Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Nitric oxide synthase’

Curator/ Author: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

In continuation with the previous posts that dealt with short history and chemistry of nitric oxide (NO), here I will try to highlight the pathways involved in NO chemical signalling.

NO is a very small molecule, with a short half life (<5 sec). It diffuses rapidly to its surroundings and is metabolised to nitrites and nitrates. It can travel short distances, a few micrometers, before it is oxidised. Although it was previously believed that NO can only exert its effect for a very short time as other nitrogen oxides were believed to be biologically inert. Recent data suggests that other NO containing compounds such as S- or N-nitrosoproteins and iron-nitrosyl complexes can be reduced back to produce NO. These NO containing compounds can serve as storage and can reach distant tissues via blood circulation, remote from their place of origin. Hence NO can have both paracrine and ‘endocrine’ effects.

Intracellularly the oxidants present in the cytosol determine the amount of bioacitivity that NO performs. NO can travel roughly 100 microns from NOS enzymes where it is produced. NOS enzymes on the other hand are localised to specific sub-cellular areas, which have relevant proteins in the vicinity as targets for signalling.

NO signalling occurs primarily via three mechanisms (according to Martínez-Ruiz et al):

  1. Classical: This occurs via soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC). Once NO is produced by NOS it diffuses to sGC intracellularly or even in other cells. SGC is highly sensitive for NO, even nanomolar amounts of NO activates sGC, thus making it a potent target for NO in signalling pathways. sGC in turn increases the conversion of GTP to cGMP. cGMP further mediates the regulation of contractile proteins and gene expression pathways via cGMP-activated protein kinases (PKGs). cGMPs cause confirmational changes in PKGs. Signalling by cGMP is terminated by the action of phosphodiestrases (PDEs). PDEs have become major therapeutic targets in the upcoming exciting research projects.
  2. Less classical: Within the mitochondria NO can compete with O2 and inhibit cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) enzyme. This is a reversible inhibition that depends on O2and NO concentrations and can occur at physiological levels of NO. Various studies have demonstrated that endogenously generated NO can inhibit respiration or that NOS inhibitors can increase respiration at cellular, tissue or whole animal level. Although the exact mechanism of CcO inhibition of NO is still debated, NO-CcO interaction is considered important signalling step in a variety of functions such as inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Interestingly, at higher concentration (~1nM) NO can cause irreversible inhibition of cellular oxidation by reversible and/or irreversible damage to the mitochondrial iron–sulfur centers,In addition to the above mentioned pathways, NO (along with AMP, ROS and O2), can also activate AMP- activated protein kinase (AMPK), an enzyme that plays a central role in regulating intracellular energy metabolism. NO can also regulate hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), an O2-dependent transcription factor that plays a key role in cell adaptation to hypoxia .
  3. Non- classical: S-nitrosylation or S-nitrosation is the covalent insertion of NO into thiol groups such as of cysteine residues of proteins. It is precise, reversible, and spatiotemporally restricted post translational modification. This chemical activity is dependent upon the reactivity between nitrosylating agent (a small molecule) and the target (protein residue). It might appear that this generic interaction results in non-specific, wide spread chemical activity with various proteins. However, three factors might determine the regulation of specificity of s-nitrosylation for signalling purposes:
  • Subcellular compartmentalisation: high concentrations of nitrosylating agents are required in the vicinity of target residues, thus making it a specific activity.
  • Site specificity: certain cysteine residues are more reactive in specific protein microenvironments than others, thus favouring their modification. As a result under physiological conditions only a specific number of cysteine residues would be modified, but under higher NO levels even the slow reacting ones would be modified. Increased impetus in research in this area to determine protein specificity to s-nitrosylation provides huge potential in discovering new therapeutic targets.
  • Denitrosylation: different rates of denitrosylation result in s-nitrosylation specificity.

Other modifications in non classical NO mechanisms include S-glutathionylation and tyrosine nitration

Peroxynitrite: It is one of the important reactive nitrogen species that has immense biological relevance. NO reacts with superoxide to form peroxynitrite. Production of peroxynitrite depletes the bioactivty of NO in physiological systems. Peroxynitrite can diffuse through membranes and react with cellular components such as mitochondrial proteins, DNA, lipids, thiols, and amino acid residues. Peroxynitrite can modify proteins such as haemoglobin, myoglobin and cytochrome c. it can alter calcium homeostasis and promote mitochondrial signalling of cell death. However, NO itself in low concentrations have protective action on mitochondrial signalling of cell death.

More details about various aspects of NO signalling can be obtained from the following references.

The post is based on the following Sources:

  1. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089158491100236Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.04.010
  2. http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?doi=338150Cardiology 2012;122:55-68 (DOI: 10.1159/000338150)
  3. http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1137266 J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3):580-581. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.016
  4. http://goo.gl/y6oY3

 

In addition, other aspects of NO involvement in biological systems in humans are covered in the following posts on this site:

  1. Nitric Oxide and Platelet Aggregation
  2. Inhaled NO in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension and Right Sided Heart Failure
  3. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production
  4. Nitric Oxide in bone metabolism

Read Full Post »

 

Author: Larry Bernstein, MD

 

Creagh-BrownBC, Griffiths MJD, Evans TW. “Bench-to-bedside review: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults”. Crit Care.  2009;  13(3): 221. Published online 2009 May 29. doi:  10.1186/cc7734. PMCID: PMC2717403.

This article is modified from a review series on Gaseous mediators, edited by Peter Radermacher.  Other articles in the series can be found online athttp://ccforum.com/series/gaseous_mediators

 

Part I.   Basic and downstream effects of inhaled NO

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO), a mediator of vascular tone produces pulmonary vasodilatation with low pulmonary vascular resistance. The route of administration delivers NO selectively improving oxygenation. Developments in our understanding of the cellular and molecular actions of NO may help to explain the results of randomised controlled trials of inhaled NO.

Introduction

Nitric oxide (NO), a determinant of local blood flow is formed by the action of NO synthase (NOS) on L-arginine in the presence of molecular oxygen. Inhaled NO results in preferential pulmonary vasodilatation it lowers pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), correcting hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). However, in the therapeutic use of gaseous NO to patients with acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and related conditions, evidence of a benefit is disappointing.

Administration of inhaled nitric oxide to adults

The licensed indication of inhaled NO is restricted to persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates. Pharma-ceutical NO is costly, and raises concerns over potential adverse effects of NO. Therefore, an advisory board under the auspices of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists published recommendations in 2005 [1]. The sponsor had no authorship or editorial control over the content of the meetings or any subsequent publication.

The NO is administered as a NO/nitrogen mixture to the tubing of ventilated patients, and the NO and NO2 concen-trations are monitored, with methemoglobin levels measured regularly. Even though rapid withdrawal induces rebound pulmonary hypertension, it is avoided by gradual withdrawal [2]. There is variation in vasodilatory response to administered NO between patients [2] and in the same patient, and there is a leftward shift in the dose-response curve with use. Toxicity and loss of the therapeutic effect is a risk of excessive NO administration [3]. A survey of 54 intensive care units in the UK as well as results of a European survey revealed that the most common usage was in treating ARDS, followed by pulmonary hypertension [4], [5]. The only use of therapeutic inhaled NO usage in US adult patients reported from a single medical site (2000 to 2003) reveals that the most common application was in the treatment of RVF in patients after cardiac surgery and then, in surgical and medical patients for refractory hypoxemia[6].

Inhaled nitric oxide in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

ALI and ARDS are characterised by hypoxemia despite high inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO[arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen] ratios of less than 300 mm Hg [40 kPa] and less than 200 mm Hg [27 kPa], respectively) in the context of evidence of pulmonary edema, and the absence of left atrial hypertension suggestive of a cardiogenic mechanism [7]. Pathologically, there is alveolar inflammation and injury leading to increased pulmonary capillary permeability and a serous alveolar fluid with inflammatory infiltrate. This is manifest clinically as hypoxemia, inadequate alveolar perfusion, venous-arterial shunting, atelectasis, and reduced compliance.

Since 1993, when the first investigation on the effects of NO on adult patients with ARDS was published [8], there have been several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect in ALI/ARDS  ​(Table 1). The first systematic review and meta-analysis [9] found no beneficial effect on mortality or ventilator-free days. A more recent meta-analysis that considered 12 RCTs with a total of 1,237 patients [10] concluded: [1] no mortality benefit, [2] improved oxygenation at 24 hours (13% improvement in PaO2/FiOratio) at the cost of increased risk of renal dysfunction (relative risk 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.02). Based on a trend to increased mortality in patients receiving NO, the authors suggested that it not be used in ALI/ARDS.  Why the NO fails to improve patient outcomes requires clarifying the effects of inhaled NO that occur outside the pulmonary vasculature.

From:

Published online 2009 May 29. doi: 10.1186/cc7734

Table 1

Studies of inhaled nitric oxide in adult patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome

The biological action of inhaled nitric oxide

NO was first identified as an endothelium-derived growth factor (EDGF) and an important determinant of local blood flow [11]. NO reacts very rapidly with free radicals, certain amino acids, and transition metal ions. The action of NOS on the semi-essential amino acid L-arginine in the presence of molecular oxygen and its identity with EDGF was the basis for the Nobel discovery of Furthgott and others [12]. Three isoforms of NO are: neuronal NOS, inducible NOS (iNOS or NOS2), and endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS3). Calcium-independent iNOS generates higher concentrations of NO [13] than the other isoforms and its role has been implicated in the pathogenesis septic shock.

Exogenous NO is administered by controlled inhalation or through intravenous administration of NO donors. It was thought to have no remote or non-pulmonary effects. The effect NO has on circulating targets is shown. (Figure 1).

From:

Published online 2009 May 29. doi: 10.1186/cc7734

Figure 1

New paradigm of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) action. Figure 1 illustrates the interactions between inhaled NO and the contents of the pulmonary capillaries. Although NO was considered to be inactivated by hemoglobin (Hb), proteins including Hb and albumin contain reduced sulphur (thiol) groups that react reversibly with NO causing it to lose its vasodilating properties. A stable derivate, in the presence of oxyhemoglobin, is formed by a reaction resulting in nitrosylation of a cysteine residue of the β subunit of Hb.  The binding of NO to the heme iron predominates in the deoxygenated state [14]. If circulating erythrocytes store and release NO peripherally in areas of low oxygen tension, this augments peripheral blood flow and oxygen delivery via decreased systemic vascular resistance [15]. Thus, NO can act as an autocrine or paracrine mediator but when stabilised may exert endocrine influences [16]. In addition to de novo synthesis, supposedly inert anions nitrate (NO3) and nitrite (NO2) can be recycled to form NO, and nitrite might mediate extra-pulmonary effects of inhaled NO [17]. In the hypoxic state, NOS cannot produce NO and deoxy-hemoglobin catalyses NO release from nitrite, potentially providing a hypoxia-specific vasodilatory effect. Given that effects of inhaled NO are mediated in part by S-nitrolysation of circulating proteins, therapies aiming at directly increasing S-nitrosothiols have been developed.

Introduce another effect. When inhaled with high concentrations of oxygen, gaseous NO slowly forms the toxic product NO2, but other potential reactions include nitration (addition of NO2+), nitrosation (addition of NO+), or nitrosylation (addition of NO), and reaction with reactive oxygen species such as superoxide to form reactive nitrogen species (RNS) such as peroxynitrite (ONOO). These reactions of NO, potentially cytotoxic NO2 , and covalent nitration of tyrosine in proteins by RNS lead to measures of oxidative stress.

In a small observational study, inhaled ethyl nitrite safely reduced PVR without systemic side effects in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn [18]. In animal models, pulmonary vasodilatation was maximal in hypoxia and had prolonged duration of action after cessation of administration [19].

References

  1. Germann P, Braschi A, Della Rocca G, Dinh-Xuan AT, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults: European expert recommendations.  Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1029–1041. [PubMed]
  2. Griffiths MJ, Evans TW. Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2683–2695. [PubMed]
  3. Gerlach H, Keh D, Semmerow A, Busch T, et al. Dose-response characteristics during long-term inhalation of nitric oxide in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1008–1015. [PubMed]
  4. Cuthbertson BH, Stott S, Webster NR. Use of inhaled nitric oxide in British intensive therapy units. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:696–700.[PubMed]
  5. Beloucif S. A European survey of the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the ICU. Working Group on Inhaled NO in the ICU of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:864–877.[PubMed]
  6. George I, Xydas S, Topkara VK, Ferdinando C, et al. Clinical indication for use and outcomes after inhaled nitric oxide therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:2161–2169. [PubMed]
  7. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J,et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:818–824. [PubMed]
  8. Rossaint R, Falke KJ, López F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med.1993;328:399–405. [PubMed]
  9. Sokol J, Jacobs SE, Bohn D. Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxic respiratory failure in children and adults: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:989–998. [PubMed]
  10. Adhikari NK, Burns KE, Friedrich JO, Granton JT, Cook DJ, Meade MO. Effect of nitric oxide on oxygenation and mortality in acute lung injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.  BMJ. 2007;334:779.[PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Palmer RM, Ferrige AG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor.  Nature. 1987;327:524–526. [PubMed]
  12. Nitric Oxide: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1998 Robert F. Furchgott, Louis J. Ignarro, Ferid Murad. Leaders in Pharmacutical Intelligence.  A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics
  13. McCarthy HO, Coulter JA, Robson T, Hirst DG. Gene therapy via inducible nitric oxide synthase: a tool for the treatment of a diverse range of pathological conditions. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;60:999–1017. [PubMed]
  14. Coggins MP, Bloch KD. Nitric oxide in the pulmonary vasculature.   Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1877–1885. [PubMed]
  15. McMahon TJ, Doctor A. Extrapulmonary effects of inhaled nitric oxide: role of reversible S-nitrosylation of erythrocytic hemoglobin. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:153–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Cokic VP, Schechter AN. Effects of nitric oxide on red blood cell development and phenotype. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;82:169–215. [PubMed]
  17. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT. The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008; 7:156–167. [PubMed]
  18. Moya MP, Gow AJ, Califf RM, Goldberg RN, Stamler JS. Inhaled ethyl nitrite gas for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Lancet  2002; 360:141–143. [PubMed]

Creagh-BrownBC, Griffiths MJD, Evans TW. “Bench-to-bedside review: Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults”. Crit Care.  2009;  13(3): 221. Published online 2009 May 29. doi:  10.1186/cc7734. PMCID: PMC2717403.

This article is modified from a review series on Gaseous mediators, edited by Peter Radermacher.

Other articles in the series can be found online athttp://ccforum.com/series/gaseous_mediators

Part II. Application of inhaled NO and circulatory effects

Cardiovascular effects

NO activates soluble guanylyl cyclase by binding to its heme group to form cyclic guanosine 3’5′-monophosphate (cGMP)   activating a protein kinase. Consequently, myosin sensitivity to calcium-induced contraction is reduced lowering the intracellular calcium concentration as a result of activating calcium-sensitive potassium channels and inhibiting release of calcium. The smooth muscle cell (SMC) relaxation with decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and decreased RV after load could improve cardiac output. However, left ventricular impairment associated with decrease in PVR allows increased RV output to a greater extent than the left ventricle can accommodate and the increase in left atrial pressure reinforces pulmonary edema.

Inhaled NO augments the normal physiological mechanism of hypoxic pulmonary ventilation (HPV) and improves systemic oxygenation ​(Figure 2). The effects of inhaled NO on systemic oxygenation are limited. Experiments show that intravenously administered vasodilators counteract HPV [3]. However, the non-pulmonary effects of inhaled NO include increased renal and hepatic blood flow and oxygenation [14].

From:

Published online 2009 May 29. doi: 10.1186/cc7734

Figure 2

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV).       (a) Normal ventilation-perfusion (VQ) matching. (b) HPV results in VQ matching despite variations in ventilation and gas exchange between lung units. (c) Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) augmenting VQ matching by vasodilating.

Non-cardiovascular effects relevant to lung injury

Neutrophils are important cellular mediators of ALI. Limiting neutrophil production of oxidative species and proteolysis reduces lung injury. In neonates, prolonged administration of NO diminished neutrophil-mediated oxidative stress [19]. Neutrophil deformability and CD18 expression were reduced in animal models [20] accomp-anied by decreases in adhesion and migration [21]. These changes limit damage to the alveolar-capillary membrane and the accumulation of protein-rich fluid within the alveoli. Platelet activation and aggregation, intra-alveolar thrombi, contribute to ALI. Inhaled NO attenuates the procoagulant activity in animal models of ALI [22] and a similar effect is seen in patients with ALI [23], but also in healthy volunteers [23,24]. In patients with ALI, decreased surfactant activity in the alveoli and noncompliance, as we recall is hyaline membrane disease accompanied by impaired pulmonary function [25].  The deleterious effects of the NO damages the alveolar wall with loss of surfactant by reactions with RNS [26]. Finally, prolonged exposure to NO in experimental models impairs cellular respiration [27].

The failure of inhaled NO to improve outcome in ALI/ARDS is therefore potentially due to several factors. First, patients with ALI/ARDS die of multi-organ failure, as the actions of NO are not expected to improve the outcome of multi-organ failure, which is a cytokine driven process leading to circulatory collapse. Indeed, the expected beneficial effect of inhaled NO is abrogated by detrimental downstream systemic effects discussed. Second, ALI/ARDS is a heterogeneous condition with diverse causes. Finally, using inhaled NO without frequent dose titration risks unwanted systemic effects without the expected benefits.

Other clinical uses of inhaled nitric oxide

Pulmonary hypertension and acute right ventricular failure

RVF may develop when there is abnormally elevated PVR and/or impaired RV perfusion.  ​Table 2 lists common causes of acute RVF. The RV responds poorly to inotropic agents but is exquisitely sensitive to after load reduction.

From:

Published online 2009 May 29. doi: 10.1186/cc7734

Table 2

Reducing PVR will have beneficial effects on cardiac output and therefore oxygen delivery. In the context of high RV afterload with low systemic pressures or when there is a limitation of flow within the right coronary artery [28], RV failure triggers a backward failure of venous return, as diagrammatically represented in  ​Figure 3.

From:

Published online 2009 May 29. doi: 10.1186/cc7734

Figure 3

Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure. CO, cardiac output; LV, left ventricle; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; RV, right ventricle.

Inhaled NO is used when RV failure complicates cardiac surgery, as cardiopulmonary bypass per se causes diminished endogenous NO production [29]. There is marked variation in response to inhaled NO between patients [30] and in the same patient over time. After prolonged use, there is a leftward shift in the dose-response curve.  The risk of excessive NO administration is associated with toxicity and loss of the therapeutic effect without regular titration against a therapeutic goal [31].  Further, cardiac transplantation may be complicated by pulmonary hypertension and RVF that are improved with NO [32]. Early ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation manifests clinically as pulmonary edema and is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality [33,34]. Although NO has been administered in this circumstance [35], it hasn’t prevented ischemia-reperfusion injury in clinical lung transplantation [36]. Inhaled NO has been used successfully in patients with cardiogenic shock and RVF associated with acute myocardial infarction [37,38,46], and in patients with acute RVF following acute pulmonary venous thrombo-emboli [39, 47].  An explanation is needed in view of the downstream effects of systemic vasoconstriction and MOF previously identified. No systematic evaluation of inhaled NO and its effect on clinical outcome has been conducted in these conditions.

Acute chest crises of sickle cell disease

Acute chest crises are the second most common cause of hospital admission in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and are responsible for 25% of all related deaths [40]. Acute chest crises are manifest by fever, respiratory symptoms or chest pain, and new pulmonary infiltrate on chest  x-ray. The major contributory factors are related to vaso-occlusion. Hemolysis of sickled erythrocytes releasing Hb into the circulation generates reactive oxygen species and reacts with NO [41]. In SCD, the free Hb depletes NO. In addition arginase 1 is released, depleting the arginine needed for NO production, [42]. While secondary PVH is common in adults with SCD the physiological rationale for the use of inhaled NO needs to be considered, except for the complication just referred to. Thus far, iNO has failed to demonstrate either persistent improvements in physiology or beneficial effects on any accepted measure of outcome in clinical trials (other than its licensed indication in neonates). Therefore, inhaled NO is usually reserved for refractory hypoxemia.

Potential problems in designing and conducting RCTs in the efficacy of inhaled NO are numerous. Blinded trials will be difficult to conduct as the effects of inhaled NO are immediately apparent. Recruitment is limited as there is little time for consent/assent or randomization. Finally, industry funding might cast doubt on the independence of the trial results.

Inhaled NO is an unproved tool in the intensivist’s armamentarium of rescue therapies for refractory hypoxemia even though it has an established role in managing complications of cardiac surgery and in heart/lung transplantation. The current place for inhaled NO in the management of ALI/ARDS, acute sickle chest crisis, acute RV failure, and acute pulmonary embolism is a rescue therapy.

Abbreviations

ALI: acute lung injury; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; Hb: haemoglobin; HPV: hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction; iNO: inhaled nitric oxide; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; NO: nitric oxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; NOS: nitric oxide synthase; PaO2/FiO2: arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RNS: reactive nitrogen species; RV: right ventricle; RVF: right ventricular failure; SCD: sickle cell disease; SMC: smooth muscle cell.

  1. Hunter CJ. Inhaled nebulized nitrite is a hypoxia-sensitive NO-dependent selective pulmonary vasodilator. Nat Med 2004; 10:1122–1127. [PubMed]
  2. Gessler P, Nebe T, Birle A, Mueller W, Kachel W. A new side effect of inhaled nitric oxide in neonates and infants with pulmonary hypertension: functional impairment of the neutrophil respiratory burst. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:252–258. [PubMed]
  3. Sato Y, Walley KR, Klut ME, English D, D’yachkova Y, et al. Nitric oxide reduces the sequestration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in lung by changing deformability and CD18 expression. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:1469–1476. [PubMed]
  4. Bloomfield GL, Holloway S, Ridings PC, Fisher BJ, et al. Pretreatment with inhaled nitric oxide inhibits neutrophil migration and oxidative activity resulting in attenuated sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:584–593. [PubMed]
  5. Kermarrec N, Zunic P, Beloucif S, Benessiano J, et al. Impact of inhaled nitric oxide on platelet aggregation and fibrinolysis in rats with endotoxic lung injury. Role of cyclic guanosine 5′-monophosphate. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:833–839.[PubMed]
  6. Gries A, Bode C, Peter K, Herr A, Böhrer H, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide inhibits human platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression, and fibrinogen binding in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. 1998;97:1481–1487. [PubMed]
  7. Gries A, Herr A, Motsch J, Holzmann A, Weimann J, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded and cross-matched study on the antiplatelet effect of inhaled nitric oxide in healthy volunteers. Thromb Hemost 2000; 83:309–315. [PubMed]
  8. Cheng IW, Ware LB, Greene KE, Nuckton TJ, et al. Prognostic value of surfactant proteins A and D in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:20–27. [PubMed]
  9. Robbins CG, Davis JM, Merritt TA, Amirkhanian JD et al. Combined effects of nitric oxide and hyperoxia on surfactant function and pulmonary inflammation. Am J Physiol 1995; 269(4 Pt 1):L545–550. [PubMed]
  10. Clementi E, Brown GC, Feelisch M, Moncada S. Persistent inhibition of cell respiration by nitric oxide: crucial role of S-nitro-sylation of mitochondrial complex I and protective action of glutathione. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:7631–7636. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Vlahakes GJ. Right ventricular failure following cardiac surgery. Coron Artery Dis 2005; 16:27–30. [PubMed]
  12. Morita K, Ihnken K, Buckberg GD, Sherman MP, Ignarro LJ. Pulmonary vasoconstriction due to impaired nitric oxide production after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61:1775–1780.[PubMed]
  13. Wessel DL, Adatia I, Giglia TM, Thompson JE, Kulik TJ. Use of inhaled nitric oxide and acetylcholine in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension and endothelial function after cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 1993; 88 (5 Pt 1):2128–2138. [PubMed]
  14. Solina A, Papp D, Ginsberg S, Krause T, et al. A comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14:12–17. [PubMed]
  15. Ardehali A, Hughes K, Sadeghi A, Esmailian F, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide for pulmonary hypertension after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2001; 72:638–641. [PubMed]
  16. King RC, Binns OA, Rodriguez F, Kanithanon RC, et al. Reperfusion injury significantly impacts clinical outcome after pulmonary transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:1681–1685. [PubMed]
  17. de Perrot M, Liu M, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S. Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167:490–511. [PubMed]
  18. Kemming GI, Merkel MJ, Schallerer A, Habler OP, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) for the treatment of early allograft failure after lung transplantation. Munich Lung Transplant Group.  Intensive Care Med 1998; 24:1173–1180. [PubMed]
  19. Meade MO, Granton JT, Matte-Martyn A, McRae K, aet al. Toronto Lung Transplant Program A randomized trial of inhaled nitric oxide to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167:1483–1489.[PubMed]
  20. Fujita Y, Nishida O, Sobue K, Ito H, et al.  Nitric oxide inhalation is useful in the management of right ventricular failure caused by myocardial infarction.  Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1379–1381. [PubMed]
  21. Inglessis I, Shin JT, Lepore JJ, Palacios IF, et al. Hemodynamic effects of inhaled nitric oxide in right ventricular myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:793–798. [PubMed]
  22. Szold O, Khoury W, Biderman P, Klausner JM,  et al. Inhaled nitric oxide improves pulmonary functions following massive pulmonary embolism: a report of four patients and review of the literature.  Lung 2006; 184:1–5. [PubMed]
  23. SiddiquiAK, Ahmed S. Pulmonary manifestations of sickle cell disease. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79:384–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Reiter CD, GladwinMT. An emerging role for nitric oxide in sickle cell disease vascular homeostasis and therapy. Curr Opin Hematol 2003; 10:99–107. [PubMed]
  25. GladwinMT, Vichinsky E. Pulmonary complications of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2254–2265. [PubMed]
  26. GladwinMT, Schechter AN. Nitric oxide therapy in sickle cell disease. Semin Hematol  2001; 38:333–342. [PubMed]
  27. Atz AM, Wessel DL. Inhaled nitric oxide in sickle cell disease with acute chest syndrome. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:988–990. [PubMed]
  28. Sullivan KJ, Goodwin SR, Evangelist J, Moore RD, Mehta P. Nitric oxide successfully used to treat acute chest syndrome of sickle cell disease in a young adolescent.  Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2563–2568. [PubMed]
  29. Al Hajeri A, Serjeant GR, Fedorowicz Z. Inhaled nitric oxide for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(1):CD006957. [PubMed]
  30. Bigatello LM, Stelfox HT, Hess D. Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in adults – opinions and evidence. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1014–1016. [PubMed]
  31. Dellinger RP, Zimmerman JL, Taylor RW, Straube RC, et al. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:15–23. [PubMed]
  32. Michael JR, Barton RG, Saffle JR, Mone M, et al.  Inhaled nitric oxide versus conventional therapy: effect on oxygenation in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157 (5 Pt 1): 1372–1380. [PubMed]
  33. Troncy E, Collet JP, Shapiro S, Guimond JG, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157 (5 Pt 1):1483–1488. [PubMed]
  34. Lundin S, Mang H, Smithies M, Stenqvist O, Frostell C. Inhalation of nitric oxide in acute lung injury: results of a European multicentre study. The European Study Group of Inhaled Nitric Oxide. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:911–919. [PubMed]
  35. Park KJ, Lee YJ, Oh YJ, Lee KS, Sheen SS, Hwang SC. Combined effects of inhaled nitric oxide and a recruitment maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Yonsei Med J 2003; 44:219–226.[PubMed]
  36. Taylor RW, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP, Straube RC, et al.  Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group. Low-dose inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA  2004; 291:1603–1609.[PubMed]

Related articles

 

Read Full Post »

Curator: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a type of autoimmune disease when the body’s immune system attacks and destroys body’s healthy tissue. It is characterised by lesions in the vessels and accumulation of collagen in the tissues. Although the pathogenesis of this disease is not clear, but one of the suggestions is that the endothelium fails to produce NO upon cold stimulation. Physiologically, NO acts as a vasodilator and its deficiency has been implicated in diseases such as hypertension and atherosclerosis.

In the body NO is generated when L-arginine is converted to L-citruline in the presence of NO synthase (NOS) enzyme, molecular oxygen, NADPH, and other cofactors. Principally, three isoenzymes of NOS are present in the body to catalyse the production of NO in various anatomic locations and under various physiological conditions. Three distinct genes encode for the three types of NOS i.e. endothelial (eNOS or NOS-3), neuronal (nNOS or NOS-1), and inducible (iNOS or NOS-2) NOS.

The inducible type 2 NOS (iNOS) may act as an immunoregulator. Several reports have provided evidence for the existence of a NO pathway in human mononuclear cells.

It is not well established if NO production increases or decreases in SSc patients. In one study by Allanore et al, NO production was shown to be reduced in plasma and PBMC supernatants, and iNOS synthesis in PBMCs.

The authors of this study investigated NO metabolites in plasma and PBMC supernatants, and iNOS synthesis in PBMC to see if the level of NO production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was low in SSc, as this might contribute to the vasodilatory abnormalities observed in this disease.

Eighteen patients with SSc were compared with two control groups: 16 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 23 patients with mechanical sciatica.The NO metabolites nitrite and nitrates were determined by flurometeric and spectrometeric assays respectively. iNOS expression was determined by using monoclonal anti‐NOS2 antibody and FACS analyses.

The data suggested a decrease in plasma NO concentration and iNOS production in PBMC in patients with systemic sclerosis as compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis and sciatica. Subgroup analysis showed no difference between limited and diffuse SSc forms. Total plasma nitrite concentrations in five healthy volunteers were similar to those in patients with sciatica, which is consistent with this group being an appropriate control group.

Thus the authors suggest that low NO production in Ssc patients might be involved in the tendency towards vasospam.

However in other studies authors have shown an increase in NO production in SSc patients. Takagi et al set out to investigate this discrepancy in NO production in SSc patients. They sought to determine whether increased NO levels are associated with various clinical subsets of SSc patients, and to assess the contribution of fibroblasts in skin lesions to NO synthesis.

In this study Takagi et al measured the levels of serum NO metabolites in SSc patients and determined the contribution of the excessive production of NO synthase (NOS)-2 by skin fibroblasts to NO synthesis. Serum NO levels of 45 patients with SSc were significantly higher than those of 20 healthy volunteers. In addition, some clinical features of SSc (the extent of skin fibrosis, short disease duration, and the complication of active fibrosing alveolitis) were all correlated positively with the levels of NO metabolites in SSc patients. RT PCR was used to determine NOS-2 mRNA expression levels in cultured fibroblasts derived from SSc patients.

The authors showed that serum NO levels were significantly elevated in patients with SSc as compared to healthy normal controls. They also demonstrated that NOS-2 was produced spontaneously by cultured SSc fibroblasts, suggesting that increased serum NO levels might reflect in part the elevated expression of NOS-2 by fibroblasts derived from SSc patients.

The discrepancy in NO production could be explained by disease stage, severity of tissue fibrosis and various circumstances of endothelial damage. Takagi et al found increased NO production in early stages of SSc with tissue fibrosis and not in later stages of the disease. Hence they suggest that NO levels may be a sensitive marker of the early stages of the development of severe tissue fibrosis in SSc patients, although a longitudinal and prospective study is needed to confirm this.

NO is known to have dual functions in the body, both beneficial and cyototoxic. Generally it depends upon the concentration and the duration of NO production. Similarily in SSC, the dual functions of NO seem to be both beneficial (as a vasodilator) and harmful (as a cytotoxic effector) in regard to the clinical manifestations of SSc. One of the limitations of these studies is that they did not investigate the absolute concentrations of NO production but only its metaoblites were measured. This might be due the fact that NO is a short-lived molecule (half-life < 5 s) and it is challenging to quantify NO production at single cell level. Such techniques (e.g.DAR 4M AM flurophore) have been developed but are challenging to apply to various experimental set ups. DAR 4M AM has been used to quantify NO production online in single cells. In SSc determination of absolute NO concentrations at cellular or tissue level at various stages of the disease process will go a long way in solving the discrepancy of NO production in SSc patients.

Sources

Low levels of nitric oxide (NO) in systemic sclerosis: inducible NO synthase production is decreased in cultured peripheral blood monocyte/macrophage cells. Y. Allanore, D. Borderie, P. Hilliquin, A. Hernvann, M. Levacher, H. Lemaréchal, O. G. Ekindjian, and A. Kahan. (2001) 40(10): 1089-1096 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/40.10.1089.

Serum nitric oxide (NO) levels in systemic sclerosis patients: correlation between NO levels and clinical features. K. Takagi, Y. Kawaguchi, M. Hara, T. Sugiura, M. Harigai, N. Kamatani . Article first published online: 24 NOV 2003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2003.02320.x Clinical & Experimental Immunology: Volume 134, Issue 3, pages 538–544, December 2003

Extracellular NO signalling from a mechanically stimulated osteocyte. Aviral Vatsa, Theo H. Smit, Jenneke Klein-Nulend. Journal of biomechanics 1 January 2007 (volume 40 issue Pages S89-S95 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.015)

Read Full Post »

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of Agent Alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production

 

Curator and Investigator Initiated Study: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Agent Alternative #1: Niacin (Vitamin B3), Fibrates and Genistein

Low HDL levels predict an increased risk of coronary artery disease independently of LDL levels, and 60–70% of major cardiovascular events cannot be prevented with current approaches focused on LDL, such as statin therapy (Werner et al., 2003), (Vasa et al., 2001a), (Walter et al., 2002), (Dimmeler et al., 2001), (Llevadot et al., 2001), (Spyridopoulos et al., 2004). In addition, low HDL levels are particularly common in males with early-onset atherosclerosis (Wilson et al., 1988). Based on these observations, prevention trials have been performed with agents such as niacin and fibrates, which raise HDL, and they indicate that modest increases in HDL independently yield a significant reduction in cardiovascular events (Rubins et al., 1999), (Brown et al., 2001), (Boden, 2000). Thus, there is compelling evidence that HDL is not solely a marker of lower risk of cardiovascular disease but instead is a mediator of vascular health.

Genistein – Phytoestrogens have received widespread attention over the past few years because of their potential for preventing some highly prevalent chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and hormone-related cancers. Genistein, the primary soy-derived phytoestrogen, has various biological actions (Liu et al., 2004), including a weak estrogenic effect and inhibition of tyrosine kinases. Genistein acutely stimulates Nitric Oxide synthesis in vascular Eendothelial cells by a cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate-dependent mechanism (Liu et al., 2004). The intracellular signaling pathways for activation of eNOS by genistein were independent of PI3K/Akt or ERK/MAPK but depended on the cAMP/PKA cascade. In addition, the genistein action on eNOS was not inhibited by an ER antagonist and was unrelated to tyrosine kinase inhibition.

Studies demonstrate that genistein has antiatherogenic effects and inhibits proliferation of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Data from animal and in vitro studies suggest a protective role of genistein in the vasculature. Studies investigating its effect on plasma lipid profiles show either a moderate positive effect or a neutral effect. Some human intervention studies suggest a beneficial effect on atherosclerosis (Anthony et al., 1998), markers of cardiovascular risk (van der Schouw et al., 2000), vasomotor tone (Walker et al., 2001), vascular endothelial function (Squadrito et al., 2003), and systemic arterial compliance (Nestel et al., 1997). Genistein also inhibits human platelet aggregation in vitro (Dobrydneva et al., 2002), (Gottstein et al., 2003) and decreases TNF-induced monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 secretion in human vascular endothelial cells (Gottstein et al., 2003). Other studies suggest that genistein may induce vascular relaxation by cAMP-dependent mechanisms (Satake and Shibata, 1999) or inhibition of tyrosine kinases (Duarte et al., 1997). In vitro studies elucidating the cellular or molecular mechanisms of the genistein action on vascular cells are lacking.

NO produced is a potent vasodilator and also has anti-inflammatory (Yu et al., 2002), antiatherogenic (Shin et al., 1996), antithrombotic (Alonso and Radomski, 2003), and antiapoptotic properties (Kotamraju, 2001). Liu et al., (2004), hypothesized that genistein directly regulates vascular function through stimulation of eNOS and NO synthesis from vascular endothelial cells. To test this hypothesis, they focused on the acute effects of genistein on eNOS and the cellular signaling related to this effect. They specifically tested the protein kinase A and tyrosine kinase pathways because these have been proposed in previous vascular studies (Satake and Shibata, 1999), (Duarte et al., 1997).

In Liu et al., (2004) study, genistein acted directly on BAECs and HUVECs to activate eNOS and NO production through nongenomic mechanisms in whole vascular endothelial cells. The intracellular signaling pathways for activation of eNOS by genistein were independent of PI3K/Akt or ERK/MAPK but depended on the cAMP/PKA cascade. In addition, the genistein action on eNOS was not inhibited by an ER antagonist and was unrelated to tyrosine kinase inhibition. The findings suggest a molecular mechanism that may underlie some of the beneficial cardiovascular effects that have been proposed for genistein.

Agent Alternative #2: Serotonin, 5-HT

5-hydroxytryptamine evokes endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation

eNOS activation in microvascular endothelial bEnd.3 cell. NO plays an important role in the dynamic regulation of the intercellular junctions of the endothelium. They have shown that eNOS is enriched at these junctions, which is a prerequisite for its activation by agonists. At the junctions, eNOS co-localizes with PECAM-1, but not with VE-cadherin and plakoglobin. The nature of the molecular mechanisms that lead to the enrichment of eNOS at intercellular junctions, and which allow these junctions to be regulated by NO, remains to be determined. Data from three experiments are presented as means±S.D. ‘D’ represents l-NAME-dependent (i.e. NOS-mediated) nitrite formation (Grovers et al., 2002).

Comparative analysis of eNOS efficacy on NO production. 5-HT is second in effectiveness.

Agonist Nitrite (nmol·mg of protein-1) -l-NAME +l-NAME D None 0.31±0.05 0.08±0.05 0.23±0.07

A23187 (5µM) 1.44±0.06 0.35±0.06* 1.09±0.08†

Acetylcholine (1µM) 0.83±0.12 0.06±0.09 0.77±0.15†

5-Hydroxytryptamine (1µM) 0.94±0.07 0.05±0.05 0.88±0.08†

VEGF (20ng/ml) 0.60±0.03 0.10±0.03 0.50±0.05†

Bradykinin (1µM) 0.28±0.06 0.04±0.05 0.24±0.07

Histamine (10µM) 0.36±0.04 0.08±0.05 0.28±0.06

Activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) resulted in the production of nitric oxide (NO) that mediates the vasorelaxing properties of endothelial cells. The goal of this project was to address the possibility that 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) stimulates eNOS activity in bovine aortic endothelial cell (BAEC) cultures. McDuffie et al., (1999, 2000) tested the hypothesis that 5-HT receptors mediate eNOS activation by measuring agonist-stimulated [3H]L-citrulline ([3H]L-Cit) formation in BAEC cultures. They found that 5-HT stimulated the conversion of [3H]L- arginine ([3H]L-Arg) to [3H]L-Cit, indicating eNOS activation. The high affinity 5-HT1B receptor agonist, 5-nonyloxytryptamine (5-NOT)- stimulated [3H]L-Cit turnover responses were concentration-(0.01 nM to 100 microM) and time-dependent. Maximal responses were observed within 10 min following agonist exposures. These responses were effectively blocked by the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, isamoltane, the 5-HT1B/5-HT2 receptor antagonist, methiothepin, and the eNOS selective antagonists (0.01-10 microM): L-Nomega -monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) and L-N omega-iminoethyl-L-ornithine (L-NIO). Their findings lend evidence of a 5-HT1B receptor/eNOS pathway, accounting in part for the activation of eNOS by 5-HT.

3 orpholinosyndnonimine inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine induced phosphorylation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells.

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is a vasoactive substance that is taken up by endothelial cells to activate endothelial nitrite oxide synthase (eNOS). The activation of eNOS results in the production of nitric oxide (NO), which is responsible for vasodilation of blood vessels. NO also interacts with superoxide anion (O2*-) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO-), a potent oxidant that has been shown to induce vascular endothelial dysfunction (Richardson et al., 2003). They examined the ability of 3-morpholinosyndnonimine (SIN-1), an ONOO- generator, to inhibit 5-HT-induced phosphorylation of eNOS in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs). They observed that 5-HT phosphorylates Ser1179 eNOS in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Maximum phosphorylation occurred at 30 sec using a concentration of 1.0 microM 5-HT. BAECs treated with SIN-1 (1-1000 microM) for 30 min showed no significant increase in eNOS phosphorylation. However, 5-HT-induced eNOS phosphorylation was inhibited in cells treated with various concentrations of SIN-1 for 30 min and stimulated with 5-HT. These data suggest that an increase in ONOO- as a result of an increase in the production of O2*-, may feedback to inhibit 5-HT-induced eNOS phosphorylation at Ser1179 and therefore, contribute to endothelial dysfunction associated with cardiovascular diseases.

Agent Alternative #3: Nebivolol

A Third-Generation ß-Blocker that Augments Vascular Nitric Oxide Release. (Broeders et al., 2000), (Brugada et al., 2001), (Dessy et al., 2005), (Iaccarino et al., 2002), (Jordan et al., 2001), (Kalinowski et al., 2003), (Mason et al., 2005), (McEniery et al., 2004), (Mollnau et al., 2003), (Mukherjee et al., 2004), (Ritter et al., 2006).

In vivo metabolized nebivolol increases vascular NO production. This phenomenon involves endothelial ß2-adrenergic receptor ligation, with a subsequent rise in endothelial free [Ca2+]i and endothelial NO synthase–dependent NO production. This may be an important mechanism underlying the nebivolol-induced, NO-mediated arterial dilation in humans. Nebivolol is a ß1-selective adrenergic receptor antagonist with proposed nitric oxide (NO)–mediated vasodilating properties in humans. In this study, they explored whether nebivolol indeed induces NO production and, if so, by what mechanism. they hypothesized that not nebivolol itself but rather its metabolites augment NO production (Broeders et al., 2000).

Dose and Time Concentration for Agents affecting endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production 

  • time concentration dependence on eNOS reuptake
  • dose concentration dependence on NO production

In the literature we found evidence for dose concentration dependence manner

Ach, Histamine, Genistein, ACEI, Fenofibrates, NEBIVOLOL, Calcium channel blocker, Enzyme S-nitrosylation

In the literature we found evidence for time concentration dependence manner:

Ach, BRL37344, a 3-adrenoceptor agonist

In the literature we found evidence for time and dose concentration dependence manner:

Histamine

NO, eNOS AgonistsStimulate phosphorylation of eNOS at serine 1177, 1179, 116 Conversion of L-arginine toL-citrulline time concentration dependence manner dose concentration dependencemanner time and dose dose (nmol·mg of protein-1)Grovers et al., (2002)
A23187 (5µM)
Acetylcholine Xu et al., (2002) Sanchez et al., (2006) (1µM)
5-Hydroxytryptamine (1µM)
VEGF ( (20ng/ml)
Bradykinin (1µM)
Histamine McDuffie et al., (1999) McDuffie et al., (2000) (10µM)
genistein Liu et al., (2004) (1µM)
ACEI Skidgel et al., (2006)
Fenofibrates Asai et al., (2006)
BRL37344, a 3-adrenoceptor agonist Pott et al., (2005)
NEBIVOLOLß1-selective adrenergic receptor antagonist with nitric oxide (NO)–mediation for vasodilation Ritter et al., (2006)
Calcium channel blocker Church and Fulton, (2006),
Enzyme S-nitrosylation Erwin et al., (2006)

Proposed integration plan of Nebivolol with CVD patients’ current medication regimen for selective medical diagnoses

Blood Pressure Medicine:

Beta blockers, Verapamil (Calan), Reserpine (Hydropes), Clonidine (Catapres), Methyldopa (Aldomet)

Diuretics:

Thiazides, Spironolactone (Aldactone), Hydralazine

Antidepressants:

Prozac, Lithium, MOA’s, Tricyclics

Stomach Medicine:

Tagamet and Zantac, plus other compounds containing Cimetidine and Ranitidine or associated compounds in Anticholesterol Drugs

Antipsychotics:

Chlorpromazine (Thorazine), Pimozide (Orap), Thiothixine (Navane), Thiordazine (Mellaril), Sulpiride, Haloperidol (haldol), Fluphenazine (Modecate, Prolixin)

Heart Medicine:

Clofibrate (Atromid), Gemfibrozil, Diagoxin

Hormones:

Estrogen, Progesterone, Proscar, Casodex, Eulexin, Corticosteroids Gonadotropin releasing antagonists: Zoladex and Lupron

Cytotoxic agents:

Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Roferon Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories

Others-

Alprazolam, Amoxapine, Chlordiazepoxide, Sertraline, Paroxetine, Clomipramine, Fluvoxamine, Fluoxetine, Imipramine, Doxepine, Desipramine, Clorprothixine, Bethanidine, Naproxen, Nortriptyline, Thioridazine, Tranylcypromine, Venlafaxine, Citalopram.

INTERACTIONS for Nebivolol

Calcium Antagonists:

Caution should be exercised when administering beta-blockers with calcium antagonists of the verapamil or diltiazem type because of their negative effect on contractility and atrio-ventricular conduction. Exaggeration of these effects can occur particularly in patients with impaired ventricular function and/or SA or AV conduction abnormalities. Neither medicine should therefore be administered intravenously within 48 hours of discontinuing the other.

Anti-arrhythmics:

Caution should be exercised when administering beta-blockers with Class I anti-arrhythmic drugs and amiodarone as their effect on atrial conduction time and their negative inotropic effect may be potentiated. Such interactions can have life threatening consequences.

Clonidine:

Beta-blockers increase the risk of rebound hypertension after sudden withdrawal of chronic clonidine treatment.

Digitalis:

Digitalis glycosides associated with beta-blockers may increase atrio-ventricular conduction times. Nebivolol does not influence the kinetics of digoxin & clinical trials have not shown any evidence of an interaction.

Special note: Digitalisation of patients receiving long term beta-blocker therapy may be necessary if congestive cardiac failure is likely to develop. The combination can be considered despite the potentiation of the negative chronotropic effect of the two medicines. Careful control of dosages and of individual patient’s response (notably pulse rate) is essential in this situation.

Insulin & Oral Antidiabetic drugs:

Glucose levels are unaffected, however symptoms of hypoglycemia may be masked.

Anaesthetics:

Concomitant use of beta-blockers & anaesthetics e.g. ether, cyclopropane & trichloroethylene may attenuate reflex tachycardia & increase the risk of hypotension

CVD patients’ current medication regimen for selective medical diagnoses

Medical Diagnoses Current medication regiment eNOS agonists &production stimulation of NO PPAR-gamma agonist (TZD) as eNOS stimulant
CAD patients Beta blockers, ACEI, ARB, CCB, Diagoxin, Coumadin yes
Endothelial Dysfunction in DM patients with or without Erectile Dysfunction Insulin yes yes
Atherosclerosis patients: Arteries and or veins AntihypertensiveCoumadin yes yes
pre-stenting treatment phase Beta blockers, Verapamil (Calan), Reserpine (Hydropes), Clonidine (Catapres), Methyldopa (Aldomet) yes
post-stenting treatment phase Antiplatelets yes
if stent is a Bare Mesh stent (BMS) CoumadinBeta blockers yes
if stent is Drug Eluting stent (DES) antibiotics
if stent is EPC antibody coated yes
post CABG patients CoumadinBeta blockers, Verapamil (Calan), Reserpine (Hydropes), Clonidine (Catapres), Methyldopa (Aldomet) yes
CVD patients on blood thinner drugs Coumadin yes

Conclusions

  •  Most favorable and unexpected to us was finding in the literature new indications for TDZs as stimulators of eNOS, in addition to the new indication for atherosclerosis besides the classic indication in pharmacology books, being in the reduction of insulin resistance.
  •  Most favorable and unexpected to us was finding in the literature new indications for beta blockers as NO stimulant, nebivolol, a case in point, thus, fulfilling two indications in one drug along the direction of the study to identify eNOS agonists. Nebivolol is a vasodilator, thus functions as an antihypertensive.

REFERENCES

Alonso DE, Radomski MW, (2003). Nitric oxide, platelet function, myocardial infarction and reperfusion therapies. Heart Fail Rev., 2003, 8:47–54.

Anthony MS, Clarkson TB, Williams JK, (1998). Effects of soy isoflavones on atherosclerosis: potential mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr., 68(6 Suppl):1390S–1393S.

Benowitz, NL., (2004). Antihypertensive Agents. Chapter 11 in Katzung, BG., Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. McGraw-Hill, 9th Edition, pp. 160-183.

Bisoendial RJ, et al. (2003). Restoration of endothelial function by increasing high-density lipoprotein in subjects with isolated low high-density lipoprotein. Circulation, 107:2944–2948.

Blair A, Shaul PW, Yuhanna IS, Conrad PA, Smart EJ., (1999). Oxidized low density lipoprotein displaces endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) from plasmalemmal caveolae and impairs eNOS activation.J. Biol. Chem., 274:32512–32519.

Brixius K, Song Q, Malick A, Boelck B, Addicks K, Bloch W, Mehlhorn U, Schwinger R, (2006). eNOS is not activated by nebivolol in human failing myocardium. Life Sci., 2006 Apr 25

Broeders MAW, Doevendans PA, Bekkers BCAM, Bronsaer R, van Gorsel E, Heemskerk JWM. oude Egbrink MGA, van Breda E, Reneman RS, van der Zee R, (2000). Nebivolol: A Third-Generation ß-Blocker That Augments Vascular Nitric Oxide Release, Endothelial ß2-Adrenergic Receptor–Mediated Nitric Oxide Production. Circulation, 102:677.

Brown BG, et al. Simvastatin and niacin, antioxidant vitamins, or the combination for the prevention of coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 345:1583–1592.

Brugada P, Brugada J, Brugada R, (2001). Dealing with biological variation in the Brugada syndrome. Eur. Heart J., 22(24): 2231 – 2232.

Caulin-Glaser T, Garcia-Cardena G, Sarrel P, Sessa WC, Bender JR., (1997). 17 beta-estradiol regulation of human endothelial cell basal nitric oxide release, independent of cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization. Circ. Res., 81:885–892.

Cheng Y, Wang M, Yu Y, Lawson J, Funk CD, and Fitzgerald GA., (2006). Cyclooxygenases, microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1, and cardiovascular function. J. Clin. Invest., 116:1391-1399

Church JE, Fulton D., (2006). Differences in eNOS activity because of subcellular localization are dictated by phosphorylation state rather than the local calcium environment.J Biol Chem., 2006 Jan 20;281(3):1477-88. Epub 2005 Oct 28.

Dessy C, Saliez J, Ghisdal P, Daneau G, Lobysheva II, Frerart F, Belge C, Jnaoui K, Noirhomme P, Feron O, Balligand JL, (2005). Endothelial {beta}3-Adrenoreceptors Mediate Nitric Oxide-Dependent Vasorelaxation of Coronary Microvessels in Response to the Third-Generation {beta}-Blocker Nebivolol. Circulation, 112(8): 1198 – 1205.

Dimmeler S, Aicher A, Vasa M, Mildner-Rihm C, Adler K, Tiemann M, Rutten H, Fichtlscherer S, Martin H, Zeiher AM, (2001). HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) increase endothelial progenitor cells via the PI3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Clin Invest., 108:391–397.

Dobrydneva Y, Williams RL, Morris GZ, Blackmore PF, (2002). Dietary phytoestrogens and their synthetic structural analogues as calcium channel blockers in human platelets. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 40:399–410.

Duarte J, Ocete MA, Perez-Vizcaino F, Zarzuelo A, Tamargo J, (1997). Effect of tyrosine kinase and tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors on aortic contraction and induction of nitric oxide synthase. Eur J Pharmacol, 338:25–33.

Erwin PA, Mitchell DA, Sartoretto J, Marletta MA, Michel T., (2006). Subcellular Targeting and Differential S-Nitrosylation of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase. J. Biol. Chem., 281:1, 151-157.

George T. and P. Ramwell, (2004). Nitric Oxide, Donors, & Inhibitors. Chapter 19 in Katzung, BG., Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. McGraw-Hill, 9th Edition, pp. 313 – 318.

Gong M, et al., (2003). HDL-associated estradiol stimulates endothelial NO synthase and vasodilation in an SR-BI-dependent manner.J. Clin. Invest., 111:1579–1587.

Gonzalez E, Kou R, Lin AJ, Golan DE, Michel T., (2002). Subcellular Targeting and Agonist-induced Site-specific Phosphorylation of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase. J. Biol. Chem., 277;42:39554-39560.

Goon, P.K.Y. Lip G.Y.H, Boos, CJ, Stonelake, PS, Blann, AD. (2006). Circulating Endothelial Cells, Endothelial Progenitor Cells, and Endothelial Microparticles in Cancer, Neoplasia, 8:79-88.

Gottstein N, Ewins BA, Eccleston C, Hubbard GP, Kavanagh IC, Minihane AM, Weinberg PD, Rimbach G, (2003). Effect of genistein and daidzein on platelet aggregation and monocyte and endothelial function. Br J Nutr, 89:607–616

Grovers R, Bevers L, De Bree P, Rabelink TJ, (2002). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity is linked to its presence at cell–cell contacts.Biochem. J., 361 (193–201) (Printed in Great Britain)

Haynes WG, Ferro CJ, O’Kane KP, Somerville D, Lomax CC, Webb DJ, (1996). Systemic endothelin receptor blockade decreases peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure in humans. Circulation, 15;93(10):1860-70.

Iaccarino G, Cipolletta E, Fiorillo A, AnnecchiaricoM, Ciccarelli M, Cimini V, Koch WJ, B. Trimarco B, (2002). {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Gene Delivery to the Endothelium Corrects Impaired Adrenergic Vasorelaxation in Hypertension. Circulation, 106(3): 349 – 355.

Jordan J, Tank J, Stoffels, Franke MG, Christensen NJ, Luft CF, Boschmann M, (2001). Interaction between {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Stimulation and Nitric Oxide Release on Tissue Perfusion and Metabolism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 86(6): 2803 – 2810.

Kalinowski L, Dobrucki LW, Szczepanska-Konkel M, Jankowski M, Martyniec L, Angielski S, Malinski, T, (2003). Third-Generation {beta}-Blockers Stimulate Nitric Oxide Release From Endothelial Cells Through ATP Efflux: A Novel Mechanism for Antihypertensive Action.Circulation. 2003 Jun 3;107(21):2747-52. Epub 2003 May 12.

Kleinman, ME, Blei, F, Gurtner, GC, (2005). Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Vascular Anomalies, Lymphatic Research and Biology, 3;4: 234-239.

Koshimizu T-A, Nasa Y, Tanoue A, Oikawa R, Kawahara Y, Kiyono Y, Adachi T, Tanaka T, Kuwaki T, Mori T, Takeo S, Okamura H, Tsujimoto G., (2006). V1a vasopressin receptors maintain normal blood pressure by regulating circulating blood volume and baroreflex sensitivity. PNAS, 103;20: 7807-7812.

Kotamraju S, Hogg N, Joseph J, Keefer LK, Kalyanaraman B, (2001). Inhibition of oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells by nitric oxide. Peroxyl radical scavenging as an antiapoptotic mechanism. J Biol Chem, 276:17316–17323.

Kuvin JT, et al., (2002). A novel mechanism for the beneficial vascular effects of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: enhanced vasorelaxation and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression. Am. Heart J., 144:165–172.

Lahav R, Heffner G, Patterson PH., (1999). An endothelin receptor B antagonist inhibits growth and induces cell death in human melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo. PNAS, 96;20: 11496-11500.

Lantin-Hermoso RL, et al., (1997). Estrogen acutely stimulates nitric oxide synthase activity in fetal pulmonary artery endothelium. Am. J. Physiol., 273:L119–L126.

Laszlo, F, Whittle BJR, Moncada S., (1994). Time dependent enhancement or inhibition of endotoxin-induced vascular injury in rat intestine by nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. Br. J. Pharmacol., 111, 1309–1315.

Laufs U, Werner N, Link A, Endres M, Wassmann S, Jurgens K, Miche E, Bohm M, Nickenig G, (2003). Physical training increases endothelial progenitor cells, inhibits neointima formation, and enhances angiogenesis. Circulation, 109:220 –226.

Li AC, Binder, CJ, Gutierrez, A, Brown, KK, Plotkin, CR, Pattison, JW, Valledor, AF, Davis, RA, Willson, TM, Witztum, JL, Palinski, W, Glass, CK. (2004). Differential inhibition of macrophage foam-cell formation and atherosclerosis in mice by PPAR-alpha, Beta/delta, and gamma. J. Clin. Invest., 114:1564-1576.

Li XP, et al., (2000). Protective effect of high density lipoprotein on endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Int. J. Cardiol., 73:231–236.

Liu D, Homan LL, Joseph, Dillon JS., (2004). Genistein Acutely Stimulates Nitric Oxide Synthesis in Vascular Endothelial Cells by a Cyclic Adenosine 5′-Monophosphate-Dependent Mechanism, Endocrinology, 145:12, 5532-5539.

Llevadot J, Murasawa S, Kureishi Y, Uchida S, Masuda H, Kawamoto A, Walsh K, Isner JM, Asahara T, (2001). HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor mobilizes bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. J Clin Invest., 108:399–405.

McDuffie JE, Coaxum SD, Maleque MA, (1999) 5-Hydroxytryptamine evokes endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation in bovine aortic endothelial cell cultures. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 221, 386-390.

McDuffie JE, Motley ED, Limbird LE, Maleque, MA, (2000). 5-Hydroxytryptamine Stimulates Phosphorylation of p44/p42 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation in Bovine Aortic Endothelial Cell Cultures. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 35(3):398-402.

McEniery CM, Schmitt M, Qasem A, Webb DJ, Avolio AP, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR, (2004). Nebivolol Increases Arterial Distensibility In Vivo. Hypertension, 44(3): 305 – 310.

Mason RP, Kalinowski L, Jacob RF, Jacoby AM, Malinski BT, (2005). Nebivolol Reduces Nitroxidative Stress and Restores Nitric Oxide Bioavailability in Endothelium of Black Americans. Circulation, 112(24): 3795 – 3801.

Mineo C, Yuhanna IS, Quon MJ, Shaul PW., (2003). HDL-induced eNOS activation is mediated by Akt and MAP kinases. J. Biol. Chem., 278:9142–9149.

Mollnau H, Schulz E, Daiber A, Baldus S, Oelze M, August M, Wendt M, Walter U, Geiger C, Agrawal R, Kleschyov AL, Meinertz T. Munzel T, (2003). Nebivolol Prevents Vascular NOS III Uncoupling in Experimental Hyperlipidemia and Inhibits NADPH Oxidase Activity in Inflammatory Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 23(4): 615 – 621.

Moncada S., (2005). Adventures in vascular biology: a tale of two mediators. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B29 May 2006 vol. 361 no. 1469 735-759

Moncada S, and Higgs EA, (2006). The discovery of nitric oxide and its role in vascular biology. British Journal of Pharmacology, 147, S193–S201

Mukherjee S, Baksi S, Dart RA, Gollub S, Lazar J, Nair C, Schroeder D, Woolf SH, (2003). {beta}-Blockers With Vasodilatory Actions. Chest, 124(4): 1621 – 1621.

Murakami H, Murakami R, Kambe F, Cao X, Takahashi R, Asai T, Hirai T, Numaguchi Y, Okumura K, Seo H, Murohara T., (2006). Fenofibrate activates AMPK and increases eNOS phosphorylation in HUVEC. Biochem Biophys Res Commun., 341(4):973-8. Epub 2006 Jan 24.

Nebivolol is a long-acting, cardioselective beta-blocker currently licensed for the treatment of hypertension.

http://www.saha.org.ar/noticias/nebivolol2.htm  – retrieved on 6/20/2006

Nebivolol

http://www.intekom.com/pharm/adcock/nebilet.html – retrieved on 6/20/2006

Nestel PJ, Yamashita T, Sasahara T, Pomeroy S, Dart A, Komesaroff P, Owen A, Abbey M, (1997). Soy isoflavones improve systemic arterial compliance but not plasma lipids in menopausal and perimenopausal women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:3392–3398.

Nofer J-R, et al., (2004). HDL induces NO-dependent vasorelaxation via the lysophospholipid receptor S1P3. J. Clin. Invest.,113:569–581.

Nolte MS and JH Karam, (2004). Pancreatic Hormones & Antidiabetic Drugs. Chapter 41 in Katzung, BG., Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. McGraw-Hill, 9th Edition, pp.693-715, in particular, Thiazolidinediones, pp.709-710, 713.

Polikandriotis JA, Mazzella LJ, Rupnow HL, Hart CM, (2005). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands stimulate endothelial nitric oxide production through distinct peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent mechanisms.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol., 25(9):1810-6. Epub 2005 Jul 14.

Pott C, Steinritz D, Bölck B, Mehlhorn U, Brixius K, Schwinger RHG, BlochW., (2006). eNOS translocation but not eNOS phosphorylation is dependent on intracellular Ca2+ in human atrial myocardium. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1437-C1445.

Ramet ME, et al., (2003). High-density lipoprotein increases the abundance of eNOS protein in human vascular endothelial cells by increasing its half-life. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 41:2288–2297.

Reid, Ian A., (2004). Vasoactive Peptides. Chapter 17 in Katzung, BG., Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. McGraw-Hill, 9th Edition, pp. 281 – 297, in particular, Endothelins, pp. 290-293.

Richardson SM, Maleque MA, Motley ED., (2003). 3-Morpholinosyndnonimine inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced phosphorylation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells. Cell Mol Biol., 49(8):1385-1389.

Ritter JM, Ferro A, Chowienczyk PJ., (2006). Relation between beta-adrenoceptor stimulation and nitric oxide synthesis in vascular control. Eur J Clin Pharmacol., 62 (Supplement 13):109-113.

Rosenzweig A., (2005). Circulating Endothelial Progenitors – Cells as Biomarkers. NEJM., 353;10: 1055-1057.

Rubins et al., (1999). Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med., 341:410–418.

Sanchez FA, Savalia NB, Duran RG, Lal BK, Boric MP, Duran WN., (2006). Functional significance of differential eNOS translocation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol., May 5; [Epub ahead of print]

Satake N, Shibata S, (1999). The potentiating effect of genistein on the relaxation induced by isoproterenol in rat aortic rings. Gen Pharmacol, 33:221–227.

Shaul PW., (2002). Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: location, location, location. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 64:749–774.

Shaul, PW and Mineo, C, (2004). HDL action on the vascular wall: is the answer NO? J Clin Invest., 15; 113(4): 509–513.

Shin WS, Hong YH, Peng HB, De Caterina R, Libby P, Liao JK, (1996). Nitric oxide attenuates vascular smooth muscle cell activation by interferon. The role of constitutive NF-B activity. J Biol Chem, 271:11317–11324.

Skidgel RA, Stanislavjevic S, Erdos EG., (2006). Kinin- and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-mediated nitric oxide production in endothelial cells. Biol Chem., 387(2):159-65.

Spieker et al., (2002). High-density lipoprotein restores endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic men. Circulation, 105:1399–1402.

Spyridopoulos I, Haendeler J, Urbich C, Brummendorf TH, Oh H, Schneider MD, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S, (2004). Statins enhance migratory capacity by upregulation of the telomere repeat-binding factor TRF2 in endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation, 110:3136 –3142.

Squadrito F, Altavilla D, Crisafulli A, Saitta A, Cucinotta D, Morabito N, D’Anna R, Corrado F, Ruggeri P, Frisina N, Squadrito G, (2003). Effect of genistein on endothelial function in postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Am J Med, 114:470–476.

Sütsch G, Kiowski W, Yan X-W, Hunziker P, Christen S, Strobel W, Kim J-H, Rickenbacher P, Bertel O., (1998). Short-Term Oral Endothelin-Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Conventionally Treated Patients With Symptomatic Severe Chronic Heart Failure. Circulation, 98:2262-2268

Uittenbogaard A, Shaul PW, Yuhanna IS, Blair A, Smart EJ., (2000). High density lipoprotein prevents oxidized low density lipoprotein-induced inhibition of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase localization and activation in caveolae. J. Biol. Chem., 275:11278–11283.

van der Schouw YT, de Kleijn MJ, Peeters PH, Grobbee DE, (2000). Phyto-oestrogens and cardiovascular disease risk. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis., 10:154–167.

Van Nueten L, Dupont AG, Vertommen C, Goyvaerts H, Robertson JI., (1997). A dose-response trial of nebivolol in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens.,11(2):139-44.

Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Adler K, Aicher A, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. (2001a). Increase in circulating endothelial progenitor cells by statin therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circulation, 103:2885–2890.

Verma S, Szmitko, PE, (2006). The vascular biology of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Modulation of atherosclerosis. Can J Cardiol, 22 (Suppl B):12B-17B.

Walker HA, Dean TS, Sanders TA, Jackson G, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ, (2001). The phytoestrogen genistein produces acute nitric oxide-dependent dilation of human forearm vasculature with similar potency to 17ß-estradiol. Circulation, 103:258–262.

Walter DH, Rittig K, Bahlmann FH, Kirchmair R, Silver M, Murayama T, Nishimura H, Losordo DW, Asahara T, Isner JM, (2002). Statin therapy accelerates reendothelialization: a novel effect involving mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation, 105:3017–3024.

Wang C-H, Ciliberti N, Li S-H, Szmitko PE, Weisel RD, Fedak PWM, Al-Omran M, Cherng W-J, Li R-K, Stanford WL, Verma S., (2004). Rosiglitazone facilitates angiogenic progenitor cell differentiation toward endothelial lineage: a new paradigm in glitazone pleiotropy. Circulation, 109:1392-1400.

Werner N, Junk S, Laufs L, Link A, Walenta K, Bohm M, Nickenig G., (2003). Intravenous transfusion of endothelial progenitor cells reduces neointima formation after vascular injury. Circ Res., 93:e17– e24.

Werner N, Kosiol S, Tobias Schiegl T, Ahlers P, Walenta K, Link A, Böhm M, Georg N (2005). Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Cardiovascular Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:999-1007

Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Castelli WP, (1988). High density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality. The Framingham Heart Study. Arteriosclerosis, 8:737–741.

Xu H-L, Feinstein DL, Santizo RA, Koenig HM, Pelligrino DA., (2002).Agonist-specific differences in mechanisms mediating eNOS-dependent pial arteriolar dilation in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol., 282:H237-H243

Yu J, Rudic RD, Sessa WC, (2002). Nitric oxide-releasing aspirin decreases vascular injury by reducing inflammation and promoting apoptosis. Lab Invest, 82:825–832.

Yuhanna IS, et al., (2001). High-density lipoprotein binding to scavenger receptor-BI activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nat. Med., 7:853–857.

Zeiher AM, Schachlinger V, Hohnloser SH, Saurbier B, Just H., (1994). Coronary atherosclerotic wall thickening and vascular reactivity in humans. Elevated high-density lipoprotein levels ameliorate abnormal vasoconstriction in early atherosclerosis. Circulation, 89:2525–2532.

Other aspects of Nitric Oxide involvement in biological systems in humans are covered in the following posts on this site:

 

Nitric Oxide in bone metabolism July 16, 2012 

Author: Aviral Vatsa PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/16/nitric-oxide-in-bone-metabolism/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_134751669 

Nitric Oxide production in Systemic sclerosis July 25, 2012 

Curator: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/25/nitric-oxide-production-in-systemic-sclerosis/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_138370383 

Nitric Oxide Signalling Pathways August 22, 2012 

Curator/ Author: Aviral Vatsa, PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/22/nitric-oxide-signalling-pathways/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_151245569

Nitric Oxide: a short historic perspective August 5, 2012 

Author/Curator: Aviral Vatsa PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/05/nitric-oxide-a-short-historic-perspective-7/

Nitric Oxide: Chemistry and function August 10, 2012 

Curator/Author: Aviral Vatsa PhD, MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/10/nitric-oxide-chemistry-and-function/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_145137865 

 

Nitric Oxide and Platelet Aggregation August 16, 2012 

Author: Dr. Venkat S. Karra, Ph.D.

http://www.tginnovations.wordpress.com/ 

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/16/no-and-platelet-aggregation/?goback=%2Egde_4346921_member_147475405 

 

The rationale and use of inhaled NO in Pulmonary Artery Hypertension and Right Sided Heart Failure August 20, 2012 

Author: Larry Bernstein, MD

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/20/the-rationale-and-use-of-inhaled-no-in-pulmonary-artery-hypertension-and-right-sided-heart-failure/  

Nitric Oxide: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1998 Robert F. Furchgott, Louis J. Ignarro, Ferid Murad August 16, 2012 

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/16/nitric-oxide-the-nobel-prize-in-physiology-or-medicine-1998-robert-f-furchgott-louis-j-ignarro-ferid-murad/ 

 

Coronary Artery Disease – Medical Devices Solutions: From First-In-Man Stent Implantation, via Medical Ethical Dilemmas to Drug Eluting Stents August 13, 2012 

Author: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/13/coronary-artery-disease-medical-devices-solutions-from-first-in-man-stent-implantation-via-medical-ethical-dilemmas-to-drug-eluting-stents/

Nano-particles as Synthetic Platelets to Stop Internal Bleeding Resulting from Trauma

August 22, 2012 

Reporter: Dr. V. S. Karra, Ph.D.

http://www.tginnovations.wordpress.com/ 

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/08/22/nano-particles-as-synthetic-platelets-to-stop-internal-bleeding-resulting-from-trauma/ 

 

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and the Role of agent alternatives in endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Activation and Nitric Oxide Production July 19, 2012 

Curator and Investigator Initiated Study: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/19/cardiovascular-disease-cvd-and-the-role-of-agent-alternatives-in-endothelial-nitric-oxide-synthase-enos-activation-and-nitric-oxide-production/ 

Macrovascular Disease – Therapeutic Potential of cEPCs: Reduction Methods for CV Risk

An Investigation of the Potential of circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells (cEPCs) as a Therapeutic Target for Pharmacological Therapy Design for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A New Multimarker Biomarker Discovery July 2, 2012

Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/07/02/macrovascular-disease-therapeutic-potential-of-cepcs-reduction-methods-for-cv-risk/  

Bone remodelling in a nutshell June 22, 2012

Author: Aviral Vatsa, Ph.D., MBBS

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2012/06/22/bone-remodelling-in-a-nutshell/ 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts