Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures’ Category

e-Proceedings for Day 1,2,3: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017, BOSTON, MA

Curator and Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

https://worldmedicalinnovation.org/agenda/

 

Highlights of LIVE Day 1: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017  BOSTON, MA • UNITED STATES

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2017/05/01/highlights-of-live-day-1-world-medical-innovation-forum-cardiovascular-%E2%80%A2-may-1-3-2017-boston-ma-%E2%80%A2-united-states/

Highlights – LIVE Day 2: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017 BOSTON, MA • UNITED STATES

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2017/05/02/highlights-live-day-2-world-medical-innovation-forum-cardiovascular-%E2%80%A2-may-1-3-2017-boston-ma-%E2%80%A2-united-states/

Highlights LIVE Day 3: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017 BOSTON, MA • UNITED STATES

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2017/05/03/highlights-live-day-3-world-medical-innovation-forum-cardiovascular-%E2%80%A2-may-1-3-2017-boston-ma-%E2%80%A2-united-states/

Read Full Post »

Highlights LIVE Day 3: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017  BOSTON, MA • UNITED STATES

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group will cover the event in

REAL TIME

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN will be streaming live from the floor of the Westin Hotel in Boston on May 1-3, 2017

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA1950

#WMIF17

Forthcoming SEVEN e-Books in 2017 AND Eight e-Books on Amazon.com

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/04/24/new-e-book-titles-forthcoming-on-amazon-com-in-2016-from-lpbi-groups-biomed-e-series-forthcoming-cover-pages/

Biggest Voices in Cardiovascular Care

2017 World Medical Innovation Forum: Cardiovascular, May 1-3, 2017, Partners HealthCare, Boston, at the Westin Hotel, Boston

https://worldmedicalinnovation.org/agenda/

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

 

7:00 am – 7:30 am
Lilly Foyer
7:30 am – 7:55 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: Robert Califf, MD, Commissioner (former), Food and Drug Administration
  • Chairman, Department of Medicine, Physician-in-Chief, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Hersey Professor of the Theory and Practice of Medicine, Soma Weiss, MD Distinguished Chair in Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. What is the state of play and the future of CVD
  2. Why Drugs are behind vs Devices
  3. Precision Medicine in CVD
  4. Nutraceuticals – more regulations??
  5. Insights that surprised you at FDA
  6. Redesign the FDA – Areas?
  7. Patient participacition post approval
Robert Califf, MD – Now at Duck
  • Commissioner (former), Food and Drug Administration
  1. CVD – drugs vs Devices
  2. Drugs are less exciting while devices are booming
  3. Effective therapies of generic drugs is remarkable
  4. Reimbursement system is messed up
  5. DIfferent drugs have equal effects and ROI is not there, Pharma are pursuing different areas
  6. Checkpoints drugs in Oncology has no analogy in CVD
  7. Enrollment in Clinical Trials: In oncology, patients flock to Trials – that is not the case with CVD Trials
  8. Precision Medicine is over inflated, it is demonstrated in Oncology, “in CVD, I wish to hear from you”
  9. System Biology and Drugs
  10. FDA – one drug is a success for several attempts, several is large
  11. FDA is not interested in the Mechanism, they are interested in identidying the population, demonstrate safety and efficacy no adverse events
  12. Investment in Devices looks better vs CVD Drugs, Biologics are different
  13. Food supplement for Prostate, some are harmful – Law forbid regulation of Nurtaceuticals not good for public health
  14. Academic centers: Duke and Partners are far advanced in HC landscape
  15. FDA works with CMS – demonstration of Value in Drugs – Pragmatic randomized Trials
  16. Total cost, better spent
  17. FDA is a Science-based Organization – tremendous people, amazing work – learned the regulation over time
  18. Political Corporation have same status like individual for First Amendment
  19. Regulate Cosmetics and Nurtaceuticals
  20. Ecosystem: Products, Patient Advocacy Groups and Regulators — better alignment
  21. Cooperation and interaction among agencies: NIH, FDA
  22. Speeding the process if Patients are involved earlier – Pragmatic study design
  23. CVD – reassurance the patient
7:55 am – 8:45 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Innovation in Translational Trials

CV/metabolic disorders comprise aggregates of many niche diseases that may be targeted with therapies against specific molecular alterations, yet the final potential markets are much larger. This model creates challenges for both drug development and patient care with implications for initial indication selection and design and execution of clinical trials – from first-in-human through post marketing studies.

 

  • Director, Translational Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School
  1. CVD Success stories NOT by Cardiologists
  2. Metabolic Drugs Clinical Trials: Outcome Trials – 4% each trial is $2Billion thousand of Patients
  3. Trial design
  4. Technologies
  5. Quality control in Clinical Trial in Russia, Gorgie – no metabolites in blood
  6. Biomarkers Predictor of responses
  • SVP, Global Head of Regenerative Medicine Unit, Head of Scientific Affairs, Japan, Takeda
  1. Stem Cells Skin cells or blood cells and converted to other cells
  2. development of Cell-based therapy for Cardiac myocytes: propiatory method to purify myocytes
  3. In Japan, Cardiac transplant in very small cases – Alternative for Heart Transplant for HF – development of gene therapy and stem cell converted to myocytes
  4. Govenrment initiative to develop regenerative medicine, procedure can be improved,
  5. approval for EF improval – conditional Approval given by Government on 100 patients
  6. Severe HF — cell therapy and procedure is consider
  7. Osaka University, cell transplantatio – in Acadedmic Center
  8. If efficacy and safety — continuous improvement – inject the cell be applied to more patient beyond CVD applications
  9. Post approval registry, call patient back every few month, HF continuos Monitoring
  • CMO, Verily
  1. Tools to make the Patient the center of the Trial and engaged
  2. Information arrives in Real Time with Analytics – value derived from Dashboard design
  3. Multidimensional Data
  4. Definition of Disease – not as a point once a year but continual
  5. Real Time monitoring, deep IT design, each Patient has own Portal, monitoring takes major resources, Large Informatics companies, screen ECG of huge populations
  6. FDA interested in NEW tools, data that comes from individual
  7. Biomarkers: Biosignals broader, connection Genomics and physiology – Neurlology
  8. CVD – BP druds and QT prolongation
  9. User-centric Design – Patient-center, data infrastructure for MDs
  • SVP, Global CMO, Novo Nordisk
  1. 2016 – three drug studies CVD and DM – Insulin: (1) Post market on Safety, (2) Preapproval assessement (3) Insulin study assess data without compromising the continuation of the study (CVRT)
  2. Engaging Patients and Investigators – Global Trials varies by Regions – Global Experts, Local Experts and RN as Coordinators — worked very well
  3. CVD Outcome Trials – engaging patients
  4. Intermediate Analysis: conduct and protect the Intermediate results no disclosure till Trial is completed
  5. Identify the right site id a challenge
  6. Multiple pathway related to CVD – Biomarkers difficult to find as insightful
  7. In Israel data integrity is the highest
  8. Innovative Medical Initiative – Novo, Lilly, Sanofi — DM data comparison
  • SVP & CSO, PAREXEL International – CRO
  1. Adaptive Trials vs Traditional Cardio (no windows) – intermediate evaluation
  2. Adaptive Trials: Flexibility 50% of Phase III Fails – Adaptive design offer more values
  3. OMICS revolution – innovative revolution
  4. Umbrella Design: different treatment for single indication
  5. Platform design – infrastructure design is inefficient vs Platform: Number of Drugs Several indications
  6. Interaction with FDA: They are open to Adaptive design wiht Power, survival rate window adaptive,
  7. Tufts data and PAREXEL: Adoption 30% of new design for Phase III: maintain blindness
  8. Data Surveillence during the Trial administration – look at data cycle time, monitor margins during the study Red flags identified before end of study
  9. Biomarkers in Early Translational Research – down stream processes to identify and validate
8:45 am – 9:15 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: Michael Mahoney, CEO, Boston Scientific

Edward Lawrence, Board of Directors, Partners

Moderator: Meg Tirrell – Biotech, Pharma
  • Reporter, CNBC
Michael Mahoney ex-GE Medical HealthCare IT and J&J Diagnostics
  • CEO, Boston Scientific

Geography – Global vs 10 years ago US focus

Pipeline strategy – Diversified: Neurology, CVD, Endoscopy – innovation cycle very strong

  • Symatec – valve company – M&A – strengthen Strategy on TAVR
  • AF product
  • Deeper Stimulation for Parkinson
  • Mitral Valve Strategy: Venture bets with VC for repair and replacement
  • TAVR – volunteer recall back in Europe – P&A – fully deployed valve synergies with Symatec
  • Digital tool
  • GHX – B to B Healthcare Exchange – automate procurement, innovate the portfolio – supply chain cost reduction
  • 30 VC investment – microelectronics, AD Neuro-modulation, Obesity, Immunology
  • Sensors – prediction of HF – two devices: diagnostics-side to reduce hospital readmission – GO HOME with Alert system to avoid ER, diagnostics
  • Cnsolidation: growing very well: Drive Category leadership – Hospitals want to deal with three suppllier.
  • Partner of Choice for Partners
  • Acquisitions: Early stage and more mature
  • Challenges in Emerging Markets:
  1. Brazil – different that China or India
  2. China – more regulation for approval
  3. India – price very low – not to offer more expensive stents
  • Cyber security – Investment in this domain to secure data – not a market reaction to this issue
  • Reimbursement: Clinical path to get Approved – Upfront effort to align approval with Reimburement
  • FDA responsive to 2nd time improvement Clinical trial designed
  • Microelectronics new direction: Endoscopy GI Pulmonary,
  • SPINAL CORD STIMULATION: GU, GI (Crohn), Neuromodulation: Depression, Pain, Parkinson

 

9:15 am – 10:05 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
New Targets in Coronary Artery Disease

Cardiovascular trials have a proud history of providing some of the most robust data in evidence-based medicine. However the growing size and complexity of these trials imperils their future. This panel will discuss the design and implementation of clinical studies globally, considering strategies for patient access, leveraging electronic health records and mobile device data, personalized medicine, regulatory implications, cost containment and management of relationships with global service providers.

  • Director, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. expose new pathways: Biology is most important, BP, High polygenic risk identification of patients for early treatment
  • VP Research, Cardiometabolic Disorders Therapeutic Area Head, Site Head Amgen San Francisco, Amgen
  1. 1,500,000 stroke
  2. CVD and atherosclerosis – is a complex disease
  3. at Amgen – Genetics will bring the breakthrough to atherosclerosis
  4. Cost is related to FAIL less – target selection is cardinal
  5. Phynotyping and genotyping for targeting the Patient that will benefit the most
Clive Meanwell, MD, PhD – Oncologist
  • CEO, The Medicines Company
  1. Orphan drugs for Genetic targets vs Opportunities of the prevalent diseases of the Heart
  2. Big Pharma are in CVD, do not discourage, CVD major cause of death
  3. Phase III needs different questions and more Phase IV needed
  4. Biomarkers:
  • Director, Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Eugene Braunwald Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Residual Real Risk: Inflammatory response, triglycerides innovations in LDLc reduction – Class of PSCK9
  2. Know biology, follow biology
  3. Science is endangered in WashDC
  • EVP, CMO, HeartFlow
  1. Clinical burden remains: Which patient will benefit?
  2. Value for Patient
  3. No investment in Coronary disease – Devices investment in this space, setbacks in bioabsorbable stents
  4. goal is holistic for economic value of the outcome of the trials
  5. Imaging Efficiency: Plaque composition, Coronary CT, flow implication of stenosis
  • CMO, Kowa Pharmaceuticals
  1. Is triglycerides the right focus
  2. Macrophage activation to prevent pathways and prevent resistance
  3. chronic HIV- pathophysiology – immune activation
  4. Pragmatic Clinical Trial Design: Novel Targets, preclinical must be faster, collaboration of Academia and Industry
10:05 am – 10:25 am
Lilly Foyer
10:25 am – 10:55 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: Gary Gibbons, MD, NHLBI
  • President, Brigham Health
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. What innovative projects at NHLBI
  2. Young Investigators
  3. Large Cohort studies: Framingham Study, 1958 – CVD Risk for: Policy: Lowering BP and Cholesterol
  4. CVD hot areas
  5. Value-based Care
Gary Gibbons, MD – Public Service, appointed by NIH Director, not by the President
  • Director, NHLBI
  1. Enabling other the pursuit of Science for Public Good
  2. Ecosystem – the Government arm –
  3. ROI – funds Projects
  4. KI – New Program – funding PIs – investigators initiatives – Next generation of Scholars
  5. 50% of KI converts to ROI
  6. Reduction in CVD is an ROI in research in CVD Biology and Drug development and Devices
  7. 2018 NIH Funding – last two years increase in budget, cuts may or may not occur
  8. Opportunity to reinvent Longitudinal Cohort Studies with insertion of Genomics sequencing – 7,000 Whole Genome – target 100,000
  9. Concepts of Data Commons – Sharing ONE resource for distributed Analytics: Reusability, interoperability, API
  10. CVD – portfolio to include Minority Population disease prevalent
  11. Translation of Science, concept mechanism
  12. Epigenomics and Patho-biology DB and changes over time -a rare resource
  13. Science is to be done for the Public Good, commonwealth of the entire nation – Accessibility of Genome Data after the National goal of sequencing the Genome
  14. 20% investigators take up 50% of the grants and squeeze out the younger generation
  15. Pragmatic optimist in this position, scientists innovate for Patients

 

10:55 am – 11:45 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
The Skinny on Fat: Therapeutic Opportunities

Explore the evolving role of adipose tissue as an active endocrine organ and discuss the possibilities to discover novel signaling pathways relevant to cardiovascular health and viable druggable targets.

  • SVP and US Medical Leader, Eli Lilly and Company
  1. Obesity and DM2 – direct (Heart Disease Arthritis) and indirect cost (quality of life and productivity)
  2. What is most exciting
  3. What is the challenges
  4. Best ideas
  5. NASH
  6. Microbiome
  7. Food Science
  • SVP and CSO, CVMET, Pfizer, Cambridge
  1. Cardiometabolic in same department with Neurodegenerative Disease – affected by metabolic state
  2. Behavior modification does not work – 1:1 care is too expensive
  3. therapeutics needed for obesity
  4. Which drugs will be translatable
  5. NASH – most die with Heart disease – if NASH treated no death??
  • Global VP, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism AstraZeneca
  1. Renal condition CKD
  2. CVD
  3. comorbidity
  4. Drug perspective: White fat in not inert, signalling
  5. combination of drug
  6. compounds that have impact on CV system
  7. Three Barriers: (1) Science, (2) access to medicines (3) holistic approach: Nephrology needs to use DM drugs, Cardiologist other drugs than cardiac drugs
  8. NASH – it is a REAL disease, impact on Patient
Thomas Hughes, PhD – ex-Novartis
  • CEO, Zafgen
  1. Inhibiting enzyme in obisity for weight reduction
  2. Inflammation burden, lipid, thrombotic events
  3. NASH
  4. Fat and glucose metabolism – integrated physiologic view
  5. Cardiovascular Outcomes: lack of harm vs showing benefit caused by emerging therapies
  6. Food and obesity
  • Director, Obesity, Metabolism & Nutrition Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School
  1. MGH-GI, Bariatric Surgery, effect on comorbidity Vascular Pressure –>> Hypertrophy, conduction and Arryhythmia
  2. Obesity in 6 Countries not only in US, Urban and Rural
  3. CVD occurs in Asia in absence of Obesity
  4. Bariatric surgery is not a public solution – it affects the gut different that drugs do
  5. what get a person to obesity and waht maintain the obesity
  6. complications of obisity – abnormal target of stores
  7. move from the ideas of calories consumption vs Brain function
  8. Develop drug against the complications vs against the obesity itself: Science of Obesity not understood,
  9. Voluntary obesity vs life style – stigma against obesity, heterogenous disease
  10. Microbiome – effect size is small master regulator are interactive Pro-biotics needs to be invented

Bruce Spiegelman, PhD

  • Stanley J. Korsmeyer Professor of Cell Biology and Medicine, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School
  1. Molecular development of fat molecule and in exercise impart on energy expansion,
  2. Capture the molecules that participate in exercise to be given to bedridden patients
  3. Obesity is a disease of energy imbalance – Food Intake and Energy expenditure – BEIGE FAT cells that expend energy
  4. Molecular involvement: Exercise causes neurogenesis: ALS, Parkinson, AD
  5. Exercise affect, Heart, Brain and cognition
  6. Science had budget challenge, Biotech, Pharma: CVD Outcomes studies
  7. R&D has challenges to get traction
  8. Microbiome – natural context  provide modest benefit, some effects
11:45 am – 12:45 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Disruptive Dozen: 12 Technologies that will reinvent Cardiovascular Care
  • Chief of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  • Chief, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

12. Aging and Heart Disease: Can we reverse the process?

11.Nanotechnologies for Cardiac Diagnosis and Treatment

10. Breaking the Code: Diagnosis and Therapeutic Potential of RNA

9. Expanding the Pool of Organs for Transplant

8. Finding Cancer therapies without Cardiotoxicity

7. Less is more: Minimalist Mitral Valve Repair

6. Understanding Why exercise works for Just about every thing

5. Power Play: The Future of Implantable Cardiac Devices

4. Adopting the Orphan of Heart Disease

3. Targeting Inflammation in cardiovascular Disease

2. Harnessing Big Data and Deep Learning for Clinical Decision Support

  1. Quantitative Molecular Imaging for Cardiovascular Phynotypes

 

1:00 pm
Lilly Foyer

Read Full Post »

Highlights – LIVE Day 2: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017  BOSTON, MA • UNITED STATES

 

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group will cover the event in

REAL TIME

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN will be streaming live from the floor of the Westin Hotel in Boston on May 1-3, 2017

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA1950

#WMIF17

Forthcoming SEVEN e-Books in 2017 AND Eight e-Books on Amazon.com

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/04/24/new-e-book-titles-forthcoming-on-amazon-com-in-2016-from-lpbi-groups-biomed-e-series-forthcoming-cover-pages/

Biggest Voices in Cardiovascular Care

2017 World Medical Innovation Forum: Cardiovascular, May 1-3, 2017, Partners HealthCare, Boston, at the Westin Hotel, Boston

https://worldmedicalinnovation.org/agenda/

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

7:00 am – 8:00 am
Lilly Foyer
7:00 am – 7:45 am
Pfizer Ballroom
FOCUS SESSION: Japan Today: Advancing Cardiometabolic Therapies

Discussion on unique aspects of cardiometabolic market in Japan, its projected trend over the next 5 years and explore transformative models of open innovation to accelerate development of new therapeutic options.

  • Yoshiro Miwa Associate Chair and Founding Director, Center for Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Sciences, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Head of Pharmaceuticals, Americas Region, Bayer
  • Director, Health & Welfare Department, JETRO New York
  • President, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  • President, Head of Global Business Development, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Holdings America, Inc.
  1. Complications of Toxin absorption and metabolic disease
  2. Collaboration with Academia: @ representatives are on two West Coast and 2 on the East Coast
  3. CVD and HTN related to aging is on the rise National Initiative to encourage change in Life Style
7:50 am – 8:00 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Opening Remarks
  • Chief Innovation Officer, Partners HealthCare
8:00 am – 8:50 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Pricing to Enable Affordability and Innovation

Balancing acceptable answers to high and escalating drug prices in the United States while making strides in medical innovation. Leaders in innovation, policy, care delivery, academia, and insurance discuss potential collaborative solutions.

 

Moderator: Peter Slavin, MD
  • President, Massachusetts General Hospital
  1. American Consumer of Healthcare pays more and it is not justifiable
  2. Pay for Value, pay for Outcomes
  • Physician-in-Chief, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Jackson Professor of Clinical Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Challenges understand PCP services and SPacialty medicine
  2. Adding fluids or taking it away is the majority of the decisions
  3. In cancer treatment 40% of prescriptions are not filled due to out of pocket cost increase
  4. In drugs Innovation are more expensive not less expensive
  5. Economists: Physicians are irrational
  6. Patient engagement, own health in their hands for compliance with treatment
  7. Assist MDs with the right data for their decision on what drugs to use
  8. Two key ways : Complications of Drugs, drive drug cost – Personalized medicine – improve outcomes on an Individual Patient basis
  9. How important is the question, affordable drugs is more important than anything in the delivery of care
  • CEO, Boehringer Ingelheim USA
  1. Many stakeholders are involved
  2. Pricing of Pharmaceutical in last 10 years, “List price” and the “Net Price” collected by Pharma has widen,
  3. high deductable plans are prevalent 40%-50% – out of pocket cost increased
  4. backlog of generic drugs – it takes 36 month to approve vs 12 month of non-generic
  5. Value-based pay, drug is only one enabler in MDs tool kit
  6. Out of pocket cost: Exposure is largest on the drug-side, that is preventive to avoid hospitalization
  7. Unfair pricing leading to not be active in certain markets, Price control outside the US, take position on Importation, not disrable to import drugs into the US, we do not wish drug shortage around the world, Canada is a Small market US is a huge market
  8. FDA on Oncology drug-device, potential exists for existing drugs
  9. Continue to do Clinical Trials in the US, claims orientations exacerbation, describe the benefit
  • EVP, Medical Devices, Abbott
  1. Who will pay and why?
  2. How we challenge development team to bring down cost of technology and plans showing cost savings in 12 month not few years down the road
  3. Selection of areas: ORTHO – hip replacement and Pain management
  4. Establish Global Pricing Models in USD, Premium, fair Price, desperative Prices is not good for the system
  • Director of Innovation, Cardiovascular Division, Senior Investigator, TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Associate Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School
  1. Cardiometabolic diseases  – drugs available to avoid events down the road
  2. new drugs at $20,000 cost per year vs Generic drugs – Economic responsibility in the Lipids area is long term
  3. MI many types bundling cost is more difficult that in Ortho
  4. Chronic disease, therapeutics, diagnostics, How to reduce cost? – Best utilization of drugs
  5. Durable response to drug, not enough data in hands of MDs
  6. Randomize Placibo and Randomize the drug, Placibo – requires better engagement
  7. After MI – 6 MEDS, compliance
  8. Clinical Trial very expensive, FDA requires PRAGMATIC TRIAL DESIGN, IDENTIFY DIFFERENT POPULATION FOR EXISTING DRUGS
  9. develop platform to test simple questions, in Cardiology
8:50 am – 9:40 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
CLINICAL HIGHLIGHT: Emerging Devices for Complex Structural Heart Disease

Evolution of mitral disease management, current practice and impact of new technologies on both repair and replacement, implications of a heterogeneous patient population, triage, timing of intervention.

Moderator: Jason Mills
  • Managing Director, Head of US Healthcare Research, Canaccord Genuity
  1. What patient to target
  2. Heterogenous population – definitive data, how it is achieved
  • Divisional VP and General Manager, Structural Heart, Abbott
  1. Homogenous or heterogenous
  2. Standard of Care- restore normal function, patient outcomes more fragile as disease progresses
  3. Paradigm, measurable reduction of regurgitation
  4. Design of Clinical Trials: MR treatment around the World,
  5. MitralClip reduce MR reduction is not resolution
  6. 1000 publication on MitralClip – data gather indicate improvement in life quality
  7. TEE alone for use of MitralClip is nor enough, need to see to do the procedure
  • EVP, Global CMO, Boston Scientific
  1. State of the Art, Mitral regurgitation and degenerative Mitral valve: mechanism and elements responsible for regurgitation, repair of Annuals vs replacement of the valve.
  2. Options at different stage of the disease
  3. Functional Mitral Regurgitation: care pathways, compounding effects, two little too late
  4. AF can cause Valve dilatation and regurgitation
  5. Treatment, patient less symptomatic
  6. HTN cause of LV systolic disfunction – treated first – improve the Mitral regurgitation
  7. Mechanism under pinning in the decision process, CLinical Trials – Device may not work for all patients in the Study
  8. leaflet condition dealt in repair strategy vs device selection
  9. Having devices focus the clinical pathways for therapeutic options, TAILORING OF DEVICES TO SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL CONDITION OF THE HEART
  • Watkins Family Distinguished Chair in Cardiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Structural Heart disease: Hole in Heart,
  2. 5 1/2 years approved for TARV
  3. TAVR will exceed Open Heart Surgery next year
  4. Mitral valve growth is in  >75 y-o more cases than Aorta
  5. Aorta Valve – seen on Echogram stenosis seen
  6. Mitral Valve – concert of several elements, very complicated, Coordination among: Device, FDA, CMS, MDs, Hospitals
  7. DO  doctors wait to long to intervene: Moderate to severe: Foundational approach Ventricular dysfunction, late stage not continue to progress.
  8. MI
  9. drivers of cords,
  10. identify Patient – can be improved by PCPs, NPs, PAs, assess severity, Center for evaluate consensus on timing the intervention
  11. relay on the Cardiologist in the Community – context: Not all MR needs surgery
  12. Functional Mitral Regurgitation, poor LV function, the valve intervention will not improve longevity may improve quality of life for two years
  13. 20% survival after MI in LV dysfunction post MI then Mitral valve intervention will not improve longevity
  14. For older pation with Functional MR and moderate LV dysfunction – trial design on utility of the intervention.
  15. More patients will be included for treatment as recognition of the disease matures
  16. WHO should do that procedue : Interventional Cardiologist or Cardiac SUrgeons: HARD procedure NOT fixing Coronary artery
  17. Set up regional centers of Care links to maintain quality and PATIENT MUST DO BETTER
  18. 200 centers in the US do MitralClip procedure
  19. Procedure expensive BEYOND THE DEVICE cost

 

  • CVP, Advanced Technology, CSO, Edwards Lifesciences
  1. 60,000 procedures in the US vs. 2.4 million patients with the MR condition
  2. Percutanious is an opportunity not to damage the heart, challenge, how to attach  to the heart and how much regorgitation to get clinical benefit, optimal benefit to patient: Multiple products are in development
  3. Aortic stenosis: we learned which patient will benefit, clinical studies, cost effective, two companies validated the approach
  4. Mitral Valve is in early stage Trans catheter is the direction
  5. PATIENT ACCESS – who will benefit
  6. devices will Improve Patient conditions
  • SVP and President, Coronary & Structural Heart, Medtronic
  1. MR at medtronic: degenerative disease, repair the valve, average surgeon does 6 procedures a year,
  2. Toolbar approach, how to do it safely no complication repeatable to know the reduction level
  3. population exists to do the development early in the stage of MR
9:40 am – 10:10 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: John Lechleiter, PhD, Chairman, Eli Lilly
Moderator: Susan Dentzer
  • CEO, Network for Excellence in Health Innovation
  • Chairman, Eli Lilly and Company
  1. Two approaches to Beta Ameloid – fail to meet Endpoint: Mild patient Solismad 24% improvement vs placibo
  2. Dementia not AD – mild to moderate patients, only.
  3. Move faster is desiable, turnaround time need be faster
  4. Would do over again, tap best minds in the World,
10:10 am – 10:25 am
Lilly Foyer
10:25 am – 11:15 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Personal Monitoring for Disease Management

Considering the evolving trends in viability and utilization and the opportunities wearables may present for real-world clinical decision making.

 

Moderator: Joe Kvedar, MD
  • VP, Connected Health, Partners HealthCare
  • Associate Professor of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School
  1. Evidence on monitoring Patients while @Home, pros and cons
  2. 2016, review evidence, recommendation for monitoring Patients while @Home
  3. Continuing care and continuing data collection
  4. Hospital administrator need a path to have more patients coming to the hospital
  5. Implement technology for quality care, access and lower cost
  • CIO, VP, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Course Co-Director, Harvard Medical School
  1. CHF, HF, – recognize that Technology alone is not enough
  2. People and Technology intervention targeting
  3. Academic medical centers – monitoring Patients while @Home is a mechanism to deliver care
  • COO, Siemens Healthineers
  1. Outcome-based evidence – innovation exited 15 years ago
  2. at Present time the market is accepting
  3. Medical Systems do not have enough capacity – shortage of MDs
  4. Monitoring Patients while @Home is to free time of MDs in the Office
  • CEO, Zoll Medical
  1. Outcome-based research on a wearable cardio-devibrilator, Arrhythmic death protection
  2. Policy: talk about reimbursement
  3. Patient data collected, histories of ECG before cardiac arrest
  4. what diagnostics to be used with this data: do not drive, do not be alone at home
  • CSO, One Brave Idea, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Associate Dean for Executive Education, Harvard Medical School
  1. Evidence and publishing results, MDs and Patient’s perspective on Autonomy vs monitoring Patients while @Home
  2. DIgital Health Comapny vs Academic Study on monitoring Patients while @Home – Wearable Patch surpass wearing a holter
  3. External wearable now acceptable and clinical evidence will convince all stakeholders
  4. Realization by physicians that monitoring Patients while @Home is a TIME SAVER in their practice will endore the technology at a rapid pace
  5. Published studies: Sharing genetic information with Academic Centers: Verily, AstraZeneca and AHA partnership
  6. Information in the Periphery but adopted in the center of Unifies healthcare eco system not in Silos anymore
11:15 am – 11:45 am
Boston Scientific Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: Robert Bradway, CEO, Amgen
Moderator: Scott Sperling
  • Co-President, Thomas H. Lee Partners
  1. Amgen –>>> Biotech to Pharma
  • CEO, Amgen
  1. Six areas: CVD, Cancer, Inflammation,
  2. CVD opportunities: Science and commercial – Heart disease, tools of Human genetics for drug development in CVD: REPATA a molecule targeting PCSK9 – variant on gene associated with LDL Pathways – genetic clue
  3. Innovation in Human genetics new sequencing technologies allowed to see disease in Human populations, disease and pathways
  4. Aging associated with risks of CVD, How we pay for innovative therapies?
  5. Benefit from innovation – 800,000 in US have a stroke every year $60 Billion treatment for patient of CVD
  6. Value of innovation at a price that allows access and lowering cost of care
  7. Cardiologist prescribed the medication for himself it took 6 month for insurance to approve
  8. Utilization management – move to innovative technologies if current therapies do not work
  9. Pay for benefit and for outcome, no pay if med does not do what it was supposed to do – refund patients
  10. focus on right patient get access. if LDL is so high – the therapy is there – the payers, enable access
  11. Access challenge: Discount, Rebates, Co-pay assistance to access therapy as REPATA at $5 a day value is high,
  12. A single payer is the Government in other countries
  13. Future at Amgen: Potential for Innovation to improve Medicine, paying for innovation needs to be strainten
  14. Coming drug is Pharmcogenetics for atherosclerosis
12:00 pm
GE Ballroom
12:15 pm – 12:30 pm
GE Ballroom
Austen-Braunwald Award

Awarded to one BWH and one MGH First Look participant who embodies the innovative, entrepreneurial, and visionary spirit of cardiovascular legends W. Gerald Austen, MD and Eugene Braunwald, MD. Granted based on select criteria, including overall presentation quality, innovativeness, commercial potential, caliber of disruption, and market need.

  • Ben Olenchock, BWH
  • Steven Lubitz, MGH
12:30 pm – 1:00 pm
GE Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: Frans van Houten, CEO, Philips
Moderator: Gregg Meyer, MD
  • CCO, Partners HealthCare
  1. Why Healthcare?
  2. How your approach to innovation enable to move fast?
  3. Develop technologies that are more affordable
  4. Data, Insight, How to get insight from data about a deterioration
  • CEO, Philips
  1. A 125 year company, shade lighting business to focus of Healthcare, global challenge a goal in Humanity for solution, services, products
  2. R&D diagnostics, Informatics to integrate data
  3. Africa and India – emerging markets with infant mortality high — develop a clinic as franchise for every price point
  4. shift from Products to Cloud-based solutions – Prevention, Diagnostics, @Home care: Neuro, Cancer, CVD
  5. Academic Institutions: Karlinska in Sweden – Stroke solution in partnership with Philips
  6. Affordability, maximum of the technology, partnership with Industry consultants, does not work everywhere, took in house the Services part and developed algorithms to assist MDs in interpretation of radiological data
  7. Patient monitoring 24×7 in ICUs,
  8. eICU – measure evolution to forcast 6 hours in advance a deterioration – highest performance, reduction 40% of death by insight from data
  9. Complex diseases created enormous data,
  10. Measuring progression of AM – AI algorithms for a digital platform
  11. Data integration, oncology patients: Genomics, Pathology, Clinical Data Scientist,
  12. R&D will be co-creation with clinical validation and publication for Market adoption
  13. Head of Radiology across several Hospitals – Better Outcomes Operations improvement due to technology
  14. Rural Africa market connected to a Hospital in a city — working on that teleconference
  15. UAE – crowdsource for nearest AED – locate incidence like UBER for CVD
  16. AI in Pathology – genomics and patient targeting – Lab in Cambridge, Big Data
1:00 pm – 1:10 pm
1:10 pm – 2:00 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Global Clinical Trials: Next Generation Design and Scalability

Cardiovascular trials currently account for 10 percent of all clinical trial participants. Discussion on design and implementation of clinical studies globally, considering strategies for patient access, regulatory implications, cost containment and management of relationships with global service providers.

 

  • Chairman, TIMI Study Group, Lewis Dexter, MD Distinguished Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  1. Bar is very high, events went down, that necessitates very large studies 30,000 patients, 12 sites around the globe, acquisition of data
  2. Outcomes, where is Pharma in development of a compound
  3. Other indications that LIPIDS
  4. surrogate outcomes
  5. Diabetes: requirements mutual effect on CVD, benefit of DM drugs for CVD OutcomesGathering data on approved drugs, looking at different doses
  6. A model for dosing compounds per each patient
  7. Benefit or harm different in the US and in other sites
  8. genetics, how it inform in drug development, validation to pan out
  9. Real World evidence in 21 Affordable Act – randomize
  10. multivariable adjustment on how many variable affect the Power of the study
  • VP, Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disease Head, Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca
  1. Patient population,
  2. new medicine vs existing registries
  3. Real World evidence include observational dat after the drug is on the market
  4. Randomization – identify population, register, randomize, collect
  • SVP, Global Clinical Research, Therapeutic Area Head, Cardiometabolic & Womens Health, MRL Lead, China R&D, Merck
  1. data from medical record
  2. investigational drugs more difficult
  • VP Cardiovascular Medicine, Covance
  1. Productive sites, approaches: Russia, Russia-Georgia, dishonest recruitment, combine resources to find sites
  2. 50% of blood analysis at sites that do not recruit at all
  3. Internal vs External validity: Early on in drug development, protocol deviation, drug MOA, variability off set by study power
  4. Patient reporting outcomes
  • Director, Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, Food and Drug Administration
  1. Surrogates: likely outcome endpoint for decision,
  2. CVD is difficult, graveyard of program that failed, inotropic drugs were stopped
  3. Global trial, most expensive to do in the US – in the US the care given need be comparable to the care in the US
  4. Requirement that the results will be relevant to type of care in the US
  5. Preserve randomization is key
  • VP, Cardiovascular Medicine,  Global Development, Amgen
  1. What is the hypothesis for testing, population match, understand the molecule for the modality
  2. Decode, benefits and risks – phynotype
  3. aggregation of data with investigational therapies,
  4. AI will become part of Clinical Trial
2:00 pm – 2:50 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Precision Cardiovascular Medicine: What is Different This Time

Explore how precision medicine is changing the face of cardiovascular medicine specifically. The session will examine the impact of combined phenotypic and genotypic characterization on optimizing response to therapeutics, trial design, improving outcomes, and redefining reimbursement.

  • EVP, R&D, Amgen
  1. Outcomes for RAPATA – a pharmacogenomic drug
  2. Precision medicine in CVD – optimistic
  3. CVD – phynotype more determinative then genotyping vs Oncology, complex traits
  4. Bippharma moves away from big public health diseases, trials are expensive, FDA harch requirements
  5. Investors:to Biotech – works on Oncology and on Orphan drugs
  6. Methodology for targeting by using genetics are more precise
  7. In Phase III a drug where biology is very well understood
  • VP, Head Translational Medicine Merck
  1. CVD in Merck – rearrange resources in South SF on
  2. Arrhythmia: Mutation if down played causes Arrhythmia if Overexpressed causes Arrhythmia – caution in terapeutics tatgets – gene indication not to develop therapy
  3. Diastolic HF – make a drug, pick up one signaling cascade and show efficacy not in all pathways
  4. Populations that are resilient in diseases as HF
  • Assistant in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School
  1. AF model in Translational medicine, metabolites
  2. moderately optimistic
  3. molecular phynotyping
  • Director, Cardiovascular Genetics Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Thomas W. Smith Professor of Medicine and Genetics, Harvard Medical School
  1. Genetic in CVD – Cardiomyopathy and genetics
  2. target molecule for therapy of genetic
  3. gene mutation variants are different the genes are the same
  4. LDL receptor led to development of Statins
  5. PCSK9 was developed from genetic observation on familial
  6. protein profiles very important
  7. Genotype more informative than phynotypes
  8. Genetic tools to direct drug discovery

Kevin Hrusovsky, Quanterix

  • Biomarkers at the bedside
  • Protein of inflammation in DM – phynotype, genotype – stratify population of patients for targeting therapeutics
  • 6 inhibitions, role of protein, multiple cytokines involved
  • Head injury – diagnostics must be very quick
  • Insurance will require prevention emphasis
  • Early diagnosis is facilitated by genokmics

 

2:50 pm – 3:40 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
CV Investing in the Next Decade

View on investing landscape, opportunities in the CV/metabolic marketplace, the drugs, devices and diagnostics currently in pipelines and notable positive trends.

Moderator: Meg Tirrell
  • Reporter, CNBC
  1. M&A landscape
  • Managing Director, Healthcare, GE Ventures
  1. Advanced diagnostics
  2. value-based care
  3. no investment in drugs
  4. Insurance are into the Game of Data Analytics – fast adoption to become standard of care
  5. Reimbursement:  Tech investors and Healthcare investors with having in mind FDA approval process
  6. Mobile health cool: eye disease, DM, skin care ECG, few specialists in China, mobile tools
  7. Interoperability in Digital Health
  • Partner, Atlas Venture
  1. Only investment in drug discovery
  2. Segment genotypes – pure innovations as differentiators
  3. Patient Analytics, Physician-Patient SW development applications – scale broad audience – value add
  4. Focus on Medical Professions tool development for this sector
  5. Learning curve for novel productivity tools Cardiac MR – Imaging Analytics – Precision medicine not in drugs but in imaging
  6. M&A – activity 4 years time horizon, new biology new modality – risk is higher
  7. First in Class
  8. Translational Research and Drug discovery are two different beasts, doing drug development inside a basic research organization
  9. Coolest technology: CRISPR – one injection reduction in a genetic disease
  • Managing Director, US Medical Technology, Equity Research, Bank of America Merrill Lynch
  1. Medtech, CVD is exciting , i.e., Valve area, ICD, Stents, Stroke, AF,
  2. Medical devices – exciting
  3. No clear leader in Mitral Valve repair and Replacement by 2019 – approved products in Europe: Abbott, Medtronic (12), Edwards
  4. Value in the market exists for investors
  5. coolest technology: Stroke – stents in the barin
  • VP, Venture, Partners HealthCare
  1. 165million fund: Drugs, devices, diagnostics – ONLY from Partner COMMUNITY developed IP
  2. Orphan CVD driven by genomics
  3. Stratify the patients to show effects
  4. Exit for medical devices is longer than drugs with innovative business models
  5. Wearables are medical devices
  6. Data will be huge and valuable
  7. Skill set needed for Drug discovery and Academic science — DOES work well in one place
  8. Editas – Academic Center: Innovations everywhere
  • Managing General Partner, Frazier Healthcare Partners
  1. Drug development investment in early stage and in late stage
  2. Focus opportunities
  3. 3 to 5 years time horizon
  4. $50 – $60million investment range
  5. FDA – is central to HC investment
  6. FDA – changed regulation to enable antibiotics development
  7. FDA in Oncology – risk reward equation – FDA played great role in drug development
  8. Leukemia, non-Hodkin Limphoma
3:40 pm – 4:30 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
CLINICAL HIGHLIGHT: Optimizing Care for the 51%: New Market Opportunities

Introduction: Cathy Minehan, Chair, MGH Corporation

Address implications of gender as a key biological factor for personalized medicine. Stroke is likely to be the first cardiovascular event, tied to AF and secondarily to hypertension. Opportunities for medication utilization and optimization in context of, manifestation of disease and understanding the biology, complications, strategies to collect relevant clinical evidence, and treatment response.

 Nancy Brown,
  • CEO, AHA
  1. Biology or bias
  • Director, Center for Arrhythmia Prevention, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Focus on Women
  2. Diagnostics requires women – large trials and power studies by gender
  3. CRT,
  4. Optimizing care for Women
  5. EF, CHF, MI are prevalent in Women
  6. Migraine in Women – related to CVD
  • EVP & Head, Global Commercial Development, Mylan
  1. Information on differences between women and men – Cholesterol
  2. Woman present with different symptoms – more progress because care is delayed
  3. Stable angina and zero plaque cardiac rehab
  4. Female specific guidelines
  5. wholistic approach, girl scouts as a start
  • CV Therapeutic Area Lead, Global Business Development, Pfizer
  1. Number of women in trials? 25% – how to extrapulate from this data?
  2. How to design trials, powering, endpoints, clinical trials, FDA – mandates reporting of Women representation in studies
  3. Data Gap – retrospective study – 30% women, guidelines based on 70% Men data
  4. Awareness – who is the PCP to close the Gap
  5. OBGYN is often the PCP, the only Annual a Women goes to
  6. Precision medicine in Women, what is actionable what is not
  7. Harness Phynotypic leverage repository
  • Medical Director, Boston Scientific
  1. Women vs Minority Women – Improvement will occur if tools and strategies will represent all demographic
  2. Accurate measurements, Women participation in trials, Latinos, Minority Women – not as % in the population
  3. best practices and guidelines
  4. Awareness, nosea and fatigue as symptoms,
  • Co-Director, MGH Heart Center Corrigan Women’s Heart Health Program, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School
  1. Heart attacks in Women and prevention, awareness among women
  2. Impact of Pregnancy: Preeclemxia, HTN, DM, hematologic disease, small gestation newborn, Minority Pregnant women – diet
  3. 30% less referred for Aortic stenosis or transplantation
  4. Care for Patient vs Episodic Care
  5. Stress in Women – metric to measure in PCP
  6. AI to be used in referral based on Medical data
  7. Migrane – several medications need to be studied on Women with the disease
4:30 pm – 5:20 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Disruptive Therapeutic Platforms: New Tools, New Outcomes

Recent advances of biological drugs have broadened the scope of therapeutic targets for a variety of human diseases. This holds true for dozens of RNA-based therapeutics currently under clinical investigation for diseases including heart failure. These emerging drugs could be considered in context of genomic/germ line screening, family history and epigenetics.

Moderator: Tony Coles, MD
  • CEO, Yumanity Therapeutics
  1. one of three death in the World
  2. Limb Ischemia
  • CEO, Moderna
  1. mRNA, clinical stage, published Human data Immuno oncology, VGEF therapeutics after MI
  2. Recombinant VGEF, PK goes to the heart mascle if goes to serum is degraded by nucleatase
  3. Post MI in pigs, Phase I, Phase II
  4. Chronic response formulation short half life (6 days)
  5. Step by step, get the right protein
  6. Cardiology – mRNA drug for one patient
  • CEO, Editas Medicine
  1. CRISPR technology – translational medicine changes in DNA
  2. viral vector therapy delivery: Eye liver, blood — easier for delivery
  3. Immune response from delivery of CRISPR molecule: control over the time response of the molecule: Immunogenicity
  4. Using biology knowledge
  • Center for Cancer Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Member of the Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Cancer Immune response plays a role
  2. CVD and the Immune System: Transfer from Oncology to CVD: Mutations on genes mutations are not silent to the immune systems — development of Vaccine
  3. Oncologists  in lung cancer saw immune response against their own tumors
  4. macrophage in the heart
  • CEO, Alnylam
  1. CVD Program – Phase III
  2. PCSK9 – as a target genetically defined mutation, Hyper-cholesteronemia – subcutaneous delivery – Lowering LDL by bi-annual injection or quarterly – non-complaint with Statin
  3. ADVANCED medicine for CVD
  • Founder, AnGes
  1. Gene therapy – pipeline of 8  –
  2. DNA Vaccine for HTN
  3. Muscular therapy – Ischemia
  4. CVD – Reduction comorbidity and mortality
5:20 pm – 6:00 pm
Novartis Foyer

Read Full Post »

Highlights of LIVE Day 1: World Medical Innovation Forum – CARDIOVASCULAR • MAY 1-3, 2017  BOSTON, MA • UNITED STATES

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group will cover the event in

REAL TIME

Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN will be streaming live from the floor of the Westin Hotel in Boston on May 1-3, 2017

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA1950

#WMIF17

Forthcoming SEVEN e-Books in 2017 AND Eight e-Books on Amazon.com

https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2016/04/24/new-e-book-titles-forthcoming-on-amazon-com-in-2016-from-lpbi-groups-biomed-e-series-forthcoming-cover-pages/

 

Biggest Voices in Cardiovascular Care

2017 World Medical Innovation Forum: Cardiovascular, May 1-3, 2017, Partners HealthCare, Boston, at the Westin Hotel, Boston

https://worldmedicalinnovation.org/agenda/

 

Monday, May 1, 2017

7:00 am – 8:00 am
Lilly Foyer
8:00 am – 11:30 am
Pfizer Ballroom
First Look: The Next Wave of Cardiology Breakthroughs

Harvard Medical School investigators describe their most promising work in rapid fire presentations highlighting commercial opportunities in cardiovascular and cardiometabolic care. Nineteen rising stars from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital will present in 10-minute sessions.

For a full look at speakers and presentations, please visit the Highlight’s page.

Early career Harvard Medical School investigators kick-off the World Medical Innovation Forum with rapid fire presentations of their high potential new technologies. Nineteen rising stars from Brigham Health and Massachusetts General Hospital will highlight in ten-minute presentations their discoveries and insights that will be the disruptive cardiovascular care of the future. This session is designed for investors, leaders, donors, entrepreneurs and investigators and others who share a passion for identifying emerging high-impact technologies. The top presenter each from BWH and MGH will be awarded the Austen-Braunwald Innovation Prize on Day 2 of the Forum. The prize carries a $10,000 award.

Novel Target Discovery Pipeline for Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Elena Aikawa, MD, PhD
Director, Heart Valve Translational Research Program, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • Aortic stenosis is a progress of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease (CAVD) – 80,000 patients – sole solution is surgery
  • Imaging methods for visualization of microcalcification formation: MRI, PET/CT, CAVD Gene network, proteomics heat mapNIRF imaging, microdissection, histology, Tissue layers cells
  • Serum Sortilin associated with aortic calcification and CVD risk
  • Discovery pipeline and CAVD Mapping

A zebrafish pipeline for cardiovascular precision medicine
Manu Beerens, PhD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Harvard Medical School

  • Cardiomyopathy – group of cardiac disorders: CHF, Atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, AF
  • Zebrafish at the forefront of CVD Precision Medicine
  • Luciferase activity vs ttn
  • high throughput screening to identify naxos modifiers
  • Endpoints: BNP levels Cardiac contractility

Using zebrafish to understand and harness cardiac regeneration

Caroline Burns, PhD
Associate Biologist, Massachusetts General Hospital; Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • Heart regeneration
  • Regenerative hearts vs Non-Regenerative hearts
  • How cardiomyocytes proliferation induced following injury
  • Uninjured, 1 day after, 7 days after,
  • Failure to regenerate is related to failure of myoocardial proliferation
  • Genetic factors required for myocardial proliferation
  • myocardial proliferation – by Chromatin – mononuclear >4c ploidy
  • Mononuclear in Human Heart – as research target
  • How to promote myocardial proliferation
  • Small molecule as enhanced to drive proliferation

Bioactive Lipid Profiling Can Identify Potential Targets for Altering Life Course Trajectories Toward Cardiometabolic Disease
Susan Cheng, MD
Associate Physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Partners HealthCare; Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School

  • Bioactive Lipids
  • Endogenous and exhaugenous factors
  • Biochemical intermediates
  • mechanisms
  • health and disease outcomes
  • Small lipid Mediators of Upstream: Eicosanoids and Incidence of Diabetes as Targets for Present and Future
  • cardiometabolic risk in future early vs late prediabetes, and DM
  • shared pathways
  • Statins favoral response
  • Stree or Injury
  • Linoleic Acid
  • Disease and Phynotyping specific investigations
  • dosing

 

Small Molecule Predictors of Outcome After Cardiac Interventions
Sammy Elmariah, MD
Assistant in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • Valvular heart disease – elderly, Aortic valve stenosis leads to failure of compensatory ventricular activity of dysfunction
  • small molecule
  • fiadnostics biomarkers
  • Acute kidney injury due to metabolite, adenohomosestine
  • validate the model – after METABOLITE data is added to the risk classification
  • Personalizing the timing of Valve Intervention
  • Biomarkers in blood predicts systolic function, EF,
  • Metabolite-Driven clinical trial of Aortic stenosis
  • TAVR

Translational trials in microRNAs
Mark Feinberg, MD
Physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • non-coding RNA Biologics – 98% of the genome
  • 2% are coding
  • MiRNA therapeutics for Atherosclerosis
  • MiRNA – Replacement Therapy- ApoE-?-NGL
  • Cholesterol, LDL
  • Vascular endothelium: Inflammation, HF, Diabetic wound healing – tissue thickness
  • Example: IncRNA, Example3: miR-26a – BMP-SMAD1-ID1-p21
  • 3 platforms for targeting non-coding RNAs in CVD:
  1. peptide-conjucated nc-RNA
  2. Ab-conjugasted nc-RNA

 

New approaches to controlling stem cell fate
Yick Fong, PhD
Research Scientist, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • controlling Stem cell fate by Transcription Factors
  • Pluripotent, fibroblasts – transformed into Bone, nerve, heart, pancreatic cells
  • This process is randon and inefficient
  • GOAL: Transplantation, drug/therapeutic screens
  • Cellular identity and function
  • In Vitro Reconstruction of cell-type specific Transcription
  • Identify Disease mechanism of Heart disease by mutation that cause disruptionCo-regulators disruption

 

Exercise Prescription to Improve Cardiovascular and Cancer Outcomes in Cancer Survivors
John Groarke, MD
Cardiologist, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Instructor of Medicine, Harvard Medical

  • cancer survivers have risk for CVD
    Metabolic Equivalent ((METS)
  • METS is the highest to lower CVD in Cancer survivors
  • Onco-cardiac rehabilitation
  • Increase excercise performance vs physical de-conditioned state
  • Cardioprotection to mitigate CV Toxicities of cancer therapy

Personalizing Diabetic Management with Hemoglobin A1c
John Higgins, MD
Associate Pathologist, Massachusetts General Hospital; Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School

  • Non glucose factors that affect A1C
  1. RBC Age span – if circulate live longer accumulates more glucose
  2. AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordics – ALL conduct clinical trials to lower A1C
  • Personalize DM Management
  • Using existing assays with the RBC Age adjustment — for achieving better future Outcomes
  • Device Manufacturers to adjust the device

Characterizing an Early HeartFailure pulmonary EF (HFpEF) Phenotype: Cardiometabolic Disease and Pulmonary Hypertension
Jennifer Ho, MD
Assistant Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital; Member of the Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • Ejection Frunction in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH)
  • Obesity >–>>> PH recapitulates human HP
  • PAECs – Molecular mechanisms – Pulmonary Artery #Endotheline Cells
  • P13K/Akt (Insulin) — AMPK  (Metformin) –>> eNOS — >> Vasodilation
  • Study ex-vivo PAEC from patients with HFpEF
  1. HFpEF subphenotypes
  2. drug therapy
  3. screening

Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease
Amit Khera, MD
Cardiologist, Massachusetts General Hospital; Instructor, Harvard Medical School

  • Integration of Genetic data and CVD data
  • GWAS –>> 60 variants associated with coronary risk
  • Polygenic genetic risk score
  • Risk for MI: Genetic risk Interpretation: Monogenic vs Polygenic
  • High risk comes from polygenic risk: Smoking, Obesity, Excercise, Health diet
  • Healthy lifestyle “corrects” genetic factor

Monogenic:

  • Hypercholesterolemia
  • Trycleceride
  • increased lipoproteins _ ASA Lp(a) inhibitors

Polygenic

  • life style, diet excercise
  • medicationS: Statins

A Novel Epigenetic Complex Implicated in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA)
Mark Lindsay, MD, PhD
Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital; Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School

  • Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
  • Aortic dissection
  • VSCULAR SMOOOTH MUSCLE CELLS in the aorta’s leaves – neo-intima damage vs knockout MALAT1 – nepangiogenesis
  • GENETIC MUTATIONS as Biologic Probes
  • GENE: HDAC9 – BRG1, MALAT1 (RNA) – STRESS in aortic homeostasis
  • Aortic root and Ascending Aorta
  • Elastin and colagen

 

Atrial Fibrillation: Genetic Basis and Clinical Implications
Steven Lubitz, MD
Cardiac Electrophysiologist, Massachusetts General Hospital

  • 6 million in US 34 Million WOrldwide
  • Leading cause of stroke
  • AF is hard to diagnose
  • preventable with anticoagulation
  • AF is Familial and inheritable
  • Genetic Variation associated with AF – genetics stratified risk
  • AF Screening: as Stroke prevention – AliveCor
  • electronic health records are powerful repositories
  • AF genetic risk – as a Biomarker
  • Technologies for screening

Targeting Vascular Calcification to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease
Rajeev Malhotra, MD
Staff Cardiologist, Associate Medical Director of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Associate Director of the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital; Instructor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • Vascular Classification: Atherocalcification Vascula r disease
  • plaque destabilization
  • coronary and aortic
  • HUMAN GENETICS Studies: GWAS
  1. Genotype
  2. Aortic CT
  3. Identify Potential Genes, increase expression associated with classification
  4. Functional-Mechanical Studies: smooth muscle cell – more proliferative vs more contractile
  5. control vs inhibition
  6. Human model of Vascular classification vs Mouse Model
  7. Disease of Vascular classification: Calxiphylaxis – HEMODialysis patients – >50% mortality within 1 year of diagnosis
  8. Drug development and Clinical Trials

Stratifying Exercise Dysfunction
Bradley Maron, MD
Association Physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School

  • Exercise Dysfunction: Complex Pathophynotype
  • iCPET: O2, exercise capacity, Pulmonary function, Hemodynamics, Invesive cardiac performance,
  • NEW SYSTEM DESIGNED: Network-Based Clinical Risk Calculator by Four Clusters – Network determine cluster assignment
  • Point of care tool – integrate into iCPET
  • Provides insights into HTN, Valvular, Myocaritis, cardiomyopathy
  1. Pulmonary
  2. exercise capacity
  3. ventilation perf
  4. o2 transport
  5. Invasive cardiac

Novel Mouse Models of Remote Cardioprotection
Benjamin Olenchock, MD, PhD
Cardiovascular Medicine Specialist, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Instructor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • Ischemic Preconditing
  • Remote limb BP Cuff in pig prevented Ischemia in heart
  • Cell death is multi cell types and cell death
  • EGLN – succinate +CO2 – Transciptional Hypoxia responses
  • EGLN Inhibitor: Systemic Egln1 deletion vs Skeletal Muscle Egln1 Deletion – Study of Cardiac Protection
  • Cardioprotective Mediators: Tissue Hypoxia ++>> Altered hepatic Tryptophan Metabolism —>> Cardioprotection
  • Tumor xenograph

Harnessing Endogenous Mechanisms of Programmed Gene Expression for Therapeutic Benefit In Cardiometabolic Disorders
Jorge Plutzky, MD
Director, Preventive Cardiology, Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

  • PPARs
  • RXR, RAR – Retinohyde –>> Retinoic Acid
  • Transcription factors: Physiology and Pathology
  • PPARalpha  <<<<—- Lipase, Lipid sustrate
  • Epigenetic Code
  • Histone Readers: Selective Inhibition of Tumor Oncogenes by DIsruption Enhancing ranked by BRD4 signal: Chemotaxis, adhesion, Migration, Thrombosis, Inflammation
  • Atherosclerosis: Knows protein, Unknown protein: Promoters, enhancers

 

Aging and the activin type II receptor pathway: a new target for heart failure therapy?
Jason Roh, MD
Assistant in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Instructor, Harvard Medical School

  • AGING and CVD – it is part of pathophysiology – CATABOLIC PROCESSES
  • Organ level

muscle waist, atropy –>> impaired function: Hand grip strength, walk speed —->> HF, systolic and diastolic Strain rate

  • Cell level: Isotype Abvs ActRII Ab

contractility, Seen in HF models and HFpEF

  • Activin-A decreases with AGE

Signaling and pulmonary vascular disease – PAH
Paul Yu, MD, PhD
Physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

  • FIBROSIS: TGF
  • OSTEOGENESIS ANTI-APOPTOSIS
  • Activin/TGFBeta —>>> BMP9 (ALK1c)
  • Loss od signaling
  • Inflammation
  • high shear stress
  • PAH
  1. Idiopathic: Sporadic or heritable
  2. Associated PAH: Scleroderma or lupus
  • Dysregulated angiogenesis– Anti VEGF165 – Zr-bevacizumab – Using PET-CT
11:45 am – 1:05 pm
7th Floor
Discovery Café Breakout Sessions: Sharing Perspectives

Seven intensive workshops led by our top faculty will address cutting-edge cardiovascular topics. Seating is reserved at the point of registration. Lunch included.

Topics to be covered include:

  • Cardiac Replacement Therapy: The Next Ten Years
  • Heart Failure: Back in The Game through New Pathways
  • Payment Models: Provider’s Perspective
  • Molecular Imaging: New Biological Endpoints – Function Over Structure
  • Open Innovation in Medical Devices: What is it? What Are the Barriers?
  • Wearables for Cardiovascular Health:  How to Validate and Integrate in Care Paths?
  • Image Based Artificial Intelligence: Which Cardiac Disease Segments and Why?

For a full list of speakers, please visit the Highlight’s page.

Seven intensive workshops led by our top faculty will address cutting-edge cardiovascular topics. Seating is reserved at the point of registration. Lunch included.

Panels

Cardiac Replacement Therapy: The Next Ten Years- Great Republic | 7th Floor

  • Introducer: Seema Basu, PhD, Market Sector Leader, Partners HealthCare
  • Garrick Stewart, MD, Associate Physician, Medical Director, Mechanical Circulatory Support Unit, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Instructor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  • Erin Coglianese, MD, Medical Director, Mechanical Cardiac Support Program, Massachusetts General Hospital

Heart Failure: Back in The Game through New Pathways- Essex North | 3rd Floor

  • Introducer: Dan Castro, Managing Director, Licensing, Partners HealthCare
  • Anju Nohria, MD, Director, Cardio-Oncology Program, Cardiovascular Medicine Specialist, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Christopher Newton-Cheh, MD, Cardiologist, Heart Failure and Transplantation, Massachusetts General Hospital

Payment Models: Provider’s Perspective- North Star | 7th Floor

  • Introducer: Sepideh Hashemi, Market Sector Leader, Partners HealthCare
  • Thomas Gaziano, MD, Associate Physician, Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School
  • Jason Wasfy, MD, Assistant Medical Director, Massachusetts General Hospital; Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School

Molecular and Advanced Imaging: New Biological Endpoints – Function Over Structure- Baltic | 7th Floor

  • Introducer: Glenn Miller, PhD, Market Sector Leader, Partners HealthCare
  • Marcelo Di Carli, MD, Chief, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Professor of Radiology and Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  • Farouc Jaffer, MD, PhD, Director, Coronary Intervention, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  • Sharmila Dorbala, MD, Director, Nuclear Cardiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Associate Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School

Open Innovation in Medical Devices: What is it? What Are the Barriers?- Essex South | 3rd Floor

  • Introducer: Pat Fortune, PhD, Vice President for Market Sectors, Partners HealthCare
  • Elazer Edelman, MD, PhD, Senior Attending Physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Thomas D. and Virginia W. Cabot Professor of Health Sciences and Technology, MIT
  1. Mortality of cardiovascular disease declines as a result of Medical Innovations as Devices
  2. Are innovations tappering off or New ones are coming??
  • Bruce Rosengard, MD, Chief Medical Science and Technology Officer, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies
  • Ronald Tompkins, MD, Director, Surgery, Innovation & Bioengineering, Massachusetts General Hospital; Sumner M. Redstone Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School

ALL

  1. Solution for Heart Failure – low hanging fruit was picked already – a workabke artificial heart more important than another Stent
  2. Large scale Programs better than multiple PI small grant applications, many are not innovating, conflict of interests, Academia and Industry relations
  3. 99% get better with a device but 1% is been harmed
  4. FDA – overworked Underfunded 52 applications reviewed per employee

 

Wearables for Cardiovascular Health:  How to Validate and Integrate in Care Paths?- Parliament/Adams | 7th Floor

  • Introducer: Thomas Aretz, MD, Vice President, Global Programs, Partners HealthCare
  • David Levine, MD, Home Hospital Director, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Fellow in General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  • Kamal Jethwani, MD, Senior Director, Connected Health Innovation, Partners HealthCare; Assistant Professor, Dermatology, Harvard Medical School
  • Paolo Bonato, PhD, Director, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Spaulding Hospital; Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School

Image Based Artificial Intelligence: Which Cardiac Disease Segments and Why?  Empire | 7th Floor

  • Introducer: Trung Do, Vice President, Business Development, Partners HealthCare
  • George Washko, MD, Associate Physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  • Mark Michalski, MD, Director, CCDS, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital
 
 
1:05 pm – 1:30 pm
1:30 pm – 1:35 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Opening Remarks Christopher Coburn
Introduction by: Anne Klibanski, MD,
  • Chief Academic Officer, Partners HealthCare
  • Laurie Carrol Guthart Professor of Medicine, Academic Dean for Partners, Harvard Medical School
  • CEO, Partners HealthCare
1:35 pm – 1:55 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Reinventing Cardiac Care

Two renowned clinical leaders provide an overview of the medical and economic challenges that cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disorders present.

They will highlight strategic direction in cardiac research and clinical care at Partners, and address how recent trends in investment, regulation, and policy may be dovetailed with efforts at Partners.

The experts also spotlight for attendees the various therapies, diagnostics, devices, and critical issues that will be discussed throughout the upcoming 2.5 days of the World Medical Innovation Forum.

  • Chief of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. New drugs: Molecular targets, Monoclonals, alternative to Statins
  2. devices implantable
  3. IT and EMR, BI
  4. Integration of Innovations, Clinical and Translational
  • Chief, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Aging and longevity of CVD Patients will increase the expense on CVD as disease
1:55 pm – 2:45 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
CEO Roundtable: Today’s Learning, Tomorrow’s Opportunities

Discussion on contribution of technology innovation to the treatment of cardiovascular disease reflecting on lessons and how they shape investment decisions.

Moderator: Benjamin Pless
  • Executive in Residence, Partners HealthCare Innovation
  1. Electrical physiology: implantable paceamker – first 1958, lead to RV, last 10years th enetire pacemaker implanted in the heart no leads. Surgical TAVR, Implantabke to Mitral valve
  • CEO, GE Healthcare
  1. Healthcare data, Analytics, data integration, machine learning, mapping efficiency,
  2. Data analytics is Present, Devices was the Past
  3. Shorten cycle of learning
  • CEO, Abiomed
  1. 20X of revenue growth since 2010
  2. HEART PUMP – only FDA approached for recover the heart, pump blood out of the heart
  3. Tracking ALL patients not samples – ALL Outcomes, all patients
  4. HF – 24×7 employees of Abiomed in labs in Hospitals, 5 years after heart attack, another attack 30% dies
  5. Protocol and standards
  • CEO, Edwards Lifesciences
  1. TAVR device no need for open heart surgery
  2. Selling services – heart-lung machine: Perfusion is a product and Service
  3. Structural heart disease – multiple innovations
  • CEO, Bard
  1. Oncology, Vascular, Urology, PDA
  2. Business model failure – clinical economic point of view
  3. Start up community and acquisitions – platforms for further investments
  • EVP, Clinical Advancement, UnitedHealth Group – Payer’s perspective
  1. Health Benefits
  2. Optum – Data to improve care,
  3. 30% of cost of care is WASTE, eliminate this cost item
  4. Heart transfer: Innvation cycle
  5. Collaboration with Pharma and with Devices: Data Analytics – fee for service vs Value Model – Total cost may be less
2:45 pm – 3:35 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Tackling the AFib Epidemic

Evolving trends in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation. Factors that will influence patient care over the next 5 years are considered, including risk stratification, procedure and technology options, and potential implications of CMS policies, such as bundling.

 

  • Associate Chief, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital Heart Center
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. HF treated by five drugs
  2. 3Million Patients in 2050 20Million Patients to experience HF
  3. Heart Rate – Rythm control in normal renge
  4. ablation surgery
  5. Prevention of Strokes
  6. AF: Chronic, persistent
  7. Risk is transferred to the providers
  8. Genetic profiling for early detection
  9. Going upstream for the Genetics and the Prevention
  • Director, Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School
  1. AF in Men with Prostate Cancer and Women with Breast Cancer
  2. Pathological issues
  3. Cardiovergent or not
  4. poor definition of the AF underpinning
  5. NEW type of anticoagulation Safer that Warfrin
  6. 2/3 of AF are not on anticoagulation: Patient preference, doctor preference related to intolerance
  7. Screening AF with Genetics
  • VP, GM, AF Solutions, Medtronic
  1. AF 26Billion spend in the Hospitals
  2. Outcome improvement
  3. Lowering AF burden is very beneficial – endpoint of freedom of 30 seconds of AF for patient with comorbidities
  4. AF – multiple CV diseases
  5. Identify AF earlier – US not labeled product for AF Patient, outcome data needed
  6. drug management – which patient will benefit: help only patients that will benefit not any patient
  7. Wholistic view of AF
  • VP, Global Health Policy, Boston Scientific
  1. Payment reduction,
  2. Chronic condition with Acute episodes, post procedure
  3. life style modification
  4. Benefits last 3 years, then they come back
  5. Payers and MDs will ask for changes in life style for chance of success [weight reduction reached to qualify for knee replacement]
  6. Frint end and backend improvement – room to be optimistic
  • President, Cardiovascular and Neuromodulation, Abbott
  1. AF – inprovement of Patient quality of life
  2. extended patient life
  3. Innovation solutions : Improve Clinical outcomens and cost care reduction final Goal: CURE
  4. Each patient need the entire Tool Box creation of multiple tools
  5. Devices – how is the value determined? value delivered along a time span not insinq with cost
  6. Innovation in patient active participation in health management – tracking by Step,
  7. Incremental innovations
  • VP US Medical Affairs, CVMD TA, AstraZeneca
  1. Drugs for AF, biology of the disease little advancement, durg approach – understand the biology of the disease and streamline approach
  2. Disease progresses, remission,
  3. Is there a Biomarker as predictor for development of AF? delay onset of AF
  4. HTN is a potential cause of AF not in all cases
  5. Sleep Apnea, life style predictors of AF
  6. Drugs do not work have high toxicity for Arrhythmia 50% reduction in AF 25% placibo reduction – wrong target – Channels is not the right target
  7. Genomics and Biology — need to understand the disease better
3:35 pm – 4:05 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
1:1 Fireside Chat: Omar Ishrak, PhD, CEO, Medtronic
Moderator: Paul LaViolette
  • Managing Partner & COO, SV Life Sciences Advisers
  1. Technology and Value
  2. M&A
  3. Disease pathway
  • CEO, Medtronic
  1. Innovations are the essence of Medical Devices development as mission in technology
  2. Training Challenge in Surgical Robotic – patient comfort of minimal invasive therapy, cost lower
  3. Antibacterial sleeve saves cost of hospitalization, id infection occur Medtronic reimburses Hospital
  4. Respect of NOT INVENTED HERE – internal and external
  5. M&A 0 TAVR internal development THEN acquisition, HTN – acquisition did not work
  6. DIABETIC PUMP  – investment in R&D over 15 years
  7. Care management as Services – therapy and care management
  8. Technology company paid when it is delivered: understand cohorts,
  9. Strategy: Chronic Disease: AF, ablation is needed –
  10. Strategy: episodic care – success of intervention and the recovery from acuity, HF compensation in early stageCRT – hospitalization one year after the intervention is not acceptable
  11. 9 and 10 are measuring outcome differently
  12. Mitral Valve – platform for new generation of diagnostics
  13. ETERNAL: recover fast, improve outcome
4:05 pm – 4:55 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
Heart Failure’s Therapeutic Mandate

One million patients are hospitalized annually for HF—80% of total US cost of HF management. After discharge from HF hospitalization, 24% are rehospitalized within 30 days, greater than 50% within 6 months. Perspective on disease management, addressing the issues of hospital readmission and optimizing therapies.

 

Moderator: Akshay Desai, MD
  • Director, Heart Failure Disease Management, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School
  1. How to leverage Big data
  2. Need for new therapies – collaboration of Academia and Pharma and Hospital
  • VP and Medical Director, Abbott
  1. HF – number of patient will double as Population grows and ages
  2. Pharmacogenetics will explain the pathophysiology
  3. Longterm management by specialist is important vs by PCP
  4. How do we randomize trials
  5. REIMBURSEMENT is key
  6. Glory of being persistant
  • VP, Global Translational Medicine Head (CVM), Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
  • Senior Lecturer, Harvard Medical School
  1. HF – lags behind
  2. heterogenous disease
  3. Preserve EF
  4. Genomics data collected on large population
  5. Big data is here, genotype, phynotypes,  – high quality data sets translation od data to therapeutics is coming
  6. Biomarkers important for endpoints
  7. Impresco – HF Drug with 20% improvement in EF
  • CMO, Myokardia
  1. HF – genetic and cellular level needed – in Oncology this is basic
  2. Precision medicine requires, devices to download CMR Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), – data on fibrotics
  3. diagnosis etiology of HF is complex
  4. Preclinical trials are very important for early insights
  5. Younger patient with cardiomiopaty and older patient
  • SVP, CMO, Global Health Policy, Rhythm Management, Boston Scientific
  1. CHF is s clinical Syndrome,
  2. Telemeter physiologic information
  3. Physiology of HF – is well understood vs AF
  4. Translation of pathophysiology to therapeutics NOT YET accomplished
  5. Impending HF – device better that BP by MS
  6. Combination of therapies – what strategies yield best outcome, 20,000 participants in Clinical Trials is the wrong practice
  7. Translational science fails when clinical trials fail
  8. Need to be in the long haul, there is a model to be successful
4:55 pm – 6:00 pm
Boston Scientific Ballroom
CLINICAL HIGHLIGHT: A New Chapter of PAD

PAD is the most challenging atherosclerotic syndrome, largely due to the technological challenges of managing peripheral artery disease through minimally invasive strategies. Top physician, governmental, and industry leaders in the field discuss the potential for new breakthroughs including novel implantable devices, pharmacologic approaches, and reductions in associated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

The panel will also discuss, Below The Knee: The Persisting Unmet Need

 

Moderator: Michael Jaff, DO
  • President, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Partners Healthcare
  • Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Reimbursement strategy for PAD
  2. Congratulate CMS for covering PAD
  3. Clinical Trial design for devices for PAD – limitations as to what to propose to FDA and CMS
  • Director, Cardiology and Interventional Cardiology Fellowship Programs, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
  1. Nine million patient PAD
  2. systemic therapy, early access to care, arterial insufficiancy, better vascularization
  3. Modification diet for atherosclerotic disease – Mediterranean diet – conselling patients on a regular basis
  4. training operator – baloons is a game changer
  5. durable patency – no need to go back
  6. systemic burden od atherosclerosis
  7. Public recognition of PAD as an important complex disease
  • Director, Coverage and Analysis Group, CMS
  1. coverage incentives in the payment system
  2. design trials with FDA and CMS to ensure approval and reimbursement – know early
  3. Evidence-based tool, quality measure group
  4. CMS approach for site of treatment/service so to be reimbursed
  5. “Reasonable and Necessary” definition for PAD treatment – CMS continue to be innovative
  6. CMS needs data to cover technology
  7. CMS wishes to work with MDs
  • Chief, Peripheral Interventional Devices Branch, Food and Drug Administration
  1. heterogeneity, lack of data
  2. devices approval require consistent data, collaboration with NIH, CMS – design meaningful trials
  3. Match patients and match treatment
  4. mulriple companies work with FDA – FDA is willing to accept treatment, benefit and the labeling claims
  5. Early contacting FDA
  • CMO, Cardinal Health
  1. neuronal claudication vs vascular claudication
  2. continnum of care
  • Co-Director, Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School
  • Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI)
  • 3D Printing – morphologic information on density and on patency
  • PAD is a tremendous challlenge PCI was solved PAD not yet
  • SVP and President, Peripheral Interventions, Boston Scientific
  1. ANTI peripheral therapies – above the knee and below the knee – different vessels
  2. No Consistency in wound care across institutions  – complexity on top of complexity
  3. Balance of rigorous science with adjustment by FDA
  4. Strategy – Category Leadership: not a singular technology: Bare stent, Stant and baloon and drug eluting stent
  5. PAD atherectomy
  6. Stem cells harvesting for clinical Trial – early stage research to assist patient early rather at late stage
  7. PAD Options is evolving
6:00 pm – 6:45 pm
Lilly Foyer

Read Full Post »

Tommy King Memorial Cardiovascular Symposium

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Saturday CEUs in Boston, May 20, 2017

St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center

Boston, MA

May 20

7:30am – 3pm

PROGRAM SCHEDULE & SESSIONS

07:30am | Registration & Continental Breakfast

08:00am | Hemodynamics; Faisal Khan, MD, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center

09:00am | Radiation Protection; Satish Nair, PhD, F.X. Masse Associates

10:00am | Break & Exhibits

10:15am | Structural Heart – TAVR Updates and Watchman

Joseph Carrozza, MD, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center

11:15am | Road to the Cath Lab — Triggers for STEMI Activation 

Lawrence Garcia, MD, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center

12:15pm | Lunch

01:00pm | HF Program including Cardiomems

Lana Tsao, MD & Jaclyn Mayer, NP, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center

02:00pm | Cath Lab Pharmacology

Mirembe Reed, Pharm.D, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center

Register now »

SOURCE

From: <acvp@getresponse.com> on behalf of “Kurt, ACVP” <kurt@acp-online.org>

Reply-To: <kurt@acp-online.org>

Date: Monday, April 24, 2017 at 2:26 PM

To: Aviva Lev-Ari <AvivaLev-Ari@alum.berkeley.edu>

Subject: cardiovascular symposium in Boston, May 20

Read Full Post »

ACC 2017, 3/30/2017 – Poor Outcomes for Bioresorbable Stents in Small Coronary Arteries

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

WATCH VIDEO:

Bioresorbable Stent Comparable to Xience at Two Years, With Concerns

 

Stephen Ellis, M.D., professor of medicine and director of interventional cardiology at Cleveland Clinic, discusses the two year outcomes of the ABSORB III trial of Absorb vs. Xience. The late-breaking trial was presented at ACC 2017. Read the article on the ABSORB III results.  Watch a VIDEO with Gregg Stone, M.D., “Poor Outcomes for Bioresorbable Stents in Small Coronary Arteries.”

 

SOURCE

https://www.dicardiology.com/videos/video-bioresorbable-stent-comparable-xience-two-years-concerns

Read Full Post »

Cheetah Medical Introduces New Algorithm for Fluid Management

Reporter: Lawrence J Mulligan, PhD

 

Cheetah Medical Advances the Science of Fluid Management

Cheetah Medical is the pioneer and leading global provider of 100% noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies that are designed for use in critical care, OR and emergency department settings. The CHEETAH NICOM™ and STARLING™ SV technologies use a proprietary algorithm to calculate parameters related to the volume of blood and the functioning of patients’ circulatory systems. Medical professionals use this information to assess patients’ unique volume requirements, guide volume management decisions and maintain adequate organ perfusion. Cheetah Medical technologies are designed to enable more confident, informed therapy decisions that support clinical goals of improving patient outcomes and driving economic efficiencies.

NEWTON, Mass. –(BUSINESS WIRE)– Cheetah Medical announced today that its eighth abstract on fluid management will be presented at Society of Critical Care Medicine meeting in January. Building on previous work, this abstract demonstrates a strong association between large volume fluid administration in septic shock and increased risk of death in more than 23,000 patients.

Each year, millions of patients require hemodynamic monitoring to ensure optimal volume and perfusion management. While intravenous fluid is typical first-line therapy for many critical care situations, volume management has been a challenge for the healthcare community. It is often difficult for a clinician to know the right amount of fluid to administer to patients, and there are serious complications associated with both under and over resuscitation.

“Ever since we’ve been using intravenous fluid, clinicians have been asking, ‘What is the right amount?’” said Doug Hansell, MD and Cheetah’s Chief Physician Executive. “Today, with non-invasive Cheetah technology, we have new tools to answer this question, and we are learning that getting this question right is more important than ever.”

Cheetah Medical has been working with leading researchers using a large U.S. dataset to better understand the risks and benefits of fluid administration. During the past two years, researchers have now released eight clinical abstracts on the importance of fluid management.

  • FLUID ADMINISTRATION IN SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK – PATTERNS AND OUTCOMES: Sepsis and septic shock is a huge national priority, as it is the most expensive condition to treat, at $24 billion per year (AHRQ). This study identified a strong association between large fluid administration (more than five liters) and excess mortality in septic shock patients. As expected, sicker patients received more fluid. However, even after accounting for the severity of illness, these patients had an increased risk of dying. (Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Conference, January 2017)
  • FLUID ADMINISTRATION IN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL SURGERY: The study looked at the relationship between intraoperative fluid therapy and complications following abdominal surgery.Based on data from 18,633 patients, an increase in complications was found with day-of-surgery fluid use above five liters for open abdominal procedures. The study recommended individualized fluid therapy to reduce potentially negative effects from over/under resuscitation with intravenous fluids. (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] 2016 Annual Meeting)
  • FLUID PRESCRIPTIONS IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH RENAL FAILURE: The implication of volume resuscitation and potential complications among patients with acute kidney injuries (AKIs) has been widely debated. This study examined the relationship between fluid administration and outcomesamong 62,695 AKI patients. It found the potential for both under and over resuscitation in those who received treatments with vasopressors. A better understanding of individual fluid needs was seen for patients requiring pressor and mechanical ventilation support. (European Society of Intensive Care Medicine [ESICM] Annual Congress, 2016)
  • EFFECTS OF FLUIDS ADMINISTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK WITH OR WITHOUT HEART FAILURE (HF): The study examined the relationship between indications of fluid overload in sepsis patients (with or without diastolic HF) and outcomes. For 29,098 patients, mortality was the highest among those who received the highest volumes of fluid. It also noted that patients with diagnosed diastolic HF received less fluids and exhibited a significantly lower mortality than predicted. These lower mortality rates could be a result of a more conservative fluid treatment strategy applied in patients known to be at risk for fluid overload. (American Thoracic Society [ATS] 2016 International Conference)
  • WIDE PRACTICE VARIABILITY IN FLUID RESUSCITATION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH ARDS: The study looked at how variable fluid resuscitation testing and treatments impacted the outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). An analysis of 1,052 patients highlighted a highly variable fluid resuscitation. The findings suggest a widespread variability in provider decision-making regarding fluid resuscitation, which may be detrimental to quality and costs, lowering the overall value of care. (American Thoracic Society [ATS] 2016 International Conference)
  • POTENTIAL HARM ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERITY-ADJUSTED TREATMENT VARIABILITY IN FLUID RESUSCITATION OF CRITICALLY ILL SEPTIC PATIENTS: The study set out to determine treatment variability for patients with severe sepsis and how it may impact mortality. Retrospectively analyzing 77,032 patients, a high degree of treatment variability was found for fluid resuscitation, with a range of 250 ml to more than 7L of fluid administered. For patients who received less fluid, there was no increased risk of mortality. In those who received the most fluid, there was a strong association with worse hospital mortality. (American Thoracic Society [ATS] 2016 International Conference)
  • ASSOCIATION OF FLUIDS AND OUTCOMES IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA (CAP): Analyzing 192,806 CAP patients, the study looked at the correlation between fluid-volume overload, hospital mortality and ventilator-free days (VFDs). A significant association was found between the amount of fluid administered on day one, increased mortality and decreased VFDs. The study may have also identified a subset of CAP patients who could benefit from a more restrictive fluid strategy. (36thInternational Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine)
  • FLUID ADMINISTRATION IN COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED SEPSISEXAMINATION OF A LARGE ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASE: The study looked at variation in fluid administration practices and compliance with “Surviving Sepsis” guidelines, which recommend a minimum initial fluid administration of 30cc/kg in sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion patients. It found that a substantial proportion of patients (47.4 %) with community-acquired sepsis received less than the recommended guidelines within the first 24 hours. (Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Conference, 2016)

“We are very proud to have supported this work – we are advancing the science of fluid management and helping to improve our understanding of how better fluid management may improve patient outcomes,” said Chris Hutchison, CEO of Cheetah Medical.

 

SOURCE

https://www.cheetah-medical.com/cheetah-medical-advances-science-fluid-management/

 

Other related articles published in this Open Access On-line Scientific Journal includes the following:

Read Full Post »

Edwards Lifesciences closes $690m a buy of Valtech Cardio and most of the heart valve repair technologies it’s developing

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

Valtech’s  Cardioband device is designed to reshape the mitral valve using specially designed anchors, aka 

transcatheter structural heart disease technologies.

Valtech won CE Mark approval in the European Union for Cardioband in September 2015 but the device is not approved for the U.S. market.

Israel-based Valtech was the target of a previous takeover attempt by HeartWare International that was spiked early this year after a proxy war. (HeartWare itself was acquired by Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) for $1.1 billion in August.)

 

Deal Terms:

The deal, announced in November 2016, calls for $340 million in up-front cash and another $350 million in milestones over 10 years. It does not include Valtech Cardio’s trans-septal mitral valve replacement program; that business is slated to be spun out on its own before the buyout’s closing, expected in early 2017, but Edwards said last year that it’s due to keep an option to buy.

SOURCE

http://www.massdevice.com/edwards-lifesciences-closes-690m-valtech-cardio-buy/?utm_source=newsletter-170124&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter-170124&spMailingID=10291384&spUserID=MTU0MTAzNDg3OTA5S0&spJobID=1081981757&spReportId=MTA4MTk4MTc1NwS2

Edwards Lifesciences closes $690m Valtech Cardio buy

JANUARY 24, 2017 BY

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF VALTECH CARDIO
IRVINE, Calif., Jan. 23, 2017 – Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE: EW), the global leader in patient-focused innovations for structural heart disease and critical care monitoring, today announced that it has closed its acquisition of Valtech Cardio Ltd., a privately held company based in Israel and developer of the Cardioband System for transcatheter repair of the mitral and tricuspid valves. Edwards announced in November that it had signed an agreement to acquire Valtech.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Edwards paid $340 million in stock and cash for Valtech at closing, subject to typical adjustments. In addition, there is the potential for up to $350 million in pre-specified milestone-driven payments over the next 10 years. Edwards’ financial guidance provided at its Investor Conference in December incorporated the expected financial impact of the transaction in 2017.
“We look forward to the Valtech team joining Edwards. We believe their knowledge, experience and the Cardioband technology are valuable additions to Edwards,” said Michael A. Mussallem, Edwards’ chairman and CEO. “This therapy has the potential to be a breakthrough structural heart therapy to help many patients in desperate need, and we look forward to gaining valuable insights from its commercial use in Europe.”
The Cardioband System is not approved for sale in the United States. The mitral application of the Cardioband System has received CE Mark in Europe.
About Edwards Lifesciences

Edwards Lifesciences, based in Irvine, Calif., is the global leader in patient-focused medical innovations for structural heart disease, as well as critical care and surgical monitoring. Driven by a passion to help patients, the company collaborates with the world’s leading clinicians and researchers to address unmet healthcare needs, working to improve patient outcomes and enhance lives. For more information, visit http://www.edwards.com and follow us on Twitter @EdwardsLifesci.
SOURCE

 

Read Full Post »

University Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich), Switzerland – A Prominent Center of Pediatric Research and Medicine

Author: Gail S. Thornton, M.A.

Co-Editor: The VOICES of Patients, Hospital CEOs, HealthCare Providers, Caregivers and Families: Personal Experience with Critical Care and Invasive Medical Procedures

Article ID #227: University Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich), Switzerland – A Prominent Center of Pediatric Research and Medicine. Published on 12/21/2016

WordCloud Image Produced by Adam Tubman

University Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich —  http://www.kispi.uzh.ch), in Switzerland, is the largest specialized, child and adolescent hospital in the country and one of the leading research centers for pediatric and youth medicine in Europe. The hospital, which has about 220 beds, numerous outpatient clinics, a day clinic, an interdisciplinary emergency room, and a specialized rehabilitation center, is a non-profit private institution that offers a comprehensive range of more than 40 medical sub-specializations, including heart conditions, bone marrow transplantation and burns. There are approximately 2,200 physicians, nurses, and other allied health care and administrative personnel employed at the hospital.

Just as important, the hospital houses the Children’s Research Center (CRC), the first research center in Switzerland that is solely dedicated to pediatric research, and is on par with the largest children’s clinics in the world. The research center provides a strong link between research and clinical experience to ensure that the latest scientific findings are made available to patients and implemented in life-saving therapies. By developing highly precise early diagnoses, innovative therapeutic approaches and effective new drugs, the researchers aim to provide a breakthrough in prevention, treatment and cure of common and, especially, rare diseases in children.

Several significant milestones have been reached over the past year. One important project under way is approval by the hospital management board and Zurich city council to construct a new building, projected to be completed in 2021. The new Children’s Hospital will constitute two main buildings; one building will house the hospital with around 200 beds, and the other building will house university research and teaching facilities.

In the ongoing quest for growing demands for quality, safety and efficiency that better serve patients and their families, the hospital management established a new role of Chief Operating Officer. This new position is responsible for the daily operation of the hospital, focusing on safety and clinical results, building a service culture and producing strong financial results. Greater emphasis on clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and partnering with physicians, nurses, and other medical and administrative staff is all part of developing a thriving and lasting hospital culture.

Recently, the hospital’s Neurodermatitis Unit in cooperation with Christine Kuehne – Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-Care), one of Europe’s largest private initiatives in the field of allergology, has won the “Interprofessionality Award” from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences.  This award highlights best practices among doctors, nurses and medical staff in organizations who work together to diagnose and treat the health and well-being of patients, especially children with atopic dermatitis and their families.

At the northern end of Lake Zurich and between the mountain summit of the Uetliberg and Zurichberg, Children’s Hospital is located in the center of the residential district of Hottingen.

childrens-hospital4
childrens-hospital3
childrens-hospital2
childrens-hospital1

Image SOURCE: Photograph courtesy of Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich), Switzerland. Interior and exterior photographs of the hospital.

Below is my interview with Hospital Director and Chief Executive Officer Markus Malagoli, Ph.D., which occurred in December, 2016.

How do you keep the spirit of innovation alive? 

Dr. Malagoli: Innovation in an organization, such as the University Children’s Hospital, correlates to a large extent on the power to attract the best and most innovative medical team and administrative people. It is our hope that by providing our employees with the time and financial resources to undertake needed research projects, they will be opened to further academic perspectives. At first sight, this may seem to be an expensive opportunity. However, in the long run, we have significant research under way in key areas which benefits children ultimately. It also gives our hospital the competitive edge in providing quality care and helps us recruit the best physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers and administrative staff.

The Children’s Hospital Zurich is nationally and internationally positioned as highly specialized in the following areas:

  • Cardiology and cardiac surgery: pediatric cardiac center,
  • Neonatal and malformation surgery as well as fetal surgery,
  • Neurology and neurosurgery as well as neurorehabilitation,
  • Oncology, hematology and immunology as well as oncology and stem cell transplants,
  • Metabolic disorders and endocrinology as well as newborn screening, and
  • Combustion surgery and plastic reconstructive surgery.

We provide patients with our special medical expertise, as well as an expanded  knowledge and new insights into the causes, diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of diseases, accidents or deformities. We have more than 40 medical disciplines that cover the entire spectrum of pediatrics as well as child and youth surgery.

As an example, for many years, we have treated all congenital and acquired heart disease in children. Since 2004, specialized heart surgery and post-operative care in our cardiac intensive care unit have been carried out exclusively in our child-friendly hospital. A separate heart operation area was set up for this purpose. The children’s heart center also has a modern cardiac catheter laboratory for children and adolescents with all diagnostic and catheter-interventional therapeutic options. Heart-specific non-invasive diagnostic possibilities using MRI are available as well as a large cardiology clinic with approximately 4,500 outpatient consultations per year. In April 2013, a special ward only for cardiac patients was opened and our nursing staff is highly specialized in the care of children with heart problems.

In addition to the advanced medical diagnostics and treatment of children, we also believe in the importance of caring and supporting families of sick children with a focus on their psychosocial well-being. For this purpose, a team of specialized nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers are available. Occasionally, the children and their families need rehabilitation and we work with a team of specialists to plan and organize the best in-house or out-patient rehabilitation for the children and their families.

We also provide therapeutic, rehabilitation and social services that encompass nutritional advice, art and expression therapy, speech therapy, physical therapy, psychomotor therapy, a helpline for rare diseases, pastoral care, social counseling, and even hospital clowns. Our hospital teams work together to provide our patients with the best care so they are on the road to recovery in the fastest possible way.

What draws patients to Children’s Hospital?

Dr. Malagoli: Our hospital depends heavily on complex, interdisciplinary cases. For many diagnosis and treatments, our hospital is the last resort for children and adolescents in Switzerland and even across other countries. Our team is fully committed to the welfare of the patients they treat in order to deal with complex medical cases, such as diseases and disorders of the musculo-skeletal system and connective tissue, nervous system, respiratory system, digestive system, and ear, nose and throat, for example.

Most of our patients come from Switzerland and other cantons within the country, yet other patients come from as far away as Russia and the Middle East. Our hospital sees about 80,000 patients each year in the outpatient clinic for conditions, such as allergic pulmonary diseases, endocrinology and diabetology, hepatology, and gastroenterology; about 7,000 patients a year are seen for surgery; and about 37,000 patients a year are treated in the emergency ward.

We believe that parents are not visitors; they belong to the sick child’s healing, growth, and development. This guiding principle is a challenge for us, because we care not only for sick children, but also for their families, who may need personal or financial resources. Many of our services for parents, for example, are not paid by the Swiss health insurance and we depend strongly on funds from private institutions. We want to convey the feeling of security to children and adolescents of all ages and we involve the family in the recovery process.

What are the hospital’s strengths?

Dr. Malagoli: A special strength of our hospital is the interdisciplinary thinking of our teams. In addition to the interdisciplinary emergency and intensive care units, there are several internal institutionalized meetings, such as the uro-nephro-radiological conference on Mondays, the oncological conference and the gastroenterological meeting on Tuesdays,  and the pneumological case discussion on Wednesdays, where complex cases are discussed among our doctors. Foreign doctors are welcome to these meetings, and cases are also discussed at the appropriate external medical conferences.

Can you discuss some of the research projects under way at the Children’s Research Center (CRC)?

Dr. Malagoli: Our Children’s Research Center, the first research center in Switzerland focused on pediatric research, works closely with our hospital team. From basic research to clinical application, the hospital’s tasks in research and teaching is at the core of the Children’s Research Center for many young and established researchers and, ultimately, also for patients.

Our research projects focus on:

  • Behavior of the nervous, metabolic, cardiovascular and immune system in all stages of growth and development of the child’s condition,
  • Etiology (causes of disease) and treatment of genetic diseases,
  • Tissue engineering of the skin and skin care research: from a few cells of a child,  complex two-layered skin is produced in the laboratory for life-saving measures after severe burns and treatment of congenital anomalies of the skin,
  • Potential treatment approaches of the most severe infectious diseases, and
  • Cancer diseases of children and adolescents.

You are making great strides in diagnostic work in the areas of Hematology, Immumology, Infectiology and Oncology. Would you elaborate on this particular work that is taking place at the hospital?

Dr. Malagoli: The Department of Image Diagnostics handles radiological and ultrasonographic examinations, and the numerous specialist labs offer a complete  range of laboratory diagnostics.

The laboratory center makes an important contribution to the clarification and treatment of disorders of immune defense, blood and cancer, as well as infections of all kinds and severity. Our highly specialized laboratories offer a large number of analyzes which are necessary in the assessment of normal and pathological cell functions and take into account the specifics and requirements of growth and development in children and infants.

The lab center also participates in various clinical trials and research projects. This allows on-going validation and finally introducing the latest test methods.

The laboratory has been certified as ISO 9001 by the Swiss Government since 2002 and has met the quality management system requirements on meeting patient expectations and delivering customer satisfaction. The interdisciplinary cooperation and careful communication of the laboratory results are at the center of our activities. Within the scope of our quality assurance measures, we conduct internal quality controls on a regular basis and participate in external tests. Among other things, the work of the laboratory center is supervised by the cantonal medicine committee and Swissmedic organization.

Additionally, the Metabolism Laboratory  offers a wide variety of biochemical and molecular diagnostic analysis, including those for the following areas:

  • Disorders in glycogen and fructose metabolism,
  • Lysosomal disorders,
  • Disorders of biotin and vitamin B12 metabolism,
  • Urea cycle disorders and Maple Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD),
  • Congenital disorders of protein glycosylation, and
  • Hereditary disorders of connective tissue, such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Marfan Syndrome.

Screening for newborn conditions is equally important. The Newborn Screening Laboratory examines all newborn children in Switzerland for congenital metabolic and hormonal diseases. Untreated, the diseases detected in the screening lead in most cases to serious damage to different organs, but especially to the development of the brain. Thanks to the newborn screening, the metabolic and hormonal diseases that are being sought can be investigated by means of modern methods shortly after birth. For this, only a few drops of blood are necessary, which are taken from the heel on the third or fourth day after birth. On a filter paper strip, these blood drops are sent to the laboratory of the Children’s Hospital Zurich, where they are examined for the following diseases:

  • Phenylketonuria (PKU),
  • Hypothyroidism,
  • MCAD deficiency,
  • Adrenogenital Syndrome (AGS),
  • Galactosemia,
  • Biotinide deficiency,
  • Cystic Fibrosis (CF),
  • Glutaraziduria Type 1 (GA-1), and
  • Maple Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD).

Ongoing physician medical education and executive training is important for the overall well-being of the hospital. Would you describe the program and the courses?

Dr. Malagoli:  We place a high priority on medical education and training with a focus on children, youth, and their families. The various departments of the hospital offer regular specialist training courses for interested physicians at regular intervals. Training is available in the following areas:

  • Anesthesiology,
  • Surgery,
  • Developmental Pediatrics,
  • Cardiology,
  • Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry,
  • Neuropediatrics,
  • Oncology,
  • Pediatrics, and
  • Rehabilitation.

As a training hospital, we have built an extensive network or relationships with physicians in Switzerland as well as other parts of the world, who take part in our ongoing medical education opportunities that focus on specialized pediatrics and  pediatric surgery. Also, newly trained, young physicians who are in private practice or affiliated with other children’s hospitals often take part in our courses.

We also offer our hospital management and leaders from other organizations professional development in the areas of leadership or specialized competence training. We believe that all executives in leadership or management roles contribute significantly to our success and to a positive working climate. That is why we have developed crucial training in specific, work-related courses, including planning and communications skills, professional competence, and entrepreneurial development.

How is Children’s Hospital transforming health care? 

Dr. Malagoli: The close cooperation between doctors, nurses, therapists and social workers is a key success factor in transforming health care. We strive for comprehensive child care that does not only focus on somatic issues but also on psychological support for patients and their families and social re-integration. However, it becomes more and more difficult to finance all the necessary support services.

Many supportive services, for example, for parents and families of sick children are not paid by health insurance in Switzerland and we do not receive financial support from the Swiss Government. Since 2012, we have the Swiss Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) guidelines, a new tariff system for inpatient hospital services, that regulates costs for treatment in hospitals all over the country and those costs do not consider the amount of extra services we provide for parents and families as a children’s hospital. Those DRG principles mostly are for hospitals who treat adult patients.

Since you stepped into your role as CEO, how have you changed the way that you deliver health care?

Dr. Malagoli: I have definitely not reinvented health care! Giving my staff the space for individual development and the chance to realize their ideas is probably my main contribution to our success. Working with children is for many people motivating and enriching. We benefit from that, too. Moreover, we have managed to build up a culture of confidence and mutual respect – we call it the “Kispi-spirit”. “Kispi” as abbreviation of “Kinderspital.” Please visit our special recruiting site, which is www.kispi-spirit.ch.

I can think of a few examples where our doctors and medical teams have made a difference in the lives of our patients. Two of our physicians – PD (Privatdozent, a private university teacher) Dr. med. Alexander Moller and Dr. med. Florian Singer, Ph.D. – are involved in the development of new pulmonary functions tests which allow us to diagnose chronic lung diseases at an early stage in young children.

  • Often times, newly born babies have a lung disease but do not show any specific symptoms, such as coughing. One of these new tests measures lung function based on inhaling and exhaling pure oxygen, rather than using the standard spirometry test used in children and adults to assess how well an infant’s lungs work by measuring how much air they inhale, how much they exhale and how quickly they exhale. The new test is currently part of a clinical routine in children with cystic fibrosis as well as in clinical trials in Europe. The test is so successful that the European Respiratory Society presented Dr. med. Singer, Ph.D., with the ‘Pediatric Research Award’ in 2015.
  • Another significant research question among the pediatric pulmonary disease community is how asthma can be diagnosed reliably and at an earlier stage. PD Dr. med. Moller, chief physician of Pneumology at the hospital, has high hopes in a new way to measure exhaled air via mass spectrometry. If it succeeds, it will be able to evaluate changes in the lungs of asthmatics or help with more specific diagnoses of pneumonia.

In what ways have you built greater transparency, accountability and quality improvement for the benefit of patients?

Dr. Malagoli: Apart from the quality measures which are prescribed by Swiss law, we have decided not to strive for quality certifications and accreditations. We focus on outcome quality, record our results in quality registers and compare our outcome internationally with the best in class.

Our team of approximately 2,200 specialized physicians largely comes from Switzerland, although we have attracted a number of doctors from countries such as Germany, Portugal, Italy, Austria, and even Serbia, Turkey, Macedonia, Slovakia, and Croatia.

We recently conducted an employee satisfaction survey, which showed about 88 percent of employees were very satisfied or satisfied with their working conditions at the hospital and the job we are doing with patients and their families. This ranking is particularly gratifying for us as a service provider for the children and families we serve.

How does your volunteer program help families better deal with hospitalized children?

Dr. Malagoli: We have an enormous commitment from volunteers to care for hospitalized children and we are grateful to them. We offer our patients and their families child care, dog therapy, and even parenting by the Aladdin Foundation, a volunteer visiting service for hospitalized children to relieve parents and relatives and help young patients stay in hospital to recover quickly. The volunteers visit the child in the absence of the parents and are fully briefed on the child’s condition and care plan. The handling of care request usually takes no more than 24 hours and is free of charge. The assignments range from one-off visits to daily care for several weeks.

malagoli_m_905

Image SOURCE: Photograph of Hospital Director and Chief Executive Officer Markus Malagoli, Ph.D., courtesy of Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich), Switzerland.  

Markus Malagoli, Ph.D.
Director and Chief Executive Officer

Markus Malagoli, Ph.D., has been Hospital Director and Chief Executive Officer of the University Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich), since 2007.

Prior to his current role, Dr. Malagoli served as Chairman of Hospital Management and Head of Geriatrics of the Schaffhausen-Akutspital, the only public hospital in the Canton of Schaffhausen, from 2003 through 2007, where he was responsible for 10 departments, including surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, rheumatology/rehabilitation, throat and nose, eyes, radiology, anesthesia, hospital pharmacy and administration. The hospital employs approximately 1,000 physicians, nursing staff, other medical personal, as well as administration and operational services employees. On average, around 9,000 individuals are treated in the hospital yearly. Previously, he was Administrative Director at the Hospital from 1996 through 2003.

Dr. Malagoli began his career at Ciba-Geigy in 1985, spending 11 years in the company. He worked in Business Accounting in Basel, and a few years later, became Head of the Production Information System department in Basel. He then was transferred to Ciba-Geigy in South Africa as Controller/Treasurer and returned to Basel as Project Manager for the SAP Migration Project in Accounting.

Dr. Malagoli received his B.A. degree in Finance and Accounting and a Ph.D. in Business Administration at the University of St. Gallen.

He is a member of the Supervisory Board of Schaffhausen-Akutspital and President of the Ungarbühl in Schaffhausen, a dormitory for individuals with developmental impairments.

Editor’s note:

We would like to thank Manuela Frey, communications manager, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, for the help and support she provided during this interview.

REFERENCE/SOURCE

University Children’s Hospital Zurich (Universitäts-Kinderspital Zürich —  http://www.kispi.uzh.ch)

Other related articles

Retrieved from http://www.swisshealth.ch/en/patienten/spitaeler/Kispi.php

Retrieved from http://hospitals.webometrics.info/en/europe/switzerland%20

Retrieved from http://www.gruner.ch/en/projects/university-childrens-hospital-zurich

Retrieved from http://www.ebmt-swiss-ng.org/university-childrens-hospital-zurich.html

Other related articles were published in this Open Access Online Scientific Journal include the following: 

2016

Healthcare conglomeration to access Big Data and lower costs

A New Standard in Health Care – Farrer Park Hospital, Singapore’s First Fully Integrated Healthcare/Hospitality Complex

A Rich Tradition of Patient-Focused Care — Richmond University Medical Center, New York’s Leader in Health Care and Medical Education

2013

Risk Factor for Health Systems: High Turnover of Hospital CEOs and Visionary’s Role of Hospitals In 10 Years

Nation’s Biobanks: Academic institutions, Research institutes and Hospitals – vary by Collections Size, Types of Specimens and Applications: Regulations are Needed

Read Full Post »

First U.S. TAVR Patients Treated With Temporary Pacing Lead (Tempo Lead)

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

UPDATED on 8/2/2017

Medtronic wins FDA nod, CE Mark for Avalus aortic valve

AUGUST 2, 2017 BY FINK DENSFORD

http://www.massdevice.com/medtronic-wins-fda-nod-ce-mark-avalus-aortic-valve/?utm_source=newsletter-170802&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter-170802&spMailingID=11611945&spUserID=MTU0MTAzNDg3OTA5S0&spJobID=1220180538&spReportId=MTIyMDE4MDUzOAS2

 

 

BioTrace Medical, Inc., a venture backed company based in San Carlos, Calif., is dedicated to reinventing temporary pacing to improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital costs.

For more information: www.biotracemedical.com

 

FDA Clears Temporary Pacing Technology for Transcatheter Aortic Valve and EP Procedures

The BioTrace Medical Tempo temporary pacing lead is designed to reduce complications and hospital length of stay

The Tempo Lead represents the first major advance in temporary pacing since the technology was introduced decades ago,” said Susheel Kodali, M.D., director of the Heart Valve Program at the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at Columbia University Medical Center in New York. “As a critical component of every TAVR procedure, temporary leads are integral to successful clinical outcomes for patients. I am excited about the potential of this technology and look forward to using it in my practice.”

Results of the first-in-human study of the technology will be presented at the annual Transcatheter Cardiac Therapeutics (TCT) conference in Washington, D.C. on Sunday, Oct. 30, at 10:59 a.m. eastern time in Room 209, Level 2.

“FDA clearance is an exciting milestone for BioTrace,” said Laura Dietch, CEO of BioTrace Medical. “We are pleased to bring this important innovation to the significant and growing number of patients needing better temporary pacing options to minimize risks and life-threatening complications. We look forward to launching in select U.S. centers in the coming weeks.”

For more information: www.biotracemedical.com

SOURCE

http://www.dicardiology.com/product/fda-clears-temporary-pacing-technology-transcatheter-aortic-valve-and-ep-procedures

December 19, 2016 — BioTrace Medical Inc. announced the first commercial use of the company’s Tempo Temporary Pacing Lead since U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance in October.

The first cases involved patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures and were performed by James Harkness, M.D., interventional cardiologist, and Brian K. Whisenant, M.D., medical director of the Structural Heart Disease Program at Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City, Utah, and Susheel Kodali, M.D., director of the Heart Valve Program at Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital.

BioTrace Medical’s Tempo Lead is for use in procedures in which

  • Temporary pacing is indicated, including
  • TAVR and
  • Electrophysiology (EP) procedures.

The lead is designed for secure and stable cardiac pacing with the goal of reducing complications and allowing patients to ambulate sooner after procedures.

“The Tempo Lead is designed to alleviate the risks associated with lead dislodgement and inconsistent pacing, providing a safer option for patients.”

Temporary leads are used in more than 350,000 procedures each year, a number that is growing rapidly as the population ages and TAVR becomes increasingly common. The temporary pacing lead, a small catheter with two electrodes, is placed in the right ventricle of the heart through a vein in the groin or neck. The lead is then connected to an external pacemaker allowing a physician to monitor and control a patient’s heart rate for several days.

SOURCE

http://www.dicardiology.com/content/first-us-tavr-patients-treated-temporary-pacing-lead?eid=333021707&bid=1620839

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »