LIVE April 22, 10:50AM – GENOMICS: CLINICAL CHALLENGES AND MEDICAL OPPORTUNITIES @ Cambridge HealthTech Institute’s 14th Annual Meeting BioIT World – Conference & Expo ’15, April 21 – 23, 2015 @Seaport World Trade Center, Boston, MA
Reporter: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN
Dr. Aviva Lev-Ari will be in attendance on April 21, 22, 23
Leaders in Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence (LPBI) are Covering the Event in REALTIME using Social Media
http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com
#biotech
#investment
@MassBio
@BostonBizJournl
@BioWorld
@BiotechNews
@bioitworld
GENOMICS: CLINICAL CHALLENGES AND MEDICAL OPPORTUNITIES
April 22, 10:50 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks
Scott Kahn, Ph.D., Vice President, Commercial Enterprise Informatics, Illumina, Inc.
LIVE from Illumina Point of View – Sequencing Activity – GLOBAL
Genomics and MEDICINE – Validation – NGS rapidly to the Clivic penetration: – WHat do we do with the data
Health WOrkFLow and Challenges
- equip MDs with tools
- Translational Research and 13 Cancer Center in Holland — Biomarker discovery
- Rate of illumina growth 450,000 genomes are sequenced per year
11:00 FEATURED PRESENTATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN ESTABLISHING IT SUPPORT FOR CONTINUOUS LEARNING IN HEALTHCARE: THE POTENTIAL FOR APPLYING LESSONS LEARNED FROM CLINICAL GENOMIC IT SUPPORT TO BROADER CONTINUOUS LEARNING CHALLENGES
Samuel (Sandy) Aronson, Executive Director, IT, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine
Continuously updated knowledge bases will be required to enable a true continuous learning healthcare environment. However, modern healthcare pressures make their maintenance difficult. The clinical genomic IT community has been wrestling with this issue for some time. We present lessons learned from supporting clinical genomic IT processes that may be generalizable to broader development of IT support for continuous learning healthcare processes.
LIVE – reposition Research and Care by CONTINUOUS LEARNING IN HEALTHCARE –
- what datapoint can be measures
- likelihood of efficacy of treatment scenarios
- architectural change in IT
- System in Partners that is related to Genetics
- Clinical Improvement
GeneInsight is licensed by Partners
Healthcare IT – delivering data into HIT
Rules generated Outside of Clinical Flow
Engine Checks Transactions but not
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
CONTINUOUS LEARNING IN HEALTHCARE — CONTINUOUS LEARNING ARCHITECTURE – Knowledge base
- data association in the knowledgebase
- mailine transaction processing
Clinical Genomics
Variant found – Discovery of the gene – lab pick up the test – CONTINUOUS LEARNING Process need to be enabled
Genesight Report Drafting ENgine
GenInsight Infrastructure:
Identified Variants, order information,auth-drafted Reports for Geneti ist Pathologist Knowledge base has information on genes and on variance.
- rule — all reports must update the knowledge base
GeneInsight Clinic – Surfacing Alerts
Diagnostic process – genetic Report
- Introduction of the infrastructure – TIME SAVED and improve quality
- Time spent to update knowledgebase autodrFTING REPORT – TIVE SAVED IN ASSESSING VARIANCE
- NETWORKS CAN HELP – linking Labs and CLinicls and Labs to one another
- ClinVar – sharing data on Gene Variants
Improvement worth the investment
11:30 FEATURED PRESENTATION: THE PENETRANCE OF INCIDENTAL FINDINGS IN GENOMIC MEDICINE
Robert C. Green, M.D., MPH, Director, G2P Research Program; Associate Director, Research, Partners Personalized Medicine, Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Much of the controversy surrounding the implementation of incidental findings in clinical sequencing is due to uncertainty about the penetrance of such findings in persons unselected for clinical features or family history. This uncertainty also influences the question of genomic population screening, i.e., whether actionable sequence variants should be sought and reported in ostensibly healthy individuals. In this talk, new data will be presented estimating the penetrance of actionable incidental findings.
LIVE — FROM THE BRIGHAM
Integrating sequencing
The REVEAL Study – single risk variant
Using Genome Sequencing for Undiagnosed DIseases: Exome Seq. and Diagnostic CLinical : Secondary and Incidental Findings – Standardized Analogy Incidental Findings – What is the right Analogy – VCOntextualization will take place in the MDs Offices
Genomics – RIsk factors requiring Contextual — whole body MRI was found to be NOT needed.
Patient-driven research JAMA Incidental findings are incidental NOT EXCEPTIONAL.
Secondary finding to be reported
GENOMIC SCREENING
Opportunistics Screening – infrastruction is in place
- Seq ordered is relatively cost neutral, Recommendation are in existance
- Follows medical model
Population Screening
- Public Health
Study MedSeq Project @Brigham – Cardiomyopathy and a Group of Health volunteers – Genome Report
Follow up with intense Medical Record monitoring
GINA Genetic Discremination and Genomic Medicine
- Medical
- Behavioral
Carrier Variation in 91%
21% had patogenic variance
2% Incidental monogenic ACMG genes, only
Penetrance of Actionable Incidental Findings in the Framingham Heart Study
465 patient — 8 pathogenic variance in dominant conditions
Phynotype – Blindly scored 5 out of 8 had a phynotype construed wiht the mutation
Aggregate Penetrance across Phynotype – Positive on INCREASE RISKS phynotopical
- Cancer
- Cardiovascular
BabySeq Project – Indication-based Report 779 genes (IBGR)
- Indication risk report
- carrier
- blood type
- pharmacogenomics
- risk for onset in childhood
Whole Genome Seq
genome2people.org
12:00 pm Census of the Apoptosis Pathway
Philip L. Lorenzi, Ph.D., Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology & the Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, MD Anderson Cancer Center
We recently compared several different “omic” approaches to constructing the autophagy pathway de novo, including siRNA screening, mass spectrometry-based proteomics, and three different pathway analysis software packages. Unexpectedly, although merging all of the validated data sets yielded 739 autophagy-modulating genes, each individual approach alone yielded sparse coverage of the autophagy pathway. The best individual siRNA screen, for example, yielded only 169 of the 739 (23%) genes. Nevertheless, text mining-based pathway analysis with Pathway Studio in conjunction with manual curation provided the most comprehensive coverage, yielding 417 targets (56% of the pathway). Here, we explored the generalizability of those findings by examining a more well-characterized pathway—apoptosis. We compiled apoptosis-modulating genes from 12 published siRNA screens and two pathway analysis software packages—Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and Pathway Studio. The resulting inventory of 6,882 proteins consisted of 215 targets identified by siRNA screening, 3,378 targets by IPA, and 6,381 targets by Pathway Studio. The extensive coverage (93%) of the apoptosis pathway provided by text mining with Pathway Studio can likely be attributed to recent upgrades in the software, including an expanded database and collection of full-text articles. Together with our previous autophagy pathway analysis, the new apoptosis results support the generalizable conclusions that: 1) siRNA screening has a large false negative rate (i.e., fails to identify many true “hits”), and 2) text mining-based pathway analysis using Pathway Studio provides the most comprehensive pathway coverage.
LIVE
Drug discovery & Development Process – Pathway Analysis – Drive drug discovery
- Part One – Pathway Analysis Strategies: Autophagy and Optosis
- Ingenuity PathAnalysis
- MetaCore – Thomsom
- GeneSpring
- David
- Pathway Studio Elsevier – MedScan – Text analysis and mining
AUTOPHAGY
Cargo needed to be discharged
Proteome
UNION of multiple technologies
Pathway Studio: False positive rates 19% reduced by curation – change direction
False negatives
ATF4 assign unknown
BEST APPROACH: Pathway Studio with manual Curation
Apply Pathways to Clinical Use in Drug Discovery
- mTOR/autophagy stimulator – Combined mTOR and autophagy Inhibition
- mitophagy
-
Part Two – validate on big data
AKT – Pathwat Studio
EDFR – no serious concern
MEK Inhibitor – No serious concern
PARP1 Inhibitor – concerns
TEXT MINING to be used in drug discovery – VERY important
GLS Inhibitors
12:30 Session Break
12:40 Luncheon Presentation I: Computational Enablement of the Hippocratic Oath in a Clinical Oncology Setting
David B. Jackson, Ph.D., Chief Innovation Officer, Molecular Health, Gmbh
The clinical response of cancer patients to oncolytic agents is influenced by three major classes of molecular determinant; tumor intrinsic factors (e.g. tumor biomarkers); patient intrinsic factors (e.g. polymorphisms) and patient extrinsic factors (e.g. co-medications). In my talk, I will present a novel computational technology and associated treatment decision support process that was designed to provide this knowledge-driven approach to clinical care in oncology.
1:10 Luncheon Presentation II: A High Performance Application Development Platform for Collaborative Genomics Research
Paul Flook, Ph.D., Senior Director, Enterprise Informatics, Illumina Inc.
Collaborative research among groups working with genomic data presents major logistical challenges. Transferring huge volumes of data can be prohibitively expensive for projects utilizing WGS data sets. Illumina has addressed this challenge by building a platform that enables collaborators to not only share data in a secure multitenant environment, but to develop and deploy their own applications close to the data.
1:40 Session Break
Leave a Reply