Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Interventional Oncology: Radiofrequency Ablation, Transarterial Chemoembolization, Microwave Ablation and Irreversible Electroporation (IRE)’ Category

The Experience of a Patient with Thyroid Cancer

Interviewer and Curator: Larry H Bernstein, MD, FCAP

 

Thyroid cancer is usually a fairly innocuous disease, but it can present in different ways. There are are perhaps two main types – medullary, and follicular.  But an anaplastic type is also a third uncommon type.  It is speculative for me to suggest that the anaplastic type is a progression of either of the two main types.  A RAS genotype coexists with the aggressive anaplastic carcinoma.  Thyroid cancers are BRAF positive in genotype.  The histological feature that is used to identify this neoplasm is the presence of “sammoma bodies”.  It is more common in women, and less common in the elderly, and the incidence appears to have increased regionally in recent years.  A recent paper suggests a common specific feature with breast cancer, which is unconfirmed.

When we consider thyroid disease, we start with euthyroid status, hypothyroid and hyperthyroid, all of which are related to the synthetic activity of the gland, that has a right and left lobe joined by a isthmus.  In the midwestern US there is a deficiency of iodine, which leads to nodular thyroid goiter.  The Mayo brothers pioneered in thyroid surgery at their clinic in Rochester, MN.  This led to the insertion of iodine in table salt (Morton’s salt- “when it rains, it pours).  Hyperthyroid status is over production of the hormone by an overactive gland. It is usually primary disease, called Grave’s Disease, after the physician who described it. I am not aware of the occurrence secondary to hyperactivity of the pituitary gland, which would result in both an increased thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyrotropin, and elevated thyroid hormone, except by a primary neoplasm of thyrotropin secreting cells.  The two hormones are under feedback control.  This feedback is a valuable diagnostic indicator because the TSH is suppressed with Grave’s disease.  The TSH assay is very accurate, and as the TSH falls, the TH increases, but the TH assay has never been as accurate as the TSH. The TH is transported in serum by three proteins: thyroxin-binding globulin (TBG), albumin, and trans-thy-retin (TTR), a quadruplex peptide with one subunit binding to retinol-binding protein (RPB), which transports retinol, vitamin A).  The importance of TTR is not a subject for discussion here, but it has extremely important ties to metabolic disease that includes hyperhomocysteinemia and Alzheimer’s disease, as this protein is produced by both the liver and the choroid plexus, but the CP production declines in the elderly.  The TTR metabolism is closely linked to total body sulfur, measured by K+ isotope measurement of lean body mass (fat free mass), and is a more accurate measure than use of urinary creatinine loss, which only measure the structural body mass, but not the visceral component.

There is another twist to the story in that thyroid hormone may be depressed over time secondary to an autoantibody to thyroid “peroxidase”, leading to destruction of the gland.  The thyroid antibody that occurs has been recently reported to be a “peroxidase” antibody in common with the mammary gland.  The disorder is denominated – Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. The presence of thyroid antibody may occur with Grave’s disease, with an occular protrusion with inflammation of the adductor muscles of eye movement.  This is termed “exophthalmus”.  However, thyroid eye disease is known to occur with hypo-, hyper-, and euthyroid status.

I here describe the long and difficult search to identify a confusing case.

 

Family history: Mother had thyroid cancer, surgically cured at Mayo Clinic. Sister had Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Father had severe rheumatoid arthritis.

History of Illness.  The patient is a male over 65 years age who attended a discussion group for several years and participated in supervised fitness exercises and did daily walks for 2-3 years prior to the discovery of the problem when he recalls, his voice was weak in making presentations to the discussion group (age 86 and over).

At the end of summer, 2013, he experienced shortness of breath and dizziness on walking.  His physician had been concerned about the change of voice prior to this.  He had a history of sleep apnea, and he was actively trying to lose weight.  Cardiac and vascular examination of carotid and of peripheral circulation were unexpectedly excellent.  Pulmonary studies were good.

A visit to an ENT physician did not explain the voice impairment.  An unexpected low TSH result came back < 0.01, compared to a normal result 9 months earlier. This was the first indication of an active cyst or Grave’s disease. The patient was referred for ultrasound exam, and a thyroid panel was ordered.  The result of the ultrasound was an enlarged right lobe with two large degenerate cysts, and a central small calcified cyst.  The cyst was biopsied and it was malignant. It was BRAF pos and RAS negative.

He was referred to the nearest world-class academic center for further endocrine evaluation.  The endocrinologist palpated a thyroid enlargement, and a biopsy was performed of the lymph nodes under a full scan of the neck.  Surgery was scheduled and a surgeon skilled in endocrine surgery and cancer removed the thyroid, and noted that the right lobe compressed the recurrent laryngeal nerve.  This was consistent with en ENT examination of the larynx that showed paralysis of the right larynx.  The good news was that the prediction was that the nerve innovation was good, and would return.

There were a few involved lymph nodes in the removed specimen. The patient was put on synthroid. The next step was to schedule I131 radioiodine treatment by oral tablets.  This required a preparatory diet of no salt or iodine intake prior to treatment.  There was also a 5 day isolation for beta ray emission (which kills residual thyroid cells).  The neck was scanned with a gamma scanned prior to induction of treatment, which required a dose of synthetic TSH and a low dose of I131.   The patiemt is recovered for 14 days post treatment and has regained much energy.

There is a residual burden of the thyroid eye disease that requires special optical care because of loss of distance perception with diplopia.  This is stable, but any surgical repair would have to wait for a year.

 

Notes from PathologyOutlines.com, Nathan Pernick, Editor-in-Chief

Thyroid gland

Reviewer: Zubair W. Baloch, M.D., Shahidul Islam, M.D., Ph.D., Ricardo R. Lastra, M.D., Michelle R. Pramick, M.D., Phillip A. Williams, M.D., MSC (see Reviewers page)

Revised: 11 July 2014, last major update IN PROGRESS
Copyright: (c) 2001-2014, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

Endocrine abnormalities and thyroid gland
Hyperthyroidism

Reviewer: Shahidul Islam, M.D., Ph.D.

General
=======================================================

  • Accelerated thyroid hormone biosynthesis and secretion by thyroid gland
  • Early symptoms: anxiety, palpitations, rapid pulse, fatigue, muscle weakness, tremor, weight loss, diarrhea, heat intolerance, warm skin, excessive perspiration, menstrual changes, hand tremor
  • Ocular changes: wide staring gaze and lid lag due to sympathetic overstimulation of levator palpebrae superioris

Thyrotoxicosis: hypermetabolic clinical syndrome due to elevated serum T3 or T4

Types
=======================================================

  • Primary hyperthyroidism: intrinsic thyroid abnormality
    • Low TSH, high free T4, normal TRH stimulation test
  • Secondary hyperthyroidism: high TSH, abnormal TRH stimulation test
  • Subclinical hyperthyroidism: low TSH (< 0.1 µIU/ml), normal T3 and T4 (Eur J Endocrinol 2005;152:1), no clinical hyperthyroidism
  • T3 hyperthyroidism: 1-4%ofhyperthyroid patients
    • Low TSH, high free T3, normal free T4
    • Associated with early treatment of hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs
  • T4 hyperthyroidism:highT4, normal T3

Graves’ disease (85%)

Micro images
=======================================================

Diffuse hyperplasia of thyroid gland

Additional references
=======================================================

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

General
=======================================================

  • Autoimmune disease with goiter, elevated circulating anti-thyroid peroxidase and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies
  • First described by Hakaru Hashimoto in 1912 (World J Surg 2008;32:688)

Epidemiology
=======================================================

Clinical features

Clinical features
=======================================================

  • Adults present with painless, gradual thyroid failure due to autoimmune destruction, may initially have transient hyperthyroidism
  • Children have variable hypothyroidism and reversion to euthyroidism so must monitor thyroid function (Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;71:451)
  • Associated with HLA-DR5 (goitrous form), HLA-DR3 (atrophic form)
  • May coexist with SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome, pernicious anemia, type 2 diabetes, Graves’ disease, chronic active hepatitis, adrenal insufficiency, MALT lymphoma of gastrointestinal tract (80:1 relative risk), other B cell lymphomas
  • Associated with well differentiated thyroid cancer (J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:764)
  • May evolve into thyroid lymphoma (J Clin Pathol 2008;61:438)

 

Laboratory
=======================================================

  • Autoantibodies include:
    • Anti-TSH (specific for Hashimoto’s and Graves’ disease)
    • Anti-thyroglobulin (less sensitive but similar specificity as anti-thyroid peroxidase, Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:837)
    • Anti-thyroid peroxidase (previously called antimicrosomal antibody, sensitive but not specific as 20% of adult women without disease have these antibodies); anti-iodine transporter (rare)
    • Note: anti-TSH antibodies block the TSH receptor in Hashimoto’s disease but stimulate the TSH receptor in Graves’ disease

Papillary carcinoma

  • 75-80% of thyroid carcinomas
  • Occult tumors in 6% at autopsy (1 to 10 mm), 46% multicentric, 14% with nodal metastases (Am J Clin Pathol 1988;90:72)
  • Occult tumors in up to 24% with other thyroid disease, but with male predominance (Mod Pathol 1996;9:816)

Epidemiology
=======================================================

  • Usually women (70%) of reproductive age

Clinical features
=======================================================

Prognostic factors
=======================================================

  • 10 year survival is 98%, similar to general population (versus 92% for follicular carcinoma); 100% if under age 20, even with nodal metastases
  • Cervical nodal involvement does NOT affect prognosis
  • 5-20% have local recurrences, 10-15% have distant metastases (lung, bones, CNS)
  • Poorer prognosis:
    • Age 40+ or elderly, male (possibly), local invasion (associated with higher incidence of nodal metastases, Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:166), distant metastases (other sites worse than lung, Surgery 2008;143:35), large tumor size, multicentricity, tall cell, columnar or diffuse sclerosing variants
    • Poorly differentiated, anaplastic or squamous foci

added July 14, 2014

Summary – Intraoperative laryngeal nerve monitoring
Objectives: The aim of this study was to stimulate the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy and to record the muscle responses in an attempt to predict postoperative vocal fold mobility.
Patients and methods: Intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during general anaesthesia was performed by using an electrode-bearing endotracheal tube (nerve integrity monitor EMG endotracheal tube [Medtronic Xomed, Jacksonville, Flo, USA]). Two hundred and fifteen recurrent laryngeal nerves from 141 patients undergoing total thyroidectomy (n = 74),
hemithyroidectomy (n = 63), or parathyroidectomy (n = 4) were prospectively monitored. In each case, the muscle potential was recorded after stimulation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve by a monopolar probe.
Results: The nerve stimulation threshold before and after dissection that induced a muscle response of at least 100 V ranged from 0.1 to 0.85 mA (mean 0.4 mA). The supramaximal stimulation intensity was defined as 1 mA. The amplitude of muscle response varied considerably from one patient to another, but the similarity of the muscle response at supramaximal intensity between pre- and postdissection and between postdissection at the proximal and distal exposed
portions of the nerve was correlated with normal postoperative vocal fold function. Inversely, alteration of the muscle response indicated a considerable risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, but was not predictive of whether or not this lesion would be permanent.  http://dx.doi.org:/10.1016/j.anorl.2011.09.003

Summary – Prognostic impact of tumour multifocality in thyroid papillary microcarcinoma
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases (2012) 129, 175—178

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of tumour multifocality in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).
Methods: All patients who underwent total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection for PTMC in our institution between 1990 and 2007 were included in this retrospective study. Statistical correlations between tumour multifocality and various clinical or pathological prognostic parameters were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: A total of 160 patients (133 women and 27 men; mean age: 47.8 ± 13.7 years) were included in this study. Tumour multifocality was demonstrated in 59 (37%) patients. Central neck metastatic lymph node involvement was identified in 46 (28%) patients. No statistical correlation was demonstrated between tumour multifocality and the following factors: age, gender, tumour size, extension beyond the thyroid, metastatic central neck lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence. A tumour diameter greater than 5 mm was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (P = 0.008).
Conclusion: Tumour multifocality does not appear to have a prognostic impact in PTMC.   http://dx.doi.org:/10.1016/j.anorl.2011.11.003

Positron emission tomography thyroid carcinoma
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases (2012) 129, 251—256

Objectives: Recurrence is observed in 15—20% of patients under surveillance following treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, due to cell dedifferentiation, the recurrence may be iodine-negative, thereby compromising detection. For this reason, new methods of exploration are indispensable to enable localization of such recurrences. The purpose of this work is to review the contribution of positron emission tomography—computed tomography (PET-CT) in the exploration of iodine-negative recurrent DTC.
Method: A comprehensive review and discussion of the medical literature was carried out.
Results: Depending on the report, the sensitivity of PET-CT ranged from 70% to 85%, with up to 90% specificity. However, the large number of false negatives, which can reach 40%, is the
disadvantage of this examination. PET-CT results lead to change in the therapeutic strategy in approximately 50% of patients with isolated raised serum thyroglobulin levels, and surgical exploration of a precise anatomical area in the neck.
Conclusion: As post-treatment recurrence of a DTC can affect patient survival, a thorough diagnostic work-up is required in these cases. Where thyroglobulin levels are elevated with no uptake on 131-iodine scans, PET-CT can be a useful complementary exploration, especially for localizing the site of recurrence.
http://dx.doi.org:/10.1016/j.anorl.2012.01.003
French ENT Society (SFORL) practice guidelines for lymph-node management in adult differentiated thyroid carcinoma
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases (2012) 129, 197—206

Cervical and mediastinal lymph-node management differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium (DTC) remains controversial. Depending on the situation, pre-operative staging and indications for and extent of lymph-node dissection are still matters of debate, even in case of palpable nodes found on primary surgery. Procedural indications for adenectomy, selective neck dissection, and anatomic regional extension of dissection are not clearly defined.

Questions raised:

• what is lymph-node involvement in DTC?
• what is the prognostic value of lymph-node invasion: for
recurrence, and for survival?

• what baseline assessment is required ahead of treatment
of papillary thyroid carcinoma to assess possible lymphnode
involvement?

• what are the principles of lymph-node surgery?
Central and lateral dissection, and dissection extended to the mediastinum;
• what is the iatrogenesis in cN0 and cN+ neck?
• what is the impact of central and lateral neck dissection on recurrence, survival, secondary treatment and surveillance in cN0 and cN+ ?
• in cN0 patients, when neck dissection is considered, what lymph-node regions should be indicated?
http://www.orlfrance.org/ download.php?id=159.

Molecular Diagnosis for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules on Fine Needle Aspiration
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013;13(6):613-62

Somatic mutation testing, mRNA gene expression platforms, protein immunocytochemistry and miRNA panels have improved the diagnostic accuracy of indeterminate thyroid nodules, and although no test is perfectly accurate, in the authors’ opinion, these methods will most certainly become an important part of the diagnostic tools for clinicians and cytopathologists in the future.

Several point mutations and gene rearrangements have been identified in thyroid cancer. The most common somatic mutation in differentiated thyroid cancer  has been studied as a potential tool to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of indeterminate FNA lesions – BRAF. This mutation occurs in papillary, poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancer and causes a V600E substitution in the BRAF protein, which results in neoplastic progression by aberrant activation of the MAPK pathway. The BRAF V600E mutation, along with RET/PTC rearrangements, are a hallmark of thyroid cancer and a vast majority of indeterminate thyroid nodules harboring either one of these two mutations are malignant on final pathology.

The RAS proto-oncogene encodes three different membrane associated GTP proteins: HRAS, KRAS and NRAS. Mutation of these domains causes increased signal transduction through both the MAPK and the PI3K/AKT pathways. These mutations are highly prevalent in FTC and in the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (40–50%) and seldom detected in the classic variant papillary thyroid cancer (10%). RAS mutations have also been identified in benign FA; however, it is unclear whether RAS-positive FA have a higher chance of progression to cancer.

Recurrence detection in differentiated thyroid cancer patients..
Clinical endocrinology, Vol. 72, No. 4. (10 September 2009), pp. 558-563, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03693.x

There was a correlation between TgAb level and recurrence (p = 0.032).
). Recurrence was found in 37.5% of 24 TgAb+/Tg- patients who showed a gradually increasing tendency in serial measurements of TgAb. Sixteen cervical foci (21.1%) missed on neck USG and 17 lesions (22.4%) located outside the neck were additionally detected with PET/CT in TgAb+ patients.

Solving the mystery of iodine uptake
Science 20 June 2014: Vol. 344 no. 6190 p. 1355    http://dx.doi.org:/10.1126/science.344.6190.1355-a

The cell membrane protein NIS (sodium/iodine symporter) transports iodine into thyroid cells, but because iodine concentrations outside of the cell are so low, how it does so is a mystery. The key? Moving two sodium ions along with the iodine ion, Nicola et al found. NIS also does not bind sodium very tightly, but the high concentrations of sodium outside the cell allow one sodium ion to bind. This binding increases the affinity of NIS for a second sodium ion and also for iodine. With the three ions bound, NIS changes its conformation so that it opens to the inside of the cell, where the sodium concentration is low enough for NIS to release its sodium ions. When the sodium goes away, so does NIS’s affinity for iodine, leading NIS to release it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Interventional Oncology: Radiofrequency Ablation, Transarterial Chemoembolization, Microwave Ablation and Irreversible Electroporation (IRE)

Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN

 

The Symposium on Clinical Interventional Oncology (CIO)

A Boldly Different Approach to IO Education

In Collaboration with

iset-logo1

 


CIO 2015   |   WESTIN DIPLOMAT HOTEL   |   JANUARY 31 – FEBRUARY 1, 2015


Experience CIO

The Symposium on Clinical Interventional Oncology (CIO) features a concentrated 2-day program renowned for its originality, patient-care focus and dynamic learning format.  CIO focuses on highlighting the most viable and sought-after

Read More

The State of Interventional Oncology

An increasing number of physicians are embracing IO (Interventional Oncology), a minimally invasive modality for the treatment of cancer. Lung cancer, the leading cause

SOURCE

 

Special Issue: Interventional Oncology in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volume 24, Issue 8, p1083-1262

August 2013
Special Issue: Interventional Oncology

Continuous Medical Education

Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh, Austin G. Duffy, Tim F. Greten, Elise C. Kohn, Timothy W.I. Clark, Bradford J. Wood
p1083–1092
Dustyn Marshall, Jeanne M. LaBerge, Brandie Firetag, Theodore Miller, Robert K. Kerlan
p1094–1103
Published online: June 25, 2013
Joseph P. Erinjeri, Contessa T. Thomas, Alaiksandra Samoilia, Martin Fleisher, Mithat Gonen, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, Raymond H. Thornton, Robert H. Siegelbaum, Anne M. Covey, Lynn A. Brody, William Alago, Majid Maybody, Karen T. Brown, George I. Getrajdman, Stephen B. Solomon
p1105–1112
Published online: April 10, 2013
Daniel Y. Sze, Tony R. Reid, Steven C. Rose
p1115–1122
Ryan Hickey, Michael Vouche, Daniel Y. Sze, Elias Hohlastos, Jeremy Collins, Todd Schirmang, Khairuddin Memon, Robert K. Ryu, Kent Sato, Richard Chen, Ramona Gupta, Scott Resnick, James Carr, Howard B. Chrisman, Albert A. Nemcek, Robert L. Vogelzang, Robert J. Lewandowski, Riad Salem
p1157–1164
Published online: June 26, 2013
SOURCE

 

Center for Interventional Oncology @ NIH

 http://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/centerio/index.html
Overview

The Center for Interventional Oncology offers new and expanded opportunities to investigate cancer therapies that use imaging technology to diagnose and treat localized cancers in ways that are precisely targeted and minimally or non-invasive.

By use of advanced imaging technologies located at the Clinical Center, including cutting-edge magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) – combined with the capability to use all three technologies simultaneously to navigate a therapeutic device through the body, the new center’s goal is localized treatment and drug delivery.

Major program components will include:

  • Interdisciplinary training and education in interventional oncology
  • Development of new image-guided for methods for personalized drug investigations
  • Image-guided “dose-painting”—tailoring drug delivery based on disease location
  • Use of  ‘medical GPS’ for tumor biopsy and treatment
  • First-in-human investigations involving new drugs, devices, molecular probes, nanoparticles, and targeted therapies
  • Interdisciplinary research involving novel technologies in interventional oncology.
In the News

The new center is intended to provide a forum for and encourage collaborations among research and patient-care experts in medical, surgical, and radiation oncology and interventional radiology. Educational and training opportunities are part of the program.

The Center for Interventional Oncology is a collaboration involving the Clinical Center (CC), NIH’s clinical research hospital in Bethesda, Md., the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

David Bluemke, MD, PhD, director of CC Radiology and Imaging Sciences, will head the Center for Interventional Oncology steering committee that comprises two NCI appointees and one each from NHLBI and the CC. Bradford Wood, MD, a CC senior investigator, is chief of the new center.

Read the full Press Release

For further information, please contact Lucy Okello, at okellol@mail.nih.gov or 301-443-8191
in the Center for Interventional Oncology.

SOURCE

http://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/centerio/index.html

 

Burgeoning Field of Interventional Oncology Is Poised for Takeoff: A Q&A With Dan Brown, MD

Andrew J. Roth
Published Online: Thursday, December 5, 2013
SOURCE

See more at: http://www.onclive.com/publications/obtn/2013/November-2013/Burgeoning-Field-of-Interventional-Oncology-Is-Poised-for-Takeoff-A-QandA-With-Dan-Brown-MD#sthash.J2p9G3u9.dpuf

Dr. Brown discusses some of the procedures involved with interventional oncology

There are two main techniques that we perform— arterial interventions and ablation. For liver cancer, arterial treatment involves threading a catheter through the femoral artery to reach the primary tumor (Figure 1). The strategy is to use the tumor’s vasculature to deliver microscopic beads that contain radioactive materials or chemotherapy into the tumor. The beads leach out the chemotherapy over the course of several weeks.

Figure 1. Hepatocellular carcinoma in a poor surgical candidate. The goal was to limit progression of disease through arterial intervention to allow transplant.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in a poor surgical candidate

a. 3-cm mass in the right lobe of the liver.

b. Catheter selecting the artery supplying the mass with enhancement of the tumor.

c. Complete tumor necrosis at follow-up imaging.

We can also infuse radioembolics in a similar way. There are two devices available—one is made of glass and the other is made of resin. In our practice, we’re treating more and more people with the radioembolic treatment because it’s an outpatient procedure. We’re starting to accumulate more data using the radioembolic treatment, especially for colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors.

Figure 2. Renal cell carcinoma undergoing cryoablation in a patient who is not eligible for surgery.

Renal cell carcinoma undergoing cryoablation in a patient who is not eligible<br /><br />
for surgerya. 3.5-cm left renal mass at baseline.
b. Ice ball at the end of CT-guided cryoablation.
c. Complete tumor necrosis 4 years after treatment.

What are some of the treatments and products used in interventional oncology that are approved by the FDA?

We’ve seen a shift toward more radioembolization use. One product approved for treating hepatocellular carcinoma is TheraSphere, an FDA approved microsphere agent. SirSpheres are FDA approved for use in colorectal cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy. There are a number of prospective randomized trials going on worldwide that combine its use with first- and second-line chemotherapy regimens, and some of the first of those is called SIRFLOX. The study is designed to evaluate whether FOLFOX chemotherapy in combination with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy is more effective than chemotherapy alone. That should have data coming out some time next spring, when the data are mature enough to start analyzing. – See more at: http://www.onclive.com/publications/obtn/2013/november-2013/burgeoning-field-of-interventional-oncology-is-poised-for-takeoff-a-qanda-with-dan-brown-md/2#sthash.P2P6VyaT.dpuf

– See more at: http://www.onclive.com/publications/obtn/2013/November-2013/Burgeoning-Field-of-Interventional-Oncology-Is-Poised-for-Takeoff-A-QandA-With-Dan-Brown-MD#sthash.J2p9G3u9.dpuf

Oncology and Interventional Oncology @ The Johns Hopkins Rariology Department

The Johns Hopkins interventional radiology physicians play a critical role as part of the Cancer Center team. Ours is a rapidly evolving field where innovative techniques for both diagnosing and treating cancer are now available resulting in prolonged quality survival for patients with cancer.

Therapeutic Procedures

  • Tumor ablation
    • Cryoablation
    • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
    • Microwave ablation
Supportive Procedures

  • Paracentesis or Thoracentesis
  • PICC line placement
  • Tunneled catheter placement
  • Port catheter placment
  • Percutaneous biliary drainage
  • Percutaneous nephrostomy
  • Pleurx catheter placement
  • Stenting of malignant strictures: bile duct, esophageal, tracheobronchial and intestinal
  • Portal vein embolization

Interventional Oncology

Interventional oncology, practiced by interventional radiologists, is one of four parts of a multidisciplinary team approach in the treatment of cancer and cancer related disorders. The others  include medical oncology, surgical oncology and radiation oncology.

Interventional oncology procedures provide minimally invasive, targeted treatment of cancer. Image guidance is used in combination with the most current innovations available to treat cancerous tumors while minimizing possible injury to other body organs. Most patients having these procedures are outpatients or require a one night stay in the hospital.

  • Some of these therapies are regional, as when treating cancers involving several areas of the liver with chemoembolization or radioembolization.
  • Others are better classified as local, as when treating focal lesions in the kidney, liver, lung and bone with cryoablation (freezing), or microwave or radiofrequency ablation (heating).

In general, these techniques are reserved for patients whose cancer cannot be surgically removed or effectively treated with systemic chemotherapy. These procedures are also frequently used in combination with other therapies provided by other members of the cancer team.

SOURCE

http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/vascular/conditions/oncology_interventional.html

Interventional Oncology is a service of Northwestern Radiology at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago – Experts in Cancer Therapies and Imaging. Our Focus is on You

We offer minimally invasive angiographic techniques and treatment options at various stages of cancer treatment. These techniques may be used alone or in combination with standard of care chemotherapy and radiation, as a bridge to organ transplantation, or as palliative treatment.

Our multidisciplinary team works closely with your referring physician to ensure you receive the best treatment to meet your needs, and our clinical nurse coordinators assist you in planning, scheduling, and following up after your treatment.

SOURCE

http://io.nmff.org/

Interventional Procedures for Cancer
(Interventional Oncology)

Doctors treat most cancers with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or some combination of these treatments, depending on the type and stage of a patient’s cancer. Interventional radiologists, working together with NYU clinical oncologists, have developed procedures to treat many cancer patients and to improve quality of life. The following interventional procedures for cancer are available at NYU Medical Center:

Chemoembolization
Tumor Ablation
Relief of Obstructions
Tumor Biopsy

Chemoembolization

Chemoembolization is a method used to deliver chemotherapy medication directly to liver tumors — either primary tumors that originated in the liver, or metastases that migrated to the liver from cancers at other sites. Even in cases where chemoembolization is not curative, this approach may relieve a patient’s symptoms and extend survival.

Doctors begin the procedure by inserting a catheter into a blood vessel in the patient’s groin and advancing it into the specific artery supplying the liver. The doctor then injects a dye and visualizes the tumor and blood vessels on an x-ray to determine the condition of the portal vein (a major blood vessel in the liver) and assess blood supply to the tumor.

The physician then injects an emulsion of anticancer drugs and radiopaque oil through a catheter selectively placed into the artery feeding the tumor. This mixture keeps a high concentration of medication in contact with the tumor for a period of time longer than that associated with traditional systemic chemotherapy. After the treatment is administered, the catheter is withdrawn, and the patient can usually return home after an overnight stay in the hospital.

Chemoembolization offers several advantages over traditional systemic chemotherapy: Prolonging the time the medication stays in contact with the tumor — up to as much as a month — increases the treatment’s effectiveness. Moreover, because the medication is delivered only to the tumor — rather than administered throughout the patient’s bloodstream — healthy tissues are spared from side effects, allowing doctors to administer dosages that are up to 200 times greater than those used in conventional chemotherapy. The substances that are part of the injected mixture not only hold the medication in place, but also block the blood supply to the tumor — depriving it of oxygen and nutrients and thereby halting its growth.

Chemoembolization is not for every patient with liver tumors. Those who have blockages of the portal vein or of the bile ducts may not be eligible for this form of therapy.

Back to Top

Tumor Ablation

Doctors are also using interventional radiology techniques to apply heating, freezing, or substances such as acetic acid or ethanol directly into tumors as a means of killing cancer cells. This type of treatment, called tumor ablation, is a relatively new technique that is showing promising results for treating cancer.

Kidney tumor (arrows). A special probe called a radiofrequency electrode is inserted into the tumor using a CT scanner to position the probe in the center of the tumor. This probe destroys the tumor with heat.
The patient’s kidney 3 months later, showing that the tumor has been destroyed while leaving the rest of the kidney intact.

During the procedure, using a CT scanner or ultrasound machine, a small needle-like device is inserted into the tumor through a tiny nick in the skin.  The doctor wastches this probe as the images are projected with the CT scanner or ultrasound machine onto a viewing screen so that the probe can be precisely guided into the tumor.  The probe is then attached to an energy source that delivers heat (using radiofrequency, laser, or microwave energy) or freezing (a treatment called cryoablation), or a special needle (infusion needle) that allows the tumor to be  injected with a tumor-destroying substance.

Back to Top

Relief of Obstructions

Some cancers can grow to the point where they obstruct the normal flow of urine or bile, causing these fluids to build up in the body. Without treatment, such obstructions can cause not only pain, but possibly infection or even liver or kidney failure. Doctors can insert an x-ray-guided catheter into the obstructed area to drain excess fluids. They may also choose to insert a stent — a tiny wire mesh tube — into the organ to bypass the obstruction and permit fluids to drain normally.

Back to Top

Tumor Biopsy

Many cancers are now diagnosed by needle biopsy. During this procedure, a doctor uses imaging techniques (such as CT, x-ray, ultrasound, or MRI) to guide the insertion of a fine needle into a patient’s tumor. A small amount of tissue is removed and then examined by a pathologist to determine if cancer cells are present. Needle biopsies are less painful, less disfiguring, and result in a shorter recovery time than conventional surgical biopsy procedures.

Back to Top

Other NYU Resources

Interventional radiologists work closely with doctors of the Perlmutter Cancer Center to ensure that patients receive treatment that is as effective as possible while maintaining an optimal quality of life. For more information, visit:

The Perlmutter Cancer Center

SOURCE

http://www.med.nyu.edu/interventionalrad/procedures/interventionalcancer.html

Interventional Oncology @Hartford Hospital

Note: Clicking on some of the procedures listed below will display information from the Society of Interventional Radiology

 

SOURCE

An NIH funded study on Irreversible Electroporation for Treatment of Liver Cancer – the procedure is explained ad follows:

Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). May 2011; 7(5): 313–316.

Irreversible Electroporation for Treatment of Liver Cancer

G&H How does the NanoKnife work?

GN The NanoKnife (AngioDynamics) works on the principle of irreversible electroporation (IRE). Using this technology, a cell is subjected to a powerful electrical field using high-voltage direct current (up to 3 kV); this creates multiple holes in the cell membrane and irreversibly damages the cell’s homeostasis mechanism, leading to instant cell death. Reversible electroporation—in which up to 1 kV of energy is used to create reversible holes in cell membranes—has been available for some time and is used to enable chemotherapeutic agents to penetrate cells. Research by Rubinsky and colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley showed that increasing the energy to 3 kV resulted in permanent holes that cause cell death.

G&H What are the potential applications of the technology?

GN In most centers, IRE is performed in the liver, kidney, lung, prostate, and pancreas; IRE is also being used to treat metastatic disease in the liver. However, I should note that the US Food and Drug Administration has only approved this technology for soft-tissue applications (under their 510(k) process); use of this technology in organs is currently an off-label application, and we inform all our patients of this fact.

G&H How does IRE differ from radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy?

GN Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses very high levels of heat to burn the cell. There are different technologies for RFA, but the fundamental idea is to use alternating current to create heat that results in cell destruction. With cryoablation, extremely low temperatures are used with a freeze-thaw cycle, which causes the cells to swell and burst. In contrast, IRE using the NanoKnife is a nonthermal method of destroying the cell.

There have been no head-to-head randomized trials comparing these technologies, but my clinical experience with IRE has yielded promising results so far. We have treated several lesions that have responded very well, and most of the patients treated with IRE seem to feel less pain after this procedure than after RFA or other treatments. These findings need to be validated in head-to-head comparisons involving patient groups with similar characteristics, but such studies have not yet been conducted. In the meantime, my colleagues and I are collecting data on all our patients—for example, the amount of pain medication they use and their postoperative pain scores—and we plan to compare these data with information from other patients.

With RFA, the treated area undergoes fibrosis and scarring, so we must wait a long time to see a decrease in the size of the treatment zone. In contrast, several of the lesions that we have treated with the NanoKnife have shown a decrease in the size of the treatment zone as early as 1 month following treatment. Another benefit of IRE compared to RFA is the ability to treat tumors close to blood vessels in the liver. With RFA, we are unable to treat tumors near a major blood vessel because of the “heat sink” effect: The part of the tumor that is near the blood vessel will not be properly treated because heat is lost to the flowing blood. With IRE, however, we have treated lesions in close proximity to vessels; in some cases, we have even had a vessel running through the treatment zone, and we have not encountered problems with collateral injury or side effects to these vessels. Our experience with IRE is still limited, so we need more time to validate these results.

G&H Who are the best candidates for the NanoKnife procedure? In which cases is use of the NanoKnife contraindicated?

GN An ideal candidate for IRE should have a tumor located within a specific organ without systemic metastases, and the tumor should meet the size criteria. IRE works best for tumors under 3–4 cm; we have treated larger lesions, but ideal results are obtained in smaller tumors.

In terms of contraindications, we are currently not treating patients with pacemakers or patients who have a history of cardiac arrhythmias or irregular heartbeats, as we have some concerns that IRE might precipitate irregular heartbeats or arrhythmias in these patients. IRE is also contraindicated in patients with extensive disease involvement outside a particular organ; if a patient already has metastases in several other organs, he or she would not be a candidate for the procedure. Finally, patients with extremely large lesions are not ideal candidates for IRE.

G&H What are the risks associated with IRE?

GN There are risks of bleeding, fistula formation, or infection any time we insert needles into the body—especially when 2 or 3 needles are used at once. Additionally, because of the high current used with IRE, the procedure carries some risk of precipitating an irregular heartbeat, although use of the Accusync device has markedly decreased the cardiac risk. Finally, use of IRE may involve site-specific risks; if we are treating a lesion in the lung, for example, there is a risk of pneumothorax, or a collapsed lung, which is usually treated with a chest tube. Similarly, if IRE is used to treat a lesion in the kidney, the procedure carries a risk of injury to the ureter or the blood vessels.

G&H How do interventional radiologists avoid killing healthy cells surrounding the cancer?

GN Needle placement is initially evaluated using a computer software model that is part of the NanoKnife platform; the interventional radiologist enters the coordinates and size of the lesion in 3 dimensions, and the software determines the size of the margin that will be achieved with the treatment. Ideally, we want to include a zone of normal cells in the treatment area; with IRE, we aim for a margin of 0.5–1 cm. Because the computer provides a reasonably accurate estimate of the treatment area, we can avoid unnecessary damage to healthy cells surrounding the tumor.

G&H What has been your experience with IRE to date?

GN So far, we have treated approximately 100 patients, and we have achieved good results in approximately 65–70% of cases. In some cases, patients who initially had good results showed recurrence over long-term follow-up and required re-treatment; in a few other patients, we achieved only a partial response following the initial treatment.

G&H Do you think IRE will grow in popularity?

GN Yes, I think this procedure will become more popular. IRE has applications in the pancreas and prostate, sites in which tumors represent significant medical problems. If results with IRE continue to look promising and larger series show an increase in survival, then this procedure will definitely become more popular than it is today.

G&H What studies have been conducted to evaluate the NanoKnife?

GN Several centers have performed animal studies to evaluate the safety of this technology and the treatment of lesions close to bile ducts or blood vessels. In terms of human studies, a phase I safety study was conducted by Thomson and colleagues at the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and these results will be published in the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. I have also presented some of our data at major meetings; we had a poster presentation at the recent Clinical Interventional Oncology meeting in Miami, Florida and an abstract presentation on our experience using the NanoKnife for hepatocellular carcinoma at the Society of Interventional Radiologists meeting in Chicago, Illinois. We also have an abstract that is being presented at the World Congress on Interventional Oncology meeting in New York City this June. At this time, I do not have data from prospective trials, but I am looking at all my clinical data in a retrospective manner and preparing these results for future publications. There are also prospective trials underway in Europe.

Additionally, the Soft Tissue Ablation Registry has been created among the centers that are currently using this technology in the United States, and publications based on this registry data are being planned. I am the co-primary investigator for the registry and will handle the interventional radiology part of the registry. Martin at the University of Louisville in Kentucky is the primary investigator for the registry. Wong at the Malizia Clinic in Atlanta is the primary investigator for the urology and prostate part of the registry. Together, we are trying to compile data from different centers so that we can learn from each other’s experience and draw conclusions from a larger group of patients.

G&H Can IRE be used in combination with other therapeutic options?

GN Normally, we use RFA in combination with trans-arterial chemoembolization; this combination has been widely used at several centers around the world. At this point, however, I am not sure how IRE might fit into a combination protocol. We have performed a few cases in which we have used IRE in 1 lobe of the liver and performed arterial treatments in the other lobe of the liver, but we have not yet tried to treat the same lesion with combination therapy.

G&H What is the necessary follow-up for these patients?

GN We do follow-up imaging at 4 and 8 weeks postprocedure. If the results are good, we then perform 6-month and 1-year follow-up examinations. Currently, we use the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors system to evaluate response to treatment, and we look for lack of enhancement in the follow-up scans. In a few cases that we have treated with the NanoKnife, we have observed a marked decrease in the size of the treatment zones with follow-up imaging. Given this finding, along with the fact that the changes we see in the NanoKnife post-treatment zone are different than those seen with thermal ablation, more research is needed in order for us to understand follow-up imaging criteria. We also need to determine the adequate timing and the role of positron emission tomography scans in the follow-up algorithm.

G&H What future studies of IRE are being planned?

GN Several studies are underway in Europe, and we have the NanoKnife registry in the United States. In addition, we are currently writing a study protocol to evaluate the role of the NanoKnife in the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. In this study, 1 group of patients will receive the standard-of-care treatment (chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy and radiation) while the other group will receive chemotherapy and IRE. Finally, working with our urologists and radiation oncologists, we are considering a potential study of IRE for the treatment of prostate cancer. Currently, we are collecting data—with good follow-up protocols for patients treated with IRE— and I will be looking at all our data in a retrospective fashion to see what conclusions we can draw.

Overall, the promise of IRE is compelling. In particular, treatment of the pancreas is an area of considerable interest; it would be a huge advance if we were able to demonstrate a survival benefit by adding IRE in a patient who was inoperable using conventional techniques.

Suggested Reading

  • Thomson KR, Cheung W, Ellis SJ, et al. Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Mar 23; Epub ahead of print.[PubMed]
  • E Neal R, 2nd, Rossmeisl JH, Jr, Garcia PA, Lanz OI, Henao-Guerrero N, Davalos RV. Successful treatment of a large soft tissue sarcoma with irreversible electroporation. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 14; Epub ahead of print. [PubMed]
  • Lee EW, Thai S, Kee ST. Irreversible electroporation: a novel image-guided cancer therapy. Gut Liver. 2010;4(suppl 1):S99–S104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pech M, Janitzky A, Wendler JJ, et al. Irreversible electroporation of renal cell carcinoma: a first-in-man phase I clinical study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.2011;34:132–138. [PubMed]

SOURCE

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127037/

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts