Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb halt CAR-T trial for autoimmune diseases over patient deaths: a potential issue with cell-based manufacturing
Curator: Stephen J. Williams,Ph.D.
As a result of trial deaths, both Novartis and Brisol Myers have halted some key CAR-T therapy trials designed for several autoimmune diseases including their rap-cel trial for systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus nephritis and multiple sclerosis and the zola-cell trials which is a CAR-T targeting CD-19 was halted.
In previous posts we examined the toxicities and pharmacovigilence related to CAR-T therapies in various cancers and these serious adverse events, mainly the tumor lysis and cytokine release syndrome, where CAR-T efficacy results in rapid lysis of tumor cells and rapid rise of interleukins and cytokines within the blood have been documented. However in this case there may have issue related to scaling up of the manufacturing process, not merely an untoward or unknown toxicity related to the therapy itself. In fact there have been many examples, some will be highlighted here, where issues may arise during Quality Control (QC) of the manufacturing up-scaling of gene and cell-therapies. For reference the following are the two major posts on this site which discuss matters of serious adverse events and pharmacovigilence of CAR-T therapies in cancer and can be read for background information of the mechanisms of toxicity of the therapy itself:
NIH Considers Guidelines for CAR-T therapy: Report from Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee
However the issues in the following report may have arose from the ‘rapid manufacturing’ technology employed to produce both the rap-cell and zola-cell CAR-T therapies.
As reported in Fiercebiotech Source: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/novartis-bristol-myers-squibb-halt-car-t-cell-trials-due-immune-events
Three deaths have forced Novartis to pause development of its CD19 CAR-T candidate in autoimmune diseases, just as Bristol Myers Squibb has halted a similar program due to immune-related adverse events, Fierce has learned. The Swiss pharma has temporarily halted development of its autologous CD19 CAR-T therapy, rapcabtagene autoleucel (rap-cel; YTB323), for several autoimmune diseases in immunology and neuroscience, Novartis confirmed with Fierce on Monday. The decision comes after the rap-cel program recorded three deaths from complications caused by serious immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IEC-HS), according to Novartis. IEC-HS is a severe systemic inflammatory side effect associated with immunotherapies like CAR-T cell therapy. The rogue immune response may be triggered when engineered T cells rapidly expand and activate inside the patient’s body. Novartis confirmed the trials included phase 2 studies of rap-cel in systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus nephritis (CYTB323J12201), systemic sclerosis (CYTB323K12201), ANCA-associated vasculitis (CYTB323I12201) and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (CYTB323L12201), as well as phase 1/2 studies evaluating safety, cellular kinetics and efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis and Sjogren’s disease, generalized myasthenia gravis, relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), and non-active progressive MS (CYTB323M12101B, CYTB323O12101, CYTB323N12101 and CYTB323R12101, respectively). Screening, randomization and treatment administration across the studies have been put on hold, the spokesperson said.
“The temporary halt will allow for a more comprehensive review of the evolving clinical and safety data across the program, following three serious immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IEC-HS) events,” Novartis told Fierce in an email. “Patient safety remains of [the] highest priority; patients who have been treated within the trials will continue to be monitored as per protocol.” The company said the ongoing program in oncology, which is currently in phase 1/2 trial for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and high-risk large B-cell lymphoma, “is not affected by this halt.”
Rap-cel is an autologous CD19-targeted CAR-T aimed to reprogram patient’s own T cells to eliminate CD19-expressing B cells. This asset is manufactured using Novartis’ T-Charge platform, a rapid manufacturing platform that allows for fewer exhausted T cells and eliminates the need for extended culture time outside of the body, according to the website. In a Monday note to clients, William Blair analysts also flagged that BMS paused enrollment in its autoimmune trials testing an autologous CD19-targeted CAR-T, zola-cel (BMS-986353). William Blair noted that in a follow-up, the company disclosed that the enrollment was paused due to “transient and reversible inflammatory events.” “Out of an abundance of caution, we implemented a voluntary pause to review clinical data across our zola-cel program,” a BMS spokesperson told Fierce in an email. “We are focused on completing our evaluation and resuming enrollment as quickly as possible.” Also targeting CD19, zola-cel acts through the same mechanism as BMS’ Breyanzi, an FDA -approved treatment for relapsed and refractory blood cancers. Like rap-cel, zola-cel was also developed using a rapid manufacturing platform. BMS’ NEXT T platform is designed to encourage the growth of more uniform and potent T cells, which may prompt a deeper and more durable response in patients, according to its website. Since both Novartis’ and BMS’ assets were developed using rapid manufacturing platforms, analysts from William Blair suggested “that rapid manufacturing could be driving increased cell expansion and the reported toxicities.”
From the press release it appears both companies are using this rapid manufacturing process and the companies suggest the deaths were a result of the rapid expansion of T cells in the patient and not from a toxicodynamic issue.
What is Rapid Manufacturing Technology?
Rapid manufacturing of CAR-T therapy: strategies and impact
The accessibility of autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies is challenged by the complex processes and capacity constraints of manufacturing. Rapid manufacturing capable of shortening manufacturing timelines could transform the CAR-T field. Here, we outline approaches to rapid CAR-T manufacturing, highlighting its impact on various stakeholders in the landscape.
Main textOver the past decade, autologous CAR-T therapies have shown remarkable success in treating hematological malignancies. However, their accessibility remains limited, which can be attributed to the complex manufacturing process involving the patient’s cells and the limited capacity of manufacturing sites, both of which contribute to the high cost of the therapy. These factors have resulted in prolonged and uncertain turnaround times for the production of these therapies, rendering a sizable population of patients ineligible for treatment due to the deterioration of their medical condition while they wait for treatment.
To resolve this issue, the field has delved into rapid manufacturing platforms. Here, we discuss approaches toward rapid CAR-T manufacturing, examine its impact on different stakeholders in the landscape, and provide insights into future directions for the field.
Approaches toward rapid manufacturing of CAR-T therapiesThe conventional clinical CAR-T manufacturing workflow involves leukapheresis, enrichment, activation (2–3 days), CAR gene insertion (1–2 days, typically performed through viral transduction with <50% efficiency), expansion (>7 days), formulation, and cryopreservation. Rapid CAR-T manufacturing have been approached via acceleration and/or simplification of the above workflow ( Figure 1 ).
Workflow accelerationWorkflow acceleration seeks to obtain CAR-T products with similar cell yields but within a shorter timeframe by refining unit operations of conventional workflows. The critical quality attributes (CQAs) and release criteria of the manufactured products are projected to remain unchanged or similar to those established in conventional workflows.
Enhancing the efficiency of CAR gene insertion and expediting cell expansion are pivotal factors for this approach. In particular, CAR gene insertion could benefit from advanced gene integration technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9 [ 1] or transposon systems [ 2], and cell expansion could be hastened by optimizing various culture parameters, such as media formulation, feeding strategy, and cell density. Machine learning could aid the optimization processes, as demonstrated in a study in which a base media formulation optimized for cell viability and expansion in a 6-day culture was generated through a model with a training data set obtained from 104 cultures [ 3].
One example of this rapid manufacturing approach is evident in Kite Pharma’s amended manufacturing protocol for its CAR-T product, Yescarta, announced earlier in 2024. Kite Pharma successfully shortened its manufacturing time by 2 days and proved comparability between the original and amended protocols i.
Workflow simplificationWorkflow simplification aims to enrich highly efficacious CAR-T stem cells (depending on the protocol and product, this population can comprise central memory T cells, naïve T cells, stem cell memory T cells, or a combination thereof) in the final product with short-term culture. This can dramatically reduce the manufacturing turnaround time from 10–12 days to 1–3 days, or even the next day. Given the emphasis on CAR-T stem cells, the CQAs and release criteria of the manufactured products are expected to differ from those established in conventional workflows.
This strategy arose from findings that CAR-T products containing cells of greater stemness demonstrated improved persistence and efficacy in clinical trials [ 4]. Therapies manufactured by this approach rely on a much lower dosage (10 6–10 7) of T stem cells, which have superior in vivo proliferative potential and are abundant in the early stages of ex vivo culture. Consequently, this approach drastically reduces or even eliminates the need for ex vivo expansion, allowing for the entire omission of cell expansion and (possibly) cell activation operations [ 5, 6] from the conventional workflow.
Establishing novel and suitable CQAs and release criteria (including cell phenotype, yield, and function) and aligning them with advanced process analytical technologies are crucial in this approach. Notably, cells manufactured by this approach may not have completed the CAR gene integration process by the end of the ex vivo manufacturing. New methods to examine the presence of edited genes, such as using quantification of reverse transcription intermediates, may be useful in this regard [ 6].
An example of this approach was explored in a clinical study sponsored by Novartis. The study compared the conventional workflow-produced CAR-T product, Kymriah, with a T stem-enriched variant produced through the T-Charge platform, in which T cells were cultured for <2 days. The study demonstrated that the T stem-enriched version had comparable efficacy and a favorable safety profile despite being administered at 10–100 times lower dosage [ 7].
Impact of rapid CAR-T manufacturingThe direct impact of rapid CAR-T manufacturing is evident in the cell therapy manufacturing sector due to its ability to overcome current hurdles, such as workforce shortages, and in implementing decentralized and point-of-care (POC) models of manufacturing. Additionally, rapid CAR-T manufacturing also aids shortening the vein-to-vein time and improving predictability in treatment start times, delivering substantial benefits to patients and other key stakeholders in the healthcare system ( Figure 2 ).
Alleviating workforce shortagesConventional manufacturing of autologous CAR-T therapies involves a predominantly manual scale-out process, which requires highly skilled workforce who can perform consistently in a high-stress current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) environment. As a result, a skilled workforce remains a pressing need in the industry [ 8] and the launch of training programs worldwide is clear evidence for the need to develop this workforce [ 9]. Rapid manufacturing reduces cleanroom turnover time, allowing facilities to produce more treatments with a smaller workforce. Together with automated platforms, such as advanced bioreactors [ 10], rapid CAR-T manufacturing has the potential to drastically reduce human intervention and to address the workforce shortage in the industry.
Towards decentralized and POC models of manufacturingDecentralized and POC models of manufacturing have often been proposed as a key solution to improve CAR-T treatment accessibility, but hurdles, such as cross-site process variability and high infrastructure costs, have hindered their implementation [ 11]. Rapid manufacturing has the potential to effectively address these hurdles. By streamlining the workflow and shortening the manufacturing cycle, it minimizes overall process variabilities to enable a smoother technology transfer between manufacturing sites. With reduced culture capacity (for the approach of workflow simplification), it also diminishes the footprint of the process, and subsequently lowers the infrastructure cost of the cGMP facility. Together with the development of compact closed cell manufacturing systems, it can reduce the need for high-grade clean rooms by allowing manufacturing in GMP-in-a-box. The implementation of a decentralized/POC manufacturing model may also eliminate additional steps in the conventional manufacturing workflow, such as cryopreservation and packaging, further reducing time and cost ( Figure 1).
Concluding remarks and future perspectivesRapid manufacturing of CAR-T products via workflow acceleration takes advantage of the clinical and regulatory experience of conventionally manufactured CAR-T products, although its workflow complexity remains a limiting factor. Workflow simplification presents a streamlined approach due to its potential to significantly reduce manufacturing turnaround time and minimize the number of process steps. However, it necessitates significant efforts to establish process and product knowledge. If comparable clinical evidence can be collected to confirm the safety and effectiveness of products, workflow simplification can outpace workflow acceleration and emerge as the preferred manufacturing trend. With workflow simplification, the bottleneck in the CAR-T cell manufacturing cycle would be shifted to release testing, which conventionally includes a 14-day sterility test following US Pharmacopeia <71> guidelines. Rapid sterility testing utilizing highly sensitive cytometry systems [ 12], or non-growth-based methods [ 13], such as sequencing, can reduce the test time significantly to a few days or even hours. Their advancement will be the next disruptive step that can perfectly complement the transition of CAR-T manufacturing toward the decentralized/POC model ( Figure 1) and enable further shortened vein-to-vein time.
Given that the number of patients receiving CAR-T is expected to increase due to expanded therapy indications, there is an mounting need for treatment accessibility. Rapid manufacturing appears poised to address this need by enabling decentralized models of manufacturing; however, its implementation is not straightforward and would face challenges, including workforce training, facility availability, and supply chain logistics [ 11]. In addition, we must remember that other activities in the CAR-T treatment value chain, such as patient selection, bridging therapy, and patient management, also significantly impact the patient journey. Thus, enhancing the efficiency of these activities alongside rapid manufacturing is crucial for maximizing the potential of rapid CAR-T manufacturing and the broader adoption of CAR-T therapy.
Summary: Rapid manufacturing of CAR-T therapies, through workflow acceleration and simplification, can significantly shorten production times, improve treatment accessibility, and enable decentralized manufacturing models while addressing workforce and infrastructure challenges.
Source: Chen, S., & Liu, D. (2025). Rapid manufacturing of CAR-T therapy: strategies and impact. Trends in Biotechnology, 43(4), 745-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.09.013
Resources
i www.cgtlive.com/view/reducing-turnaround-time-axi-cel-car-t-cells
ii www.gracellbio.com/fastcar/
iii www.arcetherapeutics.com/research/dash_car
Full speed ahead: how rapid CAR-T manufacturing can shape the cell therapy landscape
Cell & Gene Therapy Insights 2025; 11(4), 515–532
DOI: 10.18609/cgti.2025.062
| Table 1. Vein-to-vein time for commercial CAR-T cell therapies. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product name | Commercial name | Indication | Vein-to-vein time |
| Tisagenlecleucel | Kymriah® | FL, DLBCL, ALL | 3–4 weeks |
| Axicabtagene ciloleucel | Yescarta® | FL, DLBCL | 3.5 weeks |
| Brexucabtagene autocel | Tecartus® | MCL, ALL | 2–3 weeks |
| Lisocabtagene maraleucel | Breyanzi® | FL, LBCL, MCL, CLL, SLL | 3–4 weeks |
| Obecabtagene autoleucel | Aucatzyl® | ALL | 3 weeks |
| Idecabtagene vicleucel | Abecma® | MM | 4 weeks |
| Ciltacabtagene autoleucel | Carvykti® | MM | 4–5 weeks |
| ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CLL: chronic lymphocytic leukemia. DLBCL: diffuse B cell lymphoma. FL: follicular lymphoma. LBCL: large B cell lymphoma. MCL: mantle cell lymphoma. MM: multiple myeloma. SLL: small lymphocytic lymphoma. | |||
| Manufacturing overview and development state of rapid (<72 h) and expedited (4–6 days) CAR-T programs. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid CAR T (target) | Activation | Gene editing strategy | Manufacturing time | QC/release | Development stage |
| GC012F (CD19/BCMA) FasTCAR Platform | CD3/CD28 | Lentivirus | 1 day | 8 days | Phase 1b |
| BMS986354 (BCMA) NexT Platform | n.a. | Lentivirus | 5–6 days | n.a. | Phase 1 |
| YTB323 (CD19) T-Charge Platform | CD3/CD28 | Lentivirus | <2 days | 6 days | Phase 2 |
| Dash CAR T (CD19) | CD3/CD28 | Retrovirus | 2–3 days | n.a. | Preclinical |
| KITE-753 (CD19/CD20) | n.a. | Lentivirus | 5 days | <9 days | Phase 1 |
| PRGN-3007 (ROR1), PRGN-3005 (MUC16), PRGN-3006 (CD33), UltraCAR-T Platform | None | Electroporation | 1 day | n.a. | Phase 1 |
| Ingenui-T (CD19) | n.a. | Lentivirus | <3 days | n.a. | Preclinical |
| n.a.: not accessible. | |||||
Please refer to Figure 1 in the following link to appreciate the speed at which the fast manufacturing process happens: most of the time savings are regional production and less time in QC: https://www.insights.bio/cell-and-gene-therapy-insights/journal/article/3513/full-speed-ahead-how-rapid-cart-manufacturing-can-shape-the-cell-therapy-landscape
Now the first CAR-T therapies were performed at university hospitals for leukemias and were all produced in small batch at the university site. However in attempts to scale up there have been difficulties including
- interuptions in funding and capital flow to build these manufacturing facilities
- quality control issues
- supplier issues related to manufacturing
- potential issues in modeling of scale up
In another update we will further examine these issues related to each of these points as news on these topics emerges