Findings on Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) for Superficial Bladder Cancer
Curator: Demet Sag, PhD, CRA, GCP
Bladder cancer is arising from the epithelial lining, specifically the urothelium of the urinary bladder with a five year survival rate. The common one is transitional cell carcinoma (90%) and the remaining 10% of bladder cancer are squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, small cell carcinoma. This is a 9th common disease in women and 4th in men in the US. There is an increased bladder cancer death observed from 1990 to 2010. This disease is prevalent among men than women, ½ versus 1/3 of population due to higher androgen receptor expression in men.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bladder_Cancer_Treatment_Guide_v4.png The common symptoms are blood in the urine (hematuria), pain during urination, however, some of these symptoms may not be harmful or belong to other diseases such as non-cancerous conditions, including prostate infections, over-active bladder and cystitis. Hematuria may be caused by bladder or ureteric stones, infection, kidney disease, kidney cancers and vascular malformations. The first use of bacterial toxins goes back to 1700s. A new York Bone Surgeon used as a source to cure inoperable cancer patients Thus, Coley’s toxins regarded as the first use of bacterial vaccine in cancer treatment. Today BCG is used to treat bladder cancer with the similar purpose to stimulate innate immune response to cure the disease. The Listeria monocytogenes based vaccine development for other types of cancer is underway. Removal of virulence factors is the key yet choosing right type of bacteria possibly the commensal microbiome can be an important approach. Now, in 20th century especially after FDA approval of couple immunotherapies, a new wave in immunotherapy development is started.
There are 904 reported bladder cancer clinical trials, among them 272 are active with recent updates. (www.clinicaltrials.com) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Blasentumor.jpg/220px-Blasentumor.jpg The common method for diagnosis is cystoscopy, yet they are not conclusive so supportive tests are required. Recently with the advent of bioinformatics and genomics there are biomarker development. Some of them are still include primary pathways like Notch, Wnt etc. However, associated somatic mutations at HRAS (190020), KRAS2 (190070), RB1 (614041), and FGFR3 (134934), HRAS, KRAS2, RB1, and FGFR3 thought to be important. Analysis of LOH at 11p13, a region containing the Wilms tumor suppressor gene (WT1; 607102), showed deletion at the CAT locus (115500) in 13 of 18 bladder cancers (72%), at the WT1 locus in 7 of 14 (50%), and at the FSHB locus (136530) in 6 of 16 (38%). Some are developing new specific biomarkers. In addition, there is another method based on microbiome in urine samples.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age-standardized death from bladder cancer per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.[43]no data less than 1.5 1.5–3 3–4.5 4.5–6 6–7.5 7.5–9 9–10.5 10.5–12 12–13.5 (WHO Disease and injury country estimates”. World Health Organization. 2009. Retrieved 11 Nov 2009.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Longe, Jacqueline L. 2005 showed staging of the bladder cancer as follows:Diagram showing the T stages of bladder cancer T (Primary tumour) · TX Primary tumour cannot be assessed · T0 No evidence of primary tumour · Ta Non-invasive papillary carcinoma · Tis Carcinoma in situ (‘flat tumour’) · T1 Tumour invades subepithelial connective tissue · T2a Tumour invades superficial muscle (inner half) · T2b Tumour invades deep muscle (outer half) · T3 Tumour invades perivesical tissue: · T3a Microscopically · T3b Macroscopically (extravesical mass) · T4a Tumour invades prostate, uterus or vagina · T4b Tumour invades pelvic wall or abdominal wall N (Lymph nodes) · NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed · N0 No regional lymph node metastasis · N1 Metastasis in a single lymph node 2 cm or less in greatest dimension · N2 Metastasis in a single lymph node more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension,or multiple lymph nodes, none more than 5 cm in greatest dimension · N3 Metastasis in a lymph node more than 5 cm in greatest dimension M (Distant metastasis) · MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed · M0 No distant metastasis · M1 Distant metastasis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bacillus Calmette-Guerin BCG
|
synonym: | bacillus Calmette-Guerin BCG |
synonym: | bacillus Calmette-Guerin |
synonym: | Mycobacterium tuberculosis var. bovis BCG |
acronym: | BCG |
Lineage( full )
cellular organisms; Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Corynebacteriales; Mycobacteriaceae;Mycobacterium; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; Mycobacterium bovis
Taxonomy of Listeria monocytogenes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxonomy ID: 1639 Inherited blast name: firmicutes Rank: species Genetic code: Translation table 11 (Bacterial, Archaeal and Plant Plastid) Other names:
Lineage( full ) cellular organisms; Bacteria; Firmicutes; Bacilli; Bacillales; Listeriaceae; Listeria |
Entrez records | ||
Database name | Subtree links | Direct links |
Nucleotide | 52,614 | 34,526 |
Nucleotide GSS | 51 | 51 |
Protein | 1,062,786 | 834,212 |
Structure | 189 | 70 |
Genome | 1 | 1 |
Popset | 350 | 350 |
Domains | 1 | 1 |
GEO Datasets | 964 | 649 |
PubMed Central | 5,924 | 5,924 |
Gene | 118,634 | 30,988 |
SRA Experiments | 5,901 | 5,777 |
Probe | 127 | 127 |
Assembly | 372 | 274 |
Bio Project | 355 | 123 |
Bio Sample | 10,163 | 9,970 |
Bio Systems | 7,240 | 814 |
PubChem BioAssay | 362 | 322 |
Protein Clusters | 3,885 | 1,204 |
Taxonomy | 209 | 1 |
Figure: Pivotal events in the development of Lm-based vaccines for tumor immunotherapy. (From PMCID-PMC4026700 Attenuated Listeria monocytogenes for current and future immunotherapies)
From http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3574585/
Strategy | Description | Indication | Clinical Status | References |
Deletion of virulence genes | ΔactA/ΔplcB NP (BMB72) attenuated Lm administered orally | Healthy volunteers | Phase I | PMID: 2065500;
PMID: 1338384 |
ΔactA/ΔinlB NP (BMB54) attenuated Lm administered orally | Healthy volunteers | Phase I | PMID: 1338384 | |
ΔactA/ΔinlB (ANZ-100); administered intravenously | Subjects with metastatic disease to the liver | Phase I | ||
ΔactA/ΔinlB mesothelin (CRS-207); administered intravenously | Subjects with cancer to the ovary and pancreas, non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma | Phase I | ||
Subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer | Phase II (ongoing) | |||
Aberrant expression of PrfA | Lm-LLO-E7 (ADXS11-001; Lovaxin C); administered intravenously | Subjects with advanced cervical carcinoma | Phase I | PMID:15699154
PMID:19785060 |
Subjects with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 | Phase II (ongoing) | |||
Subjects with recurrent squamous or non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix | Phase II (ongoing) |
Lm-based vaccines in development that target clinically-relevant tumor-associated antigens.
(from PMCID-PMC4026700 Attenuated Listeria monocytogenes for current and future immunotherapies)
Target | Target antigen | Lm-based Vaccine | Lm-strain | Lm-expressed Antigen | References |
Cervical cancer | HPV16 E7 | Lm-E7 | 10403S (wt) | LLO signal sequence fused to HPV16 E7 | Gunn et al.,2001 |
HPV16 E7 | Lm-LLO-E7 (ADXS-HPV) | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to HPV16 E7 | Gunn et al.,2001 | |
HPV16 E7 | rLm-E7 | 10403S (wt) | HPV16 E7 fused at the N-terminus with the LLO signal sequence and at the C-terminus with E. coliPhoA | Lin et al.,2002 | |
HPV16 E7 | Lm-ActA-E7 | XFL-7 (prfA-) | ActA a.a. 1-420 fused to HPV16 E7 | Sewell et al., 2004a | |
HPV16 E7 | Lm-PEST-E7 | XFL-7 (prfA-) | LLO a.a. 1-50 fused to HPV16 E7 | Sewell et al., 2004b | |
HPV16 E7 | Lm-v1 and v2 | Lmdd (dal- dat-) | dtLLO fused to HPV16 E7 expressed from a pCMV-driven plasmid delivered by Lm | Souders et al., 2006 | |
CRPV E1 | E1-rLm | 10403S (wt) | CRPVE1 fused at the N-terminus with the LLO signal sequence and at the C-terminus with E. coilPhoA | Jensen et al., 1997 | |
Breast cancer | Rat Her2/neu | Lm-LLO-EC1, EC2, EC3, IC1, and IC2 | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to selected regions of rat Her2/neu | Singh et al., 2005 |
Human Her2/neu | Lm-hHer2/neu chimera | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to chimeric protein containing epitopes from human Her2/neu | Seavey et al., 2009b | |
Human Her2/neu | Lm-cHer2 (ADXS-cHER2) | LmddA (dal- dat- actA-) | dtLLO fused to chimeric protein containing epitopes from human Her2/neu | Shahabi et al., 2011 | |
Mouse ISG15 | Lm-LLO-ISG15 | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to mouse ISG15 | Wood et al., 2012 | |
Mouse MAGE-b | Lm LLO Mage-b311-660 | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to mouse Mage-b a.a. 311-600 | Kim et al.,2008 | |
Human p53 | LmddA-LLO-p53 | LmddA (dal- dat- actA-) | dtLLO fused to human p53 | Ishizaki et al., 2010 | |
Tumor-associated vasculature | Mouse VEGFR-2 (Flk-1) | Lm-LLO-Flk-E1, E2, and l1 | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to selected regions of mouse VEGFR-2 (Flk-1) | Seavey et al., 2009a |
Human HMW-MAA | Lm-LLO-HMWMAA-C | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to human HMW-MAA a.a. 2160-2258 | Maciag et al., 2008 | |
Mouse CD105 (endoglin) | Lm-LLO-CD105A and B | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to selected regions of mouse CD105 (endoglin) | Wood et al., 2011 | |
Melanoma | Mouse TRP2, LCMV NP | Lm-TRP2-NP | 10403S (wt) | Mouse TRP2 a.a. 24-191 fused at the N-terminus with the LLO signal sequence and at the C-terminus with LCMV NP a.a. 177-191 followed byE. coli PhoA | Bruhn et al., 2005 |
Mouse TRP2 | Lm-TRP2 | 10403S (wt) | Mouse TRP2 a.a. 24-191 fused at the N-terminus with the LLO signal sequence and at the C-terminus with E. coli PhoA | Bruhn et al., 2005 | |
Human HMW-MAA | Lm-LLO-HMWMAA-C | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to human HMW-MAA a.a. 2160-2258 | Maciag et al., 2008 | |
Prostate cancer | Human PSA | Lm-LLO-PSA | XFL-7 (prfA-) | dtLLO fused to human PSA | Shahabi et al., 2008 |
Human PSA | ADVX-31-142 (ADXS-PSA) | LmddA (dal- dat- actA-) | dtLLO fused to human PSA | Wallecha et al., 2009 | |
Hepatocellular carcinoma | HBc, HBV-X, Human alpha-Fetoprotein, and Human MAGE-A | Lm-MPFG | Lmdd (dal- dat-) | dtLLO fused to a fusion peptide containing full-length HBc, HBx a.a. 52-60, HBx a.a 140-148, AFP a.a 158-166, MAGE a.a. 271-279 and a flag tag | Chen et al.,2012 |
Fernandez-Garayzabal JF et al. (1996)
Fernandez-Garayzabal, J.F., Suarez, G., Blanco, M.M., Gibello, A., and Dominguez, L. “Taxonomic note: a proposal for reviewing the interpretation of the CAMP reaction between Listeria monocytogenes and Rhodococcus equi.” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1996) 46:832-834.
Jones, D., and Seeliger, H.P.R. “Designation of a new type strain for Listeria monocytogenes. Request for an opinion.” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1983) 33:429. [No PubMed record available.]
Kathariou, S., and Pine, L. “The type strain(s) of Listeria monocytogenes: a source of continuing difficulties.” Int. J. Syst Bacteriol. (1991) 41:328-330.
Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology “Minutes of the Meeting, 5 September 1986, Manchester, United Kingdom.” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1987) 37:85-87. (Note: rejection of proposal by Jones & Seeliger (1983) for new type strain)
Murray EGD et al. (1926)
Murray, E.G.D., Webb, A.A., and Swann, M.B.R. “A disease of rabbits characterized by a large mononuclear leucocytosis caused by a hitherto underscribed bacillus Bacterium monocytogenes n. sp.” J. Pathol. Bacteriol. (1926) 29: 407-439. [No PubMed record available.]
Pirie, J.H.H. “The genus Listerella Pirie.” Science (Washington) (1940) 91:383. [No abstract available.]
Skerman VBD et al. (1980)Skerman, V.B.D., McGowan, V., and Sneath, P.H.A. (editors). “Approved lists of bacterial names.” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1980) 30:225-420
Wayne, L.G. “Actions of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology on requests for opinions published in1983 and 1984.” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. (1986) 36:357-358. [No PubMed record available.]
H, Loock K, Sisul D, Jensen E, Miller JF, Hohmann EL. “Safety and shedding of an attenuated strain of Listeria monocytogenes with a deletion of actA/plcB in adult volunteers: a dose escalation study of oral inoculation”. Infect Immun. 2002;70:3592–601.
Johnson PV, Blair BM, Zeller S, Kotton CN, Hohmann EL. “Attenuated Listeria monocytogenes vaccine vectors expressing Influenza A nucleoprotein: preclinical evaluation and oral inoculation of volunteers”. Microbiol Immunol. 2011;55:304–17.
Mathew A, Terajima M, West K, et al. “Identification of murine poxvirus-specific CD8+ CTL epitopes with distinct functional profiles”. J Immunol. 2005;174:2212–9.
Radulovic S, Brankovic-Magic M, Malisic E, et al. “Therapeutic cancer vaccines in cervical cancer: phase I study of Lovaxin-C. J Buon”. 2009;14(Suppl 1):S165–8.
Laurence M. Wood and Yvonne Paterson ”Attenuated Listeria monocytogenes: a powerful and versatile vector for the future of tumor immunotherapy”. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014; 4: 51. Published online 2014 May 12. http://dx.doi.org:/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00051
Wiemann B1, Starnes CO. “Coley’s toxins, tumor necrosis factor and cancer research: a historical perspective”. Pharmacol Ther. 1994;64(3):529-64.
Herr HW1, Schwalb DM, Zhang ZF, Sogani PC, Fair WR, Whitmore WF Jr, Oettgen HF.
“Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy prevents tumor progression and death from superficial bladder cancer: ten-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial”. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jun; 13(6):1404-8.
Table listing all bacteria identified in this study that can be routinely cultivated and identified individually by standard methods described by the Health Protection Agency in routine investigations of urine (“Health Protection Agency, 2012”).
Genus | Aerobe or Anaerobe | Gram status |
Actinomyces | Anaerobe | Positive |
Aerococcus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Anaerococcus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Arcanobacterium | Anaerobe | Positive |
Arthrobacter | Anaerobe | Positive |
Brevibacterium | Aerobe | Positive |
Campylobacter | Anaerobe | Negative |
Corynebacterium | Anaerobe | Positive |
Enterobacter | Anaerobe | Negative |
Enterococcus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Eubacterium | Anaerobe | Positive |
Finegoldia | Anaerobe | Positive |
Fusobacterium | Anaerobe | Negative |
Gardnerella | Anaerobe | Variable |
Gemella | Anaerobe | Positive |
Lactobacillus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Mobiluncus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Mycobacterium | Aerobe | Positive |
Neisseria | Aerobe | Negative |
Nocardioides | Aerobe | Positive |
Paraprevotella | Anaerobe | Negative |
Peptococcus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Peptostreptococcus | Anerobe | Positive |
Porphyromonas | Anaerobe | Negative |
Prevotella | Anaerobe | Negative |
Propionimicrobium | Anaerobe | Positive |
Pseudomonas | Aerobe | Negative |
Rhodococcus | Aerobe | Positive |
Staphylococcus | Anaerobe | Positive |
Stenotrophomonas | Aerobe | Negative |
Streptococcus | Anerobe | Positive |
Table detailing the genera identified within each defined age group for females only.
All ages (n = 23) | Age 20–49 (n = 13) | Age 50–69 (n = 9) | Age 70+ (n = 11) | Age 20–49 and 50–69 (n = 4) | Age 50–69 and 70+ (n= 1) | Age 20–49 and 70+ (n = 9) |
Actinobaculum | Azospira | Brevibacterium | Actinomyces | Aerococcus | Enterobacter | Anaerovorax |
Anaerococcus | Butyricicoccus | Catonella | Arthrobacter | Arcanobacterium | Flavonifractor | |
Anaerosphaera | Coriobacterium | Caulobacter | Gulosibacter | Brooklawnia | Gallicola | |
Atopobium | Friedmanniella | Methylovirgula | Jonquetella | Fastidiosipila | Helcococcus | |
Campylobacter | Gardnerella | Pelomonas | Lachnospiracea_incertae_sedis | Howardella | ||
Corynebacterium | Microvirgula | Peptostreptococcus | Modestobacter | Peptococcus | ||
Dialister | Neisseria | Sneathia | Oligella | Soehngenia | ||
Enterobacter | Paraprevotella | Streptophyta | Parvimonas | Staphylococcus | ||
Enterocococcus | Rhodopila | Thermoleophilum | Proteiniphilum | Stenotrophomonas | ||
Facklamia | Sutterella | Rhodococcus | ||||
Finegoldia | Tepidimonas | Saccharofermentans | ||||
Fusobacterium | Tessaracoccus | |||||
Lactobacillus | TM7_genera_incertae_sedis | |||||
Mobiluncus | ||||||
Murdochiella | ||||||
Negativicoccus | ||||||
Peptoniphilus | ||||||
Porphyromonas | ||||||
Prevotella | ||||||
Propionimicrobium | ||||||
Sporanaerobacter | ||||||
Streptococcus | ||||||
Varibaculum |
Those highlighted in bold are not routinely cultivated and/or reported individually by standard methods described the
UK Health Protection Agency in routine investigations of urine (Health Protection Agency,2012).
Table 3:
Table detailing the genera identified within each defined age group for males only.
All ages (n = 1) | Age 70+ (n = 48) | Age 20–49 and 50–69 (n = 1) | |
Staphylococcus | Aerococcus | Kocuria | Pseudomonas |
Aminobacterium | Lactonifactor | ||
Anaerococcus | Marixanthomonas | ||
Anaerophaga | Megasphaera | ||
Anaerosphaera | Microvirgula | ||
Anaerotruncus | Mobiluncus | ||
Atopobium | Murdochiella | ||
Atopostipes | Mycoplasma | ||
Azospira | Parvimonas | Age 20 and 70+ (n = 2) | |
Butyricicoccus | Peptococcus | Actinobaculum | |
Campylobacter | Peptoniphilus | Lactobacillus | |
Catonella | Peptostreptococcus | ||
Corynebacterium | Porphyromonas | ||
Dialister | Prevotella | ||
Eubacterium | Proteiniphilum | ||
Filifactor | Pseudoramibacter | ||
Finegoldia | Rikenella | ||
Fusobacterium | Saccharofermentans | ||
Gardnerella | Sediminitomix | ||
Gemella | Sneathia | ||
Gordonibacter | Soehngenia |
Those highlighted in bold are not routinely cultivated and/ or reported individually by standard methods described the UK Health Protection Agency in routine investigations of urine (Health Protection Agency,2012).
Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) for superficial bladder cancer
Larry H. Bernstein, MD, FCAP, Curator
LPBI
Intravesical therapy for bladder cancer
http://www.cancercenter.com/bladder-cancer/intravesical-therapy/
Intravesical therapy is usually an option for people with noninvasive (stage 0) or minimally invasive (stage I) bladder cancer. With intravesical therapy for bladder cancer, drugs are put directly into the bladder through a catheter, instead of being injected into a vein or swallowed. Both immunotherapy and chemotherapy drugs can be given this way.
This approach is useful for earlier stage cancers because the drugs kill malignant cells on the bladder lining only. Intravesical therapy does not reach the deeper layers of the bladder wall, the kidneys, ureters or urethra. If cancer has spread to other organs, those tumors would also not be treated with intravesical therapy.
There are a few types of intravesical immunotherapy:
- Bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) therapy: BCG is a type of intravesical immunotherapy, and can be an appropriate way to treat early-stage bladder cancer. BCG is a bacterium that does not cause any serious disease, but is related to the germ that causes tuberculosis. For bladder cancer treatment, BCG is inserted into the bladder through a catheter. The natural immune system becomes activated by the presence of the foreign bacteria, which then affects bladder cancer cells. BCG is usually given for one to six weeks, and may be given alongside transurethral resection. Less commonly, BCG is given as a long-term maintenance treatment.
- Interferon: Several types of cells in the body produce substances called interferons, which help stimulate the immune system. These natural chemicals can also be made artificially for use as medications to treat various diseases. One application of synthesized interferon is as an intravesical immunotherapy treatment for early-stage bladder cancer.
Intravesical Chemotherapy
As described above, with intravesical chemotherapy, anticancer drugs that directly kill active cancer cells are inserted directly into the bladder through a catheter. This approach helps avoid many harsh side effects that occur as a result of the drugs harming normal cells.
The drugs most commonly used in intravesical chemotherapy are mitomycin and thiotepa. Other drugs used in this approach include valrubicin, doxorubucin and gemcitabine. Sometimes, mitomycin is given as “electromotive mitomycin therapy,” which means that the bladder is heated while the drug is inserted.
Complications of intravesical BCG immunotherapy
INTRODUCTION
Intravesical administration of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis, has become a mainstay of adjunctive therapy for superficial bladder cancer. While generally well tolerated, both local and systemic infectious complications can arise. When disseminated BCG infection occurs, antituberculous therapy with or without glucocorticoids should be administered.
The infectious complications of BCG immunotherapy will be reviewed here. The clinical use of this agent for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer is discussed separately. Disseminated infection has also been rarely reported in patients receiving BCG vaccination for the prevention of tuberculosis [1]. (See “Treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer” and “BCG vaccination”.)
PATHOGENESIS
The mechanism by which BCG leads to the development of infectious complications is not fully understood. Its mechanism of action as an immunotherapeutic agent in cancer is not fully known but recent evidence suggests that elaboration of a particular helper T cell cytokine profile known as the “Th1 response” is an integral part of its mechanism [2]. (See “Treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer”, section on ‘Bacillus Calmette-Guerin’.)
Considerable debate exists in the literature about whether infectious complications due to BCG represent a hypersensitivity reaction or ongoing active infection. The hypersensitivity hypothesis gained early credence based upon the presence of granulomas and the absence of recoverable organisms. In a number of case reports, acid-fast bacilli have not been demonstrated and organisms have not grown despite a high clinical suspicion of BCG infection [3,4]. A response to glucocorticoids, administered along with antituberculous drugs, has also supported the notion of a hypersensitivity response.
In contrast, other case reports have demonstrated viable organisms in a variety of tissues, including lung [5], liver [6,7], pancreas [8], psoas abscess contents [9], mycotic aneurysm [10], bone marrow [11], vitreous fluid [12,13], and even the brain [14]. The fastidious growth nature of BCG in culture and a doubling time of 24 to 48 hours contribute to the difficulty in its isolation. M. bovis has also been demonstrated by PCR in some cases [15], although in other reports these studies have been negative [3]. Further compounding this story are several cases of delayed infection, months to even years after the original BCG administration [16,17].
Leave a Reply