Launching LPBI’s, Fourth Line of Business (D): FIVE Podcast – Audio Series in BioMed
Curator: Aviva Lev-Ari, PhD, RN
LPBI’s Existing Three Lines of Business: A, B, C
A. Open Access online Scientific Journal
http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/
B. BioMed e-Series
http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/biomed-e-books/
PRESS RELEASES
C. Conferences in Biotech and Medicine: REAL TIME Press Coverage
http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/press-coverage/
Launching LPBI’s, Fourth Line of Business
D. FIVE Podcast – Audio Series in BioMed in the following Domains of Medicine and Life Sciences:
- Series #1: Dr. S. Saha – Reproductive Genomics
A Podcast – Audio Series on Reproductive Genomics, Male infertility and Research Breakthroughs in Female Genomic Endocrinology
- Series #2: Dr. SJ Williams – Genomics & Gene Therapy
A Podcast – Audio Series on Gene Editing and 3D BioPrinting
- Series #3: Dr. SJ Williams – Genomics & Cancer
A Podcast – Audio Series on Immune-Oncology Molecules in Development
- Series #4: Dr. A. Lev-Ari – the ART of e-Scientific Curation of Scientific Findings
A Podcast – Audio Series on CONTENT CREATION for Scientific Digital Media: Journal, e-Books, Biotech Conference Coverage in REAL TIME
- Series #5: Dr. I. Robu – Tissue Engineering & 3D Printing Materials
A Podcast – Audio Series on Medical 3D BioPrinting
EXAMPLES for what we wish to launch for you
#1:
LISTEN to Episode 5: By LUKE TIMMERMAN and MEG TIRRELL
In:
#2:
Recent Interview Gitte Pedersen by Andrea MacDonald from IDEAxME!
Gitte Pedersen Co-Founder Genomic Expression interviewed by IDEAxME!
AUDIT AUDIO
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/interview-gitte-pedersen-ideaxme-gitte-pedersen?trk=prof-post
2012pharmaceutical
Amandeep Kaur
Aashir Awan, Phd
Abhisar Anand
Adina Hazan
Alan F. Kaul, PharmD., MS, MBA, FCCP
alexcrystal6
anamikasarkar
apreconasia
aviralvatsa
David Orchard-Webb, PhD
danutdaagmailcom
Demet Sag, Ph.D., CRA, GCP
Dror Nir
dsmolyar
Ethan Coomber
evelinacohn
Gail S Thornton
Irina Robu
jayzmit48
jdpmd
jshertok
kellyperlman
Ed Kislauskis
larryhbern
Madison Davis
marzankhan
megbaker58
ofermar2020
Dr. Pati
pkandala
Rosalind Codrington, PhD
ritusaxena
Rick Mandahl
sjwilliamspa
Srinivas Sriram
stuartlpbi
Dr. Sudipta Saha
tildabarliya
vaishnavee24
zraviv06
zs22
This is very insightful. There is no doubt that there is the bias you refer to. 42 years ago, when I was postdocing in biochemistry/enzymology before completing my residency in pathology, I knew that there were very influential mambers of the faculty, who also had large programs, and attracted exceptional students. My mentor, it was said (although he was a great writer), could draft a project on toilet paper and call the NIH. It can’t be true, but it was a time in our history preceding a great explosion. It is bizarre for me to read now about eNOS and iNOS, and about CaMKII-á, â, ã, ä – isoenzymes. They were overlooked during the search for the genome, so intermediary metabolism took a back seat. But the work on protein conformation, and on the mechanism of action of enzymes and ligand and coenzyme was just out there, and became more important with the research on signaling pathways. The work on the mechanism of pyridine nucleotide isoenzymes preceded the work by Burton Sobel on the MB isoenzyme in heart. The Vietnam War cut into the funding, and it has actually declined linearly since.
A few years later, I was an Associate Professor at a new Medical School and I submitted a proposal that was reviewed by the Chairman of Pharmacology, who was a former Director of NSF. He thought it was good enough. I was a pathologist and it went to a Biochemistry Review Committee. It was approved, but not funded. The verdict was that I would not be able to carry out the studies needed, and they would have approached it differently. A thousand young investigators are out there now with similar letters. I was told that the Department Chairmen have to build up their faculty. It’s harder now than then. So I filed for and received 3 patents based on my work at the suggestion of my brother-in-law. When I took it to Boehringer-Mannheim, they were actually clueless.