What comes after finishing the Euchromatic Sequence of the Human Genome?
Author and Curator: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP
-
Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome.
Oct 21 2004 ; 431(7011): 931-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03001
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium.
The sequence of the human genome encodes the genetic instructions for human physiology, as well as rich information about human evolution. In 2001, the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium reported a draft sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome. They then worked to complete a genome sequence with high accuracy and completeness. The result of this is reported in Nature (2004), here cited. The current genome sequence (Build 35) contains 2.85 billion nucleotides interrupted by only 341 gaps. It covers approximately 99% of the euchromatic genome and is accurate to an error rate of approximately 1 event per 100,000 bases. Many of the remaining euchromatic gaps are associated with segmental duplications and will require focused work with new methods. The near-complete sequence, the first for a vertebrate, greatly improves the precision of biological analyses of the human genome including studies of gene number, birth and death. Notably, the human genome seems to encode only 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes
PMID: 15496913 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]
Comment in Human genome: end of the beginning. [Nature. 2004]
-
Human genome: End of the beginning
Lincoln D. Stein
Nature 21 Oct 2004; 431, 915-916 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/431915a
Just over three years ago, a first draft of the human genome sequence had been completed. Gaps and errors remained, but the job of fixing those problems is now largely done.
The featured article in this issue of Nature, entitled “Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome”, has been authored by members of the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (IHGSC). It is the latest, but by no means the last, milestone in this historic project.
Early in 2001, the duelling IHGSC (public) and Celera Corporation (private) groups published papers in Nature2 and Science3describing the completion of so-called ‘draft’ sequences. These sequences have revolutionized molecular biology by largely eliminating the need to clone and sequence genes involved in human health and disease.
But the draft sequences were far from perfect. Some 10% of the so-called ‘euchromatin’ — the gene-rich portion of the genome — and some 30% of the genome as a whole (which includes the gene-poor regions of ‘heterochromatin’), were not disclosed. There were hundreds of thousands of gaps, and there were misassembled regions where portions of the genome were flipped or misplaced. As a result, large-scale analyses of the genome, had to contend with numerous uncertainties and artefacts. For example, studies of the dying remnants of genes that have accumulated mutations that render them non-functional, left the possibility that such a ‘pseudogene’ was a sequencing error.
Since the publication of the drafts, the IHGSC sequencing centers have quietly undertaken a laborious ‘finishing’ process, in which each gap in the draft was individually examined and subjected to a battery of steps involving cloning and resequencing stretches of DNA. The sequence announced today has just 341 gaps remaining, and consists of contiguous runs of sequence averaging 38 million base pairs. The authors estimate that the finished sequence covers 99% of the euchromatic portion of the genome and that the overall error rate is less than 1 error per 100,000 base pairs. This substantially exceeds the original goals for the project.
The finishing procedure roughly doubled the total time and cost of the project. Does it contribute anything new to our understanding of the genome? It does indeed, and to prove the point the authors of the current paper1 describe several large-scale analyses of the genome that would have been difficult to perform on the draft sequence. One analysis studied the processes of gene birth and death. The authors find 1,183 human genes that show evidence of having been recently ‘born’ by a process of gene duplication and divergence. They also find 37 genes that seem to have recently ‘died’ by acquiring a mutation that rendered the gene non-functional. The resulting pseudogene then slowly degrades and disappears.
The authors then use the finished sequence to map out segmental duplications — large regions of the genome that have duplicated. They find 5% of the genome involved in segmental duplications, and the duplications are distributed widely across the chromosomes. The nature and extent of such duplications sheds light on the evolution of the human genome, and is needed for studying the many medically relevant disorders that are involved in segmental duplications.
Another paper in this issue, by She et al.4 (page 927), directly compares the outcomes of this second analysis with results obtained on an unfinished version of the human genome (an improved version of the Celera draft). She et al. find that the draft version artefactually ‘simplifies’ the genome by eliminating many duplicated regions. Their results bear on one of the highly publicized differences between the public and private genome projects. The public project used an older strategy in which the genome was first cloned into bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs); the clones were then mapped, and each clone was sequenced and their sequences assembled individually. Celera championed an untested technique, ‘whole-genome shotgun’ (WGS), in which the entire genome was shattered into bite-size pieces, sequenced, and then assembled by software in one conceptually simple step.
Celera proved that the WGS technique is both technically feasible and provides a dramatic cost-saving over the clone-by-clone approach. The Celera draft has had a significant impact on the public project. Almost all genome-sequencing projects since then have used some form of WGS. The cautionary results contained in the new papers from the IHGSC1 and She et al.4argue for a hybrid strategy in which WGS is supplemented by a modest amount of BAC cloning and mapping. This would protect draft WGS sequences from some of the ‘simplification’ reported by She et al. and provide the clones needed for finishing selected regions of special interest.
What is next for the human genome project?
1) Develop the definitive catalogue of protein-coding genes – estimated to be between 20,000 and 25,000.
a) Natural selection ensures that functional regions are more highly conserved than non-functional ones, so a comparative approach highlights candidate protein-coding regions.
b) The same approach shows promise for finding other functional elements such as gene promoters, which control the timing and level of expression of genes, and micro-RNAs, which have been implicated as regulatory agents of many developmental processes.
2) Sequencing the remaining 20% of the genome that lies within heterochromatin, the gene-poor, highly repetitive sequence that is implicated in the processes of chromosome replication and maintenance.
a) The repetitiveness ofheterochromatin means that it cannot be tackled using current sequencing methods, and new technologies will have to be developed to attack it.
We are only at the end of the beginning: ahead lies another mountain range that we will need to map out and explore as we seek to understand how all the parts revealed by the genome sequence work together to make life.
References
- International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Nature 431, 931−945 (2004). | Article |
- International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Nature 409, 860−921 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Venter, J. C. et al. Science 291, 1304−1351 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- She, X. et al. Nature 431, 927−930 (2004). | Article |
-
Shotgun sequence assembly and recent segmental duplications within the human genome
Xinwei She1, Zhaoshi Jiang1, Royden A. Clark2, Ge Liu2, Ze Cheng1, et al.
Nature 431, 927-930 (21 Oct 2004) | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03062;
Complex eukaryotic genomes are now being sequenced at an accelerated pace primarily using whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequence assembly approaches. WGS assembly was initially criticized because of its perceived inability to resolve repeat structures within genomes. Here, we quantify the effect of WGS sequence assembly on large, highly similar repeats by comparison of the segmental duplication content of two different human genome assemblies. Our analysis shows that large (> 15 kilobases) and highly identical (> 97%) duplications are not adequately resolved by WGS assembly. This leads to significant reduction in genome length and the loss of genes embedded within duplications. Comparable analyses of mouse genome assemblies confirm that strict WGS sequence assembly will oversimplify our understanding of mammalian genome structure and evolution; a hybrid strategy using a targeted clone-by-clone approach to resolve duplications is proposed.
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
Department of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Applied Biosystems, and
The Center for the Advancement of Genomics, Rockville, Maryland
Like this:
Like Loading...
Read Full Post »