Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) Group

Volume II can be found at http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/biomed-e-books/series-a-e-books-on-cardiovascular-diseases/volume-two-cardiovascular-original-research-cases-in-methodology-design-for-content-co-curation/

Volume III can be found at http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/biomed-e-books/series-a-e-books-on-cardiovascular-diseases/volume-three-etiologies-of-cardiovascular-diseases-epigenetics-genetics-genomics/

Volume IV can be found at http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/biomed-e-books/series-a-e-books-on-cardiovascular-diseases/volume-four-therapeutic-promise-cvd-regenerative-translational-medicine/

Please see Further Titles at

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/biomed-e-books/

Please see Further Information on the Sachs Associates 14th Annual Biotech in Europe Forum for Global Investing & Partnering at:

http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2014/03/25/14th-annual-biotech-in-europe-forum-for-global-partnering-investment-930-1012014-%E2%80%A2-congress-center-basel-sachs-associates-london/

AND

http://www.sachsforum.com/basel14/index.html

ON TWITTER Follow at

@SachsAssociates

#Sachs14thBEF

@pharma_BI

@AVIVA1950 

Share this:

• Tweet
• Print
• Email
• More

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Abdominal Aorta, Academic Publishing, Aortic Valve: TAVR, Artificial Heart, BiVAD, CABG, Cancer Surgery of the Heart, Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment, Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures, Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics, Carotid Artery, Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Clinical Diagnostics, Coagulation Therapy and Internal Bleeding, Conference Coverage with Social Media, CT, Curation, Curation methodology, De novo synthesis, Dialectic, Discovery process, Evolutionary cognition, Exec Compensation in the Cardiac & Vascular Repair Tools Subsegment, Experimental validation, Explanatory, Frontiers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disorders, Heart Transplant, Heart-Lung Transplant, Historical relevance, Mechanical Assist Devices: LVAD, Mitral Valve: Repair and Replacement, PCI, Peripheral Arterial Disease & Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Renal Denervation, RVAD, TAVI vs Open Heart Surgery, Technology Advance Assessment of, Thoracic Aorta | Tagged Aviva Lev-Ari, Biology, Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular Disorders, ebook, health, Heart disease, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Larry H. Bernstein, medical breakthrough, medical education, nitric oxide, Personalized medicine, research | 1 Comment

One Response

1. on September 27, 2014 at 2:28 PM | Reply 2012pharmaceutical

   This is very insightful. There is no doubt that there is the bias you refer to. 42 years ago, when I was postdocing in biochemistry/enzymology before completing my residency in pathology, I knew that there were very influential mambers of the faculty, who also had large programs, and attracted exceptional students. My mentor, it was said (although he was a great writer), could draft a project on toilet paper and call the NIH. It can’t be true, but it was a time in our history preceding a great explosion. It is bizarre for me to read now about eNOS and iNOS, and about CaMKII-á, â, ã, ä – isoenzymes. They were overlooked during the search for the genome, so intermediary metabolism took a back seat. But the work on protein conformation, and on the mechanism of action of enzymes and ligand and coenzyme was just out there, and became more important with the research on signaling pathways. The work on the mechanism of pyridine nucleotide isoenzymes preceded the work by Burton Sobel on the MB isoenzyme in heart. The Vietnam War cut into the funding, and it has actually declined linearly since.

   A few years later, I was an Associate Professor at a new Medical School and I submitted a proposal that was reviewed by the Chairman of Pharmacology, who was a former Director of NSF. He thought it was good enough. I was a pathologist and it went to a Biochemistry Review Committee. It was approved, but not funded. The verdict was that I would not be able to carry out the studies needed, and they would have approached it differently. A thousand young investigators are out there now with similar letters. I was told that the Department Chairmen have to build up their faculty. It’s harder now than then. So I filed for and received 3 patents based on my work at the suggestion of my brother-in-law. When I took it to Boehringer-Mannheim, they were actually clueless.

   Loading...