Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Diabetes Mellitus’

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

While a staff nurse at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, MA in 2008, I provided direct care for Morbid Obese patients, above 400 pounds that were transferred to Farr 9 – the Acute Surgery Unit from the PACU following Bariatric Surgery. The first day after a significant surgical intervention was very tough to the patient and very tough for the nurses, three types of analgesic drugs were used including epidural pumps and PCA. Pain medication diffused in the adipose tissue with just moderate amelioration of pain. Few patients had the operation done 10 years ago and needed a repair. Technology had advanced. More studies are needed to ascertain that in presence of morbid obesity and absence of DM, a Bariatric Surgery is THE Treatment for DM Disease Prevention.

Bariatric Surgery — From Treatment of Disease to Prevention?

Danny O. Jacobs, M.D., M.P.H.

N Engl J Med 2012; 367:764-765  August 23, 2012

Bariatric surgery to treat morbid obesity has improved dramatically over the past 60 years — especially over the past several decades. Today’s methods are far safer than the hazardous intestinal bypass procedures that were introduced in the 1950s. Bariatric-surgery techniques have progressed through various iterations of horizontal and vertical stapling of the stomach with or without banding (e.g., vertical banded gastroplasty) to vertical gastric partitioning or creation of a gastric pouch with proximal bypass into a jejunal loop (i.e., the gastric bypass), which is considered to be a reference standard.

Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity.

Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity.

SOURCE INFORMATION

From the Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Bariatric Surgery and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Swedish Obese Subjects

Lena M.S. Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D., Markku Peltonen, Ph.D., Sofie Ahlin, M.D., Åsa Anveden, M.D., Claude Bouchard, Ph.D., Björn Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D., Peter Jacobson, M.D., Ph.D., Hans Lönroth, M.D., Ph.D., Cristina Maglio, M.D., Ingmar Näslund, M.D., Ph.D., Carlo Pirazzi, M.D., Stefano Romeo, M.D., Ph.D., Kajsa Sjöholm, Ph.D., Elisabeth Sjöström, M.D., Hans Wedel, Ph.D., Per-Arne Svensson, Ph.D., and Lars Sjöström, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2012; 367:695-704  August 23, 2012

BACKGROUND

Weight loss protects against type 2 diabetes but is hard to maintain with behavioral modification alone. In an analysis of data from a nonrandomized, prospective, controlled study, we examined the effects of bariatric surgery on the prevention of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In this analysis, we included 1658 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 1771 obese matched controls (with matching performed on a group, rather than individual, level). None of the participants had diabetes at baseline. Patients in the bariatric-surgery cohort underwent banding (19%), vertical banded gastroplasty (69%), or gastric bypass (12%); nonrandomized, matched, prospective controls received usual care. Participants were 37 to 60 years of age, and the body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 34 or more in men and 38 or more in women. This analysis focused on the rate of incident type 2 diabetes, which was a prespecified secondary end point in the main study. At the time of this analysis (January 1, 2012), participants had been followed for up to 15 years. Despite matching, some baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups; the baseline body weight was higher and risk factors were more pronounced in the bariatric-surgery group than in the control group. At 15 years, 36.2% of the original participants had dropped out of the study, and 30.9% had not yet reached the time for their 15-year follow-up examination.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, type 2 diabetes developed in 392 participants in the control group and in 110 in the bariatric-surgery group, corresponding to incidence rates of 28.4 cases per 1000 person-years and 6.8 cases per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio with bariatric surgery, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.21; P<0.001). The effect of bariatric surgery was influenced by the presence or absence of impaired fasting glucose (P=0.002 for the interaction) but not by BMI (P=0.54). Sensitivity analyses, including end-point imputations, did not change the overall conclusions. The postoperative mortality was 0.2%, and 2.8% of patients who underwent bariatric surgery required reoperation within 90 days owing to complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery appears to be markedly more efficient than usual care in the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese persons. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01479452.)

Supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (K2012-55X-22082-01-3, K2010-55X-11285-13, K2008-65x-20753-01-4), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research to Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, the Swedish federal government under the LUA/ALF agreement concerning research and education of doctors, the VINNOVA-VINNMER program, and the Wenner-Gren Foundations. The SOS study has previously been supported by grants to one of the authors from Hoffmann–La Roche, AstraZeneca, Cederroth, Sanofi-Aventis, and Johnson & Johnson.

Dr. Lena Carlsson reports receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca and owning stock in Sahltech; Dr. Bouchard, receiving consulting fees from New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, Pathway Genomics, Weight Watchers, and Nike, payment for manuscript preparation from Elsevier and Wiley-Blackwell, royalties from Human Kinetics and Informa Healthcare, honoraria from NaturALPHA, and reimbursement for travel expenses from European College of Sports Sciences, Nordic Physiotherapy, Wingate Congress, and Euro Sci Open Forum; Dr. Björn Carlsson, being employed by and owning stock in AstraZeneca; Dr. Sjöholm, owning stock in Pfizer; Dr. Wedel, receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis; and Dr. Lars Sjöström, serving as a member of the board of Lenimen, receiving lecture fees from AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, and providing an expert statement on drug effects and weight-loss effects on obesity for AstraZeneca. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

Drs. Carlsson and Peltonen contributed equally to this article.

We thank the staff members at 480 primary health care centers and 25 surgical departments in Sweden that participated in the study; and Gerd Bergmark, Christina Torefalk and Lisbeth Eriksson for administrative support.

SOURCE INFORMATION

From the Institutes of Medicine (L.M.S.C., M.P., S.A., Å.A., B.C., P.J., C.M., C.P., S.R., K.S., E.S., P.-A.S., L.S.) and Surgery (H.L.), Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, and the Nordic School of Public Health (H.W.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Örebro (I.N.) — all in Sweden; the Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki (M.P.); and Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge (C.B.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Lars Sjöström at the SOS Secretariat, Vita Stråket 15, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden, or at lars.v.sjostrom@medfak.gu.se.

N Engl J Med 2012; 367:695-704

Read Full Post »

Risks of Hypoglycemia in Diabetics with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Risks of Hypoglycemia in Diabetics with CKD

By Mark Abrahams, MD

Reviewed by Loren Wissner Greene, MD, MA (Bioethics), Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY

Published: 03/13/2012

 http://www.medpagetoday.com/resource-center/diabetes/Risks-Hypoglycemia-Diabetics-CKD/a/31634

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), approximately 40% of adults with diabetes have some degree of chronic kidney disease (CKD).1 That’s a lot of patients—perhaps more than one might think.

What should we be doing differently for these patients? Sure, they should be getting an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) for renoprotection, and blood pressure and lipids should be aggressively managed, but how does (or should) our approach to managing their antidiabetic therapy change?

We might consider taking a more aggressive approach to their glycemic control. In clinical trials, tight glycemic control has been shown to be the primary determinant of decreased microvascular complications.1 However, once we’ve decided how aggressively to manage glycemia, the choice of which antidiabetic to use (and how to dose it) is especially important in these patients.

Unfortunately, when the therapeutic strategy is to maximize glycemic control, the risk of hypoglycemia also increases – in both frequency and severity.2 Patients taking oral antidiabetics that are primarily eliminated by the kidneys are particularly susceptible.1 Furthermore, it should be noted that older patients are also at higher risk.3

Dosing errors are common in CKD patients and can cause poor outcomes.3 Drugs cleared renally should be dose-adjusted based on creatinine clearance or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Dose reductions, lengthening of the dosing interval, or both may be required.3

As metformin is nearly 100% renally excreted, it is contraindicated in a number of patients: when serum creatinine is higher than 1.5 mg/dL in men or 1.4 mg/dL in women, in patients older than 80 years, or in patients with chronic heart failure. The primary concern here is that other hypoxic conditions (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, severe infection, respiratory disease, liver disease) may increase the risk of lactic acidosis. Because of this danger, and despite the fact that metformin is usually the recommended first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes, one should use caution when considering metformin in patients with renal impairment.3

Similarly, sulfonylureas should be used with care in diabetics with CKD. The clearance of both sulfonylureas and their metabolites is highly dependent on kidney function. As such, severe and sustained episodes of hypoglycemia due to sulfonylurea use have been described in dialysis patients.2

Regardless of which antidiabetic agent is selected, HbA1c and kidney function should be regularly monitored and the antidiabetic regimen appropriately adjusted. As patients with type 2 diabetes tend to progress over time, most will require a combination of agents to achieve desired glycemic control. These combinations should be chosen carefully in patients with CKD.1

Finally, awareness of and screening for renal impairment in diabetics is a necessary precursor to successful intervention. In these patients, CKD is underdiagnosed and undertreated, and awareness of the disease is low among providers and patients alike.1

Early detection of disease via eGFR or urinary albumin excretion can lead to timely, evidence-based intervention and help prevent or delay progression of CKD. The benefit? Improved kidney and cardiovascular outcomes, and lower associated costs.1

References:

  1. Bakris GL. Recognition, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Different Stages of Nephropathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusMayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:444-456.
  2. Cavanaugh KL. Diabetes Management Issues for Patients With Chronic Kidney DiseaseClin Diab. 2007;25:90-97.
  3. Munar MY, et al. Drug Dosing Adjustments in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75:1487-1496.

 

Read Full Post »

Mitochondrial Mechanisms of Disease in Diabetes Mellitus

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

Mitochondrial Mechanisms of Disease in Diabetes Mellitus

By Mark Abrahams, MD

Reviewed by Loren Wissner Greene, MD, MA (Bioethics), Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY

Published: 03/13/2012

http://www.medpagetoday.com/resource-center/diabetes/Mitochondrial-Mechanisms-Disease-Diabetes-Mellitus/a/31636 

Mitochondria are found in every cell in the human body.1 Known as the “power plant of the cell,” mitochondria are central to the conversion of fatty acids and glucose to usable energy in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate).1, 2 A growing body of evidence now demonstrates a link between various disturbances in mitochondrial functioning and type 2 diabetes.1

In patients with type 2 diabetes, the size, number, and efficiency of mitochondria are reduced.3 This can have pathogenic effects in the tissues central to glucose metabolism — the pancreas, liver, and skeletal muscle.

In pancreatic beta cells, mitochondria are central to insulin secretion. As the amount of glucose in the circulation increases, so does the mitochondrial production of ATP inside the cell. When this occurs, ATP-sensitive channels open, leading to membrane depolarization and the secretion of insulin.1

Much data support the concept that mitochondrial function is required for appropriate glucose-induced insulin secretion.4 Studies in beta cell lines have shown that when mitochondrial function is experimentally decreased, insulin secretion shows a similar reduction.4 Supporting studies in humans have shown that individuals with disabling mutations in mitochondrial DNA (i.e., the A32433G mutation) demonstrate impaired pancreatic insulin secretion in response to glucose challenge.

Mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle and the liver might also contribute to the development of diabetes. As part of its cellular respiratory function, mitochondria utilize (and break down) fatty acids. When mitochondrial function is reduced, intracellular fats may accumulate.2

One hypothesis is that excessive accumulation of intracellular fat may have a central role in insulin resistance. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that excessive lipids lead to reductions in numbers and function of insulin receptors.2

The link between obesity, inactivity, and type 2 diabetes is well established — and weight loss remains a cornerstone of diabetes management.3 The role of mitochondria as cellular “power plant” makes a compelling case for a causative relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and clinical disease.3

Reduced mitochondrial capacity has been demonstrated in patients with type 2 diabetes.3 In one study, patients who lost weight demonstrated an increase in mitochondrial density and insulin sensitivity. Patients achieved an average weight loss of 7.1% and experienced a decrease in mean HbA1c from 7.9 to 6.5, as well as significant improvements in both fasting and postprandial blood glucose.3

Strategies that focus on increasing mitochondrial function could represent important new approaches in the treatment of diabetes.

One agent under investigation is coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10). In animal studies, CoQ10 significantly reduced fasting and 2-hour postprandial glucose levels. In humans, early, uncontrolled studies of diabetic patients receiving CoQ10 have demonstrated improvements in blood glucose and insulin synthesis and secretion. Furthermore, the clinical benefit of CoQ10 has been evident in a number of therapeutic trials in patients with maternally inherited mitochondrial defects like MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like episodes).1 The therapeutic advantage of supplementary CoQ10 may be especially helpful in patients taking statins, as these patients have been shown to have decreased production of endogenous CoQ10.5

Impaired mitochondrial function in tissues central to glucose metabolism (pancreas, muscle, liver) may be partly responsible for diabetes pathogenesis.2 The failure to appropriately manage cellular energy needs may result in impaired insulin secretion and/or insulin resistance.2 Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction may represent a promising path forward in the development of novel treatments for diabetes.

REFERENCES

  1. Lamson DW, et al. Mitochondrial Factors in the Pathogenesis of Diabetes: A Hypothesis for Treatment. Altern Med Rev. 2002;7:94-111.
  2. Patti ME, et al. The Role of Mitochondria in the Pathogenesis of Type 2 DiabetesEndocr Rev. 2010;31:364-395.
  3. Toledo FG, et al. Effects of Physical Activity and Weight Loss on Skeletal Muscle Mitochondria and Relationship With Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:2142-2147.
  4. Maassen JA, et al. Mitochondrial Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Presentation. Diabetes. 2004;53(suppl 1):S103-S109.
  5. Ghirlanda G, et al. Evidence of Plasma CoQ10-Lowering Effect by HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;33:226-229.

 

Read Full Post »

Author and Curator: Ritu Saxena, Ph.D.

Consultants: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN and Pnina G. Abir-Am, PhD

CONTENT:

Section I   : Mitochondrial diseases and molecular understanding

Section II  : Diagnosis and therapy of mitochondrial diseases

Section III: Mitochondria, metabolic syndrome and research

I. MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASES and MOLECULAR UNDERSTANDING

Mitochondrial cytopathy in adults – current understanding:

Mitochondrial cytopathies are a diverse group of inherited and acquired disorders that result in inadequate energy production leading to illnesses. Several syndromes have been linked to mutations in mitochondrial DNA. Some key features common to mitochondrial diseases are listed as follows:

  • Diverse manifestations of mitochondrial diseases: Although all mitochondrial diseases have the same characteristic of inadequate energy production as compared to the demand, they seem to show diverse manifestations in the form of organs being affected, age of onset and the rate of progression. Reason lies in the unique genetic makeup of mitochondria. The percentage of mtDNA carrying defects varies when the ovum divides and one daughter cells receiving more defective mtDNA and the other receiving less. Hence, successive divisions may lead to accumulation of defects in one of the developing organs or tissues. Since the process in which defective mtDNA becomes concentrated in an organ is random, this may account for the differing manifestations among patients with the same genetic defect. Also, somatic mutations and mutations occurring as a result of exposure to environmental toxins may cause mitochondrial diseases.

As stated by Robert K. Naviaux, founder and co-director of the Mitochondrial and Metabolic Disease Center (MMDC) at the University of California, San Diego;  

“It is a hallmark of mitochondrial diseases that identical mtDNA mutations may not produce identical diseases…the converse is also true, different mutations can lead to the same diseases.”

  • Postmitotic tissues are more vulnerable to mitochondrial diseases: Postmitotic tissues such as those in the brain, muscles, nerves, retinas, and kidneys, are vulnerable for several reasons. Apart from the fact that these tissues have high-energy demands, healthier neighboring cells unlike that observed in skin cannot replace the diseased cells. Thus, mutations in mtDNA accumulate over a period of time resulting in progressive dysfunction of individual cells and hence the organ itself.
  • High rate of mtDNA mutation: MtDNA mutates at rate that is six-seven times higher than the rate of mutation of nuclear DNA. First reason is the absence of histones on mtDNA and second is the exposure of mtDNA to free radicals due to their close proximity to electron transport chain. Additionally, lack of DNA repair enzymes results in mutant tRNA, rRNA and protein transcripts

Spectrum of mitochondrial diseases:

Following is the list of mitochondrial diseases occurring as a result of either mtDNA mutations, alteration in mitochondrial function or those diseases that sometimes might be associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.

  • Disorders associated with mtDNA mutations-

MELAS, MERRF, NARP, Myoneurogastrointestinal disorder and encephalopathy (MNGIE), Pearson Marrow syndrome Kearns-Sayre-CPEO, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), Aminoglycoside-associated deafness, Diabetes with deafness

  • Mendelian disorders of mitochondrial function related to fuel homeostasis-

Luft disease, Leigh syndrome (Complex I, COX, PDH), Alpers Disease, MCAD, SCAD, SCHAD, VLCAD, LCHAD, Glutaric aciduria II, Lethal infantile cardiomyopathy, Friedreich ataxia, Maturity onset diabetes of young Malignant hyperthermia, Disorders of ketone utilization, mtDNA depletion syndrome, Reversible COX deficiency of infancy, Various defects of the Krebs Cycle, Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency, Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency, Fumarase deficiency, Carnitine palmitoyl transferase deficiency

  • Disorders sometimes associated with mitochondrial function-

Hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, Batten disease, Huntington disease, Menkes disease, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Aging, Type II diabetes mellitus, Atherosclerotic heart disease, Parkinson disease, Alzheimer dementia, Congestive heart failure, Niacin-responsive hypercholesterolemia, Postpartum cardiomyopathy, Alcoholic myopathy, Cancer metastasis, Irritable bowel syndrome Gastroparesis-GI dysmotility, Multiple sclerosis, Systemic lupus erythematosis, Rheumatoid arthritis.

II. DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY OF MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASES

Diagnosis:

Owing to the diversity of symptoms, there is no accepted criterion for diagnosis. Also, due to overlapping symptoms of several diseases with those of mitochondrial dysfunction illnesses, it is important to evaluate the patient for other conditions. A diagnosis could involve combination of molecular genetic, pathologic, or biochemical data in a patient who has clinical features consistent with the diagnosis including mutational analysis on blood lymphocytes and possibly muscle biopsy for visual and biochemical analysis.

The two main biochemical features in most mtDNA disorders are:

  1. Respiratory chain deficiency and
  2. Lactic acidosis.

Skeletal muscle is chosen to study the pathogenic consequence of mtDNA mutations because of the formation of ragged-red fibers (RRF) through mitochondrial proliferation and massive mitochondrial accumulation in many pathogenic situations. RRF can be detected in two ways. Mitochondrial fibers in a subset of these fibers are shown by red or purple stained area by Gomori trichrome stain; the normal or less-affected fibers stain blue or turquoise. Deep purple areas show accumulations of mitochondria as activity of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) in the case of mitochondrial mutation.

The primary care physician should remember this relatively simple rule of thumb: “When a common disease has features that set it apart from the pack, or involves 3 or more organ systems, think mitochondria.”

Treatment:

There are no cures for mitochondrial diseases; therefore, the treatment is focused on alleviating symptoms and enabling normal functioning of the affected organs. Most patients have used cofactor and vitamins; however, there is no overwhelming evidence that they are helpful in most patients.

  • Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is the best-known cofactor used in treating mitochondrial cytopathies with no known side effects. CoQ10, residing in the inner mitochondrial membrane, functions as the mobile electron carrier and is a powerful antioxidant with benefits such as reduction in lactic acid levels, improved muscle strength, decreased muscle fatigue and so on.
  • Levocarnitine (L-carnitine, carnitine), is a cofactor required for the metabolism of fatty acids. Levocarnitine therapy improves strength, reversal of cardiomyopathy, and improved gastrointestinal motility, which can be a major benefit to those with poor motility due to their disease. Intestinal cramping and pain are the major side effects.
  • Creatine phosphate, synthesized from creatine can accumulate in small amounts in the body, and can act as storage for a high-energy phosphate bond. Muscular creatine may be depleted in mitochondrial cytopathy, and supplemental creatine phosphate has been shown to be helpful in some patients with weakness due to their disease.
  • B Vitamin, are necessary for the function of several enzymes associated with energy production. The need for supplemental B vitamin therapy is not proven, aside from rare cases of thiamine (vitamin B1)-responsive pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency.

Research – Restriction enzyme for gene therapy of Mitochondria diseases:

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the only extrachromosomal DNA in humans and defects in this genome are now recognized as important causes of various diseases. Presently, there is no effective treatment for patients suffering from diseases that harbor mutations in mtDNA.

Tanaka et al discovered a gene therapy method to treat a mitochondrial disease associated with mtDNA heteroplasmy. Heteroplasmy is where mutant and wild-type mtDNA molecules co-exist within cells. This syndrome of neurogenic muscle weakness, ataxia and retinitis pigmentosa (NARP) is caused by mutations in mtDNA leading to amino acid replacement in the resulting protein that codes for a subunit of mitochondrial ATP synthase. Level of mutant mtDNA is crucial for the disease as above a certain threshold level of mtDNA, the disease becomes biochemically and clinically apparent. Authors hypothesized that a possible method to treat patients was by selectively destroying mutant mtDNA, thereby only allowing propagation of wild-type mtDNA. Since restriction endonucleases can recognize highly specific sequences, they were utilized for gene therapy. Tanaka et al utilized Sma1, a restriction endonuclease to destroy mutant mtDNA, leading to increase in wild-type mtDNA levels.

Thus, authors concluded, “ the present results indicate that the use of a mitochondrion-targeted restriction enzyme which specifically recognizes a mutant mtDNA provides a novel strategy for gene therapy of mitochondrial diseases.”

III. MITOCHONDRIA, METABOLIC SYNDROME & RESEARCH

Mitochondria:

Mitochondria are double-membrane organelles located in the cytoplasm and often referred to as the “powerhouse” of the cell. In simple terms, they convert energy into forms that are usable by the cell. Mitochondria are semi-autonomous in that they are only partially dependent on the cell to replicate and grow. They have their own DNA, ribosomes, and can make their own proteins. They are the sites of cellular respiration that generates fuel for the cell’s activities. Mitochondria are also involved in other cell processes such as cell division, cellular growth and cell death. Multiple essential cellular functions are mediated by thousands of mitochondrial-specific proteins, encoded by both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes.

Interestingly, mitochondria take on many different shapes and along with serving several different metabolic functions. In fact, each mitochondrion’s shape is characteristic of the specialized cell in which it resides. The number of mitochondria too varies in difference cell types, with as high as 500-2000 in some nucleated cells and as low as zero in RBCs and 2-6 in platelets.

The standard sequence to which all human mtNDNA is compared is referred to as the “Cambridge Sequence.” It was sequenced from several different human mtDNAs by a Medical Research Council (MRC) labora- tory based at Cambridge, UK, in 1981 and as a part of this work, Fred Sanger, the received his second Nobel Prize. Several variations in the form of polymorphisms are observed from the Cambridge sequence in the mtDNA of different individuals.

Metabolic syndrome:

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions — increased blood pressure, a high blood sugar level, excess body fat around the waist or abnormal cholesterol levels — that occur together, increasing your risk of heart disease, stroke and diabetes. Metabolic syndrome is becoming more and more common in the United States. In the future, it may overtake smoking as the leading risk factor for heart disease. In general, a person who has metabolic syndrome is twice as likely to develop heart disease and five times as likely to develop diabetes as someone who doesn’t have metabolic syndrome.

The five conditions described below are metabolic risk factors. You must have at least three metabolic risk factors to be diagnosed with metabolic syndrome.

  • A large waistline. This also is called abdominal obesity or “having an apple shape.” Excess fat in the stomach area is a greater risk factor for heart disease than excess fat in other parts of the body, such as on the hips.
  • A high triglyceride level (or you’re on medicine to treat high triglycerides). Triglycerides are a type of fat found in the blood.
  • A low HDL cholesterol level (or you’re on medicine to treat low HDL cholesterol). HDL sometimes is called “good” cholesterol. This is because it helps remove cholesterol from your arteries. A low HDL cholesterol level raises your risk for heart disease.
  • High blood pressure (or you’re on medicine to treat high blood pressure). Blood pressure is the force of blood pushing against the walls of your arteries as your heart pumps blood. If this pressure rises and stays high over time, it can damage your heart and lead to plaque buildup.
  • High fasting blood sugar (or you’re on medicine to treat high blood sugar). Mildly high blood sugar may be an early sign of diabetes.

Role of Mitochondria in Metabolic Syndrome & Diabetes:

Impaired mitochondrial function has recently emerged as a potential causes of insulin resistance and/or diabetes progression, risk factors of metabolic syndrome.

Mitochondria plays several key functions including generation of ATP, and generating metabolites via Tricarboxylic acid cycle that function in cytosolic pathways, oxidative catabolism of amino acids, ketogenesis, urea cycle; the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); the control of cytoplasmic calcium; and the synthesis of all cellular Fe/S clusters, protein cofactors essential for cellular functions such as protein translation and DNA repair. These roles define the mitochondria to be involved in metabolic homeostasis and hence, a major candidate for metabolic syndrome and its associated risk factor including diabetes, obesity and insulin resistance.

Research and Therapeutic relevance:

Understanding the underlying molecular mechanism of aberrant role of mitochondria is important in developing therapeutic agents for mitochondria-associated diseases. In the recent issue of Mitonews, several papers have been published using the products of MitoSciences, which describe research pertaining to the importance of mitochondria in obesity and diabetes. Some recent research articles based on mitochondrial research (also mentioned in MitoNews) have been briefly discussed here:

  • Metabolic inflexibility and Metabolic syndrome: Metabolic inflexibility is defined as the failure of insulin-resistant patients to appropriately adjust mitochondrial fuel selection in response to nutritional cues. Although the phenomenon has been emphasized an important aspect of metabolic syndrome, the molecular mechanisms have not yet been fully deciphered. In a recent article by Muoio et al, published in Cell Metabolism journal, essential role of the mitochondrial matrix enzyme, carnitine acetyltransferase (CrAT) has been identified in regulating substrate switching and glucose tolerance. CrAT regulates mitochondrial and intracellular Carbon trafficking by converting acetyl-CoA to its membrane permeant acetylcarnitine ester. Using muscle muscle-specific Crat knockout mice, primary human skeletal myocytes, and human subjects undergoing L-carnitine supplementation, authors have suggested a model wherein CrAT combats nutrient stress, promotes metabolic flexibility, and enhances insulin action by permitting mitochondrial efflux of excess acetyl moieties that otherwise inhibit key regulatory enzymes such as pyruvate dehydrogenase. These findings offer therapeutically relevant insights into the molecular basis of metabolic inflexibility.
  • Rosiglitazone and obesity: Eepicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been described in humans as a functioning brown adipose tissue (BAT) and has been shown in animal models to have a lower glucose oxidation rate and higher fatty acid (FA) metabolism. In obese individuals, epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is “hypertrophied”. EAT is a source of BAT may be a source of proinflamatory cytokines. Distel et al published their studies using a rat model of obesity and insulin resistance treated with rosiglitazone. They observed that rosiglitazone, promoted a BAT phenotype in the EAT depot characterized by an increase in the expression levels of genes encoding proteins involved in mitochondrial processing and density PPARγ coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α), NADH dehydrogenase 1 and cytochrome oxidase (COX4) resulting in significant up-regulation of PGC1-α and COX4 protein. The authors concluded that PPAR-γ agonist could induce a rapid browning of the EAT that probably contributes to the increase in lipid turnover. Thus, important insights into the mechanism of fat metabolism and involvement of mitochondrial proteins with a therapy were presented in the article.
  • Mitochondrial dysfunction and diabetic neuropathy: Animal models of diabetic neuropathy show that mitochondrial dysfunction occurs in sensory neurons that may contribute to distal axonopathy. The adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) signalling axis senses the metabolic demands of cells and regulates mitochondrial function. Studies in muscle, liver and cardiac tissues have shown that the activity of AMPK and PGC-1α is decreased under hyperglycaemia. Chowdhury et al using type 1 and type 2 diabetic rat and mice models studied the hypothesis that deficits in AMPK/PGC-1 signalling in sensory neurons underlie impaired axonal plasticity, suboptimal mitochondrial function and development of neuropathy. The authors have shown there is a significant reduction in phospho-AMPK, phopho-ACC, total PGC-1α, NDUFS3and COXIV in sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglia of 14 week old diabetic mice with marked signs of thermal hypoalgesia. These results were associated with an impaired neuronal bioenergetic profile and a decrease in the activity of mitochondrial complex I, complex IV and citrate synthase. The fact that resveratrol treatment reversed the changes observed in vitro and in vivo suggest that the development of distal axonopathy in diabetic neuropathy is linked to nutrient excess and mitochondrial dysfunction via defective signalling of the AMPK/PGC-1α pathway.
  • ROS and diabetes: Mitochondria generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been associated with kidney damage occurring in diabetes. Rosca et al, published an article investigating the source and site of ROS production by kidney cortical tubule mitochondria in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes in rats. The authors observed that in diabetic mitochondria, the fatty acid oxidation enzymes were elevated with increased oxidative phosphorylation and increased ROS production. The authors observed ROS production with fatty acid oxidation remained unchanged by limiting electron flow in ETC complexes, changes in ETC substrate processing and that the ROS supported by pyruvate also remained unaltered. The authors hence concluded that mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation is the source of increased ROS production in kidney cortical tubules in early diabetes

Sources:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11453081

http://health.cat/open.php?url=http://biochemgen.ucsd.edu/mmdc/ep-3-10.pdf

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2827/is_n6_v27/ai_n28687375/

http://www.columbiamitodiagnostics.org/images/Mitobrochure.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=12372991

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0004546/

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/metabolic%20syndrome/DS00522

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/ms/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22560225

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%20%20%20%2022575275

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%20%20%20%2022561641

http://www.mitosciences.com/mitonews_08_06.html

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts