Ratmansky

      American Ballet Theatre

      New York, NY

      Age: 45

      Choreographerrevitalizing classical ballet with a distinctive style that honors the past while infusing a modern sensibility to interpretations of the standard repertoire as well as his own works.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Ana Maria Rey

      Ana Maria Rey

      University of Colorado

      Boulder, CO

      Age: 36

      Atomic Physicistadvancing our ability to simulate, manipulate, and control novel states of matter through fundamental conceptual research on ultra-cold atoms.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Karen Russell

      Karen Russell

      New York, NY

      Age: 32

      Fiction Writerblending fantastical elements with psychological realism to construct wildly imaginative settings and characters in tales of transformation and redemption.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Sara Seager

      Sara Seager

      Massachusetts Institute of Technology

      Cambridge, MA

      Age: 42

      Astrophysicistadapting fundamental maxims of existing planetary science to create a comprehensive theoretical framework for determining the characteristics of planets beyond our solar system.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Margaret Stock

      Margaret Stock

      Cascadia Cross Border Law

      Anchorage, AK

      Age: 51

      Immigration Lawyerfinding solutions to complex immigration issues faced by military personnel and contributing to policy debates about the role of a healthy immigration system in ensuring national security.

      More 

    • Profile portrait of Carrie Mae Weems

      Carrie Mae Weems

      Syracuse, NY

      Age: 60

      Photographer and Video Artistexamining the legacy of African American identity, class, and culture in cinéma vérité–style works that incorporate elements of folklore, multimedia collage, and experimental printing methods.

      More 

    SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 – PRESS RELEASE

    24 Extraordinarily Creative People Who Inspire Us All:  Meet the 2013 MacArthur Fellows thumbnail

    24 Extraordinarily Creative People Who Inspire Us All: Meet the 2013 MacArthur Fellows

    “This year’s class of MacArthur Fellows is an extraordinary group of individuals who collectively reflect the breadth and depth of American creativity.” — Cecilia Conrad, Vice President, MacArthur Fellows programRead More

    About the MacArthur Fellows Program

    Frequently Asked Questions

    MacArthur Fellows

    Stay Informed

    Sign up to be notified of Fellows announcements.

    Related Video

    SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 – VIDEO

    Still image from Paleobotanist C. Kevin Boyce, 2013 MacArthur Fellow

    Paleobotanist C. Kevin Boyce, 2013 MacArthur Fellow

    Paleobotanist C. Kevin Boyce was named a MacArthur Fellow in 2013. The Fellowship is a $625,000, no-strings-attached grant for individuals who have shown exceptional creativity in their work and the promise to do more.  View … Watch Video

    – See more at: http://www.macfound.org/fellows/class/2013/#sthash.vPvXUtxh.dpuf

     

    The MacArthur Foundation, which gives out fellowship awards each year to winners who work in science, music and the arts, and journalism, among other fields. The fellowship comes with a five-year, “no-strings-attached” $500,000 stipend, which the foundation now says it is increasing to $625,000, the Associated Press reports.

    “We looked at many benchmarks and decided it was time to make an adjustment,” Cecilia Conrad, vice president of the MacArthur Fellows Program, told the AP. She adds that the grant needed to account for inflation. The amount of the grant was last changed in 2000.

    The Foundation also asked past fellows about how receiving the award affected their work and lives, with 93 percent reporting that it made them more financially stable and 88 percent said it gave them more opportunities to be creative. A small portion, about 8 percent, said that they had less time personal or family time after receiving the award, and some asked for advice on coping with newfound visibility after winning the genius grant.

    This year’s crop of MacArthur fellows includes a paleobotanist, a statistician, and a neuroscientist as well as other scientists and writers and artists, according to the MacArthur Foundationthat gives out the fellowships. These 13 men and 11 women — now so-called “Geniuses” — will receive a stipend of $625,000 over five years, an award that was recently upped to keep pace with inflation.

    “It was amazing to me,” new fellow and dancer-choreographer Kyle Abraham tells the New York Times about receiving his phone call from he foundation. “It was a shock. I was laughing about it; I was crying about it, it was so overwhelming. I’ve been trying to figure out how to pay off my student loans to this day.”

    Among the two dozen recipients are Kevin Boyce, a paleobotanist at Stanford University, who studies ancient and modern plants in an effort to understand how climate change may affect ecosystems; statistician Susan Murphy at the University of Michigan, who is developing a method to evaluate adaptive treatments for people with chronic or relapsing disorders like addiction or depression; and Sheila Nirenberg, a neuroscientist at Weill Cornell Medical College, who is studying how the brain processes visual information and ways to restore sight.

    Review Affirms Impact and Inspiration of MacArthur Fellows Program – See more at: http://www.macfound.org/press/publications/macarthur-fellows-program-review-summary/#sthash.rvNcLj3r.dpuf

     

    Read Full Post »

    ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) program: ‘Tragic’ Sequestration Impact on NHGRI Programs

    Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    NHGRI’s Green Sees ‘Tragic’ Sequestration Impact on NHGRI Programs

    September 13, 2013

    NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – The funding squeeze from the sequestration of the US federal budget, now more than half-a-year old, has already had a sizable impact at the National Human Genome Research Institute, leading to cuts to ongoing programs, scaling back of new ones, and the deferring of efforts that have not yet launched.

    The five percent cut in funding this year at NHGRI has led not only to trimmed-down renewal grants and fewer, smaller awards broadly, but also has chopped the budget for some of the institute’s important programs, according to NHGRI Director Eric Green.

    The programs that have either had their funding reduced, and in one case delayed, include the ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) program, projects focused on using genome sequencing in newborns and in clinical medicine, and other initiatives, Green said in his Director’s Report to the National Advisory Council on Human Genomics Research this week.

    In addition, many renewal grants have been trimmed, and there are “numerous examples of detrimental cuts” to the institute’s intramural research program, said Green. These cuts to large and small NHGRI programs come at a pivotal time for genomics, he noted, as the products of such research are beginning to translate into clinical possibilities.

    “It is tragic. [That] is the word I would use,” Green told GenomeWeb Daily News this week.

    “[The field of genomics] is just so exciting. There are so many opportunities,” he said. “This is precisely the time that we should be pushing the accelerator hard, and we just cannot do it because we don’t have enough fuel in our fuel tank.

    “It’s frustrating. I think the opportunities now are just spectacular,” said Green. “It’s tragic because it is just so obvious that we could do some remarkable things in genomics and we are not being able to do it.”

    ENCODE, a decade-old flagship project at NIH that aims to identify all of the functional elements in the human genome, had its budget reduced by 16 percent.

    The Genomic Sequencing and Newborn Screening Disorders program was cut by half, which left the program to fund fewer research projects than planned and its research consortium to go forward without the benefit of a data coordinating center. This new initiative, an effort to support pioneering studies on how sequencing might be used in the care of newborns and in neonatal care that was created jointly with the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, had its budget cut from $10 million to $5 million.

    The Genomic Medicine Pilot Demonstration Projects program had its budget cut by 20 percent, and NHGRI’s Bioinformatics Resources and Analysis Research Portfolio had $5 million sliced out of its budget. The new Genomics of Gene Regulation (GGR)request for applications was bumped out of this funding year entirely, and has been delayed until 2014, according to Green.

    Because the sequestration plan was concocted and agreed to well in advance of its arrival earlier this year, Green told GWDN that the institute did have some time to try to react to the sequestration and mitigate the pain from the cuts, spreading them around fairly and evenly while maintaining priorities. He said leadership at the institute tried to prepare for the possibility of sequestration by being conservative in its planning.

    Programs that were already ongoing, like ENCODE, were likely to take priority over those that were not yet launched, like GGR, in part because the infrastructure is already in place for ongoing projects and because it is easier to plan for how they operate and generate outputs, like data.

    “With ENCODE you know for every million dollars you invest you get so much back,” said Green. “With a program like newborn sequencing … we don’t totally know what it’s going to look like or play out like. We won’t know what we are missing because we won’t be able to launch it to the scale that we wanted to launch it originally.”

    Green said some of the projects being cut or delayed were created under NHGRI’sstrategic plan, a program it laid out in 2011 that involves restructuring of the institute’s divisions and some shifting in its research portfolio to include more efforts in applying genomics to medicine and healthcare.

    “Some of these RFAs that we delayed really represent key elements that we started to anticipate two years ago,” said Green. “We knew we wanted to do more in sequencing, we knew we wanted to do some pilot projects in genomic medicine. We knew we wanted to continue to accelerate efforts in understanding how the genome works … ENCODE, GGR, and so forth. It just had to be slowed down,” he said.

    Anastasia Wise, program director for the Genomic Sequencing and Newborn Screening Disorders program, told GWDN that the program was supposed to be much larger than the $5 million in awards unveiled last week, which funded a consortium of four research projects.

    Wise said NHGRI and NICHD were each initially planning to provide double the amount of funding they were actually awarded, which is now expected to be a total of $25 million over five years, although that total could be subject to the availability of funding.

    “There were definitely more scientifically meritorious applications than we were able to fund,” she said. “Even the four awards that we made ended up being cut an additional five percent because of the sequestration.”

    She said the program “wanted to be able to make more awards, and we wanted to be able to fund a coordinating center to be able to bring the network together and help provide some harmonization of data and coordination of logistics between the different members of the consortium,” but it was unable to fund that part of the effort.

    Although the fractured fiscal culture in Washington engenders caution at NHGRI as the agency looks forward, Green sees many scientific opportunities right now, as genomics begins to hit the clinic.

    “Some people are saying we are not even going fast enough,” he said. “Lots of people have been discussing what the world is going to look like when somebody gets their genome sequenced in the newborn period, and [they] think about what the implications of that are for the patient for the rest of their lives. We want to start studying this,” he said.

    “And we are starting to … but we’re not starting as aggressively as we wanted to,” Green said. “I mean, we took a big hit this year.”

    Matt Jones is a staff reporter for GenomeWeb Daily News. He covers public policy, legislation, and funding issues that affect researchers in the genomics field, as well as the operations of research institutes. E-mail Matt Jones or follow GWDN’s headlines at @DailyNewsGW.

    Related Stories

    SOURCE

    http://www.genomeweb.com//node/1280236?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Sequestration%20Impact%20on%20NHGRI;%20Adaptive%20Biotechnologies%20Gets%20$2.5M%20SBIR%20Grant;%20In%20Brief;%20People%20-%2009/13/2013%2004:10:00%20PM

    Read Full Post »

    Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD,RN

    News

    American Forces Press Service

     NEWS ARTICLE

    Hagel Announces Reduction in Civilian Furlough Days

    American Forces Press Service

    WASHINGTON, Aug. 6, 2013 – Hundreds of thousands of Defense Department civilian employees who have had to take a weekly unpaid day off from work since July 8 are getting some relief, as the total number of furlough days has been reduced from 11 to six, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced today.

    Here is the complete text of the secretary’s announcement:

    When I announced my decision on May 14 to impose furloughs of up to 11 days on civilian employees to help close the budget gap caused by sequestration, I also said we would do everything possible to find the money to reduce furlough days for our people. With the end of the fiscal year next month, managers across the DoD are making final decisions necessary to ensure we make the $37 billion spending cuts mandated by sequestration, while also doing everything possible to limit damage to military readiness and our workforce. We are joined in this regard by managers in non-defense agencies who are also working to accommodate sequestration cuts while minimizing mission damage. As part of that effort at the Department of Defense, I am announcing today that, thanks to the DoD’s efforts to identify savings and help from Congress, we will reduce the total numbers of furlough days for DoD civilian employees from 11 to six.

    When sequestration took effect on March 1, DoD faced shortfalls of more than $30 billion in its budget for day-to-day operating costs because of sequestration and problems with wartime funding. At that point we faced the very real possibility of unpaid furloughs for civilian employees of up to 22 days.

    As early as January, DoD leaders began making painful and far reaching changes to close this shortfall: civilian hiring freezes, layoffs of temporary workers, significant cuts in facilities maintenance, and more. We also sharply cut training and maintenance. The Air Force stopped flying in many squadrons, the Navy kept ships in port, and the Army cancelled training events. These actions have seriously reduced military readiness.

    By early May, even after taking these steps, we still faced day-to-day budgetary shortfalls of $11 billion. At that point I decided that cutting any deeper into training and maintenance would jeopardize our core readiness mission and national security, which is why I announced furloughs of 11 days.

    Hoping to be able to reduce furloughs, we submitted a large reprogramming proposal to Congress in May, asking them to let us move funds from acquisition accounts into day-to-day operating accounts. Congress approved most of this request in late July, and we are working with them to meet remaining needs. We are also experiencing less than expected costs in some areas, such as transportation of equipment out of Afghanistan. Where necessary, we have taken aggressive action to transfer funds among services and agencies. And the furloughs have saved us money.

    As a result of these management initiatives, reduced costs, and reprogramming from Congress, we have determined that we can make some improvements in training and readiness and still meet the sequestration cuts. The Air Force has begun flying again in key squadrons, the Army has increased funding for organizational training at selected units, and the Navy has restarted some maintenance and ordered deployments that otherwise would not have happened. While we are still depending on furlough savings, we will be able to make up our budgetary shortfall in this fiscal year with fewer furlough days than initially announced.

    This has been one of the most volatile and uncertain budget cycles the Department of Defense has ever experienced. Our fiscal planning has been conducted under a cloud of uncertainty with the imposition of sequestration and changing rules as Congress made adjustments to our spending authorities.

    As we look ahead to fiscal year 2014, less than two months away, the Department of Defense still faces major fiscal challenges. If Congress does not change the Budget Control Act, DoD will be forced to cut an additional $52 billion in FY 2014, starting on October 1. This represents 40 percent more than this year’s sequester-mandated cuts of $37 billion. Facing this uncertainty, I cannot be sure what will happen next year, but I want to assure our civilian employees that we will do everything possible to avoid more furloughs.

    I want to thank our civilian workers for their patience and dedication during these extraordinarily tough times, and for their continued service and devotion to our department and our country. I know how difficult this has been for all of you and your families. Your contribution to national security is invaluable, and I look forward to one day putting this difficult period behind us. Thank you and God Bless you and your families.

    Biographies:
    Chuck Hagel
    Related Sites:
    Special Report: Sequestration
    Secretary Hagel’s Memorandum

    SOURCE

    http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=120587

     

    DoD reduces furloughs to 6 days

    August 7, 2013 | By 

    The Defense Department reduced the number of furlough days for civilian employees from 11 days to 6 days, an Aug. 6 DoD press release says.

    Due to sequestration, the DoD faced $37 billion in spending cuts.

    The DoD submitted a large reprogramming proposal to Congress in May, asking them to let the DoD move funds from acquisition accounts into day-to-day operating accounts, the press release says. Congress approved most of this request in late July, the press release says

    In a recent survey on Federal IT Reform, Senior government IT executives laid out their vision for the coming year, detailing challenges and identifying priorities. To read more about these timely results click here to download the summary today.

    The DoD is also experiencing less than expected costs in some areas, such as transportation of equipment out of Afghanistan, so the agency took action to transfer funds among services and agencies.

    Originally the DoD projected that it would have to furlough its civilian workers for 22 days.

    On May 14, Hagel announced that civilian DoD employees would be furloughed 11 days.

    The DoD cut back on facilities maintenance, worked to shift funds from investment to operations and maintenance accounts and reduced many other non-essential programs to reduce the furlough days, DoD Secretary Chuck Hagel said in a May 14 press release.

    DoD furloughs began July 8 at a rate of one day per week.

    For more:
    – go to the DoD press release

    Related Articles:
    DoD to furlough civilian workforce for 11 days, Hagel says
    DoD still evaulating whether to furlough employees, Hale says

    Read more: DoD reduces furloughs to 6 days – FierceGovernment http://www.fiercegovernment.com/story/dod-reduces-furloughs-6-days/2013-08-07#ixzz2bmPBCHBZ

    SOURCE

    http://www.fiercegovernment.com/story/dod-reduces-furloughs-6-days/2013-08-07?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

     

    Read Full Post »

    Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, Cardiologists’ Practice Management Decisions Unclear

    Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

    Washington-Watch

    ACA Delays Decisions in Cardiology

    Published: Jun 28, 2013

    By Chris Kaiser, Cardiology Editor, MedPage Today
    Since the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, cardiologists have been mired in a fog of uncertainty, leading to delays in making important practice management decisions.

    “When I get together with colleagues at national meetings, I get the sense that nobody really understands the future,” said Cam Patterson, MD, MBA, chief of the division of cardiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    That uncertainty “throws a wrench into the planning process,” including recruitment and benchmark setting, he told MedPage Today.

    “It’s a major sea change,” added Thomas Tu, MD, director of the cardiac catheterization lab for the Louisville Cardiology Group in Louisville, Ky., who notes that physicians are “struggling” to find ways they can be influential in the new environment.

    Patterson noted the plight of young cardiologists seeking jobs in a healthcare market unsure of how or when to make its next move.

    “It’s challenging to hire new recruits when budgetary and human resources decisions are essentially on hold until there is a better understanding of what the ACA will bring,” he commented.

    Regarding setting benchmarks, Patterson said the days of merely imagining your quality is as good as the next practice or hospital are gone.

    Cold, hard data are the new norm, but which data and how best to collect and analyze them, as well as apply the results in a robust and meaningful way, are being worked out slowly.

    “As with everyone else, we are scrambling to get a grip on what our quality measures are,” Patterson said.

    Education and Prevention Will Be Key

    Hospitalists, as well as advanced nurse practitioners and physician assistants, can help ease the workload due to the shortage of primary care providers, a shortage that is particularly acute in California, according to C. Noel Bairey Merz, MD, director of the Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

    “If the reform happens the way it is intended, we should have an integrated healthcare system where primary prevention — management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking cessation counseling, and therapeutic lifestyle changes — is handled at the primary care level,” she said.

    The truth of the matter, however, is that it takes twice as long to train the average general physician as it does an average nurse practitioner, and four times as long as the average physician assistant.

    “It’s a lot to expect of physician extenders to practice primary care medicine,” Merz toldMedPage Today.

    “A better system is the medical home model, with physician team leaders and physician extenders who work on protocols. The physician extenders would be licensed and would be able to work autonomously within a protocol,” she said.

    Five years ago, the cardiology department at Geisinger Health Center in Danville, Pa., employed four nurse practitioners or clinical nurse specialists. Today, there are 12 and the department is seeking three more, according to James Blankenship, MD, vice president of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, as well as an interventional cardiologist at Geisinger.

    Blankenship also said that acknowledging the need for more primary care providers is to miss half of the equation. “We will need more specialists, as well.”

    Given the newly insured patients coming into the system, as well as the aging Medicare population, cardiologists will be stretched pretty thin. But the field of cardiology has been instrumental in advocating teamwork among the different specialties for years, he said. “That’s a train that’s already on the tracks.”

    Merz noted an expectation to see more cardiovascular care teams in response to the ACA. Such teams typically consist of a physician leader, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, behavioral experts, rehab professionals, and others.

    These teams are vital for the care of high-risk patients such as survivors of angioplasty, bypass surgery, and heart failure, she said, especially since there aren’t enough cardiologists to do it all.

    Echoing Blankenship, Merz said that cardiologists will probably be busier than ever as heart disease remains the leading killer among men and women as the population ages. She noted a decline in the most severe type of heart attack — ST-segment elevation MI, or STEMI — in the Medicare population, a decline that is likely multifactorial, but two reasons stand out as attributable to the decline — the use of low-dose aspirin and statin therapy for primary and secondary prevention, she said.

    “At whatever level these medications are prescribed and managed — primary care physician, nurse practitioner, cardiologist — one thing is clear: they work and they should continue to be utilized at the front line of heart disease management,” Merz said.

    Patients with chronic diseases already consume a great deal of healthcare resources. The other side of that coin is prevention, noted Kathy Berra, MSN, ANP, president of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association and a nurse at Stanford Prevention Research Center in Stanford, Calif.

    “Prevention is a family affair. It’s been shown that when women take care of themselves, the health of the family improves.”

    Emerging as one of the more important gatekeepers for women’s health — including cardiovascular health — are ob/gyns, Berra said.

    Gynecologists have increased their efforts to quiz women about heart disease risk factors such as hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes. If red flags are apparent, patients can be referred to primary care providers, internal medicine physicians, or cardiologists.

    “Ob/gyns are on the front line of women’s health. Perhaps under the ACA model, these specialists will have a closer relationship with cardiologists,” Berra told MedPage Today.

    Regarding nurses and other care providers in hospitals, they need to be able to educate patients about how to take care of themselves post-discharge, how to understand the importance of their medications, and how to best re-connect with their nonhospital environment.

    Readmission is at epidemic proportions and it can be reined in by patient education at the hospital level. Even pharmacists are getting more involved in patient education.

    Scott & White Hospital in Temple, Texas, has a program that encourages adherence by waiving drug copays following an education session, according to James Rohack, MD, director of the Center for Healthcare Policy at Scott & White.

    Patients on Seniorcare who are on five medications or more are asked if they want to participate in the program. If they agree, they meet with a pharmacist once a month for 15 to 30 minutes. The pharmacist goes over everything about the patient’s medication, listens to any concerns, and sends him or her home with new medications, waiving the copay.

    “Having no copay is a great benefit for patients on fixed incomes, but it goes beyond that. A little bit of education goes a long way and if patients can be reminded once a month about the importance of taking their medications, we will have fewer hospitalizations,” Rohack said.

    Accountable Care Organizations

    The development of ACOs is probably one of the biggest challenges under the ACA, said Geisinger’s Blankenship.

    The promise of ACOs is to have better integrated care, less fragmented care among various providers. Part of this integrated care involves incentives to minimize procedures that are either unnecessary or could be replaced with a less costly treatment.

    “Having been under a fee-for-service model for a long time, some in cardiology might find the new paradigm challenging,” Blankenship suggested.

    ACOs are supposed to help take the sting out of moving away from the fee-for-service model by providing the opportunity for better coordinated care — which should translate into a higher quality of care.

    However, ACOs can be difficult to set up, especially from scratch, as they have a large startup cost, he said.

    One of the most important aspects of an ACO is to have a solid network of primary care doctors. Patterson, at UNC Chapel Hill, said the uncertainty of whether his state will expand Medicaid has led to the “very aggressive acquisition of primary care practices.”

    “The goal is to have enough physicians and patients so that we will have a low-cost ACO when we are ready to implement that model. We are going to need about 1 million patients to have an efficient ACO,” he said.

    But there are also fears that the ACA will deluge cardiologists with paperwork.

    “In the clinic, I spend as much time with paperwork as I do with patients — particularly with Medicare and Medicaid patients,” noted John Day, MD, director of Heart Rhythm Services at Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City, Utah. “Many of us are worried we haven’t even seen the beginning of the deluge.”

    The intrusion of paperwork and other government regulations tends to erode the time physicians get to spend with patients — “one of the primary reasons I wanted to be a doctor,” Day said.

    In addition, Day said that he and many of his colleagues are disappointed that the ACA did not address malpractice concerns. “Perhaps it’s not so much what’s in the bill as what is not in the bill,” he said.

    “Malpractice concerns are real; they scare me every day; it affects how you practice medicine. I don’t see how you can rein in costs without addressing the malpractice quagmire,” Day told MedPage Today.

    Shifting Sands

    “For those of us working in the trenches, we have a vague concept of the changes coming down the road,” said James A. de Lemos, MD, director of the coronary care unit at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas.

    “We seem to be too busy to think about the changes, which leads to one of my biggest worries — that I won’t have prepared my troops well enough,” he said.

    From a clinical perspective, it’s business as usual, with de Lemos and colleagues focused on growth and the development of referrals and procedure services.

    “We are concerned, however, that the entire paradigm is going to shift and what we’re building today might not be financially sound in the ACO model,” de Lemos told MedPage Today.

    De Lemos, who is active in cardiovascular biomarker research, suggested that biomarkers will become more important in the ACA era of healthcare.

    “It will no longer be prudent to send everyone with a complaint to a cardiologist,” he commented. “Biomarker screening may play a role as a triage method to separate out those who merit a trip to the cardiologist from those who can be treated by primary care doctors.”

    Rohack made these suggestions for getting ready for the changes associated with the ACA:

    • Make sure you are actively aware of your quality measures, your individual quality measures.
    • When caring for uninsured adults, make sure you are aware of the potential benefits with health insurance exchanges, because they may qualify.
    • Make sure you are aware of impending deadlines regarding the implementation of certain aspects associated with electronic medical records because penalties can be assessed for missing deadlines.

     

    Who Takes the Lead?

    There are a lot of moving pieces that will contribute to finding success in the new era of healthcare and leaders must emerge to help forge pathways that others can follow. Hospitalists will be among those leaders, says Jeffrey H. Barsuk, MD, MS, a hospitalist and director of Simulation and Patient Safety for Graduate Medical Education at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.

    “At our hospital, we are probably the largest group of physicians involved in healthcare safety, quality, and reform,” he said.

    The ACA, he told MedPage Today, is starting to have more of an impact on how he and his colleagues position themselves for the future.

    In particular, the new bundled payment and fee-per-encounter models are ideal scenarios where hospitalists can make a difference by bridging gaps in the continuity of care and helping to shorten the length of stay without compromising quality.

    Hospitalists can, for example, provide smoking cessation counseling for heart patients, discuss the importance of medication adherence, and check to ensure there are no contraindications to the medications or no potential for drug-drug adverse interactions.

    Ultimately, though, clinicians at all levels, primary care practitioners and specialists, will need to work closely together because, as interventionalist Tu noted, government intervention that is not well thought out can backfire. The ACA might save money in the short run, Tu said, but in the long term, there is a great potential “to damage the care of patients and harm the profession of medicine. Already many good people don’t want to be in the field anymore.”

    http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washington-Watch/Reform/40164?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2013-06-29&utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DailyHeadlines&utm_source=WC&eun=g406134d0r&userid=406134&email=serbangg@gmail.com&mu_id=5783576 

    Read Full Post »

    « Newer Posts - Older Posts »